Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / The Murder of Christina Downer

Transcript

The Murder of Christina Downer · Murder Files Unsealed

0:00
Speaker 1: Imagine for just a second that you're sitting on your
0:02
Speaker 1: couch on a random Tuesday. You send a quick text
0:05
Speaker 1: message to a loved one. Maybe it's your sister or
0:08
Speaker 1: your daughter or just a really good lifelong friend.
0:11
Speaker 2: Right, just a normal everyday thing.
0:13
Speaker 1: Exactly, just a completely mundane Tuesday. So a few minutes
0:17
Speaker 1: pass by and your phone buzzes. You look down and
0:19
Speaker 1: there it is, a reply.
0:20
Speaker 2: And it looks completely normal, right?
0:22
Speaker 1: Yeah, it reads exactly like them. It has their usual cadence.
0:26
Speaker 1: that specific rotation of emojis they always use, just their
0:29
Speaker 1: general vibe. And when you see that, you feel that
0:33
Speaker 1: tiny subconscious wave of reassurance.
0:36
Speaker 2: That feeling of, okay, they're alive, they're out there.
0:39
Speaker 1: Right. You know, the people you care about are alive
0:41
Speaker 1: and well operating somewhere on the other end of that
0:44
Speaker 1: cellular network. So you put the phone in your pocket
0:47
Speaker 1: and you go about your day. You go about your
0:49
Speaker 1: week even.
0:49
Speaker 2: Because why wouldn't you? Exactly.
0:51
Speaker 1: Exactly. But now I want you to imagine the profound,
0:55
Speaker 1: just stomach-dropping horror of discovering months later that the person
1:00
Speaker 1: typing that response, the entity controlling that digital avatar, wasn't
1:06
Speaker 1: your loved one at all. Wow. It was their killer.
1:10
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, it completely shatters our fundamental operating system
1:15
Speaker 2: as modern humans.
1:16
Speaker 1: It really does.
1:17
Speaker 2: Because we inherently trust that digital tether. We operate under
1:22
Speaker 2: this built-in assumption that the device and the person are, well,
1:25
Speaker 2: they're one in the same entity.
1:27
Speaker 1: Right. A text from you is you.
1:28
Speaker 2: Exactly. So when a bad actor severs that physical connection
1:32
Speaker 2: but actively keeps the digital connection alive, I mean, they
1:35
Speaker 2: are essentially hijacking your reality.
1:37
Speaker 1: It's terrifying. It is.
1:39
Speaker 2: You are literally having a conversation with a ghost engineered
1:42
Speaker 2: by a predator.
1:43
Speaker 1: And that digital ghost story, that is the very real,
1:46
Speaker 1: very harrowing reality at the heart of our deep dive today.
1:50
Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's a heavy one.
1:51
Speaker 1: It really is. We are examining a true crime case
1:54
Speaker 1: that is actively unfolding in the courts right now, literally
1:57
Speaker 1: as of November 4th, 2026. This whole thing centers on
2:01
Speaker 1: the tragic disappearance and the alleged murder of a 30-year-old
2:05
Speaker 1: woman named Christina Downer.
2:07
Speaker 2: And she was also known as Christina Fowley, right?
2:09
Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. And for those of you who follow the
2:12
Speaker 1: comedy world, that name is definitely going to sound familiar.
2:15
Speaker 1: She is the sister of Saturday Night Live writer and
2:18
Speaker 1: comedian Jimmy Fowley.
2:20
Speaker 2: The public attention on this specific case has just been massive.
2:23
Speaker 2: I mean, partly due to the entertainment industry connection, sure, but.
2:27
Speaker 1: But mostly because of the crime itself.
2:29
Speaker 2: Right.
2:30
Speaker 1: Right.
2:30
Speaker 2: Mostly because of the terrifyingly relatable mechanics of the cover-up.
2:35
Speaker 2: I mean, it forces anyone who's paying attention to look
2:38
Speaker 2: at their own smartphone and just realize how easily their
2:41
Speaker 2: digital identity could be weaponized.
2:43
Speaker 1: Weaponized to mask their own physical disappearance.
2:46
Speaker 2: Exactly. It's chilling.
2:48
Speaker 1: It is. And if you look at the DA's filings
2:50
Speaker 1: from just this week, the sheer volume of manipulation is staggering.
2:54
Speaker 1: So our information today, it's pulled directly from those breaking
2:58
Speaker 1: crime news reports detailing the very recent arrests in this case.
3:01
Speaker 2: But we're going deeper than just the news, right?
3:03
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. We aren't just looking at the police blotter.
3:06
Speaker 1: We are poring over court documents that map out this
3:08
Speaker 1: incredibly tangled web of prior restraining orders.
3:12
Speaker 2: Which is a whole other layer to this.
3:15
Speaker 1: It really is. We are also analyzing public statements. from
3:18
Speaker 1: both law enforcement and Jimmy Fall himself, who has essentially
3:22
Speaker 1: crowdsourced this massive public pressure campaign to find his sister.
3:25
Speaker 2: He's been relentless.
3:26
Speaker 1: He has. So, our mission today is to look way
3:30
Speaker 1: beyond the headlines. We want to examine the anatomy of
3:32
Speaker 1: a modern crime.
3:33
Speaker 2: Like, how does this actually work in practice? Right.
3:37
Speaker 1: We're going to look at the mechanics of, well, digital taxidermy,
3:40
Speaker 1: I guess you could call it.
3:41
Speaker 2: Oh, that's a good term for it.
3:42
Speaker 1: Yeah, how a killer essentially stuffs and mounts a victim's
3:46
Speaker 1: digital footprint to fool the world. We're going to break
3:49
Speaker 1: down the systemic red flags of proxy stalking. And we're
3:52
Speaker 1: going to untangle this deeply disturbing psychological alliance between two
3:56
Speaker 1: former legal enemies who allegedly united to commit murder.
4:01
Speaker 2: That's a lot to get through.
4:02
Speaker 1: It is. OK, let's unpack this.
4:05
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, the timeline is really the spine of
4:07
Speaker 2: this entire tragedy. To even begin to understand the cover up,
4:10
Speaker 2: we have to isolate the gap between the physical reality
4:14
Speaker 2: of the crime and the digital illusion of life.
4:17
Speaker 1: OK, let's start with that illusion. Let's look at the
4:20
Speaker 1: phenomenon of going off the grid.
4:23
Speaker 2: Which is such a common thing nowadays.
4:24
Speaker 1: Right. Based on the reports, Christina Downer was not officially
4:28
Speaker 1: reported missing to the LAPD until December 2025. Wow, December. Yeah.
4:33
Speaker 1: But the physical reality is that she vanished months before that.
4:37
Speaker 1: The trigger for the official missing persons report wasn't even
4:39
Speaker 1: like a sudden realization of foul play.
4:42
Speaker 2: It was a welfare check, right?
4:43
Speaker 1: Exactly. It was her ex-husband requesting a standard welfare check.
4:47
Speaker 2: And, you know, a welfare check is a crucial mechanism,
4:49
Speaker 2: but it usually signifies that the community's natural alarm system
4:53
Speaker 2: has already been suppressed for way too long.
4:55
Speaker 1: Because people assume everything is fine until it's really, really not. Right.
5:00
Speaker 2: A welfare check basically means the casual check-ins failed, the
5:03
Speaker 2: text messages have completely stopped working, and the isolation has
5:06
Speaker 2: become absolute.
5:08
Speaker 1: And the isolation here, I mean, it was meticulously engineered.
5:12
Speaker 1: Demi Fallon noted that his last actual correspondence with her,
5:15
Speaker 1: like The last time he can confidently say he was
5:17
Speaker 1: speaking to the physical human being that was his sister
5:20
Speaker 1: was November 26, 2025.
5:23
Speaker 2: But the timeline of the actual crime is much earlier.
5:26
Speaker 1: Yeah. Investigators believe the actual murder happened way earlier, back
5:29
Speaker 1: in September.
5:30
Speaker 2: That's a massive gap.
5:31
Speaker 1: It's huge. Jimmy revealed on Instagram that investigators suspect whoever
5:36
Speaker 1: took Christina's phone used it to construct this elaborate false narrative.
5:40
Speaker 2: The off-the-grid story.
5:42
Speaker 1: Exactly. They took over her social media, her messaging apps.
5:45
Speaker 1: just to tell her inner circle that she was going
5:47
Speaker 1: off the grid.
5:48
Speaker 2: And while they were doing that, while they were selling
5:49
Speaker 2: the story of like a spiritual retreat or a mental
5:52
Speaker 2: health break, they were simultaneously using her compromised accounts to
5:56
Speaker 2: ask people for money. Right.
5:58
Speaker 1: Which is just, it's a highly strategic form of digital puppetry.
6:02
Speaker 2: It really is.
6:03
Speaker 1: So how does this kind of manufactured narrative impact the
6:06
Speaker 1: actual mechanics of a missing persons investigation? Because You know,
6:11
Speaker 1: we always hear about the first 48 hours being so critical.
6:13
Speaker 2: Yeah. What's fascinating here is how the off-the-grid narrative exploits
6:17
Speaker 2: a very specific vulnerability in our modern culture. Like you said,
6:21
Speaker 2: the first 48 hours of an investigation are literally everything.
6:25
Speaker 1: Because that's when the trail is hot. Right.
6:27
Speaker 2: That is when cellular data is fresh, surveillance footage hasn't
6:30
Speaker 2: been recorded over by a loop, and witnesses can actually
6:33
Speaker 2: remember what they saw on a given day.
6:35
Speaker 1: But if they think the person just unplugged.
6:37
Speaker 2: Exactly. Exactly. If you tell a family, hey, I need
6:40
Speaker 2: to unplug, you completely neutralize that 48-hour window. In our hyper-connected,
6:45
Speaker 2: constantly pinging society, the desire to escape is universally understood, right?
6:50
Speaker 1: Oh, totally. Burnout is like a cultural epidemic at this point.
6:54
Speaker 2: Exactly.
6:54
Speaker 1: So when the text comes in saying, I'm checking out
6:57
Speaker 1: for a bit, the family's first instinct isn't suspicion. It's empathy. Yes.
7:01
Speaker 1: They want to respect the boundary. They want to be supportive. Right.
7:05
Speaker 2: You don't want to be the crazy family member.
7:06
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, if your sister says, I'm overwhelmed, I'm
7:08
Speaker 1: taking a break from my phone, your immediate reaction is
7:11
Speaker 1: to give her that space. You definitely don't call the police.
7:14
Speaker 2: You don't send a SWAT team to her apartment just
7:17
Speaker 2: because she wanted a week of silence.
7:18
Speaker 1: Exactly.
7:19
Speaker 2: The killer is literally taking the family's love, their respect
7:22
Speaker 2: for her autonomy, and weaponizing it just to buy time.
7:26
Speaker 1: And that stolen time is the killer's most valuable asset.
7:29
Speaker 1: I mean, it allows all that physical evidence to degrade.
7:32
Speaker 2: It does. But there is a dual motive happening here, too.
7:35
Speaker 1: Right, because the source material shows they were asking for money.
7:38
Speaker 2: Yes, which is a classic financial extraction. But Jimmy Fowler's
7:42
Speaker 2: public statements point to something far more sinister than just cash.
7:46
Speaker 1: What did he say exactly?
7:47
Speaker 2: He said, quote, whoever is responsible is hoping to erase
7:50
Speaker 2: her in every way possible.
7:52
Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
7:52
Speaker 2: Yeah, it feels less like a robbery and more like
7:54
Speaker 2: a deliberate psychological annihilation of her existence.
7:58
Speaker 1: That is so dark. But I mean... I guess it
8:01
Speaker 1: makes sense. The financial extraction is often just a secondary benefit, right?
8:05
Speaker 2: To the primary goal of erasure. By keeping the digital
8:09
Speaker 2: avatar alive to ask for money, the killer accomplishes two
8:12
Speaker 2: major things.
8:13
Speaker 1: Okay, what are they?
8:14
Speaker 2: First, they reinforce the illusion of life, because obviously a
8:17
Speaker 2: dead person doesn't need Venmo.
8:18
Speaker 1: Right.
8:19
Speaker 2: And second, they slowly alienate the victim from their support system.
8:23
Speaker 1: Oh, because people get annoyed.
8:24
Speaker 2: Exactly. If a friend keeps getting strange, out-of-the-blue requests for
8:28
Speaker 2: cash from someone claiming to be off the grid, that
8:31
Speaker 2: friend might eventually get frustrated and just mute the conversation.
8:34
Speaker 1: Like, I can't deal with her right now.
8:35
Speaker 2: Right. So the killer is orchestrating the victim's social death
8:39
Speaker 2: before the physical death is even discovered by anyone.
8:42
Speaker 1: God, that is so insidious. Let's talk about the actual
8:46
Speaker 1: mechanics of pulling off that impersonation, though. Because I think,
8:49
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of you listening probably assume you
8:51
Speaker 1: would immediately know if someone else was texting from your
8:54
Speaker 1: partner's phone.
8:55
Speaker 2: People always think they'd know.
8:57
Speaker 1: Yeah. You think, oh, I spot a fake right away.
8:59
Speaker 1: But if you think about forensic linguistics, our phones are
9:02
Speaker 1: essentially massive databases of our personal syntax.
9:06
Speaker 2: They absolutely are.
9:07
Speaker 1: So if someone unlocked your phone right now, they would
9:10
Speaker 1: have a master key to your entire communication cell, wouldn't they?
9:13
Speaker 2: Oh, 100%. Forensic linguists study exactly this phenomenon. Every single
9:18
Speaker 2: person has an idiolect, which is basically a unique linguistic fingerprint.
9:23
Speaker 1: Like how you use punctuation.
9:24
Speaker 2: Exactly. It encompasses how often you use exclamation points, whether
9:28
Speaker 2: you type OK or just OK, your response latency, like
9:32
Speaker 2: how fast you reply, and your specific clustering of emojis.
9:36
Speaker 1: That makes a lot of sense.
9:37
Speaker 2: Yeah, so if a bad actor has your unlocked device,
9:40
Speaker 2: they don't even have to guess your idiolect. They can
9:42
Speaker 2: just scroll up.
9:43
Speaker 1: They just read your old text.
9:44
Speaker 2: Right. They study your historical data, and they just mimic
9:47
Speaker 2: your exact phrasing.
9:48
Speaker 1: It's like they're reverse engineering a shadow.
9:51
Speaker 2: They just step right into the silhouette of data that
9:53
Speaker 2: you've already left behind. That's a great way to put it.
9:56
Speaker 2: And they can sustain that silhouette for a terrifyingly long time.
10:00
Speaker 1: Especially if they've set that expectation, right?
10:03
Speaker 2: Right. Especially if they preemptively set the expectation of sparse communication.
10:07
Speaker 2: By saying, I'm going off the grid, the killer actively
10:10
Speaker 2: lowers the bar for the impersonation.
10:12
Speaker 1: So people aren't expecting long, detailed conversations. Exactly.
10:16
Speaker 2: The responses are expected to be short and frequent and vague.
10:19
Speaker 2: It is a brilliant, albeit completely evil, manipulation of expectations.
10:24
Speaker 1: But here is what makes this digital illusion so baffling
10:26
Speaker 1: to me. To pull this off, the killer didn't act alone. No,
10:31
Speaker 1: they didn't. And to understand why, we have to pivot
10:33
Speaker 1: from this, like, pristine, silent digital cover-up and look at
10:37
Speaker 1: the incredibly messy, loud, and physically chaotic reality that she
10:40
Speaker 1: was actually living in.
10:42
Speaker 2: The physical reality was a nightmare.
10:44
Speaker 1: It was. The source material outlines this bizarre love triangle
10:47
Speaker 1: that was heavily documented by the Los Angeles legal system
10:50
Speaker 1: long before anyone ever went missing.
10:52
Speaker 2: And this transition from the digital illusion to the physical escalation,
10:56
Speaker 2: that is where the true terror of this case lies.
10:59
Speaker 1: Yeah, we're moving into the realm of documented systemic harassment here.
11:03
Speaker 1: Let's bring in the key players according to the DA's office.
11:06
Speaker 2: Okay, lay it out.
11:07
Speaker 1: So we have Christina's boyfriend, a 41-year-old man named DeLorean Bijon-Brandon.
11:13
Speaker 1: And then we have his ex-girlfriend, a 34-year-old woman named
11:17
Speaker 1: Kaylee Markowski. Right. If we rewind the timeline to September 2024,
11:22
Speaker 1: which is a full year before investigators believe Christina was murdered,
11:26
Speaker 1: Christina Downer actually went to the courts. She actively sought
11:30
Speaker 1: a restraining order against Markowski.
11:33
Speaker 2: And the underlying incidents that prompted that restraining order, I mean,
11:36
Speaker 2: they are a textbook study in proxy stalking.
11:40
Speaker 1: Proxy stalking, yeah.
11:41
Speaker 2: And really just the complete destruction of a victim's psychological sanctuary.
11:45
Speaker 1: I read through the details of those court records and
11:48
Speaker 1: the logistics of what Markowski allegedly did. It's just staggering.
11:52
Speaker 2: It's a lot of effort.
11:53
Speaker 1: It's an insane amount of effort. These incidents date back
11:57
Speaker 1: to December 2023. Markowski allegedly stole Christina's spare key, but
12:03
Speaker 1: she didn't just take it and keep it.
12:05
Speaker 2: No, she was smarter than that.
12:06
Speaker 1: Right. She took it. made a physical copy, and presumably
12:10
Speaker 1: returned the original so that Christina wouldn't realize her home
12:12
Speaker 1: security had even been breached.
12:14
Speaker 2: Which is terrifying.
12:15
Speaker 1: Then Markowski allegedly used that access to enter the home
12:19
Speaker 1: and steal a specific zip drive belonging to Christina.
12:22
Speaker 2: And this wasn't just any drive.
12:23
Speaker 1: No, this drive contained private, topless photos. Markowski is then
12:28
Speaker 1: accused of using those photos to blackmail Christina. And ultimately,
12:32
Speaker 1: she allegedly sent them to strangers in a deliberate, targeted
12:35
Speaker 1: attack on her reputation.
12:37
Speaker 2: The violation of the home, that is the ultimate escalation
12:41
Speaker 2: in stalking.
12:41
Speaker 1: Because nowhere feels safe anymore.
12:43
Speaker 2: Exactly. A stalker wants to shatter the illusion that you
12:46
Speaker 2: are safe anywhere, especially in your own house. By secretly
12:49
Speaker 2: copying the key, the stalker achieves this almost godlike status
12:54
Speaker 2: in the victim's mind.
12:55
Speaker 1: Like they can get in whenever they want.
12:56
Speaker 2: Right. They can bypass locks. They can access the most
13:00
Speaker 2: intimate hidden data. It's about total vulnerability.
13:03
Speaker 1: And Markowski didn't stop at the home invasion either. The
13:07
Speaker 1: records accuse her of attempting to sabotage Christina's employment.
13:10
Speaker 2: She went after her livelihood.
13:12
Speaker 1: Yeah. Relentlessly calling from blocked numbers. And utilizing an Apple
13:16
Speaker 1: AirTag to track Deloria in Brandon's car.
13:19
Speaker 2: That's a major escalation, the tracking.
13:21
Speaker 1: It is. When you hear the phrase, crime of passion,
13:25
Speaker 1: I think society has sort of conditioned us to picture
13:28
Speaker 1: this sudden, impulsive break from reality. Right.
13:31
Speaker 2: Like a momentary loss of control.
13:33
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. But the sheer... operational effort here completely shatters
13:38
Speaker 1: that narrative.
13:38
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely.
13:39
Speaker 1: I mean, think about it. You have to locate a
13:41
Speaker 1: spare key, travel to a hardware store to physically copy it,
13:45
Speaker 1: infiltrate a home, rummage through all their belongings to find
13:48
Speaker 1: a specific digital storage device, extract the files, build a
13:52
Speaker 1: whole blackmail campaign, and then purchase and physically conceal a
13:56
Speaker 1: digital tracker on a vehicle. That is the opposite of impulsive.
14:00
Speaker 1: It requires immense planning, patience, and just sustained malice. So
14:06
Speaker 1: what does this all mean for how we categorize this
14:08
Speaker 1: type of crime?
14:09
Speaker 2: Well, if we connect this to the bigger picture, we
14:12
Speaker 2: are looking at the mechanics of coercive control.
14:15
Speaker 1: Okay. Can you explain that a bit? Sure.
14:18
Speaker 2: While coercive control is often discussed in the context of
14:20
Speaker 2: like a primary intimate partner, what we see here is
14:23
Speaker 2: externalized coercive control, proxy stalking.
14:28
Speaker 1: So controlling them from the outside. Yes.
14:31
Speaker 2: The goal is to regulate the victim's everyday behavior through fear.
14:35
Speaker 2: And it literally alters the victim's brain chemistry over time.
14:38
Speaker 1: You mean by keeping them in a constant state of hyperarousal?
14:42
Speaker 2: Exactly that. When your private images are being distributed to strangers,
14:47
Speaker 2: when you know someone can enter your home without even
14:49
Speaker 2: breaking a window, your nervous system never resets.
14:52
Speaker 1: You never get back to a baseline of safety. Right.
14:55
Speaker 2: You are living in a prolonged state of fight or flight.
14:58
Speaker 2: Cortisol is just constantly flooding the system.
15:01
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the air tag for a second. Because
15:03
Speaker 1: I think people treat these devices like magic. But the
15:06
Speaker 1: underlying technology is what makes them such a devastating tool
15:09
Speaker 1: for a stalker.
15:10
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're incredibly effective, unfortunately.
15:12
Speaker 1: Because an AirTag doesn't have its own GPS chip, right?
15:16
Speaker 1: Or a cellular connection.
15:17
Speaker 2: No, it doesn't.
15:18
Speaker 1: It works by exploding the Bluetooth mesh network of literally
15:21
Speaker 1: every single Apple device in the world.
15:23
Speaker 2: Right. It pings off nearby devices.
15:25
Speaker 1: Yeah. So if you hide an AirTag in someone's car,
15:28
Speaker 1: it just sits there silently sending out a secure Bluetooth signal.
15:32
Speaker 1: Any passing iPhone, iPad, or Mac, whether it belongs to
15:35
Speaker 1: a pedestrian, a driver in the next lane, or even
15:37
Speaker 1: the victim themselves, picks up that signal and anonymously relays
15:41
Speaker 1: the location to the iCloud.
15:42
Speaker 2: It effectively turns the entire public sphere into an unwitting
15:46
Speaker 2: surveillance network for the stalker.
15:48
Speaker 1: That is so creepy to think about. It is.
15:51
Speaker 2: The victim's own community, their own neighbors with iPhones, are
15:54
Speaker 2: unknowingly transmitting the victim's location back to the person hunting them.
15:58
Speaker 1: And Christina, she recognized the severity of this. In her
16:01
Speaker 1: court filings, she wrote that this harassment was causing her, quote,
16:05
Speaker 1: irreparable damage mentally.
16:07
Speaker 2: It's a chilling piece of self-awareness.
16:10
Speaker 1: It really is. She knew her psychological infrastructure was being
16:14
Speaker 1: dismantled piece by piece.
16:16
Speaker 2: And, you know, the tragedy of the legal system here
16:18
Speaker 2: is that it is excellent at documenting these red flags.
16:21
Speaker 1: Right. We have it all on paper.
16:23
Speaker 2: But it is incredibly poor at actually stopping the escalation.
16:27
Speaker 2: A restraining order is a critical piece of paper for
16:29
Speaker 2: establishing a paper trail, absolutely.
16:31
Speaker 1: But it's just paper.
16:33
Speaker 2: Right. It is not a force field. It documents the
16:35
Speaker 2: trajectory of the violence, but it relies on the honor
16:39
Speaker 2: system of a person who has already clearly demonstrated they
16:42
Speaker 2: have no honor.
16:42
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the most baffling, just twisted intersection
16:46
Speaker 1: of this entire deep dive.
16:47
Speaker 2: Yeah, this part is wild.
16:49
Speaker 1: We are moving into September 2025. This is where the
16:53
Speaker 1: adversarial legal battles take a massive, fatal pivot.
16:57
Speaker 2: The timeline of September 2025, it defies all logical conventions
17:03
Speaker 2: of adversarial relationships.
17:05
Speaker 1: Okay, let's lay out the exact sequence of events from
17:07
Speaker 1: the source material, because you almost have to hear it
17:09
Speaker 1: step by step to believe it. Go for it. On
17:11
Speaker 1: September 2nd, 2025, DeLorean Brandon, the boyfriend, files his own
17:17
Speaker 1: petition for a restraining order against his ex-girlfriend, Markowski.
17:21
Speaker 2: So he's asking for protection from her.
17:23
Speaker 1: Right. In his filing, he claims that she became violent
17:27
Speaker 1: after he left her for Christina. He is formally asking
17:30
Speaker 1: a judge to protect him from this woman. Okay. The
17:33
Speaker 1: court denies his request for an immediate temporary order, but
17:37
Speaker 1: they schedule a full hearing for September 23rd, 2025.
17:40
Speaker 2: So they have a hard date on the calendar.
17:42
Speaker 1: Exactly. There is a hard date for these two to
17:44
Speaker 1: face off in court. But here is where the timeline
17:47
Speaker 1: becomes just horrifying.
17:49
Speaker 2: The murder date. Yeah.
17:52
Speaker 1: Prosecutors believe that Delorean Branden killed Christina Downer around September 19th, 2025.
17:57
Speaker 2: Which is four days before the scheduled court hearing? Right.
18:02
Speaker 1: Four days before. And what does Brandon do next? He
18:06
Speaker 1: voluntarily cancels the September 23rd hearing against Markowski. Wow. And
18:10
Speaker 1: prosecutors allege that in this exact window, Brandon enlists Markowski
18:15
Speaker 1: as an accessory after the fact to help him dispose
18:18
Speaker 1: of Christina's body.
18:19
Speaker 2: The whiplash there is almost impossible to process.
18:22
Speaker 1: Here's where it gets really interesting. Just think about the
18:25
Speaker 1: psychological audacity of that sequence.
18:28
Speaker 2: It's hard to wrap your head around.
18:29
Speaker 1: It is. Brandon is filing for legal protection against his
18:33
Speaker 1: ex-girlfriend one week. He's telling a judge she is a
18:36
Speaker 1: violent threat to his safety. The next week, he allegedly
18:39
Speaker 1: murders his current girlfriend. And then... And who is the
18:43
Speaker 1: first phone call he makes to help clean up a homicide?
18:46
Speaker 1: The very woman he just filed a restraining order against.
18:49
Speaker 2: The woman who has spent a year allegedly terrorizing his
18:52
Speaker 2: life and his girlfriend's life.
18:53
Speaker 1: Exactly. What kind of shared pathology allows two people to
18:56
Speaker 1: go from bitter legal adversaries to literal co-conspirators in a
19:01
Speaker 1: murder cover-up in a matter of days?
19:04
Speaker 2: It really requires a deep dive into the psychology of
19:07
Speaker 2: toxic enmeshment.
19:09
Speaker 1: Toxic enmeshment, okay.
19:11
Speaker 2: Yeah, because we have this societal assumption that enemies want
19:15
Speaker 2: to avoid each other at all costs, right?
19:16
Speaker 1: Right, like you'd cross the street to get away from them.
19:18
Speaker 2: Exactly.
19:18
Speaker 1: Exactly.
19:19
Speaker 2: But in highly toxic dynamics, obsession and hatred are simply
19:22
Speaker 2: two manifestations of the exact same energy.
19:25
Speaker 1: Oh, interesting.
19:26
Speaker 2: The intense negative engagement, you know, the stalking, the blackmail,
19:29
Speaker 2: the courtroom battles, all of that is still a form
19:31
Speaker 2: of deep pathological connection.
19:33
Speaker 1: So they're still deeply connected, just in a negative way. Right.
19:36
Speaker 2: They are constantly reacting to each other, constantly occupying each
19:39
Speaker 2: other's mental space.
19:40
Speaker 1: So the restraining order wasn't really about creating distance then.
19:43
Speaker 1: It was just another move on the chessboard of their relationship.
19:46
Speaker 2: Often, yes. The legal system becomes this weaponized proxy.
19:50
Speaker 1: For their dysfunction.
19:51
Speaker 2: And when you introduce a shared goal, however horrific that
19:54
Speaker 2: goal is, that volatile energy can suddenly align.
19:57
Speaker 1: Wow.
19:58
Speaker 2: Let's look at their individual motivations here. Markowski had allegedly
20:01
Speaker 2: spent a year trying to destroy Christina. Her goal was
20:04
Speaker 2: the removal of the rival.
20:06
Speaker 1: Right.
20:06
Speaker 2: Brandon, for reasons that only he knows, decides to eliminate
20:10
Speaker 2: Christina on or around September 19th. Suddenly, out of nowhere,
20:14
Speaker 2: their objectives are perfectly synchronized.
20:16
Speaker 1: It's like two opposing magnets suddenly flipping their polarity. The
20:20
Speaker 1: repulsion just turns into this unbreakable fatal attraction.
20:24
Speaker 2: Exactly.
20:25
Speaker 1: Brandon needed an accomplice that he knew was capable of extreme,
20:28
Speaker 1: morally bankrupt behavior.
20:30
Speaker 2: And he had the proof.
20:32
Speaker 1: He already had empirical evidence that Markowski possessed no ethical
20:35
Speaker 1: boundaries when it came to Christina.
20:37
Speaker 2: And for Murkowski, becoming the accomplice might have been viewed
20:40
Speaker 2: as the ultimate twisted victory.
20:43
Speaker 1: How so?
20:44
Speaker 2: By helping him dispose of the body, she implicates him.
20:47
Speaker 2: She ties his fate to hers forever. It is the
20:50
Speaker 2: ultimate form of control over him, while simultaneously, you know,
20:53
Speaker 2: permanently removing the woman she viewed as her enemy.
20:56
Speaker 1: It's a partnership forged in mutual destruction.
20:58
Speaker 2: It really is.
21:00
Speaker 1: But think about the sheer psychological weight of that canceled hearing. Brandon,
21:05
Speaker 1: walking into a courthouse... or filing the paperwork remotely, to
21:08
Speaker 1: cancel a restraining order against a woman because by that point,
21:11
Speaker 1: the murder had already happened.
21:13
Speaker 2: Right. Christina was gone.
21:15
Speaker 1: He didn't need protection from Markowski anymore. He was actively
21:18
Speaker 1: relying on her to help him hide a corpse.
21:20
Speaker 2: The cancellation of that hearing, I mean, it is the
21:23
Speaker 2: loudest silent alarm in the entire timeline.
21:25
Speaker 1: It really is.
21:27
Speaker 2: It marks the exact moment the adversary became the accomplice.
21:31
Speaker 2: It is the hinge upon which the entire cover-up swings.
21:34
Speaker 1: But here is the fatal flaw in their master plan.
21:38
Speaker 1: Despite this horrific alliance, and despite the successful delay tactics
21:42
Speaker 1: of using Christina's phone to construct this whole off-the-grid narrative,
21:47
Speaker 1: they fail to account for the physical environment.
21:50
Speaker 2: Which happens so often.
21:53
Speaker 1: We see this time and time again in these cases.
21:55
Speaker 1: You can manipulate a digital avatar. You can fake text
21:59
Speaker 1: messages all day long, but you cannot manipulate the Earth. No,
22:03
Speaker 1: you can't. The physical world has a way of surfacing
22:06
Speaker 1: the very evidence that digital lies are trying to bury.
22:10
Speaker 2: The environment is an unforgiving adversary for a criminal. It
22:14
Speaker 2: operates on immutable laws of physics, tides, and cellular radio waves.
22:20
Speaker 1: Which brings us to the investigation's tipping point. Let's look
22:24
Speaker 1: at how law enforcement actually started to pierce through this
22:26
Speaker 1: digital smokescreen.
22:28
Speaker 2: Okay, let's get into the forensics.
22:30
Speaker 1: By December 2025, Jimmy Fowler realizes the off the grid
22:34
Speaker 1: story is a portal fabrication.
22:36
Speaker 2: He knew his sister better than that. Right.
22:38
Speaker 1: So he launches a massive public campaign. He shares missing
22:41
Speaker 1: posters and he specifically highlights Christina's deep emotional attachment to
22:46
Speaker 1: her dog.
22:46
Speaker 2: Which is such a crucial behavioral detail.
22:50
Speaker 1: It is. He is signaling to the public and to
22:53
Speaker 1: law enforcement that the behavioral data just doesn't match the
22:56
Speaker 1: digital data. She would not abandon her animal.
22:59
Speaker 2: Never.
23:00
Speaker 1: So he leverages his platform in the entertainment industry to
23:03
Speaker 1: bring national heat to the case.
23:05
Speaker 2: And that public pressure is the catalyst. It forces law
23:09
Speaker 2: enforcement to stop looking at this as just, you know,
23:12
Speaker 2: an eccentric adult taking a break and to start scrutinizing
23:15
Speaker 2: the digital footprint for real anomalies.
23:18
Speaker 1: And then we get the heartbreaking shift in April 2026.
23:21
Speaker 1: The LAPD officially informs the family that Christina is dead.
23:26
Speaker 2: Just devastating.
23:28
Speaker 1: The SNL community rallies around Jimmy. But the focus of
23:31
Speaker 1: the investigation fundamentally changes. According to the reports, this shift
23:35
Speaker 1: occurred because Christina's phone washed ashore on a beach in
23:39
Speaker 1: Santa Monica.
23:40
Speaker 2: The ocean gave it back.
23:41
Speaker 1: Yes. This physical discovery causes the case to be escalated
23:45
Speaker 1: to the elite robbery homicide division. Then, months later, in
23:49
Speaker 1: October 2026, police execute a major search warrant at an
23:52
Speaker 1: Airbnb out in Joshua Tree.
23:55
Speaker 2: The geographical contrast here is wild.
23:58
Speaker 1: It's insane. You have a phone tossed into the Pacific
24:00
Speaker 1: Ocean at the edge of the continent, and you have
24:03
Speaker 1: a search team combing through the arid, desolate Mojave Desert.
24:06
Speaker 2: You are looking at two entirely different forensic ecosystems there.
24:10
Speaker 1: So what does the act of throwing a phone into
24:13
Speaker 1: the ocean tell us about a killer's mindset versus their
24:16
Speaker 1: actual understanding of modern forensics?
24:19
Speaker 2: This raises an important question about the myth of the
24:21
Speaker 2: environmental shredder.
24:23
Speaker 1: The environmental shredder.
24:24
Speaker 2: Yeah, criminals have been conditioned by decades of cinema to
24:27
Speaker 2: view large bodies of water as a black hole. The
24:30
Speaker 2: assumption is that if an object goes into the ocean,
24:33
Speaker 2: the sheer volume of water, the depth, and the corrosive
24:35
Speaker 2: salt will permanently erase it.
24:37
Speaker 1: Like it just vanishes forever.
24:39
Speaker 2: Right.
24:39
Speaker 1: But the ocean is a dynamic machine. It doesn't just
24:42
Speaker 1: swallow things whole, right?
24:43
Speaker 2: Exactly. Exactly. The ocean operates on complex tidal patterns, longshore
24:48
Speaker 2: currents and buoyancy dynamics. When you throw a lightweight, relatively
24:52
Speaker 2: buoyant object like a modern smartphone into the surf zone,
24:56
Speaker 2: it doesn't sink to the Marianas Trench.
24:58
Speaker 1: It just bobs around.
24:59
Speaker 2: Right. The currents often reject it, pushing it laterally down
25:02
Speaker 2: the coast or spitting it right back onto a heavily
25:04
Speaker 2: populated beach like Santa Monica. Furthermore, their understanding of water
25:09
Speaker 2: damage is just outdated.
25:12
Speaker 1: Well, let's talk about that, because saltwater is highly corrosive.
25:14
Speaker 1: Doesn't it destroy the data?
25:16
Speaker 2: Well, it destroys the circuitry, absolutely. But it doesn't necessarily
25:20
Speaker 2: destroy the data.
25:21
Speaker 1: Oh, really?
25:21
Speaker 2: Yeah, the data on a smartphone is stored on NAND
25:24
Speaker 2: flash memory chips. And these chips are often encapsulated in
25:27
Speaker 2: resins that provide a surprising amount of physical protection.
25:31
Speaker 1: So the data is safe inside a little bubble?
25:33
Speaker 2: Sort of, yeah. Digital forensics units can perform what is
25:36
Speaker 2: known as a chip-off extraction. They physically remove the memory
25:40
Speaker 2: chip from the corroded motherboard... They clean the contacts, and
25:43
Speaker 2: they read the raw binary data directly using specialized hardware.
25:47
Speaker 1: Wow.
25:48
Speaker 2: So even if the phone is just a rusted brick,
25:50
Speaker 2: the data silhouette inside can often be completely resurrected.
25:53
Speaker 1: That is incredible. And honestly, even without extracting a single
25:57
Speaker 1: text message, the mere physical recovery of the device shatters
26:01
Speaker 1: the alibi.
26:02
Speaker 2: Right. Because if she's using it... If.
26:05
Speaker 1: Christina was happily living off the grid, her primary means
26:08
Speaker 1: of communication wouldn't be tumbling in the Pacific surf. The
26:11
Speaker 1: physical device proves the digital impersonation was a total lie.
26:15
Speaker 2: Exactly.
26:16
Speaker 1: But then the investigation pivots dramatically to Joshua Tree. Why
26:21
Speaker 1: an Airbnb in the desert?
26:23
Speaker 2: Well, the desert represents the other classic myth of the
26:26
Speaker 2: criminal black hole, right? Vast, uninhabited, infinite space.
26:30
Speaker 1: Like the classic mobster burial ground.
26:33
Speaker 2: Right. But the desert has its own forensic memory. And
26:36
Speaker 2: more importantly, the journey to the desert leaves an inescapable
26:40
Speaker 2: digital exhaust.
26:42
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack the mechanics of that exhaust. If they
26:45
Speaker 1: threw Christina's phone in the ocean, what digital evidence is
26:48
Speaker 1: leading police to a specific rental property in Joshua Tree?
26:52
Speaker 2: The suspect's own devices. While they were busy trying to
26:55
Speaker 2: erase Christina's digital footprint, they were likely generating massive amounts
26:59
Speaker 2: of their own. Investigators would utilize cell tower triangulation here.
27:04
Speaker 1: How does that work in a remote area?
27:06
Speaker 2: As you drive from Los Angeles to Joshua Tree, your
27:08
Speaker 2: phone doesn't just quietly sit in your pocket. It is
27:10
Speaker 2: constantly handshaking with the nearest cell towers to ensure you
27:15
Speaker 2: have a signal if a call comes in.
27:17
Speaker 1: It's sending out a ping, and the tower answers. Precisely.
27:20
Speaker 2: And the cellular provider logs every single one of those handshakes.
27:23
Speaker 2: But it's not just a matter of knowing which tower
27:25
Speaker 2: you connected to.
27:26
Speaker 1: There's more to it? Yes.
27:28
Speaker 2: The network actually calculates the time of flight, which is
27:30
Speaker 2: the exact microsecond it takes for the radio wave to
27:33
Speaker 2: travel from your phone to the tower and back. Wow.
27:35
Speaker 1: Microseconds.
27:36
Speaker 2: By measuring the signal strength and that time of flight across...
27:39
Speaker 2: three different towers, investigators can triangulate a suspect's location down
27:43
Speaker 2: to a highly specific radius. They can map the exact
27:46
Speaker 2: route the car took down the highway.
27:47
Speaker 1: That's crazy. And then you add to that the vehicle's
27:51
Speaker 1: onboard GPS telemetry and potentially the data from that Apple
27:55
Speaker 1: AirTag Markovsky used previously.
27:58
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely.
27:59
Speaker 1: If they brought their own phones, they essentially drew a
28:02
Speaker 1: glowing digital map straight to that Airbnb.
28:04
Speaker 2: They did the work for the cops.
28:06
Speaker 1: Right. And once law enforcement has that specific location, they're
28:10
Speaker 1: looking for trace evidence, DNA, luminal reactions for clean blood, fibers.
28:16
Speaker 1: They use the digital exhaust to narrow a thousand square
28:19
Speaker 1: miles of desert down to a single living room.
28:22
Speaker 2: It is the ultimate irony of the modern criminal. In
28:25
Speaker 2: their attempt to use the digital world to construct a
28:28
Speaker 2: fake reality, they fell victim to the passive surveillance of
28:31
Speaker 2: their own devices.
28:32
Speaker 1: Which brings us to where this case stands today. We
28:36
Speaker 1: have to look at accountability, the immense weight of the
28:40
Speaker 1: judicial process, and what the road to closure might actually
28:43
Speaker 1: look like for the family.
28:45
Speaker 2: The legal phase is going to be intense.
28:48
Speaker 1: LA County District Attorney Nathan J. Hockman announced the arrests recently.
28:52
Speaker 1: DeLorean Brandon is charged with murder. Kaylee Markowski is charged
28:56
Speaker 1: with accessory after the fact.
28:58
Speaker 2: These charges represent a monumental effort by investigators. But, you know,
29:02
Speaker 2: the legal battle is really just beginning.
29:05
Speaker 1: Brandon is currently being held on a massive $ 3. 13 million bail.
29:09
Speaker 1: Markowski has no bail listed. Their arraignment and plea hearing
29:13
Speaker 1: are scheduled for December 29, 2026. Okay. But there is
29:18
Speaker 1: a crucial detail in the DA's filings about Brandon's past
29:21
Speaker 1: that I want to bring up. He is facing separate
29:24
Speaker 1: pre-existing charges for assaulting his wife on two separate occasions
29:28
Speaker 1: in 2022.
29:30
Speaker 2: That is a huge piece of the puzzle.
29:32
Speaker 1: It is. This is the man with a legally documented
29:34
Speaker 1: history of intimate partner violence long before you ever met Christina.
29:38
Speaker 2: Right.
29:39
Speaker 1: D.A. Hockman released a very sobering statement emphasizing the commitment
29:43
Speaker 1: to accountability. But he also highlighted the most legally complex
29:47
Speaker 1: aspect of this entire proceeding.
29:50
Speaker 2: The lack of a body.
29:51
Speaker 1: Yes. Christina's body has not been found.
29:54
Speaker 2: And the absence of a body presents one of the
29:57
Speaker 2: absolute highest hurdles in criminal prosecution.
29:59
Speaker 1: That's what I want to dive into next. How does
30:02
Speaker 1: a prosecutor build a murder case without a body? The
30:05
Speaker 1: legal term is corpus delicti, right? That's right. The principle
30:09
Speaker 1: that you have to prove a crime actually occurred before
30:11
Speaker 1: you can convict someone of it. If you don't have
30:14
Speaker 1: a body, how do you prove beyond a reasonable doubt
30:17
Speaker 1: that she was murdered and didn't just successfully vanish?
30:22
Speaker 2: Well, the history of corpus delicti dates back to English
30:24
Speaker 2: common law. It was designed... specifically to prevent the state
30:28
Speaker 2: from executing someone for a murder that never actually happened.
30:31
Speaker 1: Which makes sense.
30:33
Speaker 2: Historically, no body meant no trial. But modern jurisprudence has evolved.
30:38
Speaker 2: Prosecutors can now prove corpus delicti using circumstantial evidence. But
30:42
Speaker 2: that evidence must form an airtight, inescapable mosaic of guilt.
30:46
Speaker 1: So how do they build that mosaic here, practically speaking?
30:50
Speaker 2: They weave together every single thread we have discussed today. First,
30:55
Speaker 2: they establish the capacity for violence.
30:57
Speaker 1: Right, using his past.
30:59
Speaker 2: The 2022 assault charges against his wife are critical for this.
31:02
Speaker 2: They destroy any defense narrative that Brandon is just a
31:05
Speaker 2: gentle man who's incapable of harming a partner.
31:08
Speaker 1: Okay, that establishes capacity.
31:11
Speaker 2: Then they layer in the documented history of coercive control
31:15
Speaker 2: and proxy stalking by Markowski. They present Christina's own written
31:19
Speaker 2: words to the court, stating she was suffering, quote, irreparable damage.
31:24
Speaker 1: So they build the environment. Right.
31:26
Speaker 2: They establish an environment of escalating lethal volatility.
31:30
Speaker 1: And then they use the digital data to prove the
31:33
Speaker 1: cessation of life. Exactly.
31:35
Speaker 2: They demonstrate that a vibrant 38-year-old woman who loved her dog,
31:39
Speaker 2: who was deeply connected to her brother, who had financial
31:42
Speaker 2: routines and a daily rhythm.
31:44
Speaker 1: She just stopped.
31:45
Speaker 2: She simply ceased to generate new authentic data on or
31:49
Speaker 2: around September 19th. They bring in the forensic linguists to
31:52
Speaker 2: testify that the text messages sent after that date were
31:55
Speaker 2: structurally incompatible with her idiolect.
31:58
Speaker 1: The linguistic fingerprint.
31:59
Speaker 2: Yes. They present the cell tower data showing the suspects
32:03
Speaker 2: traveling to Joshua Tree, while her phone is mysteriously deposited
32:07
Speaker 2: on a beach in Santa Monica.
32:09
Speaker 1: So you don't have the centerpiece of the puzzle, the body,
32:12
Speaker 1: but you assemble every single surrounding piece until the negative
32:15
Speaker 1: space in the middle forms the exact silhouette of a murder.
32:18
Speaker 2: That's beautifully put.
32:19
Speaker 1: The totality of the circumstances leaves a jury with no
32:22
Speaker 1: other reasonable logical conclusion.
32:24
Speaker 2: The data proves she did not walk away. Her life
32:27
Speaker 2: was taken.
32:28
Speaker 1: Exactly. For you listening, I think it is vital to
32:31
Speaker 1: remember that this deep dive is not just an exercise
32:34
Speaker 1: in forensic analysis. It is a stark, sobering reality check
32:38
Speaker 1: about the mechanics of domestic abuse and the lethal potential
32:41
Speaker 1: of stalking.
32:42
Speaker 2: It's a warning, really.
32:43
Speaker 1: It demonstrates how seemingly petty actions, like stealing a zip
32:47
Speaker 1: drive or hiding an air tag, are often the tremors
32:50
Speaker 1: before a catastrophic earthquake of violence.
32:53
Speaker 2: They shouldn't be ignored. Right.
32:55
Speaker 1: It also serves as a critical warning about our digital communications.
32:58
Speaker 1: If a loved one's texts feel structurally different, if their
33:02
Speaker 1: financial requests are sudden and unusual, or.
33:05
Speaker 2: If their desire to completely drop off the map contradicts
33:08
Speaker 2: their established behavioral.
33:09
Speaker 1: Baselines, yes, do not ignore that feeling.
33:12
Speaker 2: Trust your cognitive dissonance. We are highly attuned to the
33:15
Speaker 2: rhythms of the people we love. If the digital representation
33:18
Speaker 2: feels discordant with the physical person, it is imperative to
33:22
Speaker 2: ask questions and push for physical verification.
33:24
Speaker 1: To recap the harrowing journey we've mapped out today, we
33:28
Speaker 1: began with the insidious logistics of proxy stalking.
33:31
Speaker 2: The copied key, the zip drive, the tracker. Right.
33:36
Speaker 1: We watched that coercive control escalate into a chaotic battle
33:40
Speaker 1: of restraining orders, which ultimately collapsed into a fatal, twisted
33:44
Speaker 1: alliance in September 2025.
33:46
Speaker 2: A truly horrifying turn of events.
33:49
Speaker 1: We examined the mechanics of the digital cover-up, the forensic
33:52
Speaker 1: realities of the Pacific Ocean and the Mojave Desert, and
33:56
Speaker 1: the tragic confirmation of loss for Jimmy Fowley and his family.
33:59
Speaker 1: And now, the arrests of Brandon and Markowski set the
34:02
Speaker 1: stage for a highly complex, no-body prosecution.
34:06
Speaker 2: Understanding the architecture of these crimes is really the only
34:09
Speaker 2: way we can recognize the blueprint's when they are being
34:11
Speaker 2: drawn in real life.
34:13
Speaker 1: Before we sign off, I want to leave you with
34:15
Speaker 1: a final concept to mull over. It builds on everything
34:18
Speaker 1: we've unpacked today. What is it? It is the modern
34:21
Speaker 1: paradox of digital immortality versus digital erasure.
34:26
Speaker 2: Oh, that's heavy.
34:27
Speaker 1: We live in an era of inescapable surveillance. Our phones
34:31
Speaker 1: record our heart rates, our GPS coordinates, our purchases, our
34:34
Speaker 1: every keystroke. Because of this massive digital exhaust, It is
34:39
Speaker 1: practically impossible for a human being to truly vanish without
34:43
Speaker 1: leaving a trail. The data always survives. It does. Yet
34:47
Speaker 1: this case highlights a terrifying inversion of that reality. Malicious
34:51
Speaker 1: actors can weaponize those exact same devices to temporarily erase
34:56
Speaker 1: a human being from the physical world while keeping a
34:59
Speaker 1: phantom version of them alive in the digital one.
35:03
Speaker 2: They use the proof of our existence to hide our absence.
35:06
Speaker 1: They use the very tools that define our existence... mask
35:09
Speaker 1: our destruction. It forces us to ask a deeply unsettling question.
35:15
Speaker 1: The next time your phone buzzes and you read that
35:17
Speaker 1: reassuring text message, how well do you actually know the
35:21
Speaker 1: entity on the other side of the screen?
35:24
Speaker 2: That is something that will definitely stick with you.
35:28
Speaker 1: Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into
35:30
Speaker 1: the sources. We will continue to track the legal mechanics
35:33
Speaker 1: of this case as it moves through the courts. Until
35:35
Speaker 1: next time, stay curious, stay critical, and please Stay safe.