Latest / The Rita Panahi Show / The Rita Panahi Show | 20 August

Transcript

The Rita Panahi Show | 20 August · The Rita Panahi Show

0:03
Speaker 1: Starting right now, We've got a show.
0:09
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Panihee Show. Coming
0:12
Speaker 2: up tonight, Ben Carroll announces a Royal Commission into corruption
0:16
Speaker 2: on Victoria's Big Bill Projects, the panel will join me
0:20
Speaker 2: to discuss the day's top headlines. Chris Bowen contemplating a
0:25
Speaker 2: carbon credit trading system that looks suspiciously like the carbon
0:29
Speaker 2: tax two point zero. Professor I and Plimer will share
0:32
Speaker 2: his thoughts on that. Adam B. Coleman will have the
0:35
Speaker 2: latest from the US, including a shocking case of surrogate
0:39
Speaker 2: parents suing the birth mother for not aborting their child.
0:44
Speaker 2: And Meghan and Harry are moving back to the UK.
0:47
Speaker 2: Kinsey Scofield would join me to discuss all your essential
0:51
Speaker 2: royal and celebrity news and Left Is Losing It features
0:55
Speaker 2: more performative emoting on the Internet. But first, Australia's national
1:14
Speaker 2: debt has for the first time ever tipped over one
1:17
Speaker 2: trillion dollars. Total debt now makes up thirty four percent
1:22
Speaker 2: of GDP, which is the highest in history outside the pandemic,
1:26
Speaker 2: and expected to rise to thirty five point eight percent
1:29
Speaker 2: of GDP in twenty twenty nine. Treasury is also forecasting
1:34
Speaker 2: the annual interest spill to hit twenty nine point five
1:37
Speaker 2: billion dollars this year, rising to forty two point two
1:41
Speaker 2: billion dollars before the end of the decade. It's worth
1:45
Speaker 2: noting that the federal government's net debt per capita is
1:49
Speaker 2: surpassed only by the Northern Territory, the Act and debt
1:53
Speaker 2: riddled Victoria. Polling from News Poll indicates seventy percent of
1:58
Speaker 2: voters are warriorried about debt levels, including thirty one percent
2:02
Speaker 2: who say they are very worried. The coalition was on
2:06
Speaker 2: the attack against labor. Today Jim Chalmers and Anthony albanize
2:10
Speaker 2: he should hang their heads in shame. Today a trillion
2:14
Speaker 2: dollars worth of debt is nothing to crow about.
2:16
Speaker 3: Today's debt is tomorrow's taxes, and so what we're passing
2:19
Speaker 3: on to future generations isn't just debt.
2:21
Speaker 4: Poor our grim. Jim is sending our economy broke.
2:24
Speaker 5: He's got a spending habit that he can't fix without
2:27
Speaker 5: taking more of your money. It's a direct result of
2:29
Speaker 5: Jim Chalmer's inability to control spending.
2:32
Speaker 2: Joining me now is senior fellow and chief economists at
2:35
Speaker 2: the Institute of Public Affairs, Adam Crichton and former president
2:38
Speaker 2: of the Victorian Liberal Party Michael Kroger. Michael Jim Chalmers
2:43
Speaker 2: said he wanted to reimagine capitalism. He outlined his vision
2:48
Speaker 2: for this values based capitalism. Well we've got it now.
2:53
Speaker 2: It's not working out too well, no rhetor, it couldn't.
2:56
Speaker 4: Be going better. We've got record record deficits.
3:00
Speaker 5: Wek one hundred and twenty two billion of deficits in
3:03
Speaker 5: the next four years.
3:05
Speaker 4: The housing market has crashed.
3:07
Speaker 5: Hundreds of billions of dollars of people's wealth have been
3:10
Speaker 5: wiped off the value of their properties.
3:12
Speaker 4: Investors are leading the market. First time buyers.
3:15
Speaker 5: Who put in their five percent depositive lost their five
3:17
Speaker 5: percentage of the markets down.
3:19
Speaker 4: More than that, we've got stamp duty.
3:22
Speaker 5: State government stampity revenue will plum US two billion in
3:26
Speaker 5: New South Wales alone over the next year because if
3:28
Speaker 5: there are no property sales reader, there's no stamped the table.
3:32
Speaker 5: And of course with the decline in crashing housing market,
3:35
Speaker 5: it means less work for real estate agents we put off,
3:38
Speaker 5: conveyancing solicitor we put off. There's less work for carpenters
3:41
Speaker 5: and others who are fixing, repairing, homes that have been
3:44
Speaker 5: bought by people, and the coupdi gras all.
3:47
Speaker 4: It isn't bad enough, of course, what happens when mortgage
3:50
Speaker 4: applications go down.
3:51
Speaker 5: Banks make less profits, and the Commonwealth Bank of Australia,
3:55
Speaker 5: which has got eight hundred thousand shellers, has lost forty
4:00
Speaker 5: billion in market capitalization in the last three.
4:04
Speaker 4: Weeks, including six billion dollars lost today alone.
4:09
Speaker 5: So eight hundred thousand people have boss on average if
4:11
Speaker 5: they have the same and brief years I've lost another
4:13
Speaker 5: fifty thousand each because of their investment in the bank.
4:16
Speaker 5: So this is an economic disaster brought about by people
4:19
Speaker 5: that have no idea what to do in managing an economy.
4:22
Speaker 2: Reader, Adam, it is pretty green. Whether you're got shares
4:28
Speaker 2: in CBA or whether you're invested in property, everything seems
4:32
Speaker 2: to be going in the wrong direction and it's bad
4:35
Speaker 2: news for people who can least afforded. We we've been
4:38
Speaker 2: talking this week about rents going up, rents going up
4:43
Speaker 2: dramatically by up to thirty percent in the next two years.
4:46
Speaker 2: Both the NAB and property groups are forecasting that.
4:51
Speaker 3: Yeah, certainly that will be a terrible outcome for those people.
4:53
Speaker 3: You're quite right, and also they're going to have to
4:55
Speaker 3: pay more tax as well to service all this debt.
4:58
Speaker 3: I mean the trillion dollars of talking about that's great,
5:01
Speaker 3: but that's just the tip of the iceberg. You've got
5:02
Speaker 3: to add into that seven hundred billion of state debt
5:05
Speaker 3: as well, so it's actually one point seven trillion, and we're.
5:09
Speaker 2: Paying literally billions in interest every month.
5:13
Speaker 3: Yes, that's right. So the Commonwealth I think is about
5:15
Speaker 3: five cents and every dollar of revenue it earns now
5:18
Speaker 3: just goes to interest. We've already heard that Victoria is
5:21
Speaker 3: going to be about ten cents and every dollar revenue
5:23
Speaker 3: there by twenty thirty.
5:25
Speaker 2: This is a very worrying situation.
5:27
Speaker 3: And you know, it's all very well for the left
5:28
Speaker 3: to say, oh, Australia's debts very load to GDP, it's
5:31
Speaker 3: thirty five percent. Well, actually first you must add the
5:33
Speaker 3: States in, so that's fifty percent. And we already pay
5:36
Speaker 3: much higher interest rates than other countries with much more debt,
5:40
Speaker 3: much high rac in France, in the UK, sometimes even
5:42
Speaker 3: the US. So basically the point is that we can't
5:45
Speaker 3: have very high debt levels without paying extremely high interest rates.
5:48
Speaker 3: So very hard decisions are going to have to be
5:49
Speaker 3: made here. There's going to have to be big cuts
5:51
Speaker 3: at some point, because they simply can't raise tax any
5:54
Speaker 3: more than they already have.
5:56
Speaker 2: Adam, you've just released new research from the IPA revealing
6:00
Speaker 2: state governments have been overwhelmingly responsible for the increase in
6:05
Speaker 2: public debt since the COVID pandemic. States have increased they
6:08
Speaker 2: combined net debt by two hundred and seventy billion dollars
6:12
Speaker 2: over the last six years, which is more than four
6:15
Speaker 2: times as much as the federal government. State's share of
6:19
Speaker 2: total net debt across both levels of government has steadily
6:22
Speaker 2: risen to sixty eight percent this year, quadruple the share
6:27
Speaker 2: in twenty sixteen. I mean, the trench here are extraordinary.
6:32
Speaker 3: I mean, it's quite possible the states could actually overtake
6:34
Speaker 3: the Commonwealth for total debt within five to ten years,
6:37
Speaker 3: which is just extraordinary. And this is because they pay
6:39
Speaker 3: very low interest rates. Well, they pay the same interest
6:41
Speaker 3: rates the cogwalth does, because the people that lend the
6:44
Speaker 3: states they know that if push came to sharve, the
6:46
Speaker 3: Comonwealth would have to bail the states out. So they're
6:49
Speaker 3: basically paying artificially cheap debt. And the scary thing with
6:52
Speaker 3: this new research is there's all this COVID debt that
6:54
Speaker 3: was borrowed at one and a half percent or two
6:56
Speaker 3: percent per annum, and there's two hundred and seventy seven
6:59
Speaker 3: billion dollars off outstanding just on the States books. Well,
7:02
Speaker 3: that's going to all have to be refinanced at five
7:04
Speaker 3: and a half percent per adum from twenty thirty onwards.
7:07
Speaker 3: So the main finding from that research is that even
7:10
Speaker 3: if they don't have any more deficits ever again, the
7:13
Speaker 3: interest rate costs will got twenty five percent a year
7:15
Speaker 3: from twenty thirtyonards.
7:17
Speaker 2: We've tried to warn them during the COVID era that
7:20
Speaker 2: this largest is taxpayer funded craziness was going to come
7:26
Speaker 2: back and hurt us, and here we are. This was
7:28
Speaker 2: entirely predictable.
7:30
Speaker 6: Now.
7:30
Speaker 2: Premier Ben Carroll Victorian Premier Ben Carroll has announced a
7:34
Speaker 2: Royal Commission into corruption on Victoria's big build projects. The
7:39
Speaker 2: inquiry will examine the conduct of construction companies, the CFMEU, contractors, subcontractors, labor,
7:46
Speaker 2: higher firms and supplies, as well as the role played
7:50
Speaker 2: by the Victorian government and its delivery agencies. The inquiries
7:54
Speaker 2: due to report in August twenty twenty seven, and we'll
7:58
Speaker 2: have a broad mandate to a major public and civil
8:02
Speaker 2: infrastructure projects across Victoria. Michael, is this adequate? Is this
8:08
Speaker 2: precisely what the liberals have been crying out for?
8:12
Speaker 4: No, not at all. Reader.
8:14
Speaker 5: Look the very people who's set around the cabinet table
8:17
Speaker 5: for years and refuse to hold a Royal commission, including
8:19
Speaker 5: Ben Carroll, now say we need a Royal Commission. There's
8:22
Speaker 5: only one reason there's a Royal Commission because as an
8:24
Speaker 5: election held in three months, Victoria is mired in corruption
8:28
Speaker 5: and the Age newspapers uncovered a lot of this to
8:30
Speaker 5: their credit, and because the public are furious that up
8:34
Speaker 5: to fifteen billion dollars has basically been stolen through a
8:37
Speaker 5: corrupt practices in the building industry. The Labor government in
8:40
Speaker 5: trying to make it look as if they're doing something
8:43
Speaker 5: of call this Royal Commission, and we've seen what's happened
8:45
Speaker 5: at a federal level that's been a very disappointing.
8:47
Speaker 4: Royal Commission into anti semism so far? So do the
8:50
Speaker 4: public trust them?
8:51
Speaker 7: Know?
8:52
Speaker 5: The best way forward for the Royal Commission is to
8:54
Speaker 5: join up with the Queensland Royal Commission, where there's already
8:57
Speaker 5: a Royal commission into the building industry, so that would
8:59
Speaker 5: be the best way forward. And I hope that the
9:02
Speaker 5: Liberals musician has a very close look of the terms
9:04
Speaker 5: of reference because they'll be trying to cover up more
9:08
Speaker 5: than their booth reader.
9:12
Speaker 2: Well, Dan Andrews was an expert with the terms of reference.
9:15
Speaker 2: Was any time you had any sort of probe inquiry
9:19
Speaker 2: the terms of reference and the people are pointed to
9:23
Speaker 2: carry them out, you almost had a guaranteed outcome Politically,
9:29
Speaker 2: Is this going to be enough? Is this going to
9:31
Speaker 2: address the concerns Victorians increasingly have about the level of
9:35
Speaker 2: corruption in this state, because I don't think people around
9:38
Speaker 2: the country realize a lot of these issues are almost
9:42
Speaker 2: unique to Victoria. What's happened in this state is unprecedented.
9:48
Speaker 2: The levels of corruption that have been normalized are really
9:52
Speaker 2: quite disturbing. No, that's certainly true.
9:54
Speaker 3: You don't see the black and white pirate flags on
9:56
Speaker 3: construction sites and other states, which always shocks me. In Melbourne,
10:00
Speaker 3: they're all over the place, so that's really unique. Look, Look,
10:03
Speaker 3: the Poles were obviously telling the Labor government that they
10:05
Speaker 3: had to have this. Let's see the terms of reference.
10:08
Speaker 3: Let's see who is called. I mean, the former premiers
10:10
Speaker 3: really do need to be called. But this is all
10:14
Speaker 3: going to happen after election, I assume. So look, this
10:17
Speaker 3: is a safe thing they've done. Whether it's enough, I mean,
10:19
Speaker 3: there's been no bounce in the polls so far from
10:21
Speaker 3: what I've seen for state labor, so maybe it's not enough.
10:24
Speaker 2: I would say it's not enough.
10:25
Speaker 3: I think they have to do other things. They have
10:27
Speaker 3: to knock the SRL on the head, and they have
10:28
Speaker 3: to get rid of this stupid work from Home legislation
10:30
Speaker 3: which they're about to legislate in coming weeks. And the
10:34
Speaker 3: first treaty body too, which victorians verted sixty to forty
10:37
Speaker 3: against more or less, you know, which is costing hundreds
10:40
Speaker 3: of millions of dollars a year.
10:41
Speaker 2: And really the liberals, Michael, have done very little work
10:46
Speaker 2: on the issue of the treaty, the voice, the state
10:51
Speaker 2: based voice that that we've had thrust upon us despite voting.
10:55
Speaker 2: Knowing the referendum, they've said, oh, we will revert, but
11:01
Speaker 2: there's been absolutely no talk about it. They don't talk
11:05
Speaker 2: about the impact this treaty has on law making on
11:11
Speaker 2: just a day to day life in Victoria. I think
11:14
Speaker 2: most Victorias wouldn't even know there is a treaty or
11:18
Speaker 2: a state based voice.
11:20
Speaker 5: Well, the reason the Coalition doesn't talk about it every
11:24
Speaker 5: day is that they've stated their position, and that's to
11:27
Speaker 5: abolish this body.
11:30
Speaker 2: But Michael, that has no impact when it's not an issue.
11:33
Speaker 2: If Victorians don't know the detriment mental effects of this body,
11:38
Speaker 2: then it's not going to become an issue. They're not
11:40
Speaker 2: going to vote for the Liberals to abolish something that
11:43
Speaker 2: they don't understand or even know.
11:45
Speaker 3: For instance, there's a job that's current advertised four hundred
11:48
Speaker 3: and eighty thousand dollars a year to lead this body.
11:50
Speaker 3: They should be making hay with that.
11:51
Speaker 2: And every piece of legislation that's now introduced has to
11:55
Speaker 2: have consideration of this body has to I mean, we've
12:00
Speaker 2: spoken on this program about just how broad and far
12:03
Speaker 2: reaching the influence of this body is. But I think
12:05
Speaker 2: most Victorians don't know that, Michael. I mean, if you're
12:09
Speaker 2: not going to make it an issue, it's not going
12:13
Speaker 2: to be something that people are going to base their
12:15
Speaker 2: vote on.
12:16
Speaker 4: Don't worry.
12:16
Speaker 5: They have made an issue a big issue, and they
12:18
Speaker 5: said we're going to abolish it, and people who are
12:20
Speaker 5: interested in this type of body are well aware of
12:23
Speaker 5: the Wilson Opposition's policy towards it. Don't forget you as
12:28
Speaker 5: seem concerned that we're not discussing the FBA. No, it's
12:31
Speaker 5: actually not the biggest issue in Victoria. The biggest issue
12:33
Speaker 5: in Victoria is the cost of living crisis, the your
12:38
Speaker 5: debt we've got in Victoria which in four years time
12:40
Speaker 5: will be gracedad of two hundred.
12:41
Speaker 4: And thirty two hundred and forty billion.
12:43
Speaker 5: We have record crime rates, murders, gang warfare in Victoria,
12:47
Speaker 5: fire bombings all over the place, Middle Eastern crime, gangs
12:51
Speaker 5: on the rampage, and we've got alleged union corruption the
12:56
Speaker 5: building sector which is allegedly signed off fifteen billion. So
13:00
Speaker 5: of course it's an important issue, but against those issues,
13:03
Speaker 5: it's not at the top of the list for the opposition,
13:06
Speaker 5: and nor should it be when corruption crime, well.
13:10
Speaker 2: No one's saying it should be the top of the issue,
13:12
Speaker 2: but it should be an issue, and it's somewhere an issue.
13:16
Speaker 2: You can really wedge labor because so many of those
13:19
Speaker 2: other issues you've mentioned, they will change their positions, they
13:23
Speaker 2: will copy your policies they will do anything to be
13:26
Speaker 2: re elected. That is one area where they're not going
13:29
Speaker 2: to be able to reverse course. They are going to
13:31
Speaker 2: have to justify why they thrust this body on the
13:35
Speaker 2: Victorian public who voted no to the Voice. And I
13:41
Speaker 2: just think it's a lost opportunity. Shows lack of courage
13:44
Speaker 2: to just put that to the site and say it's
13:46
Speaker 2: not a cost of living issue. Well, in many ways
13:49
Speaker 2: it impacts every facet of life, every piece of legislation,
13:53
Speaker 2: so it.
13:54
Speaker 3: Can be also Victorian businesses, just briefly are still paying
13:58
Speaker 3: a COVID debt levee on their payrolls. There's no other
14:00
Speaker 3: state doing that. That should be an obvious win for
14:02
Speaker 3: the coalition, and we will get rid of the COVID
14:04
Speaker 3: det levy which no other state pays. That's a billion
14:06
Speaker 3: dollars a year from employers, very significant. That's an easy
14:09
Speaker 3: political win.
14:10
Speaker 2: I would say that is an easy one. Now, before
14:12
Speaker 2: you two go, this is a little bit lighter, but
14:14
Speaker 2: I wanted to play this from Kate Langbrul. She's taken
14:18
Speaker 2: aim at the logis over jokes targeting Dave Hughes and
14:23
Speaker 2: Carl Stepher. Novie, you haven't listened to what she.
14:25
Speaker 8: Said, it's like they're just a pack of like animals
14:30
Speaker 8: who the second where they sense the power shift, they're like, oh,
14:33
Speaker 8: let's get stuck in all those years they really enjoyed
14:37
Speaker 8: his antics and Carl turns up drug suddenly it's like, oh, no,
14:43
Speaker 8: we can't like Carl, and I'm just like you, pitiful,
14:47
Speaker 8: pitiful mind virus.
14:48
Speaker 2: Idiots, pitiful mind virus idiots. Bravo because she's sticking up
14:56
Speaker 2: for a maid there. She's certainly mates with Day Hughes
15:01
Speaker 2: and just telling the truth Adam about what is often
15:04
Speaker 2: such a toxic little cesspit and so nasty despite sort
15:08
Speaker 2: of putting themselves art as being these progressive bastions. Exactly
15:14
Speaker 2: compassion and kindness.
15:16
Speaker 3: Dave Hughes and Carl, they've just seen the way politics
15:19
Speaker 3: is going there with the people, not with these elites.
15:22
Speaker 3: That's the end of the day. I don't think that's
15:24
Speaker 3: going to hurt them. What happened in the logan is
15:25
Speaker 3: far from it.
15:26
Speaker 2: Well, no it's not. But it's Michael, just the fact
15:31
Speaker 2: that the left do have a group on the arts
15:36
Speaker 2: in this country. You have to admit that if you've
15:38
Speaker 2: got one individual, no matter how well they're known, how
15:42
Speaker 2: no matter how successful, if they deviate from that leftist group,
15:47
Speaker 2: think they're going to be attacked. And in case of
15:50
Speaker 2: Carl he was sacked.
15:53
Speaker 4: Well you can see how influential they are these days,
15:55
Speaker 4: which is not that much.
15:57
Speaker 5: I mean, Taylor Swift, the most popular told pop artists
16:01
Speaker 5: in the world strongly indoors Tamala Harris, and people are
16:05
Speaker 5: sick of the Golden Globe Academy Awards where these actors,
16:10
Speaker 5: you know, who live in gated communities and are worth
16:12
Speaker 5: hundreds of millions were getting up and lecturing people about
16:15
Speaker 5: working class issues.
16:17
Speaker 4: It just discredits those shows.
16:20
Speaker 5: And the Loggies were just partly discredited, unfortunately, by these
16:24
Speaker 5: really puerile, juvenile criticisms of Hughes and Stephanovik and people
16:29
Speaker 5: making criticians of Handsome.
16:30
Speaker 4: I mean, I mean it was pathetic. There was a collective.
16:34
Speaker 5: Groan around the country when this nonsense came on, and
16:37
Speaker 5: they just looked like a poor man poor woman's Golden
16:40
Speaker 5: Globes and it was pathetic. And you know, Kate Lanbrook
16:45
Speaker 5: was absolutely right to call it out.
16:48
Speaker 2: Gentlemen, Michael Kroger, Adam Krausch, and thank you so much
16:51
Speaker 2: for your time. Well, here is a change of tune
16:57
Speaker 2: from the Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen, who
17:00
Speaker 2: now says it would not be a catastrophe if the
17:03
Speaker 2: government fails to meet it's eighty two percent renewable target
17:06
Speaker 2: by twenty thirty, but he still believes it is inevitable.
17:10
Speaker 2: He told the Australian Financial Review. If we got to
17:13
Speaker 2: eighty two percent in twenty thirty one, is that a
17:16
Speaker 2: major national catastrophe?
17:18
Speaker 9: No?
17:19
Speaker 2: Are we still trying to get there in twenty thirty sure?
17:23
Speaker 2: Joining me now from the idealic Greek Islands is a
17:27
Speaker 2: steam geologist, author and executive director at Hancock Energy, professor
17:32
Speaker 2: Ian Plymer. Professor Minister Bowen also said that the closer
17:37
Speaker 2: we get to eighty two percent renewables, the better the
17:41
Speaker 2: country will be. Do you agree with that assessment?
17:45
Speaker 6: Well, Minister Bowen is absolutely totally delusional. We will never
17:48
Speaker 6: achieve it now other country has, We can't. And if
17:52
Speaker 6: we get anywhere near it then the costs are going
17:54
Speaker 6: to be sae crippling that we'll have to have candles.
17:57
Speaker 1: And cook our meal on a fire in the backyard.
18:00
Speaker 6: These aims of sending us broke have got to stop.
18:04
Speaker 1: We cannot achieve eighty two percent.
18:07
Speaker 6: We cannot achieve eighty percent, And for Minister Bowen to
18:11
Speaker 6: make excuses why he's propaganda and ideological campaign has absolutely
18:17
Speaker 6: totally failed.
18:18
Speaker 1: It just doesn't pass the pub test.
18:20
Speaker 6: This man is a national disgrace and he shouldn't be
18:23
Speaker 6: destroying our economy the way he's trying to do it.
18:27
Speaker 1: Well.
18:27
Speaker 2: A new consultation paper released by Chris Bold reveals the
18:31
Speaker 2: Albanizi government is exploring the creation of a carbon credit
18:36
Speaker 2: trading system as a way to stop consumers from using
18:40
Speaker 2: traditional diesel, petrol and jet fuel. Critics say the plans
18:45
Speaker 2: have the hallmarks of the Gillard era emissions trading scheme,
18:50
Speaker 2: which was one of the policies that cost Labor government
18:53
Speaker 2: in two thy and thirteen In sounds an awful lot
18:58
Speaker 2: like carbon tax. To point are, it's got all the
19:01
Speaker 2: hallmarks of that carbon tax. I'm having flashbacks.
19:07
Speaker 6: Well, you are having a flashback for every good reason.
19:10
Speaker 6: It is a carbon tax. It's a tax on anyone
19:13
Speaker 6: who's producing food. We need diesel for plowing, we need
19:16
Speaker 6: diesel for seeding, We need diesel for weeding, we need
19:20
Speaker 6: diesel for harvesting. We need diesel to transport that food
19:23
Speaker 6: from rural areas to the cities.
19:25
Speaker 1: It's a tax on every single.
19:27
Speaker 6: Person in the country. And why because governments have no
19:31
Speaker 6: control on the expenditure. They just spend like an endless
19:35
Speaker 6: source of money. They haven't cut their costs. Why don't
19:39
Speaker 6: they do what a business does is cut costs rather
19:41
Speaker 6: than just spend, spend and spend.
19:43
Speaker 1: And in order to raise.
19:46
Speaker 6: Money to keep this spending going, they have to invent
19:48
Speaker 6: all sorts of new taxes. We are already paying taxes
19:51
Speaker 6: on carbon for everything, and I can't see why we
19:54
Speaker 6: have to do it, because no one has ever shown
19:57
Speaker 6: in the scientific world that carbon diox released by humans
20:01
Speaker 6: into the atmosphere drives global warming. It's never been shown.
20:05
Speaker 1: So we're conned from day one. The con continues, and
20:08
Speaker 1: it's costing us more.
20:09
Speaker 6: And there are a lot of people out there who
20:11
Speaker 6: in some countries, especially say England, have to make a
20:14
Speaker 6: choice between eating, between having a hot bath or having
20:19
Speaker 6: a hot meal, and we're going that.
20:21
Speaker 1: Well, so this is just absolutely totally intolerable.
20:25
Speaker 2: Ian before you go, A former High Court judge has
20:28
Speaker 2: criticized the International Court of Justice for wading in on
20:32
Speaker 2: matters such as climate change policy in Calanan served as
20:36
Speaker 2: an ad hoc judge of the ICJ in twenty fourteen
20:40
Speaker 2: and was invited to write an essay as part of
20:43
Speaker 2: a publication for the court's eightieth anniversary, but that plan
20:48
Speaker 2: was abandoned after the ICJ express concern about his criticism
20:53
Speaker 2: of the court's twenty twenty five Advisory Opinion on climate change.
20:57
Speaker 2: Ian I've got to say I like this form, he said.
21:01
Speaker 2: The ICJ can either publish this chapter in full or
21:05
Speaker 2: not at all. What do you make of what he
21:08
Speaker 2: has had to say?
21:10
Speaker 6: Well, this is universal across the sciences where you cannot
21:14
Speaker 6: publish a view that's a different view to the current
21:17
Speaker 6: popular paradigm of human induced climate change.
21:20
Speaker 1: You just cannot do it.
21:21
Speaker 6: And I've tried many times, and I've published, as you know,
21:25
Speaker 6: of seventeen books, and they will not let me publish.
21:28
Speaker 1: Science on climate change. Now, to make.
21:30
Speaker 6: Matters even worse, this has perpetrated right for these schools,
21:34
Speaker 6: right for the universities, right through the scientific institutions, and
21:37
Speaker 6: now the legal institution. Another example, I was offered an
21:42
Speaker 6: honorary doctorate from a university in Austria for my work
21:46
Speaker 6: on the Broken Hill mineral deposit looking at the chemistry
21:49
Speaker 6: in the geology. Once they realized my views on climate,
21:52
Speaker 6: that offer of a doctorate was withdrawn. So this is
21:56
Speaker 6: a universal right across the Western world. If you step
21:59
Speaker 6: out of line, then you're in trouble. Now those on
22:03
Speaker 6: the other side of the world, such as in the
22:04
Speaker 6: communist countries, are well aware of this. We have inherited
22:08
Speaker 6: the same tactics and that is shut up, listen to
22:11
Speaker 6: the ideology. This is what's happening, and no one with
22:15
Speaker 6: any knowledge can have a say, and Justice Callahan is
22:18
Speaker 6: finding that's the case in the International Court of Justice
22:21
Speaker 6: as well as we have found right across the sciences
22:24
Speaker 6: that you cannot present an alternative view.
22:27
Speaker 2: Professor Ian Plyman, thank you so much for your time
22:30
Speaker 2: and happy eightieth birthday. You are a national treasure and
22:35
Speaker 2: it is an absolute pleasure to have you on this
22:37
Speaker 2: program each and every week. Coming up, left is Losing
22:41
Speaker 2: It plus a shocking case of surrogate parents in the
22:45
Speaker 2: US suing the birth mother for not apporting their child.
22:50
Speaker 2: Adam B. Coleman has the details. Welcome back, It's time
23:02
Speaker 2: for Lefties losing it Now. We've spoken at length about
23:06
Speaker 2: the mental health crisis that appears to be afflicting young
23:09
Speaker 2: leftist women, and the Internet is not helping the performative
23:13
Speaker 2: Meltdown's desire to share wild emoting is seeing too many
23:18
Speaker 2: clips like this uploaded. Now, if you want to let
23:42
Speaker 2: off steam by throwing ice cubes at your bath, then
23:45
Speaker 2: go right ahead. But do we need to film it?
23:48
Speaker 2: Is the attention seeking helping anyone? And as we've discussed
23:52
Speaker 2: this week on the program, the number of liberal women
23:55
Speaker 2: identifying with a confess killer Lindsey Clancy, who strained angle
24:00
Speaker 2: to her three children, is frightening. They've raised around a
24:03
Speaker 2: million dollars for this murderer, and they are filming clips
24:07
Speaker 2: featuring Lindsey Klance's diary entries while holding their own babies.
24:12
Speaker 1: I may never shuts off. It's constantly thinking of the
24:16
Speaker 1: next thing someone needs. They can't shut it off.
24:18
Speaker 4: I desperately want to go back to work, but now
24:20
Speaker 4: I don't know how I'm going to function, and it
24:23
Speaker 4: worries me.
24:24
Speaker 2: You know, I think I preferred to when these liberal
24:26
Speaker 2: ladies were just accusing the grieving father rather than identifying
24:30
Speaker 2: with a killer. Now for a change of pace, and
24:33
Speaker 2: it seems more and more brave and stunning ladies are
24:36
Speaker 2: showing their support for the WNBA and perhaps even nominating
24:40
Speaker 2: for the draft. I like the form of these two. Yeah,
25:05
Speaker 2: the security guard did not look in press. Now let's
25:07
Speaker 2: have a look at some polling data from CNN that
25:10
Speaker 2: would have triggered their audience. Yes, Trump's numbers are down,
25:14
Speaker 2: but look at the Democrats. They're in all sorts of trouble.
25:18
Speaker 9: PU when it comes to the Democratic brant, the net
25:21
Speaker 9: favorability rating of the Democratic Party. You know, back in
25:24
Speaker 9: twenty eighteen, when Democrats during the first Trump presidency, right
25:27
Speaker 9: when they were able to win back control the House,
25:30
Speaker 9: they were even they were even right favorable minus unfavorable,
25:33
Speaker 9: even at zero zero zero. Now look at this twenty
25:38
Speaker 9: five points under water off.
25:41
Speaker 2: We're going to miss White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt
25:44
Speaker 2: schooling members of the media who act like the Democrats
25:48
Speaker 2: propaganderam what.
25:50
Speaker 10: A stupid question.
25:51
Speaker 11: I now regret giving a question to the Associated Crest.
25:54
Speaker 10: You're a left wing hack.
25:55
Speaker 1: You're not a reporter.
25:56
Speaker 11: If there were peaceful protests on Saturday for the military parade,
26:00
Speaker 11: President Trump would allow that.
26:01
Speaker 10: Of course, the president supports peaceful protest. What a stupid question?
26:04
Speaker 2: She was the youngest pres secretary, but she was competent, articulate,
26:09
Speaker 2: and smart as a whip and never took a backwood step.
26:13
Speaker 11: Executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The
26:15
Speaker 11: President of the United States, he has the right to
26:17
Speaker 11: buire people within the executive branch. It's pretty simple answer,
26:20
Speaker 11: with all due respect, only a reporter from the New
26:23
Speaker 11: York Times would ask a question like that.
26:25
Speaker 2: And even before she became White House Press Secretary, she
26:28
Speaker 2: was triggering the leftist media. Watch this sin and melt
26:31
Speaker 2: down from Ksey Hunt when Caroline Levitt reminded her of
26:35
Speaker 2: some home truths about her colleagues.
26:38
Speaker 10: It's so it takes someone five minutes to google Jake
26:41
Speaker 10: Tapper Donald Trump to see that Jake Tapper has ma'am,
26:47
Speaker 10: I'm going to stop if I'm stating to attack my colleagues.
26:51
Speaker 12: I would like to talk about your body and Donald Trump,
26:54
Speaker 12: who you work for, if you are here to speak.
26:56
Speaker 10: On his behalf, and I will have this conversation stating
27:00
Speaker 10: facts that your colleagues have stated in the past. Now
27:03
Speaker 10: I'm sorry, We're going to come back to Caroline.
27:05
Speaker 2: Thank you very much from your time.
27:06
Speaker 12: You are welcome to come back at any point. She
27:09
Speaker 12: is welcome to come back and speak about Donald Trump,
27:12
Speaker 12: and Donald Trump will have equal time to Joe Biden
27:15
Speaker 12: when they both join us now at next Early Leader
27:19
Speaker 12: this week in Atlanta.
27:20
Speaker 2: For this to be now. Just when you think CNN
27:24
Speaker 2: has hit Rob Pottom that they couldn't stoop any lower,
27:27
Speaker 2: well they find a way to dig. Earlier in the week,
27:30
Speaker 2: we brought you the smear campaign against President Trump's personal
27:33
Speaker 2: aid Nashalie Harp, a woman who survived advanced cancer thanks
27:38
Speaker 2: to a Trump law change on experimental treatments, and then
27:42
Speaker 2: she came to work for the President. Then the Democrats
27:45
Speaker 2: decided to smear her by suggesting there was something improper
27:49
Speaker 2: about her relationship with the President, and of course, the
27:53
Speaker 2: proud feminis of CNN ran with the smear, even asking
27:57
Speaker 2: the President about it. But the gut dwellers found a
28:01
Speaker 2: new low when they went searching for a family member
28:04
Speaker 2: of Natalie Harps who is anti Trump and willing to
28:08
Speaker 2: come on sin and to humiliate her and push along
28:11
Speaker 2: this toxic, manufactured narrative. Shame on Aaron Burnett for partaking
28:17
Speaker 2: in this mere campaign, and shame on Preston Harp, the
28:20
Speaker 2: brother of Natalie for appearing on CNN.
28:23
Speaker 13: Learned right about his incredible reliance on her at all
28:27
Speaker 13: hours of the day to post social media posts.
28:31
Speaker 4: Just as one example, I think that.
28:38
Speaker 14: Trump's best friends are people who are his fan club,
28:43
Speaker 14: you know, and so she's his biggest fan, and so
28:47
Speaker 14: that's probably play lakes her and like she's good looking,
28:53
Speaker 14: she's got a good personality, Like, uh, I don't know.
29:00
Speaker 2: I want to actually press.
29:01
Speaker 14: I think she thinks that he saved He thinks that
29:04
Speaker 14: he saved your life. So like somebody living with that
29:07
Speaker 14: kind of gratitude, that must feel pretty good.
29:13
Speaker 2: Joining me now is author and founder of Wrong Speak Publishing,
29:18
Speaker 2: Adam B. Coleman. Adam, this entire story really does shame
29:24
Speaker 2: the Democrats and the media. I am shocked that some
29:28
Speaker 2: in the media are running with this. Natalie Harp is
29:32
Speaker 2: the President's personal aid. Of course she's going to be
29:36
Speaker 2: by his side constantly.
29:41
Speaker 15: Yeah, I mean, none of this surprises me when it
29:43
Speaker 15: comes to the Democrats and how loo they're willing to
29:45
Speaker 15: go to Samir Trump, Because anyone who's tacitly attached to Trump,
29:50
Speaker 15: whether you know, if it's a good nature or nothing
29:53
Speaker 15: that's out of the ordinary. I mean, imagine Donald Trump
29:56
Speaker 15: hiring someone that he actually likes and has a good
29:58
Speaker 15: personality and actually can do their job. And I find
30:02
Speaker 15: it actually very strange that her brother mentioned her looks,
30:05
Speaker 15: her personality, but not her skill set exactly.
30:11
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is the.
30:11
Speaker 15: Type of family apparently she has.
30:15
Speaker 2: That is such an excellent point because the way he
30:19
Speaker 2: answered that question complimenting her but really degrading her at
30:24
Speaker 2: the same time, suggesting that she only has this job
30:27
Speaker 2: because she agrees with the president's policies, and she's good
30:31
Speaker 2: looking and has a nice personality. She's also excellent at
30:35
Speaker 2: a job, and we saw a lot of her in
30:37
Speaker 2: that doco during the election campaign. And so yeah, this
30:42
Speaker 2: entire smear campaign seems to be rather misguided, but I'm
30:45
Speaker 2: sure there'll be plenty of people watching and believing it.
30:48
Speaker 2: Now played some polling data earlier on the Democrats brand
30:53
Speaker 2: being on the nose, even though President Trump's own popularity
30:57
Speaker 2: is diving, Why have the Democrat hats got a net
31:01
Speaker 2: favorability rating of minus twenty five percent at the moment.
31:05
Speaker 2: This is a dramatic drop for less than a decade ago.
31:12
Speaker 15: Yeah, I think the major reason is that the people
31:15
Speaker 15: who are actually growing within the Democratic Party are the
31:18
Speaker 15: least favorable people that you would actually want running anything.
31:22
Speaker 15: They're touting, mom, Donnie, They're touting all these DSA linked
31:27
Speaker 15: people as being the future of the Democratic Party, essentially
31:31
Speaker 15: allowing the Communists to win over the party. And so
31:35
Speaker 15: the Party of JFK, the party of being pro union
31:39
Speaker 15: and being somewhat moderate in viewpoint, is essentially gone, and
31:44
Speaker 15: anyone who is still voting for this particular party who
31:47
Speaker 15: holds onto these beliefs have to abandon ship, much like
31:50
Speaker 15: I did years ago.
31:53
Speaker 2: Now, let's stick with some more data on the topics
31:57
Speaker 2: that voters care about leading into the mid terms, and
32:00
Speaker 2: not surprisingly, the economy is right up there. Immigration is
32:04
Speaker 2: still a top two issue. But what about climate change?
32:08
Speaker 2: Even after America endured one of the hottest summer months,
32:13
Speaker 2: climate change barely rates a mention in the minds of
32:16
Speaker 2: most voters.
32:17
Speaker 13: Bottom line when it comes to voters is simply put,
32:21
Speaker 13: they don't care. They don't care. I mean, just look
32:23
Speaker 13: at look at these numbers. Okay, top issue a midterm vote,
32:25
Speaker 13: you can list up to three issues. The economy not
32:27
Speaker 13: surprisingly comes in at number one fifty four percent immigration
32:31
Speaker 13: twenty eight percent. Look at climate changes, it's tied for fourteenth,
32:35
Speaker 13: tied for fourteenth, all the way down here at three percent.
32:39
Speaker 2: Adam, what do you see as being behind this change?
32:43
Speaker 2: Is it because people have figured out that you either
32:47
Speaker 2: have cheap, reliable energy, or you prioritize emissions and net
32:52
Speaker 2: zero goals, or is there something else behind that data.
32:57
Speaker 15: I mean, I've always seen the climate change discussion as
33:00
Speaker 15: a luxury position. Most of my family, most of the
33:05
Speaker 15: people I interact with are relatively middle class, and I've
33:09
Speaker 15: never heard them say, yeah, I'm voting for him because
33:12
Speaker 15: of climate change. But it always seems to come from
33:16
Speaker 15: the upper middle class and upper class who care about
33:21
Speaker 15: these luxury beliefs that the world's going to burn apart
33:24
Speaker 15: in ten to fifteen years, which, by the way, they
33:26
Speaker 15: said ten to fifteen years ago, so exactly like it's
33:31
Speaker 15: just one thing after another, the ozone layer, it was
33:34
Speaker 15: one thing, and then you know acid rain, and so
33:37
Speaker 15: anyone with common sense is looking back and saying, are
33:40
Speaker 15: there changes happening in the environment. Sure, but there's always
33:44
Speaker 15: changes happening in the environment. That the history of a
33:46
Speaker 15: world includes changes in our environment.
33:51
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, We've got a professor Ian Plimer on this
33:54
Speaker 2: program regularly. He was on tonight and he's a geologist.
33:58
Speaker 2: He will tell you all about the ice ages and
34:01
Speaker 2: mass extinction events all through the history of the world. Now,
34:06
Speaker 2: I've been dying to talk more about the WNBA because
34:10
Speaker 2: we do have former NBA players now wanting to play
34:15
Speaker 2: in the WNBA, because the WNBA doesn't seem to know
34:17
Speaker 2: what the W stands for. And Fox News is reporting
34:21
Speaker 2: that Royce White has now officially declared for the w
34:27
Speaker 2: NBA draft. Can you tell me more about this?
34:33
Speaker 15: I mean, essentially, what they're trying to do is prove
34:35
Speaker 15: a point. You know, Unfortunately, the W and WNBA stells
34:40
Speaker 15: for welfare, right, the Welfare League, which is subsidized by
34:44
Speaker 15: the NBA, operates in that particular fashion. They don't operate
34:49
Speaker 15: in a way of a regular business where they have
34:52
Speaker 15: some sort of foundation where they do things to make
34:55
Speaker 15: a profit. They operate on luxury beliefs, They operate for
35:00
Speaker 15: flimsy ideas, and so now they have an outside force
35:05
Speaker 15: pressing them on it. Are you truly allowing men within
35:09
Speaker 15: the WNBA? Are you going to finally define what a
35:12
Speaker 15: man is and what a woman is and actually have
35:14
Speaker 15: that division. So it'll be interesting to see how far
35:19
Speaker 15: one rust Wade is willing to go. But it'll be
35:22
Speaker 15: interesting to see how they are reacting to it.
35:26
Speaker 7: Well.
35:26
Speaker 2: The WNBA seems to have some weird self destruction fetish
35:32
Speaker 2: because they are getting the sort of attention they've never
35:35
Speaker 2: had before. It is a real opportunity for them to
35:39
Speaker 2: reach a whole new group of fans and expand that
35:42
Speaker 2: supporter base, but they seem determined to crush it. When
35:46
Speaker 2: they have a popular player like Sophie Cunningham who's got
35:50
Speaker 2: broad appeal, they're almost terrified to put her out there
35:54
Speaker 2: that they're trying to manage it, and almost really in
35:59
Speaker 2: a weird pass an aggressive way attacker to say her
36:02
Speaker 2: viewpoints about men and women being different are not welcome
36:07
Speaker 2: and not really representative of the WNBA.
36:12
Speaker 15: Yeah, well, I mean this is why I call them
36:13
Speaker 15: the welfare League. I mean, if you think of it
36:16
Speaker 15: like this, if your dad is paying all the bills,
36:19
Speaker 15: are you going to be that responsible? No, the NBA
36:22
Speaker 15: has been paying the bills of the WNBA since its existence.
36:25
Speaker 15: It has never turned to profit and seemingly no one
36:28
Speaker 15: has cared it. The WNBA has never turned to profit,
36:32
Speaker 15: and everyone knows that the next year the WNBA is
36:34
Speaker 15: still going to exist. So they've never operated like a
36:37
Speaker 15: real business. They've operated like this is a luxury existence
36:42
Speaker 15: where they want to give an opportunity for some women
36:44
Speaker 15: to play basketball.
36:45
Speaker 1: But that's about it, and.
36:48
Speaker 2: That's why it's kind of morphed into some sort of
36:50
Speaker 2: a political movement or stats where they see the league
36:54
Speaker 2: as a vehicle to advance these fairly radical positions when
36:58
Speaker 2: it comes to gender, and not really actually a return
37:02
Speaker 2: a profit. Now, this next story is incredible. The New
37:06
Speaker 2: York Post is reporting that biological parents of a child
37:10
Speaker 2: birth by a surrogate mother, McKenna West, are suing her
37:14
Speaker 2: for more than one hundred thousand dollars for keeping the
37:17
Speaker 2: baby rather than aborting it at their requests. Nashine Gilka
37:22
Speaker 2: and Omar Ahmed far Day countersuit against McKenna West weeks
37:27
Speaker 2: before she gave birth in Texas to their baby, who
37:30
Speaker 2: was born with a serious and rare heart defect. Now
37:33
Speaker 2: around twenty weeks the unborn child was diagnosed with a
37:37
Speaker 2: life threatening medical condition, but McKenna West refused the surrogate's
37:41
Speaker 2: request to abort. She traveled from Alaska to Texas where
37:46
Speaker 2: she has more rights, where she would be recognized as
37:49
Speaker 2: the birth mother under state law. I just can't believe
37:53
Speaker 2: this story, Adam, that you can have surrogates demand an
37:58
Speaker 2: abortion at twenty weeks. So I know there was serious
38:03
Speaker 2: healthy shoes detected, but that is just a request that
38:08
Speaker 2: is I don't know. I just I find highly questionable.
38:13
Speaker 2: And the fact that this birth mother did not want
38:15
Speaker 2: to go through with it and now she's being sued,
38:19
Speaker 2: that's even more outrageous.
38:22
Speaker 15: I mean, this is what happens when you turn human
38:24
Speaker 15: beings into commodities. You know, they're treating it like, you know,
38:29
Speaker 15: we don't want that package anymore, let's just return it
38:31
Speaker 15: to Amazon. Except they're saying, why don't we just kill
38:34
Speaker 15: a human being because it's not in a favorable state
38:37
Speaker 15: that we wanted it. Let's contact the manufacturer and just
38:40
Speaker 15: destroy it from there. You know, this is unfortunately, this
38:46
Speaker 15: has been something that has come about because we were
38:49
Speaker 15: sold on surrogacy many many years ago as this treatment
38:53
Speaker 15: to help someone a struggling mother and father who are
38:58
Speaker 15: trying to have a child. Now it's turned into an economy,
39:03
Speaker 15: it's turned into an apparatus for human beings. Children are
39:08
Speaker 15: nothing more just things you can purchase and things you
39:11
Speaker 15: can kill when when they don't turn out the way
39:13
Speaker 15: that you want it to turn out too, you know,
39:16
Speaker 15: just like putting something in the oven and you baked
39:18
Speaker 15: it and it didn't come out right, Well you can
39:20
Speaker 15: just throw it away and start over. So this is
39:23
Speaker 15: this is what our reality is like. And I really
39:25
Speaker 15: wish someone had some guts to actually do something about
39:29
Speaker 15: syrocracy and abortion in a more serious way in our country.
39:35
Speaker 2: It is I think it started with all the best
39:37
Speaker 2: intentions and undatedly it's helped people who genuinely can't have
39:41
Speaker 2: children and it's given them the gift of a biological
39:45
Speaker 2: child that's that's biologically theirs. But then you hear stories
39:49
Speaker 2: like these and it's not isolated. There's there's a number
39:51
Speaker 2: of them that have been publicized in recent years and
39:55
Speaker 2: really is like it becomes becomes a commodity, as you explained,
40:00
Speaker 2: Adam be Coleman. Thank you so much for your time
40:02
Speaker 2: coming up. But why are Harry and Meghan moving back
40:06
Speaker 2: to the UK? Kiinsy Schofield is up next. Welcome back
40:19
Speaker 2: and apologies in advance because I have one final dose
40:24
Speaker 2: of Rosie for the week. Here is the Trump obsessed
40:27
Speaker 2: former comic who's filling in for Jimmy Kimmel, and of course,
40:31
Speaker 2: her monologues are centered around one topic.
40:35
Speaker 6: This has been kind of a strange experience for me
40:37
Speaker 6: because all of a sudden, I'm refamous.
40:40
Speaker 2: I'm back in the spotlight, all.
40:42
Speaker 12: Thanks to President Oopah J.
40:44
Speaker 2: Looper, who was watching.
40:47
Speaker 12: Us this evening from inside a catering court. You know,
40:57
Speaker 12: I couldn't have done it without your sweetie. You brought
41:00
Speaker 12: me back, just like you did with fascism and the measles.
41:04
Speaker 2: Joining me now is host of the Kinsey Schofield Unfiltered podcast,
41:09
Speaker 2: Kinsey Rosie o'donald. She's nothing if not predictable.
41:16
Speaker 7: She is just loving every moment of this. My body
41:19
Speaker 7: rejects it.
41:20
Speaker 16: You know.
41:21
Speaker 7: The new facelift is facelifting with that smile across her face.
41:26
Speaker 7: The irony is that she left America because she couldn't
41:29
Speaker 7: stand Donald Trump, and now she's back in America because
41:33
Speaker 7: she can't stop talking about Donald Trump. At some point,
41:36
Speaker 7: you have to wonder who's keeping home relevant. But Rosie
41:40
Speaker 7: is relentless and we'll milk this for everything she can
41:43
Speaker 7: and I didn't even think that was funny.
41:49
Speaker 2: Well it's not. That's the thing. There's a team of
41:52
Speaker 2: writers and the material is still so lame, and it's
41:58
Speaker 2: just a desperate attention seeking stunt. They're just waiting for
42:02
Speaker 2: him to send that tweet out or that post out
42:06
Speaker 2: mocking Rosie and then I go, look, he's obsessed with her.
42:09
Speaker 2: So it seems the entire endeavor is to try to
42:13
Speaker 2: get his attention, which I don't think is a good
42:16
Speaker 2: way to run a show. Now it's happening. I cannot
42:19
Speaker 2: believe this. Harry and Meghan are moving back to the UK.
42:24
Speaker 2: Media outlets have confirmed that the Sussexes have enrolled their
42:27
Speaker 2: children into a British school to start in September. King
42:32
Speaker 2: Charles was told of the move on Sunday. There are
42:35
Speaker 2: no current plans for either Prince Harry or Meghan to
42:38
Speaker 2: resume any royal duties. Kinsey, the American grift is over.
42:44
Speaker 2: It seems.
42:47
Speaker 7: I think that this is an extraordinary admission that the
42:50
Speaker 7: Great American Experiment did not deliver what Harry and Meghan.
42:54
Speaker 16: Thought it would.
42:55
Speaker 7: They left Britain promising financial independence, a global influences and
43:00
Speaker 7: a billion dollar brand. Six years later, they're enrolling their
43:04
Speaker 7: children in British schools and moving back to the institution
43:07
Speaker 7: they spent years telling us they needed to escape. It
43:12
Speaker 7: turns out the British royal family has a better shelf
43:15
Speaker 7: life than a Netflix steal.
43:19
Speaker 2: Well, I don't know how they're going to be received
43:22
Speaker 2: by the British public. Everyone loves a redemption arc, and
43:26
Speaker 2: they were beloved despite what they claim in all those
43:30
Speaker 2: bloody documentaries. When Megan first came on this scene, she
43:34
Speaker 2: was met with almost unchecked adoration. I remember because I
43:38
Speaker 2: was one of the lone people going, can't you see
43:40
Speaker 2: how fake she's But everyone else was loving her. I
43:45
Speaker 2: do wonder about Prince William and Princess Catherine. How are
43:50
Speaker 2: they going to cope with this too? Being back in
43:53
Speaker 2: the country the future King and Queen certainly aren't on
43:57
Speaker 2: good terms with the ginger and the winter.
44:01
Speaker 7: Well, so my sources in the UK are just waking up,
44:04
Speaker 7: and I can tell you that I'm told there is
44:06
Speaker 7: a genuine concern within the Wales camp because Harry and
44:09
Speaker 7: Meghan are considered unpredictable and Prince William and Princess Catherine
44:13
Speaker 7: have already lived through the consequences of very public accusations
44:18
Speaker 7: and the enormous online hostility that followed. So I don't
44:21
Speaker 7: think William's first reaction is going to be wonderful the
44:24
Speaker 7: family's back together. I think his priority will be protecting Catherine,
44:28
Speaker 7: protecting their children, and protecting their privacy from his brother.
44:34
Speaker 2: Now, before we move on from the Royals, Queen Camilla
44:37
Speaker 2: has broken her silence on King charles cancer diagnosis. Have
44:41
Speaker 2: a listen.
44:42
Speaker 1: I remember coming to see how Maggie's just after the
44:46
Speaker 1: King being diagnosed liver.
44:48
Speaker 4: Did you say anything at.
44:49
Speaker 2: The time that was quite difficult?
44:52
Speaker 6: I almost said that I felt that most of the
44:57
Speaker 6: time to say.
44:58
Speaker 2: Kin say not often that here from Queen Camilla. What
45:02
Speaker 2: did you make of the interview?
45:04
Speaker 16: Well, you're absolutely right.
45:06
Speaker 7: This was such a big deal that Queen Camilla was
45:08
Speaker 7: addressing King Charles's cancer, and it's an example of how
45:12
Speaker 7: Harry and Meghan distract from everything, isn't it. If Harry
45:16
Speaker 7: and Meghan hadn't announced what they did, then you and
45:19
Speaker 7: I would have been discussing this primarily and not the Sussex.
45:22
Speaker 16: Is their a distraction? But this is a lovely story.
45:24
Speaker 7: She's speaking for a film marking the thirtieth anniversary of
45:27
Speaker 7: Maggie's This is the cancer support charity she served since
45:30
Speaker 7: two thousand and eight. And you know, she talks about
45:33
Speaker 7: how disciplined the king is and how resilient he is.
45:36
Speaker 7: And you know, we're not just seeing a queen here,
45:39
Speaker 7: We're seeing a wife.
45:40
Speaker 16: And I think it's a very sweet story.
45:44
Speaker 2: Now Madonna has celebrated her sixty eighth birthday in Greece.
45:49
Speaker 2: Everyone's in Greece, profer see and Plyma I just spoke
45:52
Speaker 2: to was on the Greek isles. Now back to Madonna.
45:55
Speaker 2: She wore an extravagant floral dulcy and gobona gown. Oh
45:59
Speaker 2: my god, gosh, Kinsey, tell me about the celebrations. Was
46:03
Speaker 2: the much much younger boyfriend at the party?
46:08
Speaker 7: But much much younger boyfriend was there, Five children were there.
46:11
Speaker 7: She smashed plates, danced through the night. See whatever you
46:14
Speaker 7: want about Madonna, but this woman has never once mistaken
46:17
Speaker 7: herself for a civilian. You know, she's still dressing for
46:20
Speaker 7: her birthday like the pope, share and a Greek goddess.
46:23
Speaker 7: We're all fighting over the seam wardrobe.
46:27
Speaker 2: No, you know what that outfit I actually fully endorsed
46:31
Speaker 2: because we have seen her recently make some questionable choices
46:34
Speaker 2: where we've seen way more than we want to now.
46:38
Speaker 2: An actor tipped as an outside shot to become James Bond,
46:41
Speaker 2: has called for James Bond to remain a white character.
46:46
Speaker 2: Nicholas Pinnock, who is black himself, said he grew up
46:50
Speaker 2: with James Bond looking and acting a certain way. He said,
46:54
Speaker 2: I don't think changing him and ticking a box is
46:57
Speaker 2: the answer. Kinsey Bravo. First, why can't we have new
47:02
Speaker 2: characters rather than trying to change establish characters to tickdiboxes.
47:09
Speaker 2: Just write new stories with new characters for all sorts
47:13
Speaker 2: of backgrounds.
47:15
Speaker 7: I'm supposed to live in like the most creative city
47:18
Speaker 7: in the world. When it comes to character development, You're
47:21
Speaker 7: absolutely right. Create another iconic character, Give a brilliant black
47:25
Speaker 7: actor the budget, scripts, and marketing machine that created James Bond,
47:29
Speaker 7: and let him build something audiences haven't seen before. That's
47:32
Speaker 7: way more exciting to me than treating representation like a
47:36
Speaker 7: casting exercise.
47:38
Speaker 16: I think audiences are sick of it too.
47:40
Speaker 7: They're like, we see what you're We see right through
47:43
Speaker 7: what you're doing here.
47:46
Speaker 2: You can see it in just about every production, every
47:49
Speaker 2: TV series where it's almost like they're checking a box
47:52
Speaker 2: in tacking every diversity category that they possibly can, and
47:57
Speaker 2: it's kind of artless a lot of the time. Now,
48:01
Speaker 2: I've got to ask you about this very sad story,
48:04
Speaker 2: Hayden Pantitier. We've been talking about it all week. The
48:07
Speaker 2: DEA has joined the investigation into her death. The cause
48:10
Speaker 2: and manner of the death remains pending further investigation, but
48:15
Speaker 2: officials were reportedly her discussing an overdose and a cardiac
48:19
Speaker 2: arrests on nine to eleven on a nine to eleven
48:22
Speaker 2: call at the time of her death. Kinzie, We've mentioned
48:26
Speaker 2: on the show the on again, off again troubled relationship
48:30
Speaker 2: she had with Brian Hickerson and his brother, and they
48:34
Speaker 2: were at the property when she was pronounced dead by authorities.
48:38
Speaker 7: The entire world wants to hear from Brian Heckerson. He
48:41
Speaker 7: was supposed to travel to South Carolina alone. Why was
48:45
Speaker 7: Hayden with him, What was the current status of their relationship.
48:48
Speaker 7: Why was the narkian spray found on the bed and
48:51
Speaker 7: not near Hayden. The police were seen at his family's home,
48:56
Speaker 7: Brian's family's home on Wednesday morning, So we're obviously not
48:59
Speaker 7: the only people with questions, but Hayden was supposed to
49:03
Speaker 7: spend her birthday on Friday with her daughter. I mean,
49:05
Speaker 7: how heartbreaking is that Brian was never good enough for
49:08
Speaker 7: Hayden and now she's gone, and I don't know how
49:12
Speaker 7: he functions in this world with the anger that's being
49:17
Speaker 7: pointed at him after this death.
49:20
Speaker 2: It is just so tragic on so many levels, because
49:23
Speaker 2: it seemed like she had got away from him, got
49:26
Speaker 2: away from that unhealthy relationship. She wrote about it, she
49:29
Speaker 2: talked about it extensively, and yet her final days she
49:34
Speaker 2: seems to have fallen back into this passion. So it
49:38
Speaker 2: really is Kinsey quite tragic to die at that age,
49:43
Speaker 2: and we've known her pretty much her entire life. I
49:46
Speaker 2: think she got her first paid gig at nine months
49:49
Speaker 2: of age and she's worked ever since. And I think
49:53
Speaker 2: she was also failed by her family, to be fair,
49:56
Speaker 2: her own family kind of saw her as a bit
49:58
Speaker 2: of a meal ticket and they were acting more like
50:01
Speaker 2: her managers than her parents when she needed to have
50:05
Speaker 2: some guidance. Kinsisco Field, it is always a pleasure. Thank
50:08
Speaker 2: you so much for your time tonight, and that's it
50:11
Speaker 2: for me. Up next, it's late edition,