Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column News - 20th June 2025

Transcript

UK Column News - 20th June 2025 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. It's Friday the 20th of June
0:10
2025, just after 1:00. Welcome to UK called News.
0:13
I'm your host Mike Robinson and my Co host today in the studio
0:16
is Patrick Hemingson. Welcome to the programme,
0:18
Patrick. Great to be with you, Mike.
0:19
And journalist Mark Anderson joins us by video link from the
0:23
United States. Now later in the programme, I'm
0:25
going to be covering the assisted dying bill and both
0:27
Mark and Patrick have updates on what's been made public from the
0:31
recent Bilderberg conference. But we're going to begin today
0:34
with Iran, of course. And Patrick, the situation is
0:38
not being de escalated in any way.
0:40
Not at all, Mike. And it looks like we'll bring up
0:43
on screen, it looks like this is what we are looking at.
0:47
And it gives me much pain to say that, especially since we all
0:51
have very vivid memories of 2003 in the run up to the Iraq war
0:55
and how much people were shouting and screaming.
0:59
And who knew that this was an absolute scam being run by the
1:03
Bush and Blair regimes. And yet the government's didn't
1:07
listen to the people. And for this reason, it's almost
1:09
like a repeat. But let's look at where things
1:12
are at right now. So this is what the White House
1:16
put out just yesterday. So Trump basically saying he's
1:21
approved an attack in Iran but holding off on giving final
1:25
orders. So basically the president
1:27
saying Trump's deciding whether to join in the Israeli strikes
1:31
on Iran within two weeks. So he's saying I'm deciding over
1:34
the next two weeks whether to jump in or not.
1:38
But did he approve them or not? Or is he doing it or not that it
1:41
seems to be ambiguity between the headline and that article
1:43
and the and the text you put on screen there.
1:45
Complete ambiguity. And and so this is what we have
1:47
with Trump, the policies of flip flops and swings every, you
1:52
know, 12 hours it seems. And who knows what he's going to
1:54
put on his social media account. So total chaos here.
1:58
So that's what he's saying. Now, do you believe Trump?
2:00
I mean, no. Has he built up a rating of
2:03
credibility with things that he has said and things that he's
2:06
done? No, I really, I'm going to have
2:09
to say absolutely not. I don't trust Trump.
2:11
So this looks like a ruse and a clue to this may be from the
2:16
recent post from award winning journalist Seymour Hersh will
2:20
bring this up on screen here. What I have been told is coming
2:24
in Iran and this is what Hirsch has published in the last 24
2:28
hours. He's saying here.
2:30
Quite clearly, this is a report on what is likely to happen in
2:34
Iran as early as this weekend. So the window for attacks,
2:39
according to Hirsch, is evening, late evening time, United States
2:44
East Coast standard up until Monday.
2:47
And he says, according to Israeli insiders and American
2:49
officials I've relied on for decades, it will until heavy
2:53
American bombing. And he goes on with just another
2:57
important detail. The longtime US official in
2:59
Washington who told me that all will be, quote, under control if
3:03
I ran Supreme Leader I, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, quote,
3:07
departs, AKA regime change. You can, but.
3:11
It's actually much more than that.
3:12
It's actually means dead. It means dead.
3:14
Yeah. Yeah.
3:15
So. So when he says they've already
3:17
attempted to kill him at least once already, the Israelis and
3:21
so the Americans believe that they can quote, you know, finish
3:23
the job, as it were. And it doesn't end there.
3:27
We'll just look at this here when we go back and just check
3:30
out what has been said. A talk among White House
3:34
planning groups that include JD Vance, vice president of
3:38
installing a moderate religious leader to run the country.
3:42
But Israel demands a political puppet.
3:44
So Hersh is insinuating here there's a difference of opinion
3:48
between the Israelis and the United States about what type of
3:51
regime change needs to happen. So you see, they've already
3:54
created a sort of sub debate to get get the media to argue about
3:58
what is an appropriate regime change.
4:00
So we've gone all the way from no new wars, no wars in the
4:03
Middle East, no more forever wars to well, you know, we need
4:06
to defend our allies, Israel. And then Iran shouldn't have a
4:10
nuke. And now it's Iran can't have any
4:12
enriched uranium. And now it's Iran must submit to
4:16
full surrender, unconditional surrender.
4:18
Otherwise we're going to, you know, bomb Tehran and evacuate
4:22
Tehran and so forth. And now it's regime change.
4:25
So opinion polls Mike on regime change in America are not
4:28
looking good for the MAGA base and there's been a lot of talk
4:32
and things published and commentary to that effect.
4:34
So there is a definitely a split.
4:36
This is not popular with Trumps base, not at all.
4:39
And so let's let's look at the other side of the Atlantic in
4:44
Israel. And this is what they're, this
4:46
is the debate in Israel again, how to kill Iran's leader.
4:50
And this is Israel Katz. He's a defence minister
4:53
basically saying that Khomeini cannot continue to exist.
4:56
So he's calling for the murder of the Iranian leader.
5:00
So, I mean, they're still pretending like there's some
5:04
possibility for negotiations here.
5:07
I mean, this is the crazy part. And so we have this meeting
5:10
coming up in Europe. Let's take a look at this.
5:13
This is happening right now as we speak in Geneva.
5:15
European ministers are holding emergency nuclear talks with the
5:19
Iranian Foreign Ministry today, according to sources.
5:23
And it's being led by what's called Mike the the Troika, the
5:29
Troika. So who are the troika?
5:31
UK, Germany, France plus plus Kaliakalis.
5:36
So I guess not quite. Well, the Europeans, they need 3
5:40
presidents, they need a troika. Better troika is 4.
5:43
So how does that work? Yeah, in in Europe, 1 + 1 + 1 =
5:47
4, right? It's not made to make, not meant
5:49
to make sense, Mike, but that's, that's what Brussels is all
5:51
about. So what, what are the chances of
5:53
peace between these artful dodgers here?
5:58
Keir Starmer, Frederick Mercs, who's already basically said
6:01
we're, we're here to do Israel's dirty work.
6:03
And then Emmanuel Macron, who quite frankly doesn't know
6:06
whether he's coming or going. He doesn't know which way the
6:09
door swings on a good day. And Kalia Callis, well, she is
6:13
basically a Warhawk. So I'm not, I'm not holding out
6:17
much hope for this. Now what?
6:18
What do you think this is about here?
6:21
And this is the question with this one.
6:23
I don't know what they're actually up to here.
6:27
I'm very sceptical. I personally, I think that this
6:30
is inconsequential. I can't imagine what leverage
6:33
any of these Europeans will have on either the United States or
6:38
Israel. They've been totally supine when
6:41
it comes to to Netanyahu, to the genocide in Gaza and to the
6:46
unprovoked war against Iran, an illegal war of aggression.
6:51
The very thing that they're, you know, up in arms and raising
6:55
cane with Russia over in Ukraine.
6:57
They've got nothing to say about Israel.
6:59
And not only that, but they're talking about, you know, Israel
7:02
wants to assassinate the entire Iranian government.
7:04
They've already done half the government on the first day of
7:06
the attack. They've killed all the top
7:08
officials, half of them. So I mean, this should be a
7:11
crisis moment. So the question is, what's
7:14
Europe going to do here? That's the big question.
7:16
What can Europe do here? And I personally, I'm not
7:20
convinced. It almost looks like this is a
7:22
distraction because you have to remember they're all working in
7:25
concert with Israel. All of these people are diehard
7:29
Zionists. They're totally in the tank with
7:32
Tel Aviv and Netanyahu. And they're they can't do
7:36
anything, I think, to sway Donald Trump.
7:38
I can't imagine what, what leverage does Europe have?
7:42
Europe doesn't have any leverage on this as far as I can see.
7:45
And I mean, this is a very good question.
7:49
They're they're putting on a front.
7:50
But is this just good cop bad cop exercise going on do you
7:54
think? Well, if you consider, Mike,
7:56
what Seymour Hersh is published there, wouldn't this be a nice
7:59
distraction to try to? They think they can lower the
8:02
guard of the Iranians and then come in hard with a bombing
8:05
campaign on the weekend. Because isn't that what the
8:07
United States and Israel did already with the nuclear talks
8:11
in the sixth round of talks? They managed to admit it.
8:14
We reported on it last week on this programme, that Israel's
8:17
plan was to lull the Iranians into complacency while planning
8:21
a surprise attack. Now, do you think the Iranians
8:23
will fall for that twice? I don't think so.
8:26
No, I don't think so. So we'll see where this goes.
8:29
Now. Former Labour leader Jeremy
8:31
Corbyn, Mike is, is somebody that could have been the Labour,
8:37
could have been Prime Minister. He was ousted by the Israeli
8:40
lobby, by the deep state, by the intelligence services.
8:44
And certainly the United States was part of that effort, along
8:47
with the Tory party, of course, and Rupert Murdoch all happily
8:51
work together to oust Jeremy Corbyn.
8:54
Now he he has been doing a lot of interviews and he's been
8:57
doing sterling work on the floor of the House of Commons.
9:01
And it, I, I really can't imagine who would be a better
9:05
leader of the Labor Party at this very moment in time if it's
9:09
about preserving human life and World Peace.
9:12
Here's a video clip of Corbin just laying out just one
9:15
important aspect of this whole story that seems to be missing
9:19
from the mainstream coverage. Why do you think more hasn't
9:23
been made of Israelis nuclear weapons?
9:27
Because fundamentally the media narrative on most global
9:33
channels is essentially pro Israel.
9:38
Despite the genocide findings, despite the continued occupation
9:43
of Gaza and the West Bank, despite the deaths of what
9:46
60,000 and more people already there, some or other that's now
9:51
parked. And we're now into what Keir
9:54
Starmer and David Lammy call legitimate self defence.
9:57
Secondly, it was only dragged out of Lammy during persistent
10:01
questioning from Richard Bergen and myself that he acknowledged
10:06
that reluctantly that Israel actually has nuclear weapons, is
10:12
not an adherent to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty or to
10:15
the Global Ban Treaty. Iran does not have nuclear
10:20
weapons. How do I know that?
10:22
Because for once, I believe the CIA when they reported to
10:26
Congress in March that there are no nuclear weapons in Iran.
10:31
The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear
10:34
weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the
10:38
nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003.
10:43
Powerful Corbyn listen, Keir Starmer ousting of Corbin the
10:50
the imposing of Keir Starmer on the party.
10:53
It seems like a coup at this point.
10:54
It honestly does. But what the end was Tulsi
10:58
Gabbard, that's the director of national intelligence in the
11:00
United States stating unequivocally in her assessment
11:04
the the entire intelligence community's assessment in March.
11:07
Iran does not have a bomb and is not working on a bomb.
11:10
So that should be the policy of the United States government.
11:14
But that's what that's not what Donald Trump said when he was
11:19
door stepped by ACNN reporter on Air Force One.
11:23
Listen to this. But.
11:26
How close do you personally think that they were to getting
11:29
one because Tulsi Gabbard? Tulsi Gabbard testified in March
11:32
that that the intelligence community said Iran wasn't
11:35
building a nuclear weapon. I don't.
11:37
Care what she said. I think they were very.
11:38
Close to having so AM. I Where is he taking his advice
11:43
from? From the D and I or from
11:46
somebody else? Could be someone else in his
11:48
ear, could be Lindsey Graham, could be the Israeli lobby,
11:51
could be Jared Kushner, Or could just be that's what Donald Trump
11:54
thinks and to hell with the intelligence community.
11:56
He just threw Tulsi Gabbard under the bus.
11:59
He threw his DNI. It was confirmed by the Senate
12:03
under the bus. And they're trying to paper this
12:05
over in the media say, oh, there's no at daylight between
12:08
them and all of this stuff. So Donald Trump and Tulsi
12:12
Gabbard, and this is what Ray McGovern has said here.
12:15
He says memo to Tulsi Gabbard, resign.
12:17
Trump is trashed. Last vestige of independent
12:20
Intel analysis. Don't lie.
12:22
You are not on the same page leaving leave lying to Trump.
12:27
He knows Iran is not working on a nuclear weapon.
12:30
Go public. Americans have a right to know
12:33
this. That's Ray McGovern, head of
12:35
Veterans for Intelligence Sanity there in the United States.
12:40
And so here's this, what the media is kind of dived into this
12:43
year. And this is what they're
12:44
claiming anyway. In the eyes of the Trump and
12:48
some close to him, Gabbard was warning him not to green light
12:52
the Israel attacking Iran. Trump even expressed his
12:56
disapproval to her personally, the three people said so.
12:59
Three sources close to the author here, the authors of this
13:03
Politico piece here, and they go on.
13:06
Gabbard insisted to reporters Tuesday that she and the
13:08
president are on the same page on Iran.
13:10
And the persons close to Gabbard denied any tension between her
13:14
and the president. So that's the public line.
13:17
What's the reality? I think there is there is a
13:21
difference. But then again, this could all
13:22
be theatre Mike with Trump. This could just be sort of fake
13:27
opposition WWF wrestling to make it look like, oh, he has a
13:31
restraining voice in the cabinet.
13:33
It's Tulsi Gabbard. She's a peacenik.
13:35
And she released a video about the Hiroshima bombs a couple of
13:38
days before on June 10th. That seemed like very out of
13:41
character. Maybe it's legitimate, maybe
13:44
it's genuine. But if it is genuine, she needs
13:46
to resign and go public and say this is wrong, this is going to
13:50
lead to nuclear war. I mean, that would be the right
13:52
thing to do for her, seeing that she's been thrown under the bus
13:56
by her own president. Or she could play it safe.
13:59
Or this is just all theatre, Mike.
14:01
It's all theatre. Who knows, Time will tell.
14:04
Time will tell. And Mark, let me welcome you to
14:07
the programme because something that was announced a few days
14:10
ago was the sailing of the USS Nimitz.
14:17
That's. True.
14:18
Good day everyone. Listeners out in UK column land.
14:21
Hello guys. Yes, the USS Nimitz, about a 50
14:25
year old aircraft carrier reportedly is going to be
14:29
rerouted from Asia to the Middle East.
14:33
And there are various concerns across left wing, right wing,
14:37
centrist websites, so many, it's incredible that the Nimitz will
14:42
be quote unquote, the next US Liberty, USS Liberty.
14:46
And the, the thinking is that it's an old ship being prepared
14:51
for being decommissioned, which evidently will cost up to a
14:54
billion dollars to fully tear down because it's a nuclear
14:57
powered ship. And so the thinking is that why
15:01
not put this derelict out there? Israel might pull off false flag
15:06
and attack the ship. And that would much more
15:09
solidify and justify getting the US involved in the conflict
15:14
between Israel and Iran. So in other words, will history
15:18
repeat itself? That's the huge question being
15:20
asked. And it's ironic that this came
15:24
out right about the time that my interview with Phil Turney, the
15:29
USS Liberty Survivor, was released on UK Column News.
15:33
And we're showing that screen here, the screenshot from the
15:36
article, rather the interview that's now posted at
15:39
ukcolumn.org. And we can listen here
15:42
momentarily what Phil had to say about why he felt that the USS
15:48
Liberty was attacked, what the ultimate motive was, and then
15:52
relate that again to some of the theories and concerns about the
15:55
Nimitz. So let's go ahead and go with
15:57
that. It's incredible to me, given
16:00
what you described, that they can still try and claim that
16:03
this was a case of mistaken identity when we both know
16:07
better, as do your fellow survivors.
16:10
And that, evidently, and correct me if I'm wrong, they wanted to
16:15
sink the liberty and blame it on the Arab forces during that six
16:20
day war in the Mediterranean. That was the evident goal,
16:24
correct? Yes, that was that was the goal
16:27
Mark and you know we were, we were probably set up a year in
16:32
advance, a year in advance have this happen.
16:37
It was all pre planned. They wanted to sink our ship,
16:41
blame it on the Arabs and get us into nuclear war.
16:44
We had sacked aircraft on the way to come bomb Cairo even
16:49
before we were attacked. The aircraft were in the air.
16:54
Aircraft were in the air even before we got attacked.
16:57
So Lyndon Johnson, Leviasco, the premier, Prime Minister of
17:03
Israel and a handful of others and both governments did this
17:08
and to get us into World War Three, that was the whole plan.
17:14
They wanted all of it. They wanted all the land.
17:16
What's going on now in Gaza wouldn't be happening right now.
17:19
If our ship would have something to take it all, then with the
17:22
help of the United States said you got it all.
17:29
Yes, indeed. Interesting stuff.
17:30
So of course, the parallel that's being considered is that
17:34
the ship would be attacked, the Nimitz would be attacked by
17:37
Israeli forces and blamed on Iran, thereby to escalate the
17:41
war, possibly pointing toward, heaven forbid, something
17:45
approaching World War Three. At any rate, there's other,
17:51
there's various sources, including the US Naval Institute
17:54
news here that have confirmed that the aircraft carrier USS
17:58
Nimitz is sailing to the Middle East there.
18:00
There was even an earlier article, I don't know if we
18:02
still have that slide. Even back in March, before the
18:06
conflict reared its ugly head, there was already news that the
18:10
Nimitz was going to be decommissioned on for practical
18:13
reasons. And at any rate, this national
18:17
interest item came up and it's it's a very kind of strange
18:24
article in the way that it's written.
18:26
They're claiming to have solid knowledge, absolute reliable
18:30
knowledge that no, the USS Nimitz will not be destroyed in
18:34
a false flag operation, which is pretty ridiculous.
18:38
It goes on to say baseless social media theories, baseless
18:42
theories, they say, claim the USS Nimitz will be sacrificed in
18:46
a false flag attack. But experts dismissed these as
18:49
fear driven misinformation amplified by viral algorithms.
18:54
But all the people who are concerned about this are saying
18:57
is that like with the Liberty and the the main in Havana
19:01
harbours that sparked the Spanish American War, Pearl
19:04
Harbour, World War 2, Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam, they're simply
19:09
saying that there's historical precedent for false flag
19:12
operations to start major conflict.
19:14
So for someone to say in advance proactively that this won't
19:19
happen is really quite ridiculous.
19:22
There's really no way around it. And that same national interest
19:26
piece happened to cite. And there's so many things that
19:28
could be cited, but it happened to cite this X piece by a James
19:33
Lee. Many know Israel mistakenly
19:36
quote unquote attacked the USS Liberty in 67.
19:40
Fewer know he claims it may have been part of a CIA Mossad false
19:44
flag op called Project Cyanide to spark regime change in Egypt.
19:50
With the USS Nimitz headed to Iran.
19:52
You have to wonder, is history repeating itself?
19:55
So that's the widely asked question right now guys.
19:59
Not a ridiculous question at all, as the national interest so
20:02
wrongly implied. But a very important thing to
20:05
pay attention to, and it's just ironic this came out right when
20:08
my interview with Phil Turney came out, which by the way, is
20:11
getting a lot of reads right now, probably more than it
20:14
normally normally would have received.
20:17
So that's good news in that sense.
20:19
So back to you. Thank you, Mark.
20:21
And yeah, the question is, can they actually, if they had, even
20:26
if they had had this planned, can they actually pull it off
20:29
now that this this conversation is happening quite as publicly
20:32
as it is? I, I hoped, I hope it would make
20:35
a difference if indeed that is one of the sort of nefarious
20:38
plans in the back pocket of these two bad actors, the United
20:41
States and Israel, also Britain and its allies too.
20:45
We can't leave NATO out of this. But so where's Russia on all
20:48
this, Mike? That's the question.
20:50
Russia has vested interest in Iran.
20:53
They have strategic partnerships, economic plans
20:56
together. Vladimir Putin is irate.
20:58
He's doing shuttle diplomacy. This is a this is a take from a
21:01
meeting which happened just in the last 48 hours.
21:05
This is Vladimir Putin talking about Russian specialist
21:09
scientists that are currently working at the Iranian nuclear
21:13
sites. Listen to this.
21:34
And. Just to clarify, Patrick, he's
21:44
talking about 250 there at the moment.
21:46
It could be 600 in the future, but we're talking about civilian
21:49
nuclear research here, and nobody has ever suggested
21:54
anything, except for, of course, Britain, the EU and the United
21:57
States. Not research engineers who are
21:59
building, working on the maintenance and building of the
22:02
reactors because it's it's Iranian joint project.
22:05
So Russia's not happy. They've got a contract with the
22:08
Iranian government. And basically he's saying
22:10
they're not going anywhere. So he's kind of throwing down
22:13
the gauntlet. He has made private
22:14
communications with the Israelis.
22:16
Let's take a look at this. Just to reiterate where Vladimir
22:19
Putin stands here. We'll bring this up, as you
22:21
know, Russians picked up where the Germans left off.
22:23
And for sure our specialists work there, more than 200
22:27
people. We have an agreement with Israel
22:29
that they will not be targeted. OK.
22:32
So, I mean, do you trust the Israelis?
22:35
I don't know. I don't know.
22:36
In this case, given Iran's plans to develop a peaceful atom, we
22:40
could continue working together and help them in this.
22:43
We discussed it with the Israelis and the Americans.
22:45
We could fulfil Iran's needs and thus lift Israel's concerns.
22:49
Well, they already did that, that following the US withdrawal
22:52
from the JCPOA Iran nuclear deal, a perfectly good deal that
22:56
Trump tore up because he was instructed to tear it up by the
22:59
Israeli lobby. It's as simple as that.
23:02
And Russia then offered to basically come to the rescue, if
23:05
you remember after that, to handle the Iranian themselves,
23:08
to do that sort of deal independently under
23:11
international oversight. It was a win win.
23:14
But the United States, Donald Trump in his first term said,
23:17
no, we won't accept that there's going to be no deal.
23:20
And they continue to put sanctions on Iran at the same
23:23
time also increasing sanctions on Russia.
23:26
That was Trump 1.0. So that's where things stand
23:30
there. So who who knows?
23:31
I mean, this is a very, very delicate situation for the
23:34
Chinese and for the Russians, but I don't think they're able
23:37
to intervene militarily at the moment.
23:40
That's just way too dicey. But they can help in terms of
23:43
supply and I certainly. You don't see this as an effort
23:46
to bring Russia effectively bring them into a second
23:50
conflict and weaken them in Ukraine, for example?
23:54
No, I don't think so, although Russia could strategically put
23:57
assets in Iran as a marker, much like they did with Syria limited
24:02
assets. But already they're in the
24:03
driving seat in Ukraine. And if the US attack Iran,
24:06
that's they can kiss Ukraine goodbye.
24:08
It's over at that point. Russia's already moving in heavy
24:11
on Odessa. We'll see how that goes.
24:13
But so this is also brought up the debate in the United States,
24:16
Mike, about the United States's relationship with Israel, the
24:20
Israeli lobbies, relationship with congressmen and senators.
24:24
And there was an interview with Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz.
24:27
Ted Cruz is the Zionist Zionist in in the Senate.
24:31
He is the art science. He's also the right hand of
24:33
President Trump. He's also a Bible thumping
24:36
evangelical OK talker. I mean, this is the most
24:40
extraordinary interview. He really put him on the spot
24:43
on, you know, the Israeli lobby. I pack.
24:45
Why, Why is a foreign lobby not registered as a foreign agent?
24:49
And Cruz was just doing evasive action, rearguard action the
24:53
entire interview. It was a beautiful interview by
24:56
Tucker Carlson. Here.
24:57
We'll bring Ted Cruz up on. We'll call this Tucker versus
25:01
Ted Cruz and Candace Owens, a popular conservative commentator
25:06
and YouTube as well. She released just a short on her
25:10
YouTube channel that kind of sums this up and it's absolutely
25:14
extraordinary. Includes a small clip from the
25:16
Tucker Cruz interview. Let's listen to this.
25:21
Where does my support for Israel come from #1 because biblically
25:26
we are commanded to support Israel.
25:27
But #2 hold on, hold on. You're a senator and now you're
25:31
throwing out theology and I am a Christian and I am allowed to
25:33
weigh in on this. We are commanded as Christians
25:36
support the government of Israel.
25:37
We are commanded to support Israel.
25:39
And we're. What does that mean?
25:40
We're told those who bless Israel will be blessed, But
25:42
what? Hold on, Define Israel.
25:43
This is important. Are you kidding?
25:45
This, this majority Christian country define Israel could.
25:48
Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you've
25:50
asked like 49 questions about. So that's what Genesis, that's
25:54
what God is talking about. The nation of Israel.
25:56
Yes, and he's so does that the current borders, the current
25:59
leadership, he's talking about the political entity called
26:01
Israel. He's talking about the nation of
26:03
Israel. Yet nations exists and he's
26:04
discussing a nation, a nation was the people of Israel.
26:07
Is the nation the God is referring to in Genesis?
26:10
Is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right
26:12
now? Yes, yes it is.
26:15
And I'm really happy he said that because when you hear it,
26:18
you realise how ridiculous it sounds.
26:20
Even if you're not following a theology, if you don't identify
26:23
as a Christian, you realise that you have a senator that is
26:26
sitting across saying that his number one reason, he didn't
26:29
say, one of the reasons said my number one reason that I support
26:32
Israel is because the Bible commands me to do so.
26:35
And just so you know, the Bible does not command, and this is
26:37
what Tucker Carlson is getting to in that clip.
26:40
It absolutely does not command you to support the modern state
26:44
of Israel. Genesis is is pointing to the
26:47
modern 1948 created state of Israel and and you must support
26:52
it despite the fact that it is very much involved in what can
26:57
only be described as demonic behaviour since its creation,
27:01
right. And so you're going to ignore
27:02
every other biblical passage. You're going to misinterpret
27:05
this one. It's a, a dispensationalist
27:07
heresy. Dispensationalist heresy, which
27:10
was factually funded by the World Zionist Congress.
27:15
And we can do another episode on that.
27:17
As I present to you guys all of the evidence that what it guided
27:20
the notations. This really stems from the
27:23
Schofield Bible about the heresy of the Schofield Bible.
27:26
Schofield himself was an absolute fraud who got funded
27:31
and was overseas and alleges that he wrote all of these notes
27:35
in the Bible and is telling people how to read their Bibles
27:39
the first time annotations were put underneath the passages.
27:41
So this is what Genesis says and this is what it means.
27:43
And this is how this heresy arrived in America.
27:46
Then somehow this guy is able to becomes the most printed book
27:50
and Oxford Press gets behind it because like a random pastor you
27:53
get you get the idea. Here it was very, very much a
27:55
funded effort to have Christians misunderstand the Bible, and Ted
27:59
Cruz is one of these Christians. This is extraordinary.
28:04
So this really takes the mask off.
28:07
You can see a religious fanatic, Ted Cruz, saying the Bible
28:11
commands him and all Christians to support Benjamin Netanyahu
28:15
and the state of Israel. So according to Ted Cruz logic,
28:18
Mike, if I, let's say, you know, had a son, I named my son Jesus,
28:23
does that mean the Bible commands all Christians to
28:26
worship my son as the son of God?
28:28
I mean, it's just utterly ridiculous.
28:30
I think that should you have a son and call him Jesus, that he
28:34
would be more closely related to the Christian Jesus in the
28:38
current state of Israel as to any biblical entity.
28:42
I mean, you know, it's just ridiculous.
28:45
It's the literal, the literal translation or, or subjective
28:51
translation and perversion of religious scriptures and texts.
28:56
And that's the problem with extremist fanatical
28:59
Christianity, Zionist Christianity, and that's the
29:02
problem with extremist fanatical Zionism.
29:06
So that's why they go together so perfectly.
29:08
How can this be forming policy, foreign policy, war policy.
29:13
I mean, this is, I dare say this is biblical, but the level of
29:17
deceit, the lying, the the support for a genocide has
29:22
nothing to do with the teachings of Jesus Christ in my humble
29:26
opinion. But that's just me.
29:28
Maybe you have a different opinion.
29:30
Feel free to weigh in in the chat box.
29:33
OK. And that takes us to House
29:35
Republicans. Democrats moving to limit Trump,
29:38
friend. Is that actually going to
29:40
happen? Well, this is an ongoing effort.
29:41
You've got a number over 30 Co sponsors.
29:44
I believe this is ROH Connor and Thomas Massie, a Democrat and
29:48
Republican, a joint effort here to basically stem the tide of
29:52
this executive branch of Donald Trump.
29:55
And this is what Thomas Massie tweeted here.
29:59
Most Americans do not support US involvement in Israel's war
30:02
against Iran. Which begs the question, why
30:04
doesn't more of Congress oppose it?
30:06
Literally no one campaigned on another war in the Middle East.
30:11
So this is true. But this is gap between the
30:13
public, Mike, and our elected leaders.
30:15
Once again we see this strange phenomenon where the public
30:19
doesn't reflect their their views aren't reflected in the
30:22
leadership here and in America. The answer is right here.
30:26
This is basically the explanation here.
30:28
The 2020 24 election was clearly not won by the Republicans or
30:32
Trump. It was won by IPAC.
30:34
Israel won the 2024 elections. You see the black dots in the
30:38
middle, That's IPAC. You see the Republicans in the
30:41
blue or in the red and the Democrats in the blue.
30:44
Those are the two parties. So you have a giant Israeli
30:47
uniparty owned by the Israeli lobby and they spent hundreds of
30:51
millions of dollars to get those black dots.
30:53
I trust, trust me on that. So that's that's the issue
30:57
there, Mike. So I mean, that's that's about
30:59
all we have to say on this topic as well.
31:02
And yeah, I mean, we can throw up here the map of the Middle
31:06
East. And these are all US bases
31:08
within firing range of Iranian rockets.
31:11
And those will all become targets if the United States
31:14
decides to bomb the Iranians this weekend.
31:17
And if that happens, all bets are off.
31:19
How are you going to be able to contain this conflict?
31:22
I'm not sure, but I don't know. Do we have time for the?
31:25
No, we'll keep the Tony Blair Ben video until extra if that's
31:29
OK. OK, well, if we have time, sure.
31:30
Yeah, it's former MP Tony Benn. The great Tony Benn.
31:34
Yes, OK. Well, this week then, the United
31:38
Service, sorry, the Royal United Services Institute held their
31:42
land warfare conference and they've had keynotes.
31:47
Each is from Secretary of State for War John Healey and chief of
31:50
the general staff Sir Roly Walker.
31:53
We're allowed to know what these two said, which can be to boil
31:57
down to Russia, Iran, kill them all.
31:59
That's basically what they said. But RUSI says that the Land
32:04
Warfare Conference quotes bring together brings together senior
32:07
land and ground forces leaders, policymakers and experts from
32:11
the industry and think tanks to discuss and debate the dangerous
32:14
security challenges that we are currently facing or sorry that
32:18
the the UK and its allies are currently facing.
32:21
And that will quote, explore how the land forces can increase
32:26
their combat power by leveraging new methods and capabilities to
32:29
increase their lethality, enhance their survivability and
32:32
regain manoeuvrability. So the question is, what are
32:35
these new methods? Well, AI, of course, is right up
32:39
there. And so it's perhaps no surprise
32:41
that the so called gold sponsors of the conference include
32:45
Helsing, A defence technology company providing cutting edge
32:49
software and artificial intelligence to protect
32:51
democracies. That makes it sound really
32:53
great, doesn't it? And Palantir, the world's
32:56
leading software platform. These are their words for data
32:59
driven operations and decision making.
33:01
Their silver sponsors include ARX Robotics which focuses on
33:05
the digital transformation of land forces and the development
33:09
of autonomous unmanned systems. And bronze sponsors include
33:12
Stark a quotes technology driven defence company delivering the
33:17
systems that Europe and NATO need now, including unmanned
33:20
systems that are designed to meet the realities of modern
33:24
conflict. Colon AI enabled software
33:28
defined and ready for affordable production at scale.
33:32
But as the Times reports here, RUSI was forced by the Starmer
33:37
regime to issue a statement on reporting restrictions in place
33:41
at the conference. So speeches from John Healey and
33:44
Rolly Walker, as I said, were allowed to be reported upon.
33:47
But speeches, for example, by Air Chief Marshall, Sir Richard
33:50
Knighton, the chief of the Air staff, who's expected to become
33:54
head of the armed forces, and General Sir Jim Hockenhall, the
33:58
head of the of Strategic Command, we could not be made
34:01
public. There were no restrictions on
34:03
reporting on military leaders from foreign nations.
34:05
So that meant that if people were on a panel with auk based
34:11
military leader, everything could be reported about what
34:14
that panel said, except for the UK guys.
34:16
It's quite incredible. Now this has been described as
34:19
unprecedented interference from Downing St and RUSI said in an
34:23
email that they sent out on Monday quotes.
34:25
We wanted to clarify late change in reporting rules relating to
34:29
speakers from the British armed forces which differ from those
34:32
which have been applied in previous years and which also
34:35
differ from the printed brochure.
34:37
The majority of speeches and panel appearances by British
34:40
personnel will not be for reporting, whereas those by
34:44
individuals from foreign militaries will be.
34:46
So this, as I say, absolutely unprecedented censorship of what
34:52
is effectively, OK, you've got to pay to buy a ticket to, but
34:55
it's effectively a public event and it's normally widely
34:58
reported on and they normally stream or at least make
35:02
recordings of, of the speeches and put them out afterwards.
35:07
Why is the British regime doing this at this stage?
35:10
This looks very much like because they are preparing for
35:13
war and, uh, they don't want, uh, some of the comments from
35:17
some of these military leaders, uh, becoming public.
35:20
And and corporate defence contractors.
35:23
So the merger of government and corporate interest.
35:25
This is just fascist behaviour. And I'm not, I'm not saying that
35:28
flippantly right. It is what it is.
35:31
So why, why chatter mouse rules? If we're just talking about the
35:35
quote defence industry, well, it's not the defence industry,
35:38
it's the offence industry. Absolutely OK.
35:42
If you like what the UK column does, please head over to the UK
35:44
column website and to click on the box at the top of the page
35:49
for helping us out. Your help is absolutely needed
35:52
and very much appreciated. And thank you again to everybody
35:54
that is a member has joined again recently or joined
35:57
recently. We do need your support.
36:00
Please continue that if you possibly can.
36:02
Tonight at 7:00 PM, the weekly banter with Charles, myself and
36:07
Germ will go out on the usual live stream places.
36:11
And we're talking about immigration and national
36:13
identity tonight. So that's potentially
36:15
controversial. A reminder of the date for your
36:18
diary which is Saturday the 18th of October.
36:21
For the next UK column on location event in New York,
36:24
health is a topic or health related topics will be the main
36:28
theme and you'd be very welcome to come along to that.
36:31
Tickets will be on sale very soon.
36:33
We will have more details of this shortly.
36:36
The Science Beautiful Festival is taking place next weekend in
36:40
Wimborne in Dorset, UK Column will be there and well, I'm glad
36:45
to say that the Facebook competition has been won for two
36:48
free tickets for that and the winner is Madman on Facebook, so
36:54
I'm sure the guys will be in touch very shortly to help you
36:57
out with that. A quick reminder of the Don't
37:00
Let geoengineering go over Your Head event, Picnic in the Park,
37:04
which is happening in Hyde Park tomorrow at 2:00 PM.
37:08
And Sonya Poulton will be live streaming that as well.
37:11
But get along to think the weather's going to be very
37:13
pleasant for that. So get along to that if you can.
37:16
And coming soon is that Andrew Bridging will be at the Seven
37:21
Stars Hotel in Totnes on the 25th of July, 7:00 PM Doors.
37:28
Doors will be opening at 6:30. Get along to that if you
37:31
possibly can. Not to be missed as it says at
37:34
the end there. OK, let's come on then to
37:38
assisted dying. And of course, MPs are debating
37:42
and voting on the final stage of the assisted dying bill today.
37:46
And the question is, is the assisted dying bill going to be
37:49
euthanized? Well, if Kim, Kim Bledbetter and
37:53
her supporters win the vote today, the bill will go to the
37:56
House of Lords for consideration.
37:59
If the vote is lost, that will end it for now.
38:01
But in November, if you remember, MPs voted to back the
38:05
bill and that went to the next stage and they voted by a
38:09
majority of 55. Ledbetter says she's confident
38:12
the bill's going to pass today and she may have grounds for
38:15
that confidence because that 55 majority was larger than
38:18
expected. And most consider it unlikely
38:21
the 28 will have changed their minds, although some clearly
38:24
have. There have been amendments to
38:27
the bill and some of these will be voted on today.
38:30
And of course, the main amendment is that instead of
38:32
having a court having to approve an assisted dying request
38:37
supported by two doctors, it will be decided by a panel
38:40
consisting of a lawyer, a consultant psychiatrist and
38:43
social workers. Other amendments include a
38:45
requirement for any doctors assessing assisted dying.
38:49
Requests have gone through training on domestic abuse,
38:52
including coercive control and financial abuse.
38:54
As if that's going to make a difference if somebody's
38:57
particularly interested in pursuing that kind of agenda.
39:01
And another one, making independent advocates available
39:04
for anybody that might be experiencing substantially
39:06
substantial difficulty and understanding the processes.
39:11
So that's that is going on at the moment.
39:16
We wait to see what the final result of that is going to be,
39:20
but it's looking like it might proceed to the House of Lords.
39:24
We'll see. Let's move on then.
39:27
And Mark, let's bring you back and some more information is
39:31
coming out on Bilderberg since the conference ended.
39:34
What have you got for us? Well, this is.
39:38
First hand information, pretty much my own research across the
39:41
board. I was looking around at some
39:44
people whose names are not real common at Bilderberg and looking
39:48
at the economic angle. Since I mentioned Congressman
39:51
Jason Smith in last week's report, head of the Ways and
39:54
Means Committee, they write the tariff laws and so on.
39:57
I thought, well, what else economic might have happened and
40:02
there was a speech, and we'll show this here, by the European
40:06
Commissioner, Maria Albuquerque. For the High Level Conference on
40:10
European Financial Integration, we've talked before about
40:14
European Central banks integrating and fiscal fiscal
40:18
integration in the EU over the years.
40:20
Well, this is more of that advancing the Savings and
40:24
Investment Union, very important, jointly organised by
40:27
the European Commission and the European Central Bank.
40:31
And what I've got here on this is that this was on June 12th,
40:36
just before Maria Albuquerque left Portugal, where she's from,
40:41
and went to Stockholm for Bilderberg.
40:44
And this speech, of course, would be of particular interest
40:47
to some of the other attendees, which included the Bank for
40:50
International Settlements GM elect Pablo Hernandez, World
40:54
Economic Forum President Boris Brenda, and the Eurogroup
40:57
President Pascal Donahue, as well as the European Investment
41:01
Bank President Nadia Calvino. And Maria Albuquerque also noted
41:07
that financial integration could not be more relevant.
41:11
Today's discussions on the eve of Bilderberg are centred on the
41:16
Savings and Investment Union, or SIU, and she says the political
41:20
momentum is behind that. Now they're talking also about a
41:24
more power concentrated single supervision of the Savings and
41:29
Investment Union and so on and so forth.
41:32
And what they're saying is that this would help shore up the
41:37
more fragmented capital markets in the European, in the European
41:41
Union compared to the US capital markets by tapping in or
41:46
leveraging or somehow using the savings of Europeans, typical
41:51
everyday Europeans bank account savings to put a financial
41:56
muscle behind this. Sorry, just to just to sort of
42:00
I'm understanding this, obviously in the 2008 financial
42:04
crash, we saw Greece and other countries experiencing bail
42:08
insurance and money, people's money effectively being nicked
42:11
in order to shore up the failing financial system.
42:14
We're talking about a formalisation of this process.
42:19
It does look that way. It smells like that.
42:23
It remains to be seen a little bit.
42:24
But yeah, there there was those negative interest rates.
42:27
There were people in Cyprus having their bank accounts
42:30
syphoned. And at that time, the viceroy
42:33
overseeing the Cyprus situation was a long time.
42:36
Bilderberg attendee Joseph Ackerman out of Germany, a
42:39
banker we may recall. At any rate, Maria Albuquerque
42:45
revealed something very interesting in that report that
42:47
I cited the title of a moment ago.
42:50
At the end of 2023, EU financial assets totaled 34 point €34.5
42:59
trillion with AT, which sounds totally amazing to me.
43:03
I thought maybe it was a typo, but that's what she wrote.
43:07
Household financial assets in the U in the EU.
43:10
Excuse me, totaling €34.5 trillion.
43:14
Of that around €11.5 trillion sits in cash and low yield
43:19
deposits. And there's no surefire way of
43:24
knowing whether EU citizens, you know, will directly benefit from
43:28
this. Would they get an investment
43:30
prospectus in the mail saying we've we're going to invest your
43:33
savings money this way and is it going to be totally voluntary?
43:37
These are some of the questions. Would they actually get
43:40
dividends with, would their money bring returns or would it
43:44
be something much more underhanded like you mentioned a
43:46
moment ago, Mike and the, the excuse me, the publication GIS
43:57
Reports, which is more or less an impartial journal, also
44:01
expressed some concern about this.
44:04
As highlighted in the European Commission's Competitive
44:08
Competitiveness Compass, the EU will require an annual
44:12
investment of up to €800 billion by 2030 to modernise what's
44:18
called as chronically distressed economy.
44:21
These figures stem from a September 2024 report by career
44:25
European banker and past Bilderberg attendee Mario
44:28
Draghi, which underscore the urgency for groundbreaking,
44:32
groundbreaking innovation across the board.
44:35
And so it does appear highly possible that European citizens
44:43
savings could be pilfered in some way to shore up these
44:48
fragmented capital markets in the EU and to help to help EU
44:53
meet its investment goals, its investment future, you might
44:59
say, with regards to all the defence spending that it's being
45:02
called on to make. So that this is something very,
45:05
very curious, something that deserves very close attention.
45:08
Now, there's another aspect of this concerning Congressman
45:11
Jason Smith. I got a letter back because when
45:16
you see the Bilderberg attendance list, you have to
45:18
keep in mind that that's more of the invitation list.
45:22
It doesn't necessarily confirm that everyone actually showed
45:25
up. But Bilderberg wrote me back
45:27
saying, as it shows here, Congressman Jason Smith did
45:31
indeed attend, as mentioned in the participant list that was
45:34
published, and EU Commissioner Maria Albuquerque also attended
45:39
as listed. I wanted to make sure of that
45:41
because this Savings and Investment Union thing that I
45:44
cited was announced in Portugal right before Stockholm became
45:51
the site of the 2025 Bilderberg meeting.
45:55
Moving on from there, it's interesting also that Jason
46:00
Smith was there along with the EU counterpart in a way, Mauro
46:07
Sefkovic, he's the EU Commissioner for Trade and
46:10
Economic Security, as we show here.
46:12
As I noted, Jason Smith from the 8th District of Missouri chairs
46:15
the House Ways and Means Committee, trade laws, tariff
46:18
laws, customs regulations, things like that, while they
46:22
they met under the same roof. And after that, Sefkovic, who
46:27
had already been to the United States more than once this past
46:30
spring, he spoke to the American Enterprise Institute.
46:33
You might recall, while AEI, the Enterprise Institute, sent a
46:37
emissary to Bilderberg this year.
46:40
From Bilderberg, Savkovic went over to Alberta, Canada to the
46:45
G7 and met with Jameson Greer, the trade representative of the
46:50
US on the side. And he also met with Greer
46:54
earlier in the year when he visited the US and Robert
46:58
Lighthizer, who was Trump's trade representative during
47:01
Trump One point O he was also at Bilderberg.
47:05
And at any rate, the what appears to be happening is that
47:10
with a July 9 deadline being imposed by the Trump
47:15
administration, the transatlantic allies are rushing
47:18
to clinch a deal before Washington hits the EU block
47:24
with tariffs up of up to 50%, five, zero, 50%.
47:29
And Trump's import duties would affect about 70% of EU exports
47:33
to the US. So it appears that's why Jason
47:37
Smith was mainly at Bilderberg, to talk with Seth Kovic and
47:42
provide input and collaborate a bit.
47:44
So Seth Kovic could go to the G7 and try and stem the tide of
47:49
these tariffs affecting a lot of EU imports going into the US and
47:54
doing that at the G7. Now, another dimension of this,
47:58
of course, is accountability. And Jason Smith, I did a pretty
48:02
in depth search. There seems to be no indication
48:06
that any of the Missouri Meet Missouri media, either newspaper
48:10
or broadcast. They appear to have no idea that
48:13
their beloved congressman went to this elite confab in
48:17
Stockholm known as Bilderberg. And something like that happened
48:22
in 2018, which is the last time I was in the UK.
48:25
John Hickenlooper, the Colorado governor, went to Bilderberg and
48:29
he got cited by the state ethics Commission.
48:31
And 2025 is the five year anniversary of Hickenlooper
48:36
being cited by the ethics Commission in Colorado precisely
48:40
for attending Bilderberg, among some other misdeeds.
48:43
And here's a little bit of what that report had to say.
48:46
Hickenlooper had paid $1500 for travel and lodging, but he also
48:50
enjoyed luxury accommodations that were far beyond that cost.
48:54
He should have realised that he was receiving a gift from Fiat
48:57
Chrysler, the sponsor. There's one other call out quote
49:01
from that report, if we might show that the the commissioners
49:08
of the Ethics Commission report also said unanimously found that
49:12
Hickenlooper had violated the gift ban with his attendance to
49:16
the Bilderberg meetings in Turin, Italy.
49:18
And that was again in 2018. So the all important question
49:22
now as I'll show here, come to find out, Missouri also has an
49:27
ethics Commission. And I've already placed a call
49:30
to them and some of the Missouri media to see if they're going to
49:34
take an interest or at least see if they're already looking at
49:38
Jason Smith's participation at Bilderberg and whether something
49:41
similar to what happened to Hickenlooper might come down to
49:44
ensure some accountability here. So there they'll be much more to
49:48
report on that very soon. Go back to you guys.
49:52
Yeah, Patrick, what have you got on this?
49:54
Well, on the Bilderberg front, if you're looking for a good
49:57
sort of wrap up, a good review of what happened at Bilderberg,
50:01
a great summary along with original photos as well.
50:05
We've got this up on 21st Century, wired.com, a review of
50:08
Bilderberg 2025, AI, Drones, Technocracy and the
50:12
Transatlantic Alliance. This is by journalist Hannah
50:15
Borno, and this is up on our website right now.
50:18
Fantastic summary and analysis as well as naming all the names
50:23
and what everybody got up to and some great photographs as well
50:27
from her and some of her colleagues.
50:29
So we've got that up at 21 wire and as it as it goes, this is
50:33
another article that people I think need to also take a look
50:36
at here. And this is on the Guardian.
50:39
This is by Charlie Skelton, who's been covering Bilderberg
50:42
for a very long time as well. China haunts, Bilderberg talks
50:47
as usual, suspects plot, world domination.
50:49
This is a fantastic article and it just shows you the pivot
50:53
towards Asia along with all the 5th generation total warfare,
50:56
the AI, the drones, etcetera. So if you really want to kind of
51:00
get a good sort of rounded scope of what went on and what this
51:04
meeting really has been all about this year, those are two
51:07
articles I highly recommend. Hopefully we'll have those in
51:09
the show notes. OK, Thank you, Patrick.
51:12
Now let's come on to the issue of propaganda.
51:14
And the government's media complex continues to promote the
51:18
war narrative, of course. Let's have a look at a couple of
51:20
examples. First of all, we have the Mirror
51:22
here making sure we all know that first of all, World War 3
51:26
is coming and that when it arrives, conscription will be a
51:29
thing. So this whole conscription
51:31
narrative continues to sort of rumble under the surface without
51:33
any admission that it's actually going to be a thing.
51:36
But apparently, according to the Mirror, if you're a Baker, a
51:39
farmer, a doctor, a nurse, or an engineer, you'll be all right,
51:43
although I suspect the latter isn't 100% safe.
51:46
But in the meantime, gov.uk is very excited to tell us that the
51:53
nuclear bomb is great because jobs are a thing.
51:58
And so new figures, they say, reveal that 1500 skilled roles
52:04
have been created at the in the last year at the UK's Nuclear
52:07
Weapons Technology centre. AWE and they claim to have
52:12
carried out a study which shows that people working on weapons
52:15
of mass destruction receive 20% above the the UK salary, the
52:20
average UK salary. So that's good news.
52:22
They decided to announce this alongside what they describe as
52:25
a landmark £15 billion investment within this
52:28
Parliament to renew the U KS sovereign nuclear warhead.
52:33
And this was confirmed through the recent Strategic Defence
52:36
Review. To keep, they say, Britain's,
52:39
the British people safe while supporting almost 10,000 UK
52:43
jobs. Because don't forget, the first
52:45
role of government is to keep people safe.
52:48
Now Lisa Nandy was a guest on this morning's BBC Today
52:52
programme and at the end of her segment she was asked about the
52:56
pro Palestine protesters who broke into Brize Norton, RAF
52:59
Brize Norton this morning and she couldn't help herself.
53:02
She described these processors as being irresponsible and hoped
53:05
the full force of the law would be imposed because national
53:08
security is so important and quotes the first role of
53:11
government is to keep people safe.
53:14
This has become a term of sheer propaganda.
53:17
We're hearing it everywhere now. We've got to keep people safe.
53:20
That's the role of government that began that principle began
53:23
to be rolled out with with COVID.
53:26
It's now being continued through the various conflicts that we're
53:30
seeing around the world now and it's being used to justify this
53:33
increased defence spending, which is actually war spending
53:37
and just sheer propaganda. It's total Orwellian inversion.
53:41
So so activists wanting to stop the UK from sending weapons and
53:46
defence parts to Israel. Who is committing A genocide,
53:50
literally slaughtering 10s of thousands of women and children
53:54
and innocent civilians that somehow keeping people safe by
53:58
by by by clamping down on those those concerned citizens who are
54:02
doing basically, I don't know, civil disobedience I think is
54:06
probably the right word for it, but no.
54:08
Mark was talking about accountability.
54:10
What they're doing is attempting to hold people to account, but
54:13
they don't want to be held to account.
54:14
So prosecute them. Put them in prison instead.
54:17
Oh, they'd love to delete the word accountability from the
54:20
great digital archives of humanity once the opportunity
54:25
arises and replace it with Hutzpah.
54:28
We'll leave it there. Yes.
54:29
Well, look on screen at the moment is Sir Richard Moore, the
54:33
current head of the Secret Intelligence Service, otherwise
54:36
known as MI 6. And as I mentioned on Monday's
54:39
programme, he's to be replaced by Blaise Metrovelli later this
54:43
year, I think at the end of September.
54:45
Now the Prime Minister has appointed him to be the next
54:50
chair of the Kennedy Memorial Trust for a period of five
54:53
years. For those who don't know, the
54:55
Kennedy Memorial Trust was established in 1964 to
54:59
administer money raised in the United Kingdom as a tribute to
55:02
the late John Kennedy, whatever Britain's role was in his death.
55:07
Maybe it's some kind of, you know, some kind of exercise in
55:10
trying to absolve themselves of responsibility in some way.
55:14
But anyway, part of this fund was used to create and maintain
55:17
the Kennedy Memorial site Running made and the rest is
55:20
used to provide Kennedy scholarships, which enable
55:23
British postgraduate studies students sorry to to study at
55:26
Harvard and at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
55:31
Now the recruitment process for for trustees of which Moore has
55:34
now won, of course, being the chairman, they're run this
55:39
recruitment process run by the board of the trust and approved
55:42
by the Prime Minister. And in this case, the
55:44
recruitment panel was chaired by Marianne Sieghart, who's a
55:49
senior independent trustee of the Kennedy Memorial Trust,
55:52
apparently. And of course Mary Anne is also
55:54
a journalist. She's served on Ofcom's board in
55:56
the past and written for the Times and so on.
56:00
So she's a pretty establishment figure as well.
56:02
Anyway, getting back to Richard Moore, he has ABA in philosophy,
56:07
politics and economics from Oxford University.
56:09
And leaving Oxford he won a Kennedy scholarship.
56:12
So isn't it appropriate therefore that he has now become
56:16
chairman giving out these gifts? So he then went off to the
56:21
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and then in
56:25
2007 he attended Stanford Executive Programme.
56:28
So Patrick, what is this? Is this AUK equivalent of the
56:32
Rhodes Scholarship programme? Deep state and action grooming.
56:35
It's next generation. Is that what this is all about?
56:37
Yeah, we're the Chevening Scholarship Programme run by the
56:40
British embassies overseas or the the British Council.
56:43
Yeah, that's exactly what it is. It's it's a career path and by
56:47
putting the head of head of intelligence in charge of that
56:49
programme, that's talent spotting, grooming and getting
56:53
people prepared for a position in the deep state.
56:57
So maintaining the transatlantic Anglo American shape that is
57:02
represented in confabs like Bilderberg and others.
57:06
So that's exactly what it looks like.
57:08
Yes, OK, well, let's let's leave it then with this story because
57:13
I mean, everybody has seen the headlines over the last couple
57:16
of days as we've been experiencing relatively warm
57:19
temperatures for the UK, at least that you know, the BBC
57:22
here is typical temperatures to hit 32 C again as heat wave
57:26
grips UK. Now this article, if we're
57:30
talking about war propaganda, this is absolute climate
57:33
propaganda because if you read through the text of this, it's
57:36
got the usual stuff about wildfires, about how we're all
57:39
going to die and so on. And although the headline is a
57:41
little less sensationalist than others, it's absolutely
57:45
reinforcing this, this propaganda narrative.
57:48
So look, let's look at this then this came out from Sky
57:52
yesterday. Amber Heath.
57:54
Sorry, Amber heat health alert issued across England with rise
57:59
in deaths likely read more, right?
58:03
And now I strongly recommend everybody goes and looks at this
58:06
Twitter thread. We just put that back on screen.
58:09
I'm going to show a couple of the responses to this, but this
58:11
is just two of the more polite responses, so here's one.
58:15
Nobody's going to die from 30° heat.
58:17
Calm down. Fair fairpoint.
58:20
And another one here. Not gullible enough to read
58:23
more. It's summer you worthless
58:25
idiots. And those were the politest of
58:27
what is on there. Hundreds and hundreds of replies
58:30
on that, basically telling Sky News to wise up.
58:35
Because highs this weekend M24 I just checked the weather report.
58:39
Where are they getting this 32 for this weekend?
58:41
Or is this sometime in the in the unknown future?
58:44
Is that? No, I think there's probably a
58:45
couple of places around the country where the temperatures
58:47
have been a little bit higher. But Even so, the British people
58:51
spend hundreds, if not thousands of pounds every year getting out
58:54
of this country to go to Spain, to Portugal, to, to Greece to,
58:58
to experience 30° temperatures. And, and so they don't die in
59:04
the process. Now, many of the tweets in
59:07
response were highlighting the fact that actually the number of
59:11
people that die from the cold is orders of magnitude worse in
59:15
this country than those who die from, from heat stroke or some
59:19
kind of heat related illness. So, you know, it's ironic that
59:24
we are being force fed this kind of propaganda while, you know,
59:29
elderly people and, and people living in poverty continue to to
59:33
literally die during the winter from not being able to switch
59:36
their the heating on in the house.
59:38
It is quite an incredible situation.
59:40
Remember Frank Butcher and Peggy two weeks in Benidorm?
59:44
How do you say beans and chips in Spanish?
59:46
Yes, anyway. Yeah, I know.
59:48
Yes. Well, look, we got to leave it
59:50
there for today. Patrick, Mark, thank you very
59:52
much for joining us. We will be back in a few
59:55
minutes. If UK column member for some UK
59:58
column news extras, stick with the live stream.
1:00:01
Otherwise, have a great weekend. We'll see you 1:00 PM as usual
1:00:04
on Monday. See you then.
1:00:05
Bye. Bye.