Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Prince Israel Zaar on: The Supreme Court should be Mindful Ruling Against

Transcript

Prince Israel Zaar on: The Supreme Court should be Mindful Ruling Against · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Uh. On the issue of tariffs between the American people,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, and the President Trump administration. M H.
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: What does that play. It's the the constitution, the constitutionality
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: of the law of the order, the emergency power, the
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: the unilateral nature of m deciding when it's an emergency,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: the the the circumstances of the tariffs. That's the constitutionality
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: of it, and I think that's the jurisdiction of the
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Then the the second part of it, it's
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: the American people. The brought the brunt of the tariffs,
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: the question of what it's a tax, and economically it
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: is a tax, but the issue is the burden of
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: the tax, who pays the tax? And it's very clear
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: that the President has been able to make some of
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: the companies bear the burden. It means the President has
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: prevented some companies from from passing the taxes down to
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: the people. And the issue is it's just a matter
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: of time when there you know, when the mother carries
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: a baby in the stomach and if that's the right word,
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: in the womb, at the point in time it becomes
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: so heavy. That's why they call deliver and the baby
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: needs to be on its own and leave the mode alone.
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: So the issues when how long will the companies bear
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: the taxes before it's passed down to the people. So
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: I've stated that the constitutionality, that's the Supreme Court, the
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: American people. And the third part it's the President of
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: the United States. That's an administrative an executive authority part
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: of it. And to see it from the lens of
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: the president, I need to go back to this campaign,
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: the campaign promises they made to the American people and
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: about the world economy and how countries, based on his
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: analysis of it, are taken advantage of America and on
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: the unevenness of the attacks of the tariffs. They go
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: to certain countries, you know, the restrict American goods, and
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: that's true many part of the world. It's not a
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: level plane fail. And he told it. Why he start
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: to make it plain fail. You know, maybe it was
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: a misunderstanding of the economics or how tariff works. But
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: they intend it's too swell. The the American treasury with
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: with revenues collected from the twists all over the world,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: and that can be used to help the American people
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: or to fund some government projects without burdoning the the
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: the high ending American companies. You know, they the giants
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: of America without taxing the rich. Put it that way
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: in order to take out the poor. So it's to him.
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: It's looking for an in between, you know, not to
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: be somewhat they called the socialists or communists or you know,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: trying to be American first by squeezing revenue from overseas
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: to tarists and taking care of America. And it's a
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: way to to to you know, with the multipolar reality
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: of the world, you know, it seems to compete to
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: see how to squeeze our enemies or competitors. You know,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: it's the factions in America does see China three factions
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: in America and China. One does see China as an enemy.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: One does see China as a competitor in the mirror
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: that once America and China to work together. Pretty good
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: of everybody I am in that mirror. You know that
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: when two giants are fighting, you know, the grass suffer.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: It's all political. So these are the three factions when
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: it comes to the tariffs, and their reasons are genuine
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: and the the croux of the matter, it's the universality
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: of the tariffs and the discrepancy on the right of
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: tariffs and the and the uni lateral nature of the president.
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: We can choose when to activate, when to the activate.
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: So that's the confusion it creates in the market, the
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: unpredictability and the consequences it's having for the economy. The
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: consequences for the economy, it's obvious. Everybody can see it.
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: You cannot splain it. You can, it's sometimes you can
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: spin numbers in the books, but realistically you cannot spin
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: numbers because people better prompt People feel the pinch and
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: people you know, when winkle to the grossery store or
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: to buy a car, or to pay or mortgage, and
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: the threat, you know, and people have been laid layoffs,
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: and people are scared of the put and holding back,
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: carrying back, and the government is struggling, shutting down, and
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: you know, the the and the way it's going overseas.
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: You know, with all we've got the car, the cards,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: but we see that like the rare earth, we don't.
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: And some countries come to negotiate the tariffs, they don't
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: do in a good fight and they just try to
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: place the president and president and some leaders change hands,
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: you know, Prime minister, change hands. You got somebody who
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: comes in and the market likes stability or predictability and
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: the ability, and that's that's that's what it's all about
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: the tariffs. Is it genuine for the American president to
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: fulfill his campaign promises? Yes? Is it the constitutional matter
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: for the for the for the Supreme Court to be
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: scared of precedents? If it happens to her, will it
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: happen to be if the Republicans can do that with
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: the Democratic Party do that too, And if the Congress
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: does not place role to be the one in charge
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: of the tariffs, is that a new president that we're
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: trying to set And so the issue is here. The
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: issue here is what to do with the tariffs. And
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: it becomes a matter of saving face because the based
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: on the constitutionalit tur and the powers vested on the president,
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: you know, the president's legally not wrong. You can stretch
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: the law. It can only be the Supreme Court to
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: take the president that the emergency power doesn't apply here,
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: and it will be a stretched equality for the Supreme
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: Court to explain why it doesn't apply. And again it
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: comes a matter of precedents. But if you are to
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: rule against the president, and then the issue becomes what
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: happens to the tarriers already collected because some of it
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: it's used already. I think. So, so with the president,
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: wily be paid back to the countries? And how would
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: that work? And how would the world see America, you know,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: the American power? How would the president be vealed? Would
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: the president be really cooled? And how would I help America?
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: And because the talents are already here and I don't see
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: the visibilities of seeing the president is wrong and the
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court ruling against the president, that would not That's
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: what many people like for it to happen, but it
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: will becometer productive to the Court, to the President of
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: American people, for the economy for that to happen. So
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: they ruling were based on reasonableness, excessive use of power,
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: you know, how to bring the Congress back in so
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: they can only be going forward and needs to be
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: done by the Congress. But it would be illogical and
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: counter capitalist principles for the president to give the money back,
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: you know, I don't, I don't know, It's makes no
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: that makes no sense. The most important part would be consistency,
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: you know, and the rate of the tariffs and the
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: pushbacks from other countries. You know, it's in a saving
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: face type of thing, but it must make American look strong.
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: You don't want to make the president look weak. Then
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: it would start and subverted the negotiation powers of the president.
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: You can see that the President is a transactioner. He
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: likes he likes to make deals, you know, between states, right,
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: it likes two people meeting and coming out coming out
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: with something that's different from other countries. And that negotiating
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: power of the president. Don't want to give it away.
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: It can be the tiists might be reduced. The baseline
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: was ten percent, you know, to the compromise going forward
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: instead of if the courts were to rule against the president,
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: of which I don't think they should. The compromise going
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: forward might be that we keep the tariffs and the
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: percentage might be reduced maybe from ten percent baseline to
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: five percent, or it will be some negotiation. But my
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: own particular countries that are rivalries of America, you know,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: the president you have the power, you know, through the
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: consent of the Congress, to at least to be able
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: to lead. Yeah, because it's a difficult time for America
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: and it's a very challenging time. It's highly competitive times
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: in the field of artificial intelligence and supply chain. You know,
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: new materials technologies and quantum computing, vision vision technologies and
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: the way forward. You know that that that the fear
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: of dinitization, you know, and there's a fracture and the
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: realignment of the world of geopolitics and world economics and
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: the global and the world order. And the Supreme Court
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: must be mindful. If the President of a stretch his powers,
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: then the Supreme Court can can redirect the powers back
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: to the Congress going forward. You know, the the laws
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: the world about your double your body, and and and
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: and and the retroactive nature of the law. It's in
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: itself and constitutional. And for the American people, we know
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: it's been painful. And we must assume that the president
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: is doing it for for America based on the American
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: First agenda. And we assume that the presidents of the
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: American people can alice sympathize with the policy and and
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: accept the pain for why mm hm. But all this
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: can happen if there is a clear plan and objective.
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: But since the prescident is unpredictable as a strategy, when
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: it comes to economic matters and when people need to
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: struggle for survivor and to put for on the table,
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: your predictability, it's very important. We can be unpredictable with
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: your political issues. When it come to economic issues, they
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: have fixed every American. And when people start to feel
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: law on their finances and supposed to struggle to pay
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: rents or put for on the table and take their
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: friends out of a partner, a couple out for dinner,
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: and people are struggling making Russian and they can see
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: people being lay off, and you know that ambivalence in
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: the market. You know, the stock market can be great,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: but you know the commodity market itself. People start to
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: the real economy once it starts to feed the button
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: and the fear of inflation and recession and inconsistency and
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: confusion in the market. That that is what is applied.
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: And it's not a partisan issue. But the Supreme Court
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: shouldn't see that way. The Supreme Court should have stopped
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: it long time ago. But we've been close to maybe
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: if not mistaken, in this tarist since the President came
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: to office maybe eight months of seven ten months into this.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: They cannot be retroactive and so the courts must be
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: mindful about the consequences mm hmm, the global consequences, the
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: consequences to American people, the consequences to the administration, the
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: consequences to the Constitution, the consequences to our economy, the
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: consequences it has to our partners, and the consequences to
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: our rivors. You know, then sometimes the people find it
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: difficult to accept the fact that we're not in the
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: unipolar system minimal. We're in a multipolar war. And it's
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: something new that we need to we need to learn,
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: you know, about space craft. It's looking for somewhere to
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: learn and have control over things. It's a new it's
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: a new war order, and we need to push people
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: around to have space for all Americans. And he might
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: not like the president's policy, but the good thing that
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: the good thing is that he has the guts to
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: do it. It might not be going away was perceived,
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: but at least somebody's doing it, and we can only
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: make it better. You know, you don't, you don't just
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: want to pull off the clothes and you know it's
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: it's it's already entangled, the tariffs already it's entangled into
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: the system. Is interwoven into our daily lives and into
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: the economy, the supply chain and bringing companies back to America.
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: It's been used as a leverage for so many other reasons.
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: So when you take that leap off and what is left,
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: it's what the courts you've been thinking about, and the
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: fear of setting their own precedents. Oh, sometimes not trying
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: to give the president a win, because maybe the deliberates
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: may see differently. Put American first, you know, it's sometimes
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: it's a difficult decision to make. I think the ruler
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: against the president will be wise. M hm. Philosopher, Prince,
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: they are intelligence is philosopher Princess resolved from the Great
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: City of Las Vegas, h November ninth, twenty twenty five,
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: on the matters of tariff. Thank you,