Latest / Best of Business / Kate Duckworth: intellectual property law expert on Kiwi designer Sera Lilly's designs being sold on Shein without her consent
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks be follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Que fashion designer Sarah Lily has taken to social media
- 0:20Speaker 2: after finding not only her not I'll start again, after
- 0:25Speaker 2: finding not only her designs but her original photos on
- 0:28Speaker 2: fast fashion brand Sheen. In a video shared to Facebook,
- 0:32Speaker 2: Lily revealed screenshots of at least two of her Friday
- 0:36Speaker 2: Flamingo designs being sold on the site. Sheen has since
- 0:39Speaker 2: removed the photos and items for sale. To discuss how
- 0:43Speaker 2: this all sets from a legal perspective and what level
- 0:45Speaker 2: of protection k WE companies have. I'm joined by intellectual
- 0:48Speaker 2: property law expert Kate Duckworth. Thanks to your time this morning, Kate,
- 0:52Speaker 2: Good morning.
- 0:53Speaker 3: Good morning, Thank you for having me on your show.
- 0:55Speaker 2: Hey, what are the rules here? Can a company overseas
- 0:59Speaker 2: take someone else's designs and sell them?
- 1:03Speaker 1: No?
- 1:04Speaker 3: And this is so blatant, isn't it. The dresses are
- 1:07Speaker 3: almost identical, and they probably are identical, and the photographs
- 1:12Speaker 3: that are clearly the exact photographs being used. So it's
- 1:16Speaker 3: one of the more blatant and brazen examples that I've seen.
- 1:20Speaker 2: So if they had taken the design, but photographed it
- 1:23Speaker 2: themselves and maybe just altered it a fraction they could
- 1:26Speaker 2: potentially get away with it.
- 1:28Speaker 3: Yes, that question of how much of an alteration is
- 1:32Speaker 3: it that it takes it away from the original, So
- 1:35Speaker 3: that's when things get murky. But this one, at least
- 1:38Speaker 3: from what we've seen, does look to be very similar,
- 1:42Speaker 3: if not the same.
- 1:44Speaker 2: Oh, it's outrageous. I mean the photos. It looks like
- 1:46Speaker 2: they've just literally taken the marketing photos and youth that
- 1:50Speaker 2: they haven't even bothered trying to pretend that they haven't.
- 1:54Speaker 3: Yah, I agree, it's very blatant, very obvious.
- 1:59Speaker 2: So what does what sort of legal standing does a
- 2:03Speaker 2: business like serially have here?
- 2:06Speaker 3: There's a couple of legal avide news and from what
- 2:09Speaker 3: it looks like, you would have a strong case under
- 2:12Speaker 3: copyright for copying the dress design, copyright in the photographs themselves,
- 2:18Speaker 3: and perhaps some other remedies at least in New Zealand.
- 2:22Speaker 3: Under New Zealand law for something like passing off where
- 2:27Speaker 3: consumers would think that the original is or the second
- 2:34Speaker 3: comer is exactly the same as the original it doesn't
- 2:37Speaker 3: perceive any difference, and the Fair Trading Act for them
- 2:40Speaker 3: mis leading and deceptive conduct. But it's this problem with
- 2:44Speaker 3: the Internet of territoriality. So what's it's sorry, carry on,
- 2:50Speaker 3: go ahead it you know it is still the Wild West.
- 2:55Speaker 3: How do you enforce your rights on a website that's
- 2:58Speaker 3: based overseas.
- 2:59Speaker 2: That was going to be my next question, especially if
- 3:01Speaker 2: you're a small New Zealand business. What is involved in
- 3:04Speaker 2: trying to take them.
- 3:05Speaker 3: On m Well, the first step has been done and
- 3:09Speaker 3: it seems that Shine has apologized and taken it down,
- 3:12Speaker 3: which is a huge win and means that perhaps no
- 3:19Speaker 3: further action needs to be taken except for some very
- 3:21Speaker 3: vigilant monitoring. But if that wasn't the case, and if
- 3:25Speaker 3: Seine either ignored the requests or just said no, and
- 3:31Speaker 3: then you're looking at having to try and find a
- 3:36Speaker 3: court that would enforce your rights against them and force
- 3:40Speaker 3: them to take down the pictures. But it's expensive, it
- 3:43Speaker 3: can be time consuming, and because of that territoriality or
- 3:47Speaker 3: jurisdictional problem can be very hard to do.
- 3:50Speaker 2: Is it a common problem with sights like this and Timu?
- 3:56Speaker 3: Yes, it is, I think, And that's one of the
- 4:01Speaker 3: problems with these sites is that even if people know
- 4:05Speaker 3: that it's not real and that it's ripping off and
- 4:08Speaker 3: hrsing a New Zealand designer. The price is so low,
- 4:11Speaker 3: it's just so tempting.
- 4:14Speaker 2: There really is an element though, of responsibility on the
- 4:17Speaker 2: consumer here to call out these companies and not buy
- 4:21Speaker 2: cheaper riff offfs as well.
- 4:23Speaker 3: Isn't it. Yeah, that is really the only way I
- 4:27Speaker 3: think is that is to say, hey, don't harm New
- 4:30Speaker 3: Zealand designers and New Zealand businesses and buy the real thing.
- 4:35Speaker 3: But yeah, I think that the price is so low.
- 4:37Speaker 3: I can I'd like to think I wouldn't do it myself,
- 4:41Speaker 3: but I can see why people do it.
- 4:43Speaker 1: Yeah.
- 4:43Speaker 2: No, we've put a band on those websites in our house, Kate. Look,
- 4:47Speaker 2: thank you for talking us through that. Really appreciate your
- 4:49Speaker 2: time this morning.
- 4:51Speaker 1: For more from News Talks b listen live on air
- 4:54Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 4:56Speaker 1: go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio.