Latest / Challenges of Faith Radio Program / O Flock, O Flock: Ep 3459
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: Welcome back to Challenges of Faith radio program.
- 0:03Speaker 2: I'm Gary McKenz here on episode 3459. According to Futurism,
- 0:10Speaker 2: it's released to the flock system. You know, we haven't
- 0:14Speaker 2: talked about that in a few weeks. But they talk
- 0:18Speaker 2: about the flock license plate camera density by state.
- 0:24Speaker 1: And how it's ranked.
- 0:27Speaker 2: The Reclaim the Net has an analysis of the locations
- 0:34Speaker 2: of flock safety license plate readers, which has been mapped
- 0:38Speaker 2: out by volunteers, and it shows that there's one of
- 0:41Speaker 2: these devices.
- 0:42Speaker 1: For every 1,200 people in Georgia. Say what?
- 0:49Speaker 2: And that this is the highest density in the United States,
- 0:52Speaker 2: more than double the national rate, and higher than any
- 0:57Speaker 2: other state The numbers are based on 116,548 flocked cameras
- 1:05Speaker 2: mapped across the country in the U.S. Census Bureau's July
- 1:11Speaker 2: 2025 estimates of the population. At the other end of
- 1:15Speaker 2: the scale, New Hampshire has 19 mapped cameras of 1.3
- 1:21Speaker 2: per 100,000 people. The mapped flocked license plate cameras per 100,000
- 1:27Speaker 2: residents by state Of the top 15, you ready to
- 1:32Speaker 2: hear about them? Because maybe it's your state that we're
- 1:35Speaker 2: speaking of. You sure you want to know?
- 1:39Speaker 1: Of course you do. Georgia, again, 9,407 to 11, wow, 11, wow, wow, wow.
- 1:45Speaker 3: Mm, mm, mm. 83.2% of the population.
- 1:59Speaker 1: Ohio, 53% of the population.
- 2:01Speaker 3: Texas, 50.4%. Alabama, 49.5%.
- 2:02Speaker 1: Indiana, 49.2%. Illinois, 46.3%. Kansas, 44.4%. Tennessee, 43.9.
- 2:28Speaker 3: California, 43.6. Missouri, 40.9.
- 2:28Speaker 2: Kentucky, 39.7.
- 2:29Speaker 1: Colorado, 38.9. Delaware, 38.5.
- 2:29Speaker 3: Louisiana, 37.8.
- 2:31Speaker 2: Virginia, 36%. of its population as it relates to the
- 3:01Speaker 2: fly cameras. And then, of course, you've got D.C. and
- 3:05Speaker 2: Puerto Rico, 33.8%.
- 3:10Speaker 3: Wow.
- 3:12Speaker 1: And if you go over to Reclaim the Net, you
- 3:16Speaker 1: can look at the ranking.
- 3:20Speaker 2: Of all the states, of every single one. You've got
- 3:26Speaker 2: to remember now that the flock cameras are part of
- 3:28Speaker 2: a system that photographs every passing car. And it reads
- 3:36Speaker 2: and stores the license plate number along with the time
- 3:39Speaker 2: and place of the sighting. And this is just not
- 3:43Speaker 2: a local issue because agencies that have signed up to
- 3:47Speaker 2: the flock network can search each other's cameras effectively making
- 3:52Speaker 2: every town Every town that buys the system are part
- 3:57Speaker 2: of a national surveillance network.
- 4:01Speaker 1: You remember when.
- 4:02Speaker 2: One of the senators, Hall is his last name, wrote
- 4:07Speaker 2: to the flock safety in August? He put the number
- 4:13Speaker 2: of these cameras at more than 120,049 states, producing more
- 4:15Speaker 2: than 20 billion, not millions, not thousands, 20 billion vehicle
- 4:27Speaker 2: scans per month. And he reacted by saying at the
- 4:33Speaker 2: time that Americans do not surrender their privacy rights when
- 4:37Speaker 2: they drive to work, drop their kids off at school,
- 4:40Speaker 2: or go to church, and that Congress never authorized the
- 4:44Speaker 2: network that the.
- 4:45Speaker 1: Flock industry had built.
- 4:50Speaker 2: And in October, the Justice Department tried to downplay the
- 4:53Speaker 2: issue by telling the Fifth Circuit that being watched on
- 4:56Speaker 2: the road is the reality of modern life. However, the
- 5:00Speaker 2: Chief Judge, Jennifer Walker Elroy, asked, what if it becomes
- 5:05Speaker 2: not spread out and it's on every corner, which is
- 5:08Speaker 2: soon to be? And is it really episodic when it
- 5:11Speaker 2: so permeates everything? And the answer to the judge's question
- 5:16Speaker 2: is the density of our network. that the higher state
- 5:20Speaker 2: ranks in terms of the number of cameras per head,
- 5:23Speaker 2: the closer every trip its residents make is being logged.
- 5:28Speaker 2: And more likely it is that a few photos become
- 5:30Speaker 2: a detailed travel history. And in Ohio, the ranking shows
- 5:35Speaker 2: that Ohio is second, with 53% flock cameras per 100,000 people,
- 5:40Speaker 2: followed by Texas with 50.4%. Alabama with 49.5, Indiana with 49.2,
- 5:50Speaker 2: and Illinois with 46.3, the same thing that was just
- 5:54Speaker 2: recently laid out. Flock, which is headquartered in Atlanta, and
- 6:01Speaker 2: all this, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation arrested four Savannah
- 6:04Speaker 2: Police Department employees that was accused of using the system
- 6:09Speaker 2: for non-law enforcement purposes. And then you got California that
- 6:14Speaker 2: has the most flocked cameras with 17,178. And again, you
- 6:19Speaker 2: got Texas is second with 15,987. Their large population puts
- 6:26Speaker 2: them in ninth and third place, respectfully, in terms of
- 6:29Speaker 2: the number of devices per 100,000 residents. I remember one
- 6:38Speaker 2: of the board members of the community had stopped by
- 6:51Speaker 2: and asked, hey, do.
- 6:55Speaker 1: You want to get permission.
- 6:57Speaker 2: For the flock system to have access to your license plate?
- 7:02Speaker 2: I told them no, and I wrote my signature indicating no.
- 7:10Speaker 2: In Texas, the cameras were paid for with a dollar
- 7:14Speaker 2: fee on every auto insurance policy that was introduced to
- 7:18Speaker 2: fight the theft of catalytic converters, and the state spent
- 7:21Speaker 2: at least $ 30 million on at least 3,200 flock cameras.
- 7:27Speaker 2: An outgoing governor called a state agency funding of the system.
- 7:32Speaker 2: Flocks say, he says, that new city partnerships have outpaced
- 7:35Speaker 2: non-renewals by approximately 10 to 1.
- 7:38Speaker 1: Say what?
- 7:40Speaker 2: And at the other end of the scale, New Hampshire
- 7:42Speaker 2: has the fewest flock cameras per head, followed by Vermont
- 7:46Speaker 2: with 2.8, Maine with 3.1, Alaska with 3.4, and Hawaii
- 7:51Speaker 2: with 4.3. New Hampshire state law says that neither the
- 7:56Speaker 2: state of New Hampshire nor its political subdivision shall engage
- 8:00Speaker 2: in surveillance.
- 8:01Speaker 1: On any public ways with exceptions.
- 8:05Speaker 2: The police are allowed to use license plate readers, but
- 8:07Speaker 2: the data must be purged from the system within three
- 8:10Speaker 2: minutes of their capture.
- 8:12Speaker 3: Unless it is.
- 8:13Speaker 2: Tied to an arrest, a citation, or a wanted vehicle,
- 8:17Speaker 2: is it happening? Think about it. So the state with
- 8:21Speaker 2: almost no flock cameras is the one that has forbidden
- 8:25Speaker 2: keeping the data produced.
- 8:26Speaker 1: By these devices.
- 8:29Speaker 2: The Northeast is broadly lagging behind in terms of the
- 8:32Speaker 2: number of flock cameras per hit. New York has 10.7,
- 8:35Speaker 2: Pennsylvania has 10.8, New Jersey 12.8, and Massachusetts 13.4. And
- 8:42Speaker 2: in Massachusetts, a Superior Court judge ruled in September that
- 8:47Speaker 2: state police must disclose where the fly cameras are located
- 8:52Speaker 2: and when troopers search the database.
- 8:56Speaker 1: And that was as a result of a record.
- 8:57Speaker 2: Strike by the ACLU of Massachusetts as reported by the
- 9:00Speaker 2: Boston Globe.
- 9:03Speaker 1: If you really think about it, flock safety.
- 9:04Speaker 2: Makes about 80% of all map plate readers, with the
- 9:08Speaker 2: rest mostly being Motorola, Solution, Genentech, and Axis. And then
- 9:14Speaker 2: think about it. When all the makers are counted, the
- 9:17Speaker 2: top three states are Georgia with 91 per 100,000 people,
- 9:19Speaker 2: Kansas with 69.5, and Illinois with 59.9. When you think
- 9:20Speaker 2: about Kansas, Wichita, Machinist, Mason-Grimmett, They're suing the city, saying
- 9:34Speaker 2: that the police can reconstruct where you sleep, work, worship,
- 9:37Speaker 2: seek medical treatment, protest who you're associated with, currently without
- 9:42Speaker 2: a warrant. And as for other types of surveillance devices,
- 9:48Speaker 2: flock safety also makes gunshot detectors, which are always on microphones.
- 9:55Speaker 2: And these are most densely placed in Virginia, with 478
- 9:57Speaker 2: or 5.4 per 100,000, followed by Georgia and Louisiana. About
- 10:06Speaker 2: two-thirds of these devices are Flox Raven. And it's not
- 10:10Speaker 2: just law enforcement that operates these cameras. Retailers are among
- 10:14Speaker 2: the biggest operators with loads of them 1,690 in Home Depot, 1,133
- 10:21Speaker 2: map devices, more than any police department. And when you
- 10:26Speaker 2: think about it, private customers like these can choose to
- 10:29Speaker 2: share their cameras with the police. And this means that
- 10:32Speaker 2: efforts to introduce oversight of the system that's focused only
- 10:35Speaker 2: on police usage miss.
- 10:37Speaker 1: A part of the network.
- 10:39Speaker 2: So currently there are several federal bills, including the Ban
- 10:43Speaker 2: Flock Act, H.R. 10691, and the Flot Off Act, H.R. 10221,
- 10:51Speaker 2: and the Protection Against Mass Surveillance Act, H.R.
- 10:56Speaker 3: 9800.
- 10:58Speaker 2: The latter has been promised a House vote in the
- 11:00Speaker 2: lame-duck session. According to a bill tracker, by reclaiming the net, H.R.
- 11:08Speaker 2: 9800 does not restrict surveillance. Purchased entirely with state or
- 11:12Speaker 2: local funds, leaving it a substantial part of the National
- 11:15Speaker 2: Camera Network.
- 11:17Speaker 1: You ready for it? Outside its reach. Did you listen?
- 11:28Speaker 1: Did you hear? Are you sure?
- 11:31Speaker 2: Are you paying attention to wherever you live at?
- 11:37Speaker 1: Are you certain?