Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Jeopardy! Winner Pleads Guilty to Secretly Recording Woman in Beach

Transcript

Jeopardy! Winner Pleads Guilty to Secretly Recording Woman in Beach · Murder Files Unsealed

0:00
Speaker 1: Okay, so let's unpack this. I want you to imagine
0:04
for a second checking into a beautiful beach rental.
0:07
Speaker 2: Oh man, Yeah, like a trip you've been planning for
0:10
months exactly.
0:11
Speaker 1: You know, you're there for a wedding. The mood is
0:13
celebratory and the setting is just absolutely gorgeous.
0:17
Speaker 2: Right, everyone's just ready to relax.
0:18
Speaker 1: Yeah, So you unlock the door, you drop your heavy
0:21
bags on the floor, and you walk into the bedroom.
0:24
You head into the en suite bathroom to freshen up
0:27
after a really long drive, naturally, and right there, plugged
0:30
into the wall next to the sink, is just this
0:33
everyday item, a little black USB phone charger, which I.
0:37
Speaker 2: Mean you probably wouldn't even look at twice.
0:40
Speaker 1: No, not at all. In fact, you might even be grateful,
0:43
you know, thinking the host just left one there for
0:45
you to use.
0:46
Speaker 2: Yeah, nice little amenity.
0:47
Speaker 1: But then you look closer and you realize that every day,
0:50
completely mundane item is actually watching you. Ugh.
0:54
Speaker 2: It's terrifying.
0:55
Speaker 1: It is recording your most private, vulnerable moments.
0:59
Speaker 2: It's a profoundly disturbing scenario. I mean, we operate on
1:03
this fundamental assumption that when we close the door behind us,
1:08
especially in this space we've actually paid for our privacy is.
1:11
Speaker 1: Absolutely basic contract exactly.
1:14
Speaker 2: But the details we are going to explore today they
1:17
offer this really vital, necessary lens into how easily that
1:21
contract is just being shattered totally. We're looking at a
1:24
space where our legal system is frankly desperately trying to
1:28
adapt to commercial surveillance technology, and beyond the technology itself,
1:33
this incident provides a really stark, almost painful look at
1:37
the dissonance between a highly curated public persona and deeply
1:41
troubling private conduct.
1:42
Speaker 1: It really is the ultimate bate and switch, and that
1:44
is exactly the mission of our deep dive today. We
1:47
are unpacking a massive stack of sources today. We've got
1:50
detailed court records, plus some really extensive on the ground
1:52
reporting from outlets like people Wavy, WBTV and Oxygen.
1:57
Speaker 2: A lot of ground to cover a.
1:59
Speaker 1: Ton, and it all concerns a criminal case that really
2:02
forces us to rethink the entire modern short term rental economy.
2:06
We're focusing on Philip Joseph Desenna, who generally goes by
2:09
Joey Right, and until recently he was best known as
2:12
a two time Jeopardy.
2:13
Speaker 2: Champion, which is wild.
2:14
Speaker 1: It is, but his public fall from grace intersects perfectly
2:18
with these rising anxieties we all have about digital privacy.
2:22
So we aren't just going to walk through a timeline today.
2:24
We really want to understand the mechanics of the crime,
2:27
how the legal system actually processes this new breed of
2:30
digital offense, and how the court of public perception reacts
2:35
when the nice guy on TV turns out to be
2:37
someone else entirely.
2:38
Speaker 2: Yeah, and that baseline of perceived character is incredibly crucial here.
2:43
I mean to really grasp the shockwaves this case sent
2:45
through the media. We have to establish who the public
2:48
thought Joey Desenta was right, the psychological gap between the
2:52
man standing confidently on a trivia stage and the man
2:55
detailed in a police report. Exactly what makes this narrative
2:58
so jarring for people to.
2:59
Speaker 1: Process it really is because we don't just watch game shows, right,
3:02
We invest in the people on them.
3:04
Speaker 2: We absolutely do.
3:05
Speaker 1: So let's just rewind a bit to November of twenty
3:08
twenty four. Dessenna steps onto the Jeopardy stage. Now we
3:13
all know Jeopardy. It is an absolute cultural fixture in America,
3:17
oh for sure, and under the hosting of Ken Jennings.
3:20
It has really maintained this prestigious aura. It celebrates a
3:24
very specific kind of person Yeah, bright, ordinary people exactly,
3:29
people who can demonstrate this incredible trivia mastery while under
3:34
immense ticking clock pressure. It's essentially the thinking persons sport
3:39
it is.
3:39
Speaker 2: The show holds a very unique place in the cultural zeitgeist.
3:44
If you think about the landscape of modern television, most
3:46
of it is reality television.
3:47
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, total manufacture drama.
3:49
Speaker 2: Exactly, driven by interpersonal conflict or sensationalism. But Jeopardy is
3:53
this intellectual meritocracy. The contestants who actually make it through
3:57
that rigorous vetting process and succeed on screen, they are
4:00
generally viewed through a very specific psychological.
4:03
Speaker 1: Lens, like we trust them more.
4:04
Speaker 2: Yes, we apply with psychologists actually called the halo effect.
4:07
Speaker 1: Okay, the halo effect.
4:09
Speaker 2: Yeah. Because they are intelligent, articulate, and they can perform
4:13
under those bright lights, we subconsciously assume they are also reliable, stable,
4:19
and just fundamentally wholesome people.
4:21
Speaker 1: And Dessenna, he didn't just appear on the show. He
4:23
really thrived on it. He won two consecutive games in
4:27
November twenty twenty four, he took home roughly forty four thousand,
4:31
six hundred and ninety eight dollars in prize money.
4:33
Speaker 2: That's a solid run, definitely.
4:35
Speaker 1: And if you follow the show, you know that winning
4:38
two games instantly elevates you. You go from being a
4:41
random one off contestant to a recognized champion. You become
4:44
part of.
4:45
Speaker 2: The lore basically, right, you're part of the Jeopardy family at.
4:47
Speaker 1: That point, exactly. He was good enough that he earned
4:50
a return invitation. According to the reporting, he came back
4:53
for the Winter twenty twenty five champions Wildcard tournament.
4:56
Speaker 2: Which aired in January of twenty twenty five, Yes, January
4:59
twenty twenty and he didn't just show up for that either.
5:02
Speaker 1: He advanced all the way to the semifinals before finally
5:05
being defeated. So for a really solid window of time,
5:08
he had significant repeated screen time. Millions of people were
5:13
literally inviting him into their living rooms every evening, and.
5:16
Speaker 2: The persona he presented during those classic mid show contestant interviews,
5:22
the background information he shared with the public, which by
5:24
the way, was later echoed in his court proceedings, was
5:28
incredibly grounded. Yeah, very normal, very normal. The sources describe
5:32
him as a development engineer. Sometimes they referred to it
5:34
as a software developer. Living in the Raleigh, North Carolina area,
5:38
He is married. He is the father to two small children.
5:41
Full package, right, This isn't some flashy Hollywood profile. This
5:44
is the quintessential image of suburban stability and responsibility.
5:47
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
5:48
Speaker 2: In fact, his defense attorney later leaned heavily into this
5:51
exact framing in court, explicitly describing him to the judge
5:54
as a full time dad.
5:56
Speaker 1: Wow, it's just like finding a dark secret about the
5:59
most relied, liable guy in your neighborhood blockwatch you know,
6:03
the guy who organizes the carpool and mows his lawn
6:06
every Saturday. Precisely, Jeopardy winners are viewed as this incredibly safe,
6:11
wholesome brand of temporary celebrity. We project this massive aura
6:16
of trustworthiness onto people who just happen to excel at
6:18
recalling facts we do. We assume that if someone is
6:21
smart enough to know like the capital of an ancient
6:24
empire and has a nice, humble smile on television, they
6:27
must be a fundamentally good person.
6:29
Speaker 2: And what's fascinating here is this severe cognitive dissonance this
6:33
creates when someone who embodies this harmless genius archetype violates
6:38
fundamental norms of consent and privacy, the public shock is
6:42
magnified exponentially because we feel tricked exactly. We feel a strange,
6:47
almost visceral sense of betrayal, even though we don't actually
6:50
know this person in real life. We inherently conflate intelligence
6:54
and a pleasant television demeanor with moral integrity.
6:57
Speaker 1: Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
6:58
Speaker 2: So when a figure like this engages and surreptitious predatory recording,
7:03
it doesn't just tarnish an image, it completely shatters the
7:06
projected avatar we built in our own minds.
7:09
Speaker 1: It really forces you to realize that a television appearance
7:12
is just that. It's a carefully managed, brightly lit performance
7:17
that the camera turns off eventually.
7:19
Speaker 2: And then real life takes over right, which.
7:21
Speaker 1: Brings us to the reality of what was happening off camera.
7:24
I want to move from the bright lights of that
7:26
Sony Pictures studio stage to a beach house on the
7:29
Carolina coast, because the contrast between those two environments is
7:33
just staggering.
7:34
Speaker 2: That contrast is vital to understanding the gravity of the offense.
7:38
We are moving from a space of public intellectual celebration
7:41
to a space of extreme, unconsenting intimacy.
7:44
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's a harsh pivot. We are looking at October tenth,
7:47
twenty twenty five. The location is Corolla, North Carolina. Okay,
7:50
for anyone who hasn't been there, this is a very
7:52
distinct part of the outer Banks in Kurtech County. The
7:56
reporting paints a picture of an area that is heavily,
7:59
almost exclusive, reliant on tourism. Right.
8:01
Speaker 2: It's a major vacation spot.
8:03
Speaker 1: Huge. It's famous for these incredibly wide beaches and you
8:06
literally have wild horses running in the northern reaches where
8:09
the pavement just ends. But the true lifeblood of the
8:13
local economy there isn't just the beach. It's the vacation rentals.
8:17
Speaker 2: And we really need to be clear about the scale
8:19
of these rentals. We aren't talking about you know, small
8:21
roadside motel rooms or little one bedroom cabins, No, not
8:24
at all. The rental market in Corolla ranges from modest
8:27
cottages to massive, multi story, multi bedroom ocean front estates.
8:34
These homes often feature elevators, private pools, massive.
8:38
Speaker 1: Game rooms, basically mini resorts.
8:40
Speaker 2: Exactly. There are architectural ecosystems designed specifically for large gatherings,
8:44
family reunions, and major events, right.
8:47
Speaker 1: And in this specific incident, a woman was staying in
8:49
a rental in a neighborhood called Pine Island. The sources
8:53
place this near Island Lead Road, which is an area
8:55
heavily populated by these larger premium vacation halls, and she
8:59
was there for a wedding. Think about the logistics of
9:02
a destination wedding. The house is probably packed with family
9:06
or friends. It's chaotic, it's joyous, it's a celebratory weekend.
9:10
The last thing on your mind is operational security.
9:13
Speaker 2: You're just there to have fun, exactly.
9:15
Speaker 1: But while she is in this property, she discovers something horrifying.
9:18
In both the bedroom and the bathroom.
9:20
Speaker 2: Two devices. And the terrifying part is that these devices
9:24
were designed to ensure that to the untrained eye, they
9:28
longed exactly where they were.
9:30
Speaker 1: Yeah, the sources state they appeared to be ordinary black
9:33
USB wall chargers, but inside each of these everyday objects
9:37
was a hidden camera. And I really have to pause
9:39
here because this technology honestly gives me chills.
9:42
Speaker 2: It is incredibly invasive.
9:43
Speaker 1: These aren't the bulky security cameras from the nineteen nineties.
9:47
You know, there's no glowing red light, there's no visible
9:49
sweeping lens, there's no wire running along the base.
9:52
Speaker 2: Board, none of the classic giveaways.
9:54
Speaker 1: Right. A USB charger is basically invisible furniture. Today we
9:59
are so conditioned to see them everywhere in hotels, airports,
10:02
coffee shops, around kitchens. Our brains literally just filter them out.
10:06
It's a digital trojan horse.
10:08
Speaker 2: That is an excellent way to conceptualize it. If we
10:11
look at the mechanics of these specific covert devices, it
10:14
really explains why they are so insidious. A standard five
10:18
volt charging circuit actually requires very little physical space. Okay,
10:22
So manufacturers take a standard sized charging block, utilize about
10:26
ten or twenty percent of the internal volume for the
10:28
actual power conversion, and fill the remaining eighty percent with
10:32
a microscopic pinhole lens, an image sensor, a Wi Fi antenna,
10:36
and a micro SD card slot for local storage.
10:39
Speaker 1: That is wild, and because it's plugged directly into the wall,
10:42
battery life isn't even an issue.
10:43
Speaker 2: Right Decisely, that is the genius and frankly, the danger
10:47
of this specific form factor. Traditional hidden cameras run on
10:50
batteries that die in a few days. But a camera
10:52
disguised as a wall charger draws alternating current directly from
10:56
the home's electrical grid, so it never dies never It
11:00
has an infinite power supply. You can sit there for
11:03
weeks or months, silently recording every single time. It's motion
11:06
sensors triggered, writing thousands of hours of high definition video
11:11
to a tiny internal chip.
11:13
Speaker 1: So you plug your phone into it, completely unaware that
11:15
the block itself is recording you undressing or showering just
11:19
a few feet away. Yes, but here's the thing that
11:21
really bothers me, and I need you to help me
11:23
understand this logically. The sources say these devices are commercially available.
11:28
They're often cynically marketed online for quote home security or
11:33
as nannycams.
11:34
Speaker 2: Right, very easy to buy.
11:35
Speaker 1: But how did he actually get them in there? A
11:37
house in Pine Island probably has a new family in
11:40
it every single Saturday during the high season. The sources note.
11:44
It could be from prior occupancy or maintenance access. Do
11:47
we know exactly how he gained access to this specific
11:49
house to plant the devices?
11:51
Speaker 2: According to the public record and the comprehensive sources, we
11:54
have the exact method DESCENTA used to gain physical access
11:58
to that specific property on that day has not been
12:01
publicly detailed by investigators.
12:03
Speaker 1: Okay, so we don't know the exact entry method.
12:05
Speaker 2: No. However, the sources explicitly point out the systemic vulnerabilities
12:10
of the short term rental market that make this crime.
12:13
Speaker 1: So prevalent, meaning the houses are basically soft targets.
12:17
Speaker 2: Exactly because these properties change hands so frequently, the opportunities
12:22
for illicit installation are just numerous. Consider the turnover process.
12:27
A cleaning crew might have four hours on a Saturday
12:30
to flip a massive ten bedroom house.
12:32
Speaker 1: That's a crazy rush it is.
12:34
Speaker 2: They're changing sheets, scrubbing bathrooms, and vacuuming floors. They are
12:38
definitely not conducting counter esponr sweeps of every electrical outlet.
12:42
Speaker 1: Right If they see a phone charger plugged into the wall,
12:45
they probably assume the property management company left it there
12:48
as an amenity, or they just wipe it with a
12:50
dust cloth and move on.
12:51
Speaker 2: Furthermore, access control is often digitized and decentralized. Properties use keypads.
12:56
Codes are sometimes shared, they're reused or easily compromise.
13:00
Speaker 1: That's true.
13:00
Speaker 2: He could have been a prior guest who booked the
13:03
property months earlier just to install the infrastructure. He could
13:07
have known someone with maintenance access. The point the reporting
13:10
underscores is that the barrier to entry is terrifyingly low.
13:14
Speaker 1: Just the idea that someone could book a house for
13:17
a quick weekend, swap out the wall chargers in the
13:20
master bath, and leave a surveillance trap for the next
13:23
dozen families who book that house is sickening.
13:27
Speaker 2: It highlights a massive structural vulnerability in the entire hospitality economy.
13:32
When you hand over your credit card and rent a space,
13:35
there is a fundamental assumption, a core expectation of privacy
13:39
that you can change your clothes, take a shower, and
13:41
sleep without being subjected to.
13:43
Speaker 1: Surveill Yeah, that's the bare minimum.
13:45
Speaker 2: The financial success of the entire multi billion dollar vacation
13:48
rental industry rests entirely on this unseen architecture of trust.
13:52
So this crime doesn't just violate an individual victim. It
13:55
strikes at the very foundation of the hospitality economy itself.
13:59
Speaker 1: Wow. So let's get back to the timeline, because this
14:02
moves incredibly fast. The woman finds these devices, she realizes
14:06
what they are and she immediately contacts the authorities. Kurtak
14:10
County deputies respond to the Pine Island address, and this
14:14
sets off an investigation that escalates with surprising speed. Let's
14:19
walk through the mechanics of this, because how we go
14:21
from a tiny plastic block in a beach house to
14:25
a felony case against a national television champion is really gripping.
14:29
Speaker 2: The timeline is driven almost entirely by the physical and
14:32
digital evidence. The deputies arrive, secure the scene, and take
14:36
possession of the cameras. This is where modern digital forensics
14:39
takes over. Okay, the subsequent investigation by detectives successfully links
14:43
those specific physical devices directly to Dissana, and crucially, they
14:47
don't just find the hardware. Detectives examine the internal storage
14:50
of the cameras and confirm the absolute worst case scenario.
14:53
Speaker 1: The footage.
14:54
Speaker 2: Yes, images of the victim had indeed been captured without
14:57
her knowledge or consent.
14:58
Speaker 1: So this wasn't a case where he planted them and
15:00
they malfunctioned, or they only caught footage of an empty room.
15:04
The devices actively recorded a woman in her most private moment. Sadly, yes,
15:09
but I really want to dig into the how for
15:11
a second. How exactly do police look at a generic
15:16
black plastic cube that you can buy on Amazon for
15:18
twenty bucks and say, ah, yes, this belongs to Joey
15:23
Desenna from Raleigh.
15:24
Speaker 2: It all comes down to the digital footprints we leave behind.
15:28
While the specific evidentiary techniques used in this case aren't
15:31
explicitly spelled out in the initial press releases, we know
15:34
how these investigations typically operate.
15:36
Speaker 1: Okay, lay it on me.
15:37
Speaker 2: Every device that connects to a network has a MAC
15:40
address that's essentially a digital license plate stamped onto the hardware.
15:45
If these cameras were Wi Fi enabled, investigators could pull
15:48
the router logs from the rental house to see exactly
15:51
when those MAAC addresses first connected to the network. Oh wow, right,
15:55
if that timestamp matches a weekend when Desenna was the
15:58
registered guest, you have a powerful, circumstantial link.
16:02
Speaker 1: Wait, so even if he took the camera out, if
16:04
it ever pinged the house's Wi Fi, there's a permanent
16:07
record of it.
16:07
Speaker 2: It's exactly yeah.
16:09
Speaker 1: But what if it wasn't Wi Fi? What if it
16:11
just used a standard SD card and didn't broadcast anything?
16:14
Speaker 2: Even simpler, investigators extract the SD card and look at
16:17
the EXIF data on the video files. That's the hidden
16:20
metadata that shows the exact date and time of files created.
16:24
They also look at the totality of the footage. Often
16:26
the very first video file on a hidden camera is
16:29
a clear high definition shot of the perpetrator's own face
16:33
as they look into the lens to make sure it's
16:34
turned on and positioned correctly.
16:36
Speaker 1: Oh my god, the ultimate cell phone.
16:38
Speaker 2: Precisely, once they had the technological attribution firmly established connecting
16:43
the hardware directly to him, and the indisputable evidence of
16:46
the recorded images of the victim, the legal machinery moved swiftly.
16:50
Speaker 1: Yeah, the timeline definitely bears that out. On November twenty six,
16:54
twenty twenty five, investigators officially obtain a warrant for his arrest.
16:58
A few days later, on December first, Dessenna turns himself in.
17:02
The sources note he spends two nights in the Kuratuk
17:04
County jail before posting a five thousand dollars bond and
17:07
being released on December third, and the reporting makes a
17:10
specific point to note that he admitted the allegations and
17:14
cooperated with officers right out of the gate.
17:16
Speaker 2: This cooperation is a significant procedural detail. It streamlines the
17:21
judicial process immensely. When the suspect concedes to the foundational
17:25
facts of the case early on, it prevents a protracted
17:29
investigative battle and immediately shifts the focus from did he
17:33
do it? To how will the system penalize him?
17:36
Speaker 1: Ray But just pause on this timeline for a second,
17:38
because here's where it gets really interesting. Think about the
17:40
juxtaposition of his year. In January of twenty twenty five,
17:44
he is on a sound stage in Culver City, California,
17:48
bathed in applause, competing in a national Jeopardy tournament.
17:51
Speaker 2: High point of his life, probably.
17:53
Speaker 1: Exactly By December of that exact same year, less than
17:56
twelve months later, he is sitting in a county jail
17:59
cell in the Outer Banks, having surrendered on felony warrants.
18:03
The whiplash of that transition is just incredible.
18:06
Speaker 2: It is a profound and rapid shift in societal status.
18:10
And you know, following his release on bond, the procedural
18:13
steps of the justice system continued to churn. There was
18:16
a probable cause hearing in.
18:18
Speaker 1: December Okay can you explain that real quick sure for clarity.
18:22
Speaker 2: A probable cause hearing is essentially an early procedural check
18:25
by a judge. It ensures that law enforcement isn't just
18:28
acting on a hunch. They must present enough preliminary evidence
18:32
to justify the charges, keeping the defendant in the system.
18:35
Speaker 1: It's basically the judge looking at the prosecutor and saying, Okay,
18:39
show me your homework. You aren't just making this up.
18:41
You have actual evidence tying this specific guy to this
18:43
specific crime exactly.
18:46
Speaker 2: And because the detectives had successfully completed the digital forensics,
18:49
we just discussed, that threshold was easily and quickly met.
18:53
This led directly to the next major milestone on January twentieth,
18:56
twenty twenty six. This is when a grand jury formed
19:00
returned an indictment. This formalized the allegations into two classive
19:04
felony counts of secret peeping.
19:07
Speaker 1: Now people hear the term grand jury on the news
19:09
all the time, but I think there's a lot of
19:10
confusion about what it actually is. This isn't a trial, right,
19:13
It's correct.
19:14
Speaker 2: A grand jury is fundamentally different from a trial jury.
19:17
There is no judge, a present there is no defense
19:20
attorney cross examining witnesses. It is a secret proceeding where
19:23
the prosecutor presents their gathered evidence to a group of citizens.
19:27
Speaker 1: Okay, so it's one sided.
19:29
Speaker 2: Very much so. The grand jury's sole role is to
19:32
determine whether there is sufficient evidence to formally charge a
19:35
person with a serious crime, to say, yes, a crime
19:38
was likely committed and this person likely committed it. The
19:42
evidentiary core of these charges relied entirely on the digital
19:45
forensics and the investigative work proving De Senna planted those
19:49
specific cameras.
19:50
Speaker 1: Now you mentioned the formal charge, and I want to
19:52
really dig into this because the phrasing is very specific
19:56
class felony counts of secret peeping. Understanding why this was
20:00
charged as a felony rather than a misdemeanor, trespassing or
20:04
nuisance charge really requires us to look at the specific
20:08
legal statutes.
20:09
Speaker 2: Yes, the statutes are key here.
20:10
Speaker 1: The laws having to rapidly adapt to combat this exact
20:14
kind of new technology, and North Carolina has a very
20:17
specific way of handling it.
20:18
Speaker 2: It is a critical distinction that reveals how lawmakers view
20:21
the severity of digital crimes. The law recognizes that not
20:25
all invasions of privacy are identical and their severity, their methodology,
20:30
or their intent. We are looking specifically at North Carolina
20:34
at General Statute section fourteen two oh two, which broadly
20:37
addresses the crime of secret peeping.
20:39
Speaker 1: Right, and the sources point us directly to subsection of
20:42
that statute. Let's break down exactly what this subsection says,
20:46
because the language is highly deliberate. It states that it
20:49
applies to a person who secretly or surreptitiously uses or
20:52
installs in a room any device that can create a
20:55
photographic image with the intent to capture the image of
20:58
another without consent. But there's a kicker there is Here
21:02
is the absolute crucial part. It has to be done
21:04
for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire
21:07
of any person.
21:08
Speaker 2: That specific phrase regarding sexual desire is the absolute lynchpin
21:12
of the felony charge. North Carolina law draws a very
21:16
sharp distinct line between different types offenses. For example, there
21:19
is simple peeping.
21:20
Speaker 1: Okay, what does that mean in practice?
21:22
Speaker 2: Think of a scenario where someone physically walks up to
21:25
a house and looks through a bedroom window. That is
21:28
a crime. It is illegal. It is a severe invasion
21:31
of privacy, but under North Carolina law it is often
21:35
classified as a misdemeanor. It carries lesser penalties.
21:38
Speaker 1: Right, think about your last Airbnb. If the owner of
21:41
that property was incredibly nosy or acting like a creep
21:44
and peeped through the blinds while you were inside, that's terrible.
21:47
It's a crime. But under this specific law it's a misdemeanor.
21:51
Speaker 2: Exactly.
21:51
Speaker 1: But if that same owner buys a fifteen dollars hidden
21:54
camera on Amazon, installs it in the bathroom, and leaves
21:57
it there to record you, it instantly becomes a felony.
22:01
Why does the law treat the technology so much more
22:03
harshly than the physical act of looking.
22:06
Speaker 2: Because the law is attempting to quantify the permanence of
22:10
digital trauma. Subsection SEM addresses the aggravated premeditated conduct of
22:15
using a photographic device with sexual intent.
22:18
Speaker 1: Think about the steps involved.
22:19
Speaker 2: There's a lot of planning, a tremendous amount the premeditation required.
22:22
A research and purchase a disguised camera, travel to a
22:26
specific location, physically install it in an intimate space like
22:29
a bathroom or bedroom, ensure it has power, and leave
22:32
it there to capture images of an unsuspecting person. It
22:35
elevates the crime significantly beyond an impulsive act of looking
22:38
through a window.
22:39
Speaker 1: Because a digital file can be duplicated infinitely. The physical
22:42
eye forgets, but the SD card does not.
22:45
Speaker 2: Exactly. The law recognizes the enhanced harm and the enduring,
22:48
terrifying nature of digital recordings. A victim of this crime
22:53
doesn't just suffer the initial violation of being watched. They
22:56
suffer the ongoing psychological torture of knowing a digital file
22:59
exit it could be shared, uploaded, or viewed repeatedly.
23:03
Speaker 1: That's agonizing it is.
23:05
Speaker 2: Therefore, the state legislature classified this specific combination of technological
23:09
actions and sexual intent as a class felony.
23:12
Speaker 1: So what does this all mean. It means the technology
23:15
used and the intent behind it upgrade this from a
23:17
mere trespassing issue to a serious, life altering felony. The
23:22
legal system is literally trying to catch up with Amazon
23:24
shopping carts. We live in an era where literally anyone
23:28
can buy espionage level equipment with one click free shipping,
23:32
and the justice system has had to carve out these
23:34
specific felony statutes just to deal with the fallout of
23:38
that convenience.
23:40
Speaker 2: If we connect this to the bigger picture. The classification
23:43
of the crime directly dictates the potential consequences the defendant faces.
23:49
It's highly important to understand where a class eye felony
23:52
actually sits within the broader North Carolina legal framework.
23:55
Speaker 1: It sounds incredibly serious. Just the word felony carries an
23:58
immense amount of weight. When you hear it, you generally
24:00
assume someone is going to prison for a long time.
24:02
Speaker 2: It does carry weight, as it absolutely should. You lose
24:05
your right to vote, your right to own a firearm,
24:07
and it severely impacts employment. However, structurally speaking, class five
24:13
felonies sit toward the absolute lowest end of North Carolina's
24:17
structured sentencing grid for felonies.
24:19
Speaker 1: Okay, a grid system.
24:20
Speaker 2: Yeah, the state operates on a grid system that cross
24:23
references the severity of the crime with the defendant's prior
24:26
criminal history.
24:27
Speaker 1: Okay, So how does that math work out for someone
24:30
like Dissenna.
24:31
Speaker 2: For defendants with limited or no prior criminal records, which,
24:35
according to the sources was the case for Dessenna, this
24:38
presumptive range on the sentence in grid often points judges
24:41
toward community punishment, intermediate sanctions, or supervised probation rather than
24:47
an immediate active prison sentence. The grid is designed to
24:50
reserve expensive prison beds for violent offenders or habitual repeat offenders.
24:56
Speaker 1: Wait, Really, a felony that explicitly involves premeditating and setting
25:00
up hidden cameras for sexual gratification in a stranger's bedroom
25:04
might not automatically mean active prison time in this.
25:07
Speaker 2: Specific jurisdiction, given his lack of prior offenses. The strict
25:11
mathematical sentencing guidelines provide judges with a range of options
25:15
that heavily feature supervised probation. This structural reality of the
25:18
state's sentencing grid is vital to understand because it sets
25:21
the exact stage for the controversial plea deal that ultimately
25:25
resolve the.
25:25
Speaker 1: Case, which brings us to the summer of twenty twenty six.
25:29
The legal framework we just unpacked directly dictates the outcome
25:32
here in late July twenty twenty six, we get a resolution,
25:36
but it's a resolution that prioritizes community supervision over incarceration.
25:41
And I know this is going to be a really
25:42
tough pill to swallow for a lot of people listening.
25:45
Speaker 2: Negotiated resolutions commonly known as plea bargains almost always leave
25:50
the public feeling as though justice was incomplete. By their
25:53
very nature, they involve compromise rather than absolute retribution.
25:57
Speaker 1: Let's lay out the established facts of the July twenty
25:59
twenty six Dessenna pleads guilty to two counts of felony
26:03
secret peeping. By formally entering a guilty clee, he completely
26:06
avoids a trial. The sentence handed down by the judge
26:09
is sixty months, that is five full years of supervised probation.
26:13
He is ordered by the court to undergo mandatory mental
26:16
health assessments, and there is a strict no contact provision
26:19
legally barring him from ever approaching the victim. But as
26:22
you foreshadowed with the sentencing grid, there is no active
26:25
prison sentence.
26:26
Speaker 2: In legal terms, he essentially received a suspended sentence. This
26:30
means a specified prison term is legally held over his
26:33
head if he violates any condition of his probation over
26:36
the next five years, if he fails to report to
26:39
his probation officer, if he skips a mental health assessment,
26:41
if he fails a drug test, or if he attempts
26:43
to contact the victim, the judge can immediately activate that
26:47
suspended sentence and he would be sent to state prison.
26:50
Speaker 1: So he's on a very tight leash exactly.
26:53
Speaker 2: But as long as he perfectly complies with the rules,
26:55
he remains in the community.
26:56
Speaker 1: That is already a lot of legal reality to process.
27:00
But there is another major, highly controversial aspect of this
27:03
sentence that the reporting highlights. It's something that usually goes
27:07
hand in hand with sexually motivated crimes, but here it
27:10
doesn't happen.
27:10
Speaker 2: You are referring to the Sex Offender Registry.
27:13
Speaker 1: Yes, the registry. The judge rule that Dessendate was not
27:16
required to register as a sex offender. Now, I think
27:19
most people listening would assume that if you are convicted
27:21
of a felony that explicitly, by statutory definition, involves gratifying
27:26
sexual desire by secretly filming someone in a bathroom, you're
27:29
automatically going on that registry for the rest of your life.
27:33
How is it legally possible that he avoided this.
27:36
Speaker 2: It comes down once again to the specific nuances of
27:38
North Carolina law. Under their current statutes, Placement on the
27:43
Sex Offender Registry is not an automatic blanket requirement for
27:47
every single conviction under the secret Peeping Statute.
27:50
Speaker 1: It's not automatic.
27:51
Speaker 2: No it's not. The law grants judge's discretion and they
27:54
are required to waste several converging factors. They look at
27:57
the nature of the specific offense, the exact statutory visions
28:00
under which the plea was entered, and critically, in this case,
28:03
professional risk assessments.
28:04
Speaker 1: The source is mentioned a very specific evaluation took place.
28:07
Speaker 2: Right yes, just days before the July twenty twenty six
28:09
sentencing hearing, Dissenna underwent and completed a comprehensive psychosexual evaluation.
28:14
Speaker 1: Okay, let's unpack that term. What exactly is a psychosexual evaluation?
28:19
Is it just a therapist asking him if he feels bad?
28:22
Speaker 2: It is significantly more rigorous than a standard therapy session.
28:26
A psychosexual evaluation is a specialized clinical assessment conducted by
28:30
a forensic psychologist or a psychiatrist. It typically involves extensive
28:34
clinical interviews detailing the offender's entire sexual history, psychometric testing
28:40
to identify personality disorders or paraphilias, and the use of
28:43
actuarial risk assessment tools.
28:45
Speaker 1: What kind of tools?
28:46
Speaker 2: Tools like the Static ninety nine, which statistically compare the
28:49
offender's profile against databases of no reoffenders. In some jurisdictions.
28:54
It can even involve physiological testing, so.
28:56
Speaker 1: They are trying to gather objective data on how likely
28:59
this person is to strike again.
29:01
Speaker 2: Precisely, and the conclusion of that professional forensic evaluation in
29:04
Disanna's case was that he presented a below average risk
29:07
of reoffending.
29:08
Speaker 1: Below average, Okay, Yes.
29:10
Speaker 2: The court utilized that clinical assessment, combined it with his
29:14
lack of prior criminal history, and factored in the terms
29:17
of the negotiated plea agreement. Ultimately, the judge determined that
29:23
mandated sex offender registration was not legally necessary or appropriate
29:27
in this specific instance.
29:29
Speaker 1: So because a psychological evaluator ran the metrics and determined
29:33
he wasn't statistically likely to do it again, the judge
29:36
felt the immense collateral damage of the registry wasn't warranted.
29:39
Speaker 2: Correct.
29:40
Speaker 1: I want to talk about the courtroom dynamics on the
29:42
actual day of the plea because the sources paint a
29:44
very specific picture of how this narrative was handled. Before
29:47
the judge, Dessenna made a verbal statement of remorse in court.
29:51
We did the local television coverage from outlets like Wavy
29:55
reported that he said he was deeply sorry that he
29:57
recognized how much this affected certain people, and notably, he
30:00
stated that he didn't expect forgiveness.
30:03
Speaker 2: It is a highly standard element of a plea hearing
30:06
for the defendant to accept responsibility verbally often called allocution.
30:12
His explicit acknowledgement that he did not expect forgiveness is interesting.
30:16
It shows a coached or genuine awareness of the severity
30:19
of the intimate violation, even as he was actively avoiding
30:22
prison time, and.
30:23
Speaker 1: His defense attorney, John Parker Junior, played a massive role
30:27
in shaping the narrative in that courtroom. He leaned incredibly
30:30
heavily on this full time dad framing we discussed earlier,
30:33
very heavily. The sources note that this kind of sentencing
30:36
advocacy is common. It's designed to humanize the defendant and
30:40
highlight the collateral consequences of incarceration. Basically, the defense is arguing,
30:44
if you send this man to a cell, you aren't
30:46
just punishing him, you are punishing his young, innocent children
30:50
by taking their father away.
30:51
Speaker 2: It is a highly effective, though routinely controversial mitigation strategy.
30:57
Defense attorneys use it to broaden the judge's perspective. They
31:00
want to emphasize that the defendant is a multi dimensional
31:03
human being with deep community ties, dependence, and the history
31:07
of positive contributions, contrasting all of that against the singular
31:12
terrible act of the crime.
31:13
Speaker 1: Okay, I have to push back here on behalf of
31:15
everyone listening, because this is where the system feels absolutely infuriating.
31:18
Speaker 2: I understand.
31:19
Speaker 1: We hear about his detailed psycho sexual evaluation. We hear
31:23
the defense eloquently talk about his role as a loving,
31:25
full time dad. We see him avoiding active prison, we
31:28
see him avoiding the sex offender registry. But we have
31:32
to think about the victim in all of this. Absolutely,
31:34
she was just a woman trying to enjoy a destination
31:37
wedding at a beach house. Even if the digital forensics
31:40
showed the images weren't distributed online, the psychological impact of
31:44
knowing your most private, physically vulnerable moments were captured by
31:48
a stranger is just devastating.
31:50
Speaker 2: It's trauma, it is.
31:52
Speaker 1: The scales of justice feel very, very complicated here. It
31:55
feels like the entire system bent over backward to accommodate
31:58
the defendant's life in his family, while the victim's life
32:01
and sense of safety is just forever altered.
32:04
Speaker 2: That is a completely valid, deeply human, and very common
32:08
reaction to plea bargains, particularly in cases involving intimate violations.
32:13
From the outside looking in, it often appears wildly unbalanced.
32:17
But to understand why this happens, we really have to
32:20
look at the prosecutor's perspective and the sheer resource constraints
32:24
of the justice system.
32:25
Speaker 1: What do you mean by resource constraints?
32:26
Speaker 2: The reality is that roughly ninety five percent of all
32:29
criminal cases in the United States and in a plea bargain,
32:32
if every single case went to a jury trial, the
32:34
court system would literally collapse under its own weight within months.
32:38
Speaker 1: Wow. Ninety five percent.
32:39
Speaker 2: Yes, there are simply not enough judges, court rooms, or
32:43
hours in the year, so prosecutors are forced to triosh. Furthermore,
32:47
taking a case to trial is never a guaranteed victory,
32:50
no matter how strong the digital evidence appears.
32:52
Speaker 1: To be, even with the Wi Fi logs and eseuch
32:55
F data.
32:55
Speaker 2: Even then, juries consist of human beings, and human beings
32:59
can be un predictable, evidence can be suppressed on technicalities,
33:03
witnesses can falter on the stand, so.
33:05
Speaker 1: The prosecutor is basically trading severity for certainty.
33:08
Speaker 2: Exactly. The prosecutor is looking at securing a certain, permanent
33:12
felony conviction without the risk of an acquittal. They secure
33:16
a formal public acknowledgment of guilt by the defendant on
33:19
the record, and they secure strict court ordered protective conditions
33:24
like five years of intense supervised probation and an ironclad
33:28
no contact order.
33:29
Speaker 1: But what about the victim. Doesn't a trial give them
33:31
their day in court?
33:32
Speaker 2: It does, but at an immense cost. Perhaps the most
33:35
compelling factor in offering a plea deal is sparing the
33:38
victim the trauma of.
33:40
Speaker 1: A trial secondary trauma.
33:41
Speaker 2: Right. Yes, a trial would require the victim to travel,
33:44
to take the witness stand, to be aggressively cross examined
33:46
by a defense attorney who is actively trying to poke
33:49
holes in her story, and to relive the trauma in
33:51
a public court room filled with strangers. It could possibly
33:54
even involve the digital evidence, the intrusive video itself being
33:58
discussed in detail or presented at as an exhibit.
34:01
Speaker 1: That sounds like a nightmare.
34:02
Speaker 2: It is. Many prosecutors, and indeed many victims themselves, prioritize
34:07
the certainty of a plea and the avoidance of secondary
34:10
trial of trauma, overrolling the dice for a slightly harsher sentence.
34:14
Speaker 1: I see. So it's not necessarily that the system doesn't
34:17
care about the victim's pains. That the adversarial legal process
34:20
itself can act as a second trauma, and a plea
34:22
deal acts as a circuit breaker to stop that from happening.
34:25
Speaker 2: Precisely, the outcome is a permanent criminal record for DISSENTNA
34:30
five years, a strict oversight where any slip up results
34:32
in prison, and the victim is spared the grueling ordeal
34:35
of the witness stand. It is a pragmatic, cold calculation
34:40
within the constraints of the state's sentencing structure.
34:43
Speaker 1: It is pragmatic, but it certainly leaves a lingering sense
34:46
of unease. And I think that unease extends far, far
34:49
beyond this single courtroom in Custom, North Carolina. Because, zooming
34:53
out from Descenna's specific case, this incident reflects a massive
34:57
systemic vulnerability that affects literally anyone who travel. We are
35:01
looking at an absolute crisis in the short term rental economy.
35:04
Speaker 2: It is an industry wide crisis that is only accelerating.
35:08
The sources emphasize that hidden camera incidents in short term
35:11
rentals have drawn significant national and international attention over recent years.
35:16
This case in Corolla is not an isolated phenomenon. It
35:20
is just a data point in a much larger trend.
35:23
Speaker 1: Not isolated at all. The sources detail how these tiny
35:26
cameras are being disguised as literally everything you would find
35:30
in a normal home. We've talked extensively about USB chargers,
35:34
but they are also commonly hidden in smoke detectors on
35:37
the ceiling, digital alarm clocks on the nightstand, and even
35:40
picture frames. Authorities are discovering these devices and rental properties
35:44
across multiple states. It's an absolute epidemic of domestic espionage, and.
35:49
Speaker 2: The barrier to entry for this kind of crime is
35:51
virtually non existent, which is what makes it an epidemic.
35:55
As the sources point out, this technology is incredibly inexpensive
35:58
and widely available online. You don't need to be a
36:00
tech genius or a spy to set this up. Anyone
36:03
with a basic Internet connection, a credit card in twenty
36:06
dollars can become a domestic predator overnight.
36:08
Speaker 1: So how is the industry responding to this? Because if
36:10
I'm booking a place on a major rental platform, I
36:14
want to know what they are doing to protect me. Actually,
36:17
the sources outline that property managers and the massive Silicon
36:20
Valley rental platforms have implemented policies. They require hosts to
36:25
explicitly disclose any exterior security cameras on the property listing,
36:30
and they strictly unequivocally prohibit any cameras inside private living
36:35
spaces like bedrooms and bathrooms.
36:37
Speaker 2: The policies exist on paper, yes, they have strong terms
36:40
of service, but the major caveat highlighted in the reporting
36:44
is the critical flaw of the gig economy. Enforcement is incredibly,
36:49
almost comically imperfect.
36:51
Speaker 1: Because they can't actually check every single property exactly.
36:54
Speaker 2: A tech platform based into skyscraper in California cannot physically
36:58
deploy an inspector to a beach house in the Outer
37:00
Banks before every single new guest arrives. They rely almost
37:04
entirely on an honor system for their hosts.
37:06
Speaker 1: Which obviously fails sometimes right.
37:08
Speaker 2: Furthermore, under laws like Section two thirty, platforms often argue
37:12
they are merely intermediaries, not the creators of the content
37:15
or the managers of the physical property, shielding them from
37:18
direct liability. As this specific case proves, the properties are
37:23
highly vulnerable to tampering, not just by malicious hosts, but
37:27
by anyone who gains temporary access to the physical.
37:30
Speaker 1: Space, which means the burden of safety has completely and
37:33
unfairly shifted onto the consumer. The sources mentioned that renters
37:37
are now changing their behavior drastically. People are resorting to
37:41
carrying portable camera detectors in their luggage. People are downloading
37:44
specialized camera finding apps on their phones or buying RF
37:48
detectors to scan their vacation rentals.
37:50
Speaker 2: Yes, the counter surveillance market for consumers is absolutely booming
37:54
right now, But how.
37:55
Speaker 1: Do those actually work? If the camera is completely hidden
37:58
inside a plastic clock, how does an app or a
38:00
gadget find it?
38:01
Speaker 2: There are generally two methods consumers are using, as noted
38:05
in Broader security reporting. The first is an RF or
38:09
radio frequency detector. If a hidden camera is actively transmitting
38:13
its video feed over the house's Wi Fi network, and
38:17
our F detector can pick up that specific burst of
38:20
wireless transmission.
38:21
Speaker 1: Okay, so it sweeps the airwaves.
38:23
Speaker 2: Yes, you sweep it around the room, and if it
38:25
beaks loudly near a smoke detector, you know that smoke
38:28
detector is transmitting data.
38:30
Speaker 1: But what if it's not Wi Fi. What if it's
38:32
just saving to a tiny SD card inside the charger
38:36
like we talked about earlier, it's not transmitting anything.
38:38
Speaker 2: In that case, an our F detector is useless. That
38:40
is where lens sweepers come in. These devices emit a
38:43
very specific, intense frequency of red or infrared light. You
38:47
look through a specialized viewfinder on the gadget. Because a
38:50
camera lens, no matter how microscopic, is made of curved
38:53
class it will reflect that specific light back differently than
38:57
a flat piece of plastic.
38:58
Speaker 1: Oh that's clever.
38:59
Speaker 2: Yeah. If you sweep the room and see a tiny,
39:01
distinct red dot shining back at you from the grill
39:03
of an alarm clock, you have likely found the hit
39:05
a lens.
39:06
Speaker 1: Think about the reality of that for a second. You
39:08
spend thousands of dollars on a vacation to relax, You
39:11
pack the car, you drive for ten hours. You finally arrive,
39:15
and instead of pouring a drink and going to the beach,
39:17
you spend your first hour visually and electronically inspecting every
39:21
charting block, alarm clock, and smoke detector in the house
39:24
like you're sweeping an embassy for bugs.
39:26
Speaker 2: It is a profound, depressing shift in consumer behavior the
39:31
expectation of sanctuary we discussed at the beginning of this
39:33
deep dive. The idea that you rent a safe space
39:36
is gone. The space must now be actively secured and
39:40
vetted by the guest upon arrival.
39:42
Speaker 1: It's just wild.
39:44
Speaker 2: Some high end property management companies are beginning to conduct
39:46
their own electronic sweeps between tenants as a selling point,
39:50
and legislative responses are slowly evolving. But the reality is
39:54
that the physical environment of a short term rental is
39:56
now viewed by many with inherent justified suspicion.
40:00
Speaker 1: Exhausting. But let's bring it back to the person who
40:02
brought this massive issue to the forefront of the news cycle.
40:06
What is the aftermath for Joey Dessenna, Because as of
40:09
the end of July twenty twenty six, his reality has
40:12
drastically and permanently changed.
40:14
Speaker 2: His current reality is entirely defined by the legal consequences
40:17
of his actions. He's currently serving five years of supervised probation.
40:22
His daily life is monitored. He has to comply with
40:25
mandatory mental health assessments. He is under a permanent court
40:29
ordered prohibition against contacting the victim right, and perhaps most
40:34
significantly for his future employment and societal standing, he now
40:37
possesses a permanent, highly public felony record.
40:41
Speaker 1: His name is forever associated with a privacy invasive sex crime.
40:45
All of the goodwill, the wholesome intellectual image of the
40:48
Jeopardy champion, the forty four thousand dollars in prize money,
40:52
it is completely overshadowed, completely wiped out, I mean because
40:55
of the Jeopardy connection. This story stayed actively in the
40:57
news cycle for nearly two years. The sources note that
41:01
outlets ranging from local North Carolina new stations all the
41:04
way up to national entertainment magazines like People and true
41:07
crime networks like Oxygen covered it extensively. It generated a
41:11
level of intense media coverage that ordinary peeping cases almost
41:15
never get.
41:16
Speaker 2: That intense media focus is the ultimate double edged sword
41:19
of his prior minor fame. The very platform that built
41:23
his wholesome image was the catalyst for the national broadcast
41:26
of his downfall.
41:27
Speaker 1: But maybe that media coverage actually serves a vital purpose here.
41:30
It acts like a giant, blinking warning billboard for the
41:34
entire rental industry and the traveling public. It screams. Look
41:38
at what happened here, look at who did it? Look
41:40
at how incredibly easy it was to pull off.
41:42
Speaker 2: This raises an important overarching question that the sources circle around.
41:47
Does our criminal justice system have the actual capacity to
41:50
handle the sheer volume of commercial surveillance misuse that is
41:53
inevitably coming. If we synthesize the themes of this deep dive,
41:57
we see a highly disturbing intersection. We see the profound
42:01
vulnerability of private spaces in the modern high turnover short
42:04
term rental market. We see the terrifying ease with which
42:08
cheap commercial technology can be weaponized for predatory purposes. And
42:12
we see the immense, unsettling gap between a polished, intellectual
42:16
public persona and the reality of private actions that violate
42:19
fundamental human consent.
42:21
Speaker 1: It's a tremendous amount of process. The system managed to
42:24
resolve this one specific case, securing a felony conviction implementing
42:28
a structured period of probation, But the broader systemic issue
42:33
is still out there, literally plugged into a wall somewhere
42:36
right now.
42:37
Speaker 2: The official record of this case stands as a detailed,
42:40
legally documented account of a modern privacy failure. The ordinary
42:44
suburban life that Dissenter returned to after his celebrated television
42:48
appearances became something entirely destructive and the legal system had
42:52
to stretch its statutes to address it.
42:54
Speaker 1: You really did so. Just to briefly recap our journey today,
42:58
we started our deep dive under the right celebrated lights
43:01
of a national trivia stage, admiring what we thought was
43:04
a harmless champion. We followed the timeline to a dark,
43:07
startling reality in a Corolla beach house where tiny, pertically
43:11
disguised cameras shattered a victim's peace and safety.
43:14
Speaker 2: We covered a lot of ground, we really did.
43:17
Speaker 1: We navigated the complex adapting legal framework of North Carolina's
43:21
felony statutes, understanding why digital permanence changes the nature of
43:25
the crime. And we dissected the mechanics of the negotiated
43:28
plea deal that resulted in probation rather than prison, revealing
43:32
the hard realities of how our justice system allocates its resources.
43:36
Speaker 2: It is a clear, compelling demonstration of how our laws,
43:40
our rapidly advancing technology, and our public perceptions are constantly
43:44
struggling to align in the digital age.
43:46
Speaker 1: Before we wrap up today, I want to leave you
43:48
the listener. With one final thought to mull Over, we
43:52
touched on this idea of renters feeling forced to carry
43:54
portable RF detectors and sweep their rooms with infrared lenses.
43:58
It brings us back to that core idea we started
44:00
with the expectation of sanctuary. We used to go on vacation,
44:04
to unplug, to escape our daily anxieties, to let our
44:07
guard down completely. It was a mental reset. But if
44:10
the modern reality is that we have to step into
44:12
a beautifully staged beach house, drop our bags and immediately
44:16
conduct a militaristic counter surveillance sweep of the alarm clocks
44:19
and phone chargers just to feel safe taking a shower,
44:22
has the very concept of a relaxing getaway been permanently
44:26
destroyed by cheap technology. It's true unmonitored privacy, even a
44:29
luxury we can afford to rent anymore. Thank you for
44:32
joining us on this deep dive into the sources. We
44:34
will catch you next time.