Latest / History of the English Bible / 08 - History of the English Bible by John Brown

Transcript

08 - History of the English Bible by John Brown · History of the English Bible

0:00
Speaker 1: Chapter seven of the History of the English Bible by
0:03
Speaker 1: John Brown. This LibriVox recording is in the public domain.
0:07
Speaker 1: Read by Mirianne, Chapter seven. The revised version of eighteen
0:12
Speaker 1: eighty one, the authorized version of sixteen eleven, whose history
0:18
Speaker 1: we have followed, won its way gradually to national acceptance,
0:22
Speaker 1: and did so not because invested with royal authority, but
0:25
Speaker 1: by virtue of its own intrinsic excellence. Its one and
0:29
Speaker 1: only competitor of influential sort was the Genevan version, which
0:33
Speaker 1: is still in great favor with many. Indeed, the same
0:36
Speaker 1: year in which the new revision appeared, two other editions
0:40
Speaker 1: of the Genevan, a folio and a quarto, were published
0:43
Speaker 1: by the King's Printer, and for five years more further
0:46
Speaker 1: editions continued to be sent forth. Then too, even after
0:50
Speaker 1: sixteen sixteen, when it ceased to be printed in England,
0:53
Speaker 1: it continued to be printed abroad and sent over to
0:56
Speaker 1: this country. But at length this competition came to an end.
1:00
Speaker 1: The revision of sixteen eleven obtained wider acceptance and soon became,
1:04
Speaker 1: without question the Bible of the English people. Still, as
1:08
Speaker 1: the book became better known, the question of further revision
1:12
Speaker 1: began to be discussed. There is no finality in human affairs,
1:16
Speaker 1: and each generation has to take its own part and
1:19
Speaker 1: place in the general advance. Deepening acquaintance led to deeper
1:23
Speaker 1: certainty that, in spite of all the care which had
1:26
Speaker 1: been taken, numerous errors, verbal and otherwise had been retained
1:31
Speaker 1: in the version so recently revised, and others came to
1:34
Speaker 1: be added from time to time as new editions edited
1:38
Speaker 1: with insufficient care were sent forth into the world. For example,
1:42
Speaker 1: the edition of sixteen thirty one acquired the name of
1:45
Speaker 1: the Wicked Bible because it read thou shalt commit adultery
1:49
Speaker 1: instead of thou shalt not. In the editions of sixteen
1:53
Speaker 1: thirty eight, it was stated that the fire devoured twenty
1:56
Speaker 1: thousand fifty men instead of two hundred and fifty. He
2:00
Speaker 1: slew two lions like men instead of two lion like men,
2:05
Speaker 1: taught by the people of men, for by the precept
2:08
Speaker 1: of men. These are only a few examples out of many,
2:13
Speaker 1: and the list was made longer by the importation of
2:15
Speaker 1: Bibles from abroad. The printers of Amsterdam made the discovery
2:19
Speaker 1: that Bible printing might be developed into a lucrative business,
2:23
Speaker 1: and sent over considerable consignments to this country. It scarcely
2:27
Speaker 1: needs to be pointed out that English Bibles set up
2:30
Speaker 1: by Dutch compositors were not likely to be productions of
2:33
Speaker 1: unfailing accuracy. The process went on so long and so
2:37
Speaker 1: far that in sixteen forty three the Assembly of Divines
2:40
Speaker 1: at Westminster found it necessary to make a report to
2:43
Speaker 1: Parliament on the subject, giving instances of mistakes which had
2:47
Speaker 1: been made, such as found the rulers for found the mules,
2:52
Speaker 1: corruption for conception, condemnation for redemption. It was resolved in
2:57
Speaker 1: consequence that foreign Bibles should not be sold until they
3:00
Speaker 1: had been passed and allowed. It was stated in sixteen
3:03
Speaker 1: forty six at Amsterdam that an English printer there had
3:07
Speaker 1: sent out in five years forty thousand copies, that his
3:11
Speaker 1: last edition consisted of twelve thousand copies, and that altogether
3:14
Speaker 1: in that Dutch city one hundred and fifty thousand English
3:17
Speaker 1: Bibles had been printed. In bibles produced in this country,
3:21
Speaker 1: as well as in those sent from abroad, new errors
3:24
Speaker 1: were made and old ones copied from one to another.
3:27
Speaker 1: A considerable sheaf of mistakes, such as the following, came
3:31
Speaker 1: to be gathered by observant readers shall glean, for shall
3:35
Speaker 1: not glean in the throne of David. For in the
3:38
Speaker 1: room of David, shined through darkness, for walked through darkness,
3:43
Speaker 1: delighted herself, for defiled herself. And I praise you for
3:47
Speaker 1: I praise you not. This kind of process went on
3:51
Speaker 1: year after year, repeating itself and extending itself. When Doctor
3:55
Speaker 1: Shrevener set about making the Cambridge Paragraph Bible of eighteen
3:59
Speaker 1: seventy three as strictly accurate as possible, the changes, most
4:03
Speaker 1: of them trivial, but many not trivial, which had to
4:06
Speaker 1: be made to the text were to be counted by hundreds,
4:11
Speaker 1: then two. As another reason for revision, Language itself undergoes change,
4:15
Speaker 1: and words pass out of use or become unintelligible. So
4:19
Speaker 1: again there are many words which, while still in use,
4:22
Speaker 1: are understood in a different sense from that prevailing. In
4:25
Speaker 1: sixteen eleven. The translators in writing attached to one meaning,
4:30
Speaker 1: we in reading quite another, so that words which once
4:33
Speaker 1: served as stepping stones to the reader become stumbling blocks
4:37
Speaker 1: in his path. Instances of this may be found in
4:40
Speaker 1: such cases as where carriage means baggage Acts Chapter twenty one,
4:45
Speaker 1: Verse fifteen careful, anxious Philippians chapter four, verse six, liberal,
4:51
Speaker 1: noble and curl crafty Isaiah chapter thirty two, verse five, delicately,
4:57
Speaker 1: luxuriously Luke chapter seven, verse twenty, and publican a revenue officer.
5:04
Speaker 1: Then again, as to the manuscripts of the Greek text
5:07
Speaker 1: from which translations had to be made, it stands to
5:10
Speaker 1: reason that in the manuscripts from which we translate, the
5:14
Speaker 1: nearer we get to the time when the Gospels and
5:16
Speaker 1: epistles were written, the more likely we are to get
5:19
Speaker 1: to the actual words first written. Now it is well
5:23
Speaker 1: known that what are regarded as the most authoritative manuscripts
5:26
Speaker 1: of the Greek text of the New Testament have, with
5:29
Speaker 1: two exceptions, come to light since the time of the
5:31
Speaker 1: translators of sixteen eleven. Of the Uskiel manuscripts, the most
5:36
Speaker 1: ancient and important are the Siniatic, written in the fourth
5:41
Speaker 1: century and now deposited in the Imperial Library at Saint Petersburg.
5:45
Speaker 1: The Vatican, also of the fourth century and preserved in
5:49
Speaker 1: the Vatican Library at Rome, the Alexandrian of the fifth century,
5:53
Speaker 1: now in the British Museum, the Ephrium Codecs of the
5:57
Speaker 1: fifth century in the National Library, at Paris, Visa's Codex
6:01
Speaker 1: of the sixth century in the University Library, Cambridge, and
6:06
Speaker 1: the Claramontani, also of the sixth century, which formerly belonged
6:10
Speaker 1: to Biza, but is now in the National Library at Paris.
6:14
Speaker 1: Yet not one of these was available at the time
6:16
Speaker 1: when King James's translation was made. The Vatican Manuscript, one
6:20
Speaker 1: of the two oldest, though known to be in existence
6:23
Speaker 1: as early as fifteen eighty seven, was so jealously guarded
6:26
Speaker 1: at the Vatican so far as the New Testament was concerned,
6:29
Speaker 1: that not till the first half of the last century
6:32
Speaker 1: could its text be ascertained, and then only by a
6:35
Speaker 1: comparison of three more or less imperfect collations, whereas now
6:40
Speaker 1: we have a magnificent reproduction in photographic facsimile of the
6:43
Speaker 1: entire manuscript. The Sinetic Manuscript, also of the fourth century,
6:50
Speaker 1: was discovered by doctor Tischendorff as recently as February fourth,
6:54
Speaker 1: eighteen fifty nine. The Alexandrine was not brought to light
6:58
Speaker 1: until sixteen twenty eight, when it was presented to Charles
7:01
Speaker 1: the First by Cyril Luker, Patriarch of Constantinople. And although
7:05
Speaker 1: the Ephrium Codex was brought to Europe in the early
7:08
Speaker 1: part of the sixteenth century. It was not known to
7:11
Speaker 1: contain a portion of the New Testament until towards the
7:14
Speaker 1: close of the seventeenth century, and was not collated until
7:17
Speaker 1: seventeen sixteen. Then, too, manuscripts are not our only source
7:21
Speaker 1: of knowledge of the original texts of the scriptures. There
7:24
Speaker 1: are ancient versions, such as the Old Latin, the Old Syriac,
7:29
Speaker 1: and the two Egyptian versions, all of which came to
7:32
Speaker 1: be accessible to the scholars of the nineteenth century as
7:35
Speaker 1: they were not to the revisers of sixteen eleven, and
7:38
Speaker 1: from their early date must have been made from the
7:41
Speaker 1: earliest manuscripts, and were likely therefore to furnish, in the
7:44
Speaker 1: case of disputed passages, valuable suggestions as to the actual
7:48
Speaker 1: words employed at first. Thus, the possession of greatly improved
7:53
Speaker 1: apparatus furnished an additional reason for undertaking a further revision.
7:59
Speaker 1: By the time that the authorized version was forty years old,
8:02
Speaker 1: men's thoughts began to be turned to the subject. As
8:05
Speaker 1: early as sixteen fifty five, the Long Parliament made an
8:08
Speaker 1: order that a bill should be brought in for a
8:10
Speaker 1: new translation of the Bible, and four years later, the
8:13
Speaker 1: House directed that it be referred to a committee to
8:15
Speaker 1: send for and advise with Doctor Walton, Doctor Cudworth, and
8:19
Speaker 1: others such as they should think fit, to consider of
8:23
Speaker 1: the translations and impressions of the Bible, and to offer
8:26
Speaker 1: their opinions therein. The committee met from time to time
8:30
Speaker 1: at the House of Bolstrode Whitelock, but eventually the death
8:34
Speaker 1: of Cromwell put an end to all further endeavors in
8:37
Speaker 1: the way of revision. Nothing was done, as we might
8:40
Speaker 1: expect after the coming of the Restoration, but in the
8:44
Speaker 1: eighteenth century various tentative efforts were made, some of them
8:47
Speaker 1: by able men. Revised translations of the New Testament were
8:51
Speaker 1: made by Gilbert Wakefield in seventeen ninety five, by Archbishop
8:56
Speaker 1: Newcombe in seventeen ninety six, and by Scarlett in seventeen
8:59
Speaker 1: nine twenty eight. But then came the French Revolution and
9:03
Speaker 1: frightened Englishman. In seventeen ninety six the note of alarm
9:07
Speaker 1: was sounded in a letter to the Bishop of Eli and,
9:09
Speaker 1: as doctor Plumptra has said, from that time, conservatism pure
9:13
Speaker 1: and simple was in the ascendant, to suggest that the
9:16
Speaker 1: authorized version might be inaccurate, was almost as bad as
9:20
Speaker 1: holding French principles. When we pass into the nineteenth century,
9:24
Speaker 1: the long defeated hope was revived by the appearance of
9:26
Speaker 1: lectures in eighteen ten by the Lady Margaret, Professor of
9:30
Speaker 1: Divinity at Cambridge, Doctor marsh afterwards Bishop of Peterborough. In
9:35
Speaker 1: his first edition, he plainly said, it is probable that
9:38
Speaker 1: our Authorized Version is as faithful a representation of the
9:41
Speaker 1: Original Scriptures as could have been formed at that period.
9:46
Speaker 1: But when we consider the immense ascension that has since
9:48
Speaker 1: been made both to our critical and philological apparatus, when
9:53
Speaker 1: we consider that the most important sources of intelligence for
9:56
Speaker 1: interpretation of the Original Scriptures were likewise opened after that period,
10:00
Speaker 1: we cannot possibly pretend that our Authorized Version does not
10:04
Speaker 1: require amendment. The italics here given are the professor's own.
10:08
Speaker 1: Forty six years later, the Reverend William Selwyn, another Lady Margaret,
10:13
Speaker 1: professor of Divinity at Cambridge, spoke out to the same
10:16
Speaker 1: effect in a work of his entitled Notes on the
10:20
Speaker 1: Proposed Amendment of the Authorized Version of the Holy Scriptures.
10:23
Speaker 1: He said, I do not hesitate to avow my firm
10:26
Speaker 1: persuasion that there are at least one thousand passages of
10:30
Speaker 1: the English Bible that might be amended without any change
10:33
Speaker 1: in the general texture and justly reverenced language of the version.
10:37
Speaker 1: Professor Selwyn also brought the subject of revision before the
10:40
Speaker 1: Lower House of Convocation of the Province of Canterbury, and
10:44
Speaker 1: that same year eighteen fifty six, mister Heywood, MP for
10:48
Speaker 1: North Lancashire, moved in the House of Commons an address
10:52
Speaker 1: to the Crown praying that Her Majesty would appoint a
10:54
Speaker 1: Royal Commission of learned men to consider of such amendments
10:57
Speaker 1: of the Authorized version of the Bible has had then
11:00
Speaker 1: already proposed, and to receive suggestions from all persons who
11:03
Speaker 1: might be willing to offer them, and to report the
11:06
Speaker 1: amendments which they might be prepared to recommend. About the
11:10
Speaker 1: same time, also there was published a translation of the
11:12
Speaker 1: Gospel of John, newly compared with the original Greek and
11:15
Speaker 1: revised by five clergymen. The five clergymen were Doctor John Barrow,
11:20
Speaker 1: George Moberly, D C. L. Henry Alford B D. W. G.
11:25
Speaker 1: Humphrey b D. And Charles j Ellicott M A. Their
11:30
Speaker 1: purpose being to show by example the kind of thing
11:33
Speaker 1: in the way of revision many were desiring to see.
11:36
Speaker 1: That same year, also doctor Trench, then Dean of Westminster,
11:40
Speaker 1: published his work on the Authorized Version of the New Testament,
11:44
Speaker 1: pleading for a movement in the same direction. The first
11:47
Speaker 1: actual step was taken on February tenth, eighteen seventy, when
11:50
Speaker 1: a resolution was moved in the Upper House of Convocation
11:54
Speaker 1: by Bishop Wilberforce and seconded by Bishop Ellicott let a
11:58
Speaker 1: committee of both houses be appointed to report upon the
12:00
Speaker 1: desirableness of a revision of the Authorized Version of the
12:04
Speaker 1: New Testament. On the motion of Bishop Olivant, seconded by
12:08
Speaker 1: Bishop Thurwall, it was agreed to enlarge this resolution so
12:12
Speaker 1: as to include the Old Testament also, and the resolution
12:15
Speaker 1: so amended was ultimately adopted and communicated to the Lower
12:18
Speaker 1: House the following day, where it was accepted without a division.
12:23
Speaker 1: The committee thus appointed, consisting of seven bishops and fourteen
12:26
Speaker 1: members of the Lower House, met on March twenty fourth
12:30
Speaker 1: and agreed to report that it was desirable that a
12:33
Speaker 1: revision be undertaken, that it should comprise both marginal readings
12:37
Speaker 1: and such emendations in the text of the Authorized Version
12:40
Speaker 1: as may be found necessary, That it should not contemplate
12:44
Speaker 1: any new translation of the Bible or any alteration of
12:46
Speaker 1: the language, except where, in the judgment of the most
12:49
Speaker 1: competent scholars, such change is necessary, and that where such
12:53
Speaker 1: change was made, the language of the existing version should
12:56
Speaker 1: be closely followed. Finally, that it was desirable that Convocation
12:59
Speaker 1: SHO should nominate a body of its own members to
13:02
Speaker 1: undertake the work of revision, who shall be at liberty
13:05
Speaker 1: to invite cooperation of any eminent for scholarship, to whatever
13:09
Speaker 1: nation or religious body they may belong. This report was
13:14
Speaker 1: presented to the Upper House on May third, where its
13:16
Speaker 1: adoption was carried unanimously and a committee appointed to carry
13:20
Speaker 1: it into effect. In the Lower House, an attempt was
13:22
Speaker 1: made to confine the revision to scholars in communion with
13:25
Speaker 1: the Church of England. This, however, was unsuccessful, and the
13:28
Speaker 1: adoption of the report was carried with two dissentients only.
13:33
Speaker 1: The joint Committee held their first meeting on May twenty
13:35
Speaker 1: fifth and agreed to separate into two companies, one for
13:38
Speaker 1: the revision of the Old Testament and one for that
13:40
Speaker 1: of the New They also selected the scholars who should
13:43
Speaker 1: be invited to join the companies and decided upon the
13:45
Speaker 1: general rules which should guide their procedure. The rules agreed
13:49
Speaker 1: upon were to introduce as few alterations as possible consistent
13:53
Speaker 1: with faithfulness, to keep as far as possible to the
13:56
Speaker 1: language of the authorized in earlier versions. Each company to
13:59
Speaker 1: go twice over the portion to be revised, the text
14:03
Speaker 1: to be adopted to be that for which the evidence
14:06
Speaker 1: is decidedly preponderating, to make or retain no change in
14:10
Speaker 1: the text on the second and final revision by each
14:12
Speaker 1: company except two thirds of those present, to prove the same,
14:17
Speaker 1: To revise the headings of chapters, pages, paragraphs, italics, and punctuation,
14:22
Speaker 1: And finally, to refer on the part of each company,
14:25
Speaker 1: when considered desirable to divines, scholars and literary men, whether
14:29
Speaker 1: at home or abroad, for their opinions. The Old Testament Company,
14:34
Speaker 1: as at first constituted, consisted of twenty four members. An
14:38
Speaker 1: equal number acted also for the New Testament. In the
14:41
Speaker 1: course of the ten years they were at work, changes
14:44
Speaker 1: from various causes had to be made, and ultimately the
14:46
Speaker 1: revisers consisted of sixty five English scholars who took part
14:50
Speaker 1: in the work. Of these, forty one were members of
14:53
Speaker 1: the Church of England and twenty four members of other churches.
14:56
Speaker 1: Of the latter number two represented the Episcopal Church of Ireland,
15:00
Speaker 1: one the Episcopal Church of Scotland, four the Baptists, three
15:03
Speaker 1: the Congregationalists, five the Free Church of Scotland, five the
15:07
Speaker 1: Established Church of Scotland and one the United Presbyterians, one
15:12
Speaker 1: the Unitarians and two the Wesleyan Methodists. Varied representation was
15:17
Speaker 1: still further secured by the cooperation of a number of
15:20
Speaker 1: American scholars selected and invited by the Reverend Doctor Schaff
15:23
Speaker 1: of New York, acting on behalf of the English companies.
15:27
Speaker 1: Various causes of delay, however, intervened, and it was not
15:30
Speaker 1: until July seventeenth, eighteen seventy two, that the communication was
15:34
Speaker 1: made that the American companies were duly constituted. It thus
15:38
Speaker 1: came about that the English revisers of the Old Testament
15:40
Speaker 1: had already made some progress, had in fact gone twice
15:44
Speaker 1: through the Pentitok before they secured the cooperation of the
15:46
Speaker 1: American Old Testament Revision Company. The English New Testament Company
15:51
Speaker 1: assembled for the first time on Wednesday, June twenty second,
15:53
Speaker 1: eighteen seventy They met in the Chapel of Henry the Seventh,
15:57
Speaker 1: and there united in the celebration of the Lord Supper.
16:00
Speaker 1: After this act of worship, they formerly entered upon the
16:03
Speaker 1: task assigned them. Through the kind arrangement of Doctor Stanley,
16:07
Speaker 1: then Dean of Westminster, the Jerusalem Chamber of the Abbey
16:11
Speaker 1: was assigned as their place of meeting. This room, as
16:15
Speaker 1: doctor Nuth, one of the revisers, reminded us, is one
16:18
Speaker 1: of more than ordinary interest. Originally the parlor of the
16:22
Speaker 1: Abbot's palace. It was here the assembly of divines of
16:25
Speaker 1: Commonwealth days. Driven by the cold from Henry the Seventh
16:29
Speaker 1: Chapel held its sixty sixth session on October second, sixteen
16:34
Speaker 1: forty three, and there thenceforward continued to meet until its
16:38
Speaker 1: closing session of February twenty second, sixteen forty nine. Here
16:43
Speaker 1: were prepared the Westminster Confession of Faith and the longer
16:46
Speaker 1: and Shorter Catechisms, which formerly played so conspicuous a part
16:49
Speaker 1: in the religious education of the Presbyterians of Scotland and
16:53
Speaker 1: the independence of England. And here also, just fifty years later,
16:58
Speaker 1: assembled the Commission appointed by William the Third to devise
17:01
Speaker 1: a basis for a scheme of comprehension in a revision
17:04
Speaker 1: of the prayer book. It was in the same room
17:08
Speaker 1: the New Testament Company held their meetings for ten years,
17:11
Speaker 1: except on the few occasions when it was not available.
17:15
Speaker 1: Doctor Nuth has further told us of the method of procedure.
17:18
Speaker 1: The company assembled at eleven a m. And continued in
17:21
Speaker 1: session till six p m. With an interval of a
17:24
Speaker 1: half hour, prayer being offered and preliminary matters of correspondence
17:27
Speaker 1: disposed of. The chairman read a short passage as given
17:31
Speaker 1: in the authorized version. The question was then asked first
17:35
Speaker 1: as to textual changes that being settled, The chairman asked
17:38
Speaker 1: for proposals of rendering, and free discussion having followed, the
17:42
Speaker 1: vote of the company was taken. They resolved the work
17:45
Speaker 1: should be thoroughly done, but eventually grew alarmed at the
17:48
Speaker 1: probable length of the time the revision would take. At
17:51
Speaker 1: the end of the ninth day of meeting, not more
17:53
Speaker 1: than one hundred and fifty three verses had been revised,
17:56
Speaker 1: an average of only seventeen verses a day. By and by, however,
18:00
Speaker 1: for progress became more rapid, but even then the average
18:03
Speaker 1: did not rise above thirty five verses a day. The
18:06
Speaker 1: first revision of The Gospel of Matthew was completed on
18:09
Speaker 1: the thirty sixth day of meeting May twenty fourth, eighteen
18:12
Speaker 1: seventy one, and that of John on the one hundred
18:14
Speaker 1: and third day February nineteenth, eighteen seventy three. The first
18:18
Speaker 1: revision of the Apocalypse the final Book, was completed on
18:22
Speaker 1: the two hundred and seventy third meeting August twentieth, eighteen
18:25
Speaker 1: seventy seven. The meetings were held monthly for a session
18:29
Speaker 1: of four consecutive days, excepting only August and September. Thus,
18:34
Speaker 1: the first revision required two hundred and forty one meetings
18:36
Speaker 1: during sixty monthly sessions. The second revision was completed on
18:40
Speaker 1: December thirteenth, eighteen seventy eight, having occupied on the whole
18:44
Speaker 1: ninety six meetings, or about two years and a half.
18:47
Speaker 1: Then came the suggestions of the American Company for consideration,
18:51
Speaker 1: and these, together with the preparation of the preface, occupied
18:54
Speaker 1: the company until November eleventh, eighteen eighty, on which day,
18:57
Speaker 1: at five o'clock in the afternoon, after ten years five
19:00
Speaker 1: months of labor, the revision of the New Testament was
19:03
Speaker 1: brought to its close on the evening of that same day.
19:06
Speaker 1: Being Saint Martin's day, the company assembled in the Church
19:10
Speaker 1: of Saint Martin's in the Fields, and there united in
19:12
Speaker 1: a special service of prayer and thanksgiving, thanksgiving for the
19:16
Speaker 1: happy completion of their labors, for the spirit of harmony
19:19
Speaker 1: and brotherly affection that had pervaded their meetings, and for
19:23
Speaker 1: the divine goodness which had permitted so many to give
19:25
Speaker 1: themselves continuously to this work, and prayer that He whose
19:30
Speaker 1: glory they had humbly striven to promote, might graciously accept
19:33
Speaker 1: this their service, and deigned to use it as an
19:36
Speaker 1: instrument for the good of man and the honor of
19:38
Speaker 1: His Holy name. The New Testament was published on May seventeenth,
19:42
Speaker 1: eighteen eighty one, and that same day was also presented
19:45
Speaker 1: to the Queen. The revision of the Old Testament, being
19:49
Speaker 1: of a much larger book, took longer time than that
19:52
Speaker 1: of the New, but in one important respect, the work
19:55
Speaker 1: was much simpler than that which the New Testament company
19:57
Speaker 1: had before them. They had no dab difficulty in determining
20:01
Speaker 1: the original text from which to translate, whereas in the
20:04
Speaker 1: case of the New Testament that was often a matter
20:06
Speaker 1: for anxious and prolonged consideration. The received, or as it
20:11
Speaker 1: is commonly called, the massoretic text of the Old Testament scriptures,
20:15
Speaker 1: has come down to us in manuscripts which are of
20:18
Speaker 1: no great antiquity. The earliest of which the age is
20:21
Speaker 1: known is as late as eighty nine sixteen, and they
20:24
Speaker 1: all belong to the same family or recension. That there
20:28
Speaker 1: were other recessions at one time, as probable from the
20:30
Speaker 1: fact that there are variations in the ancient versions, the
20:34
Speaker 1: oldest of which the Greek Septuagant was in part at
20:38
Speaker 1: least made over two centuries before the Christian era. But
20:42
Speaker 1: as the state of our knowledge on the subject is
20:44
Speaker 1: not at present such as to justify any attempt at
20:47
Speaker 1: an entire reconstruction of the text on the authority of
20:49
Speaker 1: these versions, the revisers felt it most prudent, as they
20:54
Speaker 1: tell us, simply to adopt the massoretic text as the
20:58
Speaker 1: basis of their work, and, following the example of the
21:01
Speaker 1: translators of the Authorized Version, to depart from it only
21:04
Speaker 1: in exceptional cases. The revision of the Old Testament was
21:08
Speaker 1: commenced on the thirtieth of June eighteen seventy, and was
21:11
Speaker 1: completed in eighty five sessions, occupying seven hundred and ninety
21:15
Speaker 1: two days and ending on twentieth June eighteen eighty four.
21:19
Speaker 1: The greater part of the sessions were for ten days
21:22
Speaker 1: each and each day the company generally sat for six hours.
21:26
Speaker 1: The labor therefore was great but ungrudgingly rendered, and the revisers,
21:31
Speaker 1: like their brethren of the New Testament Company, brought their
21:34
Speaker 1: long task to a close with a feeling of deep
21:37
Speaker 1: thankfulness to Almighty God and the earnest hope that their
21:40
Speaker 1: endeavors might, with His blessing, tend to a clearer knowledge
21:44
Speaker 1: of the Old Testament scriptures. The revision of the authorized
21:48
Speaker 1: version of the Apocrypha was included in the arrangement between
21:51
Speaker 1: the companies and the representatives of the presses of Oxford
21:55
Speaker 1: and Cambridge, the publishers and proprietors of the new version,
22:01
Speaker 1: but this last portion of the work was not to
22:03
Speaker 1: be undertaken until the other and greater portions of the
22:05
Speaker 1: work were concluded. As early However, as March twenty first,
22:09
Speaker 1: eighteen seventy nine, it was resolved that after such conclusion,
22:12
Speaker 1: the company should be divided into three committees, to be
22:15
Speaker 1: called the London, Westminster and Cambridge Committees, whose work should
22:19
Speaker 1: be the revision of the Apocrypha. Also this was done,
22:23
Speaker 1: and thus in eighteen ninety five was completed. The work
22:26
Speaker 1: begun in hope and prayer no less than five and
22:28
Speaker 1: twenty years before. This work, in its completed form, as
22:33
Speaker 1: a revision of the great version of sixteen eleven, has
22:36
Speaker 1: been spreading more and more widely among the Christian people
22:39
Speaker 1: of the land. It has not escaped criticism. No work
22:42
Speaker 1: of man's hand can hope to do that. In many
22:45
Speaker 1: ways it is open to criticism. But it has made
22:49
Speaker 1: a new Bible for many, and made plainer to them
22:52
Speaker 1: the revelation of the mind of God. What does this
22:56
Speaker 1: renders effectual service to humanity? The Bible is the greater
23:00
Speaker 1: of all books. There are many echoes in the world,
23:03
Speaker 1: said Gutta, but few voices. This book is a living voice,
23:07
Speaker 1: carrying its own authority with it, as the Confession of
23:10
Speaker 1: Faith of the Scottish Church declared. Amongst the arguments whereby
23:14
Speaker 1: the Holy Scriptures doth abundantly evidence itself to be the
23:18
Speaker 1: Word of God are the heavenliness of the matter, the
23:21
Speaker 1: efficacy of the doctrine, the majesty of the style, the
23:25
Speaker 1: consent of all the parts, the scope of the whole
23:30
Speaker 1: end of Chapter seven and and of the history of
23:34
Speaker 1: the English Bible by John Brown, recorded for the Brivox
23:38
Speaker 1: by Marianne Spiegel in July two thousand and sixteen.