Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / ‘One big bunch of thieves’ corrupt Congress

Transcript

‘One big bunch of thieves’ corrupt Congress · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  Once again, Congress is pushing through another farm bill, or as I like to call it, the one big beautiful scam bill.
• 0:38
  Let's take a peek at what's inside and what other fevery is coming out of Washington, D.C.
• 0:44
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Engel here with the Constitution Study, where we read and study the Constitution, teacherising generation be free.
• 0:51
  Glad you could join me today.
• 0:55
  Or you know, I call it the one big beautiful scam.
• 0:59
  Other uh acceptable titles would be uh Porka Palooza, uh the Rip Off the American People Act.
• 1:05
  I mean, there's a lot of names we can assign to this, because the farm bill is generally full of illegal, unconstitutional nonsense designed to separate the American people from their money and often from their rights as well.
• 1:21
  So uh I'm looking actually, there's a report from the Daily Caller that's giving us an overview, and I'm going to use it um kind of as the the structure here.
• 1:31
  So uh I guess the last farm bill was passed in 2018 and was projected to cost 867 billion dollars over a decade.
• 1:42
  That's a lot of money, mostly for programs that are absolutely unconstitutional.
• 1:47
  First of all, the federal government has no authority to regulate farms.
• 1:52
  They have no leg constitutional, there's nothing in the constitution that delegates the United States the authority to regulate agriculture.
• 1:58
  Meaning the Department of Agriculture, which is farm bills you don't know a part of, um, yet they don't legally exist because the legislation creating them was not made pursuant of the Constitution.
• 2:09
  It actually is an unconstitutional act, which means that act is void.
• 2:14
  But that has yet to stop Congress from embezzling trillions, yes, trillions of dollars of your money uh to uh well pad their campaigns, pad votes, do all these other things other than what they're legally authorized to do, that is pass legislation pursuant to the constitution.
• 2:35
  This is the mess that we're getting into.
• 2:37
  Now, uh the claims are that well, the projected cost is going to be roughly the same, which in congressional speak means, oh, we're probably talking more like a trillion dollars by the time we're said and done.
• 2:49
  Because let's face it, Congress has yet to project costs properly than any bill that I'm aware of.
• 2:55
  And uh uh, you know, there again, a lot of shenanigans are going to go in here because guess what?
• 3:01
  They're not cutting any of the unconstitutional acts.
• 3:04
  They're not cutting, they're not cutting the fraud.
• 3:07
  This whole thing is a fraud.
• 3:10
  Um, because according to the Congressional Budgets Office, uh, once they reallocate some funds within the bill, it's projected again, as I said, to exceed a trillion dollars, trillion with a T.
• 3:24
  Now, our national debt's already approaching a trillion of 40 trillion dollars.
• 3:28
  Do we really need another unconstitutional trillion dollar bill?
• 3:33
  No, we don't.
• 3:35
  But I don't think that's going to stop Congress.
• 3:37
  Now, one of the things that apparently is a big to-do within this bill is provisions that are uh tied to the the Food Security and Farm Protection Act, another unconstitutional piece of legislation that wants to regulate interstate agriculture.
• 3:54
  Now, remember, Congress can regulate interstate commerce.
• 3:59
  But uh what Congress is trying to do with the Farm Security and Protection Act, uh, Food Security and Farm Protection Act is tell states how to um, well, basically how to regulate people from out of state selling into their uh uh into their property into their state, not regulate the commerce, but to uh, well, basically to play uh a national uh agriculture director.
• 4:25
  Now, it shouldn't surprise you that Iowa Senator Joni Ernst is really in favor of this because she wants to protect farmers and ranchers from well, conflicting state regulations.
• 4:37
  Uh, Ms.
• 4:38
  Ernst, I want to remind you, you took an oath to support the Constitution, and that Constitution says that Congress gets to regulate interstate commerce.
• 4:47
  It says that states cannot impose taxes or duties or imposts on products from other states, but it says nothing about regulating what can and cannot be sold in their state uh or whatever regulations are required for that state.
• 5:01
  That would be a power not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, therefore violates the 10th Amendment.
• 5:08
  Now, as Arnst Ernst said uh in a statement to uh the Daily Coil or News Foundation, as liberal activists who have never set foot on a farm try to ban our bacon with dangerous and arbitrary overregulation.
• 5:19
  I'm fighting to ensure that to make sure the voices of farmers and experts who know best are heard.
• 5:24
  That's not your job, Miss Ernst.
• 5:27
  If a state doesn't like bacon made a certain way, that's up to the people of that state.
• 5:32
  You don't have a right to force people in other states to follow your rules.
• 5:37
  But this is the type of overreach we see from Congress all the time.
• 5:42
  Uh, let's see, the the bill, the farm bill, the porcapalooza, um, also wants to set provisions requiring national uniformity in pesticide labeling, limiting a state's ability to oppose additional warning labels beyond those approved by the environmental protection agency.
• 6:00
  Again, interstate commerce.
• 6:03
  Congress can regulate interstate commerce.
• 6:05
  They cannot require, they cannot prohibit a state from putting additional warning labels on uh uh they can't regulate the commerce within the state.
• 6:15
  And the EPA, guess what?
• 6:17
  That is an unconstitutional agency.
• 6:19
  There's nothing in the Constitution that authorizes the United States to regulate the environment or to protect the environment.
• 6:27
  So again, this is just more government overreach stuff, and it's something we've come quite used to.
• 6:33
  Now, it's interesting because uh Jay Feldman, executive director of director of Beyond Pesticides, made a point.
• 6:39
  Now, I agree, warning labels are good things.
• 6:42
  The question is, should states be bound to limits established by the federal government that may not meet with the needs of the state.
• 6:51
  We didn't, the states didn't delegate to the United States the authority to regulate these things.
• 6:55
  So again, if they if it's uh uh the commerce between states, they can regulate.
• 7:00
  Between states, they can regulate.
• 7:02
  But if they sit in the if the state says, listen, um, you know, the federal government says that uh uh was it uh glyphosate, right?
• 7:02
  But if they sit in the, if the state says, listen, um, you know, the federal government says that uh uh was it uh glyphosate, right?
• 7:10
  Roundup, the glyphosate base, that that is now a national security requirement, and you cannot warn people of the known dangers of glyphosate.
• 7:10
  Roundup, the glyphosate base, that that is now a national security requirement, and you cannot warn people of the known dangers of glyphosate.
• 7:19
  Well, I'm sorry, that's illegal and unconstitutional.
• 7:19
  Well, I'm sorry, that's illegal and unconstitutional.
• 7:21
  So if a state says, no, we want to warn our people about the known dangers of glyphosate, they have every legal right to do so.
• 7:21
  So if a state says no, we want to warn our people about the known dangers of glyphosate, they have every legal right to do so because the law is a constitutional.
• 7:28
  Because the laws that Congress passed prohibiting this are unconstitutional and therefore void.
• 7:36
  Speaking of void, guess what?
• 7:38
  Tell me what the farm bill has to do with broadband access.
• 7:43
  Because there's another 350 million dollars to uh uh fund the reconnect broad uh broadband program, which I guess is meant to bring internet access to farmers.
• 7:56
  They've already spent two billion dollars of this under uh President Biden, his uh poorly named infrastructure investment and jobs act.
• 8:06
  Well, guess what?
• 8:07
  Now they want another 350 million dollars.
• 8:09
  What does that have to do with farms?
• 8:12
  If you know, I understood when I moved to a rural area, I was not going to get the same internet access I would if I lived in suburbia.
• 8:19
  That was my choice.
• 8:20
  If I want more, I have to pay for it.
• 8:23
  Why should the American taxpayers pay for farmers to get broadband?
• 8:30
  Well, uh, of course, probably one of the biggest controversial issues in the farm bill is the supplemental nutritional and food is uh food assistance program or SNAP.
• 8:41
  It's this it's the food stamps, it's the bribery of the American people with your money.
• 8:49
  Now, there have been a lot of problems.
• 8:51
  There's been a lot of fraud discovered in the SNAP program.
• 8:55
  Go figure.
• 8:57
  You know, it's like when Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, because well, that's where the money is.
• 9:02
  Why do people rip off SNAP?
• 9:04
  Because that's where the money is.
• 9:07
  Now, the USDA, another unconstitutional agency, right?
• 9:11
  Because regulating the agriculture, it's not a power delegated to the United States.
• 9:15
  Um, they have finally, finally, after all the oh my God, there's fraud and SNAP.
• 9:23
  Well, I guess they're claiming to do something.
• 9:26
  The uh uh the USDA has disqualified over 1,500 retailers that were associated with the SNAP program and disabled uh 760 illegal point of sale devices since October of last year.
• 9:43
  Uh, they claim this will result in $835 million in fraudulent transactions that will not be money wasted on uh in in that in this year.
• 9:54
  But this really is only showing up because the fraud has gotten so bad that apparently not even Washington can can ignore it anymore.
• 10:02
  Now, according to reports, the most common type of fraud is when retailers sell items that are not allowed under the SNAP program.
• 10:11
  And uh they also several them lie on their their application to become a SNAP retailer.
• 10:17
  This is according to the USDA's food nutrition service.
• 10:21
  So the idea is there, you know, SNAP is meant for, well, it's supplemental nutrition, it's there to help people who cannot get they cannot afford real food.
• 10:31
  That's regardless of this constitutional, that was its stated goal, right?
• 10:36
  If you people in the United States shouldn't be going hungry, but the idea is you wanted it to involve real food, right?
• 10:44
  Meats, fruits, vegetables, not candy and and sugary drinks and and uh you know, chips and dip.
• 10:53
  So there are only certain things that you can sell under that you can be paid for with SNAP.
• 10:58
  And apparently there's a whole black market of people who find a way to say, yeah, you know what?
• 11:03
  Well, you sure we'll sell you those those cigarettes, some uh booze, uh, all and other things that are not authorized, and we'll just reclassify them so that we can get uh SNAP benefits for stuff that you're not otherwise would not be legal to use.
• 11:18
  And uh, this is apparently quite a healthy market.
• 11:22
  Uh one grocer in Pallas Hills, Indiana was disqualified for racking up more than six million dollars in fraudulent transactions.
• 11:31
  Uh, another convenience store in Boston was convicted of almost seven million dollars of uh fraudulent SNAP benefits, more than even some full-size grocery stores in the area.
• 11:44
  Now, don't get me wrong, finding this fraud and stopping this fraud is is a good thing.
• 11:50
  The problem I have is one, how long has it taken to find this fraud?
• 11:55
  And how long has it taken before people actually have, oh, I don't know, dealt with this fraud.
• 12:00
  And although the numbers seem nice, but I have a question.
• 12:04
  If they're talking billions of dollars in fraud, a million here and a million there, how much is that really fixing it?
• 12:14
  I mean, are is the USDA, are they crowing merely because, well, see, we found something?
• 12:20
  Sure, taking no attention to all the other problems in fraud we have.
• 12:24
  We found something.
• 12:25
  See, pat us on the back, we're good people.
• 12:28
  Well, guess what?
• 12:30
  You don't legally exist.
• 12:31
  The SNAP program is a violation, it's it's unconstitutional.
• 12:35
  It's technically criminal because it's embezzlement.
• 12:38
  The Congress is embezzling money for the American people to the tune of trillions of dollars a year, and we're happy about finding a little here, little there that they in their illegal, they're embezzled funds that they caught people were cheating on these embezzled funds.
• 12:56
  That's not exactly something to crow about.
• 12:58
  Uh it's like saying, sure, we lost uh 100 billion dollars, but we we saved you half a million.
• 13:04
  Well, that's it, isn't that fine, right?
• 13:06
  This is what happens.
• 13:08
  This is why I call this the you know, it's porkapalooza or uh, you know, my other cute names for this, because for most part, it's a scam.
• 13:18
  It's the you know, the the one bid beautiful scam bill, and it's full of pork, it's full of waste, it's full of unconstitutional actions, because the whole thing is a giant dumpster load of manure, because the whole thing is unconstitutional.
• 13:37
  We've become so used to it, so dependent on it.
• 13:41
  There are actually people afraid of actually getting rid of this bill because, well, I've become dependent on the uh on the bribe.
• 13:49
  I've become dependent on the the theft of other people's money.
• 13:54
  And um you wonder why our why we have an almost 40 trillion dollar deficit?
• 14:00
  Trillion dollar deficit?
• 14:01
  Do you want to know why we haven't balanced a budget in what 30, 40 years?
• 14:01
  Do you want to know why we haven't balanced a budget in what 30, 40 years?
• 14:06
  Because the American people want the bribe.
• 14:06
  Because the American people want the bribe.
• 14:09
  They want the corrupt practices.
• 14:09
  They want the corrupt practices, they just want to be to make sure they're on the good side of the corrupt practices, the the the side that makes money, not the side that pays the money.
• 14:11
  They just want to be to make sure they're on the good side of the corrupt practices.
• 14:15
  The side that makes money, not the side that pays the money.
• 14:19
  And that's why so much of what Congress does is so corrupt and twisted and evil, because it's not about following the Constitution.
• 14:19
  And that's why so much of what Congress does is so corrupt and twisted and evil, because it's not about following the Constitution, it's not about making laws made pursuant of the Constitution.
• 14:27
  It's not about making laws made pursuant of the Constitution.
• 14:30
  It's about bribing the right people that will vote for them to keep them in office.
• 14:37
  Tana.
• 14:45
  In Congress.
• 14:47
  And again, point your fingers at Congress all you want.
• 14:50
  Remember, though, it is you that hired them.
• 14:54
  It is you that keep them in office.
• 14:56
  It is you frequently that are taking the bribes.
• 15:00
  See, a bribe only works if someone offers it and someone else takes it.
• 15:04
  If you don't take the bribe, the bribe has no power, has no power over you, has no power over anyone else.
• 15:12
  Think of that as we uh as you hear reporting about the farm bill.
• 15:17
  Speaking about submitting to bribes, of course, COVID was an amazing example of people just literally throwing their rights away to do what government said.
• 15:28
  And we're still dealing with the consequences.
• 15:30
  We're still dealing with shedding from the vaccines.
• 15:33
  We're still dealing with long COVID and vaccine injuries.
• 15:36
  And what do we do?
• 15:38
  Well, our friends over at the wellness company have an interesting product.
• 15:42
  It's called spike support.
• 15:45
  And its job is to block and dissolve the spike protein, the toxic part, the inflammatory part part of COVID-19.
• 15:54
  It's that spike protein that causes all the problem.
• 15:57
  It's the spike protein that the mRNA vaccine taught our body to make.
• 16:02
  And guess what?
• 16:03
  Congress lied about that.
• 16:04
  The the FDA and CDC lie.
• 16:06
  They said, oh no, it'll just be in your injection point.
• 16:09
  No.
• 16:10
  It uses it was designed to cross the blood brain barrier.
• 16:14
  So what do we do?
• 16:15
  Well, if you're waiting around for the government to do something to fix this, ha ha ha.
• 16:19
  Good luck.
• 16:21
  No.
• 16:21
  Go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, look up the spike support panel panel, and then do your own research.
• 16:28
  I'm not a virologist.
• 16:29
  I don't play one on TV.
• 16:31
  But people who know more about this, they have documented research that this works.
• 16:36
  It's been vetted by the chief medical board of the wellness company.
• 16:40
  And if you decide to buy, you can get 20% off your order by using the code Out Loud at checkout.
• 16:45
  So please go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, look up the spike support panel, do your own research.
• 16:50
  I want you to be an informed consumer.
• 16:52
  It is so important that we learn to for that we need to protect ourselves, not simply wait for some bureaucrat to protect us.
• 17:00
  Then when you've taken a look at it and you've decided to give it a try, don't forget to use the code Outloud at checkout to get 20% off of your order.
• 17:08
  Again, whether you've had COVID or the MRNA vaccine, or just want to protect yourselves from someone else, go to Americoutloud.shop and click on the spike support panel.
• 17:18
  Find out if this will do the job you needed to do, and then when you order, don't forget that code out loud to get 20% off of that order.
• 17:26
  If you want to live a healthier lifestyle, it starts with us deciding for ourselves.
• 17:42
  And I've devoted my life to helping people reconnect with food at its most alive stage, the sprout.
• 17:50
  When you germinate a seed, you're not just growing food, you're activating potential.
• 17:56
  Sprouts grow without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer right on your kitchen countertop.
• 18:02
  They're organic, fresh, and cost less than a dollar a serving.
• 18:06
  It's nature's fastest form of farming accessible to anyone anywhere.
• 18:11
  Discover the joy of growing your own food and the power of living nutrition.
• 18:16
  Visit the sprouting company.com and use the code out loud for an exclusive offer.
• 18:22
  You wouldn't go a day without brushing your teeth or washing your hands.
• 18:25
  What about washing your nose?
• 18:27
  I mean, your nose does filter the air you breathe, air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and irritants.
• 18:33
  Make nasal hygiene part of your routine with clear.
• 18:36
  No messy bottles to fill, no drowning sensation.
• 18:39
  Clear is a natural drug-free saline with the added benefit of xylitol, which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion.
• 18:46
  Available in stores and online at clear.com.
• 18:49
  That is xl ear.com.
• 18:52
  Feeling off lately?
• 18:53
  Bloated, brain fog, low energy.
• 18:55
  It could be parasites.
• 18:56
  The cell invaders that weaken your gut immune system and mental clarity.
• 19:00
  That's why Dr.
• 19:01
  Peter McCullough and the doctors at the wellness company formulated ivermectin and mabendazol cleanse, a medical grade solution designed to help eliminate parasites and restore balance.
• 19:10
  No gimmicks, just real medicine trusted by top doctors.
• 19:13
  Go to TWC.
• 19:16
  And use code outloud for 20% off your first order.
• 19:20
  Take control of your health today.
• 19:32
  July 4th, 2026 marks 250 years since the sign-in of the Declaration of Independence.
• 19:42
  America Outloud Doc News is that place to awaken your heart, soul, and mind to the outlook.
• 19:58
  Welcome back to everyday Americans to rejoin the Constitution study.
• 20:02
  And today we're looking at the good, the bad, and the corrupt out of DC, especially out of Congress.
• 20:08
  Look at this.
• 20:15
  He made an interesting announcement.
• 20:18
  He said, uh, well, I'll make this announcement on your show.
• 20:22
  So we have stopped payments to 450 hospices in California.
• 20:26
  Guess what?
• 20:27
  Not one is called us asking to reinstate institute them.
• 20:31
  They may have charged, changed their minds over time, but in 10 weeks, we've shut down 450 payment systems to these guys that represent at least 600 to 700 million dollars just this year.
• 20:44
  And no one is complaining because they know they got caught.
• 20:49
  Now again, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare.
• 20:51
  These are funding medical services, not a power delegated to the United States.
• 20:56
  And before someone out there screams, well, it's under the general welfare clause.
• 21:00
  General welfare clause.
• 21:01
  We'll read the stupid clause first.
• 21:01
  Well, read the stupid clause first.
• 21:03
  It says Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and exports for the to pay the debt, provide the common defense and promote the general welfare of the United States.
• 21:03
  It says Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and exports for the to pay the debt, provide the common defense and promote the general welfare of the United States.
• 21:16
  Not of the states individually, not of individuals, just to that entity called the United States.
• 21:16
  Not of the states individually, not of individuals, just to that entity called the United States.
• 21:21
  The govern the government's the federal government.
• 21:21
  The govern the government's the federal government.
• 21:24
  So Medicaid and Medicare, those are unconstitutional programs.
• 21:24
  So Medicaid and Medicare, those are unconstitutional programs.
• 21:28
  And guess what?
• 21:28
  And guess what?
• 21:29
  They were getting rid of
• 21:29
  They were getting ripped off.
• 21:30
  They stopped almost 700 million dollars a year, at least in these programs.
• 21:37
  They finally discovered them why it took so long for them to figure this out.
• 21:41
  And they said, you know what?
• 21:42
  We're just going to stop paying them.
• 21:44
  And in 10 weeks, not a single one of these providers said, excuse us, why did you do this?
• 21:50
  Now, I don't know about you.
• 21:52
  But if the company I worked for suddenly stopped paying a bit paying my paycheck, I'd ask why.
• 22:01
  If uh if I was receiving a payment from a company, you know, I have certain automatic payments that go out.
• 22:07
  And if I stop paying that, I expect someone to say, hey, Paul, uh, why'd you do this?
• 22:12
  You owe us money.
• 22:14
  According to Dr.
• 22:15
  Oz, these 450 hospitals in California didn't.
• 22:19
  Now he thinks it's because they were scamming the system and they got caught.
• 22:25
  That's quite possible.
• 22:26
  Could also be just bureaucratic entrenchment.
• 22:29
  I mean, let's face it, nobody in any of these companies probably has a vested interest in whether or not they actually get their Medicaid and Medicare funding.
• 22:38
  And also, remember, CMS, that's a ginormous bureaucracy.
• 22:43
  I bet you this wouldn't be the first time that they were simply late in paying their bills.
• 22:48
  But again, this whole comes around the corruption of saying, well, Congress is going to allocate is going to steal money from the American people.
• 22:57
  Yes, steal, to pay for things you're not legally authorized to in embezzlement.
• 23:03
  And then, oh, finally they get around saying, you know what, we found some corruption.
• 23:07
  Let's actually do something about it.
• 23:09
  And while we're talking about California, let's take a let's take a trip to the left coast, the communist coast.
• 23:16
  And um, we we we've got uh a California assemblyman.
• 23:21
  In fact, the entire Republican caucus is calling for a special legislative session to investigate an estimated 180 billion dollars in taxpayer fraud.
• 23:34
  That's billion with a B.
• 23:37
  Now, apparently this started with the assembly minority leader, uh a um health flora and uh the other caucus members sending a letter to Governor Newsom, pointing to a new estimate that California may have lost at least 180 billion dollars to fraud across all the state programs.
• 23:56
  Uh this is estimate was based on audits, public records, and other prior investigations.
• 24:01
  The leader called on Newsom to call a special session to determine the extent of the fraud and other improper payments and to advance reforms to strengthen oversight.
• 24:12
  As the uh as uh uh assemblyman uh Carl DeMo said, fraud is absolutely absolutely linked to the cost of living crisis.
• 24:22
  Every dollar, every penny of fraud is money that should be going to needy families in the form of government services that they are now seeing cuts in.
• 24:30
  Every dollar that's given out to a fraudster is a dollar that should be given back to a taxpayer.
• 24:35
  Now, I don't know if you know this, but California's a pretty expensive place to live.
• 24:41
  High taxes, high regulation, high fees, very, very expensive.
• 24:46
  So I guess a lot of fraud really isn't so much a surprise to me.
• 24:51
  The one question I haven't seen an answer to yet, and maybe it's somewhere else, 180 billion dollars over what period of time?
• 24:59
  Uh uh uh a year, a decade, you know, and to me, that's kind of important information.
• 25:04
  That's putting that in context.
• 25:07
  But remember, this is California, meaning even the Republicans want to be into your business.
• 25:12
  Uh, one of those, Assembly member Laurie Davis, who is a Republican out of Oceanside, said, Well, many sober living homes are unlicensed and unregulated.
• 25:21
  They operate in a legal gray area that protects the predator, not the patient.
• 25:26
  Um sorry, uh, so you have a sober living home, and uh it what it doesn't to follow California's ridiculous regulations.
• 25:36
  To me, that's not necessarily a bad thing.
• 25:38
  Now, unless that person is forced into a sober living home, like uh and in as a punishment for a crime, they're free to leave.
• 25:48
  The why why why is is is the California getting in the middle of all of this, except uh maybe more opportunities for oh, fraud and abuse.
• 25:58
  I mean, let's just put more money where the people are stealing the money.
• 26:01
  Um, and surprise, and again, of course, surprise, surprise, the majority Democrats in the assembly, they're not interested in in any of this.
• 26:08
  They they just it's just political theater.
• 26:11
  They are clearly performing for Trump.
• 26:15
  Now, I don't know about you, but 1600 sorry, 180 billion dollars in fraud.
• 26:21
  Uh, you're telling me they're performing for Trump.
• 26:24
  Now, maybe they are.
• 26:24
  Maybe some of this is nothing but politics.
• 26:26
  I'm that wouldn't surprise me one little bit.
• 26:29
  But when you're telling me there's there's that level of fraud over, again, an undetermined period of time, um, maybe that is something worth looking at.
• 26:39
  Is it requiring a special session of the uh other legislature?
• 26:44
  I don't know.
• 26:45
  But uh it's obviously being looked at at the federal level with uh Dr.
• 26:50
  Oz and you know, hospice.
• 26:53
  Uh, I wonder what other areas maybe should be looked at.
• 26:58
  And really, do you want to wait until the federal government gets involved?
• 27:03
  All right, let's head back to Washington, D.C.
• 27:05
  We're looking at FBI Director Cash Patel, uh, who um a few days ago filed a lawsuit uh at the circuit uh the Court of Appeals for the for DC, uh, he's filed a 250 million dollar defamation lawsuit against the magazine The Atlantic and their staff writer Sarah Fitzpatrick.
• 27:26
  Now, in the article, Ms.
• 27:27
  Fitz Tactic wrote that she cited anonymous sources that claim that Patel allegedly drank in excess and that his colleagues were concerned.
• 27:37
  Also, she claims she wrote that uh multiple current officials and former officials who have stayed close to him were concerned about the alleged drinking.
• 27:46
  She also claimed that uh Donald Trump was seeking to replace him following the ouster of uh attorney general Pam Bondi.
• 27:55
  Now, the lawsuit claims that uh uh the Atlantic and Fitzpatrick published the article with actual malice, despite being expressly warned hours before publication that the central allegations were categorically false, despite having abundant publicly available information contradicting those allegations, and despite obvious and fatal defects in their own sourcing.
• 28:00
  Fitzpatrick published the article with actual malice, despite being expressly warned hours before publication that the central allegations were categorically false, despite having abundant publicly available information contradicting those allegations, and despite obvious and fatal defects in their own sourcing.
• 28:20
  So, according to Mr.
• 28:20
  So according to Mr.
• 28:22
  Patel, he said, wait a second, you're claiming anonymous sources when I've given when I can show you actual publicly available.
• 28:22
  Patel, he said, wait a second, you're claiming anonymous sources when I've given when I can show you actual publicly available data that contradicts those allegations, and you went ahead with it anyway.
• 28:34
  That your sources were obvious problematic, and you went ahead anyway.
• 28:40
  That establishes malice.
• 28:42
  Now, why is that important?
• 28:44
  Because courts have said when you're talking about suing the media for defamation, they can't just get the thing the information wrong.
• 28:52
  In other words, you can't be sued for defamation for just getting uh uh uh just getting things wrong.
• 28:58
  You have to show malice.
• 29:00
  You have to show that you are actively out to get the person alleging defamation.
• 29:07
  Now, the lawsuit states that uh the defendants, the Atlantic and Ms.
• 29:10
  Fitzpatrick, their conscious decision to ignore the detailed, specific, and substantive refutations in the pre-publication letter.
• 29:20
  Their refusal to give a reasonable amount of time for the FBI and Director Patel to respond is among the strongest possible evidence of actual malice.
• 29:30
  And they also say that the Atlantic has a documented, long-running editorial animus against the FBI director.
• 29:39
  Now, again, I find this interesting because remember, Trump won uh wasn't he didn't also win a defamation lawsuit.
• 29:45
  Um, and again, there's Mr.
• 29:48
  Patel has a fairly high hurdle to climb.
• 29:50
  He's got to show actual malice.
• 29:54
  And if he does, if he's correct, and like, wait a second, you we we showed you evidence that it was wrong.
• 30:00
  You didn't give us a chance to respond to uh late changes.
• 30:04
  Um, you know, we you you basically show that you are out to get us.
• 30:08
  That's going to be interesting.
• 30:10
  The the 250 million dollars may sting the Atlantic.
• 30:14
  I don't know their balance sheets or whatever, but to me, it's the question of um this vendetta that corporate media has had against basically anything, not Marxist.
• 30:27
  Um would be interesting to see the court say, well, how long are you going to be able to lie about us?
• 30:31
  Because remember, freedom of the press does not include the freedom to lie.
• 30:35
  Let me say that again.
• 30:36
  Freedom of the press, freedom, freedom of speech does not include the speed, the freedom to lie.
• 30:42
  In other words, you can state an opinion all you want.
• 30:46
  Uh, who was it?
• 30:47
  Uh I think it was Daniel Patrick Moynihan that said everyone's entitled to their own opinion, they're not entitled to their own facts.
• 30:54
  So when you have an opinion, that's fine.
• 30:57
  When you're stating facts that are categorically wrong, um, that isn't covered under freedom of the press.
• 31:03
  Otherwise, otherwise, what happens?
• 31:05
  You know, you could uh uh say you had a a journalist, uh journalist who was testifying in court and lied under oath, and then claimed, well, you can't do anything about it because else freedom of the press.
• 31:17
  No, you denied the defendant, most likely the defendant, um, their right to a fair trial.
• 31:25
  When you have media that's putting out false information, you are uh frequently trying to deny people their their liberty without due process of law.
• 31:36
  This is to me, this is serious because now, does that mean I think that suddenly, magically the uh the corporate media is going to uh learn their lesson and um uh suddenly become the bastions of civility and justice?
• 31:55
  No, that's not gonna happen.
• 31:57
  I'm not even sure that this case is going to be heard.
• 32:00
  Because again, uh you have to have standing.
• 32:04
  Now, the fact that it's it's uh an FBI director that's bringing it may bring some more uh weight to it, but I guess we'll have to see.
• 32:13
  But I think this also shows that the corruption in DC is not simply within the federal government.
• 32:19
  Uh, we see again, media, and again, they're free to print whatever they want, but if they lie about it, they get in trouble.
• 32:26
  Now, you know, I I'm sure most of you have heard the saying that, well, the Supreme Court said that uh freedom of speech does not cover crying fire uh crying fire in a crowded theater.
• 32:37
  Except that's not what the Supreme Court said.
• 32:40
  Right?
• 32:40
  It's it's important to understand the case of Schneck versus United States, and what they said is that you could not use freedom of speech to protect you from the consequences of uh of your speech, such as you couldn't claim freedom of speech if you falsely lay uh uh fire in a crowded theater.
• 33:01
  You couldn't say, well, it was just freedom of speech.
• 33:03
  I can say whatever I want and not be held liable for the uh uh with the consequences of that such an action would uh lead to.
• 33:13
  So uh again, this suit by Director Patel is not a violation of freedom of the press.
• 33:18
  His allegations are that they knowingly and intentionally lied in an attempt to harm him, perfectly legitimate and valid uh uh suit, you know, does not violate freedom of speech.
• 33:30
  Of course, now he has to prove his point in a card of court of law, because since he's the one initiating, he is the uh the plaintiff, he has the burden of proof.
• 33:40
  He has to prove not only that the Atlantic and Ms.
• 33:44
  Patrick, Fitzpatrick uh printed that uh article with malice.
• 33:50
  He's got that that he's not gonna prove that it's false, they have to show malice, which can be pretty difficult uh to do in many situations.
• 33:58
  But again, we see this this you know, lies, dirty lies, we see the the good, the bag, and the ugly in so many different scenarios, it's um uh I don't know how to put this.
• 34:09
  It's a s you know, we see it everywhere.
• 34:12
  And the sad part is it seems for many people it's just become normal.
• 34:18
  And um to me, that's really sad.
• 34:21
  When when evil and corruption become normal, when we no longer stand to fight against it, what are we to do?
• 34:29
  It's kind of like the question of well, when the violation of our rights becomes normal, when people simply violate the right, and they just say, Well, okay, what are you gonna do?
• 34:38
  Because again, as I point out, our rights are under attack, and not just by government, by a lot of entities.
• 34:44
  And many times there are a lot of quote-unquote nonprofits, uh, you know, support organizations that are funding these attacks, and they get their funding frequently from you.
• 34:56
  See, there are those companies that support organizations that are priving trying to deprive you of your rights.
• 35:00
  Trying to deprive you of your rights.
• 35:02
  What do you do?
• 35:02
  What do you do?
• 35:04
  Well, I suggest you join the only Christian conservative wireless provider this nation has.
• 35:04
  Well, I suggest you join the only Christian conservative wireless provider this nation has, that you use your cell phone to defend your rights, the rights of your family, including your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
• 35:08
  That you use your cell phone to defend your rights, the rights of your family, including your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
• 35:15
  Go to patriotmobile.com/slash constitution, find a plan that works for you.
• 35:15
  Go to patriotmobile.com/slash constitution, find a plan that works for you.
• 35:20
  They got great plans, and I found their price to be very, very fair.
• 35:20
  They got great plans, and I found their pricing to be very, very fair.
• 35:24
  And uh, one thing I like about it, when you go over your data plan, they don't shut you.
• 35:24
  And uh one thing I like about it, when you go over your data plan, they don't shut you off, they don't suddenly charge you a big fee, they simply slow you down.
• 35:34
  And then it's up to you to well decide if you want to uh uh uh plan with more data on it.
• 35:40
  Best of all, though, they take a portion of every dollar they collect when you pay your cell phone bill to support organizations like the Constitution Study that are defending helping to defend your rights.
• 35:49
  Oh, yeah, use the code constitution at checkout, you get your activation absolutely free.
• 35:54
  So I joined Patriot Mobile several years ago to because again, they're they're they are supporting organizations that are looking to defend our rights.
• 36:03
  And I became an affiliate of them a while back for that very reason because it allows you to support the work that we're doing here at the Constitution Study by using your cell phone.
• 36:15
  But only if you go to Patriot Mobile.com says constitution, find a plan that works, you see if you're eligible for a discount, and don't forget, use that code constitution at checkout to get free activation.
• 36:26
  I also hope you'll head over to AmericaOut Loud.news each and every day for news and information.
• 36:31
  Now I do, and you're probably thinking, well, Paul, you've got the radio program and the website, you got all these reasons for it.
• 36:37
  But as I've just shown, where you get your news and information will color and skew how you view the world.
• 36:44
  We live in the information age.
• 36:45
  Corporate meat's been lying to us for decades, but now we can get our news from anywhere.
• 36:50
  But where do we go?
• 36:51
  Preferably someone that we can trust and verify.
• 36:54
  For me, one of those is AmericaOut Loud.news.
• 36:57
  And I want you to join me there.
• 36:59
  But I want you to do a bit more.
• 37:00
  Do like I do.
• 37:01
  Read the stories and articles, then share them.
• 37:05
  Listen to the podcast, watch the videos, and then share them.
• 37:09
  See, it's the act of sharing it.
• 37:14
  Virus protection and immune boosting just got easier.
• 37:17
  Enter the daily V stack.
• 37:18
  Using cellular absorption technology, we put vitamins A, C, D, Zinc, and Quircetin together with a multi-mineral complex for complete protection.
• 37:29
  The Daily V Stack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price.
• 37:35
  Go to ChemicalfreeBody.com forward slash out loud, get the daily V stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order.
• 37:46
  Are you looking for a healthy snacks?
• 37:49
  But you've had enough of all the sweet, sugary energy bars.
• 37:54
  Good news.
• 37:55
  There's new bars to try.
• 37:57
  That's savory, crunchy, and pack with goodness.
• 38:01
  Bear bars are based just on six simple natural ingredients, a certified organic veggie nut and seed bar.
• 38:10
  That's low temp dried, never baked or fried.
• 38:14
  Bear bars are plant-based, gluten-free, and loaded with nutrients and protein.
• 38:20
  Head over to bearbar.com slash out loud and get the exclusive discount just for America out loud listeners.
• 38:30
  That's B E A R B A Rout Loud.
• 38:38
  Prepare for the next pandemic with the wellness company's contagion emergency kit designed by Dr.
• 38:42
  Peter McCullough.
• 38:43
  Get life-saving medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, plus a free nebulizer and a guidebook for safe use.
• 38:49
  Order now by going to TWC.health forward slash out loud and use code out loud for $65 off your first order plus free shipping.
• 39:02
  Welcome back, everybody Americans you rejoin the Constitution study today.
• 39:06
  We're looking at the good, the bad, and the corrupt out of Washington, D.C.
• 39:10
  Well Mosley, we take a look at a couple of states.
• 39:15
  So uh the justice, the so-called Justice Department has been trying to strong arm states into handing over voter registration information that the federal government is not entitled to.
• 39:28
  Now the Department of Justice claims that the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, by the way, two completely unconstitutional pieces of legislation, allow them to look at all the data on voter rights from anyone.
• 39:44
  Well, the court concluded uh says neither the National Voter Registration Act or the Help America Vote Act authorizes DOJ to conduct this kind of fishing expedition it seeks here.
• 39:54
  As such, the four for the foregoing reasons, the court denies United States motion to compel production and grants defendants' motion to dismiss.
• 40:03
  Now, what the defendants in this case were the state of Rhode Island.
• 40:06
  And they are one of a series.
• 40:17
  Where Rhode Island said no and said and sought an injunction against the DOJ from compelling the uh the production of this information.
• 40:26
  And again, the the court called it a fishing expedition.
• 40:30
  And this is ex first of all, it's exactly where it is, all right.
• 40:33
  So, first of all, the federal government has no legal authority to demand this information.
• 40:36
  Voter registration is not a process regulated by the federal government.
• 40:41
  That's why the um the NVRA and HAVA, the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act, are unconstitutional and therefore void.
• 40:50
  Because voter registration has nothing to do with the federal government as a state function.
• 40:55
  But also look at they're looking for data, not because they have evidence of a crime, they're looking at to search for a crime.
• 41:02
  That's called in legal parlance, a fishing expedition.
• 41:07
  We don't have a crime.
• 41:08
  We're gonna go look to see if we can find a crime.
• 41:11
  That is not a reasonable search.
• 41:15
  Violates the Fourth Amendment.
• 41:17
  Now the question is, this is uh again, one court.
• 41:20
  What about other courts?
• 41:22
  What about other states?
• 41:23
  Are other courts going to be protected by judges in other courts?
• 41:27
  That's we're gonna have to wait and find out.
• 41:30
  Uh again, now let's switch to the Supreme Court.
• 41:33
  Uh, they are taking a look at Colorado's universal preschool program.
• 41:39
  This is where the state of Colorado funds these preschool programs, but there's a catch.
• 41:47
  You see, they basically said, listen, you could participate.
• 41:50
  You just have to actually abandon your own faith.
• 41:53
  You have to teach the state's version of sexual orientation and human identity, meaning um homosexuality and transgenderism.
• 42:00
  Homosexuality and transgenderism.
• 42:02
  Yeah, you can you just have to give up your your faith.
• 42:02
  Yeah, you can you just have to give up your your faith.
• 42:05
  And and a Catholic church, St.
• 42:05
  And a Catholic church, St.
• 42:08
  Mary's Catholic Parish, sued.
• 42:08
  Mary's Catholic Parish, sued.
• 42:11
  They said, You're you're excluding us from this program because of our religious belief.
• 42:11
  They said, You're you're excluding us from this program because of our religious belief.
• 42:18
  Now, the St.
• 42:18
  Now, the St.
• 42:19
  Mary's Catholic Parish claims that it violates their rights under the First Amendment.
• 42:19
  Mary's Catholic parish claims that it violates their rights under the First Amendment.
• 42:24
  Well, it does not.
• 42:24
  Well, it does not.
• 42:25
  Remember, the First Amendment starts out with Congress shall make no law.
• 42:25
  Remember, the First Amendment starts out with Congress shall make no law.
• 42:28
  Congress didn't make
• 42:29
  Congress didn't make this law.
• 42:30
  This has nothing to do with Congress.
• 42:32
  This is not a First Amendment violation.
• 42:34
  It is a 14th Amendment violation, specifically the Equal Protection Clause.
• 42:39
  That you the you must have equal protection under the law, where Colorado has isolated a religious community and said no food, no money for you.
• 42:51
  You're not treating them the same because of their religious beliefs.
• 42:55
  And again, this happens to be a Catholic parish.
• 42:58
  What if this were a Protestant parish or a Muslim parish or a Jewish parish that said, we would like to provide we provide preschool, we'd like some of the subsidies, but we're not willing to violate our faith in order to do so.
• 43:15
  Now, ultimately, I think the church church should be able to do these things, um, personal belief, right, without government subsidy.
• 43:23
  But if they decide to get the government subsidy, should they be treated, should they have to deny their faith to get a state-run subsidy?
• 43:33
  Now, Colorado is one of the states that have what are called blame amendments.
• 43:39
  Um it goes back to a Senator Blaine who tried to get an amendment to the U.S.
• 43:44
  Constitution to prohibit the use of public money to any religious um uh religious organization, right?
• 43:53
  And it it failed, it never made it out of out of Congress, uh, much less to the states for ratification.
• 43:59
  So what he ended up doing is promoting this in a lot of states, where they say, listen, we cannot use public funds for religious organizations, which is interesting because that amendment actually contradicts another amendment in the in the Colorado, not an amendment, an actual the original part of the Constitution, Article II, Section 4, which says the free exercise and enjoyment of religious professional worship without discrimination shall forever have to be guaranteed, and no person shall be denied any civil or uh political right, privilege or capacity on account of his opinions concerning religion.
• 44:35
  So our isn't the state saying with the Blaine Act, oh, sure, you can enjoy it, but you don't have the right or privilege or to be involved to get government money simply because you're a religious organization.
• 44:51
  Again, these are the types of things we see all the time.
• 44:53
  So now apparently, yes, this this has gone to the Supreme Court.
• 44:58
  Um, now it came because the district court said nope, uh, the plaintiffs, the the Catholic church requested a preliminary injunction um prohibiting the enforcement of this policy until the case had been uh been adjudicated.
• 45:14
  Um the district court said no.
• 45:16
  Uh the circuit court agreed with the district court, which is why this is going to the supreme court.
• 45:22
  And the question, again, is really has to do with this injunction until the case goes through the legal process.
• 45:30
  In other words, does the the Catholic church have a reasonable enough expectation of winning that the punishment of not have of having this implemented would be beyond the pale and um something that should be halted uh until the thing goes through the entire court process.
• 45:52
  We'll have to wait and see, because these things tend to go through a lot of lingual wrangling.
• 45:56
  Meaning, even if the Supreme Court decides that yes, the Catholic Church should get their injunction, then they have to the district court has to hear the case, which then will probably go to the circuit court, which then will eventually may end up back at the Supreme Court to answer the actual question.
• 46:13
  Of course, they're probably going to get it wrong because they're going to claim they're going to look at a First Amendment review rather than a 14th Amendment review.
• 46:19
  And um, well, that's just kind of how the courts have been working the last several decades.
• 46:26
  Okay, one more.
• 46:27
  We're going out to Massachusetts now, and that is uh a case that was brought to the court requesting uh a writ of sortiary, we're a Christian court to hear it, and it involves a Massachusetts schoolgirl who their parents claim uh the school hid their daughter's uh attempt to transition from girl from female to male, uh, and the school hid it uh from the parents.
• 46:53
  And I find this interesting a couple of reasons.
• 46:55
  Um, first of all, six of the nine justices said they didn't want to accept the petition for rid of her, they just didn't want they don't want to rehear the case.
• 47:05
  Um again, I find this interesting because they have looked at other cases that involve um again, uh schools hiding information, denying parents the the right to know what's going on with their children, especially with a serious mental concern, such as believing they're the wrong gender.
• 47:29
  Now, which justice voted for which, and and uh, and and uh who actually that was not disclosed, nor were there any comments or reasons offering for not deciding this, which again to me it's a little disheartening because what we're seeing is well, we've decided this, but even though this case apparently goes against the Supreme Court's previous decision that parents ultimately control the upbringing, parents are in charge of the of the medical decision for their children, and government in the form of schools cannot simply take over that right from parents.
• 48:05
  But near you have a case that seems to be an easy case, and they won't even hear it.
• 48:09
  I mean, to me, uh I I would I would simply say this should easy should have easily been we accept certiari, we reverse and remand for the courts to look at this based on our previous decisions.
• 48:22
  Um that seems to be at least that's what I would have hoped for, but that's apparently not one what happened.
• 48:29
  They simply denied to even hear the case, which means if you are a parent in Ludlow, Massachusetts, the school is still legally able to hide serious uh medical and mental information from the parents, again, for what appears to be to be political reasons more than anything else, which really is not only a sad state of affairs for the state of Massachusetts and Ludlow specifically, but it also shows that you can't trust that the courts are going to get things right.
• 49:00
  That you can't trust that the courts are going to get things right.
• 49:02
  You can't even trust that the courts are going to be there to help you.
• 49:02
  You can't even trust that the courts are going to be there to help you.
• 49:06
  Now, is it because they were too busy?
• 49:06
  Now, is it because they were too busy, they didn't have time on their docket, they didn't postpone this.
• 49:08
  They didn't have time on their docket, they didn't postpone this.
• 49:12
  They said, No, we're not going to hear this.
• 49:12
  They said, no, we're not going to hear this.
• 49:14
  Which again, to be this isn't like it required oral arguments and all of that.
• 49:14
  Which, again, to be this isn't like it required oral arguments and all of that.
• 49:18
  It would have been simple for the courts, but at least six.
• 49:18
  It would have been simple for the courts, but at least six.
• 49:22
  We don't know how many.
• 49:22
  We don't know how many.
• 49:23
  But apparently, because it takes it only takes four justices to hear a case, which means they.
• 49:23
  But apparently, because it takes it only takes four justices to hear a case, which means they no more than three justices voted to hear this case or to at least accept this case.
• 49:36
  And that means it, well, at least six decided no.
• 49:39
  And I really would love to know why.
• 49:42
  I doubt we ever will, but personally, I would really love to know why the judges said no, we're not even going to bother to hear this case.
• 49:51
  Which brings you back to the original concept of what we're talking about here.
• 49:56
  The good, the bad, and the corrupt.
• 49:59
  So much of what we see in in Washington, DC is actually corrupt.
• 50:04
  Whether it's the pharmacopia bill, you know, the porkapalooza, the incredibly expensive, unconstitutional, immoral legislation that basically is trying to bribe American farmers, American citizens into doing what the government says, letting the government just regulate everything they want.
• 50:30
  Because if you don't, we're not going to give you the bribe that we're offering.
• 50:34
  A trillion dollars a decade.
• 50:36
  That's a hundred billion dollars a year bribing the American people.
• 50:40
  And that includes you, and that includes me.
• 50:42
  Because it includes everything from subsidizing farmers to not work, right?
• 50:48
  To not plant certain crops, or to pay them uh a minimum price for their their crops, whether the market supports it or not.
• 51:00
  Or we're going to spend billions of dollars on food stamps, which is not the federal government's purview.
• 51:07
  That's a state and local issue, right?
• 51:10
  And in that we have all of this other nonsense, like uh, you know, oh, okay, uh, we're going to tell states that they can't put uh additional warning labels beyond what the EPA, the unconstitutional EPA, all of that.
• 51:25
  All of that's corruption.
• 51:26
  All of it.
• 51:28
  The corruption of Medicaid and Medicare, and not only the the unconstitutional fact that they exist and bribe the American people with money stolen from other from themselves with these ideas of Medicaid and Medicare.
• 51:43
  And of course, those are great sources for um uh for fraud because, well, that's what we said and said, that's where the money is.
• 51:50
  I guess that's why we have more government robbers and bank robbers nowadays.
• 51:56
  Just look at what's going on in California, right?
• 51:58
  They've got their own problem, not just with Medicaid and Medicare, but with other government programs.
• 52:04
  The good, the bad, and the corrupt, which again sounds like a bad TV movie, or at least a you know, spaghetti western, but I want you to realize this happens because we the people allow it to happen.
• 52:19
  We have stopped overseeing our employees in government.
• 52:23
  We treat them not as public servants, but as public masters.
• 52:28
  We've forgotten.
• 52:29
  Why?
• 52:30
  Well, because we don't read and study the constitution.
• 52:32
  We don't know what it says.
• 52:34
  Most people don't know when the federal government is infringing on their rights, or when their state governed or their county or city governments.
• 52:40
  Most don't know because they don't know what their rights are because they're not basing it on what the constitution actually says, but on one pundit, some so-called expert says.
• 52:51
  Do you know how many experts I've talked to that have no clue what the constitution actually says?
• 52:56
  Constitutional attorneys that don't realize the first amendment doesn't apply to the states because it says Congress shall make no law.
• 53:03
  That the 14th Amendment, the Supreme Court says, well, the 14th Amendment incorporated the first amendment into the state.
• 53:09
  No, because it says no such thing.
• 53:12
  This is the cost of our ignorance.
• 53:15
  Good, bad, and and corrupt.
• 53:18
  And it's going to continue until we the people start hiring better people to represent us.
• 53:23
  People that take their oath to support the constitution seriously.
• 53:27
  Not simply, yeah, yeah, yeah, I said it, but I don't really care.
• 53:30
  I'll do whatever I need to be to get elected.
• 53:32
  People that support the donkeys and elephants over their oath to support the constitution.
• 53:37
  We choose them.
• 53:38
  We hire them.
• 53:41
  You look at the people in the in the bureaucracy.
• 53:43
  Guess what?
• 53:44
  Those bureaucracies exist because the people we hire to represent us created these illegal, unconstitutional agencies that try to regulate every aspect of our life.
• 53:56
  The corruption starts in our hearts.
• 54:00
  And the fact that we're willing to sell not only our rights, but our children's future for the false promise of goodies, that someone else will pay for my food, someone else will take care of my charity for me.
• 54:15
  Someone else will take care of me in my old age.
• 54:19
  Someone else will take care of me if I get if I get poor.
• 54:22
  Someone else will do it, not realizing that all those someone else is really you.
• 54:29
  Because while you think someone else is paying for your programs, your graft, you're paying for other people's graft.
• 54:36
  And that's exactly what it is.
• 54:39
  And until we, the people know better, it's going to continue.
• 54:43
  It's why I focus here in the Constitution on reading and studying the Constitution of the United States, what the Constitution study is all about.
• 54:51
  It's on all my literature on the back of my business cards.
• 54:54
  It's it's what we do here because it is so central to understanding our rights.
• 55:00
  But it's also important that we we said, how do we deal with this?
• 55:05
  How do we what can we do?
• 55:08
  Now I created a program over a constitution study.
• 55:10
  I call my patrons, the Constitution Patriots program.
• 55:14
  It's not for this faint of heart.
• 55:16
  It's not for everyone.
• 55:17
  It's for people that really want to be serious about reading and studying the Constitution.
• 55:22
  That want to be serious about getting involved and getting engaged, knowing when their rights are violated and be prepared to defend and assert them.
• 55:31
  Now it's it's invitation only, meaning you can't just join it.
• 55:34
  You have to actually prove you're willing to be involved.
• 55:38
  How do you do that?
• 55:40
  Well, go to constitution study.com/slash patriots, read up about it.
• 55:43
  If you want to give it a try, take the boot camp.
• 55:45
  Right now, it's a one-hour video that you follow.
• 55:49
  If you'd like me to come teach the boot camp to your group organization, contact me.
• 55:53
  I'd love to see if we can make that happen.
• 55:55
  But it's a one-hour, right?
• 55:56
  The video is a one hour, and then there's a test at the end.
• 55:59
  Pass the test, sign the oath, and guess what?
• 56:00
  Pass the test, sign the oath, and guess what?
• 56:02
  You'll get an invitation to join us.
• 56:02
  You'll get an invitation to join us.
• 56:04
  And hopefully, not only learn something, but learn how you can protect not only your rights, but the rights of your family, the rights of your friends, the rights of your neighbors.
• 56:04
  And hopefully not only learn something, but learn how you can protect not only your rights, but the rights of your family, the rights of your friends, the rights of your neighbors.
• 56:12
  I also hope you'll come back and listen to the constitution study every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 56:12
  I also hope you'll come back and listen to the Constitution study every weekday, 4 p.m.
• 56:17
  Eastern Time on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard in the iHeartRadio Network.
• 56:17
  Eastern time on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard in the iHeart Radio Network.
• 56:21
  You can listen via the media player or our apps or Apple, Android, and Alexa, or listen via podcast.
• 56:21
  You can listen via the media player or our apps or Apple, Android, and Alexa, or listen via podcast.
• 56:28
  That does take a day or two for an episode.
• 56:28
  It does take a day or two for an episode to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen in your favorite podcast app.
• 56:34
  Do me a favor though, subscribe and rate the show.
• 56:36
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people.
• 56:39
  You can find all the links you need at the homepage at AmericaOutloud.news.
• 56:43
  But please, as with everything else, share those links, share this program, and help share the blessings of liberty to everyone.