Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Shannon Sharpe Sued for $50 Million for SA, Canada Might Be Cooked | HBR News 500

Transcript

Shannon Sharpe Sued for $50 Million for SA, Canada Might Be Cooked | HBR News 500 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number five hundred. Shannon Sharp sued
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: for fifty million for SA Canada Might Be Cooked, where
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: we discussed the news of the week and give it
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: the Factor treatment. Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: I hope you guys are doing well this week and
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that you
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: are not consumed by it. I'm your host, Brian, and
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: I'm joined again by my lovely co hosts Mike and Hannah,
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: who is back from her short reprieve. I guess so
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: she wasn't able to make it last week, but she's
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: back now, So call get prepare your ears for rants
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: coming from a bold.
• 0:46
  Speaker 2: I might be able to talk for thirty seconds.
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, you were coughing pretty bad last a.
• 0:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, well the last three weeks. That's what happens when
• 0:53
  Speaker 3: you visit the fam. Ah, and they have youngsters who
• 0:58
  Speaker 3: go to nursery. Now heat re dishes definitely nothing to
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: do with spike proteins. Don't worry about It's not the thing.
• 1:03
  Speaker 3: Don't worry about it.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Well, anyway, I want to say yes, thank you to
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Mike and Hannah for joining me on the show today.
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: And of course thank you guys for coming in and
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: tuning in to check it out. This week, we're going
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: to be discussing the latest with regards to allegations. Yes,
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: that's more allegations because when you're rich, that's what happens.
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: Made against former NFL player Shannon Sharp, Mark Kearney wins
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: the Canadian elections and what that may mean, and follow
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: up news regarding the If you guys remember the mid
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: air crash between the helicopter and the plane and more so,
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: stick around, it's gonna be a good time and be
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show.
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: So if you are looking at the screen, you will
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: see that I had this article from the dork side.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: I guess it's a dorkside of the Force dot com
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: is what it's called, which I never go to because
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: I don't go to nerdy websites. And apparently the latest
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: season of Disney Plus's and Or had a controversial scene
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: in it which involves something that let's just say is
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: new to Star Wars non Star Wars fans, and it's
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: created some discussion. But the directors he has an interesting take,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: or at least the writer, I think he's the writer
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: Tony Gilroy and the actress Aria Arjona. They have an
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: interesting take on it that we could discuss in the Patron.
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: So so if you want to be around for that,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: if you want to experience that cringe firsthand, you have
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: to become a badgery yourself by going to feed the
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com. For subscribe five bucks a months will
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: get you into our discord server, which we'll be able
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: to allow you to enjoy all of the additional content
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: that we have, like the Patron shows, as well as
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: various kinds of events and activities. And yeah, we hope
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: we'll see you there. And if you would give a
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: higher levels, you can actually participate in the conversation. You
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: could talk directly to us, you know, tell us that
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: we're pieces of shit or awesome or whatever it is
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: that's on your mind. And if you don't want to
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: wake up on morning to find that our all of
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: our content has been yeeded from the Internet, then go
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: to badgerfeed dot com. That's badgerfeed dot com or Honeybadger
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com. That is where our content lives, all right,
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: So with all that out of the way, we're gonna
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: go ahead and get into today's story starting with Shannon Sharp. So.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: Shannon Sharp, a former NFL player and current ESPN hosts,
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: faces serious allegations of sexual assault, as reported in recent news.
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: From April of twenty twenty five, a woman identified as
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Jane Doe I E. A woman who remains anonymous, filed
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: a fifty million dollars civil lawsuit against Sharp, accusing him
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: of sexually assaulting her on multiple occasions, beginning in twenty ten,
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: when she was nineteen, and continuing over a nearly two
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: year relationship that started in twenty twenty three. The lawsuit
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: alleges that Sharp used his fame to manipulate, control, subjugate,
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: and violate women, with specific claims of non consensual oral
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: penetration and anal rape despite her protests. Additionally, another woman,
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: Michelle Evans, has come forward with similar claims of assault
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: in twenty ten, also accusing Sharp of defamation in her complaint.
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: Leaked evidence, including a phone call recording where Sharp allegedly
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: allegedly threatened Jane Doe and sexually explicit texts oh scary
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: in the time of social media, suggesting a consensual relationship,
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: has further fueled the controversy. Dividing public opinion. Sharp has
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: vehemently denied the allegations, labeling the lawsuit a shakedown in
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: a video on Instagram and threatening to sue Jane Doe's lawyer,
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: Tony Buzby for defamation. His attorney, Mitchell Schuster, dismissed the
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: claims as ridiculous, suggesting they are opportunistic attempts to exploit
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: Sharp's fame. However, Sharp's response has drawn criticism. Fans mocked
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: his initial statement, a screenshot of a text message, as
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: unprofessional and dumb. The controversy is compounded by Sharp's past,
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: which includes a twenty twenty four incident where he accidentally
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: live streamed an intimate encounter on Instagram, which he later
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: apologized for, claiming it was unintentional. As the legal battle unfolds,
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: the allegations have significantly impacted Sharp's public image, with fans
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: split on his guilt and the media closely following the developments.
• 5:50
  Speaker 4: So how is this was this woman's support? Was she
• 5:54
  Speaker 4: an adult?
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: Nineteen?
• 5:56
  Speaker 4: Yeah, nineteeneteen, So she was an adult and this happened,
• 6:00
  Speaker 4: And allegedly again, this happened in the United States, right
• 6:04
  Speaker 4: like he did this.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's an American. Yeah, he was an American football player.
• 6:08
  Speaker 4: Yeah, okay, So it occurred under the system created in
• 6:13
  Speaker 4: the United States by feminists to help women get out
• 6:16
  Speaker 4: of abusive relationships. That that being that every like five
• 6:21
  Speaker 4: feet now there's there's you know, I know that's an exaggeration,
• 6:25
  Speaker 4: but there is a organization for women to get women
• 6:31
  Speaker 4: out of abusive relationships. And if you're in a in
• 6:34
  Speaker 4: a relationship with somebody and they're raping you over and
• 6:37
  Speaker 4: over again, that that constitutes abuse. I would think and
• 6:42
  Speaker 4: I would leave it that was happening to me, you know,
• 6:45
  Speaker 4: if it was it was a situation where I was
• 6:49
  Speaker 4: I felt like I was being actually assaulted and my
• 6:55
  Speaker 4: my no was not being listened to, I would get
• 6:57
  Speaker 4: the fuck out of there. So unless there is some solid,
• 7:03
  Speaker 4: irrefutable evidence of him blackmailing her with something, using some
• 7:09
  Speaker 4: sort of something that falls under the legal definition of
• 7:13
  Speaker 4: coercion to keep her from doing that and getting one
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: of those organizations involved, which those have been around, they
• 7:22
  Speaker 4: were created, they started to be created in nineteen eighty four,
• 7:27
  Speaker 4: and in nineteen ninety four they were gendered by the
• 7:33
  Speaker 4: law that Biden passed, the Violence Against Women Act that
• 7:35
  Speaker 4: he wrote so there's never been an excuse after that
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: for women to stay in a situation like this. There's
• 7:43
  Speaker 4: never been an excuse after that for women to be like, well, yeah,
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: he rapes me every week, but I can't leave because
• 7:52
  Speaker 4: I don't have a way out.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah, you do, Like.
• 7:55
  Speaker 4: There's an organization in your community, or at least in
• 7:59
  Speaker 4: your county, and there is a twenty four hour hotline,
• 8:03
  Speaker 4: and there has been for about forty years, a twenty
• 8:09
  Speaker 4: four hour hotline. And for about thirty years, there's been
• 8:15
  Speaker 4: organizations in pretty much every county in the country to
• 8:20
  Speaker 4: assist you through the court process, right through the extraction process,
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: getting you out of your house. The police are on
• 8:28
  Speaker 4: your side, getting you out of that relationship. There is
• 8:33
  Speaker 4: literally no excuse for this. So I don't believe that
• 8:40
  Speaker 4: a woman was in a long term or even a
• 8:42
  Speaker 4: short term relationship with a guy and stayed to let
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: him do this over and over again unless she can
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: provide some like I said, solid, irrefutable as some paperwork,
• 8:56
  Speaker 4: some kind of anything, even just to claim that that
• 9:00
  Speaker 4: you know this was going on and he used it
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: to blackmail me. And I'm not talking about well, I'm
• 9:06
  Speaker 4: gonna stop paying your bills, because that's not blackmail. You're
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: an adult. You can get a job, you can pay
• 9:12
  Speaker 4: your own bills. So something, you know, something more along
• 9:16
  Speaker 4: the lines. I can destroy your family member. I know
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: this crime you committed, I know this thing you did.
• 9:21
  Speaker 4: I'm going to use this thing against you to destroy
• 9:24
  Speaker 4: all your relationships. I'm going to, you know, use my
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: connections to engage in some form of violence against you
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: that I can't get away with something like that. It's
• 9:34
  Speaker 4: got to be something like that because otherwise she had
• 9:38
  Speaker 4: all the power she needed to get out. So it's
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: not that I don't have sympathy for her feeling like
• 9:45
  Speaker 4: she was in a bad relationship, but to label it
• 9:49
  Speaker 4: rape is bullshit, especially now after the fact, and and
• 9:56
  Speaker 4: file the lawsuit. That's bullshit. And when something like that
• 10:00
  Speaker 4: that happens, you go get help right away, you don't
• 10:05
  Speaker 4: wait and then file a lawsuit.
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, well, yeah, I think that it looks like a shakedown.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: It smells like a shakedown for sure, because again we're going,
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: you know, we're bringing up allegations from like how far
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: back twenty ten, as far back as twenty so that's
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: what fifteen years ago, and they're you know, they're The
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: way that the media is reporting on it too, is
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: a bit suspicious because it's being like it's, first of all,
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: it's a civil suit, it's not a criminal suit. The
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: other thing is the conditions of the supposed sexual assault
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: have more to do with his, you know, his celebrity
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: status being leveraged against women, not necessarily him using force.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: And the way that they describe, you know, anal rape
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: and oral you know, forced oral penetration like you mean a.
• 10:59
  Speaker 4: Blood It's really simple. I mean, all right, it's somebody.
• 11:02
  Speaker 4: If somebody points a gun at you, then yeah, leaving.
• 11:07
  Speaker 4: Leaving is not necessarily an option unless you're willing to
• 11:10
  Speaker 4: die to get out of there. But if somebody says,
• 11:13
  Speaker 4: well I'm famous, that's nothing. That means nothing. So what
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: if you're famous?
• 11:21
  Speaker 5: All right?
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: There are so many billions of people in the world,
• 11:26
  Speaker 4: and so many millions of them are famous to some
• 11:31
  Speaker 4: degree or another. I've had people call me famous. I
• 11:34
  Speaker 4: hate that, by the way, don't do that. I'm not.
• 11:37
  Speaker 4: But fame is nothing. It is entirely worthless, you know,
• 11:44
  Speaker 4: unless you do something benevolent with it that you know,
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: use it to help raise money for you know, a good,
• 11:50
  Speaker 4: good cause or something like that. It's it's or entertain people.
• 11:53
  Speaker 4: There's nothing to it. You have nothing. If you have fame,
• 11:58
  Speaker 4: it's it's it's like having internet points. So fucking what.
• 12:06
  Speaker 4: It's the same thing as girls that say, oh, I
• 12:09
  Speaker 4: dated him because he was the popular guy and he
• 12:12
  Speaker 4: was abusive, and I stayed in that situation for two
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: years because I couldn't get out because he was popular.
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: What does that have to do with anything? You can
• 12:22
  Speaker 4: walk away, it doesn't matter.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: Yeah, sorry, I was looking something up.
• 12:32
  Speaker 4: Yes, the situation needs to sue. Every single one needs
• 12:35
  Speaker 4: to sue. This happens. Every time this happens. There needs
• 12:39
  Speaker 4: to be a defamation lawsuit every time.
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, no, for sure. And I think he may pursue action,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: but you know, this is just like the way, it's
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: just an easy way to make some money, you know.
• 12:56
  Speaker 4: So actually, the more capable a guy is economically pursuing action,
• 13:03
  Speaker 4: the more he really should, just for the sake of
• 13:07
  Speaker 4: other guys who can't do it. You know, do it, Johnny,
• 13:10
  Speaker 4: But Johnny Depp, like, don't, just don't just consider your
• 13:15
  Speaker 4: own situation. There are literally thousands of guys going through
• 13:20
  Speaker 4: ship like this that have no recourse.
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: Yeah, Mike, did you want to add anything to this
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: or is it just another another met I.
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: Didn't have any anything for this, you know, I was
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: I was today trying to write notes for today's show,
• 13:38
  Speaker 2: and I got distracted by the gorilla thing.
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: Oh, I don't know anything about that.
• 13:43
  Speaker 4: Oh the one hundred men could take a gorilla, and.
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: I just have to wonder could a hundred women take
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: a gorilla? No, don't take that wrong. Don't take that wrong.
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: I was gonna say, I know a woman. I mean,
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: there's there are women on the internet that could take
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: a hundred gorillas.
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: He's not gonna help a gorilla either.
• 14:03
  Speaker 4: Well, I mean, look what it different harambe.
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, I do have some rents for stories two, three,
• 14:11
  Speaker 2: and four, So I'm not going to.
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: All right, well no, it's okay. It's it's like just
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: another and a long line of like you know, me
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: too's and stuff. So but uh yeah, if you guys
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: know about Shannon Sharp, I know he has a podcast
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: and he had on and I do wonder about this.
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: So this is just like not tied to the usual
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: stuff that we talk about. But I believe that Shannon
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: Sharp has a podcast and he has several celebrities on
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: and one of them the infamous podcast with Kat Williams,
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: where Cat Williams notoriously dropped all kinds of like crazy
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: information about the business, about Hollywood, about the comedy business,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: about a lot of the black entertainers, all that, and
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: how I mean all of the memes and all of
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: the video clips of Kat Williams going off about you know,
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five, all lives will be exposed, like
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: he was saying that kind of stuff that was on
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: Shannon Sharp's podcast. He was the host, so and he
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: was like giving this guy a platform and then these
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: allegations come out and I have to I mean, the
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: timing isn't like right on there, it's a yeah, it's
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: a but it's you know, it's in it because if
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: you want to silence somebody one thing that we.
• 15:27
  Speaker 4: Know happens like after somebody blows a whistle, right right,
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: so he's had or or after like in the case
• 15:35
  Speaker 4: of Bill Cosby, where he started he was about discipline,
• 15:39
  Speaker 4: and yes.
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: He was about to do a new show where he
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: was going to try to like put you know, make
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: something for the black population that was positive and encouraging.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: He saw there were problems where things were going. Of course,
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: you know, he was a big advocate for that stuff
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: before that, when he was doing you know, the the
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: Fat Albert Show and all kinds of stuff, you know,
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: the Cosby Show, et cetera. And he walked away from
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: that for a while for whatever reason. I guess he
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: thought I'll just retire. Everything's cool, and then he saw
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: things were getting bad. He was like, I think I'm
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: gonna go back out there and try to like salvage,
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: you know, like try to change things. And then allegations
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: came out, and you know, it ruined him. It just
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: ruined old.
• 16:23
  Speaker 4: He retired because he was old, and he came back.
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: But he came back, yes, And then they threw what
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: men did.
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I just did a mantella moment where I thought
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: he died in prison. He didn't.
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: No, no, No, he did not die in prison. He's
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: a lot, he's I don't think he's in prison. Now
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: there's an appeal process going on. So the thing is
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: he might get off and.
• 16:45
  Speaker 4: Like be freeing his appeal.
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I believe so. But the thing is he is
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: now persona on grad. It doesn't matter now has Yeah,
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: it's already in the public consciousness to be like, oh,
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: that guy, the guy who know roofed women like this
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: is like, people defaulted that so hard. I know it's bull,
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: but they default to it really hard, to the point
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: where if you said, actually, no, I don't think that's
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: how it went there, they will get upset with you,
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: like they'll get mad because they want that to be
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: the reality when I think it's Yeah, So the Shannon
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: Sharp thing, I think it is. I think it is
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: very suspicious.
• 17:22
  Speaker 4: I think women partied with him and used drugs and
• 17:24
  Speaker 4: had sex with him and then came back later and
• 17:28
  Speaker 4: was like it was rue food. Like you're not being
• 17:32
  Speaker 4: roofied if you put it in your own mouth.
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah, for sure. No, No, obviously how it works. Yeah,
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: the only thing he confessed to was having drugs with
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: women like that. That doesn't mean he forced it on them.
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: That means that they went over there to get high,
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: and fuck, that's what it means, at at the very least,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: to get high. So like that, Yeah, but but this
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: is not the way we're supposed to take it. So
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: the Shannon Sharp thing is a little bit sketchy because again,
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: it was only after that that all these allegations came out,
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: and it really just like the Cosby thing, just like
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: the Harvey Weinstein thing. You know, however you feel about that,
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: his reputation is going to be irreversibly damaged by this,
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: and he's just gonna.
• 18:17
  Speaker 4: Have had a couple of victories in court too. Yeah,
• 18:19
  Speaker 4: he has him with everything, including the kitchen sink. But again,
• 18:26
  Speaker 4: like unless the people involved, what the heck.
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: What the heck was that? Oh? That was my phone?
• 18:33
  Speaker 4: I have my ringtone. Okay, So I work with intellectually
• 18:37
  Speaker 4: disabled adults. Yeah, and sometimes they get upset if your
• 18:42
  Speaker 4: phone rings and stuff like that.
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: So you have something cartoons my.
• 18:46
  Speaker 4: Ringtone, and they they like that.
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: So yeah, it too.
• 18:51
  Speaker 4: It makes me laugh every time my phone goes off.
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: Yeah. But anyway, yah, So yeah, the Shannon Sharp thing
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: you were talking about, Harvey Weinstein getting his charges.
• 19:02
  Speaker 4: Yeah, Harvey Weinstein, Like, there have been some.
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: That was funny.
• 19:11
  Speaker 4: I thought that it was a funky teapot. No, it's
• 19:13
  Speaker 4: it's cartoon noises. But there have been incidents with with
• 19:17
  Speaker 4: Harvey Weinstein where like we've gone and looked at there
• 19:21
  Speaker 4: was a lady that reveal released actual video of what
• 19:24
  Speaker 4: she was doing and everything and with him, and it
• 19:28
  Speaker 4: was pretty obvious that she gave consent verbally, gave consent.
• 19:33
  Speaker 4: He asked permission, she gave consent. And her argument was
• 19:38
  Speaker 4: because she knew he had some level of power that
• 19:41
  Speaker 4: that that made it non consensual in that and she
• 19:46
  Speaker 4: went in there to get that evidence. By the way,
• 19:48
  Speaker 4: but in that circumstance, you're not powerless. Like the minute
• 19:55
  Speaker 4: that happens. There have been laws against using a position
• 20:00
  Speaker 4: of power to get sex from a subordinate or someone
• 20:04
  Speaker 4: who works with you and relies on you for the
• 20:09
  Speaker 4: income because of the way they work with you and everything.
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: There have been laws about that for decades, decades, like
• 20:19
  Speaker 4: it's it's been longer than I've been alive, in fact,
• 20:24
  Speaker 4: So everything that came out evidence wise with regard to
• 20:29
  Speaker 4: to Weinstein, again, it doesn't really Femine has been fighting
• 20:33
  Speaker 4: really hard to make that rape, but it doesn't really
• 20:36
  Speaker 4: constitute rape, and they don't want it to be rape
• 20:39
  Speaker 4: when women do it, and women do it, they do
• 20:43
  Speaker 4: it to men and they do it to other women.
• 20:45
  Speaker 4: So you know, they really are creating a pathway for
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: men in the future to take women out of the
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: workplace if they really want to, because Women have more
• 20:57
  Speaker 4: of a tendency to use a position of power to
• 21:01
  Speaker 4: get sex from somebody who doesn't want to have sex
• 21:05
  Speaker 4: with them than men do. They have more of a
• 21:08
  Speaker 4: tendency to do that. They don't. It's like they don't
• 21:11
  Speaker 4: care if they're wanted or not as long as they
• 21:14
  Speaker 4: get what they want. Where you know, men do seem
• 21:18
  Speaker 4: to prefer to be wanted, and that that Weinstein situation
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: like to that this day, I've not seen a single
• 21:27
  Speaker 4: case related to that where the evidence actually solidly proves
• 21:33
  Speaker 4: that he made somebody do things against their will over
• 21:39
  Speaker 4: their protests or used I will uh, i'll take things
• 21:45
  Speaker 4: away from you that you can't get somewhere else and
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: that you rely on. Uh and and can't you know,
• 21:53
  Speaker 4: can't get around, like you can't make an income if
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: I don't give you my my blessing. He hasn't. There's
• 22:01
  Speaker 4: no evidence that he's put that on women. The evidence
• 22:05
  Speaker 4: is that they've used him and his proclivities, and that's
• 22:11
  Speaker 4: a vulnerability, by the way, to get ahead of other
• 22:14
  Speaker 4: women who wouldn't do that.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, fair enough. All right, Well, anyway, let us
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think about the Shannon Sharp story In
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: the comments.
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: I'll put it back up here so you guys are.
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: Reminded, and yeah, I look forward to seeing your thoughts
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: in the comments section. All right, let's move on to
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: the next story. So here, let me show you this picture.
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: All right, So I had this article from the Tazara
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: Post published on February's second So it's not it's a
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: little bit older, which sort of does a follow up
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: on the mysterious circumstances are unning the death of US
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: Army Captain Rebecca Lobach pictured here, twenty eight year old
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: Blackhawk helicopter pilot killed in a mid air collie with
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: a PSA American Airlines passenger jet on January twenty nine,
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, near Reagan National Airport, which resulted in
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: sixty seven deaths, the deadliest US aviation incident in nearly
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: twenty five years. Loback, who had over four hundred and
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: fifty hours of flying experience and recently served as a
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: military special aid or social aid. Sorry, she recently served
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: as a military social aid at the Biden White House
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: and had her entire social media presence scrubbed by the
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: US Army and her family within three days of the
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: crash before her name was publicly released on February first,
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five. The article raises questions about what the
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: Army might have been hiding, noting the unusual delay in
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: identifying Lobach and the rapid erasure of her online footprint,
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: which included her LinkedIn profile and other accounts. This piece
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: also highlighted the political context of the incident. You guys
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: remember when this happened. Trump blamed diversity initiatives for undermining
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: air safety, fueling right wing rumors about Loback's role in
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: the crash, despite her family describing her as graceful as
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: she was fierce. The article suggests potential cover ups, pointing
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: to the Army's history of managing public perception in high
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: profile incidents. It mentions conflicting preliminary data about the altitude
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: sorry altitudes of the aircraft involved with investigations ongoing, and
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: includes a photo of Lobach at the White House press
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: room in twenty twenty three, which I think I have here.
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: Let me see if I can find it, just so
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: you know that she was in fact like part of,
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: or like you know, involved with the Biden administration, which
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: might suggest something as well. Anyway, credited to Samantha Brown.
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: The author Joe Tizara m D questions the transparency of
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: the army's actions, framing the score social media as a
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: possible attempt to control the narrative around Lobox involvement in
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: the catastrophic event. And there was something else too, But
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: go ahead and respond to it, and I'll dig up
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: the other thing.
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: When when when the government and indeed the government controlled
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: media conceals the identity of a criminal or a you know,
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: criminally negligent person, we should go ahead and assume by
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: default that it's a black, lesbian Muslim, right, because it's
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: usually one or the other or the other. It's never
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: all three, but it's always one of them. So until
• 25:37
  Speaker 2: we open the box whenever we can, we're just gonna
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: have to assume that every one of these unsolved cases
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: happened at the hands of a black, lesbian Muslim. Sorry,
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: I don't make the rules. I'm just following my own orders.
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: But no, yeah, this, this, this case is another conundrum.
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: We can barbecue over the cremated remains of Hanlan's razor.
• 26:07
  Speaker 2: This looks on the surface and most of the way
• 26:11
  Speaker 2: down like a clear cut case. Of incompetence. It's pretty
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: obvious that this woman was not employed for her competence,
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: but because she does not have a penis, and never
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: has had a penis, and has no interest in penises.
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: It's very important in the field of aviation. You don't
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: want your concentration getting distracted by any preoccupation with penises
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: or finding yourself because oh my god, my penis. Co
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: pilot is trying to man explain something to me. Listen
• 26:49
  Speaker 2: near you, little shit. I didn't get where I am
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: today by listening to some penis having penis man with
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: a penis in his will you shut up about some
• 26:59
  Speaker 2: ting wang and we too low. I don't even know
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: where that banging ow. Everybody's dead. So yeah, it doesn't.
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: It doesn't just come down to incompetence. It doesn't even
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: come down to incompetence. It comes down to active and
• 27:16
  Speaker 2: applied hatred against men and male competence. See, the purpose
• 27:25
  Speaker 2: of a system is what it does. Although, to be honest,
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: when you think about it, flying a helicopter into a
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: speeding plane, it's not a trivial operation. It requires remarkable precision.
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: You've got to align x, y and Z coordinates. But
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: to fly at exactly the right speed. It's like threading
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: a needle. You could try a hundred times and miss
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: every time, while some bitches in your airpiece going where
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: did you you learn to fly? Over and over again?
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: Which begs the question was this done on purpose? Was
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: it done with enough malice to completely override any incompetence?
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: Was this.
• 28:19
  Speaker 2: A kamikaze mission? I mean, well, all DEI is essentially
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: a Kamikazee program. On the part of the employers, sure,
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: it's how do we tank our company as quickly as possible?
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: Lesbians and lots of them, that's how. But but I
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: mean on the part of the pilot in question, was
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: she actively trying to die in a fireball in the sky?
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: Was it an act of terrorism? Probably not. I mean
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: I failed to see what kind of message it's supposed
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: to send. Was it just an act of self deletion
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: selected to be as quick and as painless as possible.
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: Probably not. I mean, it could have gone very wrong,
• 29:09
  Speaker 2: and it could have been slow and painful. I mean,
• 29:12
  Speaker 2: maybe it was. He probably was, So I'm gonna go
• 29:16
  Speaker 2: with no. But that leaves us asking how something can
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: be achieved by accident that would have been almost impossible
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: on purpose. And it comes down to a different razor. Well,
• 29:33
  Speaker 2: it's not even a razor. It's an equation of coincidence
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: multiplied by frequency equals inevitability. Coincidences are not coincidence when
• 29:45
  Speaker 2: they occur above a given frequency. See the purpose of
• 29:51
  Speaker 2: a system is what it does at any given moment. Right,
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: there are thousands of aircraft in the sky. It's tens
• 29:59
  Speaker 2: of thousands if if you include all the helicopters, in
• 30:02
  Speaker 2: light aircraft and whatnot, especially above major cities, especially in
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: the vicinity of airports, And the fact that there aren't
• 30:12
  Speaker 2: more collisions like this is a testament to how well
• 30:17
  Speaker 2: oiled the system is. Usually, I mean, but the more
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: you replace the cogs in the machine, the straight white
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: male pilots who have fought tooth and nail to get
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: to the top of the of the competence hierarchy, the
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: more you replace them with these boneless waifs whose only
• 30:44
  Speaker 2: skill in life is shitting on men, the closer you
• 30:49
  Speaker 2: draw us to the inevitability that the chances of such
• 30:53
  Speaker 2: a disaster happening become one in one, Like if all
• 30:59
  Speaker 2: ten thousands of those aircraft in the sky were piloted
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: by black, lesbian Muslims. This ship would be it would
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: literally happen every day, and if it did, the fuck
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: witted communist lunatics who made it happen would still blame Trump,
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: and they would still be outraged and falling backwards onto
• 31:25
  Speaker 2: their fainting couches. When Trump has the audacity to blame them,
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: knob heads, all of you please kill yourselves. It's the
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: only way to stop you killing other people allegedly. I
• 31:41
  Speaker 2: mean in Minecraft, don't know, nobody killed anyone. I'll stop.
• 31:48
  Speaker 4: The whole situation. The bit about her being repeatedly told
• 31:56
  Speaker 4: that she was gonna crash, that she needed to change
• 31:59
  Speaker 4: your course, and and just arrogantly refusing to change her
• 32:05
  Speaker 4: course like that. That's been discussed quite a bit on
• 32:10
  Speaker 4: X And there's an excuse that a lot of women
• 32:13
  Speaker 4: are using for this behavior that is not valid, but
• 32:16
  Speaker 4: they think it is valid, and that is that the
• 32:19
  Speaker 4: individual who was warning her about the impending accident was
• 32:23
  Speaker 4: a subordinate. Right. There are two kinds of leaders that
• 32:26
  Speaker 4: that you can work with. Right, they're good leaders. They're
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: they're they're leaders that know how to use every tool
• 32:34
  Speaker 4: in their toolbox to make sure that they achieved the
• 32:38
  Speaker 4: best possible outcome for the initiatives they're engaging in in
• 32:44
  Speaker 4: order to achieve the goals that they have set out.
• 32:48
  Speaker 4: And then there are shitty leaders. Shitty leaders fear their
• 32:53
  Speaker 4: subordinates or they judge their subordinates their arrogant assholes on
• 32:59
  Speaker 4: our regular basis that will not listen when somebody gives
• 33:05
  Speaker 4: them information that contradicts the pathway they have chosen for
• 33:10
  Speaker 4: whatever it is they're doing. And it doesn't matter whether
• 33:14
  Speaker 4: you're a manager at a gas station or a helicopter pilot,
• 33:20
  Speaker 4: or a governor or a principle of a school. If
• 33:26
  Speaker 4: you behave that way in any job, you're a shitty leader.
• 33:31
  Speaker 4: Where it does matter is, you know, if you're just
• 33:34
  Speaker 4: a convenience store manager, you might not sell as much
• 33:38
  Speaker 4: milk this year because you're a dumbass, right, But if
• 33:42
  Speaker 4: you are ignoring a subordinate when you are doing something
• 33:47
  Speaker 4: that is life or death, that's a whole different story.
• 33:52
  Speaker 4: And if you cannot be the kind of leader who
• 33:57
  Speaker 4: uses the tools in your tool that are represented by
• 34:01
  Speaker 4: the skills and capabilities, the knowledge and wisdom of your subordinates,
• 34:06
  Speaker 4: recognize when someone has the capacity to contribute positively to
• 34:12
  Speaker 4: your job performance. You don't belong in a position of leadership,
• 34:18
  Speaker 4: even if it's a shitty shift manager job in a
• 34:22
  Speaker 4: retail outlet, but especially if it's a job where other
• 34:28
  Speaker 4: people's lives depend on you not making stupid choices. I
• 34:34
  Speaker 4: will never get tired of saying stop paying women to
• 34:38
  Speaker 4: make stupid choices. Sixty seven people, sixty seven people paid
• 34:43
  Speaker 4: this woman to make a stupid choice with their lives.
• 34:48
  Speaker 4: Their lives were sacrificed for her stupid choices. We have
• 34:53
  Speaker 4: to stop tolerating that. As a population, our leadership is
• 35:00
  Speaker 4: deeply concerned about their not being enough births. Our leadership
• 35:06
  Speaker 4: is deeply concerned about the population growth spiraling down to nothing.
• 35:11
  Speaker 4: If you let people die because women can't be criticized,
• 35:17
  Speaker 4: that's only gonna get worse. Just saying.
• 35:23
  Speaker 1: All right, uh so I did get a couple of
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: super chows and well, a Superchow and a super Chat
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: or two. I'm not sure how the memberships work. I
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: don't know if those are like paid for or whatever,
• 35:35
  Speaker 1: but I'll read it. But yeah, thanks guys for that.
• 35:40
  Speaker 1: And once again, I'm just you know, it's Hannah and
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: Mike basically hit it on the head. I mean, we
• 35:46
  Speaker 1: have to be able to, like, you know, be honest
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: about what causes these things and do what we can
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: to mitigate it. And the problem is that people are
• 35:53
  Speaker 1: just really sensitive about criticizing women like when they mess up,
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: praise them when they do good. Sure, but also you know,
• 36:02
  Speaker 1: the other side of this is true. But anyway, first
• 36:06
  Speaker 1: we got Meredith g up here and she gave us
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: five dollars and said HBr News number five hundred. Buzzby,
• 36:14
  Speaker 1: the attorney involved in the Sharp case, has brought multiple
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: suits against Ditty, and in one of those cases the
• 36:20
  Speaker 1: case fell apart do and there are allegations that Busby
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: or his firm coach the accuser. Busby appears to be
• 36:30
  Speaker 1: an ambulance chaser on SA lawsuit sexual assault, even if
• 36:34
  Speaker 1: some others claim he is honorable. As a lawyer told me,
• 36:38
  Speaker 1: even a bad case has settlement potential. Yes, that's true.
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: Is anyone else wondering if Ditty's innocent? Now that's out there.
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: But when the entire establishment comes out and says Diddy
• 36:52
  Speaker 2: is guilty, they come out and make Ditty the escapegoat.
• 36:56
  Speaker 2: I'm kind of well, I'm in say minds about it now,
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: because this is what they this is what they did
• 37:01
  Speaker 2: with Michael Jackson. Michael Jackson, Yeah, you're fucked now. Now
• 37:08
  Speaker 2: we're gonna call you a fucking nonce and your career
• 37:12
  Speaker 2: is over, and fifteen years from now, you're gonna fucking
• 37:16
  Speaker 2: die from the drug overdoses that we basically coerced you
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: into descending into. And I'm not saying did he's inoson,
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: it's probably not. I don't think anyone in Hollywood was
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: really innocent except Michael Jackson. To be honest, I think
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: Michael Jackson was the only Hollywood starlett who was actually
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: innocent because he you know, he's pulled into it when
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: he was fucking ten years old. And that's fine.
• 37:41
  Speaker 4: That's why the five.
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: Yeah he was, when he was in the Jackson five,
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: he was five years old.
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: Yes, yes, so he yeah he was. He was always
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: under their control. But yeah, I'm starting I still think
• 37:53
  Speaker 2: diddies are fucking wrong and announced. But I you know,
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: part of me is like the entire establishment is throwing
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: him under the bus. So that gives me a little
• 38:04
  Speaker 2: bit of pause for thought, you know what I mean.
• 38:09
  Speaker 4: It does make you wonder, It does make you wonder,
• 38:13
  Speaker 4: and when it comes down to it, I like, you
• 38:15
  Speaker 4: really can't trust anything that you see in the media. Well,
• 38:23
  Speaker 4: I'm sure that if you know, I'm not sure if
• 38:28
  Speaker 4: if any of the things that we've seen or reported
• 38:30
  Speaker 4: have any truth behind him at all, right, but I
• 38:34
  Speaker 4: am sure that if he is guilty, the only person
• 38:38
  Speaker 4: that's going to go down for the involved crimes is
• 38:42
  Speaker 4: going to be him, unless exactly Trump administration gets involved
• 38:48
  Speaker 4: and changes the way things go and makes makes a
• 38:54
  Speaker 4: disclosure mandatory in terms of you know, who was involved,
• 38:59
  Speaker 4: because this is basically what they've done with Epstein, what
• 39:05
  Speaker 4: the previous administrations have done with Epstein, and you know,
• 39:09
  Speaker 4: this is this is what's going to be done with
• 39:11
  Speaker 4: anybody who you know, if we are to believe what
• 39:15
  Speaker 4: the media has said about them, was running an operation
• 39:20
  Speaker 4: to blackmail. This basically what's been reported, right with running
• 39:25
  Speaker 4: an operation to blackmail the worst of the worst of
• 39:31
  Speaker 4: perverts and nut jobs among the wealthy, famous, and powerful,
• 39:36
  Speaker 4: who wanted things that you can't normally get and things
• 39:41
  Speaker 4: that are illegal that you know they they would get
• 39:45
  Speaker 4: in trouble for having, and needed to be able to
• 39:48
  Speaker 4: do it behind closed doors like this. This kind of thing,
• 39:53
  Speaker 4: This is the kind of thing that you see in
• 39:57
  Speaker 4: in anime like came think of the one with the
• 40:04
  Speaker 4: the the fetish club where the photographer accidentally gets in
• 40:08
  Speaker 4: there and then his camera blows things up after that,
• 40:13
  Speaker 4: speed speed grapher. It's really fucked up. It's weird, it's
• 40:16
  Speaker 4: not quite fucked up. And and it's about a club
• 40:25
  Speaker 4: like that where the wealthy and the powerful get in
• 40:28
  Speaker 4: and they have these horrifically weird, nasty proclivities. But then
• 40:32
  Speaker 4: there's also this side story that's magical and uh, there's
• 40:37
  Speaker 4: a character that has the power and it's an underage
• 40:39
  Speaker 4: character to it's nasty, but she has the power to
• 40:44
  Speaker 4: give people the power to kill with their sexual proclivities.
• 40:50
  Speaker 4: And this photographer his is taking pictures and that thereafter
• 40:54
  Speaker 4: he uh, like every every picture he takes is it
• 40:59
  Speaker 4: kills somebody. He points his camera at somebody and pushes
• 41:02
  Speaker 4: the shutter button that there's an explosion. Yeah, but there's
• 41:07
  Speaker 4: a whole other rest of the story to it. But yeah,
• 41:11
  Speaker 4: and it really is like the kind of thing that
• 41:15
  Speaker 4: this looks like these news stories look like to me,
• 41:18
  Speaker 4: Like you you watch fiction or you you run across
• 41:23
  Speaker 4: fiction that's like that, and you think, oh, this is
• 41:27
  Speaker 4: this is unrealistic. This is out of this world. This
• 41:29
  Speaker 4: kind of thing couldn't survive, you know, in the Leo
• 41:34
  Speaker 4: environment that exists todays, people would get caught and they
• 41:37
  Speaker 4: would get busted and they would get prosecuted. And then
• 41:41
  Speaker 4: you find out about Diddy parties and Epstein Island and
• 41:45
  Speaker 4: you have to wonder what else there is?
• 41:48
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, absolutely so, Like you know when there is
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: a there are breeds of lizard where if you grab
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: their tail, they just like detach the tail if it
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: gets if something grabs the tail and then they go
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: on other one back eventually, And what I think if
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: they do in what's happening with this? Just you know
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: real quick on this the ditty thing is, I'm sure
• 42:10
  Speaker 1: he's guilty of some things, but they're probably going to
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: attach as much to him as possible, and just like
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: the lizard that just abandons its tail, they're just gonna
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: abandon him. In fact, if you go on to you
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: can usually tell they're doing this because if you just
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: go on like any like streaming service and you just look,
• 42:27
  Speaker 1: you're just like I have an Amazon Firestick, I don't
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: have a Netflix, I don't have an Apple TV. I
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: don't have. The only thing I have is Amazon Prime,
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: and that's only because I have an Amazon account, and
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: it just kind of comes with it because I use
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: Audible and you know, Lindsey buys things on Amazon. And
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: but if you just open up a firestick, there's just
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: tons and tons of like expos a movies and documentary
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: shows about Didty, like oh the Ditty Tapes, Oh the
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: Secrets behind Diddy. So the entire media apparatus is going
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: to like co sign on this because they have no
• 43:03
  Speaker 1: choice now, right, So what I think they're gonna do
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: is they're going to treat it like this is this
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: one guy as a loan actor. Maybe he has a
• 43:10
  Speaker 1: few friends or confidants, and this is all happening in
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: this one self contained thing. And that's essentially them cutting
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: off their own tail so that the machine can keep going.
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: And that's just like a casualty right to keep it alive.
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: And I think that this is what they you know,
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: that's not related to the Michael Jackson thing, but because
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: Michael Jackson, you know, what happened to him was he
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: was actually fighting the music produce production companies specifically, I
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: think it was I don't remember which one. It might
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: have been Sony, Yeah, and he was because he was
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: trying to get I remember when he was trying to
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: get the rights of the Beatles music. If you guys
• 43:47
  Speaker 1: remember this. I remember this going on, and part of
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: it was because he was friends with Paul McCartney, but also,
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: you know, he was going to buy the Beatles music
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: and he wanted to essentially free the record you know,
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: record studios, or at least like the production of music
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: from the studios. And he talked at length about it's
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: essentially like organized crime, and of course it is. It
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: makes perfect sense, like the music business is organized crime,
• 44:14
  Speaker 1: has a lot of that involved as well as Hollywood.
• 44:17
  Speaker 1: There's a great book that I'm going to be reading
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: soon called Hollywood Babylon that goes into that and it's
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: it gets into pretty dark territory. So Michael Jackson was
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: an obstacle that needed to be removed. I think that
• 44:30
  Speaker 1: the people who tend to do well just lay low
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: and they don't really like like Prints for example. You know,
• 44:36
  Speaker 1: he didn't like Rock the Boat, but he was pretty
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: good about staying out of that kind of thing. And
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: I think that he did he, like so many others,
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: did get wrapped up in it, but it's probably more
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: of a tool than like a like a mover and
• 44:52
  Speaker 1: a shaker, you know, like.
• 44:53
  Speaker 4: Well, here's what you gotta get about this, all right.
• 44:57
  Speaker 4: If he was just the ye sexual convenience store manager,
• 45:03
  Speaker 4: right of an illegal convenience store of fucked up sexual proclivities,
• 45:12
  Speaker 4: which is what it sounds like like he was just
• 45:15
  Speaker 4: the guy that maybe didn't even procure things for people,
• 45:19
  Speaker 4: just provided the environment. You can come in here and
• 45:24
  Speaker 4: get what you want, and people who are bringing in
• 45:27
  Speaker 4: what you want will will bring it here. Like if
• 45:31
  Speaker 4: he was that guy and he's going down now, the
• 45:34
  Speaker 4: reason isn't because the establishment wants to put a stop
• 45:38
  Speaker 4: to what he was doing. We know that, right. The
• 45:41
  Speaker 4: reason isn't because they're protecting any victims, right. The reason
• 45:47
  Speaker 4: isn't because they're doing there they're going after big, big
• 45:54
  Speaker 4: targets or anything like that. And the reason isn't because
• 45:56
  Speaker 4: of anything that he did to piss anybody off. The
• 46:01
  Speaker 4: reason is because everybody that was involved, everybody that was
• 46:05
  Speaker 4: at his party's, everybody that is on film or there's
• 46:10
  Speaker 4: witnesses that will testify against them, that there's any kind
• 46:13
  Speaker 4: of evidence that did anything illegal that could destroy them
• 46:20
  Speaker 4: is now on notice. Well, guess what we can destroy
• 46:24
  Speaker 4: you now, so you better toe. And the reason that
• 46:29
  Speaker 4: this stuff, the reason that this stuff, the reason the
• 46:31
  Speaker 4: Epstein thing happened, the reason that the Diggy thing happened,
• 46:35
  Speaker 4: the reason that the Weinstein thing happened, because I guarantee
• 46:37
  Speaker 4: you Harvey Weinstein was in a similar situation where there
• 46:41
  Speaker 4: are shitloads of people that are are sweating bullets as
• 46:48
  Speaker 4: to whether or not they're going to go down with
• 46:49
  Speaker 4: this guy, and probably the Cosby thing too. Right, the
• 46:53
  Speaker 4: reason all of these things happen is so that the
• 46:55
  Speaker 4: establishment can put the people in on notice to the
• 47:02
  Speaker 4: political line. The reason it's happening now is because during
• 47:05
  Speaker 4: the last twenty years online people have gotten more and
• 47:10
  Speaker 4: more politically savvy and more and more politically active, and
• 47:15
  Speaker 4: the Overton window is no longer under the control of
• 47:19
  Speaker 4: the mainstream establishment media, the education system, and the entertainment media.
• 47:27
  Speaker 4: So you now have a situation where if there are
• 47:31
  Speaker 4: people with fame that have large platforms that go against
• 47:38
  Speaker 4: the establishment, they provide aid to the enemy, they provide
• 47:45
  Speaker 4: comfort to the enemy of the establishment, and they can't
• 47:50
  Speaker 4: have them doing that. They need a unified front, So
• 47:54
  Speaker 4: that's probably all this is about. They don't care. There
• 47:59
  Speaker 4: is no level of evil that these people could have
• 48:04
  Speaker 4: committed that the establishment gives a rats ass about. Yeah, right.
• 48:10
  Speaker 4: The only thing they care about is if they take
• 48:14
  Speaker 4: one person that was involved that the most people are
• 48:18
  Speaker 4: connected to, and they punish that person, that gives them
• 48:21
  Speaker 4: leverage against all of the people that they're trying to control.
• 48:25
  Speaker 4: That's all it is. So we may never I don't
• 48:28
  Speaker 4: know what the FBI actually has on Epstein. I know
• 48:33
  Speaker 4: that they're sabotaging the current administration's efforts to make it public.
• 48:38
  Speaker 4: We may never actually see anything from the FBI. Somebody
• 48:43
  Speaker 4: may go to jail for making it impossible for us
• 48:46
  Speaker 4: to get that information, but I will be shocked if
• 48:50
  Speaker 4: that information ever becomes public. And we probably won't ever
• 48:54
  Speaker 4: see the ditty list either. Yeah, and that information again,
• 48:58
  Speaker 4: somebody's probably going to make it impossible for that information
• 49:02
  Speaker 4: to be made public. But and the thing that you
• 49:06
  Speaker 4: should be paying attention to really is you know what
• 49:11
  Speaker 4: connections you can can figure out and the who the
• 49:16
  Speaker 4: people are that are involved in not sharing the information
• 49:21
  Speaker 4: with the public and not prosecuting anybody. But the scapegoat
• 49:25
  Speaker 4: That's that's you really need to pay attention to, because
• 49:27
  Speaker 4: those are the people that are pulling their using this
• 49:31
  Speaker 4: to pull strings, and they're regardless of how evil what
• 49:37
  Speaker 4: these people did is, they're a thousand times scarier. And
• 49:43
  Speaker 4: the other thing is, if you really want to push
• 49:45
  Speaker 4: for a list and and a group of people to
• 49:47
  Speaker 4: be exposed, the biggest, most important, not biggest as in
• 49:53
  Speaker 4: the largest number of people on it, but of of
• 49:56
  Speaker 4: greatest significance and most important list that we shoul to
• 50:00
  Speaker 4: be clamoring for is you remember that a couple of
• 50:04
  Speaker 4: years ago we heard about that slush fund that Congress
• 50:08
  Speaker 4: had for when people who worked in the the Congressional
• 50:14
  Speaker 4: building or with Congress, or or were staff of you know,
• 50:21
  Speaker 4: any anything involved with Congress made sexual misconduct out conduct allegations,
• 50:26
  Speaker 4: this slush fund would pay them off and shut them up.
• 50:29
  Speaker 4: That's the list that we should be clamoring for. Who
• 50:32
  Speaker 4: are the elected officials who paid somebody off instead of
• 50:38
  Speaker 4: confronting a sexual misconduct allegation and proving it false. Yep,
• 50:47
  Speaker 4: because people that are corrupt.
• 50:50
  Speaker 1: Yeah, but let us know what you guys think about
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: this one. I still have more super child at chats now. Actually,
• 50:56
  Speaker 1: but that was the one from Meredith g thank you Meredith,
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: and then Zarah thanks with a membership. I think they
• 51:02
  Speaker 1: I'll read the comment, but thank you for the membership. Sering.
• 51:05
  Speaker 1: He says, fifty million dollars, who do they kidnap Chelsea Clinton?
• 51:09
  Speaker 1: Which is a quote from Rush Hour. I know the quote,
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: so thank you. That was Chris Tucker, who I think
• 51:17
  Speaker 1: is like kind of messed up now. But anyway, Albatross
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: gives us five dollars and says, man or woman, if
• 51:23
  Speaker 1: you're the kind of person who doesn't like taking orders,
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: why join the military, army, military Air Force in the
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: first place? Yeah, she was in the army. Yeah, well,
• 51:32
  Speaker 1: obviously a really good point. I understand that she was
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: placed there, and part of it had to do with
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: her status as a lesbian woman. I guess they wanted
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: to make that. Remember that ad for the military that
• 51:44
  Speaker 1: was like animated with you know, being raised by two moms.
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: It was a girl in the military. They they were
• 51:50
  Speaker 1: trying to make that real so they could use it
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: as like, oh, look at this, you know so, but yeah,
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: it's it's you know, it's a good question. It's a
• 51:58
  Speaker 1: good point, and I think I think that one of
• 52:00
  Speaker 1: the first things you should probably learn when you go
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: into the military is how to take orders. Like it's
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: probably the first thing that you learn.
• 52:08
  Speaker 4: So anyway, again, learn in elementary school.
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: You should learn that before you go into military.
• 52:14
  Speaker 4: Sure, but that's true. In fact, you should learn that
• 52:16
  Speaker 4: before you go to school.
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, all right, but anyway, let us on't you
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments. I gotta
• 52:23
  Speaker 1: move on, So here we go. Canada is cooked. So
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: in the recent Canadian federal election held on April twenty first,
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, resulted in a significant shift, with the
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: Liberals securing forty five percent of the vote and the
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: Conservatives thirty seven percent. According to Nanos Research polls. This
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: outcome marked a rare binary election, with the two major
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: parties collectively capturing over eighty percent of the vote, sidelining
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: third parties like the NDP, block, Quvequa Greens and People's Party.
• 52:55
  Speaker 1: So like normally Canada's got like a bunch of parties,
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: they're generally stick like I think all parties are just
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: split along like you know, two different hemispheres. If that
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: sometimes there's not really a difference.
• 53:08
  Speaker 2: But in this afication, don't you worry that that sort
• 53:12
  Speaker 2: of thing ever happens. Yeah, because no one reports on
• 53:15
  Speaker 2: it like they do in countries where there's any dispute whatsoever.
• 53:21
  Speaker 1: Okay, So anyway, the Liberals, led by Justin Trudeau, emerged,
• 53:25
  Speaker 1: though the exact seat distribution isn't specified. The fallout has
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: been marked by heightened political tension, exacerbated by President Donald
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: Trump's supposed influence, which a lot of Canadians seem to
• 53:37
  Speaker 1: think he had an effect on the election somehow, whose
• 53:41
  Speaker 1: tariffs and provocative stance on Canada as a potential fifty
• 53:45
  Speaker 1: first state have been blamed for traumatizing the nation and
• 53:49
  Speaker 1: shaping voter sentiment. This external pressure, alongside domestic economic concerns,
• 53:54
  Speaker 1: contributed to a polarized electorate, as noted by former Prime
• 53:57
  Speaker 1: Minister John Created I'm not going to pronounce that friendship,
• 54:01
  Speaker 1: Trey Tanne I guess, who described the election as having
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: an existential quality. Theories on the result point to several factors. First,
• 54:09
  Speaker 1: Trump's aggressive policies, including tariffs threatening Canada's economic security, likely
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: galvanized voters around the Liberals, who were perceived as better
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: equipped to handle international relations, suggested by Sharon's comments. Second,
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: the election's binary nature, a departure from Canada's typical minority
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: government outcomes, may reflect voter desire for stability amid uncertainty.
• 54:30
  Speaker 1: Whip polls showing a clear preference for the Liberals over
• 54:33
  Speaker 1: the Conservatives. Additionally, misinformation and foreign influenced concerns supposedly highlighted
• 54:39
  Speaker 1: by Justice Marie jossuer hogey I Guess Inquiry may have
• 54:43
  Speaker 1: influenced voter perceptions. Those specific impacts aren't detailed. The combination
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: of external pressures, economic fears, and a polarized political landscape
• 54:51
  Speaker 1: likely drove Canadians to favor the Liberals, seeking unified response
• 54:54
  Speaker 1: to global challenges. And I like to add to that.
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: So now we have this guy. Carney is the new
• 55:01
  Speaker 1: Prime Minister of Canada, and he is worse than Trudeau
• 55:04
  Speaker 1: if if that's possible, but he is. He is a
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: straight up globalist. We covered this on a previous show.
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: There's a lot of he has a lot of sketchy
• 55:14
  Speaker 1: connections with China and the Chinese Communist Party. That a sigh.
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: But he's like a big He's part of the World
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: Economic Forum. He goes to all their things, just like
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: Trudeau used to do. And essentially, like the thing about
• 55:28
  Speaker 1: Canada is that there are bombarded with state funded news
• 55:36
  Speaker 1: propaganda twenty four to seven, and there are some like
• 55:41
  Speaker 1: like because of the Internet, there are controls or at least
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: to the degree that the Canadian government can do it,
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: that prevent Canadians from accessing information outside of the sort
• 55:51
  Speaker 1: of pre approved sources. And so they were essentially fearmongered
• 55:56
  Speaker 1: into voting for this party because they used this Trump's
• 56:04
  Speaker 1: jokes about the fifty first state as a weapon to
• 56:07
  Speaker 1: fear monger the population into voting for the Liberals. And
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: the problem with Canadian Conservative Party, and I put that
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: in quotes, is that they're not really different. They don't
• 56:17
  Speaker 1: really stand on business, and they didn't really do the work.
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: Pierre Poliev got lazy and complacent and felt entitled to
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: the position, thought that it was guaranteed to him because
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: he went viral a couple of times. Did not do
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: the work. He was invited on several American podcasts like
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: THEO Vaughn and you know, Patrick bet David Joe Rogan
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: did not go okay. I think he like sat down
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: with Jordan Peterson once and that was the extent of it.
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: And even that conversation was treating his position as Prime
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: Minister as a foregone conclusion when it was still months
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: before the election happened. So Pierre Polyev dropped the ball
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: big time and he got spineless. He basically went after
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: Trump for his comments instead of calming people down, trying
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: to relax the you know, the rhetoric or whatever do
• 57:06
  Speaker 1: or just do his own version of it, sit down
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: with Donald Trump, whatever he decided to be like, I
• 57:12
  Speaker 1: stand with Canadians. And then because of that, because he
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: showed weakness, they went with this guy who is going
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: to put Canada through some very difficult times. Going forward
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: to the point where just as another aside, Alberta is
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: the sentiment about Alberta seceding from the nation is very
• 57:34
  Speaker 1: high right now because Alberta is sort of like the
• 57:37
  Speaker 1: Texas of Canada. You know, they're also the sort of
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: energy center of Canada as well, like it's where all
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: of the oil is and the other things fossil fuels
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: and so what Alberta historically gets boned by the eastern parts.
• 57:54
  Speaker 1: The way that Canada's government set up is really fucked up.
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: Like basically they had these things called equity payments or
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: equality payments where different provinces. At the end of like
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: a fiscal year or whatever, like a fyscal period of time,
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: they have to redistribute wealth between provinces. So what that
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: means is the provinces that make the most money lose
• 58:17
  Speaker 1: the most money, and the ones that do the least
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: in that get the most because they equalize the payments
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: across the board. So people who live in like you know,
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: Ottawa or Quebec, who don't do shit, or at least
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: don't produce as much, they get more of the money
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: from the equity payments. And Alberta always ends up paying
• 58:35
  Speaker 1: out the most because it's where all the oil is at.
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: So there, I.
• 58:40
  Speaker 2: Would have a lot more sympathy for Alberta had they
• 58:43
  Speaker 2: not done to us what they did to us ten
• 58:48
  Speaker 2: years ago, almost exactly ten years ago, being told that
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: that Alberta is totally different than the rest of Canada
• 58:56
  Speaker 2: but not in our experience.
• 59:00
  Speaker 4: Got to remember what happened there, right we were, we
• 59:03
  Speaker 4: were winning, and then a Supreme Court judge came to
• 59:07
  Speaker 4: observe the case, and then all of a sudden, the
• 59:10
  Speaker 4: judge made a ruling that cited no law and made
• 59:13
  Speaker 4: no sense. So yeah, I don't. I don't think.
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: That Canadian Canada's conservatives are not.
• 59:21
  Speaker 2: That Alberta the power that is held over Alberta and
• 59:30
  Speaker 2: indeed over all of Canada, where they take everything that
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: Alberta produces and gives it to Quebec basically. And yeah,
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: if anyone else has anything to say, please say no,
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: I have a long run ahead of me.
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: Okay, I mean I'm I think I'm done. I'm just saying, well,
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: I'll add something later.
• 59:51
  Speaker 4: Go ahead, Well I will say this. And this is
• 59:59
  Speaker 4: this is the result of people thinking top down. When
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 4: the United States fixed our problems with our election system
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 4: and we got Trump into office this time because that's
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 4: what the majority of the public actually wanted and we
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 4: got We eliminated the ability of the people who cheated
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 4: in the last election to repeat the same cheat that
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 4: they used. We didn't do that from the top down.
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 4: That was done in counties and states and sometimes even
• 1:00:36
  Speaker 4: in municipalities by changing local ordinances and state laws regarding
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 4: the security of the vote system. So that you know,
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 4: some of the stuff I saw on online where people
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 4: are putting up videos of like people taking home boxes
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 4: of unmarked ballots and stuff from the centers where people
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 4: are voting and everything. We pretty much made it so
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: that was not something that could happen again, and lo
• 1:01:08
  Speaker 4: and behold that year. You know that one election showed
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 4: up as an anomaly in our history and we've gone
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 4: back to the baseline. That's what you have to do.
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 4: If you're going to fix things in Canada, you cannot
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 4: expect your federal government to do it. You have the
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 4: same sort of parliamentary system that came from English common
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 4: law that we have. It's got some differences, but how
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 4: voting is handled locally is going to determine whether or
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 4: not the people of the country decide who becomes your
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 4: national leader. There is no other way to deal with that.
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 4: That's the first thing. The second thing is Alberta seceeding
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 4: is going to be really challenging for Alberta if Canada
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 4: decides to say no, you can't do that and refuse
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 4: to let them leave, because there's only a narrow little
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 4: part of the state that borders up against the United States,
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 4: and the rest of this state is it's surrounded on
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 4: three sides, like three and a half sides, you could say,
• 1:02:20
  Speaker 4: by other Canadian provinces. So what you end up with then,
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 4: is its borders are vulnerable almost all the way around
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 4: to invasion by Canadian military if it were to if
• 1:02:38
  Speaker 4: it were to secede, and of course there's Canadian military
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 4: within that may follow federal orders. So unless Alberta somehow
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 4: made a deal to become part of the United States
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 4: and let the United States military come in and defend
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 4: the area, which would make it look like we were
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 4: giving Canada the middle finger, which would be kind of funny.
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 4: That's not going to happen. The idea of Alberta succeeding
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 4: from the seceding from the Canadian nation, it's highly unlikely.
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 4: It'd be interesting to watch if that happened, and it
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 4: certainly wouldn't be a bad thing for the United States
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 4: to acquire it. But I don't think anybody should hold
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 4: their breath. I really don't. But you know, the men
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 4: of Canada, that's you're. The thing that you need to
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 4: do if you feel like the election did not go
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 4: your way is start taking every measure you can and
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 4: supporting every measure you can to fix the local statutes
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 4: and the local procedures for how elections are handling handled
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 4: in your country. And that's the only thing that you
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 4: can do to stave off another election like this if
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 4: you're not happy with the results.
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: Mike, So yeah, do people seriously think this electoral result
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: is because of Trump?
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 2: Like if Trump hadn't shit talked just intrudeeru, Mike.
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, yes. But here's the thing. The
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 1: people who overwhelmingly were affected by the media in Canada
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: to vote for the Liberals were the boomers. So that
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: I mean, and I don't like to pick on boomers
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 1: talk normally, but the boomers did this for sure.
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 2: Exactly what I'm going to get into. If like, if
• 1:04:42
  Speaker 2: Trump hadn't shit talked just In Trudeau a couple of times,
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 2: the Liberals wouldn't have taken their fourth victory in a row,
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: bearing in mind Trump wasn't in powered during the last
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: win or the one in twenty fifteen that changed everything
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 2: to be other reasons like maybe Canada is a closed
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: system of left wing echo chambers and has been for
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 2: several lifetimes. Much like in the UK and most of
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 2: the rest of Europe, we don't have freedom of speech.
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 2: As such, the flow of information has been monopolized by
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: the most ruthless ideology, willing to lie and censor their
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 2: way to the top, namely the far left, and people
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: are still finding ways to blame anything but the far
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 2: left for the tyranny of the far left. But people
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 2: are pointing to a pole, the pointing at a graph
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 2: about a pole indicating that the Conservatives were winning until
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 2: January this year, and then it sort of pincered into
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: a switch. Bitch, it's Canada. It's like reading a pole
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: from North Korea and assuming that that poll is on
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 2: the level. No, that is not an exaggeration, and it's
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: not much of one. The Canadian government can censor any
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: information they like and inflate any narrative they like, and
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: there's nothing anyone can do about it. They can trample
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: peaceful protesters in the street and freeze their bank accounts
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 2: and get away with it because they control the flow
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 2: of information. Yes, there is a handful of you know,
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 2: sensible tech savvy there, I say, right wing Canadians who
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: are able to break out of the bubble of state
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 2: controlled media, but they are very much in the minority. Again,
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: it's the same in the UK and Europe. Yes, they
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: hate Trump, They've always hated Trump, but it's not because
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: of what Trump does. Is because of what the media
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: says he does. It's the two minutes of hate through
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 2: which the politically illiterate masses are put through every day
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 2: over their fucking breakfast. There is no trace of a
• 1:07:10
  Speaker 2: mainstream media outlet. There is anything but far left. There
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 2: isn't even an equivalent of Fox News. Everything in Canada
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 2: and Europe is MSNBC or CNN or and they're funded
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 2: by the government that died in the world, far left government.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 2: Even if they are indeed showing you accurate polling data,
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: that data only reflects what the masses have been programmed
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 2: to think. Even if Trump had just shut his fucking
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 2: mouth about Canada and he never talked or that smack
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 2: about the fifty first state or whatever, they would still
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: have been subjected to all this hysteria about the tariffs
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 2: and whatnot. But everyone uses tariffs. Every country has been
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: tariffing America up the assets forever. Yeah, but I only
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: just heard about them. I had no idea what tariff
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: was until the TV told me to be afraid of
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: the tariffs that Trump has only just introduced in the
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 2: other direction. So, as far as I con said, Trump
• 1:08:23
  Speaker 2: invented tariffs just now, just for the sake of fucking
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: everyone else over And never before in history has Canada
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: had any drive or incentive to nationalize themselves in opposition
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 2: to the USA. It literally never happened until literally yesterday.
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: That's that's that's a long story, but it's one the
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 2: boomers ought to know. But I'm not just talking about
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 2: the boomers. By the way. That's another graph everyone's pointing at.
• 1:08:57
  Speaker 2: It's amazing the extent to which people will try damned
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 2: lies and statistics when it gives them someone else to blame.
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 2: It's funny how Gen x's will always find a way
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 2: to blame everything on the boomers or the millennials. That's
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 2: so convenient, isn't it. How your generation just magically dodges
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 2: all the blame. Yeah, the communist wave that has been
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 2: sweeping through the West relentlessly for a century just somehow
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: skipped over you and all your friends, did it? Yeah? No,
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: it didn't. Every generation gets twenty to forty years in
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: which they are principally in charge of the wheels of progress,
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: and for Gen X, that has been I mean it's
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 2: roughly the past twenty years, right, the twenty years in
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 2: which bad has gone to worse, Right, fuck you, you
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 2: did it too. I get to say this because I'm
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: on the cusp of gen X and millennial, the sins
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 2: of both generations and the glory of both generations. And
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: at the same time, I reject all the all of
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: the above, because this isn't about generations or the arbitrary
• 1:10:12
  Speaker 2: identities we give those generations likecophobic missandric Communism has been
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 2: dissolving its way through our civilization for a century at
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 2: the very least, a decade at a time, a year
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 2: at a time, a day at a time. And if
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: we're gonna blame it on our parents and all our children,
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 2: thank good fucking lord man. The demons have already won
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: our guilt, our blame, our blood, our fault. I've been
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: far too sympathetic. I am not innocent. You are not innocent.
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 2: No oh, one is innocent. When I do the tool lyrics,
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 2: you know I'm finished.
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 4: There you go when you were when you really think
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 4: about it. Nearly in the United States, gen X can
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 4: come can claim to have been politically uninvolved. But there's
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 4: a problem with that too. And I'll go back to
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 4: Armstrong Park with this. I always talk about this, right
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 4: we we we uh as kids when I was growing
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 4: up in my neighborhood had a very rough and tumble
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 4: attitude toward childhood, and our parents had a very rough
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 4: and tumble attitude toward raising us, and so we were
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 4: unsupervised a lot, and there was a lot of fighting, right,
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 4: But a group of kids at the park that decided
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 4: to pretend they were a gang, and they beat up
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 4: the other kids, and they would hang around and look cool,
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 4: you know, by the swing set, or they would hang
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 4: around and look cool by the monkey bars, but they
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 4: really didn't know what they were claiming to be, what
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 4: that meant. But they were the neighborhood bullies. And there
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 4: were two groups of two divided groups of when it
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 4: came to how to handle this. There were kids that
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 4: fought back even if they were going to lose, and
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 4: there were kids that avoided them. Right, And it's the
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 4: kids that fought back even if they were going to
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 4: lose they took them down, not the kids that avoided them.
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 4: And it's that way in every situation. It's not that
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 4: the squeaky wheel gets the grease in the workplace. It's
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 4: that the squeaky wheel alerts you to what's wrong with
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 4: the machine. And until people step up to try to
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 4: fix the squeaky wheel and do something about the situation.
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 4: They're all guilty of condoning it. And so gen X
• 1:13:01
  Speaker 4: has claimed that none of this is our fault because
• 1:13:04
  Speaker 4: our generation was not politically active, is actually an admission
• 1:13:09
  Speaker 4: of guilt because we saw this happening and we did nothing.
• 1:13:16
  Speaker 4: It doesn't matter if boomers were running the country. We
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 4: were old enough to vote, we were old enough to
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 4: write letters, we were old enough to march, we were
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 4: old enough to call. We were old enough to create
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 4: our own news media back in the day when you
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 4: could actually do that with paper media and be successful.
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 4: And there weren't very many of us that did any
• 1:13:41
  Speaker 4: of those things. So Mike's right, and gen X can
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 4: stop blaming everybody else and become a force of nature
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 4: or stop complaining because it's your.
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 6: Fault, it's everyone's fault, and it's everyone's responsibility to fix it.
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 4: Yep, grab a shovel.
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 1: All right, Well, I guess we will see. But apparently,
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 1: like I said, Alberta is considering leaving the union. People
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: Americans have made pitches say we will, we will take
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: you as long as it's just you. But yeah, I
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: mean Canada is in for a very Canada is in
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: for a very tough while. And the thing is too
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 1: according to the data I saw the reason one of
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: the reasons why the Boomers outvotedly that age that age
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: group outvoted was because there's more of them. So apparently
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 1: there are more people of that generation voting, or there
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 1: are just more people of that generation than the younger generations.
• 1:15:02
  Speaker 4: Where their name came from, right, because they were the
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 4: the largest generation. There was a huge boom of babies.
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 4: There was a huge number of babies born after the war.
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: So yeah, yeah, And look, I like I said, I'm
• 1:15:21
  Speaker 1: not blaming them myself. I've always I've often made the
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 1: defense that simply blaming a generation for your problems is
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 1: not the solution. I'm saying that when you look at
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: what the reasons for that might be. Like, my mother
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 1: in law is basically a boomer. She's like right on
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: the cusp of that and Generation X, I guess, and
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: she gets all of her information from TV, and so like,
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 1: it's not I'm not blaming them for just following the
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 1: you know, operating on the information that they are given
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 1: based on their resources. They're not as savvy with the
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: tech that younger generations are. I mean even gen X
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: is guilty of that. You know, well, because a lot
• 1:16:08
  Speaker 1: of people gen X don't do a lot of stuff online.
• 1:16:11
  Speaker 1: I think that's like more the you know domain, I
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: guess of the millennials and especially the zoomers, of which
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: the zoomers, especially zoomer men, young men, voted overwhelmingly against that.
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: In Canada. It's just that there are not enough of them.
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: They just weren't. In Canada's more of a direct democracy,
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 1: you know, so basically, once Toronto and like you know,
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 1: Ottawa or or one of the other big cities, once
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: those those larger, higher population provinces vote, the election is over.
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: Like it doesn't like Alberta just has a smaller population.
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: They can't they don't really have any influence. Even Karen.
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 1: I was looking at Karen's Twitter and she posted about that.
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, she did a long after thread about yeah, the
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 2: Alberta situation.
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean we've been talking about this for a
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: long time. Like Lindsay, who's from Alberta, you know, she
• 1:17:08
  Speaker 1: has also lamented that like there's like our elections zo't
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 1: like people who live in Alberta literally can say voting
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter because there it's not like a representative republic
• 1:17:19
  Speaker 1: like the United States. It's a direct democracy, one to one.
• 1:17:23
  Speaker 1: So that means that the places in that the areas
• 1:17:27
  Speaker 1: that have the highest population win all the elections. So
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 1: that's the party that wins. Right And as long as
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 1: you have like essentially provinces that are suckling at the
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: teat of other provinces for resources, guess who's gonna vote
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: to suckle more of the teat. So I mean, then
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 1: that's how it shakes out. So and that's what Carneye
• 1:17:51
  Speaker 1: is promising. He's basically like calling it and he's not
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 1: calling it a tax, but they're gonna be spending like,
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: I don't know, tens billions or maybe even one hundred
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 1: billion or some crazy amount when he could have just
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: made a deal with Trump and probably got it done
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: for like maybe a couple billion. And yeah, and the
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 1: and of course again Canadians are generally like controlled by
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: their media, except for the younger people who know how
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: to use the Internet and know how to get their
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 1: information somewhere else. So again I'm not saying this is
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: the boomer's fault because boomers. I'm saying that this is
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 1: the this is something that will affect It's not even
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: a fault thing. The people who are operating with bad
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: information and the mistaken assumption that they can trust their
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: government and trust their media and if it's all they've
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: ever known, Like imagine going into you know, China and
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 1: telling people that they're dumb for following shijiping. They wouldn't know.
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 1: They don't even have the language tools to understand what
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: you're saying because they live in China and to them,
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: that's the world. The people who live in North Korea
• 1:19:02
  Speaker 1: believe that Kim Jong un can fly and like kill
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: with a glare or something. They think he's like a
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: supernatural being, right, because that's what the media tells them.
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: So I think, and I know that's an exaggeration, but
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 1: I'm saying that, you know, I don't. I don't hold
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: it against them. I just think it's gonna be bad
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: because there's gonna be more suffering. But there is one
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 1: other thing about Canadian ness. I think that you know,
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: I've talked about a couple of times, and I've talked
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: to Lindsay about a lot that Canadians think that they're
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: fighting the man by essentially like siding with Carney. He's
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: they're being used by this guy, okay, and the and
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: what the the illusion is we're better than Americans because
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 1: we're Canadians, and that's Canadian identity, is that we're nicer people.
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 1: Even Pierre Paulie fell into the trap of well, I'm
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: not like Trump because he's mean, I'm gonna be nice
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: and this is going to kill them. This is what
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: is happening. Like Canadian identity is not an identity. It's
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 1: just an opposition to American identity. That's how it exists.
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: And this is something that I've been trying to get
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 1: people to see is that you, if you are a Canadian,
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 1: you have to figure out what that means, Like you
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: have to be something outside of how it relates to
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: the United States, Like we are not your enemy. You know,
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 1: we have like more in common with Canadians than not.
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 1: But for some reason, Canadian people have this thing in
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: their head that they're just better people than Americans are.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: And and I don't know if that comes from the
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 1: French part or what, but it is something they have
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: to deal with. And uh, Canada is just gonna keep
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: destroying itself because it feels like it will make it,
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: you know that Trudeau thing like when what do they
• 1:20:50
  Speaker 1: say when when when enemies, you know, beat you, you
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: win or something like that, Like it's this idea that
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 1: you can just sort of like stick it out and
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: be like, well, I'm better than you while they're kicking
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 1: your ass and that makes you better, so therefore you win.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: And they're doing that to themselves now, like the Mad
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: program is being done to the Canadian people right now,
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: Like it's crazy and I just want Canadians to know that,
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: you know, you got to figure out what it means
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: to be Canadian and have that identity and don't be
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: ashamed of it, because that's what Americans are figuring out
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 1: just now. We almost lost that. And this guy, he's
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: a globalist. He's going to want to erase your identity,
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: just like Europe, just like the UK, just like every
• 1:21:34
  Speaker 1: other part of the world except for the truly sovereign nations,
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: or at least the ones that are trying to be
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 1: like El Salvador, like the United States, like Russia. Like
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: like it or hate it, it's true, they believe themselves
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 1: to be sovereign and they're gonna fight for that. Canada
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: has to figure out what it is and Canadians have
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: to figure that out and they have to fight for that,
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: and that means they're gonna have to fight their own
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 1: government and their own ideas about themselves. It's not about
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 1: how you are compared to us, it's how you are
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: a you know, what are you? What are Canadians? So anyway,
• 1:22:03
  Speaker 1: that's all I wanted to say about that. Yeah, Canada's
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 1: got up. They got up rough couple of years, and
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 1: I hope that. I mean, Carney is effectively declaring in
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: a way, he's declaring war on us. He's not gonna
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: send troops over that would be stupid, but but he
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: is seeing America as the enemy, and he is conditioning
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 1: the people of Canada to dislike Americans because Trump says
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: mean things on x It's ridiculous. It's not even like
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: it's beyond immature. But anyway, so, uh, yeah, Karen's not
• 1:22:36
  Speaker 1: thrilled with that. We got to move on to the
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: next story though, So uh, let me see if there's
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: any super chats or anything that I missed in I
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: think there was one other super child that I got,
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: yeah from Meredith g So Meretig gives us five bucks,
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: thank you. Meredith and says for the January crash, this
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 1: is the helicopter crash. I have a neighbor with buddies
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: in the military who have indicated that she achieved her
• 1:22:58
  Speaker 1: position by filing discrimination and harassment complaints to get a
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 1: promotion she didn't earn. Again, just a rumor. I cannot confirm. Well,
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: that would make sense that I could see that, because
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: if you if you were filing for complaints and then
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: that got you a promotion, then I could see how
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 1: you could have the arrogant attitude of not taking advice
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 1: from from people on your team because you feel like
• 1:23:24
  Speaker 1: you could just be like, well that sounds like harassment discrimination, Well,
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 1: would you please turn left here? What because I'm a lesbian?
• 1:23:35
  Speaker 5: Yeah, so that's that's that's that's an attitude that I've
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 5: run into with a lot of lesbians actually because of
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 5: a lesbian that right there, Any anything that you say, oh,
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 5: it's a lovely day outside to day.
• 1:23:51
  Speaker 4: What because of a lesbian And I'm inside, Like I'm not.
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: You mean like inside the closet.
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 4: Yeah, Like honestly, I Am not kidding. That's and it's
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 4: it's not universal, right, there's like about five or ten
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 4: percent of lesbians that don't act like that, but the
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 4: rest of them do. From my personal experience, maybe it's
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 4: just lesbians and Ohio, but uh, you know, it's sorry
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 4: to say that, guys, but if she was a lesbian,
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 4: that explains a lot about the way that she behaved
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 4: in my opinion.
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I heard that. I heard that there was a
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 1: guy on the team had way more flight hours than
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: she did, just so you know again, but she so control.
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 4: So anyway, there's a thing that needs to happen, by
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 4: the way, and this is this is probably gonna be
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 4: controversial because, uh, sexual harassment is seen as a legitimate complaint,
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 4: and I mean it depends on what the reason the
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 4: complaint is made, you know, is it happens to be
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 4: like it's obviously if somebody says, if you want to
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 4: continue to work here, uh, you gotta do this or
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 4: you gotta do that sexual thing, then yeah, that's sexual harassment.
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 4: Or if somebody discriminates because you're gay or straight or
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 4: any other sexual identity, blah blah blah, sexual harassment. That's
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 4: I'm not denying that, all right, but it needs to
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 4: be somehow addressed that if somebody uses sexual harassment allegations
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 4: and the response to sexual harassment allegations as a means
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 4: of climbing the ladder of authority and responsibility within their
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 4: company and then does damage that the company should have
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 4: recourse against them, and there there should be if they
• 1:25:58
  Speaker 4: deliberately strove for a position they couldn't handle and blackmailed
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 4: the company using this system of being able to make
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 4: allegations and being able to sue and say, you know,
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 4: I was discriminated against and so on, to stay in
• 1:26:15
  Speaker 4: a position that they did not deserve. There should be
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 4: a legal investigation as to whether or not evidence was
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 4: available to them that should a reasonable person should have
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 4: understood would demonstrate that they didn't belong in that position,
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 4: that they weren't competent, and if they didn't make the
• 1:26:38
  Speaker 4: reasonable decision to step back down, there should be a
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 4: criminal law addressing that. Yeah, especially if there is harm
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 4: to human health in human life as a result of
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 4: what they did, because that is essentially using coercive control
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 4: to gain control that then you used to do harm
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 4: to people through your known incompetence.
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: Yep. All right, well let us know what you guys
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 1: think about this. One of the comments, thank you for
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 1: the super Chow Meredith, let us move on to the
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 1: next story. So On April twenty third, twenty twenty five,
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 1: Reuters reported that militants in Indian Administered Kashmir bananant Bananat
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 1: bananant I had to is Okay killed twenty six people
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: in a targeted attack near the tourist destination of Pahalgam,
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: marking the deadliest assault on civilians in the region in
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: nearly twenty years. The attackers separated the men from the
• 1:27:53
  Speaker 1: women and children, asking the men their names before shooting
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 1: them at close range. According to security of officials and survivors,
• 1:28:01
  Speaker 1: the attack shattered the relative column in Kashmir, where tourism
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 1: had surged to three point five million visitors in twenty
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 1: twenty four, and prompted India to downgrade diplomatic ties with Pakistan,
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 1: accusing it of involvement, a claim that Pakistan denies. Survivors
• 1:28:18
  Speaker 1: like Asavari Jagdale, I hope again I apologize for butchering
• 1:28:23
  Speaker 1: if I did, recounted hiding intents as militants demanded her
• 1:28:26
  Speaker 1: father recite in Islamic verse, highlighting the brutality of the assault,
• 1:28:31
  Speaker 1: which drew international condemnation from leaders like our president and
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 1: EU chief Ursula vonder Leyan So I just the reason
• 1:28:39
  Speaker 1: why this one I wanted to highlight it. Will Allison
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: shared it. But it is because the article is written
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 1: as well. Actually it was. It did gender the language.
• 1:28:50
  Speaker 1: It says militants in Indian Kashmir segregate men from women
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: and children before opening fire on the men. So just
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 1: you know, it's a is a tragedy, I understand.
• 1:29:01
  Speaker 2: And the men was not included in the.
• 1:29:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's not.
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: It's not in the title for anyone who's listening. I mean, yeah,
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 2: I I learned about this story through the Men are
• 1:29:15
  Speaker 2: Human account on Twitter, presumably that's how I was inbound too.
• 1:29:20
  Speaker 2: And yeah, they whoever operates that account posted this, and
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 2: then they got all manner of of people saying, oh, yeah,
• 1:29:35
  Speaker 2: misogyny involves men killing women. Missery involves men feeling bad
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 2: about women's say, and then they had to sort of
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: go this, this is about men being killed for being men,
• 1:29:54
  Speaker 2: And the mind boggles. The reason so many people think
• 1:29:59
  Speaker 2: of missing as nothing, as a peripheral afterthought, if anything,
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 2: is not because it's rare, but because it's common in
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 2: any given war, in any given conflict, in any given massacre,
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 2: it is the men who die first or die only,
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: but it's always tied to something else. Well, they're killing
• 1:30:24
  Speaker 2: those men because there are different people, because there are
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 2: different race, or a different religion, or a different socio
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 2: political persuasion. It's not because they're men. Well maybe, but
• 1:30:38
  Speaker 2: they're not killing the women because they're women. So for
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 2: all your mental gymnastics, the corollary does apply that they
• 1:30:48
  Speaker 2: are killing the men because they are men, and then
• 1:30:53
  Speaker 2: they go on to subjugate and enslave the women who
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 2: survive the ordeal. And then, or you're feminists in this,
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 2: that it's because they are women that so to getting
• 1:31:06
  Speaker 2: and it's like, no, it's because they're the only ones
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 2: left alive. Moreover, it's because these genocidal psychopaths, despite their
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 2: genocidal psychopathy, refuse to kill women. Just like the worst
• 1:31:29
  Speaker 2: hardened criminals in maximum security prison will exactly the worst
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: possible communal punishments against men who may have dared to
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: harm women. Even the biblically evil monsters help bent on
• 1:31:48
  Speaker 2: destroying entire peoples still won't destroy the women of those peoples.
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 2: And I use the adverb biblically just to apply historical context,
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 2: I could just as well. I've said quarenically or talmudically
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: or iliadically or whatever. This has been the case since
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 2: two thousand years ago, since four thousand years since ten
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 2: thousand years ago. I mean, I could go on. I
• 1:32:15
  Speaker 2: covered this in an animation based rant video I made
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: some time ago called The Inside Outer's Guide to Gender Side.
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 2: Believe it or not, this devaluing of men's lives in
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 2: relation to women's lives is not some political phenomenon that
• 1:32:37
  Speaker 2: magiced itself into existence like a hundred years ago. It
• 1:32:42
  Speaker 2: even goes back since long before romantic chivalry. It's the
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 2: problem our species has faced since it discovered language, quite honestly,
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: and perhaps long before even that. And that is not
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 2: to say, ladies and gentlemen, that there is anything natural
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 2: about it, at least if there is any distinction to
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: be made between natural and man made or should I say,
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 2: guynes centrism made, is it is natural for men to
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: fight each other, and it is natural for men to
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: protect women. But it's also natural for women to fight
• 1:33:25
  Speaker 2: other women and for women to protect men, or be
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 2: it in you know, somewhat different ways. It's even natural
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 2: for primates to experience tribal warfare for the sake of territorialism.
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 2: But it is not natural for men to kill jaw
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: dropping the vast swathes of other men for purely ideological reasons.
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: And yet it happens rather a fucking lot for a
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: very long time time, killing men because they are men,
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 2: not killing people in Kashmi, in Kashmir, because there are
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 2: a slightly different persuasion of people than another persuasion of people.
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 2: In Kashmi, it was men who came first. If we
• 1:34:17
  Speaker 2: had a rule, right, if we had a rule where
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 2: you know how we don't kill women even if they
• 1:34:26
  Speaker 2: belong to a tribe we don't like. Well, if we
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 2: extend that rule to men, and we don't just kill
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 2: men because they belong to a tribe we don't like,
• 1:34:38
  Speaker 2: I think I think that would reduce an awful lot
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 2: of killing. I think that would reduce an awful lot
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: of war in the first place. What if we took
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 2: that compassion we have for women and we extend it
• 1:34:54
  Speaker 2: two men. And I don't mean toxic compassion or whatever
• 1:34:59
  Speaker 2: you're a can reflectively be thinking about in your head.
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 2: I don't mean the biggotrey of low expectations. I don't
• 1:35:05
  Speaker 2: mean suicidal empathy. Like if their culture doesn't gel with
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: your culture, that's fine. Just find different places in which
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: to live. There's nothing wrong with that. That's what diplomacy
• 1:35:21
  Speaker 2: is for. We get this bit of the land, you
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 2: get that bit of the land. Let's agree to disagree,
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 2: and let's keep ourselves to ourselves. And let's not in
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 2: the event that some bitches kick up a stink, let's
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: not mass murder a bunch of men. And let's not
• 1:35:39
  Speaker 2: pretend that women are the primary victims of that mass
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 2: murder of men. It's a it's a pipe dream. I know.
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 2: It's like, it's not natural, right. You can't expect us
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 2: to hold those kind of standards. Well, maybe not, but
• 1:35:56
  Speaker 2: I'll try until my dying day. I'm gonna try. You
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 2: may say I'm a dreamer, and I don't ready give
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 2: a fine fuck if I am the only one. I
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 2: hope someday you will join us and the world will
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 2: live as many, yet not as one. I fucking hate
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 2: that song, and not just imagine, and not just because
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 2: it was melodically dog water, but because of that specific lyric,
• 1:36:29
  Speaker 2: the one that Loki calls for a one world government.
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 2: Love you, John but you fucked up in the end
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 2: big time. That's exactly why you got murdered by a
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 2: nutjob while your useless fucking wife stood by without a
• 1:36:43
  Speaker 2: scratch on her going on to screech pointlessly into a
• 1:36:46
  Speaker 2: microphone to this day, do you see how it comes
• 1:36:49
  Speaker 2: full circle? John you, John you, We're the nigger of
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 2: the world. You still are. We all are. Take it
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 2: from there.
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, that's I There's no where you can go
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: from there, So I am vague man.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: All right?
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: Uh, Hannah, did you want to say anything about this one?
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 4: Most of what I would say was pretty much covered
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 4: by Mike, But I just want to point out, you know,
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 4: like this is this is the way it always is,
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 4: with one exception, one very stark and widely recognized exception.
• 1:37:31
  Speaker 4: And I know there's a lot of debate as to
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 4: how that exception went down, what extent to what extent
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 4: it happened, whether the reasons for it were in any
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 4: way valid, uh, you know, and and whether what was
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 4: done was wrong. But most of the time, overwhelmingly because
• 1:37:54
  Speaker 4: the propaganda that is used in war is that patriarchy
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 4: over there, those rapists over there, those men of that
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 4: culture abuse their women, those men of that culture neglect
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 4: to control their women properly, to the women's detriment, and
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 4: so on, they sexualize their women, They do this to
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 4: their women, They do that to their women, and you
• 1:38:21
  Speaker 4: end up with this situation of it's the men of
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 4: the culture that are dangerous. The men of the culture
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 4: are the ones that are likely to be violent and
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 4: fight back and so on. And in so many cultures,
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 4: women are not trained to fight, and they are not
• 1:38:38
  Speaker 4: taught that they are responsible as much as men are
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 4: for the welfare of their nation. It's men who die,
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 4: men who are killed, men who are targeted, and so on.
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 4: It's also partly the reason why so many women were
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 4: killed during the Holocaust, because they thought that's what the
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 4: Nazis would do. When it started to look like, hey,
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 4: they're going to start running people up and killing them,
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 4: they sent their men in their family out of the
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 4: country first, because they thought that the women would have time,
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 4: the women would be spared. And the Nazis had more
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 4: of an attitude where they they thought of Jews like
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 4: we think of headlice, and so they killed everything. They
• 1:39:30
  Speaker 4: killed women and children and men, the men that were
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 4: left behind and so on. Anybody that they couldn't enslave.
• 1:39:37
  Speaker 4: They killed, and people think of it as misogynistic because
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 4: the women were not spared the fate that men always
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 4: have being the primary targets of war, being the primary
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 4: targets of genocide and so on. And in a situation
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 4: like this, what happened here, which is is heartbreaking. As
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 4: always when this type of thing happens, men were targeted
• 1:40:10
  Speaker 4: because they know. The killers know that if you want
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 4: to ensure a group a group of people isn't able
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 4: to survive, is unable to remain cohesive and survive as
• 1:40:26
  Speaker 4: a group, you take out the protectors and the providers.
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 4: And that's what they did. There's this horrific video that's
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 4: been going around on x that from from this situation
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 4: that has sort of this weird juxtaposition because that was
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 4: a tourist area and people were there to have fun,
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 4: and it's it's like, you know, nothing like this was expected.
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 4: In the moment, there was a guy who was on
• 1:40:59
  Speaker 4: a zip line and he was just having a blast
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 4: and you could see, you know, he was enjoying himself
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 4: on the zipline. He was completely aware, unaware of what
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 4: was going on below him, and you can just hear
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 4: the screaming and the gunshots over the sound of you know,
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 4: he's whooping and hollering because he's he's going pretty fast
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 4: on the zipline. He's happy. And I can't imagine, you know,
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 4: going back later and looking at that video from his perspective,
• 1:41:32
  Speaker 4: if he'd been on the ground, he would have been
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 4: targeted or he would have been one of the perpetrators.
• 1:41:41
  Speaker 4: Like I couldn't tell from the video exactly, Like there's
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 4: some evidence of which side he would have been on,
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 4: but it's not from him. It's from the guy that
• 1:41:56
  Speaker 4: was running the zipline, And so it's not something that
• 1:42:02
  Speaker 4: I would be like, well, definitely this But either way,
• 1:42:09
  Speaker 4: that video really if you find it. I think there's
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 4: a an account called fascinating and there's another account called
• 1:42:18
  Speaker 4: Creepy that both have that up because it's it's just
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 4: a weird catch that this guy actually caught that going
• 1:42:28
  Speaker 4: on m H.
• 1:42:31
  Speaker 2: I saw that video. I wasn't sure if it was
• 1:42:33
  Speaker 2: from the exact same thing because they didn't mention it
• 1:42:36
  Speaker 2: was from cashm And you don't you don't see anyone
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 2: getting shot in the video.
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 4: Right, No, you just hear it.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 2: It just it just looks like the outskirts of a festival.
• 1:42:46
  Speaker 2: There's a few sort of sort of clumps of people
• 1:42:50
  Speaker 2: and you're not sure what's going on.
• 1:42:52
  Speaker 4: But yeah, one of the accounts, and I can't remember
• 1:42:55
  Speaker 4: which one, but because I saw it on two accounts,
• 1:42:57
  Speaker 4: one of them didn't say where it was from or
• 1:42:59
  Speaker 4: when was from exactly, and the other one did and
• 1:43:03
  Speaker 4: that it was from the recent attack at Kashmir. Now
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 4: it's also possible that they mislabeled it, so I like,
• 1:43:11
  Speaker 4: I'm not gonna make any solid claims. It must be
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 4: this or it must be that, but I just can't
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 4: imagine what went through that guy's head later on.
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a sad situation, but it's what we have
• 1:43:29
  Speaker 1: to report on.
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 2: Though.
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 1: Yeah, let us know what you guys think about this
• 1:43:32
  Speaker 1: one in the comments. We just double checked me. Ture
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: didn't miss anything here, No rumble rants, no more super
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: child's Okay, let's get into the last story. Let us
• 1:43:42
  Speaker 1: know what you guys think about this one in the comments. Okay,
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: So you probably don't know who this is. This is
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 1: Kimberly Ellis, director of San Francisco's Department on the Status
• 1:43:53
  Speaker 1: of Women. So on April twenty third, twenty twenty five.
• 1:43:58
  Speaker 1: According to the stand Kimberly Ellis, director of San Francisco's
• 1:44:04
  Speaker 1: Department on the Status of Women since her appointment by
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 1: former Mayor London Breed Yes that's the real name in
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty, was ousted by the city's Oversight Commission following
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 1: a financial probe into questionable spending. The investigation reveals significant irregularities,
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 1: including an eighty five thousand dollars contract awarded to Ellis's
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 1: friend for behavioral coaching in twenty twenty three and over
• 1:44:30
  Speaker 1: six hundred thousand dollars spent on a one day conference
• 1:44:34
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four WOW, which included lavish expenses like massages, hotels,
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 1: and a fashion show, as well as a thirty thousand
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 1: dollars overpayment to a no bid contractor. The unanimous decision
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 1: by the seven member San Francisco Commission on the Status
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 1: of Women to remove Ellis came after her placement on
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 1: administrative leave in March of twenty twenty five amid a
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 1: city attorney review. LS, a former rising star in the
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 1: state Democratic Party, is now suing the city over her dismissal,
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 1: escalating the controversy surrounding her tenure.
• 1:45:11
  Speaker 4: You know, I don't know why they're so upset about this. Honestly,
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 4: I'm not kidding. Because if you go through all of
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 4: the government agencies and departments and all of the offices
• 1:45:26
  Speaker 4: that are dedicated to various women's initiatives, whether it's the
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 4: offices dedicated to initiatives for abused women, the offices that
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 4: are dedicated to initiatives for scholarships and grants for women,
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 4: or women in business, or women in the military, or
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 4: I don't know, women picking their nose and wiping it
• 1:45:48
  Speaker 4: on the seat on the bus, like any women's initiative,
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 4: And there probably is something stupid like that in our government,
• 1:45:57
  Speaker 4: whether it's local or federal, or organizational like a university
• 1:46:05
  Speaker 4: or an NPO, nonprofit organization, any of those, the women
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 4: at the top, and it is usually women at the top,
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 4: they usually do this kind of thing. You'll see the
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 4: organization and say it takes in a million dollars for
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 4: services to women and funding for women and everything. Half
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 4: of that or more will go to pay its administrators
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 4: and their expenses, their company expenses. And when you look
• 1:46:38
  Speaker 4: into their company expenses, their company expenses will be things
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 4: like this, and you'll see that their salaries are more
• 1:46:47
  Speaker 4: than people normally get paid for that kind of job,
• 1:46:50
  Speaker 4: and their their work that they're doing in that job
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 4: is less than people are usually expected to do in
• 1:46:56
  Speaker 4: that type of job. And it's across the board. It's consistent.
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 4: There's all most It would be very difficult to find
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 4: an organization that claims to serve women that doesn't have
• 1:47:06
  Speaker 4: these type of grifters at the top of it. Right,
• 1:47:08
  Speaker 4: people call advocates for men grifters for wanting somewhat of
• 1:47:16
  Speaker 4: pay for their work, right like normally people might where
• 1:47:22
  Speaker 4: people might get one thousand dollars to create a presentation,
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 4: or we've shown actually on HBr talk where people creating
• 1:47:31
  Speaker 4: presentations for their government that are barely like a school
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 4: kid could make them are getting five and sometimes six
• 1:47:44
  Speaker 4: figures to create those. And people will call MRAs grifters.
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 4: If you recoup some of your expenses for your Internet use,
• 1:47:53
  Speaker 4: you know, going with business internet instead of personal internet
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 4: so that you your streams don't get interrupted and stuff.
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 4: And then these women do this stuff and they've been
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 4: doing it. They've been milking that cash cow at every
• 1:48:09
  Speaker 4: level of government, in nonprofit organizations, within religious organizations, right
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 4: within any organization that they can use to get your money,
• 1:48:23
  Speaker 4: whether it's your tax dollars or your donations. They've been
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 4: doing this for decades. They've been doing it since the sixties,
• 1:48:31
  Speaker 4: the nineteen sixties, longer than I've been alive, longer than
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 4: anybody on this show has been alive. You know, most
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 4: of the women that figured out that they could do
• 1:48:42
  Speaker 4: this and started doing this, most of them are dying
• 1:48:47
  Speaker 4: off now because of old age, and the women that
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 4: are doing it now are two generations, three generations later.
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 4: I don't know why they're upset about this one in particular.
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 4: She's just acting like a feminist.
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 1: Yep, just doing what they do. And again, you know,
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 1: people will talk about what we do as like the
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 1: other side of the coin. I wish there was anybody
• 1:49:22
  Speaker 1: in this on this side that could make this kind
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: of money honestly, much less in the sketchy way that
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: they do, and that people would call us grifters. It's
• 1:49:32
  Speaker 1: actually completely laughable. Like if I really wanted to grift,
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: i'd be doing this. I could like use my brown
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 1: skin and probably double my money and just just pretend
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: to be a fucking civil rights activist and make like millions,
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: and you know, she got caught, Like imagine all the
• 1:49:52
  Speaker 1: people who don't get caught that exploit the same systems.
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: So uh, you know, I mean this is like part
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 1: for the cores, typical feminist behavior, typical woke projecting, shill garbage,
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: but worth highlighting because this is the thing, like with
• 1:50:09
  Speaker 1: these people, they're not even helping the people they claim
• 1:50:12
  Speaker 1: to advocate for. They're not even helping them, They're just
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 1: helping themselves. And at the same time, you got like
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 1: people who are supposedly sensibly centrist or whatever that like
• 1:50:24
  Speaker 1: basically paint us as the same as these people when
• 1:50:27
  Speaker 1: we're basically like essentially putting our ourselves in a position
• 1:50:32
  Speaker 1: where we are we're just like radioactive. Like people don't
• 1:50:38
  Speaker 1: want to associate with us, people don't want to have
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 1: us on their podcasts. This is the reason why I
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: think HBr, for whatever reason, seems to have like this
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 1: magical power of like getting a guest on and they
• 1:50:50
  Speaker 1: come on our show and then they go off and
• 1:50:52
  Speaker 1: they become like massive afterwards because they they're the people
• 1:50:57
  Speaker 1: who are on here are not quite where we're at,
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 1: even though they kind of agree with us, Like Blair
• 1:51:01
  Speaker 1: White sargon, mister Reagan, like, there's you know, Jordan Peterson.
• 1:51:07
  Speaker 2: Quick, it's list of the people who didn't.
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, right, right, yeah, but those are just some examples.
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah we are. But it's so and it look I'm
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 1: not mad about it, but I'm just saying like that,
• 1:51:20
  Speaker 1: this is why I don't What I don't like is
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 1: that argument that you know, oh, the the and when
• 1:51:26
  Speaker 1: they when they say the manisphere, they include us in that.
• 1:51:28
  Speaker 1: I'm just just so you you guys be clear. You know,
• 1:51:31
  Speaker 1: they'll say the manisphere or the red pill, and they're
• 1:51:34
  Speaker 1: just looking at the people that they can make into
• 1:51:37
  Speaker 1: the worst possible actors, but then broadening the net to
• 1:51:40
  Speaker 1: include people who are trying to do good work. Whether
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: it's us or people like Warren Ferrell, it doesn't matter, right,
• 1:51:46
  Speaker 1: It's just about that there are people engaging in containment
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 1: to some degree. They just want like to hold onto
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 1: the Overton window. I don't know what the logic is,
• 1:51:56
  Speaker 1: but that's what it is, and we're trying to move
• 1:51:58
  Speaker 1: it desperately because this kind of stuff has to stop,
• 1:52:02
  Speaker 1: Like this is a waste of money. Obviously it's exposed,
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: and I hope that there's more of that, but the
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 1: both sides thing. It drives me out the wall like
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 1: it drives me at the wall. I'd rather deal with
• 1:52:13
  Speaker 1: an absolute like danger haired, fire breathing feminist lizard person
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: that's just calling me names at the top of her
• 1:52:20
  Speaker 1: lungs than somebody who's like, well, I'm the smartest guy
• 1:52:23
  Speaker 1: in the room and I think you're both wrong. Like
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 1: those people make me crazy.
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 4: Show me the coin, because I want to see I've
• 1:52:31
  Speaker 4: never seen a coin that is a gold fucking to
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 4: balloon on one side and a dime on the other.
• 1:52:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah, a penny.
• 1:52:40
  Speaker 2: It's giving particularly frustrating in the UK, the right is
• 1:52:46
  Speaker 2: still pulling itself apart, Like the Reform Party looks like
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 2: it might have a shoe in But there's people who
• 1:52:54
  Speaker 2: are saying it's not right wing enough, and there are people.
• 1:52:56
  Speaker 1: Who use it.
• 1:52:59
  Speaker 2: Constantly criticizing the people who are saying it's not right
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 2: wing enough. This is never going to get solved, Like
• 1:53:09
  Speaker 2: as as soon as there's an opportunity for one faction
• 1:53:13
  Speaker 2: of the right to fight against another faction of the right,
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 2: they do it immediately. Like that the right cannot come
• 1:53:26
  Speaker 2: together as as as one happy family in the way
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 2: the left has come together as one big, happy family
• 1:53:33
  Speaker 2: for the last century or so. It's and I don't know.
• 1:53:38
  Speaker 2: I don't know what side to come down on. I
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 2: don't know whether I should be like, fuck reform or
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 2: let's get behind reform and see what happens. Like I
• 1:53:51
  Speaker 2: don't I don't know what to do. There's there's no
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 2: there's no cohesion like like there is in America at
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 2: least at least you have half of the people getting
• 1:54:03
  Speaker 2: behind Trump and half and half of the people who
• 1:54:07
  Speaker 2: are just dds for life like we we don't have
• 1:54:11
  Speaker 2: that here. It's we're still like we have the six
• 1:54:16
  Speaker 2: different extreme left wing parties dominating everything, and this like
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 2: a quarter of the country arguing forever about how, how,
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 2: how how the right wing is doing everything wrong.
• 1:54:32
  Speaker 4: It's yeah, you need a firebrand, you need somebody that
• 1:54:39
  Speaker 4: is such a big personality that people will get behind them.
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 4: But they also have to have the right set of ideas.
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 4: It sounds so well, set set free, male ingenuity and uh,
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 4: you know men, men's men's personality as a as a sex.
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 4: And you don't have anybody like that right now.
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 2: No, we don't have anything resembling a Trump. We just
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 2: have divisions all across the board and it's not looking good.
• 1:55:12
  Speaker 2: That's that's why I'm gonna come. So I'm gonna come
• 1:55:16
  Speaker 2: visit y'all forever as soon as I can.
• 1:55:20
  Speaker 4: Like even you don't even need a Trump, You just
• 1:55:23
  Speaker 4: need a John Wayne.
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 2: We need a fucking Churchill. But we're not going to
• 1:55:29
  Speaker 2: get a Churchill because we can't agree on the fucking
• 1:55:31
  Speaker 2: Churchill even means anymore. It's been a very long show.
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: Let's yeah, let's wrap it up, guys. So I did
• 1:55:38
  Speaker 1: get one more rumble rand Noba Fan twenty one gave
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 1: us a dollar and said, here's a crazy forty chess idea.
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 1: Have a sued Sudie grift where you grift money from
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: commi's and use that to fund men's shelters. Imagine accelerating
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 1: the comedy purity spiral. Huh, maybe we can write something
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 1: up that actually doesn't sound like a bad idea. Well, thanks, guys,
• 1:56:01
  Speaker 1: we got to end the show here. I just got
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 1: really terrible news that my oldest friend passed away today.
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 1: And like I've known him since I was since as
• 1:56:12
  Speaker 1: long as I can remember knowing anybody, and like I've
• 1:56:17
  Speaker 1: known him longer than my brothers and I I just
• 1:56:20
  Speaker 1: learned you passed away. I'm sorry, I just learned this.
• 1:56:22
  Speaker 1: So I'm gonna wrap this up here. Guys, thanks for
• 1:56:25
  Speaker 1: coming on the show, and thank you to Mike and
• 1:56:30
  Speaker 1: Hannah for being here with me. And thank you guys
• 1:56:34
  Speaker 1: for uh, you know, watching, and yeah, I'm gonna go
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 1: into the Patron Show. Now we're gonna look at this
• 1:56:41
  Speaker 1: article about and Or and uh we'll talk about it
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 1: in the Patron Show. So if you if you guys
• 1:56:50
  Speaker 1: want to join us, go to feed the badchel dot
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 1: com forward slash subscribe to become a member, and uh
• 1:56:56
  Speaker 1: you'll be able to watch all the additional content. But
• 1:56:59
  Speaker 1: in the mean time, if you guys liked this video,
• 1:57:01
  Speaker 1: please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed to
• 1:57:04
  Speaker 1: the BELF notifications, leave as a comment. Let us know
• 1:57:06
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we discussed on the
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 1: show today. And please please please share this video because
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 1: sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 1: on today's episode of HBr News and we'll talk to
• 1:57:15
  Speaker 1: you guys in the next one. We'll see you next Tuesday.