Latest / The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated / We are winning in Iran

Transcript

We are winning in Iran · The Hugh Hewitt Show: Highly Concentrated

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Welcome to today's podcast sponsored by Hillsdale College, All Things
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: hillsdalet Hillsdale dot ed or. I encourage you to take
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: advantage of the many free online courses there, and of
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: course I'll listen to the Hillsdale dialogues, all of them
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: at Hugh for Hillsdale dot com or just Google, Apple,
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: iTunes and Hillsdale. Welcome Back America. Hugh hewittt in the
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: Relief Factors studio Beltwigh, joined by an lsc Rothman, you
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: can follow on Exit nosc Rothman, senior writer for a
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: National Review, participant often in the Editors podcast. No. I
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: asked you to stick around extra today because I listened
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: to the editors this week and I love Rich, Love Michael,
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: Brendan Doherty, love Charles C. W. Cook. They've all been
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: guessing here frequently. But I don't think they I don't
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: think they dealt fairly with you and the last editors.
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: Did you get enough time to stake the case in
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: your opinion?
• 0:56
  Speaker 2: Well, I think I got plenty of time.
• 0:59
  Speaker 3: My colleagues are more skeptical of the campaign than I am,
• 1:03
  Speaker 3: and for reasons that are perfectly well reasoned and legitimate
• 1:07
  Speaker 3: and prudent. I wouldn't question any of their motives. I
• 1:10
  Speaker 3: think they're sound and the.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: Sacticism is justified.
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: Question they're wrong.
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: I argue that as well.
• 1:19
  Speaker 4: I want to give you a lot.
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: Of run Unspy. How you see the war.
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: Well, listen, and as I said on the show, if
• 1:27
  Speaker 3: you were to gauge it, I gauge it in two
• 1:29
  Speaker 3: different ways, tactically and strategically. Tactically, this is one of
• 1:33
  Speaker 3: the most impressive military campaigns in the history of the
• 1:36
  Speaker 3: human race. Which is not an exaggeration the degree to
• 1:40
  Speaker 3: which we're taking out a top twenty military power on
• 1:43
  Speaker 3: the planet Earth. This is state interstate conflict. This is
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: not the sort of war that we're used to in
• 1:47
  Speaker 3: the post nine to eleven world. We're fighting as state power,
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: and we are doing so with incredible success. Everything is
• 1:54
  Speaker 3: relative and in relative terms. We've been gaming out this
• 1:57
  Speaker 3: war with a Ran for twenty five years longer, and
• 2:00
  Speaker 3: those wargames produced catastrophic results in the world. Before October seventh,
• 2:05
  Speaker 3: twenty twenty three, Iran was capable of shutting down the
• 2:08
  Speaker 3: Straight within the first week and shutting down the Straight
• 2:11
  Speaker 3: to its own traffic as well mining the Straight, as
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: it did in the nineteen eighties, threatening shipping with really
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: scary anti ship missiles, drones, ballistic missiles, etc. The prospects
• 2:21
  Speaker 3: were for a major campaign, a ground war with up
• 2:24
  Speaker 3: to a million troops men at arms occupying the entire country,
• 2:27
  Speaker 3: Iranian cities, leveled, huge refugee crisis across the region, instability
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: throughout the region, up to a million dead on both
• 2:35
  Speaker 3: sides of the conflict. You can go check this out.
• 2:36
  Speaker 3: To say nothing of oil prices which were expected to
• 2:39
  Speaker 3: skyrocket two hundred three hundred dollars a barrow within the
• 2:41
  Speaker 3: first week. As recently as twenty nineteen, everything changed after
• 2:46
  Speaker 3: October seventh. Has Reel spent the last three years methodically
• 2:50
  Speaker 3: dismantling Iran's proxy terrorist network, which were to pose a
• 2:55
  Speaker 3: real threat in an existential war. We were expecting that
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: Iranian terrorist cells active and passive, would be activated in
• 3:03
  Speaker 3: North America, in Latin America, in Europe and would target
• 3:06
  Speaker 3: soft targets, and that threat has not entirely abated to
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: my knowledge. I wouldn't say that the threat is completely gone,
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: but it was much more grave a menace to Israel,
• 3:17
  Speaker 3: to American troops in the regions and Syria and Iraq, etc.
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: And what we're experiencing instead is total.
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: Air superiority, verging on air supremacy, the destruction of the
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: Iranian navy, the entire navy, the elimination almost of Iran's
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: capacity to fire long range ballistic missiles, short range ballistic missiles.
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: We're attenuating its drone capacity.
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: We're striking really hard now at these depots and factories
• 3:43
  Speaker 3: that allow Iran to manufacture the munitions that would have
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: shielded its nuclear program and possibly denied US area access
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: to the entire Middle East in the event of if
• 3:52
  Speaker 3: we didn't act.
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: And we have experienced.
• 3:56
  Speaker 3: Three US soldiers killed by enemy fire, six rather just
• 4:00
  Speaker 3: killed by enemy fire, each of which is a tragedy,
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: each of which is an atrocity. You could argue, I
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: would argue, and definitely something to warn. But again, if
• 4:08
  Speaker 3: we are going to look at this campaign and say
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: we've sustained three fatalities due to enemy fire and that's unacceptable,
• 4:15
  Speaker 3: I just don't understand where you're coming from. What metrics
• 4:18
  Speaker 3: are you using to evaluate that, What historical benchmarks are
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: you grading this against. I just feel like it's an
• 4:24
  Speaker 3: impossible standard to hold the United States too, that the
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: enemy can't be allowed to fire a successful shot. That's
• 4:29
  Speaker 3: just an unrealistic standard to hold any country engaged in
• 4:32
  Speaker 3: a real war, and this is a real war.
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: Some numbers. Ten Israelis have been killed, thirteen American serviceman
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: sixtion combat seven is a result of an air catastrophe
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: that was not caused by the enemy or by friendly fire.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: We've lost a couple of jets to friendly fire in Kuwait.
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: A number of our United Arab Emirates in Qatari and
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: Saudi Arabian facilities have been hit today. A reported just
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: minutes ago. The state of Gutter expresses its strong and
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: unequivocal condemnation of the brutal Iranian attack on the industrial
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: city of ross Laffen, which caused fire sufficient damage significant
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: damage to the facility. Gutter views this attack as a
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: dangerous escalation, the blatant violation of its sovereignty, as well
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: as a direct threat to its national security and the
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: stability of the region. Meanwhile, Israel in the United States
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: took out the largest facility seaborne facility for the production
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: of domestic use natural gas in Iran. So the war
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: is widening to the Iranian infrastructure and overnight Israel took
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: out like number three and number five on the list
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: of the top ten people in Iran. Every morning I
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: opened up the Times of Israel, Noah, and they've gotten
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: two or three more of the batties. I don't know
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: anyone could describe this as other than an overwhelming success
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: with the tragic costs of life. That's how it is
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: to be described. I haven't.
• 6:00
  Speaker 3: When I say this stuff like I'm accused of being
• 6:02
  Speaker 3: pollyannish about this campaign, because there are downsides and I
• 6:05
  Speaker 3: don't want to minimize those. But again, the Iranian campaign
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: to extend the pain of this war to Gulf states
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: is part of the playbook, and the playbook suggested that
• 6:17
  Speaker 3: Iran would execute something like the twenty nineteen a Ramco attack.
• 6:20
  Speaker 3: Remember that the attack on the Saudi petroleum processing facility,
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: the largest on the planet Earth.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: That was a strategic assault.
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: It was involved multiple drones hitting very specific targets designed
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: to affect international oil prices. We're not seeing anything nearly
• 6:34
  Speaker 3: that coordinated. And the reason we're not seeing anything nearly
• 6:36
  Speaker 3: that coordinated is because our technological and intelligence capacities shared
• 6:41
  Speaker 3: with Israel have evolved to the point where strikes on
• 6:44
  Speaker 3: leadership targets, pinpoint strikes on individuals, the sort of thing
• 6:48
  Speaker 3: that we could only fantasize about in two thousand and
• 6:51
  Speaker 3: three when we attempted to open that war with a
• 6:52
  Speaker 3: decapitation strike and failed.
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: That's usually what happens. Very hard to forget that instead.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: Quit early one thousand and three because we thought we
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: knew where Sudam was and we didn't get Sadamn for months.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: For months he hit out, and of course the dec
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: of cards, we never fully decapitated the regime. There's a
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: different kind of war, but.
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: No I will one contrast, we've eliminated forty nine of
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: Kamane's top associates, including the head of his intelligence services,
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: his security chiefs, the.
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: Guy who was running the war.
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: And we're pealing back the layers of this regime, which
• 7:26
  Speaker 3: is contributing a to instability in the regime. The command
• 7:28
  Speaker 3: and control structure is gone. We're seeing people individual IRGC
• 7:31
  Speaker 3: commanders act autonomously, which minimizes the amount of damage they
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: can do. And second you peel back these layers, you
• 7:37
  Speaker 3: finally you get to people who are maybe less loyal
• 7:40
  Speaker 3: to the regime, who maybe prioritize their own survival and
• 7:42
  Speaker 3: their family survival, who maybe want to talk to us.
• 7:45
  Speaker 2: These are all stratiefic objectives.
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: Have you seen the reports of members of the besiege
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: and a few IRGC refusing to report for work or deserting.
• 7:56
  Speaker 3: I have not, but Hugh and I said this on
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: the commentary podcast today. It was really curious to me
• 8:02
  Speaker 3: to hear Benjamin Nya who say, yesterday, Iranian people go
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: out and celebrate in the rules. Yep, we got your back.
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: We're in the sky, we're watching you. Go celebrate, enjoy
• 8:12
  Speaker 3: your lives. I didn't expect that to happen for.
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: A couple of weeks.
• 8:15
  Speaker 3: He's not said go engage in insert violence, but he
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: is saying go outside.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: He is, and I was taken him back by that
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: as well. We may play that for you don't go
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: anywhere America because Noah Rothman is probably occasionally I like
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: to talk to pundons who agree with me. Noah and
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: I might be the most Impacotico views of the war.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: I think the world is so much better off. We
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: got to talk about the strategicy involved as well. China
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: cannot be liking any of this, and we got to
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: talk about American public opinion. Don't go anywhere. I'm you
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: you itt no A. Rothman will be right back. Welcome
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: back in America. I'm Hugh Hewittt with Noah C. Rothman,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: senior writer for a National Review. Noah, I have described
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: this as a battle within Cold War two. Cold War
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: two of course with the United States and China, but
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: the battle here has three parts Venezuela, Cuba, and of
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: course Iran. If you're China, how do you view the
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: developments of the last fifteen months of Donald Trump's presidency.
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: Well, it haven't been great if you've predicated your geopolitical
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: strategy on developing and leaning on as many of the
• 9:24
  Speaker 3: anti American powers as you could. And again, as of
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: January I'm sorry October sixth, twenty twenty three, they consisted
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: roughly of Russia, China and North Korea, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: and you could say Nicaragua perhaps, but on the edges
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: of that.
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: Sort of thing.
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: And we've seen a significant attenuation of the anti American
• 9:43
  Speaker 3: access over the course of I would say that the
• 9:47
  Speaker 3: end of Joe Biden's presidency all the know thanks to him,
• 9:50
  Speaker 3: in part because Israel took its destiny into its own hands,
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: but the Trump administration has pretty much taken Venezuela off
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: the board for now. I don't love that the regime
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: is still in place, and it still has the very
• 10:02
  Speaker 3: same character of the regime that Hugo chav has established
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: in nineteen ninety nine. But they're playing ball, and the
• 10:08
  Speaker 3: oil exports that were gifted to Cuba have been cut off.
• 10:12
  Speaker 3: China can no longer rely on them either. That's strategically valuable,
• 10:16
  Speaker 3: and Irana is China's gas pump. China's insulated itself from
• 10:21
  Speaker 3: fuel shocks.
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: To my understanding, They've.
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: Electrified a lot of their civilian automotive fleet, and they
• 10:28
  Speaker 3: have significant stockpiles in anticipation.
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: Of this very scenario.
• 10:32
  Speaker 3: But it's going to hurt, and they're going to rely
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: ever more on Russia now strategically. The thinking, as I
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: understand it, among those who do this kind of thinking,
• 10:42
  Speaker 3: is that it is in our interests to do something
• 10:45
  Speaker 3: like the opposite of the Sino Soviets split, like a
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: reverse Kissingerian approach to the dynamics between China and Russia.
• 10:53
  Speaker 3: Rather than split them, we want to bind them together.
• 10:56
  Speaker 3: We want their fates intertwined, because Russia is a declining power.
• 11:00
  Speaker 3: It is a power embroiled in a war it cannot win.
• 11:03
  Speaker 3: It is a gas station that has a nuclear weapons
• 11:06
  Speaker 3: facility attached to it, as I believe Lindsay Graham used
• 11:10
  Speaker 3: to say, and China is a rising power, but it's
• 11:14
  Speaker 3: got plenty of internal problems on its own, and it
• 11:17
  Speaker 3: is confronting now something that it hasn't seen in a
• 11:19
  Speaker 3: long time, which is a demonstration of American state power.
• 11:23
  Speaker 3: We're seeing a lot of commentary about how exquisite ordinance
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: is being depleted, and that's a problem because we can't
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: replace it as fast as we're using it, specifically missile interceptors,
• 11:34
  Speaker 3: but also a variety of other high end missiles, you know,
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: long range weapons, standoff munitions. But that's got to be
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: mitigated by the fact that we have demonstrated the will
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: to use them in a sustained way, in a strategic way,
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: and in a very impressive way. That's the sort of
• 11:52
  Speaker 3: thing that puts the fear of God into you. There's
• 11:54
  Speaker 3: something that people who observe foreign policy just kind of dismiss,
• 11:58
  Speaker 3: and that is elementary human psychology, Like I don't begrudge
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: this is something.
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: This is where we're going to disagree with you.
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: I don't begrudge European powers that have been treated like
• 12:07
  Speaker 3: garbage by this administration for months and saying well, now
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: you need us, and look where it's going to get you.
• 12:13
  Speaker 3: That's elementary human psychology. So too is the human psychology
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: of seeing the United States decimate a rogue but not
• 12:22
  Speaker 3: in substantial military power in Iran with the quickness, with
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: relative ease, and demonstrate the will to continue that fight,
• 12:32
  Speaker 3: to fruition to an endgame that is shaping the thinking
• 12:36
  Speaker 3: in Beijing. That is changing their considerations. It may not
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: change the considerations for the better by the way they
• 12:42
  Speaker 3: may proceed in the windows we do disagree, that's closing fasts.
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: I expect European leaders to act in their national interest.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: Palmerston said that we have no permanent friends or enemy to,
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: only permanent interests. So I expect them to look past insults,
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: behavior that they don't consider to be reciproc all of
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: that to the fact that they wanted one thing from
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: America arms for Ukraine, which we sold them. We didn't
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: give it to them. They haven't spent five percent, much
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: less two percent for decades. They have been a free
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: writer and I've been okay with that. I'm like Lindsay Graham,
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: we need Europe. But this is not the time to
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: exercise your peak. This is the time to do something
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: symbolic because they have you know, the British Navy's down
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: to twenty seven ships. I think that they're not really
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: a superpower. They've got some nukes. France is crippled by
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: internal divisions that make our look like paper mache. The
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: people we can rely on are the Polls, the Ukraines,
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: the Thins, the Swedes, and they can't really give us
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: they're involved in a war, so the people are a loser.
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: Here is great Britain in France. You get a minute
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: to the break. Then we'll come back and have America. Yeah.
• 13:53
  Speaker 3: Sure, listen, there's nothing I disagree with there, and it
• 13:55
  Speaker 3: would be very valuable for us to have these ships
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: to help escort missions when it's time to do those
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: escort missions, which is now. Now is the time to
• 14:01
  Speaker 3: sequentially degrade RAN's capacity to project power in the Persian golf,
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: and then we demonstrate that the Persian golf is clear.
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: Everything's going to happen in a sequential order. But we're
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: going to have to agree to disagree. Yes, I understand.
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: I believe it's cutting off your nose to spite your face,
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: to react as they have reacted. Do I blame them?
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: Do I think that they don't have any motive or
• 14:18
  Speaker 3: impetus for acting that way?
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: No, I guess it's fine. And then we don't disagree.
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: We just think they had to be I think they
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: had to be more mature. So do you. But you're
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: more understanding of them, I say, huh. Great nations don't
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: need psychologists. I'll be right back with Noah Rothman to
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: talk about American public opinion after this Welcome Back America,
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: hew it in the Relief Actors Studio inside the Beltway,
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: Join by Noah C. Rothman, Senior writer for National Review.
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: You can hear Noah on the Editor's podcast. He's a
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: guest host on the Commentary podcast Today, which I will
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: listen to after the show. You can follow him on
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: Exit no c Rothman. No, I want you to listen
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: to Harry Anton on CNN last night talk about the
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: state of American public opinion, beginning with Republicans and Trump.
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: Then we'll come back and get your thoughts on how
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: this might feed into November. Here is Harry Anton, and
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: this is one.
• 15:17
  Speaker 5: Of those because just take a look here, MAGA GOP
• 15:19
  Speaker 5: a view of Trump approve one hundred percent, one hundred percent.
• 15:24
  Speaker 5: If you are a member of MEGA and the GOP
• 15:28
  Speaker 5: you approve of Donald John Trump zero percent say that
• 15:32
  Speaker 5: they disapprove. You don't have to be a mathematical genius
• 15:35
  Speaker 5: to know you can't go higher than one hundred percent.
• 15:38
  Speaker 5: He is the nineteen hundred and seventy two Miami Dolphins. Now,
• 15:41
  Speaker 5: there are some Republicans who disapprove of Donald John Trump,
• 15:45
  Speaker 5: but they are not members of the Make America Great
• 15:49
  Speaker 5: Again movement. The bottom line is this, if you are
• 15:51
  Speaker 5: a member of MEGA, you approve of Donald Trump.
• 15:54
  Speaker 6: It's interesting, though, because there have been a couple prominent
• 15:56
  Speaker 6: people who have sort of come out online and they're
• 15:58
  Speaker 6: very mad about this war with Iran because he promised
• 16:02
  Speaker 6: no new wars. Is there anything that people might be
• 16:05
  Speaker 6: leaving MAGA relative to twenty twenty four?
• 16:08
  Speaker 5: Yeah, okay, so you know I've said it before, and
• 16:11
  Speaker 5: you know the theme of this segment is Tucker Carlson
• 16:14
  Speaker 5: b darn and when we look at the numbers, I
• 16:16
  Speaker 5: mean I've heard some people say, oh, you know what,
• 16:18
  Speaker 5: when you look at those MAGA numbers, it doesn't account
• 16:21
  Speaker 5: for those who might have left MAGA. But take a
• 16:22
  Speaker 5: look here Americans who identify as MAGA. In November of
• 16:25
  Speaker 5: twenty twenty four, it was twenty eight percent of Americans.
• 16:27
  Speaker 5: Now it's basically the same of anything, it's slightly higher
• 16:30
  Speaker 5: at thirty percent. The bottom line is this, the magabase
• 16:33
  Speaker 5: within the.
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: GOP is not shrinking.
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: It's the same size.
• 16:37
  Speaker 5: If anything, it is slightly larger than it was back
• 16:40
  Speaker 5: in twenty twenty four, when, of course, Donald Trump won
• 16:42
  Speaker 5: a second term. So that one hundred percent that Donald
• 16:45
  Speaker 5: Trump has approval among MAGA GOP that is not an
• 16:48
  Speaker 5: artifact of MAGA shrinking.
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: It's just an indication of how.
• 16:51
  Speaker 5: Strong Donald Trump's grip is on that MAGA base.
• 16:54
  Speaker 6: And so I guess it begs the questions what's happening
• 16:57
  Speaker 6: with inside the GOP and if there are any splits there,
• 17:00
  Speaker 6: because with that those kind of numbers, they're going to
• 17:02
  Speaker 6: want to retain that right so they can retain their seed.
• 17:04
  Speaker 5: Yes, yes, and you know what we're talking about.
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: You know, we've mentioned Iran in the intro.
• 17:09
  Speaker 5: Of this segment GOP on US military action in Iran.
• 17:12
  Speaker 5: Look at this in Magga, it's ninety percent approval. It's
• 17:15
  Speaker 5: ninety percent approval, just five percent disapprove. If you disapprove
• 17:19
  Speaker 5: of the job that Donald Trump is doing, or excuse me,
• 17:21
  Speaker 5: the US military action in Iran, and you're a member
• 17:24
  Speaker 5: of the GOP, look at this, it's your non maggot,
• 17:26
  Speaker 5: You're not Magga. It's thirty six percent there, fifty four
• 17:29
  Speaker 5: percent approval. But the majority of Republicans approve of the
• 17:32
  Speaker 5: job that the US military action is in Iran, and
• 17:34
  Speaker 5: the majority of MAGA, which is the majority of the
• 17:37
  Speaker 5: GOP very much proof ninety percent, very little.
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: You No, you are not MAGA. I am not MAGA.
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: I'm a Reagan Conservative. I don't know how you describe yourself?
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: What do you make of I think Harry is a
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: pretty good pull, sure, and I think it's an honestly presented,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: presented set of numbers. What do you make of them?
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: It comports with what I've been seeing in the polling.
• 17:59
  Speaker 3: And it's important to distinguish self described MAGA voters versus
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: self described Republican voters, because self describe MEGA voters to
• 18:06
  Speaker 3: expressed a higher approval rating of the president overall. To
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: say nothing of the Iran war specific whereas Republican voters
• 18:13
  Speaker 3: take a more nuanced view, and I've seen numbers that
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: are higher than sixty four percent among Republicans who support
• 18:18
  Speaker 3: this war. Depends on the poll you go to. I've
• 18:21
  Speaker 3: seen mid seventies, I've seen low eighties.
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: You have to.
• 18:24
  Speaker 3: Remember that it's not like Donald Trump came out of
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: nowhere and said we should be hostile and confrontational with Iran.
• 18:31
  Speaker 3: This has been baked into the Republican DNA, Republican voters
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: DNA since the inception of the Islamic Republic forty seven
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: years ago, including Donald Trump himself, who was one of
• 18:41
  Speaker 3: the most outspoken expostulators of a view that we should
• 18:45
  Speaker 3: be much more aggressive towards Iran as early as nineteen
• 18:48
  Speaker 3: eighty and has been consistent in that view throughout his
• 18:51
  Speaker 3: career in public life. So this is not something that
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: the President really has to sell to Republicans. It's a
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: different story when you're talking about the rest of the
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: the electorate, and we can get really deep and granular
• 19:03
  Speaker 3: with this thing, like for example, YouGov has a survey
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: of today which indicates that while seventeen percent of self
• 19:09
  Speaker 3: described Republicans I'm maga. Just Republicans express dissatisfaction with Trump's
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: job approval, A full third thirty three percent are disapproving
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: of the president when it comes to gas prices, and
• 19:19
  Speaker 3: gas prices are ineluctibly linked with the instability in the
• 19:24
  Speaker 3: Persian Gulf and therefore an expression of disapproval in the war.
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: You could really go granular with this thing if you
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: wanted to, But I think that does kind of miss
• 19:33
  Speaker 3: the mark because while these voters are expressing dissatisfaction with
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: their own personal finances, and that satisfaction will could and
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: probably will result in less enthusiasm to go to the
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: polls in November, especially if these conditions persist. I doubt
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: they will, but if we were in stasis between now
• 19:49
  Speaker 3: and November, that would mute enthusiasm to vote for Republican
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: candidates at the polls. But I think it just misses
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: the point because we're not talking about November's elections, talking
• 20:00
  Speaker 3: about the price of gas between now and July. We're
• 20:04
  Speaker 3: talking about an apocl confrontation with an immortal American enemy,
• 20:10
  Speaker 3: And on the other side of this thing could be
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: a lot of benefits that Americans will perceive and don't
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: even understand their paying Now. Nobody has any idea how
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: much resources we devote, how much time it takes, how
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: many US service personnel and civilians, public servants alike, devote
• 20:27
  Speaker 3: to containing the threat from Iran. These people work day
• 20:30
  Speaker 3: and night to kill our servicemen, to kill our public servants,
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: to frustrate our interests in the world.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: We've just gotten really good at interdicting it. But they
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: never stop. They do not sleep. This is what they do.
• 20:40
  Speaker 3: And if on the other side of a world without
• 20:42
  Speaker 3: the Islamic Republic, where we finally get to engineer the
• 20:45
  Speaker 3: pivot to Asia that we've always wanted to engineer, we
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: can contain Russia in Europe. We know how to do that.
• 20:52
  Speaker 3: NATO allies are very good at doing that. What we
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: can't do is extricate ourselves from the Middle East as
• 20:56
  Speaker 3: long as the Islamic Republic exists. And if we could,
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: that would be an epochal strategic shift for the United
• 21:04
  Speaker 3: States and very bad news for our enemies.
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: And that is my view, is that every Republican running
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: for reelection ought to learn the speech that Noah just
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: gave off the cuff and say it again and again
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: and again, because I think it's a winning issue if
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: the war is won last minute too. Noah, if you're
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: a Republican candidate, what do you say right now about
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: the war? Right now?
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: Well, listen, I would say that.
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: I would say that if you're talking about politics right
• 21:33
  Speaker 3: as a credidate an appeal to.
• 21:34
  Speaker 2: Voters, yeah, I would say that. Listen.
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: My political career is important to me, and I think
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: that I'm valuable to you as your constituents. You matter
• 21:45
  Speaker 3: to me, and I want to serve you best, and
• 21:46
  Speaker 3: I'm trying to do that now. And what I'm going
• 21:49
  Speaker 3: to do is put my political interests aside in favor
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: of the American national interest. These people are enemies. They
• 21:56
  Speaker 3: want to kill us, they have killed us. It is
• 21:59
  Speaker 3: far more important to me to be of service to
• 22:01
  Speaker 3: you and of service to the history of this country
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: then it is for us to argue about who should
• 22:07
  Speaker 3: control the next budgeting process in Congress, who should control
• 22:10
  Speaker 3: committee chairs. That doesn't matter to me nearly as much
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: as the safety of you and your children, And that's
• 22:15
  Speaker 3: what I'm here to protect.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: Bingo. Noah Rothman campaign consultant extraordinaire, except he's not. He's
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: a senior writer at NRO follow him on exit. Noah
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: S c. Rothman, thank you for the extra time today, Noah,
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: I'll be right back. America Station. You inside the Beltway.
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: And if you've been watching c SPAN for the last
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: day and today, you've seen Republicans standing up demanding voter
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: ID and citizenship before they vote in federal elections, and
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: they're pummeling the Democrats because of the way the Majority
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Leader John Thune set this up. The leader joint me now,
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: Leader Dune, welcome, Well played, mister Bond. This is if
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: this was a fight, they'd stop it. The Democrats could.
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: Are they going to.
• 22:54
  Speaker 7: We'll find out here soon enough. You know, I think
• 22:57
  Speaker 7: the one thing that this is a Save America Act
• 23:01
  Speaker 7: is a package of just common sense policies that should
• 23:04
  Speaker 7: get an automatic yes literally from every member of the Senate.
• 23:08
  Speaker 7: And the core of it, as you know, is a
• 23:10
  Speaker 7: requirement for Americans to demonstrate that they're eligible to vote
• 23:13
  Speaker 7: and that they are who they say they are when
• 23:14
  Speaker 7: they go to do so. And requiring a photo ID
• 23:17
  Speaker 7: for a whole lot of things in this country is
• 23:20
  Speaker 7: something that you know, Americans expect, You would think that
• 23:23
  Speaker 7: they'd be able to produce one to vote in our elections,
• 23:26
  Speaker 7: so I think it's on the substance where it's a winner.
• 23:29
  Speaker 7: We just have to do everything we can to make
• 23:31
  Speaker 7: sure that we're pounding them over the course the next
• 23:34
  Speaker 7: week or two, and then we'll see where the votes are.
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: Well. I enjoy tuning in when I can, and whenever
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: I want to break from using my voice. I just
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: turned on c SPAN because we're winning so well played,
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: well played. Is there any idea of how long they'll
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: put up with this?
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: Is?
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: Is there any way they can stop it? Democrats?
• 23:53
  Speaker 7: I mean not really. I mean what we did. We
• 23:56
  Speaker 7: called up the House passed version and typically to get
• 23:59
  Speaker 7: a up on the floor, and the Senate takes procedurally
• 24:02
  Speaker 7: what we call culture on the motion to proceed, which
• 24:04
  Speaker 7: is a sixty vote threshold in the Senate. Because this
• 24:08
  Speaker 7: came over in the form of a message in the House,
• 24:10
  Speaker 7: it was at fifty one, so we were able to.
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: Get on it.
• 24:12
  Speaker 7: And then I filled the amendment tree, which prevents the
• 24:15
  Speaker 7: Democrats from getting some of the amendment votes on some
• 24:18
  Speaker 7: of the crazy ideas they have, so it keeps it more,
• 24:22
  Speaker 7: gives us more control, I guess, I would say, of
• 24:23
  Speaker 7: the floor, and we ultimately we end up voting on
• 24:27
  Speaker 7: but again, we'll see how long it goes. I think
• 24:31
  Speaker 7: that we need to have a sufficient amount of time
• 24:34
  Speaker 7: obviously to make the case and get this issue in
• 24:36
  Speaker 7: front of the American people and hold the Democrats accountable.
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: So later down, if Chuck Schumer had a brainstorm, which
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: would be rare, but it doesn't not impossible and decided
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: I'll offer to reopen DHS, We'll vote on the appropriation
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: bill if they'll stop pummeling us. Would you take that deal?
• 24:56
  Speaker 7: You know, I will say that would be That's a
• 25:00
  Speaker 7: good question. I think that'd be a might be. It
• 25:04
  Speaker 7: might be an off ran for the Democrats, honestly, And
• 25:07
  Speaker 7: we've got to get d DHS opened up. And you know,
• 25:10
  Speaker 7: we've got one hundred and twenty thousand people at DHS
• 25:12
  Speaker 7: who started missing paychecks and many of those, of course
• 25:15
  Speaker 7: work with TSA or other agencies that are crucial, crucial
• 25:18
  Speaker 7: for national security. And so yeah, if they were willing
• 25:22
  Speaker 7: to make a deal on that, we might we might be,
• 25:25
  Speaker 7: we might be willing to negotiate, but.
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: They take that TKO Senator, yesterday, one of your colleagues
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: I talked to was about to go through to a
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: TSA line, and this Senator had been padded down on
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: their way home. I'll bet you a lot of Senators
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: are getting padded down unnecessarily right now because they can't
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: be very happy. But I think about the Coast Guard
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: and the counter terrorism people. This is nuts. This is
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: really nuts. In the middle of a war.
• 25:52
  Speaker 7: It is and you know, what's the second time they've
• 25:53
  Speaker 7: done this to you. And this is especially troubling because
• 25:56
  Speaker 7: we are in the middle. It's a dangerous world. We've
• 25:58
  Speaker 7: got cyber threats and the Cyber Office is located within
• 26:01
  Speaker 7: the Department of Homeland Security, so that's also affected by
• 26:05
  Speaker 7: this appropriation bill. And it just it makes you wonder
• 26:09
  Speaker 7: what is on their minds. I mean, I think they
• 26:11
  Speaker 7: have become so obsessed with I'm told there's another No
• 26:14
  Speaker 7: King's rally out here in the next week or two.
• 26:16
  Speaker 7: The Democrats are you know that happened last fall and
• 26:19
  Speaker 7: slowed down negotiations on ending that government shutdown. They are
• 26:23
  Speaker 7: held so hostage by the far left in the country
• 26:27
  Speaker 7: right now and are so infected with Trump derangement syndrome
• 26:32
  Speaker 7: and blind hatred of the president that they don't want
• 26:34
  Speaker 7: to do anything obviously that that gives him a victory
• 26:38
  Speaker 7: and this isn't The White House has been very willing
• 26:41
  Speaker 7: to negotiate. I mean, I don't know if, of course
• 26:43
  Speaker 7: you've been following the back and forth on this, but
• 26:45
  Speaker 7: they really are on ICE and DHS or I should
• 26:48
  Speaker 7: say customs of border patrol, the two things. Right now
• 26:51
  Speaker 7: the Democrats have held hostage.
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: That to me is a.
• 26:55
  Speaker 7: You know, it's a.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: Defund the police, defund law.
• 26:59
  Speaker 7: Enforcement position that they've taken in spite of the fact
• 27:02
  Speaker 7: that the administration has made numerous efforts to engage with
• 27:04
  Speaker 7: the Democrats on some of the issues they care about
• 27:07
  Speaker 7: in ways that I think the Democrats ought to be
• 27:09
  Speaker 7: willing to accept them. I'm just this is about politics,
• 27:12
  Speaker 7: nothing more, nothing less for them, you know, a.
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: Leader I did not know we had another No King
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: spectacle coming. I have heard the President called an authoritarian
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: by Ben Rhodes and because of Venezuela and Cuba and
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: Iran and the fascist talking is out there. You know
• 27:25
  Speaker 1: what I say to them, Supreme Court ruled against the
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: thing that matters most to him, the tariffs, and they
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: said you can't do it, and he didn't arrest him.
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: You know, it's the like least authoritarian thing in the
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: world is to abide by the ruling of the people
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: who rule against the thing you want the most. And
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: so they're just silly. Let's turn to the war. Five
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: minutes ago and Na da Viol, a very good reporter
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: out of Israel, posted the IDF confirmed it has struck
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: the Iranian naval fleet in the Caspian Sea. The fleet
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: had been used during the war in Ukraine to transfer
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: equipment from Iran to Russia. I think the Iranians are
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: getting pummeled and they don't know how to surrender.
• 28:04
  Speaker 7: Yeah, it seems like it, I mean, and I think
• 28:07
  Speaker 7: the President clearly understands the importance of reopening the strait,
• 28:11
  Speaker 7: whether it's done the easy way or the hard way.
• 28:13
  Speaker 7: But you know, operations have been going on now for
• 28:16
  Speaker 7: less than three weeks, and thousands of stories have taken
• 28:18
  Speaker 7: place against their missile launchers, their ballistic missiles all the
• 28:23
  Speaker 7: I just think they're you know, the the administration, our
• 28:27
  Speaker 7: military leadership, our war planners have done a great job
• 28:31
  Speaker 7: of just taking completely away from the Iranians their ability
• 28:35
  Speaker 7: to threaten the region. And I think that's what this
• 28:37
  Speaker 7: was all about. And so I mean, we need to
• 28:40
  Speaker 7: finish the job. Hopefully that'll be done soon. But I
• 28:42
  Speaker 7: think every day we start, you know, we achieve more
• 28:44
  Speaker 7: of our objectives in defanging the Iranians regime.
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: I'm very glad that Senator Collins and our colleagues got
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: the defense appropriations built through. Is a supplemental necessary and
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: if so, can reconciliation be used to move.
• 28:58
  Speaker 7: It could be option obviously that we'll keep available to
• 29:02
  Speaker 7: us and honestly, in both defense and homeland security, if
• 29:05
  Speaker 7: they continue, I think we have to. We got to
• 29:08
  Speaker 7: do what we can and make sure we're doing everything
• 29:10
  Speaker 7: we can to defend the country and the homeland and
• 29:13
  Speaker 7: the Democrats seem very unwilling to do that. But so
• 29:17
  Speaker 7: if a supplemental is necessary, we'll obviously entertain that the
• 29:21
  Speaker 7: White House sends it up. We did, as you know,
• 29:23
  Speaker 7: put a significant amount of funding last summer in the
• 29:26
  Speaker 7: Working Family's Tax Cuts bill for defense. But you know,
• 29:30
  Speaker 7: obviously this costs money, and we need to make sure
• 29:34
  Speaker 7: that we keep sure keep our munitions built up so
• 29:37
  Speaker 7: that the deterrence is always the best thing that we
• 29:41
  Speaker 7: can do as a country. And you want to desur
• 29:43
  Speaker 7: bad behavior around the world. You know, it's not as
• 29:47
  Speaker 7: it's always been said that it's not our strength tempts
• 29:51
  Speaker 7: our adversaries, it's our weakness. And I think that's why
• 29:53
  Speaker 7: we've got to make sure that we're sufficiently funding our
• 29:56
  Speaker 7: readiness in a way that deters bad behavior later.
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: I'm old enough to remember Grenada, and I'm old enough
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: to remember Panama and nineteen ninety one, and then of
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: course two thousand and one Afghanistan in two thousand and
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: three March to Bagdad. Every time our troops do something big,
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: I'm always amazed at the iterations. I mean, triple generation
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: jumps and weaponry accuracy lethality. Do you sit around the
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: Senate conference room and look at each other? How do
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: they do this?
• 30:24
  Speaker 7: You kind of do? I mean you look at the
• 30:26
  Speaker 7: operations that have been conducted just in this past you know,
• 30:30
  Speaker 7: the time frame here is starting with the B two
• 30:33
  Speaker 7: bombing run in Iran earlier this year, of Venezuela, this operation.
• 30:38
  Speaker 7: It is remarkable how good these people are, and it
• 30:41
  Speaker 7: makes you grateful as a nation that there are young
• 30:44
  Speaker 7: men and women who want to serve their country and
• 30:46
  Speaker 7: have the skill, the expertise, the experience and the determination
• 30:51
  Speaker 7: to keep the country safe. And I think we've seen
• 30:54
  Speaker 7: that in so many ways just in the last few months.
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: All Right, last question. Everyone always assumes the Republicans get along.
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: They've never been to a conference meeting, and now they've
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: seen Senator Paul and Senator Mullen kind of comeing to
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: verbal blows today. Does Senator Mullin have the votes to
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: get confirmed because we need him confirmed quickly.
• 31:16
  Speaker 7: We do, and they'll I'm hoping he'll be voted out
• 31:19
  Speaker 7: of the committee tomorrow. I think that'll be the case,
• 31:21
  Speaker 7: and then we'll get him up on the floor early
• 31:22
  Speaker 7: next week. We got to fill that position, and he's
• 31:25
  Speaker 7: the right person for it. And yes, there are some
• 31:28
  Speaker 7: it got a little spicy, and there's some personal history
• 31:30
  Speaker 7: that those two have, but at the end of the day,
• 31:33
  Speaker 7: it's about the job, and you know, it's an important job,
• 31:36
  Speaker 7: and I think Senator Mollin is the right person to
• 31:38
  Speaker 7: fill it.
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: I always say, a little sparky is fun lights up
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: the night. Sah Majority of Leader of Thune. Thank you
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: for joining me. As always a pleasure talking to your leader.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: Welcome back in America. I'm Hugh Hewett. Josh crosh Hour
• 31:50
  Speaker 1: is editor in chief of Jewish Insider, a daily newsletter.
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: Josh Before I go to any specifics, how do you
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: think the war is going?
• 32:00
  Speaker 8: I mean, militarily, If you look at the objectives that
• 32:03
  Speaker 8: both the US and Israel set out at the beginning
• 32:05
  Speaker 8: of the war, you really couldn't have asked for a
• 32:08
  Speaker 8: whole lot more. The first twenty four hours saw the
• 32:12
  Speaker 8: killing of the Ayatola and some of the top Iranian
• 32:16
  Speaker 8: military officials know Israel I know certainly has had certain targets,
• 32:21
  Speaker 8: the besiege headquarters, some of the checkpoints, some of the
• 32:26
  Speaker 8: IRGC offices and leaders. So there's been a lot of
• 32:31
  Speaker 8: military successes. I think the one thing that has been unclear,
• 32:36
  Speaker 8: and we talked about this last week, Q is you
• 32:38
  Speaker 8: know there's been a mixed messaging for the US and Israel.
• 32:41
  Speaker 8: I think a little bit on whether regime changes the
• 32:43
  Speaker 8: goal and whether that's a reasonable expectation as a result
• 32:46
  Speaker 8: of the military operation.
• 32:47
  Speaker 4: Has also been you know, a lack I.
• 32:49
  Speaker 8: Think of communication a little more of the US side
• 32:53
  Speaker 8: in terms of what the goals are. And I think
• 32:55
  Speaker 8: President Trump lately, as we're talking about the war, its
• 33:00
  Speaker 8: aims and the threat that it posed with its nuclear
• 33:03
  Speaker 8: ambitions very clearly the last few days. But that's been
• 33:07
  Speaker 8: an issue, But in terms of the military successes, I
• 33:09
  Speaker 8: think Israel's been very transparent about the accomplishments. The US
• 33:13
  Speaker 8: has been briefing on a daily basis, and I think
• 33:16
  Speaker 8: militarily they've taken out a lot of the Iranian infrastructure,
• 33:20
  Speaker 8: a lot of the top leadership, and it has been
• 33:24
  Speaker 8: fairly significant to date.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: Great breaking reports have the IDF sinking at least five
• 33:29
  Speaker 1: Iranian Navy ships in the Caspian Sea used for reef
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: supply of Russia. One of the Israeli journalists I followed
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: closely is Nada viol I think he sort of center left.
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: He writes in a piece called Lara Jeani was the system.
• 33:44
  Speaker 1: Now he's gone this paragraph. One senior figure told me
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: Nada vel imagine Israel waking up after weeks of war
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: to find no military industry, no Raphael, no Israel aerospace industries,
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: no R and D technological backbone for the regime left.
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: That's the scale of damage we're inflicting. That's the campaign
• 34:07
  Speaker 1: billions that they are losing each day, and that's Israel's
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: insurance policy for the day after. What do you think
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: of that?
• 34:16
  Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean, that's consistent with what we've been hearing,
• 34:18
  Speaker 8: certainly on the Israeli side, Hugh. We have a story
• 34:21
  Speaker 8: on Jewish Insider about the lieutenant colonel who has been
• 34:24
  Speaker 8: briefing the Israeli public who said that Iran is now
• 34:28
  Speaker 8: as of as of right now, they're no longer able
• 34:30
  Speaker 8: to produce ballistic missiles, which is one of the big
• 34:33
  Speaker 8: goals in terms of both the goals of the war
• 34:38
  Speaker 8: and getting getting rid of its bablistic missile UH stockpile,
• 34:42
  Speaker 8: and also the nuclear inrichment. And on the ballistic missile front,
• 34:47
  Speaker 8: apparently they've declared UH success at least on the Israeli side.
• 34:53
  Speaker 4: They're the you mentioned UH.
• 34:56
  Speaker 8: You know, there's been a lot of notable officials in
• 34:58
  Speaker 8: recent days that have been taken out. The latest is
• 35:02
  Speaker 8: the Iranian Intelligence Minister sm A L Katib, who the
• 35:06
  Speaker 8: Israeli military said today that it had killed in an
• 35:09
  Speaker 8: overnight airstrike. So, like again militarily, there are a lot
• 35:12
  Speaker 8: of checks on the boxes of what the US and
• 35:15
  Speaker 8: Israel have been doing. I think the one big remaining
• 35:18
  Speaker 8: question is is regime what is the timetable and is
• 35:22
  Speaker 8: regime change going to be the outcome of these of
• 35:26
  Speaker 8: this pretty very very deliberate military even.
• 35:29
  Speaker 1: From the beginning, it's been my estimate that this would
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: go until June, but not longer than June. And that's
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: for a variety of reasons. But I would I would
• 35:38
  Speaker 1: think June, given how long carriers can deploy. We have
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: the Ford is leaving today and the h the hw
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: Bush is on its way there. The Lincoln's been there
• 35:50
  Speaker 1: a long time. There is a durability factor there are
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: our Air Force has a long range strike. I don't
• 35:56
  Speaker 1: think there'll be any targets. Laugh Josh. That's the now
• 35:59
  Speaker 1: whether or not this horror moods reopens. Let me play
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: for you the Secretary of General of NATO RUTA today.
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: If you can find that clip Harley and play it
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: for job of ba blistic missiles.
• 36:12
  Speaker 9: Of the nuclear capability is severely degraded. But it comes
• 36:16
  Speaker 9: to the straitor for Moose. I've been in contact with
• 36:18
  Speaker 9: as many allies. We all agree, of course, that straight
• 36:21
  Speaker 9: has to open up again. And what I know is
• 36:25
  Speaker 9: that allies are working together discussing how to do that,
• 36:29
  Speaker 9: What is the best way to do it. They're working
• 36:31
  Speaker 9: on that collectively to find your way forward.
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: All right. Now, that's not saying yes, but it's not
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: a no, Lindsey Graham, Mister NATO blew up yesterday at
• 36:42
  Speaker 1: NATO's reluctance to help the United States clear the strait
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: and keep them open. And I'm kind of there too,
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: and I've always been a big supporter of NATO. What
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: do you think is the blowback at Britain and France
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: as a result of their being afraid to be a
• 36:56
  Speaker 1: part of this.
• 36:58
  Speaker 8: Well, look, it's the Trump has expressed as yesterday was
• 37:03
  Speaker 8: letting some steam off when he was with the Irish
• 37:06
  Speaker 8: leader about about the British Prime Minister Starmer and his
• 37:11
  Speaker 8: sort of hesitance to be engaged.
• 37:13
  Speaker 4: Look, I think there's also, you know, a challenge on
• 37:17
  Speaker 4: the US front.
• 37:18
  Speaker 8: We didn't we talked about the public wasn't quite as mobilized,
• 37:22
  Speaker 8: and in terms of preparing for war as we've seen
• 37:25
  Speaker 8: in other past interventions, there wasn't a whole lot of
• 37:27
  Speaker 8: mobilization on the international front. Now, I remember all too well,
• 37:31
  Speaker 8: Hugh that, even going back to the Iraq War and
• 37:33
  Speaker 8: other international engagements, that the Europeans always seemed to kind
• 37:37
  Speaker 8: of carve from the sidelines.
• 37:38
  Speaker 4: That's not entirely new, but there was sort of.
• 37:41
  Speaker 8: A lack of building that Coalition of the willing, and
• 37:44
  Speaker 8: I think it's been done a little bit on the
• 37:45
  Speaker 8: fly as we speak, So I'm not sure it's a
• 37:48
  Speaker 8: lack of wanting to engage as much as it is,
• 37:51
  Speaker 8: you know, about preparing their publics in their own countries
• 37:53
  Speaker 8: about what what the goals.
• 37:55
  Speaker 1: Are and the coalition that w was nineteen ninety one,
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: we had the bridge in two thousand and three for
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: Iraq Afghanistan. Article five triggered everyone kind of pretended to play.
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: The UA had more real soldiers in real combat than
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: Germany did in Afghanistan, but everyone pretended to play We
• 38:16
  Speaker 1: carry the load with the bridge. Now, however, Ukraine is
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: in its fourth year. We're supplying Ukraine everything except manpower.
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: And we did it before NATO started spending it. And
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: now NATO isn't setting a mind sweeper. A mind sweepers
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: you get the last minute.
• 38:36
  Speaker 8: Yeah, look, I would hope, I would hope that it
• 38:39
  Speaker 8: would be as simple as, you know, some communication at
• 38:43
  Speaker 8: better diplomacy, that we could kind of coordinate more effectively,
• 38:46
  Speaker 8: and that they are not trying to resist helping out
• 38:49
  Speaker 8: and dealing with the threat that Iran poses.
• 38:50
  Speaker 4: Very much to their own countries.
• 38:52
  Speaker 8: In fact, terrorism is an even more pronounced threat, and
• 38:54
  Speaker 8: Iranian terrorism or Indian sponsored terrorism is very very real
• 38:58
  Speaker 8: on the European homefront.
• 38:59
  Speaker 4: So they understand, they should understand these.
• 39:02
  Speaker 8: Countries the threat that Iran has posed and does pose,
• 39:04
  Speaker 8: and I would hope that it would be more of
• 39:06
  Speaker 8: an issue of diplomacy rather than an issue of their
• 39:08
  Speaker 8: reading of the security threat.
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: We can only hope. Josh Crushauer, thank you. Don't go anywhere, America.
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: I'm do Hewett. Stay tuned to the Salem News Channel.
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: I'll be right back. Welcome back to America. I'm Hugh Hewitt.
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: Joined by Charles CW. Cook of National Review. He is
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: a contributor to the Editor's Podcast. He also has his
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: own podcast, the Charles C. W. Cook Podcast. Charles, I
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: had Noah on earlier. I gave him extra time because
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: I thought you guys all ganged up on him in
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: the Editors this week, although you were the most gentle
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: of the three. How do you just not in that context,
• 39:46
  Speaker 1: but just you, Charles C. W. Cuck, how do you
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: assess the war whine?
• 39:51
  Speaker 10: It's quite difficult, and it's been a remarkable military success
• 39:55
  Speaker 10: at the outset, and I'm deeply impressed by the performance
• 40:01
  Speaker 10: of the Department of Defense, and as I said on
• 40:04
  Speaker 10: the editors, I hope our adversaries are watching. I'm sure
• 40:08
  Speaker 10: they are. Where I'm a little stymied here is I'm
• 40:11
  Speaker 10: not quite sure what we're doing. It's not that I
• 40:15
  Speaker 10: don't think there are all manner of good reasons to
• 40:18
  Speaker 10: be there.
• 40:19
  Speaker 4: There are.
• 40:20
  Speaker 10: It's not that I am per se against this action.
• 40:23
  Speaker 10: I'm certainly not. But the President has been all over
• 40:26
  Speaker 10: the place when describing what their aims are here, and
• 40:30
  Speaker 10: because there wasn't a debate, I'm just not quite sure
• 40:33
  Speaker 10: how to judge it. I'm not sure how long he's
• 40:36
  Speaker 10: going to stay. I'm not sure whether we're going to
• 40:38
  Speaker 10: commit the resources we would need, for example, to reopen
• 40:41
  Speaker 10: the straits of horror moods.
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: So I find it quite difficult to judge.
• 40:45
  Speaker 10: Not because I think, you know, I've seen some people
• 40:47
  Speaker 10: who have derangement syndrome saying the US is losing that's
• 40:50
  Speaker 10: absolute nonsense.
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: I'm just not.
• 40:52
  Speaker 10: Sure how long we're going to stay in what we're doing,
• 40:54
  Speaker 10: so I find it difficult to know.
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: I'm a bit like I'm going to borrow from in
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: Antigony and Butcher Misophocles. You cannot tell how good the
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: day has been until the evening comes. We won't know
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: till it's over. But it sure looks pretty impressive to me.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: And I'm not worried about the Strait of Hormuz, even
• 41:12
  Speaker 1: though the price of gas is up Politically. I know
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: that's a problem for Republican if it remains upcome the midterms,
• 41:19
  Speaker 1: But this is much bigger than the midterms in my view?
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: What do you make? And I think this is actually
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: the untold story. This might break NATO. When Lindsey Graham
• 41:28
  Speaker 1: and Hugh Hewitt and a bunch of old Reagan conservatives
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: are saying what in the world they won't even send
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: mind sweepers. What is the purpose of NATO? Is it
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: just to protect NATO? What's your reaction to that, Charles,
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: that people are turning on NATO who have always been
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: pro NATO.
• 41:46
  Speaker 10: Yeah, I'm pro NATO, but I'm also of the view
• 41:51
  Speaker 10: that NATO is in effect American power, and so I
• 41:56
  Speaker 10: don't get too hung up on the formal structure. I
• 42:00
  Speaker 10: think that the United States is in effect playing the
• 42:04
  Speaker 10: role that the British Empire played before nineteen forty five.
• 42:09
  Speaker 10: Back to about the Battle of Waterloo, and that is
• 42:12
  Speaker 10: as the global hedgemon with naval supremacy on which others rely.
• 42:18
  Speaker 10: So I'm not sure it can break NATO in the
• 42:21
  Speaker 10: sense that it's not going to break American hegemony. And Europe,
• 42:24
  Speaker 10: whether it likes to admit it or not, is completely reliant,
• 42:27
  Speaker 10: more reliant now than it has been for a while
• 42:30
  Speaker 10: on that supremacy. So I think it's more a matter
• 42:34
  Speaker 10: for us. You know, are we getting tired of being taken.
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: For a ride?
• 42:38
  Speaker 10: And I suppose in some sense the answer is yes.
• 42:41
  Speaker 10: But on the other hand, Donald Trump has made this
• 42:43
  Speaker 10: a big feature of both of his presidencies, to tell
• 42:46
  Speaker 10: Europe to pay more and to put pressure on them.
• 42:50
  Speaker 10: So I very much see this within the context of
• 42:53
  Speaker 10: that existing tension.
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: Now, Charles, one of the memorable moments of my life,
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: and it's long. It's seventy years old, when after nine
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: to eleven, w addresses Congress and he looks up and
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister Blair is there. He thanks him for being there,
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: to thank you, friend, and that spoke volumes about the
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: special relationship. Kiir Starmer has trashed that in two weeks.
• 43:18
  Speaker 1: Do you think the British public is in favor of that.
• 43:22
  Speaker 10: Well, here's what I think you and I take no
• 43:24
  Speaker 10: pleasure in saying this as somebody who was formerly British
• 43:28
  Speaker 10: and whose family lives there. But the British, irrespective of
• 43:32
  Speaker 10: Kirs Starmer and the most recent examples, have rendered themselves,
• 43:37
  Speaker 10: through their own choices, somewhat irrelevant. I mean, if you
• 43:40
  Speaker 10: think back, even just over a decade ago to when
• 43:43
  Speaker 10: Barack Obama was considering going into Syria after the Libya adventure,
• 43:48
  Speaker 10: the British Parliament voted against helping.
• 43:51
  Speaker 1: And this was a big deal.
• 43:52
  Speaker 10: This was reported in the United States as being a
• 43:54
  Speaker 10: big deal. It had some impact, not definitive impact, but
• 43:58
  Speaker 10: it had some impact on Barack Obama's decision not to
• 44:01
  Speaker 10: go in. That wouldn't happen now. If the British Parliament
• 44:04
  Speaker 10: had taken a vote ahead of this and said we're
• 44:06
  Speaker 10: not going to help in Iran, it would not really
• 44:08
  Speaker 10: have factored in very much to America's calculations. So, although
• 44:11
  Speaker 10: I am very sad about that, and although I am
• 44:14
  Speaker 10: sad about the decline of the special relationship which has
• 44:17
  Speaker 10: accompanied it, I think it's a lot less important than.
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: It used to be.
• 44:20
  Speaker 10: Look at the British inability, the British of all people,
• 44:23
  Speaker 10: inability to send a naval power around the world within
• 44:28
  Speaker 10: what two weeks they said they would need two weeks.
• 44:31
  Speaker 10: When the Falklands were invaded in the early nineteen eighties,
• 44:34
  Speaker 10: Missus Thatcher sent hundreds of ships to the Falkland islands
• 44:39
  Speaker 10: within forty eight hours. So the British have done this
• 44:42
  Speaker 10: to themselves. I don't think that is a case for
• 44:45
  Speaker 10: going into Iran or for this or that president, but
• 44:47
  Speaker 10: the British have rendered themselves irrelevance such that it doesn't matter.
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: Unfortunately, well, now there is New NATO, there is poland
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: there is Finland. There is Ukraine, which is a sort
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: of deep fact on member of New NATO, and they
• 45:02
  Speaker 1: are holding the line against one of the maligned powers
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: in the Alliance of Tyrants. I'm just curious if you
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: think Britain can recover its mojo, and whether or not
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: France might recover with new political leadership. They've only had
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: twenty seven ships right now, They've got seven submarines, one
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: of which is at sea right now. They've got two
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: aircraft carriers. I don't know how you send aircraft carriers
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: out without an escort fleet that they haven't got. Can
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: they get it back? Do they want it back?
• 45:33
  Speaker 10: Well, it's a huge question because they're going to have
• 45:37
  Speaker 10: to if they're going to get it back, acknowledge that
• 45:40
  Speaker 10: there is more to life than welfare spending. And I'm
• 45:42
  Speaker 10: really not being a moaning conservative when I say this.
• 45:45
  Speaker 10: I am very much a physical conservative. But the British
• 45:48
  Speaker 10: have now for ten fifteen years, really since the end
• 45:53
  Speaker 10: of the Blair years, ramped up welfare spending, raised taxes
• 45:59
  Speaker 10: to pay for it, and let everything else go by
• 46:02
  Speaker 10: the wayside. There is no dynamism in the British economy.
• 46:06
  Speaker 10: There is no interest in the creation of wealth. There
• 46:09
  Speaker 10: is no interest in the generation of great companies or
• 46:12
  Speaker 10: great ideas or frankly great men in the way that
• 46:15
  Speaker 10: there once was. And the same is true of defense.
• 46:18
  Speaker 10: That the British have given up on defense. They have
• 46:20
  Speaker 10: allowed their defense capability to atrophy. So it won't just
• 46:25
  Speaker 10: be one good prime minister or one new political party
• 46:29
  Speaker 10: or one favorable election. Culturally, in their souls, the British
• 46:35
  Speaker 10: are going to have to acknowledge that there is more
• 46:37
  Speaker 10: to government than handing out money. And at the moment
• 46:41
  Speaker 10: they're just incapable of doing it again. I hate saying this.
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: I hate this.
• 46:44
  Speaker 10: I take no pleasure in it just because I move country,
• 46:47
  Speaker 10: you know, I haven't left all those sentiments behind. I
• 46:49
  Speaker 10: wish the British and their island well, but I don't
• 46:52
  Speaker 10: see anything at the moment that suggests that there is
• 46:55
  Speaker 10: an uprising against the status.
• 46:57
  Speaker 1: Quo one minute, Charles, not the rise of Parage and
• 47:02
  Speaker 1: a party to his right. Is that not the stirring
• 47:05
  Speaker 1: of the embers.
• 47:08
  Speaker 10: It's the stirring of the embers. But you need a
• 47:09
  Speaker 10: lot more than embers, you know, a very very.
• 47:12
  Speaker 4: Large fire here.
• 47:13
  Speaker 10: And Nigel Farage, although admirable in some ways, is still
• 47:18
  Speaker 10: operating within the existing political structure, and he is, for example,
• 47:23
  Speaker 10: quite bad on housing development because he understands that the
• 47:27
  Speaker 10: people he need have all of their wealth tied up
• 47:29
  Speaker 10: in their homes. The real shift in British history in
• 47:33
  Speaker 10: the recent years was Margaret Thatcher, who operated outside of
• 47:36
  Speaker 10: all of that, and the results spoke for themselves. So
• 47:40
  Speaker 10: I hope that it can happen again. But I'm not optimistic, Charles,
• 47:45
  Speaker 10: But you.
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: Are honest, and I appreciate that. Candor Charles C. W. Cook,
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: listen to him on the editors read him in National View.
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: We listen to his podcast, Charles B. W. Cook and
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: come right back, Sharon Bedford from The Illness Welcome Back
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: in America. I'm Hugh Heugh at Sarah C. Bedford is
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: a senior investigations editor at The Washington Examiner, and she
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: covers the Hill like few people. Sarah, what do you
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: think the endgame is going to be for the Save
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: Act and the DHS shut down?
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: Well, it'd be great.
• 48:19
  Speaker 11: If those two things could sort of get done together, right,
• 48:22
  Speaker 11: and you finally have enough pressure on Senate leadership to
• 48:27
  Speaker 11: bring the Save Act to the floor have a.
• 48:30
  Speaker 2: Real debate about it. And you know what.
• 48:32
  Speaker 11: People like Senator Mike Lee and other big supporters of
• 48:35
  Speaker 11: the Save Act wanted all along was to have to
• 48:38
  Speaker 11: force Democrats to defend their opposition to the Save Act,
• 48:42
  Speaker 11: which is like full of eighty twenty proposals, right, voter ID,
• 48:46
  Speaker 11: proof of citizenship to register to vote. Those are things
• 48:50
  Speaker 11: that most Americans support, and so Senatorly and others who
• 48:54
  Speaker 11: wanted to force, you know, a talking filibuster, and we've
• 48:57
  Speaker 11: talked about before how that's maybe not.
• 48:59
  Speaker 2: The most realistic way to try to.
• 49:00
  Speaker 11: Overcome the sixty vote threshold. But the real thirty thousand
• 49:04
  Speaker 11: foot view of the goal of all of that was
• 49:05
  Speaker 11: to try to force Democrats to say why they're against
• 49:09
  Speaker 11: proposals that are so popular. And finally it looks like
• 49:12
  Speaker 11: Republicans are going to get that chance with soon bringing
• 49:15
  Speaker 11: the builds to the floor, even if it doesn't end
• 49:17
  Speaker 11: up having the votes to pass.
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: Spartacus is up right now Corey Booker, and he's saying
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: crazy stuff. Patty Murray has said, oh, you can't use
• 49:26
  Speaker 1: your student idea anymore. I don't even know if that's true,
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: but it's not really consequential to me. We've had Amy
• 49:32
  Speaker 1: Klobuchar saying that Elon Musk is setting up a data
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: center at DHS to take They're saying crazy things. Do
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: you think those crazy things will hurt them in the fall?
• 49:44
  Speaker 11: Well, it depends on how much Republicans are willing to
• 49:46
  Speaker 11: push on the Save Act. I mean, so far, it
• 49:48
  Speaker 11: seems like not that much. It's only in the past
• 49:51
  Speaker 11: few weeks that you've seen momentum really builds behind the
• 49:54
  Speaker 11: Save Act.
• 49:55
  Speaker 2: But if you go point by point through.
• 49:57
  Speaker 11: Most of the Democrats objections to the Save America Act
• 50:01
  Speaker 11: and we've done that at the Washington Examiner.
• 50:02
  Speaker 2: Most of them don't stand up to scrutiny.
• 50:04
  Speaker 11: You know, this idea that married women, for example, won't
• 50:07
  Speaker 11: be able to register to vote if they've had their
• 50:10
  Speaker 11: name changed.
• 50:10
  Speaker 2: Legally, that's just not the case.
• 50:13
  Speaker 11: And so, you know, Democrats don't really have a cohesive
• 50:17
  Speaker 11: argument against the Save Act. And that's what Republicans were
• 50:21
  Speaker 11: sort of thinking on why they wanted these open conversations
• 50:24
  Speaker 11: on the floor of the US Congress, because it's so
• 50:27
  Speaker 11: difficult for Democrats.
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: To hold the line against something that's so popular.
• 50:31
  Speaker 1: Democrats want to cheat. And it comes down to that
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: they want to cheat in a few places where it
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: makes a big difference in a few hundred votes mean
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: an election that some elections do not feature cheating does
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: not mean that cheating does not occur in some elections.
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: Let me switch topics to the war. I've been covering
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: it top to bottom. I believe it's going very very well,
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: about as well as any war could go. In which
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: you've suffered fourteen casualties, thirteen casualties and among Americans ten
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: Israelis now six team with six Palestinians killed this afternoon
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: in the city of Hebron. Our allies and the Gulf
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: nations are taking it as well. But Iran is getting pummeled.
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: What's your take on the war.
• 51:11
  Speaker 11: Of Sarah Bedford, Iran is and I you know, it
• 51:16
  Speaker 11: was interesting today you had d and I Pulci Gabbard,
• 51:19
  Speaker 11: you had CAA director John Ratcliffe, FBI director Cash Hotel
• 51:22
  Speaker 11: on the Hill, and they faced a lot of questions
• 51:25
  Speaker 11: about the threats from Iran. And what was really interesting
• 51:27
  Speaker 11: to me is that the extent that Democrats were able
• 51:30
  Speaker 11: to I don't know if land some successful blows is
• 51:33
  Speaker 11: the right way to put it, but were able to
• 51:35
  Speaker 11: sort of really press Ratcliffe and Gabbard in particular. It
• 51:38
  Speaker 11: was really all about messaging related to the war, right,
• 51:41
  Speaker 11: because it's hard for Democrats at the stage to argue
• 51:43
  Speaker 11: that the war has been unsuccessful in achieving its goals
• 51:47
  Speaker 11: or that it's a bad idea to make sure that
• 51:49
  Speaker 11: Iran doesn't get a nuclear weapons. So you really all
• 51:51
  Speaker 11: Democrats had to go off of we're messaging critiques. You
• 51:54
  Speaker 11: know you said this at one point, now you're saying this.
• 51:57
  Speaker 11: Your opening remarks had a paragraph that you didn't end
• 52:00
  Speaker 11: up reading out loud. In the case of gabbered, But again,
• 52:03
  Speaker 11: those were just all sort of rhetorical critiques about the
• 52:05
  Speaker 11: way that the Trump administration is talking about the war,
• 52:09
  Speaker 11: and not really critiques of what the Trump administration is
• 52:13
  Speaker 11: actually doing.
• 52:14
  Speaker 1: Sarah, I think the American media is overwhelmingly anti war
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: because they're anti Trump overwhelmingly, and they cannot bring themselves
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: a report. This is going as well as any military
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: operation in my life, and I've seen a lot of wars,
• 52:28
  Speaker 1: beginning with Grenada in nineteen eighty three. I remember vaguely
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: the end of Vietnam, but not really that well, and
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: that was a disaster. But doesn't anyone on the left
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: recognize the incredible, awesome ability of the American military.
• 52:44
  Speaker 11: Well, I think that's why you do see Democrats treading
• 52:46
  Speaker 11: rather carefully, not necessarily going after the Trump administration directly
• 52:50
  Speaker 11: saying this is really bad.
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: We don't want the Iranian people to be free.
• 52:53
  Speaker 11: We definitely want one of our biggest adversaries in the
• 52:56
  Speaker 11: Middle East to have nuclear weapons. They are sort of
• 52:59
  Speaker 11: that's why don't have a coherent message from Democrats. They're
• 53:03
  Speaker 11: going after messaging and things like that, because again, like
• 53:06
  Speaker 11: you said, it has so far been a successful mission.
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: I hope it remains that way. Sarah C. Bedford follow
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: her on x at Sarah C. Bedford. Thank you, Sarah.
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: You've heard me talk a lot about Consumer Cellular how
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: you can switch your carrier save money without the sacrifice.
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: That's because Consumer Cellular uses the same towers as major carriers.
• 53:27
  Speaker 1: Make the switch today and get twenty five dollars off
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: at Consumer Cellular dot Com slash shoe. If you're over fifty,
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: get one line of unlimited talk, text and data for
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: thirty five dollars plus an additional five dollars per month
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: off for the first five months. When you visit Consumer
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: Cellular dot Com slash shoe, use the promo code Q
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: twenty five. Consumer Cellular ranks number one for network coverage
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: and consumer satisfaction. According to ACSL, You'll be working with
• 53:53
  Speaker 1: an actual human being when you switch base right here
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: in the US, so get one line of unlimited talk,
• 53:58
  Speaker 1: text and data for only thirty five dollars per month,
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: plus an additional five dollars off per month for the
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: first five months. Think of all the money you will save.
• 54:06
  Speaker 1: Go to Consumer Seular dot Com slash shoe. Promo QUE
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: twenty five are called one eight hundred and four to
• 54:13
  Speaker 1: one one forty four fifty four consumer cellular dot com
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: slash shoe. Clean water is not complicated, but it is essential.
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: Without it, public health suffer, education declines, economic stability well
• 54:25
  Speaker 1: it weakens if it doesn't collapse. Across Latin America and
• 54:28
  Speaker 1: the Caribbean, families are facing that reality of unclean water.
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: Every day. Mothers walk miles for clean water. Children are
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: exposed to preventable diseases because they haven't got it. Communities
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: are held back by the absence of basic clean water access.
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: But strategic compassion changes outcomes through food for the poor.
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: Your gift provides safe and living water, improving how strengthening communities,
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: and supporting gospel centered transformation through trusted local partnerships. This
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: is a measurable impact with lasting result. Your gift to
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars and sure two people have safe and living
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: water or four one hundred dollars a family of four
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: will be transformed for a year. I hope you act.
• 55:09
  Speaker 12: Text Hewitt Hgwitt, that's Hewitt hg Witt to five one
• 55:16
  Speaker 12: five fifty five that's Hewett to fifty one five five five,
• 55:20
  Speaker 12: or visit Hughewitt dot com right now and click on
• 55:23
  Speaker 12: the blue giving living Water banner at the top to
• 55:26
  Speaker 12: provide living water today and thank you.
• 55:33
  Speaker 1: Welcome back to Maerica. I'm Hugh Hewett. Mary Katherine Ham
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: joins me, host of the Getting Hammered podcast and Fox
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: News contributor, Mary Katherine, you really hit Paul Eric hard today.
• 55:44
  Speaker 1: He was a villain. You said we should talk about
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: Norman Borlog, but let's just pause to dance on the
• 55:50
  Speaker 1: on the grave a little bit. That guy was wrong
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: about everything.
• 55:52
  Speaker 13: Forever well wrong about everything, and hurt people being wrong
• 55:57
  Speaker 13: about it, and was never once sorry about how wrong
• 56:00
  Speaker 13: he was. And I just think with people like Paul Aarl, like,
• 56:02
  Speaker 13: I'm usually pretty nice unless you're an actual terrorist when
• 56:05
  Speaker 13: you die, But like a lot of people made decisions
• 56:08
  Speaker 13: based on this person's worldview that did not allow for
• 56:11
  Speaker 13: the idea of human innovation at all, and a lot
• 56:14
  Speaker 13: of people are sad because they made decisions based on
• 56:16
  Speaker 13: that worldview. And that worldview was also used to bully
• 56:19
  Speaker 13: a bunch of people with government policy and environmental wacko
• 56:22
  Speaker 13: stuff to make all of our lives worse. And so
• 56:25
  Speaker 13: I just I don't want to let that kind of
• 56:28
  Speaker 13: person with that kind of scholarship so easily into elite
• 56:32
  Speaker 13: conventional wisdom.
• 56:33
  Speaker 2: Anymore, can we learn some lessons? Pleased?
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: I appreciate it, Paul Air, like for the Steelers fans
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: believe malth Is, like that the world was overpopulated and
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: what's going to run out of resources? Wrong? Wrong? Wrong?
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: Then you and Vic spent a lot of time on
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: the oscars. They only reach seventy point nine million people.
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: That's less than a presidential debate, because people would rather
• 56:53
  Speaker 1: get their politics when people are really in politics as
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: opposed to the movies. And the only movie I saw
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: was Marty Supreme. I think they're dead. I think the
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: oscars are dad. Mary Catherine, you may be the person
• 57:03
  Speaker 1: who watched them.
• 57:05
  Speaker 13: Well, I didn't even watch them. I was just reporting
• 57:07
  Speaker 13: what I saw the next day.
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: Okay. I got the impression that you had watched them.
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: In my gosh, I did not think. Let's talk about
• 57:13
  Speaker 1: something important. Let's talk about the Iranian women soccer team.
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: They're being forced back because the terrorists are taken their
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: families hostage. No one accept you and Vic had paid
• 57:24
  Speaker 1: attention to this.
• 57:26
  Speaker 13: I know, and I wish people would. I was saying
• 57:28
  Speaker 13: at the Oscars perhaps someone could wear a pin for them.
• 57:31
  Speaker 13: That's an ongoing crisis with specific women involved that we
• 57:35
  Speaker 13: I'm sure in Hollywood alleged that they care deeply about
• 57:38
  Speaker 13: women under oppression, while they pretend that we are all
• 57:40
  Speaker 13: oppressed here in America under Donald Trump. It's shameful that
• 57:44
  Speaker 13: no one talks about it, and it is a situation
• 57:46
  Speaker 13: where I think some people don't understand. When you live
• 57:48
  Speaker 13: under a totalitarian regime like in Iran, if you are
• 57:52
  Speaker 13: able to get out, your family is subject to torture,
• 57:55
  Speaker 13: to kidnapping, to awful punishments, to disappearing. They are under
• 58:00
  Speaker 13: tremenous familial pressure and filial pressure to go back.
• 58:04
  Speaker 2: Home to spare them that.
• 58:06
  Speaker 13: But by the way, they'll be in trouble as soon
• 58:09
  Speaker 13: as they get back home. It's a really awful situation,
• 58:11
  Speaker 13: and I'm praying for them and praying that the Iranian
• 58:14
  Speaker 13: people will soon be in a different position.
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: Well. The one thing I think our government could do,
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: and I hope Secretary of State Ribio does, is mark
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: the names of the women who defected and then are
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: coming back and say very clearly the Iranian regime when
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: you fall, the people who are in charge of these girls,
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: these women and their families will be marked and will
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: be found, and if you mistreat them, you will be
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: prosecuted and hung by the neck until dead, just like Nurremberg.
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: That's all we can do, right, We could do that.
• 58:47
  Speaker 2: We could do that.
• 58:48
  Speaker 13: And the nice thing about the threat credibility of Donald
• 58:51
  Speaker 13: Trump is that people might actually believe it.
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: So yes, now, Mary Catherine, I began the show talking
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: I Noah. I want to end it by asking you,
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: I think we're winning. I think we're winning big. I
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: don't say that point of view reflect that anywhere in
• 59:04
  Speaker 1: the media, And I mean, really, we're really winning big, big, big.
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: What do you think now?
• 59:11
  Speaker 13: I think that the media has trouble covering military conflict.
• 59:15
  Speaker 13: They don't like American might and military being used for
• 59:18
  Speaker 13: basically any ends, so they don't want to cover tactical
• 59:22
  Speaker 13: and operational victories as victories. Instead, they just focus on, well,
• 59:25
  Speaker 13: there's risk, Well we don't know all that is true,
• 59:28
  Speaker 13: there are always risks in conflict of this kind. But
• 59:32
  Speaker 13: they're not dealing with or contextualizing any of this for
• 59:35
  Speaker 13: people who'd actually like to understand it and how things
• 59:37
  Speaker 13: are going on the ground or in the air, which
• 59:40
  Speaker 13: is a pretty astounding victory on many fronts, including the
• 59:44
  Speaker 13: continuing amazing intel from Israel that allows the striking of
• 59:50
  Speaker 13: specific targets, which by the way, minimizes civilian targets or
• 59:54
  Speaker 13: civilian casualties, and we end up taking out large parts
• 59:59
  Speaker 13: of their higher ups, which is what can inspire people
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 13: to actually come out of their house. You have Baby
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 13: Yahoo telling the Iranian people we're watching from the skies
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 13: for you.
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: I mean, that's something else.
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, what I would love to see. You know, my daughter,
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 1: you know, her husband is a flyboy who now sales ships.
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: He's been in out of the war. He's not in
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: the war right now, he's in the far side of
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: the world. But I wish that we would celebrate these
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: men and women in the fight. They're such extraordinary professionals.
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: And I think you're the one who said, please make
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 1: a friend in the was that you please make a
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: friend in the military. Yes, please make a friend. We
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: have no idea what they're doing. It's extraordinary.
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 13: No, it's it's shameful that the press is so bad
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 13: at this. The Surf and Turf was another great example
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 13: of like, y'all don't know anyone you can call who's
• 1:00:49
  Speaker 13: been in the military, who could tell you about this.
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 13: I wish they did. I wish that more civilians knew
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 13: more military folks. It is the beauty we have this
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 13: beautiful volunteer force full of these amazing families who put
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 13: so much on the line, and getting to know them
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 13: will help you understand their lives and what they sacrifice
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 13: for us. And the press is foremost in needing to
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 13: do that. By the way, That's why I work with
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 13: Travis Manning Foundation, because we make a lot of connections
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 13: between civilian life and military.
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: Life, and right now the civilians ought to be thinking
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 1: about the military family next door and asking, especially if
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: their wife or husband is deployed, can we give you
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: a ride to school? Can we give you a meal?
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: Let me close by doubling back to what you began
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: with Saint Patrick's Day. Mary Catherine am if not Irish,
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: this is a shock to everyone. She's English and she's
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 1: completely Protestant. But your dad made a shamrock for you,
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: and I want every dad to know that. Tell that story.
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 13: So I was between five and seven, probably, and I
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 13: remember being a little panicked in the morning of Saint
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 13: Patrick's Day because I realized I didn't have anything green
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 13: on and couldn't find anything, and my dad found somewhere
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 13: a piece of felt the house and handcut this beautiful
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 13: little shamrock and we pinned it on my shirt and
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 13: I saved it for years. I probably could still find
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 13: it somewhere around here, but it's just this little creative
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 13: knickknack from when I was a child where my dad
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 13: quickly solved a problem at six years old. I was like, Wow,
• 1:02:17
  Speaker 13: how amazing is that? And I still think it's amazing
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 13: and I appreciate it.
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 1: It's been thirty five years and you're remembering what your
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 1: dad did on Saint Patrick's Day. Is a message to
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: dad's that everything they do every day matters. That's actually
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 1: what I took away from that, Mary katherineham every day,
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: what a dad does.
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 2: Matters, it does.
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 13: And there's nothing like having a good dad, and I
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 13: have one.
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: So I'm very thankful.
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 1: Well said and a well produced episode The new Getting
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: Hammered dropped. I will talk about corn, beef and cabbage
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: in the Filipinos tomorrow with Vic Mattis.
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: That was weird, but that's good.
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: We'll do that tomorrow. Mary Katherine aam follow on Exit
• 1:02:56
  Speaker 1: mk Hammer. Get getting hammered on, your like and subscribe.
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 1: Playlist it's back. It's weekly, great fun, Stay tuned America.
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: I'm dugious