Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / There Is No Basis To Scrub Jeffrey Epstein's NPA According To The DOJ

Transcript

There Is No Basis To Scrub Jeffrey Epstein's NPA According To The DOJ · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: One of the biggest farces in the history of farces
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: is the fact that Jeffrey Epstein received that sweetheart deal
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: that he received. That should have never happened. It should
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: have never went down. And everybody involved in that sweetheart
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: deal should lose their pensions, should not have a job
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: working for the federal government, and should be looked at
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: for perhaps even losing their law license. And I truly
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: mean that when I say it. That's how big of
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: a travesty this was. To think that any prosecutor anywhere
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: in the country would give this guy this kind of
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: deal is just beyond me. And then for the court system,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: The government to say that there is no legal basis
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: to invalidate the sweetheart deal is even more absurd. So
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: what you're telling me is there are no levers to
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: pull on. If something goes wrong in the legal system,
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: we just have to deal with it. Huh? Seems like
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: every time something goes south in the legal system, it
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: always ends up going in the favor of the federal government,
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: never in the favor of the people. And once again,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: we're seeing that here. So what you're telling me is
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: your rich buddies like Jeffrey Epstein who get these stupid
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: ass non-prosecution deals handed to them by their friends in
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: government are just allowed to have them and there's no recourse?
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: There's no way to go back and look at one
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: of these deals and say it was done in bad
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: faith and get rid of it? Just another loophole in
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: technicality for the so-called elite, huh? Today we have another
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: article from Law and Crime. Author of this article, Jerry Lamb. Headline,
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: federal prosecutors say there's no legal basis to invalidate Jeffrey
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Epstein's sweetheart deal. Well, I say that needs to be
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: looked at. Then maybe they need to come up with
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: a new solution here where in the future, if a
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: deal like this is given, a panel can be put
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: together and the panel can look at it and say,
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: you know what? This is not a deal that we're
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: comfortable with because this is unacceptable and it can never
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: happen again. The Department of Justice on Monday rejected efforts
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: by the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein to get a sweetheart
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: non-prosecution deal thrown out so that Epstein can be prosecuted
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: for alleged abuse of dozens of underage girls. Now imagine
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: being the judge who denies this. In a 35-page motion
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: first reported by the Miami Herald, federal prosecutors claim that
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein's survivors have no legal basis to invalidate the
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: non-prosecution agreement. The same agreement the judge in the case
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: previously said broke the law. So you see what's going
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: on here? You have judges saying that this agreement broke
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: the law. Then you have a court saying, oh, well, no,
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: there's no recourse here for this because there's nothing that
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: was invalid. So they can't even figure it out. As
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: far as the legal system itself, what's right or wrong here?
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: And then they expect us just to stomach it and
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: suck it down and be okay with it? No way.
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: There is no chance that this legal agreement should have stood.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: There is no chance that it should stand at all.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: And in fact, it's ridiculous that anyone would refer to
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: this and try and use it as a defense, as
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: we found out in the previous article. It holds no
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: water unless you're down in Florida. Many of Epstein's survivors
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: were middle school and high school girls between the ages
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: of 13 and 16 who were recruited from the local
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: South Florida area. According to prosecutors, despite a judge's earlier
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: ruling that the plea deal violated the Crime Victims Rights Act,
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: So basically what they're doing is using legalese loopholes and
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: technicalities in the law itself that Congress passed, that Congress wrote.
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: To get their buddies off once again. And this is
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: how they do it, right? They put these loopholes and
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: these technicalities and these laws that you or I would
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: never be able to exploit. Because we don't have the money.
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: We don't have the legal power and the backing to
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: really go toe-to-toe with the federal government. But somebody like
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell, they certainly do. And when
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: you have those resources, well, the world is your oyster.
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: In Monday's DOJ filing by attorney Byung Pak, who was
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: appointed by President Donald Trump, the government admits that the
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: survivors were treated unfairly, but says that prosecutors were within
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: their rights to do so. Real nice by Byung Pak, huh?
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: Hell of a guy. Hell of a attorney here. I mean,
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: this guy's defending... Just think about this for a minute, okay, folks?
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: This man is defending this prosecution agreement. All because he
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: doesn't want the government... To have some dirt on their face.
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: Instead of just admitting that this deal was bad, it
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: was garbage, and the government shit the bed, they'll fight
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: it to the very end. While at the same time
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: telling you, oh, we're looking for justice for these survivors. Yeah, right.
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: In the filing, federal prosecutors did concede that the U.S.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: Attorney's Office in South Florida failed to treat Epstein's survivors,
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: most of whom were 13 to 16 years old, when
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: they were abused fairly. But they said the law gives
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: prosecutors discretion in deciding how to dispose of a case.
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: Survivors have a right to confer with prosecutors, but no
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: rights beyond that. So basically, let's just re-victimize these people.
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: And let's make it so nobody wants to come forward
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: ever again because there's no justice. Oh, so I come
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: forward and then what happens? These people are protected by
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: their non-prosecution agreement. Then they can hire their private investigators
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: to come bother me again like they did to all
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: of the people involved. Let me be very clear with you.
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: If I walk out of my home and anyone's rummaging
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: through my trash, we're going to have a big problem.
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: If I'm sitting in the street and somebody's following me
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: around and you don't have a badge, once again, we're
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: going to have a big problem. These people have gotten
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: way too comfortable thinking that they can bully people. They
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: have gotten way too comfortable thinking that when they walk
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: in the room, they're the only ones with big dick energy.
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: But the reality is people have had enough. And just normal, average,
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: everyday folks like you are the backbone of that. And
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: if they think that we're going to stop demanding justice
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: here or for other victims of violent crimes, they are
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: sorely mistaken. PAC also warned the judge overseeing the case,
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: Kenneth Mara, against taking action to overrule Acosta's original decision
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: not to prosecute Epstein. So, who is this Byung-Pak guy?
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: And why is he out here trying to defend Jeffrey Epstein?
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: Pretty interesting, right? Wasn't that one of Bill Barr's guys? Oh,
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: it was, wasn't it? Good old Darth Barr. One of
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: the most unreliable, untrustworthy people to ever... Plant their lazy,
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: do-nothing asses in Washington, D.C. Courts are not to interfere
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: United States attorneys in their control over criminal prosecutions, Pak said.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: The decision whether to prosecute Epstein lies solely within the
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: executive branch, and any order today by this court as
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: to what the government must do in the future would
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: be wholly inappropriate. So that just gives you a little
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: bit of an idea of how the Justice Department has
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: felt about Epstein and these survivors throughout time. And it
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter who the president is. Every single one of
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: these attorney generals has been an impediment for justice going
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: all the way back to Clinton. We're talking since Clinton,
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: that's how many presidents... Jeffrey Epstein has been active under.
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: And how many attorney generals stepped up and did something
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: about it? So I don't want to hear anything about how,
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: you know, Bill Barr was appointed by Donald Trump to
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: get rid of human trafficking. That's a bunch of bullshit.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, over
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: and over again, on repeat. The Herald did note, however,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: that Pax said Epstein's survivors would be given the chance
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: to meet with prosecutors in private and, if they desired,
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: to be heard at a public hearing. He also said
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: he would agree to give federal prosecutors additional training on
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: dealing with survivors of crimes of this nature, basically just,
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: you know, shoving it under the rug. And this is
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: why I've been so critical of the Department of Justice,
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: of the FBI, and their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: criminal enterprise. And for all the people out there that
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: want to continuously play politics about this, folks, I hate
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: to tell you, how much more evidence do you need
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: to see that it's both sides of the aisle here
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: that have, you know, chips in the game? They don't
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: want this to be out there. They don't want the
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: whole entire scope of what Epstein was up to to
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: be released to the public because it's going to be
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: damning for all of these people. As previously reported by
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: Law and Crime, the controversy surrounding Epstein's plea deal dates
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: back to 2007, when federal prosecutors in Florida, under the
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: leadership of current U.S. Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, who
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: was then the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida,
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: Acosta's prosecutors quietly entered to a secretive non-prosecution agreement with
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: the billionaire pedophile, which ensured that Epstein and his co-conspirators
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: would not be prosecuted federally in exchange for Epstein's guilty
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: plea to much less serious state prosecutions. charges. Epstein served
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: only 13 months in a county jail and the prostitution
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: charges were made up. You see, folks, you can't have
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: a prostitute who's underage, right? So how do you have
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: prostitution charges at all? It was child molestation, child grooming,
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: and child trafficking, point blank, period. Additionally, Acosta's deal ensured
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: that Epstein's co-conspirators were all shielded from prosecution under what
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: is now viewed as an extraordinarily unprecedented agreement and was
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: followed by the FBI's ongoing probe being shut down. So
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: the probe was shut down too, by the way. Imagine
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: you're one of these FBI agents who's working on this.
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: And some jerk-off suit bureaucrat walks in and says, well,
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: that's a wrap, boys. Shut it all down. And again,
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: that's why my criticism is mainly directed at the bureaucrats
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: of the FBI. Folks, please don't get that confused. The
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: rank-and-file agents that are out there doing their job, I
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: don't have any beef with them. People are out there
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: doing their job. I get it. My problem is with
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: the bureaucrats out here playing games. They'll act like they
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: don't give a damn about what's going on here, but
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: God forbid you get on the wrong side of them politically,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: and they're going to come after you full bore. Jack Scarola,
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: a former prosecutor representing one of Epstein's survivors, told the
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: Herald that a prosecutor's discretion in granting plea deals while
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: broad is far from unlimited. He specifically noted that a
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: defendant's victims have the right to appeal a plea deal
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: at sentencing. This was not the case here, as Epstein
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: and Acosta's office reached their plea deal without conferring with
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: any of Epstein's survivors. And then you wonder why people
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: again are saying this deal was corrupt. The whole thing
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: is garbage. It's all gross. Well, this is why. And
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: that's why we're going back and going over some of
• 11:55
  Speaker 1: these articles and laying the groundwork again. You know, that
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: stupid ass article from NPR talking about conspiracy theories when
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: they should be digging into what went on here really
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: launched me into orbit and sent your boy on basically
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: a crusade where we're going to go back and cover
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: all of this again for all of the new listeners,
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: all of the people who might not have heard it
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: the first time around and with a fresh eye. Because
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: if there's anything that's absurd here, if there's anything that's disgusting,
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: it's this sweetheart deal. Courts reject plea deals when they
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: find them to be unjustifiable and unreasonable, especially if they
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: are not told the full scope of the agreement, Scarola said.
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: He also said separately that Congress did not contemplate the
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: extraordinary circumstances of this conspiracy between the government and a
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: serial child molester. I disagree with that. I'm sure they did.
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: And they don't care. Point blank. How many times has
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: the government hopped into bed with some disgusting animal? Scarola
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: previously predicted the Epstein deal would be revoked. Pak, who
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: took over Epstein's case in March, was joined in submitting
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: Monday's brief by U.S. Attorney Jill E. Steinberg and Nathan P. Kitchens.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: Once again, folks, you see what's going on here. You
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: see that this is absurd and you see why people
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: are fired up about it. Yet we have no answers.
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: We don't have any allies in Congress. Do we have
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: any allies in Congress or the Senate that want justice here?
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: We sure do not. Nobody calling for hearings. Nobody calling
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: for subpoenas. Nobody getting their phone record seized. Not a
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: damn thing. And the band just plays on. So it's
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: left to us to continue to demand justice. And the
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: best way to do that, the best way to get
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: people to act when they're being inactive is to embarrass them.
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: So that's what we'll continue to do. We'll shine a
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: spotlight on the piss-poor job done by the Department of
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: Justice until they get off their do-nothing asses and get
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: some justice. All right, folks, that's going to do it
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: for this episode. If you'd like to contact me, you
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: can do that at bobbycapucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y underscore C-A-P-U-C-C-I.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: The link that I discussed can be found in the
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: description box.