Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / The Order Remanding Jeffrey Epstein To The Care Of The State (Part 2) (5/20/26)
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
- 0:03Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're picking up where we
- 0:06left off, with Judge Berman's opinion and order denying Jeffrey
- 0:11Epstein's request for bell. See Indictment O Grand Jerry voted
- 0:17to indict mister Epstein on or about July second, twenty nineteen.
- 0:22The indictment charges mister Epstein with two felonies involving minor girls,
- 0:26some as young as fourteen. Count one includes conspiracy to
- 0:29commit sex trafficking of minor girls in violation of US
- 0:33Code eighteen, section three seventy one, and Count two includes
- 0:37sex trafficking of minor girls in violation of US Code eighteen,
- 0:41Section fifteen ninety one. It states, from at least in
- 0:44or about two thousand and two up to and including
- 0:48at least in or about two thousand and five, Jeffrey
- 0:51Epstein entysed and recruited and caused to be enticed and
- 0:54recruited minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New York,
- 0:58and to the state in pom Beach, Florida, to engage
- 1:00in sex acts with them, after which he would give
- 1:03the victims hundreds of dollars in cash indictment dated July second,
- 1:07twenty nineteen. Moreover, and in order to maintain an increase
- 1:12his supply of victims, Epstein also paid certain of his
- 1:15victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by Epstein.
- 1:20In this way, Epstein created a vast network of underage
- 1:23victims for him to sexually exploit in locations including New
- 1:27York and Palm Beach. The indictment also charges the victims
- 1:32where as young as fourteen years old at the time
- 1:34they were abused by mister Epstein, and were for various reasons,
- 1:38often particularly vulnerable to exploitation. Mister Epstein intentionally sought out miners.
- 1:45He knew that many of his victims were, in fact
- 1:47under the age of eighteen, because in some instances minor
- 1:50victims expressly told them their age. Following his arrest on Monday,
- 1:56July eighth, twenty nineteen, mister Epstein was arraigned and present
- 2:00entered with the indictment by Magistrate Judge Henry Pittman. Legal
- 2:05principles governing release versus remand under the Bell Reform Act
- 2:09US Code eighteen, Section thirty one forty two, a court
- 2:13can order a defendant's detention if it determines that the
- 2:16defendant is either one a danger to the community or
- 2:19two a risk of flight US Code eighteen, Section thirty
- 2:23one forty two E. A court does not need to
- 2:26find both bases are proven to order a defendant's detention.
- 2:29United States versus Blanco, Second Circuit, twenty fourteen. Dangerousness means
- 2:35that the defendant is a danger to the safety of
- 2:38any other person or the community. US Code Section thirty
- 2:42one forty two. A finding of dangerousness must be supported
- 2:46by clear and convincing evidence see United States versus Ferranti,
- 2:50Second Circuit, nineteen ninety five. Where there's a strong probability
- 2:54that a person will commit additional crimes if released, the
- 2:58need to protect the community because I'm sufficiently compelling that
- 3:01detention is on balance appropriate US first Chimachrenga, Second Circuit,
- 3:09nineteen eighty five. Even a single indictment of witness tampering
- 3:13may be sufficient to revoke Belle Lafontaine at one thirty four.
- 3:17To order detention based upon risk of flight, the court
- 3:20must find, by a preponderance of the evidence that no
- 3:23conditions could reasonably assure the defendant's presence at trial. See
- 3:28United States versus Jackson, second Circuit. Nineteen eighty seven. US
- 3:33Code eighteen, Section thirty one, forty two. The constitutional limits
- 3:37on a detention period based on dangerousness to the community
- 3:41may be looser than the limits on detention period based
- 3:44solely on the risk of flight. In the former case,
- 3:47release risks injury to others, while the latter case, released
- 3:51risks only the loss of a conviction. US versus Milan,
- 3:55second Circuit, nineteen ninety three, quoting the United States Versorena,
- 3:59nineteen eighty six, second Circuit, A Bell package that may
- 4:03reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant at trial will
- 4:06not necessarily assure the safety of the community. United States
- 4:11versus Rodriguez, second Circuit, nineteen ninety one. The Bell reformac
- 4:15sets forth the following four factors to be considered in
- 4:18the release romand analysis. One the nature and circumstances of
- 4:23the crimes charged. Two the weight of the evidence against
- 4:26the person. Three the history and characteristics of the defendant,
- 4:30including the person's character and financial resources. And four the
- 4:35seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant's release. US
- 4:39Code eighteen, Section thirty one forty two G. The weight
- 4:43afford it to each factor under section thirty one forty
- 4:46two G is within the special province of the district court.
- 4:50United States verus Pallino, three thirty five SDNY twenty eighteen.
- 4:56The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do
- 5:00not apply to the presentation and consideration of information at
- 5:04the release remand hearing US Code eighteen, Section thirty one
- 5:08forty two F two. For example, the government is entitled
- 5:11to present evidence supporting remand by way of proffer, among
- 5:15other means. US Code eighteen, Section thirty one forty two
- 5:18F two. See also US First La Fontaine, Second Circuit,
- 5:22two thousand Bail hearings are typically informal affairs, not substitutes
- 5:27for trial or even for discovery. US Code Section thirty
- 5:31one forty two F two b expressly states that the
- 5:34federal rules of evidence do not apply at bel hearings. Thus,
- 5:38courts often based attention decisions on hearsay evidence. United States
- 5:43versus Abuhama three ZHO nine, Second Circuit, two thousand and four.
- 5:48District courts are afforded wide discretion regarding the scope of
- 5:51such hearings. US versus Bartalk Second Circuit twenty twelve E.
- 5:57The presumption of remand in US Code ode section fifteen
- 6:00ninety one cases. A US Code eighteen, Section fifteen ninety
- 6:05one case involving sexual victimization of a minor is unusual
- 6:09in that it includes a presumption in favor of pretrial detention,
- 6:14reflecting the significant harm caused by such a crime. The
- 6:17presumption is that no condition or combination of conditions will
- 6:21reasonably assure against flight or danger to the community. United
- 6:25States Verse English, Second Circuit twenty eleven, quoting US Code eighteen,
- 6:31section thirty one forty two E three E. Mister Epstein
- 6:36may rebuct presumption by coming forward with evidence that he
- 6:39does not pose a danger to the community or a
- 6:42flight risk. US Verst mercedes the government retains the ultimate
- 6:46burden of persuasion that mister Epstein presents a danger to
- 6:50the community by clear and convincing evidence. Even if rebuttal
- 6:54evidence is presented. The presumption favoring detention does not disappear
- 6:59entirely idea at four thirty six. It remains a factor
- 7:03to be considered among those weighed by the district court.
- 7:07If mister Epstein poses a danger to others, and to
- 7:10the community. The court begins with dangerousness because that concept
- 7:16is at the heart of the case. It finds that
- 7:18the government is shown by clear and convincing evidence that
- 7:21mister Epstein threatens the safety of another person and or
- 7:25the community, as follows on pages ten through twenty one,
- 7:30victims had advised the court that they would fear for
- 7:32their safety if mister Epstein was released. Victims have specifically
- 7:37conveyed to the government that any former release by the defendant,
- 7:41including home detention with full time private guards, could result
- 7:45in their harassment and abuse. At a bail hearing on
- 7:49July fifteenth, twenty nineteen, two victims movingly testified about their
- 7:53past sexual encounters with mister Epstein when they were reminders
- 7:57age fourteen and sixteen, respectively. In enacting the CVRA, Congress
- 8:03stated that victims deserve the right to be heard at
- 8:07specific points in a criminal justice process, including bell hearings.
- 8:12Giving victims a voice not only improve the quality of
- 8:15the process, but can also be expected to often provide
- 8:18important benefits to the victims. Miss Annie Farmer was introduced
- 8:22by her counsel, David Boyce, and stated that she was
- 8:25sixteen years old when she had the misfortune of meeting
- 8:29Jeffrey Epstein in New York. Miss Farmer said that mister
- 8:33Epstein flew her to New Mexico and was inappropriate with her.
- 8:37She was reluctant to go into details about her experience
- 8:40with mister Epstein. Miss Farmer opposes mister Epstein's pre trial
- 8:44release because she believes other Epstein victims would continue to
- 8:48be victimized and that mister Epstein's wealth and privilege and
- 8:52notoriety would make it difficult for other victims to come forward.
- 8:57Miss Courtney Wilde, introduced by her counsel Brad Edwards, and
- 9:02said she was sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein starting at
- 9:05the age of fourteen. She asked the court to keep
- 9:07mister Epstein in detention for the safety of any other
- 9:10girls out there that are going through what she was
- 9:13going through. Miss Wilde said that mister Epstein is a
- 9:17scary person to have walking the streets. Mister Epstein poses
- 9:21a threat to additional young girls if he's released. At
- 9:26the remand release hearing on Monday, July fifteenth, twenty nineteen,
- 9:29as noted, the court heard poignant testimony from two of
- 9:33mister Epstein's alleged victims about their fears and anxiety over
- 9:37his potential release, even if under strict conditions of home confinement.
- 9:42The court is also concerned for new victims. Mister Epstein's
- 9:47alleged excessive attraction to sexual conduct with or in the
- 9:51presence of minor girls, which is said to include his
- 9:54soliciting and receiving massages from young girls and young women,
- 9:58perhaps as many as forty times a day, appears likely
- 10:01to be uncontrollable. Defendants alleged sex crimes where of an
- 10:07addictive sexual nature that cannot be suppressed simply by a
- 10:10restrictive set of bell conditions. Accordingly, mister Epstein's past sexual
- 10:15conduct is not likely to have abated or been successfully
- 10:18suppressed by fierce determination, as his defense counsel suggests. Defense
- 10:24counsel contends that he wasn't a predator that couldn't control
- 10:28his conduct. He disciplined himself. Defense counsel also argues that
- 10:33appreciating the gravity of these charges, putting aside the age
- 10:36of these witnesses, and putting the consent issue aside, it's
- 10:40not like Epstein's and out of control rapist. It seems
- 10:43fair to say that mister Epstein's future behavior will be
- 10:47consistent with past behavior, including a trove of lewed photographs
- 10:51of young looking women and girls which were recently uncovered
- 10:54during the July twenty nineteen search of mister Epstein's seventy
- 10:58first Street mentioned. The search results suggests that possibly the
- 11:02defendant could target another vulnerable victim c United States First
- 11:08Baker three forty nine f Dot supp where the defendant
- 11:12was alleged to specifically target vulnerable women and where he
- 11:16attempted to contact an alleged victim. The court was persuaded
- 11:19that the defendant would be a danger to society if released.
- 11:24Despite having been convicted of the above mentioned to Florida
- 11:27sex crimes in two thousand and eight involving an underage girl,
- 11:31mister Epstein, as noted, maintained his New York residence of
- 11:35vast trove of sexually suggestive photographs of nude underage and
- 11:39adult girls doc at eleven example one at nine. That is,
- 11:43during July six and seventh, twenty nineteen, the authorized search
- 11:48of mister Epstein's NYC residents, the FBI found a substantial
- 11:52collection of photographic trophies of his victims and other young females.
- 11:57This evidence includes compact discs labeled young, redacted names, miscellaneous nudes,
- 12:03one girl picked nudes, and the government contends that this
- 12:06evidence includes hundreds or perhaps thousands of sexually suggestive photographs
- 12:11of nude underage girls and women, and that it's corroberative
- 12:15in nature and it's consistent with the victim recollections of
- 12:19inside mister Epstein's residence. This newly discovered evidence also suggests
- 12:24that mister Epstein poses an ongoing and forward looking danger
- 12:28see doc at eleven at ten. See also Baker Us
- 12:32First good Win two fifteen WL six three eight six
- 12:37five six eight at three, Kentucky, October twenty first, twenty fifteen.
- 12:43All Right, we're gonna wrap up right here, and in
- 12:45the next episode, we're gonna pick up where we left off.
- 12:48And that's with the section fifteen ninety one presumption of
- 12:52pre trial remand reflects the seriousness of mister Epstein's alleged crimes.
- 12:58All of the information that goes with this episode can
- 13:01be found in the description box.