Latest / Brian Thomas / Tech Friday w/ Dave Hatter - Sponsored by Intrust IT - 9/04/2026
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: It is 6.30 at 55 KRCG Talk Station. It is
- 0:05Speaker 1: that time of week. Appointment listening without question. Tech Friday
- 0:08Speaker 1: with Dave Hatter. Brought to you by Interest IT. Find
- 0:10Speaker 1: them online at interestit.com. Businesses obviously need the professionals in
- 0:13Speaker 1: Interest IT for all their computer needs and problems. Things
- 0:17Speaker 1: do crop up. Welcome back, Dave Hatter. Thank you for
- 0:20Speaker 1: sponsoring the segment with your company. And congratulations by being
- 0:23Speaker 1: identified by the Cincinnati Business Courier as the best in
- 0:26Speaker 1: the business.
- 0:27Speaker 2: Thanks, Brian. Always good to be here.
- 0:29Speaker 1: I know we're going to talk about Waymo downtown. My
- 0:31Speaker 1: wife will not get into one. I asked her about
- 0:32Speaker 1: that the other day when I read that article. But
- 0:34Speaker 1: real quick here, I'm sure you saw it. China-linked cyber
- 0:38Speaker 1: espionage group apparently compromised Cisco routers, which allowed them to
- 0:43Speaker 1: monitor traffic through the devices and use them to probe
- 0:46Speaker 1: other high-value networks. They compromised the systems and, of course,
- 0:50Speaker 1: the network administrator's information, which logged into the routers and
- 0:53Speaker 1: other equipment. So I guess Cisco routers are ubiquitous, aren't they?
- 0:59Speaker 3: Yeah, Cisco is one of the largest network infrastructure companies
- 1:02Speaker 3: out there and, frankly, has been for a really long time. Many,
- 1:06Speaker 3: many companies use Cisco equipment. So, I mean, if you
- 1:10Speaker 3: think about it, and this is the sort of thing
- 1:12Speaker 3: you and I have now been talking about for many years, Brian,
- 1:16Speaker 3: all of this infrastructure that we have, that makes all
- 1:19Speaker 3: of this work. And I don't mean critical infrastructure like
- 1:21Speaker 3: the electric grid, although it now relies on this sort
- 1:25Speaker 3: of technology to work, right?
- 1:27Speaker 2: Devices talk to each other.
- 1:29Speaker 3: I'm always on here talking about the Internet of Things
- 1:31Speaker 3: and how everything is digital and has software and is interconnected. Well,
- 1:35Speaker 3: it relies on equipment from people like Cisco and Fortinet
- 1:39Speaker 3: and SonicWall and Dell.
- 1:41Speaker 2: And others, right? So....
- 1:43Speaker 3: If you're an adversarial nation state attacker and you can
- 1:48Speaker 3: figure out how to compromise these devices, or frankly, you
- 1:52Speaker 3: can just build your own devices that people use because
- 1:55Speaker 3: they don't understand the risks. Our government has been warning
- 1:59Speaker 3: about this sort of equipment coming from places like China.
- 2:05Speaker 3: The potential for eavesdropping, the potential for stealing trade secrets
- 2:09Speaker 3: and military secrets The potential for literally just causing chaos
- 2:14Speaker 3: because you could potentially turn the devices off. You could
- 2:18Speaker 3: make them misbehave, for lack of a better description. Like
- 2:22Speaker 3: I remind folks, Stuxnet. Stuxnet is an example of this.
- 2:27Speaker 3: Back many years ago, someone, and I use that term loosely.
- 2:31Speaker 1: The Israeli government attacked the centrifuges and blew them up
- 2:35Speaker 1: in the Iranian nuclear weapons enrichment facilities. Yes, that's a
- 2:39Speaker 1: great illustration, Dave. Let me cut to the chase on this.
- 2:42Speaker 1: Are Cisco routers used in our electric grid, perhaps?
- 2:46Speaker 3: Probably.
- 2:47Speaker 1: Okay, that's enough. Probably is good enough. Okay, there you go.
- 2:50Speaker 1: Probably is good enough. And this is just Cisco routers.
- 2:54Speaker 1: How many forms of nefarious intrusion activity and hacking into
- 2:58Speaker 1: sensitive infrastructure-like related systems has the Chinese Communist Party been
- 3:03Speaker 1: engaged in? A lot, right?
- 3:05Speaker 2: A lot.
- 3:06Speaker 3: And it's China, it's Russia, it's North Korea, it's Iran,
- 3:12Speaker 3: it's criminal actors. And frankly, I just keep saying this
- 3:19Speaker 3: over and over, we have got to get serious about
- 3:22Speaker 3: spending the money to protect this infrastructure, both the networking
- 3:27Speaker 3: infrastructure that powers all the infrastructure and the critical infrastructure itself,
- 3:31Speaker 3: because eventually... even if they don't mean to do it,
- 3:35Speaker 3: someone is going to do something that brings this stuff down.
- 3:39Speaker 3: I mean, I'm very concerned someday they're going to flip
- 3:42Speaker 3: the switch and just turn something off. But even if
- 3:45Speaker 3: they don't mean to do it, it could be, you know,
- 3:48Speaker 3: you plant some kind of backdoor in these things and
- 3:50Speaker 3: then someone makes a mistake that turns it off.
- 3:52Speaker 2: It's disturbing.
- 3:55Speaker 1: Do you think the potential for death global, whether it's
- 3:59Speaker 1: from aftermath of violence and looting and craziness going on,
- 4:02Speaker 1: or maybe simply because respirators get shut off. If the
- 4:05Speaker 1: power to shut off, if an EMP blew up and
- 4:08Speaker 1: the entire power shuts off for 80% of the great
- 4:10Speaker 1: United States, do you, as I believe, think that will
- 4:13Speaker 1: result in more death than perhaps the bombs dropped on
- 4:16Speaker 1: Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
- 4:19Speaker 3: Well, I don't think you have to think what you
- 4:21Speaker 3: or I think about it. You can go out and
- 4:23Speaker 3: see like congressional testimony and so forth on EMP attacks.
- 4:26Speaker 2: You can read the book one second after. Now, it's
- 4:28Speaker 2: a novel.
- 4:29Speaker 3: There's a movie coming out about it. But this whole
- 4:32Speaker 3: idea of electromagnetic pulse is a scientific fact.
- 4:35Speaker 2: Yes.
- 4:36Speaker 3: And if you set off low-grade nuclear weapons at the
- 4:39Speaker 3: right height, you can literally knock out all of the
- 4:42Speaker 3: power in the United States or somewhere close to it.
- 4:44Speaker 2: I mean, I don't think anyone can say for sure.
- 4:45Speaker 1: As an act of war or leading up to war,
- 4:48Speaker 1: disabling the infrastructure for all electricity. That would be a non-kinetic,
- 4:52Speaker 1: not like a bomb blowing off. There wouldn't be the
- 4:54Speaker 1: visual carnage in the first several days. It would unfold.
- 4:58Speaker 1: But no one's ever tried that on a mass scale before,
- 5:00Speaker 1: have they, Dave? No one ever tried dropping a bomb
- 5:02Speaker 1: before World War II. Hey, it's new. We tried it out.
- 5:05Speaker 2: It worked.
- 5:06Speaker 1: But no one's done it since. And we now are
- 5:08Speaker 1: accused of being guilty of genocide. But all that in this,
- 5:12Speaker 1: it took decades before we sort of reflected on the
- 5:15Speaker 1: profound realities of that type of weapon blowing up. We
- 5:18Speaker 1: all kind of collectively realize across this great planet of
- 5:21Speaker 1: ours that no one was going to be using nukes
- 5:23Speaker 1: as a first strike because of mutually assured destruction. Dave,
- 5:26Speaker 1: no one's ever tried an EMP before. Someone's going to
- 5:28Speaker 1: try it first, and then we'll all judge in the
- 5:30Speaker 1: aftermath of history who was right in using it or not.
- 5:33Speaker 1: That's what scares the hell out of me.
- 5:36Speaker 2: I'm with you, Brian.
- 5:37Speaker 3: I mean, here's a report, High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse Waveform Application
- 5:42Speaker 3: Guide from the Department of Energy, right? And it explains
- 5:46Speaker 3: how something like this could work. The detonation of a
- 5:48Speaker 3: nuclear weapon at a high altitude or in space can
- 5:50Speaker 3: generate an electromagnetic pulse referred to as a high-altitude EMP
- 5:55Speaker 3: or HEMP that consists of three components. And then they
- 5:58Speaker 3: break down what these three components, E1, E2, and E3 do.
- 6:02Speaker 3: This is from the Department of Energy. You know, this
- 6:04Speaker 3: isn't some doomsday prepper type stuff. This is from the
- 6:07Speaker 3: Department of Energy. And, you know, the same search, when
- 6:09Speaker 3: I search for this, so it says that the Cybersecurity
- 6:12Speaker 3: and Infrastructure Security Agency has a page on EMP. You know,
- 6:16Speaker 3: it can have the potential, I'm reading from their page,
- 6:18Speaker 3: to damage significant portions of the nation's critical infrastructure, including
- 6:21Speaker 3: the electric grid, communications equipment, water and wastewater systems, and
- 6:25Speaker 3: transportation modes.
- 6:26Speaker 2: But, you know, I don't.
- 6:27Speaker 3: Necessarily even need to set off an EMP if I
- 6:32Speaker 3: can just basically infiltrate all of your equipment.
- 6:36Speaker 1: Like through the Cisco routers, for example.
- 6:38Speaker 2: Yes.
- 6:38Speaker 1: Yeah, I know. That's kind of where I was going, Dave.
- 6:41Speaker 1: I'm sorry to go down that avenue, but this is just,
- 6:44Speaker 1: this is, you've been talking about this for years and years.
- 6:46Speaker 1: And finally, I guess our government's waking up to the
- 6:48Speaker 1: challenges we face. And here we go. Yet one more
- 6:51Speaker 1: illustration of embedded, dangerous, nefarious technology. CCP software that could
- 6:58Speaker 1: do exactly what we're talking about right now without an EMP.
- 7:00Speaker 1: 637 right now. Don't go away. More talk about including, yes,
- 7:03Speaker 1: flock cameras for Dave Hatter. He's not a fan. 641-55-KRCD
- 7:06Speaker 1: Talk Station. IntrustIT.com. Get Dave Hatter and his crew on
- 7:13Speaker 1: the job for your business computer needs. And tune in
- 7:15Speaker 1: every week for this segment. And if you're over in
- 7:17Speaker 1: Fort Wright, he's the mayor of your town, and you
- 7:19Speaker 1: don't have flock cameras. And so we just had the
- 7:21Speaker 1: announcement from Charmaine McGuffey here in Hamilton County. She has
- 7:23Speaker 1: shut them down for her own reasons. I found the
- 7:25Speaker 1: timing rather interesting, Dave, even though you don't like flaw cameras,
- 7:28Speaker 1: that she shut them down in advance of one of
- 7:30Speaker 1: the busiest days in downtown Cincinnati coming up on Riverfest.
- 7:34Speaker 1: Odd timing. I don't know what the urgency was for that,
- 7:36Speaker 1: but that raises question marks in my mind. But how
- 7:39Speaker 1: does it feel, Dave Hatter, my civil libertarian when it
- 7:42Speaker 1: comes to privacy rights friend, to be in bed with
- 7:44Speaker 1: Code Pink and... Socialist and Liberation Campaign, the People's Forum,
- 7:50Speaker 1: Answer Coalition, all these other leftist groups which are aligned
- 7:52Speaker 1: with Neville Roy Singham and the Chinese Communist Party in
- 7:55Speaker 1: the fight against flock cameras and AI in our country.
- 7:58Speaker 1: Politics and privacy rights make strange bedfellows, Dave.
- 8:02Speaker 3: It has been interesting to see how different groups of
- 8:07Speaker 3: people who would typically be opposed to each other have
- 8:09Speaker 3: aligned around this mass surveillance thing.
- 8:12Speaker 2: You know, I'm People are now.
- 8:15Speaker 3: Fixated on the word flock like they are Coke or
- 8:18Speaker 3: Kleenex or something, right? They're stuck on the brand name
- 8:20Speaker 3: as opposed to the mass surveillance issue because there are
- 8:23Speaker 3: other companies that make these kinds of cameras. So I'm
- 8:27Speaker 3: always a little hesitant to get too deep on the
- 8:30Speaker 3: flock thing simply because, yes, flock is the main purveyor
- 8:35Speaker 3: of mass surveillance at this point.
- 8:36Speaker 2: They're the most well-known. They're the most widespread.
- 8:39Speaker 3: But there are other companies that make these kinds of things,
- 8:42Speaker 3: and that's one of the concerns. organizations like the Electronic
- 8:45Speaker 3: Frontier Foundation and others who sort of watch this space
- 8:49Speaker 3: and warn about these kind of things have put out
- 8:52Speaker 3: there that, you know, you can't just say, oh, we'll
- 8:55Speaker 3: get rid of the flock and we'll put one of
- 8:56Speaker 3: these other things in and then assume that it doesn't
- 8:59Speaker 3: have similar issues. Now, you know, flock has come under
- 9:02Speaker 3: a lot of fire for a lot of different reasons,
- 9:06Speaker 3: not including reporting that's shown, you know, like one guy
- 9:09Speaker 3: going out watching himself on a flock camera, you know,
- 9:12Speaker 3: speaking to the potentially lacks, alleged lacks security.
- 9:17Speaker 2: There, if you will.
- 9:19Speaker 3: But the bottom line is, you know, the whole mass
- 9:21Speaker 3: surveillance thing, I'm just sort of fundamentally against, Brian, as
- 9:25Speaker 3: you know. And when you look at examples from around
- 9:29Speaker 3: the world where these types of systems have been hacked
- 9:32Speaker 3: by a nation state adversary and then used for targeting
- 9:36Speaker 3: within the A country by an adversary like Russia and
- 9:40Speaker 3: Ukraine in the Russia Ukraine war in the Israeli Iranian thing.
- 9:45Speaker 2: Mm hmm.
- 9:46Speaker 3: So while I certainly understand the potential benefits that you
- 9:51Speaker 3: can get from these devices, I think the cons vastly
- 9:55Speaker 3: outweigh the benefits. And, you know, we've made it 250
- 9:57Speaker 3: years without massacres. surveillance like this. You know, it is
- 10:02Speaker 3: interesting to me that I don't know how long flock
- 10:07Speaker 3: cameras have been in operation in It is kind of interesting,
- 10:12Speaker 3: to your point, that they would turn them off right before,
- 10:15Speaker 3: to your point, one of the largest events in the region.
- 10:19Speaker 2: I'm glad.
- 10:20Speaker 3: I'm glad they're shutting them down. And honestly, I had
- 10:22Speaker 3: not caught that story. So I don't know what the
- 10:25Speaker 3: rationale for it is.
- 10:26Speaker 1: Well, she suggested it's what is Flock doing with the
- 10:30Speaker 1: data they collect was kind of the impetus behind her
- 10:32Speaker 1: alleged reasons for shutting this down.
- 10:36Speaker 3: That's always been one of my concerns, Brian. This is
- 10:38Speaker 3: a third-party company. Who knows what they're doing with the data?
- 10:42Speaker 3: We've seen example after example after example of it being misused.
- 10:47Speaker 3: Are they selling it to other companies? We've seen examples
- 10:53Speaker 3: where the system just doesn't work right and people are
- 10:55Speaker 3: getting pulled over at gunpoint because it misreads their license plate,
- 10:59Speaker 3: sends an alert, and suddenly police show up because they
- 11:01Speaker 3: think they have a stolen.
- 11:02Speaker 2: Vehicle or possibly worse. Sure.
- 11:05Speaker 3: I think you and I have talked about the possibility
- 11:08Speaker 3: of other companies who are building technology that could interface
- 11:11Speaker 3: with this and could do things like, okay, you and
- 11:14Speaker 3: I and Joe are all riding in a car together.
- 11:17Speaker 3: And it's picking up your devices in my car and
- 11:20Speaker 3: Joe's devices in my car. And then somewhere down the road,
- 11:24Speaker 3: so now your devices are affiliated with my vehicle and
- 11:30Speaker 3: And somewhere down the road, I'm getting pulled over because
- 11:32Speaker 3: one of you was accused of a crime and somehow
- 11:34Speaker 3: it's connected to me now because your device was regularly
- 11:38Speaker 3: riding in my car, like maybe we're carpooling. So, yeah,
- 11:41Speaker 3: you know, overall, I am not a fan of these things. Again,
- 11:45Speaker 3: I understand the benefits. I know they've produced some some
- 11:48Speaker 3: good results in some cases. I think the cons greatly
- 11:52Speaker 3: outweigh the pros, which is why I've been against it
- 11:55Speaker 3: pretty much from.
- 11:56Speaker 2: The word go.
- 11:56Speaker 3: I don't like the whole dystopian panopticon of mass surveillance
- 12:02Speaker 3: that we're building. And it feels like people, as you
- 12:05Speaker 3: pointed out earlier, Brian, on both sides are kind of
- 12:08Speaker 3: waking up to this, hey, we don't really want all
- 12:11Speaker 3: of this mass surveillance. We don't need all this mass
- 12:13Speaker 3: surveillance anymore. And I'm happy to hear that Hamilton County has.
- 12:18Speaker 2: Come off of it. And it seems like that is
- 12:20Speaker 2: an ongoing trend.
- 12:21Speaker 1: It is an ongoing trend, no question. And I share
- 12:23Speaker 1: your thoughts and concerns about it. But being a practical guy,
- 12:26Speaker 1: I am. I think the genie's out of the bottle
- 12:28Speaker 1: as much as we might hate it. I don't know
- 12:29Speaker 1: how we can put it back in the bottle. Speaking
- 12:32Speaker 1: of third parties having access to data, what about those
- 12:35Speaker 1: apps that we voluntarily put on our phones? Dave's going
- 12:38Speaker 1: to talk about that and some practical solutions to help
- 12:40Speaker 1: your privacy. Next, it's 640. Receive Eat Talk Station. 651-55
- 12:46Speaker 1: care city talk station, interest it.com. Find Dave Hatter. Also
- 12:50Speaker 1: find him online. You get all the articles he relies on,
- 12:52Speaker 1: all the information he posts throughout the week. Unrelated to
- 12:55Speaker 1: this particular segment, linkedin.com. Just search Dave Hatter. You'll find him. Dave,
- 12:59Speaker 1: the answer to the question is Hamilton County partnered with
- 13:01Speaker 1: flock in 2022, beginning with 25 cameras is now at 75,
- 13:05Speaker 1: all of which have been shut down as of yesterday.
- 13:08Speaker 1: So moving forward, practical advice from Mr.
- 13:10Speaker 2: Hatter.
- 13:11Speaker 1: Get rid of old apps, Dave. What's us? Why should
- 13:14Speaker 1: we do this?
- 13:16Speaker 2: Well, Brian, you know, we've talked about this so many
- 13:18Speaker 2: times before.
- 13:19Speaker 3: The company, okay, an app is just software, right? You know,
- 13:25Speaker 3: app is short for application, software application. So when you
- 13:29Speaker 3: hear someone say software, when you hear someone say programming,
- 13:33Speaker 3: you know, app, application, it's all essentially the same thing.
- 13:37Speaker 3: It is a software application. Again, apps have sort of
- 13:40Speaker 3: become colloquially used to describe software. software applications you install
- 13:45Speaker 3: on your phone. And the companies that build these things
- 13:50Speaker 3: have employees that need to get paid. Software developers have mortgages.
- 13:55Speaker 3: They like to eat. They have to put the kids
- 13:57Speaker 3: through school, all this sort of stuff. My point is
- 13:59Speaker 3: they're not building these apps for you out of the
- 14:02Speaker 3: goodness of their heart. If something is free or because
- 14:06Speaker 3: they're just nice people that want to make sure that
- 14:08Speaker 3: you have some game to play or some doom scrolling
- 14:10Speaker 3: thing to spend five to eight hours a day on,
- 14:12Speaker 3: on your little box there, right? If something is free, 99%
- 14:19Speaker 3: of the time, you are paying with your data.
- 14:21Speaker 2: You are not the customer.
- 14:23Speaker 3: You are the product. They are monetizing your data. And
- 14:26Speaker 3: the more data they can collect about you, the better.
- 14:28Speaker 3: We've talked about this before, particularly back when TikTok was
- 14:31Speaker 3: all the rage. I encourage people, even if you don't
- 14:34Speaker 3: have an Apple phone, go to the Apple App Store
- 14:36Speaker 3: and look up an app like TikTok. look up the
- 14:39Speaker 3: latest game you just downloaded or the latest free app
- 14:42Speaker 3: you downloaded for shopping or whatever, and check the Apple
- 14:45Speaker 3: privacy label. The privacy label is kind of like the
- 14:48Speaker 3: nutrition label on a can.
- 14:50Speaker 2: At a store.
- 14:50Speaker 3: It tells you, and Apple requires app developers to do this,
- 14:54Speaker 3: it requires them to say.
- 14:55Speaker 2: What data they want to collect.
- 14:57Speaker 3: And it's usually eye-opening, if not shocking to people, to
- 15:01Speaker 3: see that the flashlight app you just downloaded is collecting
- 15:05Speaker 3: an incredible amount of information out of your phone. your location,
- 15:09Speaker 3: your contacts. Why does the flashlight app need to know
- 15:12Speaker 3: your contacts? Why does it want to read your texts?
- 15:16Speaker 3: It's a flashlight app, right? Well, it's because the people
- 15:19Speaker 3: behind the app use that data either to directly sell
- 15:22Speaker 3: you things or they sell your data to other companies
- 15:25Speaker 3: who want it and will pay for it a lot
- 15:28Speaker 3: in many cases.
- 15:29Speaker 2: So they can sell you stuff or whatever.
- 15:31Speaker 1: It's not necessarily- Part of the flock concern from Charmaine McGuffey.
- 15:34Speaker 1: What are they doing with the data that they're collecting, right?
- 15:36Speaker 1: We just talked about that.
- 15:37Speaker 3: That is exactly right. It's all interconnected. And now, Brian,
- 15:40Speaker 3: you have things out there like surveillance pricing. The idea
- 15:44Speaker 3: that you could go into a store, they have digital
- 15:47Speaker 3: price tags, and because they can identify you from your
- 15:50Speaker 3: phone and they've bought tons of data about you and
- 15:52Speaker 3: maybe already have data about you from whatever you bought.
- 15:54Speaker 2: There in the past.
- 15:55Speaker 1: Kroger card.
- 15:57Speaker 2: Yeah. Amazon, whatever.
- 15:59Speaker 3: You might get a different price than me because they
- 16:01Speaker 3: know you can pay more. That's a real thing. Several
- 16:04Speaker 3: states have already banned it. Maryland, for example. I wrote
- 16:06Speaker 3: an article about surveillance pricing. I'll post it out there today, too.
- 16:10Speaker 3: When people say I have nothing to hide, I understand that.
- 16:14Speaker 3: But all of this data is being collected and it's
- 16:16Speaker 3: being used in ways many people can't even fathom, like
- 16:19Speaker 3: the surveillance pricing. Again, could you go on Amazon right
- 16:23Speaker 3: now and see a different price than me because they
- 16:25Speaker 3: know enough about you to know that you'll pay more?
- 16:27Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a real thing.
- 16:28Speaker 1: Absolutely.
- 16:29Speaker 2: So all of that said, the more.
- 16:31Speaker 3: Apps you have, the more data is being collected, sold,
- 16:35Speaker 3: who knows where it's going, who knows what they're doing
- 16:37Speaker 3: with it, who knows how it might be used against you, again,
- 16:40Speaker 3: in ways you wouldn't even be able to predict like
- 16:42Speaker 3: surveillance pricing. So the bottom line is the less apps
- 16:45Speaker 3: you have, the better. And even if you're not actively
- 16:49Speaker 3: using an app, if the software is installed, the app
- 16:51Speaker 3: is installed on your device, it may be silently collecting
- 16:54Speaker 3: data about you around the clock whether you're using it
- 16:57Speaker 3: or not.
- 16:58Speaker 1: Just like your Roomba vacuum.
- 17:01Speaker 2: Exactly. The Internet of Things, apps, et cetera.
- 17:03Speaker 1: You brought Orwell into your home. Damn thing's got a
- 17:06Speaker 1: camera on it.
- 17:08Speaker 2: And a microphone.
- 17:09Speaker 1: And a microphone.
- 17:10Speaker 2: Go ahead. I was going to.
- 17:13Speaker 3: Say, why does your vacuum need a camera and a microphone?
- 17:16Speaker 1: Great question. And why in God's name? See, I learn
- 17:19Speaker 1: something every single day doing this program. Why in God's
- 17:21Speaker 1: name would anybody need a flashlight app?
- 17:25Speaker 3: Well, yeah, since the phone typically has one built in.
- 17:28Speaker 1: It's right there. Hit the button. It comes on. Hit
- 17:30Speaker 1: the button. It turns off. What possible upgrade could a
- 17:33Speaker 1: human being need?
- 17:35Speaker 3: The less apps you have, the less IoT devices you have,
- 17:38Speaker 3: and until we get to a place where there are
- 17:40Speaker 3: either laws that prevent this or the companies behind it
- 17:44Speaker 3: take your privacy and security seriously, every time you download
- 17:47Speaker 3: some sort of app, unless it's well-vetted, like I have
- 17:51Speaker 3: an Apple phone because they tend to be more privacy
- 17:53Speaker 3: and security friendly. Outside of the apps that shipped from Apple,
- 17:57Speaker 3: I bet I don't have 10 apps.
- 17:59Speaker 1: Neither do I.
- 18:00Speaker 2: Because I don't want all.
- 18:02Speaker 3: These companies collecting my data and doing who knows what
- 18:04Speaker 3: with it.
- 18:05Speaker 2: Yeah.
- 18:05Speaker 3: So less apps you have, the better. If you have
- 18:07Speaker 3: apps you're not using, delete them.
- 18:09Speaker 2: Get rid of them.
- 18:11Speaker 3: It reduces your exposure to your data being leaked, breached,
- 18:15Speaker 3: used in ways that you would not appreciate. Clean your
- 18:18Speaker 3: phone out. Clean your computer out. Get rid of things
- 18:21Speaker 3: that you don't need.
- 18:23Speaker 2: You'll be better off.
- 18:24Speaker 1: Amen, brother. And just if you're wondering about deleting the app,
- 18:27Speaker 1: just remember that you You were able to live without
- 18:29Speaker 1: it for so damn long before it finally showed up.
- 18:31Speaker 1: Was your life that so, was so difficult that you're like, oh, well,
- 18:35Speaker 1: I need a flashlight app. No, no, you don't. You
- 18:38Speaker 1: didn't before and you don't need it now. Dave Hatter,
- 18:39Speaker 1: God bless you, sir. Interestit.com, linkedin.com for Dave Hatter and
- 18:44Speaker 1: the info. Dave, I'll look forward to next week. I
- 18:46Speaker 1: hope you have a wonderful holiday weekend, my friend.
- 18:49Speaker 2: Thanks, Brian.
- 18:49Speaker 3: I hope you and Joe and all your listeners do too.
- 18:52Speaker 2: And I will chat with you then.
- 18:53Speaker 1: Appreciate it, brother. Looking forward to it.
- 18:55Speaker 2: 657.