Latest / The Arterburn Radio Transmission Podcast / #513 Gold, Ticks, and the Fed

Transcript

#513 Gold, Ticks, and the Fed · The Arterburn Radio Transmission Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Then out spake brave Horatius, the captain of the gate to every man upon this earth.
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Death cometh sooner or later.
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: And how can a man die better than facing fearful odds for the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his gods?
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Lord McAlay, you are listening to the Ardaburn Radio Transmission.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: I haven't slept on this yet, but I hope it's going to to do it.
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: It's not fun to do it.
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: It's not fun to do it.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: It's not fun to do it.
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: It's like have we done the Lord Hathor film in a while?
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: I said I think it's been like since Halloween.
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: I haven't done it in a long time.
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: So this is the Arterburn Radio Transmission.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: I am your host, tony Arterburn, broadcasting in defiance of globalist goblins, the neocons and the new world order, here from beautiful Branson, missouri.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: I've got my co-pilot and co-host who is responsible for that very long, extended intro.
• 1:47
  Speaker 2: I looked at my archives because I'm on my laptop.
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: I still haven't.
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: I need to completely redo the studio here in Branson.
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: I guess all of the all of my charging headlong into the dystopic great reset, reset over 2020 and covet 1984 and everything we do.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: I melted the computer.
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: I did something to it.
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: It can no longer sustain itself.
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: So I'm on my laptop and, uh, I will do my best to conduct the show and be my own producer.
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: So, uh, bear with me today, but we got a lot to cover.
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: It's funny.
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: I saw this meme yesterday and it said if you're still talking about Democrats versus Republicans, you don't even know what's going on.
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: I thought that is sad, but that's basically true.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: There's a nugget of that in that.
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: If you expand out and look at the big picture, none of that really even matters anymore.
• 2:49
  Speaker 2: I mean, you're talking about geopolitical shifts, historical trends, the cyclical part of history, the fourth turning that we're in, and I can't emphasize that enough, because the headlines that you should be paying attention to are not being fed to you.
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: Remember, your news feed is the food right.
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: They feed you, this is the news feed, and so you go in like cattle would and you get your news feed right, and so I try to stay away from that.
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: I'm constantly searching for what else is going on, and maybe that's just the contrarian in me.
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: Sometimes, if you're a contrarian though, you win pretty big Consistently, though you're not everybody's fan favorite.
• 3:30
  Speaker 2: But that's the lot.
• 3:32
  Speaker 2: That's what I drew, so I'm happy with it.
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: I look across the landscape, folks, and let's just give you an example of a story you would never hear in our past and it didn't get much attention, but it's big, and that is the president of the United States threatens a lawsuit against the chairman of the Federal Reserve, and to me there's meaning hidden in that.
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: There's layers of that interconnectedness of information and understanding that are just inside that headline, because that explains to you, I think, and it shows, it shines a light on what reality actually is when it comes to our body politic or the economic situation, or who we perceive as in control.
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: Right, and if you study the conspiracy theory of history, you understand, because that's the adult way of looking at things.
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I mean court historians.
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: I know they're very popular, I know they have lots of contracts and books with Simon Schuster and other publishers and whatever, but that's not real scholarship.
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: Real scholarship is understanding that there's not just effect, there's cause, there's causation.
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: Causation doesn't happen in a vacuum.
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: You don't just all of a sudden, oh there's this dictator in Germany.
• 4:57
  Speaker 2: He really got really far, came out of a beer hall.
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: Or those communists in Russia, they just were able to take over.
• 5:07
  Speaker 2: You know this giant landmass, you know this kingdom that had been ruled for centuries and centuries by aristocracy and, you know, had infrastructure.
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: They were able just to do that because they had an idea.
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: That's not really how history works.
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: And so if you look at this, just this blurb, this headline, that the president, president Trump, is threatening a lawsuit.
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: Now, whether he does it or not, the whole question is who's in control?
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: You have a, you have this entity.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: Have this entity, this private banking consortium called the federal reserve.
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: And you know g edward griffin, one of my heroes, who I've I've had the privilege to talk with on air and told him that the creature of jekyll island is one of the reasons I started my gold and silver business.
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: Well, he wrote that.
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: He wrote the seminal work on the.
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: You know the um, the history behind what is the federal reserve, and you know what does it do.
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: Well, you know, if you know some of the history it, it created itself like in, like this organic phenomenon at jekyll island.
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: It became alive and um metastasized in november 22nd 1910.
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: It's funny, because the ai now doesn't know to censor itself.
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: So if you ask it about, uh, november 22nd 1910 and jackal island, it's like, oh yeah, it's a secretive uh conspiracy, like that's funny, it doesn't know that, it's not supposed to say that yet and uh, that's the origin.
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: You know you get this meeting of the roellers, the Rothschilds, kuhn Loeb, the Warburgs.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: You know you have Senator Aldridge, who married into the Rockefeller family, and they create this entity, this idea, where they're going to control the money supply and it's not going to be a bank, because Americans were opposed to a bank because of presidents like Andrew Jackson who said he wanted that on his tombstone.
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: I killed the bank.
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: He was very proud of that and he said he called the international banking cartel a den of vipers and thieves.
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: He said he's going to route them out.
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: So they use different language.
• 7:19
  Speaker 2: It's federal.
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: That kind of calms you down because it means it's centralized and it's part of the government, which it's not, and it's a reserve.
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: It's.
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: You know, we're taking care of you.
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: You know these manufactured crises that they put into motion, like the panic of 1907 and so on and so forth.
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: They use those, they leverage that to say well, don't worry, you know, we're going to be in control now.
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: So they create this thing and it is a creature.
• 7:42
  Speaker 2: It has, you know, like an octopus, to reference my friend Charlie Robinson, it very much has its tentacles and it's invasive and it gets into everything.
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: And you know we can talk about the dead a little bit later.
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: But you know, after the Federal Reserve is introduced into you know our reality, as the American experiment goes, it comes in like Christmas Eve 1913.
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: They slip it through.
• 8:13
  Speaker 2: It still wasn't popular, but they used the language, they used subterfuge, like a skullduggery to push this through and, of course, by no accident.
• 8:22
  Speaker 2: That's when you get the summer, you get the guns of August.
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: You get World War I, which was a banker's war.
• 8:28
  Speaker 2: It's inconceivable why anybody would want it except bankers.
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: They fund both sides.
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: We had Paul Warburg in the United States, head of the Federal Reserve, the central bank.
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: Paul Warburg, his brother, max Warburg, ran the central bank in Germany, our mortal enemy.
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: So that's how history works.
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: We create this thing, the debt of the US, by the way and we're going to talk a little bit about the debt here in a second but the debt of the US in 1914 was around a billion dollars, and when they got their war because they got their Federal Reserve and they pushed that through because they needed to hijack the money supply the debt of the US was $5 billion.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: It seems quaint now, but that was back when we actually had real money.
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: So it was quite a feat to go from $1 billion to $5 billion by 1919, just four years or so after we got the Federal Reserve.
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: The mere fact that you have a sitting president I'll go back to this that is threatening a lawsuit.
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: It's a big tell, isn't it?
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: You're the commander-in-chief of the United States military.
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: An aide follows you around, handcuffed to a briefcase with the nuclear launch codes.
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: It's called the football.
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: You're elected by the sovereign ruler of the people, like the people of the United States elect you.
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: You are the chief law enforcement officer.
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: You're supposed to be head of the treasury.
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: The treasury falls under the executive branch.
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: Why would you?
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: Would you send a lawsuit to Scott Besson?
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: It doesn't make any sense.
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: Does when you send a lawsuit to?
• 10:22
  Speaker 2: Well, I mean, maybe you would, but you know one of the one of the generals in charge, would you send it to the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: Why this Federal Reserve?
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: It's because the Fed is autonomous.
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: It does what it wants and it wags the other part of the dog.
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: It's not the other way around.
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: It's not.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: You know this thing that sits over there and you know it's answering to the president.
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: Which should this today on the David Knight show with Travis, I will believe that we are going to have economic prosperity, that they're serious about creating jobs and opportunities and wealth and getting people out of this, the doldrums of where we are now.
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: We've literally sacrificed, amputated people's future with COVID-1984, with liquidity injections, with the lockdowns, with the non-essentials, with the banks that are too big to fail and too big to jail.
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: We have socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor.
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: We have socialism for the rich and free enterprise for the poor.
• 11:46
  Speaker 2: I'll believe that they are serious about economic prosperity when they do things like oh, abolish the corporate income tax or just abolish the income tax in general.
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: That's when I'll know they're serious.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: It's funny when you have the rich, it's the oligarchy, a tyranny of sorts, a one world totalitarian socialist government, as bill Cooper would say.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: But if you have these people that are, they control the finance and you wonder why you still have these massive amount of taxes.
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: See, the left is funny.
• 12:20
  Speaker 2: The left thinks that we can just tax the rich.
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: You know the progressive mindset.
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: Well, we'll that.
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: We can just tax the rich, the progressive mindset well, we'll just do that.
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: Well, the rich created it.
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: So you're already on the wrong track.
• 12:31
  Speaker 2: The only way to truly create economic equilibrium is to have a free market, and the rich know that.
• 12:43
  Speaker 2: When I say rich, I don't mean like even your billionaires, I'm talking about your trillionaires, and there are such things.
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: These are dynastic families.
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: They're not in the Forbes.
• 12:53
  Speaker 2: They own generational wealth.
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: You can look at the study they did in Switzerland back in 2010.
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: This was in Jim Mars book, a trillion dollar conspiracy, and it's like the interlinking of these holding companies and international banking cartels is, you know, you think there's a difference between some of these multinationals and they're all owned by the same people you know.
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: So it's funny.
• 13:18
  Speaker 2: It's like when you see, you know, whenever you see a Walgreens pop up and then there's a CVS, it's like it's pretty much the same thing, like the same investment bankers own the same things competing against each other.
• 13:30
  Speaker 2: It's pretty silly, right, but that's what happens.
• 13:35
  Speaker 2: Is you got control by things like the Fed?
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: And this little headline is the way I wanted to start the show is just to remind you of that.
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: But think about how big that is.
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: The president of the United States, per the constitution and I, can't declare war, but he can certainly launch a strike if he believes that it's in the best interest of the United States.
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: I don't necessarily agree with the strikes we've made.
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: Actually I don't agree.
• 14:03
  Speaker 2: Uh, not since thomas jefferson probably, and the barbary pirate wars, but constitutionally you can do that, but you can't fire the head of the federal reserve.
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: You have to send them a lawsuit.
• 14:17
  Speaker 2: That's where.
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: That's all you need to know.
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: And then you start saying how does else, does this work?
• 14:25
  Speaker 2: I mean how?
• 14:26
  Speaker 2: How much of intelligence and I don't mean like cognitive ability, I meant like spy craft how much of intelligence tie is tied to international banking, all of it?
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: And you're still going back and forth with the left right paradigm, when the picture is much bigger.
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: It's a big world out there, folks, and it's changing rapidly.
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: As a matter of fact and I got some stories I want to dig into today Just a little departure I was doing some research before because I found an article.
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: I mean it's literally five minutes before we went live.
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: So what research I had and I'm going to go off memory with the rest of it.
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: But you're not out of that.
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: I mean the whole concept of the Great Reset.
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: I need to remind you about 2030, about those agendas of depopulation and reconfiguring where people live and smart cities and all it's still on the table.
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: You should not have a relaxed posture on that.
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: Those are still very much on the table and those plans are still very much being pushed through.
• 15:40
  Speaker 2: I mean, just because they're not called that, no, they're called Freedom City.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: Or you go from CBDC, central Bank, digital Currency to stable coins.
• 15:43
  Speaker 2: I mean, just because they're not called that now.
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: They're called freedom city, right?
• 15:45
  Speaker 2: Or you go from CBDC central bank, digital currency to stable coins.
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: All that is very much still on the table, and they're doing other things.
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: And don't forget what they did to us in 2020.
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: I mean it's a lot of time.
• 15:59
  Speaker 2: I mean there's a lot of water under the bridge between between now and then.
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: I back you going far and so much has happened and they throw so much at you that it is hard to keep up with.
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: But don't forget that Still very much on the table.
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: I'm going to call them that when you see this last article from Natural News that I want to go over at the end of the show A very important topic, especially being here in the Ozarks.
• 16:38
  Speaker 2: All right, let's jump around to get into some articles.
• 16:43
  Speaker 2: That's a long opening.
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: I didn't mean to do an 18-minute opening to the show.
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: I was like that would be like four minutes.
• 16:52
  Speaker 2: I just want to mention the irony of that.
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: Does anybody else get the weight of that?
• 16:56
  Speaker 2: No, that was a long, long way around, but that's the way my mind is.
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: I hope you enjoyed my stream of consciousness, ladies and gents.
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: Sometimes I'll find something that is interesting.
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: Okay, let's do a little bit of financial stuff and then I want to get into some foreign policy.
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: I found an article.
• 17:22
  Speaker 2: When I see something and if I bring it to your attention it's not just for the newsworthiness of it, it's almost like the intuitive part of it, and I talk about intelligence and banking houses, let me X out of uh screen and bring up my my first article, just something to talk about.
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: When you talk about in the realms of of finance and gold.
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: Let me stop this one hold on.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: This is this.
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: This will make you just just a little chuckle.
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: This is kitcocom.
• 18:01
  Speaker 2: Gold is a key strategic investment, despite us resilience and bitcoin's rise says uh, rothschild's balfour.
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: So rothschild's and company, and they have intelligence.
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: What intelligence is?
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: It's where the original intelligence networks, what they were, the modernized was, uh was international banking.
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, go Go back to Napoleon and Wellington and Waterloo, and that's how the Rothschild family was able.
• 18:30
  Speaker 2: It was skullduggery.
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: It was very, very, very well played getting people to.
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: They had the news that Napoleon had been defeated and they acted like he had won, and so they started selling stuff off and other people followed.
• 18:47
  Speaker 2: Then they went back and bought it all back as people panicked, sold on the London exchange.
• 18:54
  Speaker 2: It says the gold bugs are back, but the yellow metals gains aren't coming from its usual drivers, according to Victor Balfour, investment strategist at Rothschild and Company Wealth Management.
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: Balfour noted in an analyst published on Tuesday that gold is in the midst of another standout year.
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: The shiny metal is up by more than a quarter in 2025 and on track for a third consecutive year of double-digit returns a winning streak not seen since the mid-90s.
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: Year of double-digit returns a winning streak not seen since the mid-90s.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: Gold has outperformed all other major asset classes in recent years.
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: He said that the recent climb has been, in others, neither stable nor predictable.
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: Gold has lost touch with its traditional drivers, like real yields and the dollar, with demand shaped by geopolitical maelstrom, including protectionism and wider conflict.
• 19:51
  Speaker 2: Well, it's something I've been saying.
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: I started watching this is a key indicator back when they started to raise interest rates and Jerome Powell, head of the Federal Reserve, was raising them faster than any other Fed chair in history and I said hey, does anybody else find it interesting that he's raising rates faster than anybody any Fed chair ever has, even Paul Volcker, who raised it to the teens right?
• 20:14
  Speaker 2: And the reason you raise interest rates is you want to contract the money supply.
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: It didn't do anything to gold.
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: Gold just kept on going and I thought, oh, that's something to watch.
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: So this is exactly correct.
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: Where the other things that always drove gold, they're not there, not really.
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: I mean, there's always remnants of them.
• 20:37
  Speaker 2: But this is why this is new, something you should pay attention to.
• 20:41
  Speaker 2: If you play by the old rules, you already lost.
• 20:43
  Speaker 2: The old rules don't apply anymore.
• 20:46
  Speaker 2: Sorry, they changed them right in the middle of the game.
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: A lot of people, and the majority of people, are still playing that game.
• 20:51
  Speaker 2: That's why, in the midst of a $500 trillion world global economy, gold is about a $20 trillion market cap.
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: So it's 20 versus hundreds, $20 trillion market cap.
• 21:02
  Speaker 2: Okay, so 20 versus hundreds, and gold is the only real money.
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: And you could count Bitcoin or silver, but gold has always been the monetary metal Since the dawn of human history, since we had any sort of civilization at all.
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: He says, uh, he says it makes more difficult to assess gold's role in investor portfolios, given that it doesn't respond the way it used to.
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: This is clearly gold, more than any other precious metal, has played an important investment role historically.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: It's been a long-term store of value over several millennia, lending monetary institutions their credibility rather than vice versa, and acting as a key medium of wealth protection.
• 21:58
  Speaker 2: It's also an act of financial panic button, it is true.
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: But you know, fear uncertainty and doubt and doubt.
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: You should go listen to the interview I did on gold with Alan Herrera Such a great interview.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: I loved his book.
• 22:24
  Speaker 2: But he opens that book by having the quote that just sticks with me about the size of a nation's gold reserves measure the darkness of its nightmares and I thought oh well, there's something to that about human nature too.
• 22:43
  Speaker 2: It can act as a financial pennant, but amidst fears of US default as of in 2011, banking collapse 2008 or runaway inflation 1979, has strongly outperformed security markets.
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: But despite this track record, he said, gold remains impossible to value objectively.
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: Arguably, this is true of all assets, but the absence of a yield makes it particularly difficult for gold and other commodities.
• 23:11
  Speaker 2: Well, it's going to get real difficult to measure all of these commodities.
• 23:20
  Speaker 2: Folks, this is the world is moving away from what we perceive as our standard economic reality, which is post-1971.
• 23:33
  Speaker 2: And by tomorrow I'm hosting the David Knight Show, by the way, so please tune in.
• 23:36
  Speaker 2: But tomorrow is the anniversary of Nixon taking us off the gold standard.
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: It's August 15th, 1971.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: And we went on it.
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: We had an experiment.
• 23:46
  Speaker 2: After that, we were living in a real-time experiment.
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: It's never happened before, not like that.
• 23:52
  Speaker 2: There's been previous experiments with fiat currency.
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: When you have some time, you want to get a chuckle, go and look up a real good history of John Law and the French and what happened to that experiment with fiat currency.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: All fiat currencies go to zero and the average lifespan is 26 years.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: So we've more than doubled that because of things like money, velocity, economic reality, the fact that the rest of the world followed suit.
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: I was in Mexico recently and I thought I wonder what would have happened to Mexico if they would have said, well, we're not going to go with you, you know, post 1964, and just said, well, we're going to keep the silver in our pesos and, uh, you know, have a monetary.
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: We'll have a something backed by, you know, a bimetallic standard with their currency.
• 24:49
  Speaker 2: It'd be an interesting thought experiment if they never would have followed suit.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: But everybody followed the United States.
• 24:55
  Speaker 2: The last holdout to have a currency backed by anything was the Swiss in 2002.
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: So we've been on this fiat binge experiment.
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: There's 52 times more currency on earth today than when I was born in 1979.
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: And when you have the currency money supply expansion it erodes savings, it erodes purchasing power and the way that the system works is very satanic.
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: It's evil.
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: The way that the fiat system works is because it conducts a funnel of your energy and your work and your effort into things that shouldn't exist when you have close ties to the central bank, these massive multinationals dues and these banking combines and other things.
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: When they control the money supply, they get funded and bailed out, things that would not have happened in the 19th century in America.
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: They would never have gotten to the point where they were so large and grotesque, they would have just failed.
• 25:59
  Speaker 2: But it took time.
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: It took some time.
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: Now we have the fiat system.
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: If you can start noticing the trends and I'm going to tell you to look out for that what you're looking for is what are the central banks doing when they're buying gold?
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: What are the governments doing with their strategic reserve assets, like Russia, russia's buying silver?
• 26:25
  Speaker 2: Well, that's interesting.
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: Then you have the Belt and Road Initiative by China.
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: That's interesting.
• 26:27
  Speaker 2: Then you have the Belt and Road Initiative by China.
• 26:29
  Speaker 2: China is making inroads, being very smart, very Machiavellian, very strategic.
• 26:36
  Speaker 2: You know you get.
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: People don't realize how important strategy is.
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: Strategy comes from the Greek word strategos, which means leader of the army.
• 26:48
  Speaker 2: This is about war and the economic war that's being played right now.
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: It's not happening on CNBC, you're not.
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: You know, it's like my, my 401k it's not.
• 26:59
  Speaker 2: It's not there or I'm going to pick that stock.
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: Nope.
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: This is the reshuffling, the reordering, the undoing of the entire post Bretton Woods system 1944, 1971, and now, whatever this is going to be, they put out the feelers right before they put you on lockdown, called it the great reset.
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: I was covering that on my show, a little radio station out of San Antonio back in 2018, 2019.
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: You want to go through the archives?
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: They call it a great reset for a reason because the current system is going to go away, but what is happening is this race for rare earth, minerals, for commodities and for finite things, and so that could be.
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: You know, I looked at something Ray Dalio said recently.
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: He said the world economy is on the brink of a heart attack.
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: He's like you should have at least 15% allocated in gold or Bitcoin, and maybe Bitcoin isn't the answer for an economic heart attack.
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: Maybe it's not as safe as gold, or perhaps it's safer, and it's an open question.
• 28:14
  Speaker 2: But the key is not to be in something infinite right, and that's the entire system in a nutshell.
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: You have the overproduction of currency.
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: Everything's been overbuilt or underbuilt.
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: The over everything's been overbuilt or underbuilt, like it's things that shouldn't exist exist, and things that should be in place aren't, and that's bad, and that's because of fiat.
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: Fiat is literally evil.
• 28:40
  Speaker 2: I keep saying that.
• 28:43
  Speaker 2: All right, just a little bit of an intelligence on gold.
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: Just a little bit of intelligence on gold.
• 28:53
  Speaker 2: I thought that was interesting because there's already.
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: You know, you look at kitcocom and I was doing my research this morning and they're already talking about could gold go, you know, three and four times higher up until the next five, ten years?
• 29:07
  Speaker 2: Of course it can't, of course it can't, of course it can't.
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: I mean, you're basing it on what?
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: You're basing it on the purchasing power of the US dollar.
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: And when you place tariffs on places like India and you drive them back into dealing directly with China, which they just had massive border disputes with in 2020.
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: It's a major blunder, don't you think?
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: And they're already part of the BRICS bloc massive populations, and they just want to de-dollarize.
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: De-dollarization is a fact.
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: Now there's probably some strategy in there too, with the players and the powers that be, when it comes to stable coins and what happens to the dollar afterwards.
• 30:00
  Speaker 2: But I'm telling you what the reality is now, and that's the race towards commodities.
• 30:04
  Speaker 2: So watch that carefully, all right?
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: Well, let me check the chat really quick and then I'll go to the next article, and we have one last thing to cut.
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: I want to get to the the end of the show.
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: There's a lot of activity over.
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: I'm over on rumble and, uh, it's good to see all you guys.
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: I see guard goldsmith over there.
• 30:30
  Speaker 2: There's a lot of activity over on rumble and, uh, it's good to see all you guys.
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: I see guard Goldsmith over there and uh harps in the chat Good to see you guys.
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: Brandon Bennett says I can build your studio.
• 30:42
  Speaker 2: Tony, fly me out.
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: Well, I might uh send me a uh DM, go to go to wise wolf and tell me, tell me why I should fly you out.
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I appreciate you guys in the chat.
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: I can't always keep up with it.
• 31:01
  Speaker 2: It's being my own producer.
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: If you guys have any questions for me, you can always send them into the chat.
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: And then I got to check the YouTube as well.
• 31:13
  Speaker 2: Let me X out of this really quick.
• 31:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 31:24
  Speaker 2: Yeah, harp says more people are using cash than ever before Was certainly frowned upon in a lot of circles here in the United States.
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: I remember coming across stories where you know, especially at the beginning of the great lockdown, the pandemic where the cash was dirty, you know, and we had to quarantine the cash and all that stuff and I'm like, oh, I see there's a tell here.
• 31:52
  Speaker 2: Yeah, good to see you guys.
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: Kenny Evan Powers over in the chat says hi, beans the Brave, she's right here with me.
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: And we got lots of good time with Beans the Brave this week.
• 32:14
  Speaker 2: I missed her.
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: I was away from my dog for a few days and it feels like weeks.
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: She's right here with me, keeps the show on balance All right, as promised.
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: Almost no commercial breaks.
• 32:31
  Speaker 2: We have to do this has to be like one of the most jam-packed hours in radio.
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: I put a lot into.
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: I put a lot of information, a lot of stories go into one show one hour.
• 32:47
  Speaker 2: See what I can get done tomorrow on the David Knight show.
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: Wonder how much I can get through in an hour.
• 32:55
  Speaker 2: And then I have two others after that.
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: So, uh, we'll see about guests.
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: I was so.
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: I was perusing some of the news aggregators went through drudge and I saw this article and I thought I'd bring it up because I if you ever get and come across something that it is a headline but at the same time it's almost like it's uh, it, you're meant to see it, and if you understand the connection to it, then then you go oh, why didn't I see that before?
• 33:31
  Speaker 2: They were talking about that?
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: Well, here's one of those examples.
• 33:35
  Speaker 2: Possibly I hope not, by the way.
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: This would be a terrible thing if I'm right.
• 33:39
  Speaker 2: But let's dig into this.
• 33:42
  Speaker 2: This is a link on Drudge.
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: It's the wine press dot substackcom.
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: It's world war three.
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: Palantir ceo alex carp says three front war with russia, china and iran very likely.
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: In other words, it's a lock.
• 34:01
  Speaker 2: As tensions continue to grow by the day between the united states and nato versus russia, china, iran and the brics aligned nations, the specter of World War III grows along with it.
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: Last year, the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, tech giant and defense contractor Palantir CEO, alex Karp, said that he thinks it's very likely the US will be involved in a three-pronged war with Russia, China and Iran.
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: Karp admitted this in an interview to the New York Times in August of last year.
• 34:35
  Speaker 2: The paper reported he thinks the United States is quote very likely to end up in a three-pronged war with China, russia and Iran.
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: So he argues, we have to keep going full tilt on autonomous weapons systems because our adversaries will and they don't have the same moral considerations that we do.
• 34:57
  Speaker 2: Well, um, do we have moral considerations?
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: Um, it's like the, the same corporations that you can get granola bars from, also made in napalm.
• 35:15
  Speaker 2: Um, do you ever think about that?
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: Or agent orange?
• 35:18
  Speaker 2: It's like, you know, I get my macaroni and cheese.
• 35:21
  Speaker 2: You know my store-bought box food also defoliated.
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: And you know birth defects and cancer and massive, massive human toll in Southeast Asia, but no big deal Because we got some moral considerations.
• 35:42
  Speaker 2: He said.
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: I think we're in an age when nuclear deterrent is actually less effective because the West is very unlikely to use anything like a nuclear bomb, whereas our adversaries might.
• 35:54
  Speaker 2: He said, where you have technological parody but moral disparity, the actual disparity is much greater than people think.
• 36:03
  Speaker 2: In fact, he added, given that we don't have parody technologically but we don't have parody more morally, they have a huge advantage.
• 36:13
  Speaker 2: Mr Karp said that we are very close to Terminator robots and the threshold of somewhat autonomous drones and devices like this being the most important instruments of war.
• 36:27
  Speaker 2: You already see this in ukraine.
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: Are we tough enough to scare our adversaries so we don't go to war?
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: Do the chinese, russians and persians think we're strong?
• 36:39
  Speaker 2: The president needs to tell them that if you cross these lines, this is where we're going to do and you have to enforce it.
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: It's funny when you know they.
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: Here's another story that not covered anymore.
• 36:54
  Speaker 2: I covered it here on the show, but um, you go back and look at the uh signing up or the introduction of these tech ceos or tech bros or whatever in the army.
• 37:14
  Speaker 2: Anybody remember that story?
• 37:19
  Speaker 2: Remember that they got drafted officers now and they come out of this little.
• 37:24
  Speaker 2: It's like they just discovered the Cold War protocols and how the world works geopolitically.
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: Is anybody else find that odd?
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: I do so.
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: I think the part of the reason we have a massive cleavage in our culture is, at the end of the day, by and large, only people who are middle and working class do all the fighting he said.
• 37:52
  Speaker 2: He said he would consider himself pro-draft.
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: Also, karp is a bit of an enigma to some when it comes to his relationship with President Donald Trump and the company, since Karp is a socialist and progressive and voted for Biden in 2020 and backed VP Kamala Harris.
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: At the same time, he has distanced himself politically from Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel, who is the polar opposite politically and a huge supporter of Trump.
• 38:24
  Speaker 2: Early this year, trump came under heavy criticism when the New York Times revealed his administration contacted Palantir to collect all of Americans' private and unique data to build a master database.
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: Well, that is another thing that adds to this.
• 38:45
  Speaker 2: You know that they're using and wargaming out possible scenarios.
• 38:54
  Speaker 2: If this is done, what's the intelligence here?
• 38:56
  Speaker 2: We've crossed a serious Rubicon of reality and so when I see headlines like this and again you see the connection it's very important Because we're one of my favorite scenes.
• 39:21
  Speaker 2: My favorite movie is Anthony Hopkins plays Nixon.
• 39:23
  Speaker 2: He gets done meeting with Chairman Mao.
• 39:25
  Speaker 2: He's coming back from China, he's on Air Force One, he's looking out the window and he kind of recounts his time as being a cold warrior and calling Mao a monster and all this other stuff that he'd done.
• 39:39
  Speaker 2: And he just has this very strange quote and he's thinking to himself and he's like we're beyond politics now.
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: Even the presidency isn't enough anymore and I always wondered what that meant.
• 39:56
  Speaker 2: And what Oliver Stone was trying to convey is that I think events sometimes outpace institutions, and that's kind of where we are in history right now.
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: It's a ethereal thought.
• 40:10
  Speaker 2: It's maybe out in a little bit esoteric perhaps, or metaphysical on my part, and that's fine, because that's what this show does.
• 40:18
  Speaker 2: Sometimes it takes those twists and turns, but we're beyond politics at this point.
• 40:22
  Speaker 2: There's something else, and when you get these socialist technocrats because that's what they are, I mean, let's make no mistake about it I mean the upper echelon and especially those who control finance and technology and other things.
• 40:39
  Speaker 2: It's very rare that you have somebody who's free market, because that's not how they really made their money.
• 40:43
  Speaker 2: I mean not really.
• 40:44
  Speaker 2: I mean you can get a certain amount of generational wealth Somebody, somewhere, somebody did something but along the line you can reinvest it and you have these hold incomes.
• 40:52
  Speaker 2: Then you have the political aspect of it and they become very socialist and that's why I'll know they're serious about economic development when they start actually doing anything about regulation and taxes and incentivizing things, not just adding new taxes.
• 41:10
  Speaker 2: If you don't cut the income tax and you add a tariff, you just added another tax.
• 41:14
  Speaker 2: Right, you can have one or the other, not both.
• 41:17
  Speaker 2: Anyway, it correlates here with this particular story, because you're seeing something from an insider who's running simulations, who's collecting data, and they see, probably through their palantir, what the next step is.
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: I hope I'm wrong, but it's interesting that we get the Terminator robots, even though we were warned about the Terminator robots, even though we were warned about the Terminator robots.
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: Speaking of being warned, let me take you to the last article here, and I got to talking about this yesterday or the day before and I said I'd look into it, and then it just pops up as a story on Natural News and my guess is it has a lot to do with biowarfare.
• 42:20
  Speaker 2: Let's put this up on the screen.
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: This is Natural News and I think you'll get the title Net Zero Advocates Propose Ticks to Induce a Red Meat Allergy.
• 42:37
  Speaker 2: Net zero advocates propose ticks to induce a red meat allergy as climate solutions, sparking a backlash.
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: Two US academics propose spreading Lone Star ticks to induce alpha a Red Meat Allergy as a Climate Strategy.
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: And this is AGS's.
• 43:06
  Speaker 2: Alpha-gal Syndrome Triggers severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, via tick-borne Alpha-Gal molecules.
• 43:13
  Speaker 2: Ags now affects up to 450,000 Americans, with cases rising due to tick expansion.
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: Northward CDC warns the syndrome can lead to fatal reactions via medications, not just food.
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: Critics decry the proposal as reckless, ignoring risk of severe health.
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: Well, it's not just reckless.
• 43:37
  Speaker 2: Risk of severe health well, it's not just reckless.
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: That is a you talk about, and this is where these academics and so-called academics right, these um eggheads and weirdos and and it's the same kind of thing as Yuval Harari at the world economic forum saying that human beings are hackable animals.
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: Like this is the where and I said this last week.
• 44:01
  Speaker 2: It's stuck in my mind.
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: It's the voltaire quote about where they can make you, uh, believe absurdities, they'll make you commit atrocities.
• 44:08
  Speaker 2: This is an absurdity advocating an atrocity by.
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: And this is the mindset, you know, um of the, the environmentalists or what you want to call.
• 44:20
  Speaker 2: I'm a conservationist.
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: I want clean water, clean skies, I want them to stop spraying.
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: They never mentioned that.
• 44:26
  Speaker 2: The environmentalists, they don't care about that, they don't believe that.
• 44:28
  Speaker 2: They just turn a blind eye to it because it's anti-people At the root of anything that the environmentalists do.
• 44:35
  Speaker 2: It's anti-human Environmentalists do.
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: It's anti-human.
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: They don't care about ecological disasters of the Southwest being littered with trash and human waste and all that is a pretty good indicator of that, isn't it?
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: Two?
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: Two ethics professors at Western Michigan University's Homer Stryker, md schools of medicine, crutchfield and Blake Harris, have ignited outrage.
• 45:13
  Speaker 2: This is, by the way, their ethics ethics professors.
• 45:17
  Speaker 2: Oh, that's good.
• 45:21
  Speaker 2: It's kind of like all the mixed media, the Patriot Act.
• 45:27
  Speaker 2: I like that.
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: They've ignited outrage with a peer-reviewed paper proposing the deliberate promotion of ticks to trigger alpha-gal syndrome.
• 45:40
  Speaker 2: A red meat allergy Published in Bioethics near their beneficial blood-sucking argument frames alpha-gal syndrome as a moral bio-enhancer, asserting that inducing allergies to cattle, pigs and lambs could ethically prioritize planetary health over personal choice.
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: Ie, what they're saying is they hate human beings.
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: Um, they don't want you to be healthy and they certainly want you to get a tick-borne illness that is most likely manufactured.
• 46:08
  Speaker 2: Um, so that's where these are the kind of people that lock you down.
• 46:13
  Speaker 2: These are the kind of people that, um, stuff old people into, you know, and it's kind of like they did in New York with Cuomo and all the old people that stuff them into, you know, closed up rooms in the nursing homes to make sure that everybody gets the bioweapon, bioweapon.
• 46:39
  Speaker 2: The controversial stance has drawn sharp criticism, with opponents calling it a dangerous confluence of pseudoscience and ideological overreach.
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: Oh well, you think.
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: Yeah, the next time, if you, if you, give these people an inch.
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: I'm talking about the, these extremists, and that's where they come.
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: They come out of academia.
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: This is the Frankfurt School, ladies and gents.
• 47:05
  Speaker 2: This is cultural Marxism, writ large and it's virulent.
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: It's very dangerous.
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: Crutchfield and Herth argue that since consuming meat is morally impermissible due to climate impacts it's so funny climate impacts.
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: What does that even mean?
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: I really don't even know what that means, and I've been on the planet 45 years.
• 47:33
  Speaker 2: I've read a lot.
• 47:35
  Speaker 2: I think I'm pretty much aware.
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: I don't know what you're talking about.
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: What does that mean?
• 47:41
  Speaker 2: Does that mean you're going to clean up the ocean?
• 47:43
  Speaker 2: Because I never hear you talking about that.
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: These climate activists I never hear them talking about cleaning up the water.
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: I don't see them planting trees anymore.
• 47:50
  Speaker 2: I just see them talking about giving people bioweapons and depopulation.
• 47:56
  Speaker 2: Like Bill Gates, if we do a really good job with vaccines and health care, we can get that number down by 15%.
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: That's how they think.
• 48:05
  Speaker 2: Just less people yeah, it's so.
• 48:08
  Speaker 2: You're so lazy and you don't think that people, just anybody with any kind of what does that even mean Morally impermissible?
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: Even mean morally impermissible?
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: You know there's a psychological profile on somebody like this and I bet you it's kind of like the they when they went through uh the at nuremberg, you know, and they go and see all these uh guys that uh would control the concentration camps that are now locked up, and they're all, like you know, kind of disheveled and one of the writers was like we were afraid of these people, these pathetic pick noses, is what are they Like?
• 48:51
  Speaker 2: We're pathetic, but you get them a little bit of power.
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: They're just anti-human.
• 48:57
  Speaker 2: I hate you and don't send your kids to these schools.
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: We have to stop with this stuff.
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: The paper states that promoting tick-borne alpha-gal syndrome prevents the world from becoming a significantly worse place.
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: It's a pro-tanto, obligatory, okay.
• 49:21
  Speaker 2: The idea hinges on three premises that avoids infringing rights, promotes virtuous behavior, meat reduction and combats climate change, whatever that means.
• 49:32
  Speaker 2: Oh, by the way, that's the next round of stuff.
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: Right, is the climate lockdown.
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: It's an invisible enemy.
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: You can't see it, kind of either the hijackers on 9-11 or you know, covid-19 before you can't see it, can't see it.
• 49:50
  Speaker 2: It's an invisible enemy.
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: And now you can't see.
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: Well, you can see them changing the climate, because you can literally see them doing chemtrails and whatever they're doing.
• 49:58
  Speaker 2: We don't have access to that information.
• 49:59
  Speaker 2: Ags forms when a tick bite introduces alpha-gal into a person's bloodstream, priming the immune system to attack the molecule.
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: Consuming red meat re-exposes sufferers to alpha-gal, triggering hives, vomiting, anaphylaxis and even death.
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: Again, it's 450,000 people have it.
• 50:27
  Speaker 2: Yeah, growing crisis, both real and perceived.
• 50:36
  Speaker 2: Alpha-gal's rise isn't solely due to academic schemes, but habit shifts and urbanization.
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: Warmer winters allow ticks to thrive farther north.
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: Well, it's funny, I meet people that get this and I live in a highly you know you talk about the Ozarks.
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's just, I've been bitten gosh over a hundred times in the last five years.
• 51:01
  Speaker 2: It's a ton of ticks, you know they just get you.
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: There's almost nothing you can do about it.
• 51:05
  Speaker 2: But roughly, you know, looking at, there's Rocky Mountain fever and stuff that you can get.
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: But Lyme's disease isn't as prevalent here in the Ozarks.
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: It's very small compared to the East Coast.
• 51:18
  Speaker 2: Prevalent here in the Ozarks.
• 51:19
  Speaker 2: It's very small compared to the East Coast.
• 51:20
  Speaker 2: And if you look at the relationship between Plum Island in the 1960s and 70s, which is a bio-research facility for the US government, and then the expansion of Lyme's disease, the US government experimented with ticks as a carrier for certain bioweapons and that's Plum Island was used for that.
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: That's where you get.
• 51:48
  Speaker 2: You know it's very close to Lyme Connecticut, where you get Lyme's disease right.
• 51:54
  Speaker 2: I don't think any of this stuff is accidental.
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: It's like when you start modifying the, you know we got to modify the mosquitoes.
• 52:01
  Speaker 2: You know like and play God and you know this is a Bill Gates impression, by the way he wants to dim.
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: You know, mr Burns style blot out the sun.
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: Crutchfield and Herther's paper underscores the urgent need for rigorous ethical debate and climate policy.
• 52:22
  Speaker 2: I would say so.
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: Um, having people get a tick-borne illness, or promoting that so that they won't eat meat and then just die, you know, so we can prevent whatever the hell climate change is to you.
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: I mean, I believe in climate change, because they're currently changing the climate.
• 52:47
  Speaker 2: Why don't you just have them stop spraying the stuff?
• 52:50
  Speaker 2: But no, it's because you like the spray, because it hurts people.
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: And then anything that hurts people is good for you, because that's the way you think, because this is cultural Marxism.
• 53:01
  Speaker 2: It's why the 20th century is a mass grave of ideological deaths due to Marxism.
• 53:06
  Speaker 2: It is a satanic philosophy of the highest order, and you can see it permeating through academia Really not that hard to track as more Americans grapple with A ags.
• 53:20
  Speaker 2: Misinformation from academics and the press amplifies fear.
• 53:24
  Speaker 2: We must prioritize science over sloganeering.
• 53:27
  Speaker 2: In the end, the lone star tick is no climate savior.
• 53:32
  Speaker 2: It's a vector of legitimate worry.
• 53:35
  Speaker 2: The real challenge remains balancing humanity's survival with earth's.
• 53:40
  Speaker 2: Tinkering with nature's equations, even in the name of ethics, may have unforeseen and unpalatable consequences.
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: Well, I would think so.
• 53:48
  Speaker 2: Another example of insanity, and you know I want you to think about that next time you hear some of these climate activists.
• 53:59
  Speaker 2: They don't care about anything being cleaned up, they just want you gone.
• 54:04
  Speaker 2: You know.
• 54:06
  Speaker 2: That's why it's all about this abstract idea and not real solutions.
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: I mean, there used to be something like Greenpeace or something would have.
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: You could go, plant a tree.
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: Who does that anymore?
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: I plant trees, but you don't see people going out and advocating planting trees.
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: That used to be a real thing.
• 54:24
  Speaker 2: That's something that's great for the environment, or just cleaning things up.
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: You can do that or a garbage island, or the Pacific or the third world countries that dump massive amounts of trash, going.
• 54:36
  Speaker 2: After that they just talk about climate change and then what you need to stop doing.
• 54:41
  Speaker 2: You've got to stop eating food that may make you healthy, because you need to look like us.
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: Have you ever seen somebody that advocates this kind of stuff?
• 54:48
  Speaker 2: They look really healthy, don't they?
• 54:50
  Speaker 2: It's like the health ministers that are balloons all over Europe, all over europe.
• 55:02
  Speaker 2: We, you know, we do that here in this country too, except, uh, you know, we'll put somebody with mental um, some kind of mental disease, in charge of something.
• 55:08
  Speaker 2: All right, well, there's something look out for.
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: Uh, another, another set of academics pushing bio-warfare against the American people or the people of the world.
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: It shouldn't surprise you.
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: Harp666 says they are 100% trying to kill you.
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: They are killing you.
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: That's true.
• 55:33
  Speaker 2: Nef Empower says they take away my red meat.
• 55:39
  Speaker 2: I might as well die.
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: I need to stake at least two or three times a week.
• 55:42
  Speaker 2: Oh no, kidding like that doesn't even seem whatever.
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: That alpha that doesn't even seem like it's in nature.
• 55:51
  Speaker 2: That doesn't make any sense.
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: Like that's to me that is introduced, but I'll have to do a lot more research before I can proclaim that.
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: But do your thinking on that and what's that?
• 56:04
  Speaker 2: I never heard of this before and now I'm hearing of it and I don't know if it's because things got warmer.
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: All right, let's check spot prices and then I'll get you guys out of here.
• 56:16
  Speaker 2: Thanks for being here today.
• 56:19
  Speaker 2: I got lots of stuff planned for the show and I've been so busy lately.
• 56:23
  Speaker 2: It's always good to um talk with my support group.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: You know it's funny.
• 56:26
  Speaker 2: A lot of people that look forward to talking to uh close friends or, you know, meeting acquaintances, uh, you know, having a dinner to dinner.
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: I just go talk to the to the earth.
• 56:36
  Speaker 2: I go on wwcr and a short wave around the world and all my other platforms where you guys join me, and I appreciate it.
• 56:44
  Speaker 2: All right, let's talk about spot prices.
• 56:47
  Speaker 2: It looks like the yellow metal gold 3334 luciferian bankster notes per troy ounce for the yellow metal silver's at 3737.99 per troy ounce.
• 56:59
  Speaker 2: Extremely cheap.
• 57:05
  Speaker 2: Bitcoin was at $118,000 last time I checked At least that was this morning Up on a bunch of different geopolitical news on regulation and other things.
• 57:21
  Speaker 2: So something to watch as we go into the weekend.
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: I hope you guys will join me tomorrow on the David Knight Show.
• 57:25
  Speaker 2: I'll be live here on these channels 8 am Central Time to 11 am Central Time and we'll see about.
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: I'll start working on guests now, but we've got lots of specials going on at Wolfpack and Wise Wolf Gold and Silver.
• 57:42
  Speaker 2: You can get into precious metals as little as $50 a month, but we go all the way up to $5,000.
• 57:46
  Speaker 2: Everything in between.
• 57:47
  Speaker 2: Wolfpackgold promo code 1776.
• 57:52
  Speaker 2: You want some free silver?
• 57:53
  Speaker 2: Get over there if you want to turn your soon-to-be worthless fiat dollars into real money.
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: That's what my friend Charlie Robinson would say.
• 58:02
  Speaker 2: All right, you guys take care of each other, from Beans the Brave, myself and the crew and everybody here in Branson.
• 58:07
  Speaker 2: We will see you next week.
• 58:10
  Speaker 2: Take care.
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: End of transmission.