Latest / Global Voice Radio Network's tracks / Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 082426 - The Sixteenth Amendment, Tariffs, and the Structure Beneath the System

Transcript

Radio Ranch with Roger Sayles REPLAY 082426 - The Sixteenth Amendment, Tariffs, and the Structure Beneath the System · Global Voice Radio Network's tracks

• 0:20
  Unknown: Forward moving and focused on freedom. You're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 0:30
  This mirror stream is brought to you in part by
• 0:34
  mymitoboost.com
• 0:36
  for support of the mitochondria like never before. A body trying to function without adequate mitochondrial
• 0:43
  function is kinda like running an engine without oil. It's not gonna work very well. It's also brought to you by snapfat.com.
• 0:51
  That is snap,phat,.com.
• 0:55
  It's also brought to you by the Prife International Terahertz frequency wand through iteraplanet.com.
• 1:03
  Thank you so much for joining us, and welcome to the program.
• 2:02
  Unknown: There you go. You hear or you call me back? There we go with the daily
• 2:06
  intro of Alvin Lee ten years after. And there we go intro. You, yeah, Chris.
• 2:11
  Yeah. It's the intro and
• 2:14
  it's been there ever since I started doing this stuff a years ago and it will continue because it's so prophetic. We're going to touch on some of that today, I think. As we do most days, certainly today. You got your phones in now, Chris. You changed over, didn't you? I do. I do. I do. The difference between you using the microphone on that cellphone and this gear you got on it right now is night and day.
• 2:40
  Unknown: Well, I'm glad to see an improvement. Me too.
• 2:43
  Unknown: And Shane joined us right while you were doing that too. So, he's there. I'm expecting probably
• 2:49
  Thomas
• 2:50
  Maddox join us who no telling. You can join us too if you want to.
• 2:55
  For those who may not know if there's any newer type people, you can call 404404.
• 3:01
  Get your pen, pencil, keyboard.
• 3:03
  (404) 448-1420.
• 3:09
  You call in, I see you call. If you're a new listener, it'll show up as a phone number.
• 3:15
  Then, I've gotta hang up and I've gotta turn around and reinstitute
• 3:19
  the call from this end like we just did with Shane and get you into the party crowd here.
• 3:26
  Supposedly, we've got a fix for that,
• 3:29
  but I just wasn't in a mood to deal with it today. I wanna get all these other situations I got juggled
• 3:35
  fixed and then we can start moving forward and improving things. Right now, for today, thanks to Bill Gates and the Microsoft bunch, that's the way we gotta do it, okay?
• 3:45
  So,
• 3:47
  Thursday,
• 3:49
  February
• 3:49
  21,
• 3:50
  almost end of the month. You know, February is a short month anyway. So,
• 3:55
  that is important.
• 3:58
  Roger Sales with you. Radio Ranch, name of the program, People's Patriot Network, name of the venue, and the platform.
• 4:06
  All that's out of the way. How are you guys doing today? Chris, you alright today?
• 4:11
  So far, so good. Okay. Shane, you alright today?
• 4:16
  Yes. I am. Did you go down and urinate on the hedges at Apple for me?
• 4:23
  Not yet. Okay. Well, I wish you'd put that all on it. Wish you'd morning. I wish you'd put that high on your priority list. Okay?
• 4:34
  Alright. There's a couple things I teased you guys yesterday a little bit with a teaser article that Thomas Maddox, one of our newer, you know, there's people coming to the information and the message and he's one of the newer and I'm folks, I'm sure most of you know who I'm talking about the guy from Texas
• 4:52
  who I did a a conference call or a presentation if you will to his
• 4:58
  I don't know, almost 40 people a couple weeks ago on a Thursday night, and so they're getting their arms around it and getting excited about all the potentials and what it offers anyone that wants to open up their mind, understand what's really happening,
• 5:13
  and go get their arms firmly around a good chunk of reality
• 5:18
  because that's what this is.
• 5:20
  Okay? Consciousness,
• 5:21
  you can call it that if you want.
• 5:24
  But
• 5:25
  anyway, Thomas and his bunch are relatively new.
• 5:29
  And that just gives us more eyes and ears out there. See? Now, people know
• 5:34
  a little bit better what it is and they see things and they can understand
• 5:38
  the significance or that it's significant and they forward em to me.
• 5:44
  And this was one of those instances, Thomas. I don't know where he found it. If he calls in, we'll find out. I gotta move over to this other computer here to deal with it.
• 5:52
  And
• 5:53
  I read the title of it yesterday, and I wanted to read the article. It's not too long, and and then we can discuss it and there may be some exciting
• 6:03
  remedy for us here, Chris because I'd like to see maybe if we can't get a hold of this attorney that's doing all this up in Washington State and let him know why he's never gonna have any success
• 6:15
  with his efforts,
• 6:16
  okay?
• 6:17
  Absolutely.
• 6:19
  Yeah. So,
• 6:20
  the name of the art interestingly
• 6:22
  enough,
• 6:23
  this comes from Radio
• 6:25
  New Zealand.
• 6:27
  So, this isn't The US article. This is a New Zealand based article here,
• 6:33
  alright? And of course, American Samoa is kind of down in that part of the world, alright?
• 6:39
  American Samoans title of the article, American Samoans discriminated.
• 6:43
  Oh, we can't have any discrimination, can we?
• 6:46
  Can we have any discrimination?
• 6:49
  Unknown: Absolutely
• 6:50
  not. Except in the two party system, there might be selective discrimination. Well, there's some discrimination here because the
• 6:58
  Unknown: the American Samoans are being discriminated against in the US military
• 7:03
  of all
• 7:04
  places.
• 7:07
  A US military,
• 7:08
  the US military has begun discriminating.
• 7:12
  Now, I'm looking. If somebody calls in, I'm not looking at the computer with all that information on it. I'm reading from an article, okay? So,
• 7:21
  if you wanna wait, if you're gonna call in, wait until we're finished here because I may not see you.
• 7:27
  The US military
• 7:28
  has begun discriminating
• 7:31
  against servicemen
• 7:32
  and women born in American Samoa,
• 7:36
  a US lawyer
• 7:38
  has said.
• 7:40
  Historically,
• 7:41
  American Samoan
• 7:43
  born
• 7:44
  US nationals
• 7:46
  and US citizens
• 7:49
  were treated equally
• 7:52
  by the military
• 7:54
  according to the Seattle based attorney, I'm going to butcher this name here,
• 8:00
  Liatalo
• 8:02
  Charles
• 8:03
  Allalima.
• 8:07
  Liatalo
• 8:08
  said
• 8:09
  the funny they should use his first name there. Liatalo said the US armed
• 8:15
  services
• 8:16
  are a primary source of employment
• 8:20
  and income for young people in American Samoa,
• 8:24
  which is known for having the highest enlistment rate
• 8:29
  of any state or territory.
• 8:32
  How about that?
• 8:33
  Okay. He said this is set to change,
• 8:37
  quoting the good attorney here.
• 8:40
  The Trump administration
• 8:43
  has just issued an order
• 8:45
  saying,
• 8:47
  Okay,
• 8:47
  all of you American Samoan born
• 8:50
  who are not US citizens,
• 8:54
  all of you American Samoans born who are not US citizens
• 8:59
  will lose your job
• 9:01
  as officers
• 9:03
  if you don't get US citizenship,
• 9:07
  which they then have to apply for
• 9:10
  and go through the process of
• 9:14
  naturalization.
• 9:18
  Naturalization
• 9:19
  takes around eight months
• 9:22
  and has a fee of $6.80
• 9:25
  US dollars.
• 9:27
  Applicants must pass English,
• 9:30
  US history,
• 9:33
  and government tests and take an oath of allegiance.
• 9:39
  American Samoans are born with their allegiance to The United States
• 9:44
  according to
• 9:47
  Let me repeat that. American Samoans are born with their allegiance to The United States according to Liatawa.
• 9:55
  Well, they don't have any allegiance
• 9:57
  to the federal United States or else they wouldn't make them go through this process of naturalization,
• 10:03
  would they?
• 10:05
  Unknown: They haven't signed up for slavery yet and cast their filthy oath. See, is this interesting or what? Okay.
• 10:13
  Unknown: The officers
• 10:15
  who don't naturalize
• 10:17
  would lose their commissions.
• 10:19
  I didn't even know they I thought they had a restriction on being officers in the first place is what we've heard previous to this. Evidently, some have snuck through that ceiling.
• 10:29
  Okay. The officers who don't naturalize
• 10:32
  would lose their commissions
• 10:34
  and others would miss out on the chance of promotion,
• 10:39
  he said.
• 10:40
  Liatalo
• 10:41
  Charles Alalima
• 10:43
  is one of heads up, Chris. Get those ears perked.
• 10:48
  Is one of a group of lawyers
• 10:54
  seeking
• 10:56
  to have those born in The US territory
• 11:01
  automatically
• 11:02
  recognized,
• 11:04
  let's say, as birthright
• 11:06
  citizens.
• 11:09
  Okay?
• 11:10
  His
• 11:11
  group
• 11:12
  of lawyers, Chris, I hope you caught that, His clients argue
• 11:18
  that their American
• 11:20
  Samoan
• 11:21
  birthright
• 11:23
  their American Samoan birthright, which in actuality is the old state citizen,
• 11:29
  k,
• 11:30
  entitles them to full citizenship under The US constitution.
• 11:36
  Well, they don't realize they've already got it.
• 11:43
  Unknown: That's very curious, Roger. If I might observe, one, a group could be the bar guild of that particular area or the Western District or the Pacific District.
• 11:55
  Unknown: Hold on. I caught I caught Daryl. I caught Daryl calling in here, so let me call him back. Okay. And I don't wanna get on into this article. Where'd you Well, you're calling him back. Well, I'm finding calling back?
• 12:09
  It's not it's while I'm finding him, for god's sakes.
• 12:13
  Unknown: Oh, okay. Well, while you're looking for Daryl on your menu, keyboard, memory, data bank,
• 12:20
  it the old noncitizen
• 12:22
  or you the nonresident alien
• 12:26
  foreign to corp US
• 12:28
  and those keeping because they hid it there in Samoa,
• 12:33
  their
• 12:34
  national
• 12:35
  birthright,
• 12:36
  birth state,
• 12:38
  capital c
• 12:40
  citizenship or
• 12:42
  non slave capacity,
• 12:45
  not subject to the power of the congress, the federal power of the tyrannical congress, and their capacity as a tyrant, dead spotter, dicketer across the world. Hey, Darryl. Just hold on. I got you in. Okay. Go ahead, Chris. I'm sorry.
• 13:01
  Well, just just that these attorneys are obviously aware of the particular significance of their separated styles. No. They are. Critical capacity. But you Their status. That's right. They're bringing it to the forefront. But you see, they don't understand why.
• 13:17
  Unknown: That's Well, I didn't say that. Yeah. I mean, you know, that's where oh, and we may have an opening here. I don't know. I'm always looking for openings and way to proffer the message. So, anyway, welcome, Darryl.
• 13:28
  Let me finish reading this. It's just pretty quick to the end here and we can discuss it because I think it's pretty interesting. We knew kind of about it already but this is interesting case coming from the most unlikely of sources, New Zealand.
• 13:43
  He his clients argued that
• 13:46
  let me go back up. As a group of lawyers, I went over that one. His clients argue
• 13:50
  that their American Samoan birthright
• 13:54
  entitles them to full citizenship
• 13:56
  under The US constitution.
• 13:59
  A clause
• 14:00
  of the constitution
• 14:01
  says all persons born on US soil are automatically
• 14:06
  entitled to citizenship.
• 14:08
  When The US acquired American Samoa in 1900,
• 14:14
  says Liataya,
• 14:15
  it became part of the nation.
• 14:19
  Liataya
• 14:20
  is working with the plaintiffs,
• 14:23
  John
• 14:24
  something else, Pale Tulule,
• 14:27
  and somebody else, Tulule,
• 14:29
  who have filed a motion with the Utah
• 14:32
  District Court
• 14:34
  against the US Justice Department.
• 14:38
  However,
• 14:39
  the department responded
• 14:41
  earlier this month saying
• 14:44
  only congress had the authority
• 14:46
  to define
• 14:48
  relationship between territories
• 14:50
  and the mainland.
• 14:51
  This
• 14:52
  attorney
• 14:53
  disagrees.
• 14:55
  There are two types of citizenship.
• 14:58
  Citizenship granted by congress
• 15:00
  and citizenship
• 15:02
  by birth on US soil,
• 15:04
  he said,
• 15:06
  if you're born on US soil,
• 15:09
  you are a US citizen
• 15:11
  as we do not have here to have an act of congress to make American Samoans born
• 15:19
  people of US citizens.
• 15:21
  So that's the end of the article. Pretty interesting. Hey, Daryl. How you been, man?
• 15:27
  Unknown: Oh,
• 15:29
  kinda crazy.
• 15:30
  But what
• 15:32
  nothing new there. Yeah.
• 15:35
  Yeah. I
• 15:38
  this is this is an interesting topic.
• 15:40
  You you made a comment earlier
• 15:43
  about the the military
• 15:45
  the Samoans serving in the American military.
• 15:49
  The the the key phrase there
• 15:52
  that they're having a problem with is
• 15:55
  the
• 15:57
  American Samoans
• 15:59
  cannot hold high office.
• 16:03
  Okay? So you won't find an American Samoan
• 16:06
  of the general officer group.
• 16:09
  General officers. Okay.
• 16:11
  Okay. Now they can they can be they can be vassal officers.
• 16:16
  They can't they can't they can't rise to
• 16:21
  a general officer, you know, wearing the stars. Right. Okay. Okay. So they can't rise above Kern? That there's
• 16:29
  yeah.
• 16:30
  There's a there's a distinction there. Sure there is. Of course, there is.
• 16:35
  I just wanted to I I just wanted to address that so there wasn't any contradictions.
• 16:40
  Okay.
• 16:41
  And what was the name of that article? Where can I find it? It's the the website is radionz.co.nz.
• 16:54
  Unknown: I'll send you the article.
• 16:56
  It's Okay.
• 16:57
  Radio
• 16:58
  NZ for New Zealand.
• 17:01
  Country.nz
• 17:03
  and
• 17:04
  I don't know
• 17:06
  June
• 17:08
  twenty eighth of June of last year.
• 17:11
  So, there, you know, the other thing that happened that raised my awareness of this in the first place was when these people were in this very same movement here obviously
• 17:22
  wanting to do a plebiscite.
• 17:24
  A plebiscite.
• 17:25
  This was like five, six years ago maybe.
• 17:28
  And a plebiscite
• 17:30
  is when
• 17:31
  a country
• 17:33
  votes together to make a change,
• 17:37
  and they were wanting to move over under this birthright citizenship.
• 17:42
  That case eventually went all the way up to the appellate level in DC.
• 17:47
  In the DC Circuit and they applied for certiorari
• 17:51
  but the Supreme Court can't hear that case.
• 17:54
  See, what these lawyers don't know is that they're the pivotal thing in the system. And if they give them birthright citizen,
• 18:02
  they don't have any place else to hide the old state citizen.
• 18:06
  That's the reason they're different.
• 18:09
  Unknown: Right.
• 18:10
  Well, yeah. So this this goes pretty deep is that
• 18:14
  what they're demonstrating
• 18:16
  and no new news here to anybody probably listening to this
• 18:20
  this narrowcast,
• 18:22
  but what they're what they're demonstrating
• 18:25
  is that they are consistently illiterate
• 18:28
  as to the nature of what
• 18:30
  the laws are and the terms and conditions.
• 18:33
  And so they're they're just manifesting their own illiteracy,
• 18:37
  and it spreads like a virus into the population.
• 18:44
  Unknown: Well, yeah. Because I mean, they're they're the authority figure. They're the attorneys. They're the ones that have been to law school. They're the ones that did the big heavy exam. They're the ones that have the little card. They should know, shouldn't they? They should.
• 19:00
  Unknown: No.
• 19:02
  No.
• 19:04
  They shouldn't. No. Wait.
• 19:07
  No. No.
• 19:08
  No. No. This is this is a this is a logical fallacy.
• 19:13
  And so,
• 19:15
  yeah,
• 19:16
  attorneys are attorneys. They they turn the words. That's what an attorney does. There's none of them that are
• 19:25
  by by any reasonable standards
• 19:28
  knowledgeable of real law
• 19:31
  and they are completely ignorant
• 19:34
  ignorance.
• 19:35
  They were of ignorance
• 19:36
  of history
• 19:38
  and and their own
• 19:40
  lawful and legal histories.
• 19:43
  They
• 19:44
  they're bar attorneys. They they take an oath to
• 19:48
  the the Crown
• 19:51
  Corporation out of the city of London. They're they
• 19:56
  they're just showing their own cognitive dissidence and and misunderstanding is all it is, and they
• 20:02
  will just perpetually
• 20:04
  continue to twist the words.
• 20:07
  This is this is potentially very,
• 20:10
  problematic
• 20:11
  for,
• 20:14
  the Department of Justice, Secretary State, and the Congress
• 20:19
  potentially
• 20:22
  in that,
• 20:25
  you know, if you can
• 20:26
  if if it can be legitimately
• 20:29
  documented,
• 20:30
  the the atonement, the attorney, twisting of the words in the national
• 20:35
  in the Nationality Act and
• 20:38
  and create
• 20:40
  a a reasonable pattern of logic
• 20:43
  that somebody like
• 20:47
  James Corbett if James Corbett got ahold of this,
• 20:51
  he he would cause some big problems. Okay. Yes.
• 20:54
  Unknown: And it gives us a well, see, it gives us an opening and it gives us a little different approach. It's why I am excited about it because now we know there's a, what do we know? We we know they don't understand what they're talking with and they're playing with the hydrogen bomb in their lap. Okay? They There's two types of citizenship. That's right. We know that they know there's two types of citizenships,
• 21:18
  and we know that they're a group of lawyers.
• 21:22
  So
• 21:23
  and we know that they are doing their suit through one of the districts of the Utah so we can track them. We could trace them down through the Utah District Court.
• 21:36
  Do you have a case site on that? Nope. It's not in this little article but I'm sure we can call up there. Let's see what it said. It said, it gave the district here in Utah.
• 21:45
  It is a filed emotion with the Utah District Court.
• 21:49
  It didn't say north, south, or whatever
• 21:52
  against the US Justice Department. It's probably in Salt Lake.
• 22:00
  Okay? May I bring a point forward? Yes, you can. Bob has joined us. I think Thomas joined us. Morning, Bob. Caught those two. Morning, Daryl. Out of the corner of my eye over there. Hey, Mark. And I want to thank Thomas publicly for finding this and sending this along and it it
• 22:16
  buttresses my point about the more new students and new blood we bring into this, things like this happen, see?
• 22:24
  I mean, Darryl found the other stuff on New Zealand on American Samoa. I started talking about it one day. Daryl gets on the internet, goes to the American Samoa newspaper,
• 22:34
  finds all kinds of interesting stuff.
• 22:37
  That was what? About two years ago, Daryl?
• 22:41
  Unknown: Yeah. I I don't know. It it it could have been that long ago.
• 22:44
  There's there's a fantastic
• 22:47
  amount of information about this
• 22:50
  that they constantly
• 22:52
  bury. It'll it'll raise its head up, and then it will go away.
• 22:57
  Like,
• 22:59
  you know, like the the the lawsuit
• 23:03
  that
• 23:03
  the Supreme Court wouldn't hear
• 23:05
  about
• 23:07
  the American Samoans
• 23:10
  acquiring their
• 23:12
  their benefits.
• 23:14
  And
• 23:15
  the Supreme Court wouldn't even hear it. Nope. And could. They can't hear it. Uh-uh.
• 23:20
  And
• 23:22
  so,
• 23:24
  I mean,
• 23:26
  I I am constantly reminded
• 23:28
  on a daily basis now
• 23:30
  even
• 23:31
  how entangled
• 23:33
  my understanding
• 23:35
  and how to separate
• 23:37
  the
• 23:39
  the wheat and the and and the tares.
• 23:41
  It
• 23:42
  Unknown: is just so Daryl. So been muddled and so complicated. You've got a real logical Bubble bubble oil in double. You know, logical processing accomplished
• 23:52
  mind. Okay? And you got turned onto this what? Four years ago, something like that? I never, he never talked to me. He went out, read the book, got bought the book, read the book, filed his affidavit,
• 24:04
  had done all that stuff before he ever even called into the program, okay?
• 24:09
  But
• 24:10
  you can't
• 24:11
  can can now that you've had this amount of time under your belt with this, and I know you spend a lot of time with it,
• 24:18
  can you believe what these people have accomplished here?
• 24:26
  Unknown: Yeah. I
• 24:27
  I actually would, on occasion
• 24:30
  and I I'm not saying this in a hyperbolic way. I I would actually experience a physical sensation
• 24:36
  of vertigo
• 24:38
  where my I had to sit down.
• 24:42
  I literally sit down and my head would spin.
• 24:46
  And I reckon that to being
• 24:50
  a spiritual manifestation
• 24:52
  of becoming
• 24:55
  aware of the depth of this and
• 24:58
  the actual trauma,
• 25:00
  the trauma that it it
• 25:02
  inflicts actually on us and those
• 25:06
  who
• 25:07
  actually try to peer into that abyss.
• 25:10
  You,
• 25:11
  at some point, probably experience some sort of
• 25:15
  mental and emotional and spiritual trauma
• 25:18
  to to realize how just how abused
• 25:21
  you have been and and those around you
• 25:25
  persist in being.
• 25:27
  By at what? And this trauma
• 25:29
  is is reason.
• 25:30
  This is a real thing. This is a very real thing.
• 25:33
  And and something that's not I don't believe appropriately
• 25:36
  or addressed
• 25:38
  given enough
• 25:41
  enough play
• 25:43
  is to have compassion and empathy for those people around us that
• 25:48
  are traumatized.
• 25:50
  We we are we are in a a federated world of
• 25:56
  induced trauma.
• 25:57
  It's
• 25:59
  a it's a macro scale of
• 26:03
  mental
• 26:04
  mental abuse, spiritual abuse on this on a MK Ultra scale.
• 26:09
  Yeah.
• 26:11
  And
• 26:12
  so it it it's painful,
• 26:15
  and you go through withdrawal symptoms.
• 26:18
  And so I just wanna
• 26:20
  share that with people is that just when you think you've sort of figured it out,
• 26:24
  take a deep breath and relax because you haven't. For those
• 26:30
  Unknown: of you who are are out there talking to people about this,
• 26:34
  well, the lesson that I've learned over a lot of networking years and especially this kind of a networking thing here
• 26:42
  is that you can't want something worse for someone
• 26:46
  than they want it for themselves.
• 26:48
  And
• 26:49
  see Thomas, I was having a conversation briefly with Thomas before the program. He said, I just want to free everybody. You ain't going to free everybody.
• 26:58
  Everybody don't want to be free.
• 27:00
  That's the hard lesson I've had to learn, Thomas
• 27:03
  and it's a hard lesson because you've want to project
• 27:07
  your fire, freedom in your heart into everybody and I just don't believe everybody's
• 27:13
  got it and I don't believe everybody's supposed to get this message and that
• 27:17
  saves me a lot of pain
• 27:19
  and it adds to society
• 27:22
  for me. So just going in is because you're so exuberant, and I see it. I understand it. I've been there. I'm telling you what I've learned. Okay?
• 27:33
  Unknown: Well, when I say that, I don't I don't actually mean everybody.
• 27:38
  You know? Yeah. I I know people
• 27:41
  are not going to do anything.
• 27:43
  I I've learned that. Yeah. And and I've moved on.
• 27:47
  And they'll ridicule and they'll
• 27:49
  Yeah. Let me know how that works out. I know,
• 27:53
  they're so happy with their 40
• 27:56
  to 60%
• 27:57
  Unknown: tax that they're paying that they're not gonna listen to a darn thing I say. Yeah. They're just happy to be here. Well, you know, it's interesting. I had a guy call in. He's only called in once. It's a couple of weeks ago and he's he had a terrible connection. He calls in. He said, remember him, Chris? I think you were on with me and he said, I said, what's your name? And he said, freedom,
• 28:17
  d u m b.
• 28:19
  You remember that guy?
• 28:21
  Unknown: And I do.
• 28:23
  Unknown: And he said, well, yeah, Roger. I heard John Joyce years ago. I bought your book. And I said, well, I'm just gonna sit back and see how Roger does.
• 28:32
  And that's like seven years later, and he's about ready to file his affidavit.
• 28:40
  Hey, Roger. Yeah. Hey, Bob. How are doing today, man?
• 28:45
  Unknown: Oh, not too bad. I'm gonna get real noisy here running some equipment, but I wanted to bring something up in in relation to citizenship, and that is this deal with the young lady from
• 28:55
  Unknown: Weather
• 28:55
  there you got a business call, Bob. You got a previous to your business? That's That's
• 29:01
  Unknown: that's not not me this time. Okay. Okay. I can hear it too.
• 29:05
  At any rate,
• 29:07
  the idea that
• 29:09
  Pompeo has said that she ain't coming back. She's not a US citizen. She has no passport,
• 29:15
  etcetera, etcetera.
• 29:17
  But yet the
• 29:19
  spokesman for the family, apparently, father was a diplomat.
• 29:24
  And, of course,
• 29:26
  in that case, they wouldn't have
• 29:28
  she wouldn't have citizenship
• 29:30
  because he would have been foreign. You know, he would have been in residence.
• 29:35
  But the
• 29:36
  the spokesman for the the family saying, no. Actually, he had he was not a diplomat by the time she was born. So, you know, they're reading too much into that. She does have a passport. She does have this, that, and the other. She is a US citizen.
• 29:50
  Unknown: So Is that Omar? How
• 29:52
  Unknown: it ends up, but the thing I like is it's going to bring all of this out in public a little more
• 29:59
  in the open
• 30:00
  and bring it up for discussion.
• 30:03
  Unknown: Bob, well, I'm not familiar with this case you're talking about.
• 30:08
  Unknown: Oh, she's an ISIS bride. She got radicalized online. Is apparently of Middle Eastern descent.
• 30:15
  They've just given her name and but she was born here in The US to a diplomat or a former diplomat, whichever,
• 30:24
  at the time of her birth. And she got radicalized,
• 30:26
  and she went over, and she had a baby with these guys. And now she's pleading to come back because life is hell over there.
• 30:32
  And president Trump and Pompeo are saying,
• 30:36
  you know, go away from us. We never knew you. Oh, man. I let's Not a dehawed game.
• 30:41
  Unknown: Let's let's interesting to see how it all turns out. Well yeah. And I've been wondering where Trump's birthright citizenship crusade went
• 30:49
  because that falls right into this. And the important point on this case, and I haven't even really heard about this,
• 30:57
  is what what she Alabama
• 31:00
  Unknown: shihati girl, you'll get just dozens of hits. Okay. Well, I'll try and remember that but
• 31:06
  Unknown: my my feeling initially
• 31:09
  is that would hinge on whether her father was still in diplomatic service when she was born. That would be a real important point
• 31:17
  because under, I believe, those laws, it exempts
• 31:22
  diplomats in foreign service from
• 31:25
  citizenship.
• 31:27
  Unknown: This is something I was just looking at. Does
• 31:30
  Unknown: does the state department have jurisdiction to
• 31:33
  if somebody
• 31:35
  mean, she was out there. She was on public forums. She was in Twitter and, you know, on the Internet talking deaf to Americans.
• 31:43
  So that's treason.
• 31:45
  So
• 31:46
  do they I think that they would have the power to rescind her passport regardless. Yeah. I would think so.
• 31:53
  Unknown: But that's an interesting thing.
• 31:55
  If get going in here. Was he still here? Bob and After his diplomatic
• 32:00
  mission ended,
• 32:02
  when she was born, was he still here under some type of how was he still here?
• 32:09
  Unknown: And that's what I don't know. This is all in the genesis, you might say, and it's just gonna be really fun to watch it unfold because if nothing else, it's gonna get this information out in the public eye.
• 32:21
  Unknown: Well, I I really think we got I have a little bit. Yeah. Hold Chris, I'd like to see maybe, I like you got a lot of spare time. I'd like to see somebody. Somebody could get a hold
• 32:32
  of the district court in Utah
• 32:35
  and see if we can find out who these people are and get contact
• 32:39
  with them. That that would seemingly be
• 32:42
  a nice step to take. So, anyway, there's just things that are on my I've got a right. They put there. Okay, Bob. I'll bless you. Thanks for checking in, man.
• 32:51
  Thomas, you joined us. We got Shane on.
• 32:55
  Chris joined us. I think Daryl's still there. Is that our round table?
• 33:00
  Yeah.
• 33:01
  Okay. Chris,
• 33:03
  you were trying to say something. I kept interrupting you. What what do you have on your mind?
• 33:08
  Unknown: Well, you know, I had just recently done quite a bit of diligent research into
• 33:13
  the special diplomatic ambassador
• 33:16
  and
• 33:17
  consular immunity
• 33:18
  aspects
• 33:20
  from that guidebook. I think I sent a copy of it to several of you on police
• 33:25
  officers or
• 33:27
  government agents in relations with these different capacities of special
• 33:32
  privileged diplomatic immunity.
• 33:34
  And
• 33:35
  this is kind of what you're they're dancing on the head of a pin about with this. Now there was Jihad Jain that was one of the cases they had. This one here appears to be a different one that Bob's talking about,
• 33:48
  but it's pretty close to me up here. That's either the fifth or the eighth circuit up in Utah. I think it's the fifth, but I'm not positive. Could be the eighth. No. No. No. This is Utah district district courts are not
• 34:00
  Unknown: the that's probably in the tenth. It's in the tenth circuit because anytime John and Glenn had to appeal anything, it went to the tenth circuit in Denver.
• 34:09
  So, it's tenth circuit but it's a district court and and I would guess it's in Salt Lake. That's first place I'd check.
• 34:16
  Unknown: Probably so. It's the capital city.
• 34:19
  Unknown: So,
• 34:20
  but anyway, it may be a lead for us to follow-up on if we could get a hold of these lawyers and say, hey, let me show you what's really going on here. You wanna know why there's two citizenships?
• 34:30
  Because one of em is a slave and that's the one you wanna be
• 34:34
  because it's got goodies. It's
• 34:37
  Unknown: got goodies. Well, that's the that's
• 34:40
  yeah. That US citizen is a severely
• 34:43
  diminished aspect because it's really reduced you to property,
• 34:47
  chattel,
• 34:47
  or cattle, a thing that is a race ident,
• 34:51
  an individual aisle
• 34:53
  who is subject
• 34:55
  to the power of congress pursuant to the language in the so called fourteenth red amendment,
• 35:00
  and that
• 35:01
  conscriptive nature of that plenary powers of congress
• 35:05
  in the status of the potentates and dictators and despots of the world where they have abject
• 35:13
  subjugation of their classes of slave classes,
• 35:16
  not to be confused with the bourgeoisie
• 35:19
  Unknown: elite. Let's not have any confusion with the bourgeoisie
• 35:23
  going on.
• 35:25
  So what I'll do is I'll post that. I'm just gonna put that up. I'll I just posted yesterday's
• 35:32
  show on cast boxes of first chance I've had to get the darn thing uploaded where it would upload because of all these problems I'm having. So, bear with me through this little
• 35:43
  this little span
• 35:45
  of aggravation.
• 35:47
  Unknown: I
• 35:48
  was just reading through some FB so called FBI because it's actually the impostor FBI agent Kenneth Meade, the number 5831,
• 35:58
  Michael Kenneth Meade in particular,
• 36:01
  who started this Protectual Joint Terrorism Task Force investigation
• 36:05
  of these alleged
• 36:07
  insanely
• 36:08
  sovereign citizens
• 36:10
  and converting my wife to a witness against me and others to give as a confidential informant. Let me tell you what. And it's very interesting to read their language. There's a case. It's either Neil versus US or US versus Neil
• 36:25
  from the Supreme Court that says that you cannot use so called sovereign citizen beliefs
• 36:31
  as evidence to
• 36:33
  question
• 36:34
  competency.
• 36:35
  Although, it might question
• 36:38
  your knowledge base and your lack of actual
• 36:42
  true knowledge very clearly. Don't want Because if you're declaring to be something it can't possibly be because it's oxymoronic,
• 36:49
  you might be adopting an insane position that could
• 36:53
  Unknown: endanger you. Don't wanna be any sovereign citizen.
• 36:57
  Don't wanna root canal. Don't want malaria or the plague.
• 37:01
  Don't want any of those things.
• 37:04
  If anybody asks you and that they'll bait you.
• 37:08
  Thomas, you should you should call, you should really school your bunch up on this. Is they'll bait you if with
• 37:16
  that question, are you a sovereign citizen? Are you claiming to be a sovereign citizen? And that throws you into that whole genre, FBI,
• 37:23
  special units, and visits, and all that You do not wanna be a sovereign citizen and if anybody asks any anybody that question, you tell em emphatically no.
• 37:34
  Unknown: Absolutely
• 37:35
  not.
• 37:37
  Unknown: Hey, I don't even know what that means. So, let's move on. Yep. So, Do you hear? Do you know when it comes to parsing,
• 37:44
  parsing these words is the is the difference between freedom and slavery. We're gonna get into taxes here in a minute. There's a saying I ran across in my reading that the difference between
• 37:57
  tax evasion
• 37:59
  and tax avoidance
• 38:01
  is a cell wall.
• 38:08
  Unknown: Let me say that again. Run ahead by me. Better read that one again. Difference between tax
• 38:15
  Unknown: evasion
• 38:17
  and
• 38:18
  tax
• 38:19
  avoidance
• 38:20
  is a cell wall.
• 38:25
  Unknown: I heard it was 50. Better than anything.
• 38:28
  Unknown: Me say
• 38:30
  it another way.
• 38:33
  Tax evasion
• 38:34
  is illegal.
• 38:36
  Tax avoidance
• 38:38
  is your duty.
• 38:43
  Unknown: Well, that's very curious,
• 38:45
  Roger, because you're exactly talking about the equivocation,
• 38:49
  the duplicity of meanings,
• 38:51
  the dualistic
• 38:52
  sword,
• 38:53
  Satan's word,
• 38:55
  where they try to use their broad general terms with specificity to destroy you with your own words.
• 39:03
  And particularly the word term
• 39:05
  that you're using here
• 39:07
  avoid or evade versus
• 39:09
  evasion versus avoidance,
• 39:11
  dutiful avoidance where we all have the duty
• 39:15
  and the right
• 39:16
  to not pay taxes that we're not circumscript to pay and not to deem ourselves a taxpayer.
• 39:23
  But they always wanna put that label on you so they can claim that you're evading. Presumption. Kinda like the claim that they that I invaded the traffic device
• 39:31
  when I was not evading the traffic device. I pulled in to get a darn bottle of water for Christ's sake. But you It's just that I've discovered something. It changed my mind. Do you see what they're doing when they do that, Chris? They're setting the presumption.
• 39:44
  Yes.
• 39:45
  In bidding intents.
• 39:47
  Unknown: K.
• 39:48
  So,
• 39:49
  anyway, the American Samoa thing's interesting. I I appreciate it, Thomas. You finding that and sending it along. It's it's gives us maybe a track to run on,
• 39:58
  and and it shows us that these subjects, even though they're not understood, are being brought to the surface because of their inconsistency
• 40:06
  and their incongruity.
• 40:08
  K?
• 40:10
  Now,
• 40:11
  this I caught the other day, and some of you probably saw this over on Zero Hedge. Daryl, you follow this stuff pretty close. Did you see this article, I think it was over the weekend,
• 40:21
  called The History of the American Income Tax?
• 40:27
  Daryl may not be with us. He may be over there running his lathe.
• 40:30
  Some of you may have you left. Yeah. It it Yeah. I'm I'm there. Okay.
• 40:35
  Did you see this article on zero hedge on the weekend, the history of American income tax?
• 40:43
  No. I I I somehow missed it. Okay. Well, I'm let me add. I'm put this article, a link to this, and an artic link to the other one on today's cast box description when I load it today.
• 40:54
  So, but in reading it, there
• 40:57
  were some history here that I'd never been exposed to. I dare say probably, if I hadn't been exposed to it, probably most of you haven't either, okay? And so I wanted to particularly cover this article this week and go into it. It's got some nice lessons for it for us. Daryl, did you have something to add?
• 41:19
  Unknown: Well, you you were bringing up taxes. I just I just wanted to mention that
• 41:25
  the the only thing that you can tax is what they own.
• 41:30
  If you're being taxed on something, it's because they own it by some means.
• 41:34
  Unknown: Okay. I'll buy that. That's a big picture thought, but if
• 41:41
  Well
• 41:42
  and and we know we we know that you don't have to be owned if you don't want to. More people will learn that in the future. I'm gonna start this from read it from the top
• 41:51
  so that you'll get the context of it. Okay? The 70%
• 41:55
  income tax scheme of Republican
• 41:58
  Ocasio Cortez
• 42:00
  and the closely related wealth tax proposal
• 42:03
  of Senator Elizabeth Warren
• 42:06
  should take federal taxation into historically unprecedented
• 42:10
  territory.
• 42:11
  You would not know that through listening to the academic
• 42:16
  supporters
• 42:17
  of this newly fashionable
• 42:19
  cause of progressive taxation,
• 42:22
  to advocates of these policies,
• 42:24
  such as economist
• 42:25
  Thomas
• 42:27
  Pickety, we're gonna reference him through the rest of the article,
• 42:30
  Thomas Pickety, he's an economist,
• 42:32
  Emmanuel Saez,
• 42:34
  and Gabriel Zuckman,
• 42:36
  they simply seek to restore an allegedly lost
• 42:39
  progressive legacy of high income taxation
• 42:43
  from the early and the middle
• 42:45
  twentieth century.
• 42:47
  Piketty made his argument in the Boston Globe earlier this week suggesting that
• 42:53
  Cortez
• 42:54
  and Warren's proposals
• 42:56
  simply correct a, quote, unquote, historical amnesia
• 43:00
  that's been in place since 1980
• 43:03
  when a secession of Republican presidents
• 43:06
  allegedly,
• 43:06
  quote, turned their backs
• 43:08
  on the true origins
• 43:10
  of the income tax.
• 43:12
  Part of Piketty's narrative
• 43:15
  rests on misleading
• 43:16
  statistics.
• 43:18
  Imagine that.
• 43:19
  He points to the high statutory tax rates of the mid twentieth century,
• 43:25
  81%
• 43:28
  on the top income bracket between 1930 and 1980,
• 43:32
  fifty years. Yet, as we've discussed before,
• 43:35
  nobody actually paid those rates or anywhere close to them. The effective tax
• 43:41
  rate, that is the portion of the total income earnings that individuals
• 43:46
  actually pay to the government,
• 43:48
  was much lower in this same period.
• 43:52
  During the early 1960s
• 43:54
  as a benchmark,
• 43:55
  it hovered at just about 40%
• 43:58
  for 1,000,000
• 43:59
  earners,
• 44:01
  $1,000,000
• 44:02
  earners,
• 44:03
  despite
• 44:04
  an average statutory rate
• 44:07
  absent deductions
• 44:08
  of nearly twice that, and a top marginal rate in excess of 90%.
• 44:14
  We'll get to what I want to get to here in a second, but I want you to get the flavor of what's going on here.
• 44:21
  Piketty's history is faulty on another count. According to his telling,
• 44:26
  income taxation itself
• 44:28
  was the original answer to spiraling
• 44:31
  inequity
• 44:33
  in the nineteenth
• 44:35
  century,
• 44:35
  and here's a quote here,
• 44:38
  Between 1880
• 44:39
  and 1910,
• 44:41
  1880
• 44:42
  to 1910,
• 44:44
  while the concentration
• 44:45
  of industrial and financial wealth
• 44:48
  was gaining momentum in The US,
• 44:50
  and the country was threatening to become almost
• 44:54
  as unequal as old Europe,
• 44:56
  a powerful political movement
• 44:59
  in favor of an improved distribution of wealth
• 45:03
  was developing.
• 45:05
  This led to the creation of a federal income tax on income in 1913
• 45:13
  and on
• 45:15
  inheritances
• 45:16
  in 1916.
• 45:18
  Now we get into the meat of this stuff. Even Piketty's basic historical narrative, however, does not hold up to the scrutiny.
• 45:26
  So the next part here is called the forgotten origins of the income tax, and this is what I had never seen before, okay?
• 45:34
  The federal income tax came into being after the ratification of the sixteenth amendment in 1913,
• 45:41
  but its purpose
• 45:42
  had little to do with correcting
• 45:45
  income
• 45:46
  inequality.
• 45:48
  Rather, the income tax's origins trace to an obscure debate
• 45:53
  over another issue
• 45:55
  that's seen a resurgence of attention
• 45:58
  in recent years,
• 46:01
  the protective tariff.
• 46:04
  The story of the sixteenth amendment
• 46:06
  begins in the early nineteen oh nine after
• 46:10
  president William Howard Taft
• 46:12
  called upon congress
• 46:14
  to revise
• 46:16
  existing tariff schedule
• 46:18
  of The United States.
• 46:20
  Tariffs at the time were technically a revenue generator.
• 46:24
  Before the income tax,
• 46:27
  import taxes
• 46:28
  actually provided the largest share of the federal government's revenue stream.
• 46:34
  Because of the complexities
• 46:36
  of international
• 46:37
  trade,
• 46:38
  however,
• 46:39
  a revenue tariff
• 46:41
  also provided ample opportunity
• 46:44
  to extend heavy protectionism
• 46:47
  to politically
• 46:48
  connected industries
• 46:50
  by selectively
• 46:52
  imposing high rates
• 46:54
  on their foreign competitors.
• 46:57
  Tariff scheduled
• 46:58
  revisions
• 46:59
  in the nineteenth century
• 47:01
  accordingly
• 47:02
  became a political free for all of bribes,
• 47:07
  backroom deals,
• 47:08
  and favor
• 47:09
  trading.
• 47:12
  This particular approach to lawmaking
• 47:16
  heavily advantaged the philosophy
• 47:18
  of protectionism,
• 47:20
  both by offering it political cover
• 47:23
  under the auspices of raising revenue
• 47:27
  and by advantaging legislative
• 47:30
  log rolling.
• 47:31
  Log rolling is a practice of bundling hundreds
• 47:34
  or even thousands
• 47:36
  of political favors together in the same bill
• 47:40
  in order to secure enough support to pass congress.
• 47:44
  That's what law I've never heard that before, log rolling.
• 47:47
  They still do it today.
• 47:48
  As a result,
• 47:50
  the period between the civil war and the early 1900s
• 47:54
  produced a nearly uninterrupted
• 47:58
  succession
• 47:59
  of highly
• 48:00
  protective
• 48:01
  revenue
• 48:02
  tariffs.
• 48:05
  When President Taft issued the call in 1909,
• 48:09
  he actually hinted
• 48:11
  at a desire to see the existing tariff rates reduced
• 48:16
  and the schedule revised
• 48:18
  to improve its stated revenue objectives.
• 48:22
  In the hands of Congress, however, the tariff schedule revision
• 48:27
  became a personal project of
• 48:30
  here's a drum roll
• 48:32
  a personal project of
• 48:35
  Senator
• 48:36
  Nelson
• 48:37
  Aldrich
• 48:38
  of Rhode Island,
• 48:40
  an arch protectionist
• 48:42
  and a master of legislative procedure.
• 48:46
  Under his watchful eye,
• 48:48
  the Payne Aldrich tariff bill bearing his name
• 48:52
  quickly
• 48:52
  devolved into an even more protectionist
• 48:56
  rate schedule than the older statute.
• 48:59
  It was replacing.
• 49:00
  So,
• 49:02
  Aldrich comes in. Remember who Aldrich was.
• 49:05
  You like
• 49:07
  the Rockefeller
• 49:08
  kid's middle name was Aldrich. He married his into the Rockefellers.
• 49:15
  Aldrich's
• 49:16
  scheming presented a political conundrum for the free traders,
• 49:21
  most of them clustered in the Senate's Democratic
• 49:24
  minority.
• 49:25
  Free trade
• 49:27
  had lost almost every major tariff fight in the previous five decades.
• 49:33
  Even when the Democrats enjoyed a congressional majority and the White House in 1894,
• 49:40
  their attempt to lower the tariff schedules rates across the board quickly
• 49:45
  succumbed to the same forces of log rolling
• 49:49
  and favor trading.
• 49:51
  Cronyism
• 49:52
  whittled away most of the proposed cuts in the legislative process,
• 49:57
  as even normally free trade Democrats
• 50:01
  discovered they could use the tariff to secure favors for their home districts.
• 50:07
  By 1909,
• 50:08
  battling Aldrich directly
• 50:10
  over tariffs
• 50:12
  meant
• 50:13
  certain failure.
• 50:16
  Shortly after Aldrich
• 50:18
  brought his bill to the Senate floor in 1900
• 50:22
  Senator Joseph Weldon
• 50:24
  Bailey of Texas
• 50:26
  decided on a bold
• 50:28
  alternative
• 50:29
  strategy. This is one of your Texans there, Thomas,
• 50:31
  who said 1909,
• 50:33
  rather than attack the tariff head on and ensuring
• 50:37
  the defeat,
• 50:38
  Bailey executed
• 50:40
  a flanking move to try and drain the Payne Aldrich bill of its political support.
• 50:47
  He proposed a parallel federal income tax
• 50:51
  from Texas, Thomas,
• 50:53
  proposed a federal income tax aiming to partially swap
• 50:57
  this new source of tax intake for the revenue stream that came from the tariff assessments.
• 51:04
  If tariffs Sounds like controlled opposition. Yeah, in this well, this is how they do stuff. This is why I want to read it, okay? If tariffs were no longer the primary source of federal tax revenue,
• 51:16
  Bailey
• 51:17
  resounded,
• 51:18
  the protectionist would lose that cover from the tariff schedule
• 51:22
  provided for higher discriminatory
• 51:24
  rates
• 51:25
  against foreign competitor industries.
• 51:28
  Bailey's plan still faced substantial
• 51:31
  obstacles.
• 51:32
  For one,
• 51:34
  his income tax bill would face an almost certain Supreme Court challenge
• 51:38
  if it ever became law.
• 51:40
  In 1895
• 51:41
  a case, and it's referring to that case Pollock,
• 51:44
  think it's called Pollock,
• 51:46
  an 1895
• 51:47
  case
• 51:48
  struck down the core provision
• 51:50
  from the previous iteration of the income tax as being subject to the constitution's
• 51:55
  restrictions
• 51:57
  on direct taxation.
• 51:58
  Bailey knew this,
• 52:00
  however, and not fully intended to force a new court ruling with the belief that a carefully worded bill could reverse an earlier five to four court decision.
• 52:12
  Now, the next section here is the sausage being made.
• 52:16
  We referred to that yesterday, Chris.
• 52:19
  The sausage
• 52:20
  being made.
• 52:21
  Second,
• 52:22
  hello. Hello. Second, the Democrats were still in the minority with only 32 of 92 senate seats.
• 52:29
  In order for Bailey's plan to work, they would need to peel away approximately 15 Republicans
• 52:35
  to back the income tax.
• 52:37
  This task was not unfeasible.
• 52:41
  The Republican ranks included 10 to 12 progressive insurgents
• 52:45
  who favored more expansive taxation
• 52:48
  to finance other social aims
• 52:50
  and who signaled an intent in supporting the income tax.
• 52:55
  A handful of other Republicans
• 52:57
  was growing lukewarm on the party's protectionist line,
• 53:01
  which primarily benefited industrial states in the Northeast
• 53:05
  at the expense of the agriculturally
• 53:07
  exporting states in the West.
• 53:10
  By early May of nineteen oh nine,
• 53:13
  Aldrich publicly admitted that Bailey might have the votes to pull off the proposed income tax for tariff revenue swap
• 53:21
  and temporarily
• 53:22
  suspended
• 53:24
  the consideration
• 53:26
  of the tariff
• 53:27
  bill on the Senate floor
• 53:29
  to buy himself more time to regroup.
• 53:32
  So there was dissension
• 53:34
  in the Republican side, and this guy from Texas had won a number of people to make Aldrich nervous.
• 53:41
  The parliamentary
• 53:42
  maneuver triggered almost two months of complex legislative jockeying
• 53:47
  as Aldrich and Bailey
• 53:49
  courted votes from senators on
• 53:59
  forced the withdrawal ninth of Bailey's measure
• 54:02
  by engineering a surprise vote on a parliamentary
• 54:06
  procedure
• 54:07
  when Bailey was absent from the floor.
• 54:13
  The Payne Aldrich tariff became law a few weeks later,
• 54:18
  and true to expectations
• 54:20
  imposed
• 54:21
  overtly protectionist
• 54:22
  rates
• 54:23
  upon the competitors of thousands of politically connected
• 54:27
  manufacturing
• 54:28
  firms.
• 54:30
  Aldrich
• 54:31
  paid a steep price to preserve his tariff though.
• 54:35
  In order to peel away
• 54:37
  votes away from Bailey's
• 54:39
  competing income tax bill,
• 54:41
  he had to offer a consolation prize.
• 54:45
  In exchange for other senators abandoning the Bailey Plan,
• 54:49
  he would permit a constitutional
• 54:51
  amendment
• 54:52
  to come to the floor
• 54:55
  in its place,
• 54:57
  thereby
• 54:58
  resolving
• 54:59
  the obstacles
• 55:00
  to income taxation
• 55:03
  caused by the 1896
• 55:05
  Supreme Court Pollock ruling and avoiding the need for another federal court challenge
• 55:12
  on the subject.
• 55:14
  There's a little bit more here.
• 55:16
  For these obscure origins of the turn of the century tariff policies
• 55:21
  or it says from, from these obscure origins.
• 55:25
  In the turn of the century tariff policies,
• 55:28
  the sixteenth amendment
• 55:30
  was born.
• 55:32
  Is that interesting?
• 55:35
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. I I actually remember reading that now.
• 55:39
  Yeah. I I read that.
• 55:42
  I read that over the weekend.
• 55:44
  It it actually fits in a timeline of a particular area I'm studying right now.
• 55:49
  And so,
• 55:51
  basically, what Aldrich was able to pull off was
• 55:54
  he he employed a problem reaction solution on his
• 55:59
  fellow senators in the congress. Yep.
• 56:02
  And
• 56:03
  and
• 56:04
  it was it was definitely a bait and switch. It's it's much like the Federal Reserve Act, which was sponsored by
• 56:12
  the the Republicans.
• 56:14
  Oh, yeah. This guy named Aldrich.
• 56:16
  And it was soundly rejected
• 56:19
  by
• 56:20
  the congress and
• 56:21
  people.
• 56:23
  And then after
• 56:25
  all the shenanigans that you just described
• 56:28
  was complete,
• 56:29
  this is the reason why Taft had to be defeated
• 56:32
  is because he wasn't gonna go along with their plan,
• 56:36
  and he was very popular.
• 56:38
  So they they had to they had to,
• 56:41
  bring Woodrow Wilson in.
• 56:43
  And the only way they could do that was with,
• 56:46
  you know, pulling part of the vote away using Teddy Roosevelt. Right. Teddy Teddy Roosevelt with the Bull Moose Party, which I called the BS party. Right. And
• 56:58
  and so they get Wilson in,
• 57:00
  and then
• 57:01
  he will go ahead and sign off
• 57:05
  on the
• 57:06
  on this tax
• 57:08
  and
• 57:08
  on the Federal Reserve Act. So
• 57:11
  there was a there was a very long plan. Now, of course, the Democrats the Democrats brought the Federal Reserve Act and
• 57:20
  the tax, the the income tax, and
• 57:26
  that was just another bait and switch. This
• 57:29
  Unknown: is exactly what Aldrich wanted all along. Sure. And that's just the the reason I wanted to go into this, and I'm glad you added all that, Darryl, is to show you the MO of these guys. Because listen, what do you think they're doing up there with Trump today with all these tariffs? He's got a little bit better ground on because they've adjusted it over the last twenty years, exported all our industries to these cheap labor countries and then bringing that stuff back in with no taxation. So, I understand what his protectionist stance and I think he's doing the good thing, but you can see how they use all this. Daryl, did you hear that story I covered yesterday about Venezuela?
• 58:07
  No. I I actually didn't. The the real deal in Venice the real deal in Venezuela.
• 58:13
  And the reason I store I covered this because that what's going on down there was set up, and these guys are using this same kind of crap right here. And the way they did it what the big deal of Venezuela is not the big prize.
• 58:27
  Venezuela's
• 58:28
  oil is very dirty, it's high sulfur content.
• 58:31
  However,
• 58:32
  there's an area of land next door between Guyana
• 58:36
  and Brazil
• 58:38
  and Venezuela,
• 58:40
  where they found what they think might be the largest pool of clean, sweet crude in the world.
• 58:45
  It's been under dispute for decades.
• 58:48
  That's what Venezuela's
• 58:50
  about.
• 58:50
  Okay? And the way they say plant drilling? Yes. The way they set Venezuela up for this is was I I I want to grab em and slap em. I heard the Venezuelan
• 59:02
  secretary of state, it being interviewed on a true honest video interview and he laid the whole story out and what they did
• 59:11
  was they got this little puppet guy, Guyana, whatever his name is and they got him
• 59:16
  somewhat. Guillo.
• 59:19
  Got him somewhat established down there and then they call for new elections in the country.
• 59:24
  There's a couple of districts in Venezuela
• 59:27
  that haven't participated or whatever and I think that's where this guy's attached to those that bunch and so they go to Uruguay.
• 59:35
  They go, yes. They go to Uruguay and Uruguay with the other states down here set up a neutral
• 59:42
  meeting in in the Dominican Republic and even the former king of Spain came over and sat at it. They had the meetings. They came to the agreement on the new elections.
• 59:53
  They signed all the documents.
• 59:55
  Everybody went out to start getting ready for what they'd agreed on, and at the last minute, this guy, this US puppet backed out.
• 1:00:03
  But everything had been agreed on, and it was all set up. So they went ahead and held the elections,
• 1:00:09
  and that's the grounds they're using to say the elections that got Maduro elected
• 1:00:15
  were illegitimate.
• 1:00:16
  They set the whole thing up, and that's what I covered yesterday. The same kind of crap here. See?
• 1:00:24
  Unknown: Alright. Well, listen. I I,
• 1:00:26
  yeah. That that makes all perfect sense there. I I wanna go back. I mean, that that's a great example. I I I just wanna return back to where you had started us out at, Roger,
• 1:00:37
  because there's more. Yes. Okay. Good. Alright.
• 1:00:40
  And and
• 1:00:42
  let's let's unwind this even farther. It's like, we were saying at the beginning of the show that but wait. There's more. Okay? So
• 1:00:50
  the the Federal Reserve Act, the,
• 1:00:53
  sixteenth amendment.
• 1:00:55
  Okay. Let's stop there for a second.
• 1:00:57
  We know who the basic players are, so let's unwind this a little bit. What did this accomplish? Well, a lot of things. Well, here's one that's kind of off the radar.
• 1:01:07
  One of the really, really, really big things it did was it shifted
• 1:01:12
  federal income,
• 1:01:14
  hypothetically,
• 1:01:16
  federal income from a tariff
• 1:01:20
  based
• 1:01:21
  to,
• 1:01:23
  at this point, being subsidized
• 1:01:24
  by a direct tax.
• 1:01:28
  Over time,
• 1:01:30
  they
• 1:01:34
  aggregated more and more people into the status of US citizen
• 1:01:39
  and attached this
• 1:01:40
  and encumbered them with this status,
• 1:01:43
  which then
• 1:01:46
  compounded
• 1:01:48
  their income by,
• 1:01:51
  you know, the citizens. So so let me reiterate that. What happened was a switch in the federal government's income
• 1:01:58
  from tariff based
• 1:02:00
  to
• 1:02:01
  direct tax.
• 1:02:04
  So what you did is at that point, you've had a change.
• 1:02:09
  The argument can be made, and I am making the argument, that sovereignty
• 1:02:13
  and and the perspective of what
• 1:02:16
  what
• 1:02:17
  consists of sovereignty
• 1:02:19
  changed right there. Another
• 1:02:22
  another
• 1:02:22
  nail in the coffin
• 1:02:24
  because
• 1:02:26
  you went from
• 1:02:28
  the
• 1:02:30
  federal government earning its own way through tariffs
• 1:02:33
  to subjugating the people.
• 1:02:35
  Now when you have this tax in place, you can incorporate
• 1:02:39
  different
• 1:02:41
  civil aspects of law
• 1:02:44
  into consolidating
• 1:02:45
  your power and subjugating.
• 1:02:47
  So
• 1:02:48
  the the the trade
• 1:02:51
  so what was elevated?
• 1:02:53
  Well, what happened was the citizenry
• 1:02:55
  or the people
• 1:02:56
  were subverted,
• 1:02:59
  and corporation,
• 1:03:00
  international treaty, and commerce
• 1:03:03
  ascended,
• 1:03:05
  giving power and rise to treaty.
• 1:03:09
  This this is huge.
• 1:03:12
  So we've had a complete inversion of not only in status,
• 1:03:16
  but in in in how law
• 1:03:19
  and
• 1:03:20
  Structure.
• 1:03:21
  The premise, the presumptions of law have been completely turned on their head, and it happened.
• 1:03:27
  Unknown: A key part of it happened right there. Did did that make sense? Yep. Yep. And what changed? They changed the structure. Okay. They changed the structure, and they left just enough illusionary
• 1:03:37
  reality
• 1:03:38
  there that they could continue to make these gigantic
• 1:03:41
  changes underneath
• 1:03:43
  that really, really, really manifest themselves here where we're living in this time today.
• 1:03:50
  Unknown: Exactly.
• 1:03:51
  So this is
• 1:03:53
  I'll kinda race ahead here a little bit.
• 1:03:56
  Is Thomas still on the line? Thomas, are you still there? Think he is. Tom, you there?
• 1:04:01
  Oh, okay. Yes. I'm here. Yes. I'm just being on call. Thank you. I I have
• 1:04:06
  I have something I wanna add to you here in just a moment. So
• 1:04:10
  on basically,
• 1:04:11
  on on Wilson's deathbed,
• 1:04:15
  you know, he makes the quote, I paraphrase,
• 1:04:18
  I fear
• 1:04:20
  I have basically just basically, he's saying, I fear I have destroyed my nation,
• 1:04:26
  which in fact he had because he was
• 1:04:30
  A shield I mean he was just a he was just a sock puppet. And this is the part I have for you if you're not familiar with another Texan by Thomas
• 1:04:38
  if you're not familiar with Mister.
• 1:04:40
  Colonel Edward Mandel House.
• 1:04:43
  You you need to do a deep dive on your fellow Texan there and listen and become elucidated on the skullduggery that he and his family
• 1:04:52
  going all the way back free civil war was involved in
• 1:04:57
  in,
• 1:04:58
  and the the subversion
• 1:05:01
  of
• 1:05:02
  everything to the South and made,
• 1:05:05
  made themselves millionaires out of it.
• 1:05:08
  And they worked in collusion with,
• 1:05:11
  Judy p Benjamin.
• 1:05:13
  And
• 1:05:16
  this is this
• 1:05:17
  so so why do I drag all this up? Am I muddying this all up? I don't think so. What I'm trying to show here
• 1:05:24
  is a far deep wide ranging connection
• 1:05:28
  of
• 1:05:29
  a common
• 1:05:30
  common
• 1:05:31
  society of people who are playing this game generationally.
• 1:05:36
  Yep.
• 1:05:36
  Okay. So if you go back if you go back
• 1:05:42
  to
• 1:05:43
  where where should we where could I jump in at that at?
• 1:05:46
  Let's let's well, let's jump in with Aldridge.
• 1:05:49
  Okay?
• 1:05:50
  Who were who were some of his contemporaries,
• 1:05:53
  mister Aldridge?
• 1:05:55
  Well, Mandelhouse was.
• 1:05:57
  Edward Edward Mandelhouse was.
• 1:06:00
  Who was some other ones?
• 1:06:02
  There was this guy,
• 1:06:04
  this Warburg.
• 1:06:05
  Mhmm. Yeah.
• 1:06:07
  He was. So who's another one? Let me see. Oh, here's this guy.
• 1:06:13
  Barak Barak Baruk. And this other guy named Milner.
• 1:06:16
  Edward Milner.
• 1:06:19
  Unknown: Oh, what a piece of Anybody familiar any for everybody familiar with mister Milner? He is a piece of work. That boy was. Yeah.
• 1:06:28
  Unknown: And and who was who was mister Milner?
• 1:06:31
  One of the probably most incredibly powerful
• 1:06:34
  and deviant man that most of the world's never heard of. Well, he was the
• 1:06:40
  he was the
• 1:06:42
  inheritor
• 1:06:43
  of
• 1:06:44
  and
• 1:06:45
  executor
• 1:06:46
  of the
• 1:06:49
  Cecil Rhodes
• 1:06:52
  legacy
• 1:06:53
  and trust
• 1:06:55
  and was responsible
• 1:06:58
  for
• 1:06:59
  affecting
• 1:07:00
  a
• 1:07:01
  ongoing
• 1:07:03
  plan. Now who who else was during that period of time? Theodore Herzl
• 1:07:08
  was part of that.
• 1:07:10
  Unknown: Father of Zionism.
• 1:07:13
  Unknown: Yeah. So but see, there's a there's a collection here. And now now I'm I'm trying to I'm trying to stay on the big aspects of this part. So so so I'm not digging into a lot of little details, which I could, but I won't,
• 1:07:26
  is that there is
• 1:07:30
  there is an overarching
• 1:07:33
  connection
• 1:07:34
  with a secret society
• 1:07:37
  called the network or the establishment
• 1:07:40
  or the roundtable
• 1:07:42
  or whatever else little name they wanna call it
• 1:07:45
  that is British.
• 1:07:47
  It's a British.
• 1:07:49
  It's a British construct.
• 1:07:51
  It's been ongoing
• 1:07:52
  since,
• 1:07:55
  oh, around the eighteen sixties, and there was this big big debate between
• 1:08:00
  a man by the name of Gladstone,
• 1:08:03
  who was
• 1:08:05
  in the parliament, and another guy by the name of Benjamin Disraeli. And there was this big argument going on back and forth between, are we gonna be big British or are we gonna be little British?
• 1:08:14
  Are we
• 1:08:17
  Israeli wants to continue Israeli wants to continue the idea of British Empire.
• 1:08:22
  Gladstone's saying enough.
• 1:08:25
  Alright?
• 1:08:27
  And Israeli wins.
• 1:08:30
  And and so through the the schooling in Oxford,
• 1:08:33
  you have this young Cecil Rhodes who comes up, is indoctrinated in this, makes a fortune in South Africa,
• 1:08:41
  goes on to perpetrate the Boer Wars,
• 1:08:45
  succeeds,
• 1:08:46
  and is is fabulously wealthy at the same time as being
• 1:08:50
  at the same time as being sponsored
• 1:08:53
  and subsidized
• 1:08:54
  by
• 1:08:56
  Rothschild,
• 1:08:57
  the Rothschild banks.
• 1:08:58
  And so he's he's he's well schooled.
• 1:09:01
  He's an ideologue,
• 1:09:04
  and he has a vast fortune.
• 1:09:06
  And he constructs
• 1:09:08
  a group of people,
• 1:09:10
  you know, a dozen people in the right places,
• 1:09:14
  finances him,
• 1:09:16
  exercises a plan,
• 1:09:18
  and the
• 1:09:20
  I'm making a big claim here, but you can you can look at the Federal Reserve Act and the,
• 1:09:27
  and the sixteenth amendment
• 1:09:29
  and the election of Woodrow Wilson
• 1:09:31
  as their first big plant in the ground where they really got a hold of this thing. And there's no and there's no coincidence.
• 1:09:39
  Unknown: There's It really did. No coincidence that the the end the year they did it ended in '13.
• 1:09:46
  You forgot the seventeenth amendment in the middle of that year too, by the way.
• 1:09:52
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:09:53
  Well, yeah, it it it just it just continues to roll on from then. So then if you study history from a different point of view on a different topic, whether it be World War
• 1:10:03
  or whether you look at the geopolitics
• 1:10:06
  or you look at the national politics, and you keep this in mind, and you have to look at all these different aspects of history during this period and go back and see that these names are connected to it.
• 1:10:17
  See, this this doesn't happen in a vacuum.
• 1:10:20
  This this is a very well thought out organized plan.
• 1:10:23
  Now the the East Coast Brahmins,
• 1:10:26
  okay, in the Northeast, they were all a part of this and very happy to play their part
• 1:10:31
  and be a part of this. This this little elite group up in there is called the Pilgrim Society.
• 1:10:37
  They were a part of of the Cecil Rhodes plan,
• 1:10:42
  and they played their part, and they're still playing their part. And and a lot of these people made their vast fortunes and wealth. The Carnegies, the Kennedys were involved in it. This comes out of the opium monopoly
• 1:10:55
  of the the the British monopoly, the British opium monopoly. If you don't understand that,
• 1:11:01
  you still don't. You gotta go back into that to understand the British opium monopoly
• 1:11:06
  and that the British were the first first and foremost the world's greatest slavers
• 1:11:13
  and
• 1:11:13
  and and drug cartel and pushers
• 1:11:16
  Unknown: and still are. And that but and still are to this day. It was the British giving the Jews
• 1:11:23
  the monopoly on those areas.
• 1:11:26
  So, yes, it was the British, but they let the other people, the Jews, do their dirty work for them.
• 1:11:33
  Unknown: Well well, yeah. But but, I mean, let's go to the source. Okay? Let's go to the source. Sure. You know, I'm I'm fine with that. I don't have a problem with that. I mean, when you study the British opium monopoly, you you realize
• 1:11:46
  that they were in charge of production.
• 1:11:48
  Yep. The British Empire and India, through their through the domination of India and the domination of China for a hundred years
• 1:11:57
  and and and
• 1:12:00
  and even parts of Persia
• 1:12:02
  and Afghanistan,
• 1:12:04
  that was part of the war there.
• 1:12:06
  They're they're they're they're trying to go in there, was this opium control, and then they dominated the whole
• 1:12:14
  all of Asia with opium addicting everybody.
• 1:12:18
  And when you go back and and look at the actual statistics, the money, the actual money
• 1:12:23
  that the British Empire derived from drug
• 1:12:27
  trading,
• 1:12:28
  in the East, you you start to realize how they financed
• 1:12:32
  their empire and how filthy it was. Yep. And Now did they did they
• 1:12:37
  did they offshore? Did they see, they had a the British had a policy, and Gladstone talks about this. He goes, well, you know, we're involved in all this filthy stuff, but then we we put on the veneer and pretense that we're not involved all the while we're producing it and gain the income back from it.
• 1:12:54
  So
• 1:12:56
  part of the problem with the opium problem,
• 1:13:00
  as as World War during this time period okay. This is why this is important. During this time period
• 1:13:06
  of the of the thirteenth
• 1:13:08
  amendment and
• 1:13:10
  the Federal Reserve Act and
• 1:13:13
  sixteenth and
• 1:13:15
  seventeenth
• 1:13:16
  is that
• 1:13:17
  Britain knows
• 1:13:19
  and so do
• 1:13:20
  the Milner Group.
• 1:13:22
  They know
• 1:13:24
  that British Empire is coming to an end Yep. As it existed.
• 1:13:28
  They knew this. They knew this. They were all on top of it. They'd made a treaty with China.
• 1:13:35
  Their opium opium revenues were
• 1:13:39
  drastically reduced.
• 1:13:40
  The numbers support this when you look at the actual schedule and table, this is all lined out there year by year,
• 1:13:47
  it's in decline.
• 1:13:49
  So what they're doing
• 1:13:51
  is that they need to find a new revenue stream,
• 1:13:56
  and they need to find new territories
• 1:13:58
  to reconquer or
• 1:14:00
  get income from. Hello,
• 1:14:02
  America.
• 1:14:04
  So at this same time, as revenue from the opium trade in China was going down, revenue from the opium trade
• 1:14:12
  in The United States was coming up. Okay.
• 1:14:17
  And and and so
• 1:14:19
  this this drug problem started a long time ago with the British
• 1:14:25
  hustling hustling opium into here
• 1:14:28
  Unknown: and still continues to this day. Let me give you an example,
• 1:14:32
  Darrell.
• 1:14:33
  Right before the program, I watched a video
• 1:14:36
  on El Chapo,
• 1:14:38
  This El Chapo trial up in Brooklyn. Are y'all y'all aware that's going on? You know, they captured the guy. Right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They caught him in Mexico years ago, put him in jail. He tunneled out, got out. We caught him again. I doubt that he's gonna escape again.
• 1:14:54
  Well, they had the trial in Brooklyn federal court.
• 1:14:58
  And this has not yeah. I haven't seen it anywhere on the news. Okay? But evidently,
• 1:15:04
  at the final part of the trial, he'll be sentenced in June.
• 1:15:08
  But at the final part where he could get up and say his stuff,
• 1:15:11
  he started getting up and naming all the politicians
• 1:15:14
  that he donated money to. And he got to Hillary Clinton,
• 1:15:18
  Nancy Pelosi,
• 1:15:20
  and Adam Schiff before they shut the courtroom doors.
• 1:15:24
  But evidently, he read off a litany of people. He said he gave the president of Mexico
• 1:15:29
  a 100,000,000,
• 1:15:32
  and his lieutenant
• 1:15:33
  that was on the stand for three days up there is the one that confirmed all that because he was in the negotiations.
• 1:15:40
  So all that stuff's being snuffed right now, but ain't that a perfect icing to what you were saying that started a hundred years ago and that's right that these guys pause. Yep. This is why yeah. Exactly. That is a that is a perfect
• 1:15:56
  Unknown: period to that sentence because
• 1:16:00
  you
• 1:16:01
  really have to do
• 1:16:03
  sort of a deep dive on this period in eighteen nine
• 1:16:08
  nineteen twenty,
• 1:16:09
  this period in here. You kinda have to do it really, spend some time and do a deep dive on, figure it out with the advantage of the of
• 1:16:18
  the evidence in history. You have the forethought of foresight of history in detail.
• 1:16:24
  Why am I
• 1:16:26
  saying this is so important? This period of time is so important. I just don't do it to play around. I I have a purpose.
• 1:16:33
  The purpose is that this time period
• 1:16:37
  is so
• 1:16:39
  in sync with where we're at right now with the things that are going on right now. Okay? This is
• 1:16:44
  the the the very,
• 1:16:47
  you it's
• 1:16:49
  it's so important because you you really don't know who's playing what part.
• 1:16:54
  You really don't.
• 1:16:56
  And and and so we have to be very careful that we're not making,
• 1:17:01
  snap decisions
• 1:17:02
  and and long term,
• 1:17:04
  judgments on short term indications here.
• 1:17:07
  And and this history of this time period, the players
• 1:17:11
  really
• 1:17:11
  should give people some pause,
• 1:17:15
  to think through through,
• 1:17:16
  Unknown: you know, what's going on right now. Well, they was the real it was the foundational period they were setting up that we alluded earlier to structure.
• 1:17:24
  This is when they were setting up the structure they were going to switch to. You know, all those three things that happened in '13,
• 1:17:31
  the war, the Balfour Declaration that came out of it. The the Treaty
• 1:17:36
  of Versailles where they set
• 1:17:38
  Germany up for World War two and and and in that period of time after that, then they cause a depression Yeah. To strengthen the Federal Reserve. Yeah. And during that depression is when they slip in the legislation that initiated birth certificates
• 1:17:53
  in 1921.
• 1:17:54
  Yep. Okay? So you can see them setting all these things up. Exactly.
• 1:17:59
  Unknown: Ed Edward Edward Mandelhouse,
• 1:18:01
  a Texan
• 1:18:02
  the Texan in,
• 1:18:04
  you know, 1914
• 1:18:06
  was,
• 1:18:08
  you know, in Wilson's
• 1:18:11
  in Wilson's diary saying exactly what they were gonna do and how they were gonna do it on just this issue
• 1:18:17
  of US citizens
• 1:18:18
  and and causing them to be surety
• 1:18:21
  for the rest of their lives as chattel. You know? They had this figured out. Now if you go back to the Balfour agreement and Lord Balfour,
• 1:18:28
  who was one of his best buddies? I mean, these guys were pals. Like, they used to share Wasn't it Milner? An apartment. Milner?
• 1:18:36
  Yeah.
• 1:18:37
  Milner. That was his buddy. And and and who was who was financing
• 1:18:43
  who was financing and subsidizing
• 1:18:46
  the
• 1:18:47
  the Rhodes Roundtable, the Milner Group? Well,
• 1:18:51
  the Rothschilds.
• 1:18:52
  Unknown: Do you know Okay.
• 1:18:54
  Were you listening the day I I some recently, we got into the background on this Rhodes Trust from some source
• 1:19:01
  and they were talking about the Rhodes
• 1:19:03
  Rhodes put his trust
• 1:19:06
  in a real special trust vehicle. I don't remember what it was but it had limitations
• 1:19:11
  that other trusts don't have and one of em was it can only be given hereditary to a direct heirs
• 1:19:20
  and of course, he was homosexual
• 1:19:22
  and had no children but his brother had two sons
• 1:19:27
  and so when he died, it went to the two sons. One of them was in his 30s and the other was in his 40s and both of em, I forget one of em got killed and the other one died of some mysterious disease and there was no more lineage. Yeah. It went to the Privy count. It went to the Privy Council. The Privy Council controls Rhodes Trust today. Yeah.
• 1:19:49
  Unknown: The Privy Council and the
• 1:19:53
  order the of the guarder and some of these other things are are very special and very real.
• 1:20:01
  So the the next big the next big thing that was to come out of the
• 1:20:06
  the Milner Group's agenda
• 1:20:08
  after World War one and the Treaty of Versailles was
• 1:20:13
  the
• 1:20:14
  League of Nations. Yes. Alright? That was that that was on that was on their agenda.
• 1:20:21
  See,
• 1:20:21
  actually, I I have to correct myself. I made a misstatement. Okay? I actually made a mistake
• 1:20:27
  earlier.
• 1:20:29
  Howard Taft
• 1:20:30
  Howard Taft was very popular and would have been reelected.
• 1:20:34
  And he actually would have went ahead with,
• 1:20:38
  according to his own his own writings,
• 1:20:40
  and I
• 1:20:42
  I'm I'm going I'm covering a lot of ground here where I I know I'm not have my notes in front of me, but,
• 1:20:47
  Howard Taft would would have accommodated
• 1:20:50
  the
• 1:20:51
  Federal Reserve Act and the income tax. He he he would have accommodated that.
• 1:20:56
  Okay? He you know, in the in the smoky smoky back rooms, he'd already said, well, okay.
• 1:21:02
  What he wasn't gonna go along with
• 1:21:06
  was
• 1:21:07
  the League of Nations.
• 1:21:09
  He wasn't gonna do it,
• 1:21:11
  and they had to have it.
• 1:21:13
  And they had they had before them,
• 1:21:17
  this unknown,
• 1:21:20
  incompetent
• 1:21:22
  Harvard or
• 1:21:25
  Unknown: yeah. Princeton. Princeton.
• 1:21:27
  Unknown: Princeton.
• 1:21:28
  Princeton. Princeton. Princeton.
• 1:21:31
  And they
• 1:21:34
  he had he had all of the the leanings
• 1:21:38
  and intent that Edward Mandelhouse did, who had wrote the book administrator Drew,
• 1:21:45
  which was a was a
• 1:21:48
  Philip Wood, you sir. The most
• 1:21:51
  yeah. Yeah. The the most fantastic
• 1:21:53
  narcissistic
• 1:21:55
  ideology of of, aggrandize
• 1:21:58
  socialism and being a hero, and that was sort of in this Walter Mitty mind of Woodrow Wilson, but he was very inept.
• 1:22:05
  And so they they applied Mandelhouse,
• 1:22:07
  Edward Mandelhouse,
• 1:22:09
  to be his brain, kinda like Roe was for
• 1:22:15
  G. W. Bush. You know? He they he was his handler.
• 1:22:18
  And
• 1:22:19
  so they the the big idea was to get the League of Nations, and they didn't get it.
• 1:22:24
  Alright?
• 1:22:25
  Do you So what they did do is
• 1:22:28
  they got the council for foreign relations, and then later they got the UN in
• 1:22:34
  which serves their purposes.
• 1:22:36
  So the Council for Foreign Relations
• 1:22:38
  is a direct
• 1:22:40
  descendant of Chatham House
• 1:22:43
  and the
• 1:22:44
  Royal Institute for International Affairs out of Britain in the city of London.
• 1:22:49
  And
• 1:22:51
  so,
• 1:22:53
  I mean, you can run around all over the place looking for
• 1:22:56
  boogeyman,
• 1:22:57
  but here's here's what I suggest to everybody. It's really easy.
• 1:23:02
  You can do it in the next five minutes. You go on to Wikipedia,
• 1:23:05
  and you type in Rhodes Scholars and look at the American list.
• 1:23:08
  You look at those
• 1:23:10
  those hundreds of people over the course from early nineteen hundreds who were Rhodes Scholars,
• 1:23:15
  And then you go look at the list of Marshall Marshall Plan, the Marshall Scholars.
• 1:23:21
  And there you have your core
• 1:23:23
  British intelligence agencies,
• 1:23:26
  operatives
• 1:23:27
  throughout the last hundred years
• 1:23:30
  that have infiltrated
• 1:23:32
  finance,
• 1:23:33
  corporation,
• 1:23:34
  law,
• 1:23:35
  and
• 1:23:36
  Unknown: and government at every level. And and there you have your your collaborators and your infiltrators. Right? You know, from that time frame, there's a couple of good guys on the good side. Good guys, white hat guys that come to mind that we don't get mentioned enough and one of em is the only reason that they didn't get that league of nations through
• 1:23:56
  and that was Lindbergh's father,
• 1:23:58
  okay? Lindbergh was a real thorn in their side and the other guys who are turned out, I think if you look at em historically,
• 1:24:08
  Darryl, are pretty good guys.
• 1:24:10
  Our name, well, one of em was named Carter and the other was named Glass
• 1:24:15
  and one of em was a senator from Oklahoma
• 1:24:18
  and I don't remember where the other one was from but those are the guys that the Federal Reserve Act is named.
• 1:24:25
  The Carter Glass Act,
• 1:24:28
  or the Glass Carter Act, one of them. And later on down the line,
• 1:24:33
  Glass, who was I think the one from Oklahoma,
• 1:24:37
  publicly
• 1:24:39
  lamented on his name being associated with it and involved with the passage of it.
• 1:24:47
  Unknown: So The other the other
• 1:24:50
  a
• 1:24:51
  little bit later, but in that same vein is Lewis t McFadden. Yes. And if if you don't if you don't understand who Lewis t McFadden is, I know Roger does and and many others, but if
• 1:25:03
  if you don't, then you need to I I guess you need to buy Roger's book and and read and then do some of your own research. This was this man was a giant.
• 1:25:14
  In in the later days,
• 1:25:16
  a a great
• 1:25:18
  a great man
• 1:25:20
  was
• 1:25:22
  the
• 1:25:23
  the congressman from
• 1:25:25
  Youngstown,
• 1:25:26
  Ohio Ohio area. Trafficant.
• 1:25:28
  Jim Trafficant.
• 1:25:30
  Okay.
• 1:25:31
  And so the the reason the reason that the reason I bring these people up and sort of I I guess I've sort of been allowed to dominate this conversation a little bit, thank you, Roger, and bring out history and talk about history,
• 1:25:45
  is because
• 1:25:47
  we we
• 1:25:49
  we know a lot about the details, but we still have to keep our minds open to the history and the big picture.
• 1:25:55
  And and I I keep saying this over and over again to people.
• 1:25:59
  They don't care who you if you talk. They don't care if we're talking right now. But if enough people was to listen to us, they would have to kill us.
• 1:26:08
  You just remember that, Thomas.
• 1:26:11
  Unknown: Go ahead. Gerald, I have a question. Yeah.
• 1:26:14
  I I don't think we can overlook
• 1:26:18
  the underlying
• 1:26:19
  powers behind the Bar Ra Itta
• 1:26:23
  ish
• 1:26:24
  so called government and
• 1:26:26
  MI,
• 1:26:27
  the Masada Israeli six or five as the case may be, his influence of the ancient Roman area
• 1:26:35
  because the sun never sets on the Roman Empire of Britain. And the Jesuit influences that were taken over by the infiltration
• 1:26:43
  of Caiaphas
• 1:26:45
  and Justinian's
• 1:26:46
  code and the influences therein
• 1:26:49
  when they developed the Vatican, the now called the Vatican, the con of life of the holy Roman Catholic Christos synagogue of Satan, which hijacked
• 1:26:58
  Unknown: by the Zionist influence of the criminal cabal that calls itself Zionist as professional criminal thieves. Yep. Well, the Jesuits Well, thank you for taking me off. Yeah. Yeah. Go ahead. The Jesuits are running that deal, and I think it, I think really in this many years of myself in this and asking this question and doing research and being objective and open minded about it. I think the whole thing is run by the Jesuits and they got the the Jews out there because of their traditional role and their capabilities
• 1:27:28
  and they worked totally hand in hand and really a couple of things brought me to that conclusion.
• 1:27:35
  One, when just just intellectually
• 1:27:38
  thinking about it and back in those days, 05/01/1776,
• 1:27:43
  a long time ago,
• 1:27:45
  there wasn't a central bank but maybe in one or or even a couple of countries of Europe but there was a Catholic church in virtually every city on the face of the earth.
• 1:27:57
  A couple of years ago. That was the original intelligence network. Yep. Yeah. Couple of years ago. So.
• 1:28:03
  Fifteen. Let me finish, Danny. Daryl, just this other point. Yeah. Fifteen years or so ago, I'm listening to a radio show and they come on, you know, the two top guys on the council in foreign relations
• 1:28:14
  were Catholics. One of them was Rat Singer at the time and I thought, holy smokes, they
• 1:28:20
  don't even run the council on foreign relations on the top two spots.
• 1:28:25
  So that was kinda these things over the years just kinda seal it and give you a little bit idea of the pecking order, you know? Sorry to interrupt. Go ahead, Daryl. Right. Well,
• 1:28:37
  Unknown: if you go back to
• 1:28:39
  if you go back to the autobiography
• 1:28:41
  of Cecil Rhodes,
• 1:28:42
  he he goes
• 1:28:44
  makes no bones about it. He goes into detail
• 1:28:48
  from a a a Oxford big picture view
• 1:28:54
  as to how he was trained in the British Empire
• 1:28:57
  and and what the agenda was. But that he looked at he looked at the the Masons.
• 1:29:05
  He looked and was influenced and a part of it. He looked at the Jesuits. He was influenced and was a part of it. He looked at the Roman Catholic church.
• 1:29:13
  He
• 1:29:15
  he looked at all of it,
• 1:29:17
  and he took the very best aspects of all of their different methods
• 1:29:23
  and consolidate them consolidated
• 1:29:25
  them
• 1:29:26
  into a very small select group of a dozen people initially
• 1:29:31
  to exercise
• 1:29:33
  and initiate their plan. So
• 1:29:35
  literally
• 1:29:37
  a baker's dozen of men
• 1:29:40
  in the late eighteen hundreds working through the first
• 1:29:44
  decade and a half in the nineteenth century were able to
• 1:29:51
  accomplish this. Now they they did this
• 1:29:54
  in in concert with the British parliament. They did it with in concert with
• 1:30:01
  the US Congress.
• 1:30:03
  They did it with
• 1:30:05
  in in all parts of British government and federal government and intelligence services.
• 1:30:11
  And
• 1:30:13
  Gavistalk Institute,
• 1:30:15
  the forerunner to that,
• 1:30:17
  was well in the house. Blavatsky's
• 1:30:20
  Theosophical Society. Well yeah. So this was this was done,
• 1:30:26
  this was done,
• 1:30:30
  I I mean, there's many all these people, all these players are are true and real.
• 1:30:35
  I'm not taking away from any of their individual groups or individual responsibilities.
• 1:30:40
  What I'm what I'm saying,
• 1:30:42
  this this is me saying this,
• 1:30:44
  is that, you know, my conclusion in this particular period and its legacy
• 1:30:50
  is that the Milner Group
• 1:30:54
  was the
• 1:30:57
  the consolidator
• 1:30:59
  and the effectuator
• 1:31:03
  of
• 1:31:04
  the best of the worst ideas and and ways to do it, and we still live with it now. And and what has what has come out of that is the trilateral
• 1:31:14
  the tri trilaterals
• 1:31:15
  that Anthony Sutton wrote about,
• 1:31:17
  the senior executive service,
• 1:31:20
  which is British
• 1:31:21
  administration,
• 1:31:25
  The
• 1:31:26
  corporate the biggest the biggest corporation that nobody in this country for all statistical purposes never
• 1:31:32
  heard of is Serco.
• 1:31:35
  And who are they? Well, they
• 1:31:38
  were originally
• 1:31:39
  RCA,
• 1:31:40
  which is
• 1:31:41
  the Radio Corporation of America, which is a British corporation that was founded in the early nineteen hundreds
• 1:31:47
  and dominated wireless technology.
• 1:31:50
  Unknown: Well, hold the hold the the hold And used for spike. Hold on. One little one little caveat. That's the Radio Corporation
• 1:31:57
  of America,
• 1:31:58
  and it was founded by David
• 1:32:01
  Sarnoff.
• 1:32:02
  Yeah. And it was American. It wasn't British.
• 1:32:06
  Unknown: Yeah. Well, I I think I think you But he tied in with American I think I could This is Well, no. Actually
• 1:32:14
  yeah. Actually,
• 1:32:16
  it it I'm I'm probably gonna have to
• 1:32:20
  debate that.
• 1:32:22
  Unknown: Well, we we could, but, you know, I mean, this is a lot of my radio back back broadcasting
• 1:32:27
  background,
• 1:32:28
  and there was a lot of information we covered on it. Now, I did see something real interesting, however, recently,
• 1:32:35
  that's a new wrinkle I'd never seen before on radio
• 1:32:39
  is that Tesla had invented radio. They set up Marconi and got his patents passed. Yeah. And then they set up the Marconi
• 1:32:47
  Association,
• 1:32:49
  which is the predecessor that you may be talking about,
• 1:32:52
  and then that corporate the Marconi
• 1:32:55
  Association
• 1:32:56
  gave all the patents and everything,
• 1:32:58
  lock, stock, and barrel, to RCA.
• 1:33:03
  Unknown: Well, okay. That that that might be
• 1:33:06
  that that could that could have happened. The the other thing about that was in 1945
• 1:33:12
  or '48,
• 1:33:13
  the US patent office
• 1:33:16
  in Washington
• 1:33:18
  re basically
• 1:33:20
  invalidated
• 1:33:21
  all of the Marconi patents and reassigned them to Tesla.
• 1:33:26
  Just
• 1:33:28
  so I mean, see. Just in passing that that that was acknowledged that was acknowledged that the Marconi patents
• 1:33:36
  were
• 1:33:39
  a a fraud,
• 1:33:41
  a British fraud from the very beginning. That's what came out in what I saw recently.
• 1:33:47
  Yeah.
• 1:33:48
  So I I mean, this is I mean, we're we're kinda we're kinda having fun with this.
• 1:33:54
  I mean, you you can look at the lineage, the British lineage of RCA as RCA,
• 1:34:00
  then to GE,
• 1:34:02
  NBC,
• 1:34:04
  and
• 1:34:05
  and Serco. So so Serco,
• 1:34:07
  this company that you've never corporation, this this octopus that you probably never heard of has a direct effect on your life every day. It's part of what Donald Trump ostensibly
• 1:34:17
  is fighting,
• 1:34:18
  and it's huge. It is it is so
• 1:34:22
  it is so big, and we haven't even,
• 1:34:25
  you know, we haven't even addressed
• 1:34:28
  Oh.
• 1:34:28
  I mean, we're we're kinda off in the ditches here. We're we're kinda off in the weeds but it's
• 1:34:34
  Unknown: I got I got somebody calling so I gotta write down the number. So, just bear with me here. Oh, that's fine. I I think I I know who that is. Going to go ahead, guys. That the circle could also be known as scepter
• 1:34:47
  Unknown: from the double o seven.
• 1:34:51
  Unknown: Okay. Yeah.
• 1:34:54
  Well, you know, there's there's all kinds of interesting symbology there. You know,
• 1:34:59
  ball
• 1:35:00
  is is
• 1:35:02
  double o,
• 1:35:04
  and and a seven
• 1:35:06
  can be
• 1:35:08
  interpreted
• 1:35:09
  as being ball.
• 1:35:11
  So, I mean, there's
• 1:35:13
  that's kind of off in the weeds too. But Ten four. That that's salient.
• 1:35:19
  Yeah.
• 1:35:21
  Unknown: So well, go ahead. Well, I'm trying I think I think it's Been running off here. Okay. Let's see here. That didn't show up as Michael. Let's see if that was him calling in. Thomas joined us back.
• 1:35:32
  Now hold on. Michael, if you're listening, you gotta hang up. I'll call you right back. I tell you what, this screwy ass stuff.
• 1:35:41
  While I'm so distracted, you guys continue, please.
• 1:35:47
  Unknown: Well Bill. So so I am so interested. Just to just to read Okay. Go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead, Chris. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Well, I was just gonna say, Daryl, I am totally blown away by what you've learned in doing your own study. We all study independently on our own what trips our trigger, what interest intrigues us, and drives us to learn. And we all go different things, but everything that we
• 1:36:10
  learn ties together and gives a better picture, a broader overview
• 1:36:15
  of this whole nefarious global
• 1:36:18
  criminal conspiracy to take over the world and run it by a bunch of global gangsters for their own self period interest by selling anything that appeals for the lustful
• 1:36:28
  satisfaction
• 1:36:30
  of the masses of human sheeple that will pay anything to get their trip, their trigger, to get their thrill, their sex satisfaction,
• 1:36:37
  their drug satisfaction,
• 1:36:39
  or power and control over others' demonic satisfaction.
• 1:36:44
  Unknown: Let me see. I I think you're describing the the the Catholic practice of indulgences.
• 1:36:50
  There you go. You know, you know, I I have to I have to comment, you know, the you know, I to
• 1:36:57
  to, you know, recapitulate what you just said. Well, how many facets does a diamond have?
• 1:37:03
  Alright? And and how many how many satellites
• 1:37:06
  how many five g satellites do you have to put in the air before you have a constellation?
• 1:37:11
  You know, this you you can't you cannot look at any of this information at any point
• 1:37:16
  in a vacuum. You you
• 1:37:19
  you have to
• 1:37:20
  you have to stand back away from this. You know? You you have to
• 1:37:24
  you have to examine it in detail, and then you have to stand way back from it to look at the picture. And every time you take a every time you take a step back, it gets bigger.
• 1:37:36
  Unknown: It's like eating liver.
• 1:37:39
  Todd, Thomas, did we get you and Michael on? I've been fighting to try and get these guys on. They're calling in. I'm trying to call out. Did we get you guys on?
• 1:37:49
  Unknown: I'm on. Michael said he's tried to call in twice. Keeps getting a busy signal. I think he's got a weak connection on his cell phone because when we hung up I see. He was
• 1:38:00
  Unknown: It's
• 1:38:00
  just it's, you know, there's more of this Skype crap. His number calls in.
• 1:38:05
  I've got him in the database.
• 1:38:08
  So, when it not calls in, it should say
• 1:38:11
  him but it doesn't and when I try and type it in to call that number back, it says him. So, I don't know what's going on. Apologize to him, okay? We'll try and get it straightened out. But I think what
• 1:38:24
  might be happening is we're exposing too much of these people. Hell, there ain't no. No. No. No. No. Don't get off of it. You and you and Chris need to go have coffee.
• 1:38:33
  We're
• 1:38:37
  we're
• 1:38:38
  a fly on an elephant's right now.
• 1:38:42
  Okay? But we got the good. We got the but we got the goods on these boys and they know it. Okay?
• 1:38:48
  And so, it's our mandate
• 1:38:50
  to try and do what we do as well as we can and then to take that and enlarge it.
• 1:38:58
  I mean, that's what I see. Right. I don't know what else to do.
• 1:39:06
  Unknown: Get out get out of this US citizen system. That's the only thing we can help people do.
• 1:39:13
  Unknown: Well, I'm talking about the program here, you know, and what the way I approach it and what I feel like my duties and responsibilities
• 1:39:20
  are in the big picture, you know. Hello, come on in. Come on in, whoever you are.
• 1:39:26
  Just say, I mean, we're fortunate to have the platform and the group, the core group we got, people like Daryl, people like Chris, people like Bob,
• 1:39:35
  these people that call in, that have glommed on to this and have made it their lives. Daryl has taken, you live this now, Daryl, like I do.
• 1:39:44
  Okay?
• 1:39:47
  Unknown: Yeah.
• 1:39:48
  Probably. It's
• 1:39:50
  you know, I
• 1:39:52
  yeah. I I have OCDs
• 1:39:54
  associated with this. I
• 1:39:58
  guess I'm I guess I'm sort of inoculated
• 1:40:01
  from it.
• 1:40:03
  And
• 1:40:05
  in some ways, over time, I've I've learned to harden my my feelings and my heart a little bit
• 1:40:12
  and just look at the information.
• 1:40:15
  And I I tend to be a little
• 1:40:18
  brutal about it.
• 1:40:21
  But
• 1:40:23
  there's what the point is, and going back to what Thomas was saying, and I think I think most of us can all agree, the first thing you have to do,
• 1:40:31
  ladies and gentlemen,
• 1:40:33
  men and women, is learn how to protect yourself.
• 1:40:36
  Okay? So learn learn how to protect yourself. And when you're confident to protect yourself
• 1:40:42
  to some degree,
• 1:40:45
  become proficient at whatever level you you you are at
• 1:40:49
  and and solid in that. And then
• 1:40:53
  you can you can help protect your the people you love. Start there.
• 1:40:58
  And
• 1:41:00
  and and and
• 1:41:01
  don't don't run past your confidence to do that unless you put people in in danger, yourself or others.
• 1:41:09
  And
• 1:41:11
  and so that way,
• 1:41:13
  don't try to bite off too much at one time and do too much at one time because,
• 1:41:19
  you know, that's an unrealistic expectation
• 1:41:22
  that will almost always result in failure. Yeah.
• 1:41:25
  And and so when you're doing it this way, my assertion is you're actually showing love to yourself and to your family and being kind because
• 1:41:36
  and and remember that people were going to be traumatized by this and some halves of compassion and empathy for these people.
• 1:41:42
  Okay?
• 1:41:43
  And I mean, I can literally walk into almost any venue
• 1:41:47
  and overwhelm
• 1:41:48
  everybody in there in a matter of moments. And I I don't
• 1:41:53
  I don't do that.
• 1:41:56
  I don't do that because if I was to do that, I would be doing it in a selfish, greedy way for me
• 1:42:03
  for me to vent instead of having compassion and empathy for them to
• 1:42:08
  to address them where they're at. And so instead of telling them things, I ask them questions. Yep. And and speak softly
• 1:42:16
  and gently as a rule.
• 1:42:18
  Except when I'm on here when I can be harsh and direct and brutal. And
• 1:42:24
  Unknown: You're you're when you can be your real you can be your real self on the radio, can't you?
• 1:42:31
  Unknown: Right. I well, I can I yeah? Go ahead. Yeah. Who's trying to talk? Is that Bob?
• 1:42:37
  Unknown: Yes. It is. Hey, Bob.
• 1:42:40
  I'm not promoting
• 1:42:42
  this website nor the product, if you wanna call it that, but he was first on Joyce Riley back years ago,
• 1:42:51
  and many of you may be aware of him.
• 1:42:54
  But for those that aren't,
• 1:42:56
  in terms of research and informative,
• 1:43:00
  information
• 1:43:02
  concerning the sixteenth amendment and its legislative intent and all of that,
• 1:43:07
  there is a site called wisestarrett.com.
• 1:43:12
  Was eiss or wiess.
• 1:43:15
  Unknown: I can't recall. Yeah.
• 1:43:19
  Unknown: And
• 1:43:20
  he brings forward he he doesn't really talk about noncitizen
• 1:43:24
  national, etcetera, etcetera, but, basically, it's the same thing in as much as
• 1:43:30
  and here you go, the government
• 1:43:32
  impugning it or indicting itself with its own document.
• 1:43:37
  There is a place in the in the code,
• 1:43:42
  and it's code for a reason. We know. There's a place in the code called revocation
• 1:43:47
  of elections. Yes. There is. And, of course,
• 1:43:50
  people talk about election as if it's a vote. Well, no election's choosing to have scrambled
• 1:43:55
  or soft. You know? I mean, election is a choice,
• 1:43:59
  and that's the point. You're revoking your choice.
• 1:44:02
  And, of course, that imputes that there was a choice to start with, which most people just, you know well, it's just a presumption. I didn't know I had a right to shoot. Well, Bob Anyway, if you look on wife Paris,
• 1:44:14
  they've got lots of historical data under the resources
• 1:44:18
  that's very informative just in terms of
• 1:44:21
  how it happened, why it happened,
• 1:44:23
  and how it was implemented. I would add. Just.
• 1:44:27
  Unknown: Bob, I would add that that revocation
• 1:44:29
  of election was the linchpin of John and Glenn's program
• 1:44:34
  Unknown: because John found that Withdrawal consent.
• 1:44:37
  Unknown: Yes. And what it is is he had found in the regulations where you could change your status
• 1:44:43
  and if you did revoke the election and change your status,
• 1:44:46
  you could send in three years
• 1:44:49
  they'd
• 1:44:50
  pay you three years what you've paid back to you, okay?
• 1:44:54
  Here's Robert calling in. I'll try and so, that was what John and Glenn built their whole deal on because that right at first, there were some people getting big checks back and of course, that gave everybody a lot of incentive,
• 1:45:09
  and they let that go on. Second. Yeah. And they let that go on about a nanosecond.
• 1:45:14
  Robert, I can't call you back if you keep calling in.
• 1:45:18
  Jeez.
• 1:45:19
  People learn. I gotta call you back.
• 1:45:22
  Okay?
• 1:45:24
  Maybe not for long. Paul's got a fix for this and I just didn't have the time this morning to mess with it but we'll try and get this
• 1:45:32
  implemented where we got a different
• 1:45:35
  different thing to use, and we don't have to go through these damn hoops.
• 1:45:38
  But
• 1:45:39
  that revocation of election is very important, okay? And the IRS let that happen until they figured out what was going on, and they shut that door real quick, and anybody else that sent in the affidavit
• 1:45:53
  with that package
• 1:45:54
  got a $500
• 1:45:56
  frivolous filing penalty for every year.
• 1:46:03
  And now, I've said before that if you send the affidavit into the IRS today,
• 1:46:09
  Thomas, if you send yours into the IRS before you send it into the Secretary of State,
• 1:46:15
  they will bless you with a $5,000
• 1:46:19
  frivolous filing penalty.
• 1:46:22
  Unknown: I'm not I'm
• 1:46:24
  not contacting them for anything.
• 1:46:26
  Unknown: Okay. Well, you may want to down the line, but that'll be your choice. But anyway, I that's a real important thing, that revocation of election, Bob.
• 1:46:37
  Robert, did we get you? It sounds like we got a taxi guy with us. Robert, are you there?
• 1:46:43
  Unknown: Yeah. I'm here, but you're fading out just a wee bit.
• 1:46:48
  Not not you, Bob. He's he's talking to me, I think. You're fading out just a wee bit, Roger. Just a wee bit. But yeah. Bob, quick. That that website you mentioned, is that the guy over there in Paris, France?
• 1:46:59
  Unknown: He's actually not in Paris, but, yes, he was, and he moved out into the
• 1:47:04
  outer part. But
• 1:47:06
  and, yes, that is the same guy. His name it's it's real easy to remember his name. His first name is Adele,
• 1:47:13
  and his last name is Wyse. So you just think of the sound of music. But
• 1:47:18
  anyway
• 1:47:19
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. I he he had an ad in Las Vegas about how to get out of taxes
• 1:47:26
  following his plan. It's it's slightly different than Rogers, you know, but it kind of it kind of
• 1:47:33
  parallels, if you will. I I and I I did hear him on this also.
• 1:47:37
  Also,
• 1:47:38
  Unknown: but he's he's pretty smart guy. Yeah. Pretty smart cat. Yeah. He figured. Is he out there is he out there in a rotunda while wearing a yellow vest?
• 1:47:49
  Unknown: I don't know about that.
• 1:47:51
  Unknown: He's he's probably trying to keep a target off of him. I don't know.
• 1:47:56
  Unknown: Yeah. Anyway,
• 1:47:57
  Do that.
• 1:48:00
  Unknown: So I'm gonna mute out. I've gotta get here. I need to talk to you. Okay. Go cut your business. I remember to mute this side. Okay.
• 1:48:06
  Unknown: Bob Bob lets his eavesdrop on his business deals.
• 1:48:11
  Robert,
• 1:48:12
  did you have anything else to add? You called in here late to see you, man. Thanks for contributing.
• 1:48:16
  Robert, what's on your mind today?
• 1:48:20
  Unknown: Oh, not too much. I was just sitting here listening, and then my ears immediately started twitching when he mentioned
• 1:48:26
  the the
• 1:48:27
  Paris guy. I thought, oh, yeah. I heard that. Yeah. Okay. He was on George a couple times, I think. Okay. The late George Riley. So Well So pretty pretty good pretty fun. We've beat this stuff pretty good today. Brent's on tomorrow. We know we just kind of turn the mic over to him but I got a a number of
• 1:48:44
  Unknown: a number of tabs open here I'd like to close. So, let me run down a few of em and we there's
• 1:48:52
  plenty of room for discussion in here.
• 1:48:54
  Conspiracy researcher David Ike has been totally banned from speaking in Australia.
• 1:49:01
  He had a visa, everything ready to go. He was an hour or two from the flight leaving and they got hold of him and said, you're not welcome. You can't come.
• 1:49:10
  Israel and Netanyahu stepped into all kinds of over in Poland
• 1:49:15
  and they're getting all kinds of
• 1:49:17
  backlash from that. The
• 1:49:20
  Israeli foreign minister over there in in a speech was talking about, he said, on Sunday, Kat said that the polls collaborated
• 1:49:29
  with the Nazi Germans
• 1:49:31
  during the second World War and quote, I'm gonna quote this this Israeli
• 1:49:36
  ambassador
• 1:49:37
  sucked antisemitism
• 1:49:40
  with their mother's milk.
• 1:49:43
  Let me repeat that. Sucked
• 1:49:45
  antisemitism
• 1:49:47
  with their mother's milk.
• 1:49:49
  That was a statement by a country's ambassador
• 1:49:53
  in another country that he's the ambassador too.
• 1:49:57
  This one's kinda good.
• 1:49:59
  Chris,
• 1:50:00
  this is one of your fellow residents.
• 1:50:03
  I think you're gonna like. I'm you. I think you're gonna like this.
• 1:50:06
  The US appellate court has reopened the Palestinian lawsuit
• 1:50:11
  against billionaire
• 1:50:12
  Israel donor Sheldon Adelson.
• 1:50:16
  And these these Palestinians,
• 1:50:19
  they had evidently
• 1:50:21
  had it
• 1:50:22
  ruled in their favor to district court. It went to the appellate court. They shut it down for but they've reopened it, and it's a big lawsuit,
• 1:50:31
  and there's a bunch of people involved.
• 1:50:34
  15 or 20 of these dirty some bitches because of cast lead,
• 1:50:38
  and the the appellate level court has reopened that case. Now and the reason this is important is look what's going on with the with the Southern Poverty Law Center.
• 1:50:49
  I mean, they're Oh, yeah. Okay? I I Michael Pimp leadership
• 1:50:54
  Unknown: conference.
• 1:50:55
  Unknown: Oh, okay. So Now the
• 1:50:58
  Unknown: Pedophile Liar Center. Right. And they got a big judgment against them for about 6 or 8,000,000 or something.
• 1:51:04
  And and here recently, and now a bunch of people have started coming at them filing offensive lawsuits.
• 1:51:11
  So, this is just good news. I, you know, when I say on here, the worms turning,
• 1:51:15
  it's incidents like this that kind of give you the indication that it might be.
• 1:51:21
  Man, I'll tell you, everybody's wanting to call in. I'm doing the absolute best I can, okay?
• 1:51:31
  Patrick, just as, boy, this is a I want, if they only knew how they'd screwed people up.
• 1:51:39
  Unknown: Well, let me
• 1:51:40
  let me Who was that lady Let me let me give a Yeah.
• 1:51:45
  Unknown: No. Oh, go ahead. Daryl or Robert. What you have? Robert, what were you gonna say?
• 1:51:49
  Unknown: I was just gonna say, who who was that lady I think was the last man that was
• 1:51:53
  pushing in those those cables and saying, number please, was connecting phone calls? That's what you remind me of. You're a modern day her. That's what I I feel like the guy in the Ernestine.
• 1:52:03
  Unknown: No. No. No. I feel like the guy in the Federal Express commercial where he's got that six or seven phones up his ears.
• 1:52:11
  I I think somebody joined us. Patrick, you got online, Patrick?
• 1:52:17
  Unknown: Yeah. Yeah. I'm around. Okay. Running down the highway. Listen to y'all shattered today. Okay. Hey, what what do you think about this? This this
• 1:52:25
  deep deep under current of the government shadow government which we all know is there.
• 1:52:30
  Them getting their letters at Danny Bush's funeral
• 1:52:33
  and all of that Guantanamo Bay and
• 1:52:37
  that they're gonna execute all these
• 1:52:40
  Unknown: for, you know, treason and all this stuff. Is this all a bunch of hoopla? I don't know. For real? I mean, like, you know? I have no idea. There's some indications that it is. There's some people with connections that say that it is.
• 1:52:52
  This is something I was thinking about this morning. You haven't heard us get one time
• 1:52:58
  often say, well, Q says,
• 1:53:01
  Q says, and all the people that have been chasing that stuff for a year by some anonymous sort source putting all this stuff up there in mysterious crypto language,
• 1:53:11
  I think have been chasing their tail because to my knowledge, very little of that stuff has come to come to fact and fruition.
• 1:53:18
  Okay?
• 1:53:19
  Yeah, I, yeah, I agree too. Patrick. I agree too. That's why I deal with what we deal with here. I can show you the slaughterhouse cases. I can show you this stuff. I can explain it to you and it's real and you can get your arms around it. You can't get your arms around something that's got an anonymous source.
• 1:53:39
  Unknown: Yeah. Right. I don't know who Well, that's You have
• 1:53:42
  Yeah.
• 1:53:43
  Yeah. I think you have to be very suspect of it.
• 1:53:47
  And
• 1:53:48
  I think
• 1:53:50
  we're about out of time here, so I just wanna take just a just a few seconds and give you a quote out of history. Woodrow Wilson,
• 1:53:58
  his book, The New Freedom. This is his quote.
• 1:54:02
  His quote about a secret monolithic power so pervasive.
• 1:54:06
  With undue influence, men in commerce are afraid of somebody,
• 1:54:10
  something they know there is a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive
• 1:54:17
  that they better not speak about it above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
• 1:54:23
  And Yep. And the irony of all this, the irony of his awareness, okay, do not make long term
• 1:54:30
  decisions on short term indications.
• 1:54:34
  Here is his lesson.
• 1:54:36
  The irony of his quote is that it was the same power that placed him in the White House
• 1:54:42
  in the White House.
• 1:54:44
  So we have to be very careful here. Very careful. Yep.
• 1:54:48
  Unknown: Well, we try and tread on on as good ice as we can get here, folks, and I think we our particular approach has pretty good solid ice under us, and I'm tickled to death with the progress we've made. The people like Patrick and Thomas and Michael Badeneric tried to call in 3 or four times. We'll get that straightened out. We'll maybe get Michael back on next week.
• 1:55:10
  But tomorrow's Brent and we'll see what he brings to the table and it's always a nice way to wash up the week on the spiritual foundation of this trek that we're all on kind of collectively,
• 1:55:22
  really.
• 1:55:24
  This this searching for truth, this searching for understanding,
• 1:55:27
  and this above all drive to be free,
• 1:55:30
  okay?
• 1:55:31
  So, I'm just tickled to death that we've got the platform and to have this group of of what I consider to be fine individuals that listen in and go out of their way to get involved and I really appreciate and love each and every one of you. You know, I've said that and what you don't understand is what I've gone through to this point defined you.
• 1:55:53
  Unknown: Well,
• 1:55:54
  you know, as as more and more people be get their aux cord, they they will, I guess.
• 1:55:59
  Two quotes well, two scriptures.
• 1:56:02
  Write these down, guys.
• 1:56:04
  Exodus.
• 1:56:05
  Exodus. Okay? There's another word for you. Exodus 23
• 1:56:09
  Exodus. Thirty two and thirty three.
• 1:56:12
  Exodus
• 1:56:13
  twenty
• 1:56:14
  twenty three thirty two and thirty three.
• 1:56:17
  The gist of it, it's in a word. Make no covenant.
• 1:56:22
  Then go to Psalms
• 1:56:24
  eleven
• 1:56:25
  fifteen.
• 1:56:27
  Psalms eleven fifteen.
• 1:56:30
  It talks directly to a surety.
• 1:56:34
  Okay?
• 1:56:35
  So for for the people that don't think that the Bible's full of politics, that the Bible is full of law,
• 1:56:42
  okay,
• 1:56:44
  that that is
• 1:56:46
  listen. If if you don't understand the law, how are gonna follow the gospel? You know, I I you know, maybe I'm being hard again. So Well, listen. Whatever What was that guy, Roger, said this is a law book? Who was that? That was a guy from the Rommel School of Law.
• 1:57:00
  Unknown: His name was Peter. Mhmm.
• 1:57:02
  Quite a guy. That whole Rommel School of Law bunch was a neat neat bunch. Anyway, thanks all y'all that contributed today. Good show. I'll have the links to those articles on the show description on Castbox which I think I'll get to upload timely today
• 1:57:17
  And you guys have a great day, and we'll see you tomorrow with Brent.
• 1:57:21
  Appreciate everybody's contribution.
• 1:57:25
  Hasta la Vega, guys. Done away with. See you tomorrow. Ciao. Ciao.
• 1:57:32
  Unknown: Later. Bye.
• 1:58:29
  Unknown: Blasting the Voice of Freedom Worldwide, you're listening to the Global Voice Radio Network.
• 1:58:35
  Unknown: Bye bye, boys. Have fun storming the castle.