Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Wammen's History Month is Here Which Means...? Boots on the Ground for Ukraine! | HBR News 492

Transcript

Wammen's History Month is Here Which Means...? Boots on the Ground for Ukraine! | HBR News 492 · Honey Badger Radio

0:03
Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four ninety two. Women's History
0:07
Speaker 1: Month is here, which means hoots on the ground for Ukraine,
0:11
Speaker 1: we discussed the news of the week and give it
0:13
Speaker 1: the Badger treatment. Hello everyone, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
0:22
Speaker 1: Hope you guys are doing well this week and that
0:23
Speaker 1: you're laughing at all of this absurdity so that you
0:26
Speaker 1: are not consumed by it. I'm your host Brian and
0:29
Speaker 1: I'm joined by, as always, my lovely co hosts, Hannah
0:31
Speaker 1: Wallen and doctor Randemercam. We have a great show line
0:35
Speaker 1: up for you guys this week, full of stories that
0:38
Speaker 1: are definitely gonna get people talking, so please be sure
0:42
Speaker 1: to continue those conversations in the chat as well as
0:45
Speaker 1: the comments section. Onek's this week's HBr News show. We're
0:49
Speaker 1: gonna be talking about, well, let's just say the UK
0:53
Speaker 1: response to a certain conversation that occurred in the White House,
0:58
Speaker 1: which will apparently guarant t piece in Ukraine UH and Britain.
1:04
Speaker 2: UH.
1:05
Speaker 1: The same country, by the way, plans on cracking down
1:08
Speaker 1: on what it calls hyper masculine social media and more so,
1:13
Speaker 1: stick around, It's gonna be a good time and be
1:16
Speaker 1: sure to join us afterwards for the patron only show.
1:19
Speaker 1: Did you guys know that it's Women's History Month? And
1:22
Speaker 1: that means that Black History Month is yesterday's news and
1:25
Speaker 1: we can't talk about it anymore because now we're doing
1:28
Speaker 1: the celebrating of women and nobody is more excited about
1:30
Speaker 1: that than Halo the game Halo. Yeah, yeah, it's that's right,
1:39
Speaker 1: that's right. You may you may think that that's a
1:41
Speaker 1: strange thing to care about, but you would be wrong,
1:45
Speaker 1: and obviously you hate women. So apparently halowaypoint dot com
1:52
Speaker 1: is doing a Women's History Month. Uh, the dedication to
1:58
Speaker 1: all of the female characters that have appeared in Halo,
2:01
Speaker 1: which apparently are fifty. I didn't know there was any
2:05
Speaker 1: so characters.
2:06
Speaker 3: So fictional characters.
2:08
Speaker 1: Yes, fictional women involved, fictional female representation created Halo. No no, no, no, no,
2:15
Speaker 1: well no, do you mean.
2:17
Speaker 3: Like they're not even honoring?
2:20
Speaker 1: Well, there you do.
2:22
Speaker 2: You now get to play as Mistress Chief, who is
2:25
Speaker 2: exactly the same doom guy costume.
2:27
Speaker 1: No, she's gonna be called I believe she's gonna be
2:30
Speaker 1: called master Chef because she's gonna be cooking. So anyway,
2:39
Speaker 1: we're gonna go into the after show we're gonna look
2:41
Speaker 1: at this, and if you want to join us, you
2:42
Speaker 1: have to become a Badger yourself and going to Feedbbadger
2:45
Speaker 1: dot com ford set subscribe and setting up a monthly
2:48
Speaker 1: subscription five bucks a month will get you into our
2:50
Speaker 1: discord server where well we we can we anybody can
2:53
Speaker 1: get into discords the free version by going to badginations
2:56
Speaker 1: on online. But if you want more access, you can
2:59
Speaker 1: become a member and that will let you watch all
3:02
Speaker 1: of the additional content. Alison and Mike just put out
3:05
Speaker 1: a new rageing and there's more videos coming all the time,
3:10
Speaker 1: so you know, please be considered joining the community. Uh,
3:13
Speaker 1: it is a very special community, to be sure. And yeah,
3:18
Speaker 1: there's a lot going on. So I hopefully we will
3:20
Speaker 1: see you all there. That is Feedbadger dot com. Force
3:23
Speaker 1: I subscribe. And if you don't want to wake up
3:24
Speaker 1: one morning to find that our presence online has been
3:28
Speaker 1: reduced to a smoldering creator, then you might want to
3:32
Speaker 1: look for our archive content at Honeybadger radio dot com
3:35
Speaker 1: or badgerfeed dot com. That's where all the content lives,
3:39
Speaker 1: all right. So with all that out of the way,
3:42
Speaker 1: let us get into today's stories. So first we're going
3:47
Speaker 1: to talk about this so on March. As of March fourth,
3:54
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, UK Prime Minister Kiir Starmer has repeatedly
3:58
Speaker 1: emphasized strong support for Ukraine with you probably heard about
4:03
Speaker 1: the recent goings on with Zelensky visiting the White House
4:08
Speaker 1: and the European reaction to that, including readiness. This is
4:14
Speaker 1: Starmer again, readiness to deploy British according to Starmer, quote
4:19
Speaker 1: boots on the ground and planes in the air end
4:23
Speaker 1: quote to secure and defend a lasting peace deal in
4:27
Speaker 1: Ukraine and amid Russia's ongoing war. He first made this
4:32
Speaker 1: pledge on February twenty seven during a White House press
4:34
Speaker 1: conference with US President Donald Trump, stating the UK is
4:38
Speaker 1: prepared to back a peace deal with troops and aircraft.
4:42
Speaker 1: That's a peace deal, guys, working with allies to ensure
4:47
Speaker 1: peace endures and deter Russian aggression. Starmer doubled down on
4:52
Speaker 1: this commitment on March second, after hosting a summit of
4:55
Speaker 1: European leaders in London, outlining a quote coalition of the
4:59
Speaker 1: will it end quote to defend any peace agreement with
5:03
Speaker 1: the UK, leading by offering military presence, though he stressed
5:08
Speaker 1: it requires strong US backing. He reiterated this on March third,
5:13
Speaker 1: clarifying Europe must take the lead but needs US support
5:16
Speaker 1: while denying Trump is an unreliable ally. Despite recent tensions,
5:22
Speaker 1: these statements reflect the strategic push for European leadership, military deterrence,
5:27
Speaker 1: and a quote just peace end quote. But specifics on deployment,
5:31
Speaker 1: timing or scale remain vague, sparking debate online about risks
5:35
Speaker 1: of escalation. You think so that has been said.
5:40
Speaker 2: Yes, it's disturbing and perturbing how easy it is now
5:45
Speaker 2: to coerce normies into warmongering. I mean normies who have
5:51
Speaker 2: already been convinced that the extreme left is the sensible center.
5:56
Speaker 2: If you can even call them normies at this point,
5:58
Speaker 2: and unfortunately I think we can. All you have to
6:01
Speaker 2: do is tell them it's just like World War two,
6:04
Speaker 2: is it, though? Or is it more like the Iraq War,
6:10
Speaker 2: considering you're talking about the Coalition of the willing, like
6:13
Speaker 2: the Iraq War, that war that almost everyone was against. Yes,
6:19
Speaker 2: Saddam Hussein was an evil fuck, but it was none
6:22
Speaker 2: of our business. Like, let a Ran deal with it,
6:25
Speaker 2: Let Saudi Arabia deal with it. They've got plenty of
6:28
Speaker 2: muscle over there have had it, whether the fuck would
6:31
Speaker 2: we send our own young men to die, especially when
6:36
Speaker 2: Iraq had exactly nothing to do with nine to eleven
6:39
Speaker 2: or indeed any so called weapons of mass destruction, And
6:43
Speaker 2: so we amassed in our millions to protest against it,
6:49
Speaker 2: and it didn't do shit. Nobody cared. So I don't
6:54
Speaker 2: know why they're even bothering to convince us that it's
6:57
Speaker 2: a good idea to send our young men to die
6:59
Speaker 2: in get An, the war that has fuck all to
7:01
Speaker 2: do with this. They're gonna do it anyway. It's just
7:05
Speaker 2: as I say, it's disturbing that so many people have
7:08
Speaker 2: nevertheless been successfully hoodwinked this time to the point where
7:14
Speaker 2: they can call it a peacekeeping mission with boots on
7:17
Speaker 2: the ground and planes in the air. It doesn't sound
7:19
Speaker 2: like peace, bro, That sounds exactly like a heart fucking war.
7:24
Speaker 2: So yeah, so here we are. War is peace, freedom
7:32
Speaker 2: and slavery, ignorance, his strength and so on. So this
7:35
Speaker 2: is how democracy dies with thunderous applause. No, this is
7:40
Speaker 2: how democracy kills us to the sound of thunderous applause.
7:44
Speaker 2: This is how democracy ransacks our countries and our populations
7:49
Speaker 2: until there's nothing left but your precious democracy where three
7:56
Speaker 2: wolves and a lamb decide on what's for dinner. Oh wait,
7:59
Speaker 2: there is there's no lamb. We killed it, or rather
8:03
Speaker 2: we deployed it into another enclosure to get eaten by
8:06
Speaker 2: Russian bears. It might seem like a good time to
8:11
Speaker 2: start protesting against any potential draft, but the tragic thing
8:17
Speaker 2: is they don't even need a draft. Men have been
8:20
Speaker 2: volunteering their lives for this conflict ever since it started,
8:24
Speaker 2: and they will continue to volunteer in droves because the
8:28
Speaker 2: media has convinced them that Ukraine is a blameless, noble,
8:34
Speaker 2: totally not corrupt country being led by unequivocal heroes like Zelenski.
8:41
Speaker 2: It's not, bros. It's a mafia state led by a
8:48
Speaker 2: tinpot dictator being puppeted by deep state operatives who are
8:54
Speaker 2: only interested in lining their own pockets, just like every
8:57
Speaker 2: other war we've been involved with since World War Two.
9:03
Speaker 2: And you know, I'd like to be able to say,
9:07
Speaker 2: it would be so easy to be able to say,
9:10
Speaker 2: fuck them. If they want to die for a government
9:12
Speaker 2: that hates them on behalf of another bunch of governments
9:15
Speaker 2: who hate them, they're idiots. Let him die let's thin
9:18
Speaker 2: the herd of our idiots the leave the resources for
9:22
Speaker 2: the rest of us. But unfortunately, this would leave us
9:27
Speaker 2: with almost no armed forces left, much like it already
9:32
Speaker 2: has with Ukraine. It's going to make it a hell
9:36
Speaker 2: of a lot easier for China to roll on in
9:40
Speaker 2: and take over unopposed, which was probably the plan all along.
9:44
Speaker 2: But on the bright side, it looks like China is
9:48
Speaker 2: the only force keep all these goddamn Muslims in check. Ah,
9:54
Speaker 2: get me out of this country, guys, get me out
9:56
Speaker 2: of this fucking continent. It's doomed. I count as a
10:00
Speaker 2: refugee by now. I could be arrested and or killed
10:05
Speaker 2: any day now for saying the things I'm saying. Doesn't
10:08
Speaker 2: that qualify me? No, because I'm British and everyone hates us.
10:13
Speaker 2: Oh well, I'm gonna go crawl under a rock. Oh wait,
10:17
Speaker 2: the government just made rocks illegal because foreigners are using
10:20
Speaker 2: them as weapons. Never mind, I'm gonna go crawl under
10:24
Speaker 2: some fucking lava. I wish we luck.
10:30
Speaker 1: All right, Hannah.
10:31
Speaker 3: Yep. Every time they say boots on the ground, and
10:34
Speaker 3: they always say it like that for very specific reason.
10:39
Speaker 3: Every time they say boots on the ground. You need
10:41
Speaker 3: to ask who's boots. That means out loud, That means
10:46
Speaker 3: on social media, that means everywhere. It means talking to
10:51
Speaker 3: friends and family when they use that phrase.
10:53
Speaker 1: It means.
10:56
Speaker 3: Writing to your politicians. It means commenting on news story
11:00
Speaker 3: worries all over the internet. Whose boots? Whose boots are
11:04
Speaker 3: we talking about? Because most of the time they're the
11:08
Speaker 3: boots of young men who we would ordinarily think of
11:13
Speaker 3: as kids. We don't hire him because he's too young
11:17
Speaker 3: and doesn't have any experience, but we're going to stick
11:19
Speaker 3: a gun in his head or his hands and fill
11:23
Speaker 3: his head full of bullshit and send him to another
11:26
Speaker 3: country and tell him to shoot at other people who
11:29
Speaker 3: are his age, other men, other young men who have
11:34
Speaker 3: had the same thing done to them and who have
11:39
Speaker 3: no stake in the game other than the fact that
11:43
Speaker 3: they are going to lose their lives. If they don't
11:46
Speaker 3: lose their lives, they're going to be traumatized for life,
11:50
Speaker 3: and they're going to be traumatized in a way that's
11:53
Speaker 3: going to affect their family relationships, their future employability, their
11:59
Speaker 3: ability to just live in peace in their homes and
12:02
Speaker 3: their communities. They're going to suffer PTSD right, and if
12:07
Speaker 3: they don't go through that, then they're going to be
12:11
Speaker 3: shamed for what they were forced to do. Twenty years
12:16
Speaker 3: from now, people will condemn every soldier that fought in
12:19
Speaker 3: this war and survived, just like they did with Vietnam,
12:24
Speaker 3: just like they did with Desert Storm and Desert Shield.
12:28
Speaker 3: They've even done it to a degree with World War
12:32
Speaker 3: Two veterans like they escaped it somewhat but not that much.
12:38
Speaker 3: And there is a prejudice against veterans in modern society
12:45
Speaker 3: that no one ever talks about. Right, Oh, he might
12:48
Speaker 3: be dangerous because he might have PTSD. Oh, Oh he
12:52
Speaker 3: might have health problems that'll make him a bad bet
12:55
Speaker 3: in hiring. Oh he might have issues that will make
12:59
Speaker 3: him a bad beat in a relationship. Nobody talks about it.
13:04
Speaker 3: Everybody does it. And you want to inflict it on
13:08
Speaker 3: a set of eighteen year olds that literally have nothing
13:12
Speaker 3: to win. They get nothing for fighting this. This is
13:19
Speaker 3: not their fight. This should be resisted with every fiber
13:25
Speaker 3: of your being. If you care about young men, do
13:29
Speaker 3: not let your government do this. Peace needs to happen,
13:37
Speaker 3: and weapons can be used as a threat. The speak
13:42
Speaker 3: softly and carry a big stick, but those boots on
13:46
Speaker 3: the ground are filled with the feet of young men
13:52
Speaker 3: and they should not be sent.
13:56
Speaker 1: You know, it's funny when this conflict started, all of
14:00
Speaker 1: a sudden, white English boys were like loved by you know,
14:05
Speaker 1: their government. All of a sudden. It was just like
14:08
Speaker 1: when the thing that happened in I think it was
14:11
Speaker 1: when Gaza happened, and they wanted all of a sudden,
14:15
Speaker 1: like when the October seventh happened, the military commercials changed
14:20
Speaker 1: completely for the United States and it was like, you know,
14:23
Speaker 1: manly white dudes like waiting to jump out of helicopters
14:26
Speaker 1: or whatever. Like the whole narrative change. And the thing
14:29
Speaker 1: is we saw that, like guys in America were like, no, no,
14:34
Speaker 1: because for decades you have been shitting us for being men,
14:38
Speaker 1: and now you want us to go and fight and
14:39
Speaker 1: die in a conflict we don't give a shit about.
14:42
Speaker 1: And I suspect that this is even more magnified in
14:46
Speaker 1: the UK because for how long have they been saying,
14:50
Speaker 1: you know that the UK is just like you know
14:53
Speaker 1: that basically white men, in particular Englishmen, have been getting
14:58
Speaker 1: shit on and now they have a bunch of foreign
15:00
Speaker 1: men and those guys aren't going to fight for a
15:03
Speaker 1: country they don't believe in, Like I've seen videos of
15:05
Speaker 1: them saying, no, I'm not even from here. I'll just
15:08
Speaker 1: go back to my country, right if they ask. So
15:11
Speaker 1: that's I got the question. So you don't have the
15:13
Speaker 1: foreign men that you imported, you don't have the native
15:16
Speaker 1: men that their support because you have shit on them
15:19
Speaker 1: for so long and you want them involved in a
15:22
Speaker 1: conflict that's like thousands of miles away that they have
15:26
Speaker 1: no investment in except for the people in power, except
15:30
Speaker 1: for people like Kiera Starmer and the European Union and NATO,
15:34
Speaker 1: you know, and Zelensky's that's what it's all about. It's
15:38
Speaker 1: about that. I mean, I don't want to get into
15:41
Speaker 1: like all the shit with NATO and what Zelensky is,
15:43
Speaker 1: you know what, why he's there and all that, because
15:45
Speaker 1: Mike kind of touched on it. But let's look at
15:47
Speaker 1: some numbers really quick. Okay, So since the invasion happened
15:54
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two, there has been an estimated loss
15:58
Speaker 1: in Ukraine of about eighteen to twenty three percent of
16:03
Speaker 1: the population. And when I say the population, it's probably
16:08
Speaker 1: very likely almost all men. After that's happened, he was
16:13
Speaker 1: conscripting people, forcing them to go to war, and then
16:17
Speaker 1: he raised the age limit on conscription to send even
16:20
Speaker 1: more men to war, and all of that progressive bullshit
16:23
Speaker 1: about being like a trans woman and trans women are women,
16:25
Speaker 1: that did not matter all of a sudden. It was
16:27
Speaker 1: just men, because when it's time to die for your country,
16:30
Speaker 1: they will make you do it and whatever you identify
16:33
Speaker 1: as won't matter. Okay in the meantime, and I will say,
16:37
Speaker 1: just to be clear, because I have to be consistent,
16:40
Speaker 1: Russia lost about six hundred thousand men as well. Now
16:44
Speaker 1: Russia's winning. They're like, unless this goes to war, war
16:48
Speaker 1: like full on, which is what Trump advanced, are trying
16:50
Speaker 1: to prevent. You know, they're going to win some land.
16:54
Speaker 1: So Trump is like, look, we need to make a
16:56
Speaker 1: piece deal because people have to stop dying. And I can't.
16:59
Speaker 1: I can't, for the life of me imagine someone taking
17:03
Speaker 1: a position like against that, because that's the reality. Okay.
17:09
Speaker 1: So Ukraine's lost like twenty something percent of their population
17:14
Speaker 1: and they're outnumbered like Russia's bigger period and Russia still
17:19
Speaker 1: lost about six hundred thousand people of men. We're talking
17:23
Speaker 1: about men here, you know, Darling so these are the
17:27
Speaker 1: numbers that we're looking at, and it is men. So
17:31
Speaker 1: this just goes to show that, you know, the government
17:37
Speaker 1: of the UK does not care about their men until
17:40
Speaker 1: it's time for them men to die. So and British
17:44
Speaker 1: men and everybody should be extremely vocal about this, like
17:48
Speaker 1: if we valued the lives of men, this would not
17:52
Speaker 1: be an option. And it's the people who are the
17:54
Speaker 1: most for this shit are people who don't risk anything,
17:57
Speaker 1: including a lot of women like the women of NATO,
18:01
Speaker 1: the women of the European Union that had been the
18:03
Speaker 1: most vocal because they're not gonna go. Even the women
18:07
Speaker 1: in Ukraine who basically were just like, well, I'll just
18:09
Speaker 1: go to Germany or Sweden or something and I'll just
18:12
Speaker 1: get a new man and start over. And they just
18:14
Speaker 1: do that. So like this is the reality. Anyway, it's
18:18
Speaker 1: a big mess. And yeah, I don't know, I mean
18:22
Speaker 1: I should, oh, I think I should open up discord
18:24
Speaker 1: in case somebody sends me a superchow. But uh yeah,
18:28
Speaker 1: uh it's it's not good. But again, you know, Englishmen,
18:33
Speaker 1: like this is not a country worth fighting for and
18:37
Speaker 1: you should be very vocal about that. Meredith g Okay,
18:40
Speaker 1: I did get a super chow from Mariagi for five
18:43
Speaker 1: bucks andince, she says, HPR news number four ninety two,
18:46
Speaker 1: honey for the Badgers. Captain obvious here, But part of
18:48
Speaker 1: the reasons so many young men were sent to their
18:50
Speaker 1: deaths in Ukraine is because Boris Johnson interfered with any
18:54
Speaker 1: agreement with Russia that would have prevented it. The descendants
18:58
Speaker 1: of the same assholes who got your into two World
19:01
Speaker 1: wars occupy the halls of power in Europe and Great Britain.
19:04
Speaker 1: Is so no surprise they that Europe is at war again.
19:08
Speaker 1: The US needs to stop funding this crap. Very based,
19:12
Speaker 1: thank you, Meredith. Yes, and again, Yeah, it just comes
19:17
Speaker 1: down to, like, you know, they don't value male lives,
19:20
Speaker 1: and that's and that's what it That's what it is.
19:23
Speaker 1: So okay, anyway, anybody got any other things to say
19:27
Speaker 1: about this?
19:28
Speaker 2: Yeah, they only value male lives when they can end them. Yes, yes, paradoxically.
19:33
Speaker 3: Enough, because they're treating him as a currency.
19:37
Speaker 1: Yep, that's right. So we'll we'll. I hope that Trump
19:43
Speaker 1: can you know, come up with some piece deal. I
19:46
Speaker 1: understand that Zelensky is coming back to crawling back to
19:50
Speaker 1: the table to work something out, and Trump's gonna make
19:54
Speaker 1: some He has some big announcement at the address tonight,
19:56
Speaker 1: so we'll see. I know that his primary goal was
20:00
Speaker 1: what do we gotta do to keep people from dying?
20:02
Speaker 1: And I think that that is a step towards that.
20:04
Speaker 2: So go ahead and slay the world's smallest violin with
20:07
Speaker 2: your dick Zelenski.
20:11
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Uh sorry, you know it's like it's he's like, uh,
20:16
Speaker 1: you know, a welfare queen, Like that's basically making demands
20:20
Speaker 1: and being entitled for shit. It's like, no, we're not
20:22
Speaker 1: funding this anymore, and we don't want this war. You know,
20:25
Speaker 1: what are you gonna do? Like, we're gonna defeat Putin? Why?
20:29
Speaker 1: What's the goal? The goal should be to protect lives.
20:34
Speaker 1: That's ultimately what it should be. So anyway, I'm gonna
20:39
Speaker 1: move on to the next story. Let us know you
20:40
Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comment section. I
20:42
Speaker 1: look forward to your thoughts. Meanwhile, let's go to the
20:45
Speaker 1: east to Japan. Do you I just want to make
20:51
Speaker 1: the sound okay. So Japan has frozen. So remember we
20:57
Speaker 1: covered last week we're talking about how un Women was
21:00
Speaker 1: trying to get Japan to like change their policy based
21:04
Speaker 1: on their very old tradition of you know, the imperial
21:07
Speaker 1: line always being male, even though the emperor is more
21:11
Speaker 1: like a you know, ceremonial position, but it's still a
21:15
Speaker 1: really big deal to the Japanese well. Japan has decided
21:19
Speaker 1: to freeze voluntary funding for the United Nations Committee on
21:22
Speaker 1: the Elimination of Discrimination against Women following the panel's October
21:26
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four recommendation to revise Japan's male only imperial
21:31
Speaker 1: succession law. As per this Antarctic Press report from January
21:36
Speaker 1: twenty ninth to twenty twenty five, the Imperial House law
21:39
Speaker 1: restricts the throne to males and strips female royals marrying
21:43
Speaker 1: commoners of their status, preserving conservative pre war traditions. Japan's
21:48
Speaker 1: Foreign Ministry, led by spokesperson Toshiro Kitamura. Toshihiro Kitamura, sorry
21:54
Speaker 1: announced the funding freeze and blocked a planned THEE DAW
21:57
Speaker 1: visit by March twenty twenty five, arguing the UN's call
22:01
Speaker 1: infringes on national sovereignty, not basic human rights. This move,
22:05
Speaker 1: detailed in the AP article aligns with exposts from late
22:08
Speaker 1: February suggesting Japan's broader pushback against UN pressure, though it's
22:13
Speaker 1: limited to seedaw's voluntary contributions. Exact amounts aren't specified, but
22:19
Speaker 1: are part of Japan's annual UN report, typically in the millions.
22:24
Speaker 1: The decision reflects Japan's conservative government under the Liberal Democratic Party,
22:28
Speaker 1: prioritizing tradition over gender equality, because what the fuck is
22:32
Speaker 1: that despite public polls showing ninety percent support for a
22:36
Speaker 1: female emperor like Princess Aiko per The Times. Other web
22:40
Speaker 1: sources like The Washington Post and ABC News confirmed the
22:43
Speaker 1: timeline and tension, noting seedaw's longstanding criticism of Japan's gender inequality.
22:49
Speaker 1: They were ranked, according to the World Economic Forum one
22:53
Speaker 1: hundred and sixteenth by their standards. Did you know that?
22:57
Speaker 1: That's how sexist they are? The World Economic Forum has
23:00
Speaker 1: decided that uh x on Act sentiment is split. Some
23:05
Speaker 1: hail it as a sovereignty win, other see it as
23:07
Speaker 1: a step back for women, but no official updates since
23:10
Speaker 1: January twenty twenty five suggests a broader UN funding pull,
23:14
Speaker 1: keeping it niche but significant in Japan UN relations. So
23:19
Speaker 1: Japan does something based So there you go.
23:22
Speaker 3: That's hilarious. I think that the UN, the UN, or
23:27
Speaker 3: the US should follow suit. And also stop funding you
23:30
Speaker 3: and women in support of Japan's sovereignty. I think that
23:33
Speaker 3: would be great.
23:37
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Of course, if the.
23:39
Speaker 3: US stopped funding you in women, you and Women would disappear,
23:44
Speaker 3: that would also be great.
23:47
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah. An if anybody else got thoughts on this.
23:53
Speaker 2: I got nothing for this one. Oh the other three
23:56
Speaker 2: stories are about Brenton, so I'm comtable.
23:58
Speaker 3: I will I will point this out, all right, Oh.
24:01
Speaker 1: That's true, they are. It's a British show.
24:04
Speaker 3: I'll point one thing at women feeling entitled to a
24:06
Speaker 3: title that historically existed because men rose to the top
24:13
Speaker 3: of their civilization and then defended that with the risk
24:19
Speaker 3: of their death, with their blood and the blood of
24:22
Speaker 3: their family members, their male family members, right, and and
24:26
Speaker 3: the blood of men who were loyal to them because
24:29
Speaker 3: they were great or because they were the best leader
24:33
Speaker 3: that could be found, basically the strongest leader. And this
24:39
Speaker 3: is something that you watch this in royalty, you watch
24:43
Speaker 3: this in in politics, you watch this in among emperors,
24:50
Speaker 3: among all the different words that we've had throughout various
24:56
Speaker 3: nations histories for the dictator that we follow voluntarily because
25:04
Speaker 3: nobody else has stepped up to do the job and
25:08
Speaker 3: then been able to defend it from other people who
25:10
Speaker 3: wanted to take it away from them. Women have never
25:14
Speaker 3: been that person who is able to defend that for
25:20
Speaker 3: their whole lives.
25:22
Speaker 1: Right.
25:22
Speaker 3: Only after circumstances where a country has established strength do
25:30
Speaker 3: women become that leader. When they try to do it
25:34
Speaker 3: in any other circumstance, they get killed.
25:39
Speaker 1: Right.
25:39
Speaker 3: Sometimes men also get killed trying to do that, but
25:42
Speaker 3: women always get killed trying to do that. Right, Women
25:47
Speaker 3: pioneering positions of leadership don't die of old age because
25:54
Speaker 3: they can't defend them. They don't have what it takes,
25:59
Speaker 3: and they wait until environments like today where there is
26:05
Speaker 3: zero threat involved in holding a position of leadership like that,
26:12
Speaker 3: zero risk, and then they say, I want that I
26:16
Speaker 3: deserve that title. I'm just as much royalty as you are.
26:21
Speaker 3: I'm just as prestigious as you are. You're just discriminating
26:25
Speaker 3: against me because I'm a woman. No, bitch, you didn't
26:29
Speaker 3: earn it, you never earned it. Shut up, sit down,
26:35
Speaker 3: and let the men hold the positions, especially given the
26:41
Speaker 3: fact that what are you gonna do with it? Absolutely nothing,
26:47
Speaker 3: Now that it doesn't matter you want it, like, shut
26:50
Speaker 3: the fuck up and sit down.
26:52
Speaker 1: Yep. Well, the point of this is control. It's basically
26:56
Speaker 1: like they're just trying to spread I mean, they want
27:01
Speaker 1: to control every country in some fashion, and the best
27:05
Speaker 1: way to do it is by exploiting our desire to
27:09
Speaker 1: you know, like treat women well. So the UN women
27:13
Speaker 1: is probably like among the most effective angles. And they
27:17
Speaker 1: go to a country and they wag their finger at
27:18
Speaker 1: them and say, you're not you're not kind to women,
27:21
Speaker 1: so you should change his thing. And all they have
27:23
Speaker 1: to do is buckle like a belt, and then they
27:25
Speaker 1: push for something like it starts off. It's always something small,
27:28
Speaker 1: you know, just like, oh, just let us do this
27:30
Speaker 1: one thing, and it's not going to be a big deal.
27:32
Speaker 1: And then they wait a little bit and then they
27:33
Speaker 1: push for something else, and they push for something else,
27:35
Speaker 1: and next thing, you know, you know, they're first they're
27:37
Speaker 1: asking to be invited. Then they want to see at
27:39
Speaker 1: the table. Then they want to control the table. And
27:41
Speaker 1: that's what it is. And Japan has to draw a
27:44
Speaker 1: line and say no this far, no father.
27:47
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, I honestly think this is a big deal.
27:53
Speaker 1: It is a big deal. Yes.
27:54
Speaker 3: Men wanting to ride on men's coat tails and pretend
28:01
Speaker 3: to be walking and every time women do that, they
28:06
Speaker 3: take away men's you know, men's legacy. But they also
28:11
Speaker 3: they also bury the things that make men inspired to
28:17
Speaker 3: do great things, and they also bury the things that
28:22
Speaker 3: make society inspired to follow great men. If you don't
28:27
Speaker 3: want your country to fall the way the United States
28:29
Speaker 3: almost has, and we're pretty close, like we are that
28:35
Speaker 3: cartoon that stops just inches before it hits the bottom
28:40
Speaker 3: after falling off of a cliff right now. If you
28:46
Speaker 3: don't want that, don't let women do this.
28:49
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm not inclined to give all that much of
28:51
Speaker 2: a fuck about Japan. You all have got the same
28:54
Speaker 2: problems as us, but fucking sort of out yourself. It's
28:59
Speaker 2: pretty simple. Stop using women to shit on men or
29:04
Speaker 2: in men like some kind of human centipede. At least
29:10
Speaker 2: at least don't eat to cuttle fish at a spot
29:12
Speaker 2: asa paste baby steps.
29:18
Speaker 1: All right. Well, uh yeah, I'm I'm glad that there's
29:21
Speaker 1: more pushback against like these busy bodies, and uh, it's
29:27
Speaker 1: good to see. So that's why I want to point
29:29
Speaker 1: out a little bit of you know, and and on
29:31
Speaker 1: top of that, they did it on Women's History Month,
29:33
Speaker 1: that mu sting. Oh well, let us know where you
29:36
Speaker 1: guys think about this one in the comments. I look
29:38
Speaker 1: forward to seeing your thoughts. Time to move on to
29:41
Speaker 1: the next thing, though Stonewall is in the news. UH.
29:45
Speaker 1: The US Agency for International Development USAID has withdrawn over
29:51
Speaker 1: six hundred thousand dollars in funding from Stonewall, a prominent
29:55
Speaker 1: British LGBTQ plus advocacy group, as part of sweepy cuts
30:00
Speaker 1: under the Trump administration's recent downsizing of foreign aid announce
30:04
Speaker 1: in late By the way, Stonewall claims to be a charity.
30:07
Speaker 1: If you get money from the government, you're not a
30:09
Speaker 1: charity like NGOs that get money from USAID. Guess what
30:14
Speaker 1: not NGOs literally the opposite literally an oxymoron of NGOs
30:20
Speaker 1: or charities, but anyway. Announced in late February twenty twenty five,
30:25
Speaker 1: this move is tied to Trump's order to slash ninety
30:28
Speaker 1: percent of USAID's foreign aid contracts totaling sixty billion dollars
30:33
Speaker 1: to align with an America First policy, per reports from
30:36
Speaker 1: multiple outlets. The Daily Mail article notes Stonewall's reliance on
30:40
Speaker 1: this funding for international programs, particularly in Eastern Europe, where
30:44
Speaker 1: it combats anti LGBTQ plus violence, and warns of potential
30:49
Speaker 1: staff cuts and project collapses, with only rolls dyed to,
30:54
Speaker 1: with only rolls tied to dedicated funding preserved. Stonewall statement
30:59
Speaker 1: to the BBC side, the article vows to continue its
31:01
Speaker 1: global equality fight despite these setbacks, blaming economic pressures and
31:06
Speaker 1: USAID's withdrawal. Posts found on X from February twenty fourth
31:11
Speaker 1: March to through March third of twenty twenty five amplify
31:14
Speaker 1: the story, with users like at mister Real, mister pool X,
31:19
Speaker 1: and Tippy Maxwell framing it as a political win for
31:23
Speaker 1: the DOJ agenda, while others decry US tax dollars funding
31:27
Speaker 1: foreign advocacy, calling it misaligned with American interests. However, the
31:31
Speaker 1: establishment narrative, supported by web sources like Three Letter Agencies, AP,
31:36
Speaker 1: BBC and NBC, focuses on the broader USAID cuts impact
31:40
Speaker 1: on global health and humanitarian programs, not just Stonewall, suggesting
31:45
Speaker 1: this is one of many terminations, including HIV, slash AIDS
31:49
Speaker 1: and material health maternal health projects. Critically, the narrative's tone
31:55
Speaker 1: hence at a political spin, with ex post reflecting conservative
31:59
Speaker 1: pushback against l GBTQ plus advocacy abroad. No exact figures
32:02
Speaker 1: beyond six hundred thousand are detailed, and USAID's reasoning beyond
32:06
Speaker 1: Trump's policy shift is unclear, leaving room for debate on
32:09
Speaker 1: whether the targets are this target Stonewall specifically, or if
32:14
Speaker 1: it's part of a broader pattern.
32:16
Speaker 2: It's hilarious that this entity calls itself the United States
32:21
Speaker 2: Agency for International Development. They're using the word development in
32:27
Speaker 2: much the same way they use progressive, namely turning everyone
32:32
Speaker 2: into fat gay spastics, into useless, screeching lesbians who hate
32:38
Speaker 2: their own countrymen. How the fuck does this develop a
32:42
Speaker 2: nation or the interests of its people.
32:46
Speaker 1: It doesn't.
32:47
Speaker 2: It makes us defenseless, degenerate losers who will be dead
32:52
Speaker 2: in two generations because we're only interested in fighting each other,
32:57
Speaker 2: and by fighting, I mean having a flailing, bitch flapping
33:01
Speaker 2: contests amongst ourselves. This isn't AID, it's the opposite of it.
33:07
Speaker 2: It's exactly what you would do if you were trying
33:10
Speaker 2: to undermine and demoralize a nation. It seems like everyone
33:15
Speaker 2: hates America because it's government is always interfering with other countries, and.
33:21
Speaker 1: Yes it is.
33:22
Speaker 2: USAID is a perfect example of it. If you wanted
33:25
Speaker 2: to help us, you'd be assisting us in departing all
33:30
Speaker 2: the violent foreign criminals, and maybe incentivizing us to build
33:36
Speaker 2: stable families and small, privately owned businesses that can thrive
33:42
Speaker 2: in a free market. For that, you might need an
33:46
Speaker 2: elusive phenomenon we call men's rights. But no, it's never
33:50
Speaker 2: about that. It's always about turning men into women. You've
33:55
Speaker 2: heard about the gay bombs, right, I remember that. Yeah,
34:01
Speaker 2: the boffins in the US Air Force at some point
34:04
Speaker 2: in history seriously did research into the possibility of using
34:09
Speaker 2: like pheromonal chemical weapons that would make enemy soldiers so
34:14
Speaker 2: horny that they would compulsively suck each other off instead
34:19
Speaker 2: of defending their territory. It sounds ridiculous, but it's true.
34:23
Speaker 2: It happened, and we're told that the story ended with
34:28
Speaker 2: it didn't happen. They couldn't figure out how to do it. Well,
34:32
Speaker 2: here comes the twist they did. That's exactly what usay
34:37
Speaker 2: it is doing, except it's not a physical bomb. It's
34:41
Speaker 2: it's it's it's a financial bomb. They pay a bunch
34:46
Speaker 2: of academic fagots to turn everyone else into academic fagots,
34:50
Speaker 2: and it's working. We should be outraged that this was
34:55
Speaker 2: ever happening. It is an act of war. But because
34:59
Speaker 2: it's going on for so long and it's been so effective,
35:04
Speaker 2: our powers that be are not even outraged at this
35:08
Speaker 2: act of war. They're outraged at the administration who repealed it,
35:15
Speaker 2: the administration who stopped dropping the financial gay bombs and
35:21
Speaker 2: declared peace. I mean, I can't even don't even can't.
35:27
Speaker 2: I hate this place. I fucking hate it that that
35:31
Speaker 2: does it. I'm just I'm just gonna swim. I'm just
35:33
Speaker 2: gonna swim across the Atlantic Ocean and wash up on
35:37
Speaker 2: a beach in New England. And and I'm gonna I'm
35:41
Speaker 2: gonna pretend to be a lobster.
35:44
Speaker 1: That that means.
35:46
Speaker 2: That means they'll catch me and boil me and shred
35:48
Speaker 2: me up and put me in a lobster roll. But
35:50
Speaker 2: fuck it, it's a more dignified fate than the one
35:53
Speaker 2: my own country has installed for me. At least I'll
35:56
Speaker 2: be a lobster roll that gets eaten and not one
35:59
Speaker 2: that gets fucked repeatedly by a lesbian transsexual. Mostly give
36:06
Speaker 2: me strike.
36:09
Speaker 1: Straight.
36:09
Speaker 2: You're saying that we should organize our societies along the
36:13
Speaker 2: lines of the lobsters.
36:17
Speaker 3: No, no, no, So you got to make sure that
36:20
Speaker 3: you wash up in Florida and just make sure that
36:23
Speaker 3: one of your feet touches the beach first, because that's
36:27
Speaker 3: that's a that's a way to get in. Oh wait,
36:30
Speaker 3: no you're not. You're not Cuban.
36:33
Speaker 1: Kubano. All right, it would work if you.
36:37
Speaker 3: Were from Cuba. But now this, this, this doesn't surprise me.
36:42
Speaker 3: You know, like this, the ship we've been looking into,
36:45
Speaker 3: this is minor compared to what US AIDS, the U.
36:50
Speaker 3: S a I. D. System has been funding. And I'm
36:54
Speaker 3: gonna keep calling it that. I want everybody else to
36:56
Speaker 3: call it that to us. Now, USA, it's US AIDS,
36:59
Speaker 3: and we have inflicted it on the entire world. But
37:03
Speaker 3: but I mean this organization at Turboids, the organization has
37:08
Speaker 3: been trying to surreptitiously sterilize the men of South Africa.
37:16
Speaker 3: I'm not kidding. They were pushing vas ectomy. And it's
37:21
Speaker 3: also the organization that has been forcibly circumcising children in
37:28
Speaker 3: Africa and calling it voluntary. They call it voluntary circumcision, right,
37:34
Speaker 3: it's it's the organization that has been interfering in family
37:38
Speaker 3: relationships in other countries under the guise of preventing domestic violence,
37:46
Speaker 3: which they are essentially covering for when women do it, right,
37:53
Speaker 3: So I'm not surprised that they are also trying to
37:58
Speaker 3: essentially turn every but gay, which you shouldn't be able
38:03
Speaker 3: to do if it's natural, if it's naturally occurring, and
38:08
Speaker 3: then how how are they able to convert the public.
38:15
Speaker 3: It's so funding conversion therapy to make straight people gay
38:20
Speaker 3: is is kind of and it's voluntary conversion therapy. That's
38:25
Speaker 3: the sad thing may trick people. I guess it's more
38:28
Speaker 3: of a scam into getting involved in these organizations and
38:31
Speaker 3: then program them to think that they feel a certain
38:36
Speaker 3: way or that they have to feel a certain way
38:39
Speaker 3: to be politically correct, which is even worse because you
38:43
Speaker 3: know that you don't feel that way and you're hiding.
38:47
Speaker 3: That's that's just as bad as as conversion therapy used
38:52
Speaker 3: on people to make them not gay or not lesbian
38:57
Speaker 3: or not trans right. It shouldn't be done in either direction.
39:02
Speaker 3: So yeah, in short, don't call it usa i D.
39:07
Speaker 3: Don't call it USAID, call it us AIDS because it
39:11
Speaker 3: is essentially an immune deficiency virus. It is there to
39:15
Speaker 3: break down your boundaries. It is there to break down
39:18
Speaker 3: your defenses. And it is there to destroy your entire
39:23
Speaker 3: immune system against foreign invasion until you can be taken
39:27
Speaker 3: over by the shitheads that have taken over the United
39:31
Speaker 3: States up until this last election.
39:37
Speaker 2: I'm glad we're allowed to talk about this, especially when
39:40
Speaker 2: we're not allowed to talk about certain injections that literally
39:45
Speaker 2: give people AIDS. But that's not a thing. This was
39:49
Speaker 2: a joke. This was never happening. Please don't arrest me.
39:53
Speaker 2: Oh my god. Yeah.
39:58
Speaker 1: And you know, I it interesting also because this relates
40:04
Speaker 1: to the next story, which I think you can see
40:08
Speaker 1: a bit of a correlation here. Why would why would
40:12
Speaker 1: they be doing this stuff? Why would they be trying to,
40:16
Speaker 1: you know, spread I guess you could say education that
40:21
Speaker 1: is intended to weaken men. That is specifically what is
40:25
Speaker 1: targeting women, whatever happens to them, it's a side effect. Generally,
40:30
Speaker 1: this is aimed at men. Why would you do that?
40:32
Speaker 1: Why would you want to make men weak? Right? Because
40:37
Speaker 1: it's easier to rule over them. And what happens when
40:40
Speaker 1: men start to think for themselves and question the establishment
40:44
Speaker 1: and even like complain and criticize and do their research
40:49
Speaker 1: and fight back, Well, they decide they're going to try
40:52
Speaker 1: and crack down. So Britain has initiated a crackdown on
40:58
Speaker 1: what it calls hype super masculine social media content, with
41:03
Speaker 1: the Digital Regulator ofcom urging tech giants to go beyond
41:07
Speaker 1: legal requirements under the Outline Safety Act to combat quote
41:12
Speaker 1: misogynistic influencers end quote. The Telegraph article. By the way,
41:17
Speaker 1: misogynistic influencers, that's like a term you can't define. It
41:22
Speaker 1: just is it's just out there in the ether. It
41:25
Speaker 1: could be anybody, okay, anybody. They just decide based on
41:30
Speaker 1: what they think is too far. And this is why,
41:33
Speaker 1: by the way, the First Amendment is is like so important,
41:37
Speaker 1: because if you don't have like complete and absolute freedom
41:41
Speaker 1: to say whatever the hell you want, then all somebody
41:44
Speaker 1: has to do is come up with some bullshit label
41:47
Speaker 1: misogynistic and then label it, put it on anything that
41:50
Speaker 1: they don't like, and censor you anyway. The Telegraph article
41:55
Speaker 1: published on February twenty fifth, twenty twenty five, details of
41:58
Speaker 1: comm's guidance to company like ex Meta and TikTok calling
42:02
Speaker 1: for action against online abuse of women and girls, including pylons,
42:07
Speaker 1: which they put in quote harassment and speech that normalizes
42:11
Speaker 1: sexual violence, even if it's not illegal. I just want
42:14
Speaker 1: to point out that most of the online harassment or
42:17
Speaker 1: bullying that happens to women is done to them by
42:20
Speaker 1: other women, and they're not going to censor those women.
42:23
Speaker 1: They're only going to go after the men, if anything,
42:25
Speaker 1: because remember, hyper masculine social media content is the target,
42:30
Speaker 1: not protecting the women, because women are bullying other women
42:34
Speaker 1: online all the time, okay, anyway, ofcom Chief executive Melanie
42:41
Speaker 1: Dawes warned tech firms are failing to act on these risks,
42:45
Speaker 1: proposing nudges to deter misogynistic posts, demonetizing such accounts, and
42:51
Speaker 1: blocking revenge pornography. Again, what does that even mean? The
42:55
Speaker 1: focus is on influencers, often men like Andrew Tate, who
42:59
Speaker 1: use stats, wealth or advice to attract young boys and men,
43:03
Speaker 1: risking a clash with platforms like x where Elon Musk
43:06
Speaker 1: has hosted controversial figures and criticized regulation as censorship. Again,
43:12
Speaker 1: I just want to say, because they, of course they
43:14
Speaker 1: mention Andrew Tate. They use Andrew Tate because people like
43:19
Speaker 1: some of you guys in the audience think that he
43:22
Speaker 1: legitimately hates women, and that's the standard they use. So
43:26
Speaker 1: you have to allow that guy to exist online. I'm sorry.
43:29
Speaker 1: I know you have to hate women.
43:31
Speaker 2: He doesn't whips.
43:33
Speaker 1: Obviously true, obviously true. But but what my point is
43:37
Speaker 1: is that there are people who will say, well, not
43:39
Speaker 1: that guy. See, that's where you are wrong, because as
43:44
Speaker 1: soon as you make an exception for anybody, you are
43:48
Speaker 1: creating the standard by which you will be judged by
43:51
Speaker 1: these people. They don't care about Andrew Tate. They care
43:54
Speaker 1: about everybody else that and they're using him as to
43:58
Speaker 1: get their foot in the door. So you have to
44:01
Speaker 1: legitimately stand up for the guy like you would anybody else.
44:03
Speaker 1: This is one of the main reasons why when I
44:06
Speaker 1: got involved with this, I gave dupe. I felt that
44:10
Speaker 1: due process was important as a principle, But I also
44:13
Speaker 1: gave every man who was accused, even if I hated
44:16
Speaker 1: their guts, I gave them all the benefit of the
44:19
Speaker 1: doubt because I knew that if at any point there
44:23
Speaker 1: was gonna be an issue with somebody and then there
44:25
Speaker 1: was like a supposedly a real example of misogyny or
44:29
Speaker 1: rape or whatever it is, that that was gonna be
44:32
Speaker 1: the new standard by which they were gonna hold all men.
44:35
Speaker 1: So basically, one man does wrong to them, and that's
44:38
Speaker 1: just enough for them to condemn all men and also
44:41
Speaker 1: inflict policy on all men. So I don't care about
44:47
Speaker 1: the guy, it doesn't matter. But what I'm saying is
44:49
Speaker 1: when they say his name, it's not talking about him specifically,
44:55
Speaker 1: does not does not matter because it could be anybody.
44:58
Speaker 1: It could be Rollo, it could be Haul, it could
45:01
Speaker 1: be Tim Golditch, it could be the Warren Ferrell. It
45:04
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. They will use there.
45:06
Speaker 3: It's just like they have Warren Ferrell.
45:12
Speaker 1: And of course, yeah, so what I'm saying is.
45:15
Speaker 3: Reprehensible, absolutely absolutely lies. Yes, absolutely, that's it's stuck for
45:22
Speaker 3: quite a long time.
45:23
Speaker 1: Yes, I think that it still gets though, it still
45:25
Speaker 1: gets brought up sometimes. I think, yeah, it's still it
45:29
Speaker 1: still comes up sometimes if he gets into like if
45:33
Speaker 1: he starts to actually like gain ground or make progress
45:37
Speaker 1: and becomes influential, that's what it is. It comes down to.
45:41
Speaker 1: That's yeah, they pull it out. So as soon as
45:42
Speaker 1: somebody it becomes influential in the space and starts talking
45:46
Speaker 1: about this stuff and starts making an impact, then these
45:49
Speaker 1: people will come out and say that's a misogynist. And
45:51
Speaker 1: if you agree with with them on any of their targets.
45:55
Speaker 1: You are help you are helping them, Okay, so any
46:00
Speaker 1: let me finish the write up. And they're going out
46:03
Speaker 1: to Elon Musk too, so that's another that's why they're
46:06
Speaker 1: bringing him up. Oh, he supports free speech. He's part
46:08
Speaker 1: of the problem, right free speech. That's masculine. I mean,
46:12
Speaker 1: I guess it is. Posts found on x from late
46:15
Speaker 1: February to early March of twenty twenty five has missed
46:19
Speaker 1: mixed reactions. Some see it as an attack on free
46:22
Speaker 1: speech because it is Elon Musks calls. He called Britain's
46:26
Speaker 1: government tyrannical. That's sort of one of the examples that
46:30
Speaker 1: the this opinion piece brings up. Okay, who basically say
46:35
Speaker 1: this is hyper masculine because Elon Musk is calling them out,
46:38
Speaker 1: I guess. While Mark Zuckerberg's critique of European censorship suggests
46:42
Speaker 1: that tech pushback the establishment narrative, per The Telegraph and
46:47
Speaker 1: The Daily Skeptic February twenty fifth frames it as a
46:50
Speaker 1: necessary step against harm, but critics, including some ex posts,
46:54
Speaker 1: argue its overreach, targeting masculine energy per Zuckerberg's comment, and
47:00
Speaker 1: risking tech exodus as Musk and Google warned in February
47:04
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five over the Online Safety Act. The guidance
47:08
Speaker 1: is still in consultation, with final rules do later in
47:11
Speaker 1: twenty twenty five, leaving its impact on platforms and free
47:14
Speaker 1: speech unresolved. Sentiment online leads towards contention, but no concrete
47:19
Speaker 1: outcomes yet. And also I want to add, this is
47:22
Speaker 1: just Britain's crackdown. We already know that the United States
47:26
Speaker 1: and Canada are doing this stuff as well. We've already
47:29
Speaker 1: gone into all of the ways that the Department of
47:31
Speaker 1: Homeland Security is trying to you know, end misogynist behavior online.
47:37
Speaker 1: But I wanted to point out that they're talking about
47:39
Speaker 1: what they're calling it hyper masculine. And there's even like
47:43
Speaker 1: I think the ADL and the SPLC have like groups
47:47
Speaker 1: of you know, masculinist groups on their hate list and
47:51
Speaker 1: like pro male groups because apparently that and that's like
47:55
Speaker 1: where the Proud Boys are on there with Paul Elam
47:58
Speaker 1: by the way, so you see what's going on.
48:00
Speaker 3: But anyway, he's the only woman in the men's rights
48:05
Speaker 3: movement that's name named by the by the SBLC. Yeah,
48:11
Speaker 3: the rest of us, they didn't, they didn't have the
48:13
Speaker 3: guests to name the rest of us. But they consider
48:16
Speaker 3: her the face of the female side of the men's
48:18
Speaker 3: rights movement. She is the female Paul Elam So therefore, therefore, uh,
48:25
Speaker 3: they had to name her, and then they just named
48:29
Speaker 3: groups after that. But I I gotta point something out right.
48:34
Speaker 3: These people claim that misogyny is rampant on the internet,
48:39
Speaker 3: but they are using masculine as a slur. They are
48:45
Speaker 3: using a description for being male as a slur, while
48:50
Speaker 3: they call you hateful for being male, for not being
48:54
Speaker 3: more feminine. Right, they call hyper masculinity dangerous, but what
49:00
Speaker 3: they are promoting is hyperfemininity, and they are promoting the
49:05
Speaker 3: toxic end of it, the toxic end of it being
49:08
Speaker 3: as a woman, I am allowed to criticize you. I'm
49:11
Speaker 3: allowed to tell any lie I want. I'm allowed to
49:13
Speaker 3: falsely accuse you. I'm allowed to be as much of
49:16
Speaker 3: a bitch to you as I want, and you can't
49:19
Speaker 3: say anything back because that's aggression against a woman, Right,
49:23
Speaker 3: That's the toxic end of hyperfemininity, cry bullying, weaponized weakness.
49:33
Speaker 3: Women are not that weak, they're just dishonest about it.
49:39
Speaker 3: Do not accept this, Do not back down, Do not
49:46
Speaker 3: allow your politicians to inflict this on you, because if
49:49
Speaker 3: you do, you will never get your speech back, not
49:55
Speaker 3: without blood. And here in the United States, people who
50:00
Speaker 3: or pushing for censorship with the idea that freedom of
50:05
Speaker 3: speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences. Yeah, what you say
50:09
Speaker 3: can change people's opinions, and that can include changing people's
50:13
Speaker 3: opinions of you, but it does not give your government
50:16
Speaker 3: the right to punish you for saying things. And this
50:21
Speaker 3: idea of this is something else that us AIDS has
50:29
Speaker 3: been promoting overseas, the concept of internet based gender based
50:38
Speaker 3: violence or something like that, Internet facilitated gender based violence,
50:42
Speaker 3: online gender based violence, electronic gender based violence. There is
50:48
Speaker 3: no such thing as online violence. Violence is physical, all right.
50:55
Speaker 3: Violence is when somebody hurts you physically, when they engage
50:59
Speaker 3: an a physical act against you that can do physical
51:02
Speaker 3: damage to your body. That is violence. Even yelling at
51:07
Speaker 3: you really isn't violence. It might be shitty behavior, but
51:13
Speaker 3: it doesn't cause physical damage unless somebody has a superpower
51:18
Speaker 3: that I don't know about. Right, Even yelling at you
51:22
Speaker 3: is something that you can walk away from unscathed. You
51:27
Speaker 3: might feel bad about it, You might internalize what somebody says.
51:31
Speaker 3: If you don't have the strength to slough it off
51:35
Speaker 3: like water off a duct's back. Not harmed.
51:40
Speaker 1: Yeah, can I tell you what their claims are real quick?
51:43
Speaker 1: Some quotes from them thing, let me put let me
51:46
Speaker 1: let me tell you what they said. Okay, Uh so
51:49
Speaker 1: I'll come warned that misogynistic influencers were being rewarded with
51:54
Speaker 1: greater reach, particularly to boys and young men, by algorithms.
51:58
Speaker 1: So that did you guys know that algorithm works in
52:00
Speaker 1: our favor? Did you know that? And then it says, yeah,
52:04
Speaker 1: to happen, it said. And then then it says at
52:07
Speaker 1: the same time that these influencers use their position to glorify, justify,
52:11
Speaker 1: and create tolerance for sexual violence. The regulator said. Misogynistic
52:16
Speaker 1: speech is often not illegal, but at scale it could
52:20
Speaker 1: normalize harmful beliefs in men and boys and impact women
52:24
Speaker 1: and girls's experience, both online and offline.
52:30
Speaker 3: Yeah, calling you an angry hoe is not sexual violence.
52:34
Speaker 3: I'm sorry, ladies, but you know you need to switch
52:39
Speaker 3: out the yellow jello in your back with an actual spine. Okay,
52:46
Speaker 3: this is Women's History Month, and you're all going to
52:50
Speaker 3: be throwing examples up all over the internet. You're going
52:54
Speaker 3: to post them on Facebook. You're gonna post them on X.
52:58
Speaker 3: You're gonna post if you're on X. If you have
52:59
Speaker 3: to have that gets to be on X. Right, you're
53:01
Speaker 3: gonna what's the blue Skies or whatever? You're gonna post
53:04
Speaker 3: upon blue Skies and whatever other alternatives there are. You're
53:09
Speaker 3: gonna make YouTube videos about the great female warriors of
53:13
Speaker 3: the past. They would be embarrassed by you. Right, you
53:21
Speaker 3: have no courage, you have no integrity, Grow some tits
53:28
Speaker 3: and have a little toughness. Right, you have your fune
53:33
Speaker 3: with abuse of women on social media. When you talk
53:36
Speaker 3: to people like me and Karen and Alison and Lauren
53:39
Speaker 3: and other women and the men's rights movement, who you've
53:43
Speaker 3: said things to, like you should get raped, so you'd
53:45
Speaker 3: know what it's like. Who you've threatened in the past,
53:50
Speaker 3: who you've gotten kicked out of events, who At one point,
53:54
Speaker 3: some of the women in gamer Gate had actual stalkers.
53:59
Speaker 3: We have one lady who was sent blueprints of her
54:03
Speaker 3: house with a falsely cordial sounding letter that detailed access
54:12
Speaker 3: to members of her family. It was so bad that
54:15
Speaker 3: she had to get law enforcement involved. Right, I've been docked,
54:18
Speaker 3: Karen's been docked. I think Allison's been doxed. We've all
54:23
Speaker 3: had exactly the experiences that feminists claim that women should
54:28
Speaker 3: be afraid of online, and we haven't stopped doing what
54:31
Speaker 3: we're doing right, and those experiences we're at the hands
54:36
Speaker 3: of the women who complain that those experiences happened to women.
54:42
Speaker 3: So I'm not buying your bullshit, right, ladies, man up,
54:48
Speaker 3: If you want to have this knockdown, drag out gender
54:52
Speaker 3: war on the internet, then prepare for the fight that's coming.
54:58
Speaker 3: You're already moving. So yeah, you're you're not going to
55:03
Speaker 3: silence the other side. You're not going to win social
55:08
Speaker 3: media censorship. It isn't going to happen. It's it's not
55:14
Speaker 3: coming for you.
55:16
Speaker 1: We are yep. One last thing I want to say
55:20
Speaker 1: about this too, So this Online Safety Act that they're
55:24
Speaker 1: pushing for, it will give the regulator the power to
55:28
Speaker 1: fine tech giants that basically step out of line billions
55:34
Speaker 1: of dollars if they repeatedly break their own moderation rules
55:38
Speaker 1: and fail to stop you know, like misogyny online. They're
55:42
Speaker 1: going to use it to sue people like Elon Musk,
55:45
Speaker 1: so they're going to try and make him broke. And
55:47
Speaker 1: I suspect that's where it's going to go. I don't.
55:50
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know. We'll see if it happens.
55:52
Speaker 1: And you don't wonder where are they getting the money
55:54
Speaker 1: to do this problem? I want yea.
55:56
Speaker 3: The more they try this ship, the more they push
55:58
Speaker 3: this ship in foreign countries, the more Musk is just
56:01
Speaker 3: going to go after their funding from the United States,
56:04
Speaker 3: because all of this is based on money coming from
56:07
Speaker 3: the United States. So I'm I'm laughing right now at
56:12
Speaker 3: the fact that the people that are pushing the shit,
56:14
Speaker 3: their funding is going to dry up. They will have nothing.
56:17
Speaker 3: In the end, they will have shown all of their
56:19
Speaker 3: cards and they will still lose.
56:27
Speaker 1: All right, Mike, did you want to did you want
56:30
Speaker 1: to say something?
56:31
Speaker 2: Yes?
56:31
Speaker 1: I did?
56:34
Speaker 2: Ahem.
56:36
Speaker 1: All right, hey, ye, hey ye.
56:40
Speaker 2: Men of the West, I beseech thee stay the hell
56:44
Speaker 2: away from women. Don't try to court them, don't try
56:49
Speaker 2: to woo them, and for God's sake, don't try to
56:52
Speaker 2: touch them. It will be your undoing. Now, what I've
56:59
Speaker 2: just said will undoubtedly fall under the rubric of what
57:03
Speaker 2: they're calling speech that normalizes sexual violence, even though it's
57:09
Speaker 2: the exact opposite. I'm telling men to look out for themselves,
57:13
Speaker 2: to center themselves in their own interests and their own
57:18
Speaker 2: well being, to be content in their own company. Make
57:24
Speaker 2: no mistake, this is what the government is cracking down on.
57:29
Speaker 2: They don't give a shit about and takes. He's just
57:32
Speaker 2: a fucking scarecrow. If they really wanted to suppress his
57:39
Speaker 2: online presence, they would. All they have to do is
57:42
Speaker 2: send in a few hysterical female politicians to bitch at
57:47
Speaker 2: YouTube executives and they would go ahead and suppress his channel,
57:53
Speaker 2: disable comments and ratings, and make sure his videos never
57:58
Speaker 2: appear in the recommend did feed or in the homepage.
58:02
Speaker 2: That's exactly what they did with Where can we even
58:07
Speaker 2: call him a rommie Tomlinson? You know that's what happened
58:11
Speaker 2: with him. Some British politicians don't like you. All right
58:17
Speaker 2: into the shadows, you go, simple as that is. Anyone
58:22
Speaker 2: in any doubt at this point that they did the
58:25
Speaker 2: same thing with Honeybudger Radio and my channel and Brian's
58:29
Speaker 2: channel and Karen and Allison all of us. But they
58:33
Speaker 2: did it behind closed doors, and they did it like
58:36
Speaker 2: ten years ago. Because we truly are they who cannot
58:41
Speaker 2: be named. They are not doing this with the people
58:46
Speaker 2: who tell men to pursue women, the pick up artists
58:51
Speaker 2: of the world. They want the radical PUAs upfront and
58:56
Speaker 2: center so they can terrify women and indeed terrify schoolgirls
59:03
Speaker 2: into thinking evil men are coming for them to drug
59:08
Speaker 2: them and rape them and leave them for dead. But
59:11
Speaker 2: not Muslims obviously, just those dastardly native men. Once again,
59:19
Speaker 2: I ask, at what point do I qualify for asylum?
59:24
Speaker 2: For instance, when I'm in the United States, As far
59:26
Speaker 2: as I know, to be eligible for asylum, you must
59:29
Speaker 2: be able to demonstrate that you are persecuted or have
59:33
Speaker 2: a fear of persecution in your home country due to
59:37
Speaker 2: your race, religion, nationality, social group, or political opinion. Am
59:43
Speaker 2: I not eligible on all of these counts? My race
59:49
Speaker 2: is Northwest European, my religion is not Islam, my nationality
59:57
Speaker 2: is English, my social group is I don't even know
1:00:01
Speaker 2: what that means, but let's go with men's right. And
1:00:05
Speaker 2: my political opinion is critical of my government. This combination
1:00:12
Speaker 2: of parameters is extremely likely to see me in prison
1:00:16
Speaker 2: any day now for several years, where I'll very likely
1:00:21
Speaker 2: get murdered. Isn't there someone in America who can get
1:00:25
Speaker 2: me to the chopper. I'll send you my address. I
1:00:29
Speaker 2: will leave everything behind. I don't care anymore. This is
1:00:32
Speaker 2: the fucking emergency. Elon Bro, send over one of those
1:00:38
Speaker 2: rockets of yours. I have a pair of chopsticks. I
1:00:41
Speaker 2: will catch it. I don't even care if you send
1:00:45
Speaker 2: me to Mars. It can't be any worse than spending
1:00:50
Speaker 2: another second in this prehistoric tar pit of authoritarian tyranny.
1:00:57
Speaker 2: No one should have to live like this. Pray for me, folks,
1:01:01
Speaker 2: Pray for my family. Send me your thoughts and prayers.
1:01:04
Speaker 2: I will take it. It is at least marginally better
1:01:07
Speaker 2: than nothing. Maybe maybe we're all in a simulation where
1:01:11
Speaker 2: thoughts and prayers actually accomplish anything. It's worth a shot.
1:01:18
Speaker 2: On that note, I will drink another shot. It's always
1:01:22
Speaker 2: worth another shot. It excuse me for a second. Carry on.
1:01:27
Speaker 1: Okay, So that's where we are with those stories. Let
1:01:34
Speaker 1: me make sure that no one's sent in a super
1:01:36
Speaker 1: chat or a super chow. But I think you well, basically,
1:01:42
Speaker 1: I think that we are gaining ground in a couple
1:01:45
Speaker 1: of different ways, and that's why there is so much resistance,
1:01:49
Speaker 1: because that's how you know you're over the target. You're
1:01:52
Speaker 1: getting hit with flak, or, as the gamer gators used
1:01:55
Speaker 1: to say, you know you're going in the right direction
1:01:57
Speaker 1: because you keep running into enemies. So that's I think
1:02:01
Speaker 1: that that is something that we can take away from
1:02:04
Speaker 1: this is that, yeah, we can see what you guys
1:02:07
Speaker 1: are doing. We can see through all of this crap
1:02:12
Speaker 1: and how it's all happening at a governmental level and
1:02:15
Speaker 1: also at the cultural level. So where we see you,
1:02:19
Speaker 1: and we're just gonna keep on moving forward. And I
1:02:22
Speaker 1: think that men are in particular in mass are waking up,
1:02:26
Speaker 1: including the normies. But maybe I'm just an optimist. Anyway,
1:02:30
Speaker 1: We're gonna go now into the Patron Show and we're
1:02:34
Speaker 1: gonna look at this article speaking of games where Halo
1:02:40
Speaker 1: celebrates Women's History Month with fictional Halo characters. So that
1:02:44
Speaker 1: should be interesting. That should be interesting. And again, if
1:02:48
Speaker 1: you want to join us, you know, become a Badger,
1:02:51
Speaker 1: go to feedabadge dot com, forward slash subscribe. If you
1:02:53
Speaker 1: want to check out the free version, go to Badger
1:02:55
Speaker 1: Nation dot online. Join the discord for free and hang
1:02:57
Speaker 1: out with the people there. They're all good people and
1:03:01
Speaker 1: there's always stuff going on. Tonight's game night, I think,
1:03:04
Speaker 1: so yeah, I look forward to seeing you guys. And look,
1:03:06
Speaker 1: we did this in record time, Like I did four
1:03:10
Speaker 1: stories in one hour. That's crazy, and we started late. Wow,
1:03:16
Speaker 1: we're getting better at this. It's only taken us like
1:03:18
Speaker 1: two hundred and something shows. What show me on right now?
1:03:23
Speaker 1: Uh yeah, oh no, I'm sorry five hundred over five
1:03:27
Speaker 1: hundred shows, But that's okay. We're getting there anyway. I'm
1:03:31
Speaker 1: gonna wrap it up there, So if you guys like
1:03:33
Speaker 1: this video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed,
1:03:36
Speaker 1: hit the bell for the notifications, leave us a comment,
1:03:39
Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about what we
1:03:41
Speaker 1: talked about on the show today. You'll find links to
1:03:43
Speaker 1: the you know the info on these stories in the
1:03:46
Speaker 1: description and please please please share this video because sharing
1:03:50
Speaker 1: is caring. Thank you guys so much for coming on
1:03:52
Speaker 1: today's episode of HBr News, and we will talk to
1:03:54
Speaker 1: you guys in the next video.