Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Stronk Independent whammon - NOW’s accidental confession | HBR Talk 362

Transcript

Stronk Independent whammon - NOW’s accidental confession | HBR Talk 362 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Second stage tanks now pressurized pass to not report it
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: feels good demon A fifteen seconds. Guidance is internal well
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: eleven ten nine Ignition sequence Star Chick five four three two.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: This is Honey Badger Radio Radio week Right, Hello, and
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: welcome to HBr Talk three sixty two Drunk Independent Women.
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: Now's Accidental Confession. I'm your host, Hannah Wallen here with
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: the personification of perceptivity Mike Stevenson and the doge in charge,
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: Brian Martinez, who is working in the background, so you
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: probably won't hear anything from him. We probably won't have
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: a Luren tonight. She's a little under the weather.
• 0:47
  Speaker 3: It's just sleepy, so it's just first.
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: This is sleeping about that. Yeah, yeah, Lauren works hard.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: But we have tonight the accidental confession of the what
• 1:00
  Speaker 2: six Sisterhood of the National Organization for Women. They probably
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: have no idea that people will recognize this based on
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: what they have said in this rant disguised as a
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: I don't know what they call this, but it basically
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: gives some information by the nature of their complaints that
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: I don't really think they had intended people to take
• 1:24
  Speaker 2: away from this whole set of complaints which this is
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: what women do best, all right, women complain better than
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: women do anything else. And here you have, like, they
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: have so many complaints on this list, it's it's unbelievable.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: And when I was like, I go through it periodically
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: just to look for specific things, and you know, I
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: open some of the stuff that they've linked to, and
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: one of the things that I noticed is they almost
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: exclusively get all of their information from the New York Times,
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: which is generally speaking, an indication that someone is mentally ill,
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: like if they don't read anything, but that there's the
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: high chance that they need medication. But in any case,
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: and the other thing that I noticed is far from
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: its original reputation, and as a great news organization with
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: hard hitting stories and original work, the New York Times
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: does an awful lot of reporting on things that other
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: news organizations reported first, and then they just put their
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: own spin on it. So back when I was an
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: aspiring journalist and I was studying journalism, which was in
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: high school, and I say aspiring, I was working for
• 2:45
  Speaker 2: a newspaper at that time. We studied you know, the
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: Washington Post and the New York Times and all these
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: big newspapers and their histories and everything watched. I can't
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: remember the movie that had Robert Redford in it about
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: Woodward and Bernstein, but it was, you know, like we
• 3:07
  Speaker 2: were told, you know, these are the guys to admire
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: and everything. And then I got older and figured out
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: they missed the most important part of that story, and
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: the most important part of that story was what Nixon
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: was doing in the background and why they actually did
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: that break in they That's a story for another time.
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: But the history of the New York Times during wartime
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: and throughout from its beginning, really it was kind of
• 3:34
  Speaker 2: lionized as this great publication. Yes, all the President's men,
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: that was at Jen Bottle, Thank you, But it just
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: is shocking to see how bloglike they've become. Like that's
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: what bloggers do. Bloggers read news stories and then they
• 3:54
  Speaker 2: write articles or essays basically with their own take on
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: the news story, and they link usually to the original source.
• 4:03
  Speaker 2: Sometimes article writers on a particular topic, that is that
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: several contributing news stories are involved in, like what's going
• 4:15
  Speaker 2: on with title nine. Well, here's a bunch of different
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: news stories with a bunch of different information. I'm putting
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: that information together and this is the conclusion that I'm
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: drawing or the information that I'm providing, here's the pattern
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: or whatever, and that that gets done by maybe better bloggers.
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: But it's not really news reporting to do that. It's
• 4:38
  Speaker 2: just passing the same news story around like like a
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: drunken ho at a frat party. It's really sad.
• 4:47
  Speaker 3: We can try to understand the New York Times effect
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: on men something something something something something something something staying
• 4:54
  Speaker 3: in life. That's actually from that song and you read
• 4:58
  Speaker 3: through the lyrics that the word is.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: So ever, what is the New York.
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: Times effect on men? Begs? Can you expand?
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: Never mind, well, their mis injury is nothing new. You
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: will go back through some of their older stories. You
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: can find that out.
• 5:15
  Speaker 3: Would be pressing as hell for the Begs to have
• 5:18
  Speaker 3: discovered this back in the seventies.
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yep, that And of course they've been manipulated in
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: the manipulative in the past too, Like they come up
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: when you study about great publications, but they also study
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: it come up when you study about publications that engage
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: in something called yellow journalism, which is essentially a combination
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: of clickbaiting and except of course before clicking existed, and
• 5:43
  Speaker 2: political spin, so social political spin off often. But so
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: we've been going through this. We'll go back to the
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: top of the page. They basically call it Trump extint
• 5:56
  Speaker 2: or Trump administration is harming women with almost one hundred
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: policy mandates, threatens healthcare, economic security, and fails to protect
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: women from violence. So that's there, the Trump Administration's policies
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: harming women. This is their list, and we've been going
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: through this list. And remember the last couple of weeks,
• 6:17
  Speaker 2: we went through the file of things that were discontinued,
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: the hundreds of National Science Foundation grants for research that
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: were discontinued as a result of funding cuts. And as
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: it turns out, what we discovered was that actually Trump
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: was just cutting the funds off from the Long March
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: through the institutions of feminist feminism's particular brand, their their
• 6:45
  Speaker 2: intersectional brand of cultural Marxism. And that's why hostmad So
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: today we're looking at some more reasons. And as I
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: was going through this right I noticed a pattern. One
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: part of the pattern was there's still a lot of
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: intersectional feminist Long March study institutions things that they're they're
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: pissed off about. John Doe says, we're still funding Israel. Yeah,
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: the feminists are still getting their money. And yes, I'm
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: i am calling Israel a feminist state. So just the
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: crap that has been promoted with regard to feminism coming
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: from that nation.
• 7:23
  Speaker 3: Every state in the Middle East is a feminist state.
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: Is Grade eight Men's are activism books. A lot of
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: people have trouble with this, but yeah, same shit, different color.
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: That's kind of all we hear all the time about
• 7:37
  Speaker 2: those patriarchies over there, that patriarchy over there, and people
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: frequently will cite a news article from like two thousand
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: and eight or so something way back when that then
• 7:48
  Speaker 2: I think the National Organization for Women is the one
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: that promoted it. In fact, so it might have been
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: where the fear came from over that specific incident, because
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: there are dozens of incidents like that that have made
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: the news that nobody ever talks about. There was there
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: was an incident where, well there were two. Actually there
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: was one where we were all told that a woman
• 8:18
  Speaker 2: was executed for being raped, and I started digging through it,
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: and actually what I found out was they didn't execute
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: her for being raped. They executed her for engaging in an
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: adultery with an individual who was not involved in any
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: rape issue. Basically had been during this extra marital affair
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: with this individual. She had given him nude images of
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: herself and she got nervous about him having them, and
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: she met with him to get them back so she
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: could destroy them. And while they were meeting, which this
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: was in a country where she was supposed to have
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: an escort from a family member to leave her home,
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: and she did not have an escort from a family
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: member while they were meeting, and it's a clandestine meeting.
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: So they're in a location that you know, she can
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: get to without being seen and he can get to
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: without being seen. They're sitting in a car. Their car
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: was attacked by a gang and the gang beat the
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: hell out of him and raped her, and she reported
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: the rape. She had to because they beat the hell
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: out of her too, and in doing so, she had
• 9:33
  Speaker 2: to admit that she was out without a family member
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: who she was with, what was going on, And it
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: came out that she was having this extra marital affair
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: with this man, and so they both got executed because
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: it is that that nation has a death penalty, had
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: a death penalty for extra marital affairs, but they referred
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: to it as fornication. If you engage a fornication male
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: or female, you got the death penalty. There was another
• 9:58
  Speaker 2: instance where they said that a woman was caned or
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: whipped whatever it was, for being raped, and I looked
• 10:08
  Speaker 2: into that one as well, and so what I found
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: out was the evidence in their case to a consensual affair.
• 10:19
  Speaker 2: She was not married, so it was not a death
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: penalty offense. She wasn't having an extra marital affair. She
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: was engaging in pre marital sex with this guy, and
• 10:29
  Speaker 2: as a result of that, the penalty was this lashings right,
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: So this is yeah, we're talking if you weren't here
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: when I started, we're talking about that patriarchy over there.
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: So when I read the whole case, when I read
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: the whole outcome, what I found out was he had
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: a one hundred and twenty and she got eighty. And
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: I also found out that under their law, if she
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: accused him of rape and he was found guilty, he
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: would have had the death penalty and she would have
• 11:05
  Speaker 2: gotten off scot free. Less he agreed to marry her
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: and she agreed to marry him, And if that was
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: the case, then they wouldn't have been punished so essentially,
• 11:20
  Speaker 2: when a woman is in that situation and she fears punishment,
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: she goes into the court and said, no, no, he
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: raped me, but I'll marry him if that's if he's
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: willing to marry me. And then the guy is stuck
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: in a position of either fighting the case or taking
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: the you know, taking the other punishment of getting married
• 11:38
  Speaker 2: to this woman who is so willing to quickly lie
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: about him. And the evidence showed that they were in
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: a consensual affair, and so they both got their punishment.
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: But in a patriarchy that treats women as less important
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: than men and oppresses women, why did she only get
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: two thirds of the punishment that he got. I always
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: bring that up because some patriarchy.
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a similar thing that happens in areas that
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: are considered stereotypically you know, hick or hillbilly. The phenomenon
• 12:16
  Speaker 3: of the shotgun wedding. Yep, yeah, it's it's not it's
• 12:20
  Speaker 3: not just in the Islamic world, it's it's all over
• 12:23
  Speaker 3: the well, the entire world. Whenever there's an extramarital or
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: or premarital affair, it's is considered so undesirable that someone
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: has to be charged with the crime, and it's always
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: the man. It's always it's always the man who's who's
• 12:45
  Speaker 3: charged with the rape. And then we get these stories
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: that a woman was murdered for being raped, and it's
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: never that. I mean, it's almost never that. But even
• 12:58
  Speaker 3: if it was for being raped, you have to wonder
• 13:02
  Speaker 3: what certain feminists make of this, certain feminists who think
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: that rape is worse than murder because rape victims have
• 13:09
  Speaker 3: to live with the consequences of what's happened to them,
• 13:13
  Speaker 3: because even losing their lives isn't as bad as living
• 13:17
  Speaker 3: their lives knowing that they have been overpowered by a man,
• 13:22
  Speaker 3: because being overpowered by a man is worse than death.
• 13:27
  Speaker 3: So with that logic in mind, you should murder people
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: who've been raped, because then they don't have to live
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: with what happened to them. It's a conversation that many
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: people have had and that we've delved into for a
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: long time now. In fact, there was a famous Joe
• 13:45
  Speaker 3: Rogan podcast with that fucking community can't remember, but Joe
• 13:50
  Speaker 3: was like, you would rather be murdered than raped, right,
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: you would rather rather be murdered than rape, and the
• 13:58
  Speaker 3: guy and the guy could I didn't wriggle out of
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: it because of this overwriting ideology that it's a woman
• 14:10
  Speaker 3: being raped is worse than a woman being murdered. Like
• 14:14
  Speaker 3: I said, without logic, why wouldn't you murder a woman
• 14:17
  Speaker 3: has been raped? Because that, yeah, would be better. But
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: when you sound it out like that, it's fucking psychotic.
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I've seen both extreme ends of the illogical pathway
• 14:34
  Speaker 2: that that feminist logic and scare quotes gets you to.
• 14:38
  Speaker 2: Because I've made no secretive fact that I've been a
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: victim of sexual assault and it's not just been one
• 14:45
  Speaker 2: individual or one time. And you know, I'll be in
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: conversations about some social issue or another and how it
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: impacts men or how it impacts women, And when feminists
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: can't win the argument a about that particular thing with logic,
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: reason and facts, and they're getting their butts kicked in
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: the debate, then they pull out. They think rape is
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: their trump card. And you know, I've seen feminists actually
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: get hysterical on X threads. Oh, you're just harassing a
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: rape victim, like out of nowhere, you be talking about
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: taxes or some shit, and the next thing, well, I
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: was raped, Okay, you know and if I'm in the thread,
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: I'll say, Okay, well so was I. You know, it
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: really sucks, but it doesn't really have anything to do
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: with this topic. And there was one feminist that tried
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: to get me banned and like called a bunch of
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: other people in and you know, went off the deep
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: end accusing me of being a fake victim because I wasn't,
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: you know, hysterical about my experience. Like my last experience
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: with personal experience with being a sexual assault victim was
• 16:05
  Speaker 2: before I turned before I turned to nineteen, And so
• 16:10
  Speaker 2: there is absolutely the fact was before I turned eighteen.
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: There's there's absolutely no reason why I should have massive
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: feelings about it. Now I'm fifty three. It's been decades,
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: literally decades since it happened to me, and I've had
• 16:29
  Speaker 2: plenty of time to take every bit of power away
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: from the people who hurt me in the past by
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: gaining the most recovery you could possibly gain from any
• 16:42
  Speaker 2: trauma that you experience. And you know, I've learned everything
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: I can learn about situational awareness and the things that
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: led to me being victimized. How to you know, protect
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: other people from this that are around me, and so on,
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: like that's my story, you know, And so I'm not
• 17:01
  Speaker 2: I'm not one of those people that makes a big
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: deal about it because it was a big deal when
• 17:06
  Speaker 2: it happened, but in my case, it's certainly not a
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: big deal today. If I could make it not have happened, sure,
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: I would make it not have happened. But if somebody
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: offered to help me commit suicide so that I wouldn't
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: have to feel or remember anything about it anymore, I'd
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: be like, are you crazy? What the fuck is wrong
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: with you? I'm a happy person now, I'm married, have
• 17:31
  Speaker 2: three kids, have a grand baby, Like, what on earth
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: would you want to take that away from me for?
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: And I've had that conversation with feminists where you know,
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: they can't talk about anything other than oh, you have
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: to be traumatized for life? How can you possibly even
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: talk to men? And they really get mad when they
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: find out that one of my perpetrators was not male.
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: One of my perpetrators was female, and that blows their
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: minds Now they don't know how to deal with that,
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: and then they get really mad at me. How dare
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: you talk about that? You know? And so it's like, well,
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: you guys are messed up at the other end of it,
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: people who recognize the idiocy of the feminist argument that
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: being raped is worse than being murdered take it to
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: the extreme of well, you know, if you didn't resist
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: because there was a gun, it wasn't really a rape.
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: You consented. And I've had to give this explanation to people.
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: All Right, if somebody takes your wallet at gunpoint, that
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: is against the law. That is, that is robbing you,
• 18:38
  Speaker 2: because it is recognized that threatening your life over your
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: money makes it a crime, right, that using force or
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: coercion to take your property is a crime. And if
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: somebody grabs you at gunpoint and forces you to clean
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: their house and wash their dishes and do all of
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: their other manual labor in the home for free right,
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: that is a crime because it is using force or
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: coercion to take away your control over what you're going
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: to do with your body. And rape is kind of
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: a combination of those two things. It is taking your control,
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: robbing you of your control at gunpoint, and it does
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: have the potential to cause other damages like sti's and pregnancy,
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: or if you're male, being forced to pay eighteen years
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: of child support to your rapist who has custody of
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: a resulting baby. So it's it's fair for it to
• 19:41
  Speaker 2: be a crime, and it's fair for it to be
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: understood as traumatic. But it's also fair to point out
• 19:48
  Speaker 2: that the most traumatic part of it isn't the sexual aspect.
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: That is the least traumatic aspect of it. The most
• 19:55
  Speaker 2: traumatic aspect of it is the fear, the force that
• 19:58
  Speaker 2: is used, and the coercion that has used, the sense
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: of being having your agency taken away from you. Right,
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: And so that's not worse than being murdered. It sucks.
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: Just because something's not worse than being murdered doesn't mean
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: that it's not terrible. Feminists can't understand that, and there's
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: a tiny handful of non feminists or anti feminists that
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: also can't understand that. There are varying degrees of things
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: that suck. Some of them sucks so bad that they're
• 20:30
  Speaker 2: horrifying and leave you with nightmares and behavioral outcomes from
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: trauma that you have to take some time to work
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: out and overcome so you're not fucked up for the
• 20:40
  Speaker 2: rest of your life. Right, But that doesn't mean there
• 20:45
  Speaker 2: aren't worse experiences that you could have, like, for instance,
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: thinking that your child is going to die. I had
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: that experience for just a minute. And if someone had said, well,
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: we can go back and take that trauma away, or
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: could take away the trauma of one of your rapes,
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: I would it. Hands down. I would rather not know
• 21:04
  Speaker 2: what it's like to think your baby's gonna die. Man Like,
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: more than anything else that's ever happened to me, that
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: was the scariest, hands down, single most frightening moment of
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: my life. So there you go. And the dumb thing
• 21:17
  Speaker 2: was it was over somebody's wording. It didn't actually that
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: there was no real threat to his life. There was
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: a threat to my life, but I didn't know that
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: in any case, So there you go. Feminist logic isn't logic.
• 21:30
  Speaker 2: Bucking feminist logic by going too far in the other
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: direction isn't logic either, And the reality is that true
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: logic is not even in between. It's off to the
• 21:42
  Speaker 2: side of both of those. And speaking of feminist logic,
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: and there are victims of being told that they cannot
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: the intersectional feminists cannot have their long march through the institutions.
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: And the first three things First, yeah, the first three
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: things on this list are undeniably long march shoot the institutions.
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: We have removed all consider of race, gender, or ethnicity
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: of Air Force Academy applicants. So, in other words, whether
• 22:11
  Speaker 2: you get in, it doesn't make a difference whether you
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: get in or not if you are black, white, male, female, tall, short, fat, skinny,
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: well maybe fat, I don't know, that might make a difference.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: But yeah, none of the things that are affirmative action
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: things DEI things make a difference in whether you get
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: in and what advice they give you on your direction
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: your study is really, really really not necessary. None of
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: that's necessary. And so they're mad about that executive order.
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: They're mad that Harvard University has been told though DEI.
• 22:47
  Speaker 2: They're mad that you two female military leaders were fired.
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: They don't even say why they were fired. They're just
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: mad that they were fired. The commander in chief has
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: the right to do that. By the way, can get
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: fired all the time. Yes, the link is in the
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: low bar to this list. Men get fired all the time.
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: Feminists never say anything about, oh it's discrimination to fire
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: that man. Nope, only if a woman gets fired, right,
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: But then I start looking at here we go Froze
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: twenty seven point five million in Title nine grants for
• 23:18
  Speaker 2: sixteen state service providers, including nine Planned Parenthood affiliates, reducing
• 23:24
  Speaker 2: access to vital healthcare for over eight hundred thousand Americans,
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: most of whom are low income. Right, so we know
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: what Planned Parenthood does. They claim to provide free services
• 23:38
  Speaker 2: for women, but then when you walk in the door,
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: you pay a fee. That's the first thing. The second
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: thing is they claim that abortion isn't their main But
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: if you tell them that you can either do abortions
• 24:00
  Speaker 2: or all these other services at a particular facility, but
• 24:03
  Speaker 2: you can't do both, they act like they have to
• 24:06
  Speaker 2: close those facilities down. So which is it. Do you
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: do so much abortion, you know, so many abortions that
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: that's your main income and you wouldn't be able to
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: support all of those other things if you weren't murdering babies,
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: or do you not need abortion to fund those? Because
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: if that's the case, you have plenty of opportunity to
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: just open up clinics that only do abortion and let
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: those be funded by abortion, and take the government funding
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: for the clinics that do pap smears and breast exams
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: and mammograms and all that stuff, and not associate. Don't
• 24:46
  Speaker 2: hold those patients needs hostage to pay for your abortions.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: And what does Planned Parenthood do? They throw themselves on
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: the ground, kick and scream, whine, cry unfair, Oh the humanity,
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: Oh how dare you? We can't we can't do that,
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: We can't separate those things. We can't run this without abortion.
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: But we barely do any abortions except for the fact
• 25:13
  Speaker 2: that abortion is actually when you count it as when
• 25:18
  Speaker 2: you count each abortion being done as the death of
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: a human being. Abortion is the leading cause of human
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: death in the world, including the United States, and a
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: great deal of abortion that's done around the world is exported,
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: specifically by Planned Parenthood. So I don't let anybody tell
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: you that's not their cash cow, because if it wasn't
• 25:43
  Speaker 2: their cash cow, if it was actually costing them money,
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: like they said, they wouldn't raise such a fluss about
• 25:49
  Speaker 2: having to separate it from everything else they do.
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: But we don't define these humans as humans, so they're
• 25:55
  Speaker 3: not humans.
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: I love that argument. I always like to ask people
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: what species they are. And fetus, by the way, is
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: not a species. Embryo is not a species, zygote is
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: not a species. Game meat is not a species, and
• 26:09
  Speaker 2: it's also not what is developing in your uterus when
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: you're pregnant. It's also genetically distinct from the mother because
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: it has the father's DNA. That's how you catch him
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: when you want child support from him. Therefore, it's not
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: part of her body. So it's technically people like to
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: make the personhood argument, and then they'll conflate that with
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: the humanity argument. It is a human death, It is alive.
• 26:40
  Speaker 2: It meets the scientific criteria for a living organism. It
• 26:44
  Speaker 2: is human. So it is a living human organism. And therefore,
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: when you have an abortion, you are having a living
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: human organism killed a.
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: Human is what we say. It is a man and
• 26:56
  Speaker 3: a woman of what we say. It is a genocide
• 26:59
  Speaker 3: is what we say. It is. You can it can
• 27:03
  Speaker 3: justify any atrocity by just saying it's not the atrocity.
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: Yeah, well, and that's another thing. So I start looking
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: into this, right, this whole what's what's the deal with
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: planned parenthood? What's their big complaint? So let's look and
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: it says Trump administration is withholding Orange Man is withholding
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: tens of millions of dollars from Planned parenthood clinics that
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: provide contraception, STI testing, and other health services to low
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: income Americans. Those they don't mention the biggest thing that
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood does and the thing that the fight is over. Nine.
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood state affiliates that receive federal money from the
• 27:46
  Speaker 2: fifty five year old Title nine Family Planning Program got
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: notices Monday that they shared with Politico informing them that
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: their funding is being temporarily withheld. The notice pointed to
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: possible violation of federal civil civil rights law and President
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: Trump's executive orders, including prohibitions on promotion of diversity, equity
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: and inclusion and taxpayer SUBSIDIAI subsidies, subsidization. If I can
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: pronounce things right today of open borders, so diversity, equity
• 28:21
  Speaker 2: and inclusion, Why would they say that? Why why would
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: they say that at all about Planned Parenthood? Well, the
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: letter to Planned Parenthood chapters, many of whom many of
• 28:34
  Speaker 2: them in GOP controlled states, oh NO, cites the clinics,
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: mission statements and other public documents that stress a commitment
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: to black communities as evidence of their non compliance. And
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: what is what is Planned Parenthood's commitment to black communities? Well,
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: if you look at their abortion clinics. They placed them
• 28:56
  Speaker 2: strategically in black communities, in urban centers, in neighborhoods where
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: the income is low and women are likely to act
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: out of desperation. So the women of Planned Parenthood. Planned
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: Parenthood is mostly a women run organization. The women of
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: Planned Parenthood are praying on the fears and desperation of
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: women in poor communities where black single mothers are disproportionately
• 29:26
  Speaker 2: represented and per capita as a result. In part of this,
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: because they they're promoting abortion to this population. Specifically, black
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: women outnumber white women per capita five to one in abortions.
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: Now in raw numbers, they don't because in raw numbers,
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: white women outnumber Black women significantly, but that's still a genocide.
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: Can you imagine this has been this way since abortion
• 29:55
  Speaker 2: was legalized, and actually even before. Can you imagine the
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: different parents, the larger voting block that the Black population
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: in the United States could be with less abortion in
• 30:11
  Speaker 2: the country, with maybe just taking that ratioed from one
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: from five to one down to one to one, or
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: just eliminating it altogether, the black population would have grown
• 30:25
  Speaker 2: to become a closer population in size to the white population.
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: If planned parenthood had not interfered. So if we discuss
• 30:40
  Speaker 2: disadvantaged populations that can't get out of their disadvantage situations
• 30:46
  Speaker 2: because they are outvoted by majority populations, say minority populations
• 30:51
  Speaker 2: that are always outvoted, and let's say the black population
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: is always outvoted because they are a minority population, well
• 30:59
  Speaker 2: planned parent hood is partly to blame for that. It
• 31:01
  Speaker 2: is directly their fault, given how many of them they
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: have taken out before they were born, much less old
• 31:11
  Speaker 2: enough to vote. We have a super child from John
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: Doe for five dollars said, there's a video of X
• 31:17
  Speaker 2: on X of an IDF soldier raping a man. The
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: IDF pig who raped the Palestinian man with a baton
• 31:24
  Speaker 2: and caused internal damage to his intestines was celebrated and
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: Israelized protested to allow the idea to rape Palestinian men.
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: This reminds me of the sixteen year old Palestinian boy
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: who is brutally murdered by the IDEF. They poured gasoline
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: down his throat and let him on fire like a candle.
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: This is this is one of those things that feminists
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: gloss over as well. And this is in a lot
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: of different foreign countries. There have been story after story
• 31:53
  Speaker 2: of soldiers, male soldiers that have been captured by enemy
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: soldiers that had been treated as Between Israel and Palestine,
• 32:05
  Speaker 2: that kind of stuff is happening on both sides, and
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: that's the same thing happens in the Congo. The same
• 32:11
  Speaker 2: thing has been reported in nations in all over South
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: America and Africa. There are occasional stories you hear about
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: that when you dig really deep into the lore of
• 32:26
  Speaker 2: World Wars one and two, and in Middle Eastern nations
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: when they're at or this is a common thing. We
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: always hear about it being used as a weapon against women,
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: but it is much more frequently used as a weapon
• 32:38
  Speaker 2: against men, and it's much more frequently used in a
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: way that does a lot more bodily damage. It's a
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: rabbit hole that I don't advise going down unless you
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: have a really strong stomach for gore. But in any case,
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: playing parenthood things. So we're not going to read this
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: whole thing, but it's just going to.
• 32:59
  Speaker 3: Say it's pretty hard that people are arguing over a
• 33:03
  Speaker 3: concept of birthright citizenship right now in countries where people
• 33:08
  Speaker 3: don't even have a birthright, like a right to birth,
• 33:14
  Speaker 3: otherwise known as a right to life, and that really
• 33:18
  Speaker 3: is a human right, by the way, inalienable to any
• 33:22
  Speaker 3: country or government. It doesn't involve having a right to
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: anyone else's labor unless you count the woman in question
• 33:29
  Speaker 3: going into labor. I suppose, I suppose it's unhelpful that
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: we have the same word for two different things. Labour
• 33:38
  Speaker 3: can mean doing physical work, either as a paid employee
• 33:43
  Speaker 3: or as a slave, or it can mean giving birth
• 33:47
  Speaker 3: to a child that in ninety nine of cases you
• 33:51
  Speaker 3: made a series of choices that led to that birth.
• 33:55
  Speaker 3: And this is why there's so much conflation between what
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: the working class have to go through and what women
• 34:01
  Speaker 3: have to go through, because we call it the same
• 34:03
  Speaker 3: thing is labor. And this is and this is why
• 34:06
  Speaker 3: communism took off so much more when it comes to
• 34:09
  Speaker 3: the the mother kind of labor than it did to
• 34:12
  Speaker 3: the slave kind of labor. Like neither of these things
• 34:17
  Speaker 3: are necessarily always involuntary. The fact, in the majority of
• 34:21
  Speaker 3: the cases they are voluntary, but in the in the
• 34:25
  Speaker 3: case of women, it's it's something they kind of have
• 34:29
  Speaker 3: to do to keep the species going, and it's something
• 34:31
  Speaker 3: that they invite upon themselves. Every time they have sex,
• 34:36
  Speaker 3: whereas the labor that men have to go through is
• 34:38
  Speaker 3: very often not voluntary any more than the sex they
• 34:41
  Speaker 3: had was volunteering themselves to become a father. Although you
• 34:46
  Speaker 3: could argue either way, and it's yeah, I lost my
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: thought process there, but you can see where you can
• 34:55
  Speaker 3: see where I'm coming from, right, But.
• 34:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, definitely, And you know, I understand why labor is
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: called labor because it's hard. Mine was very difficult. That's
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: why I thought my son was going to die and
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: we had to have an emergency sea section because without
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: the sea section, his life actually was threatened. But basically
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: they said, this is our last chance. In the middle
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: of that sea section, when they were trying to get
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: him out, dude found out who was in charge at
• 35:24
  Speaker 2: the time and hold up in the rib cage and
• 35:26
  Speaker 2: they had to go in after him with a knife.
• 35:28
  Speaker 2: But they thought they were going to have to make
• 35:29
  Speaker 2: a second cut to get him out, but they didn't, like,
• 35:32
  Speaker 2: I don't have two sea sections, cars or anything like that.
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: But all turned out well in the end, But it
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: was a lot of work, twenty seven hours of really
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: being in stage being in stage four for the majority
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: of it and not being able to figure out why
• 35:48
  Speaker 2: the baby couldn't get any further because I had an
• 35:51
  Speaker 2: inexperienced nurse who thought he was smaller than he really was.
• 35:54
  Speaker 2: Really not a good story, and I have known women
• 35:58
  Speaker 2: who have had worse ones than me. One of my
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: friends was in in the first stage of labor for
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: a month and they kept telling her it was Braxton Hicks,
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: and then she went to She went to the hospital
• 36:10
  Speaker 2: because she could feel that something was wrong, and it
• 36:13
  Speaker 2: turned out that she was also way overdue by the
• 36:16
  Speaker 2: way that it turned out that the umbilical cord was
• 36:20
  Speaker 2: wrapped around her son's neck. Miracle of miracles, that actually
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: turned out okay too, and he manages he is the
• 36:30
  Speaker 2: manager of a fast food restaurant now like, but that
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: was another instance where you know, she could have lost
• 36:37
  Speaker 2: the baby because somebody didn't know what they were doing.
• 36:41
  Speaker 2: So but in any case, you know, none of that
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: changes the fact that pregnancy, especially from from the time
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: that the that spermicide and condoms became available, the first
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: really widely available types of birth control, especially long before
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: gen X started hitting the age where we could get pregnant.
• 37:06
  Speaker 2: It's voluntary from consensual sects because you can always use.
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: When condoms were invented, when rubber condoms, specifically vulcanized rubber
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: condoms were invented, vulcanized rubber diaphragms were also available made available,
• 37:23
  Speaker 2: so you had both and you can use both together.
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: And spermicide wasn't too far off from that. And so
• 37:30
  Speaker 2: if you use those three methods together, you reduce your
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: chance of pregnancy to almost nothing. Like you, it would
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: be enough to call it statistically impossible for you to
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: get pregnant from sex as a result of that, And
• 37:47
  Speaker 2: condoms have only improved over time, diaphragms have only improved
• 37:50
  Speaker 2: over time, and spermicide is still widely available. And we
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: also have other barrier methods. We have IUDs, we have
• 38:00
  Speaker 2: the pill, we have various other forms of hormone and
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: birth control that you don't have to think about every
• 38:05
  Speaker 2: day today, in twenty twenty five, there is not a
• 38:11
  Speaker 2: woman alive any United States who has an excuse to
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: create an unplanned pregnancy and then whine about how did
• 38:22
  Speaker 2: this happen to me? I don't understand. You have eleven
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: different categories of birth control available, many of which can
• 38:30
  Speaker 2: be combined. It is conceivable pun intended that you could
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: use four different things together if you wanted during sex
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: to avoid conception. And because we hold all the cards
• 38:48
  Speaker 2: when it comes to consent, we women are the ones
• 38:50
  Speaker 2: that if we complain that we didn't consent, everybody, from
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: the government to all of the assistance that's availailable for
• 39:00
  Speaker 2: sexual assault victims, to our friends and neighbors, we get
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: sympathy for that. Men don't, Right, so we can say
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: I'm not going to consent if you don't wear condom,
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: and in some countries you say that and he sealths
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: he can go to jail.
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 39:19
  Speaker 2: It's how they almost took down wiki links, like they
• 39:24
  Speaker 2: couldn't get him on espionage or anything like that. They
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: had some chick accused him of rape for not using
• 39:30
  Speaker 2: a condom during sex. But yeah, so there's no excuse
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: none for women to complain that they need abortions today
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: for convenience. But here we have this huge fight going on,
• 39:44
  Speaker 2: and yeah, playing Parenthood's big complaint is that they're holding
• 39:49
  Speaker 2: their patience hostage for their ability to promote diversity, equity
• 39:57
  Speaker 2: and inclusion and their ability to serve illegal immigrants. The
• 40:03
  Speaker 2: letter tied to the group for serving undocumented I love
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: how they always say to undocumented they're illegal immigrants, writing
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: that Planned Parenthood's funding is being withheld because the organization
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: overtly encourages illegal aliens to receive care. So that's it.
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: It's not that they're actually the government's actually taking money
• 40:19
  Speaker 2: away from just wantonly you know, like we're just being
• 40:23
  Speaker 2: mean to women who need pap smears and birth control
• 40:27
  Speaker 2: pills and you know, so on. No, no, they're they're
• 40:31
  Speaker 2: basically saying, yeah, you can do all that, you just
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: can't do these two things that you don't have to
• 40:37
  Speaker 2: do in order to You don't have to use any
• 40:41
  Speaker 2: political theory at all. In order to write a prescription
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: for birth control pills, you don't have to have any
• 40:49
  Speaker 2: ideology involved at all. To give a pap smear, right,
• 40:54
  Speaker 2: you don't have to have any belief system that you're
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: imposing on the people come to you for help. In
• 41:02
  Speaker 2: order to screen somebody for genital cancers. None of that
• 41:06
  Speaker 2: is necessary. None of the politics, none of the the lying,
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: none of the discrimination is necessary. You can provide those
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: services completely politics free. Doctors all over the country do
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: it in private practice that isn't federally funded. So on
• 41:25
  Speaker 2: to the next one. And we may get through just
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: two of these today. I don't know, but okay, So
• 41:32
  Speaker 2: that's their first thing. Now has admitted here by doing this,
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: that it is more important to them to promote these
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: Marxist ideas of diversity, equity, inclusion or affirmative action or
• 41:51
  Speaker 2: bridge is what they're calling it now, or political correctness basically,
• 41:55
  Speaker 2: than it is for them to serve the women who
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: they claim rely on them. That's the first thing they've admitted.
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: So that's the next thing they've admitted is coming up
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: in the next one. Restricted equal opportunity for women's service
• 42:09
  Speaker 2: members by eliminating lower physical fitness standards for women in
• 42:14
  Speaker 2: combat units. So let me repeat that, restricted equal opportunity
• 42:22
  Speaker 2: for women's service members by eliminating lower physical fitness standards
• 42:28
  Speaker 2: for women in combat units. So now just admitted with
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: that the women cannot compete with men. Women do not
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: meet the same standards as men in the same numbers,
• 42:39
  Speaker 2: that women are not equal to men. Everything a man
• 42:43
  Speaker 2: can do isn't necessarily doable by a woman. There are
• 42:47
  Speaker 2: things men can do that women cannot do. When there
• 42:50
  Speaker 2: are things men can do better than women can do them,
• 42:54
  Speaker 2: there are things men can do faster than women can
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: do them, and so now basically needs a leg up.
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: Now admits that women need a leg up from government
• 43:05
  Speaker 2: in order to be in the same workplace as men
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: in the military. Pretty sad admission there. Now they're next admission,
• 43:10
  Speaker 2: and I'm going to skip some here to make this point.
• 43:14
  Speaker 2: Let's see if this is where am I on this? Okay,
• 43:18
  Speaker 2: just making sure that's the right thing. Cut twelve billion
• 43:21
  Speaker 2: in Department of Health and Human Services grants two states
• 43:25
  Speaker 2: for programs involving infectious disease tracking, mental health services, addiction treatment,
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: and more, weakening already vulnerable public health resources. And that's
• 43:35
  Speaker 2: in March twenty six five. It says, see if I yeah.
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: So in the beginning of this this is the article
• 43:46
  Speaker 2: that it links to. I'm pure New York Times, right,
• 43:52
  Speaker 2: So you get halfway through the article and they admit
• 43:55
  Speaker 2: they stole this from NBC and the tay that now
• 44:02
  Speaker 2: is offering is the take that this article provides. Right,
• 44:08
  Speaker 2: But let's get rid of this because it's bullshit. So
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: the original article from ABC. I may have to move
• 44:15
  Speaker 2: things around here a little bit, but here we go.
• 44:20
  Speaker 2: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is pulling back
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: eleven point four billion in funds allocated in response to
• 44:29
  Speaker 2: the pandemic, in which they obviously mean COVID to state
• 44:32
  Speaker 2: in community health departments, blah blah blah. So this was
• 44:35
  Speaker 2: COVID money. So what they're saying is this COVID money
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: should have just continued indefinitely even though the crisis is over.
• 44:43
  Speaker 2: Would be like saying, you know that once FEMA establishes
• 44:47
  Speaker 2: their activities in Texas responding to this recent tragedy, this
• 44:55
  Speaker 2: recent weather tragedy, that after the waters have receded and
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: everybody that has had disaster hit their homes, you know,
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: has been re homed and the debtor buried, and people's
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: injuries are treated, and there isn't really anything for FEMA
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: to do there anymore, that they should build a federal
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: FEMA building there and remain and be funded because reasons
• 45:22
  Speaker 2: called mission creep, we don't have to find some other
• 45:25
  Speaker 2: work to do there, right, and in order to continue
• 45:28
  Speaker 2: to just forever be funded by the federal government just
• 45:32
  Speaker 2: sitting around in Texas disaster reliefing some other thing, you know,
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: whatever they can come up with. Like that's essentially the
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: argument that is being made here with regard to these funds.
• 45:46
  Speaker 2: So feminists admit here first of all, that they think
• 45:49
  Speaker 2: this is a women's issue. This is all welfare. This
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: money is all money that is established for social services
• 45:58
  Speaker 2: for low income individuals. We got a super child from
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: Meredith g. She says, honey for the badgers. So let's
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: try to reconcile that for the abortion legal cases, fetus
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: isn't human deserving of rights. But for the birthright citizenship
• 46:14
  Speaker 2: legal cases, the fetus has rights of citizenship and should
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: be granted class certification for a class action lawsuit. Also,
• 46:21
  Speaker 2: the necessary health services offered by Planned parenthod is a
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: stand of care, standard of care for a woman to
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: obtain a prescription contraceptive. That they are not offering those
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: services as part of an annual wellness examination. Yeah, here's
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: the thing with Planned Parenthood. Okay, we have this whole
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: organization that's federally funded to provide health care services for women.
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: What organization does that for men?
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: Like?
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: I need a cricket sound effect here for this. There
• 46:48
  Speaker 2: isn't one. You know, planned Parenthood claims to offer services
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: for men. There aren't as many clinics that do anything
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: that have anything available for men, and those that do
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: do not do nearly as much. They don't they don't
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: actually have that many men coming in for services. And
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: if you're not on Medicaid, they're they're charging you money
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: and so it's not free. They're not doing as much
• 47:14
  Speaker 2: for men. I suppose you could say the VA hospitals
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: are more for men. They're the parenthood of men. If
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: you if you get get sent to war and fight
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: for your country, then you could get you can get
• 47:29
  Speaker 2: your medical services paid for. Aside from that, according to
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: the federal government, if you're if you're a man in
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: this country, you can just fucking die, like, unless you
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: have children, they don't care. They don't fund anything for you,
• 47:46
  Speaker 2: and make sure shit aren't gonna fund anything to prevent
• 47:48
  Speaker 2: you from having children because then you're not useful. So yeah,
• 47:52
  Speaker 2: with this one, they're admitting that women are financially dependent
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: on the federal government. But what that means is that
• 48:01
  Speaker 2: women are financially dependent on men. So I looked up
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: what percentage of US tax dollars are paid by male taxpayers,
• 48:10
  Speaker 2: and of course the AI overview sort of try to
• 48:12
  Speaker 2: be politically correct about this. Well, there's no way to
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: figure that out, right, But then it gives this. However,
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: some studies provide insights into the general trend, and this
• 48:24
  Speaker 2: is the one I think is the single most important.
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: Right here, a study found that unmarried male filers had
• 48:31
  Speaker 2: an average tax liability of five two hundred and twenty
• 48:34
  Speaker 2: one dollars compared to two thy six hundred and thirty
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: nine for unmarried female filers. So given equal status unmarried
• 48:43
  Speaker 2: and filing a tax returned. So no, no one person
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: being head of the household, any other person isn't affecting it.
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: You're you're, it's both both are considered. If there is
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: a household, they would be considered head of the household.
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: If they have children, their head of the household. Right,
• 48:59
  Speaker 2: and men's tax liability is doubled out of women, and
• 49:04
  Speaker 2: of course among men and women in general, you have
• 49:09
  Speaker 2: it drops down here. It's generally understood that men, having
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: higher average incomes and potentially different filing statuses and deductions,
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: tend to contribute a larger portion of income taxes compared
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: to women. So what feminists are saying is they want
• 49:24
  Speaker 2: that big chunk of men's taxes. Mostly men's taxes, men
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: are paying double that of women, and then women get
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: all these benefits. They get welfare benefits if they are
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: unwed or low income mothers. There's food stamps, there's rental
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: assistants or other forms of housing assistance. The Department of
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: Health and Human Services can even help you pay for
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: a car. For a long time, there was childcare assistance.
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: I don't know if that's still a thing, but I
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: believe it was called Title twenty. And at one point
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: I looked into being a provider, and when I started
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: looking into the experiences of other providers, I decided that
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: that wasn't gonna be a thing for me. We'll just
• 50:05
  Speaker 2: say that if you do it in your home, you
• 50:07
  Speaker 2: need to lie spray your carpets every day. It's bad.
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: But in any case, yeah, they just want men to
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: be tax to pay for women's choices. When you look
• 50:17
  Speaker 2: at my ex account and you go to my main
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: page that has my history and not whatever just shows
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: up in your feed and you see, you know, a
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: little picture that I have and everything with the blue
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: hair girl with the red pill behind it is my banner.
• 50:32
  Speaker 2: Instead of a nice picture and everything up there, I
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: just have a black screen with white text that says
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: in all capital letters, stop paying women to make stupid choices,
• 50:44
  Speaker 2: and the reason is because it's fucking expensive. And it's
• 50:48
  Speaker 2: not just expensive in one way. So here we have,
• 50:52
  Speaker 2: you know, the majority of taxes are paid by men.
• 50:55
  Speaker 2: The majority of taxes are paid by men. It's demonstrable
• 50:58
  Speaker 2: through studies on who's paying what. Women are more likely
• 51:02
  Speaker 2: to qualify for benefits, so they're not paying as much
• 51:06
  Speaker 2: tax as because of that earned income tax credit, child
• 51:09
  Speaker 2: tax credit, so they're they're less liable partly because of that.
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: And then after not getting taxed as much because they
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: have children, then they also are more likely to be
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: eligible for all of those social safety nets, Medicaid CHIP.
• 51:28
  Speaker 2: I don't know if CHIP is still considered a thing,
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: but there's Medicaid for children, there's Medicaid for parents with
• 51:34
  Speaker 2: dependent children who are under a certain income level, and
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: most of those parents are single moms. So then you
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: have on top of that, like if you add the
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: effects of raising a child in a family without an
• 51:52
  Speaker 2: involved father, children of involved fathers are more likely to
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: grow up to become on web parents. They're fifty percent
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: more likely to grow up to become unwed parents, and
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: they are fifty percent more likely to end up on welfare.
• 52:06
  Speaker 2: If they're boys, they're fifty percent more likely than children
• 52:10
  Speaker 2: raised with involved fathers to grow up and get into
• 52:13
  Speaker 2: trouble with the law. So in addition to taking men's
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: tax dollars and spending them not paying taxes themselves, they're
• 52:26
  Speaker 2: also the cause of future tax liabilities in the next
• 52:30
  Speaker 2: generation in multiple ways. Stop paying women to make stupid choices.
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: It's fucking expensive. Then the next one that I was
• 52:41
  Speaker 2: going to look at here, I mean to skip several
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: maybe come back to those later, but there it.
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: Is all right.
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: This one kind of hit me too as I was
• 52:49
  Speaker 2: going through, and I wanted to talk about it today,
• 52:52
  Speaker 2: even though it's on a different page. So we have
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: reduced accessibility to Social Security benefit applications for those outside
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: of the United States. Social Security is our pensioner system,
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: our state run, government run pensioner system. Like you can
• 53:09
  Speaker 2: contribute to your own pension, and your employer can contribute
• 53:12
  Speaker 2: to a pension. I have a pension fund with my
• 53:14
  Speaker 2: employer if you work for years and years for the
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: same company, like a lot of people will have a
• 53:19
  Speaker 2: teaching career where they work for thirty years. When they retire,
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: they have contributed to a fund that then pays them
• 53:26
  Speaker 2: a retirement income. Right, But the Social Security system was
• 53:33
  Speaker 2: created for people who do not have that, and it's
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: now being used for everybody's eligible to receive social inco
• 53:42
  Speaker 2: security income. But if you've got retirement income, you can
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: get taxed on it. I shouldn't say everybody, because if
• 53:49
  Speaker 2: you're a school teacher, you're not. If you retire from
• 53:52
  Speaker 2: school teaching, it's not. There's different legal stipulations. You're not
• 53:56
  Speaker 2: necessarily eligible for both because it's also a state run
• 54:01
  Speaker 2: retirement system, but you still have to pay into it,
• 54:03
  Speaker 2: so the government does double dipping, but they don't want
• 54:06
  Speaker 2: you to double dip back. But in any case, they're
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: mad here, right, because the Trump administration apparently reduced accessibility
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: to Social Security benefit applications and changes by requiring in
• 54:21
  Speaker 2: person or online identity verification. So, in other words, they're
• 54:26
  Speaker 2: upset that the Trump administration made it more difficult to
• 54:31
  Speaker 2: defraud the Social Security system. Now, why would they be
• 54:35
  Speaker 2: upset about that? Oh, yeah, that's right. They're protecting illegal
• 54:38
  Speaker 2: immigrants and stuff eliminating phone verification options. What's a lot
• 54:41
  Speaker 2: more difficult to verify by phone. You can provide actual
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: ID online or in person. But in a phone call,
• 54:52
  Speaker 2: you're not showing somebody like your driver's license, your state ID,
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: your birth certificate, your Social Security card, none of that.
• 54:59
  Speaker 2: You're having a conversation. Right. You might hand over a
• 55:02
  Speaker 2: number and tell somebody a number, but you can't. You're
• 55:06
  Speaker 2: not proving that that's yours. You don't even have to
• 55:09
  Speaker 2: prove you have it in your possession. The majority of
• 55:12
  Speaker 2: adult Social Security beneficiaries are women, so I looked into
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: this right because they have they have a link here
• 55:19
  Speaker 2: women's stake in social Security. Women are the majority of
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: adult beneficiaries collecting Social Security is retired or disabled workers
• 55:28
  Speaker 2: and as wives and widows. So it's not just one thing,
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: right when someone When a guy passes away, there's a
• 55:36
  Speaker 2: widow's benefit. There's a benefit for his children if she
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: hasn't worked, if she may not be eligible for her
• 55:41
  Speaker 2: own Social Security, but she can get that widow's benefit.
• 55:45
  Speaker 2: It won't be as much, but it's still money the
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: government pays to her based on his pay in. But
• 55:53
  Speaker 2: retired or disabled workers is a different different story. And
• 55:58
  Speaker 2: then there's also if you get on disabil when you're underage,
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: you get full disability, but if you reach adulthood, you
• 56:06
  Speaker 2: have to work a certain number of years before you
• 56:09
  Speaker 2: get for full disability. So there's another program called SSI
• 56:13
  Speaker 2: Supplemental Security Income I think it's called, which is much
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: smaller than Social Security. But if you are deemed disabled
• 56:20
  Speaker 2: and you didn't pay into Social Security, you can still
• 56:23
  Speaker 2: get that, which probably the majority of that is also women,
• 56:27
  Speaker 2: because it's more likely for somebody to reach adulthood, not work,
• 56:33
  Speaker 2: but not get deemed disabled and then you know, so
• 56:37
  Speaker 2: many years later start collecting disability money. It says women
• 56:42
  Speaker 2: make up fifty six percent of Social Security beneficiaries age
• 56:46
  Speaker 2: sixty two or older, sixty six percent age eight five
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: or older. Women spend fewer years in the workforce. This
• 56:52
  Speaker 2: is familiar right here. Women spend fewer years in the workforce,
• 56:56
  Speaker 2: and they typically earn less than men when they are
• 56:58
  Speaker 2: at the workforce, which means they are less like to
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: qualify for a private pension, and if they do, it
• 57:04
  Speaker 2: will be smaller than the pension earned by men. So
• 57:06
  Speaker 2: when feminists talk about the wage gap and they say
• 57:09
  Speaker 2: for the same work, then they admit women spend fewer
• 57:13
  Speaker 2: years in the workforce. Well, that's not the same work.
• 57:17
  Speaker 2: So feminis is here with a social Security income. What
• 57:21
  Speaker 2: they've admitted there is that women rely on men to
• 57:24
  Speaker 2: work themselves to death so that they can have retirement income.
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: Even though they didn't work as hard or as long,
• 57:32
  Speaker 2: they didn't do equal work in the workplace, they didn't
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: pay in as much, and they're gonna outlive their their husbands.
• 57:40
  Speaker 2: Richard Bierre gave us five dollars and said, well, technically
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: piling piloting an armed drone from a shipping container sized
• 57:47
  Speaker 2: control room could be considered a combat role. The physical
• 57:50
  Speaker 2: requirements likely don't have to be as intense and something
• 57:53
  Speaker 2: that a woman could do while pregnant. Hence the maternity
• 57:56
  Speaker 2: flight suits. Just don't ask her to parallel park the
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: drone when returning from the mission.
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: Oh that's great.
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: Reality, though, when you put a woman in one of
• 58:04
  Speaker 2: those positions, that means that it's not open to a man, right, So,
• 58:08
  Speaker 2: if you if you create a circumstance where women don't
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: have to meet the same standards and they don't have
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: to be part of the same whatever style system, if
• 58:18
  Speaker 2: it's lottery, if it's a performance or whatever that determines
• 58:23
  Speaker 2: it that sends men into combats, into combat zones to
• 58:29
  Speaker 2: actually face bombs and guns and mines land mines IEDs
• 58:37
  Speaker 2: not to be confused with IUDs because that would hurt
• 58:40
  Speaker 2: really bad. Basically, you're putting it creating a situation where
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: if a man is eligible, he's forced to do that
• 58:49
  Speaker 2: because the women get all the cushy jobs because they
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: couldn't meet the physical standards because they are not equal
• 58:55
  Speaker 2: to the men. And remember it's been a month or two,
• 59:01
  Speaker 2: but we went through and examined some of the requirements
• 59:07
  Speaker 2: involved some of the things that the military has been
• 59:10
  Speaker 2: having to do in order to adjust the military environment
• 59:16
  Speaker 2: to accommodate women. And it was pretty obvious by the
• 59:19
  Speaker 2: time we were done. It is it is not cost
• 59:22
  Speaker 2: effective to have women in the military at all. It's
• 59:26
  Speaker 2: a sad thing. There may be other support jobs that
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: women could do that are not you know, that are
• 59:32
  Speaker 2: not military jobs that you could draft women into that
• 59:37
  Speaker 2: are civilian jobs, but the expenses related to accommodating women
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: in the military. You don't have to accommodate men in
• 59:48
  Speaker 2: the military. They just mold men into what they want
• 59:52
  Speaker 2: men to be and impose upon men what they want
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: men to do. Right, but they have to accommodate women
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: in the military because women are not equal to men.
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 2: Women are not physically equal to men, and women are
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 2: not psychologically equal to men. Wow, Chris, even if stopped
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 2: clock is right twice a day? Uh, if it's if
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: it's analog, Yeah, there there is no draft. Well, there
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 2: is no draft. Is a is a bullshit argument. I
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: will give you this though. Right now, they haven't gone
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: into the second stage of the draft, where they actually
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 2: start calling people up and saying come in. We are
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: only in the first stage where they make you register. Well,
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 2: they don't make you register because you're a chick, right,
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: They didn't make me register because I'm a chick. They
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 2: made my brother register, they made my husband register, they
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 2: made my son register, they made my father register during
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 2: the Vietnam War. You're right, Uh, broken or stopped doesn't matter. Actually,
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 2: obviously you're young enough that you've never had a VCR.
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 2: That clock's not broken. It's just not set because why bother.
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 2: In any case, the first stage of the draft is
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: selective service, and selective service basically imposes upon every man.
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 2: There are men that I take care of in the
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 2: work that I do, who not only cannot hold a job,
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 2: they can't even hold a spoon. Okay, there's some of
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 2: them that can't even hold a spoon, can't stand up
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: by themselves, or can't stand up guests who had to
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 2: register for the draft when they turned eighteen. Those guys
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 2: had to register for the draft, but I enable bodied
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: women did not. Now I'm all for our arguments to
• 1:01:37
  Speaker 2: end selective service and eliminate the possibility of any future.
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: Moved to the second stage where they start calling men
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: up and forcing them to go into training to prepare
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 2: them to go to war. But the idea that it
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 2: should be imposed on men and nothing should be imposed
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 2: on women just bullshit. Albatross gave us five to No
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 2: statement came through. Thank you very much for that, Albatross.
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 2: If you had intended to send a super chow through,
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 2: you'll have to let us know, like a statement through,
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 2: you'll have to let us know. It's it's possible that
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 2: the system ate it in any case. Yeah, that's thank
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 2: you very much for that. Anyway. And but on to
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 2: go back where I was here, and I'll say, I
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: think I'm going to make this the last thing because
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 2: it's there's a nice divider here. So this one was
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 2: interesting too. Cut twelve billion dollars in Department of Health
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 2: and Human Services grants to states for programs involving Oh wait,
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: I already read that one, didn't I okay, so the
• 1:02:42
  Speaker 2: next one? Then the Department of Education. The instructed the
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 2: Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, to take all necessary steps
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 2: to facility facilitate the closure of the Department of Education,
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: and return authority over education to the states and their
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: local communities. And they claimed defied the Constitution by dismantling
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 2: federal oversight of education. Though defied the Constitution? Did they do?
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 2: I have it open? I look this up. There is
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 2: nothing in the Constitution that actually mandates a Department of Education,
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: like it's it's not a thing. There's no there's no
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: Bill of or nothing in the Bill of Rights that
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 2: says the federal government has to oversee public education. There's
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: nothing in the original Constitution, there's nothing in any amendment
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: after that explicitly states that the federal government must have
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 2: a Department of Education. So there there, that's just female hysteria.
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 2: But why would they want it federalized? Well, go back
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 2: to Title nine right. Title nine was created in nineteen
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: seventy two, and initially it was a law that existed
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: specifically to address a system of quotas that existed in universities,
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: reserving seats in certain professional areas for male students who
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 2: were going to go on and take jobs or start
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: their own businesses in those areas of physicians, attorneys, areas
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 2: like that. Back in the day, there were two factors
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 2: that kind of affected university's decision to do that. One
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 2: was women did have more of a tendency than men
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: to study for a degree, get that degree, and then
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 2: not use it to earn a living, not provide any
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 2: prestige from the university as a graduate from that university,
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 2: working in that field of study, and not make donations
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: to the university because they weren't making any money, so
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: they weren't they didn't have like some debt to the university.
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: They didn't, you know, of gratitude, and they might even
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 2: not pay off their college loans. Chris, You're almost right,
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 2: but not quite. Trump won because men out voted women,
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: and I hope they outvote women again in the next election.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 2: But in any case, so so back then, women started
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: doing more in those areas. Women started looking for more
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 2: prestige themselves in those roles, and so it became more
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 2: logical for universities to allow more women into those areas
• 1:05:31
  Speaker 2: of study. But the universities weren't keeping up. They had
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: started to keep up. The trend of having quota systems
• 1:05:39
  Speaker 2: like that was dying. Feminists didn't think it was dying
• 1:05:42
  Speaker 2: fast enough, so they got this law passed and so
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: by the time it went into effect, it was pretty
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: much outdated. So then there's this agency to enforce this
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 2: new law and they have very little to do, and
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: they're rapidly because coming unnecessary. Well, when you create, when
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 2: you build onto the government, just like with the the
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: welfare stuff that it turns out that that was COVID
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: funding that was being rolled back because the COVID crisis
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: is over and not permanent funding. And there's there's two
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: instances of that on this list. By the way, when
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 2: you create a law that requires some agency or department
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: to enforce it, you must have or board, you must
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: have work for that new government body to do indefinitely.
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: So as soon as that happened, they started in on
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 2: sports right, and in order to create work for the
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: overseers of the application of Title nine, they started attacking
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: men's Olympic sports. The justification scare quotes was there wasn't
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 2: parody of participation and universities in extracurricular athletic activities. In
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 2: other words, universities had bigger sports programs for men than
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 2: they did for women, and feminists assumed that this was
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: because the women were being discriminated against. What they ended
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: up proving was the women were less frequently interested. There
• 1:07:22
  Speaker 2: were not as many women at the universities that were
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 2: interested in athletic participation as there were men who were
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 2: interested in athletic participation. Well, what the Board of Educations Agency,
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 2: what the not Board of Education, the Education Departments board
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 2: that oversees Title nine did was they created a quota
• 1:07:44
  Speaker 2: system that required parody. So, in other words, if you
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 2: have half of your male students involved in some athleticletic activity,
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 2: you got to have half of your female students involved
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 2: in some athletic activity. And if you try to prove
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: that you don't have a level of equal interest, then
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 2: then you lose. You lose the argument you're not allowed
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 2: to have fewer women playing sports at your school. So
• 1:08:13
  Speaker 2: what ended up happening dozens of lawsuits, dozens of threats
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: to colleges for lawsuits, and so on. Because of this
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 2: lack of parody, and universities all over the country during
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 2: the late eighties and early nineties clear into the late
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 2: nineties started having to because they could not get They
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: couldn't get more women involved in sports. They couldn't get
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 2: the women to like they couldn't persuade them to do
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 2: like powder puff football or tackle football, or any of
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 2: the types of sports that men were involved in that
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 2: women weren't doing. So instead, they shut down the men's
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: sports teams that were not as profitable as their football
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: and basketball programs were. It's usually the most profitable or
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: their baseball programs the most profitable programs for the universities, right,
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 2: so there was a great loss of university level Olympic
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 2: wrestling and university A level Olympic gymnastics for men. They
• 1:09:17
  Speaker 2: would still have their women's gymnastics team, but they would
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 2: eliminate the men's right and so for years, like men
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: who might get scholarships for participation in those sports, or
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: men who might be Olympic hopefuls couldn't participate at the
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 2: university level, not because women were being discriminated against, but
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: because women were not interested enough in participation to equal
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: the interest that men had in those schools. So that's
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 2: where it went. So then when they got to the
• 1:09:50
  Speaker 2: point where they didn't have any schools left to badger
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: and threaten browbeat about participation, they came out with the Clariact,
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: which requi wired universities to start tracking and reporting on
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 2: sexual misconduct on campus. And they used as the excuse
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: the laws on sexual harassment in the workplace, where they
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: consider the academic environment to be a similar environment to
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 2: the workplace, and they treated Title nine as a means
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: of imposing the same standards and the same not necessarily law,
• 1:10:28
  Speaker 2: but policy on university campuses that get imposed on workplaces.
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: And it's it's a complicated thing in workplaces too, because,
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: for instance, if you work at a at at a
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: location where there is heavy labor being done, even just
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 2: occasional heavy labor, like carrying something heavy into a store
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: from a shed outside or a storage area outside, and
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 2: the manager imposes on the men on your staff that
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: they have to go out and get those things, but
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 2: the women don't. And one of the guy's complains about
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 2: the unequal treatment that's considered harassment of the women in
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 2: the workplace. Why doesn't she have to do everything I
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: have to do well, how dare you harass this woman
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 2: by suggesting equal standards be imposed on her In the
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: name of equality, University campuses started policing dating relationships university,
• 1:11:31
  Speaker 2: not the police rate. They created something akin to a
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: human resources department for students. They started policing conflict between
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 2: students that didn't involve sexual misconduct but could be called
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: sexual misconduct. So a couple dates for six months, they
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: break up, and they're taking the same classes and the
• 1:11:50
  Speaker 2: guy doesn't stop showing up to class. The girl can
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 2: now accuse him of stalking her, and he has to
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 2: go through an investigation. And even if the only time
• 1:11:59
  Speaker 2: she ever sees him anywhere is that he hasn't stopped
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: attending classes that they scheduled together and hasn't dropped out,
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: basically that that's considered harassing her. Had a young man
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 2: contact me, what do we do about this? And my
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 2: main advice, by the way, to any young man dealing
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 2: with anything like this on a university campus, tell your
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 2: parents what's going on and get a lawyer, because you
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 2: have equal rights under the Constitution and you cannot get
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 2: through this without a lawyer. It is imperative start documenting
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: everything and get a lawyer, and if you can help it,
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 2: avoid being alone. You know, bring your buddies with you
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 2: when you go places you know, and don't have anything
• 1:12:51
  Speaker 2: to do with the girl, and don't lack witnesses, credible witnesses.
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: But this is happening all over the cunty. There are
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 2: currently over eight hundred process lawsuits in the United States
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: as a result of what happened next after the Clariact,
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 2: you had twenty eleven the Dear Colleague Letter that obligated
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 2: universities to not just police and investigate and report to
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 2: the Department of Education, but then to also impose penalties.
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: So they now had to have these tribunals that were
• 1:13:33
  Speaker 2: like university court where they would have a trial with
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: the accused student being the defendant and the accuser being
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 2: like a plaintiff represented by the school against the other
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 2: student and railroad the accused, so that they were actively
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: getting rid of men accused of any kind of sexual
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 2: misconduct and the treatment didn't go both ways. Standards were
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: not the same as the legal standards in criminal court
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 2: for those same offenses. They didn't even have to be
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: as high as the university's own standards for other equal
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 2: or worse offenses. So that same student right that's accused
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: of that's accused of stalking, for continuing to go to
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 2: his scheduled classes after his girlfriend breaks up with him,
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 2: might be kicked out of school and blacklisted from other schools,
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 2: Whereas if he had beaten the shit out of another student,
• 1:14:38
  Speaker 2: he would have had more due processes in his hearing
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 2: and had a better chance at remaining on campus, like, oh,
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 2: you stole my French frise, I'm going to kick your ass.
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 2: That would have been that would have been more tolerated
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: than simply attending his scheduled classes because a woman didn't
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 2: want him there, So oh, there you go. Now we
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 2: have this situation where millions of dollars are being spent
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 2: by schools defending against these lawsuits, and hundreds of young
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 2: men have had gone into debt for an education that
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 2: they don't get to finish because the university campus was
• 1:15:19
  Speaker 2: able to deny them the service that they provided or
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: that they paid for without due process. And then on
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 2: top of that, if you have it the other way around,
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: if the individual is guilty but female, the guy still
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 2: can get in trouble. The Reason magazine actually reported on
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 2: a case at Amherst where a young man was passed
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 2: out drunk, was completely unaware of his surroundings, had no
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 2: memory of the incident. His girlfriend's friend was in his
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 2: dorm room and she sexually assaulted him, and then she
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 2: texted to her other friends about it a feeling worried
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 2: because it was pretty clear that she was the aggressor,
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 2: and so on, And then nothing came of it for
• 1:16:13
  Speaker 2: several months, and then a group of girls that she
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: was friends with convinced her to report him for sexual
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 2: misconduct and they kicked him out of school and he
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 2: had to sue. So, even when the woman was the aggressor,
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 2: even when the woman engaged in sexual misconduct, the school
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 2: blamed the victim because he was male. Now, if you
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: want an alternative, what should happen if there's a rape
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 2: on a university campus. The answer is really simple. The
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 2: same thing that should happen if there's a rape on
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 2: public transport or in the home or in a dark
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 2: alley downtown in the community, and neither of the people
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 2: involved as a university student. Exactly the same thing should happen,
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 2: whether it's on a university campus or not. Whether the
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 2: people are university students or not. The victim should go
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 2: to the hospital and ask the hospital to call the police.
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: You call nine to one one if you can't get
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 2: out of the situation. You don't go to some human
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 2: resources department to deal with a violent crime. Because if
• 1:17:13
  Speaker 2: you go to the human resources department of your university
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 2: and you let them be the ones to deal with
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 2: the violent crime. Let's say, in case number five, right,
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 2: the guy was actually guilty, went into the girl's dorm
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: room founder passed out drunk in her bed, and raped her. Right,
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 2: go to the university tribunal. They find him responsible, They
• 1:17:37
  Speaker 2: kick him out of school and blacklist him. Okay, and
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: then what where does he go? What does he do?
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 2: The answer, I can tell you what. The answer is
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 2: not right. It's not jail. He doesn't go into a
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: sex offender program. He doesn't get any of the type
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 2: of therapy that they give to sex offenders. Nobody addresses
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 2: the causes behind his behavior, the mental causes behind his behavior.
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: He just moves on. But now he's angry because he's
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 2: been kicked out of school. And the less than six
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 2: percent of the population that commit rape are entitled. They
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 2: are violent outside of that situation, they engage in other
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 2: criminal behavior. Right, So you have just, by bypassing the
• 1:18:26
  Speaker 2: actual legal system, released an angry, fucked up person who
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 2: commits criminal violence back out into the community to go
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 2: hurt somebody else. What the hell kind of bullshit idea
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 2: was that? So the last admission that the National Organization
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 2: for Women has engaged in here is that they need
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 2: the beatings to continue from morale to improve, you must
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 2: not solve any problems. You must maintain systems that do
• 1:18:58
  Speaker 2: not work. Must give feminists control over educational environments and
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 2: impose regulations on educational environments that bypass the legal system
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 2: and reduce the punishment and therefore the ability to address
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 2: the behavioral causes of both men and women who engage
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 2: in sexual misconduct. In illegal sexual misconduct, you also create
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 2: punishments for sexual misconduct. It's not necessarily illegal in those circumstances.
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 2: So you basically give feminists the right to take away
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 2: somebody's equal access to education on the basis of somebody
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 2: else's feelings without proof. Feminists have admitted they need to
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: mooch off of men. They have admitted men and women
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 2: are not equal and women there are many things men
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 2: can do that women can't, and women are not as strong,
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 2: women are not as tough, and women cannot meet the
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 2: same physical standards. They've admitted that they are willing to
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 2: hold their female patience healthcare hostage in order to promote
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 2: ideologies that have nothing to do with that healthcare. And
• 1:20:15
  Speaker 2: they have admitted that they are more hell bent on
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 2: promoting ideology than solving some of the biggest problems. Like
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: remember at the start of the show, we're talking about
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 2: rapist feminist trump card. When they can't win an argument
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: about something else, that's what they bring up, right, It
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 2: is the most important issue for women that you know,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 2: affects depending on what research you read, anything from one
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: in five to one in three. And therefore it's a crisis.
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: But god forbid you do anything useful about it. How
• 1:20:53
  Speaker 2: dare you think that might be a good idea? And
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 2: that's feminism in a nutshell, that's the national in all
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: organization for women. They have basically admitted they are retarded. Oh,
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 2: with that, I think we've pretty much covered what I
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 2: wanted to cover today. I don't really think they are.
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: I think they're actually malicious, you know, But with that,
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 2: I think I will thank Mike for being here. I
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: know you didn't get to say much mine kidding, I.
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 3: Didn't think of much to say. You've like I turn
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 3: up on Tuesdays and Thursdays to make sure that Hannah
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 3: and Brian never have to do a show by themselves.
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 3: They can't, I know they can't. If no one turned up.
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 3: Hannah could breathe through this in two hours.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 2: I probably could.
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 3: Oh, You'll both have this ability that's frankly miraculous to
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 3: us introverts that you can just talk for two hours
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 3: and you never have to struggle to think of someone
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 3: to say. God, bless you, God bless you all.
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: You're a sweetheart. The thing is, I do love when
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 2: you go on a rant, though, I absolutely do. I
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: was I'm surprised you didn't about the taxes because I
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 2: I know that the systems in your country are pretty
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 2: much the same, and they're just there's different names and
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 2: some different wordings of policies and shit. Richard Beherre says,
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 2: we have an incoming super child. It hasn't showed up yet,
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 2: but yeah, so surprised because you're one of the men
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 2: who pays into that higher percentage of taxes. You're single,
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 2: and childless, and now technically you pay more taxes on
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 2: your income if your tax system is run like the
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 2: tax system is in the United States. If you were
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 2: a married father, you would your your income would be
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 2: taxed at a slightly lower rate because you would be
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: the head of a household that you would have dependents.
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 2: But because you are a single on you know, not
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 2: a father and a single man, you're end up you
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 2: end up paying more. Lauren's in the same situation. She
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 2: doesn't have children and she is not married. So if
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: you're single and living alone, you are not considered the
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 2: head of a household. You don't have a household of one,
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 2: so you're taxed at no dependents, no earned income tax credit.
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 2: I don't think at least I don't think like my
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 2: husband and I haven't been eligible for that for years.
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: No deductions for the things that families get, and so
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 2: you pay more per per dollar at the same income
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 2: level that an individual who was part of a family
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 2: would pay. We did get a rumble rant from Noba
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 2: fan twenty one, who gave us a dollar and said
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 2: the worst argument I've ever heard when telling a woman
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 2: that men are legally required to sign up for the
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 2: draft was women always wanted to join the military and
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 2: refused to allow me to counter women didn't always want
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 2: to join the military, and in fact anti suffragettes who
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: outnumbered suffragettes significantly when the suffragette movement started in the
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 2: United States. One of their main arguments was that they
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: did not want the draft imposed on women, and they
• 1:24:00
  Speaker 2: feared that if women got right the right to vote,
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: that that would follow, so they feared being in the military.
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 2: And even today, right now, any woman who is within
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: the age range that you could be qualified to join
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 2: the military can walk into a recruiter's office right now
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 2: and sign up. Any woman can do that. Nothing is
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 2: stopping you. There's no discriminatory law, policy, nothing that says
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 2: you can't sign up. It's like something like seventeen percent
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: now of the military is women, right, so fewer than
• 1:24:36
  Speaker 2: one in five soldiers are women. And then when you
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 2: get into the like the the more dangerous the role
• 1:24:44
  Speaker 2: the soldier is in, the fewer women are in that
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 2: part of the military. So, yeah, if women always wanted
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: to join the military, then why isn't it fifty to
• 1:24:55
  Speaker 2: fifty Why aren't women clamoring to be today included in
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 2: the draft? Why when they have the Women's March, why
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 2: is it that they have a whole page full of
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 2: women's issues that include things that are really not women's issues,
• 1:25:15
  Speaker 2: like the environment unless you count the fact that a
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 2: lot of environmental damage is caused by women's beauty habits
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 2: and women's birth control. But they didn't make including women
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 2: in the draft one of their issues. They didn't march
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 2: for that. There's not been a single women's March type
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 2: protest for that. They've protested vehemently for the right to
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 2: kill their babies, they've protested vehemently for sole control over
• 1:25:45
  Speaker 2: elections in the United States, but no protests for more
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 2: women in the military for some reason, even though nothing
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 2: is stopping them. Oh yeah, John Doe's got a good
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: point to you. All the SSRIs they take. More women
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: by far are on SSRIs than men in the United States.
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: You know, more, more women are contributing to the amount
• 1:26:08
  Speaker 2: of drugs, these types of drugs that are filtering into
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 2: our water system. So yeah, that's super chow. It is
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 2: not coming through, and it's it's getting late. Double check
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 2: and see if Brian can see it. It's it's just
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 2: not it's not coming through at my end, so like
• 1:26:33
  Speaker 2: it's not showing up in the discord where it and
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: I don't I don't have access to the background. Well,
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 2: I mean we read out the one about piloting and
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 2: piloting an armed drone? Was that the one that you
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: were talking about, Richard beerre because I I if it's not,
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: I don't know who got lost in the system, got
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 2: held up in the system or whatever. But oh, there
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 2: it is. It just came through. So Richard sent us
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 2: five dollars and said, I heard a story where a
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 2: man was accused by a woman and kicked out of
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 2: his university, transferred to another university, and the accusers notified
• 1:27:08
  Speaker 2: the new school and he was expelled from there too.
• 1:27:11
  Speaker 2: He then enrolled in a community college and the accusers
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 2: notified the community college and he was again expelled. He
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: landed some kind of unpaid internship, and the accusers notified
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: the employer, which cost him the internship position. And there
• 1:27:25
  Speaker 2: was a fifth instance. And I think that he did
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 2: file a law suitingast the accuser. Well, I hope he did,
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: because that is actually stalking and harassment. If a woman
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 2: does it in the court system, it's considered vexatious litigation.
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: But when they're doing it just in the public like that,
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 2: then then it becomes, you know, a different story. They
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: can't be legally stopped by the court system a vexatious litigant.
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: When you find someone guilty as a vexatious litigant, the
• 1:28:00
  Speaker 2: the judgment against them includes they can't engage in any
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 2: more litigation against the person that they were targeting. And
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 2: if their litigation had been had involved or included things
• 1:28:14
  Speaker 2: like filing false complaints with police and stuff, the police
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: can't even take their complaints against that person without a
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: judge's order saying they can make the complaints. So if
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 2: they want to accuse them of anything else, they have
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 2: to actually go to a judge and get permission. And
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 2: the case that got me started cont making contact with
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 2: Men's Rights Movement was a case like that, seven years
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 2: long of this vexatious litigant filing for frivolous restraining orders
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: and then making false allegations, and then the allegation would
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 2: be demonstrably proved false with physical evidence, and then that
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 2: would all get dropped and she would she would file
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: for a new emergency restraining order and start all over again,
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 2: and the accusation ranged from accusing him of rape, and
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 2: each time that she changed her story on that she
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 2: changed it to another time when he had physical evidence
• 1:29:09
  Speaker 2: proving that he was at a different location than she
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 2: claimed involved in something that was there were other people
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 2: around him, and the allegation couldn't possibly be true too.
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 2: She filed for a restraining order and then like a
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 2: couple of weeks later, accused him of a drive by
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: greeting that never happened. So eventually the court deemed her
• 1:29:30
  Speaker 2: to be a vexatious set again, and she cannot file
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: complaints against him anymore. She can't get a restraining order
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 2: against him, she can't file any kind of court motions
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: or anything like that. Richard throwing lawnmower case was another case,
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 2: and that one lasted twenty years. I don't have as
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 2: much documentation for that case. It was I wasn't right
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 2: there when it was happening. It happened to a childhood
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 2: friend of mine who really had He has a rough
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: time select women who are not psycho bitchit. But in
• 1:30:03
  Speaker 2: any case, yeah, what Richard Beer described in a super chow,
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 2: that's that's essentially the same thing as vexatious litigation. But
• 1:30:13
  Speaker 2: with universities. So now that we've read the super chow,
• 1:30:18
  Speaker 2: thanks everybody for listening, Thanks Mike for being a part
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: of the panel, and thanks for Brian for doing all
• 1:30:25
  Speaker 2: the work that you do in the background to make
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 2: this happen, and everybody else who works in the background
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 2: to make HBr talk happen. Good night.
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 4: All Men's Right activists are machines, dude. Okay, they are
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 4: literal machines. They are talking point machines. They are impossible
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 4: to fucking deal with, especially if you have like especially
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 4: if you have like a couple of dudes who have
• 1:30:46
  Speaker 4: good memory. On top of that too, Holy shit, you're
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 4: fucked