Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3372 Supreme Court Justices To RESIGN?!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_00]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_00]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_00]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:20[SPEAKER_00]: Hey, gang, it's me, Dr. Steve coming to you from a rather rainy, serotonin upstate New York.
- 0:26[SPEAKER_00]: We had an amazing time on Lake George yesterday.
- 0:28[SPEAKER_00]: We rented a boat.
- 0:30[SPEAKER_00]: And even your Patriot professor went tubing.
- 0:34[SPEAKER_00]: If you can believe in my grip is still so far from the Alcy.
- 0:36[SPEAKER_00]: If I can find a video, I'm sure someone on the boat caught me in one of my more embarrassing moments for sure.
- 0:43[SPEAKER_00]: But we have to talk about the latest rumors that are swirling all over DC right now on impending retirements
- 0:50[SPEAKER_00]: On the Supreme Court, if true this is going to be absolutely huge, literally historic.
- 0:56[SPEAKER_00]: Let's start with the huge win that the Supreme Court just delivered for President Trump.
- 1:01[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, Trump got yet another massive win from the justice.
- 1:05[SPEAKER_00]: And rather stunning eight to one decision, I'll let you guess the one Supreme Court justice who descended, I'll give you a hint.
- 1:13[SPEAKER_00]: She has something to do with an auto pen.
- 1:16[SPEAKER_00]: This decision is being called Trump's wrecking ball on the deep state.
- 1:21[SPEAKER_00]: So in an eight to one decision, that sent shockwaste throughout DC, the Supreme Court overturned a lower-court injunction that had blocked the federal government from moving forward with a Trump executive order that directed nineteen federal departments to develop plans for the large-scale layoff.
- 1:40[SPEAKER_00]: So the key with this E.O.
- 1:42[SPEAKER_00]: is that it was going to basically decimate
- 1:45[SPEAKER_00]: the deep state by a mass purge of federal employees throughout nineteen departments.
- 1:50[SPEAKER_00]: Now, because the state protects itself with the courts basically playing the part of the immune system for the state preventing any federal employee from ever being fired.
- 2:01[SPEAKER_00]: a lower court stepped in and stopped the government from even planning the layoffs.
- 2:07[SPEAKER_00]: Let that hit you.
- 2:07[SPEAKER_00]: That's how ridiculous this lower court ruling was.
- 2:10[SPEAKER_00]: They couldn't even think of laying off federal workers.
- 2:14[SPEAKER_00]: Well, those days are now officially over.
- 2:17[SPEAKER_00]: In an eight to one ruling, the court sided once again with Trump, they completely reversed the lower court ruling and they have authorized the planning process manned in by Trump's E.O.
- 2:29[SPEAKER_00]: can now continue.
- 2:31[SPEAKER_00]: As you may have guessed, Justice Cotunji Brown Jackson, Justice Auto Pen, was literally the only Justice who descended, even the liberal, Judge Cagan, saw my or voted with the conservative majority of Trump's plan to drastically downsize DC, was so legally sound that even liberal justice could not argue against it.
- 2:54[SPEAKER_00]: But Jackson, Auto Pen,
- 2:58[SPEAKER_00]: She literally absolutely went nuclear in her dissent.
- 3:02[SPEAKER_00]: She accused her on colleagues of having demonstrated what she called enthusiasm for greenlining president Trump's legally dubious actions.
- 3:11[SPEAKER_00]: That's what she wrote in her loan dissent.
- 3:13[SPEAKER_00]: In other words, she's basically calling out the entire court, including her liberal colleagues, for being biased towards Trump, for basically greenlining the Trump agenda.
- 3:25[SPEAKER_00]: She's accusing particularly the conservative
- 3:28[SPEAKER_00]: majority of fast tracking Trump's agenda without proper deliberation.
- 3:33[SPEAKER_00]: But the irony is that, sort of my or actually wrote a separate opinion, basically explaining the law, the Jackson, as if she were a fifth grader.
- 3:43[SPEAKER_00]: She had to clarify that the executive order specifically directs agencies to plan reorganizations consistent with applicable law.
- 3:51[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, when you're fellow liberal justices are fact checking you, I mean, what do you even say to that?
- 3:57[SPEAKER_00]: And this is a repeatable occurrence.
- 3:59[SPEAKER_00]: So this, I mean, for decades, federal workers have been practically impossible to fire, right?
- 4:06[SPEAKER_00]: They've operated like an unelected shadow government, often denying the very officials voters elected to oversee them.
- 4:14[SPEAKER_00]: So this order, we've already seen twenty thousand probationary federal employees terminated.
- 4:19[SPEAKER_00]: This Supreme Court ruling gang, this opens the floodgates for what could be the largest reduction in federal workforce in modern history.
- 4:27[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, we're talking about potentially hundreds of thousands of positions eliminated.
- 4:33[SPEAKER_00]: And of course, the key legal issue that Jackson completely messed is the question, does the president have the authority to restructure the executive branch?
- 4:42[SPEAKER_00]: And the answer, according to
- 4:45[SPEAKER_00]: Eight Supreme Court Justice is a resounding.
- 4:48[SPEAKER_00]: Yes, and that's precisely why it was Jackson herself and her descent, who said that this decision allows Trump to take a wrecking ball to the federal bureaucracies under his executive jurisdiction.
- 5:00[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I voted for that.
- 5:01[SPEAKER_00]: That's right.
- 5:02[SPEAKER_00]: Now, this decision was handed down amidst growing rumors in the legal community and throughout DC that were on the consposing two retirements from the court and unfortunately,
- 5:14[SPEAKER_00]: There are favorites.
- 5:15[SPEAKER_00]: Justice is Samelito and Clarence Thomas.
- 5:18[SPEAKER_00]: And if that happens, this would be before the midterms.
- 5:22[SPEAKER_00]: And a lot of it has to do with just the political importance of timing.
- 5:26[SPEAKER_00]: These retirement so is to ensure light-minded successors.
- 5:29[SPEAKER_00]: So we saw this with Justice Anthony Kennedy.
- 5:31[SPEAKER_00]: Oh, well, for him it wasn't so much up.
- 5:34[SPEAKER_00]: like-minded successor.
- 5:35[SPEAKER_00]: He was a flip-flopping idiot.
- 5:37[SPEAKER_00]: I mean, he was a legal and deraimance, but he was ironically appointed by Ronald Reagan, but ended up siding with the liberals most of the time.
- 5:46[SPEAKER_00]: But he wanted continuity.
- 5:47[SPEAKER_00]: He wanted to allow a Republican president to pick his successor, which I found rather interesting.
- 5:53[SPEAKER_00]: And of course Trump did.
- 5:55[SPEAKER_00]: Trump is now appointed three justices.
- 5:59[SPEAKER_00]: By contrast, liberals are still fuming over Ruth Bader Ginsburg's decision to remain on the court.
- 6:06[SPEAKER_00]: She refused to step down during the Obama era when she could have been replaced by another radical leftist.
- 6:11[SPEAKER_00]: And instead, she was replaced by Amy Coney Barrett.
- 6:15[SPEAKER_00]: So ironically, the one who gave the decisive vote for overturning Rovy Wade, the Rovy Wade decision that Ginsburg had long idolized, she became her replacement.
- 6:26[SPEAKER_00]: Now, if Alito and Thomas are going to retire, the argument is they had better do it now while Trump's in power.
- 6:33[SPEAKER_00]: And rumors are that they are considering doing just that.
- 6:37[SPEAKER_00]: Now, of course, if that's the case, Trump will most likely use his unprecedented political power to push through appointees who are very, very conservative, reliably so as Thomas and Elito have been.
- 6:51[SPEAKER_00]: I also think, given the current state of the electoral map, that frankly, Republicans don't have a lot to worry about when it comes to control of the Senate in twenty twenty-six, and increasingly when it comes to control of the White House foreseeable future.
- 7:05[SPEAKER_00]: We talk about Pennsylvania's going red, it's going the way of Ohio, and Democrats simply cannot electorally win the presidency without Pennsylvania.
- 7:14[SPEAKER_00]: So I wouldn't be surprised if Thomas and Alito actually decided to stick around, figuring that the Senate is safe for the GOP and that JD is most likely going to club or whoever the Democrats nominate in twenty twenty eight.
- 7:28[SPEAKER_00]: It's a risk.
- 7:29[SPEAKER_00]: It's a gamble.
- 7:30[SPEAKER_00]: You never know.
- 7:32[SPEAKER_00]: And we certainly don't want to find ourselves in the same situation that the Liberals found themselves after Ruth Baderdinsburg.
- 7:37[SPEAKER_00]: So keep an eye on Thomas and Alito over the next few months.
- 7:42[SPEAKER_00]: And we'll see what happens there.
- 7:44[SPEAKER_00]: If they don't retire, interestingly, then that's an indicator that the Washington Insiders believe the Senate and the White House are both relatively safe for the next several years.
- 7:55[SPEAKER_00]: So what do you think?
- 7:55[SPEAKER_00]: Let us know in the comments section down below.
- 7:57[SPEAKER_00]: And as always, if you haven't already done so, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe button.
- 8:03[SPEAKER_00]: God bless you.
- 8:05[SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for listening this episode of the Turley Talks podcast.
- 8:08[SPEAKER_00]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 8:13[SPEAKER_00]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 8:21[SPEAKER_00]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.