Latest / U.S. Right to Know articles / Babies exposed to microplastics and hormone-disrupting chemicals through formula, plastic bottles, infant feeding supplies
Transcript
- 0:03Babies exposed to microplastics and hormone-disrupting chemicals through formula, plastic bottles, infant
- 0:09feeding supplies. Key findings.
- 0:15One study estimated that polypropylene baby bottles can release up to 16.2
- 0:21million microplastic particles per liter of formula during conventional formula preparation. Studies
- 0:27detected microplastics and chemicals, including phthalates and bisphenols, in formula, packaging, and
- 0:34other feeding products. Some studies reported changes in gut bacteria, immune related
- 0:40markers, and hormone function, but the review could not establish whether exposure
- 0:44causes harm. Babies may consume millions of microplastics and traces of harmful
- 0:50chemicals through infant formula, plastic bottles, and other feeding products, according to
- 0:55a scientific review. The review, published in September in Environmental Science and
- 1:00Pollution Research, examined 27 studies of these products published over They past
- 1:05decade. They show evidence of tiny plastic particles and endocrine disrupting chemicals,
- 1:10EDCs, including phthalates, bisphenols, perfluoroalkyl substances, PFS or forever
- 1:16chemicals, and organophosphorus flame retardants
- 1:22Overall, the findings highlight an emerging problem with profound implications for public
- 1:27health, the authors say.
- 1:29This review highlights the daily, unnoticed, and poorly regulated exposure to various
- 1:35chemical agents that occurs today, they wrote. The discovery of plastic particles
- 1:39in infant formula and baby bottles, even before their first use, raises
- 1:44ethical questions about the safety of products intended for this population."
- 1:49The amounts may be tiny by weight, but these exposures may cause
- 1:52long-term health harms. Frequent formula consumption, especially where breastfeeding is limited, adds
- 1:58to worries about exposure. Microplastics, MPs, or particles smaller than 5 mm,
- 2:05can produce highly reactive, oxygen-containing molecules that can damage cells
- 2:10also damage the intestinal lining or gut bacteria, studies show.
- 2:14Meanwhile, EDCs can interfere with hormonal signaling and the body's energy regulation,
- 2:19the authors say. Chemicals such as phthalates, bisphenol A BPA)
- 2:24have been linked to adverse birth outcomes
- 2:29obesity, and reproductive health problems. Recent evidence, for example, suggests that early
- 2:35PFAS exposure
- 2:40may be transferred to the next generation.
- 2:43How babies
- 2:44may be exposed to contaminants
- 2:46Infants face unique risks from exposure to these compounds because their bodies
- 2:50are still developing and cannot process and eliminate most contaminants as efficiently
- 2:56as adults. Their nervous and hormonal systems are also more sensitive to
- 3:00disruptions in metabolism and hormone regulation. The review describes two main routes
- 3:06of exposure: plastic particles
- 3:12and chemicals that migrate from food contact materials into commercial formula. One
- 3:17study estimated that polypropylene baby bottles can release 1.3 million to 16.2
- 3:23million microplastic particles per liter 33.8 ounces during conventional formula
- 3:29preparation. A 4-ounce bottle could contain nearly 2 million particles, the review
- 3:35shows. The review also found plastic particles in commercially available powdered formulas
- 3:40and chemicals in formula packaging and solid or semi-solid foods. Reported substances
- 3:45included phthalates such as D. Ethylhexal, phthalate DEHP)
- 3:51organophosphate flame retardants and their byproducts.
- 3:56Exposure may begin before birth. The review identified studies that detected plastic
- 4:01particles or related substances in the placenta, breast milk
- 4:06samples, suggesting that infants may encounter contaminants beyond formula and bottles. Human
- 4:12milk remains the recommended nutrition for infants.
- 4:15Another study published this month adds to concerns that microplastics can enter
- 4:19drinking water intended for infants and young children. Researchers consistently detected polypropylene
- 4:26particles measuring 20–50 micrometers in water from plastic sippy cups, water bottles
- 4:32with straws designed for toddlers. They estimated that children aged 3 to
- 4:376 could ingest 1.2 nanograms of polypropylene per kilogram of body weight
- 4:42daily by taking 100 sips from a reusable polypropylen bottle. Prolonged use,
- 4:47sucking, and biting the straw may contribute to particle release. Plastic chemicals
- 4:53may harm infant gut health and immunity. Some studies cited in the
- 4:57September review reported associations between exposure to plastic-related chemicals and changes in
- 5:03the body that can affect an infant's health or development. One, for
- 5:07instance, found lower gut bacterial diversity. These bacteria help train the immune
- 5:12system, protect against harmful microbes, and support digestion. Another study linked plastic
- 5:19baby bottle used to changes in intestinal vitamins and minerals and short-chain
- 5:23fatty acids. These compounds help maintain gut health, support the immune system,
- 5:28and regulate inflammation. Animal experiments also reported possible long term effects. In
- 5:35one study, researchers found changes in hormone levels and ovarian dysfunction. They
- 5:40also reported reproductive effects across generations in mouse pups exposed to microplastics.
- 5:46Other animal studies suggested that microplastics could interfere with digestion and absorption
- 5:51of essential milk proteins. These proteins help provide nutrients for growth and
- 5:57development. Findings from animal models reinforce the biological plausibility of potential
- 6:03long-term health effects. However, their applicability to human populations remains uncertain, the
- 6:09authors wrote. Calls for better monitoring, regulation of infant feeding supplies,
- 6:15the review has important limitations. The researchers say they did not assess
- 6:19the quality of the 27 studies. Differences in testing methods and sample
- 6:24sizes made findings difficult to compare. Most of the evidence came from
- 6:29observational studies, laboratory experiments, or animal studies. Still to be determined is
- 6:35how much of these contaminants infants absorb, how their bodies respond, and
- 6:39whether there are lasting health effects of exposure, the authors caution. Finding
- 6:45contaminants in infant products does not prove that they cause illness. In
- 6:50addition, no internationally accepted limits exist for microplastics in food, and rules
- 6:55for chemical additives vary by region. Earlier this year, the FDA said
- 7:00infant formula remains safe after reporting results from its largest ever testing
- 7:04of infant formula for contaminants, including heavy metals, pesticides, phthalates, and PFAS.
- 7:10The test did not cover microplastics. The authors recommend Better monitoring of
- 7:14microplastics and hormone-disrupting chemicals in infant formula, packaging
- 7:19and feeding products, consistent testing methods, more research into early childhood exposure,
- 7:24safer packaging. Stricter limits on chemicals that move from packaging into food.
- 7:29Protecting the developing population means anticipating and controlling these factors that could
- 7:34threaten health, the authors wrote. Although we have only partial evidence, it
- 7:39is sufficient to justify responses from regulatory, public health, and research agencies,
- 7:45making it necessary to establish an autoxicological surveillance system that takes concrete
- 7:50action to address this issue. Reference Amaya MC, Bolaños Rodriguez SD, Burgos
- 7:57J.S. Hernandez Rincon EH Microplastic, and Endocrine Disruptor Contamination in Infant Formula
- 8:03and Early Health Effects. Scoping review. Inviron Psi Pulut Res 2026-33, 1528515297,
- 8:11DOI 10.1007-S 11356-026-381535.