Latest / The Achaemenid Empire: Persia's Golden Age of Power — Fexingo History / Cyrus the Great's Empire of Tolerance
Transcript
- Lucas: So, we've covered a lot of the Achaemenid Empire's military campaigns, its incredible infrastructure, and even its coinage. But I think there's one aspect of Cyrus the Great's rule that really set the tone for the entire empire, and it's something that still resonates today. Luna: What's that? Lucas: His policy of tolerance. I mean, Cyrus didn't just conquer—he actively worked to win over the people he conquered. He let them keep their own gods, their own customs, their own local leaders. It was a radical departure from how empires usually operated back then, where you'd smash the statues of the local gods and install your own. Luna: Right, the Assyrians were notorious for that. Deporting whole populations. Lucas: Exactly. The Assyrians would uproot entire nations and resettle them elsewhere to break their identity. Cyrus did the opposite. The most famous example is, of course, the return of the Jews from exile in Babylon. The Bible actually mentions Cyrus by name in the Book of Ezra—he issued a decree allowing them to go back to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple. Luna: So he was seen as a liberator, not a conqueror. How did he pull that off? Lucas: Well, he presented himself as a restorer of order. When he took Babylon in 539 BCE, he claimed that the Babylonian god Marduk had chosen him to overthrow the impious king Nabonidus and restore proper worship. We have the Cyrus Cylinder, a clay cylinder inscribed in Akkadian cuneiform, that spells this out. It's often called the first charter of human rights, though that's a bit of a stretch—it's more like a propaganda document that justifies his rule by saying he's fulfilling the gods' will. Luna: And the Jews believed their God was working through him too. Lucas: Exactly. The prophet Isaiah even refers to Cyrus as God's anointed, his 'messiah'. That's the only time in the Hebrew Bible a non-Jewish ruler is given that title. Cyrus didn't just let them go—he gave them back the sacred vessels that Nebuchadnezzar had looted from the Temple, and he even contributed funds for the rebuilding. It was a masterstroke of soft power. Luna: Did he do this for other conquered peoples too? Lucas: Yes, as far as we can tell, it was a general policy. The Cyrus Cylinder mentions restoring the gods of various cities to their sanctuaries and returning their displaced populations. We know he did something similar in the city of Ur, and probably elsewhere. He wasn't just being nice—it was pragmatic. If you have a huge, diverse empire, you can't rule it all by force. You need local elites to cooperate, and letting them keep their religion and traditions goes a long way. Luna: So it was a conscious strategy to build loyalty. Lucas: Absolutely. And he set a precedent that most of his successors followed. Darius and Xerxes, for instance, continued this policy. We have documents from Egypt showing that Darius codified Egyptian laws and supported the construction of temples to Egyptian gods. Of course, there were times when tolerance broke down—Xerxes, for example, crushed a rebellion in Babylon and reportedly destroyed the statue of Marduk. But by and large, the Achaemenids were remarkably tolerant. Luna: What about Zoroastrianism? I mean, Cyrus himself was likely a Zoroastrian, right? Lucas: Probably, yes. Most scholars think the Achaemenid kings were Zoroastrians or at least strongly influenced by Zoroastrian teachings. Ahura Mazda is invoked constantly in their inscriptions. But they didn't force it on anyone. They saw their own god as supreme, but they acknowledged that other peoples had their own gods, and that was fine. It's a very different approach from, say, the later Roman Empire, which demanded worship of the emperor, or the Islamic conquests. Luna: So Cyrus's tolerance was both ideological and practical. Lucas: Exactly. It's hard to separate the two. On one hand, there's a genuine Zoroastrian emphasis on truth and order—asha, the cosmic principle of truth. On the other hand, it just made good political sense. When you have an empire stretching from the Indus to the Mediterranean, you can't afford to alienate your subjects. The Achaemenid system of satraps, which we covered in a previous episode, was part of that—local governors with a lot of autonomy. Luna: And that's why the empire lasted over two hundred years. Lucas: I think it's a big part of it. Compare that to Alexander the Great, who conquered the Achaemenid Empire but didn't have a coherent policy of tolerance. He tried to merge cultures, but he also destroyed Persepolis and was resented by many Persians. His empire fell apart almost immediately after his death. Cyrus's empire, on the other hand, was stable for generations, and even after it fell, the idea of a benevolent, tolerant ruler lived on. The Cyrus Cylinder is sometimes cited in modern discussions of human rights. Luna: That's fascinating. So Cyrus wasn't just a great conqueror—he was a great ruler. Lucas: He was. And I think that's why he's remembered so fondly, not just in Persian tradition but in Jewish, Greek, and even modern Western thought. He's a rare figure in ancient history who is almost universally praised. Even the Greek historians, who generally looked down on Persians, had good things to say about Cyrus. Luna: So what's the takeaway from all this? Lucas: I think it's that tolerance can be a powerful tool of statecraft. Cyrus showed that an empire built on respect for diversity can be stronger than one built on fear. It's a lesson that a lot of later rulers, and even modern nations, could learn from. Of course, it wasn't perfect—there were still rebellions and harsh crackdowns—but the overall approach was remarkably enlightened for its time. Luna: I'd love to see a modern leader with that kind of vision. Lucas: Wouldn't that be something? Anyway, that's Cyrus the Great's empire of tolerance. A powerful legacy from a ruler who died more than 2,500 years ago, but whose ideas still echo today.