Latest / The Chuck ToddCast / Chuck’s Commentary - Jeff Bezos Gutting The Washington Post Is A Dark Day For Journalism + The One Loophole For A Third Trump Term

Transcript

Chuck’s Commentary - Jeff Bezos Gutting The Washington Post Is A Dark Day For Journalism + The One Loophole For A Third Trump Term · The Chuck ToddCast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, artisonal pastries, and
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: and a new protein box. I will tell you I
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: have done the gluten free box. I have done it
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: a second time. I have also used the code the
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast at checkout
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: They give you step by step instructions.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: I really dig this.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: There is nothing like having an artesion bakery in your
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: worth giving Wildgrain to try. Right now, Wildgrain is offering
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: my listeners thirty dollars off your first box plus free
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: croissants for life. Come on when you go to wildgrain
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast to start your subscription today. That's
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: thirty dollars off your first box and free croissants for
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: life when you visit wildgrain dot com slash podcast, or
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: simply use the promo code podcast at checkout. This is
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code. Hello there,
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: Happy Thursday, Happy super Bowl Thursday. Right are We are
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: now in the ninety six hour window of Super Bowl,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: of the sort of the Super Bowl extravaganza. And I'm
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: tempted to say that the Super Bowl hype feels lessish.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: And I don't know if I'm saying that because I'm
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: buying into the premise that they're you know, we don't
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: have the traditional stars in the Super Bowl right now.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: There's no Patrick Mahomes and there's no Tom Brady, and
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: there's no Josh Allen. There's no Lamar Jackson, no Aaron Rodgers.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: So I hate to like pile on on that, but
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: there does feel this feels less hyped or am I
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: just accepting you know, am I putting my own bias
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: on it?
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: I will.
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: I will accept the premise that I might be because
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: the Super Bowl doesn't overly excite me, and I think
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: out of you know, my great fears that it won't be competitive,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: But I certainly hope we will have a competitive more
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: to say about the super Bowl, as I always promise,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: I want to keep the sports to the end. I've
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: made a few references and had a few rants about
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post, but we now know what happened, and
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: I guess you could say, I'm this is my official
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: obituary for the Washington Post because my frustration on this.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: This is not and I think different people go about
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: this a different way. I do not believe Jeff Bezos's
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: job was to be a to treat the Washington Post
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: as a charity case. So I'm not you know, I'm
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: not asking him to lose money to keep the Washington
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: Post up and running. I'm asking him to be honest
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: about what he's up to. I'm asking him to be
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: more straightforward about his motivation, and I'm asking him to
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: acknowledge that he The question is did he hire the
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: wrong people or did he actually make a business decision
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: that has nothing to do with the business of media
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: and everything to do.
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: With the business of space.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: Before I get to it, but I want to start
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: off with associating myself with something Jeff Bezos said in
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: twenty thirteen. Thanks to my friend Don van Ada, one
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: of the great sports reporters out there, does a lot
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: of great work over at ESPN, and it's been everywhere
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: times you name it, he re upped this. It's an
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: important quote, and I want to quote.
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: From Jeff Bezos.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: So, when Jeff Bezos bought the Washington Post two hundred
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: and fifty million dollars in twenty thirteen, he did a
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: Q and A in the newsroom with legendary Washington Post
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: reporter Bob Woodward. And Woodward asked Bezos in front of
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: all of his Jeff Bezos new employees at the Washington Post,
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: a simple question, Why'd you do it?
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: Let me read you Jeff Bezos's answer.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: In twenty thirteen, I finally concluded that I could provide
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: runway financial runway because I don't think you can keep
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: shrinking the business. You could be profitable and shrinking, and
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: that's a survival strategy, but it ultimately leads to irrelevance
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: at best, and at worst, it leads to extinction. In
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: some ways, I almost want to drop the mic and
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: leave right like, there you go, what's about to happen
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: to the Washington Post? Exactly what Jeff Bezos said he
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: wasn't going to do. So I wanted to start off
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: with the Jeff Bezos quote so that as I read you,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: Matt Murray, and I want to say this about Matt
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: Murray's the executive editor of the Washington Post. Matt Murray's
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: had to be the face of all of this. It
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: sucks that anybody has to be the face of this.
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: But what really sucks is he didn't make these decisions.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: He has to execute a strategy and execute decisions that
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: were made by two people who did not face the
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: public or their employees. So you know, look, I do
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: not I feel poor Matt Murray's been hung out to dry.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: And you could say, well, he could have resigned well,
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: and look, everybody's got pay bills, so be very careful.
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: It's always easy to say when you don't have that job,
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: to say you could quit, you could do this well,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: you know your circumstance is your circumstance. If you have
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: the luxury to do it, great, and you think you
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: can make a statement, kudos, But not everybody does.
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: Matt Murray is a.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: Great, capable editor, managing editor, editor of a newsroom, runs
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: a newsroom. He is not in charge of the business strategy.
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: He executes the strategy. So I say this because I
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: don't I don't want to see Matt Murray demonized. You
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: want to be angry, be angry at Jeff Bezos for
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: hiring Will Lewis, and you don't even have to be
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: angry at him hiring Will Lewis. What you should be
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: angry at is that Will Lewis isn't being shoved out
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: the door along with all these employees. Because Will Lewis's
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: strategy has been a disaster. Every move he's made has
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: cost the Post money, cost the Post readers, cost the
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: Post relevance. So the idea that Lewis's job is safe,
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: but three hundred Washington Post staffers are being shown the
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: door because hey, this is you know, oh you know,
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: we just no. The media business is hard. But this
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: was a choice. But anyway, Jeff Bezos in twenty thirteen said,
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: you do this, and you know you may go to
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: extinct irrelevance. So let me read you today's memo that
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: I'm sure was approved by Will Lewis and Jeff Bezos.
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: And I'm not going to read the whole thing, but
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: I'm going to read a few paragraphs, so this one.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: These moves include substantial newsroom reductions, impacting nearly all news departments.
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: For the immediate future, we will concentrate on areas that
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: demonstrate authority, distinctiveness, and impact and that resonate with readers. Politics,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: national affairs, people power and trends, national security in DC
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: and abroad. Forces shaping the future, including science, health, medicine, technology,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: climate in business, journalism that empowers people to take action,
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: from advice to wellness, revelatory investigations, and what's capturing attention
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: in culture, online and daily life. So that's the that's
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: the mission. Apparently let me continue, but we take these
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: actions with clarity of purpose. The need has never been
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: more urgent to reposition the post. A more flexible, sustainable
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: model will help us better navigate unprecedented volatility, competition, technological change,
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: news consumption habits, and cost pressure. As you know, we
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: have grappled with financial challenges for some time. They have
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: affected us multiple in multiple rounds of cost cuts and buyouts,
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: along with peer periotic constraints on other kinds of spending.
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: We have concluded that the company structure is to root
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: it in a different era when we were a dominant
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: local print product. This restructure will help to secure our
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: future in service of our journalistic mission and provide us
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: stability moving forward. Then he keeps going we are far
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: from alone and reevaluate our model and rethinking how we operate.
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: The ecosystem of news and information on and off platform
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: is changing radically. News consumers enjoy more variety, voices, of
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: platforms and options than ever before. In just the last
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: five years, multiple startups, even individuals have created meaningful products
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: that draw at tension and generate impact at low cost.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: And it goes on to blame search and blame all
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: these other structural issues that were issues in twenty thirteen,
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: that were issues when Marty Barron took over. So the
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: point being there, of course there have been issues. These
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: are issues that the New York Times confronted, and as
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: Nate Silver, you should check out his substance he did.
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: He noted that both you know, essentially this gets it
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: to the real business decision that Jeff Bezos made. But
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: he did a terrific sort of showing of that. There
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: was this study of sort of like impact, sort of
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: judging how much how much impact your news stories had,
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: and the Times in the Post were essentially neck and neck,
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: neck and neck. It's sort of you know, whether it
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: was attention impact, how often their articles were however you
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: wanted to measure. But there was a pretty good measurement
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: that he was using to do this, and I wasn't
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: familiar with the specific metric he was using, but it
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: made the larger point that both the Times in the
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: Post were sort of essentially in the same place late
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, even into twenty twenty, twenty twenty one,
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: you know, the Times like the Post experienced you know,
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: this this sort of softening of interest in Washington news
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: with the incoming Biden administration, right, and Joe Biden being
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: sort of catatonic for most of his term. Obviously meant
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: that the attention economy when it came to Washington politics
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: was less interested. The Times diversified, right, the Times has
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: all had, you know, decided to use the opportunity when
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: there was attention, and they they went big, right. Yeah,
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: they cut their sports department, but only after they bought
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: the Athletic Okay, the leading national sports news organization in
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: the country. So they actually went bigger on sports, not smaller, right.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: And they went with a brand, and they took a brand,
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: and they doubled down on a brand, you know. And
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: they've done this with Wirecutter, and they've done this with
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: their recipes, and they've done this with games. The Washington
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: Post was perfectly positioned to potentially do something similar on
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: a variety of fronts. This is among the wealthiest metropolitan
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: areas in the country. You have some of the most
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: well read people. People pay for news. Not every community
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: is got to, is my god. They charge you for
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: everything around here, right, people are buying newsletters from punch
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: Bowl and buying pro political pro subscriptions and national journal
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: and hotline passes and all sorts of things. So this
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: is a market that is very comfortable paying for information.
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: But Jeff Bezos had a problem. His number one competitor
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: for space contracts is Elon Musk. Elon Musk had had
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: all sorts of ties to the two front runners for
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: president in twenty twenty three and twenty twenty four, Ron
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: DeSantis and Donald Trump, and Elon Musk was leveraging those
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: relationships in any way possible. And when he realized Disantas
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: was going nowhere, right, He's eventually.
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: Sidled right up to Trump.
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: If there is a competitor in the private space race,
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: to Elon Musk, it's Jeff Bezos with Blue Origin. The
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: only way to build a private space company is to
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: have access to the government's resources NASA and all sorts
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: of infrastructure. All right, we may be in the privatizing
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: era of space, but the structure is still sort of government.
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: You're very dependent upon government, and you need access to government.
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: And if Donald Trump just shut the door on Jeff Bezos,
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: Blue Origin would be just sort of stuck here, maybe
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: have to work with another country if they wanted to
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: get up and stuff like that. So he looked at
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: the look I think his initial decision to purchase. Now,
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: when you sort of everything looks obvious now in hindsight.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: So why did twenty thirteen Jeff Basos.
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: By the Washington Post.
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: We know what he said. I told you up top
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: what he said, but he still like, why did he
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: think it was a good idea? Well, if you recall
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: at the time, right, I believe Amazon had just made
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: the decision to create a basically open a second headquarters,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: and they made the decision to open it in Crystal
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: City of Virginia.
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: Why did they do that?
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: Because the most important government contracts to AWS right, the
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: arguably the more profitable arm of Amazon, rather than the
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: product most of us interact with on a daily or
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: some of you on an hourly basis, are Pentagon contracts.
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: So Amazon made the decision it needed to be close
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: to Washington. Look, I'll be honest, as a political anthropologists,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: the way I looked at it, I was I was rooting.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: I remember remember there was this whole campaign who was
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: going to get the second headquarters in? Amazon did a
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: very public, almost American Idol style RFPs right request for
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: proposals from various cities, and they had certain things they needed.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: They needed easy access to public transportation, among you, affordable housing,
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: all sorts of it, but it was public transporation was
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: a big thing, There's no doubt. I remember I was
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: hoping he'd picked Saint Louis. And you've probably heard me
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: a few times. I'm obsessed with Saint Louis for a
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: variety of reasons.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: You know, Saint Louis was I ate.
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: The America all sort of chipped in to figure out, hey,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: we can't let Detroit spiral, and we got investment in Detroit,
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: and we got Wall Street interested in Detroit, and Detroit
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: is in better shape today than it's been in a while.
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: We've not had that same you know, there was a time,
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: right Saint Louis hosted an Olympics nineteen oh four. I
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: believe it was because it was the gateway to the West, Right,
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: Saint Louis was the most important, Say, before there was
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: LA in San Francisco, there were Saint Louis. Right, it
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: was the western frontier and it was an extraordinarily important city.
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: And even when I was growing up, right, you know,
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: it was a hub and had lots of corporate headquarters there, right,
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: and isaer Bush being the most iconic, but TWA Transworld
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: Airlines that was a huge airline that was not a
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: small airline, it was a big airline. And it is withered,
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: and there's a we can There's a variety of reasons.
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: Saint Louis is one of those. When you if you
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: ever wanted to understand how the interstate highway system really
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: did segregate communities and destroy urban communities, go traveling downtown
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: Saint Louis when you go, and I believe it's fifty five.
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: If I have it wrong, I hope my friends and
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: Saint Louis will will correct me.
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: I've got some.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: I've got off and on ties to Saint Louis, and
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: I'll leave it at that.
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: Some of you will know what I'm referring to.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: But it's one of those that it's just ugly. It's terrible,
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: like you know that. You know, there was a lot
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: of urban planners in the twenties, thirties, forties, and fifties
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: who essentially used African American communities, you know, just almost
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: either bulldozed them, divided them in half. But it was
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: you know, if you were in a if you were
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: fighting a not in my backyard mindset, you know, the
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: black communities lost every one of them. And this was
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: all over. You can read the Powerbroker about Robert Moses
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: and what he did New York and how this was done.
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: You can just see how the interstate system was built
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: in Saint Louis. You can see remnants of this in
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: New Orleans and some other of these cities that this
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: has been done. Do you hate hangovers, We'll say goodbye
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: to hangovers. Out of Office gives you the social buzz
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: without the next day regret. They're best selling. Out of
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: Office gummies were designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz,
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: boost your mood, and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: different strengths, you can tailor the dose to fit your vibe.
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: From a gentle one point five milligram micro doose to
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: their newest fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience.
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: Their THHC beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: to a glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: tell you this, I've given up booze. I don't like
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: the hangovers. I prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: wellness brand that believes feeling good should be fun and easy.
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: Soul specializes in delicious hemp derived tea see in CBD
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: products all designed to boost your mood and simply help
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: you unwind. So if you struggle to switch off at night,
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: so also as a variety of products specifically designed to
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: just simply help you get a better night's sleep, including
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: their top selling sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: deep restorative sleep. So bring on the good vibes and
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: treat yourself to Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: my audience thirty percent off your entire order. So go
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: to get sold dot Com use the promo code toodcast.
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: Don't forget that code. That's getsold dot Com promo code
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: toodcast for thirty percent off. So I was really but
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: there was a lot of reasons. So Saint Louis, I
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: think needed a shot in the arm. But I also
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: thought it was a Hey, this is a it still
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: has some wealth to it. It still is a highly
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: educated community, and more importantly, it's it's a more politically
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: diverse community. And I would thought the tech industry needed
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: more buy in from Red America. So, hey, don't you
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: know you're going from Seattle? All right, why don't you
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: you know, I thought Saint Louis so for a variety
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: of reasons, right, I thought Saint Louis was gonna be
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: a good spot. So but the point was they picked
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: I remember the last thing I expected was DC. So
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: Bezos made a business and so what did he do?
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: Then?
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: He buys the Washington Post. And I think he saw
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post as an investment in being able to
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: curry favor in Washington for Amazon. And it made a
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: ton of sense. Right, you're the owner of the Washington Post.
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: You're going to get more meetings with the lawmakers that
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: you need to have meetings with. And you know, you
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: could say, okay, Jeff Bezos, well we'll give him that too,
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: But it only adds. It's only additive, right, It gives
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: you outsized potential influence and all of it, you know,
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: and so but but in order in order for that
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: to stay, the Post had to be.
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: Robust.
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: So he did endorse a robust version of the Washington Post.
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: I think he saw it as a trophy. He did
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: not see it as a business in and of itself, which.
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: Has always been my frustration. He saw it.
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: As a trophy that could help him with his other businesses.
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: So initially that's because he had all these government contracts
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: with AWS moves, the second Amazon headquarters, which is all
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: about those Pentagon contracts, and then of course there's his
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: hobby with space all of it. Having, you know, having
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: that kind of influence in Washington was going to be
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: helpful all of those businesses. Well, in comes Donald Trump
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: and the polarization of media in general and the weaponization
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: by the right to attack any journalists, any journalistic organization
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: that dared try to report accountability stories about anybody left
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: or right. But you know, everything got and Donald Trump
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: personalized everything in that first turn, and the question was
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: how was it going to impact Bezos? And look, the
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: conventional with the rest of official Washington was just as
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: alarmed about Donald Trump as the Washington Post was, So
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: in some ways, I think Bezos felt comforted that he
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: was still on the side. Yes, he was did lose
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: a government contract because Donald Trump essentially punished Amazon, punished
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: Bezos because he didn't like the coverage he was getting
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: out of the Washington Post. Passed forward to twenty twenty three.
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: Right when.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos decides to radically remodel the Washington Post. Yes,
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: there was a moment that the Post was having.
• 23:08
  Speaker 2: They couldn't.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: They were losing some traffic, losing and it had to
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: have less to do with it, you know. They just
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: they didn't do anything right with the upside that they
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: were experiencing in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen and investing
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: in sort of cementing some of the growth that they have. Right,
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: you get growth, you should want to cement it.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: They didn't.
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: The New York Times did right, just the Salzburger's just
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: but there they own the Times. For the Times to
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: be a successful business, Jeff Bezos bought The Washington Post
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: for the success of his other businesses. He never was
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: that interested in the success of the business of news
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: and information itself, because if he had been, he would
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: have made a lot more different decisions. You don't hire
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: somebody who's just a tabloid editor from the UK who
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: just is a clickbait, attention economy type of journalists. It's
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: a great way to make money if you're an individual.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: It's not a long term sustaining business. Just go see
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: the UK news market if you need more proof of that.
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: And never mind that like will Lewis's journalistic credentials were
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: pretty much shit for his connection with the with the
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: Murdock scandals that did cost him a bit of his
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: reputation in the UK.
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: But Bezos makes this hire anyway.
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: You don't hire will Lewis because you think there is
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: more money to be made in a transformational business to
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: be created that somehow others Fred Ryan and Marty Beron
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: didn't figure out. You hire will Lewis because you want
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: to change the tenor and reputation of the Washington Post itself.
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: So again, it's twenty twenty three, Donald Trump's front runner
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: for President Donald Trump. Jeff Bezos is watching the entire
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: tech community just side and the crypto community are sort
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: of both one and the same as decided they've given
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: up on Biden, Harris and the Democrats and they're going
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: all in with Trump. They know that any policy proposal,
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: if you give enough money, is a policy they can
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: get enacted. One of those pokes is Elon Musk, who's
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: got SpaceX. So Bezos had a choice to make. Now
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: he could have sold the Washington Post. But why wouldn't
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: he sell the Washington Post Because whoever he sold the
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: Washington Post to would likely have kept it a robust
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: journalistic organization more like Marty Baron's Washington Post than the
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: one whatever version we're going to see over the next
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: six months. And it probably would have been heavy on
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: accountability of this administration. Some crazy shit's happening every hour
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: of every day, and the Washington Post this is who
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: they are. In my entire lifetime, right, the Washington Post's
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: been a major news look. Essentially, Watergate took the Washington
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: Post from being one of two major papers in Washington.
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: You had the Washington Star in the Washington Post to
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: suddenly being, oh well, there's the New York Times in
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post. They went from really good local paper
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: to very important national paper. So just about anybody running
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: the Post is going to have that as the North Star.
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: But if he had sold it, Trump would have blamed
• 27:01
  Speaker 1: Bezos still probably still punished him. Made it a little
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: bit harder to get those space access to the space
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: resources that the government controls lose out in just about
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: every competitive bid with SpaceX.
• 27:22
  Speaker 2: But if he keeps it, and he makes a few.
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: Performative changes, again, it doesn't matter to him whether the
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: Post succeeds or fails. We have all established, right Peter
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: Baker did a terrific tweet. He's a former Washington poster,
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: works at the New York Times, where he noted, And actually,
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos' wealth has been increasing right this, you know,
• 27:52
  Speaker 1: the one hundred million dollars is literally a rounding error
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: for Jeff Bezos' network worth. And remember it's networth. This
• 27:59
  Speaker 1: is he had to give half of his work to
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: his first wife and he still.
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: Has this kind of network.
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: So it doesn't matter if the Post succeeds or fails.
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: What matters is does Blue Origin have access to the
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: government space resources? Is ABS going to get all of
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: its government contractsnewed by the Pentagon? So yes, Jeff Bezos
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: made a business decision, but it was not about the
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: business of The Washington Post. The Washington Post is a
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: pawn in his gallery that is used to make sure
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: the other businesses aren't punished by a very pugilistic president
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: who doesn't believe that there should be a free press
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: that's there to be critical of him as much as
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: is a free press there that can be praiseworthy of
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: him if that organization deems it worthy. So I do
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: think it's important that I accept the premise that this
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: was a business decision. But don't you tell me it's
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: about the business of news and information, because if he
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: was making that kind of business decision, number one he
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: would have sold it, or number two, he would have
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: created the Everything information store. Right now, as somebody else
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: said to me, you know, it's possible that, you know,
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: Jeff Beson is just not that bright, meaning he's really
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: good at one thing, building Amazon. There's no evidence at
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: Blue Origins any good as a private space company. Yet
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: you know he is not you know, look whatever, Elon
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: Musk has a lot of character flaws as a human being.
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: But the guy's a genius. We know that, all right.
• 30:01
  Speaker 2: He is.
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: You know, if you're going to tell me, who do
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: you want in charge of building a tunnel from LA
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: to San Francisco. Yeah, I trust his math before I
• 30:10
  Speaker 1: trust anybody else's math. I just don't want Elon Musk
• 30:15
  Speaker 1: worrying about culture and society because I think he's a weirdo.
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: But even weirdos are geniuses. In fact, a lot of
• 30:23
  Speaker 1: geniuses are weirdos. So it's just possible he you know,
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: he's just you know, net worth does not a high
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: net worth does not always mean high IQ. Donald Trump
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: wants to believe that, right. He wants to believe only
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: dumb people are poor and all rich people are smart
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: because he's rich and he knows he's not very smart,
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: but he wants people to think he's smart. So this
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: is sort of the paint by numbers perception that way
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: too many people in government are practicing these days. And
• 30:55
  Speaker 1: I watch it a lot. The deference that gets paid
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: to wealthy people in general, but particularly by politicians and
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: others is kind of gross when you know they were
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: an expert at one thing either they you know a
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: lot of times right, I would say about the super
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: rich people I've ever been around, about half inherited their
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: money and about half, you know, did it because they
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: were a part of building a business. But it didn't
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: mean they were an expert at that business. It didn't
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: automatically mean they were any good at anything else.
• 31:33
  Speaker 2: So that is a possibility.
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: Because if you were to look at the what the
• 31:37
  Speaker 1: Washington Post is deciding to do, it is about the
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: dumbest business decision you can do. So let's go back
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: to my Matt Murray emails. You could say, I've got
• 31:48
  Speaker 1: a lot of strong opinions on this. For the immediate future.
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: We're going to concentrate on areas that demonstrate authority, distinctiveness,
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: and impact and that resonate with readers. Politics, national affairs, people,
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: power and trends, National security of DC and abroad. Forces
• 32:03
  Speaker 1: shaping the future, including science, health, medicine, technology, climate, and business.
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: You know who else has that same north star? Every
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: other news organization that cover is in Washington or covers Washington.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: That's Politico's north star. I could argue that's you know,
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: punch Bowl probably covers eighty percent of that National journal
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: or the Hotline would have said something like that, The
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: New York Times coverage of Washington.
• 32:27
  Speaker 2: Has that as a north star.
• 32:29
  Speaker 1: So what the Washington Post had that none of these
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: other news organizations had is they also were the regional
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: and local authority, So they had a distinct You know,
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: last time I checked, do you want to stand out
• 32:48
  Speaker 1: from your competitors or do you want to look very
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: similar to your competitors? The Washington Post has made a
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: decision to go small and to become more like Politico,
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: and the irony is it right? The founders of Political
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: Jim Benheid and John Harris left the Post and said, hey,
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: they basically say there needs to be you know, the Post,
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: and you know, the Post should be focusing more on
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: these areas and they could own this area now. Jim
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: Benheid John Harris weren't advocating getting rid of sports and
• 33:18
  Speaker 1: culture and all of that. What they were arguing is
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: that the Post should be more robust, be smarter about
• 33:23
  Speaker 1: some of its core authoritative topics, including politics in the
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: coverage of Washington. And I've always said that the Washington
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: Post for my adult lifetime used to what I used
• 33:34
  Speaker 1: to say when I worked at the National Journal in
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: the Hotline. He said, boy, the Washington Post lets a
• 33:38
  Speaker 1: bunch of us live right, roll call, Politico, National Journal,
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: punch Bowl. If the Washington Post chose to get involved
• 33:48
  Speaker 1: in any of those areas and become you know, hourly
• 33:52
  Speaker 1: authorities on what's happening on Capitol Hill like punch Bowl,
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: you know, or daily authorities about what's happening on campaign
• 33:58
  Speaker 1: trail like Hotline, or daily and hourly newsletters about all
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: sorts of industries in Washington like Politico, they could do it,
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: but it would put these others out of business, you know.
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: So now the Post wants to retreat and essentially become
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: a Washington trade publication that covers the business.
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: Of Washington.
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: That's Politico, that's Role Call, that's National Journal, that's Bloomberg.
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: That's how the New York Times covered all. You get
• 34:37
  Speaker 1: my point. So, if this were a business decision about
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: positioning The Washington Post in a place to be a
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: successful standalone business on its own, this is not what
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: you would do. So again, it's a business decision, but
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: it had nothing to do with the business of the
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: Washington Post. Now I'm going to close on this before
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: we get to my conversation with Danny fun about mobile
• 35:02
  Speaker 1: gaming and whether this is a if we suddenly put
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: a carton of cigarettes, the proverbial cartner cigarettes in the
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: hands of every eighteen year old boy in America, I guess,
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: twenty one year old boy in America, young man in America.
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: I'm going to confess something I am. I am enthusiastic
• 35:31
  Speaker 1: about the future of news and information. I'm enthusiastic about
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: independent media because look, I think the I think Jeff
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: Bezos here behaved like an evil rich guy stereotype, right,
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: couldn't faith when he bought the Washington Post, he couldn't
• 35:48
  Speaker 1: wait to be in the newsroom when he absolutely destroys
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: the Washington Post. He's meeting with peg Pete Hegseth at
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: Blue Origin and his wife hanging out at a Paris
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: fashion show. Right, it is a classic, Like, I mean,
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: you couldn't script it better, right if you wanted to.
• 36:08
  Speaker 1: It is gilded age. Let them eat cake. You can
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: pick your metaphor. And I'll tell you I do think
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: the pitchforks are out. Bernie Sanders said something interesting, and
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: you know, Bernie has a way of taking any issue
• 36:23
  Speaker 1: and saying it's about the millionaires and the billionaires. But
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: he made an interesting observation about the Epstein files, and
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: he says, you know, one of the reasons he thinks
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: that there's so much interest in the Epstein files beyond
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: the conspiracy theorists. Right, conspiracy theorists love the Epstein files
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: for a variety of other reasons. But there's sort of
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: there's a next level of interest. Right, there's just a
• 36:41
  Speaker 1: it just garneled it, and that is, these fucking rich
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: people play by their own set of rules, and look
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: at the shit they get away with. And so here's
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos behaving by a whole other set of rules.
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: And I you know, look, I blame myself for assuming
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos what's more worn than Elon Musk? Right, you know,
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: Warren Buffett bought the Omaha World Herald of years ago
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: because he wanted a good newspaper to read as he
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: stayed in Omaha. And I think I know what I thought.
• 37:10
  Speaker 1: I thought, Jeff Bezos sort of raised middle class kid,
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: you know, sort of raised in a way that a
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: lot of Americans go through, you know, single parent for
• 37:19
  Speaker 1: a while, stepfather all, you know, moved around a couple
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: of times, sort of lived, had a lived, had a lived,
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: working class, middle class ferry experience that maybe may have
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: ground him differently than it grounds a guy like Elon Musk,
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: who was you know, raised by a weirdo father. And
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: you know, or some of these tech guys who are
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: all you know, a lot of them are, you know,
• 37:45
  Speaker 1: like Bill Gates was you know, his dad had you know,
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: he wasn't. I think he was born in second base,
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: not third base.
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: But you get the drift, right, you get my drift.
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: And so I think, you know, I was even impressed
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: with how he handled his divorce. Right, he didn't fight
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: it half and half, except that the premise that he
• 38:09
  Speaker 1: couldn't have built his built Amazon without a spouse. You know,
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: perhaps he was the guilty party and he felt like
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: he had to just.
• 38:19
  Speaker 2: Do it that way. I don't know, but it's interesting.
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: It feels like there was one Jeff Bezos that we
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: all thought we knew, and then there's the guy who's
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: more interested in being in Hollywood, more interested in having
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: these you know, weddings in Italy and Europe and having
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: all sort of being flashy with his money. Right, it's
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: his prerogative, enjoy it, Sure, go ahead, But I don't
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: know if you know it is the amount of white
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: collar anger that's going to be now coupled with blue
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: collar anger. Right if blue collar Americans didn't like Mett
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: Romney because he looked like the boss that was going
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: to lay them off, and that's why some of these
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: guys who may not have liked the skin color of
• 39:21
  Speaker 1: Barack Obama but voted for him in twenty twelve, because
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: Mett Romney looked like the guy that was going to
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: lay him off. Well, now blue collar and white collar
• 39:32
  Speaker 1: America are going to be pretty angry at the boss.
• 39:36
  Speaker 1: And you know it's it is actions like this that
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: I this this sort of moment that's coming, and I think, again,
• 39:49
  Speaker 1: I blame myself. I thought I'd bet I've been in
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: a few dinners with Jeff bezos side, you know, clearly
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: not enough to truly get the measure of the man.
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: But he seemed like a pretty smart, well read, sort
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: of pragmatic individual. Meaning I thought he could read a room,
• 40:12
  Speaker 1: and I don't think any of these tech guys can
• 40:14
  Speaker 1: read a room right now. And you know, whether we
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: call him a tech guy, he's kind of more of
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: an old retail brick and mortar guy that used sort
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: of technology to sort of take over the retail market.
• 40:29
  Speaker 1: But you know, I don't think this is good politics.
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: And the party that associates the most with the wealthiest
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: people right now is on the right. You know, it's funny,
• 40:39
  Speaker 1: for a period of time, all the rich people, the
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: richest people in America seemed to be Obama supporters, right
• 40:45
  Speaker 1: They loved Obama, the celebrity of Obama.
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: And now they are.
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: Whether they don't, maybe they don't like hanging with Trump,
• 40:54
  Speaker 1: but they're all paying the price to hang with them.
• 41:00
  Speaker 1: But like I said, the good news is the public
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: is not going to trust corporate owned media or billionaire
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: owned media. They're only going to trust independent media. And
• 41:09
  Speaker 1: the good news is there is whether we call it
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: DMV today, DMV now, But the appetite, I mean, the
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: Anthony Davis trade for the Washington Wizards has not been
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: covered by the Washington Post. It broke about three hours
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: after the Matt Murray announced the end of the sports department,
• 41:30
  Speaker 1: and so I was curious if they'd even like note like,
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: this is the biggest trade in Washington Wizards for the
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: Washington Wizards, at least since getting rid of Black Bradley Beal,
• 41:39
  Speaker 1: and I think bigger than that, maybe not since Chris
• 41:43
  Speaker 1: the acquiring Chris Weber. And there's no Washington Sports section
• 41:50
  Speaker 1: to cover it. I went over to see if they
• 41:52
  Speaker 1: had any updates, maybe just carry a wire story. So
• 41:56
  Speaker 1: now in order to call it, you know, I'm going
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: to check out. I keep, for no offense to my
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: friends at the Washington Times. I keep forgetting that they're
• 42:04
  Speaker 1: still doing some sports coverage there, and good for them.
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: So I'll check that out, and I'll be checking it
• 42:09
  Speaker 1: out more for obvious reasons. I love my local sports teams,
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: not all of them, but if you will. But the
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: point about sports is This is sports is the community
• 42:18
  Speaker 1: glue that builds the trust that gets people to believe
• 42:23
  Speaker 1: the hard news that's being reported. So don't tell me
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: sports is not worth the investment. What that tells me
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: is you have a bunch of newsroom leaders, particularly somebody
• 42:34
  Speaker 1: that you're importing in where they don't have you know,
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: they they their news organizations. You know, they've never covered
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: sports the way our news organizations have. So it is
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: a cultural disconnect. And I think will Lewis doesn't fully
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: appreciate what he has just done or what he thinks
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: he's recommended. But here's what I will say. I don't
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: think the Post will recover from this. They may exist,
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: just like Newsweek exists, but his newsweek, the newsweek of
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: Howard Feinman, of Evan Thomas, we all know it's not.
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: It's kind of newsweek in name only. Now, look, there's
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: still some good reporters left. The congressional team at the
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: Post was fairly untouched. But what's it going to look
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: like in a year. And let me just tell you,
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: it is going to be fascinating to see what the
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: subscriber base looks like.
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: In six months.
• 43:46
  Speaker 1: They thought they lost a whole bunch of subscribers after
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: the bizarre editorial page shakedown, another business decision that it
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: was all about space and nothing about the business of
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: the Post. They ain't say nothing yet, So rest in peace,
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: Washington Post. Maybe the brand will come back, maybe somebody
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: else buys it, or maybe we just build something new.
• 44:13
  Speaker 2: It's okay. The New York Herald Tribune is no longer here.
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: Than the world's okay. The Washington Star is no longer here.
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: There's some great journalists looking for work. I am many
• 44:26
  Speaker 1: of you know what I'm up to. I've been quiet
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: lately about what I'm up to, but I'm I'm getting
• 44:33
  Speaker 1: closer to being in a position that hopefully I can
• 44:35
  Speaker 1: help contribute to solving this problem in the Washington market
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: in particular. So in that sense, thank you Jeff Bezos
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: for giving an entrepreneur like myself and a few others
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: the opportunity to show that you can do your civic
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: duty for your community and also make a dollar or
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: two while you're at it. Having good life insurance is
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: incredibly important. I know from personal experience. I was sixteen
• 45:08
  Speaker 1: when my father passed away. We didn't have any money.
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: He didn't leave us in the best shape. My mother,
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: single mother, now widow, myself sixteen, trying.
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: To figure out how am I going to pay for college?
• 45:19
  Speaker 1: And lo and behold, my dad had one life insurance
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: policy that we found wasn't a lot, but it was
• 45:25
  Speaker 1: important at the time, and it's why I was able
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: to go to college. Little did he know how important
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: that would be in that moment.
• 45:34
  Speaker 2: Well, guess what.
• 45:35
  Speaker 1: That's why I am here to tell you about Etho's life.
• 45:38
  Speaker 1: They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your
• 45:40
  Speaker 1: family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process, and it's
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: just answer a few health questions online. You can get
• 46:01
  Speaker 1: a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.
• 46:07
  Speaker 1: You can get up to three million dollars in coverage,
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: and some policies start as low as two dollars a
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty
• 46:14
  Speaker 1: twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no
• 46:17
  Speaker 1: medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family
• 46:22
  Speaker 1: with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quot at
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: ethos dot com slash chuck. So again that's Ethos dot
• 46:29
  Speaker 1: com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the rates
• 46:34
  Speaker 1: themselves may vary as well, but trust me, life insurance
• 46:37
  Speaker 1: is something you should really think about it, especially if
• 46:40
  Speaker 1: you've got a growing family. All right with that, let
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: me give you a few thoughts on the on the
• 46:50
  Speaker 1: Super Bowl, Eric, I have my fear is that it's
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: a blowout that we're having eighties nineties Super Bowl right
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: where the NFC is so much more dominant than the AFC.
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: And you know, it was like, you know, whatever AFC
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: team sort of hacked their way to the Super Bowl.
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: Remember when the San Diego Chargers with Nate Tron means business,
• 47:15
  Speaker 1: you know, and they got there and they got kind
• 47:19
  Speaker 1: of pummeled by Steve Young's forty nine ers. Right, all
• 47:22
  Speaker 1: those Buffalo bill blowouts from the Jim Kelly era. I mean,
• 47:26
  Speaker 1: the only team NFC team that didn't they would win
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: super Bowls without blowing out the AFC were the Giants, Right.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: You had the Scott Norwood field goal. And then even
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: the game against the Broncos. I think that the Giants
• 47:38
  Speaker 1: trailed at halftime and then they ended up they ended
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: up beating the Broncos for the first Super Bowl for Parcels.
• 47:44
  Speaker 1: So I fear we're gonna have one of those games.
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: I hope not.
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: Right the borings there was, there was nothing that I
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: don't know whether super Bowl parties right now, That's that's
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: the That's the other question, is a super Bowl party.
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: Is it better to be at a super Bowl party
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: if the games will blowout? And is it better to
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: be at home if the game is close? Right? So
• 48:08
  Speaker 1: that's the one upside might be if this is a blowout,
• 48:12
  Speaker 1: it makes for socializing at the super Bowl party a
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: little bit easier. But there's nothing I hate, you know.
• 48:17
  Speaker 1: I love me a good super Bowl party. I've got
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: a great We've got some great friends that love to host.
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: And but my only small peeve about it is if
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: it's a really competitive game, It's like, I don't want
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: to be at a party while I'm watching anyway, So
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: my fear is that, right. I love the Sam Donald story.
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: I still remember Freshman, the freshman at USC who was unbelievable,
• 48:43
  Speaker 1: and I have I've not seen him be that good
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: until he was a Viking.
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: By the way, what an indictment on the Jets, right
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: the Sam Donald redemption Tour. Basically once he left the
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: Jets and could get anywhere else, it seemed to over
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: time write his mental state memo to young quarterbacks, pray
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: you don't get drafted by the New York Jets. My
• 49:09
  Speaker 1: gut is also low scoring game because the dirty little
• 49:12
  Speaker 1: secret about watching the Seahawks is they don't seem to
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: want to put the game in Darnald's hands one hundred right,
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: They've had they had a great one two punch, they
• 49:22
  Speaker 1: only have one running back obviously that they're they one
• 49:25
  Speaker 1: of their two stars there.
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: But I mean, he's been a.
• 49:29
  Speaker 1: Machine walker the way I mean, I know, I know
• 49:35
  Speaker 1: this facing him in fantasy right, and that defense is outstanding.
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: Here's what I think about the Patriots. A Mike Vrabel
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: Patriots team is not going to get blown out. So
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: I do believe that they will muck this game up
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: a little bit. So I am I am smelling very
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: low scoring. You know, I could see twenty to three,
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: I could see sixteen to seven. I could see, you
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: know that it could be Seattle's always in control, but
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: right they don't seem to pull away.
• 50:10
  Speaker 2: Maybe a few more.
• 50:11
  Speaker 1: Field goals than touchdowns. The May injury concerns me a
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: little bit, you know, nothing like having a shoulder issue there,
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: because his great strength is to throw the ball down
• 50:21
  Speaker 1: the field a little bit, so you have to ask
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: yourself about that. So needless to say, you know, I'm
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: If you're going to make me put money, I'm I
• 50:30
  Speaker 1: would I'd feel the most comfortable with, particularly a first
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: half under and probably the overall as well. And I'd
• 50:39
  Speaker 1: be And I think it's Seahawks or nobody for me.
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: And like I told you, I I you know, there's
• 50:47
  Speaker 1: there's plenty of player props out there, but in some
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: ways I do think player props are sort of a
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: bigger problem.
• 50:57
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: It's sort of my own more my own small little
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: moral line in the sand that I'm drawing on that.
• 51:04
  Speaker 2: So enjoy the Super Bowl.
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: And you know, I have to say, I'm as you know,
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: I'm a huge football fan. It's going to be a
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: long five months until the start until the Hurricanes first game,
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: which by the way, is Labor Day Friday.
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: Get ready so.
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: I will not be talking about college football perhaps until
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: at least September second or third. The one thing I'm
• 51:39
  Speaker 1: going to watch for the advertisements is I am very
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: curious what the AI messaging is. Not how many ads
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: use AI, but how AI is messaged. Right, remember a
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: couple of years ago the Super Bowl is where we
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: found out how Crypto is going to market itself. I
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: have a feeling right this captive eyeballs we're going to
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: I'm very you know, to watch all the different ways
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: the AI lean in AI companies are going to communicate.
• 52:09
  Speaker 1: I know that's something that I'm intrigued about, curious about,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: and we'll be making a note up. So with that,
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: let's do a little last check and then we'll get
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: out of here. As Chuck, all right, I got six
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: on the screen. I'm going to hit six. That's my goal.
• 52:25
  Speaker 1: I'm sticking to it, all right. This question comes from James.
• 52:29
  Speaker 1: He says, thanks again for the podcast. Listening from France
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: right on helps me think differently about US politics and
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: gives me hope. As an institutionalist, I am the king
• 52:38
  Speaker 1: of the institutionalists in independent media. You've said Congress has
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: lost its incentives to act as a check on presidential power.
• 52:45
  Speaker 1: And I wonder if that's partly due to nationalized parties
• 52:47
  Speaker 1: expecting members to fall in line behind the president. But
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: states still defend their authority across party lines. What incentives
• 52:53
  Speaker 1: allow that? And could something similar help Congress reclaim its power. Well,
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: so this is where I believe that the fact, you know,
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: this is where the power of the primary coupled with
• 53:10
  Speaker 1: the power of gerrymandering, coupled with the power of too
• 53:14
  Speaker 1: big of congressional districts. Right, So I'm on my hobby
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: horse and about that the actual size of the US
• 53:20
  Speaker 1: House is way too small and the shrinking, the fact
• 53:24
  Speaker 1: that the that the representative democracy is further away from
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: the average person. Right, we have one member of Congress
• 53:33
  Speaker 1: now per eight hundred thousand people, when in nineteen thirty
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: we were one member of Congress per three hundred and
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: fifty thousand people. Eight hundred thousands is the size of
• 53:44
  Speaker 1: a major city in this country. And you can't tell
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: me that is a single community of interest, right. New
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: York City is not a single community of interests. Austin,
• 53:52
  Speaker 1: Texas is not a single community of interests. Detroit, Michigan
• 53:55
  Speaker 1: is not a single community of interests. There are multiple
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: communities of interests within said metro area. So this is
• 54:03
  Speaker 1: where it's like if you were to ask me, what's
• 54:05
  Speaker 1: one reform that could do this, Well, it's getting rid
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: of partisan primaries, right if you could empower all voters
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: in every congressional district to have more of a say
• 54:16
  Speaker 1: on who the representative is. So either you're drawing districts
• 54:21
  Speaker 1: to be competitive, which is why I'm always careful not
• 54:24
  Speaker 1: to just trash all jerrymandering because in the way we've
• 54:27
  Speaker 1: all self sorted as a country, we may need a
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: gerrymander to create competition. But you know, you could mandate competition.
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: You could mandate the size of the districts. Maybe no
• 54:38
  Speaker 1: district can be bigger than point zero three percent of
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: the population, which would put it in about one perform
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: in two thousand at the moment. And if you did that,
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: I think it would do. If we did that, and
• 54:49
  Speaker 1: then the gerrymandering doesn't is an impactful. Partisanship gets diluted,
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: and I think incentives become more regional and geographic rather
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: than partisan. Right now, when you have jerrymandering and partisan primaries,
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: it means the head of the party has all sorts
• 55:10
  Speaker 1: of outsized influence on the individual member of Congress.
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: But if you.
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: Have if your power comes from because you're you know,
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: the whole of your electorate, well, then the electorate itself
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: has more influence on you than the party leader, because
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: the party leader can only help you with one part
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: of your of your constituency, versus having to answer to everybody.
• 55:35
  Speaker 1: So you know, I think we need all three things right.
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: Doubling the side of the house right now, it would
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: I would want it should just be one perform a
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: thousand right now. That would mean doubling the sides of
• 55:47
  Speaker 1: the House. That in turn minimizes the impact of jerrymandering.
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: And on top of that, I get rid of partisan
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: primaries and essentially all party you know, everybody votes, and
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: you know, uh for for everybody, the top two whatever
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: it is, you do it that way. Doesn't mean parties
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: can't endorse, doesn't mean parties won't have preferences of who
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: the officially endorsed candidate is, and then they can give
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: those resources in a larger in an all voter primary.
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: But this is how we elect our mayors, and our
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: mayors are the least partisan office holders in America and
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: if we're tired of partisanship, that's the path to go.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: Thank you, James.
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: Next question boy, another year, European question from another question
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: from Europe. It's a sextuary insight insightful analysis that really
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: helps me understand you as politics more clearly from a
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: European perspective.
• 56:39
  Speaker 2: I have two questions.
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: How likely is it that the divide between MAGA and
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: Liberal America becomes unbridgable and turns violent and our Americans
• 56:45
  Speaker 1: even able to protest effectively given how comparatively limited their
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: demonstrations seem compared to European protest kind regards Bernard from MEU.
• 56:52
  Speaker 1: You know, Fuddy Bernard, I've heard this from some of
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: my other European friends, going, how come more people aren't
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: in the streets right? My counter on that is, we did,
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: we did the streets stuff, and you know, the public
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: was in the streets a lot in twenty seventeen. In
• 57:07
  Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, I think now it's a bit more concentrated.
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: But one one could argue that, you know, those No
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: Kings protests keep growing, and we're about to have another one,
• 57:21
  Speaker 1: I think, and that's only going to keep growing. So
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: and we've seen the demonstrations in Minneapolis have been huge.
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: But I understand, I get what you're saying. I think
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: what you're saying is it feels like European protests have
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: been bigger than about Trump in America than the American.
• 57:40
  Speaker 2: Protests about Trump in America. As for the issue of.
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: That unbridgeable divide, I am. I'm mostly common this won't
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: end with violence, that this era that here's what I
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: and I say this, and I don't say it for
• 58:09
  Speaker 1: dramatic purposes, but look, we're going to get through this.
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: We've been through these periods before.
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: Now.
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: A lot of people had to die before we got
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: through it with the Civil War, a lot of people
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: died with our horrible labor laws in the nineteen hundreds
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: and the nineteen tens. A lot of people die during
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: the Civil rights movement. So the question is how many
• 58:34
  Speaker 1: people have to die before we sort of turn the corner.
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: How violent it's already violent. We've already had violence right
• 58:43
  Speaker 1: January six was pretty violent. We've had two assassination attempts
• 58:47
  Speaker 1: on Donald Trump. We've had those assassinations in Minneapolis, first
• 58:53
  Speaker 1: of the lawmakers, then.
• 58:59
  Speaker 2: The two.
• 59:02
  Speaker 1: The two killings by by Ice agents. The question is, so, look,
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: we'll get through this? How how much blood has to
• 59:13
  Speaker 1: be spilled? Can we get through this without a full
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: fledged civil war? And you heard Tim Wilson. Now, I
• 59:23
  Speaker 1: I think we don't want to be there, but it
• 59:26
  Speaker 1: only takes you know, we are on it. We're in
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: a tinder box.
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 59:34
  Speaker 1: I'll tell you a scenario that I've been very nervous about.
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: If things had kept escalating in Minneapolis. Now, Donald Trump
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: chose the escalation, so did Tom Holman, right by sending
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: Tom omen there. And they're making and some of the
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: moves are real, and some of them might be the
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: UH for show. But it all is in an attempt
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: to de escalate, not escalate. And what it but things escalate?
• 1:00:01
  Speaker 1: It does Tim Walls call in the National Guard? And
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: if Tim Walls calls in the National Guard? Does Trump
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: then try to federalize that National Guard?
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 2: And who does is?
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: Do we see the National Guard and Minneapolis PD shooting
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: or being shot at by Ice and vice versa?
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 1: So I almost am uncomfortable even articulating that scenario, But
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: we have to be honest, right, it's all it's crossed,
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 1: clearly crossed your mind and it's crossed my mind. But
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 1: I don't think these divides are unbridgable. But I do think,
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: and I go back to something I've said, and I
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 1: think I've said it here a few times, and I
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: certainly say to my speeches, which is, you know what,
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 1: I think the biggest reason why particularly you guys, you
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 1: guys in Europe are struggling. You can't figure out what
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 1: you're seeing here. This looks so un American. Is the
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: American the America you're used to was Cold War America. Well,
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 1: Cold War America was an outlier in America. Cold War
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 1: America was the most pragmatic version of America that we had.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 2: The rest.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: American politics up until nineteen forty, you know, seventeen eighty
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 1: nine right for the Constitution in nineteen forty and American politics,
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 1: you know, from I'm going to go ahead and say
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: two thousand and five, two thousand and four to today
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 1: has been very familiar. Our natural state is polarization. We
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 1: make fifty two forty eight, fifty one forty nine decisions.
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: We don't make seventy thirty decisions. So there's a lot
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: of people that are always going to be in the
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: minority when we make decisions as a country. It's not
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: lost on me that we had our biggest growth as
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: an economic and security power in the Cold War, when
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: we were the most pragmatic, when we both parties kept
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 1: their extremes at bay, and you know, we focused on
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: the existential threat that was the Soviets and the fear
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 1: of nuclear holocaust, and that kept us sober politically. Then
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 1: that fear went away. So it so, I don't so,
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 1: I guess what I'm saying is the divides have always
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: been unbridgable. But it but they but they've been tolerated. Right,
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: We tolerate our divides. We accept that we disagree on
• 1:03:06
  Speaker 1: what those divides are, and we kind of muddle through.
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: So we'll get there.
• 1:03:14
  Speaker 2: But we've done a ton of damage. And you know,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: I it's going to.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 1: Take decades to restore the faith of global allies to
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 1: stick by the United States again. We're probably going to
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: have to We're probably going to have to go seventy
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 1: percent of the way when all of these relationships for
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: a while, when for a long time we only had
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 1: to go thirty percent of the way. And we're going
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 1: to have to have leaders, people that run for president
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 1: that accept the premise of what America is supposed to be.
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 1: And you know, look, this is the first un American
• 1:03:54
  Speaker 1: president we've ever had. He does not believe in the
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: story of America. He does not believe that America an idea.
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 1: You know, he doesn't.
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: I don't.
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: And here's the thing with Trump. It's not that he
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: doesn't believe it. I don't think he's really thought about it.
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 1: You know, I think about it all the time. I
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 1: think of every president as a chapter in the story
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 1: of America. He doesn't most of our not most every
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: president in my lifetime, and every president for the most
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: part that I've read about, believed that a baton was
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: passed to them and they were going to be passing
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: a baton, and that they were all writing another chapter
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: in the story of America. Donald Trump doesn't want a chapter.
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: He wants to throw away that book and only have
• 1:04:44
  Speaker 1: a book, the Book of Trump. But he does not
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 1: believe in the You know, I don't think he knows
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: what a Federalist paper is. And I promise you he
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: hasn't read it all. If he's read one, he didn't
• 1:04:55
  Speaker 1: done it since grade school. Next question comes from got
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 1: somebody from Chicago it's Mike, he said. Some presdident I
• 1:05:11
  Speaker 1: were debating wild scenarios where Trump could serve a third term.
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 1: One theory floated was that if Trump became Speaker of
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: the House and the newly elected president and VP resigned,
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 1: he could ascend to the presidency again. I know the
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 1: Constitution bars him from being elected president again, but could
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 1: he legally return via the line of succession. So it's funny.
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 1: The Speaker of the House loophole has always been the
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: one I've thought about too. I interviewed Steve Bannon about
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 1: ten months ago and we went through this sould Trump
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 1: twenty eight and he's like, oh, he's going to be
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 1: unbalot And I said, I said, I know you want to.
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 1: I said, constitution bars it. And he says, well, you
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: just wait, We've got a path. It's the only one
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: I can think of, is that one. I think that's
• 1:06:00
  Speaker 1: the only one. I think it's the you know, it
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 1: fits the description that my friend likes to say, which is,
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 1: you know, our biggest problem with Trump is failure of imagination.
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 1: You know, Donald Trump doesn't spend a lot of time
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 1: thinking about what's the best way to tame the Iranians,
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 1: but he does think a lot of time about all
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: the different loopholes that he can exploit.
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: In the Constitution.
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: When you look at the language of the twenty second Amendment,
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: it keeps using the word elected. Right, So that's loophole
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 1: that you've found very well, and I think that that's
• 1:06:34
  Speaker 1: a fair loophole. But the twelfth Amendment is fascinating because
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: the wording doesn't have elected in there. It just simply says,
• 1:06:43
  Speaker 1: no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 1: be eligible to that a vice president of the United States,
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 1: and you're ineligible, no person. Let's read the word, no
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: person shall be elected to the office of president more
• 1:06:57
  Speaker 1: than twice. And no person who has held the office
• 1:07:00
  Speaker 1: of president or acted as president for more than two
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 1: years of a term to which some other person was
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: elected president shall be elected to the office of the
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: president more than once.
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 1: That's if a vice president takes over and serves less
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 1: than two years of the previous president's term, they can
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 1: still run for two full terms of their own, potentially
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: serving ten years. So you know, the word elected matters
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 1: a lot there. Right. You have to assume that Republicans
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: win a House majority for this to happen. You have
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: to assume that Donald Trump can get all the votes
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: he needs to be speaker, so he would still have
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 1: to go through a process right to become speaker. And
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 1: I just, you know, so I think you've identified the
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 1: one loophole where you could claim a fig leaf of
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 1: constitutional legitimacy. But in some ways it reminds me of
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: Putin and Medvedev. So Putin decided to become prime minister
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: to abide by what was a two term limit in Russia,
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 1: right for president.
• 1:08:18
  Speaker 2: So what does he do?
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: He makes the prime minister slot of the more powerful slot.
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: He slides in and becomes prime minister. Medvedev becomes the president. Right,
• 1:08:31
  Speaker 1: he's the head of state. But that's really it. It's
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 1: kind of like he weakened the presidency for that period
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: of time to sort of how Israel's presidency works. Right,
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: the prime minister has all the power, the presidency is
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: head of state, a little more ceremonial, a few pieces
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: of power, but not a ton. That's what this would
• 1:08:53
  Speaker 1: feel like, right, And I you know, I think you've
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 1: identified the loophole, and I all so believe that attempting
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 1: it it would be impossible. I still think if there's
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 1: going to be a Trump on the ballot, and that's
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 1: the thing, right, Like Republicans would rather have a Trump
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: on a ballot than Trumps president, right because they it's
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: Trump's voters that they need to get their majorities in Congress,
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 1: and they don't necessarily want to actually work with Trump
• 1:09:25
  Speaker 1: the situation you're outlining, you know, and do they just
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 1: campaign that Trump's going to run for speaker and then
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 1: you make it a referendum on that? Right? But I
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: do think you've found the loophole that it in theory
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 1: could be it. I will just say I just don't
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 1: think it could. I don't think he could pull it off.
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: And then you know, the actuary tables are going to
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 1: catch up to Donald Trump sooner.
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: Than you think.
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 1: Next question comes from Branden and Charlotte. Hey, I really
• 1:09:58
  Speaker 1: enjoy the podcast. Appreciate how you keep us in FUM
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: without leaning into full doom and gloom. What are your
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 1: thoughts on the DJ Collecting voter roles and seizing ballot
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: boxes in Fulton County, Georgia feels like voter suppression or worse,
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: a way to track and target people who didn't vote
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 1: for Trump. Why isn't this getting more attention and how concerned.
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: Should we be?
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: Well, I think it's getting a decent amount of tension.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: What I don't understand is what they want to do
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 1: with all these voter roles. I think some of this
• 1:10:21
  Speaker 1: has to do with just simply purging roles voter roles,
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: and just trying to make it harder. You know, people
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 1: are going to have to reregister.
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: I know what I would do.
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 1: If you're concerned that they're messing with your voter registration,
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 1: just go register to vote again. You know it cancels
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 1: out the old registration and just do it again. That
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: would be the number one way I'd protect myself on
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: this if if I had, if I were a registered
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 1: voter in a state that has agreed to letting the
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice have the voter roles. You know, there's
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 1: a part of me that says, call their bluff and say,
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: you know, yes, let's let's let's do an audit of
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: all the voter roles. Let's set up a special committee,
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: and let's explain how it works and explain how each
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 1: state does it. Ultimately, what I think Trump's up to
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: is that he just he just wants to keep feeding
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: the conspiracy that he's somehow won in twenty twenty, and
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: it's he is just so committed to it. I mean,
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: I guess it's amazing that he's committed to the bit
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 1: this long, right, but it is sort of I find
• 1:11:45
  Speaker 1: it laughable, except it's so serious, right, what he's trying
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 1: to do in the manipulation of it all. Yeah, I
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: think what you're I think the realistic fear we should
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: have is is a form of voter suppression, which is
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 1: just purging of voter rolls or using it to you know,
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 1: perhaps the information is given to some nefarious political direct
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 1: mail company to scare those voters from voting. But there
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 1: are other ways to get those voter roles too. But
• 1:12:20
  Speaker 1: that's what that's why, you know. I think the fail
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 1: safe is if you're in one of these states that
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 1: is decided to not care about their Tenth Amendment rights.
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: I'm very curious to see what happens with this lawsuit
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 1: from Fulton County with it and see if they get
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 1: their ballots back. If federalism is still in existence, they'll
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 1: get their ballots back.
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: But I would.
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 1: I would advocate for, you know, just go run story again,
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 1: give them more voter roles to go through. Next question
• 1:12:58
  Speaker 1: comes from Brian. Hey, I've been a fan works since
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: twenty oh seven. All right, thanks for everything you do.
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 1: Maybe I need a refreshment. Our politics usually works what
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: as usual anymore? But anyway, but isn't it unusual for
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 1: the out party to get a bill through? How much
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: influence should we expect in a situation like this? Best bride?
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 1: One hundred percent? Now, I'll say this. Traditionally, when a
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 1: president gets shellacked in a midterm George W. Bush oh six,
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 1: Barack Obama twenty ten and twenty fourteen, Bill Clinton nineteen
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 1: ninety four, they've wanted to prove that, particularly Obama twenty
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: ten and Clinton ninety four, because they had their own
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 1: real storry about that. Hey, all right, we can go
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 1: I can govern with the other side. Let me show
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 1: you how I can govern with the other side.
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 2: And there's you.
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 1: And by the way, the new majority. Usually it's in
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 1: their interest to prove because a lot of them won
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: by saying, look, I'll work with Trump where I can,
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 1: or you know, I'll work with Obama where I can,
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. So so bad, there might be
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: a few a few things here or there. Maybe it's
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: on healthcare subsidies. I mean, Trump's such a political chameleon, right,
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 1: he has no ideology, and if you know, it all
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: depends on how much the Democrats want to want to
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: allow Trump to come along for the ride, you know,
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 1: or do they want instead to prepare for twenty twenty
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 1: eight in twenty twenty nine, right, and you and you
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 1: actually pass bills that are designed to be vetoed.
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 2: So I think there are two ways.
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: If Democrats get control of Congress, of what you know,
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: you find a few things you can work on, particularly affordability,
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: maybe something on electricity. You know, there's going to be
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 1: things that you should You got your budgets and things
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: like that. But I might argue that if you're if
• 1:14:58
  Speaker 1: you're trying, you know that you pass some bills and
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: you dare him to veto it. Now, the question is
• 1:15:06
  Speaker 1: what if he doesn't. And this is Trump, you never know.
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: How much do you attempt to work with him? I
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 1: think it depends on how you got elected. I think
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 1: some people got elected to say we've got to eradicate
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: Trump from politics, and some people will get elected by
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: promising those swing voters, look, they're you know, I'm not
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 1: going to throw out every idea just because Trump came
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: up with it. But I do think when you look
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 1: at you know, there was some affordability bills, that some
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: economic stimulus that the Democrats passed in O seven that
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: George W. Bush signed. There was certainly welfare reform that
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: Republicans passed that bill Clinton signed. So and we like,
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: I go back to there's no greater political chameleon than
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And you know, there's always this one instinct
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: of his like, look at what he did, was how
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: he was with mom Donnie. Oh, Mom Donnie won by you.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 1: You know, he likes to be associated with winners, and
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: he may deem especially if it's a blowout. He may
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: want to show that there are some things he's because
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: that means some of his voters voted for the Democrats.
• 1:16:27
  Speaker 1: So I wouldn't don't I wouldn't assume. I wouldn't assume
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: it's that it's going to be nothing but messaging bills
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: if Democrats win full control of Congress in working with Trump.
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: All right, I'm going to have two more questions here
• 1:16:43
  Speaker 1: and this will be I will empty my my cue
• 1:16:47
  Speaker 1: four this week, Hey, Chuck, Anthony from La here, long time,
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 1: first time quick question. If the Senate ends up split,
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: say forty eight Republicans, forty eight Democrats and four independents,
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: who are the independence By the way, how is majority
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 1: controlled determined? Do Independence have to declare caucus and can
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: they switch at any time? Could that lead to the
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: majority leadership changing hands? Thanks for turning me into a
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: college football fan last year, Anthony right on. Perhaps the
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: the conferences ESPN or Fox can give me a kickback
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: for for bringing bringing another fan into the full well.
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: The independents also vote on who which who which party
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: should organize. Now some of that stuff's usually negotiated, you know,
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: behind the scenes. Now, who are your four independents? Right?
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: I think Lisa Murkowski is up for grabs?
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 1: I think Lisa Murkowski if if if her vote is
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 1: the difference between the Democrats having full control of Congress
• 1:17:46
  Speaker 1: and organizing with them, right, if they are a seat short,
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: does Murkowski become you know, and do Democrats offer her,
• 1:18:00
  Speaker 1: say energy and natural resources in exchange for coming over?
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: So the Independence in theory have some leverage here if
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: they choose to use it. Right, you know, I've always
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: had this dream that the four to six of them
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: in there would be independence and they would always vote
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 1: in a block right each time and maybe maybe they
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 1: would agree, okay, for calendar year twenty twenty seven, Democrats
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: are in charge for calendar year twenty twenty eight, Republicans.
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 2: Or whatever it is.
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: But ultimately it's it's you know, if it's one of
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 1: those where you know, we had it when we had
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: a fifty to fifty Senate with Dick Cheney as the tiebreaker,
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: when George W. Bush came into office, and then Jim
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: Jefferts decided to leave the Republican Party become an independent
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: and caucus with the Democrats, and the minute he did that,
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: it went from a fifty to fifty Senate to a
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: fifty one to forty nine Senate and the Democrats had control.
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 1: So that's how works, right, And yes, it can be
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: that fickle.
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: Jefferts just said, ask screw it, I'm out now. I
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: think there was a lobbying campaign by Dashel that Harry
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: Reid and all of that stuff that was taking place.
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: You know, Jeffers was the most liberal Republican in the
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: Senate at the time, right, Barack Obama got on inspector
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: to flip to become the sixtieth Democrat for a small
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: period of time until the Scott Brown election. So yeah,
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: in theory, majority can change hands mid term. Wheat, Like
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 1: I said, it happened in my lifetime in twenty oh
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: one with Vermont Senator Jim Jeffers. Last question comes from
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 1: Nelson H and New Orleans, Louisiana. I love the podcast.
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: I'm calling my shot. If James Talerico wins the Democratic
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: primary upsets John Cornyn, I'm getting the vibe that his
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: timing could be perfect to catch fire, just like Barack
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: Obama did in twenty eight. Sure it probably won't happen,
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: but think about it. As we all say, history doesn't
• 1:19:59
  Speaker 1: repeat itself, but it sure does. Rhyme all the best
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: and ghost saints spelled of course with the French do.
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: I am a believer of the following that the most
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: likely Democratic nominee in twenty eight is somebody we're not
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: talking about today. I have floated Tall Rico as that idea.
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 1: Now I will say this, I think he's This was
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 1: a bad week for tall Rico's politics, right this story
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: about how he referred according to an influencer, Tall Rico
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: referred to Colin Allred as a mediocre black man versus
• 1:20:39
  Speaker 1: Jasmine Crockett, a talented black woman, and that phrase really
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 1: took off on social media. Colin Allred certainly took offense
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: to it, understandably, So now there was no recording, it
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 1: wasn't clear what was what I found interesting to pick
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 1: a word was tall. Rico never did I'd saying it
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 1: and basically confessed to saying something like it. And then
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: because when you're doing the that isn't what I meant
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: to say, that's code for.
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I probably was a little loose.
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 1: Now you've thought he was off the record, but hey,
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 1: if you're not assuming, you know I do. The only
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 1: time I assume I'm not being quoted is when I'm
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: in a private home with my close friends or in
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: my house. I am very careful in public. I assume
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: when people say anything to me that it's very possible
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: they're recording that they could be used, you know, in
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 1: social media, for better or for worse. Right, So I
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 1: am a big milk toaster. When you come and see
• 1:21:49
  Speaker 1: me in public. It's sort of in sort of you know,
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 1: unofficial venues. So so I think it's he's I think
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: it's done some damage. And you know, I'm not one
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: hundred percent convinced. Colin all Redwood have Endorseddasman Crockett, but
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: he is now and he's all in now. So but
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 1: where your head is at is where my head's at.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: So another name I throw out there, Molly McMorrow, Right,
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: I think she's somebody who are already went viral once
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: when she was a state legislator. She's now decided to
• 1:22:30
  Speaker 1: run for US Senate. She's I think she's going to
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 1: be the goldilocks candidate that Democratic primary, right, Hanley Stevens
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: is going to seem to establishment Abdul say it, it
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: might seem too progressive. She's going to be the one
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 1: that seems to bridge. That's certainly the race she's trying
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: to run. And it's probably going to work just because
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 1: of how defined I think Stevens and I'll say it
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: are becoming maybe Rob saying getting elected governor of Iowa
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: if some Democrat pulls a statewide upset in the Deep South,
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: in any race. Right, the point is is that I
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: think it's just as likely. I'm with you, remember better
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: O'Rourke was considered a major presidential candidate. He didn't even
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 1: win in twenty eighteen, and within six months of losing,
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: he's considered one of the front runners for the nomination
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 1: because of how close he came to defeating Ted Cruz
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: in twenty eighteen. So the Democratic Party's history is they're
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 1: likely more likely to go with the new, freshest face
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: they can find Pete Bootage. Look, without the intervention of
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: Jim Clyburn and COVID, I will go to my grave,
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 1: believe in bodhajj and Sanders have a fight to the convention,
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 1: and I think Pete wins the convention fight, but it's close.
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 2: But you know, and that's a.
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 1: World without COVID essentially, and in a world that Iowa
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 1: the Caucuses correctly and gave Pete his correct victory there
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 1: in Iowa. But either way, the point was this former
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 1: mayor of South Bend, who lost a race for d
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: n C chair suddenly is one of the front runners
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: for the Democratic nomination. Right the Democratic Party, an unknown
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: governor from Georgia ends up the Democratic nominee. A lesser
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: known governor of Arkansas ends up the Democratic A guy
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: who was state senator in six years before he ever
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: ran for president ends up the nominee in Barack Obama.
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 1: The history of the Democratic Party is when they and
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: here's another fact in this recent era, when they go
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 1: with first time candidates, the new candidate, they're more likely
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 1: to win. When they go with people that have been
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: around a while, they're more likely to lose. Al Gore,
• 1:24:50
  Speaker 1: John Kerry, Joe Hillary Clinton, sitting Vice President, Kamala Harris.
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 2: Right, Biden was an.
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 1: Outline, an unusual you know, in a normal primary process,
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden never wins that primary. Right, it was a
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: he was an accidental primary winner because of the circumstances
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 1: of of Covid and Clyburn, and that nomination was looking
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: a lot more like seventy six with beat Boodaget's Jimmy
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 1: Carter parallels, or even a bit ninety two with Bill Clinton,
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 1: you know, having to go all the way to the
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 1: convention and keep beating back Jerry Brown. So I don't
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: think you're off kilter here. I like I said, let's
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 1: see how taal Rico manages this first crisis of his
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 1: political career. And I'll tell you this. I you know,
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: I was I was more pro tol Rico as a
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 1: potential dark horse if he'd run for governor then running
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: for Senate.
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: I do think that.
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: He's going to I think he'd have made it more
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: because I think he could have run and lost for
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 1: governor but kept it close and still preserved sort of
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 1: a future. I think this Senate seat right, especially if
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 1: Kakeet past the primary. But I just think it's the
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: wrong position. I think he had a serving in Austin
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 1: in the Texas State legislature. I just thought his issues
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: that he was that Abbott would have been a better
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 1: foil for him, and it would have been a It
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: would have been better for the party, better for the
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 1: future of Texas Democrats. But he's trying to take a
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 1: short cut. He has too many consultants, I think whispering
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: sweet presidential nothing's in his ear and saying, hey, senate's
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: an easier road.
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 2: Okay, good luck with that.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 1: But I like your thinking, Nelson, because history backs up
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 1: your prediction whether it's him. The point is, if you're
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: going to close this off into gambling terms, go find
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: the twelve to fifteen to twenty to one shot. Right
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 1: now in the Democratic primary, they're more likely to be
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 1: the nominee than one somebody who's run before, and two
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 1: somebody who had national name recognition ten years earlier.
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 2: How are that? Enjoy your weekend.
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: I hope nothing crazy happens that I see you before Monday,
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: but if not, hey, that's the beauty of being in
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 1: this world.
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 2: We can pop in and quickly jump on something. But
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: if not, for that, I'll see it Monday. Joy the
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 2: super Bowl