Latest / Reformed Thinking / Christ’s Pattern for Restoring the Sinning Brother (Matthew 18:15–18)

Transcript

Christ’s Pattern for Restoring the Sinning Brother (Matthew 18:15–18) · Reformed Thinking

0:00
So imagine standing on a crowded beach, you know, just watching
0:03
the water, and suddenly you spot a swimmer caught in a violent
0:07
RIP current. Right, a terrifying situation to
0:10
be in. Yeah, they're thrashing around,
0:13
getting pulled further and further out to sea, and you
0:17
happen to be holding a life preserver.
0:18
But you just stand there. Yeah, instead of swimming out or
0:21
throwing the preserver, you pause.
0:23
You think to yourself, well, if I throw this, it might hit them
0:25
in the head, right? Or worse, you know what?
0:28
If they get offended that I criticize their swimming
0:30
technique, so I should probably just stay here on the sand.
0:33
I mean, I do not want to ruin their afternoon which.
0:36
Sounds completely insane when you frame it like that.
0:38
It sounds like absolute madness. Yet, according to the
0:41
theological sources we are unpacking today, this is the
0:45
precise scenario playing out in modern church congregations
0:49
every single Sunday. It really is.
0:52
Welcome to a deep Dive on reformed thinking.
0:54
I am so glad you could join us today.
0:56
We are stepping into a rigorous, highly practical evaluation of
1:00
one of the most misunderstood and honestly, actively avoided
1:04
texts in the entire New Testament.
1:06
Matthew 18. Yes, specifically verses 15
1:10
through 18. Our clear mission for this
1:12
session is to unpack the biblical process of church
1:15
discipline. And we are going to examine how
1:17
the original authors of our provided sources present this
1:20
text not as some kind of punitive corporate firing squad,
1:25
but as a deliberate, compassionate rescue operation.
1:29
That framing really sets the proper theological lens for our
1:32
entire discussion today. It does.
1:34
We are analyzing this text from a distinctly Protestant
1:38
perspective, specifically adhering to Reformed theology
1:41
and the Westminster Confession of faith.
1:43
In this tradition, you know, the local gathered body of believers
1:47
is not viewed as a loose social club.
1:49
It is not a weekly network. No, not at all.
1:52
It is a holy assembly governed exclusively by the Word of
1:55
Christ. Spot on, and the goal here is to
1:57
understand the actual mechanics of that governance.
2:00
We are looking strictly at how the author's outline Christ's
2:03
instructions for dealing with unrepentant sin within the
2:06
visible Church. And the massive theological
2:08
weight behind those steps. But before we get into the
2:11
mechanics, we really need to acknowledge the reality that
2:14
you, the listener, might be bringing to this topic today.
2:18
That is a very necessary caveat. Because you might be highly
2:21
accustomed to modern evangelical environments that well, they
2:25
actively and systematically avoid confrontation.
2:28
Yeah, there is a prevalent culture of peace at any cost in
2:31
our current era. Right.
2:33
It is often driven by seeker sensitive pragmatism.
2:36
The primary objective is making sure no one ever feels
2:39
uncomfortable or judged or offended in any way.
2:42
And because of that cultural conditioning, the very phrase
2:45
church discipline probably sounds harsh to modern years.
2:47
You know, absolutely. It sounds intolerant.
2:49
It sounds like something from a bygone puritanical era.
2:52
But this deep dive is a shortcut to grasping the historical,
2:56
theological, and practical gravity of Christ's actual
2:59
commands. We are going to look at the
3:01
text, the original Greek syntax, and the pastoral application.
3:05
We want to see how confronting sin is actually the highest,
3:09
most rigorous form of covenant love.
3:11
So we have to ask, why does this process even exist in the first
3:15
place? To find that answer, we really
3:17
have to look at the verses immediately preceding Matthew
3:20
18, verse 15. Because context dictates
3:23
everything about how we read this passage it.
3:25
Really does. If you isolate verses 15 through
3:28
18 and read them on their own, well, the text reads like a cold
3:33
bureaucratic policy manual. Right, Like something for
3:36
managing difficult employees in a corporate setting.
3:39
Yeah, but the text does not exist in a vacuum.
3:41
Not at all. The verse is immediately before
3:43
this instruction. That would be Matthew 18.
3:46
Verses 10 through 14. They contain Jesus.
3:49
Parable of the wandering sheep. And in that parable, the
3:53
shepherd leaves the 99 sheep on the hillside, right?
3:56
He goes searching for the single solitary sheep that wandered off
3:59
into danger. Yes, and the sources explicitly
4:01
argue that church discipline is an extension of that exact
4:05
pastoral care. It is shepherding grace in
4:07
action. Precisely.
4:08
Discipline is not a contradiction of mercy.
4:11
It is mercy moving directly, aggressively, even, toward a
4:14
center who is in spiritual peril.
4:16
Christ is acting as the shepherd seeking the lost, and he
4:22
delegates that seeking action to the local church.
4:25
So we have this beautiful analogy of the shepherds seeking
4:28
the lost sheep. Or the lifeguard swimming out
4:30
into the RIP current. Right.
4:32
But why does the church so often stay on the beach?
4:34
Why do leaders ignore the wandering sheep?
4:37
That is the big question. The sources talk about a crisis
4:40
of unholy tolerance in modern congregations.
4:43
They use the term antinomianism. Yes, that is a heavy theological
4:47
term. For the listener who might not
4:49
have a seminary degree, what does that word actually mean in
4:52
practice, and why does the text identify it as a dereliction of
4:55
duty? Well, antinomianism literally
4:58
means against the law. OK.
5:00
In a practical church setting, it is the subtle, pervasive idea
5:04
that because we are saved by grace, the moral law of God no
5:07
longer has any bearing on how we live.
5:09
Oh I see it produces a culture where leaders and members just
5:12
ignore blatant ongoing sin. They do it to maintain numerical
5:15
growth or, you know, to avoid causing any relational friction.
5:19
And the sources argue this is a completely complete dereliction
5:21
of duty. Yeah.
5:22
Absolutely. It is a failure to protect the
5:24
purity of Christ's bride. When a church tolerates
5:27
rebellion under the guise of being welcoming or inclusive,
5:31
they are committing an act of spiritual negligence.
5:34
Because true peace cannot exist in an environment devoid of
5:38
righteousness. That is an essential point.
5:41
To bring that back to the lifeguard analogy, leaving the
5:44
drowning swimmer alone because you want to be inclusive of
5:48
their choice to drown is a massive failure of love.
5:51
It really. Is if the swimmer is drowning,
5:54
the most loving thing you can do is intervene, even if that
5:57
intervention involves a physical struggle.
6:00
Right, because if you try to pull a drowning person to
6:02
safety, they will often fight you.
6:04
Yeah, they will thrash around and try to push you into the
6:06
water because they are panicking.
6:08
And the church often acts like a lifeguard who stays on the
6:10
beach, watches the swimmer get pulled out to sea, and justifies
6:14
the inaction by saying, well, I didn't want to cause a scene.
6:17
The sources are telling us that such an attitude simply abandons
6:20
the person to the deceitfulness of their own heart.
6:23
That dynamic of the drowning person fighting the rescuer is a
6:26
highly accurate representation of church discipline.
6:30
The theological reality driving the need for this rescue is the
6:34
absolute holiness of the visible church.
6:36
Christ is holy because He loves his sheep.
6:39
He will not permit unrepentant sin to be treated lightly.
6:43
He will not let it be swept under the rug as if it does not
6:45
matter. The entire process of discipline
6:48
sits right at the intersection of holy grace and redemptive
6:50
purpose. Yes, because grace trains
6:53
believers to renounce ungodliness.
6:55
The Church is a covenant community.
6:58
And because of that covenant, sin is never simply a private,
7:01
isolated matter. Never sin destroys fellowship,
7:04
it hardens the human conscience, and it brings dishonor to the
7:07
name of Christ in the public square.
7:09
The Shepherd's heart is not sentimental and it's not
7:12
permissive. It takes sin seriously because
7:15
sin is a deadly force. Discipline is the mechanism
7:17
Christ instituted to protect both the individual from the
7:20
hardening effects of their own rebellion and to protect the
7:23
congregation from the leavening influence of unholiness.
7:26
Because the overarching goal is a loving rescue, the very first
7:30
step must be the most intimate and the most protected.
7:34
We move from the theological motivation of the shepherd to
7:37
the practical physical initiation in verse 15.
7:40
The command is explicit quote. If your brother sins against
7:44
you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone.
7:47
So the very first action is entirely private.
7:50
Entirely. Private and the specific
7:53
vocabulary Jesus uses here reveals the mechanism of this
7:56
private step. The English translation tell him
7:59
his fault softens the original Greek quite a bit.
8:02
Really. How so?
8:04
Well, the Greek verb is a lexon. This is an aorist active
8:07
imperative. OK, unpack that for.
8:09
Us. It is a direct, urgent command,
8:11
meaning to bring something to the light, to cross examine or
8:14
to convict the conscience of the individual.
8:16
Wow, that is much stronger than just casually mentioning a
8:19
fault. Yes, it requires an active,
8:22
deliberate effort to expose the hidden sin so that it can be
8:26
dealt with and healed. But we must also also notice
8:28
what word Jesus deliberately avoided.
8:31
What word is that? He did not use the verb krin.
8:34
That word implies a final judicial condemnation.
8:38
I see the distinction. The goal of this private meeting
8:41
is not to issue a guilty verdict, slam a gavel and walk
8:44
away feeling self-righteous. The goal is to reach the
8:47
conscience of the offending brother.
8:49
It is a rescue mission aimed directly at the heart.
8:52
But I want to push back on this step on behalf of the listener.
8:55
Please do. In our current digital, highly
8:58
conflict avoidant culture, the idea of going directly to
9:01
someone face to face to confront them about a sin feels
9:04
absolutely terrifying. Oh, it feels incredibly socially
9:07
dangerous. So isn't it safer, or perhaps
9:10
more patient and wise to just pray about it for a few weeks?
9:14
Or maybe talk to a few trusted friends in a small group first
9:18
to process your feelings. You know, just to make sure you
9:20
aren't overreacting. I understand the instinct.
9:22
I think a vast majority of people listening would assume
9:24
that discussing the issue with a small group of trusted
9:27
confidants is the cautious, prudent approach before actually
9:31
confronting the person directly. The sources aggressively
9:34
dismantle that exact hesitation, what you just described.
9:39
Talking to trusted confidants to process feelings is almost
9:42
always the pervasive sin of gossip.
9:44
That is a hard truth to hear. It is in church circles this
9:48
behavior frequently masquerades as a prayer request.
9:52
Someone will say we really need to pray for Dave.
9:55
I noticed some really concerning things about his business
9:58
practices lately. Yeah, we have all heard that
10:00
exact phrasing. When you talk to everyone else
10:03
except the person who actually committed the offense, you are
10:07
in direct, flagrant disobedience to Christ's clear command.
10:10
Going privately bounds the circle of knowledge.
10:13
It restricts the information to the smallest possible
10:16
circumference, just you and the offender.
10:19
And that restriction has a psychological mechanism behind
10:21
it, doesn't it? When you restrict the
10:23
information, you are protecting the offender's reputation.
10:26
Precisely bounding the circle of knowledge protects the dignity
10:29
of the offender and preserves the peace of the broader Church.
10:32
Which is so crucial. By keeping the matter private,
10:36
Christ is maximizing the opportunity for a quiet, low
10:39
profile restoration. He is strictly forbidding the
10:43
public outrage, the passive aggressive social media
10:46
denunciations and the subtle toxic whispering campaigns.
10:50
The very things that routinely destroy local congregations from
10:54
the inside out. Yes, the command requires a
10:57
physical face to face honest encounter.
11:00
You look the person in the eye and address the reality of the
11:04
sin. We all know the destructive
11:06
nature of the Christian prayer request gossip.
11:09
It is masked as piety, but Jesus is effectively saying put the
11:12
phone down, stop texting your small group about Dave, and go
11:16
knock on Dave's physical door. And the end of verse 15 gives
11:19
the motivation for that terrifying knock on the door.
11:21
If he listens to you, you have gained your brother.
11:24
The sources point out a specific commercial term used in the
11:26
original text there. They do.
11:28
The word echidasis means to gain or recover an asset of immense
11:32
value. It suggests that a soul of
11:34
massive, incalculable worth has been pulled back from the
11:37
absolute brink of loss. It is not about winning a
11:39
theological debate or proving that you were right and they
11:43
were wrong. It is about recovering a
11:45
treasure. Looking at this through a
11:47
Reformed theological framework, this initial private step
11:52
represents the pastoral application of what is known as
11:55
the third use of the law. Yes, that is a key concept here.
11:59
Hold on, for those listening who do not have a systematic
12:02
theology textbook sitting on their desk, what are the 1st 2
12:05
uses of the law and why does this third use matter so much in
12:09
the context of confronting a brother?
12:11
That is, a necessary clarification.
12:13
In Reformed theology of the moral law of God has three
12:16
distinct uses. OK, lay them out first.
12:18
The first use is civil or pedagogical.
12:20
It restrains evil in broader society through the threat of
12:24
punishment. Right, like speed limits keeping
12:26
us from driving recklessly. Exactly.
12:28
The second use is evangelical. It acts as a mirror to expose
12:32
our utter inability to save ourselves, thereby driving us to
12:36
seek the grace of Christ. So it shows us our sin and
12:39
points us to the cross. Yes, but the third use is
12:42
normative. It guides the born again
12:45
believer in the path of grateful obedience.
12:47
It shows us how to live a life that pleases the God who already
12:51
saved us. So by confronting the brother in
12:54
private, you are applying that third use of the law.
12:57
You are using the moral law to expose the specific sin, not to
13:02
condemn them to hell, but so that the remedy of the gospel
13:05
can be applied to their conscience.
13:07
It is a loving call back to the obedience they've already
13:09
professed. So you are basically holding up
13:11
a mirror to them and saying, look, you are a believer, you
13:14
love Christ, but this action in your life does not align with
13:18
who you are in Him. That is the exact dynamic, and
13:21
this action is completely grounded in the Gospel
13:24
indicative. The indicative refers to what
13:26
God has already done for us in Christ.
13:28
We only possess the courage to confront a fellow Sinner because
13:32
the Holy Spirit first confronted us in our own rebellion.
13:35
We are acting entirely out of the forgiveness we have already
13:37
received. Keeping the cross in view
13:39
humbles the person doing the confronting.
13:42
It ensures they approach the erring brother in meekness,
13:45
fully aware of their own capacity for self deception and
13:48
weakness. You do not approach them as a
13:50
superior judge. You approach them as a fellow
13:53
patient in the same hospital, offering the medicine that cured
13:57
you. That is a brilliant way to
13:59
phrase it. But let's consider the stakes.
14:01
If that private rescue fails, what happens when you go to your
14:05
brother alone? You apply that third use of law
14:08
with all the gentleness and meekness you can muster, and he
14:11
just stonewalls you. It happens more often than we
14:14
would like to admit. What if he looks you in the eye
14:16
and says, well, I don't care what you think, I'm going to
14:18
keep doing what I'm doing? If the heart remains hardened
14:21
against that private appeal, the circle of accountability must
14:24
widen. It widens to protect both the
14:27
objective truth of the situation and the safety of the wider
14:30
flock. We escalate from a private,
14:33
intimate appeal to a verified plural intervention in Matthew
14:37
18, verse 16. Jesus says quote, but if he does
14:40
not listen, take one or two others along with you, that
14:43
every charge may be established by the evidence of two or three
14:47
witnesses. This specific escalation proves
14:49
that Christ's process is neither impulsive nor simplistic.
14:53
Jesus is directly quoting Deuteronomy 19 verse 15 in this
14:57
verse. By doing so, he is bringing the
14:59
immutable moral equity of the Old Covenant law right into the
15:03
governance of the New Testament ecclesia.
15:05
In the ancient Near East, that requirement for multiple
15:08
witnesses was a vital bulwark against malicious perjury.
15:12
It prevented a person's life, reputation or property from
15:16
being ruined by a single biased or fabricated accusation.
15:20
Christ is establishing A structural safeguard.
15:23
Serious matters of sin must be objectively confirmed.
15:27
They cannot simply be assumed based on one person's grievance.
15:31
Truth matters deeply to God, and charges must be established by
15:34
verified, objective evidence. This feels very much like
15:37
getting a medical second opinion.
15:39
How so? Well, if you go to a doctor and
15:41
they tell you that you have a severe life threatening illness
15:43
that requires major invasive surgery, you don't just jump
15:46
straight onto the operating table.
15:48
Right, you want to be absolutely sure.
15:50
You want another doctor or perhaps a panel of specialists
15:53
to look at the blood work, review the charts, and confirm
15:57
that the initial diagnosis of the disease is actually correct
16:01
before prescribing a severe, painful treatment.
16:04
That makes perfect sense. Bringing one or two others along
16:07
isn't about forming A hostile mob to bully or shame the person
16:11
into submission. It is about confirming the
16:13
spiritual diagnosis. The medical analogy illustrates
16:16
the protective nature of the step well.
16:18
These witnesses essentially act as a spiritual jury.
16:22
Their job is not to immediately take the side of the person who
16:25
invited them. No.
16:26
Their job is to provide objective, dispassionate
16:29
verification. They have to determine if the
16:31
charge being brought is a genuine violation of God's
16:34
written Word. The sources specifically
16:36
referenced the Westminster Standards to clarify this point.
16:39
The Witnesses must ask, is the offense an actual violation of
16:42
the moral law as outlined in Westminster Confession Chapter
16:45
19, or is it a disruption of biblical worship as outlined in
16:49
chapter 21? That distinction is incredibly
16:52
vital for everyday church life. We have to differentiate between
16:56
an actual biblical sin and just an annoying personality quirk or
17:01
a difference in preference. Yes, subjective feelings are not
17:04
grounds for discipline. For example, if someone is
17:07
chronically late to a committee meeting, that might be
17:09
incredibly frustrating, but it does not warrant church
17:12
discipline. But if someone is engaged in
17:15
unrepentant financial fraud within their business, that is a
17:18
violation of the moral law. The witnesses forced that
17:21
necessary distinction. They protect the accused from
17:24
unjust, petty, or vindictive charges, and they protect the
17:27
accuser by validating the biblical serious nature of the
17:30
offense when is genuine. Furthermore, the sources analyze
17:34
how this plural proof protects the local church from 2 specific
17:38
destructive extremes, mysticism and legalism.
17:42
Let's unpack both of those extremes, starting with
17:44
mysticism. How did the witnesses guard
17:46
against that? On the mysticism side, you
17:48
frequently encounter people who claim a private, subjective word
17:51
from God to excuse their explicitly sinful behavior.
17:55
I have seen that happen. A person might say, God told me
17:58
I need to leave my spouse for my own personal happiness and self
18:01
actualization. Or, you know, the Spirit led me
18:04
to stop paying my debts, right? The presence of two or three
18:07
grounded, biblically literate witnesses cuts right through
18:12
that subjective mystical fog. They hold the person's behavior
18:15
and their claims up to the harsh objective light of Scripture.
18:18
They confirm that God never contradicts his own moral law.
18:22
Spot on. And what about the other extreme
18:24
legalism? How does bringing witnesses
18:27
prevent that? On the legalism side, the
18:29
requirement for witnesses prevents church authority from
18:32
being abused or weaponized without proof.
18:35
A pastor or an elder board cannot initiate discipline
18:37
against a member simply based on rumors, suspicions, or personal
18:41
preferences. If a leader says I just have a
18:43
bad feeling about that guy, well that is not grounds for
18:46
discipline. You need plural verifiable
18:49
proof. It creates a firewall against
18:51
authoritarianism. There is also a powerful
18:53
psychological mechanism at play here.
18:55
When we look at the offenders mindset when we sin, we are
18:58
incredibly skilled at rationalizing our own behavior.
19:01
We truly are. If I confront a brother
19:04
privately, he can easily dismiss my warning.
19:07
He can tell himself well that is just his opinion, he always
19:10
overreacts. He just doesn't understand the
19:12
nuance of my situation. But when you bring witnesses,
19:16
you shatter that rationalization.
19:19
The pastoral term for that dynamic is plurality of
19:22
pressure. A person caught in unrepentant
19:24
sin is wrapped in layers of self deception.
19:27
But when two or three mature, respected believers, perhaps
19:31
ordained elders or seasoned godly Saints within the
19:34
congregation, stand physically in front of them and unitedly
19:37
say we have reviewed the evidence, you are in serious
19:40
error. It changes everything.
19:42
They say this behavior is a direct violation of God's word
19:45
and it is destroying your soul. It becomes exponentially harder
19:48
to dismiss the warning. It loosens the iron grip of self
19:52
deception. It multiplies the means of
19:54
reproof. This plural pressure is a severe
19:56
mercy. It is intentionally designed to
19:58
wake the Sinner up and break their hard heart before the
20:01
situation has to reach the. Congregational level.
20:04
But tragically, human pride is a formidable force.
20:07
People do harden their hearts against that plural pressure.
20:09
I'm sure every pastor listening to this has a heartbreaking
20:13
story of a member who sat in a room with two elders, heard the
20:17
truth spoken in love, and stubbornly folded their arms and
20:21
refused to repent. It is a heavy burden to bear.
20:24
When those verified plural appeals are definitively
20:27
rejected, the nature of the rebellion shifts.
20:30
It goes from being a private, interpersonal offense against a
20:33
single brother to a hardened public resistance against
20:36
Christ's appointed means of grace.
20:39
The narrative must now move to the ultimate earthly court,
20:42
which is the gathered congregation.
20:44
In verse 17, Jesus dictates the next step.
20:47
If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church.
20:50
We must define our terms with absolute theological precision
20:53
here. The word ecclesia in this
20:56
specific context is not referring to the universal
20:58
invisible body of all believers throughout history.
21:01
Because you physically cannot tell a matter of local church
21:03
discipline to the invisible church.
21:05
Exactly. Nor is the text referring to a
21:08
distant hierarchical magisterium like the Roman Catholic model,
21:12
where a Bishop in another city makes the ruling.
21:14
The sources are unanimous on this point.
21:16
The ecclesia here is the local, physically gathered assembly of
21:21
baptized believers. The local congregation is
21:23
established by Christ as the final definitive Court of Appeal
21:27
on earth for the governance of its own members.
21:29
I want you, the listener, to pause and consider the heavy
21:33
emotional weight of the second-half of that verse, Jesus
21:36
says. And if he refuses to listen even
21:39
to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax
21:43
collector. That is a staggering statement.
21:46
We were talking about treating someone like an absolute
21:49
outsider. We are talking about social and
21:52
covenantal exclusion. It is a massive shift in
21:55
relationship. I think a lot of people struggle
21:56
to reconcile that severe exclusion with the compassion
21:59
Jesus showed during his earthly ministry to those exact groups
22:02
of people. Jesus ate with tax collectors.
22:05
He yielded the servants of Gentiles.
22:07
You did. How does treating someone like a
22:09
Gentile aligned with the heart of Christ?
22:11
This tension forces us to understand the precise nature of
22:14
excommunication. The sources describe this final
22:17
step not as an act of vengeance, but as a severe mercy.
22:20
What does that look like practically?
22:22
To treat an unrepentant member as a Gentile and a tax collector
22:25
means formally removing their assurance of salvation.
22:29
It means barring them from the Lord's Supper, a practice known
22:32
in Reformed circles as fencing the table.
22:35
The Church is taking action to ensure that the Holy Sacrament
22:38
is not profaned by someone living in open, defiant,
22:41
unrepentant rebellion. The congregation is formally
22:44
publicly declaring that this person's visible, ongoing
22:47
lifestyle is currently incompatible with a credible
22:51
profession of Christian faith. But let's clarify the mechanism
22:54
of why the church does this. It is not about punishing the
22:57
person, right? It is about realigning their
22:59
reality. Yes.
23:00
This is never done out of malice, hatred, personal
23:03
vindictiveness, or a desire for political control within the
23:06
church body. Treating them as a Gentile means
23:08
the church must begin evangelizing them anew.
23:11
You no longer treat them as a secure brother or sister in
23:14
Christ. You treat them as someone who
23:16
desperately needs to hear the gospel of repentance.
23:19
You preach Christ crucified to them with fresh, urgent clarity.
23:23
I think we need to spend some time on the psychological and
23:25
spiritual impact of this exclusion.
23:28
What does it actually feel like to be removed from the table?
23:31
It is devastating. When a person is barred from
23:34
communion, they are suddenly cut off from the covenantal comfort
23:37
they have grown used to. They sit in the Pew while the
23:40
elements are passed and they are bypassed.
23:42
The social and spiritual isolation is designed to be
23:45
jarring. It is meant to shock the system.
23:48
The shock is the intended mechanism.
23:50
The discipline is designed to awaken them to their immense
23:53
spiritual peril. As long as the church continues
23:56
to serve them communion and speak peace to them while they
23:58
live in rebellion, the church is effectively aiding in their self
24:02
deception. The church is handing them a
24:04
spiritual narcotic. By removing the covenantal
24:07
comfort, you are praying that the sudden, painful loss of
24:10
fellowship will be the catalyst that drives them to rock bottom.
24:13
You want them to feel the isolation of their sins so
24:16
intensely, the genuine repentance becomes the only
24:20
logical, desirable option. It reveals the deeply corporate
24:24
nature of holiness. The modern church often
24:27
functions like a collection of isolated religious consumers.
24:30
Very true. People show up on Sunday
24:32
morning, grab a coffee, listen to an inspiring lecture, listen
24:36
to the music, and go home completely disconnected from the
24:39
lives of the people sitting next to them.
24:41
But a refusal to tell it to the Church when a member is an
24:44
unrepentant sin shows a massive loss of love for Christ's holy
24:48
and the purity of his bride. If the church ignores the sin,
24:52
the whole body is implicated. The congregation has a shared,
24:55
unavoidable duty to pursue holiness together.
24:58
That concept of corporate accountability is central to
25:02
Reformed ecclesiology. To belong to the visible Church
25:05
means voluntarily placing yourself under the loving
25:08
oversight and authority of the local body.
25:10
Modern Western individualism violently recoils at this
25:14
concept. It really does.
25:16
Modern people generally want the emotional blessings of community
25:19
without any of the structural obligations of accountability.
25:21
But Christ did not design the church as a consumer service.
25:24
He designed it as a covenantal family.
25:27
And in a healthy family, if a sibling is engaged in
25:30
destructive behavior, the rest of the family doesn't just smile
25:33
and pretend everything is fine. They intervene.
25:36
The familial obligation is absolute.
25:39
When a member persists in sin and the church collectively
25:42
pleads with them to turn back, and they still defiantly refuse,
25:47
the church must change its visible judgment about that
25:50
person's spiritual standing. To continue speaking peace and
25:54
assurance to someone who is actively, defiantly rejecting
25:57
Christ's commands would be a cruel, deceptive falsehood.
26:01
Biblical love tells the truth, even when the truth involves the
26:05
agonizing process of removing someone from the membership
26:08
roles and treating them as an unbeliever.
26:10
This naturally leads any thinking listener to wonder
26:13
about the mechanics of authority.
26:14
It is the next logical question. By what right does a group of
26:18
local fallible people and act such a life altering judgment?
26:22
Taking someone off a membership role, denying them access to the
26:25
Lord's Supper, publicly declaring their profession of
26:27
faith to be invalid, That is massive.
26:30
It destroys a person's social standing.
26:32
It alters the trajectory of their life.
26:34
This moves the discussion to the theological engine driving the
26:38
entire process. We have to look at Christ's
26:41
delegated authority in verse 18. Jesus says, quote truly I say to
26:46
you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and
26:49
whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
26:52
To understand the staggering weight of this verse, the
26:55
sources provide a rigorous technical breakdown of the
26:58
original Greek syntax. The phrases shall be bound and
27:02
shall be loosed are translated from very specific Greek verb
27:06
forms known as future perfect passive paraphrastics.
27:10
OK, stop right there. I know it's a mouthful.
27:12
Future perfect passive paraphrastics.
27:14
That sounds like a spell from a fantasy novel for the listener
27:17
trying to grasp the practical implication.
27:20
Translate that grammar into everyday English.
27:22
What does that tense actually mean?
27:23
It sounds intimidating, but the meaning is intensely practical.
27:27
The precise grammatical translation of that syntax is
27:30
Whatever you bind on earth shall have already been bound in
27:33
heaven. Let me repeat that.
27:34
Yeah, shall have already been bound.
27:36
The tense indicates that the action on earth follows and
27:39
reflects the prior action in heaven.
27:41
The earthly church is not initiating the judgement.
27:44
It is reflecting A judgement that heaven has already
27:47
established based on the truth of God's Word.
27:49
So to translate that grammar into a practical image for the
27:53
listener, the church isn't holding a blank check from God,
27:56
allowing them to make up rules and bind people to whatever
27:59
arbitrary standards they invent, right?
28:01
It's more like a bailiff in a courtroom reading the verdict
28:04
that the judge has already handed down.
28:06
That is a great analogy. The bailiff doesn't write the
28:08
law, and he doesn't decide the sentence.
28:11
He merely announces what the judge has decreed.
28:13
The Church is just declaring what heaven has already decided
28:16
based strictly on God's written word.
28:18
The bailiff analogy captures the dynamic Florida State.
28:22
The Church's authority is strictly declarative.
28:25
The sources draw a sharp contrast between this
28:27
declarative authority and the mystical hijacking of this text
28:31
often seen in the prosperity gospel movement.
28:33
Oh yes, you frequently hear charismatic preachers claiming
28:37
that verse 18 gives them the supernatural ability to bind
28:40
territorial demons or loose financial blessings over an
28:44
audience. That interpretation is a
28:46
complete categorical distortion of the biblical context.
28:49
It is taking a text about church discipline and turning it into a
28:53
magic incantation for personal gain.
28:55
Precisely the binding and losing in Matthew 18 refer exclusively
29:00
to retaining or releasing the guilt of sin based on a person's
29:04
response to church discipline the.
29:06
Authority given to the Church is ministerial, not magisterial.
29:09
The church is a servant submitting to the Word, not a
29:12
master ruling over it. And it is vital to notice that
29:15
Jesus uses the plural U in the Greek.
29:18
Meaning what practically? This authority is not vested in
29:21
a single rogue pastor acting like a dictator.
29:25
It is vested in the gathered local congregation acting
29:28
together in plural unity to reflect Christ's kingship.
29:31
The theological implication of that specific Greek syntax is
29:34
sobering. The sources argue that this
29:36
reality, the fact that heaven stands behind the faithful
29:39
discipline of the church, should produce immense fear, humility
29:42
and carefulness in church elders and members.
29:45
It is a severe warning to those modern church leaders who fear
29:48
legal repercussions, bad public relations on social media, or a
29:53
drop in Sunday attendance numbers more than they fear God.
29:56
When a church acts faithfully according to Scripture to
29:59
discipline an unrepentant member, their earthly action is
30:02
the literal echo of a divine decree.
30:06
If church leaders truly grasped the reality that heaven stands
30:09
behind faithful discipline, they would never treat these matters
30:12
lightly, emotionally or politically.
30:15
It removes any conceivable room for personal vendettas,
30:18
favoritism, or spiritual abuse. The church only has the
30:21
authority to speak where Christ. Christ is clearly spoken in His
30:24
Word. When discipline is carried out
30:26
humbly, patiently and biblically, the unrepentant
30:28
Sinner is not just facing an annoyed elder board.
30:31
They are facing the authority of Christ Himself, expressed
30:34
through His local body. Conversely, when a repentant
30:36
Sinner breaks down, confesses their sin, and is restored and
30:39
loosed by the congregation, they receive a tangible earthly
30:43
physical assurance of heaven's forgiveness.
30:45
It is an incredible, beautiful mechanism of grace.
30:48
It truly is. Let's synthesize the core
30:50
message for everyone listening. Matthew 18, 18 verses 15 through
30:54
18 is not a cold procedural manual for conflict resolution.
30:58
It is the lifeblood of Christ's redemptive government over His
31:01
people. The shepherd seeks the wandering
31:03
sheep, the King commands the process of objective truth and
31:07
justice, and the Savior restores the repentance center.
31:11
Discipline, despite how harsh it sounds to modern heirs, is a
31:14
vital, non negotiable expression of covenantal love.
31:18
Requires immense courage. It requires the courage to
31:21
confront a friend privately. It requires the patience to.
31:24
Establish objective proof with witnesses and it requires the
31:27
integrity to. Maintain the purity of the
31:29
visible church even when it costs the church popularity or
31:31
numbers without these elements actively.
31:34
Functioning A congregation forfeits its calling to reflect
31:36
the holy character of Jesus Christ to a watching world.
31:39
I want to leave you with a specific.
31:41
Lingering thought. This builds on the text critique
31:44
of modern individualism, and it is something you can Mull over
31:48
long after this audio ends. It is a heavy question.
31:51
We've established today that. Biblical accountability requires
31:54
a physical face to face, locally gathered ecclesia.
31:58
You have to physically go to your brother.
32:00
You have to physically take witnesses.
32:02
You have to physically tell it to the gathered church.
32:04
But consider our highly. Transient digital age We live in
32:08
an era where a. Person can simply delete an app,
32:11
block a phone number, or quietly slip out the back door of a
32:14
sanctuary to attend a different church down the street.
32:16
The absolute second they're confronted with their sin, it is
32:19
easier than ever to. Run away if we could just ghost
32:22
our local. Congregation to avoid the
32:24
painful grace of discipline. How does that reality challenge
32:28
our basic understanding of what it actually means to belong to
32:32
the body of Christ? It forces every believer to.
32:34
Ask a terrifying question. Are we actually submitting to
32:37
Christ's physical governance, or are we just consuming religious
32:41
content on our own autonomous terms?
32:44
That is the question we all have to.
32:45
Answer Thank you for joining us for this rigorous deep dive on
32:48
Reformed thinking. We encourage you to weigh these
32:51
historical and theological concepts against your own
32:54
understanding of true biblical love and to consider the severe
32:57
mercy that Christ requires of His people.