Latest / UK Column Radio / Building a Social Contract to Dismantle the BeastSystem — James Roguski | Jerm Warfare

Transcript

Building a Social Contract to Dismantle the BeastSystem — James Roguski | Jerm Warfare · UK Column Radio

0:35
None. James Roguski.
0:40
Roguski. Thank you for joining me in the
0:42
trenches. I like Roguski.
0:46
It's great. It reminds me of the of Top Gun
0:48
Mavericks. Sorry, Mavericks friend Goose.
0:50
There you go, do. You consider yourself a
0:53
maverick. You know, probably I, I consider
0:59
myself just seeking the truth. When I turned, I think it was
1:04
62, I'm 65 years old now. But a, a couple years ago at, at
1:08
my birthday, somebody asked me, you know, what do you do and how
1:12
did you get into it? And, and they also asked me what
1:14
my Zodiac sign was. So I'm born in the end of April.
1:20
And so I'm born into the sign of Taurus, the bull.
1:24
And it wasn't until I was 67 years old that I realised that
1:27
I'm perfectly suited for what I do, which is whenever I step in
1:31
some bullshit, I point it out. And there's a lot of it going
1:36
around these days. And most of it is coming from
1:39
our governments. And you know, that's seems to be
1:43
the theme. If if you read something from
1:46
your government, it's probably manipulative, it's probably a
1:50
lie. It's probably something that
1:53
someone who has some lobbying influence over government has
2:00
gotten government to do their bidding.
2:04
And you know, the concept of the will of the people being done by
2:08
the people that we hire to work for us, you know, to participate
2:12
in government, man, have we lost sight of that?
2:16
It it's, it's a mess. It's a, it's a, it's an enormous
2:19
mess. And I'm not going to pretend to
2:22
say that I know the answer because it is such a deep mess
2:26
and the corruption is so deep and, and so much of our lives is
2:33
influenced by it. We have a problem.
2:35
And, you know, many people understand that and they're
2:37
working very hard to try to, you know, find a solution to it.
2:40
And I don't think the solution is more government.
2:42
I think the solution, it is hard.
2:45
It's going to be very, very difficult to find and it's going
2:47
to require some dramatic, horrific changes.
2:52
I'm not necessarily advocating, you know, burning it all down
2:55
and starting over. But I used to work in
2:58
construction. And sometimes what you need to
3:01
do is realise that the building is decrepit and it needs to be
3:06
torn down. And you don't want to get caught
3:09
in, you know, the crumbling of the structure falling on top of
3:13
you. But sometimes you need to tear
3:15
it all down and start over, and we're pretty darn close to that
3:18
place right now all around the world, regardless of where you
3:22
may be. So are you suggesting revolution
3:28
rather than evolution? You know, revolution just means
3:33
going around in circles and coming back to where you were.
3:36
So we need a, we need a better word.
3:39
We, we certainly need change. We need to look at the systems
3:44
that are in place, whether it's health, which has, you know,
3:48
been mostly my focus. You know, public health is a
3:53
joke. That's probably mostly what I
3:55
want to talk about with you. But, you know, personal health,
3:59
money, communications, industry, business, work, every aspect of
4:07
our life, we, we need to be able to re evaluate it.
4:12
And you know, one of the things that people don't use this word
4:15
very often, but a social contract, you know, amongst each
4:20
other, how do we agree to live with each other?
4:25
And and so, you know, if you're talking about money and all of
4:27
the concerns about, you know, global digital currencies, you
4:31
know, central bank digital currencies, you know, programmed
4:34
money, oh, it must have been in the late 40s or early 50s.
4:40
I could just imagine, you know, somebody sitting in a bar had
4:44
the flash of an idea and said, hey, I got this great idea.
4:48
Let's make little pieces of plastic and we'll get people to
4:51
use that for money and we'll skim 2345 percent off the top.
4:57
And you know, if you said that in a bar, you know, 7080 years
5:03
ago, people would think you're drunk and you're crazy.
5:06
Nobody's ever going to go for that.
5:07
That's insane. But look at our universe right
5:11
now. You know, the banks and, and,
5:13
and the, the, the holders of, you know, credit cards create
5:18
money Every time you use one of those credit cards, they create
5:22
money out of nowhere, you know, to skim off the top.
5:27
And, and the vast majority of people have no comprehension
5:31
whatsoever about what a racket, you know, money is.
5:36
And it's all digital. It's just not yet programmable,
5:41
but it's pretty darn close to that.
5:43
And, you know, most people have been using digital money for
5:46
their whole life. You know what percentage, You
5:48
know, everybody in the audience asks yourself, you know, what
5:50
percentage of all of the transactions that you've ever
5:53
made in your life? We're done with physical money,
5:57
right? Very little of it.
6:00
And and so that whole system is corrupt and it has been for our
6:07
entire life. And we're just going along
6:10
because nobody's come up with a better idea.
6:13
And I don't, you know, I'm not saying I have the answer.
6:17
I'm saying, you know, you can certainly see the problem.
6:20
And, and, and so with our health, it's probably the thing
6:23
that I've spent most of my life, you know, dealing with.
6:26
I've been, I've been blessed, I've been lucky.
6:28
I think I've been smart and intelligent about it.
6:30
But I'm 65, I'm healthy. And you couldn't pay me to go to
6:36
a medical doctor. I haven't been to one since I
6:39
was 19. And you couldn't pay me to take
6:42
an aspirin. You couldn't take me to, You
6:44
couldn't pay me to take a pharmaceutical medication
6:47
because I understand their system.
6:50
Their system is not designed to make you healthy.
6:53
Their system is designed to poison you slowly under the
6:57
belief that swallowing a poison will change the symptoms of, you
7:02
know, warning signs of whatever it is you may be dealing with.
7:05
And, you know, the latest thing with, you know, the COVID-19
7:08
jabs and all the things associated with it, it's just
7:11
the quintessential example of industry lying with the help of
7:17
government. And that is the definition of
7:19
fascism. When corporations and
7:23
governments work together to take advantage of, you know,
7:27
everyday people, you know, I think the entire world has
7:31
become a, a corporate government collusion, you know, fascism
7:37
around the world. And we the people are are, you
7:41
know, just casualties of war at this point.
7:45
What is the purpose of a doctor? Well, it's supposed to be a
7:50
teacher, OK? It's supposed to be someone who
7:53
has knowledge and wisdom and experience and in my view, OK,
7:58
which is different than I think what is going on in the world.
8:01
And that wasn't the question I thought you were going to ask me
8:05
was to, you know, to help people comprehend and identify the
8:13
cause and the source of their problem.
8:17
Now, there's always an exception to every rule, but I could
8:20
almost guarantee you that the source of anybody's health
8:24
problem is not a chronic deficiency of a pharmaceutical
8:29
medication. That's just not what it is.
8:33
And and so, you know, if you use your car as an example, if the
8:37
red light goes off on the dashboard and there's something
8:41
wrong with your car, if you went to the mechanic and asked them,
8:44
you know, could you fix the light on my car?
8:49
That's analogous to, you know, having symptoms, right?
8:52
You know, the classic symptoms people call a cold, sneezing,
8:56
coughing, teary eyes, runny nose, fever, you know, maybe
9:01
diarrhoea and sweating. And, and you know, these are
9:03
attempts of your body to get rid of something.
9:06
And people look at that and they don't ask, well, what have I
9:10
been doing that my body's trying to get rid of something, right?
9:13
Let me help my body get rid of it and then you're done.
9:17
No, they suppress those symptoms, whether it's the
9:19
symptoms of the cold or flu or an allergy or or whatever it may
9:22
be toxic poisoning and, and so drugs just suppress the lights
9:29
on the dashboard. If, if you're not feeling well,
9:33
your doctor should ask you 1000 questions and, and, and you
9:37
know, find out from you what is it that you've been doing or not
9:42
doing, What's in your environment, what's in your
9:44
mind, what's in your psyche, what's, you know, what's going
9:47
on with you as an individual and you have to make those changes.
9:52
Well, that's not their model. Their model is to talk to you
9:56
for 5 minutes, identify your symptoms, identify and ICDI CD10
10:01
code International Classification of disease, you
10:05
know, run by The Who. Oh, let's put you in a box.
10:10
Let's redefine you as, you know, having this ailment.
10:16
And then they can follow a protocol.
10:18
I was reading Doctor Artis's, doctor Brian Artis's book today,
10:24
I'm sorry, yesterday, and in the beginning he talks about his
10:29
losing his stepfather. He died in the hospital.
10:34
Because they followed protocol. They ignored what they were
10:38
looking at. They made a misdiagnosis, which
10:41
is where everything starts. You know, I, I joke that I was
10:46
born with a terminal illness. It's called James Roguski
10:50
syndrome. I've been managing it for 65
10:53
years. It's, you know, it's, it's
10:55
chronic. Eventually it'll probably get me
10:58
right. But at the moment I'm handling
11:00
it pretty well. If anybody were to ever try to
11:04
label me as being a cancer patient or a heart patient or
11:09
diabetic or this or that anything, they're not paying
11:12
attention to you as an individual.
11:15
And and so if your doctor is paying attention to you and
11:21
trying to help you figure out why you have whatever disease
11:27
you you have, then maybe that doctor is worth, you know,
11:31
keeping if they're just diagnosing you, which means two
11:36
people don't know die to a not gnosis to know when you're
11:42
diagnosed. It's just so that they can put
11:44
in a form to get paid and follow a protocol that doesn't have
11:49
anything to do with you. It's got everything to do with
11:51
what drug companies say is going to hide your symptoms.
11:54
And so are there any doctors out there?
11:58
There's maybe a few, but not in the medical pharmaceutical
12:01
profession, that's for sure. Well, let me zoom out.
12:05
What is the purpose of The Who? Well, their stated purpose is to
12:11
guarantee the right of health to everybody.
12:16
And you know, health and healthcare are not rights.
12:21
They are different. You are supposed to have the
12:25
right to make your own decisions.
12:28
So the right to decide whatever it is you do to care for your
12:34
own health is, is not your not your right.
12:37
It's also your responsibility. What The Who has morphed into,
12:42
especially in the last 2025 years or so, is a cartel or
12:49
really the marketing arm of the pharmaceutical cartel.
12:52
I woke up 1 morning and I had been, you know, reporting on The
12:55
Who. And the director general of The
12:59
Who, through the International Health Regulations, has the
13:02
authority to make a declaration for whatever reason, when he
13:07
decides he wants to, he can declare a fake, a public health
13:12
emergency of international concern.
13:15
Hey, there's something going on in some corner of the world.
13:18
You know, everybody should be afraid.
13:20
Well, that acronym PHEICI woke up 1 morning and what I heard
13:26
inside my head was the pharmaceutical hospital
13:28
emergency industrial complex. And so they basically are
13:32
promoters for big pharma. You, you know, because we've
13:37
talked about it a number of times.
13:38
I've reported on their negotiations for amendments to
13:41
the International Health Regulations.
13:43
And now they're in the middle. Still to this day, despite what
13:46
people have reported, they're still trying to finish the
13:49
negotiations for the pandemic agreement.
13:52
And in the interim agreements that they have so far, they've
13:57
agreed that pandemic emergency products are only
14:04
pharmaceuticals, drugs, devices, vaccines, and, and also cell and
14:11
gene based therapies, not to mention all of the diagnostics
14:16
which are fraudulent. So if they can get people to
14:19
take a test and believe that they have an ailment that
14:24
another poison is the treatment for, it's really great for
14:28
business. And So what they're negotiating
14:31
is a system by which, you know, I, I kid you not, what they have
14:36
on the table right now are, are sample contracts that nations
14:42
would sign with corporations, with The Who as a signatory, you
14:48
know, middle man. If they find a pathogen or if
14:52
they create one in a computer or if artificial intelligence
14:55
creates A genetic sequence that they claim would be pathogenic,
15:00
they want companies to sign contracts to share the profits.
15:05
So, you know, what they're really negotiating with the
15:07
pandemic agreement is, is a cartel, you know, that I call
15:13
the organisation of pandemic emergency corporations.
15:17
They are being fascist. They, they want government to
15:22
work with industry to take advantage of we the people.
15:26
And you know, this is the the theme people use words like, you
15:30
know, fascism and socialism and communism and capitalism and all
15:34
those sort of thing. The core definition of fascism
15:37
isn't about left wing, right wing.
15:39
You can be a left wing fascist, a right wing fascist.
15:42
You could be all kinds of things.
15:44
When you see government supporting corporations at the
15:50
expense of people, call it whatever you want to call it.
15:54
That is where we are right now in the world and it's horrible.
15:59
And if government and the people in government are going to
16:01
continue to support corporations rather than support the freedoms
16:06
and rights of people, there's, there's going to be problems.
16:11
You know, people are ultimately either going to become sheep and
16:15
just give in and submit to the authority of your government.
16:20
And we're going to live in 1984, or we're going to stand up and
16:25
defend our rights and freedoms as men, women and children.
16:29
And it's not going to be easy because if you look at your
16:33
life, I mean, right now, you know, we're we're communicating
16:36
through a system that's owned by a corporation, OK.
16:41
Now there's a lot of movements, you know, to have more
16:45
responsible corporations, you know, or, or cooperative
16:51
structure behind that system. But what we're dealing with, you
16:57
know, is not designed to support individual rights, freedoms and
17:01
choice. It's designed to turn a profit
17:04
off the expense of of people. And until that changes, we're
17:08
going to continue having problems.
17:10
You also referred to it as a global power grab.
17:20
I don't know that I've, maybe I have used that term in the past,
17:24
but while that is the case, I, I think that it, it, it's, they've
17:33
already got the power, they've already got the structure.
17:36
And if you, if you look at it from a, much like you said
17:41
earlier, like, like take a step back and look at a bigger
17:43
picture. Let's take a really big step
17:45
back and, and look at an even bigger picture.
17:49
Whatever your belief may be, if you believe, you know, in some
17:53
type of creator, you know, call it God, call it whatever you
17:56
want to call it, bring that down a notch.
18:00
And if you create something, it's yours.
18:04
You have control of it. If you write a book, if you
18:07
create some kind of artwork, you know, whatever.
18:10
Whoever creates something should never be controlled by the thing
18:17
that you have created. OK, I don't have children, you
18:21
know, but people get together, they have children.
18:24
And, you know, at the age of 18, you set the child free in most
18:28
societies. I guess many times, you know,
18:32
children could try to, you know, control over their parents.
18:36
But essentially what we have done is put ourselves in the
18:42
position of being controlled by our own creations.
18:48
If if God created men, women and children and we created
18:53
government, we've allowed government to then create
18:58
corporations. And then corporations create
19:03
this scenario where we submit ourselves to their authority by
19:10
signing some kind of an agreement with them.
19:13
And we put ourselves under the corporation as a subject, as a
19:18
customer, as a user, as you know, whatever terminology they
19:23
might have. If it's a social media company,
19:27
when you sign your agreement with them, you subject yourself
19:31
to that agreement and you give up all of your rights, maybe
19:36
unknowingly, but you know, well, you want the benefits of doing
19:41
business with that company, whatever it may be, or working
19:45
for that company. And you give up your rights that
19:49
you have as not just the creator of that corporation, but the
19:53
creator of the government that created that corporation.
19:57
And so when you allow yourself to be made subservient to
20:01
something that is supposed to serve you, government is
20:05
supposed to serve people. Corporations are supposed to
20:09
serve people through the creation in government.
20:13
But somehow it's been turned around.
20:16
And if you really want to get deep, here's a thought for you.
20:22
What if the quote unquote Antichrist?
20:26
Is actually the system that connects all of this.
20:31
So if you could visualise, let's start with the United Nations,
20:37
OK? I'm not saying they're
20:38
necessarily at the top of it, but they're pretty close up
20:40
there. The United Nations is connected
20:44
to all of its member nations and through subsidiaries like The
20:47
Who, you know, many nations are connected through there, all of
20:53
those nations. If you could just envision the
20:55
organogram, you know the, the, the chart of the organisation,
21:00
look at the United Nations with all of the 193.
21:03
I think it is countries that are members, but then look at all of
21:06
the governments that each of those countries have.
21:09
Take any nation, maybe they're divided into provinces or states
21:13
or or whatever term they may have subsidiary units, OK.
21:18
Then you take it down in the United States to the county and
21:21
the city, you know, on the local level.
21:24
Then off of each one of those government entities that have
21:28
the authority to create corporations on your
21:32
organisation chart, put, you know, all of the corporations
21:37
that are created by that government.
21:39
Look at all of the nonprofits. Look at all the foundations.
21:42
OK, Then look at all of the public schools.
21:45
Look, look at everything that the government licences and
21:50
you'll realise that the mark of not the mark of the beast, but
21:53
the actual beast system is already in place.
21:59
How many people never deal with that enormous beast?
22:06
How many people are, you know, out in the woods living freely,
22:11
self sufficient, taking care of themselves?
22:14
Everybody, just about on every day of their life interacts with
22:20
the beast. And that beast is the system
22:24
that we've created and you know, no one government official, no
22:28
Prime Minister, no president, no Pope, you know, forgot about
22:31
churches and religion, you know, Add all of that in there too,
22:35
right? That system should be seen as
22:40
anti freedom. And so, you know, if the
22:44
Christos, if Christ is, you know, the bit of divinity that's
22:48
inside of you, the Antichrist is the system that controls you or
22:54
attempts to. And so we deal every day with a
22:57
system that is a beast. And who among us thinks that
23:03
they have the power to slay that beast?
23:07
You're lucky if you can hide from it.
23:09
Now it's got cameras everywhere. And so people are looking for,
23:13
you know, who's going to be born in the world and it's going to
23:16
be called the Antichrist. We've birthed the Antichrist for
23:20
generations. It's the system that controls
23:23
you. A lot of times, you know, people
23:24
will say they right now they are doing this to you.
23:27
They are doing that to you. Well, who is they?
23:30
You know, they, somebody told me, a friend of mine, you know,
23:33
it's an acronym for the hierarchy enslaving you.
23:37
That is the beast system. And until we understand that
23:41
whether it's the, you know, South African or UK or
23:43
Australian or Canadian or United States or or Ukrainian or or
23:47
Russian government, it is the system.
23:51
You know, it, it used to be in the 60s, people would refer to
23:54
it as the man. OK, well, maybe that's, you
23:57
know, sexist because women are part of that system as well.
24:01
But the government, religious, corporate banking, money system,
24:08
the system is what is ruining our individual lives.
24:13
Then you take artificial intelligence and put it on top
24:16
of that and, you know, global bank, central bank, digital
24:20
currencies and everything like that.
24:24
It's just an adjunct to the system that we've been living
24:27
under our entire life. You know, call it the Matrix if
24:30
you want, OK, but it's it's a beast and we need to slay it.
24:35
And it's not going to be easy because we've all come to depend
24:38
on it. How?
24:44
You first have to understand that that is what the problem
24:47
is, OK? You're not going to elect new
24:50
people to take a position and change the system.
24:56
You know, the system is the problem, OK, The corporate
25:00
banking, education, religious government system on every
25:05
level, Once you become aware that that is the matrix, that is
25:10
the beast, that is the system that is controlling your life.
25:14
And you step up and you say, no, maybe not you, because I'm, you
25:19
know, the United States is about to celebrate its 250th, you
25:24
know, birthday next year. I wasn't around 250 years ago,
25:28
so I didn't create it. But you know, proverbially we
25:32
the people created our government.
25:37
It needs to be dissolved. It needs to be rethought.
25:40
It needs to be reworked. It it needs to be, I don't want
25:46
to say burnt down, OK, because that implies violence.
25:51
And ideally we can do this in a way that is not violent.
25:55
And unfortunately, what typically happens in violent
25:59
revolutions is they just put back a different version of the
26:03
same damn thing. OK.
26:05
What we need is to recognise the spark of divinity within each of
26:11
us and respect it. And, you know, it's different
26:15
systems for interacting. Do we need corporations?
26:20
Should corporations be given the rights of people and and rights
26:23
that are more than the rights that people enjoy?
26:27
Well, hell no. OK, you know, are cooperatives a
26:32
little bit of a step in a better direction maybe.
26:37
OK, with religion, you know, whatever belief you may have,
26:44
understand that belief is what you do when you don't know.
26:48
So if you believe that somebody in a organised religion can lead
26:52
you to God, well, that's a totally different thing than is
26:57
taught in many religions, which is you need to find God and and
27:01
that inside of you. And, and so if you believe that
27:06
nonprofit organisations bringing this back to The Who in these
27:12
negotiations, there are 400 relevant stakeholders who are
27:18
participating in negotiations that the vast majority of the
27:22
world's population has no idea or even happening.
27:26
Well, these 400 organisations have gotten language put in
27:30
place in both the financial aspect of the international
27:35
health regulation amendments. So that's over and done.
27:37
They got that put in place. And in the pandemic agreement,
27:41
it's just awaiting the final negotiations, the same language
27:44
is in there. That money is put aside for any
27:49
organisations that help with what has been negotiated in
27:53
these agreements. Well, the reason they want the
27:55
pandemic agreement to go through is because they're going to be
27:58
on the receiving end of a lot of the money that's going to flow
28:01
through this cartel. And, and, and so, you know, is
28:05
it right that corporations and relevant stakeholders are
28:11
involved in these negotiations? And we the people have no say
28:16
whatsoever. We're not even allowed to watch.
28:20
This is the problem. Our creations have taken control
28:26
of our lives, and we need to assert our right and
28:31
responsibility as the creator of government, which then charters
28:37
corporations or nonprofits or religions or whatever.
28:42
We have to stand above it and understand our place and not
28:46
subjugate ourselves by, you know, signing contracts that
28:51
give away our rights and freedoms for some, you know,
28:55
benefit, whether it's a government benefit or, you know,
28:58
some type of service from a corporation or whatever it might
29:01
be. OK, but then again, how?
29:05
How, How do we do it? Well, you you have to recognise
29:07
the problem. OK, if, if.
29:10
You so so, so let me be more specific.
29:14
OK, So we recognise the problem. Good.
29:16
All right, now what? I'm not pretending to be able to
29:27
offer an answer for the entire thing.
29:31
What I am saying is we need to start working on what I would
29:36
call a new social contract. How do we want to deal with each
29:45
other in a way that is different than government?
29:49
What you're kind of alluding to then is kind of building
29:53
communities and parallel networks and that kind of thing,
29:55
which is the sort of thing that we've been talking about for
29:57
years. If you could envision, certainly
30:01
in the United States, whenever we seem to have some type of
30:05
natural disaster, a flood, a hurricane, a tornado,
30:08
earthquake, whatever it may be, the government agencies who are
30:12
supposed to be there during the emergencies get in the way.
30:17
They literally stop people from helping where you know, people
30:20
who have survived the tragedy, you know, they get their trucks,
30:24
they get their boats, you know, they get whatever it is they
30:26
need to do. You know, they, they donate
30:28
money and, and supplies and, and they go into harm's way, you
30:31
know, to get people out of danger.
30:33
OK. We rely on each other because
30:38
in, when, when, when it's most needed, government fails and and
30:45
ultimately there is an unspoken bond amongst people where hey,
30:53
these, you may not even know them, but you're able to help.
30:58
You're in a situation where you're right there and you can
31:00
help. So you do.
31:03
And I think the vast majority of people, you know, have that
31:05
goodness in their heart and they would certainly do that.
31:07
Some people may try to take advantage of it, but the
31:10
government just gets in the way. OK.
31:13
And so there was another word that you said that had me
31:18
triggered off on another idea. Now I think I forgot what it was
31:20
where, where where you had mentioned something.
31:22
But the point is we'll. See Parallel Systems and
31:25
Networks. Thank you.
31:27
And, and so do we need government, you know, mind
31:33
control or do we need cooperation?
31:37
Do we need a looser network where it's not that we hire and
31:44
choose a representative to tell us what to do?
31:50
That's not how government is supposed to be.
31:53
It has morphed into that. And as long as people view
31:58
government as that which controls your mind, OK.
32:05
If we're even talking about government, we're barking up the
32:10
wrong tree, OK, We need, you know, a different type of
32:16
organised social contract. And so, you know, it's one of
32:20
the things that that I'm working on, you know, a new
32:23
socialcontract.com. I'll give you the link, you can
32:26
put it in in the thing. I'm not saying I have all the
32:29
answers. I'm saying that in each and
32:31
every aspect of existence, whether it's money or health or,
32:38
you know, education, communications, transportation,
32:45
there are new methods that are available to us.
32:49
As technology and innovation comes forth, there's new things
32:53
that we have to deal with that, you know, the people who created
32:56
our government 250 years ago had no idea these things were going
32:59
to come up. We need new ways to organise our
33:04
society, you know, maybe where computers and artificial
33:09
intelligence and robotics do a lot of the hard work.
33:13
But they, if they are our creations, they have to be under
33:18
our control, not under the control of an oligarch who owns
33:24
a company, who got a government grant to do some research, you
33:27
know, to create some type of software or, you know, robotics
33:32
that then makes them, you know, gobs and gobs of money while
33:36
everyone else is unemployed and, you know, begging just for
33:40
survival. We need an entirely new and
33:44
different organisation structure.
33:47
And it's not government and it's not corporations and it's not
33:50
religions. What might it be?
33:54
Well, we have to put our heads together.
33:55
We have to have those discussions.
33:57
And you know me, I'll do it right now.
34:00
I always give people my phone number.
34:01
If this is a topic that you want to discuss, give me a phone
34:04
call. I'm in California, so you may
34:08
have to do a country code to, you know, United States.
34:11
But my phone number in California is 310-619-3055.
34:17
You know, put it in the in the notes for the description of the
34:20
video. I'm not saying I have the
34:22
answer, but I'm saying that I can identify that we're not
34:26
going to find the answer in government and corporations and
34:29
religions and nonprofits and all of the structures that we have.
34:33
Those structures have become the proverbial, you know, beast that
34:39
is controlling our lives. And none of us really are able
34:43
to live freely as long as that beast survives.
34:47
We need to slay it. We need to we need to create a
34:50
new system that respects our rights and is of benefit to each
34:55
and every one of us, while giving every person the freedom
34:59
to live their lives the way their spirit inside tells them
35:03
to live. You talk about creating the
35:08
system and I'm just wondering, James, if some of it is by
35:13
design, some of it's by emergence?
35:16
By emergence, can you explain what you mean by emergence?
35:20
Do you mean by emergency, by necessity, or just?
35:23
No, no, no. It came to be.
35:25
It came to be organically. Well, you know, is there a large
35:35
mind behind the beast system that has put ideas into people
35:43
so that we think we've built it, but it's been built by a greater
35:49
intelligence than each and every one of us.
35:52
So, you know, you're really getting into some esoteric stuff
35:54
that I'd love to talk about. I'll, I'll ask you and, and your
35:57
audience a question that I think opens up some curiosity.
36:02
Where do you believe ideas come from?
36:09
Do you own your idea? Did it come from you?
36:13
Did you create it or, or is it an idea that is coming through
36:19
you, you've tapped into it and maybe it was thought by somebody
36:23
else. I've, I've had many experiences
36:27
in life where an idea comes in and after the fact you recognise
36:35
that. Well, you know, many people
36:36
around the world have that idea. You're not the first one to have
36:39
that idea, OK? You might be the first one who
36:43
voices it, OK, but where do ideas come from?
36:49
And how do you know that what seems to be a good idea is
36:57
actually a very well crafted psychological operation that
37:02
gets you to do the bidding of the thinker of that idea?
37:06
And you do something that you believe is good and righteous
37:10
and just and wonderful and it's going to help society.
37:13
But it's all part of a much more sophisticated thought that you
37:18
look at it after the fact and you go, oh, crap, I thought I
37:22
was doing something good. And look how it's been perverted
37:24
into something very, very bad. And so, man, you know, we could
37:29
talk for days about, you know, who is the thinker of the ideas
37:34
that you adopt and what ideas might be accepted.
37:41
But then the idea follows right behind it and says, oh, that's
37:44
going to be too hard. You're going to you're going to
37:46
face too much resistance. You can't do that.
37:49
Nobody's going to want to do that.
37:50
You know, they people like the comfort of the current system.
37:54
When you ask yourself with every single idea that you recognise
37:59
that you are thinking, that is in your your space of
38:03
consciousness, is that my idea or did it come from somewhere?
38:09
You know, is there a realm, you know, like we we know about, you
38:13
know, cell phones, OK, you know, that there's some kind of energy
38:16
that comes out of here and some other cell phone can tune into
38:20
it. You know, people know you can
38:22
tune a radio or tune a television or whatever.
38:25
You get into the frequency and you know, I've had that
38:29
experience with loved ones where you know what they're thinking
38:32
before they say it. I, I've had numerous experiences
38:35
with friends and, and stuff where I've said something and
38:39
their response was, Oh my God, I was thinking the same thing.
38:43
OK, well, was that just coincidence or is thought
38:48
something that, you know, Neuralink can tap into and
38:51
control? You know, do we want to let
38:53
companies put sensors in our brains or in our bloodstream and
38:57
tap into our thoughts and, and put thoughts into our minds?
39:01
Do we want to allow that to happen?
39:03
Or do we want to realise that we can have better, more?
39:08
I'll take that back. We can choose to focus on
39:13
better, more creative, more fair, universal, just ideas to
39:21
build a better system that when you build the better mousetrap,
39:25
when you build the better system, you know, if you could
39:29
build a better currency, OK, that people trust more than they
39:39
trust the dollar or the pound or Bitcoin or whatever, people will
39:43
flock to it. So what we need are people that
39:47
have better ideas, creative ideas.
39:50
Where those ideas come from, you have to be careful because any
39:53
good idea can be used for bad. But whether it's, you know, new
39:58
ideas of how to educate children.
40:00
Do you want to continue to teach people from, you know, young
40:05
age, young children to be slaves in a system where they go to
40:10
school for 12 plus years to just be bludgeoned in submission and
40:14
only the ones who submit and obey and follow the rules and
40:18
become good slaves for the corporation or government?
40:22
Is that what we want to continue to do to our children?
40:25
There are systems out there where people are educating
40:28
children in a very different way and you come out with a very
40:31
different adult. You come out with somebody who's
40:34
creative and self sufficient and is not preyed upon by the
40:40
systems that they've been programmed to obey.
40:43
And so whether it's education or religion or communications or
40:46
transportation or whatever, are we headed towards a Mad Max, you
40:52
know, 1984 dystopian society? Are we headed for, you know, a
40:57
Star Trek future where, you know, money is a thing of the
41:01
past and, and people have their needs and so they live their
41:06
lives with a creative purpose as the main focus rather than just
41:10
survival and competition. Do we want to cooperate rather
41:14
than compete all the time? And do we, you know, people
41:19
don't even understand the darn meaning of the word capitalism?
41:22
Capital is the means of production.
41:26
You know, do you want someone else to own all of the means of
41:30
production? So you have to work in their
41:32
factory or their sweatshop or their, you know, building
41:36
software using AI, you know, working for somebody else to
41:39
profit from it or, you know, do we need a different system?
41:44
Anybody who is pro capital is anti human.
41:50
And I'm not, I'm not an advocate for communism or socialism or
41:54
fascism or any of the isms. We need new ideas to have a new
41:59
system that maybe hasn't been defined yet.
42:02
So it doesn't have a name. And if anybody wants to talk
42:06
about that, boy, that would be spectacular.
42:11
James, you. Got your speech there for a
42:14
moment. No, don't play devil's advocate.
42:18
I refuse to advocate for the devil.
42:19
You can take the other side of the discussion and challenge my
42:22
ideas, but don't advocate for that guy.
42:25
I don't support that. You're you're suggesting that
42:31
new ideas is what are all what all what are needed?
42:37
Is what is needed new? Hold on, what is the correct
42:40
language? New ideas?
42:42
We we need, we need some new ideas.
42:43
How about that? Yes, OK, You're suggesting we
42:46
need some new ideas. Could it also be argued that
42:51
some old ideas are great and also could be readopted?
42:55
I, I think of, for example, my grandparents, you know, they had
42:59
wisdom that I don't think I have and, and perhaps their
43:04
grandparents had had wisdom that that was lost, you know, and so
43:08
on. I will certainly go down that
43:11
path and agree that there are many ideas that have been lost
43:16
and need to be re re recognised. I guess you know one of them.
43:24
I can turn and go outside in my yard.
43:27
I've spoken of this, maybe not with you, but with other people
43:30
numerous times. I I live in the Los Angeles
43:32
area. We have a very small, not a tiny
43:35
home, but very small home. It's only about 1000 square
43:38
feet. Our yard is only about 1000
43:42
square feet. That's pretty small for a yard.
43:45
OK. I think I have 16 or 17 fruit
43:48
trees that grow in my little yard.
43:51
It's a jungle, OK? All of the greenery that grows
43:56
beneath those trees are what most people would call edible
44:00
weeds, things like stinging nettle and mallow and dock and
44:08
dandelion and nasturtium and lamb's quarters.
44:13
And, you know, people who are into, you know, gardening and
44:16
foraging will understand. Most people would pull those out
44:19
of their yard and treat them as weeds.
44:23
But they're edible. So every day I go out into the
44:25
yard and either pick some fruit or, you know, some vegetation,
44:30
make a salad. I'm not saying you need to be
44:32
vegan. You know, maybe that's the
44:33
ultimate I I don't have chickens, I don't have other
44:36
animals. We don't have space for any of
44:38
that. But that's old school.
44:42
That's Garden of. I got a little Garden of Eden
44:45
stuff out there. Why in the world would you hire
44:49
a gardener to mow your grass every day like my neighbours,
44:53
every week, like my neighbours do, to just throw all of that
44:57
greenery away, you know, put whatever weeds and stuff you
45:01
have in in the compost pile and make food for your food?
45:05
OK, well, that's an old idea. And I think the trigger that
45:10
started me down that path was I, I watched a video a couple of
45:14
decades ago of a father whose child came home with a handful
45:20
of sunflower seeds and the project was to grow some
45:24
sunflowers. Well, if you've ever grown
45:26
sunflowers, you plant a couple of seeds, you get a couple of
45:29
sunflowers, you get a couple of 1000 seeds.
45:32
And so when you work with Mother Nature, you know, the plants
45:36
that grow in my yard, they drop, I don't want to overstate it,
45:41
certainly hundreds of thousands, probably millions of seeds.
45:47
So I don't need to buy seeds. Mother Nature provides.
45:53
So that's, you know, a simple old idea.
45:57
You know, frugality is an old idea.
46:00
Waste not, want not. OK.
46:03
One of the things that I've done, as you know, one of the
46:06
many things I've done in my life is during COVID, when everybody
46:10
started leaving Los Angeles, people would leave beautiful
46:14
antique furniture on the side of the road as trash because they
46:20
had to fit it into a truck to leave.
46:22
So we spent a couple of years just, you know, picking up old
46:25
furniture, polishing it up, fixing it up.
46:27
I have those carpentry skills and reselling it as better than
46:32
you could possibly buy in any store.
46:34
They don't make them like they used to.
46:36
You can't buy good furniture because you can't afford to now,
46:40
right? And, and so those are just two,
46:43
you know, there are ideas with mesh networks for communications
46:48
where the device that you have connects to the next closest
46:52
device and the the communication travels, you know, through the
46:56
network of all of the people who have the devices.
46:59
It's not controlled by a single solitary point.
47:03
So you're not dependent on a phone company that can shut you
47:07
down. OK.
47:09
There are spectacular ideas out there in the world.
47:12
And, you know, I want to spend the rest of my days focusing on
47:16
how do we make this world a better place?
47:18
We can certainly point out what's wrong and what's broken
47:21
and what needs to be replaced. But if we put our energy into
47:25
what is it that we want? We can, if we will, and we must
47:30
make the world a better place. But that's on us.
47:33
It's not going to happen. And, and the people who are part
47:37
of the beast system right now, if they were to make it happen,
47:41
they would just plug it into the beast and use it to control us
47:45
even more. We have to do it independently,
47:48
in a creative way that is separate and is not controlled
47:52
by any one organisation, any one person, but is, you know, open
47:57
for everybody's. Use so more decentralisation.
48:04
As a general rule, probably, you know, there's every system you
48:10
have to analyse, you know, uniquely, but when you
48:14
centralised power, you generally give up freedom.
48:19
And so if the decision making is closer to the source, if you get
48:24
to decide, you know, when you wake up in the morning what
48:27
you're going to do that day as opposed to going to work and
48:31
doing what someone else tells you to do, you can see it
48:34
immediately. You're going to be happier.
48:37
Now, you still have to work, you still have to choose, you still
48:40
have to put in the effort. It's not a free ride.
48:44
But I think you could look at almost any study that's out
48:49
there that people who feel that they have control over their day
48:52
to day decision making are far happier than slaves.
48:57
And, and so we're we're slaves. Most people are slaves in the
49:01
way that they don't recognise the prison, they don't recognise
49:04
that the job or the belief structure or the educational
49:10
system that they're part of actually controls them.
49:14
And you know, we should, there are people who are just out of
49:19
control. And, you know, part of the
49:21
problem is to give freedom with the understanding that there
49:26
will be people who abuse that freedom.
49:29
And we have to have systems in place to stop the abuse of that
49:34
freedom. But what we have in place now
49:37
is, is a system that causes people to want to rebel because
49:43
it's so constrictive. You can't keep people in a cage
49:48
for very long. You know, some of them will
49:51
rebel. And it's it's one thing when
49:56
people rebel against their the warden of the prison that
50:02
they're in because they're not supposed to be in that prison.
50:07
It's another thing to have a prison where people are
50:10
dangerous and they have intent to harm others and we need to
50:16
come together and control their violent nature.
50:20
That's a difficult decision. Finland has probably done a a
50:24
better job than most countries. I'm not an expert on their
50:27
systems, but they treat, you know, quote unquote criminal
50:32
activity in a different way. The bigger problem, and I can
50:37
point to something like the Prep Act here in the United States is
50:41
we've made criminal activity legal by passing laws that allow
50:48
corporations and, and people to get literally to literally get
50:52
away with murder, right? I mean, corporations and stuff
50:56
that did harm throughout COVID are protected from any kind of
50:59
criminal civil lawsuit because the PREP Act says you can't
51:03
touch them. The law has been corrupted to
51:07
protect criminals. That's the system.
51:10
You know, in the United States, I don't know how many, probably
51:13
hundreds of millions of words make up the the Code of Federal
51:20
Regulations, just on the federal level.
51:22
No human being can comprehend that many rules.
51:26
I mean, Moses came down with 10 rules and those were flawed.
51:29
And that's a whole other discussion.
51:31
I'll just leave it there. People want to have that
51:32
discussion. The more laws you have, the more
51:37
control you have. What you need are agreements
51:41
amongst people to live together. It's, it's a social contract.
51:46
It's a new social contract that we need to agree to.
51:52
I didn't agree to the constitution, OK.
51:55
People in the UK didn't agree to the Magna Carta.
51:58
They weren't around hundreds almost 1000 years ago.
52:01
Whatever constitution that you have in your country, maybe in
52:05
South Africa, it's relatively modern.
52:07
Maybe you were, you know, of age at the time and you agreed to
52:10
it, but you didn't. It was agreed on your behalf.
52:16
And maybe you agreed to it and maybe it's working and maybe it
52:20
isn't. But the issue really is if we
52:24
don't make a new system that functions better so that people
52:28
gravitate to it. They want to use the money.
52:32
They want to use that system of transportation.
52:34
They want to use that system of communication.
52:36
They want to put their children through that system of
52:39
education. They, they want that better
52:43
idea. If we don't build it, then we're
52:46
going to be stuck in the beast system that currently exists.
52:49
But if we do build and implement better ideas, people will
52:53
gravitate to it. And all of the stuff that we're
52:56
concerned about now will just wither and die on the vine
52:59
because we stop feeding the beast.
53:02
Every time you pay a, you know, a subscription or whatever to
53:06
some corporate Netflix or Hulu or whatever it might be, you're
53:10
feeding the beast of propaganda. Stop it.
53:13
OK, every, every time you, you know, utilise a credit card,
53:17
you're feeding the beast of whoever's profiting from your
53:21
purchase. Stop doing it.
53:23
OK, well, it's easier to stop something when you have a better
53:28
something to go to. And unfortunately, the new
53:32
systems are being built by the people who control the old
53:34
system, and we need to not let that happen because it's only
53:39
going to be a tighter noose around our necks.
53:43
But who creates the the new social contract?
53:46
Who enforces it? And what about those who don't
53:50
want to be part of it? That's all part of it.
53:55
Live your life the way you want. He who creates is the one who is
54:00
supposed to control. And so none of us, we did not
54:04
create our systems of government.
54:07
We did not create the vast majority of people, did not
54:12
create the corporate structure, the corporate hierarchy.
54:16
These are new ideas that are not in the, you know, public
54:20
awareness at the moment. They need to be.
54:24
And so, you know, I'll give my phone number again,
54:26
310-619-3055. You can find all my work on
54:33
jamesroguski.subsnack.com. Reach out to me if you want to
54:38
work towards a better future. I'm not saying it's going to be
54:40
easy, but it's looking like if we don't do it, it's going to
54:44
get really very, very difficult. And, and the system that is
54:49
currently in place is growing exponentially.
54:53
It's already entrapped the vast majority of humanity.
54:57
But there's still a better way. There's still a way to build a
55:01
better future. And we need new ideas, and those
55:06
will come from sources who are not currently in power.
55:09
They will come from regular people who accept a thought from
55:13
wherever thoughts come from. Accept a new idea if you share
55:18
it and it's a good idea, and you can turn it into a functional
55:21
reality. If it truly is a good idea,
55:24
people will join in and you can't make them.
55:27
But if you have a better idea, you know people will gravitate
55:30
to it. How can my audience follow you?
55:37
I've got about two dozen websites, so, you know, a new
55:40
socialcontract.com is one of them.
55:42
But I think that what we need more than anything is for people
55:49
don't, don't follow me, connect with me, OK?
55:54
It's not leader and follower, it's connection.
55:57
So everybody already has my phone number 310-619-3055.
56:03
Send me a text message. If you're not in the US, use
56:07
Signal or Telegram or WhatsApp. It's all the same phone number.
56:10
You know, you can find me that way.
56:12
Let's connect and communicate. Let's not follow the leader.
56:16
It's come together as equals and discuss ideas and choose the
56:24
ones that we think are are are feasible and go forward into a
56:28
better and brighter future. James Rogowski, thank you for
56:33
joining me in the trenches.