Latest / UK Column Radio / Sasha Latypova: All Vaccines Cause Most Illnesses Today | Jerm Warfare

Transcript

Sasha Latypova: All Vaccines Cause Most Illnesses Today | Jerm Warfare · UK Column Radio

0:30
Speaker 1: My name is Jim. This is germ warfare, the battle
0:33
Speaker 1: of ideas. From the time when you and I first
0:37
Speaker 1: spoke during the COVID Era to now, a lot has changed. First,
0:45
Speaker 1: the people have forgotten that there was this whole covid era.
0:50
Speaker 1: Have you noticed, It's as though it never existed. I'll
0:53
Speaker 1: find that baffling.
0:55
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. A lot of people, well, well, I mean
1:00
Speaker 2: I understand, you know, like a lot of people want
1:03
Speaker 2: to the one the ones who fell for it and
1:06
Speaker 2: probably in the bubble, and they know, they know that
1:08
Speaker 2: they were fooled. They want to forget because it's embarrassing,
1:13
Speaker 2: it's humiliating, and it's also scary because they're there, what
1:17
Speaker 2: have we done? What we have we done to our children?
1:19
Speaker 2: But they don't want to to face it head on,
1:22
Speaker 2: and so the next, you know, most common thing is
1:27
Speaker 2: you escape it. You try to pretend it didn't happen.
1:30
Speaker 2: You live in denial, you know.
1:32
Speaker 1: So would you go back to twenty nineteen knowing what
1:37
Speaker 1: you know now?
1:40
Speaker 2: No? No? Yeah? And and and my life was very
1:46
Speaker 2: charmed at that time, very you know, I can say
1:50
Speaker 2: I was I was absolutely happy, I was doing what
1:52
Speaker 2: I loved. I had no worries in my life, and
1:56
Speaker 2: it was blissful, frankly, but I don't want to go
2:01
Speaker 2: back there. I much prefer knowing the truth.
2:06
Speaker 1: Well, I mean me too. I mean, if it weren't
2:08
Speaker 1: for the COVID era, my child would be vaccinated and
2:13
Speaker 1: he isn't.
2:14
Speaker 2: And that's such a blessing. I am so delighted for
2:19
Speaker 2: your child. I'm so delighted. It's beyondwards. Yeah, it's amazing
2:25
Speaker 2: because that gives me hope. Certainly, you know people like
2:29
Speaker 2: you who are having children now and are well aware,
2:33
Speaker 2: it makes it all worthwhile.
2:35
Speaker 1: Mmm. I'm going to play a video clip. I think
2:40
Speaker 1: this all set the tone for the conversation.
2:43
Speaker 3: And over the next decade, as more and more patients
2:46
Speaker 3: chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference,
2:49
Speaker 3: but I wanted to see could I prove it? So
2:52
Speaker 3: we got all the data from my practice. We looked
2:54
Speaker 3: at every baby born into my practice and published it
2:57
Speaker 3: in an international journal of public health. What we found,
3:01
Speaker 3: and that study was peer reviewed, it was robust. We
3:04
Speaker 3: found massive increases. I mean we're talking four to five
3:09
Speaker 3: more allergies, autoimmune conditions, neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had
3:14
Speaker 3: infections of all kinds massively increased in the vaccinated compared
3:19
Speaker 3: to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study.
3:25
Speaker 3: Within days of it being available online, I get a
3:28
Speaker 3: call from my attorney. Don't go see any patients, don't
3:30
Speaker 3: write any prescriptions, don't go into the office. Your license
3:33
Speaker 3: has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.
3:38
Speaker 1: What's today Today?
3:41
Speaker 3: It is the last time I will be doing clinical
3:45
Speaker 3: medicine in Oregon.
3:47
Speaker 2: Knowing that you guys are keeping it going.
3:50
Speaker 3: The heart of this place lives on.
3:55
Speaker 2: My currently very well researched and back up theory. And
4:01
Speaker 2: this is working theory that I have, and I invite
4:04
Speaker 2: anyone to try to overcome it is that vaccines that
4:09
Speaker 2: by far the number one driver of all chronic illness
4:14
Speaker 2: at all age. So starting from babies into the eight
4:17
Speaker 2: into the late eighties, the number one driver is vaccines,
4:22
Speaker 2: vaccinations and other injections such as, for example, vitamin case
4:26
Speaker 2: shot that they push on the babies at birth. And
4:30
Speaker 2: I can discuss it in more detail, but basically, people
4:34
Speaker 2: people always fight me, and because there is this propaganda
4:39
Speaker 2: narrative that you have gazillion different causes of chronic illness.
4:43
Speaker 2: It could it could be lurking just about anywhere. So
4:48
Speaker 2: the narrative goes like this. First, if you ask them
4:51
Speaker 2: you know what causes chronic illness, you will you will
4:54
Speaker 2: have response such as, you know, we're baffled, we just
4:56
Speaker 2: don't know what caused cancer in this twenty five year
4:59
Speaker 2: old where baffled. Next next layer is it's everything. It's
5:04
Speaker 2: absolutely everything. You know, look at the you know, in
5:07
Speaker 2: California there's a so called proposition sixty five, and they
5:12
Speaker 2: will put stickers everywhere saying this, you know, this is
5:16
Speaker 2: known to cause cancer, and it will be a stickers
5:18
Speaker 2: will be on Starbucks cops. I found them on the
5:22
Speaker 2: package of walnuts. You will find them on cabinetry saying this,
5:27
Speaker 2: this is known to cause cancer. You will find them
5:30
Speaker 2: on gas stations, outdoors, You'll find them. You'll find them everywhere.
5:33
Speaker 2: So the messages cancer is lurking everywhere. And then but
5:38
Speaker 2: it's definitely not vaccines, like this person who published a
5:44
Speaker 2: really good study from the video from CGD that you showed,
5:48
Speaker 2: it's definitely not vaccines. And if you publish solid scientific
5:52
Speaker 2: data contradicting this narrative, you immediately get kicked out of
5:57
Speaker 2: your profession and prosecuted, and then you know, and then
6:01
Speaker 2: they have other layers of defense. But the data is
6:05
Speaker 2: that the vaccines cause ninety eight percent of all chronic illness.
6:14
Speaker 2: The ninety eight percent of risk that you personally face
6:18
Speaker 2: of getting any chronic illness, especially serious chronic illness like
6:21
Speaker 2: cardiovascular cancer, the neuro degenerative, or the immune. Ninety eight
6:26
Speaker 2: percent of that risk is given to you by vaccines
6:30
Speaker 2: and only two percent risk is everything else, everything you
6:35
Speaker 2: can think of, glyphassay, trace glife essay. I'm not saying,
6:39
Speaker 2: you know, if you all of a sudden like spreading
6:42
Speaker 2: life as say that's safe. No, but trace clife es
6:44
Speaker 2: said that you might encounter in cereals or you know,
6:48
Speaker 2: even the you know, the cam spraying, the the EMF
6:53
Speaker 2: radiation that has some you know, some legitimately health risks.
6:59
Speaker 2: All of this combined, all of those other things that
7:03
Speaker 2: you think about, all of it combined only contributes two
7:06
Speaker 2: percent to the total risk of chronic illness. So you know,
7:11
Speaker 2: and I welcome anyone to disprove it. And every time
7:14
Speaker 2: I get an argument and people saying, oh, it's just
7:16
Speaker 2: toxic food that Americans eat, and seriously, did you see
7:21
Speaker 2: what we ate in the Soviet Union. Uh, and uh,
7:24
Speaker 2: you know all all this stuff. It's just how toxic
7:30
Speaker 2: food supplier is fighting for us and uh, you know
7:35
Speaker 2: all those things. I'm every time I encounter somebody like that,
7:39
Speaker 2: I'm like, Okay, fine, you just bring me a study
7:42
Speaker 2: that shows that you can induce cancer by feeding somebody something. Okay,
7:47
Speaker 2: if you if you feed them like carbyrates and sugar,
7:50
Speaker 2: show me that you can you can induce cancer. Those
7:52
Speaker 2: don't exist. But I can show you numerous ways of
7:55
Speaker 2: inducing cancer by injections and so anyway, so this is like,
8:01
Speaker 2: this is what I'm saying. You have to keep in mind.
8:04
Speaker 2: Vaccines contribute over ninety percent of the total risk of
8:08
Speaker 2: the chronic disease for the entire population, entire lifespan, and
8:13
Speaker 2: everything else is about two percent. So that's why we
8:17
Speaker 2: need to focus. And the propaganda narrative wants us to
8:19
Speaker 2: focus on anything but vaccines, including on both sides of
8:23
Speaker 2: freedom now, including our braves leadership, you know, And this
8:29
Speaker 2: is this is a constant battle, and this is what
8:31
Speaker 2: we need to bring people's attention to.
8:35
Speaker 1: You mentioned vitamin K. Now, most people don't even know
8:38
Speaker 1: what that is.
8:39
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a. That's the next next level research I'm
8:42
Speaker 2: going to be doing actually into vitamin K. But yeah,
8:45
Speaker 2: it's it's a It's another giant scam really and a
8:50
Speaker 2: very dangerous one.
8:52
Speaker 1: Well, as it happens, I looked into it before my
8:55
Speaker 1: Kito was born, and I told them not to give
8:57
Speaker 1: the vitamin K. In many states across the US, you
9:01
Speaker 1: cannot say no to vitamin K.
9:04
Speaker 2: Yeah, correct, So they today the hospitals in many states.
9:10
Speaker 2: There are some states that are worse than others. But
9:14
Speaker 2: it's horrific what's happening around pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal Because
9:21
Speaker 2: they're extremely militant, they pushed the injections, especially like any injections,
9:27
Speaker 2: and vitamin K by itself. So first of all, babies
9:31
Speaker 2: don't need vitamin K. I will write more about this
9:34
Speaker 2: in detail. They don't need vitamin K. But the vitamin
9:37
Speaker 2: K shot is not just the vitamin K. It contains
9:40
Speaker 2: all the adjuvants that vaccines contain, It contains aluminum, it
9:45
Speaker 2: contains all these other toxic things that are injected with
9:47
Speaker 2: vaccines for the same reason because they want the immune response.
9:50
Speaker 2: And the data that I've presented and shared and published
9:56
Speaker 2: on this control group project, they actually specifically looked into
9:59
Speaker 2: the different between totally unvaccinated people and totally unvaccinated people
10:07
Speaker 2: who also avoided vitamin K and whose mother wasn't vaccinated
10:12
Speaker 2: in pregnancy, so purely unvaccinated and unjobbed with any anythings.
10:18
Speaker 2: And so the mother's vaccination and vitamin K contribute. So
10:23
Speaker 2: the risk goes like without it, the risk is two
10:25
Speaker 2: percent of chronicleness. With it, with maternal vaccination and vitamin K,
10:31
Speaker 2: the risk is already thirteen percent. So the risk dramatically
10:36
Speaker 2: jumps up just with the vitamin K shot. And so
10:41
Speaker 2: it's not anything benign, it's just as dangerous. And yes
10:44
Speaker 2: they're extremely militant. In some states, they will call CPS
10:48
Speaker 2: on the Child Protective Services on you, they will remove
10:51
Speaker 2: your parental rights. They do enormously evil things to force
10:56
Speaker 2: people to inject babies with this.
10:59
Speaker 4: They and they fear and they say, oh, your baby's
11:01
Speaker 4: going to have a brain bleed, and you know all
11:04
Speaker 4: that that's nonsense, that's nonsense, that's actually based Again, I'm
11:08
Speaker 4: going to write more extensive.
11:10
Speaker 2: Analysis of this. They claim that baby have too sin blood.
11:15
Speaker 2: You know, the blood is way too sin and we
11:18
Speaker 2: need to like coagulate it. It's the most ridiculous statement
11:23
Speaker 2: I've ever heard. Babies have the highest percentage of water
11:26
Speaker 2: per body weight than any other at any other point
11:30
Speaker 2: in time. We progressively lose water as we When we grow,
11:36
Speaker 2: our body mass grows, but the percentage of water declines.
11:40
Speaker 2: And then when we age, we actually lose body mass
11:44
Speaker 2: and water and like all the people visibly shrink because
11:47
Speaker 2: they're literally smaller now and so, and the percentage of
11:51
Speaker 2: water in the baby is something like eighty five percent,
11:54
Speaker 2: and in the old person it's something like fifty five percent.
11:58
Speaker 2: All it is is babies us have more water content than.
12:02
Speaker 1: Older people, Sessia. But I think there's something else that
12:08
Speaker 1: they don't tell you. M You're supposed to actually wait
12:13
Speaker 1: for all the blood and nutrients and whatever else from
12:17
Speaker 1: the mother to get transferred through the umbilical cord. They
12:21
Speaker 1: don't wait. They cut it quickly.
12:24
Speaker 2: Mm hmm, yeah, exactly exactly. So that's that's yeah, that's
12:26
Speaker 2: an additional point that you need to, you know, to
12:29
Speaker 2: wait all the all those factors. You know, God created
12:33
Speaker 2: us perfect. Babies come out completely perfect. Nothing needs to
12:37
Speaker 2: be done to them. No, no, nowhere, It says well,
12:40
Speaker 2: which other animal species do we have when it comes
12:43
Speaker 2: with a bag of prescription meds and injections, it's it's
12:48
Speaker 2: it's nuts, okay. And so based on that hair brain theory,
12:53
Speaker 2: they force this very dangerous injection with aluminum into every
12:58
Speaker 2: newborn into right when they're born. It justifies any logic.
13:06
Speaker 1: Andy Wakefield was on my podcast and he I think
13:09
Speaker 1: was one of the first two have the pharmaceutical industry
13:14
Speaker 1: attack him for finding He didn't he didn't even find
13:18
Speaker 1: a link. He yeah, he found a very loose correlation,
13:22
Speaker 1: and they totally destroyed him.
13:24
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he said something really mild, like, you know,
13:27
Speaker 2: maybe this should be considered, and yeah, there was a
13:29
Speaker 2: total destruction of his reputation career everything. You can never
13:35
Speaker 2: in vaccines, an approval of vaccines, Uh, they never do
13:42
Speaker 2: placibo contry true placibo control studies ever. And actually you know,
13:48
Speaker 2: and that it applies to entire field of virology. They
13:51
Speaker 2: never use actual scientific method. So it's another one that
13:56
Speaker 2: I've been you know, in frequent debate debate about with
14:01
Speaker 2: people who spend their life in virology or molecular biology
14:06
Speaker 2: or some related field, and they maybe even well intended
14:10
Speaker 2: in intentioned people. But we get into debates and I'm saying, look,
14:14
Speaker 2: you know, you can't show me a single study from virology.
14:19
Speaker 2: You know, for the past hundred years, you can't find
14:22
Speaker 2: a single study, single paper published where there is actual
14:25
Speaker 2: true control involved. And the scientific method requires testing the
14:30
Speaker 2: null hypothesis with proper controls. The you know, placbo controls
14:36
Speaker 2: are well designed positive and negative controls and so, and
14:39
Speaker 2: they never do it. So it means that they never
14:41
Speaker 2: use scientific method ever. And they just make these claims,
14:45
Speaker 2: these grandiose claims. Uh. And then they inject people with
14:49
Speaker 2: poison based on those claims, and then they compare poison
14:51
Speaker 2: and poison so that they never show any like true difference,
14:56
Speaker 2: true outcomes. And it becomes ridiculous because population gets progressively
15:01
Speaker 2: more poisoned, and then they do more you know comparisons,
15:06
Speaker 2: you know, on already poisoned population.
15:11
Speaker 1: I mean, so's so what's happening, yeah, is that they
15:14
Speaker 1: can't really do a true what did you call it
15:18
Speaker 1: a double blind study? Because what of America is already vaccinated?
15:27
Speaker 2: Uh? Well yeah, it depends depends for Yeah, it depends
15:29
Speaker 2: for what. But right, so they can't really even compare
15:33
Speaker 2: now with the truly unvaccinated. So the study I'm referring
15:37
Speaker 2: to the control group project, they found they found quite
15:43
Speaker 2: about one hundred thousand unvaccinated people, but the completely unvaccinated
15:47
Speaker 2: or like somewhat unvaccinated I would say. But then they
15:51
Speaker 2: out of that, they've they found about fifteen hundred completely
15:55
Speaker 2: completely unvaccinated people. And so that's what you need to
15:58
Speaker 2: understand this whole impact. And so that's why this study
16:02
Speaker 2: is so valuable because it actually does look into that issue.
16:05
Speaker 2: And it also kind of they did you know, they
16:07
Speaker 2: divided the risk by you know, you have maternal vaccination
16:11
Speaker 2: the viemin case shot, and then how many vaccines afterwards
16:13
Speaker 2: did you receive to really study how the risk of
16:17
Speaker 2: chronic disease changes with increase in vaccination. And that's that's
16:21
Speaker 2: extremely important. And of course the CDC and all the
16:23
Speaker 2: public house officials and all over the world, they don't
16:26
Speaker 2: want this. This is their this is their kryptonite. I mean,
16:29
Speaker 2: they can't they can't allow this to be publicly known.
16:36
Speaker 1: So for clarity, all vaccines.
16:40
Speaker 2: Yes, all vaccines. All vaccines. So there there's also you know,
16:45
Speaker 2: variation as far as what kind of damage and what
16:47
Speaker 2: kind of like typically what kind of illnesses you will see. Uh.
16:51
Speaker 2: And there are of course differences how the traditional vaccines
16:54
Speaker 2: were made, you know, let's say fifty sixty years ago,
16:58
Speaker 2: or how then the recombinant protein vaccines started being made.
17:03
Speaker 2: And now then the final, final, next generation is this
17:06
Speaker 2: mRNA anstrosity, and that's a whole different ball of wax.
17:10
Speaker 2: So like they progressively, the technology itself becomes progressively more toxic.
17:15
Speaker 2: And the traditional vaccines are not safe. I mean they're
17:18
Speaker 2: they're very dangerous too. And and once you know, once
17:21
Speaker 2: you know what vaccine injury looks like, even mentally going back, now,
17:26
Speaker 2: I know in the Soviet Union, I know this person,
17:29
Speaker 2: this person, this person. These are even in myself, I
17:33
Speaker 2: recognize signs of vaccine injury now based on those childhood
17:38
Speaker 2: vaccines that I received. But they're they pale in comparison.
17:42
Speaker 2: And what is going on with the recombinant ones they
17:45
Speaker 2: started this, So recombinant once, for example, added on this whole,
17:50
Speaker 2: you know, like the transgender stuff. It's a lot of
17:55
Speaker 2: it is propaganda and bullying and pressure on on young
18:00
Speaker 2: on teenagers and children, but also a lot of it
18:05
Speaker 2: is in induction, initial induction of the gender confusion, which
18:11
Speaker 2: is part of sort of mental illness, which is driven
18:14
Speaker 2: off of psychiatric effects of these shots. And we know
18:18
Speaker 2: that let's say recombinant vaccines, they contain a lot of
18:23
Speaker 2: synthetic synthetic DNA and plasmids, and they have a lot
18:27
Speaker 2: of features that are very similar to the to the
18:32
Speaker 2: mRNA shots. Uh, and it's you can kind of trace it.
18:37
Speaker 2: So like the development of this this psychiatric condition comes
18:41
Speaker 2: as a wave after the the recombinant technologies were more
18:45
Speaker 2: widely introduced, you know, that's an example. And now with
18:48
Speaker 2: the RNA, we have yet new types of things like
18:52
Speaker 2: turbo cancer, the heart attacks and strokes and babies, a
18:58
Speaker 2: lot of ocular you know, like ocular nerve damage, like
19:04
Speaker 2: immediate blindness, microstrokes, you know, micro clotting, those white abnormal
19:12
Speaker 2: clothes and stuff like that. And that's that's a feature
19:15
Speaker 2: of this new platform. So like every time they have
19:17
Speaker 2: some sort of a new platform, you see a different
19:21
Speaker 2: wave of different effects.
19:25
Speaker 1: Wait, so you're suggesting that there could actually be a
19:29
Speaker 1: connection between certain vaccines and mentally illness, and for example,
19:34
Speaker 1: the whole LGBTQ thing.
19:37
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, oh yeah, So you know, I'm not saying that,
19:40
Speaker 2: you know, the condition of being gay is because of vaccines.
19:45
Speaker 2: I don't have very good link to that. I doubt it.
19:48
Speaker 2: And certainly gay lifestyle precedes vaccination, you know, by thousands
19:53
Speaker 2: of years, so we can safely say that maybe just
19:56
Speaker 2: you know, the gay lifestyle is its own thing. But
19:59
Speaker 2: the whole issue with new, the transgenderism, and.
20:03
Speaker 1: Which is new, I mean, it's only being around what
20:05
Speaker 1: twenty years, not even right.
20:07
Speaker 2: Twenty years exactly what they like, and the recombinant protein
20:10
Speaker 2: vaccines actually coincide with that pretty well. But the ones
20:16
Speaker 2: that are carrying now I'm saying DNA loosely, I mean
20:20
Speaker 2: synthetic DNA. It's it's just a chemical compound, okay, But
20:23
Speaker 2: the way they make, the way that they can then
20:26
Speaker 2: transfect the cells so get inside cellular membranes, is carrying
20:33
Speaker 2: much more damage. And if that happens, let's say in
20:36
Speaker 2: the brain or even like, we don't really have a
20:39
Speaker 2: good series of mind. It's not even clear that our
20:41
Speaker 2: mind is in our brains, and so wherever it gets
20:44
Speaker 2: into the system that affects psychiatric condition. It could be
20:49
Speaker 2: also based on the god flora, you know, killing off
20:53
Speaker 2: god flora and it gets replaced with different species because
20:57
Speaker 2: the God produces a lot of newer transmitter and so
21:01
Speaker 2: the God could drive the psychiatric health health health. And
21:05
Speaker 2: we know that for example, in autism recovery or improvement
21:09
Speaker 2: of the symptoms. It's important to focus on the God
21:13
Speaker 2: floor why because of the same thing. Because neurotransmitters are
21:16
Speaker 2: made in you by your God bacteria. And if, for example,
21:19
Speaker 2: they get killed off by these plasmids that are floating around,
21:24
Speaker 2: which is the equal eye cells will pick up plasmids,
21:27
Speaker 2: that's what that's how they do it in the in
21:29
Speaker 2: environ manufacturing. So you have equalized cells and your God.
21:33
Speaker 2: This plasmid comes in with some foreign toxic material, the
21:37
Speaker 2: equal eye will pick it up and start reproducing that
21:40
Speaker 2: instead of making your normal neuro transmitters well and effects
21:44
Speaker 2: of course your psychiatric state. It can result in ADHD,
21:50
Speaker 2: anxiety and anxiety. It is like it's a very broad
21:53
Speaker 2: you know you have anxiety, if you have a chronic anxiety,
21:58
Speaker 2: it's it can manifest and variety of ways. You can
22:01
Speaker 2: become depressed, you can become suicidal, or you can start
22:05
Speaker 2: having because you're depressed on suicide and you start having
22:07
Speaker 2: transgender ideologists, because you feel like you never feel okay
22:11
Speaker 2: in your body. And so and here comes your teacher
22:14
Speaker 2: and says, oh, let's go into the secret room where
22:17
Speaker 2: your parents can't access these files, and let me talk
22:20
Speaker 2: to you about becoming a boy or if you're a
22:24
Speaker 2: girl or a girl, if you're a boy. You know,
22:26
Speaker 2: this is what and this is what's going on in California.
22:29
Speaker 2: In California, for example, after child is twelve or thirteen,
22:36
Speaker 2: I have a nephew here, and this is an issue
22:38
Speaker 2: right now, not the transgenderism, but the access to data
22:43
Speaker 2: for parents. After the child is thirteen, the parents cannot
22:47
Speaker 2: see their medical records, so the doctors can start transitioning
22:55
Speaker 2: him in the school secretly, and you as a parent,
23:00
Speaker 2: and you want to see the records. So that's how
23:05
Speaker 2: that's how this whole you know, combined, that's how they
23:08
Speaker 2: feed off of this poisoning of children. It's a it's
23:11
Speaker 2: a multifaceted, but they have created this whole entire system
23:16
Speaker 2: where they want to take away the children, poison them,
23:19
Speaker 2: and then in a variety of ways, and then based
23:22
Speaker 2: on the results of the poisoning, they will harvest this
23:25
Speaker 2: into their own financial interests. Whatever those are the gender
23:29
Speaker 2: transitioning or you know, the just having them depend on
23:34
Speaker 2: you know, autistic children are very profitable. It's a huge industry.
23:38
Speaker 2: It's a multi billion dollar industry of all these you know,
23:41
Speaker 2: autistic care and autistic research. And it depends on the
23:45
Speaker 2: supply of autistic children and the supply of autistic children,
23:48
Speaker 2: it depends on vaccination.
23:50
Speaker 1: So there we go, and everybody's on the spectrum these days.
23:54
Speaker 2: Have you noticed, Yeah, yeah again, in California it's one
23:59
Speaker 2: in twelve boys officially diagnosed with autism. This is a catastrophe.
24:03
Speaker 2: And and and there, you know, in California continues the
24:08
Speaker 2: most draconian, draconian ways of prosecuting parents, forcing children to vaccinate.
24:18
Speaker 2: It's incredible what's going on. And it's not the only state.
24:21
Speaker 2: And it's California and New York, Illinois, West Virginia, Connecticut.
24:24
Speaker 2: I mean, they're they're all incredibly awful.
24:28
Speaker 1: But let me play devil's advocate for a second. Could
24:30
Speaker 1: it also not be argued that, I mean, autism isn't
24:35
Speaker 1: the thing you can't just look at it under a microscope,
24:37
Speaker 1: isn't it. Could it be possible also that they're just
24:39
Speaker 1: completely over diagnosing and just calling everything autism.
24:45
Speaker 2: Well, it's certainly a spectrum, so there are more functioning
24:49
Speaker 2: people and far less functioning people. But by any metric
24:53
Speaker 2: you look at it, it's kyrocketed so high that and
24:58
Speaker 2: also the prevalence of and nonverbal autism skyrol it's in
25:03
Speaker 2: the same proportion. So you can't say you can exclude
25:07
Speaker 2: the lower you know, you can say, well, maybe we
25:10
Speaker 2: can cut the data and exclude the more functioning people
25:13
Speaker 2: and call it something else. Asperger, I don't know. But
25:18
Speaker 2: we still have this humaneously increasing incidence of severe and
25:23
Speaker 2: nonverbal autism, that children that need to be institutionalized, children
25:28
Speaker 2: that can care for themselves for the rest of their lives.
25:31
Speaker 2: It's an incredible human tragedy and it is driven by scenes.
25:35
Speaker 2: Also in the same in control group study, incidence of
25:39
Speaker 2: autism was less than one percent in in unvaccinated group,
25:46
Speaker 2: but that less than one percent was contributed solely by
25:50
Speaker 2: those whose mothers were vaccinated and who received the case shot,
25:55
Speaker 2: nobody the people who did not have those It was
25:58
Speaker 2: zero autism. And overall in the unvaccinated group we had
26:02
Speaker 2: zero incidents of cancer zero for entire lifespan from children
26:07
Speaker 2: to eighty year olds and zero incidents of cardiovascular disease,
26:11
Speaker 2: and that's the number one killer today.
26:14
Speaker 1: So when we talk about it, when you talk about vaccines, Sasha,
26:20
Speaker 1: what exactly are you referring to you? Is it just injectables?
26:24
Speaker 1: Also the ones that you put in the tongue.
26:27
Speaker 2: Yeah, I would stay away from those as well. So
26:29
Speaker 2: the ones they the oral ones, I think it's only
26:33
Speaker 2: polio today and I'm not aware of that. There's like
26:38
Speaker 2: flu myst that those are the mysts also, I would
26:40
Speaker 2: avoid that. But the oral is oral polio vaccina, and
26:45
Speaker 2: that's that's a horrendous thing. I've actually written an extensive
26:52
Speaker 2: review and together with my colleague Tabil Lorman, we started
26:56
Speaker 2: looking into in detail into this polio situation. And I'm
27:00
Speaker 2: kind of perplexed that nobody in the space in the
27:03
Speaker 2: people who are writing about polio have ever mentioned this,
27:07
Speaker 2: because until I didn't know, I've read others other people's
27:11
Speaker 2: work on this. Until I myself went looking, I was like,
27:15
Speaker 2: why didn't anybody mention this? But basically poliovirus so they
27:22
Speaker 2: claim there are multiple strains of polyovirus, right, and there's
27:26
Speaker 2: poliovirus one, polyvirus two, and polyvarius three, and they have substrains,
27:32
Speaker 2: but in general it's these chateagy the main the main
27:34
Speaker 2: strains of these one, two, and three. Poliovirus one was
27:39
Speaker 2: allegedly isolated in nineteen forty one. If you you know,
27:41
Speaker 2: if you go look on search, you will say they
27:45
Speaker 2: will say, oh, it was isolated in nineteen forty forty
27:47
Speaker 2: one by by Francis and mac. This is Walter Mack
27:53
Speaker 2: was one of the key people in this and I
27:57
Speaker 2: went looking for them. I was like, okay, I would
27:59
Speaker 2: like to see that of isolation and read it. And
28:02
Speaker 2: I found that paper and published it on my sub stack.
28:06
Speaker 2: So that isolation, you know, magic, was from three children
28:13
Speaker 2: who were killed by ten selectamy surgery. Actually not even
28:16
Speaker 2: from those three children. It's even funnier than that. Not
28:18
Speaker 2: not funny, it's a tragedy. So there was a family
28:21
Speaker 2: in Ohio that had five children, or they had six children.
28:25
Speaker 2: Five of them had tance electomy on one day and
28:29
Speaker 2: after this tans electomy, three of them died and two
28:32
Speaker 2: of them were severely injured. And a team of CDC
28:38
Speaker 2: Warriors immediately descended to help hospital avoid liabilitytans for Botchton
28:44
Speaker 2: selectomists by claiming it was polio, but there wasn't. There
28:50
Speaker 2: was no polio in that community. So after these children died,
28:55
Speaker 2: they come in and they start contact tracing all the
29:00
Speaker 2: you know, children's playmates and cousins and stuff like that,
29:04
Speaker 2: and they collected fifty four stool samples from everyone who
29:08
Speaker 2: was never exposed to polio, never had pollio, There was
29:11
Speaker 2: no polio in the community. And then they said, oh,
29:14
Speaker 2: and from these others, three children who had nothing to
29:17
Speaker 2: do with anything. They were completely healthy, but they somehow
29:21
Speaker 2: were friends with the deceased children. We've isolated polio virus one,
29:26
Speaker 2: and that was the basis of the so coccine. That's
29:31
Speaker 2: your polio virus. It never existed. And then they the
29:36
Speaker 2: polio virus two and polivar is three are completely secret.
29:39
Speaker 2: There are no isolation papers. They're saying they were taken
29:42
Speaker 2: from people who had polio, but you can't find any
29:45
Speaker 2: source material and frankly, it never existed. Maybe somebody just
29:49
Speaker 2: in the military said so. And now from then on
29:53
Speaker 2: at these trains where they came from, no trace, no information,
29:57
Speaker 2: But they are the ones that are responsible today for
30:00
Speaker 2: any polio case in the world. Is those vaccines there?
30:04
Speaker 2: They said polo wild virus is eradicated. The only source
30:08
Speaker 2: of folio today in the world are those po poliovirus vaccines,
30:12
Speaker 2: and the oral polio vaccine is based on those strains
30:15
Speaker 2: two and three.
30:18
Speaker 1: So and polio was a pesticide, Well, they started calling
30:25
Speaker 1: polio anything under the sand.
30:27
Speaker 2: It's just like lime disease, you know, it's a collection
30:30
Speaker 2: of things that generally somebody has some form of paralysis. Today,
30:36
Speaker 2: for example, gian barret, that's polio. That's what they would diagnose,
30:39
Speaker 2: saying as polio. But now they're saying it's gien barret
30:42
Speaker 2: because it's a usually it's a flu vaccine injury. And
30:45
Speaker 2: also it's common with a marine vaccines. So but we
30:49
Speaker 2: cannot call it polios and so we have to call
30:52
Speaker 2: it Gillen Barret. But in the fifties and sixties the
30:55
Speaker 2: same exact say, it was called polio. So any sort
30:57
Speaker 2: of event where there is like a partial paralysis, numbness,
31:02
Speaker 2: some sort of a central nervous system involvement, partially complete
31:06
Speaker 2: paralysis with or without recovery, or maybe just high fever
31:10
Speaker 2: and diarrhea, and they would say, oh, yeah, it's polio.
31:13
Speaker 2: So but that can be induced y as by pesticides,
31:15
Speaker 2: by insecticides, by botched tense electomies, batch dental surgeries, botched
31:22
Speaker 2: you know, other surgeries, you know, any anywhere you can
31:25
Speaker 2: produce this effect. And then they will say, well, no,
31:28
Speaker 2: it's not the hospital's fault, it's poliovirus. It's the scary
31:31
Speaker 2: thing that just attacked us, you know.
31:37
Speaker 1: But what's actually going on here is that, as your
31:41
Speaker 1: work shows, vaccines are creating these illnesses and not taking
31:47
Speaker 1: them away.
31:48
Speaker 2: Yeah, vaccines are creating these illnesses. So, for example, in
31:51
Speaker 2: others saying that even today, the judge you BT will
31:54
Speaker 2: admit you can you can make it admitted that for example,
31:59
Speaker 2: Frank Franklin Delano Roosevelt, you know, the US president in
32:03
Speaker 2: the forties who famously had polio. Right, so he was
32:07
Speaker 2: in a wheelchair because of polio. Well it turns out
32:11
Speaker 2: that wasn't polio. It was Garret uh and and CHGBT
32:15
Speaker 2: will also say, well, yeah, it wasn't classical polio because
32:19
Speaker 2: a classical polio is like one side, and he had
32:22
Speaker 2: both sides simultaneously, and he just like suddenly got paralyzed
32:26
Speaker 2: when he was on vacation in his compounds and were
32:28
Speaker 2: in nova Scotia and uh, well, I'm thinking he was
32:33
Speaker 2: vaccinated and he got paralyzed. And even today they admitted
32:37
Speaker 2: Gaon Barret wasn't polio, but he is the face of polio.
32:41
Speaker 1: You know, what, what is it about a vaccine that
32:47
Speaker 1: does this? I mean it sounds like a very broad
32:50
Speaker 1: question because supposedly vaccines all different. I'm guessing the mechanisms
32:55
Speaker 1: all the same. So what is it then that they're not.
33:00
Speaker 2: All the same? That's the problem. So I mean there
33:02
Speaker 2: are there are I would say there are categories of
33:05
Speaker 2: mechanisms that are in many of those shots. But the
33:09
Speaker 2: problem with number one with vaccines is they are never
33:14
Speaker 2: made to any particular specification, so they're always variable. There
33:20
Speaker 2: are always a concoction of things that are well. Traditional
33:23
Speaker 2: ones were based more on the organic matter. But it
33:26
Speaker 2: was always like any organic matter that you take out
33:30
Speaker 2: of the organism immediately starts dying in decaying, And so
33:34
Speaker 2: they have this dying the king matter, you know, monkey cells,
33:40
Speaker 2: aborted fetal cells. You know, they throw in some bovine
33:45
Speaker 2: serum and it and you know it's just not just
33:48
Speaker 2: incredible amount of absolute garbage and sewage that they brew
33:53
Speaker 2: and filter and and then it's all de kaying and decomposing,
33:57
Speaker 2: so you can never make it consist stand and reproducible.
34:02
Speaker 2: And so they just and they never regulated them as
34:05
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical drugs. It was always like it. Initially it was
34:09
Speaker 2: made just by CDC without any regulations. Eventually it was
34:13
Speaker 2: brought into the FDA, but with a whole bunch of
34:17
Speaker 2: legal ways of avoiding regulation. And today that's the case,
34:21
Speaker 2: like they avoid all regulation and they just brew this
34:26
Speaker 2: decomposing stuff and then you have to guess what. And
34:29
Speaker 2: then they add metals to it as adjuvants, and they
34:33
Speaker 2: add a lot of food products as adjuvants, and they
34:36
Speaker 2: call them generally regarded as safe because their food, but
34:39
Speaker 2: food is absolutely not safe to inject. And so that
34:44
Speaker 2: kind of composition rough approximation also varies batch to badge,
34:50
Speaker 2: wile to wile, And so what individual person gets is
34:54
Speaker 2: a mystery, and then how individual body react to it
34:58
Speaker 2: is also a mystery. But there are different diferent known mechanisms.
35:01
Speaker 2: So from population studies and other research we can figure
35:05
Speaker 2: out that there are multiple mechanisms. So for example, the
35:08
Speaker 2: injection of food proteins will result in effect of anaphylaxis,
35:13
Speaker 2: which was described by Charles Rashee in nineteen thirteen and
35:17
Speaker 2: he received a Nobel price for it. So an anaphylaxis
35:20
Speaker 2: is generally speaking, it's going to it's going to be
35:24
Speaker 2: produced in small percent of the population, but pretty significant,
35:27
Speaker 2: something on the order of five to ten percent will
35:30
Speaker 2: develop it with each injection. And for example, if you
35:35
Speaker 2: were injected with peanut oil as adgulant, which was Merk's
35:39
Speaker 2: adjuvant for a long time, you will have a pinat allergy.
35:42
Speaker 2: If you injected with album and adjuvant from cereals corn
35:46
Speaker 2: soil rice, you will have allergy to gluten corn soil rice.
35:51
Speaker 2: If gelatine was there, you will have alpha gel or
35:56
Speaker 2: shell fish gelatine from fish gelatine, or you know various
36:02
Speaker 2: other ahs. And the famous one is little Lake acid acids,
36:08
Speaker 2: which is oils and proteins from like canola and those
36:13
Speaker 2: seed oils. Right, So it's not that the seed oils
36:17
Speaker 2: are dangerous, it's when you injected with them as part
36:21
Speaker 2: of vaccines, you will develop an ephylaxis to them. So
36:24
Speaker 2: at the next encounter with seed oils, when you start
36:27
Speaker 2: eating them, you're gonna have allergic gut reaction and eventually
36:31
Speaker 2: insulin sensitivity and in some cases you will develop diabetes
36:35
Speaker 2: and obesity. So that's how you know, that's the effect
36:40
Speaker 2: of the of an ephylaxis. Then injection with metals will
36:45
Speaker 2: have another passway of damage, and that's that's primarily caused
36:50
Speaker 2: by stripping what's called zeta potential from blood flow and
36:54
Speaker 2: other coloidal fluid flows in your body. And you know,
36:59
Speaker 2: blood flow has all the components of the blood, such
37:04
Speaker 2: as cells, red blood cells, white blood cells, you know,
37:07
Speaker 2: different lipids and proteins that are in it are all
37:11
Speaker 2: separated from each other by negative charge on the surface
37:14
Speaker 2: of the cell. It's called zeta potential. And because of
37:19
Speaker 2: that negative charge, they kept separate and they're all flowing.
37:23
Speaker 2: And if that charge starts diminishing for whatever reason, then
37:28
Speaker 2: there will be pile ups. And if it's quickly diminished,
37:31
Speaker 2: you will see that the fact that they were showing
37:33
Speaker 2: with you know, fresh blood and then pouring vaccines under
37:38
Speaker 2: microscope and looking at the microscope, what happens with the
37:41
Speaker 2: fresh blood, and we saw immediate clumping and immediate these
37:45
Speaker 2: rulo patterns forming, right, so the red bloo cells stuck
37:48
Speaker 2: together like coins. So that's the effect of stripping's zeta potential.
37:53
Speaker 2: Why because lipid nanoparticles are hugely what's called cationic. They
37:58
Speaker 2: have high positive char charge, and an aluminum is a
38:02
Speaker 2: very very known high triple cat so it has triple
38:06
Speaker 2: positive charge on its surface and when it enters the
38:10
Speaker 2: blood flow, so positive with negative charge immediately cancel each
38:15
Speaker 2: other out. So you now you have stripping of the
38:17
Speaker 2: negative charge and you start having these clumping and pile
38:20
Speaker 2: ups and blood clothes and all these processes. The same
38:24
Speaker 2: can happen with lymphatic flow, any interstitial fluid flow, and
38:29
Speaker 2: you're going to have various types of fallout like crystals,
38:34
Speaker 2: you know, uria crystals, kidney stones, gall bladderstones, plaques, lipid plaques, cataracts,
38:43
Speaker 2: the same. The protein deposits on the lens, and so
38:47
Speaker 2: that's you can. I can go forever describing all these things,
38:52
Speaker 2: but you can you can appreciate the variety of mechanisms
38:55
Speaker 2: of damage that are build into the shots, the variability
38:59
Speaker 2: that drives this very very hard to pin exactly these effects,
39:04
Speaker 2: and a lot of opportunity for gas lighting and pointing
39:07
Speaker 2: in different other directions. Right, So it's a perfect setup here,
39:12
Speaker 2: but people need to start understanding that again, as I said,
39:15
Speaker 2: coming back again to control project, ninety percent of your
39:19
Speaker 2: risk of chronic disease comes from vacciums. Everything else is
39:22
Speaker 2: almost irrelevant. So that's how we need to look at it.
39:28
Speaker 1: That's very interesting. So what sort of timelines or time
39:31
Speaker 1: frames are we looking at because this can you said earlier,
39:35
Speaker 1: you can have an immediate effect, or it can take years.
39:38
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's also very hard to study and very hard
39:42
Speaker 2: to research, and I can't give you like a very
39:45
Speaker 2: definitive answer. It depends on individual. It depends on what
39:49
Speaker 2: they were injected with, where it went in the body,
39:52
Speaker 2: which is random, how it got carried, which cells got affected,
39:56
Speaker 2: which cells were transfected. Didtional vaccines at least did not
40:01
Speaker 2: transfect the cells unless very very rare bizarre instances, But
40:08
Speaker 2: they were not known as a transfectant, so the buddy
40:11
Speaker 2: had easier time getting rid of them. Now more newer
40:17
Speaker 2: platforms like recombinant and the mRNA, well they are transfectant,
40:22
Speaker 2: and recombinant largely transfects the biome, but mRNA transfects mammalian cells.
40:29
Speaker 2: So they finally got to the holy grail that they wanted.
40:32
Speaker 2: They wanted to transfect the mammalian cells and those are
40:35
Speaker 2: really really hard. And so that there we go. So
40:38
Speaker 2: you can have what type where did it go? Did
40:42
Speaker 2: it transfect yourselves? If it did, which ones biome or
40:46
Speaker 2: mammalian or both, And then it depends. It just depends
40:51
Speaker 2: how your body is going to deal with it, how
40:53
Speaker 2: you're going to deal with it. But number one thing
40:55
Speaker 2: is to stop vaccinating. And if you stop vaccinating, you
40:59
Speaker 2: have and you maybe you know, you have maybe some
41:01
Speaker 2: side effects or some illness, but over time you can
41:06
Speaker 2: you can recover. I've seen it happening. My own daughter
41:09
Speaker 2: was severely severely injured by childhood vaccine, probably by by
41:13
Speaker 2: by Mark HPD, and I honestly thought she was gonna die.
41:20
Speaker 2: It was so bad. But we managed to over time
41:27
Speaker 2: make her feel better and she is functioning now, she's
41:31
Speaker 2: well functioning. Now she has she has her own job,
41:34
Speaker 2: and she you know, she's totally at least it wasn't mental,
41:37
Speaker 2: thank god, it was all physical. It's pots, but it's
41:43
Speaker 2: it's manageable. And again, your body has a self healing mechanism.
41:48
Speaker 2: You just need to try to help it and over
41:52
Speaker 2: time you can become better. Okay, I'm not saying completely recovered, cured.
41:57
Speaker 2: Maybe you know, some people might be, but at least
42:01
Speaker 2: you will be you will be better. The key is
42:04
Speaker 2: to stop these injections. If you continue injections, it's you know,
42:09
Speaker 2: it's not it's not recoverable.
42:12
Speaker 1: And obviously stay away from multiple injections and vaccines and
42:18
Speaker 1: don't get boosters and all that kind of thing. Does
42:20
Speaker 1: that make it worse, Yes.
42:22
Speaker 2: It makes it worse, Absolutely makes it worse. The more
42:24
Speaker 2: the more, it's like a Russian roulette. So as I said,
42:27
Speaker 2: it's a it's a such huge variability of components and
42:32
Speaker 2: how individuals get affected that you think of it as
42:35
Speaker 2: a Russian roulette. And well, if you play it ninety
42:39
Speaker 2: times or whatever CDC wants to inject every child with,
42:42
Speaker 2: will you guaranteed to have a dead or disabled child?
42:45
Speaker 2: Guaranteed you're guaranteed to win that game. And so that's
42:49
Speaker 2: what I tell people, Just don't do it. To stop.
42:55
Speaker 1: Such I wonder if in many ways COVID was a
42:58
Speaker 1: blessing because more people than I can remember have a
43:06
Speaker 1: critical view of vaccines.
43:08
Speaker 2: Now, m yeah, there was a there was a recent
43:13
Speaker 2: poll by Political which is a hugely you know, pro
43:17
Speaker 2: pro establishment organization and It was funny because I think
43:21
Speaker 2: they needed to hide the real answer, and they, as typical,
43:25
Speaker 2: they split it by the party, you know, affiliation, Democratic, Republican,
43:30
Speaker 2: just ignore. But there was a total qualumn and it
43:33
Speaker 2: was something like and they also phrased the questions very
43:37
Speaker 2: in a very skirmish way, you know, like you know
43:40
Speaker 2: that they're trying to kind of massage the message. So
43:44
Speaker 2: but the question was like something along the lines of
43:48
Speaker 2: vaccines trustworthy or not, And they got like forty six
43:54
Speaker 2: percent of the people said no, which is huge, and
43:58
Speaker 2: then thirty thirty some percent and said yes, trustworthy. And
44:02
Speaker 2: then there was this category of fifteen percent this said other.
44:05
Speaker 2: And I guarantee you it was like absolutely effing no way,
44:12
Speaker 2: which means the vast majority of the population will not
44:15
Speaker 2: get vaccinated.
44:17
Speaker 1: You'll be criticized. This is just correlation, Sasha, you haven't
44:23
Speaker 1: got any causation yet, Well.
44:25
Speaker 2: Yeah, we have a causation, and the in the that
44:29
Speaker 2: we actually do have a causation. So in my research,
44:34
Speaker 2: I also wanted to like, that's that's my point to
44:38
Speaker 2: anyone who wants to debate me on vaccines and say
44:41
Speaker 2: that no, for example, it's not vaccines, it's our it's
44:43
Speaker 2: the food. So you know, the food drives all the
44:47
Speaker 2: chronic disease epidemic, and we just need to fix food,
44:50
Speaker 2: like RFK propaganda now tells us. And so my responses
44:55
Speaker 2: as well, why don't you show me a study where
44:57
Speaker 2: you can induce what I where you want diabetes for example,
45:01
Speaker 2: by that it just induced diabetes in a mouse or
45:05
Speaker 2: a rad buy food. And then let's see how that
45:10
Speaker 2: what you did in the diet, and how that translates
45:12
Speaker 2: to humans, whether it's realistic or not. And there's another
45:18
Speaker 2: I also asked the same question about cancer, Well, can
45:20
Speaker 2: you show me how you can induce cancer and not
45:23
Speaker 2: in a human of course that's an esthical, but in
45:25
Speaker 2: the in an animal model. Uh. And and you know,
45:31
Speaker 2: the people send me the study which was recently circulated,
45:36
Speaker 2: a very well conducted study in about thousand rats. They
45:40
Speaker 2: fed them glyphasade at ten x and one hundred acts
45:45
Speaker 2: of regulatory limit every day of their life in water.
45:49
Speaker 2: So imagine if you were drinking glypha sade at one
45:52
Speaker 2: hundred acts of regulatory norm with coffee every morning for
45:57
Speaker 2: the rest of like from the beginning when you were
45:58
Speaker 2: a baby to you know, for the rest of your life,
46:02
Speaker 2: your total risk of developing cancer. If it's a translatable study,
46:07
Speaker 2: the total risk of developing cancer in this scenario is
46:09
Speaker 2: four percent. So yes, you can cause cancer by glyphs it.
46:17
Speaker 2: But it's very difficult. It's very difficult, and it's entirely
46:20
Speaker 2: unrealistic that exposure that you need for any normal encounter
46:26
Speaker 2: with glaph side, even for people who actually routinely work
46:28
Speaker 2: with it. And so that's my point. And so and
46:35
Speaker 2: another thing I started looking for these kinds of examples.
46:39
Speaker 2: So do you know how we make mice for or
46:43
Speaker 2: rats for preclinical research that and we need these animals
46:49
Speaker 2: that reliably develop cancer at early age. And so what
46:54
Speaker 2: do we do with them? We have a mouse vaccination schedule.
47:01
Speaker 2: We don't we don't make them smoke, we don't feed
47:05
Speaker 2: them sugar, we don't you know, we don't feed them carbs,
47:11
Speaker 2: we don't even feed them life as it, because as
47:13
Speaker 2: I've demonstrated, it's pretty difficult. And by the time you
47:17
Speaker 2: induce cancer, the animal is too old to do any
47:19
Speaker 2: any research with it. So you need to need cancer
47:21
Speaker 2: early and reliably. That's when you do the mouse vaccination schedule.
47:26
Speaker 2: And that's that gives you early, reliable, commercially successful animal
47:30
Speaker 2: model that will develop cancer, uh, you know, on the
47:33
Speaker 2: consistent schedule and will also we can also develop particular
47:37
Speaker 2: types of cancers depending on what we you know, how
47:40
Speaker 2: we vaccinate them, when we vaccinate them with what, and
47:43
Speaker 2: then what we feed them subsequent, So the food is
47:46
Speaker 2: used as a secondary vector. And you know, you can
47:51
Speaker 2: you can make things faster, better and in the different
47:54
Speaker 2: locations of the body how you needed to you for
47:57
Speaker 2: your commercial mouse trains. But the primary saying is vaccination.
48:03
Speaker 2: There's no other way to induce cancer reliably. So that's
48:07
Speaker 2: what That's what I'm saying. You know, you can try
48:10
Speaker 2: to argue with my theory, but so far, and I'm
48:14
Speaker 2: very open minded. That's why I invite people, please, you know,
48:17
Speaker 2: send me papers that prove otherwise or prove something else,
48:20
Speaker 2: and I will very happily review and adjust my view
48:23
Speaker 2: if I find something. But so if I haven't seen it.
48:28
Speaker 1: You do know, though, that you're going to get some
48:31
Speaker 1: angry responses about the animal testing. The animal testing part, well,
48:38
Speaker 1: I mean, so.
48:39
Speaker 2: Would you like to do it on humans? I know,
48:42
Speaker 2: so we do. You know, I'm not against animal testing,
48:45
Speaker 2: by the way.
48:45
Speaker 1: Actually, there are a few humans I think we could send.
48:51
Speaker 2: I know, I know there's there's this these like throwaway
48:54
Speaker 2: comments about oh, we should test it on prisoners, which
48:56
Speaker 2: is like, oh my god, like did you know that
48:58
Speaker 2: Nazis did this right? Uh, But also they're oh, well,
49:03
Speaker 2: let's let's test it on Faucia. Even in the case
49:05
Speaker 2: of Faucia. I don't want to do that because I
49:08
Speaker 2: don't want to go on that same level with him.
49:11
Speaker 2: That's what that's what people like him do. I'm not
49:14
Speaker 2: on the same level with him. I'm a I'm a
49:16
Speaker 2: different I'm a human being. I'm not a Satanist, you know.
49:19
Speaker 2: And so that's what I'm saying, like, let's not go there.
49:23
Speaker 2: The the animal research is legitimate. You know, you have
49:27
Speaker 2: to have animal studies. If you want to develop drugs,
49:31
Speaker 2: new drugs or you know, new new products medical devices,
49:35
Speaker 2: you do need to have animal studies. And they are
49:41
Speaker 2: supposed to be also regulated by animal institutional research bodies
49:47
Speaker 2: and protocols and ethical guidelines. We're not supposed to be
49:51
Speaker 2: just you know, be cruel and torturing them like what
49:53
Speaker 2: Fauci did with those bigles. That's that's just pointless torture
49:58
Speaker 2: or JD. Vans. For example, our vice president does in
50:01
Speaker 2: his amplify bio horrific experiments on monkeys sewing their skulls
50:06
Speaker 2: of and injecting them directly into the brain with toxic,
50:10
Speaker 2: complete toxic matter for no reason whatsoever. So that's that's
50:15
Speaker 2: called pointless and cruel handling of animals and wasting animals
50:20
Speaker 2: lives for these psychopathic objectives. No ethical animal research supposed
50:27
Speaker 2: to be done, you know, in the most humane manner,
50:31
Speaker 2: and for the sole reason of reducing the risk to humans.
50:36
Speaker 2: So we need to do risk a whole bunch of
50:38
Speaker 2: things about new substances or new devices or something, and
50:42
Speaker 2: before we can give it to a human, we need
50:44
Speaker 2: to make sure that we're not doing something majorly bad.
50:47
Speaker 2: And that's the only purpose of the animal research. And
50:50
Speaker 2: so that's that's my position on it, all right.
50:54
Speaker 1: So conversely, somebody who's completely unvaccinated as likely to live
51:01
Speaker 1: a very healthy life. Mm hm, yes, assuming, assuming, assuming
51:08
Speaker 1: they don't go down the road of smoking and drugs
51:11
Speaker 1: and all that kind of stuff.
51:13
Speaker 2: Yeah, Also, the you know, destructive lifestyles of course, and
51:17
Speaker 2: you know smoking, you know, excessive drinking, other risky activities,
51:23
Speaker 2: you know, drug use, of course those are those can
51:27
Speaker 2: certainly contribute to the chronic disease burden. But even the
51:31
Speaker 2: you know, even things like smoking, I'm kind of revisiting
51:34
Speaker 2: now and I've never smoked, and I don't like smoking,
51:36
Speaker 2: and I don't want to be around smokers. But even that,
51:39
Speaker 2: I'm revisiting now and being more let's say, rational about it.
51:44
Speaker 2: When you look at the data, it's nowhere nearly as
51:46
Speaker 2: dangerous as vaccination. Nowhere nearly. I mean, it is dangerous,
51:49
Speaker 2: but not not like if I had a choice be
51:55
Speaker 2: smoking and taking vaccines.
51:57
Speaker 1: Everybody, everybody knows an old person who lived to ninety
52:01
Speaker 1: five smoked the whole life and died of a heart attack,
52:05
Speaker 1: right exactly.
52:06
Speaker 2: Well, there was the famous Ladies. I think she is
52:09
Speaker 2: to date the longest lived human recorded, the French lady
52:15
Speaker 2: who lived to be one hundred and twenty seven years old,
52:18
Speaker 2: and she smoked all her life and drank every day.
52:22
Speaker 1: Like literally, there's something in that.
52:29
Speaker 2: There's something in that. And I also know that, you know,
52:32
Speaker 2: smoking has been around for thousands of years, right, so,
52:37
Speaker 2: and all those diseases that are you know, and cancer
52:40
Speaker 2: was extremely rare, and actually you know, many people stayed
52:44
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't have the data. I don't
52:45
Speaker 2: have the research. But if you read there's like references
52:49
Speaker 2: from eighteen hundreds and seventeen hundreds for people saying I've
52:52
Speaker 2: never seen cancer in my life, but certainly they cancer
52:56
Speaker 2: in children does not exist without vaccines. I can absolutely
53:00
Speaker 2: guarantee you that. So in children cancer it's only induced
53:03
Speaker 2: by vaccines. If we go, you know, to people over fifty,
53:07
Speaker 2: maybe there are other you know, maybe it's a smoker
53:10
Speaker 2: and then there's like other contributing factors. But in a child,
53:14
Speaker 2: there's nothing else that can induce cancer. It's only vaccines.
53:19
Speaker 1: Based on what you're saying, is it then true to
53:25
Speaker 1: conclude that people a thousand years ago were healthier than
53:28
Speaker 1: what we are today on average or never?
53:31
Speaker 2: Yeah, on average? Possibly is, because I think it just
53:34
Speaker 2: depends on where in the world. Obviously the vikings the vikings, well,
53:39
Speaker 2: I mean, yeah, so you know, based on the the
53:46
Speaker 2: records that exist. So the Native American population, for example,
53:51
Speaker 2: was in the record like one in the initial encounters,
53:56
Speaker 2: or let's say the encounters before they became a war, right,
54:00
Speaker 2: they were like trading and normal interactions with people who
54:04
Speaker 2: came from Europe or the places, and they all universally
54:09
Speaker 2: said how very strong, how vibrant they were, how tall
54:13
Speaker 2: they were healthy, you know, and yeah, we have those
54:17
Speaker 2: accounts of people living long lives, living healthy, not having
54:23
Speaker 2: all these insane illnesses, insane societal burden of chronic illness
54:28
Speaker 2: at all. And now we're being told that, you know,
54:32
Speaker 2: that they were all dying at the age of twenty,
54:35
Speaker 2: which is ridiculous.
54:37
Speaker 1: It does seem ridiculous.
54:39
Speaker 2: That's that's ridiculous. It's not true. You know. They of
54:42
Speaker 2: course they twist the life expectance statistics to suit their
54:47
Speaker 2: public health propaganda. And I've seen those presentations and know
54:52
Speaker 2: exactly how they do it. So they you know, they
54:54
Speaker 2: give you average statistic which includes, uh, well that you know,
54:58
Speaker 2: there were a lot of wars, a lot of accidents,
55:00
Speaker 2: and there was high childhood mortality. Was there was high
55:04
Speaker 2: high birth rate and you know, due to shortage of
55:09
Speaker 2: food and cramped conditions and neglect and so forth. Yeah,
55:13
Speaker 2: a lot of children would die in childhood. But that's
55:16
Speaker 2: a different issue. It's not because of the infectious diseases.
55:19
Speaker 2: It was nutrition, conditions of living, sanitation, and neglect, you know,
55:26
Speaker 2: like parents, some parents just didn't care. It was too
55:30
Speaker 2: many of them anyway, and it was like the attitudes
55:32
Speaker 2: were different to that, and so that's and then they say, well,
55:37
Speaker 2: you know, because of this high childhood mortality, now your
55:40
Speaker 2: average is something like forty seven years old. But that's
55:43
Speaker 2: not not true. But the average person would survive into
55:46
Speaker 2: their seventies and eighties just as just as they are today.
55:50
Speaker 1: You know, if so many people today are vaccinated, sessha,
55:57
Speaker 1: what does it mean for the neo future.
56:02
Speaker 2: Well, we're going to have a pretty significant early die off.
56:09
Speaker 2: And not only just that, well, we're already having a
56:12
Speaker 2: very significant impact of chronic disease burden. It's skyrocketed. And
56:18
Speaker 2: we all know that the hospitals are now full. So
56:20
Speaker 2: they were not full during they were empty, but they
56:24
Speaker 2: are now packed. It's very hard to get any medical appointments.
56:29
Speaker 2: You have to wait. The hospitals are consistently running out
56:33
Speaker 2: of capacity of all the people who are arriving, you know,
56:36
Speaker 2: with the consistent episodes of whatever they have in cancer
56:39
Speaker 2: or cardiovascular or newer degenerative and that is just going
56:45
Speaker 2: to generate a reduced lifespan for those people. And once
56:54
Speaker 2: but also I see the that a lot you know,
56:58
Speaker 2: as we've discussed the political poll for example, well, a
57:00
Speaker 2: lot of people are just now beginning to understand the
57:04
Speaker 2: real reason for this. And so we also see a
57:07
Speaker 2: positive trend of younger people having children and refusing all
57:10
Speaker 2: vaccines and people in whatever age just stopping vaccination. And
57:18
Speaker 2: you know, that is a positive trend. And if that continues,
57:21
Speaker 2: then okay, well this wave will die off eventually, but
57:24
Speaker 2: we now will have a healthier, really healthier generation, and
57:27
Speaker 2: we have hope that more of us pushing back against
57:32
Speaker 2: this evil system will create a better world for us.
57:37
Speaker 1: There must be areas in the world also with very
57:40
Speaker 1: low vaccination rates compared to say the US.
57:43
Speaker 2: Oh yes, still they still exist, although who has become
57:48
Speaker 2: a real cityc it's just enforcement mechanism and they just
57:56
Speaker 2: use again the corruption buying the government, putting the government
58:00
Speaker 2: that replacing them doing the regime changes. If somebody pushes
58:04
Speaker 2: back and bringing you know, Bill Gates and Geo's who
58:08
Speaker 2: and starting push vaccinations again into those countries, so it
58:14
Speaker 2: remains to be seen. But yeah, there are places in
58:16
Speaker 2: the world that are with lower vaccination coverage and and
58:21
Speaker 2: you know, and and again, so like that's not the
58:23
Speaker 2: argument that people throw at me about food, oh, our
58:26
Speaker 2: toxic food. And I'm like, well, have you been to
58:28
Speaker 2: India or you know, any sort world and have you
58:32
Speaker 2: seen the population there? They're fit and healthy, and look
58:35
Speaker 2: at what they eat, and it's their water is polluted
58:38
Speaker 2: and the air is polluted and and and it's right.
58:41
Speaker 2: It's the only difference is vaccination coverage. That's all.
58:46
Speaker 1: I think. Then the Amish are ahead of the curve.
58:50
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, yes they are. They're definitely as far as health,
58:54
Speaker 2: that's probably the healthiest population in the US. And I
59:00
Speaker 2: mean there are a couple of other groups that also,
59:02
Speaker 2: you know, avoid vaccinations, but Amash would be the healthiest
59:07
Speaker 2: group I could point to.
59:12
Speaker 1: Twenty years ago we were all mocking them.
59:16
Speaker 2: Well I wasn't. I mean, I thought, you know, I
59:20
Speaker 2: thought there was you know, my perspective. So that was
59:23
Speaker 2: good that in the US you were allowed to do
59:25
Speaker 2: to express your religious views the way. You know, if
59:29
Speaker 2: your religion sells that you don't want it, well then
59:32
Speaker 2: you don't want it. And I thought it was fine.
59:34
Speaker 2: I thought everybody had a choice. I really didn't see
59:37
Speaker 2: this whole massive evil, you know, just coming at your
59:42
Speaker 2: throat with this like as a parent, right, I started
59:45
Speaker 2: seeing it maybe toward you know, my children were already
59:49
Speaker 2: teenagers and toward the high school, and started getting more
59:52
Speaker 2: and more. At the beginning, it wasn't like that, and
59:55
Speaker 2: I could, you know, That's why, you know, nothing alerted
59:58
Speaker 2: me to even that when I was a young mother,
1:00:01
Speaker 2: because it was it always was presented. It's always totally
1:00:04
Speaker 2: your choice. It's just just best, it's best for you
1:00:06
Speaker 2: to we just recommend. And then today they literally at
1:00:09
Speaker 2: your throat if you if you say no to one
1:00:12
Speaker 2: vaccination and repeatedly, repeatedly on a continuous basis. So I
1:00:18
Speaker 2: don't go to the conventional doctors anymore. I have a
1:00:22
Speaker 2: private doctor and only go occasionally for sports testing. But
1:00:28
Speaker 2: people that I or my friends, my relatives that do
1:00:31
Speaker 2: have primary care conventional doctors, the stuff that they tell me,
1:00:35
Speaker 2: just like I want to tear my hair out, like
1:00:37
Speaker 2: what happens in those appointments.
1:00:40
Speaker 1: What's the moral of the story, Well, the.
1:00:42
Speaker 2: Moral of the story, don't vaccinate, avoid all injections, but
1:00:49
Speaker 2: especially for your children. Absolutely like do not do not
1:00:52
Speaker 2: do that. As I said, if you do it enough,
1:00:55
Speaker 2: it's a Russian roulette and you will win disabled or
1:00:59
Speaker 2: even a dead child. And nobody wants to do that.
1:01:01
Speaker 2: And you don't want to live with the realization that
1:01:05
Speaker 2: you did it to your child for the rest of
1:01:07
Speaker 2: your life. I guarantee you that's the thought that you
1:01:10
Speaker 2: do not want to have in your mind.
1:01:14
Speaker 1: How does the pharmaceutical industry get away with it?
1:01:17
Speaker 2: How do they get away with Well, the government gives
1:01:20
Speaker 2: them all the protections. It's a mafia. It's called public
1:01:24
Speaker 2: private partnership, and public private partnership is mafia and fascism.
1:01:28
Speaker 2: Also by definition, it's corporatism fascism. And you know they
1:01:33
Speaker 2: have it now officially legally in the US. It's advertised
1:01:37
Speaker 2: as a great thing. And so pharmaceutical companies would not
1:01:42
Speaker 2: have done any of this if the government didn't didn't
1:01:46
Speaker 2: set up the whole system with the Prepact, with avoidance
1:01:49
Speaker 2: of any well, initially with National Vaccine Injury Lower nineteen
1:01:53
Speaker 2: eighty six. So they give them first layer of liability protection.
1:01:57
Speaker 2: Now they have a complete layer of liability protection called
1:02:00
Speaker 2: PREP Act. And it actually took about ten years for
1:02:03
Speaker 2: the government to convince pharma companies that this is a
1:02:08
Speaker 2: workable system. So they were training them for about ten years.
1:02:12
Speaker 2: I have PowerPoint presentations from FDA legal counsel explaining how
1:02:18
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical companies are absolved from all liability just to pacify
1:02:22
Speaker 2: them all and bring them on board into this collaborative
1:02:25
Speaker 2: you know, collaborative public private partnership of for pandemic preparedness
1:02:29
Speaker 2: and start producing these absolutely poisonous vaccines because pharma companies
1:02:32
Speaker 2: know very well that they're poisonous. It's not a secret
1:02:35
Speaker 2: to anyone. They know very well as poisonous. Government says,
1:02:41
Speaker 2: Government says, I want you to produce a billion doses
1:02:44
Speaker 2: of this and ship it to me. And pharma says, well,
1:02:46
Speaker 2: I wasn't born, yes, because then you're going to make
1:02:48
Speaker 2: me liable, right, And the government says no, no, no, no, no. Look,
1:02:52
Speaker 2: look we have this wonderful system. And this went on
1:02:55
Speaker 2: for ten years before they pull the trigger in twenty twenty. Look,
1:02:58
Speaker 2: we have this whole new after in the Food and
1:03:01
Speaker 2: Drugs and Cosmetics Act called Chapter five six four, and
1:03:05
Speaker 2: it makes everything that you currently do that that currently
1:03:09
Speaker 2: is illegal by the Food and Drugs and Cosmetics Act
1:03:12
Speaker 2: perfectly legal if we the government say it's an emergency.
1:03:16
Speaker 2: And so they've they've done this for ten years and
1:03:19
Speaker 2: finally convinced everyone that okay, yeah, yeah, we can do that.
1:03:22
Speaker 2: And so then they then they went and they did
1:03:24
Speaker 2: the COVID pandemic.
1:03:28
Speaker 1: Quote unquote, uh.
1:03:30
Speaker 2: Huh yeah yeah. So but otherwise they nobody is nobody
1:03:35
Speaker 2: is a full They all know it's poisoned, and they
1:03:37
Speaker 2: all know that pharma know that as a private sector
1:03:40
Speaker 2: they will be thrown under the bus and made the
1:03:43
Speaker 2: escapegoat and the bad guy. And not that they're good guys,
1:03:45
Speaker 2: they're bad guys. There. It's it's it's two parts of mafia.
1:03:47
Speaker 2: But the hierarchy is the government has the ultimate ultimate tool,
1:03:53
Speaker 2: which is called sovereign liability shield that they can extend
1:03:57
Speaker 2: to their pharmaceutical co conspira And as long as the
1:04:01
Speaker 2: pharmaceutical co conspirators are convinced and on board, then it
1:04:05
Speaker 2: all works out.
1:04:09
Speaker 1: Sasha, how can I follow your work?
1:04:12
Speaker 2: Well, I'm on substack, So on substack is my main
1:04:15
Speaker 2: source and you can find me in my publication is
1:04:20
Speaker 2: called due Diligence and art or such a little tip
1:04:23
Speaker 2: about dot substock dot.
1:04:24
Speaker 1: Com that art but threw me off back in the
1:04:29
Speaker 1: day when I first discovered your substack, I'm thinking, like,
1:04:33
Speaker 1: this is just a substack with art and then suddenly
1:04:37
Speaker 1: mixed in between all these truth pomps.
1:04:41
Speaker 5: Yeah, well I wasn't even going to publish art, but
1:04:46
Speaker 5: one of my readers said, or like I said, several
1:04:49
Speaker 5: of my readers said, oh, we also wanted to publish
1:04:51
Speaker 5: your art, and as well, they don't.
1:04:54
Speaker 2: They don't have anything to do with each other. But
1:04:56
Speaker 2: if you guys want it, sure, and actually people like it.
1:04:59
Speaker 2: They think it's it's a kind of like a relief
1:05:02
Speaker 2: from all the darkness and some danger. They keep doing
1:05:07
Speaker 2: it so mmmm.