Latest / V / Trump's Most Challenging Week Yet | Episode 258

Transcript

Trump's Most Challenging Week Yet | Episode 258 · V

0:00
Speaker 1: Hey, everybody.
0:00
Speaker 2: Welcome to Vince on a Wednesday. Good to have you
0:02
Speaker 2: with us. It's April. It's April. It's April 1st, but
0:06
Speaker 2: no fooling around today. I've got a lot to get
0:08
Speaker 2: to with you. We've got to talk about the big
0:10
Speaker 2: address to the nation the president's about to make. We're
0:12
Speaker 2: going to talk about Iran. There's lots of developments here,
0:16
Speaker 2: including the fact the president is saying that we're just
0:19
Speaker 2: about done here. In fact, he wants to get out
0:21
Speaker 2: in the next, he said, two to three weeks. I've
0:24
Speaker 2: got the updates on that, a lot coming up on
0:25
Speaker 2: that subject. Also, massive numbers of Supreme Court cases that
0:30
Speaker 2: are coming through. We had a big decision yesterday about
0:34
Speaker 2: whether or not you can be compelled by the government
0:37
Speaker 2: to lie to a child in order to abuse them.
0:41
Speaker 2: A big First Amendment decision yesterday. And then we need
0:44
Speaker 2: to get to today's big Supreme Court oral argument, and
0:47
Speaker 2: that is going to be about birthright citizenship. Can illegal
0:51
Speaker 2: aliens simply pour across our border? and then produce nearly 300,000
0:57
Speaker 2: new American citizens every year? Yeah, that's the numbers we're
1:00
Speaker 2: talking about. We've got a lot to get to on
1:03
Speaker 2: a very important edition of Vince. It is great to
1:06
Speaker 2: have you with us. Great to have you with us.
1:08
Speaker 2: You guys are the best. All right, let me tell
1:10
Speaker 2: you about one of our great sponsors, Rumble Wallet, great
1:13
Speaker 2: sponsor of our program. Rumble is just a fantastic platform.
1:16
Speaker 2: Perhaps you're watching us right now, rumble.com slash Vince. Rumble's amazing.
1:20
Speaker 2: You know, What's happening all across the internet right now
1:23
Speaker 2: is lots of censorship is coming back. A lot of
1:25
Speaker 2: the tech companies are trying to shut down conversations that
1:29
Speaker 2: you and I are very much entitled to have with
1:31
Speaker 2: free speech. Rumble's the only platform that's consistently standing for
1:35
Speaker 2: free speech. And now Rumble's taking that fight to the
1:38
Speaker 2: financial world with Rumble Wallet. This is where you control
1:40
Speaker 2: your own money. Not a bank, not a government, not
1:43
Speaker 2: a tech company, not even Rumble can touch it. This
1:45
Speaker 2: is your money. your freedom. And with Rumble Wallet, you
1:49
Speaker 2: can do all sorts of things. First of all, most importantly,
1:51
Speaker 2: keep your own money in your own hands. And you
1:53
Speaker 2: can tip creators like yours truly. There's no waiting. It's instant.
1:57
Speaker 2: You can also buy and save digital assets like Bitcoin,
1:59
Speaker 2: Tether Gold, and now USAT, Tether's brand new US-regulated stablecoin.
2:05
Speaker 2: Tether Gold is real gold on the blockchain, actual gold
2:08
Speaker 2: bars that you own. USAT keeps your money steady and
2:12
Speaker 2: protected from inflation all without relying on banks. So let's
2:16
Speaker 2: take control back. Go to wallet.rumble.com or search Rumble Wallet
2:20
Speaker 2: in your app store. Download it, open your account, move
2:23
Speaker 2: your money to where it belongs in your hands. Rumble
2:26
Speaker 2: Wallet is a technology provider only and not a custodial service.
2:29
Speaker 2: See terms at wallet.rumble.com. What's with the shirt today? OneMadWoman7 asked. Well,
2:39
Speaker 2: I'm glad you asked, OneMadWoman7. Hopefully you're not too mad
2:42
Speaker 2: about this. It's Clarence Thomas. Look at that. How good
2:45
Speaker 2: does he look? There's Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. And
2:49
Speaker 2: it says hope at the bottom. And I do hope,
2:52
Speaker 2: I hope the court listens to Clarence Thomas today as
2:54
Speaker 2: they debate birthright citizenship with the president of the United
2:58
Speaker 2: States seated in the courtroom. Oh, I can't wait to
3:03
Speaker 2: get to that. We will get to that coming up.
3:05
Speaker 2: It's going to be epic. It's going to be very epic.
3:08
Speaker 2: But let me start with you today about the big
3:13
Speaker 2: news about what the president's up to tonight. God, the
3:15
Speaker 2: guy's so busy. The president of the United States is
3:18
Speaker 2: set to address the nation tonight at 9 p.m. Eastern time.
3:23
Speaker 2: We get this news overnight from Caroline Leavitt, the White
3:26
Speaker 2: House press secretary, saying that the president will give an
3:29
Speaker 2: address to the nation to provide an important update on Iran,
3:34
Speaker 2: on Iran. This is a big deal. So a big
3:37
Speaker 2: presidential address tonight. All of the networks now have committed
3:41
Speaker 2: to carrying the broadcast. So the world is going to
3:45
Speaker 2: see this tonight. And what will the president say? What
3:49
Speaker 2: will the president discuss? Well, obviously the central topic is Iran,
3:53
Speaker 2: but it's going to have to be, I mean, I
3:55
Speaker 2: think you and I can probably divine out what this
3:57
Speaker 2: will look like. It'll be an assessment of how this
4:00
Speaker 2: operation has gone so far. And it's going to be
4:05
Speaker 2: an advanced preview of what comes next. Where do we
4:07
Speaker 2: go from here? And so yesterday, I think we had
4:11
Speaker 2: a very helpful Pentagon press briefing from the Department of
4:13
Speaker 2: War yesterday that included, once again, Secretary of War Pete
4:16
Speaker 2: Hegseth and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Raisin Kane,
4:19
Speaker 2: Dan Kane, General Dan Kane was there. And our very
4:23
Speaker 2: own Reagan Reese, my White House correspondent, was over there
4:26
Speaker 2: at the Pentagon yesterday morning and got a chance to
4:28
Speaker 2: question both men. And one of the questions that I
4:33
Speaker 2: suggested Reagan ask, and thankfully she did, was, would you
4:36
Speaker 2: ask these gentlemen, what uses do we have for the
4:40
Speaker 2: United States Marines and the United States Army for the
4:43
Speaker 2: soldiers other than a ground invasion? Because the media is
4:46
Speaker 2: running its gums about, oh, a ground invasion is coming,
4:49
Speaker 2: a ground invasion is coming. Well, what else might we
4:52
Speaker 2: use these kinds of troops for? And Reagan asked, and
4:58
Speaker 2: General Kane answered, take a look at yesterday's interaction on
5:02
Speaker 2: this subject.
5:03
Speaker 1: Watch.
5:04
Speaker 3: No, just to answer your question, Reagan, you know, the
5:08
Speaker 3: range of military options that those forces can offer are extensive,
5:13
Speaker 3: not just limited to what you mentioned in terms of
5:16
Speaker 3: forces on the ground. And I wouldn't want to take
5:18
Speaker 3: away the president's decision space, but there are a multitude
5:22
Speaker 3: of things, not the least of which is Iran should
5:25
Speaker 3: note that they're out there and that they are a
5:29
Speaker 3: pressure point. And so they should carefully consider, I think,
5:33
Speaker 3: at the diplomatic level, not my job as a chairman,
5:36
Speaker 3: but at the diplomatic level to consider what's in front
5:38
Speaker 3: of them.
5:40
Speaker 2: There's a very impressive force, very impressive force that the
5:44
Speaker 2: United States is now using as leverage in this debate,
5:48
Speaker 2: in this debate, in this conflict. in an effort to
5:51
Speaker 2: get a deal. So General Kane goes, look, we could
5:53
Speaker 2: use them for a lot of things. It doesn't just
5:55
Speaker 2: have to be for a ground invasion, but they're there,
5:58
Speaker 2: and Iran should know it. It's the reason the president
6:00
Speaker 2: keeps talking about it. It's the reason the Department of
6:02
Speaker 2: War keeps talking about it. Very public about these troop movements.
6:06
Speaker 2: They want people to know. They want the Iranians to
6:08
Speaker 2: know that we can do anything we want. So why
6:12
Speaker 2: don't you make a deal with us before we have
6:14
Speaker 2: to exercise some of these options? General Kane with that update.
6:17
Speaker 2: Thank you to the general for answering our question on
6:19
Speaker 2: that subject. President Trump yesterday in the Oval Office said
6:25
Speaker 2: that it's time for other countries to begin protecting the
6:28
Speaker 2: Strait of Hormuz. And in fact, this morning, we just
6:30
Speaker 2: got an update. The Wall Street Journal reports that the
6:32
Speaker 2: United Arab Emirates is now committing to protecting the Strait
6:36
Speaker 2: of Hormuz, which is the first time any of the
6:39
Speaker 2: countries in the Gulf region have now committed to that
6:41
Speaker 2: kind of protection. This is after the Iranians have been
6:44
Speaker 2: throwing missiles in their direction. So some amazing developments right now.
6:48
Speaker 2: But here's the president yesterday talking about the Strait of
6:52
Speaker 2: Hormuz and saying we are going to be done. Listen
6:54
Speaker 2: to the certainty with which he talks about this. Two
6:57
Speaker 2: to three weeks. Here's the president of the United States yesterday.
7:01
Speaker 1: I think we're two or three weeks in. We'll leave.
7:05
Speaker 1: There's no reason for us to do this.
7:06
Speaker 4: Look, the problem with the Strait, a guy can take
7:09
Speaker 4: a mine, drop it in the water, and say, oh,
7:11
Speaker 4: it's unsafe. It's not like you're taking out an army
7:14
Speaker 4: or you're taking.
7:15
Speaker 1: Out a country or you're doing it. They can drop it.
7:17
Speaker 4: Or you can take a machine gun from the shore
7:19
Speaker 4: and shoot a little few bullets on a ship.
7:21
Speaker 1: Or maybe an.
7:22
Speaker 4: Over-the-shoulder missile, small missiles.
7:27
Speaker 1: That's not for us.
7:29
Speaker 4: That'll be for France. That'll be for whoever's using this trade.
7:33
Speaker 4: But I think when we leave, probably that's all cleared up. Today,
7:36
Speaker 4: I heard tremendous numbers of ships were sailing through. We're
7:40
Speaker 4: negotiating with them right now. They've been, again, we have
7:44
Speaker 4: had regime change. Now, regime change was not one of
7:46
Speaker 4: the things I had as a goal.
7:48
Speaker 1: I had one goal.
7:49
Speaker 4: They will have no nuclear weapon. And that goal has
7:52
Speaker 4: been attained. They will not have nuclear weapons. But we're
7:56
Speaker 4: finishing the job. And I think within maybe two weeks,
8:00
Speaker 4: maybe a couple of days longer to do the job.
8:03
Speaker 1: But we want to knock out every single thing they have.
8:06
Speaker 4: Now, it's possible that we'll make a deal before that
8:09
Speaker 4: because we'll hit bridges and we've hit some. We'll hit
8:12
Speaker 4: some bridges. We've got a couple of nice bridges in mind.
8:16
Speaker 4: But if they come to the table, that'll be good.
8:19
Speaker 4: But it doesn't matter whether they come or not. We've
8:21
Speaker 4: set them back. It'll take 15 to 20 years for
8:25
Speaker 4: them to rebuild what we've done to them.
8:27
Speaker 1: They have no Navy. They have no military. They have
8:30
Speaker 1: no Air Force. They have no telecommunications. They have no
8:33
Speaker 1: anti-aircraft systems. They have no leaders. You know, their leaders
8:37
Speaker 1: are all gone.
8:38
Speaker 2: Their leaders are all gone. So you heard that ending
8:41
Speaker 2: point is also kind of where he started, which is like, look,
8:43
Speaker 2: I didn't go in there with the intention of a
8:45
Speaker 2: regime change. That's not why we went in. That was
8:47
Speaker 2: never the mission. The mission was to stop the nuclear threat,
8:50
Speaker 2: to get rid of their nuclear arsenal, to get rid
8:52
Speaker 2: of their nuclear development, to seize the nuclear material, whatever
8:56
Speaker 2: we can do to stop them from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
8:58
Speaker 2: Regime change, that wasn't really the point. Although we did
9:00
Speaker 2: kind of change the regime anyway, because we killed literally
9:03
Speaker 2: everybody at the top. So now they got all these
9:06
Speaker 2: lower level people who are kind of falling into place
9:08
Speaker 2: and we're working with these new people and we're trying
9:10
Speaker 2: to come up with a deal with them. That's his plan.
9:13
Speaker 2: But the president has been clear throughout this whole process
9:17
Speaker 2: what this has all been about, stopping the nuclear run.
9:20
Speaker 2: And he said, we just had their military back by
9:22
Speaker 2: 20 years. You know, if you listen to Secretary of
9:25
Speaker 2: State Marco Rubio, who's been out talking about this, what
9:28
Speaker 2: Iran had done after Operation Midnight Hammer, after the United
9:32
Speaker 2: States had bombed these nuclear facilities. First and foremost, they
9:37
Speaker 2: continued to brag, even to Steve Witkoff, about how much
9:40
Speaker 2: enriched uranium they had. They had all this, like, well,
9:43
Speaker 2: we have all this enriched uranium that we could use
9:45
Speaker 2: as a nuclear weapon, but we promise we're not going
9:47
Speaker 2: to do that. But there's no reason to enrich uranium
9:49
Speaker 2: to the levels they had done unless they were in
9:51
Speaker 2: pursuit of a nuclear weapon. And also, they were building
9:54
Speaker 2: a missile shield. They were building ballistic missiles to ludicrous levels.
10:00
Speaker 2: in order to protect the development of their nuclear program.
10:04
Speaker 2: That's what they were doing. They were building a blanket
10:06
Speaker 2: of missiles in order to try and create an environment
10:09
Speaker 2: where nobody could penetrate and get to their nuclear weapons.
10:13
Speaker 2: And And development. So, you know, the United States detected
10:16
Speaker 2: all this and said, OK, this is enough. We've had
10:18
Speaker 2: 47 years of this crap. We've had endless, you know,
10:21
Speaker 2: rope-a-dope with Iran. We're not playing this game anymore. We're
10:24
Speaker 2: taking them out. So they take out the nuclear program.
10:27
Speaker 2: And now President Trump tonight is set to address the nation.
10:31
Speaker 2: And I guarantee it's going to be, I guarantee insofar
10:36
Speaker 2: as I can gather this publicly, that Um, he's going
10:39
Speaker 2: to make a, a big statement tonight to basically say
10:42
Speaker 2: to the American people, look, we've, we've achieved almost all
10:46
Speaker 2: of the objectives that we set out to in the
10:47
Speaker 2: first place. We just have to, we have, we have
10:49
Speaker 2: two weeks of cleanup basically coming up. And then after that,
10:53
Speaker 2: I'm calling on the world. to protect the Strait of Hormuz.
10:57
Speaker 2: These other countries need to pony up. You need other
10:59
Speaker 2: countries to commit to doing this. We can't handle everything.
11:02
Speaker 2: We're not going to do it all for you. We've
11:04
Speaker 2: got our own energy. We're not even anywhere near as
11:06
Speaker 2: dependent as you are on the energy that flows through
11:09
Speaker 2: that strait. So get involved. And the Iranians, right now
11:13
Speaker 2: is your chance. Make a deal. You could have a
11:15
Speaker 2: glorious future. Or things could get even rougher for you.
11:18
Speaker 2: That's the president. I expect. Tonight, we'll see what he
11:21
Speaker 2: has to say. Again, 9 p.m. Eastern this evening. We'll
11:24
Speaker 2: keep an eye on that. That statement yesterday that the
11:28
Speaker 2: president made from the Oval Office, the reason he was
11:31
Speaker 2: in the Oval Office was because he was talking about
11:33
Speaker 2: election integrity. He wanted to talk about election integrity, and
11:38
Speaker 2: specifically because Congress is out on vacation. Everybody's at Disney World.
11:42
Speaker 2: Everybody's like, I think, were there some guys in Scotland?
11:44
Speaker 2: Did you guys see this? There's like members of Congress
11:47
Speaker 2: like flying around like in Scotland. They're in foreign countries.
11:49
Speaker 2: They're on vacation. They're on vacation. And the president says, OK, fine,
11:53
Speaker 2: you know, without Congress in place, I'll just do it myself.
11:56
Speaker 2: So yesterday, the president of the United States signed an
12:00
Speaker 2: executive order to clean up mail in voting nationwide. Now, now, interestingly,
12:07
Speaker 2: I know we started our show with Reagan Reese. It
12:09
Speaker 2: is also Reagan Reese's scoop that this would happen yesterday.
12:13
Speaker 2: She got a hold of this. She just before the signature,
12:16
Speaker 2: she said President Trump was expected to sign and did.
12:18
Speaker 2: this executive order, cracking down on mail-in voting all across
12:23
Speaker 2: the country. The executive order requires the Secretary of Homeland
12:26
Speaker 2: Security to create a list of verified U.S. citizens who
12:30
Speaker 2: are eligible to vote in each state with the Social
12:34
Speaker 2: Security Administration's help. So Homeland Security is going to come
12:37
Speaker 2: up with a list of every citizen who's even eligible
12:39
Speaker 2: to vote in the state, according to a fact sheet
12:42
Speaker 2: shared with The Caller. By the way, that'll be really
12:44
Speaker 2: helpful to make sure that you don't have the same
12:47
Speaker 2: person registered in multiple states. The presidential action will also
12:50
Speaker 2: require that the U.S. Postal Service only sends absentee ballots
12:55
Speaker 2: to those who are on each state's approved mail-in ballot list.
13:00
Speaker 2: Ballots will now have specific, secure envelopes with unique barcodes
13:05
Speaker 2: for tracking, according to the order. States will be provided
13:08
Speaker 2: with their revised lists of confirmed voters no less than
13:12
Speaker 2: 60 days before each federal election under the order. The
13:17
Speaker 2: executive order also tells the U.S. Attorney General, rather, to
13:21
Speaker 2: prioritize investigating and prosecuting anyone accused of sending ballots to
13:26
Speaker 2: ineligible voters. States that disobey the order can lose federal
13:31
Speaker 2: funding under the presidential action. According to the White House,
13:34
Speaker 2: Abigail Jackson, election integrity has always been a top priority
13:38
Speaker 2: for President Trump. The American people sent him back to
13:40
Speaker 2: the White House because they overwhelmingly supported his common sense
13:45
Speaker 2: election integrity agenda. The president will do everything in his
13:48
Speaker 2: power to defend the safety and security of American elections
13:51
Speaker 2: and to ensure that only American citizens are voting in them. Amazing.
13:57
Speaker 2: So what you have from the president here is, okay,
14:01
Speaker 2: what federal authority Touch points do I have? Well, I've
14:03
Speaker 2: got the Department of Homeland Security. I can keep track of,
14:06
Speaker 2: you know, who's actually eligible to vote in the United States.
14:10
Speaker 2: And then I also have the U.S. Postal Service. And
14:13
Speaker 2: now we're going to say, hey, Postal Service, you're only
14:15
Speaker 2: allowed to send absentee ballots if the person's on the
14:19
Speaker 2: approved mail-in ballot list. Now, will there be crazy left-wing
14:24
Speaker 2: legal challenges to all of this?
14:25
Speaker 5: Of course.
14:26
Speaker 2: Everything President Trump does solicits a crazy left-wing legal challenge.
14:30
Speaker 2: And it works its way through the courts. The president says,
14:34
Speaker 2: we've got to fix this now. And I can't wait
14:36
Speaker 2: any longer for Congress to try and fix it. So
14:39
Speaker 2: good for the president of the United States. Just just,
14:41
Speaker 2: you know, one more thing. One more thing. He went
14:43
Speaker 2: to the Kennedy Center yesterday to see a performance of Chicago.
14:46
Speaker 2: I don't even know how he has time for.
14:48
Speaker 1: All of this.
14:48
Speaker 2: You know, the people are going to a big show.
14:50
Speaker 2: They'd be planning their day around it, like looking at
14:52
Speaker 2: the clock. I got to get to my show tonight.
14:54
Speaker 2: We got to leave work a little early so we
14:55
Speaker 2: can make it through traffic to get to the show.
14:58
Speaker 2: President Trump, he literally signs an executive order to secure
15:00
Speaker 2: America's elections, announces that we're leaving Iran in two to
15:03
Speaker 2: three weeks, and then heads off to go see Chicago.
15:06
Speaker 2: And then he gets ready to go to the United
15:07
Speaker 2: States Supreme Court this morning to sit for another massive, yes,
15:13
Speaker 2: election integrity concern about birthright citizenship. The guy's staying busy,
15:18
Speaker 2: in other words. But here he is yesterday saying, I'm
15:21
Speaker 2: going to do it myself. Now, he's going to do
15:23
Speaker 2: it himself. And, you know, I don't know how Reagan
15:28
Speaker 2: does this.
15:28
Speaker 1: Okay.
15:28
Speaker 2: And then Reagan was there. And Reagan asked him yesterday,
15:34
Speaker 2: does this mean, if you have to do this now yourself,
15:37
Speaker 2: does this mean that you believe that the Save America
15:41
Speaker 2: Act is unlikely to pass? Here's the president yesterday, cut one.
15:45
Speaker 2: He's annoyed now that that the Save America Act appears
15:48
Speaker 2: destined to flop in the United States Congress. Watch.
15:51
Speaker 6: Mr.
15:52
Speaker 1: President, do you still think it's going to pass?
15:55
Speaker 2: I don't know.
15:55
Speaker 4: It's the craziest thing. The Democrats are totally against it. Again,
15:59
Speaker 4: they're unified. I think maybe you would have Fetterman, who
16:02
Speaker 4: I have a lot of respect for. But the Democrats
16:05
Speaker 4: are unified against it.
16:08
Speaker 1: And you need Democrat votes.
16:10
Speaker 4: Unless you do something smart called the filibuster, terminate the filibuster, which.
16:13
Speaker 1: They should do.
16:15
Speaker 4: Republicans should do that, but there are a couple of
16:16
Speaker 4: Republicans that maybe they're not so smart because the Democrats
16:21
Speaker 4: will do it on the first day in office, maybe.
16:23
Speaker 1: The first hour. It's a question, will it be the
16:25
Speaker 1: first hour or the first day?
16:27
Speaker 4: So who can believe that a person, you can't even
16:34
Speaker 4: get it to the floor, that a person wouldn't vote for,
16:37
Speaker 4: think of it, for citizenship, proof of citizenship, for voter identification.
16:45
Speaker 4: And we also added one. We added mail-in ballots. Mail-in
16:48
Speaker 4: ballots with exceptions for the.
16:49
Speaker 1: Military, for people that are sick, people that are traveling,
16:53
Speaker 1: for the disabled. We have very generous exceptions.
16:58
Speaker 4: But who would believe that that would be possible not
17:00
Speaker 4: to get those things to vote for? And then we
17:02
Speaker 4: added best of Trump. We added no men and women sports.
17:07
Speaker 4: Different subject, but we added that. And we said no
17:09
Speaker 4: transgender mutilization of our children. These are all 90, 95,
17:17
Speaker 4: maybe 98 in some cases, maybe 99 in terms of
17:21
Speaker 4: those first two.
17:24
Speaker 1: If you talk about the first two, I.
17:26
Speaker 4: Think, you know, I think 98, 99% voter identification, right?
17:32
Speaker 1: Wouldn't you think, don't you think it's nice? With picture.
17:35
Speaker 4: Wouldn't you think it's nice when the Democrats had their convention,
17:39
Speaker 4: I remember it so well, you had to have identification.
17:44
Speaker 1: To get into the arena and.
17:46
Speaker 4: They had a card that was bigger than most of
17:48
Speaker 4: their chests and it had everything it had their picture
17:51
Speaker 4: and if you didn't have that card they threw you
17:54
Speaker 4: away in new york city recently we had big snowstorm
18:00
Speaker 4: mayor mandami had mandami he called out for people to
18:04
Speaker 4: shovel snow but you had to give identification with picture
18:11
Speaker 4: if you didn't have And it wasn't one identification.
18:14
Speaker 1: You had to have two. So to shovel snow in New.
18:18
Speaker 4: York City, you need identification, double, with picture. But to vote,
18:22
Speaker 4: which is maybe our most cherished.
18:24
Speaker 1: Thing, you don't need.
18:26
Speaker 4: They don't want voter ID, the Democrats, because they want
18:30
Speaker 4: to cheat. The problem is we need their votes. In
18:32
Speaker 4: order to get it, you need their votes. Look, they
18:37
Speaker 4: know their policy is so bad. They know that if
18:40
Speaker 4: they gave those votes, they might never win another election.
18:43
Speaker 2: They might never win another election. They might never win
18:47
Speaker 2: another election. I mean, really, the future of the country
18:50
Speaker 2: is on the line. This is why we keep calling it.
18:52
Speaker 2: We call it the Save America Act because it would
18:54
Speaker 2: save America. It would protect the American election system and
18:57
Speaker 2: prevent the very kind of fraud and cheating that you
18:58
Speaker 2: were just hearing the president talk about. So it just.
19:03
Speaker 2: It's disappointing. I don't like that his tone has shifted
19:06
Speaker 2: on this. Basically, his tone appears to be one of,
19:09
Speaker 2: you hate to say defeat, but just kind of like
19:12
Speaker 2: he's resolved to have to do this a different way. Resolved,
19:16
Speaker 2: I'm going to have to do this a different way
19:17
Speaker 2: because we just don't have enough support. He goes, obviously,
19:19
Speaker 2: the Democrats don't support it, and I can't even get
19:21
Speaker 2: enough Republicans to support it. Now, you heard him say recently,
19:24
Speaker 2: he's like, John Thune needs to be a leader. He
19:27
Speaker 2: needs to be a leader. If he's going to be
19:29
Speaker 2: a leader, he needs to be a leader. He needs
19:31
Speaker 2: to be the kind of guy who twists arms, threatens people,
19:34
Speaker 2: incentivizes people, whatever it takes to be able to achieve
19:38
Speaker 2: this objective. But the president is going to, in the
19:41
Speaker 2: absence of that, he's going to do what he can
19:42
Speaker 2: on his own, including yesterday's executive order. So thank you
19:46
Speaker 2: to the president for that update. One more election rigging.
19:50
Speaker 2: update for you, a direct election rigging update, and then
19:52
Speaker 2: I want to get to the Supreme Court. We've got
19:54
Speaker 2: a lot to discuss today. In Virginia, the fight continues
20:00
Speaker 2: in Virginia. If you live in Virginia and you have
20:02
Speaker 2: not yet voted in this referendum, go to the polls,
20:06
Speaker 2: vote no. Right now, vote no on election rigging. Because
20:10
Speaker 2: as we speak, remember, Democrats are looking to steal a
20:14
Speaker 2: whole bunch of seats right now. In Virginia, it's a
20:18
Speaker 2: 6-5 map right now. Six Democrats to five Republicans. Democrats
20:21
Speaker 2: want to steal four of those seats. They want to
20:23
Speaker 2: make it a 10-1 map for the midterms. They're trying
20:26
Speaker 2: to do it right now. Obama's involved. Abigail Spanberger, of course,
20:30
Speaker 2: the deranged governor of Virginia is doing this. And the
20:35
Speaker 2: good news for you at this hour is, is that
20:37
Speaker 2: in the early vote, all the Republican counties are outperforming.
20:40
Speaker 2: The Republican districts are outperforming the Democrat districts in terms
20:45
Speaker 2: of turnout. Now, it's not by huge margins, but it
20:48
Speaker 2: is an advantage right now. And we don't know the
20:51
Speaker 2: specific vote tally, of course, but we just know that
20:53
Speaker 2: Republicans are showing up. That's a big deal. But we
20:56
Speaker 2: have to maintain that momentum going all the way to
20:59
Speaker 2: April 21st at the end of this. This is not
21:01
Speaker 2: just important to Virginia. It's important to the entire country
21:04
Speaker 2: because they could steal the entire United States House of
21:06
Speaker 2: Representatives this way. This is an election rigging operation. And
21:10
Speaker 2: if you doubt how serious it is to the left,
21:13
Speaker 2: how desperate they are to rig the United States House,
21:16
Speaker 2: look no further than the fact that Hakeem Jeffries and his,
21:20
Speaker 2: you know, the money that he controls, the dial-up Democrat,
21:24
Speaker 2: this guy just gave $ 20 million to the cause. Now,
21:28
Speaker 2: Republicans have raised a very small sum of money. It's
21:31
Speaker 2: like $ 8 million, I think, in Virginia for this battle.
21:35
Speaker 2: If we're going to win in Virginia, it seems at
21:37
Speaker 2: this point it's going to be a grassroots fight. That
21:40
Speaker 2: the grassroots, people like me and you, are the only
21:42
Speaker 2: way that we are going to get victory here to
21:45
Speaker 2: stop the rigging. I saw this morning, I saw a
21:47
Speaker 2: report that some Republicans have thrown up their hands. They're like, oh,
21:52
Speaker 2: we're probably going to lose Virginia. Let's just keep our
21:54
Speaker 2: money there. for other elections later in the midterms. No,
21:57
Speaker 2: you idiots. No, you idiots. This is an effort to
22:01
Speaker 2: rig the entire House of Representatives. Don't save your money
22:04
Speaker 2: for electoral contests where you're trying to appeal to voters
22:08
Speaker 2: for later races. Fight now in the most obvious election
22:13
Speaker 2: rigging of the year. Fight right now. These Democrats are
22:18
Speaker 2: dumping a lot of money into this. Democrats are worried
22:21
Speaker 2: that they're not going to be able to succeed One
22:24
Speaker 2: DC publication punch bowl this morning headline, could Dems blow
22:28
Speaker 2: it in Virginia? Could Dems blow it in Virginia? God willing,
22:31
Speaker 2: they do. But the only way that we can make
22:34
Speaker 2: that come true is if we stay in the fight.
22:36
Speaker 2: You have to do it right now. So Virginians, get
22:38
Speaker 2: out and vote. Vote no. Vote hell no to election
22:41
Speaker 2: rigging in Virginia. Okay, coming up in a moment, I'm
22:43
Speaker 2: going to talk to you a little bit more about
22:45
Speaker 2: what the Supreme Court is up to, why I've got
22:47
Speaker 2: so much faith in this guy. Love this guy. Look
22:49
Speaker 2: at Clarence Thomas. I see some people asking me in
22:51
Speaker 2: the chat, where'd you get this shirt from? It was,
22:53
Speaker 2: I think it was my producer, Corey, who gave it
22:55
Speaker 2: to me years ago. And I have no idea where
22:57
Speaker 2: he got it, but I've had it. And I opened
23:00
Speaker 2: up my shirt drawer this morning and I thought to myself,
23:03
Speaker 2: Clarence Thomas, there he is. I'm going to wear that.
23:06
Speaker 2: I need to, especially today. Love Justice Thomas. All right,
23:09
Speaker 2: more ahead on the program. We're going to get to it.
23:11
Speaker 2: I want to thank our sponsors today. The guys who
23:13
Speaker 2: make it possible for us to keep doing this each
23:15
Speaker 2: day for free. You know, I've been using the BoneCharge
23:18
Speaker 2: infrared sauna blanket. Love BoneCharge. BoneCharge. They're a great infrared
23:23
Speaker 2: sauna blanket because it's a sauna in my house, which
23:26
Speaker 2: is like an amazing thing. And I can wrap myself
23:29
Speaker 2: up with it. The infrared heat works its magic and
23:31
Speaker 2: it helps with muscle recovery, detoxification, total game changer in
23:35
Speaker 2: my life. And everybody I know who uses the Bond
23:38
Speaker 2: Charge sauna blanket loves it. It loves it. It's great.
23:42
Speaker 2: It's very great. And then when you're done with it, just,
23:44
Speaker 2: you know, just wipe it down, fold it up, store
23:47
Speaker 2: it away. And it's perfect. It's really perfect. My wife
23:51
Speaker 2: uses the red light face mask. Allison loves the red
23:53
Speaker 2: light face mask from Boncharge because it helps improve your
23:57
Speaker 2: skin's texture and reduces inflammation. It's like a mini spa
24:00
Speaker 2: treatment right inside of our home. Beautiful. If you're thinking
24:03
Speaker 2: about trying either of these products out, you're in luck.
24:05
Speaker 2: Head to Boncharge.com. Use the code Vince at checkout to
24:09
Speaker 2: get 15% off. That's Boncharge.com, B-O-N-C-H-A-R-G-E. bondcharge.com. Both of these
24:14
Speaker 2: products have made a huge impact on us and our wellness.
24:17
Speaker 2: You're going to love them too. Use the code Vince
24:19
Speaker 2: at bondcharge.com to save 15%. These statements and products have
24:24
Speaker 2: not been evaluated by the FDA. These products are not
24:26
Speaker 2: intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or condition.
24:31
Speaker 2: All right, here we go. Birthright citizenship. Birthright citizenship. Did
24:39
Speaker 2: the people who drafted the 14th Amendment intend to confer
24:44
Speaker 2: on every illegal alien and every Chinese national and every
24:50
Speaker 2: single random person who came across our border? Did they
24:53
Speaker 2: intend to confer on them the privilege of having U.S.
24:57
Speaker 2: citizen children just by giving birth in the United States?
25:00
Speaker 2: Is that what the 14th Amendment was about? Was that
25:04
Speaker 2: what it is? The answer to that is no, not
25:08
Speaker 2: at all. There are three Civil War era amendments, sometimes
25:13
Speaker 2: referred to as the Civil Rights Amendments, the 13th, the 14th,
25:17
Speaker 2: and the 15th Amendments. The 13th Amendment to the Constitution
25:23
Speaker 2: was to free the slaves. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution,
25:28
Speaker 2: which is what we're talking about today, was to say
25:31
Speaker 2: that former slaves are indeed American citizens of the United States.
25:35
Speaker 2: And the 15th Amendment is to protect the voting franchise
25:39
Speaker 2: for those very same people. Each of those amendments was
25:44
Speaker 2: designed to end slavery and fully integrate into the United
25:50
Speaker 2: States Black Americans who had been enslaved and their children
25:54
Speaker 2: to make sure that that they were a full part
25:57
Speaker 2: of this American dream. That's it. That's what the 13th, 14th,
26:01
Speaker 2: and 15th Amendments are for. And yet, over the years,
26:05
Speaker 2: the left has so distorted the purpose of the 14th
26:08
Speaker 2: Amendment beyond recognition that they now sort of idly, they
26:12
Speaker 2: just make a blanket claim that it confers on illegal
26:16
Speaker 2: aliens the ability to have children here in the United
26:19
Speaker 2: States and boom, they're American citizens. Now, how big is
26:22
Speaker 2: this problem right now? What's the scale of this? Well,
26:25
Speaker 2: back in 2023, Pew Research found that approximately 300,000 babies,
26:34
Speaker 2: that was in 2023, 300,000 babies each year in the
26:38
Speaker 2: United States are born to illegal aliens.
26:42
Speaker 5: 300,000.
26:43
Speaker 2: That's 300,000 American citizenships handed out right now, again, in
26:50
Speaker 2: this insane system that it shouldn't work this way at all.
26:53
Speaker 1: 300,000.
26:55
Speaker 2: So when we talk about, and to give you a
26:58
Speaker 2: sense of perspective, that's 8% of all U.S.
27:00
Speaker 4: Births.
27:01
Speaker 2: In that very same year, 3.6 million babies were born
27:03
Speaker 2: in the United States. 300,000 of them were to illegal aliens.
27:10
Speaker 2: So if 8% of all U.S. births are citizens that
27:14
Speaker 2: shouldn't be citizens at all, what you're witnessing is what
27:18
Speaker 2: the left has been planning for many years, which is
27:22
Speaker 2: their plot to import new voters and to have basically
27:28
Speaker 2: a homegrown stockpile of new voters that they're bringing in
27:33
Speaker 2: without your permission, without anybody's permission. These people are pouring
27:37
Speaker 2: into our country illegally, breaking our laws, and then as
27:41
Speaker 2: a reward, they get to have US citizen children. Additionally,
27:45
Speaker 2: it also gives access To the illegal aliens who have
27:50
Speaker 2: these babies, it gives them access to America's welfare programs.
27:54
Speaker 2: Right now, an illegal alien is technically, under the law,
28:00
Speaker 2: forbidden from getting access to welfare in the United States.
28:03
Speaker 2: You're not allowed to go on food stamps or something.
28:06
Speaker 2: If you're an illegal alien who just pours across our border,
28:08
Speaker 2: that's illegal. But here's the gigantic Mack truck-sized loophole. If
28:13
Speaker 2: you have a child, then they're entitled to it. They're
28:17
Speaker 2: entitled to welfare because now our country has made them
28:21
Speaker 2: an American citizen. So what ends up happening is the
28:24
Speaker 2: kid gets welfare benefits and all of that welfare flows
28:28
Speaker 2: to the illegal alien parents. That's how that works. In
28:32
Speaker 2: addition to a bunch of other social services that you
28:35
Speaker 2: and I are paying for, including emergency rooms and things
28:37
Speaker 2: for illegal aliens in our country. It is a totally
28:42
Speaker 2: demented and broken system by design. This is what the
28:44
Speaker 2: left wants. And so it's useful if we just go
28:47
Speaker 2: back in history a little bit. I told you about
28:48
Speaker 2: the 13th and 14th and 15th Amendments, what they were
28:51
Speaker 2: for in the first place, why they were drafted, why
28:53
Speaker 2: we have them. In case you're wondering, you know, what
28:57
Speaker 2: you're going to hear today in the oral arguments at
28:59
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court, this all revolves around the
29:01
Speaker 2: fact that the president of the United States put out
29:04
Speaker 2: an executive order clarifying that this is insane, that this
29:08
Speaker 2: shouldn't work this way, and that the 14th Amendment was
29:10
Speaker 2: very explicit about, you know, who we considered to be
29:14
Speaker 2: a U.S. citizen, and it's not illegal aliens. So this
29:17
Speaker 2: is going before the Supreme Court today in big oral arguments.
29:20
Speaker 2: President Trump will be present today. As of 10 a.m.
29:25
Speaker 2: this morning, he'll be present there. Now, there will be
29:27
Speaker 2: no video footage or pictures or anything like that because
29:30
Speaker 2: there is no video footage or pictures inside of the
29:32
Speaker 2: Supreme Court during these oral arguments. But the president, in fact,
29:36
Speaker 2: has a ceremonial seat that's reserved at the Supreme Court.
29:39
Speaker 2: It's always there. It's just nobody really ever uses it.
29:42
Speaker 2: President Trump will use it today. He's going to go
29:45
Speaker 2: and sit there and watch the argument. And as they're
29:48
Speaker 2: arguing today, you're going to hear references to a variety
29:52
Speaker 2: of Supreme Court cases in the past. One of them
29:55
Speaker 2: is a case that the left likes to cite with frequency,
29:57
Speaker 2: called Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark. It's a case
30:01
Speaker 2: dating back to 1898. And in that case, the court
30:06
Speaker 2: concluded that the son of a Chinese laborer would be
30:11
Speaker 2: considered an American citizen because the son was born here
30:15
Speaker 2: in the United States. Now, what the left is not
30:18
Speaker 2: going to tell you, what they're not going to spend
30:19
Speaker 2: any time dwelling on is the fact that that Chinese
30:23
Speaker 2: laborer was here in the United States legally. That's the
30:27
Speaker 2: big distinction here. We had a legal immigrant who has
30:30
Speaker 2: this child who the court at the time said is
30:33
Speaker 2: a U.S. citizen. Now, you can disagree with that. You
30:36
Speaker 2: can even say, I think you can probably arrive at
30:39
Speaker 2: the same conclusion that, wait, what is a legal immigrant?
30:42
Speaker 2: entitled to a U.S. citizen child. Shouldn't it just be
30:44
Speaker 2: for U.S. citizens? Yeah, I think that would be the
30:46
Speaker 2: proper way to handle this. If a legal immigrant wants
30:48
Speaker 2: a U.S. citizen child, they should become a naturalized U.S. citizen,
30:52
Speaker 2: and then their kid can be a U.S. citizen at birth.
30:54
Speaker 2: That would, I think, make the most sense in the world.
30:57
Speaker 2: But regardless, just in terms of the technicalities here, that
31:00
Speaker 2: was a legal immigrant in the Wong Kim Ark case.
31:05
Speaker 2: One more case to think about, one more big case
31:08
Speaker 2: to think about from the 1920s, And that was at
31:12
Speaker 2: the time, it was widely understood that Indians who were
31:16
Speaker 2: born in the United States were not actually American citizens,
31:20
Speaker 2: but not yet, at least. So in the 1920s, Congress
31:24
Speaker 2: had to pass a law called the Indian Citizenship Act.
31:28
Speaker 2: to confer American citizens on Indians who were born in
31:31
Speaker 2: the United States. Because between the passage of the 14th
31:35
Speaker 2: Amendment and the Indian Citizenship Act, everybody in the country
31:39
Speaker 2: knew that just being an Indian born in America doesn't
31:43
Speaker 2: make you an American citizen. In other words, the 14th
31:45
Speaker 2: Amendment didn't extend to Indian children. And so American citizenship
31:53
Speaker 2: finally comes to pass for Indian children. in the 1920s
31:57
Speaker 2: in the form of the Indian Citizenship Act. So this is,
32:01
Speaker 2: and one last thing, one last big thing, although we
32:05
Speaker 2: could talk about this endlessly. For many years now, there
32:08
Speaker 2: has been a tradition of birth tourism internationally, taking advantage
32:15
Speaker 2: of the stupidity of this American system, the one we
32:18
Speaker 2: have right now. You've had Chinese nationals, wealthy Chinese nationals,
32:23
Speaker 2: which means that they're connected directly to the Chinese Communist Party,
32:27
Speaker 2: flying into the United States, having American citizen babies by
32:31
Speaker 2: virtue of this stupidity, usually in places like California where
32:35
Speaker 2: these Democrats are in bed with the chi-coms, Eric Swalwell, anybody,
32:40
Speaker 2: and then their kids fly back to China with brand
32:43
Speaker 2: new U.S. citizenships, and that's where they grow up, as
32:47
Speaker 2: American citizens. It's all so completely insane. And today the
32:53
Speaker 2: United States Supreme Court has a big opportunity to finally
32:56
Speaker 2: put an end to this nonsense. Now, what does it
32:58
Speaker 2: mean if they do put an end to it? And
33:00
Speaker 2: there's no promise that they will, but if they do
33:03
Speaker 2: put an end to it, what does it mean for
33:05
Speaker 2: anybody who's been made an American citizen under the demented system? Well, honestly,
33:11
Speaker 2: if you're a betting man, if you wanna assess this
33:15
Speaker 2: for what's really going to happen, My suspicion is that
33:18
Speaker 2: the court is not going to take away U.S. citizenship
33:21
Speaker 2: from anybody who got it under the broken system. They're
33:24
Speaker 2: going to stay. They're going to say, going forward, one
33:29
Speaker 2: would assume, going forward, no more free American citizenship to
33:33
Speaker 2: the children of illegals. So we're not going to upend
33:36
Speaker 2: anybody's life who's already been sold a bill of goods
33:39
Speaker 2: on the stupid system. But going forward, we're going to
33:42
Speaker 2: fix this system for good. And if we do that,
33:45
Speaker 2: That is a chance, a huge chance for us to
33:47
Speaker 2: protect our country's sovereignty and our country's elections. It'll end
33:54
Speaker 2: one of the worst schemes that the Democrats have ever
33:57
Speaker 2: imposed on the United States of America. In fact, the
34:01
Speaker 2: president's one of the guys who worked for the president
34:03
Speaker 2: in the first administration who drafted the original birthright citizenship
34:08
Speaker 2: executive order. His name is Theo Wald. He wrote about
34:11
Speaker 2: this last night. He said, tomorrow the court is going
34:13
Speaker 2: to hear one of the most consequential cases of the
34:15
Speaker 2: last 50 years, whether the 14th Amendment grants birthright citizenship
34:19
Speaker 2: to the children of illegal aliens. And then he goes
34:22
Speaker 2: through the history of it, and he talks about how
34:23
Speaker 2: ridiculous it is that so much of this is happening.
34:27
Speaker 2: He points out that we don't give citizenship to the
34:30
Speaker 2: children of foreign diplomats, true, born in America. And in
34:33
Speaker 2: the same way, we should not give citizenship to children
34:35
Speaker 2: of illegal aliens. No European country, not even the Vatican,
34:39
Speaker 2: grants birthright citizenship to children born to unlawful residents. Theo
34:44
Speaker 2: says Democrats are naturally freaking out about this case. Why?
34:48
Speaker 2: Because it's a terrifying prospect for the future of their party.
34:51
Speaker 2: They've seen the data showing how much population loss blue
34:54
Speaker 2: states have seen over the last few years. It's possible
34:56
Speaker 2: that California could lose up to 6%. electoral votes in
35:00
Speaker 2: the next census. The only way they can maintain their
35:02
Speaker 2: power is by continually replacing the population with the children
35:08
Speaker 2: of illegals. It's one of the major pillars of Democrat power,
35:13
Speaker 2: and it may just be coming to an end. Keep
35:18
Speaker 2: your eyes on this case. It's one of the biggest
35:20
Speaker 2: cases ever to appear before the United States Supreme Court.
35:23
Speaker 2: Huge role arguments today. The president of the United States
35:25
Speaker 2: is going to be seated present for them. I'm very
35:30
Speaker 2: much looking forward to this. And once again, pray for
35:32
Speaker 2: your country. Pray that these justices have the wisdom of
35:35
Speaker 2: a guy like Justice Clarence Thomas. Clarence Thomas knows what
35:38
Speaker 2: this is all about. Will the rest of them? We'll see.
35:42
Speaker 2: We'll see. More ahead on this edition of Vence. I've
35:44
Speaker 2: got some more things to talk about with you, including
35:45
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court. Some crazy developments in the
35:48
Speaker 2: last 24 hours there. But let me tell you about
35:50
Speaker 2: a great company that I really, really enjoy working with,
35:53
Speaker 2: Blackout Coffee. You guys love Blackout Coffee? I love Blackout Coffee.
35:58
Speaker 2: It's so good. Sorry, I started thinking about Blackout. If
36:03
Speaker 2: you want your coffee strong, smooth, and roasted for maximum flavor,
36:06
Speaker 2: then Blackout Coffee is for you. Blackout Coffee is an
36:08
Speaker 2: America first company. They roast their beans right here in
36:11
Speaker 2: the United States. They ship them fresh to your door.
36:13
Speaker 2: Their blends are bold, full-bodied, crafted for people who take
36:16
Speaker 2: their coffee seriously. Their medium dark roast delivers a very
36:19
Speaker 2: strong flavor without bitterness. It's smooth. It's powerful. It gives
36:22
Speaker 2: you the extra boost that you need to stay focused
36:24
Speaker 2: all day. And I love their subscribe and save option, too,
36:28
Speaker 2: because you never run out of coffee. You swap flavors, pause,
36:31
Speaker 2: cancel any time, get deep discounts plus free shipping, all
36:35
Speaker 2: while earning reward points on every purchase that you can
36:37
Speaker 2: redeem for future orders. It's convenient. It saves you money.
36:41
Speaker 2: They've got whole bean, ground, flavored coffees, espresso, single serve options.
36:45
Speaker 2: There's something for everybody. Today, you can get 20% off
36:47
Speaker 2: your first order at blackoutcoffee.com. Use the code Vince at checkout.
36:52
Speaker 2: That's blackoutcoffee.com. Promo code Vince. Join me in drinking Blackout.
36:57
Speaker 2: Promo code Vince, blackoutcoffee.com. Get 20% off your first order.
37:00
Speaker 2: Thank you to Blackout. And thank you also to Brickhouse
37:04
Speaker 2: Nutrition for their great product, Lean. You guys know about Lean?
37:07
Speaker 2: Lean's awesome. Lean's a great thing. People have been using
37:10
Speaker 2: those weight loss injections to try and lose some weight.
37:12
Speaker 2: And those work by helping you lower your blood sugar
37:15
Speaker 2: and reduce your appetite. But there are people out there
37:17
Speaker 2: who want to lose weight and they don't want painful
37:20
Speaker 2: weekly injections. Is that you? Especially when you hear about
37:22
Speaker 2: some of those side effects? No, you don't want that.
37:25
Speaker 2: This is why doctors at Brickhouse Nutrition created a weight
37:27
Speaker 2: loss supplement called Lean and the results have been amazing.
37:30
Speaker 2: The studied ingredients in Lean have been shown to help
37:33
Speaker 2: lower your blood sugar, help you burn fat by converting
37:35
Speaker 2: it into energy, and help you curb your appetite and
37:37
Speaker 2: your cravings so you're less hungry. And here's the thing.
37:40
Speaker 2: Lean by Brickhouse Nutrition is not for casual dieters. It's
37:44
Speaker 2: for serious people. It's for frustrated dieters with 10 or
37:46
Speaker 2: more pounds to lose. So if that's you, let's get
37:49
Speaker 2: you started with 20% off, free rush shipping. Just visit TakeLean.com
37:54
Speaker 2: and enter Vince for your discount. That's promo code VinceTakeLean.com.
37:58
Speaker 2: These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This
38:00
Speaker 2: product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent
38:03
Speaker 2: any disease, and it's not a substitute or alternative for
38:06
Speaker 2: care from a healthcare provider. Yeah, as I mentioned, the president,
38:10
Speaker 2: is going to attend the oral arguments today. Here he
38:13
Speaker 2: is disclosing the news yesterday to Peter Doocy. Cut to,
38:16
Speaker 2: take a look.
38:17
Speaker 3: The Supreme Court tomorrow is going to hear arguments about
38:19
Speaker 3: your executive order trying to get rid of birthright citizenship.
38:24
Speaker 1: And I'm going.
38:25
Speaker 2: You're going to go to the Supreme Court tomorrow.
38:26
Speaker 1: The President I think so. I do believe it. The
38:27
Speaker 1: Press And just sit there and listen. The President Because
38:28
Speaker 1: I have listened to this argument for so long.
38:31
Speaker 4: And this is not about Chinese billionaires or billionaires from
38:35
Speaker 4: other countries who all of a sudden have 75 children
38:39
Speaker 4: or 59 children, in one case, or 10 children.
38:42
Speaker 1: Becoming American citizens. This was about slaves.
38:47
Speaker 4: And if you take a look, slaves— we're talking about
38:49
Speaker 4: slaves from the Civil War. And if you take a look,
38:53
Speaker 4: And when it was filed, all of this legislation, all
38:56
Speaker 4: of this, everything having to do.
38:58
Speaker 1: With birthright citizenship, it was at the end of the
39:01
Speaker 1: Civil War.
39:02
Speaker 4: The reason was it had to do with the babies
39:05
Speaker 4: of slaves and the protection of the babies of slaves.
39:10
Speaker 1: It didn't have to do with the.
39:11
Speaker 4: Protection of multimillionaires and billionaires wanting to have their children
39:16
Speaker 4: get an American citizenship. citizenship. It is the craziest thing
39:20
Speaker 4: I've ever seen. It's been so badly handled by legal
39:23
Speaker 4: people over the years. If you look at the original
39:27
Speaker 4: birthright citizenship papers, they all happened right after the Civil War.
39:33
Speaker 4: The reason was it had to do with the babies
39:36
Speaker 4: of slaves. And hopefully it's going to say because our
39:40
Speaker 4: country is being scammed.
39:42
Speaker 1: We're getting all of these people. They're selling the rights
39:45
Speaker 1: to them.
39:45
Speaker 4: People are making a living, a big living, getting hundreds
39:48
Speaker 4: of thousands and even millions of dollars from bringing people
39:52
Speaker 4: in and saying, congratulations, your whole family is going to
39:57
Speaker 4: be a citizen of the United States of America.
39:59
Speaker 1: That's not what it was for. It wasn't for billionaires
40:02
Speaker 1: bringing people in or family in. It was for the
40:06
Speaker 1: children of slaves.
40:09
Speaker 4: And What you really have to do, and I don't
40:12
Speaker 4: think the lawyers talk about it as much, look at
40:14
Speaker 4: when the Civil War ended and look at the date
40:18
Speaker 4: of when this was enacted.
40:19
Speaker 1: Okay. The Press Have you ever met a Supreme Court?
40:22
Speaker 2: Is this going to be the first time you're going
40:23
Speaker 2: to the Supreme Court?
40:24
Speaker 4: The President No, once before, the opening of the Supreme
40:26
Speaker 4: Court and the last administration.
40:28
Speaker 3: The Press And which justices will you be listening for
40:31
Speaker 3: most closely?
40:31
Speaker 1: The President I love a few of them. I don't
40:35
Speaker 1: like some others. And, you know, you say what you want.
40:39
Speaker 4: But you have the ones that were appointed by Barack
40:42
Speaker 4: Hussein Obama and Biden. I don't care how good your
40:46
Speaker 4: case is. You can have the greatest case ever. They're
40:49
Speaker 4: going to rule against you. They always do. And it's
40:52
Speaker 4: not supposed to be that way.
40:54
Speaker 2: It's not supposed to be that way. We had one
40:58
Speaker 2: other point. The president just reminded me of this as
41:01
Speaker 2: we were talking about what the 14th Amendment was about
41:03
Speaker 2: at all. It is about the children of freed slaves.
41:07
Speaker 2: It's about making sure that they're all considered American citizens.
41:11
Speaker 2: And the left has paid lip service for years to
41:14
Speaker 2: this idea that they're trying to redress the problems of
41:19
Speaker 2: the legacy of slavery. Have you heard this conversation? But
41:23
Speaker 2: have you noticed that insofar there are problems that date
41:26
Speaker 2: back to that era? They're all created by Democrats, all
41:30
Speaker 2: of them. A mangled interpretation of the 14th Amendment that
41:35
Speaker 2: sells out black Americans and makes them have to compete
41:40
Speaker 2: with illegal aliens for jobs is in no way redressing
41:46
Speaker 2: the sins of two centuries ago. It's in fact exacerbating them.
41:52
Speaker 2: So if anybody is hurting black Americans right now, going
41:57
Speaker 2: back hundreds of years in that damage. It's the Democrat Party,
42:01
Speaker 2: and they're doing it to this very day. As the
42:04
Speaker 2: Supreme Court takes this case up today, they're going to
42:07
Speaker 2: have the ability to protect all Americans, and yes, Black Americans,
42:12
Speaker 2: from the sins that are being committed against them by
42:15
Speaker 2: a Democrat Party who's constantly selling us out. It's amazing.
42:19
Speaker 2: It's amazing. And the Supreme Court has a really big
42:22
Speaker 2: opportunity today. All right, let me... Let me get to
42:26
Speaker 2: some of the other things. You heard the president say
42:28
Speaker 2: a moment ago that he never gets a good citizen,
42:32
Speaker 2: gets a good ruling from the Supreme Court, but that
42:35
Speaker 2: the lefty justices never go his way. Well, this is
42:38
Speaker 2: one of those rare moments where I'm here to tell
42:40
Speaker 2: you the president was kind of wrong yesterday, at least
42:45
Speaker 2: in one case. And here's why. Justices Sotomayor and Kagan
42:50
Speaker 2: actually sided with the other justices yesterday in an 8-1
42:55
Speaker 2: slam dunk decision saying that therapists cannot be forced by
43:02
Speaker 2: the government to lie to children about their gender. Yeah,
43:07
Speaker 2: I know. It's as crazy as it gets. Here's how
43:10
Speaker 2: this saga starts before it gets to the United States
43:12
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. The Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented this client,
43:17
Speaker 2: this plaintiff here, is they brought this case. Her name
43:22
Speaker 2: is Kaylee Childs. Kaylee Childs. And she's a Christian counselor.
43:27
Speaker 2: And she's in Colorado. And her job was to, you know,
43:33
Speaker 2: talk to kids who were, in this case, confused about
43:36
Speaker 2: their own gender and help them through that, help them
43:40
Speaker 2: navigate in a healthy way through that, through talk therapy,
43:43
Speaker 2: just to talk with the kid. and to tell the
43:45
Speaker 2: child that you were made in the image and likeness
43:47
Speaker 2: of God. You weren't born in the wrong body. You're
43:50
Speaker 2: perfect just the way you are. What a lovely and
43:52
Speaker 2: wholesome message. Well, the state of Colorado decided to forbid
43:56
Speaker 2: that message. They called it, quote, conversion therapy. You're not
44:00
Speaker 2: allowed to tell a child the truth. You have to
44:03
Speaker 2: lie to them. You have to abuse them. You have
44:06
Speaker 2: to enable their destruction. Well, for Kaylee Childs, who seems
44:11
Speaker 2: like a good person, a good Christian woman, she said, well, no,
44:14
Speaker 2: that's not, That's not good enough. You're violating my rights.
44:19
Speaker 2: And this is unacceptable. So with the Alliance Defending Freedom,
44:22
Speaker 2: she takes it all the way up to the United
44:24
Speaker 2: States Supreme Court. And yesterday, in an 8-1 decision, the
44:29
Speaker 2: Supreme Court absolutely slammed Colorado into the ground for what
44:34
Speaker 2: it did to Kayleigh Childs and every other talking counselor,
44:40
Speaker 2: people who do speaking therapy, talking therapy. they dunked this
44:45
Speaker 2: into the earth and they said, this is unacceptable. It's
44:47
Speaker 2: a total violation of the First Amendment. You can't do that.
44:51
Speaker 2: That's viewpoint discrimination to do that. You're allowed to. Just
44:55
Speaker 2: because you're a doctor, just because you're a therapist doesn't
44:57
Speaker 2: mean you lose your First Amendment rights. You retain them.
45:01
Speaker 2: And it helps in this case, as far as I'm concerned,
45:04
Speaker 2: that she's on the side of decency. She wasn't lying
45:06
Speaker 2: to the child. She was trying to prevent the lies
45:09
Speaker 2: from poisoning the children. Good for her, and good for
45:13
Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court to arrive at this conclusion. Now,
45:15
Speaker 2: you may hear that number, and you go, 8-1, 8-1. Well,
45:18
Speaker 2: then who's the one? Surprise, surprise, the woman who's not
45:23
Speaker 2: a biologist, Katonji Brown Jackson. Katonji Brown Jackson spent more
45:28
Speaker 2: pages in her dissent than the majority opinion spent explaining
45:33
Speaker 2: that the First Amendment was totally violated by the state
45:36
Speaker 2: of Colorado. She was whining page after page after page
45:41
Speaker 2: in defense of the abuse of children. Now, it's amazing
45:45
Speaker 2: that she's got all these thoughts on why children should
45:47
Speaker 2: be abused. Suddenly, in an issue that involved transing kids,
45:51
Speaker 2: she's got all these declarative reasons for why that's a
45:53
Speaker 2: good idea. But you'll remember in her Supreme Court confirmation
45:57
Speaker 2: hearing in the United States Senate, she straight up said,
46:01
Speaker 2: I'm not a biologist. I don't even know the difference
46:03
Speaker 2: between a man and a woman. I don't have the
46:05
Speaker 2: expertise for that. And yet here she is running her
46:08
Speaker 2: sock about what doctors should be doing and what good
46:11
Speaker 2: medical treatments are. And, oh no, the government is going
46:15
Speaker 2: to start interfering with medicine. The government's doing no such thing,
46:20
Speaker 2: interfering with medicine. It's all so stupid. Now, an 8-1
46:24
Speaker 2: decision to protect kids yesterday, an 8-1 decision to protect children,
46:29
Speaker 2: which is wonderful. And Katonji Brown Jackson should be impeached
46:33
Speaker 2: from the United States Supreme Court for a number of reasons.
46:36
Speaker 2: But in addition to being an idiot, the more sinister
46:38
Speaker 2: thing is that she's entirely guided by her politics. She's
46:42
Speaker 2: guided by a religious orthodoxy to this kind of demonic
46:49
Speaker 2: ideology of abusing children. It's like a culture of death
46:54
Speaker 2: that she represents. And she shouldn't be on the United
46:57
Speaker 2: States Supreme Court. You know, back in the early 1800s,
47:01
Speaker 2: there was a Supreme Court justice who was impeached by
47:04
Speaker 2: the name of Samuel Chase. They called him Old Bacon Face,
47:08
Speaker 2: which is an unfortunate nickname, and a very unfortunate nickname.
47:11
Speaker 2: I don't think he gave it to himself. Somebody else
47:13
Speaker 2: gave him that. And Samuel Chase was impeached. One of
47:17
Speaker 2: the reasons, one of the articles of impeachment against him
47:20
Speaker 2: was that he was a partisan zealot, that he was
47:22
Speaker 2: spending too much time on the bench wielding his partisan
47:25
Speaker 2: politics rather than abiding.
47:27
Speaker 1: By the law.
47:28
Speaker 2: Well, if that was good enough for an article of
47:30
Speaker 2: impeachment for a Supreme Court justice around the founding of
47:32
Speaker 2: our country— It should be good enough for an article
47:35
Speaker 2: of impeachment against Katonji Brown Jackson, who feigns ignorance about
47:39
Speaker 2: what a woman is. Of course, she knows what a
47:41
Speaker 2: woman is. But the kind of the Marxist tendencies that
47:45
Speaker 2: have overtaken her mind have made it so that she's
47:48
Speaker 2: incapable of telling the truth about even simple things. And
47:51
Speaker 2: so if that's the case, you shouldn't be on the
47:53
Speaker 2: United States Supreme Court. Impeach that woman.
47:54
Speaker 1: Just get rid of her.
47:55
Speaker 2: Just get rid of her. Or at least signal to
47:58
Speaker 2: the public that this is insane and begin those impeachment proceedings.
48:02
Speaker 2: I mean, come on. It's crazy. An 8-1 decision. If
48:05
Speaker 2: you can get, if you can get Elena Kagan and
48:07
Speaker 2: Sonia Sotomayor to join the other justices on a case,
48:11
Speaker 2: that's how obvious the decision is. It's beyond obvious. And
48:17
Speaker 2: yet Katanja Brown Jackson couldn't join them.
48:20
Speaker 4: Yeah.
48:20
Speaker 2: It tells you a lot. It tells you a lot. Now, um,
48:25
Speaker 2: we also had another crazy, crazy judge, uh, judicial case yesterday.
48:28
Speaker 2: I have a lot of legal news today. A lot
48:31
Speaker 2: of legal news today. Um, There was a very crazy judge,
48:36
Speaker 2: Judge Richard Leon. He's a federal district judge yesterday, a
48:40
Speaker 2: George W. Bush appointee. So again, I don't care if
48:42
Speaker 2: he's a Bush appointee or not. I want to remind
48:46
Speaker 2: you of something too. Oftentimes when you see these crazy
48:48
Speaker 2: judges that have been appointed by, say, Ronald Reagan or
48:51
Speaker 2: George W. Bush, you're like, that guy was a Reagan appointee.
48:53
Speaker 2: How is he such a psychopath? Part of the reason
48:56
Speaker 2: for the psychopaths that were appointed by Republicans is often
48:59
Speaker 2: the blue slip in the United States Senate. Remember that
49:01
Speaker 2: blue slip we keep talking about? The blue slip gives
49:04
Speaker 2: Democrats in the Senate a veto power over picks in
49:08
Speaker 2: their own states. So when presidents and Republican presidents come
49:12
Speaker 2: forward with a nominee and then Democrats are like, nope,
49:14
Speaker 2: that guy's not acceptable. Republican presidents oftentimes have had to
49:17
Speaker 2: pick people that the Democrats were against. like to be
49:21
Speaker 2: in the state. So as a result, you end up
49:23
Speaker 2: with these insane judges in a lot of cases, including
49:27
Speaker 2: appointed by Republican presidents. And so this loony judge, Richard Leon,
49:33
Speaker 2: yesterday told President Trump he's not allowed to build a ballroom. Now,
49:38
Speaker 2: I want to tell you something about the ballroom at
49:40
Speaker 2: the White House right now. The East Wing is gone.
49:43
Speaker 2: There's a massive hole in the ground right now. This
49:46
Speaker 2: project needs to be finished. And it's not taxpayer funded.
49:50
Speaker 2: President Trump has raised all of the money from private donors,
49:54
Speaker 2: which follows a great tradition in American history. In fact,
49:58
Speaker 2: the whole National Mall is built with private donors. Every monument,
50:02
Speaker 2: all these monuments you're staring at, these statues all around
50:05
Speaker 2: the city, these are things that have been built with
50:07
Speaker 2: private donations. Big benefactors come and cut checks and give
50:11
Speaker 2: it to the American people. And as a result, we
50:14
Speaker 2: end up with some of these beautiful sites. And the
50:17
Speaker 2: president is now trying to do the same thing to
50:19
Speaker 2: build a ballroom at the White House, which every president
50:22
Speaker 2: has been asking for. Luckily, the president that's a builder
50:25
Speaker 2: is in a position to do something about it. And
50:28
Speaker 2: so he is. He's building a ballroom. And this judge
50:31
Speaker 2: gets in his way and says, you can't do that.
50:33
Speaker 2: You have to go to Congress, he says. And in
50:37
Speaker 2: his juvenile opinion yesterday, he used, if you want to
50:43
Speaker 2: know how ridiculous this guy is, he doesn't have a
50:45
Speaker 2: judicial temperament. He's not like a sober judge. He's not
50:48
Speaker 2: staring at the law and trying to assess what's accurate
50:50
Speaker 2: and what's not. Instead, he's using exclamation points in his
50:56
Speaker 2: legal opinion. From Laura Powell on X Today. She said,
51:01
Speaker 2: whatever happened to the professionalism of the judiciary? The judge
51:04
Speaker 2: used 18 exclamation marks in his 35-page opinion. 18 exclamation marks.
51:11
Speaker 2: Four times he started his refutation of an argument made
51:13
Speaker 2: by the defendants with, please, just a single word and
51:17
Speaker 2: an exclamation point. This is a formal legal opinion. It's
51:21
Speaker 2: not a casual conversation. It's not a tweet. It's not
51:24
Speaker 2: a post on Truth Social. It's not a Facebook post.
51:28
Speaker 2: It's a judicial decision. And then he's using exclamation points.
51:34
Speaker 2: I'm shocked that he didn't include emojis in this thing.
51:39
Speaker 2: The guy's a nut job. The guy's a nut job.
51:43
Speaker 2: And President Trump, he posted the truth social yesterday where
51:49
Speaker 2: he's more than entitled to use exclamation points in his reactions.
51:51
Speaker 2: In fact, he uses lots of exclamation points, but he's
51:54
Speaker 2: not writing judicial opinions.
51:56
Speaker 3: Here he is.
51:57
Speaker 2: Yesterday. In the ballroom case, the judge says we have
51:59
Speaker 2: to get congressional approval. He's wrong. Congressional approval has never
52:03
Speaker 2: been given on anything in these circumstances, big or small,
52:07
Speaker 2: having to do with the construction at the White House.
52:09
Speaker 2: In this case, even less so because the ballroom is
52:11
Speaker 2: being built with private donations, no federal taxpayer money. President
52:15
Speaker 2: Donald J. Trump. So the president's really tapped into the
52:19
Speaker 2: most important point here. Normally, in order to get funds
52:22
Speaker 2: authorized to do something, you would have to go to
52:24
Speaker 2: Congress to do that. You want to be build something
52:27
Speaker 2: brand new and you need taxpayer money to do it,
52:29
Speaker 2: you have to go to Congress to get an authorized
52:31
Speaker 2: dispersal of funds for taxpayer money for a project like that. Okay,
52:34
Speaker 2: that would stand to reason. Here, he's not doing that.
52:37
Speaker 2: He's got private funding coming in. You got rich benefactors
52:40
Speaker 2: who are giving money to build a ballroom. So he's
52:42
Speaker 2: doing it. And the president has the ability to call
52:46
Speaker 2: the shots on what happens at the White House. In fact,
52:49
Speaker 2: under the law, the president has wide discretion for White
52:53
Speaker 2: House construction projects. It's been the tradition. at the White
52:57
Speaker 2: House for presidents to continue to add on to it.
53:01
Speaker 2: In 1902, Theodore Roosevelt built the East Wing as an
53:05
Speaker 2: extension at the White House. In fact, that very same
53:08
Speaker 2: East Wing was overhauled by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1940s.
53:13
Speaker 2: When FDR overhauled it, he built a presidential emergency operations
53:18
Speaker 2: center underground, a big bunker under the East Wing. And
53:22
Speaker 2: you'll remember back in October of last year, I was
53:24
Speaker 2: telling you, you know something? This ballroom project, based on
53:29
Speaker 2: the fact that there was a couple things that stood
53:30
Speaker 2: out to me, I looked at it and I go,
53:32
Speaker 2: wait a second. The ballroom, they're tearing down the East Wing.
53:36
Speaker 2: They're going to build a ballroom. The East Wing sits
53:38
Speaker 2: on top of the Presidential Operations Center. They're telling Treasury employees,
53:42
Speaker 2: the Treasury Department's writing a story, you can't take photos
53:44
Speaker 2: of the construction or the demolition. Why are they telling
53:47
Speaker 2: them that? It's not because they're embarrassed by the demolition.
53:50
Speaker 2: Everybody knows the demolition's happening. It's like, oh, it's a
53:52
Speaker 2: big cover-up. No, the reason they don't want photos is
53:55
Speaker 2: because there's something classified in that zone. They don't want
53:58
Speaker 2: people to have a perspective on the Presidential Emergency Operations Center.
54:02
Speaker 2: So you guys remember this chat that I was speculating
54:05
Speaker 2: at the time? I think they're rebuilding the entire bunker.
54:09
Speaker 2: I think that this project is not merely a ballroom.
54:12
Speaker 2: I think they're doing something pretty epic here that they're
54:16
Speaker 2: not fully disclosing right now. Well, here's President Trump this
54:22
Speaker 2: week confirming What I was talking about with you last October.
54:26
Speaker 2: Cut four. Here's the president.
54:27
Speaker 6: The military is building a big complex under the ballroom,
54:32
Speaker 6: which has come out recently because of a stupid lawsuit
54:36
Speaker 6: that was filed. But the military is building a massive
54:40
Speaker 6: complex under the ballroom. And that's under construction, and we're
54:44
Speaker 6: doing very well. So we're ahead of schedule. That's part
54:46
Speaker 6: of it. The ballroom essentially becomes a shed for what's
54:50
Speaker 6: being built under the military, including from drones and including
54:54
Speaker 6: from any other thing.
54:56
Speaker 1: The glass on the windows, you see the big windows,
55:00
Speaker 1: the glass.
55:01
Speaker 6: Is extremely thick. It's high-grade, bulletproof glass. So all of
55:05
Speaker 6: the windows are bulletproof. I think the Times wrote, gee,
55:10
Speaker 6: some of the windows are fake. We have no fake windows.
55:12
Speaker 6: They said they talked about a stairway in the south.
55:15
Speaker 6: We don't have a stairway in the south. That was
55:18
Speaker 6: replaced a long time ago.
55:20
Speaker 5: All right.
55:20
Speaker 2: So you hear the president saying, yeah, we're building. It's
55:22
Speaker 2: basically the ballroom is essentially a shed on top of
55:26
Speaker 2: a huge presidential emergency operations center. The military is very
55:29
Speaker 2: involved in this. which is a fun detail. And so
55:33
Speaker 2: what's happening here is this, as this loony judge tries
55:36
Speaker 2: to get in the way and say, you can't do that.
55:38
Speaker 2: What is he precluding from happening right now through this
55:41
Speaker 2: ridiculous opinion? Well, the answer is not merely the construction
55:45
Speaker 2: of a gorgeous and necessary ballroom for the White House,
55:49
Speaker 2: not merely preventing private donors from privately improving the United
55:52
Speaker 2: States of America. He's also imperiling national security. The president
55:57
Speaker 2: of the United States is doesn't have an emergency operation
56:00
Speaker 2: center for no reason. It's because it is essential to
56:03
Speaker 2: the country's national security. So this loony judge is getting
56:08
Speaker 2: in the way, not merely of an amazing entertainment space.
56:12
Speaker 2: That's a small detail compared to the epic presidential emergency
56:15
Speaker 2: operation center that they're trying to build underground right now.
56:20
Speaker 2: That's what's on the line. And the president is going
56:22
Speaker 2: to stay in this fight as he now has to
56:24
Speaker 2: fight against yet another radical judge who decides to take
56:28
Speaker 2: control of the entire country on his own. Just to
56:31
Speaker 2: give you a sense of the state of play. It's a, it, it,
56:34
Speaker 2: it's never ending for this guy. This guy's got a
56:37
Speaker 2: million things to deal with. Um, and I've got a
56:39
Speaker 2: million things to deal with today on the big national
56:41
Speaker 2: radio show. We've got a lot more to talk about
56:42
Speaker 2: the Vin show.com. You can get your big local radio listings. Uh, and, uh,
56:46
Speaker 2: also if you want to join us on rumble is again,
56:48
Speaker 2: the show is from 12 to three Eastern time. We
56:50
Speaker 2: do the show from one to three Eastern time live
56:53
Speaker 2: on rumble. You can join us there. The fast, the,
56:55
Speaker 2: the amazing rumble chat, a chat, anybody who joins me
56:58
Speaker 2: on the radio show, tell everybody else how great it is.
57:00
Speaker 2: Would you, would you tell them so that they can
57:01
Speaker 2: all join me too? We just have an epic time.
57:03
Speaker 2: We just have a wonderful time together. And then we
57:06
Speaker 2: also have the great Dan Bongino program. I think Dan's
57:10
Speaker 2: going to have an amazing show today. I think he's
57:11
Speaker 2: just going to have an amazing show. It's at rumble.com
57:13
Speaker 2: slash Bongino. That's 10 a.m. Eastern time this morning. And
57:16
Speaker 2: then we've got the great Haley Carania. She's live at
57:18
Speaker 2: noon Eastern time. rumble.com slash Haley. Haley with two Ys.
57:21
Speaker 4: Why?
57:22
Speaker 2: Because she's incredible. That's coming up today. I think, well,
57:25
Speaker 2: she's got a lot of great content for you as well.
57:27
Speaker 2: I was texting with Haley yesterday. We've got some good
57:29
Speaker 2: I know she's got some great stuff coming. I know it.
57:31
Speaker 2: I'm confident in this. You should check in with her.
57:35
Speaker 2: Just the best people to work with, and you're the
57:37
Speaker 2: best audience to have. Thank you for being here, as always.
57:40
Speaker 2: I'll be back with you tomorrow, hopefully with some epic
57:44
Speaker 2: audio from the birthright citizenship case today in the United
57:47
Speaker 2: States Supreme Court. Looking forward to that. Rooting on Justice Thomas.
57:51
Speaker 2: Rooting on Justice Clarence Thomas. Wearing the Justice Thomas shirt today.
57:54
Speaker 2: For those of you listening on the audio podcast, you
57:56
Speaker 2: should check it out. Rumble.com slash Vince. Thanks for being here.
57:59
Speaker 2: Talk to you soon. The Dan Bongino Show.
58:06
Speaker 5: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
58:08
Speaker 5: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
58:12
Speaker 5: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
58:15
Speaker 5: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
58:17
Speaker 5: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue.
58:21
Speaker 2: That is it.
58:22
Speaker 5: This is not a football game. If you vote, we
58:26
Speaker 5: will win.
58:26
Speaker 1: It is not complicated.
58:28
Speaker 2: The Dan Bongino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.