Latest / Conversations: Special Guests with Preston Scott / Wait, Bill Gates Did A 145 On Climate Change?

Transcript

Wait, Bill Gates Did A 145 On Climate Change? · Conversations: Special Guests with Preston Scott

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Here we go our number two. Hosey over there in
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: Study one A. I'm here in Study one B. It's Monday,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: November third, show fifty four eighty six of The Morning
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: Show with Preston Scott. Great to be with you. Friends.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: We were introduced to this gentleman a long time ago
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: when his book Inconvenient Facts came out I got to
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: know Greg Wrightstone a little bit, and we've had him
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: as a guest on the program ever since. A second
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: book followed, A very Convenient Warming, and he is the
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: executive director of the CO two Coalition. Greg. Good to
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: have you back on the show. How are you, friend?
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: Good? And I have good news to report from the
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: climate change front. We are winning bigly. That is good. Well.
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: I you know, I called because I talked about you
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: last week when I saw the story in Epic Times
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: about Bill Gates. I won't call it a onet eighty.
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: I'll say it's one forty five. Is that fair? He
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: did a one?
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: Yeah. He went about as far as you could expect
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: him to go by by what we're talking about here
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: is his near retraction of climate crisis. He says, you know,
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: I was wrong about this. You know, he says we'll
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: have serious consequences, but you know what, We're all going
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: to survive. People will be able to thrive and live
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: in nearly every climate. It's not going to be the
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: catastrophe that I've been talking about for the last thirty years.
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: And so this is a huge, huge reversal. And bear
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: in mind Bill Gates has been funding to the tunes
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: of hundreds of millions of dollars some of these many
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: other groups, and he's pulling his funding on some of these.
• 1:44
  Speaker 2: And one of those one of those organizations actually is
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: pulled from is the Breakthrough Institute. Ted Northhouse was the
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: founder there and he also almost I think it was
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: the day before the Gates came out. Ed Northhouse probably
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: never heard of him, but he was a huge climate alarmist,
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: and oh yeah, I said just about the same thing
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: he said, you know. And then following on to that,
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: we had interviews on Joe Rogan with our founder will
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: Have for doctor William Haffer and Richard Lyndzon the two
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: hours on Rogan that reached probably twenty million people talking
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: about the realities of climate change and how it's beneficial
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: not catastrophic.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: Well, and then it still gets back down to you know,
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: we were just talking about a story greg In Maryland
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court is taking on a case brought by the
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Council of Baltimore, the mayor and the city Council against
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: BP and they're claiming, you know, fossil fuels, climate change
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: costing all this damage, sea level rise, extreme weather, et cetera,
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. But what we constantly see is
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: none of the dire predictions, none of them happened. They
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: don't come true.
• 2:58
  Speaker 2: They don't. You know, we have to wonder now why
• 3:01
  Speaker 2: Gates and Nordhouse and these others are moving back. And
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: I've been saying now for decades. You know, eventually the
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: truth will win out, and it always does. It just
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: might take longer than we would like. And I think
• 3:15
  Speaker 2: we're seeing that today. Like you say, the predictions they
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: make all false, are note of them put pan out,
• 3:21
  Speaker 2: and they continue doing it. Just last week about the
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: Great Barrier Reef. I'll be writing about that in the
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: newsletter this week, claiming that eighty percent of coral reefs
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: around the world are dying and nothing could be further
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: from the truth. The Great Barrier Reef in twenty twenty
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: four had the largest they started doing these surveys in
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: nineteen eighty three. In twenty twenty four, I had the
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: largest amount of coral that they've surveyed, breaking records of
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: healthy corals and the Great Barrier ief. But they're saying
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: just the opposite. They're lying, and they've been able to
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: lie and get away with it for decades.
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: Now.
• 3:58
  Speaker 2: Hopefully that will altern around and we can expose and
• 4:02
  Speaker 2: we've been, you know, with your help, we've we've been
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: exposing some of their lives. But hopefully when we'll get
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: a big, big, big turnaround here and Gates can pulse
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: them in his funding like he is now, maybe some
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: of this climate rhetoric will be toned down and we'll
• 4:19
  Speaker 2: get the truth out there.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: Back with geologists, Author and executive director of the CO
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: two Coalition, Greg Ridestone. Greg by trade, you you study
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: things in a very different world that takes a lot
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: of time, and yet you find yourself sort of steering
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: a coalition of scientists and experts that recognize that this
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: this move using what I call global warming as a vehicle.
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: We don't have time. We have to push because the
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: transformation to our economy and our culture has been pretty dramatic,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: given it's been built on myths, it is.
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: But you know what, boy, ever since Trump came in,
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: it's just been a u turn and we've been seeing
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: really really good things coming out of Washington, d C.
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: I never thought I would say that again after years
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: of the Biden administration just heaping one climate nonsense factoid
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: or non factoid onto another and imposing regulations and over
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: regulations on us. Chris Wright, it's the Department of Energy,
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: Lee Zelden at EPA. Boy, they're really really, really pushing back.
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: And here at the CO two Coalition we're working. We
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: provide the science, the facts and the data in support
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: of what Zeldm and Wright are doing. And even Chris
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: Duffiet or a Sean Duffy at the Department of Transportation,
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: we'll be filing a comment coming up on transportation issues.
• 6:05
  Speaker 2: And so that's our role as scientists. We stay out
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: of the politics as best we can. It's hard to
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: with this subject matter, but we supply that the facts
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: and the data is to support this. And we've got
• 6:17
  Speaker 2: to Our senior legal counsel is Chuck Weller, who's devised
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: to a great legal strategy using science and when we
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: file these comments for the EPA and Department of Energy
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: for their deregulation. These are all filed and created with
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: the expectation that it will eventually be heard at the
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: Supreme Court, because what they will do there's this called
• 6:42
  Speaker 2: the endangerment finding. Each of these repeals will go through
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: and then it will be sued by the Environmental Defense
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: Fund or whoever, and then it'll go to the Fifth
• 6:53
  Speaker 2: Circuit Court of DC that will rule in favor of
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: the alarmists, and then DOE or EPA will will appeal
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: that and ends up the Supreme Court. So our comments
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: and our science are all designed to be used so
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: it can be in support of the Supreme Court overturning
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: some of the previous really really bad rulings under both
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: Obama and Bid deministrations their epas. Because they've regulated, they
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: have systematically stripped freedoms away from everyone listening to this
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: this morning. You don't know the freedom to choose what
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: kind of light bulbs to use. Dishwashers, washer dryers, even
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: your ceiling fans are highly regulated. They're more expensive. They're
• 7:40
  Speaker 2: not more they say, for example, dishwasher precedent new dishwashers,
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: they say they're highly efficient. Well, i'll tell you what
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: the government's definition of efficient is a lot different than
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: my wife's definition. The government says they're using less electricity
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: and less water. That might be true. My wife's definition
• 8:01
  Speaker 2: of a good dishwasher is one that gets the dishes
• 8:04
  Speaker 2: cleaned and dried in thirty minutes or less, and we
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: don't have that now. These are now two and a
• 8:10
  Speaker 2: half to three and sometimes four hour cycles for a dishwasher,
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: all to save a couple of a couple little bit
• 8:17
  Speaker 2: of electricity and water.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Greg, you talk about the dam maybe possibly starting to break,
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: Is there one particular case, one particular regulation, one thing
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: that you're looking at that could be that part of
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: the dam that really opens it up.
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: Oh, yes, yes, yes, it's already. They've already. It's the
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: card we've got the stack of cards or house of cards.
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: When we pull this one out, the whole house of
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: cards collapse. It's called the endangerment finding under the Obama
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: EPA in two thousand and nine, they found that the
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: carbon dioxide was a pollutant and could be regulated. It's
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: not a pollutant, No, it's not. And so this is
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: we filed comments were open. We filed two separate comments,
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: and bear in mind these comments need to be reviewed
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: by EPA and consideration of the repeal of this rule.
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: They need any any sufficient comment that's filed, they have
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: to consider it. And so we'll be using that and
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: that will eventually be used in the Supreme Court. And
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: so it's going through the it's gone through the comment process.
• 9:27
  Speaker 2: E p. A is in the process of going through
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: the thousands of comments that were filed, and I anticipate
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: at some point over the next few months E p.
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: A and Lee Zelda and will come out and say,
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: you know what, We're still going to be reviewed all
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: the comments and we're going to repeal it. And that's
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: when again one of the one of the alarmist groups
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: will will sue and it ends up the Fifth Circuit
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: and then the Supreme Court. But this endangerment finding is
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: what will bring this whole house of cards falling down
• 9:55
  Speaker 2: when it is repealed. That's everything is really been based
• 9:59
  Speaker 2: on this notion the carbon dioxide as a pollutant. It
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: is not. It's they call it the demon molecule. We
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: call it the miracle molecule.
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: Go Greg. Thanks as always the books Inconvenient Facts A
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: second book of Very Convenient Warming, Warming, and I want
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: to invite you to sign up. Go to CO two
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: coalition dot org, get on their mailing list, get the
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: weekly newsletters sent out. Greg writes in it routinely. Greg
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: thanks as always for the work you're doing and for
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: making time for us.
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much,