Latest / Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe / Do Black Holes Have Hair?
Transcript
- 0:08Speaker 1: Hey or he have you started to go gray yet?
- 0:11Speaker 2: I'm not sure I ask you to answer that question.
- 0:13Speaker 2: You know, I want to preserve my air of mystery.
- 0:16Speaker 2: How about you.
- 0:17Speaker 1: I found a silver hair too in my beard, but
- 0:20Speaker 1: so far I'm still all brown up top. But you know,
- 0:23Speaker 1: I'm getting a little.
- 0:24Speaker 2: Impatient, getting impatient. What do you mean you want to
- 0:27Speaker 2: go gray?
- 0:28Speaker 1: I wouldn't mind that gravitas that comes from having a
- 0:31Speaker 1: little bit of gray.
- 0:32Speaker 2: You mean you don't have enough gravity right now?
- 0:36Speaker 1: My gravity has actually been increasing.
- 0:38Speaker 2: There you go. It sounds like your body's doing it
- 0:40Speaker 2: for you. But are you trying to counteract the you know,
- 0:44Speaker 2: whole physicist look with the shorts and the sandals.
- 0:46Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, I'm trying to look a little bit more
- 0:47Speaker 1: grown up.
- 0:48Speaker 2: I'm not sure gray hair is going to help you there.
- 0:50Speaker 1: Maybe I should just shave my head.
- 0:52Speaker 2: There you go. That's one way a little older, more distinguished.
- 0:57Speaker 2: And after you shave it, you could paint it gray.
- 0:59Speaker 1: I'm not sure that's how gravitas is accumulated.
- 1:02Speaker 2: Sounds like physicists don't know how gravity or gravitas works.
- 1:06Speaker 2: Both big mysteries. Hi, I am Horehammick cartoonists and the
- 1:24Speaker 2: author of Oliver's Great Big Universe.
- 1:26Speaker 1: Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor
- 1:30Speaker 1: at UC Irvine, and I never really gone after gravitas.
- 1:34Speaker 2: What do you mean you just inherently have it? Can
- 1:36Speaker 2: you say you're a physicist?
- 1:38Speaker 1: People go ooh, No, exactly the opposite, trying to break
- 1:42Speaker 1: down those barriers, you know. That's why I wear socks
- 1:44Speaker 1: and sandals every day. Don't try to create any distance
- 1:48Speaker 1: between myself and my students.
- 1:49Speaker 2: Or apparently your feet and the exterior world.
- 1:53Speaker 1: And everyone knows that's another reason to live in southern California, right,
- 1:57Speaker 1: Socks optional.
- 1:59Speaker 2: I guess that's what physics is. It's all about, you know,
- 2:00Speaker 2: breaking barriers, connecting with the universe. Anyways, Welcome to our podcast,
- 2:05Speaker 2: Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of our
- 2:08Speaker 2: Heart Radio.
- 2:09Speaker 1: In which we try to break down the barriers between
- 2:12Speaker 1: ourselves and nature, between you and a complete understanding of
- 2:16Speaker 1: everything we do and don't know about the universe. We
- 2:19Speaker 1: think the universe is the greatest mystery and we are
- 2:22Speaker 1: here to crack it.
- 2:23Speaker 2: That's right. The universe is full of barriers of things
- 2:25Speaker 2: we can't see things we can't understand and things that
- 2:28Speaker 2: we may never understand, including barriers about fashion and dress
- 2:33Speaker 2: codes at universities.
- 2:35Speaker 1: You know, people say, focus on what you're good at,
- 2:37Speaker 1: and so that's why I just don't pay attention to fashion.
- 2:40Speaker 2: So you're good at wearing sandals, it sucks.
- 2:42Speaker 1: I'm good at ignoring fashion. I just do my own thing.
- 2:45Speaker 2: Well, I am totally with you. I think the most
- 2:47Speaker 2: comfortable thing in the world to wear is socks and sandals.
- 2:50Speaker 2: If anyone does not try that out there, I highly
- 2:53Speaker 2: recommend it, or or socks with flip flops even better.
- 2:57Speaker 1: I'm so glad this is an audio only medium.
- 3:00Speaker 2: We don't have smell of vision, thankfully, though.
- 3:04Speaker 1: I'm terrified at the mental images you are creating in
- 3:07Speaker 1: the minds of our listeners.
- 3:08Speaker 2: Actually have socks that have the little notch for your
- 3:11Speaker 2: flip flop strap.
- 3:14Speaker 1: You're like one step away from those horrendous toe shoes.
- 3:17Speaker 2: Oh no, no, no, that's where I draw the line.
- 3:19Speaker 1: I see one notch is fine. Four notches two too many.
- 3:25Speaker 2: I don't need each of my individual toes wrapped in
- 3:28Speaker 2: its own little pocket.
- 3:29Speaker 1: Again with the troubling mental images.
- 3:31Speaker 2: Here, well, but toes are a big part of the
- 3:33Speaker 2: universe theories of everything, and so physicists have been on
- 3:37Speaker 2: the lookout and on the search for one SU's theory
- 3:39Speaker 2: that can explain everything in the universe, including all the
- 3:42Speaker 2: mysterious bits of it.
- 3:43Speaker 1: And some of the most mysterious bits of the universe
- 3:46Speaker 1: are those pieces that we cannot see, things hidden behind
- 3:50Speaker 1: the event horizon of black holes. What's going on in there?
- 3:54Speaker 1: Are there singularities or is there something else? How does
- 3:57Speaker 1: gravity work for quantum particles? All the answers are waiting
- 4:00Speaker 1: for us behind these barriers.
- 4:03Speaker 2: Yeah, black holes seem to be the sort of the
- 4:05Speaker 2: epitome of mystery in the universe. It's almost like a
- 4:07Speaker 2: little pocket that takes you out of the universe.
- 4:10Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, it's sort of like they are their own
- 4:12Speaker 1: little pocket universes because they are cut off from us.
- 4:15Speaker 1: And maybe the most tantalizing thing is that we can
- 4:17Speaker 1: only know a few things about what's gone past that barrier.
- 4:21Speaker 2: Yeah, they're almost like cosmic sensors, you know, they're like
- 4:25Speaker 2: hiding information, blacking it out for everyone to uh see
- 4:29Speaker 2: or a Nazi.
- 4:29Speaker 1: And physicists hate when they lose information. When some knowledge
- 4:34Speaker 1: is hidden from them, and so we spend a lot
- 4:36Speaker 1: of time wondering about what we can know about the
- 4:39Speaker 1: things that have fallen into a black hole. Is it
- 4:42Speaker 1: possible to show up to a black hole and know
- 4:45Speaker 1: what has been tossed into it?
- 4:46Speaker 2: Yeah, we have a lot of questions about black holes,
- 4:49Speaker 2: but maybe not as important as the one we're asking today.
- 4:53Speaker 2: So today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question
- 5:00Speaker 2: do black holes have hair?
- 5:03Speaker 1: And do black holes wear socks with their sandals?
- 5:06Speaker 2: I think the real question is black holes have black
- 5:09Speaker 2: hairs or gray hairs? Or does it depend on the
- 5:12Speaker 2: age of the black hole or it's gravitas exactly?
- 5:15Speaker 1: Maybe the really big super black holes are like the
- 5:17Speaker 1: silver backs of the universe.
- 5:19Speaker 2: I guess. Don't all black holes by definition have gravitas?
- 5:22Speaker 2: I mean you kind of have to take them seriously, right,
- 5:24Speaker 2: I guess so if gravity is the bending of space time,
- 5:27Speaker 2: then gravitas is like the bending of the social structure. Like,
- 5:30Speaker 2: are there lightweight black holes out there or you know,
- 5:33Speaker 2: frivolous black holes? Probably not right.
- 5:36Speaker 1: They probably aren't like teenage black holes that the parent
- 5:38Speaker 1: black holes thing should be taking their life more seriously?
- 5:42Speaker 2: Where did that come from?
- 5:44Speaker 1: Frivolous. You're like, what are these black holes doing with
- 5:47Speaker 1: their lives anyway? Or maybe it's just because I have
- 5:49Speaker 1: teenagers in high school.
- 5:51Speaker 2: I think you might be bringing us the home issues
- 5:55Speaker 2: here on the Physics podcast.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Well, in the end, we are trying to understand the
- 5:58Speaker 1: universe through the lens of our own minds, so it's
- 6:01Speaker 1: impossible to separate personal issues from physics issues.
- 6:05Speaker 2: You could be a family physicist. You know there's family physicians. Yeah,
- 6:09Speaker 2: there are a lot of dynamics in the household.
- 6:11Speaker 1: Yeah exactly. Maybe black hole therapy can solve some problems.
- 6:15Speaker 2: Yeah, just throw the whole family to black hole and
- 6:19Speaker 2: they have to get along.
- 6:21Speaker 1: It might get kind of hairy.
- 6:23Speaker 2: But Harry, apparently black holes can be, or might be
- 6:26Speaker 2: or could be. And so that's the question we're asking
- 6:28Speaker 2: here today, which is kind of a weird question. I mean,
- 6:30Speaker 2: who thinks of black holes having hair?
- 6:32Speaker 1: Physicists? Physicists use hair as a metaphor for all sorts
- 6:36Speaker 1: of crazy stuff.
- 6:37Speaker 2: Well, it's a fun question, and so as usual we
- 6:39Speaker 2: were wondering calming people out there, I thought about this,
- 6:42Speaker 2: Harry question.
- 6:43Speaker 1: So thanks very much to everybody who answers these questions.
- 6:46Speaker 1: For this really fun segment of the podcast, and we
- 6:48Speaker 1: are always looking for more volunteers and we want to
- 6:50Speaker 1: hear from you, So join the group right to me
- 6:53Speaker 1: to questions at Danielandjorge dot com.
- 6:56Speaker 2: So think about it for a second. Do you think
- 6:58Speaker 2: black holes have hair? Here's what people had to say.
- 7:01Speaker 3: I suppose you'd have to ask yourself what exactly you're
- 7:04Speaker 3: talking about when you mean hair. My assumption is that
- 7:07Speaker 3: you would be referring to a biological process, and since
- 7:09Speaker 3: black holes are not a biological entity, I would struggle
- 7:13Speaker 3: to believe that they create hair in it of themselves.
- 7:15Speaker 4: Well, I don't know about actual hair, but I do
- 7:18Speaker 4: know that when things fall into a black hole, they
- 7:20Speaker 4: get spaghettified. So maybe black holes are surrounded by a
- 7:23Speaker 4: whole bunch of spaghettified ragg doll hair.
- 7:26Speaker 5: I'm assuming by hair you're asking about something that I
- 7:30Speaker 5: have never heard of, and not asking about like hair
- 7:34Speaker 5: on your head.
- 7:35Speaker 1: But since that's the only.
- 7:36Speaker 5: Definition that I know, I'm going to say, no, black
- 7:38Speaker 5: holes do not have hair on them.
- 7:40Speaker 4: The only thing I can really equate hairs to would
- 7:44Speaker 4: be like cosmic strings of some sort. I really don't know.
- 7:49Speaker 4: I don't know.
- 7:50Speaker 1: Well, if black holes have hair, it's yet another thing
- 7:53Speaker 1: that tests more hair than I do.
- 7:55Speaker 2: All Right, some great answers here, pretty creative talking about
- 7:58Speaker 2: like is a cosmic a hair?
- 8:02Speaker 1: That's right? Cosmic strings? Are these cracks in space time
- 8:05Speaker 1: we talked about once, which do seem kind of hairy,
- 8:08Speaker 1: but are completely separate from what we mean when we
- 8:10Speaker 1: say black hole hair.
- 8:11Speaker 2: I also wonder if them you can take this question literally, like,
- 8:14Speaker 2: if the Earth falls into a black hole, it would
- 8:16Speaker 2: have a lot of hair in it literally, right, or
- 8:19Speaker 2: would it? I don't know.
- 8:20Speaker 1: Yeah, well that sort of goes to the heart of
- 8:22Speaker 1: the question. Really, are black holes what they eat? Or
- 8:24Speaker 1: does it not matter what you put into a black hole?
- 8:27Speaker 1: Can you not tell the history of a black hole
- 8:29Speaker 1: in any way?
- 8:31Speaker 2: I see these are internal hairs, hairs you don't really
- 8:37Speaker 2: want to see.
- 8:37Speaker 1: Maybe somehow we ended up talking about ingrown hairs on
- 8:40Speaker 1: the podcast.
- 8:42Speaker 2: Yes, do black holes have ingrown hairs?
- 8:46Speaker 1: Next week, the comparison between black holes and black heads?
- 8:50Speaker 2: Yeah, oh boy, those are very popular on the TikTok.
- 8:55Speaker 1: And we're back to teenage issues.
- 8:57Speaker 2: Here you go, black hole popping right here on the podcast,
- 9:00Speaker 2: it's the sound of a black hole popping. But anyways,
- 9:02Speaker 2: let's get down to it, Daniel, and let's maybe recap
- 9:05Speaker 2: for people what exactly is a black hole and what
- 9:08Speaker 2: do we know about them?
- 9:09Speaker 1: So we don't really know what a black hole is.
- 9:11Speaker 1: We have a theoretical concept from general relativity that tells
- 9:15Speaker 1: us that if you have enough matter or enough energy
- 9:18Speaker 1: density in a small region of space, that that space
- 9:21Speaker 1: will be so curved that no information can escape. No photons,
- 9:25Speaker 1: no particles, no gravitational waves, nothing from beyond this event
- 9:30Speaker 1: horizon can ever propagate out and tell you anything about
- 9:33Speaker 1: what's hidden behind that curtain. That's the sort of general
- 9:36Speaker 1: relativity idea of a black hole. And we've seen some
- 9:39Speaker 1: things out there in the universe that really closely resemble
- 9:43Speaker 1: a black hole. There's something at the center of our
- 9:44Speaker 1: Milky Way, there's a bunch of collapsed stars, there's something
- 9:47Speaker 1: at the center of other galaxies that really resembles a
- 9:50Speaker 1: black hole. But you know, because you can't see inside
- 9:53Speaker 1: the event horizon, we're not exactly sure that what we've
- 9:56Speaker 1: seen out there in the universe aligns with Einstein's idea
- 10:00Speaker 1: of what a black hole would look like.
- 10:01Speaker 2: Yeah, it's basically like an actual hole in space. Right, Like,
- 10:05Speaker 2: once you have enough mass into one spot and it's
- 10:08Speaker 2: tense enough, that region of space becomes a hole. Right
- 10:11Speaker 2: like anything you throw in there, it's going to stay
- 10:12Speaker 2: in there.
- 10:13Speaker 1: It's a hole in that sense. But a hole sort
- 10:14Speaker 1: of gives you an idea of like a discontinuity, like
- 10:17Speaker 1: there's a gap or something. But remember that space is smooth,
- 10:20Speaker 1: it's continuous. So what we're talking about is space being bent,
- 10:23Speaker 1: space being curved, you know the way that like the
- 10:25Speaker 1: Earth doesn't move in what looks like a straight line
- 10:27Speaker 1: to us because it's following the curvature of space. When
- 10:31Speaker 1: you put mass inside space, it bends it. It changes
- 10:34Speaker 1: the relative distances between things, which changes how things flow.
- 10:38Speaker 1: And so near a black hole, space is curved and
- 10:40Speaker 1: curved very very intensely, and as you get closer, that
- 10:43Speaker 1: curvature gets stronger and stronger. But it is continuous, right,
- 10:46Speaker 1: there's not like a sharp cut off. But there's a
- 10:48Speaker 1: point on this smooth curvature past which nothing can escape,
- 10:52Speaker 1: and that's the radius we call the event horizon. And
- 10:54Speaker 1: so you could say that's sort of like a threshold.
- 10:57Speaker 1: It's like a hole if you fall into you'll never escape.
- 11:00Speaker 2: Yeah, I think you're saying that there's no cank in space,
- 11:02Speaker 2: but there is sort of a point, that sort of
- 11:04Speaker 2: a discontinuity where light can no longer escape.
- 11:07Speaker 1: Yeah, there's a discontinuity sort of in your fates. Like
- 11:10Speaker 1: if you have photons on one side of it and
- 11:11Speaker 1: photons on the other side of this radius, the ones
- 11:14Speaker 1: past the radius can escape and fly through the universe,
- 11:17Speaker 1: and the ones inside the radius will never escape. So
- 11:20Speaker 1: there's a sort of discontinuity in the outcomes of particles.
- 11:23Speaker 1: But remember the event horizon. It's not a physical barrier.
- 11:26Speaker 1: It's just this difference in the outcomes of particles.
- 11:28Speaker 2: It's sort of like a real hole, right, Like there's
- 11:31Speaker 2: no barrier, you just follow. At some point you're on
- 11:33Speaker 2: the hole, and some point you're not on the hole. Yeah,
- 11:36Speaker 2: that's right, all right. So then what do we know
- 11:38Speaker 2: about black holes, if anything at all.
- 11:40Speaker 1: So the frustrating thing is that we have this theoretical
- 11:42Speaker 1: concept of what might be inside a black hole. In
- 11:45Speaker 1: Einstein's pictures, famelessly, this infinitely dense dot, a singularity where
- 11:50Speaker 1: gravity has had this runaway effect compressing and compressing and
- 11:53Speaker 1: compressing forever with nothing to resist it and creating this
- 11:56Speaker 1: infinitely dense dot at the heart of a black hole.
- 11:59Speaker 1: But of course we can't see inside a black hole.
- 12:01Speaker 1: All we can do is observe them from the outside.
- 12:04Speaker 1: No information escapes from the inside of a black hole,
- 12:07Speaker 1: according to Einstein's theory. But we can know a few
- 12:10Speaker 1: things about the black hole, like we're on the outside
- 12:13Speaker 1: of it. But we can still measure some things about
- 12:15Speaker 1: the black hole without going inside. For example, we can
- 12:19Speaker 1: know the mass of the black hole. We can measure
- 12:22Speaker 1: the black hole's impact on space time even past the
- 12:25Speaker 1: event horizon, So we can know something about the black
- 12:28Speaker 1: hole without even seeing past the event horizon.
- 12:31Speaker 2: You mean, like we can know how much gravity it
- 12:33Speaker 2: exerts onto the things around it.
- 12:36Speaker 1: Exactly. The curvature of space time continues past the event horizon, right,
- 12:40Speaker 1: there's no kink, Like we said, it's smooth, so past
- 12:42Speaker 1: the event horizon, it's still exerting an influence on space time,
- 12:47Speaker 1: and we can use that measurement of the curvature to
- 12:49Speaker 1: tell how much mass there is inside the event horizon,
- 12:53Speaker 1: in the same way that like you can measure the
- 12:55Speaker 1: mass of the Earth just by seeing its gravitational effect
- 12:58Speaker 1: on the Moon or on a satellite. Right, all that
- 13:00Speaker 1: gravity adds up and has the same effect on the point.
- 13:03Speaker 1: Doesn't tell you anything about like the configuration of the
- 13:06Speaker 1: Earth or whatever. And you could replace the Earth with
- 13:08Speaker 1: a point particle to have the same gravitational effect. But
- 13:11Speaker 1: from a distance you can measure the overall gravitational force.
- 13:15Speaker 1: And we can do that for a black hole obviously.
- 13:18Speaker 2: And the idea is that like, the more gravity of
- 13:20Speaker 2: black hole exerts and of the things around it, the
- 13:22Speaker 2: more massive it is.
- 13:24Speaker 1: Exactly, we can do the calculation to say how much
- 13:26Speaker 1: space time gets bent by black holes of a certain mass,
- 13:29Speaker 1: and so we can back that up and say, well,
- 13:31Speaker 1: we measure this amount of curvature, and so therefore black
- 13:34Speaker 1: hole must have this mass.
- 13:36Speaker 2: I wonder if like mass is the actual right term
- 13:38Speaker 2: for it, right, Like, we don't even know if what's
- 13:40Speaker 2: inside of a black hole is mass or just a
- 13:43Speaker 2: whole bunch of pure energy.
- 13:45Speaker 1: Right, that's exactly right. We use mass as a way
- 13:47Speaker 1: to sort of measure the energy that's inside the black hole,
- 13:50Speaker 1: because remember that space time is really curved by energy density,
- 13:54Speaker 1: not necessarily just by mass, like a proton bends space time,
- 13:58Speaker 1: even though it's just made of a bunch of quarks
- 14:00Speaker 1: which are very very low mass. But there's a lot
- 14:02Speaker 1: of energy stored inside the proton energy in the bonds
- 14:04Speaker 1: of those quarks, which contributes to its mass and contributes
- 14:08Speaker 1: to the curvature of space time. So on one hand
- 14:11Speaker 1: you could say, well, it's really just the stored energy
- 14:13Speaker 1: of the black hole. On the other hand, that's kind
- 14:15Speaker 1: of what mass is. Mass is the internal stored energy
- 14:19Speaker 1: of an object, and so on one hand, yeah, it's energy.
- 14:22Speaker 1: On the other hand, that's what we call mass.
- 14:24Speaker 2: Wait, so it's like it's inertial mass or gravitational mass.
- 14:28Speaker 2: Does that mean a black hole can have kinetic energy
- 14:30Speaker 2: as well well?
- 14:31Speaker 1: In general relativity, inertial and gravitational masses are the same thing.
- 14:35Speaker 1: So yes, this is its inertial mass. This is like
- 14:38Speaker 1: how hard it is to get it moving and how
- 14:40Speaker 1: hard it is to slow it down, et cetera, et cetera.
- 14:43Speaker 1: And yes, black holes can have kinetic energy. They can
- 14:45Speaker 1: move right, and you can move past a black hole,
- 14:48Speaker 1: and velocity is all relative. So if you're flying past
- 14:51Speaker 1: a black hole at half the speed of light, you
- 14:53Speaker 1: see it moving towards you at half the speed of light.
- 14:56Speaker 1: So yes, black holes can definitely move, they can have
- 14:58Speaker 1: kinetic energy.
- 15:00Speaker 2: All right. So then how would you measure the mass
- 15:02Speaker 2: of a black hole. You would sort of like put
- 15:04Speaker 2: a scale near it or throw a pebble to see
- 15:07Speaker 2: how it swings around it. How would you do it?
- 15:09Speaker 1: Unfortunately, we're not near enough any black holes to do
- 15:11Speaker 1: any experiments, but fortunately in astrophysics we can watch these
- 15:15Speaker 1: experiments happen. So the best way to measure the mass
- 15:17Speaker 1: with black hole is to see the motion of stuff
- 15:19Speaker 1: near it, like the mass of the black hole the
- 15:21Speaker 1: center the Milky Way. We measure by looking at stars
- 15:24Speaker 1: that whiz past it and seeing the gravitational force on
- 15:28Speaker 1: those objects and knowing how much mass has to be
- 15:31Speaker 1: to create that gravitational force to make the stars bend
- 15:34Speaker 1: the way they do. And for distant black holes and
- 15:37Speaker 1: other galaxies, we can see like the sort of swirl
- 15:39Speaker 1: of stars around the center of the galaxy and use
- 15:42Speaker 1: that to measure the gravitational force from the black hole.
- 15:45Speaker 2: Yeah, that's what I meant, you know, a pebble star.
- 15:48Speaker 1: Yeah, basically, yes, same thing, the pebble.
- 15:50Speaker 2: Method, all right, So then what else can we know
- 15:53Speaker 2: about a black hole?
- 15:54Speaker 1: Another thing we can know about a black hole is
- 15:56Speaker 1: it's electric charge. If you put electrons into a black hole, Well,
- 16:00Speaker 1: charge is concerned in the universe. So if an electron
- 16:03Speaker 1: falls into the black hole, the black hole now has
- 16:05Speaker 1: an overall negative charge. At another electron, get another negative charge.
- 16:09Speaker 1: So you can know the overall charge of a black hole.
- 16:13Speaker 2: Well, you mean like a black hole can have a voltage.
- 16:15Speaker 1: Yeah, a black hole can have an overall charge and
- 16:18Speaker 1: it can have electric fields. Right in the same way
- 16:21Speaker 1: that black hole has mass, and that makes for effectively
- 16:24Speaker 1: a gravitational field or bending of space time past the
- 16:28Speaker 1: event horizon. The black hole can have a charge and
- 16:30Speaker 1: that creates an electric field which can also be pasted
- 16:33Speaker 1: the event horizon.
- 16:34Speaker 2: Interesting, but I guess if I wonder if a black
- 16:37Speaker 2: hole has a negative charge, can you use it as
- 16:39Speaker 2: a battery? Probably not, right, Like you can't get electrons
- 16:43Speaker 2: to flow out of it, can you?
- 16:44Speaker 1: You can use a charged black hole the way you
- 16:46Speaker 1: can use any other kind of charged particle. Right, You
- 16:49Speaker 1: can use it to create electric fields. You can use
- 16:52Speaker 1: it to repel stuff or attract stuff. But I think
- 16:54Speaker 1: batteries involved like the flow of electrons through materials and
- 16:58Speaker 1: I don't know that's chemistry.
- 17:03Speaker 2: That's too hairy for you.
- 17:04Speaker 1: Yeah, But essentially, you can think of a black hole
- 17:06Speaker 1: as just like an enormous particle, right the way like
- 17:10Speaker 1: an electron sort of has a charge attached to it,
- 17:12Speaker 1: but you don't really think about like where is the charge.
- 17:15Speaker 1: It's just like a property of the electron. You could
- 17:17Speaker 1: think the black hole as just sort of like enormous particle.
- 17:20Speaker 1: You don't have any details about, like where is the
- 17:22Speaker 1: electric charge. It's just sort of like assigned to the
- 17:24Speaker 1: entire event horizon, the same way you assign the mass
- 17:27Speaker 1: to the entire event horizon. You don't really know what's
- 17:30Speaker 1: going on inside, how it's that mass arranged? Is it
- 17:32Speaker 1: still in bananas? Is it squished into something else? Is
- 17:35Speaker 1: it nuclear pasta? You don't know anything about the internals.
- 17:38Speaker 1: You just assigned it to the exterior, and then you
- 17:40Speaker 1: can treat it like anything else that has a charge.
- 17:42Speaker 2: I see, sort of like maybe the Earth. You could
- 17:44Speaker 2: do that with the Earth too, right, Like, I'm sure
- 17:45Speaker 2: the Earth has an overall.
- 17:46Speaker 1: Charge exactly, any extended object with an overall charge from
- 17:50Speaker 1: a distance, you can treat like a point particle with
- 17:52Speaker 1: a charge, the math is exactly the same. And the
- 17:55Speaker 1: case of the Earth, of course, we can know it,
- 17:57Speaker 1: and it's not hidden beyond an advent horizon, So we
- 17:59Speaker 1: could learn about this stuff in other ways. In the
- 18:01Speaker 1: case of a black hole, you can't. And there's something
- 18:03Speaker 1: sort of similar there about a black hole and a particle,
- 18:06Speaker 1: the way that like two electrons are identical. You know,
- 18:09Speaker 1: you can't tell the difference between this electron and that electron.
- 18:12Speaker 1: They have all the same properties. That's what defines them.
- 18:15Speaker 1: Two black holes with the same mass and the same charge,
- 18:17Speaker 1: and it'll talk about it in the same spin, are
- 18:20Speaker 1: really two identical objects?
- 18:22Speaker 2: All right? Well, talk about spin? What a spin for
- 18:24Speaker 2: a black hole?
- 18:25Speaker 1: So the same way that you can toss stuff into
- 18:27Speaker 1: a black hole that has charge, you can also toss
- 18:29Speaker 1: stuff into a black hole that makes it spin. You
- 18:32Speaker 1: throw something exactly towards the center of the black hole,
- 18:34Speaker 1: it'll make it grow and make it more massive. But
- 18:36Speaker 1: if you throw something into the event horizon but a
- 18:38Speaker 1: little bit off center, then it's sort of like you're
- 18:40Speaker 1: giving it a push. The way if you're like holding
- 18:42Speaker 1: a bicycle wheel on an axle and you hit the rim,
- 18:44Speaker 1: it'll start to spin. Or if you push on a
- 18:46Speaker 1: merry go round, it'll start to spin. If you throw
- 18:48Speaker 1: particles into the edge of the black hole, you can
- 18:51Speaker 1: get it to spin because angular momentum, like charge, doesn't
- 18:55Speaker 1: disappear in our universe. So that black hole then has
- 18:57Speaker 1: to accumulate that angular momentum, which means it has to spin.
- 19:02Speaker 2: But I guess the angular momentum in the universe is
- 19:04Speaker 2: not like a fundamental thing. Is It's not like energy
- 19:08Speaker 2: or regular momentum. Is it like? It's really just like
- 19:11Speaker 2: the difference between two points in your body and how
- 19:13Speaker 2: they're moving relative to each other, isn't.
- 19:15Speaker 1: It Now, angular momentum is just as fundamental as linear momentum,
- 19:18Speaker 1: and maybe even more fundamental than energy number. Energy not
- 19:22Speaker 1: actually conserved in our universe because conservation of energy requires
- 19:26Speaker 1: space to be static, and our universe space is expanding,
- 19:29Speaker 1: so energy is not conserved. But linear momentum and angular
- 19:32Speaker 1: momentum are both conserved in our universe. It comes from
- 19:36Speaker 1: deep symmetries. Linear momentum comes from the fact that space
- 19:39Speaker 1: is the same everywhere, that like translation from here to there,
- 19:42Speaker 1: shouldn't change your experiment, and angular momentum comes from the
- 19:45Speaker 1: fact that there's no preferred direction in space, that every
- 19:49Speaker 1: direction is equivalent, and so angular momentum has to be
- 19:51Speaker 1: conserved and that makes angular momentum something very fundamental to
- 19:54Speaker 1: the universe.
- 19:55Speaker 2: All right, Well, so then a black hole can have
- 19:57Speaker 2: angular momentum, and that is that what it's been exactly.
- 20:00Speaker 1: The spin of the black hole is how it stores
- 20:02Speaker 1: angular momentum. And there's all sorts of fascinating consequences there
- 20:05Speaker 1: in general relativity, because like a singularity can't spin. So
- 20:10Speaker 1: the idea is that inside a spinning black hole is
- 20:12Speaker 1: maybe not a singularity but a ringularity, like a whole
- 20:17Speaker 1: circle of singularities, and those singularities are all spinning together,
- 20:21Speaker 1: which is how they store the angular momentum. But nobody
- 20:24Speaker 1: really knows what's actually going on inside.
- 20:27Speaker 2: All right, So the things we can know about a
- 20:28Speaker 2: black hole are its mass, it's spin, and it's charge.
- 20:32Speaker 2: Now the big question is can we know how hairy
- 20:35Speaker 2: it is? So let's dig into that question. But first
- 20:38Speaker 2: let's take out a quick break. All right, we're talking
- 20:53Speaker 2: about the hairs of a black hole. Can a whole
- 20:56Speaker 2: half hairs.
- 20:58Speaker 1: That's exactly the question. And when physicists say hair, they
- 21:01Speaker 1: don't really mean hair. They're just taking a word that
- 21:05Speaker 1: exists that has another meaning and giving it a meaning.
- 21:08Speaker 1: In physics, which is, you know, has a great tradition
- 21:10Speaker 1: of being very confusing what.
- 21:12Speaker 2: You mean, like in this case it actually is like
- 21:15Speaker 2: a cosmic string or a particle or something, or is
- 21:18Speaker 2: it just a metaphor, it's.
- 21:19Speaker 1: A metaphor for anything else. Essentially, general relativity tells us
- 21:22Speaker 1: that we can know three things about a black hole.
- 21:25Speaker 1: Its mass, it's been its charge, and nothing else. Nothing
- 21:29Speaker 1: about its history, no interesting little details, no texture, no hair.
- 21:34Speaker 2: Is that because of the event horizon. Basically, like if
- 21:38Speaker 2: you wrap the Earth around an impenetrable, you know, black shield,
- 21:43Speaker 2: you could also not tell anything about the Earth, whether
- 21:45Speaker 2: it's t had hairs or not.
- 21:46Speaker 1: I think that's true, but maybe only because an impenetrable
- 21:50Speaker 1: black shield would basically have to be an event horizon
- 21:52Speaker 1: of a black hole. There's no other way to make
- 21:55Speaker 1: something truly impenetrable. If you just build something really solid
- 21:58Speaker 1: and black, it would like read it it's some temperature,
- 22:01Speaker 1: and that would tell you about what's going on inside
- 22:03Speaker 1: of it. The only way to really be impenetrabled to
- 22:06Speaker 1: give up no information would be to make a black hole.
- 22:08Speaker 2: I guess that's what I mean. It's like, the reason
- 22:10Speaker 2: we can't know anything else about a black hole is
- 22:12Speaker 2: because it has an event horizon which keeps all the
- 22:15Speaker 2: information inside. It's not something like that information is destroyed, right.
- 22:20Speaker 1: We don't know what's going on exactly. And that's the
- 22:22Speaker 1: deepest question, is like is the information destroyed? Is it
- 22:25Speaker 1: actually contained within black hole somehow or is it actually destroyed?
- 22:30Speaker 1: Like is the internal state of a black hole the same,
- 22:33Speaker 1: no matter what you've put into it. Make a black
- 22:35Speaker 1: hole out of bananas and you make another one out
- 22:37Speaker 1: of apples. Do you really get exactly the identical black
- 22:41Speaker 1: hole out of those two things if you put in
- 22:43Speaker 1: the same amount of mass? Or is there some history
- 22:47Speaker 1: there some way to tell a banana from an apple
- 22:50Speaker 1: black hole?
- 22:51Speaker 2: I guess I'm trying to, you know, relate it to
- 22:53Speaker 2: the earth, and like you could make an earth out
- 22:55Speaker 2: of bananas, and if you put it behind your impenetrable shield,
- 22:58Speaker 2: you could also not tell the Earth what's made out
- 23:00Speaker 2: of bananas or apples.
- 23:03Speaker 1: That's exactly right, but it conflicts with sort of other things.
- 23:06Speaker 1: We've seen in the universe and our quantum intuition, because
- 23:08Speaker 1: quantum mechanics tells us that information is not destroyed, that
- 23:12Speaker 1: the present is uniquely determined by the past, and that
- 23:16Speaker 1: therefore from the present you can always derive the past,
- 23:19Speaker 1: that like the past, has left a permanent imprint on
- 23:22Speaker 1: the present. Quantum mechanics tells us that we can run
- 23:24Speaker 1: the laws of physics forwards or backwards in time, so
- 23:27Speaker 1: we could use the present to predict the future in
- 23:29Speaker 1: the same way we could use the present to reveal
- 23:31Speaker 1: the past. And this is in conflict with that. This says, no, no, no,
- 23:34Speaker 1: there's no information here. Once you create a black hole,
- 23:37Speaker 1: you can't tell what its history is at all. There's
- 23:40Speaker 1: no texture to grab onto, no little details if you
- 23:43Speaker 1: zoom in, there are no hairs there to reveal the
- 23:46Speaker 1: history of the black hole.
- 23:47Speaker 2: I wonder if maybe the real question is not whether
- 23:50Speaker 2: a black hole has hair. The question seems to be
- 23:52Speaker 2: more like, if I toss a hair into a black hole,
- 23:54Speaker 2: does the hair get destroyed forever? Or is it just
- 23:58Speaker 2: going to stay inside the black hole and it's going
- 24:00Speaker 2: to be there, but we can't tell if it's there.
- 24:03Speaker 1: I think those are both really interesting questions, but I
- 24:05Speaker 1: think there are separate questions. In general relativity, we can't
- 24:08Speaker 1: know anything that passes the event horizon. But maybe general
- 24:11Speaker 1: relativity black holes are not the black holes we see
- 24:14Speaker 1: in our universe. Maybe there are little ripples and hairs
- 24:17Speaker 1: on the event horizon that we could use to learn
- 24:19Speaker 1: about what has fallen in. And then the second question
- 24:22Speaker 1: is like what happens to stuff that falls in does
- 24:24Speaker 1: form some new state of matter? Is that information still there?
- 24:27Speaker 1: Because we think that black holes eventually evaporate, that they
- 24:30Speaker 1: radiate away all of their energy, they lose their mass,
- 24:33Speaker 1: and if that information has been destroyed within them, then
- 24:36Speaker 1: that information is lost forever, which would be very confusing
- 24:39Speaker 1: from the point of view of quantum mechanics.
- 24:41Speaker 2: Well to the second question, I know we've talked about
- 24:43Speaker 2: in the podcast before, how it is possible to go
- 24:46Speaker 2: into a black hole and survive. Right, Like, for a
- 24:49Speaker 2: big enough black hole, the event horizon happens. You don't
- 24:52Speaker 2: have to get spaghetified or shredded apart to go into
- 24:55Speaker 2: technically the event horizon of a super massive black hole, right,
- 24:58Speaker 2: That's right.
- 24:58Speaker 1: And if for really large black hole holes, if they
- 25:01Speaker 1: do have significant charge and or spin. There are even
- 25:04Speaker 1: stable orbits within the event horizon of the black hole.
- 25:08Speaker 2: So you could like fall into a super massive black
- 25:10Speaker 2: hole and stay in there but still be hole, still
- 25:14Speaker 2: be there.
- 25:14Speaker 1: And still be inside. According to general relativity, yes that
- 25:17Speaker 1: is possible. Again, we don't really know right what is
- 25:20Speaker 1: going on inside there, so we don't really know the
- 25:22Speaker 1: fate of any of this stuff until you know, you
- 25:24Speaker 1: jump into a black hole and figure it out.
- 25:26Speaker 2: Well, not me, Maybe it should be the physinessist. I mean,
- 25:29Speaker 2: I think you need the cartoonist outside to draw what
- 25:32Speaker 2: happens and then figure out if it's a good idea.
- 25:35Speaker 2: But I guess what I mean is you can throw
- 25:37Speaker 2: a hair into a black hole and it can survive,
- 25:40Speaker 2: Like you can have a hair inside of a black hole.
- 25:42Speaker 2: It's she said, if somebody else comes by, they won't
- 25:44Speaker 2: be able to know whether you threw a hair in
- 25:46Speaker 2: there or not.
- 25:46Speaker 1: Exactly that's true. According to general relativity. You could build
- 25:49Speaker 1: a black hole out of hairs and nobody else could
- 25:52Speaker 1: tell the difference between that and a black hole made
- 25:54Speaker 1: out of toenails or something else.
- 25:56Speaker 2: But you would know there was a hair in there.
- 25:57Speaker 1: You would know because you saw it falling in.
- 25:59Speaker 2: You mean, yeah, or because I tossed it into the hole.
- 26:02Speaker 1: That's true, you would know the history, but there'd be
- 26:04Speaker 1: no way to measure it from the objects itself. There'll
- 26:06Speaker 1: be no record on the outside that would tell you. Again,
- 26:09Speaker 1: according to general relativity.
- 26:11Speaker 2: Okay, so then what does that mean? Does that mean?
- 26:14Speaker 2: Quantum mechanics says something differently.
- 26:16Speaker 1: Quantum mechanics definitely says something different, And quantum mechanics tells
- 26:19Speaker 1: us that this whole picture of a black hole according
- 26:22Speaker 1: to general relativity is very very likely wrong. Remember that
- 26:26Speaker 1: general relativity is not built on the foundation of quantum mechanics.
- 26:29Speaker 1: It makes very different assumptions about how the universe works.
- 26:32Speaker 1: It assumes that space and time are continuous and smooth,
- 26:36Speaker 1: that you can have like infinitely small distances and infinitely
- 26:39Speaker 1: small masses. Quantum mechanics gives us a very different picture.
- 26:42Speaker 1: It says everything is discreet, it's quantized, it's chunked up
- 26:46Speaker 1: into pieces, and there's a limited amount of information we
- 26:49Speaker 1: can know about the universe. General relativity says that you
- 26:52Speaker 1: can have tiny little objects moving in smooth paths, so
- 26:55Speaker 1: you can perfectly know how they move. Quantum mechanics says
- 26:57Speaker 1: that's not possible, and they come directly into inflict at
- 27:00Speaker 1: the heart of a black hole, where general relativity says
- 27:03Speaker 1: you have this point of infinite density and quantum mechanics says, no,
- 27:06Speaker 1: that's not possible. And so what we need is some
- 27:09Speaker 1: sort of merging of the two, a theory of quantum
- 27:11Speaker 1: gravity that tells us what happens when quantum objects feel
- 27:15Speaker 1: very strong gravity.
- 27:16Speaker 2: I guess maybe the question is what does quantum mechanics
- 27:19Speaker 2: say about the black hole hair question?
- 27:22Speaker 1: So quantum mechanics as we have it now doesn't know
- 27:24Speaker 1: how to deal with gravity for particles. Right, particles are
- 27:28Speaker 1: very different from things like sand, or rocks, or base
- 27:31Speaker 1: balls or even pieces of hair. Those things are basically
- 27:34Speaker 1: classical objects, so we know where they are and we
- 27:36Speaker 1: can talk about them as if they always have a
- 27:38Speaker 1: specified location. But quantum particles are different. They have like
- 27:41Speaker 1: probabilities of being here and probabilities of being there, So
- 27:44Speaker 1: we don't know how to do gravity for particles. Like
- 27:47Speaker 1: if a particle has a probability to be here and there,
- 27:50Speaker 1: does it have half the gravity here and half the
- 27:52Speaker 1: gravity there, or is there a gravity probability we don't know.
- 27:56Speaker 1: What we need is a theory of gravity for particles,
- 27:59Speaker 1: and nobody has one, and so until you have that theory,
- 28:02Speaker 1: you can't actually know what quantum mechanics even says about
- 28:06Speaker 1: what's going on inside a black hole, or whether there
- 28:08Speaker 1: are ripples in texture on the surface of the black
- 28:11Speaker 1: hole that you can use to figure out what's inside.
- 28:13Speaker 2: I see, I think this is what I'm trying to
- 28:15Speaker 2: get to, is like, what do you mean like quantum
- 28:18Speaker 2: mechanics says there are ripples on the surface that might
- 28:20Speaker 2: be able to tell you if a black hole is
- 28:21Speaker 2: made out of hairs or bananas.
- 28:23Speaker 1: Unfortunately, we have no perfect theory of quantum gravity, but
- 28:25Speaker 1: people are doing some calculations to try to figure out
- 28:28Speaker 1: is it possible for a quantum black hole to have hair? Wait?
- 28:31Speaker 2: Wait, wait, what's a quantum black hole?
- 28:33Speaker 1: So quantum black hole would just be a black hole
- 28:35Speaker 1: as described by a theory of quantum gravity, instead of
- 28:39Speaker 1: a classical black hole as described by general relativity. Right,
- 28:42Speaker 1: Einstein's classical black holes are a singularity with an event
- 28:45Speaker 1: horizon around them, with no hair whatsoever, a perfectly smooth surface,
- 28:48Speaker 1: and you can't tell anything about what's inside or what
- 28:51Speaker 1: was used to build it. Quantum black hole is a
- 28:53Speaker 1: description of a different theoretical object, one that follows rules
- 28:57Speaker 1: of quantum gravity.
- 28:58Speaker 2: All right, let's dig into that. Is a quantum black hole,
- 29:01Speaker 2: hole that's both black and white at the same time.
- 29:03Speaker 1: No, no, but that sounds awesome. I wish that were true.
- 29:08Speaker 1: Carlo Rovelli has this fun theory that black holes might
- 29:11Speaker 1: be collapsing stars that are slowed down by gravitational time dilation,
- 29:16Speaker 1: and eventually they turn around and become white holes. And
- 29:19Speaker 1: we had a fun conversation with him and some of
- 29:22Speaker 1: his colleagues about exactly that how a black hole can
- 29:24Speaker 1: be in a superposition of a state maybe being a
- 29:26Speaker 1: black hole, maybe being a white hole. So basically, yeah,
- 29:29Speaker 1: your theory is one of the contenders.
- 29:31Speaker 2: There you go. So, then how is a quantum black
- 29:33Speaker 2: hole different than a regular relativity black hole.
- 29:37Speaker 1: So there's a few different answers to that, because there
- 29:39Speaker 1: are a few different theories of quantum gravity. Right, we
- 29:41Speaker 1: have no perfect theory. We don't even have a theory
- 29:44Speaker 1: that's complete and it works on paper, not to mention
- 29:46Speaker 1: a theory which has been tested against what's actually happening
- 29:49Speaker 1: out there in the universe. So people are working in
- 29:52Speaker 1: different directions in quantum gravity, and some of them are
- 29:55Speaker 1: working specifically on this problem and have ideas for the
- 29:58Speaker 1: consequences of their particular quantum gravity on the hairiness of
- 30:02Speaker 1: a black hole. So in some theories of quantum gravity,
- 30:05Speaker 1: black holes have different kinds of hairs.
- 30:07Speaker 2: Like long hair, curly hairs, luster's hairs. What did to
- 30:11Speaker 2: say about what black holes could be like?
- 30:13Speaker 1: Yeah, so let's go through some of the options. The
- 30:14Speaker 1: first real progress in quantum gravity was Stephen Hawking. He said, actually,
- 30:19Speaker 1: let's figure out whether black holes radiate a weigh any information.
- 30:23Speaker 1: And he has his famous theory of Hawking radiation that
- 30:26Speaker 1: says that black holes generate particles. You know, if you're
- 30:30Speaker 1: near the surface of a black hole, it'll actually be
- 30:32Speaker 1: shooting off particles at you. This is Hawking radiation. The
- 30:35Speaker 1: thing about Hawking radiation from black holes is that it's
- 30:37Speaker 1: supposed to contain zero information that just depends on the
- 30:42Speaker 1: mass of the black hole and nothing else about the
- 30:44Speaker 1: internal configuration, about whether it's apples or bananas.
- 30:47Speaker 2: And that's because it's like generating particles out of the vacuum,
- 30:51Speaker 2: right out of nothingness, out of pure energy that's inside
- 30:54Speaker 2: the black hole. Like, it doesn't depend on what kind
- 30:58Speaker 2: of energy, whether it has hairs or been in it's inside.
- 31:01Speaker 2: It just kind of creates stuff. As I think, I
- 31:04Speaker 2: understand that it just creates stuff and then radiates it out.
- 31:07Speaker 1: That's right, that it creates stuff based just on the
- 31:09Speaker 1: energy the mass of the black hole. Actually it's formulated
- 31:12Speaker 1: fascinatingly in terms of like black hole thermodynamics. So you
- 31:15Speaker 1: can think about the temperature of the black hole. But
- 31:18Speaker 1: you have to be very careful about applying Hawking's arguments
- 31:21Speaker 1: to like a microscopic particle picture of what's happening about
- 31:24Speaker 1: creating these particles, because Hawking doesn't have again, the full
- 31:27Speaker 1: theory of quantum gravity. He did this sort of semi
- 31:30Speaker 1: classical calculation where he thought about quantum fields and near
- 31:33Speaker 1: event horizons, and he figured out that these quantum fields
- 31:35Speaker 1: have to radied. He doesn't have a microscopic picture. And
- 31:39Speaker 1: you'll often hear this story about Hawking radiation, about particles
- 31:42Speaker 1: and antip particles created near the event horizon. One falls
- 31:45Speaker 1: in and one escapes, et cetera, et cetera. That's all
- 31:48Speaker 1: hand wavy storytelling. That's not accurate it doesn't actually hold
- 31:52Speaker 1: together in terms of what's happening with Hawking radiation.
- 31:54Speaker 2: Wait, it doesn't hold together, or we don't know if
- 31:56Speaker 2: it's true.
- 31:57Speaker 1: If you start from that microscopic picture and try to
- 31:59Speaker 1: build up a prediction of Hawking radiation, it doesn't work.
- 32:02Speaker 2: What do you mean, Like, the radiation we measure from
- 32:04Speaker 2: a black hole doesn't match what you would predict from that.
- 32:07Speaker 1: Well, number one, we've never measured the radiation from a
- 32:09Speaker 1: black hole. This is still just theoretical.
- 32:11Speaker 2: So then what do you mean.
- 32:12Speaker 1: As soon as you make yourself this microscopic picture and
- 32:14Speaker 1: then you have these quantum particles, you have all sorts
- 32:16Speaker 1: of questions you can't answer, like about fuzziness and probability,
- 32:20Speaker 1: and whether the particles can fluctuate past the event horizon
- 32:23Speaker 1: or not. And so the quantum mechanical picture isn't really
- 32:26Speaker 1: complete about what's happening to these little particles. Nobody can
- 32:29Speaker 1: start from those particles and calculate up and predict Hawking radiation.
- 32:32Speaker 1: That's not what's happening. Hawking has started from sort of
- 32:34Speaker 1: a bigger, broader picture, just from understanding like the energy
- 32:37Speaker 1: flow the quantum fields near the event horizon, and predicted
- 32:41Speaker 1: that the emit radiation. But again there's no microscopic picture
- 32:44Speaker 1: that really holds together. But you want to know more
- 32:46Speaker 1: details about how that works. We have a whole episode
- 32:48Speaker 1: about Hawking radiation where we can review that in detail.
- 32:51Speaker 2: But I think the main picture you're saying is that
- 32:53Speaker 2: we do know that black holes radiate Hawking radiation. We
- 32:56Speaker 2: just don't know like the specific details of what's happening
- 32:59Speaker 2: at the border of a black hole to make that happen.
- 33:01Speaker 1: That's right, Hawking didn't come up with a complete theory
- 33:04Speaker 1: of quantum gravity, so he doesn't have a microscopic picture,
- 33:07Speaker 1: and he predicts this Hawking radiation, which again should contain
- 33:10Speaker 1: no information. So a Hawking black hole basically has no hair,
- 33:14Speaker 1: even though it's kind of a quantum black hole. But
- 33:16Speaker 1: there are other theories of quantum gravity people who've been
- 33:18Speaker 1: working on, and some of these do predict black hole hair.
- 33:21Speaker 2: All right, let's get into the hairy details of these
- 33:23Speaker 2: theories and whether or not black holes have hair or
- 33:26Speaker 2: quantum hairs or no hairs at all, and what it
- 33:29Speaker 2: could mean about our understanding of the laws of physics.
- 33:32Speaker 2: But first, let's take another quick break, all right, we
- 33:47Speaker 2: are braiding our knowledge of the universe here talking about
- 33:50Speaker 2: black hole hairs and whether they have it or not.
- 33:54Speaker 2: And so according to Einstein, who is famous for his hair,
- 33:56Speaker 2: by the way, his gray hair, even as black holes
- 33:59Speaker 2: don't have hair, which seems kind of mean given how
- 34:01Speaker 2: much hair he had. But it seems like quantum mechanics
- 34:04Speaker 2: at first said they didn't have hairs, but now there
- 34:06Speaker 2: were some theories about quantum gravity that say, maybe they
- 34:09Speaker 2: do have hairs.
- 34:10Speaker 1: That's right, And all these calculations are approximate. You know,
- 34:13Speaker 1: nobody has a full theory of quantum gravity that they
- 34:15Speaker 1: can start from and predict these things from first principles.
- 34:18Speaker 1: Everybody is doing sort of approximations. They're saying, well, we
- 34:21Speaker 1: don't have the full theory, but maybe it looks a
- 34:23Speaker 1: little bit like this, And if it looked like this,
- 34:25Speaker 1: then what would be the answer to this question? But
- 34:28Speaker 1: a lot of is approximate and handwavy and inconsistent with
- 34:31Speaker 1: other things. But you know, this is how progress is made.
- 34:34Speaker 1: We don't always just have a flash of insight with
- 34:36Speaker 1: the whole answer that we can work from. We put
- 34:38Speaker 1: things together and try to patch them together, and eventually
- 34:41Speaker 1: maybe it comes together into a bigger picture of everything, all.
- 34:44Speaker 2: Right, Well, so then how do these fuzzy quantum gravity
- 34:47Speaker 2: theories say that black holes have hair?
- 34:50Speaker 1: So there's a paper about ten years ago that try
- 34:52Speaker 1: to study the configuration of gravitons far away from a
- 34:56Speaker 1: black hole, so outside the event horizon. Really interesting question
- 35:01Speaker 1: to think about gravity as a quantum force because if
- 35:05Speaker 1: gravity isn't the curvature spaced time, if quantum gravity lies
- 35:08Speaker 1: in the direction of like figuring out how to express
- 35:11Speaker 1: gravity in the same kind of language that we express
- 35:14Speaker 1: other forces like the weak force and electricity, magnetism and
- 35:17Speaker 1: the strong force as forces mediated by particles the way
- 35:21Speaker 1: they like the photon mediates electromagnetism. Then gravity would have
- 35:25Speaker 1: a particle, the graviton that you use to mediate gravity.
- 35:30Speaker 1: And so in this picture this is like graviton based
- 35:32Speaker 1: quantum gravity. People thought about, like, what's happening with all
- 35:36Speaker 1: the gravitons in the vicinity of a black hole?
- 35:39Speaker 2: Like what they get sucked in too? Right?
- 35:41Speaker 1: Yeah? Would they get sucked in? Is there information in
- 35:44Speaker 1: the flow of the gravitons. People are often writing in
- 35:47Speaker 1: and asking me if the mass of the black hole
- 35:50Speaker 1: is contained within the event horizon and gravity is quantum mechanical,
- 35:54Speaker 1: wouldn't it need to like shoot out gravitons in order
- 35:57Speaker 1: to mediate gravity, and wouldn't that break the area of
- 36:00Speaker 1: the black hole? So you can see how it's tricky
- 36:03Speaker 1: to think about gravity as a quantum force. If there
- 36:06Speaker 1: really is an event horizon there.
- 36:08Speaker 2: Whoa Okay, So let me see if I got this right,
- 36:11Speaker 2: and a quantum theory that has gravitons in it, which
- 36:14Speaker 2: we don't know if they exist or not, like the
- 36:16Speaker 2: gravity of a black hole, you would feel it because
- 36:19Speaker 2: it's shooting gravitons at me or am I shooting gravitons
- 36:23Speaker 2: at the black hole? Couldn't both be the case?
- 36:25Speaker 1: Yeah, both would be the case. And one question is
- 36:27Speaker 1: whether those gravitons contain any information about what's inside the
- 36:32Speaker 1: black hole or not. On one hand, you can imagine
- 36:34Speaker 1: the event horizon itself just generating a gravitational field and
- 36:39Speaker 1: shooting off gravitons from the event horizon. No information about
- 36:42Speaker 1: what's going on inside, only information about the total mass. Right,
- 36:46Speaker 1: Like if you could change the configuration inside, if you
- 36:48Speaker 1: build it out of bananas instead of apples, you get
- 36:51Speaker 1: the same exact distribution of gravitons in the outside, or
- 36:54Speaker 1: is there information in the graviton ripples that tells you
- 36:58Speaker 1: about what's happening inside the event horizon. So there's this
- 37:01Speaker 1: paperback ten years ago that deduced some small changes in
- 37:05Speaker 1: the graviton field far away from the event horizon based
- 37:09Speaker 1: on the mass that was inside. Essentially like a little
- 37:12Speaker 1: bit of a history imprinted on the space around the
- 37:15Speaker 1: black hole that could tell you what had fallen in.
- 37:18Speaker 1: You could like show up to a black hole a
- 37:20Speaker 1: million years later and say, oh, there was a banana
- 37:22Speaker 1: and then an apple, and then three granola bars thrown
- 37:25Speaker 1: into this black hole.
- 37:26Speaker 2: What do you mean, Like, how would the banana versus
- 37:28Speaker 2: the apple affect the graviton that the black hole shoots out, So.
- 37:32Speaker 1: It affects the gravitational field outside. The gravitons themselves don't
- 37:36Speaker 1: pass the event horizon, but the event horizon itself has
- 37:39Speaker 1: some shape to it, because remember, in Einstein's general relativity,
- 37:43Speaker 1: a black hole is a perfectly spherical object, right like,
- 37:47Speaker 1: as you zoom into it, you never see any bumps,
- 37:50Speaker 1: any ripples, any change. It's perfectly spherical. But quantum mechanics
- 37:53Speaker 1: says that can't be the case, right, that there's always
- 37:56Speaker 1: a discritizations like a pixelization inherent to the universe, which
- 37:59Speaker 1: means the event horizon has to have some ripples to
- 38:02Speaker 1: it's some texture to it, and those tiny little deviations
- 38:05Speaker 1: can change the ripples of the gravitons on the outside,
- 38:09Speaker 1: and they're caused by the history of stuff that you've
- 38:12Speaker 1: thrown into the black hole. So you make a very
- 38:14Speaker 1: slightly different black hole if you put in bananas than
- 38:17Speaker 1: if you put in apples. That information is not lost,
- 38:19Speaker 1: it's somehow contained on the event horizon of the black hole.
- 38:23Speaker 2: Like if a black hole has a banana at its
- 38:25Speaker 2: center or an apple at its center, you're saying that
- 38:28Speaker 2: it might cause a different texture of the event horizon
- 38:32Speaker 2: at the border of it.
- 38:33Speaker 1: Exactly. Yeah, And you could detect this if you could
- 38:35Speaker 1: measure gravitons in the vicinity of the black hole.
- 38:39Speaker 2: How would the banana or the apple affect the texture
- 38:41Speaker 2: all the way at the edge of the black hole?
- 38:43Speaker 2: Like if I put a banana or an apple on
- 38:44Speaker 2: the center of the Earth, would it I guess it
- 38:46Speaker 2: would affect the surface of the Earth in some microscopic way.
- 38:50Speaker 1: You have to think about this quantum mechanically right, we're
- 38:52Speaker 1: talking about the quantum states of all these objects, which
- 38:55Speaker 1: contain the history of everything that's happened to them. Remember,
- 38:58Speaker 1: in a quantum world, the present is uniquely determined by
- 39:02Speaker 1: the past, which means that every possible past has a
- 39:06Speaker 1: different present, which means you can invert it. You can say, well,
- 39:09Speaker 1: because we're in this present, we can tell what the
- 39:11Speaker 1: past was. So all the tiny ripples, the details of
- 39:15Speaker 1: the quantum states of everything around you could be used
- 39:18Speaker 1: in principle to like rewind time and tell you about
- 39:20Speaker 1: what's happened in the past. For folks who watch that
- 39:23Speaker 1: show Devs, that's the whole basic principle. And so the
- 39:26Speaker 1: idea is that you throw a banana or an apple
- 39:29Speaker 1: into the black hole, it creates a slightly different black
- 39:31Speaker 1: hole in a way that imprints that information. I don't
- 39:34Speaker 1: know the details. I can't tell you, like a banana
- 39:36Speaker 1: black hole looks like this, or an apple black hole
- 39:39Speaker 1: looks like that. But in quantum mechanics, there's a lot
- 39:41Speaker 1: of potential information on the surface because the surface is
- 39:44Speaker 1: not totally smooth, it can't be whereas a gr black
- 39:48Speaker 1: hole has to be perfectly smooth with no information.
- 39:51Speaker 2: Well, I think you're saying maybe it's not specific to
- 39:54Speaker 2: quantum black holes. Like in a relativity black hole, you
- 39:57Speaker 2: could also throw a banana and everything inside of the
- 40:00Speaker 2: black hole could remember the banana. You just couldn't tell
- 40:02Speaker 2: from the outside because it's perfectly smooth. According to Einstein,
- 40:05Speaker 2: you're saying that in a quantum black hole, the black
- 40:08Speaker 2: hole is not perfectly smooth. You could maybe read from
- 40:10Speaker 2: its surface what you threw it.
- 40:12Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. That was one theory in a paper about
- 40:14Speaker 1: ten years ago that effectively the gravitons could tell you
- 40:17Speaker 1: about the texture of the surface, which would in turn
- 40:19Speaker 1: tell you about what's going on inside. The problem is
- 40:22Speaker 1: that gravitons may be impossible to ever detect. Remember, gravitons
- 40:27Speaker 1: are not gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are huge waves in
- 40:31Speaker 1: the gravitational field that we can detect. Gravitons would be
- 40:35Speaker 1: like drops in the ocean compared to waves in the ocean.
- 40:38Speaker 1: So if they exist, they're super duper tiny and it
- 40:41Speaker 1: may be impossible to ever see.
- 40:43Speaker 2: What does it have to be gravitons? I wonder if
- 40:46Speaker 2: there is a texture to a quantum black hole, wouldn't
- 40:49Speaker 2: you also maybe detect other particles coming from the Hawking
- 40:52Speaker 2: radiation off of it, and maybe could you could tell
- 40:55Speaker 2: its texture from that.
- 40:56Speaker 1: You could, And there was a theory a couple of
- 40:57Speaker 1: years ago that suggested, maybe you remember we talked about
- 41:01Speaker 1: on the podcast, that there might be wormholes that connect
- 41:04Speaker 1: the interior and exterior of the black hole, and that
- 41:07Speaker 1: Hawking radiation could in fact give you information about what's
- 41:11Speaker 1: going on inside. That it's not the way Hawking described it,
- 41:14Speaker 1: totally information free, but maybe actually has information about what's
- 41:18Speaker 1: going on inside, because these wormholes are like bridges that
- 41:21Speaker 1: are connecting quantum entangled particles, some of which on the
- 41:25Speaker 1: inside and some of which on the outside of the
- 41:27Speaker 1: black hole. So there are versions of quantum gravity in
- 41:29Speaker 1: which Hawking radiation does have information in it.
- 41:32Speaker 2: All right, So then what are some of the other
- 41:34Speaker 2: theories about quantum black holes?
- 41:35Speaker 1: So all these would be very very hard to detect
- 41:37Speaker 1: because you're talking about detecting Hawking radiation and differences in
- 41:40Speaker 1: it which we've never even seen, or detecting gravitons, so
- 41:43Speaker 1: we don't even know exist, and if they do, would
- 41:45Speaker 1: be very hard to see. Recently, there was an idea
- 41:48Speaker 1: to look for hair on extremal black holes. We've talked
- 41:51Speaker 1: about this on the podcast recently. Black holes have maximum
- 41:54Speaker 1: spin or maximum charge that they can maintain, beyond which
- 41:58Speaker 1: a vent horizon disappear and things go crazy. But when
- 42:01Speaker 1: black holes are near this extremal state, things that fall
- 42:05Speaker 1: into them might leave instabilities on the event horizon in
- 42:08Speaker 1: some theories of quantum gravity, and if so, it would
- 42:11Speaker 1: generate ripples in their gravitational waves, not in their gravitons,
- 42:16Speaker 1: and gravitational waves are things we can detect that we
- 42:19Speaker 1: might be able to see sometime in the future.
- 42:22Speaker 2: What do you mean instabilities on the event horizon? What
- 42:25Speaker 2: does that mean?
- 42:25Speaker 1: Well, think about what happens when something falls into a
- 42:27Speaker 1: black hole. It's going to fall into a specific spot.
- 42:30Speaker 1: Right you toss a banana into a black hole, You're
- 42:33Speaker 1: tossing it in one side of this sphere, not on
- 42:35Speaker 1: the other side, and so immediately what's going to happen
- 42:39Speaker 1: is that the event horizon is going to grow out
- 42:41Speaker 1: to meet you. So the event horizon is not going
- 42:43Speaker 1: to be spherical for a moment. Then it slurps in
- 42:45Speaker 1: this banana, it falls into the singularity, and the black
- 42:48Speaker 1: hole rings back down to a perfect sphere that's in
- 42:51Speaker 1: general relativity at least.
- 42:53Speaker 2: Wait, what do you mean if it's not perfectly spherical?
- 42:55Speaker 2: What shape is it? Like a blong? Does it go
- 42:58Speaker 2: oblong for a second?
- 43:00Speaker 1: Yeah, it goes oblong for a second. And if you remember,
- 43:02Speaker 1: we talked about merging black holes. When black holes merge,
- 43:06Speaker 1: their event horizons grow together, and in some moments they
- 43:09Speaker 1: look like a dumbbell or they look like something else.
- 43:12Speaker 1: And I commented on that podcast. So that's exciting because
- 43:14Speaker 1: it tells you something about the history of the black
- 43:17Speaker 1: holes in a way that you can't otherwise know. In
- 43:19Speaker 1: gr but there's no hair theorem applies to the stable
- 43:22Speaker 1: state of the black hole. Like you put a banana
- 43:23Speaker 1: in a black hole, you expect it it's event horizon
- 43:26Speaker 1: and have a little bit of a funky shape as
- 43:27Speaker 1: it sort of settles back down to a new stable object.
- 43:31Speaker 1: But in this theory of quantum gravity, it says that
- 43:33Speaker 1: those instabilities persist that you create like waves on the
- 43:37Speaker 1: surface of the black hole which ripple basically forever, they
- 43:40Speaker 1: don't ever.
- 43:40Speaker 2: Go away, sort of like a gravitational wave.
- 43:44Speaker 1: Almost yes, exactly, and these would generate gravitational waves, which,
- 43:48Speaker 1: according to this paper, we might be able to detect,
- 43:52Speaker 1: probably not with our current observatories like LEGO, but with
- 43:55Speaker 1: future gravitational wave observatories like LISA or some of the
- 43:58Speaker 1: other projects, we might be able to actually see these
- 44:01Speaker 1: gravitational waves from these hairy black holes.
- 44:04Speaker 2: So wait, you're saying, like, even if I drop a
- 44:06Speaker 2: hair or a banana into a black hole maybe a
- 44:09Speaker 2: billion years ago, and it happens to be one of
- 44:12Speaker 2: these extreme black holes even today, it might be generating
- 44:15Speaker 2: gravitational waves that tell me what was dropped in a
- 44:18Speaker 2: billion years ago.
- 44:19Speaker 1: That's the theory, Yes, exactly. So if you're planning to
- 44:22Speaker 1: commit crimes and drop your evidence into a black hole,
- 44:26Speaker 1: this might be a loophole.
- 44:27Speaker 2: Wouldn't all that information just be radiated away or it
- 44:30Speaker 2: would stay there for a billion years.
- 44:32Speaker 1: It would fade with time for sure. So if you
- 44:34Speaker 1: want to catch a killer using clues dropped into a
- 44:37Speaker 1: black hole, your best bet is to use your gravitational
- 44:39Speaker 1: wave observatory immediately afterwards, because it would fade away. Even
- 44:43Speaker 1: these ripples would eventually fade away. As you say, energy
- 44:45Speaker 1: is being lost, right, it's being radiated away, but in
- 44:48Speaker 1: principle it still persists. Forever. Technically, it just gets fainter
- 44:51Speaker 1: and fainter.
- 44:52Speaker 2: I see, like the ripple stays on the surface of
- 44:55Speaker 2: the black.
- 44:55Speaker 1: Hole somehow, mm hmm, exactly.
- 44:57Speaker 2: All right, Well, what does this all mean about our
- 44:59Speaker 2: understanding black holes? Like, there's still a big mystery. It
- 45:02Speaker 2: seems we don't really even understand what black holes are.
- 45:05Speaker 2: We've seen these things out there in space. We didn't
- 45:07Speaker 2: even know if they actually are black holes, if they
- 45:09Speaker 2: are gr black holes, if there are quantum black holes.
- 45:13Speaker 1: And this is really at the heart of the question,
- 45:15Speaker 1: what's going on out there? I suspect that what's really
- 45:19Speaker 1: happening in the universe is something different from any of
- 45:21Speaker 1: these theories. You know, it's going to be a big surprise.
- 45:24Speaker 1: And the exciting thing is if black holes do have hair,
- 45:27Speaker 1: we might be able to measure it. We might be
- 45:29Speaker 1: able to get these subtle signatures from the ripples on
- 45:32Speaker 1: the surface of the event horizon to tell us what's
- 45:35Speaker 1: going on inside and maybe give us some clues about
- 45:38Speaker 1: what kind of universe we live in.
- 45:40Speaker 2: Would that be the holy grail of black holes or
- 45:43Speaker 2: the hairy banana.
- 45:44Speaker 1: Exactly the way Einstein's hair is the holy grail for
- 45:47Speaker 1: all physicists.
- 45:49Speaker 2: Is it think I think like Brian Cox, is it
- 45:52Speaker 2: popularized and you kind of physicists here?
- 45:55Speaker 1: Yeah?
- 45:56Speaker 2: The whole like emo kind of hipster aging pop star. Yeah, yeah,
- 46:00Speaker 2: there you go.
- 46:01Speaker 1: I don't think I'm ever going to be an aging
- 46:03Speaker 1: pop star. But you know, there are all these really
- 46:07Speaker 1: deep questions about the nature of the universe we live in.
- 46:09Speaker 1: Is information destroyed or not? It might be the black
- 46:12Speaker 1: holes are like cosmic toilet, it's just flushing away this
- 46:15Speaker 1: information to be destroyed. Or it could be that they're
- 46:18Speaker 1: preserving that information. They're radiating it back out into the
- 46:21Speaker 1: universe somehow, and then information is not destroyed in our universe.
- 46:25Speaker 1: It's a pretty deep question about the nature of reality.
- 46:28Speaker 2: Yeah, and the nature of information itself, Like could you
- 46:31Speaker 2: ever destroy information? Or does the universe always remember everything?
- 46:37Speaker 2: Is there always a paper trail?
- 46:38Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. If you committed a crime a billion years ago,
- 46:41Speaker 1: justice might still be coming.
- 46:43Speaker 2: All right, Well, more deep questions about the universe and
- 46:46Speaker 2: a big reminder that there's still a lot for us
- 46:49Speaker 2: to discover and to understand and to learn about and
- 46:52Speaker 2: potentially to comb over as well. We hope you enjoyed that.
- 46:56Speaker 2: Thanks for joining us see you next time.
- 47:06Speaker 1: Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain
- 47:09Speaker 1: the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. Or more podcasts
- 47:13Speaker 1: from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
- 47:17Speaker 1: you listen to your favorite shows.