Latest / Predictable with Stu Burguiere / Ep 949 | Kamala’s First Solo Interview Was a Lie-Soaked DISASTER | Guest: Mike Howell

Transcript

Ep 949 | Kamala’s First Solo Interview Was a Lie-Soaked DISASTER | Guest: Mike Howell · Predictable with Stu Burguiere

• 0:01
  We've got a great show lined up for you.
• 0:03
  First,
• 0:03
  a quick word from our friends at Jace Medical.
• 0:06
  According to a new report,
• 0:07
  President Biden has signed off on a highly classified plan that shifts
• 0:10
  America's nuclear strategy to focus on China as a nuclear threat.
• 0:14
  And to prepare for the possibility of the communist nation
• 0:17
  teaming up with Russia and North Korea.
• 0:20
  That sounds
• 0:21
  wonderful.
• 0:22
  All this stuff,
• 0:23
  no matter what you're talking about,
• 0:23
  when you're talking about unrest around the world,
• 0:26
  kind of reminds you you need to be a little bit prepared.
• 0:28
  There's something you can do to ensure that you and your loved ones
• 0:31
  have medication on hand when it's needed,
• 0:33
  and that's called the JC.
• 0:34
  Case
• 0:35
  from Jace Medical.
• 0:36
  You can stock up on medication right now,
• 0:38
  so you're prepared.
• 0:39
  It's a personalized emergency kit that contains essential antibiotics and
• 0:43
  medications that treat the most common and deadly bacterial infections.
• 0:47
  We take this stuff for granted.
• 0:48
  We're always thinking that
• 0:49
  the pharmacy is always going to be there for us.
• 0:51
  Well,
• 0:52
  there's been a lot of times in our history where that hasn't been the truth,
• 0:54
  so.
• 0:56
  5 life saving antibiotics for emergency use,
• 0:59
  are in a Jace case,
• 1:00
  and you can expand it as well with all sorts of customizations,
• 1:03
  but
• 1:03
  just fill out a simple form online.
• 1:05
  You'll have it in case you need it.
• 1:06
  Go to jace.com,
• 1:08
  enter the code stew at checkout for a discount on your order.
• 1:11
  The promo code is stew atjace.com,
• 1:14
  J A S E.com.
• 1:18
  Stu does America.
• 1:23
  We've got Mike Howell joining us from the Heritage Foundation in a
• 1:26
  few minutes to give us the real story on Project 2025,
• 1:29
  which is evil.
• 1:31
  And there's been a few overnights,
• 1:33
  uh,
• 1:33
  overnight updates in the second attempted
• 1:35
  assassination of Donald Trump.
• 1:37
  I want to get to some of those here.
• 1:38
  In fact though,
• 1:39
  we should
• 1:40
  break the news early and,
• 1:41
  uh,
• 1:42
  and make sure that you're aware of it.
• 1:44
  We've accomplished something pretty
• 1:46
  significant as a nation.
• 1:49
  We went an entire day without an assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
• 1:52
  Yeah,
• 1:53
  we did it,
• 1:53
  guys.
• 1:54
  Woohoo.
• 1:55
  There it is,
• 1:56
  one full day with no assassination attempts.
• 2:01
  Act blue,
• 2:02
  good work.
• 2:04
  Good job,
• 2:06
  Democrats.
• 2:06
  You,
• 2:06
  you kept it off the,
• 2:08
  off the,
• 2:08
  the news for at least one more day.
• 2:10
  So,
• 2:10
  um,
• 2:11
  congratulations to Donald Trump,
• 2:13
  who didn't get shot at yesterday.
• 2:15
  The day before he did,
• 2:16
  but or almost did,
• 2:17
  but
• 2:18
  Not yesterday,
• 2:19
  he's OK,
• 2:19
  so congratulations.
• 2:20
  Uh,
• 2:21
  they wouldn't let me finish.
• 2:22
  Uh,
• 2:22
  JD Vance reveals Trump's first reaction to the gunman.
• 2:25
  This comes from the Daily Wire,
• 2:27
  and,
• 2:27
  uh,
• 2:28
  basically,
• 2:29
  Donald Trump,
• 2:30
  who's handling this stuff
• 2:32
  much better than I would be,
• 2:33
  like if I got shot in the head,
• 2:36
  in the ear,
• 2:37
  and bled all over the place on TV and stood up and said,
• 2:40
  fight,
• 2:40
  fight,
• 2:40
  fight,
• 2:41
  and then a gunman was hanging out in the bushes for 12 hours waiting for me to come,
• 2:45
  you know,
• 2:45
  around the 9th hole.
• 2:47
  I think I'd be a little bit more
• 2:49
  testy than Donald Trump is over this.
• 2:51
  He basically said,
• 2:52
  uh,
• 2:52
  he said,
• 2:52
  I'm a little mad because I was about to make a birdie putt on the 6th hole,
• 2:56
  and they wouldn't let me finish.
• 2:58
  So,
• 2:58
  I mean,
• 2:58
  I guess that's the best way to handle this stuff.
• 3:01
  You might as well,
• 3:02
  uh,
• 3:03
  sit back and just try to take it in perspective.
• 3:04
  I don't know,
• 3:05
  maybe this guy just,
• 3:06
  just,
• 3:07
  uh,
• 3:07
  he's different,
• 3:07
  obviously.
• 3:08
  He's a unique fellow
• 3:10
  uh that we have learned over the past few years,
• 3:11
  and he's handling this stuff
• 3:13
  much better than I would.
• 3:14
  I would just,
• 3:15
  you know,
• 3:15
  I would just want to be in a Popemobile everywhere I went,
• 3:17
  but he doesn't seem to have that feeling at all.
• 3:19
  I don't know if he's
• 3:20
  not worried about dying.
• 3:21
  I don't necessarily think that's it.
• 3:23
  Maybe he just
• 3:24
  believes in the law enforcement around him.
• 3:26
  I mean.
• 3:27
  There's some reasons to not be so optimistic about that,
• 3:30
  I think.
• 3:30
  The fact that they didn't even search the perimeter
• 3:32
  before he went golfing is a little concerning,
• 3:34
  though the fact that they found a,
• 3:36
  you know,
• 3:37
  a barrel of a rifle sticking out of a bush
• 3:40
  is a miracle,
• 3:41
  I think.
• 3:41
  It's amazing that they found that in the
• 3:43
  first place without a real thorough search beforehand,
• 3:45
  but
• 3:45
  that's where we are now.
• 3:47
  The Trump administration is trying to make people understand
• 3:50
  there's a reason for all of this happening,
• 3:52
  and a lot of it is because
• 3:54
  when you tell people that someone is Hitler.
• 3:57
  Their instinct is to really hate that person.
• 3:59
  A person who's on the fringe,
• 4:01
  like this uh character that tried to assassinate Donald Trump,
• 4:04
  Ryan Ralph,
• 4:05
  I think his name is.
• 4:06
  When you have a guy who's already on the fringe,
• 4:08
  and you're already out there,
• 4:10
  you start hearing this constantly,
• 4:12
  and maybe you start believing and start saying,
• 4:14
  hey,
• 4:14
  that's something I can do.
• 4:15
  One of the things that's been pretty consistent in the reporting on this guy
• 4:19
  is that he's always been looking for a way to make a difference.
• 4:22
  That's
• 4:24
  sometimes.
• 4:24
  manifested its way in
• 4:27
  in a good circumstance earlier on in life.
• 4:29
  Lately it's been more like kind of crazy stuff like he's
• 4:31
  going to Ukraine to recruit people to come fight in Ukraine,
• 4:37
  but
• 4:37
  this seems to be maybe what he thought,
• 4:40
  hey,
• 4:40
  I couldn't get the Ukraine thing done.
• 4:42
  I failed pretty much everything else in my life.
• 4:44
  He was down to something like $68 in his bank account,
• 4:47
  and he said,
• 4:47
  Well,
• 4:47
  if I go to Florida.
• 4:49
  That I do this,
• 4:50
  that'll make a difference.
• 4:51
  And like this is,
• 4:52
  you know,
• 4:52
  where people have been put mindset wise
• 4:55
  for Donald on Donald Trump for years and years and years and years and years.
• 4:58
  They released a Democratic rhetoric inspired
• 5:01
  another attempt on Donald Trump's life.
• 5:02
  This is from the Trump campaign.
• 5:03
  They went through 50
• 5:05
  different quotes.
• 5:06
  Stuff like,
• 5:07
  you know,
• 5:07
  we,
• 5:07
  he needs to be eliminated,
• 5:09
  said by congressmen,
• 5:10
  right?
• 5:11
  Like this is,
• 5:11
  there's a whole list of them,
• 5:13
  tons of stuff that you can go check out the entire list.
• 5:15
  Maybe we'll tweet it out
• 5:17
  so you can see it,
• 5:18
  but it's very disturbing,
• 5:19
  and
• 5:20
  this has been something that has been central
• 5:22
  to
• 5:23
  the Democrats' approach,
• 5:25
  especially during the Biden administration.
• 5:26
  Now Biden came out and was basically like,
• 5:28
  hey,
• 5:28
  I've got a red empire-like wall behind me.
• 5:30
  Let me tell you how
• 5:32
  of an existential threat
• 5:34
  Donald Trump is.
• 5:35
  Kamala echoed that same type of stuff.
• 5:38
  They've tried to back off of that a little bit and become joyful,
• 5:41
  you know,
• 5:41
  so we're all for joyful assassination attempts.
• 5:44
  Hillary Clinton though just yesterday again was saying that the media
• 5:47
  has to have a narrative that is going to push people
• 5:50
  to
• 5:51
  to
• 5:52
  to understand that Donald Trump is a massive threat
• 5:55
  to their country,
• 5:56
  to them,
• 5:57
  to their children.
• 5:58
  Like,
• 5:59
  what do you do when that's true?
• 6:02
  That's that's how you describe Michael Myers.
• 6:05
  So I mean,
• 6:05
  I don't know.
• 6:06
  Usually what you do in that situation is try to go take them out,
• 6:09
  and that's what it seems like the Democrats
• 6:11
  are encouraging at this point,
• 6:13
  uh,
• 6:13
  and especially the fact,
• 6:14
  and I mentioned this yesterday,
• 6:15
  it's one thing to say stuff,
• 6:17
  right?
• 6:17
  Like,
• 6:17
  you know,
• 6:18
  there's a lot of,
• 6:18
  like,
• 6:19
  I mean,
• 6:19
  Donald,
• 6:20
  they got mad at Sarah Palin for saying,
• 6:22
  hey,
• 6:22
  we're targeting these districts,
• 6:23
  and they said that caused a shooting.
• 6:26
  You know,
• 6:26
  Joe Biden said,
• 6:27
  we want to put a bull's eye on Donald Trump.
• 6:29
  It's much worse.
• 6:31
  Do I think that that rhetoric should inspire some
• 6:33
  nut job?
• 6:34
  No,
• 6:34
  but.
• 6:35
  You know,
• 6:35
  I mean,
• 6:36
  people do,
• 6:36
  and I will say,
• 6:38
  at
• 6:38
  some point,
• 6:40
  you hit a point when there's multiple assassination attempts against a person.
• 6:43
  The only
• 6:44
  responsible thing to do is to knock this crap out.
• 6:47
  I understand you can say things,
• 6:49
  you know,
• 6:49
  people use football analogies and,
• 6:52
  and,
• 6:52
  you know,
• 6:52
  we destroyed the competition and
• 6:55
  uh we're going to roll over them,
• 6:56
  and all these things that have somewhat of a violent connotation behind them,
• 7:00
  but we all get what they mean.
• 7:01
  I mean,
• 7:01
  at least most people do.
• 7:03
  At some point though,
• 7:03
  when the assassination attempts have already started and are continuing,
• 7:07
  maybe then you back off of that a little bit and
• 7:09
  you are a little more careful with what you say.
• 7:11
  It's just an idea,
• 7:12
  uh,
• 7:13
  but it seems like the responsible idea.
• 7:15
  Now another responsible thing for a candidate to do is to do an interview.
• 7:18
  And we showed you the,
• 7:19
  our new graphic,
• 7:20
  which is how many days we've had since an assassination attempt.
• 7:23
  Our old woman was how many days
• 7:25
  since Kamala has done an interview,
• 7:27
  and I believe we got up to 80.
• 7:29
  Uh,
• 7:29
  because the one she did with Tim Walls on CNN doesn't count.
• 7:32
  She's with Tim Walls,
• 7:33
  that's a buddy interview.
• 7:34
  I want a solo interview.
• 7:35
  And I,
• 7:36
  you know,
• 7:36
  I,
• 7:36
  I
• 7:37
  was charitable to break the streak
• 7:39
  by counting an interview with ABC 6
• 7:42
  Action News.
• 7:44
  Exclusive action news interview.
• 7:46
  Kamala Harris discusses economy,
• 7:47
  guns,
• 7:48
  and more.
• 7:48
  Let's go through some of this.
• 7:50
  Uh,
• 7:50
  this is an interview,
• 7:51
  as I mentioned,
• 7:51
  with ABC 6,
• 7:53
  action news.
• 7:54
  And you have to just hear how bad she is.
• 7:58
  Yes,
• 7:59
  she had a debate that cleared a very basic hurdle.
• 8:02
  I will admit that.
• 8:03
  In fact,
• 8:04
  I predicted it and said it multiple times before it happened.
• 8:06
  The same thing with her,
• 8:08
  you know,
• 8:08
  with her speeches.
• 8:10
  She can clear basic hurdles as a candidate.
• 8:12
  She's not the worst candidate in the world.
• 8:14
  Where she tends to fall down is when she's not expecting something,
• 8:18
  when she's taken off guard,
• 8:19
  when it's a lower level
• 8:21
  spotlight where she doesn't really prepare for it,
• 8:24
  and when she's drawn out over a long period of time,
• 8:26
  when she has to not answer the questions once or twice or 3 times,
• 8:29
  she has to answer the 4th and 5th and 6th level questions.
• 8:32
  I mean this one should be incredibly easy for her,
• 8:35
  but she's asked this question
• 8:36
  by
• 8:37
  ABC 6 Action News.
• 8:39
  Watch
• 8:40
  at the debate the other night.
• 8:41
  You talked about creating an opportunity economy,
• 8:43
  right?
• 8:44
  I remember.
• 8:44
  I wonder if we can drill down on that a little bit.
• 8:46
  When you talk about get some bringing down prices and making life
• 8:50
  more affordable for people,
• 8:51
  right?
• 8:51
  What are one or two specific things,
• 8:53
  specific things?
• 8:54
  OK,
• 8:54
  what are they?
• 8:55
  Well,
• 8:55
  I'll start with this,
• 8:57
  the specific things.
• 8:57
  I grew up a middle class kid.
• 8:59
  Uh oh.
• 8:59
  My mother raised my sister and me.
• 9:01
  She worked very hard.
• 9:03
  That's nothing to do with
• 9:04
  she was able to finally save up enough money to buy our first house.
• 9:08
  When I was a teenager,
• 9:09
  we didn't ask for this.
• 9:11
  I grew up in a community of hardworking people,
• 9:13
  you know,
• 9:13
  construction workers and nurses and teachers,
• 9:16
  the jobs of your neighbors.
• 9:17
  You're I try to explain to some people who may not have had the same experience,
• 9:21
  you know,
• 9:22
  but
• 9:22
  a lot of people will relate to this.
• 9:24
  They will,
• 9:25
  you know,
• 9:25
  I grew up in a neighborhood of folks who were very proud of their lawn,
• 9:28
  of their lawn,
• 9:29
  you know,
• 9:30
  no,
• 9:31
  and really,
• 9:32
  and I was raised.
• 9:34
  To believe and to know that
• 9:37
  all people deserve dignity.
• 9:39
  Dignity.
• 9:39
  Where's the proposal and that.
• 9:42
  We as Americans have a beautiful character.
• 9:46
  Character.
• 9:46
  What are you doing with your hand right now?
• 9:48
  Ambitions and aspirations and dreams,
• 9:50
  but not everyone necessarily.
• 9:53
  Has
• 9:54
  access to the resources that can help them fuel those dreams and ambitions.
• 9:58
  OK,
• 9:59
  so you're proposing ambitions about building an opportunity economy,
• 10:02
  it is
• 10:03
  very much with the mind of
• 10:06
  investing in the ambitions and aspirations and the incredible work
• 10:10
  epirations like 3 times and creating opportunity for people,
• 10:14
  for example,
• 10:14
  to start like 10 times.
• 10:17
  My mother worked long hours and our neighbor helped raise us.
• 10:21
  This is a disaster,
• 10:22
  I still call her our second mother.
• 10:24
  Our second mother.
• 10:25
  She was a small business owner.
• 10:27
  I love our small business owners.
• 10:28
  Holy crap.
• 10:29
  I mean that went on forever
• 10:31
  and she never gets to anything other than eventually mentioning,
• 10:34
  and we're going to throw $50,000 at some people we like.
• 10:38
  There's really nothing in there of note,
• 10:40
  that especially stuff that she hasn't mentioned.
• 10:42
  It's embarrassing.
• 10:44
  That was not,
• 10:45
  by the way,
• 10:46
  a particularly difficult question.
• 10:48
  Hey,
• 10:48
  tell us about your lead economic proposal.
• 10:52
  It wasn't like,
• 10:53
  hey,
• 10:53
  your lead economic proposal is wrong for these reasons,
• 10:56
  tell us how you're gonna justify that.
• 10:57
  No,
• 10:57
  it was just like,
• 10:57
  hey,
• 10:58
  tell us about it.
• 10:58
  Give me a proposal that you're,
• 10:59
  you're backing.
• 11:00
  Nothing.
• 11:01
  Hey,
• 11:01
  we're talking about lawns.
• 11:03
  Lawns.
• 11:05
  People are proud of their lawns and they have ambitions.
• 11:09
  That's your policy proposal.
• 11:11
  It's,
• 11:11
  it doesn't really improve from there,
• 11:13
  I have to admit.
• 11:15
  Um,
• 11:16
  so another good question here,
• 11:18
  and this is actually true,
• 11:19
  people,
• 11:20
  a lot of times,
• 11:20
  there's a lot of fact checks going around.
• 11:22
  This is actually one of those that is,
• 11:24
  that does check out.
• 11:25
  She's currently the vice president of the United States.
• 11:29
  And a lot of people don't believe that because she's acting like she's
• 11:32
  this change candidate that wants to move forward and turn the page on,
• 11:37
  I guess,
• 11:38
  the current administration that she's working in.
• 11:41
  So again,
• 11:42
  a good question here from ABC 6 Action News
• 11:45
  about whether,
• 11:46
  you know,
• 11:47
  look,
• 11:47
  aren't you currently the vice president?
• 11:49
  How are you different than Joe Biden?
• 11:51
  Are you're talking about a new way forward.
• 11:53
  I think some people have a question.
• 11:55
  Given maybe your current role as Vice President of the United States,
• 11:59
  how different you are
• 12:00
  from Joe Biden.
• 12:02
  And so I wonder if there are one or two spots,
• 12:04
  policy areas or approaches where you would say,
• 12:07
  I'm a different person.
• 12:09
  Well,
• 12:09
  I'm obviously not Joe Biden,
• 12:11
  and
• 12:12
  that's funny.
• 12:12
  You're not,
• 12:13
  you know,
• 12:13
  I offer a new generation of leadership and an answer.
• 12:16
  So for example,
• 12:17
  thinking about
• 12:18
  developing and creating an opportunity economy.
• 12:21
  Are you doing an opportunity economy again?
• 12:23
  It's about
• 12:24
  investing in areas that
• 12:27
  really
• 12:28
  need a lot of work.
• 12:29
  Oh please don't say aspiration,
• 12:30
  maybe focusing on.
• 12:31
  Again,
• 12:32
  the aspirations and the dreams,
• 12:34
  but also just recognizing that at this moment in time
• 12:36
  some of the stuff we take for granted years ago
• 12:39
  we can't take for granted anymore.
• 12:41
  For example,
• 12:42
  another
• 12:43
  plan that I have that is a new approach is to expand the child tax credit check
• 12:48
  to $6000.
• 12:49
  Wait,
• 12:49
  but that was for
• 12:50
  young families.
• 12:51
  That was JD Vance's first year of their child's life
• 12:53
  because
• 12:56
  that is obviously only plan is JD Vance's stage of development of a child.
• 12:58
  And a lot of young parents need the help to buy a car seat or
• 13:03
  a crib or clothes for their kids.
• 13:05
  Did you take this from JD Vance.com.
• 13:06
  My
• 13:07
  approach is about
• 13:09
  new ideas,
• 13:10
  new policies that are directed at the current
• 13:14
  moment.
• 13:15
  And also,
• 13:16
  to be very honest with you,
• 13:18
  my focus is very much on what we need to do over the next 1020 years.
• 13:22
  To
• 13:24
  catch up to the 21st century around again capacity but also challenges.
• 13:29
  Oh,
• 13:30
  around again capacity
• 13:32
  and also
• 13:34
  challenges.
• 13:35
  You didn't study for this one,
• 13:37
  did you?
• 13:37
  Can you see the difference with her having a week to sit with experts
• 13:41
  to memorize things and her just going off the top of her head?
• 13:43
  Do you get that?
• 13:44
  Is there,
• 13:45
  can you detect the difference at all?
• 13:48
  Also,
• 13:48
  she was asked about gun ownership because that was a surprise to me.
• 13:51
  I didn't remember her ever saying she was a gun owner.
• 13:55
  She did say that in the debate and she was asked about her gun proposals.
• 14:00
  You mentioned that you are a gun owner.
• 14:01
  I know you said it in 2019 as well.
• 14:04
  I want to talk about your values on this issue.
• 14:06
  When it comes to gun ownership,
• 14:08
  where do you draw the line
• 14:10
  in America on gun ownership and
• 14:12
  gun use?
• 14:13
  Well,
• 14:13
  like you said,
• 14:14
  Brian,
• 14:14
  I am
• 14:15
  a gun owner and Tim Walls,
• 14:17
  my running mate,
• 14:17
  is also a gun owner.
• 14:18
  We're not taking anybody's guns away.
• 14:20
  Oh,
• 14:20
  you're not,
• 14:21
  huh?
• 14:21
  No,
• 14:21
  you're not going to take guns away.
• 14:22
  I support the Second Amendment and I support reasonable
• 14:26
  gun safety.
• 14:27
  How does that work exactly?
• 14:29
  Part of my approach to this is I was a career prosecutor for most of my career.
• 14:34
  I have personally prosecuted homicide cases.
• 14:37
  I have personally
• 14:39
  looked at autopsies.
• 14:41
  I have personally seen
• 14:43
  what assault weapons do to the human body
• 14:47
  and so.
• 14:48
  I feel very strongly
• 14:50
  that it is consistent with the 2nd Amendment and your right to own a gun
• 14:55
  to also say
• 14:56
  we need an assault weapons ban.
• 14:58
  They're literally tools of war.
• 15:00
  Are they literally
• 15:01
  literally designed to kill
• 15:03
  a lot of human beings quickly.
• 15:06
  OK,
• 15:07
  first of all,
• 15:07
  they're not,
• 15:08
  they were not designed as tools of war.
• 15:10
  They were adopted by the US military after they were already released.
• 15:14
  They are also called modern sporting rifles.
• 15:17
  You said you're not going to take
• 15:19
  the,
• 15:19
  uh,
• 15:19
  you're not going to take anybody's guns.
• 15:21
  And then you also said you want to ban
• 15:24
  the most popular sporting rifle in America.
• 15:27
  That's kind of an issue,
• 15:28
  right?
• 15:28
  It doesn't seem at all consistent.
• 15:30
  And here's another thing about guns,
• 15:31
  they're all designed to theoretically kill people.
• 15:35
  It's about the people,
• 15:35
  it's about how they are used.
• 15:38
  Right,
• 15:38
  that's just,
• 15:39
  I mean,
• 15:40
  an unfortunate fact of firearms is
• 15:43
  that sometimes people will use them for bad purposes.
• 15:46
  Used to be that we have,
• 15:47
  like if someone uses a car to run over a bunch of people,
• 15:49
  we would go after that person,
• 15:51
  we wouldn't look to ban the car.
• 15:52
  In this particular case,
• 15:54
  we're looking to ban the guns.
• 15:55
  This makes absolutely
• 15:57
  no sense whatsoever,
• 15:58
  but it is not,
• 16:00
  you know,
• 16:00
  it's not like
• 16:02
  she's not thinking this out deeply,
• 16:03
  right?
• 16:03
  She does not have
• 16:04
  the capacity
• 16:07
  to come up with these ideas on her own.
• 16:09
  And when she's not prepped,
• 16:10
  this is kind of the nonsense she comes up with.
• 16:12
  Oh well,
• 16:12
  I saw an autopsy.
• 16:13
  What does that have to do with anything?
• 16:16
  It's got nothing to do with anything.
• 16:18
  You know,
• 16:18
  when people die,
• 16:19
  they die.
• 16:19
  It's sad,
• 16:20
  uh,
• 16:21
  but they don't look good,
• 16:22
  whether,
• 16:22
  what,
• 16:23
  no matter what kind of gun they're using or a knife or whatever else.
• 16:25
  It's not,
• 16:25
  it's not a pretty picture,
• 16:26
  that doesn't,
• 16:27
  it's not how you make policy.
• 16:28
  You don't make policy because you you saw some icky things,
• 16:31
  uh,
• 16:32
  one time when you were doing a case.
• 16:35
  Doesn't make any sense.
• 16:35
  All right,
• 16:36
  um,
• 16:36
  how about,
• 16:37
  uh,
• 16:37
  you know,
• 16:37
  there's a bunch of Trump people out there voting for Donald Trump.
• 16:40
  You've basically called them fascists,
• 16:43
  and,
• 16:43
  and they're horrible human beings.
• 16:45
  So how do you bridge that gap?
• 16:46
  This is another question from ABC 6 Action News.
• 16:50
  How do you speak to his voters,
• 16:52
  or maybe people who just share his
• 16:54
  values but are open to something else?
• 16:57
  I,
• 16:59
  based on experience and uh
• 17:02
  and
• 17:03
  a lived experience,
• 17:04
  know
• 17:05
  in my heart I know in my soul I know
• 17:09
  that the vast majority of us as Americans have
• 17:11
  so much more in common than what separates us.
• 17:13
  Oh,
• 17:13
  that's nice,
• 17:14
  and I also believe that I am accurate in knowing
• 17:19
  that most Americans
• 17:20
  want a leader who brings us together as Americans.
• 17:25
  And not
• 17:26
  someone who professes to be a leader who is trying
• 17:29
  to have us point our fingers at each other.
• 17:31
  This is a great example of what she does.
• 17:34
  If you wanna say,
• 17:35
  hey,
• 17:35
  uh,
• 17:36
  Americans want a leader who brings,
• 17:38
  bring us together.
• 17:39
  Now that's a nonsensical platitude,
• 17:41
  but OK,
• 17:41
  you wanna say that.
• 17:42
  That's how you'd say it,
• 17:43
  right?
• 17:44
  Look,
• 17:44
  Americans want a leader who's gonna bring us together.
• 17:47
  This is what she says.
• 17:48
  And I also believe
• 17:50
  that I am accurate.
• 17:52
  In knowing
• 17:54
  That most Americans would.
• 17:55
  She's just
• 17:56
  she used filler after filler after.
• 17:58
  I also believe that I am accurate in knowing that Americans
• 18:03
  want a leader that you don't need all that phraseology.
• 18:06
  She's using that to run out the clock,
• 18:07
  but really more than anything else,
• 18:09
  extend the time period where she can come up with something to say after that.
• 18:13
  You can,
• 18:14
  any sentence can start this way.
• 18:15
  You know,
• 18:16
  I also believe
• 18:17
  that I am accurate
• 18:19
  in knowing
• 18:20
  I'd like a 4 meal at Taco Bell.
• 18:23
  No matter what,
• 18:23
  it doesn't matter.
• 18:24
  All that is nonsense.
• 18:26
  This is what she does,
• 18:27
  because she has no idea where she's going when these sentences begin.
• 18:31
  Kind of an issue for a president of the United States.
• 18:33
  Let me give you another clip.
• 18:34
  This is from also
• 18:35
  ABC Action News.
• 18:38
  If there's one thing.
• 18:40
  That
• 18:40
  you wish Americans knew
• 18:42
  about who Kamala Harris is that you don't think they know yet.
• 18:46
  What would that be?
• 18:48
  I don't know.
• 18:49
  I mean,
• 18:50
  probably it's not very different from
• 18:53
  anybody watching right now.
• 18:54
  I love my family.
• 18:55
  I mean,
• 18:55
  look at the improv skills there.
• 18:57
  She loves
• 18:59
  her
• 18:59
  family.
• 19:01
  That's what people might want to know about her,
• 19:03
  and you might say,
• 19:04
  you know,
• 19:04
  so that was kind of a,
• 19:05
  a boring clip,
• 19:06
  honestly,
• 19:07
  like it's
• 19:07
  nothing really happened and then why did you pull that one?
• 19:10
  Because almost nothing happened in this interview,
• 19:13
  OK?
• 19:14
  I played you every relevant
• 19:16
  aspect of it already.
• 19:17
  Anything that,
• 19:18
  any sort of information,
• 19:19
  those are the pieces that were filled with information from this interview.
• 19:22
  Let me give you how desperate I got.
• 19:24
  This was the last clip that I pulled.
• 19:26
  Well,
• 19:26
  it's a beautiful family,
• 19:28
  and we thank you for your time.
• 19:29
  Pleasure meeting you.
• 19:30
  Thank you,
• 19:30
  Brian.
• 19:31
  Thank you.
• 19:31
  Thank you.
• 19:33
  Thank you all.
• 19:34
  Wonderful.
• 19:34
  Thank you guys.
• 19:37
  If you don't mind,
• 19:38
  we're going to do a crew photo.
• 19:40
  I,
• 19:41
  that's all I have.
• 19:42
  The interview was 11 minutes.
• 19:45
  We,
• 19:45
  I just don't know if that qualifies as an interview.
• 19:49
  Now I will give the guy answering asking the questions a little bit of credit.
• 19:52
  They were very nicely phrased,
• 19:54
  very friendly room,
• 19:55
  but like there are a couple of questions
• 19:57
  that could have theoretically led to something,
• 19:59
  but you see there's no pushback,
• 20:00
  there's no follow up,
• 20:01
  there's no
• 20:03
  interest in pushing her.
• 20:04
  And saying,
• 20:05
  hey,
• 20:05
  wait a minute,
• 20:05
  you're not answering these questions.
• 20:07
  You don't seem to know anything about the topics I'm asking you about.
• 20:10
  Wait,
• 20:10
  this gun thing you just pointed out,
• 20:11
  that's not even true.
• 20:13
  How about the idea that the assault weapons ban has already been tried
• 20:16
  and has been
• 20:18
  shown by multiple authorities to show
• 20:20
  it had no effect whatsoever.
• 20:22
  People just started killing people with other types of guns.
• 20:25
  Didn't work
• 20:26
  at all.
• 20:27
  Full stop.
• 20:30
  But that's where we are.
• 20:31
  Well,
• 20:31
  look,
• 20:31
  we know she's a bunch of nonsense,
• 20:32
  she knows she's spilling,
• 20:34
  and we got about 3 or 4 Veep thoughts
• 20:36
  out of that,
• 20:36
  I think.
• 20:36
  We're gonna come up with those,
• 20:37
  maybe in future weeks,
• 20:38
  but for,
• 20:39
  for now,
• 20:39
  let's look back at the life of Kamala Harris and another
• 20:42
  Veep thought.
• 20:46
  And now
• 20:48
  Deep Thoughts
• 20:50
  by Kamala Harris.
• 20:54
  the
• 20:54
  business of our work.
• 20:58
  For the council to report on the work that has occurred
• 21:02
  since our last
• 21:03
  meeting across these
• 21:04
  areas.
• 21:07
  Also discussed the work.
• 21:09
  the work we
• 21:17
  This has been
• 21:18
  Veep Thoughts
• 21:20
  by Kamala Harris.
• 21:31
  We all know that the left's endgame is court packing,
• 21:34
  and I mean that's their
• 21:36
  mechanism to get to what they want.
• 21:37
  They'll pass every single thing they want,
• 21:39
  they'll just do it through the executive branch,
• 21:41
  and once they get enough justices on there and they're going to support them.
• 21:44
  It's free reign.
• 21:46
  At First Liberty Institute,
• 21:47
  they call this assault on the court what it really is,
• 21:49
  a Supreme Court coup.
• 21:51
  Right now,
• 21:52
  uh,
• 21:52
  if we add our voices and take action together,
• 21:54
  we can really help stop,
• 21:57
  you know.
• 21:58
  We can stop their nonsensical plan,
• 22:00
  their radical plan
• 22:02
  to take over the Supreme Court.
• 22:03
  The future of the court
• 22:04
  and of preserving an American
• 22:06
  independent judiciary is literally in our hands,
• 22:09
  and that's why First Liberty Institute is taking action.
• 22:12
  They need you to join up.
• 22:13
  This is a great organization.
• 22:14
  They have done so many things for our country.
• 22:17
  All these big cases on religious liberty that you've heard about,
• 22:19
  that we've talked about on the show.
• 22:20
  It's first liberty.
• 22:22
  They're constantly
• 22:23
  at the core of this,
• 22:24
  making sure that the right side
• 22:27
  wins the Supreme Court
• 22:28
  rulings.
• 22:29
  They've done incredible work,
• 22:30
  and now they're looking for a million patriots like
• 22:32
  you to stand up for the Supreme Court.
• 22:35
  And then as a nation we can safeguard the independence
• 22:37
  of the judiciary
• 22:38
  just as the founding fathers intended.
• 22:40
  You got to say no to the left's Supreme Court coup.
• 22:43
  We can secure the blessings of liberty and protect the future
• 22:45
  of our constitutional rights for our children and our grandchildren.
• 22:49
  So go to supremecoup.com/stew,
• 22:52
  supremecoup.com/stew.
• 22:55
  You can learn how you can help stop
• 22:57
  the radical left's takeover of the Supreme Court through
• 22:59
  First Liberty Institute.
• 23:01
  It's supremecoup.com,
• 23:02
  supreme.com/stew.
• 23:09
  There's a disturbing story in The New York
• 23:11
  Times about how immigrants are being harassed.
• 23:15
  In July
• 23:16
  2 men went door to door at a sprawling apartment complex in Georgia,
• 23:19
  a suburb that is a hub for a fast growing Latino population,
• 23:23
  asking residents
• 23:24
  if they were US citizens
• 23:26
  and whether they were registered to vote.
• 23:29
  But it was
• 23:30
  a ruse.
• 23:31
  That's right.
• 23:31
  You know who was in charge of the whole thing,
• 23:33
  the whole criminal operation?
• 23:36
  The Heritage Foundation.
• 23:37
  That's what the New York Times tells me.
• 23:39
  Heritage Foundation spreads deceptive videos about non-citizen voters,
• 23:42
  and I want to get someone to answer for these crimes.
• 23:45
  I want to bring in Mike Howell.
• 23:46
  He's the oversight project executive director
• 23:49
  at the Heritage Foundation.
• 23:50
  Mike,
• 23:51
  thanks so much for coming on the program.
• 23:52
  Thanks for having me.
• 23:53
  I mean this is
• 23:55
  quite an accusation here.
• 23:56
  They're basically
• 23:58
  saying,
• 23:58
  you know,
• 23:59
  the Heritage Foundation is out there harassing immigrants to try to get them
• 24:02
  on record about whether they're voting or not.
• 24:04
  Can you tell me what this project is and what actually happened?
• 24:08
  Yes,
• 24:08
  so the New York Times is basically a glorified crossword puzzle and Sudoku
• 24:13
  with a bunch of blue and no clickbait stories,
• 24:15
  and one of them came out,
• 24:17
  uh,
• 24:17
  you know,
• 24:17
  a week or so ago,
• 24:18
  and it's a hit piece on our great investigative journalism work
• 24:21
  that we put out to the tune of 56 million shares on Elon Musk's pin tweet,
• 24:26
  where we're basically doing these spot checks across the country,
• 24:29
  asking non-citizens if they're registered to vote.
• 24:32
  And guess what,
• 24:32
  a lot are because they are.
• 24:35
  And so we were down in Georgia and ran this play and we got
• 24:39
  an astonishingly high number,
• 24:40
  I believe it was about 14% in this one apartment complex,
• 24:43
  admitted on camera
• 24:44
  that they were registered and that they were non-citizens.
• 24:47
  Keep in mind that is a crime
• 24:49
  and admissions of a crime on camera are admissible pieces of evidence,
• 24:53
  so the very high
• 24:54
  evidentiary threshold was reached.
• 24:56
  The New York Times freaked out because they want people
• 24:58
  to think that everything's on the up and up.
• 25:00
  They commissioned a guy named.
• 25:02
  Ken Bessinger
• 25:03
  to go out and run his second hit piece on us.
• 25:05
  He's tried this before and failed,
• 25:07
  and he took a big old swing here,
• 25:08
  and he had another big old miss.
• 25:10
  They basically found 3 out of the 7 illegal aliens
• 25:13
  we spoke to on camera,
• 25:15
  and a woman named Marta,
• 25:16
  who is an illegal alien,
• 25:18
  said,
• 25:18
  holy moly,
• 25:19
  uh,
• 25:19
  she lied on camera because she was,
• 25:21
  uh,
• 25:22
  you know,
• 25:22
  for whatever reason,
• 25:23
  and so they ran that
• 25:25
  as a retraction and tried claiming that they proved the whole thing was false.
• 25:28
  Of course.
• 25:28
  It's not false.
• 25:29
  We tore apart this hit piece in a long thread that went line by line,
• 25:33
  and guess what,
• 25:34
  got way more views and engagements than the original New York Times hit piece
• 25:38
  because again,
• 25:39
  they're just a crossword puzzle factory with some
• 25:42
  blue and non-clickbait headlines every now and then.
• 25:44
  Yeah,
• 25:44
  I mean,
• 25:44
  it's really amazing that their fact check of you,
• 25:48
  this big debunking of this effort,
• 25:51
  says 3 of the 7 people Heritage Filmed later said they had misspoken.
• 25:56
  Now,
• 25:56
  first of all,
• 25:58
  why we would believe someone who's on the line for breaking the law,
• 26:01
  for saying they've misspoken is,
• 26:02
  is part one of this,
• 26:04
  but part two is it's less than half.
• 26:06
  I mean,
• 26:07
  uh,
• 26:08
  it seems like there's still an issue here,
• 26:09
  right?
• 26:10
  Yeah,
• 26:10
  and they didn't even prove that they're indeed not registered to vote.
• 26:14
  They just asked them,
• 26:15
  and you know,
• 26:16
  it looks like someone coached them up from my read of the situation,
• 26:19
  to,
• 26:19
  you know,
• 26:19
  answer and clear up the mess that they made.
• 26:22
  I mean,
• 26:22
  being,
• 26:23
  being registered to vote and voting
• 26:24
  is a deportable offense.
• 26:26
  So why would an illegal alien admit
• 26:28
  to a deportable offense on camera?
• 26:30
  It's,
• 26:30
  you know,
• 26:30
  beyond the pale.
• 26:31
  But the New York Times ran with it anyways.
• 26:33
  They could have at least proven that these people were not at all registered.
• 26:36
  They did not do that.
• 26:36
  That.
• 26:37
  In fact,
• 26:37
  they worked with the Georgia Secretary of State,
• 26:39
  Brad Rappensberger,
• 26:41
  to say,
• 26:42
  oh,
• 26:42
  well,
• 26:42
  they're not registered at that address.
• 26:44
  OK,
• 26:45
  sure.
• 26:45
  A lot of the illegal aliens tell us they get registered at work,
• 26:48
  DMVs,
• 26:48
  any of the shelter addresses they're at.
• 26:50
  That's not a sufficient check on the system.
• 26:52
  And so you have,
• 26:54
  uh,
• 26:54
  Raffensberger and his team working with the New York Times
• 26:57
  in order to kind of,
• 26:58
  you know,
• 26:59
  say,
• 26:59
  hey,
• 26:59
  nothing to see here.
• 27:00
  All of this invasion of the United States has no impact.
• 27:03
  Whatsoever
• 27:04
  on our very porous election system,
• 27:06
  it's crazy.
• 27:06
  It's why Americans are rightfully concerned
• 27:09
  that foreign interference by illegal aliens in our elections is a massive problem.
• 27:13
  And what the left always brings up though is that these are,
• 27:15
  first of all,
• 27:15
  there's no widespread evidence of voter fraud,
• 27:18
  as if that makes it something that we shouldn't worry about.
• 27:21
  But I mean,
• 27:21
  is that true?
• 27:22
  Do we know how many of these people are actually voting?
• 27:25
  How common is it for an illegal immigrant to actually
• 27:27
  get to the ballot and actually cast a vote?
• 27:30
  It's remarkably easy.
• 27:31
  Due to the motor voter registration laws,
• 27:34
  they're basically asked to register at the DMV and have
• 27:36
  to opt out by admitting that they're a non-citizen.
• 27:39
  Keep in mind if you're an illegal alien that just trekked across,
• 27:42
  you know,
• 27:42
  5 countries and paid off the cartels to get here,
• 27:44
  uh,
• 27:45
  you'd have to be pretty dumb to check a box in a government office.
• 27:47
  Office admitting that you are here illegally,
• 27:49
  uh,
• 27:50
  but they designed the system that way.
• 27:51
  It's largely an un-policed system.
• 27:53
  That's why the only way to get at these cases are these spot checks,
• 27:56
  which we're we're doing.
• 27:57
  And we forced Oregon the other day,
• 27:59
  far left Oregon,
• 28:00
  to admit that they had hundreds of illegals registered.
• 28:02
  Ohio's done the same.
• 28:03
  Texas has done the same.
• 28:05
  And uh the New York Times keeps pointing to,
• 28:07
  well,
• 28:07
  you don't have all these convictions.
• 28:09
  Of course you don't,
• 28:10
  because who's going to be prosecuting?
• 28:12
  The Georgia Secretary of State who's working with the
• 28:14
  New York Times to pretend it's not a problem,
• 28:16
  Biden administration,
• 28:18
  most states don't even have election prosecutors full-time.
• 28:21
  I think Texas is probably one of the only ones who does.
• 28:24
  And so it's all fake news and they're trying
• 28:25
  to point to a problem that they don't want policed
• 28:28
  in the first place.
• 28:29
  And that's what we're doing,
• 28:30
  where where it's remarkably easy,
• 28:32
  just asking non-citizens if they're registered,
• 28:34
  and sure enough,
• 28:35
  a lot of them admit that they are and the systems exist
• 28:37
  for them not only to be registered but encouraged to vote.
• 28:40
  It's,
• 28:41
  it's amazing that,
• 28:41
  I mean,
• 28:42
  and again,
• 28:42
  you look at every single poll on this,
• 28:44
  pretty much everybody who's an American citizen says,
• 28:47
  yeah,
• 28:47
  let's,
• 28:47
  let's require ID,
• 28:48
  let's have these basic checks.
• 28:50
  So many people,
• 28:51
  I mean it's really one of the most popular.
• 28:53
  Public proposals in our discourse requiring
• 28:57
  voter ID to vote,
• 28:58
  and yet
• 28:59
  the left and the media and the New York Times
• 29:01
  treat it as if it's this crazy racist idea.
• 29:05
  There's no evidence that
• 29:07
  African Americans don't want this policy,
• 29:10
  that Hispanics don't want this policy.
• 29:12
  People want
• 29:13
  the people that are voting to be checked out and make sure that they're citizens.
• 29:17
  That's absolutely right.
• 29:18
  The New York Times caters to a very small sliver of,
• 29:21
  you know,
• 29:21
  upper middle class,
• 29:22
  kind of,
• 29:22
  you know,
• 29:23
  far lefties
• 29:24
  that,
• 29:24
  you know,
• 29:25
  in these metropopolitan areas,
• 29:26
  they just feed them what they want to hear that reassures them
• 29:29
  on some of their more fringe,
• 29:30
  you know,
• 29:30
  racialized beliefs,
• 29:31
  and that's what it's all about.
• 29:33
  I mean,
• 29:33
  case in point,
• 29:34
  today we just fact checked the New York Times again
• 29:37
  because after last week's debate,
• 29:39
  they said,
• 29:40
  uh,
• 29:41
  the comment that Harris supports transgender surgeries.
• 29:44
  Illegal alien prisoners needed context.
• 29:47
  And here we've been sitting on this document set
• 29:49
  at the Bureau of Prisons where they actually have
• 29:51
  this whole procedure and process laid out for anyone
• 29:54
  in federal prisons to get these transgender surgeries,
• 29:57
  which has a huge
• 29:58
  subpopulation of illegal aliens.
• 30:00
  And it's not just the basics of,
• 30:02
  you know,
• 30:03
  the chopping off.
• 30:04
  It's everything up into augmentations,
• 30:06
  breast implants,
• 30:07
  laser hair removal surgeries.
• 30:09
  They're giving them the works,
• 30:10
  and you are paying.
• 30:11
  For it.
• 30:12
  And so the New York Times
• 30:13
  felt the need to try to debunk something that the right said,
• 30:16
  but clearly they're in this.
• 30:18
  They're the best PR agency for illegal aliens
• 30:21
  in the world.
• 30:21
  Probably.
• 30:22
  Maybe this is the best way to get your
• 30:24
  transgendered care covered.
• 30:25
  It's probably better than Obamacare,
• 30:27
  so that's at least something.
• 30:28
  Before we go,
• 30:29
  I want to talk to you,
• 30:30
  Mike,
• 30:30
  about Project 2025.
• 30:31
  The left is coming after
• 30:33
  the Trump administration,
• 30:34
  saying this is Trump's plan
• 30:37
  for the for the White House,
• 30:38
  but
• 30:39
  You know,
• 30:39
  again,
• 30:40
  like Heritage has a job,
• 30:42
  right?
• 30:42
  Like they come up with ideas to pitch to government
• 30:46
  officials to try to get them to improve the government.
• 30:49
  I mean that's what Heritage does,
• 30:50
  isn't that basically just what Project 2025 was,
• 30:53
  a list of things you guys thought would be the best possible ideas.
• 30:56
  Right,
• 30:57
  every 4 years we release the mandate for leadership,
• 30:59
  which are policy recommendations for any incoming
• 31:02
  administration.
• 31:03
  I've done it all the way going back to Reagan.
• 31:05
  Uh,
• 31:06
  this year is,
• 31:06
  is no different,
• 31:07
  and,
• 31:08
  you know,
• 31:08
  President Trump and his
• 31:10
  campaign,
• 31:10
  you know,
• 31:10
  have been running such a,
• 31:12
  you know,
• 31:12
  clear and,
• 31:13
  you know,
• 31:13
  convincing kind of domination thus far that,
• 31:15
  you know,
• 31:16
  President Biden had the back.
• 31:17
  Out and so you see the left grasping at straws,
• 31:20
  trying to find something else to yell about,
• 31:21
  and they poured millions and millions of dollars into this PR campaign
• 31:24
  trying to tie P-25 to President Trump,
• 31:27
  which is clearly nonsense.
• 31:28
  It does not speak for President Trump.
• 31:30
  It never has.
• 31:31
  Only President Trump speaks for President Trump,
• 31:33
  but
• 31:34
  hey,
• 31:34
  they'll disinformation the day away anyways.
• 31:37
  Is it a bit kind of annoying for you guys over at Heritage who worked on this thing,
• 31:41
  I mean,
• 31:42
  for a long time,
• 31:42
  and now not only is the left coming after you,
• 31:45
  but also,
• 31:45
  I mean,
• 31:46
  like there's been a lot,
• 31:47
  I mean,
• 31:47
  Trump has distanced himself,
• 31:49
  and as you say,
• 31:50
  he speaks for himself.
• 31:51
  I mean there's never,
• 31:52
  there's never a question.
• 31:52
  Where Donald Trump stands on something,
• 31:53
  he just blurts it out.
• 31:54
  That's what he does.
• 31:55
  But I mean it has been one of these
• 31:57
  things that like everyone seems to be distancing themselves
• 32:00
  from what I've read of Project 2025.
• 32:02
  There's a lot of stuff online that's just not true about it.
• 32:05
  Most of the proposals that have gone into this seem to be
• 32:08
  really common sense conservative proposals for government.
• 32:12
  What's going on here?
• 32:13
  Yeah,
• 32:14
  I mean,
• 32:14
  essentially they're mischaracterizing the whole thing.
• 32:16
  There's been numerous fact checks,
• 32:18
  even from some of the,
• 32:19
  you know,
• 32:19
  the far left outlets have basically said this is false.
• 32:22
  On our website,
• 32:23
  you'll see a US Today fact check of the entire thing when,
• 32:25
  when Harris tried tying
• 32:27
  Project 2025 to Trump.
• 32:28
  But,
• 32:29
  you know,
• 32:29
  they're just powering through.
• 32:30
  They know they do not need to be held accountable
• 32:32
  to such concepts as.
• 32:34
  The truth and honesty.
• 32:35
  And I'll tell you what's annoying.
• 32:37
  On Sunday,
• 32:37
  we had a
• 32:38
  transgender nude protest outside the Heritage Foundation.
• 32:41
  They're basically just getting a lot of mentally unstable
• 32:44
  people really spun up and through fear mongering,
• 32:47
  and that's no different than what you see in
• 32:49
  some of these assassination attempts on President Trump.
• 32:51
  There are a lot of unwell people out in this country that the The Left
• 32:55
  is actively messaging to in order to activate
• 32:58
  their deepest held conspiracy theories and convictions,
• 33:01
  and it has real world consequences,
• 33:03
  and you know they should tone the rhetoric down,
• 33:05
  get back to honesty,
• 33:07
  but I have zero expectations of them doing that.
• 33:09
  It's very true.
• 33:10
  I keep looking at this election and I keep thinking to myself,
• 33:13
  how have Democrats ever lost an election?
• 33:15
  Like every single thing the media does is aligned to try
• 33:20
  to have them win.
• 33:22
  We have multiple assassination attempts
• 33:25
  of President Trump that are being blamed on President Trump.
• 33:29
  The victims of these crimes
• 33:32
  are being blamed for the actual crime.
• 33:37
  I look at this and I wonder how can conservatives even win in this environment?
• 33:40
  Is it even possible?
• 33:42
  Yeah,
• 33:43
  it absolutely is possible.
• 33:44
  The fundamentals right now are pretty powerful in
• 33:46
  that this has been a horrible administration.
• 33:49
  The American people reject all these insane policies,
• 33:52
  and so in any fair election,
• 33:54
  you'd expect those things to win out.
• 33:55
  The problem is
• 33:56
  President Trump and his team are going to have to win by a margin that,
• 33:59
  you know,
• 33:59
  is beyond what you need in a free and fair election.
• 34:02
  I mean,
• 34:02
  they've
• 34:03
  pulled out all the stops.
• 34:04
  Right now,
• 34:04
  you and I and everybody who are listening are paying
• 34:07
  for uh BP Harris' get out the vote effort.
• 34:10
  They've turned every federal agency into that.
• 34:12
  They've flooded the border with an invasion and allowed these people
• 34:15
  to get registered to vote and try to tone down any policing of that.
• 34:19
  They're trying to put President Trump in jail,
• 34:21
  they're trying to have him killed,
• 34:22
  the rhetoric is out of control.
• 34:24
  The media is covering for all.
• 34:25
  These lies.
• 34:26
  And so
• 34:27
  of course President Trump can win,
• 34:29
  but he is going to have to win by a margin
• 34:31
  that is bigger than what would be required in a free and fair election.
• 34:34
  And due to the crazy policies
• 34:36
  and the bad record,
• 34:37
  that is certainly well within the realm of possibility.
• 34:41
  Mike Howell is the Oversight project
• 34:42
  executive director at the Heritage Foundation.
• 34:44
  Mike,
• 34:45
  thanks so much for coming on and talking us through all this.
• 34:48
  Hey,
• 34:48
  thanks for having me.
• 34:56
  You don't need me to tell you that life is precious,
• 34:58
  that it could be taken away in an instant.
• 35:01
  I mean,
• 35:01
  Think about what we've seen over the past couple of months.
• 35:04
  Even our presidential candidates can barely.
• 35:07
  survive
• 35:08
  the current status of things.
• 35:10
  So what do you do?
• 35:11
  Well,
• 35:11
  you've got to prepare yourself for whatever comes around the corner.
• 35:14
  You can't stop every single threat.
• 35:15
  You can't
• 35:16
  do everything,
• 35:16
  but you can prepare yourself for whatever might be around the corner
• 35:19
  with a 4 week emergency food kit from my Patriot Supply.
• 35:22
  I have one in my home.
• 35:23
  You should have one on yours too,
• 35:24
  because it covers you for like 99% of stuff,
• 35:27
  right?
• 35:27
  Like.
• 35:28
  I mean,
• 35:28
  I guess zombie apocalypse,
• 35:30
  you might still have a problem after a month,
• 35:31
  but most of the time you'd expect the,
• 35:33
  uh,
• 35:34
  you know,
• 35:34
  this country to be able to bounce back and
• 35:36
  put things back together.
• 35:37
  But you saw
• 35:38
  even during COVID,
• 35:39
  there were times you couldn't even get toilet paper,
• 35:41
  right?
• 35:41
  What happens if you can't get your hands on the food that you need?
• 35:44
  With over 2000 calories per day,
• 35:46
  there's enough to go around during times
• 35:48
  of social unrest,
• 35:48
  government crackdowns,
• 35:49
  or God forbid,
• 35:50
  an attack on the homeland.
• 35:52
  The food lasts up to 25 years,
• 35:54
  ready whenever disaster strikes.
• 35:56
  We've seen,
• 35:56
  you know,
• 35:56
  mass panic in our lifetimes before,
• 35:59
  some not that long ago.
• 36:00
  I'm not going to take my family's safety for granted.
• 36:03
  I,
• 36:03
  I,
• 36:03
  I don't think you will either,
• 36:04
  so do something about it.
• 36:06
  Right now you can get $50 off the same 4 week emergency food kit that I have in my home.
• 36:10
  Go to preparewith Stew.com.
• 36:12
  Preparewith stew.com.
• 36:13
  Save $50
• 36:15
  on your 4 week emergency food kit,
• 36:17
  and my Patriot supply will send it over as fast.
• 36:19
  as humanly possible.
• 36:20
  They are,
• 36:20
  you know,
• 36:21
  really fast.
• 36:21
  A lot of times you get your order on the same
• 36:23
  day,
• 36:23
  or I guess maybe the next day.
• 36:25
  I mean,
• 36:25
  they're not,
• 36:26
  you know,
• 36:26
  they're not like,
• 36:27
  you know,
• 36:27
  hanging out in front of your house waiting to put it in your mailbox,
• 36:29
  but they get it out really quickly.
• 36:30
  Get your 4-week emergency food kit at preparewith Stew.com.
• 36:33
  It's preparewith stew.com,
• 36:35
  Preparewith stew.com.
• 36:40
  Some new polling news out today,
• 36:42
  uh,
• 36:42
  good ones for Kamala Harris.
• 36:45
  Harris holds a 6 point national lead over Trump in post-debate polling.
• 36:49
  We're just starting to kind of get those
• 36:51
  initial
• 36:52
  polls that are after the debate,
• 36:54
  seeing what the effect of that debate was.
• 36:57
  Uh,
• 36:57
  the,
• 36:58
  it's,
• 36:58
  this is Morning Consult,
• 37:00
  usually does pretty well for Harris,
• 37:02
  and this is no exception,
• 37:03
  51 to 45.
• 37:05
  Uh,
• 37:05
  Democrats,
• 37:06
  of course,
• 37:07
  she's got 94% of the vote as opposed to Trump having 91% of Republicans.
• 37:12
  She's also winning independents by 6,
• 37:14
  and has 78% of the black vote,
• 37:16
  56% of ages 18 to 34.
• 37:20
  And so it's not too much surprising there,
• 37:23
  a good poll for her.
• 37:24
  You'd expect a polling bounce.
• 37:26
  We've talked about that a little bit
• 37:27
  after the debate,
• 37:28
  probably a couple of points.
• 37:30
  This is a couple of points higher than the previous polling average,
• 37:33
  which is about 2 or 3 depending on who you're looking at.
• 37:37
  Um,
• 37:37
  so that's where that stands right now.
• 37:39
  And that's like,
• 37:40
  you know,
• 37:40
  it's one national poll,
• 37:41
  not that big of a deal.
• 37:42
  A worse
• 37:43
  result for
• 37:44
  Donald Trump came from Iowa.
• 37:46
  Now this is the Selzer poll.
• 37:47
  This is.
• 37:48
  You know,
• 37:49
  polling nerds love her because of her attention to detail,
• 37:53
  whether you believe that is true or not,
• 37:55
  but
• 37:55
  it shows Donald Trump leading in Iowa
• 37:57
  only 47 to 43.
• 38:00
  Now that is a really close result.
• 38:02
  If you don't remember,
• 38:03
  Iowa's kind of past.
• 38:05
  Barack Obama was able to win Iowa in 2008.
• 38:08
  Since then it's gone very red.
• 38:10
  It's been an easy state for Republicans to win.
• 38:13
  Trump was leading
• 38:15
  over
• 38:16
  Joe Biden by 18 points
• 38:18
  in the poll.
• 38:19
  This has been the way
• 38:20
  Iowa has looked here for a while,
• 38:22
  a low double digit type of state.
• 38:24
  However,
• 38:25
  this says it's only 4 points.
• 38:26
  Now look,
• 38:27
  it's one poll.
• 38:28
  Do I believe that Iowa is a 4 point state?
• 38:30
  No,
• 38:30
  I do not.
• 38:31
  I do not believe it's a 4 point state.
• 38:32
  If it is a 4 point state,
• 38:34
  your next president is Kamala Harris.
• 38:35
  There's no question about it.
• 38:36
  She will definitely win the election in an environment
• 38:39
  where Iowa is a 4 point state.
• 38:41
  That being said,
• 38:42
  I don't believe that,
• 38:43
  and this is one poll we'll see if this is shown in others as well.
• 38:47
  We have seen some scary polls in certain states,
• 38:49
  Florida being a little close.
• 38:51
  There's been a poll or two in Texas that showed it relatively close,
• 38:54
  but
• 38:55
  generally speaking,
• 38:55
  when you step back from the whole picture,
• 38:58
  you know,
• 38:58
  Donald Trump,
• 38:59
  I think,
• 38:59
  is going to be fine in those three states.
• 39:01
  We will see,
• 39:02
  uh,
• 39:02
  as the polling adapts,
• 39:03
  and I did mention this,
• 39:04
  I think earlier,
• 39:05
  we have something supposedly coming this week,
• 39:07
  you know,
• 39:07
  I just need Glenn to prove a couple of the details on the project,
• 39:10
  but.
• 39:11
  When he does,
• 39:11
  we'll have something that will help you
• 39:12
  kind of sort through all this polling information
• 39:15
  in one simple way,
• 39:16
  and that's coming here in the next couple of days,
• 39:18
  so we'll keep you updated on that as we go forward.
• 39:34
  Is your teen unsure what to do after high school?
• 39:37
  And I don't mean like which video game to play or which,
• 39:39
  you know,
• 39:40
  flavor of Cheetos they're gonna eat.
• 39:42
  I'm talking about like after high school when it's done.
• 39:45
  There's a new 6 week life and career skills course from Praxis,
• 39:48
  which might be exactly what you need.
• 39:50
  For the past decade,
• 39:51
  Praxis
• 39:52
  has helped nearly 1000 homeschoolers and
• 39:54
  recent high school graduates launch their careers
• 39:57
  without college through their mentorship program,
• 39:59
  which is a really cool idea.
• 40:00
  Now
• 40:01
  they're bringing all this expertise
• 40:03
  to teens with their new course called Discover.
• 40:07
  Discover is a 6-week self-paced course designed to equip teens with,
• 40:11
  you know,
• 40:11
  essential life and career skills,
• 40:12
  the stuff they should be learning in school,
• 40:13
  I guess.
• 40:14
  But might not be
• 40:15
  like you know how to build a professional network,
• 40:17
  how to make money by creating
• 40:20
  value.
• 40:21
  I know nobody does that anymore.
• 40:23
  Uh,
• 40:23
  developing a vision for the future.
• 40:25
  These are really important things that,
• 40:26
  you know,
• 40:26
  a lot of times you don't get when you are in a school.
• 40:29
  So
• 40:30
  how do you work with this?
• 40:31
  Well,
• 40:32
  I should mention,
• 40:33
  it includes a coaching call,
• 40:34
  a free resume review,
• 40:36
  a copy of the book,
• 40:37
  Don't do Stuff You Hate.
• 40:39
  Pretty good advice.
• 40:40
  And now for a limited time,
• 40:41
  they're offering listeners of this particular program 50%
• 40:44
  off the course.
• 40:46
  You've got to use the promo code SU 50 to get that though.
• 40:48
  STU
• 40:49
  50 250 you're gonna get over $300 off of this right now.
• 40:54
  Go to discoverspraxis.com/blaze.
• 40:58
  Discoverpraxis.com/blaze.
• 41:00
  Don't forget that promo code.
• 41:01
  It's 250.
• 41:03
  Discoverpraxis.com/blaze.
• 41:06
  Learn more.
• 41:09
  So in the aftermath of October 7th,
• 41:11
  1 thing that wasn't really talked about
• 41:13
  was as all these horrible things are happening to Israelis
• 41:17
  from Hamas,
• 41:18
  at that point,
• 41:19
  Hezbollah basically said,
• 41:21
  oh,
• 41:21
  this is a good time to launch a bunch of rockets at Israel.
• 41:23
  They're kind of,
• 41:24
  you know,
• 41:24
  distracted.
• 41:25
  So they did that.
• 41:26
  Since then they've been back and forth firing at
• 41:28
  each other and kind of in constant like light conflict
• 41:31
  ever since.
• 41:32
  It hasn't escalated to major war status yet,
• 41:35
  thankfully.
• 41:36
  But Israel has been doing what it can to try to take out Hezbollah members,
• 41:40
  and
• 41:41
  today it was there was just a bananas story that came out about what is going on there.
• 41:48
  Israel somehow
• 41:49
  was able to sell or give
• 41:52
  thousands of pagers
• 41:54
  to
• 41:55
  Hezbollah members,
• 41:57
  and they were taking them around,
• 41:58
  using them on a day to day basis.
• 42:00
  What they did not know was inside of these pagers
• 42:04
  they were wearing around in their pockets on their hips
• 42:07
  was
• 42:08
  explosives.
• 42:10
  In fact,
• 42:11
  a couple of hours ago before the show started.
• 42:14
  Israel,
• 42:15
  or I mean allegedly Israel,
• 42:16
  they have not admitted this,
• 42:17
  but everyone believes it's them,
• 42:19
  lit up these pagers and all of them exploded at once.
• 42:24
  So hospitals around Lebanon are filled with Hezbollah
• 42:27
  members with just giant holes in their legs.
• 42:29
  Some of them were actually killed.
• 42:30
  But
• 42:32
  I'm talking about thousands.
• 42:34
  They said,
• 42:35
  I think Lebanon said it was 2800 people
• 42:38
  had been hit with these pagers that were timed to go off and explode at the exact
• 42:43
  moment
• 42:44
  together so that people couldn't get rid of
• 42:45
  them when they realized what was going on.
• 42:47
  I mean,
• 42:48
  talk about James Bond craziness.
• 42:50
  This was something
• 42:52
  that has never been done before,
• 42:54
  certainly at this scale.
• 42:56
  Israel,
• 42:57
  uh,
• 42:57
  you don't want to screw with Israel.
• 42:58
  I would say don't do that.
• 42:59
  That sounds like a bad idea.
• 43:00
  Imagine where these Hezbollah members are thinking.
• 43:02
  Everything around them
• 43:03
  could be an explosive device at this point.
• 43:06
  We'll give you more details on that coming up tomorrow.
• 43:16
  Hey,
• 43:16
  if you're looking for something that you could do that would help out the show,
• 43:19
  uh,
• 43:19
  quickly,
• 43:19
  that would take no time and no money,
• 43:21
  we would appreciate it if you go to YouTube.com/SuDAmerica,
• 43:24
  just click follow on the page.
• 43:25
  We're getting close to 100,000 subscribers,
• 43:27
  we'd love to reach that nice round number.
• 43:29
  Give us a second,
• 43:30
  click like,
• 43:31
  click follow,
• 43:32
  and do it today.
• 43:32
  YouTube.com/SuDAmerica.