Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 20th September 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 20th September 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Speaker 1: Good afternoon. Today is Friday, the twentieth of September twenty
0:12
Speaker 1: twenty four, just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News.
0:15
Speaker 1: I'm your host, Brian Gerrish. Delighted to be joined today
0:19
Speaker 1: by Debbie Evans, and we've also got Mark Anderson coming
0:23
Speaker 1: in on a link from the United States. So theme
0:27
Speaker 1: really of our news today, which as always has come
0:30
Speaker 1: together due to the individual work of the presenters for
0:34
Speaker 1: today's news, is really on the subject to the state,
0:37
Speaker 1: how it is working, how it's deceiving people, and a
0:42
Speaker 1: little bit of what the real agenda.
0:44
Speaker 2: Is.
0:44
Speaker 1: No better place to start than have a look at
0:47
Speaker 1: the Labor Party and the sorts of images that they're
0:52
Speaker 1: showing very strongly. So here we are be part of change,
0:56
Speaker 1: join Labor and together we can change Britain. But of
1:00
Speaker 1: course they don't say changing from what to what, and
1:04
Speaker 1: this is extremely important. The Labor website just full of
1:09
Speaker 1: these images. Here's Starmer looking particularly bland and authoritarian, and
1:17
Speaker 1: it simply says change. But what on earth are they
1:20
Speaker 1: talking about, because it's obvious that they're not actually declaring
1:24
Speaker 1: what the change is, that change is going to happen.
1:28
Speaker 1: And here's another one, where Starmer is in front of
1:32
Speaker 1: the label change begins. So I'm going to ask our
1:35
Speaker 1: audience again what is the change that's being planned and implemented.
1:41
Speaker 1: So how do we dive into this. Well, let's have
1:43
Speaker 1: a little look at the Labor Party and democracy. Now
1:48
Speaker 1: this is very simplistic, but I've done it in order
1:51
Speaker 1: to try and get our audience today thinking about what
1:54
Speaker 1: they're actually seeing. So, of course, in UK at least,
1:58
Speaker 1: everything revolves around the big parties Labor and Conservative, and
2:02
Speaker 1: that party organization is the Beast, which of course ultimately
2:07
Speaker 1: holds power over choosing and getting people like Stamer into
2:12
Speaker 1: the position of Prime Minister. Now, hand in glove with
2:16
Speaker 1: that goes the power of the civil service, and I'm
2:19
Speaker 1: going to be talking about that a little bit more
2:21
Speaker 1: in just a couple of minutes. But essentially, this is
2:24
Speaker 1: the power base that the public is shown. We are
2:28
Speaker 1: led to believe that this forms our representative democracy, where
2:34
Speaker 1: basically the nation state is working in the best interests
2:38
Speaker 1: of the public. I believe this is a sham, a
2:42
Speaker 1: complete sham. And let's bring in the other side of
2:45
Speaker 1: the coin, which I'm calling the international collective. Let's remember
2:50
Speaker 1: that funding is the key thing which makes the political
2:55
Speaker 1: system happen, whether it's in UK or in the United States.
3:00
Speaker 1: Then we've got very powerful lobbying groups such as the
3:04
Speaker 1: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. We've got the European Union,
3:09
Speaker 1: We've got the World Economic Forum. These are just examples
3:13
Speaker 1: the powerful United Nations, of course, highly influential labor friends
3:18
Speaker 1: of Israel, very powerful within the Labor Party. And I'm
3:22
Speaker 1: just bringing in another example, the Council on Foreign Relations.
3:27
Speaker 1: But of course there's the Trilateral Commission. There's many others,
3:30
Speaker 1: and we already know that Starmer has pledged allegiance not
3:35
Speaker 1: to his nation state but to the international collective, because
3:39
Speaker 1: he was quite happy to say publicly that he would
3:42
Speaker 1: prefer working with the World Economic Forum than Westminster any time.
3:47
Speaker 1: But here's his powerful civil service with a headcount of
3:51
Speaker 1: over half a million people. They're all broken down into departments,
3:56
Speaker 1: numbers and categories here. But I'm going to say to
3:59
Speaker 1: have viewers that it's very clear that this organization has
4:03
Speaker 1: been hollowed out from the inside, inasmuch as overall it's
4:08
Speaker 1: been captured by the woke international agenda. We can call
4:13
Speaker 1: it woke fascism because the corporates are in there as well.
4:17
Speaker 1: But if you look down the contents of this statistical
4:20
Speaker 1: bulletin on the civil service, you see that everything is
4:25
Speaker 1: being looked at in detail. Sex, age, ethnicity, excuse me, disability,
4:31
Speaker 1: sexual orientation are very big one. Religion and belief. Surprisingly,
4:36
Speaker 1: over fifty percent of the civil service say they're Christian,
4:40
Speaker 1: but of course that's not reflected by the activities of
4:43
Speaker 1: the state. And then if we go in a different direction,
4:47
Speaker 1: we can bring in that labor system again. But if
4:49
Speaker 1: we have a look at the funding, A big thanks
4:52
Speaker 1: to politics dot co dot uk that did a really
4:55
Speaker 1: good analysis and I encourage you to go and see that.
4:58
Speaker 1: Here's some of the sums of money put in a
5:01
Speaker 1: million from Ecotricity Limited, seven hundred thousand from Martin Taylor.
5:06
Speaker 1: I just picked out one person. This is Danny lou Thompson.
5:12
Speaker 1: Now could be somebody with a duplicant name, but I'm
5:15
Speaker 1: guessing it isn't. But all we're just showing is here
5:19
Speaker 1: is a person linked ultimately with investment management. I would
5:23
Speaker 1: say that's pretty close to hedge funds. And then when
5:26
Speaker 1: we look at that organization, we're into Quadrature's Climate Foundation
5:33
Speaker 1: So this would represent a very powerful lobbying group for
5:36
Speaker 1: this sort of policy into the Labor Party. So if
5:40
Speaker 1: we've got an international change agenda being unleashed on UK
5:45
Speaker 1: we've got people pumping money into the Labor Party effectively
5:49
Speaker 1: that controls it. What sort of people have we got
5:52
Speaker 1: in the Labor Party. Well, we know Starmer and we
5:56
Speaker 1: mentioned Lammy the Foreign Secretary on Monday, but let's bring
6:00
Speaker 1: him back on screen.
6:04
Speaker 3: Putin said Russian Basically, Putin said, don't send tanks. We
6:07
Speaker 3: sent them. Putin said, don't send any missiles. We sent them.
6:11
Speaker 3: Putin threatens every few months to use nuclear weapons. It's
6:15
Speaker 3: totally unaccepted. We won't be bullied by Putin, shameless shameless
6:21
Speaker 3: grand side standing.
6:23
Speaker 1: Well, the point I'm making here is he's mocking a
6:29
Speaker 1: a foreign leader of importance. The arrogance, the aggression. This
6:34
Speaker 1: is the sort of people we're dealing with, and they
6:37
Speaker 1: want the war running because it's in the interests of
6:40
Speaker 1: the West. Now, finally we've got Western media talking about
6:45
Speaker 1: the death toll in Ukraine. Let's have a look at
6:47
Speaker 1: this on screen. And basically we're now got admission from
6:53
Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal at least of a million now
6:56
Speaker 1: dead or injured in the Russian Ukrainian War. This is,
7:00
Speaker 1: in my opinion a pretty accurate figure. Let's expand it
7:03
Speaker 1: one million, and ultimately this war is to be continued
7:10
Speaker 1: in the best interests of the West until the last
7:14
Speaker 1: Ukrainian is dead. More Ukrainian deaths than Russians. The BBC
7:19
Speaker 1: talking about seventy thousand Russian dead. The figure that's been
7:24
Speaker 1: talked about widely on the internet about Ukrainian deaths is
7:29
Speaker 1: three hundred to four hundred thousand, and this would agree
7:34
Speaker 1: with the figures of about a million dead or injured.
7:38
Speaker 1: So these are horrific. This is horrific state of affairs.
7:41
Speaker 1: This is the mentality of people in politics in UK.
7:45
Speaker 1: And we're focusing on the Labor Party. But the other
7:49
Speaker 1: thing going on, of course is the police state. We
7:52
Speaker 1: could call it Starmers, stars Estate and a big thank
7:55
Speaker 1: you to one of our viewers that spotted this police
7:58
Speaker 1: job advert. Well, it's about somebody to work Collaby collaboratively
8:04
Speaker 1: as part of analyst, researchers and police officers working under
8:08
Speaker 1: the Strategic Intelligence and Briefing Team related to aggravated activism,
8:14
Speaker 1: strategic protest and significant public order events. Beyonder no illusion.
8:20
Speaker 1: This is spying on the UK public and anybody speaking
8:25
Speaker 1: out against the government is now going to come under
8:27
Speaker 1: this sort of scrutiny with arrests and sentencing accordingly. So
8:34
Speaker 1: this is the state, this is Starmer's star Z state.
8:37
Speaker 1: But of course it's got this huge corporatist element which
8:41
Speaker 1: could also lead it to a description of fascism. Let's
8:45
Speaker 1: have another look at Lammy in action, this time apparently
8:49
Speaker 1: on a softer note, but is that true. Let's have
8:53
Speaker 1: a listen, but we.
8:55
Speaker 3: Need a hard headed, realist approach towards using all levers
9:02
Speaker 3: at our disposal, from the diplomatic to the financial. And
9:08
Speaker 3: I say to you now, these are not contradictions, because
9:14
Speaker 3: nothing could be more central to the UK's national interests
9:20
Speaker 3: than delivering global progress on arresting rising temperatures.
9:28
Speaker 1: So this is all soft and scridgy dialogue. It's all
9:31
Speaker 1: about saving the world. We are to believe climate change
9:36
Speaker 1: is real and not in depth political agenda. And we
9:40
Speaker 1: are to believe that Lammy, the man that wants to
9:42
Speaker 1: keep the killing going in Ukraine, has got the best
9:45
Speaker 1: interests of every human being on the planet with regard
9:49
Speaker 1: to saving us from climate change. Let's have a look
9:52
Speaker 1: at some of his words in detail. That, of course
9:55
Speaker 1: was just an excerpt from what he said. But here
9:58
Speaker 1: we've got some other quotes. I've seen with the Inflation
10:01
Speaker 1: Reduction Act in the United States, the Green Deal in
10:04
Speaker 1: the European Union, and the accelerating transition in China, foreign policy,
10:10
Speaker 1: economic and industrial policy becoming increasingly intertwined. So we're not
10:16
Speaker 1: going to be able to say what's going on because
10:18
Speaker 1: we can't say that it's foreign policy or its industrial policy,
10:23
Speaker 1: or it's economic. It's in a blur. It's in a
10:27
Speaker 1: snake's wedding is my favorite expression. It's in a knot,
10:31
Speaker 1: and the public is not going to untie that knot.
10:33
Speaker 1: And this is because this is strategic globalist agenda, he says,
10:38
Speaker 1: with Ed Middiband Steve Reid leaning court negotiations on climate
10:42
Speaker 1: and nature, we have a pair of experience determined negotiation negotiators,
10:48
Speaker 1: the Middiband brothers, of course, coming from a Marxist background,
10:51
Speaker 1: and we've got to push all of this under the
10:54
Speaker 1: UK government in order to keep one point five degrees
10:58
Speaker 1: alive and finally here to drive forward this cross country, sorry,
11:03
Speaker 1: this cross government reset even further I am announcing today
11:07
Speaker 1: that we will appoint new UK Special Representatives for Climate
11:11
Speaker 1: Change and Nature. And he goes on to say, of
11:15
Speaker 1: course that he's got Ed Milliburn and Steve Reid to support,
11:19
Speaker 1: but they're going to reboot internationally, showing that whether you
11:23
Speaker 1: are from the global North or the global South, we
11:26
Speaker 1: want to forge genuine partnerships to tackle this crisis together.
11:31
Speaker 4: So this is.
11:32
Speaker 1: About the complete reorganization of politics, not only in UK
11:37
Speaker 1: but also on a world stage, supposedly to protect us
11:41
Speaker 1: from climate change. But of course with those changes, any
11:46
Speaker 1: other part of our life, any in each part of
11:49
Speaker 1: our lives can be changed under this new system. What
11:53
Speaker 1: is the system? Some people have labeled it as a
11:56
Speaker 1: woke fascism, which I think is pretty accurate. People are
12:00
Speaker 1: calling it more a Marxist system. Some people refer to communitarianism.
12:05
Speaker 1: But whatever you choose to label it as, if you
12:09
Speaker 1: look at the detail, this system is hostile to the individual,
12:14
Speaker 1: it's hostile to families, and it's certainly hostile to the
12:18
Speaker 1: nation states, because the nation state needs to be destroyed
12:22
Speaker 1: in order to bring in the Great Reset, which is
12:26
Speaker 1: their ultimate world political agenda. And mark on that note,
12:30
Speaker 1: let's bring you in because of course you've been reporting
12:34
Speaker 1: on this from the angle of in particular cities, but
12:39
Speaker 1: also looking at the dynamics of this globalist agenda. Welcome
12:45
Speaker 1: and what have you got for us today?
12:48
Speaker 5: Well, Brian, This past Wednesday, RFK Junior's Children's Health Defense
12:56
Speaker 5: HDTV put out a program called Break the Stile the
13:00
Speaker 5: UN's One World Government and the who's One Health Agenda.
13:05
Speaker 5: And one of the broad themes that was carried out
13:09
Speaker 5: in this and I wasn't able to cover the whole thing,
13:11
Speaker 5: but I did pick up on a couple key speakers.
13:14
Speaker 5: One of the broad themes was while they're worried about
13:17
Speaker 5: the vaccination regime, while they're worried about medical tyranny, they're
13:21
Speaker 5: really concerned about the overarching political tyranny that's needed to
13:26
Speaker 5: enforce medical tyranny. So therefore, seeding power or delegating power
13:32
Speaker 5: to the UN and the WHO was roundly criticized, and
13:38
Speaker 5: this is a list of the speakers. The two I
13:40
Speaker 5: covered were Sabello Sabanda of South Africa and doctor Ostried
13:45
Speaker 5: Stuckelberger of Switzerland. And the narrative here at the beginning
13:49
Speaker 5: is what if the UN and the WHO are being
13:51
Speaker 5: used to build a technocratic government over our world where
13:55
Speaker 5: we lose the right to free speech and decision making.
13:57
Speaker 5: This week Join and Empowering Online event cleverly countering two things,
14:03
Speaker 5: countering the UN Summit of the Future and countering the
14:07
Speaker 5: who's One Health Congress, both of which start today. In
14:12
Speaker 5: terms of their preliminary programs, Our power to the People's
14:16
Speaker 5: Summit include informative strategies and how we can take back
14:19
Speaker 5: our freedoms from unelected globalist agendas and their accomplices nationally,
14:25
Speaker 5: and we'll move on from there. This was shown this
14:29
Speaker 5: past Monday on UK column somemmat of the Future and
14:32
Speaker 5: as it indicates, the action days the startup stuff starts
14:36
Speaker 5: as of today. The whole thing runs through September twenty third,
14:39
Speaker 5: counting the Summit itself will move on. And this is
14:44
Speaker 5: the other plank. The One Health World Congress, as noted,
14:48
Speaker 5: starts today Cape Town, South Africa, and it includes of
14:51
Speaker 5: course the WHO, the UN Environmental Program and two other
14:55
Speaker 5: UN related entities, and so everything is really kicking off.
15:00
Speaker 5: But one thing I've learned as I covered this was
15:03
Speaker 5: they seem to be falling behind a bit on achieving
15:06
Speaker 5: the sustainable development goals and some other matters. The One
15:10
Speaker 5: Health Congress starting today in South Africa. I could get
15:14
Speaker 5: into a lot of it. This is just shown that people,
15:17
Speaker 5: so people can look it up later to read more details.
15:22
Speaker 5: But anyway, the bottom part says that this bills on
15:25
Speaker 5: the success of the seventh World One Health Congress that
15:29
Speaker 5: was held back in twenty twenty two in Singapore, and
15:32
Speaker 5: therefore this year's event will bring together one health stakeholders
15:36
Speaker 5: ranging from science researchers, policymakers, representatives of international institutions, civil society, etc.
15:43
Speaker 5: From the private sector around the world. And one of
15:46
Speaker 5: the things left out of this, of course is the
15:48
Speaker 5: general public. And the presenters at the Children's Health Defense
15:52
Speaker 5: program took issue with that, and we'll continue to describe
15:56
Speaker 5: what went down at that program. Sibello to hear, he
16:00
Speaker 5: had a lot to say. He's a lawyer and advocate
16:03
Speaker 5: of the High Court of South Africa and he notably
16:06
Speaker 5: has worked with the UN's Indigenous People's Council. The photos
16:10
Speaker 5: from this event are all original screenshots by me. He
16:14
Speaker 5: addressed the Declaration on Future Generations, which is an offshoot
16:19
Speaker 5: of the Summit of the Future that I mentioned as
16:21
Speaker 5: this slide shows, and this is the most recent version
16:26
Speaker 5: of the Declaration on Future Generations, and these first three planks,
16:30
Speaker 5: Brian kind of laid the groundwork for what this is
16:33
Speaker 5: all about. And I put the link with this and
16:35
Speaker 5: that'll be in the show notes, so people can read
16:38
Speaker 5: the whole thing if they want to. But these first
16:40
Speaker 5: three planks are very fundamental. We the heads of State
16:43
Speaker 5: and Government and high representatives having met at the Summit
16:47
Speaker 5: of the Future at the UN Headquarters on twenty two
16:52
Speaker 5: and twenty three September twenty twenty four, that's coming up.
16:54
Speaker 5: Of course, they're looking ahead, reaffirming our commitments to the
16:58
Speaker 5: purposes and principles of the Charter of the UN, the
17:01
Speaker 5: Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as our respective
17:05
Speaker 5: obligations they say, under international law, and also reaffirming our
17:10
Speaker 5: commitments to the twenty thirty Agenda for Sustainable Development, including
17:14
Speaker 5: the twenty twenty three SDG Summit Political Declaration, and our
17:19
Speaker 5: pledge to Future Generations as set out inter elia in
17:23
Speaker 5: the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. So the mention
17:28
Speaker 5: there Brian, of the Charter of the UN and the
17:31
Speaker 5: other entity the other UN documents. One thing that needs
17:35
Speaker 5: to be mentioned really clearly is those documents have always
17:38
Speaker 5: regarded human rights as being revocable. They're conditional. They're just
17:43
Speaker 5: privileges that are doled out from the state to the
17:46
Speaker 5: people that can be revoked at any time. That's inherent
17:49
Speaker 5: in the language of the Charter of the UN and
17:52
Speaker 5: other documents and other UN protocols. Anyway, in terms of
17:58
Speaker 5: the the Sustainable Development Political Declaration, this is from a
18:04
Speaker 5: UN press conference or excuse me, press release, and this
18:08
Speaker 5: SDG Summit Political Declaration going back to twenty twenty three.
18:13
Speaker 5: It gets into a lot of things. It says here
18:16
Speaker 5: the adoption of the ten page document by the heads
18:19
Speaker 5: of state and government and high representatives gathered at the
18:23
Speaker 5: UN in New York back in twenty twenty three in
18:25
Speaker 5: September of that year. That came at a critical juncture
18:28
Speaker 5: as global crises, including armed conflict, adverse climate impacts, and
18:33
Speaker 5: the lingering effects of the COVID nineteen pandemic threaten the
18:37
Speaker 5: achievement get that threatened the achievement of the Sustainable Development
18:40
Speaker 5: Goals by twenty thirty, and the Secretary General Antonio Guterres
18:45
Speaker 5: went on to say this brand the Sustainable Development Goals
18:49
Speaker 5: need a global Rescue Plan, and he also noted that
18:54
Speaker 5: the Sustainable Development goals are at their halfway point to
18:57
Speaker 5: their deadline, so there's some indication, as I mentioned earlier,
19:01
Speaker 5: that this is falling behind once again because it used
19:03
Speaker 5: to be called Agenda twenty twenty one something like that,
19:08
Speaker 5: so they've had to move the goalpost several times now.
19:12
Speaker 5: The Rio Declaration that I mentioned just moments ago goes
19:16
Speaker 5: all the way back to nineteen ninety two, as this
19:18
Speaker 5: slide shows, and that was known as the Earth Summit,
19:23
Speaker 5: and we mentioned that with regards to Steven Rockefeller recently
19:26
Speaker 5: on the column. And moving on from there, we have
19:31
Speaker 5: a little bit more from Sabelo Sabanda, and he noted
19:36
Speaker 5: there are agencies run by people, he said this during
19:39
Speaker 5: these Children's Health Defense program this past Wednesday, there are
19:43
Speaker 5: agencies run by people who have not been voted in
19:46
Speaker 5: by any one of us. And as he said that,
19:50
Speaker 5: he focused on Preamble eleven of the document I mentioned
19:55
Speaker 5: a few minutes ago, the Declaration of the Future. Preamble
20:00
Speaker 5: eleven talks about to build a stronger, more effective and
20:05
Speaker 5: resilient multilateral system with the United Nations at its core,
20:10
Speaker 5: and Sabello took issue with this showing or believing and
20:14
Speaker 5: explaining that is that he sees a lot of un
20:17
Speaker 5: consolidation of power in the works, and he believes that
20:21
Speaker 5: plank of that declaration proves that. He went on to say,
20:26
Speaker 5: though in a more reassuring tone, that the people are
20:30
Speaker 5: not well aware of how they've been empowered by their
20:34
Speaker 5: constitutions and their laws. So the US Constitution, other constitutions
20:39
Speaker 5: of other countries, He's saying, the laws of other countries
20:42
Speaker 5: do provide some shield, some protection, but the people need
20:46
Speaker 5: to become more knowledgeable of how that works and what
20:49
Speaker 5: it consists of, and they need to work harder to
20:51
Speaker 5: become more informed about what the UN and the WHR
20:55
Speaker 5: are doing to consolidate their power to try and achieve
20:58
Speaker 5: these SDGs by twenty thirty, even though they may be
21:01
Speaker 5: falling behind. So the other speaker I covered doctor A
21:05
Speaker 5: Stried Stupelberger. She also has some UN affiliation high level
21:10
Speaker 5: international expert for United Nations agencies, bilateral institutions and for
21:15
Speaker 5: the European Commission. She's an interdisciplinary scientist at the University
21:19
Speaker 5: of Geneva and Lussan and Switzerland. And she asked the
21:23
Speaker 5: question what's wrong with the pack to the future. Her
21:27
Speaker 5: answer to that question was it'll transform global governance and
21:30
Speaker 5: turbocharge the UN sustainable development goals for a common digital future.
21:36
Speaker 5: And she said, yes, it's normal to have an annual
21:38
Speaker 5: September UN meeting, though she disagrees with the procedure and
21:41
Speaker 5: the content and the media, of course is a mouthpiece
21:45
Speaker 5: for the UN's One World Governance and one World Health
21:48
Speaker 5: quote end quote. But what's not normal is that the
21:52
Speaker 5: loop of discussion is closed tighter than ever before, and
21:55
Speaker 5: she said the UN is quote violating its own instruments
21:59
Speaker 5: end quote. We have not given consent. I repeat, we
22:02
Speaker 5: have not given consent to transfer power of our governments
22:06
Speaker 5: to the UN, nor for our governments to decide or
22:10
Speaker 5: to make their decisions at the UN. And she added
22:13
Speaker 5: there's a high tech drive that the people have not
22:15
Speaker 5: accepted or consented to in high technology, including AI, and
22:19
Speaker 5: the people need to be enabled, she said, to opt
22:23
Speaker 5: out of this planned digital world. So those were the
22:27
Speaker 5: most salient points I believe, Brian, of this past Wednesday's program,
22:31
Speaker 5: and it comes at a very timely moment to counter
22:34
Speaker 5: with the UN and who are doing today right as
22:38
Speaker 5: these summits kick off and so with that, I believe
22:42
Speaker 5: I have a couple of short announcements.
22:44
Speaker 1: Mark, I just wanted to say that what wonderful observations
22:48
Speaker 1: Boyce Abello Sabanda that he's pointing out that people need
22:53
Speaker 1: to wake up and understand the protections of their own
22:57
Speaker 1: constitution and constitutional structure. This is very, very important. And
23:03
Speaker 1: I believe you've just got a little extra segment here
23:05
Speaker 1: on smart cities.
23:08
Speaker 5: Yeah, there's an AV program coming up next month. I
23:11
Speaker 5: believe it's on October tenth, where I'll be doing another
23:14
Speaker 5: presentation on smart cities and global cities. But we don't
23:17
Speaker 5: want to let these people rest for one second. We
23:20
Speaker 5: want to keep a very close eye on them, very
23:21
Speaker 5: well ahead of time. So the Global Parliament of Mayors
23:25
Speaker 5: and the Smart City Expo World Congress are teaming up
23:28
Speaker 5: November five through seven in Barcelona. This slide is from
23:32
Speaker 5: the Global Parliament of Mayors and the next slide is
23:35
Speaker 5: from the Smart City Expo World Congress itself, the event
23:40
Speaker 5: for Better Cities they claim again November five through seven
23:43
Speaker 5: in Barcelona, Spain. And this will be included in my
23:46
Speaker 5: AV program and when it actually comes up and happens,
23:49
Speaker 5: I'll be covering that as well, Brian, So back to you.
23:52
Speaker 1: Okay, well, thank you very much for that analysis. Very good, Debbie.
23:58
Speaker 1: Let's bring you in because of course nature has become
24:02
Speaker 1: such an interesting word. Should we trust Lammy when he's
24:07
Speaker 1: talking about the word nature?
24:10
Speaker 6: Oh well, good afternoon everyone, and yet well spotted Brian.
24:13
Speaker 6: It's the word nature because everyone's focusing on the word climate.
24:17
Speaker 6: And where are all our politicians. They've only just come
24:20
Speaker 6: back from summer holidays and now they're all at the conferences,
24:22
Speaker 6: which is where David Lammy. I'm presuming he's going to
24:26
Speaker 6: be as well. But it doesn't mean to say there's
24:28
Speaker 6: nothing happening. And back on the thirtieth of August, we
24:32
Speaker 6: reported on the news about tradeable energy quotas, which really
24:36
Speaker 6: means carbon rationing. But how are they going to introduce
24:40
Speaker 6: this carbon rationing to us?
24:41
Speaker 2: All?
24:42
Speaker 6: Well, I want to introduce you to alex Sobell. He's
24:45
Speaker 6: a labor MP for Leeds Central and Headingly. He's married
24:49
Speaker 6: with two kids and his background is social enterprise.
24:52
Speaker 7: He's set up.
24:53
Speaker 6: The net zero or Parliamentary Group to help secure low
24:56
Speaker 6: carbon and he was Shadow Minister for Nature Recovery. There's
25:01
Speaker 6: that word again. Nature recovery. But he's gone on to
25:04
Speaker 6: do great things. He's not actually in the government at
25:06
Speaker 6: the moment, which is interesting. However, he's gone on to
25:09
Speaker 6: do great things. And here he is being awarded with
25:12
Speaker 6: the prestigious Nature two thirty award. There he is pictured
25:16
Speaker 6: with none other than Chris Packham. But let's listen to
25:19
Speaker 6: him putting a question to the Leveling Up Secretary only
25:23
Speaker 6: recently in April. Now he speaks quite quickly and he's
25:26
Speaker 6: quite passionate, but he's talking about zero carbon homes.
25:30
Speaker 7: Have a listen, today's a birthday.
25:33
Speaker 8: The government shoots a zero carbon homestand and then scrapped it,
25:36
Speaker 8: the cod sable homes and then scrapped it. We now
25:39
Speaker 8: have a few home centerfized support. But local authorities such
25:42
Speaker 8: as leads, want to go above in planning policy to
25:44
Speaker 8: higher standards. Why will the sexual state not allow leads
25:48
Speaker 8: to build even better zero carbon homes?
25:56
Speaker 7: Hmmm, better zero carbon homes.
25:58
Speaker 6: Well, shortly after that he brought up the Climate and
26:01
Speaker 6: Nature Bill, which is a private member's bill. Now this
26:04
Speaker 6: was only brought out on in May this year. Now,
26:07
Speaker 6: who's heard of the Climate Nature Bill? Because I'll explain
26:11
Speaker 6: why you haven't heard about it in a minute, but
26:13
Speaker 6: when we look further into it, let's look at the
26:15
Speaker 6: passage of the bill. So currently at the moment it's
26:18
Speaker 6: only in the first stage. However, if we look further
26:21
Speaker 6: into the bill, we can see that what the aim
26:24
Speaker 6: of the bill is to do is to get the
26:27
Speaker 6: UK to achieve.
26:28
Speaker 7: Climate and nature. There's that word again.
26:30
Speaker 6: Nature targets to give the Secretary of State a duty
26:34
Speaker 6: to implement a strategy to achieve this target. So what
26:40
Speaker 6: is this duty of the Secretary of State. So the
26:43
Speaker 6: duty of the Secretary of State basically is, within twelve
26:45
Speaker 6: months of passing of this act, they have to lay
26:48
Speaker 6: before Parliament a strategy to limit the UK carbon dioxide emissions. Well,
26:53
Speaker 6: I guess that probably includes us, as we're humans and
26:56
Speaker 6: we emit carbon dioxide, and we're also going to be
26:59
Speaker 6: ending the extraction of exploration and fossil fuels as rapidly
27:04
Speaker 6: as possible to minimize damage to ecosystems. But the bill
27:08
Speaker 6: goes on to say that we should prioritize avoidance the
27:13
Speaker 6: loss of nature. We have to adhere to mitigation and
27:17
Speaker 6: conservation hierarchy. Now I'm not quite sure who those are
27:21
Speaker 6: in the hierarchy, although I think we might come on
27:23
Speaker 6: to find out. But the strategy must not have a
27:27
Speaker 6: negative impact on poorer communities or deprived communities or young people.
27:32
Speaker 6: But they do note here that financially they are going
27:36
Speaker 6: to need to support those whose livelihoods will be affected.
27:39
Speaker 6: So could we be looking at the introduction of universal
27:41
Speaker 6: basic income, I wonder as a form of compensation. So
27:45
Speaker 6: how do the public get involved? Because this is really important.
27:47
Speaker 7: Isn't it?
27:48
Speaker 6: How the public gets involved? Well, within three months of
27:51
Speaker 6: the passing of this act, apparently they're going to set
27:54
Speaker 6: up a Climate and Nature Assembly where they're going to
27:57
Speaker 6: sample the UK population. Now, is assembly is going to
28:01
Speaker 6: be considering expert advice. We'll come on to that later
28:04
Speaker 6: in the news and see what expert advice they're going
28:07
Speaker 6: to be given. But they're going to need to have
28:09
Speaker 6: a majority of sixty six percent. Interesting statistic there, sixty
28:13
Speaker 6: six percent a majority to rule on what's going to
28:16
Speaker 6: be included in the strategy for the rest of us
28:19
Speaker 6: and who does it cover? Will it covers all of us?
28:21
Speaker 6: The UK, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the whole country. And
28:27
Speaker 6: here's the bill itself. We've got Yeah, there you go.
28:30
Speaker 6: It's covering all of us, so every single person in
28:33
Speaker 6: the UK watching it's applicable to us. Here's the bill,
28:36
Speaker 6: which was introduced on the twenty first of the third
28:39
Speaker 6: twenty four by Alex Sobel, who you've just seen. And
28:42
Speaker 6: then you've got another few familiar names, Ed Davey, Catherine Lucas,
28:48
Speaker 6: the normal the normal bunch that you would think would
28:51
Speaker 6: be involved in a green agenda.
28:53
Speaker 7: But who are zero Hour?
28:55
Speaker 6: Because this Climate and Nature Bill has been abbreviated to
28:59
Speaker 6: the can Bill CAN. Why do we need the CAN Bill?
29:04
Speaker 6: Why is this so important? Well I can tell you
29:07
Speaker 6: why because in the next slide we're going to show
29:10
Speaker 6: you that the government's actually been very deceptive and duplicitous,
29:13
Speaker 6: I believe, because this was formerly known as the Climate
29:17
Speaker 6: and Ecology Bill, but almost by stealth, they've now called
29:22
Speaker 6: it the Climate and Nature Bill. And they note that
29:24
Speaker 6: this is the only proposed legislation before the United Kingdom
29:28
Speaker 6: Parliament that ensures a comprehensive, joined up approach to emergencies.
29:34
Speaker 6: So who have they got, Well, they've got one hundred
29:36
Speaker 6: and seventy mp supporting them, they've got sixty three peers
29:39
Speaker 6: supporting them. They've got the largest cross party environmental group
29:44
Speaker 6: in Parliament. Not just that, they've got a load of
29:46
Speaker 6: scientists backing them as well. And here you can see
29:49
Speaker 6: one thousand plus scientists are calling on MPs to prioritize
29:54
Speaker 6: the CAN Bill and you'll see a picture of them
29:57
Speaker 6: outside Parliament, all all very much pro this CAN bill
30:03
Speaker 6: because they want to fast track it or super turbo
30:07
Speaker 6: charge it. So how can you be involved in accelerating CAN.
30:13
Speaker 7: Have a look at the studio from zero hour.
30:18
Speaker 9: We can prevent catastrophe by shifting to a zero carbon
30:21
Speaker 9: economy in a way that protects jobs and upgrades our democracy.
30:28
Speaker 9: That's where the bill comes in. It's been written with
30:31
Speaker 9: help from top scientists. Now we need Parliament to make
30:35
Speaker 9: it law and for that it needs the support of
30:38
Speaker 9: a majority of MPs. The bill will protect and restore forests,
30:43
Speaker 9: soils and ecosystems. It will require the government to rapidly
30:49
Speaker 9: reduce our entire carbon footprint. This means taking responsibility for
30:54
Speaker 9: emissions from imports and dealing with the environmental damage caused
30:59
Speaker 9: by our supply.
31:03
Speaker 6: So there you have it, Zerra. There's a longer video online.
31:05
Speaker 6: Please go and look at it because they're a very
31:07
Speaker 6: active group. But if you want regular updates and you
31:09
Speaker 6: want to find out more, then go no further than
31:12
Speaker 6: looking at Grassroots check In, where they meet every Tuesday
31:15
Speaker 6: to give you an update.
31:16
Speaker 7: I'm sure you'll all be flocking.
31:18
Speaker 1: There, Debbie, thank you very much for that. Well, once
31:22
Speaker 1: you know where to look for the political agenda, it's
31:25
Speaker 1: easy to see. And this is what we need to
31:27
Speaker 1: be saying to our audience. Once you see it, spread
31:30
Speaker 1: the word, warn other people, and get digging because of
31:34
Speaker 1: course information you find can be extremely helpful to us
31:38
Speaker 1: and we can help promote that. Now, I just want
31:41
Speaker 1: to say that we would like people to spend a
31:45
Speaker 1: little bit more time on the website. There's a huge
31:47
Speaker 1: amount of material on the website. Mike has produced this
31:51
Speaker 1: little interactive to say. Of course, on the website itself
31:54
Speaker 1: you can see other channels such as X that we're
31:58
Speaker 1: now working on. There's a lot of information in the website.
32:03
Speaker 1: If you want to support us, click and there. But
32:07
Speaker 1: also we're selecting information which we think is important, sometimes
32:13
Speaker 1: very old articles which are now very relevant or highly
32:16
Speaker 1: relevant in today's political world, under editor's choice. So you
32:21
Speaker 1: can have a look there. We've also got a comment section,
32:25
Speaker 1: and of course where a particular interviews taking place, we're
32:30
Speaker 1: also enabling people to share it and make comments. So
32:34
Speaker 1: this is all very important to actually get information out
32:39
Speaker 1: and to help people stay interested in the material. So
32:42
Speaker 1: if you used to watching us on another channel and
32:45
Speaker 1: you just watch the news, we'd encourage you to go
32:48
Speaker 1: to the website and have a look. And of course
32:50
Speaker 1: the other key thing is if you do go to
32:52
Speaker 1: the website, you can choose to make a donation or
32:57
Speaker 1: to actually join us as a full time member five
33:01
Speaker 1: pounds a month or fifty pounds a year or five
33:04
Speaker 1: hundred pounds for a UK Column lifetime membership. And if
33:09
Speaker 1: you do this is so important because of course this
33:12
Speaker 1: actually keeps us operating and we want to grow and
33:16
Speaker 1: expand what we're doing. Class it gives us some reserves
33:19
Speaker 1: if we're challenged in the future. We're also highlighting the
33:23
Speaker 1: shop here so you can support us by making purchase
33:27
Speaker 1: or indeed you can make a health purchase via Clyde
33:30
Speaker 1: de Carl, who we've been supporting. Now we've got an
33:34
Speaker 1: interview coming up tomorrow which I think is one of yours, Debbie.
33:38
Speaker 1: If you can give us a little bit more on
33:40
Speaker 1: this one, Kelly.
33:42
Speaker 6: I think nice have lost today there, Brian, because that
33:45
Speaker 6: was shown yesterday. It's Friday to day, the weekend is
33:49
Speaker 6: upon us. Yet this is the wonderful Dr Robin Kelly.
33:52
Speaker 6: He is actually a member of UK column. He's in
33:55
Speaker 6: New Zealand, trained.
33:56
Speaker 7: In the UK.
33:57
Speaker 6: He's how everybody wants a GEP to be. Seriously, if
34:01
Speaker 6: you don't trust GPS or you don't trust doctors, you're
34:04
Speaker 6: going to trust this one the presence Doctor Robin Kelly.
34:07
Speaker 7: Please watch.
34:07
Speaker 6: It is very uplifting.
34:09
Speaker 1: Okay, thank you for picking me up on that. Of course,
34:12
Speaker 1: is because I'm not normally doing a Friday, so my
34:15
Speaker 1: head's usually in a mon A Monday mode. But that's fine. Now.
34:19
Speaker 1: We also just wanted to put out an add here
34:21
Speaker 1: for an interview with Ben Rubin and Diane Rasmus and mcaddy.
34:27
Speaker 1: That's going to be twelve o'clock UK time this coming
34:31
Speaker 1: Saturday tomorrow even and that'll be on Pattern eighteen substat
34:36
Speaker 1: dot com, which is Ben Rubin's own channel, so you
34:39
Speaker 1: might like to have a look at that. Now, let's
34:42
Speaker 1: go on to the subjects of extreme democracy. Not my words,
34:45
Speaker 1: as we shall see, but important here that this really
34:50
Speaker 1: demonstrates that small things by our viewers and supporters can
34:54
Speaker 1: have a big difference. So I was sent a letter
34:57
Speaker 1: which one of our viewers had received from the allent
35:00
Speaker 1: During Institute. If we expand this, it said, you could
35:04
Speaker 1: be one of thirty two people selected to take part
35:07
Speaker 1: in a citizens panel on the subject of data and
35:11
Speaker 1: national security. And this panel will answer the important question
35:16
Speaker 1: new technologies could change how national security agencies use people's data?
35:21
Speaker 1: What impact does this have on public attitudes, trust and
35:25
Speaker 1: expectations around how their data is used? And the panel
35:29
Speaker 1: has been commissioned by the Center for Emerging Technology and
35:32
Speaker 1: Security and is a research center center based at the
35:36
Speaker 1: Allen During Institute, the UK's National Institute for Data Science
35:41
Speaker 1: and note artificial intelligence. Well, if we read a little
35:45
Speaker 1: bit more here, we're exploring this question now because new
35:49
Speaker 1: technology excuse me, new technologies could change how national security
35:54
Speaker 1: agencies use people's data. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have
36:00
Speaker 1: investigatory powers which are used to protect people across the
36:03
Speaker 1: UK from a range of threats. This means they can
36:06
Speaker 1: use data in ways other government departments cannot, often by
36:11
Speaker 1: gathering people's information about their knowledge. It's important that this
36:15
Speaker 1: is balanced with respect for human rights, including the right
36:19
Speaker 1: to privacy. So this all sounds wonderful. This is another
36:23
Speaker 1: part of the document. If we just put that one
36:25
Speaker 1: back on screen. This is frequently asked questions and it
36:30
Speaker 1: says that the panel follow and established a democratic process
36:34
Speaker 1: used all over the world. Well that's a very interesting
36:37
Speaker 1: statement because we're going to be digging into that a
36:40
Speaker 1: lot deeper. It brings together a group of people selected
36:44
Speaker 1: by lottery who broadly represent the entire community. I'm not
36:49
Speaker 1: feeling encouraged by this so far. It then goes on
36:52
Speaker 1: to talk about the Alan Turing Institute and the Center
36:55
Speaker 1: for Emerging Technology again, but it also brings in an
36:59
Speaker 1: organization called Hopskin. Hopkins van mill is a specialist social
37:04
Speaker 1: research agencies. And finally here the Sautician Foundation and not
37:11
Speaker 1: for profit organization that specializes in recruiting for these kinds
37:16
Speaker 1: of events. And of course Bent Ruben has been talking
37:19
Speaker 1: about this, but that was brilliant information from one of
37:23
Speaker 1: our viewers. At the same time, in a conversation with Debbie,
37:27
Speaker 1: she mentioned this document. It's from Climate Assembly UK the
37:33
Speaker 1: Path to Net Zero. Let's pop on a little bit
37:36
Speaker 1: of extra information on screen, and what it's doing is
37:39
Speaker 1: talking about random stratified sampling done by computer, and it
37:45
Speaker 1: says once the deadline for responses had passed, the sortitionan
37:50
Speaker 1: foundation used random stratified sampling by computer to generate a
37:57
Speaker 1: list of one hundred and ten people to become assembly members.
38:02
Speaker 1: The computer selected no more than one person from any
38:06
Speaker 1: single household. And in blue there's a comment supposedly by
38:10
Speaker 1: a member of the public who said they feel very,
38:13
Speaker 1: very privileged to take part in this, But of course
38:17
Speaker 1: what you can see is unaccountable people selecting individuals using
38:23
Speaker 1: their algorithms and calling this democracy. So if we just
38:29
Speaker 1: move on a little bit. When I look at documents,
38:32
Speaker 1: I always go and look at the small print and
38:35
Speaker 1: buried away in footnotes. Here was a particular gentleman. His
38:39
Speaker 1: name is Ariel Procacia, and he's been working on this
38:45
Speaker 1: sort of material with his team at Harvard University and
38:49
Speaker 1: the Carnegie Mellon University. Let's have a little listen to
38:53
Speaker 1: this or watch this video clip to see what he's
38:57
Speaker 1: talking about.
39:00
Speaker 4: So that the topic of the talk is extreme democracy.
39:03
Speaker 4: And I want to start with a quote from Kim
39:05
Speaker 4: and Cin issues an Argentinian kind of politician, a new
39:08
Speaker 4: kind of politician. She gave a very popular TED talk
39:12
Speaker 4: a couple of years ago, and in this talk she
39:15
Speaker 4: quoted Marshall McLuhan was the Canadian professor as saying that
39:20
Speaker 4: politics is solving today's problems with yesterday's tools. And the
39:24
Speaker 4: point I want to make is kind of similar, which
39:26
Speaker 4: is that, you know, the world has really changed in
39:29
Speaker 4: the last decades with modern technology, but the way we
39:32
Speaker 4: do democracy hasn't really fundamentally changed for centuries. So it
39:37
Speaker 4: seems like really a good time to rethink how we
39:41
Speaker 4: do democracy, in particular the you know, the theme of
39:45
Speaker 4: the talk is that computer science has a lot to
39:47
Speaker 4: contribute to this discussion. So I want to argue that,
39:50
Speaker 4: you know, we should be thinking both about how we
39:52
Speaker 4: do democracy, the practice of democracy, and also the ways
39:56
Speaker 4: in which democracy can be applied. So trying to incre
40:00
Speaker 4: the reach of democracy by thinking about new applications domain
40:04
Speaker 4: through you could call it democratic thinking and computational thinking.
40:08
Speaker 4: So I'm going to illustrate this theme through three projects
40:11
Speaker 4: that we've worked on recently. One is in the space
40:14
Speaker 4: of liquid democracy, which is a paradigm that allows voters
40:18
Speaker 4: to delegate their votes, and these delegations are transitive. The
40:22
Speaker 4: second is going to be participatory budgeting, which is the
40:25
Speaker 4: idea that the city can allocate its budget by eliciting
40:29
Speaker 4: preferences from its residents and aggregating them to get a budget.
40:34
Speaker 4: The third part I call it the virtual democracy. It's
40:36
Speaker 4: a term that I came up with for the purposes
40:38
Speaker 4: of this stock. But the idea is that we'll have
40:40
Speaker 4: will make decisions by having a virtual election among machine
40:45
Speaker 4: learning models, the free voters, and I'll show you how
40:48
Speaker 4: we want to use this approach in order to make
40:50
Speaker 4: ethical decisions in AI. So this is where liquid democracy
40:56
Speaker 4: comes in. I could say that it's a part of
40:58
Speaker 4: them that lies between direct democracy and representative democracy. And
41:03
Speaker 4: the idea is that as a voter, I can either
41:05
Speaker 4: vote myself directly, or if I feel that I don't
41:08
Speaker 4: have the time, that I don't have the information, I
41:10
Speaker 4: can choose to delegate my vote to another voter. And
41:14
Speaker 4: like I said before, delegations are transitive in the sense
41:17
Speaker 4: that if A delegates to B and B delegates to C,
41:20
Speaker 4: C would be able to vote on behalf of both
41:22
Speaker 4: A and B.
41:26
Speaker 1: So not to worry extreme democracy. Liquid democracy. These people
41:31
Speaker 1: have created it they are completely unaccountable. Their computer algorithms
41:36
Speaker 1: are completely unaccountable. But trust them, they're going to be
41:40
Speaker 1: selecting us to give them the decision that they wanted
41:44
Speaker 1: in the first place. Debbie, let's bring you back again,
41:47
Speaker 1: because you've been really looking at these citizens assemblies and
41:51
Speaker 1: the dangers, and of course this type of liquid democracy
41:55
Speaker 1: relies very much on this practice.
41:59
Speaker 6: I have indeed, and it's going to be a case
42:01
Speaker 6: of careful what you wish for, because how many of
42:03
Speaker 6: us are ever going to trust a politician again? So
42:06
Speaker 6: what better way than to get the citizens to we'll
42:12
Speaker 6: set the rules. How about we set the rules? Have
42:15
Speaker 6: a look at this video.
42:18
Speaker 10: I'm here to say to you, hand on heart that
42:21
Speaker 10: I did not lie to the House when those statements
42:24
Speaker 10: were made. They were made in good faith and on
42:26
Speaker 10: the basis of what I honestly knew and believed at
42:30
Speaker 10: the time.
43:45
Speaker 6: So who is it going to be that it's going
43:47
Speaker 6: to be making the new rules? So I go always
43:49
Speaker 6: go straight to the UK column website to.
43:52
Speaker 7: Research, and I found on the website a.
43:55
Speaker 6: Reference to a wonderful Ian Davis blog actually called sorting Sortician.
44:02
Speaker 6: This is if you're not a member of the UK column.
44:05
Speaker 6: You find absolute duels in the forums.
44:07
Speaker 7: I really would.
44:08
Speaker 6: Recommend that you join up and have a look. But
44:11
Speaker 6: if we go further into Ian's article, we can see
44:14
Speaker 6: that this is a select by lot. This is a
44:18
Speaker 6: random selection to populate assemblies or to fill political positions,
44:24
Speaker 6: to to deliberate on issues and to deliver collective judgments.
44:29
Speaker 6: So this is what Sortition actually means. And he talks
44:32
Speaker 6: about the Sortition Foundation as being a transatlantic organization with
44:36
Speaker 6: its offices conveniently in Cambridge and Portland. But back in
44:41
Speaker 6: two nineteen the BBC were actually reporting on this and
44:45
Speaker 6: on about how thirty thousand households had suddenly received a
44:48
Speaker 6: letter inviting them to join a citizen's assembly. World did
44:52
Speaker 6: you get a letter? And what can the public do
44:54
Speaker 6: to cut carbon emissions? So did you get a letter?
44:59
Speaker 6: Well this is litle bit of video. Obviously some people
45:02
Speaker 6: did have a look.
45:04
Speaker 11: You could be one of other one hundred of people
45:06
Speaker 11: selected to take part in the.
45:08
Speaker 2: UK wide Citizens Assembly on.
45:10
Speaker 10: How the UK tackled climate change.
45:14
Speaker 6: So this weekend is going to be about introducing you
45:16
Speaker 6: to climate change in a thorough way.
45:18
Speaker 11: It was really exciting to be told I was selected.
45:20
Speaker 11: It just seemed like a very rare opportunity.
45:23
Speaker 6: Initially, I wasn't sure what it would be like. I
45:26
Speaker 6: hadn't done anything.
45:27
Speaker 7: Like that before.
45:28
Speaker 5: Perfect I didn't have a clue what zero carbon was.
45:34
Speaker 6: I didn't know enough about climate change.
45:37
Speaker 7: I was open to information.
45:40
Speaker 2: There were so many different perspectives and opinions, so many
45:45
Speaker 2: people of different ethnicity, different ages.
45:50
Speaker 1: It was so nice to see, you know, the representation
45:54
Speaker 1: of the UK.
45:55
Speaker 2: The fact that you've given up Colin to come here
45:58
Speaker 2: and take this seriously is of the greatest important.
46:02
Speaker 11: It felt like the community kind of working together towards
46:05
Speaker 11: a problem that the whole world needs to face.
46:07
Speaker 7: To be fair, obviously, at the moment we're all on lockdown.
46:11
Speaker 7: Moving on to three internet weekends was quite good. We
46:14
Speaker 7: were still investigating things.
46:16
Speaker 2: On our own.
46:17
Speaker 9: I'm not seeing what experts now, but.
46:19
Speaker 2: We all have opinions.
46:20
Speaker 7: Everybody's tyson of this creamer air.
46:22
Speaker 6: Surely most people would want that for their children and
46:25
Speaker 6: their grandchildren.
46:26
Speaker 3: Well, if we treat climate change the same way we're
46:28
Speaker 3: treating coronavirus, then we can't do it.
46:31
Speaker 9: We all want the government to take heed of our recommendations.
46:36
Speaker 10: They need to act on it.
46:37
Speaker 2: But also to act on it fast, so it's.
46:40
Speaker 1: Not about saying okay, we just keep deliberating over it
46:43
Speaker 1: over the next one year two years.
46:45
Speaker 11: They are by law bound to try to get to
46:47
Speaker 11: this target.
46:48
Speaker 7: It's quite to be done in a fear and positive way.
46:51
Speaker 11: So if we don't act now, we're just going to
46:53
Speaker 11: run out of time and there won't be a few
46:55
Speaker 11: toure for any books.
46:56
Speaker 2: And if we can show that we can do it,
46:58
Speaker 2: then perhaps will follow.
47:01
Speaker 7: I think somebody has to be a leader.
47:06
Speaker 6: So we have actually got another piece of video and
47:08
Speaker 6: I think we'll hold on to that for extra because
47:11
Speaker 6: there is so much on this, because I want to
47:14
Speaker 6: go back to look at what Brian was looking at
47:16
Speaker 6: a minute ago, the path to net zero and this
47:20
Speaker 6: document here is a joint endeavor between Parliament and people
47:24
Speaker 6: is written by mel Stride and Darren Jones. But if
47:27
Speaker 6: we go further on into the report and have a look,
47:30
Speaker 6: we can see that they're looking at citizens becoming a
47:32
Speaker 6: crucial or having a crucial role to play. One hundred
47:36
Speaker 6: and eight Citizens were given the space to understand or
47:40
Speaker 6: discuss what actions the UK should take. So why is
47:45
Speaker 6: it important? Well, in the next slide it'll tell you
47:49
Speaker 6: that the Climate Assembly, the members are actually going to
47:52
Speaker 6: mirror the voice of the UK population, so that's you
47:55
Speaker 6: and me.
47:56
Speaker 7: And they've been.
47:57
Speaker 6: Busy organizing these weekends in Birmingham. So when you see
48:02
Speaker 6: what they say that the members say, I mean they
48:05
Speaker 6: think it's like they've won the lottery. I felt like
48:08
Speaker 6: I'd won the lottery when I got my letter. I'd
48:11
Speaker 6: be dafh not to do it. It's amazing to get
48:14
Speaker 6: the chance to have a stay and influence what may
48:16
Speaker 6: happen in the future. And I was in the Army
48:18
Speaker 6: for twenty two years, so I've not got a problem
48:21
Speaker 6: meeting new people. So this is why it's so important.
48:25
Speaker 6: But who are they selected from, because you know, Brian's
48:29
Speaker 6: talked about the Sortition Foundation. Ben has talked about Sortition
48:34
Speaker 6: as well, and this is being selected by the Sortition Foundation.
48:39
Speaker 6: And here we've got a quote I think from date
48:41
Speaker 6: Sir David Attenborough because he's hugely supportive of this. So
48:46
Speaker 6: he's very grateful to the one hundred and ten. I
48:49
Speaker 6: think we must have lost two somewhere, but he's grateful
48:52
Speaker 6: to the one hundred and ten people who came from
48:54
Speaker 6: all corners of the world to be part of this.
48:59
Speaker 6: So let's look the stages that you have to go through.
49:01
Speaker 6: Did you if you've got your letter, you've got the letter,
49:04
Speaker 6: you've been randomly selected, you're really intrigued, and you've responded
49:08
Speaker 6: to it. Stage two means that you go through a
49:11
Speaker 6: computer random so a random stratified sampling done by the computer.
49:17
Speaker 6: And then in stage three, really it's well, you know,
49:20
Speaker 6: how would you like to travel and what dates are
49:23
Speaker 6: you available? So that's the liaison and final replacements. So
49:27
Speaker 6: let's look at the assembly makeup and look at the
49:31
Speaker 6: document because it's a very long document, but they'd say
49:34
Speaker 6: that they're taking people from all sides of the argument.
49:36
Speaker 6: There's a table there as well that if you go
49:39
Speaker 6: to the document you can see where the members have
49:42
Speaker 6: been made up from. And the weekend seem to be
49:44
Speaker 6: a really jolly affair because they've had three weekends. This
49:49
Speaker 6: has all been going on behind closed doors, folks. I mean,
49:52
Speaker 6: I didn't know these things were happening, but they obviously
49:55
Speaker 6: have been. They had three jolly weekends, but as you
49:58
Speaker 6: heard before, the fourth weekend was canceled because of lock up,
50:01
Speaker 6: so they had to do all of their work online.
50:05
Speaker 6: So there's loads of experts and facilitators that go to
50:08
Speaker 6: this conference. And please look to the document because there
50:10
Speaker 6: are so many. But I wanted to see who was
50:13
Speaker 6: involved from wider society. So who have they brought in? Well,
50:16
Speaker 6: we've got the Bishop of Salisbury, We've got the president
50:20
Speaker 6: of the National Farmers' Union, We've got the Secretary General
50:23
Speaker 6: for the Muslim Council, Martin Lewis from the Money Saving Forum,
50:28
Speaker 6: the Chief rabbis there, the Archbishop of Westminster's there, the RSPB,
50:32
Speaker 6: even the CEO of the NHS. So there's a whole
50:35
Speaker 6: bunch of very varied people. But which organizations are involved?
50:39
Speaker 6: So we've got three that are involved in cystens assemblies.
50:43
Speaker 6: We've got the Involved Foundation, and the Involved Foundation actually
50:47
Speaker 6: produced that piece of video. But should we trust politicians?
50:51
Speaker 6: They're a public participation charity and apparently they ensure that
50:55
Speaker 6: we get high quality citizens assembly. Well, I'm not quite
50:58
Speaker 6: sure how we do that if it's random select but hey,
51:00
Speaker 6: perhaps someone else will make a comment on that. And
51:04
Speaker 6: then we've got the Sautition Foundation, which is not for
51:06
Speaker 6: profit and uses randomly selected people. And then we've got
51:10
Speaker 6: My Society, which is a not for profit social enterprise.
51:14
Speaker 7: And they use data. They're very data driven.
51:17
Speaker 6: So I always like to go to see who's funded this,
51:19
Speaker 6: who's funded it? Well, it's been funded by the House
51:21
Speaker 6: of Commons, the ESME, Fairburn Foundation, the European Climate Foundation.
51:26
Speaker 6: This is such a big topic. I'm only skirting literally
51:30
Speaker 6: the top of it.
51:31
Speaker 7: And you'll see.
51:31
Speaker 6: Rachel Reeves name there. Hasn't she been busy And of
51:35
Speaker 6: course now she's not part of this.
51:36
Speaker 7: But she was so b Debbie.
51:40
Speaker 1: If I just come in very briefly, as you showed
51:43
Speaker 1: that weekend and the very influential people that are brought in,
51:48
Speaker 1: my mind was taken right back to the common purpose
51:52
Speaker 1: technique which I observed and exposed many years ago, when
51:58
Speaker 1: people were effectively being controlled by being introduced to people
52:02
Speaker 1: that they would take at their every word. So if
52:05
Speaker 1: the local chief of police spoke to a small group,
52:09
Speaker 1: people would believe what he or she said to the
52:11
Speaker 1: audience on policing. The chief executive from the local council, MPs,
52:18
Speaker 1: whoever it was, came in. Of course, the audience of
52:22
Speaker 1: ordinary men and women was highly influenced by the people
52:26
Speaker 1: brought in. So these, to my mind, are highly controlled interactions.
52:32
Speaker 1: Once the computer has selected the individuals.
52:36
Speaker 7: Absolutely one hundred percent.
52:37
Speaker 6: And perhaps in extra we can talk in a little
52:40
Speaker 6: bit more detail about these three organizations. We can talk
52:44
Speaker 6: about involved, we can talk about the Sortition Foundation, but
52:47
Speaker 6: perhaps we should end this segment really on how this
52:51
Speaker 6: is going to happen. And if we go right to
52:53
Speaker 6: the end of the segment, we can look at behavior change,
52:58
Speaker 6: because that's where this is all coming from, of course,
53:01
Speaker 6: is behavior change. And you'll see a slide with Professor
53:06
Speaker 6: Nick Cheater from Warwick Business School, and Professor Nick Chater
53:11
Speaker 6: is organizing this whole behavior the Climate Change Committee. You
53:17
Speaker 6: can see his picture there and if you go to
53:19
Speaker 6: the next slide, he says, and I quote, we the
53:23
Speaker 6: citizens see new rules as having wide support and adherence.
53:28
Speaker 6: The public have made decision a public have made decisions
53:32
Speaker 6: through citizens assemblies and haven't been imposed directly by government.
53:39
Speaker 6: So there's so much more to come on this. But
53:42
Speaker 6: basically we're looking at two tier citizenship. Because have you
53:45
Speaker 6: got a letter?
53:46
Speaker 7: I haven't.
53:48
Speaker 1: It's pretty incredible, Debbie, isn't it. It's giving the illusion
53:52
Speaker 1: that people are actually fully involved in democracy, but the
53:57
Speaker 1: reality is that they are being controlled. And I note
54:00
Speaker 1: that in our chat box. One of our audience today
54:05
Speaker 1: started to talk about the Delphi technique, and I think
54:08
Speaker 1: that member of the public, whoever you are, was absolutely
54:12
Speaker 1: on the money, because the Delphi technique is the means
54:15
Speaker 1: by which the public is controlled in a room to
54:19
Speaker 1: produce the outcome that the organizers of the event want
54:23
Speaker 1: in the first place. Mark, let's bring you in. You're
54:28
Speaker 1: on the subject of unexpected deaths here, But of course
54:33
Speaker 1: all of that has also happened as a result of
54:36
Speaker 1: the COVID lockdown policy, which was introduced with a lot
54:40
Speaker 1: of psychological manipulation of the population. So really, you're showing
54:45
Speaker 1: us how dangerous these sorts of policies are when people
54:50
Speaker 1: take them at face value and don't understand what's actually
54:54
Speaker 1: being done, so therefore they can't challenge it properly.
55:00
Speaker 5: Brian, this is a very sad and jarring event. Not
55:04
Speaker 5: that there haven't been a lot of other people that
55:07
Speaker 5: have suddenly died on a sports field or during training,
55:11
Speaker 5: or they almost died and had a very serious medical situation,
55:14
Speaker 5: but this one is particularly noteworthy. Channel four WSMV, a
55:20
Speaker 5: NBC affiliate out of Tennessee, reported that a fifteen year
55:25
Speaker 5: old died suddenly while jogging. And he's a cross country runner,
55:29
Speaker 5: so it's completely non contact sport. We don't need to
55:32
Speaker 5: think about performance enhancing drugs being involved. And he's out
55:37
Speaker 5: of Cheatham County, Tennessee. His name Tristan Franklin. He was
55:41
Speaker 5: born in September sixth, two thousand and eight. He passed
55:45
Speaker 5: away suddenly while jogging for cross country training August twenty seventh,
55:49
Speaker 5: so he died just shy of his sixteenth birthday. This
55:52
Speaker 5: is his obituary out of Tennessee a shot of that.
55:57
Speaker 5: And I bring this up mainly Brian because of the
56:00
Speaker 5: way the media is handling this. And you know, you
56:03
Speaker 5: could think about older athletes that have been in high
56:07
Speaker 5: contact sports for years, football, your kind of football and
56:11
Speaker 5: my kind of football, other contact sports. Maybe they're on
56:15
Speaker 5: performance enhancing drugs, maybe they've had birth defects, maybe there
56:19
Speaker 5: have been other factors as to why they might die
56:22
Speaker 5: or have a very serious medical event. But we all
56:25
Speaker 5: know and strongly suspect that the COVID vaccinations, the mRNA
56:30
Speaker 5: injections have played a role in this. It's just a
56:34
Speaker 5: question of degree. Now that media slide, I was still
56:37
Speaker 5: wanting to stay on that for just a moment. I
56:40
Speaker 5: always ask the humorous question, how many mainstream reporters does
56:43
Speaker 5: it take to screw in a light bulb? Well, a lot.
56:46
Speaker 5: So they needed three reporters from this NBC affiliate. And
56:51
Speaker 5: when they reported on this, it was purely emotionalism, just
56:54
Speaker 5: an emotional vignette. Zero inquiries, zero curiosity as to why
57:00
Speaker 5: I a perfectly healthy fifteen year old would just drop
57:03
Speaker 5: dead on the spot while jogging. And he did not
57:07
Speaker 5: die later at the hospital. He literally died right on
57:10
Speaker 5: the ground. And so this news affiliate was really lazy
57:14
Speaker 5: about this. This next slide is from the State of Nevada.
57:18
Speaker 5: A commentary attached to their website. At least sixty nine
57:21
Speaker 5: athletes collapse in one month, many dead. This is from
57:25
Speaker 5: twenty twenty one, and so that's an interesting read. I
57:30
Speaker 5: believe we'll have the link to that in the show notes.
57:33
Speaker 5: But the situation is such, Brian, where I called the
57:38
Speaker 5: media station that I just mentioned, I called the newsroom
57:41
Speaker 5: yesterday and I said, do you know how, rather why
57:47
Speaker 5: or by what means this fifteen year old passed away.
57:50
Speaker 5: It's not like he was some older athlete and a
57:52
Speaker 5: high contact sport. It's not like he was in some
57:55
Speaker 5: high risk category and she was very laxadaisial this reporter.
58:00
Speaker 5: I said, is there going to be an autopsy in
58:03
Speaker 5: the first place? And if so, do you know when
58:05
Speaker 5: we'll you'll have the coigner's report, And she vaguely thought
58:09
Speaker 5: there might be an autopsy and she didn't know when
58:11
Speaker 5: the coroner's report would come in. But there was also
58:15
Speaker 5: an article Brian on that same news organization's website, very
58:21
Speaker 5: very critical of the idea of medical freedom, and very
58:26
Speaker 5: very critical of people who suspect vaccinations, especially the COVID vaccination,
58:32
Speaker 5: are very hazardous or dangerous, and so the fix already
58:36
Speaker 5: seems to be in. But this is a particularly tragic item.
58:39
Speaker 5: I'll be keeping a close eye on and I'm going
58:41
Speaker 5: to keep calling that newsroom every few days until I
58:45
Speaker 5: get an answer, until I find out whether there's a
58:48
Speaker 5: coroner's report and see what the actual cause was. But
58:52
Speaker 5: what I suspect is if they were to find out
58:54
Speaker 5: it was from vaccination, I don't believe they would report it.
58:58
Speaker 5: But I'm going to really dog them on this and
59:00
Speaker 5: we'll see what results I get.
59:02
Speaker 1: Okay, were thank you very much, and tragic event. Whatever
59:06
Speaker 1: the circumstances. Debbie, let's just bring you on briefly, because
59:11
Speaker 1: of course we don't have to worry in UK. We
59:13
Speaker 1: have the Medicines and Health Regulation Authority protecting us from
59:17
Speaker 1: all of those nasty pharmaceutical companies, do we?
59:24
Speaker 2: Oh?
59:24
Speaker 6: And this week it was the MHRA board meeting. Stay
59:27
Speaker 6: tuned for extra. I've got news.
59:30
Speaker 7: But Dame June's going to be leaving, isn't she.
59:33
Speaker 6: So there's a job coming up and they've advertised the
59:36
Speaker 6: job the CEO of the MHRA commanding a nice juicy
59:41
Speaker 6: salary between what's that one hundred and sixty thousand and
59:44
Speaker 6: two hundred thousand. There's a bit more I can add
59:47
Speaker 6: on that an extra too. But I thought, shall I
59:49
Speaker 6: apply for a new job? I mean, I love the
59:52
Speaker 6: job that I have with the UK column, trust me.
59:55
Speaker 6: But you know what I do fit the criteria. So
59:57
Speaker 6: when you go to look at the job description, So
1:00:00
Speaker 6: you don't need to be a medical professional what I am.
1:00:03
Speaker 7: That's helpful.
1:00:04
Speaker 6: You don't need to know anything about patient safety really,
1:00:06
Speaker 6: but I do. You do need to have sat on
1:00:09
Speaker 6: a board and been mixing with lots of people. And
1:00:13
Speaker 6: I was as a government advisor. So the position specification
1:00:18
Speaker 6: pretty much fits me, and applications close seventh of October.
1:00:23
Speaker 6: Do you think I should apply for the CEO of
1:00:26
Speaker 6: the MHRA And do you think if I did apply,
1:00:29
Speaker 6: they would interview me? But maybe there's somebody else that's
1:00:33
Speaker 6: watching one of our viewers, one of our members, who would.
1:00:35
Speaker 7: Also like to apply. Seventh of October.
1:00:38
Speaker 1: Well, w thank you for that. I detect some chaos
1:00:42
Speaker 1: in the MHRRA as more and more questions being asked
1:00:46
Speaker 1: about their appalling performance in safety or protecting the public
1:00:50
Speaker 1: during the so called COVID pandemic. So I think this
1:00:54
Speaker 1: is really interesting. Should you apply? Well, I think you should.
1:00:58
Speaker 1: Let's see what they have to say about you, and
1:01:01
Speaker 1: if any of our audience have got an opinion on that,
1:01:03
Speaker 1: please let us at UK Column. No, we must end there,
1:01:08
Speaker 1: So I'm going to say a big thank you to you,
1:01:09
Speaker 1: Debbie and to Mark really important information I believe in
1:01:14
Speaker 1: today's news. So for the audience, please get researching yourself
1:01:18
Speaker 1: and send us and the thing you think is important.
1:01:22
Speaker 1: We must end there. If you're a member of UK Column,
1:01:25
Speaker 1: join us for extra in a few minutes. If not,
1:01:29
Speaker 1: for the rest of the audience, we will be back
1:01:32
Speaker 1: on Monday at one o'clock. See you then bye bye