Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News Podcast 3rd June 2024

Transcript

UK Column News Podcast 3rd June 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. Today is Monday, the third of June twenty twenty four,
0:13
just after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News. I'm your host,
0:16
Maran Gerrish, delighted to be joined by Professor Diane Rasmus and Macaddie, and
0:22
also by Mark Anderson from the USA. Well, what is the theme of
0:28
our news today. I think it's very much on the fact that it can't
0:32
possibly be true that we have elected politicians who are discussing our best interests in
0:38
Parliament and we're now about to go through an election to select the latest best
0:44
group of right honorable men and women in order to run our lives to the
0:49
best of our satisfaction. I think something rather different is going on, and
0:54
we're going to have a look in particular at propaganda and facts and misinformation in
1:00
this news edition. So if you've joined us, welcome, Let's have a
1:06
look. And let's start with a very simple tweet that was sent through to
1:08
me and I thought, with my morning cup of tea, my goodness,
1:12
this is really incredible. So here's the tweet. It's from at Defense HQ,
1:18
the UK's Ministry of Defense. It says, here's the reality NATO never
1:22
agreed it wouldn't expand and has been open to new members since it was founded
1:27
in nineteen forty nine. Its job is keeping its members safe, and I've
1:32
commented on that by saying, as NATO weapons are unleashed on Russia at the
1:37
hands of Western NATO allies, the uk of Ministry of Defense pumps out the
1:42
propaganda of we've got clean hands. So let's have a look at this fascinating
1:48
little video clip. Although we are short and sharp, with empowering solemn music
2:27
and of course the messages that we've done nothing wrong. It's all those nasty
2:31
Russians. And the question is has NATO pushed forward and effectively intimidated and forced
2:42
the Russians into action? Well that's what the Russians would say. But what
2:46
was particularly interesting was just to have a little look at how the public responded
2:51
to this video. So they were clearly challenging that little video clip. The
2:55
myth we had this one by thinking slow and then we arrived to the two
3:01
thousand and eight Progress Summit of NATO, which was a massive mistake on the
3:07
Western side trying to push Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. It was quote stupid
3:12
at every level at that time. If you want to start a war with
3:15
Russia, that's the best way of doing it. And that was an interview
3:19
with Sir Roderick Line, British Ambassador of Russia two thousand to two thousand and
3:23
four. And the person who posted this tweet x has even been kind enough
3:30
to put the link through to the document itself. So I'm going to say
3:35
this is really interesting because we've got the public actually engaging in order to challenge
3:42
what the Ministry of Defense has said. Simplicicus here has actually put out part
3:47
of a document. Now I'm taking the document at face value at the moment,
3:53
but in it there's a quote supposedly from the Secretary of State James Baker,
3:58
we understand the need for assurances to the countries in the east. If
4:02
we maintain a presence in Germany that is part of NATO, there will be
4:06
no extension of NATO's jurisdictions for sources of NATO one inch to the east.
4:13
So these still need checking. However, the point I'm making is that it's
4:17
very interesting to see the public coming back and what they're effectively saying to the
4:21
Ministry at Defense is no, we are not accepting what you have said on
4:27
face value. So if we put up two more just to have a little
4:30
look, let's bring this one in. So Lulu Bowen has said NATO on
4:35
NATO is not sovereign, is instructed and directed by European countries. So by
4:42
proxy NATO did agree to borders. France and Germany have absolutely overthrown the Minsk
4:48
agreement. Now there is more in this little tweet, but what I want
4:53
to point out is the person is really thinking through what's going on. And
4:58
of course we start to see the luring of the lines between what is NATO
5:02
acting as NATO what France and Germany are doing acting as sovereign states. This
5:08
must be immensely confusing to the Russians, but of course it gives the opportunity
5:14
for the Western powers, the US and the UK in particular, to one
5:18
minute hide behind their actions and nation, and the next minute hide behind their
5:24
actions as NATO. Let's bring another one on screen here, and this is
5:29
tougher. It says, No, the reality is NATO is not keeping anyone
5:32
safe. It's backing wars in foreign countries like Ukraine. And that goes on.
5:38
Say, if there were no Allied partners. No one had everyone else's
5:42
back, then the world would be much safer and happier for it. So
5:47
it says there may be occasional small wars in some backwater, but it wouldn't
5:51
drag everyone into the fight. Diana, I'm going to welcome you to the
5:56
News today. Your specialist professional area is informatics and research. What is your
6:02
take on the response here? I think we've got the public really starting to
6:08
do the job, which is argue back instead of just shout thanks. Brian,
6:14
Yes, glad to be here. Absolutely, I agree with you.
6:16
It's really interesting. I think how they are confusing and mixing the messages around
6:23
to make people believe that perhaps correct information is misinformation and vice versa. And
6:29
that's what I'm going to cover here today, to go a little bit further
6:30
in to see trying to figure out what it is that they're actually doing and
6:34
what we need to do to make people more aware of this. So I'd
6:39
like to start here with a video from scan News from that w Evans sent
6:44
to me over the weekend, and we'll go from there. Minds in British
6:47
life things we don't agree on, political, cultural, ideological, But here
6:53
perhaps is the deepest when one part of the population rejects the other's version of
6:58
reality. Concept. We've come here to West Cumbria, just outside the Lake
7:09
district actually, and we're going to the Weekend Truth Festival WTF for short.
7:13
I think most people would describe it as a conspiracy theory festival, So yes,
7:20
WTF. Indeed, we have an article here as well that went along
7:25
with the video that the journalist wrote, saying that Katie Hopkins was there.
7:30
She was one of the headline speakers and said I smell a virgin when she
7:32
looked directly at the Sky News reporter who was there, as he sort of
7:36
said infiltrating it, and he interviewed some of these so called conspiracy theorists and
7:43
trolls and used the kind of language that Marianna Spring likes to use when she's
7:46
describing people that don't see things in the mainstream view and the official view of
7:50
things. And he quoted someone here saying Teresa said, it's not a fiction
7:56
book, is it, you know, as if to ridicule Teresa for thinking
7:59
that it was in fact real. Well, it is real, and there
8:01
is a sequel to the Great Reset, So these are not fictional items.
8:05
And I think that's what they're trying to do, you know, just at
8:09
first glance and talks about strong emotion, and if we look at the next
8:13
slide here, if they were talking about the strong emotion of these conspiracy theorists
8:18
and how angry they were, Well, does anyone remember back in twenty twenty
8:22
when those of us who didn't buy into the COVID narrative were called covidiots.
8:26
This is an article from the Telegraph from early on in twenty twenty. They
8:30
certainly had strong emotion against the rest of us who had a different way of
8:33
seeing things, didn't they. So I know that UK Column has been looking
8:39
at the so called independent fact checking organization Full Fact for some time. If
8:43
you haven't read this article from Brian from back in twenty twelve, I highly
8:46
recommend it. It goes a little bit deeper into some controversy that the UK
8:50
What Column was involved in and stood up against back in twenty twelve. But
8:54
I decided to go a little bit further into Full Fact itself. And or
9:01
if you were really upset about it, you could maybe think of your own
9:05
bad language to substitute with the word fact. But I won't do that because
9:07
as a professional organization. So here is a crowd funder that will start with
9:13
from Full Fact where they are trying to crowdfund the twenty twenty four election,
9:18
and just to show you the video there that they were promoting to get people
9:22
to donate to this eighty five thousand pounds that we want, go ahead,
9:26
please fucks the facts, the fact, the fact. In the run up
9:31
to the general election, we're being bombarded with facts everywhere we look, but
9:35
how do we know what to trust. That's where Full Fat comes in.
9:39
Full Fact is the UK's leading independent fact checking charity. Every day, the
9:43
team at Full Fact tirelessly sifts through claims, statements and news to ensure that
9:48
everyone receives accurate and reliable information. And we must ensure that bad information doesn't
9:54
gain traction and doesn't corrupt the results of the election. We've honed our skills
9:58
over four general elections and three referendums and now we're bringing all our experience to
10:03
this election. But we're asking for your help. We need to raise eighty
10:07
five thousand pounds to fact check the general election at a scale never seen before.
10:11
Your donation will help fund our biggest ever team of fact checkers. That
10:15
means more fact checks on more politicians, reaching more people. You'll be playing
10:20
your part in amplifying good information to ensure that voters in every constituency can make
10:24
informed choices on the issues that matter to them. Donate to Full Fact now
10:30
and keep the facts at the heart of the general election. Thank you so,
10:41
given that fabulous video with your amazing background music. I would like to
10:46
go into a Full Fact a little bit more as an organization and a particular
10:50
who is at the top, who is in charge of Full Fact, And
10:52
just to ask these questions of do we really believe that this is in fact
10:56
an independent fact checking organization. My view is no, but let's see what
11:01
you think. So I went into looking some of the financials of Full Fact
11:07
and some of the major supporters, and some of these financial figures you can
11:11
freeze the screen. I know there's quite a bit there, but there's some
11:13
information about who is donated to Full Fact in the past few years in terms
11:18
of major grants, in terms of the directors, who are on the trustee
11:22
board and so on, and who the major supporters have been. You know
11:24
what it says here that basically this website giving is great where I found these
11:28
figures, say, well, it's you know, it's basically it's in a
11:31
fabulous position. They're doing so well, they're you know, really going forward.
11:35
But who are the trustees that are listed there? So we see the
11:39
full list of the Full Fact Trustees. If you look at some of the
11:43
biographies of some of the men that individuals who are listed, we see here
11:48
Michael Samuel. He is the co founder and the chair of Full Fact.
11:52
I'm going to go into him in a little bit more detail, so I'll
11:56
come back to him, but let's look at these other two. Tim Gordon
12:00
is on the World Economic Forums Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and he is
12:05
in charge of Best Practice AI, and he is working on the AI Initiative
12:09
for Full Fact, which is essentially AI trying to fact check fact. Finally,
12:15
we have here James Harding. He is co founder and editor of Tortoise.
12:18
So maybe there's something therefore been riven to follow up on as well,
12:22
and so we can start to see here that Okay, already we're seeing these
12:26
are not independent people who are on the trustee board, and they're quite significant
12:31
positions of power when it comes to the global structure of things. So going
12:35
on to look at Michael Samuel, he has a total of sixty five appointments
12:41
listed on the company's house website. And I know that company's house is not
12:43
always entirely reliable, but it's the best that we have. I think he
12:48
has fifteen current appointments if you filter it by that, and I'm really interested
12:52
in what some of these companies do. He's listed as a philanthropist around the
12:58
internet, and we kind of know what that sort of implies. He is
13:01
in charge of a company called Neux, He's in charge of other things.
13:05
We also have as well his wife Julia, and they have this address called
13:09
in Summerset, which I looked it up as a listed country house, very
13:13
large mountain. That's their correspondence address that's listed in most places we can see
13:20
here. Sir Marcus Samuel was his great great grandfather. He has the peerage
13:24
title of Verse Viscount Yerstead. I hope I'm saying that correctly. He was
13:28
Michael's great great grandfather. And what is significant about him, and be ready
13:33
for this, is that he is the founder of Shell Oil Energy Corporation.
13:39
And we go straight through the peerage, straight through his antstressed and we can
13:43
track this directly back to him, and the peerage has maintained itself up up
13:48
to that point. It's really interesting to see as well when you look at
13:54
this website that is called the Mark, which lists his information about this.
14:01
Like I guess, it's like a reputation website. So you have to apply
14:03
to be managed by the Mark and you can then see their digital profile information
14:11
and so it's very carefully crafted and at list all these organizations that he's a
14:15
member of, he's a chairman of this, he donates to that. It
14:18
just kind of goes on and on and on. So I think it's interesting
14:22
if you compare it to something like Companies House, you compare it to LinkedIn
14:28
that whoever, these people are paying a lot of money to have their digital
14:31
identity shaped into a certain way. Here's part Sorry, Diane, if I
14:37
might just come back in here. I think it's important to say that we're
14:41
looking at people and their connections. The main thing we're focusing on is that
14:48
they're extremely powerful. And if you're involved with sixty five companies, or at
14:54
some stage you've been involved with sixty five companies, it's interesting to see the
14:58
amount of effort that must take to keep going. And also what are their
15:03
connections and interests. So if we're on the subject of independent fact checking,
15:09
is it independent if people have got interests connected in and the problem is we
15:16
don't know. So I just want to stress and echo back to the audience.
15:18
We're not saying these people are doing anything wrong. What we're saying is
15:22
that if you're claiming utter transparency in your full fact checking, we need to
15:28
be very clear who is involved and why they're involved, and what vested interests
15:33
individuals have. Absolutely, these were a couple of articles that were linked from
15:39
his carefully crafted profile. One is about the Princess of Wales who visited it.
15:46
That's just back in twenty twenty three when she was still in public view,
15:50
where she visited the and Freud Center, which is something that he is
15:54
the chairman of and that's worth quite a bit of money. That's actually him
15:58
standing behind Princess of Wales. And articles about mental health awareness anxiety, climate
16:06
anxiety in particular that young people or maybe people in general are anxious about the
16:11
climate. So again another piece of agenda setting there. If you ask me,
16:15
this is a website that is available through libraries. It's a subscription database
16:19
that you have to pay for to or you have your libraries have to pay
16:23
for. So this gives a lot of a lot of information on filings and
16:26
so on by corporations. So just to give you a couple of ideas of
16:30
the financials of these organizations, Mirex Energy is one of many that Michael Sanuel
16:36
comes up on and that has twenty twenty three shareholders funds of I can't see
16:40
that's a few million pounds. And if we go on to the next one,
16:44
we also see the Anafreud Center and we see full Fact. So the
16:48
balance sheet of Anafreud Center, the bottom line there is over thirty million pounds
16:53
and Full Fact has a little over a million pounds. So we see,
16:59
you know again once again, why are we doing this crowdfunding? Why are
17:02
we trying to give the illusion that they need this eighty five thousand pounds for
17:07
crowdfunding this information. This is another organization that Michael Samuel tais. It's called
17:12
Civic And again we see this this narrative over and over again that Wie Evans
17:19
has covered as well about change. We have to change, we have to
17:22
change quickly, We have to do these causes that are systemic issues and we
17:27
have to go in and fix them. So I'm just gonna ask this question
17:30
because I hope to come back to this later. What is next for faux
17:33
facts? And the next answer that I can find is AI. We are
17:38
going to be using AI to do the fact checking, and it will be
17:41
led by this man who is appointed by the WEF as being in charge of
17:47
AI for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. And Marianna Spring luckily wrote an article on
17:52
the weekend about AI fake information, so I will be interested in looking at
17:59
further what she has to say about this topic and how this will maybe tie
18:03
in with the AI fact checking and AI fact check. Marianna, that's a
18:07
bigger question that I have. Brian, okay, Dan, thank you very
18:11
much. That lots of questions to be asked around full fact or faux fact
18:15
as we prefer to call them, But we'll be digging in and seeing what
18:19
else comes to the surface. I did note the business about them saying children
18:25
are becoming increasingly anxious you mentioned there in that presentation, and of course we've
18:30
heard so much of that as a result of the lockdown policy during the time
18:34
of COVID. But we'll come back onto that perhaps a little later in extra
18:38
time. Mark, let's bring you on, because if we're talking about who
18:44
controls the power base, is it the politicians or is it organizations such as
18:48
Buildeberg. Well, Bildeberg has a way of someding like old hats sometimes Brian,
18:56
but it keeps on ticking. They took off two years for COVID twenty
19:02
and twenty twenty one. They may have had smaller breakout sessions or internet sessions
19:06
at that time, but anyway, they're back with a vengeance. The seventieth
19:10
meeting in seventy years. As I've mentioned recently and on this slide, it
19:14
just gives the basics. They finally released their own press release, even though
19:18
we had a good tip that they were meeting in Madrid, Spain, but
19:22
they didn't release it until the first day of their meeting. They're just so
19:26
open on the thirtieth of May, and it says here the key topics for
19:30
the discussion this year, and I gave the official website of the Bilderberg Meetings
19:36
dot org that has been in existence for the better part of twenty years.
19:40
Another time that they claimed that they're so magnanimous and open into transparency. But
19:45
here are the thirteen topics. The state of AI, AI safety, changing
19:51
faces of biology, climate, future of warfare, geopolitical landscape, Europe's economic
19:57
challenges, US economic challenges, US political landscape, ie, they don't want
20:03
Trump in there, among other things. Ukraine and the world. Ukraine and
20:07
the World, roll that off your tongue, Middle East, China and Russia.
20:12
Some very common topics there, and that in fact is a theme to
20:17
think about. Some of these topics are long term. It's not just flash
20:21
in the pan. This is something I won't read in its entirety. It's
20:25
the typical brush off statement that the Builderberg anonymous media department, whose media department
20:33
has no people that they name, and they don't even give a letterhead or
20:37
a physical address. Again more of their transparency. They were founded in nineteen
20:42
fifty four and they were seated with CIA money. I've mentioned that before.
20:47
A UK professor Richard Aldrich of Warwick has confirmed that that CIA money started Builderberg.
20:53
Anyway, they mentioned, of course that the meetings are held under the
20:56
Chathamhouse Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received,
21:02
but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker or speakers, nor any
21:06
other participant may be revealed. In other words, who talks about what can't
21:10
be talked about. And as these ideas and projects kind of work their way
21:15
through society, no one will really know from whom or whence they came,
21:18
so it kind of provides a cloaking for what they do. But anyway,
21:23
moving on here in this next slide, I call it the Buildeberg continuum.
21:29
And what's important here, Brian, is that a lot of people get the
21:33
idea that Builderberg is flashing the pan always on top of the latest topics.
21:36
But in fact they stay with key topics and have for several years. And
21:41
this belies the argument that they just go there to have a retreat and take
21:47
off their jackets, loosen their ties, have some caveat and just vent their
21:52
concerns for the betterment of international relations. And they even make that claim by
21:56
registering as a charity the builderberg Is Sociation of the UK that charity and the
22:03
American Friends of Bildeberg in the state of New York another registered charity. At
22:07
any rate, AI, as my self made chart shows here Brian, AI
22:14
has been discussed twenty thirteen. It appears so that's way back in the UK
22:18
when they met at Wafford twenty fifteen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, twenty
22:22
twenty three, and this year Russia eight times, twenty fifteen in Austria,
22:27
and all the way through to this year twenty twenty four in I Madrid,
22:30
Spain, China at least six six times, as far back as twenty eleven
22:34
in Switzerland, and then these other years I show here twenty seventeen, nineteen,
22:40
twenty two, twenty three and twenty four Ukraine twenty fourteen when Bilderberg met
22:45
in Denmark, and of course that's the year that the Russian leaning government of
22:49
Ukraine was overthrown by Western insiders, including Victoria Newland, who can be traced
22:56
to Builderberg directly in indirectly then also in twenty twenty two, t twenty three
23:00
and this year disinformation evidently in Virginia in twenty seventeen, Italy twenty eighteen,
23:06
Switzerland twenty nineteen and Washington, DC a couple of years ago, and Pharma
23:11
medical issues Spain as far back as twenty ten when I started covering Bildeberg for
23:15
Jim Tucker UK twenty thirteen, DC, twenty twenty two and Spain twenty twenty
23:21
three. So you see they hang on to these issues a long time,
23:25
which clearly suggests that they're nurturing and building on what they discussed the year before.
23:30
So these are not just offhand, have a retreat, loosing your tie
23:33
kind of discussions. Anyway, Another one of the topics, one of the
23:40
topics of the thirteen this year is Middle East, as I indicate in this
23:44
slide, and that can be traced most clearly at least to Sigrid Cog or
23:51
Pig. I'm not sure how you pronounced their last name, Secred Cog,
23:55
I'll say Cog in the wheel right, a Dutch diplomat and politician serving a
24:00
Minister of Finance and first Deputy Prime Minister in the fourth Mark Rutty Cabinet.
24:07
And she is that would be the Netherlands, and she's senior humanitarian and reconstruction
24:12
coordinator for Gaza through the UN. So curiously, there's a Gaza concern among
24:19
Bilderbergers this year in Madrid, and it's interesting to note that rarely, if
24:26
ever, do you see and Israeli official at Builderberg and I can't quite fully
24:30
explain why, So what position they're taking on Gaza. I don't know.
24:34
Brian is curious that the WHO, for all its faults and schemes that we
24:41
find very underhanded, the World Health Organization actually has done some admirable, laudable
24:48
work trying to help the people of Gaza. So is Builderberg feeling a humanitarian
24:52
impulse toward Gaza? We'll find out soon enough. Anyway, in this next
24:57
slide, another Builderberg. I'm just kind of hitting on some highlights. There'll
25:02
be more in depth reports coming up about certain aspects of Bilderberg that I'll be
25:06
writing and reporting about. But of course, the changing faces of biology concerns
25:11
mister Albert Bola, the chairman of the pharma colossus Pfizer and Borla has been
25:18
to Builderberg. I'm going to say three times now it's at least twice,
25:22
but I believe three times, Brian, and we'll move on from there.
25:26
Kind of given an overall framework here, another person pertaining to the current Builderberg
25:33
topic the changing faces of biology, is clearly doctor Pamela Rendy Wagner, nominated
25:40
the new director of the European version of the Senators for Centers for Disease Control
25:47
and on twenty of February twenty twenty four, she was nominated to be the
25:52
Director of the European Centers for Disease Control for a five year period. So
25:56
she was at Bilderberg two along with Albert Borrel and others who have an interest
26:00
in big pharma and moving on here, Brian, this is an important aspect,
26:07
I would contend, and I've covered Builderberg and analyzed them quite a bit,
26:11
I would contend that if it was only the private sector, Shell Oil,
26:15
and Diane mentioned Shell with regards to Fox Facts, Royal Dot Shell has
26:21
been a strong underpinning of Buildeberg for many, many years, that's worth noting.
26:26
But if it was Shell Oil, even Feizer, various private concerns.
26:30
If they were meeting to talk about their stocks, to talk about their financial
26:33
fortunes, without government officials there and without the media there, you might argue,
26:40
well, they can have their country club meetings and sit their caveat and
26:44
do what it is they do. But the problem is breaking the public trust.
26:48
And I mentioned in this slide I don't necessarily need to go through all
26:52
of it, but the government people there are about thirty five of one hundred
26:57
and thirty one attendees this year in Spain Brian that's about twenty six percent,
27:03
so a full one quarter of those there are mainly current serving government officials,
27:08
a few former ones. And I'll mention as a quick footnote, and this
27:11
is curious. I look twice, I'll look again, but I'm pretty sure
27:15
there are no UK currently sitting government officials at Builderberg this year. I don't
27:22
believe there were any. There were former ones like John Sowers who's with Newburg
27:27
and he used to be six but any's associated with the Builderberg Association charity.
27:33
But there appear to have been no sitting British officials there this year, which
27:37
is curious. But some of those who were there this year from government Radislaus
27:42
of Corsti, Polish Foreign Affairs Minister Tarun Chabra, the Senior Director for Technology
27:51
and National Security of the US National Security Council, Adelai at DIMO, Spain's
27:57
Foreign affairs minister. Wait a minute, no, the US Deputy Treasury Secretary
28:03
is Adelaide, pardon me, And then Spain's Foreign Affairs Minister Jose Alberres,
28:11
and then some of the media. We have Anne Applebaum of the Atlantic.
28:15
Of course, we have Gideon Rahman of the Financial Times, the chief Foreign
28:21
affairs commentator, Matthias Dapfner, the share and CEO of Actual Springer. He's
28:26
notable because last year, working with Zanni Mitt and Budles are the economists,
28:30
who of course was there this year as well. They announced through the economists
28:36
that Axel Springer was going to make a major foray into the US media market.
28:41
But the media, they sell out their ethics at the door of Bilderberg,
28:45
just as government officials cannot claim that they can jettison or get rid of
28:52
their government officials a government title or government duties. That is, they can't
28:56
just lead that at the door and go break bread with these private tiers.
29:00
That's an absolute breaking of the public trust, as it is with the media.
29:06
And here in this next slide, I'll just mention in passing, I'm
29:11
looking at something called Builderberg channels. And this is US Army General retired David
29:17
Petraeus, former CIA director and a frequent Builderberg attendee. For the last ten
29:22
or eleven years, he's been assigned to a key Builderberg post. That is
29:25
KKR Global Institute and the founder of kk R. Henry Cravis is the husband
29:30
of Bilderberg Steering Committee co chair Marie Cravis, who also has the American Friends
29:36
of Builderberg charity. So we'll be looking at mister Petraeus Brian in some future
29:41
reports very soon, both on the screen and in the written word by me.
29:47
I'll be looking at this more closely. The real reason why KKR wants
29:51
portray Us on call, and I argue and Forbes kind of suggests at least
29:56
that Portrayus's connection and I would say, including the one through Builderberg especially,
30:03
are what really give KKR an edge and hiring him portray Us to head that
30:10
KKR Global Institute. So Portraeus's Builderberg connections make him very handy and useful for
30:18
that private equity firm KKR, which is among the world's most powerful equity firms.
30:22
And then these last couple slides are articles I did on Builderberg Brian this
30:27
one last year in August. Builderberg Beyond the Meetings Part one. I'm looking
30:33
at doing part two pretty soon, which will take into account not only this
30:37
year's meeting, but looking beyond just the phenomenon of the annual meetings. And
30:42
back about several years ago I did one other one and we can show that
30:48
slide and I can conclude a Builderberger in action Joseph Ackerman a German born banker,
30:55
and he took over Cyprus some years ago. I wrote this article in
31:00
twenty fifteen when Cypress had his financial woes and he became the virtual economic Viceroy
31:06
of Cypress. So it's interesting when Bilderbergers enter into action. And that's what
31:10
we'll be looking at, Brian in my future reports and that second installment I
31:15
plan on writing to look beyond just the annual meetings and really get into the
31:18
nitty gritty as to where these channels go. So over to you, Marleric,
31:23
thank you very much. While we're looking at the power base which in
31:26
my opinion certainly ultimately controls politics and we need to do much more of this.
31:32
Who are these people, who are the authorities they work with, all
31:37
the organizations and what's their true agenda? Well, if you like what UK
31:42
Column does, then please support us for a mere five pounds a month.
31:48
That donation makes a huge difference to what we can do. And of course
31:51
it's our funding members that allow UK Column to work and be here. So
31:56
if you're not already a monthly subscriber, please consider doing that and helping us
32:01
expand. Now, the information we put out is always there to be shared.
32:07
Give us a mention please. We just say that we're still having problems
32:10
with Facebook. We seem to be blocked from our own account, but we
32:14
are working on that. At the moment. You can always help us out
32:17
by making a purchase through the UK Column shop. We're in summer, but
32:22
if the weather's similar to Plymouth at the moment, maybe you should look at
32:28
a hoodie. We'll see what happens. Now, I'd just like to give
32:31
a mention to our virtual event Sunday, the sixteenth of June ten am when
32:37
the UK Column team, that's just some of the team on screen. We'll
32:40
be talking about UK Column, what we've done, how we arrived, where
32:45
we are, and we'll be encouraging our supporters to join in get fully behind
32:52
the UK Column because our intention for the future is to expand and you can
32:58
help us do that. Now, where does that take us? This is
33:01
another BBC article Diane talked about us being bombarded with facts. People were claiming
33:10
that I think we're being bombarded with propaganda, and of course BBC is a
33:15
lead, but this caught my attention Writer's pride over queer Welsh adoption drama,
33:21
and the caption under the photograph says that writer Daf James says is bilingual drama
33:28
about a same sex couple adopting feels like a massive triumph. Now I can
33:31
tell our audience that in the time from the time that I took this clip
33:37
and it's live with us on UK column now that headline has changed and the
33:42
headline above the photo says lost boys and Fairies writer proud of adoption drama.
33:49
So clearly there's been a problem in the BBC with the language that they've used
33:52
and that's had to be changed. But as I got into this article,
33:58
I felt deeply uncomfortable, and maybe not entirely for the reason some people may
34:02
think. Was this image that caught my attention because the caption that went with
34:07
this is that the couple social worker Jackie played by Elizabeth Berrington, assesses,
34:14
supports and guides them the two men through the adoption process, and of course
34:19
in the image is a rather nice looking lady, very kind who's helping these
34:23
two gentlemen to adopt. But there's some questions, let's think about them.
34:28
Did the children's parents consent to their children being taken for adoption? Under what
34:34
circumstances were these children taken from their original birth parents? Did the children's parents
34:39
consent to their children being placed with a male couple? And question three,
34:45
did the children have a say in how they would be brought up? And
34:49
I'm going to suggest to the audience that nobody was consulted. I may be
34:54
wrong on this, but I'm going to draw viewers' attention back to work that
35:00
the UK column was doing way back in twenty thirteen, and on this occasion,
35:06
we put out a video of a baby being snatched, a newborn baby
35:09
being snatched from its mother's arms by very callous, coldhearted social services people.
35:15
The video will be in the show notes for today's news. This was a
35:21
still that we put up on the fifth of April twenty thirteen. Two ladies
35:27
taking the baby, the mother screaming. It was truly harrowing to watch what
35:32
was happening. We asked what kind of women can help snatch a newborn baby
35:37
from his mother and remain so cold. We also asked who these women were.
35:43
And as I was looking at this information this morning, what happened was
35:47
an email came in where another mother was asking the UK column for help because
35:53
her children have been taken snatched by social services. Now I can't show you
35:59
detail, but it says, good morning, I've seen a video of view
36:02
on TikTok regarding the corruption of social services and my children were taken. So
36:08
this is the harrowing reality of children and social services. Children taken with claims
36:16
of risk of future emotional harm, never proven to any satisfactory standard, but
36:24
in a court with no jury, no public, no press, and those
36:29
children simply handed on to other individuals. I am going to say, immensely
36:34
cruel. And the UK column is working hard in the background see if we
36:37
can get the lid off exactly what is happening around children being taken in UK
36:45
and the numbers which run into the thousands. We'll end that segment there.
36:51
Dian, Let's bring you back in because you've been dealing with the traumatic subject
36:55
of vaccine damage and you've recently attended the Raleigh up in Glasgow. Tell us
37:01
what you found. Yes, Brian, we just got back at about two
37:07
in the morning last night from this vaccine injury event in Glasgow, traveling back
37:13
to Edinburgh, the middle of the night. Not a fun place to be
37:15
on the inmate at one in the morning when it's raining. But so first
37:19
I want to say that this was an event called the Bring the Noise Podcast
37:23
Vaccine Injury Yes fundraising event sponsored by Bring the Noise podcast John Watt, who
37:30
has been interviewed previously on the UK column. I believe we have a little
37:35
video clip of the supporting act, so I didn't know who that was,
37:54
but I posted this on Twitter last night. If you want my full coverage
37:58
from last night, please go to my Twitter which is d I A n
38:01
E. Uk C. That's Diane UKC. Please follow me with air.
38:06
I found out on Twitter this morning that somebody replied and that is someone called
38:10
hand Pan Guy on TikTok, and Mike told me that he is commonly seen
38:15
at other similar events, that the kind of music that he plays sort of
38:20
meant to chill people out, and I was definitely feeling chilled out, and
38:22
I was very interested in that instrument that he was playing, which apparently he
38:25
makes himself. So it was really interesting to hear that, so which was
38:31
good for what was to come, because I would say the rest of the
38:34
event was quite obviously emotional, very sad for those who are there who are
38:39
seriously injured and seeking answered, and also just because of the controversial nature of
38:45
the panel. So if we can go through this photo that I have from
38:49
the panel, going from well from left to right. In the picture,
38:52
we have John Watt, Alex Mitchell who was vaccine injured, Adam Roland,
38:58
who is very very sweet. I met him last night and Debbie has interviewed
39:02
him on the column previously. We have doctor Tina Peers, we have doctor
39:07
John Campbell, and Neil Hanby who is an albat MP up here in Scotland.
39:14
I would like to note that this is a UK Column exclusive. Somebody
39:16
said I think it was John Watt who asks if there are any journalists in
39:20
the audience. I know UK column is here tonight. You guys are sound
39:22
and so of course I raised my hand and cheered at that one. There
39:27
weren't any other media organizations there that I could see, so I was really
39:30
happy to be there to at least support the vaccine injured, regardless of what
39:35
we might think of some of the panelists one way or the other. And
39:38
in particular I would like to talk about doctor Rasin Mahatra who was there,
39:44
but as you saw, he was not on the panel. He tweeted earlier
39:47
in the day yesterday that he was well. He was in Geneva on Saturday
39:52
for the Freedom of Protest event in front of the UN protesting the pandemic treaty
39:58
or stuff. But he he took a flight from Dublin to Scotland yesterday and
40:05
he tweeted that as they were boarding the plane, a passenger took it into
40:08
a cardiac arrest and he had to help save the patient. So he was
40:15
there on time For his part. It made it sound like he wasn't going
40:19
to be there on time, but he was. Unfortunately, though, he
40:22
left at sort of the interval and didn't come back, and so he wasn't
40:27
there for the question and answer period. And I know that he sort of
40:30
tried to address during his part of the formal part of the discussion that he
40:35
was aware that people have questioned why he hasn't been helping more of the vaccine
40:40
injured in the UK, because he should have the knowledge to do so.
40:45
However, he said that he sees it as his role to serve around the
40:47
world and that's why he's been traveling to different countries. There are some people
40:51
who think he was doing it just because he likes his speaking engagements, and
40:53
he has six hundred thousand followers on Twitter and on these things, so some
40:58
questions there for me. So I stayed there until past midnight with my husband
41:05
John, who was there videoing most of it holding his phone up with his
41:08
one working hands, and we've got most of it on video, so maybe
41:13
we can do a short clip once we have a chance to get that edited.
41:15
The VIP event, which I was able to get to as being the
41:20
only media person there, there are also some vaccine injured people who were there
41:24
were talking about meeting the speakers. Of course, nobody got to meet doctor
41:30
Malhaltra because he had taken off to his hotel wherever he was. I did
41:34
get to see it, got to meet Adam which spoke with him for a
41:37
few minutes again very very sweet man. There's me with my husband John,
41:44
and with the other John Watt, and then another John, John Campbell with
41:49
my husband John as well, so lots of John's there at the VIP event.
41:52
I didn't give a chance to speak with John Campbell directly, but there
41:57
was some again vaccine injured people there who are really trying hard to understand what
42:02
was going on give the answers. We had a podcaster, Craig Houstin,
42:08
who I did not expect to see there last night. He was there to
42:13
sort of give the He was kind of the m C. He ran the
42:16
auction. He spoke to everyone a little bit. And John and I are
42:21
huge fans of Craig Houston. He's based in Glasgow. He has brilliant commentary
42:25
about all of the the SMP issues, we'll just say that, and he's
42:31
really really funny. So I got a chance to catch up with him,
42:34
and I hope that maybe we can get him on the column at some point
42:37
as a guest in the future because he was just such a great man and
42:39
so hilarious. So hopefully we can have some more discussion in extra But just
42:45
to say a few things, I guess if I have a little bit of
42:49
time, not a whole lot, but there were a really a couple of
42:52
important points people trying to get answers. One of the biggest reveals that I
42:58
found was really really interesting about some of the Q and A in particular,
43:02
was, for example, there was an A and E doctor who was there
43:06
who was obviously very switched on, very awake to what's been happening. And
43:09
he said during the last few years, when people have been coming in with
43:13
blood plots and brain bleeds and hemorrhaging, and that the other doctors who were
43:17
there serving in a ANDE have said, well, this is the price that
43:21
we have to pay to keep everyone safe. I thought that was absolutely disgusting.
43:27
I heard from Tina Peers, doctor Tina Pears, who got some pushback
43:32
from the audience because she said that she had taken the jabs because she was
43:37
forced to do so, so she got some pushback for that. She also
43:40
said that she had a treatment for COVID in twenty twenty, so there were
43:45
questions from the audience around was it COVID or was it something else. She
43:49
went into a discussion about maths cell disorders, which I didn't quite follow,
43:52
but that's what she was blaming for what she was calling long COVID. Neil
44:00
Harvey, Neil Neil Handby. Sorry, the MP got a lot of questioning
44:04
because he was trying to say, well, labor is not going to get
44:07
us out of this problem in the general election, and there were literally people
44:09
in the audience yelling back at him. Nobody is going to get us out
44:14
of this. You're not getting us out of this. We need complete change
44:16
everywhere. We need reform. Audience members asking about why aren't you talking about
44:22
Agenda twenty thirty, Why aren't you talking about depopulation? Nobody wanted to go
44:25
there. There was still a bit a bit afraid to go into those sort
44:30
of bigger questions that some of us have. As I was like tweeting,
44:34
I was tweeting a question from the audience, and I know that this has
44:37
not been verified, but it was a question that came up about graphing and
44:43
things floating around in people's bodies as a result, I'm not saying one way
44:45
or the other on that issue for myself, but the question came up,
44:51
and I was tweeting that my Twitter account got locked out and I lost everyone
44:54
that I was following temporarily and I had to answer a bunch of complicated questions
44:59
to get back into may account. So also makes me wonder if Elon Musk
45:01
is as in favor of free speech as he says he is, because it
45:06
was just very strange timing brain. Okay, Diane, thank you very much
45:10
for that report. Well, it's tragic that so many people are suffering from
45:14
these injuries and there's still no proper reaction from the government. But then,
45:17
of course we know the government is in bed with the pharma pharmaceutical companies that
45:23
say their products are safe, and the UK Column will be doing much more
45:28
to expose what the dialogue has been between some of these companies and the so
45:34
called safety regulator, the MHRRA. So stay posted with UK Column for future
45:39
news reports. Mark, let's bring you back in because supposedly again now government,
45:45
our politicians both sides of the Atlantic would have us believe that the World
45:51
Health Organization has our best interests at heart. Indeed, lots of irony is
46:00
found here, Brian noting here the World Health Assembly Agreement reached on wide ranging,
46:06
decisive package of amendments to improve the international Health regulations. Those rags actually
46:13
go back to sanitation guidelines of the UN back in the nineteen fifties, and
46:17
then the IHR were officially created in nineteen sixty nine. They were amended in
46:22
two thousand and five, so they've been a long pre existing thing. There's
46:25
really not any surprise in my book that the IHR update the amendments the update
46:31
of those amendments was completed. Of course, the other side of the package
46:36
is the opposite side of the ledger, is that the treaty was not and
46:42
as James Riguski indicated on UK column this past Friday, and I'm noting now,
46:46
they could call a special session. It could easily go into late this
46:51
year or even the next World Health Assembly, the seventy eighth in the spring
46:54
of twenty twenty five, before they really get a crack at that treaty.
47:00
That does by time for those opposed to that accord to marshal their forces as
47:05
it were, and reiterate their objections and their concerns about the treaty. It's
47:12
no real surprise the regulations were updated, given their history and how long they've
47:15
been established. Of course, the things that mister Gagski mentioned about quarantine and
47:22
the increased quarantine powers of countries for travelers is a huge concern in the articles
47:29
of the IHR here on this slide, I need not go through all of
47:32
them in the interest of time. But Taedros Gabriasis, the Director General of
47:38
the who had this to say. The decision to conclude the Pandemic Agreement within
47:44
the next year demonstrates how strongly and urgently countries want that treaty, which I
47:51
think is not necessarily the case. I don't think that they all, you
47:55
know, are chomping at the bit to get that treaty done necessarily, that's
48:00
something to be yet determined. Because he added, the new pandemic is a
48:05
matter of when, not if. Of course, the avian or bird flu
48:08
is still the top candidate. Today's strengthening of the IHR provides powerful momentum.
48:15
Tadrose added to complete the pandemic agreement in his opinion, which once finalized,
48:21
can help to prevent a repeat of the devastation to health societies and economies caused
48:29
by COVID nineteen. Of course, the most disturbing thing here, and this
48:32
ties into what Diana is saying, is that the devastation caused at that time
48:37
is also the devastation caused by the Jabs and the WHO in never mentioning that
48:44
in the IHR and treaty talks, that is always the biggest red flag.
48:49
They as an institution, they do not recognize any downside officially to the mRNA
48:55
injections and things of that nature. So that's why these issues continue to be
49:02
such a concern. This happened around the time of Buildeberg, and in some
49:07
ways this is a more specific and urgent thing than Buildeberg, but Buildeberg also
49:12
reflected with Albert Morley being there. They're ties to big Pharma and trying to
49:15
nurture those issues along anyway. The new amendments to the IHR include introducing a
49:22
new definition of a pandemic emergency to trigger more effective international collaboration in response to
49:30
events that are at risk of becoming or have become a pandemic. The pandemic
49:36
emergency definition GET this represents a higher level of alarm that builds on the existing
49:42
mechanisms of the IHR, including the determination of public health emergencies of international concern.
49:49
According to the definition, a pandemic emergency is a communical, communicable disease
49:54
that has or is at a high risk of having why geographic go spread to
50:00
and within multiple states, et cetera, et cetera. These slides, of
50:04
course, will be something people can freeze and read in more detail. Other
50:08
changes to the IHR include a commitment to solidarity and equity or on strengthening access
50:15
to medical products and financing more money More vaccines, etc. To avoid vaccine
50:22
nationalism and spread these things around the world equitably. Establishment of States Parties committees
50:29
to facilitate the effective implementation of the amended regulations, and creation of national IHR
50:37
authorities to improve coordination of implementation of the regulations within and among countries. So
50:45
those are some of the key highlights and changes. But here's an interesting twist.
50:49
Brian Epoch Times on the seventeenth of maya this year brought out that the
50:53
ex United States Centers for Disease Control director says it's high time to admit the
51:00
significant side effects of COVID nineteen vaccines exist. And they reported this to the
51:07
Epoch Times credit. And there's a little bit more we can say about this
51:12
moving on from there. Again, I won't share the whole thing, but
51:15
here's some highlights. Doctor Robert Redfield, that's his name, former director of
51:21
the Centers for these Disease Control and Preventions, said that many officials who tried
51:24
to warn the public about potential problems with COVID nineteen vaccines were pressured into silence,
51:30
and that it's high time to admit that there were significant side effects that
51:34
made people sick. Doctor Redfield made the remarks in a May sixteen interview with
51:40
Chris Cuomo on News Nation on television, and Redfield went on to say,
51:45
those of us that tried to suggest there may be significant side effects from vaccines,
51:51
we kind of got canceled because no one wanted to talk about the potential.
51:53
There was the potential that there was a problem from the vaccines, excuse
51:59
me, because they were afraid that that would cause people not to want to
52:04
get vaccinated, doctor Redfield said, and we'll add a little bit more in
52:10
his interview and News Nation, Doctor Redfield said the vaccines that were developed as
52:15
part of Operation Warp Speed were important and saved a lot of lives. However,
52:20
despite their benefits, the drawbacks of the vaccines must be a matter of
52:23
open discussions. So, doctor Redfield, Brian was part of Operation Warp Speed
52:29
at the time Donald Trump was president pushing that operation, and that kind of
52:34
gives you the timeline of when he got involved in all this. So at
52:38
least we're seeing a longtime CDC official admit to a reasonable degree that there's real
52:45
problem, something that the who can't seem to accomplish. So back to you,
52:51
Brian, Yeah, well, thank you very much. For bringing us
52:53
up to date there, and of course what have we got. We've got
52:57
another global organization, the World Health Organization, setting policy which politicians in our
53:04
respective countries effectively just implement without any full and open dialogue with the punk public.
53:12
So is the government running the country as far as health's concerned, or
53:15
is it now the World Health Organization? It's very difficult to tell. But
53:21
let's move on again. The subject is really propaganda in a way. But
53:24
we're back with the BBC and I think this is appropriate. Remember that if
53:29
you are enjoying watching UK column News on a Monday, Wednesday, a Friday,
53:35
three times a week BBC News, BBC propaganda is on the hour,
53:42
every hour of every day. So this is the power of it. This
53:46
is the headline here Tories pledge to tackle confusion over the legal definition of sex.
53:53
So the BBC is trying to suggest to the public that this issue of
53:58
what a man or a woman is is now so difficult for ordinary people to
54:02
understand that they can't really understand the policy that we're going through in the election.
54:09
Of course, Richie Sunnac gets a quote. Let's see what they say.
54:14
He said on the matter the safety of women and girls is too important
54:19
to allow the current confusion around definitions of sex and gender to persist. Well,
54:24
where has the confusion come from. Of course, it's come from government
54:29
policy, both on the labor and the conservative side. He went on to
54:32
say, the Conservatives believe that making this change in law will enhance protections in
54:37
a way that respects the privacy and dignity of everyone in society. So this
54:44
is the twist. The Conservatives under Richie are really saying, we're here to
54:50
protect you and we are going to make the necessary rules to protect people.
54:57
But if we look at how the policy is evolved over the years, the
55:00
reality is it's been the development of the policy itself around men and women and
55:07
what their sexual identifyer is. It's been that policy which has confused more and
55:13
more people. Now I want to take our audience's mind back to Eric Pickles.
55:17
This is the eleventh of April twenty thirteen that the UK column reported this
55:23
quote, and what we said at the time was Eric Pickles, the local
55:28
government secretary, leaves no doubt about what the real message is. He stated
55:32
recently April twenty thirteen, we are going to shake up the balance of power
55:38
in this country. We are going to change the nature of the constitution,
55:44
being no doubt about our commitment to localism. I know I look like an
55:49
unlikely revolutionary, but the revolution starts here and I'm going to strongly suggest to
55:54
our audience that this is exactly what's been unleashed on the public. Loss,
56:00
confusion and breakdown is a key driver for the destabilization necessary for revolution. And
56:07
it's the Conservative government the moment that is doing what it said it was going
56:10
to do in twenty thirty, which is to bring in chaos in order to
56:15
start that revolution and breakdown. And now apparently we have an electorate that doesn't
56:21
understand the difference between a man and a woman. But if Eric Pickles wasn't
56:25
enough that the same news report we also commented on Nicholas Bowles MP, who
56:32
was quoted in the Garden at that time and elsewhere that the then Prime Minister
56:37
and his deputy Nick Klegg want their quote people power revolution to unleash chaotic effects
56:45
across local communities. Chaotic. Therefore, in our votecabury, that's the Conservative
56:52
and Lib dem vocabrey is a good thing. And this was backed up by
56:58
Danny Krueger, Cameron advisor and Tory candidate for Sedgefield, who said that the
57:04
Conservatives plan to introduce a period of what he described as creative destruction in the
57:10
public services. So against that background, I'm going to say, for me,
57:15
it is very clear that if you cannot understand the confusion and chaoe and
57:20
breakdown that's unfolding around us in all aspects of our society, but particularly in
57:27
language and understanding, even the understanding of what a man and a woman is,
57:30
this is an orchestrated attack from within our own government. Now let's move
57:36
on, because the article in the in the BBC text quickly spoke about the
57:42
Equality and Human Rights Commission. I paid attention and visited the website. Most
57:47
people won't, they'll take it at face value. But of course the first
57:52
thing we see here is this organization operates a business plan. So are we
57:58
dealing with a is I government body with our best interests at heart or are
58:02
we dealing with the business plan? Is very difficult to know. And another
58:07
one here is it saying an update on our approach to regulating artificial intelligence.
58:15
So now we see, as Diane mentioned earlier on, we're seeing links through
58:19
to the power of the use of artificial intelligence to control the way the public
58:24
behaves. We've got a little video clip here talking about the Equality and Human
58:29
Rights Commission. Let's have a look at it. It's about being open minded,
58:40
having respect for human dignity. It's about recognizing the good in people and
58:47
being fair and decent to each other. These are the values we all recognize
58:54
the principles of equality and human rights. But how can we all conte it
59:00
to affair more equal and prosperous society for future generations. We have got to
59:07
start providing some guidance because this will be a time that defines us. If
59:27
everyone gets a fair chance, we all drive. So think about the message
59:40
we ordinary people, men and women. We don't know enough about life to
59:46
organize our relations with other human beings. We need the Equality and Human Rights
59:51
Commissioned to do us to it for us and immense cynicism. I think in
59:55
that little video clip, the lady to me was a blue rid It's Tory,
1:00:00
and so the words coming out of her mouth is designed for other voters
1:00:05
to pick up on what she's saying as if this was the way we should
1:00:09
be going. So think through what are we dealing with a government appointed body
1:00:15
which is telling us how to interact with other human beings under a business plan.
1:00:21
There are some weaknesses, I think, and if we have a look
1:00:22
at what the business plan talks about, it's these topics. I won't give
1:00:28
you them all, but I just want to highlight a couple. We've got
1:00:30
tackling sexual harassment in the workplace, supporting change excuse me, and uniform services.
1:00:37
This is really important because this is driving the woke agenda into the police
1:00:43
and the military in particular. But they're at number three. We've got regulating
1:00:47
artificial intelligence and tackling digital exclusion. So here are these people. They're working
1:00:54
on everything, including upholding freedom of expression supposedly, but they're also building their
1:01:00
own organization and developing their people. So we had a little look into the
1:01:07
team to see what we could see. This is Jessica Butcher mb AND.
1:01:13
She was appointed for four years a serial technology entrepreneur, angel investor and business
1:01:20
advisor and co founder CMO of Blipper from twenty eleven to twenty fifteen during its
1:01:27
rapid assent as one of the global tech pioneers. Now she has been voted
1:01:31
by the government to look after our relationships with other people. It seems to
1:01:37
me that her main drive is and business, but she's got lots of personal
1:01:42
opinions about the issue of personal relations ships and I believe this is one of
1:01:47
the reasons why the government a selector. And of course she's received an award
1:01:52
including the BBC's Top one hundred Women. So here we see the circle going
1:01:57
around. But if you want to have a look at Blipper here, they
1:02:00
are transforming the world around us. But look at the sub headline creating your
1:02:07
own metaverse there, and if I bring this one up, you see the
1:02:12
value of the business that we're dealing with. So according to this site from
1:02:15
this lady, the projected value of the metaverse by twenty thirty is five trillion
1:02:22
dollars. But don't worry, their main interest is how you interact with fellow
1:02:29
human beings. So this is a bit more from the site itself. I
1:02:35
just bring up that artificial intelligence one here again they're going to be regulating it.
1:02:43
Well, are they going to be doing that or are they going to
1:02:45
be facilitating the use of artificial intelligence to the best to the best outcome for
1:02:53
those global corporations. It's very difficult to say, but I just want to
1:02:59
bring all screen Mike Robinson's slide from way back the twenty seventh of October twenty
1:03:05
twenty three, because he'd picked up that Rishi was quoted as saying that the
1:03:08
British people should have peace of mind that we're developing the most advanced projections for
1:03:14
AI of any country in the world, and he went on to say,
1:03:19
the UK's answer is not to rush to regulate. This is a point of
1:03:22
principle. We believe it's innovation. It's a hallmark of the British economy,
1:03:28
so we will always have a presumption to encourage it, not to stifle it.
1:03:32
And finally, instead we're building world leading capability to understand and evaluate the
1:03:38
safety of AI models within government. So is the government body working for the
1:03:44
best interests of the public or is it really there working alongside the government in
1:03:49
the best interests of the business. It's difficult to tell. But here's another
1:03:53
twist. If we look at the Equality in Human Rights Commission and people involved,
1:03:59
we've got May Thompson. She is also the CEO of Media Trust here.
1:04:05
She was CEO of the Women's Foundation Hong Kong. She's held senior positions
1:04:11
at the Walt Disney Company in the Financial Times, she's been part of the
1:04:15
all Well Foundation, and she's one of the Charity Times Top fifteen Women Leaders.
1:04:20
So immensely powerful woman who's worked with companies such as Walt Disney. But
1:04:28
why do we sorry? Why are we interested in that? Well, let's
1:04:30
have a look at this little video clip from the Media Trust itself. Media
1:04:36
Trust is a unique charity that changes lives through the power of media. For
1:04:42
over twenty one years, we've been asking media professionals to give something back,
1:04:46
empowering charities, communities, and individuals to have a voice and be heard.
1:04:55
And it's not just broadcast journalists helping out either. Last year alone, six
1:04:59
hundred media professionals volunteered their time, their passion, and their expertise to over
1:05:04
three thousand, five hundred charitable causes. We're stalling the detail. Media Trust
1:05:15
gives opportunities, encouragement, and most importantly of all, practical health, enabling
1:05:21
those charities to establish themselves and raise their essential funds. Media Trust works to
1:05:30
support marginalized communities, giving them both skills and confidence to challenge the way their
1:05:35
community is perceived. Isn't it time we change the record. Media Trust uses
1:05:44
the power of the media to inspire, to support, to train, and
1:05:46
mentor young people. We make sure they're armed with the essential tools they need
1:05:51
to find work and become self sufficient. Media trusts work transforms lives. Please
1:06:06
help us to keep making a difference. So there we are trust us to
1:06:14
make a difference. They're transforming lives. But why do they want to transform
1:06:18
lives? We'll have a look at the small print of the Media Trust and
1:06:21
are bringing up on screen for you here because it says that our Western Communicating
1:06:27
Climate Program, initiated and funded by the Goarfield Western Foundation, supported thirty environmental
1:06:33
charities to extend the power reach and impact their communications. And what do they
1:06:39
want to push across It's climate change. And what's more is that they are
1:06:45
working directly with the output of COP twenty six, where many participants were able
1:06:51
to translate their learning into action, hosting events and exhibitions at the summit showcase
1:06:57
stories of climate action, and secure media coverage. So I'm going to end
1:07:02
it there, but just to say that if we follow through what the government,
1:07:05
what the BBC say is happening with these organizations, it is very easy
1:07:12
if you're methodical to work out there's something completely different happening. We're out of
1:07:16
time now for the UK Column News, so I must end there. But
1:07:23
as always, do your own research, be methodical and you will see that
1:07:29
what we are being told on a daily basis is not exactly as the UK
1:07:32
Government would have it. We will end there. Thank you very much for
1:07:36
joining us wherever you are in the world. And if you are a monthly
1:07:42
subscriber of UK Column, please wait for a few minutes and join us for
1:07:45
UK Column Extra. We will see you then. UK Column News will be
1:07:50
back at the same time on Wednesday. See you then bye bye. Everything there any