Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / CERN Recreates Matter From the Universe’s Earliest Moments
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration
- 0:05Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
- 0:27Speaker 2: Imagine for a second, trying to figure out exactly what
- 0:29Speaker 2: the universe looked like just one millionth of a second
- 0:33Speaker 2: after it was born.
- 0:34Speaker 3: Right, which is just an unimaginably short amount of time.
- 0:37Speaker 2: Yeah, completely, And you can't use a telescope, right because
- 0:40Speaker 2: light literally did not exist yet in any way that
- 0:43Speaker 2: we could ever actually see.
- 0:44Speaker 3: No no stars, no galaxies, no dust clouds.
- 0:47Speaker 2: Nothing exactly nothing. So to see that far back you
- 0:50Speaker 2: basically have to build a time machine. And today we
- 0:54Speaker 2: are exploring a microscopic big Bang.
- 0:56Speaker 3: It's a really wild concept.
- 0:58Speaker 2: It is. We are unpacking how scientists of the certain
- 1:01Speaker 2: research facility are smashing atoms together at nearly the speed
- 1:05Speaker 2: of light to recreate the absolute beginning of everything. And
- 1:09Speaker 2: as part of this journey, we are going to look
- 1:11Speaker 2: at how discovering an atomic nucleus shaped like a sub
- 1:16Speaker 2: atomic bowling pin is completely rewriting our understanding of the cosmos.
- 1:20Speaker 3: Yeah, a bowling pin. It sounds absurd, but it's true.
- 1:23Speaker 2: Okay, let's unpack this because you are about to learn
- 1:25Speaker 2: how the tiniest, most incomprehensibly small pieces of matter hold
- 1:30Speaker 2: the absolute secrets to the universe's most violent and mysterious era.
- 1:34Speaker 3: It really is a journey to the absolute, blistering extremes
- 1:39Speaker 3: of physics. I mean, when we talk about the beginning
- 1:41Speaker 3: of the universe, that very first millions of a second,
- 1:44Speaker 3: we basically have to throw out every single thing we
- 1:47Speaker 3: think we know about matter.
- 1:48Speaker 2: Right, because it's nothing like what we see today, Oh.
- 1:51Speaker 3: Not even close. If you look at the atoms that
- 1:54Speaker 3: make up your own body, or you know the device
- 1:57Speaker 3: you were listening to this on the air, you are
- 2:01Speaker 3: none of those building blocks existed.
- 2:03Speaker 2: Yet because it was just too hot exactly.
- 2:05Speaker 3: The universe was far too hot and chaotic for anything
- 2:08Speaker 3: that organized to survive.
- 2:10Speaker 2: So there were no molecules, no basic elements like carbon
- 2:13Speaker 2: or oxygen. The heat was just I mean unimaginable. You
- 2:16Speaker 2: couldn't even form a basic proton or neutron.
- 2:19Speaker 3: No, you couldn't. Instead, the universe was completely filled with
- 2:22Speaker 3: this primordial matter, which is an extreme state known as
- 2:25Speaker 3: quark gluon.
- 2:26Speaker 2: Plasma, quark gluon plasma.
- 2:28Speaker 3: Yeah, in our modern, you know, much cooler universe. Quarks
- 2:31Speaker 3: and gluons are essentially the fundamental hardware of reality. They
- 2:35Speaker 3: are locked up tightly inside protons and neutrons. But the
- 2:38Speaker 3: way they are locked up is actually incredibly counterintuitive. The
- 2:42Speaker 3: force that holds them together, which we call the strong force,
- 2:46Speaker 3: it acts a lot like a microscopic rubber band.
- 2:48Speaker 2: Wait a rubber band, how so?
- 2:51Speaker 3: Well, Normally in physics, if you say, move two magnets apart,
- 2:54Speaker 3: the attraction gets weaker.
- 2:56Speaker 2: Right, the further away they are, the less they pull, exactly.
- 2:59Speaker 3: But with if you try to pull two of them apart,
- 3:02Speaker 3: the strong force connecting them actually gets stronger the further
- 3:05Speaker 3: you pull. Oh wow, Yeah, the tension just builds and builds,
- 3:08Speaker 3: and eventually the rubber band snaps. But instead of leaving
- 3:12Speaker 3: you with two free, isolated quarks, the pure energy of
- 3:15Speaker 3: that snap instantly manifests into brand new quarks.
- 3:19Speaker 2: You're kidding, So it just makes more of them.
- 3:21Speaker 3: Yep, they immediately pair up again. So under normal conditions,
- 3:24Speaker 3: you can never ever get a quark by itself. They
- 3:27Speaker 3: are permanently confined.
- 3:29Speaker 2: Unless I'm guessing you introduce an apocalyptic level of heat
- 3:33Speaker 2: and energy, which is where that primordial quark gluon plasma
- 3:37Speaker 2: comes in.
- 3:37Speaker 3: That is the threshold. Yeah, in that first fraction of
- 3:40Speaker 3: a microsecond after the Big Bang, the ambient heat and
- 3:44Speaker 3: the energy density were so unimaginably intense that those rubber
- 3:48Speaker 3: bands simply melted away. Wow, the boundaries of the protons
- 3:52Speaker 3: and neutrons just dissolved, So the quarks and gluons were
- 3:55Speaker 3: no longer confined into these neat little packages. They were
- 3:58Speaker 3: free roaming past one another in this totally chaotic, ultra hot,
- 4:04Speaker 3: frictionless liquid soup.
- 4:06Speaker 2: And because that primordial soup hasn't existed naturally for what
- 4:10Speaker 2: thirteen point eight billion years, studying it requires actually recreating.
- 4:14Speaker 3: It, which is no small feat.
- 4:16Speaker 2: Right. If you are standing inside the CERN facility in
- 4:18Speaker 2: Switzerland right now, specifically at the Alice detector, you'd be
- 4:22Speaker 2: looking at the exact machinery designed to do that. They
- 4:24Speaker 2: are taking atomic nuclei, accelerating them through a twenty seven
- 4:28Speaker 2: kilometer underground ring to ninety nine point nine to nine
- 4:31Speaker 2: percent the speed of light and just collide them head on.
- 4:33Speaker 3: The engineering required to achieve this is staggering. I mean,
- 4:37Speaker 3: we're talking about engineering a microscopic event with temperatures hundreds
- 4:40Speaker 3: of thousands of times hotter than the core of our suns.
- 4:43Speaker 2: That's just nuts.
- 4:43Speaker 3: It is. It is a level of heat that fundamentally
- 4:47Speaker 3: breaks the rules of modern matter just to free those
- 4:50Speaker 3: subatomic particles for a fleeting moment.
- 4:53Speaker 2: It's kind of wild to conceptualize. To me. It's like
- 4:57Speaker 2: trying to understand how a massive compon plex wedding cake
- 5:02Speaker 2: was baked by taking two fully baked cakes and just
- 5:05Speaker 2: smashing them together so hard and so incredibly fast that
- 5:08Speaker 2: they instantly melt back down into raw flour, sugar, and eggs.
- 5:13Speaker 2: I love that, except in this case it's the fundamental
- 5:15Speaker 2: matter of the universe. We are violently destroying the modern
- 5:19Speaker 2: structure of reality to see the raw, unbaked ingredients.
- 5:22Speaker 3: What's fascinating here is that this isn't just about destroying matter.
- 5:25Speaker 3: When you use that k analogy, you're hinting at reversing
- 5:28Speaker 3: a one way process. In a very real mathematical sense,
- 5:31Speaker 3: this experiment is a time machine. By creating that quark
- 5:34Speaker 3: gluon plasma, researchers are actively recreating the exact primordial conditions
- 5:39Speaker 3: of the early universe. It is not a computer simulation.
- 5:42Speaker 3: It is not a theoretical model.
- 5:43Speaker 2: That's a real deal.
- 5:44Speaker 3: It is the actual physical state of the cosmos as
- 5:47Speaker 3: it existed thirteen point eight billion years ago, basically pulled
- 5:50Speaker 3: out of the past and brought into existence for a
- 5:53Speaker 3: fraction of a second inside a physical detector.
- 5:55Speaker 2: So we have this time machine that relies on a
- 5:58Speaker 2: total incomprehensible amount of energy to melt these subatomic bonds naturally.
- 6:03Speaker 2: For decades, physicists assumed the only way to generate that
- 6:07Speaker 2: kind of apocalyptic heat was to use the absolute heaviest,
- 6:11Speaker 2: most massive ammunition they could find. That was the prevailing wisdom. Right,
- 6:15Speaker 2: you want the biggest bang, you use the biggest ingredients.
- 6:17Speaker 3: Yeah, that was the foundational assumption of the field. For
- 6:20Speaker 3: a very long time, the scientific community operated on the
- 6:23Speaker 3: premise that creating this primordial plasma required collisions between massive,
- 6:28Speaker 3: extremely heavy atomic nuclei. Look lead, right, Yes, lead was
- 6:32Speaker 3: the standard ammunition. A single lead nucleus has over two
- 6:36Speaker 3: hundred protons and neutrons packed together. So when you take
- 6:39Speaker 3: two of those massive heavyweights and smash them together at
- 6:42Speaker 3: near light speed, the total kinetic energy involved in the
- 6:45Speaker 3: crash is astronomical, which makes sense right. It results in
- 6:48Speaker 3: a massive, sprawling release of energy, which everyone thought was
- 6:52Speaker 3: the absolute baseline requirement to generate enough heat to melt
- 6:56Speaker 3: protons and neutrons into that quark gluon plasma.
- 7:00Speaker 2: But that entire assumption has just been turned on its head.
- 7:03Speaker 2: Physicists have now succeeded in creating this exact same primordial
- 7:07Speaker 2: matter by smashing together much much smaller, lighter nuclei. Specifically,
- 7:13Speaker 2: they used oxygen sixteen and neon.
- 7:16Speaker 3: Twenty, and this sent shockwaves through the physics community. I mean,
- 7:19Speaker 3: oxygen has just sixteen protons and neutrons in its nucleus.
- 7:23Speaker 2: Neon has twenty, compared to over two hundred for lead.
- 7:26Speaker 3: Exactly compared to lead, these are absolute featherweights. They contain
- 7:30Speaker 3: just a tiny fraction of the total mass.
- 7:32Speaker 2: Okay, hold on, I have to push back on this
- 7:33Speaker 2: because the math doesn't seem to add up here. You
- 7:35Speaker 2: just said lead has over two hundred protons and neutrons
- 7:38Speaker 2: and oxygen has sixteen. If lead is the heavyweight champion
- 7:41Speaker 2: of atoms, how does a featherweight like oxygen pack enough
- 7:44Speaker 2: punch to actually melt matter? It's a great question, because
- 7:48Speaker 2: if breaking those strong force rubber bands requires such an
- 7:52Speaker 2: absurd amount of heat, doesn't using a lighter ingredient contradict
- 7:57Speaker 2: the whole idea that you need a massive impact to
- 7:59Speaker 2: generate that kind of force. I thought maximum mass was
- 8:02Speaker 2: the whole point.
- 8:02Speaker 3: I know it completely sounds like a contradiction on the surface,
- 8:06Speaker 3: but it actually reveals a much deeper, more elegant truth
- 8:10Speaker 3: about the physics of phase transitions. We have to stop
- 8:12Speaker 3: thinking about it purely in terms of total math and
- 8:15Speaker 3: start thinking about relativistic energy density. Okay, think of it
- 8:18Speaker 3: like a stiletto heel versus a snowshoe.
- 8:21Speaker 2: I'm listening.
- 8:21Speaker 3: So a massive lead nucleus is like a snowshoe. It
- 8:25Speaker 3: has a tremendous amount of total mass and energy, but
- 8:28Speaker 3: when it collides, that energy is spread out over a
- 8:30Speaker 3: relatively large sub atomic area.
- 8:32Speaker 2: Right, the impact is distributed exactly.
- 8:34Speaker 3: Now, Oxygen and neon are much much smaller. When you
- 8:37Speaker 3: accelerate an oxygen nucleus to ninety nine point ninety nine percent,
- 8:41Speaker 3: the speed of light, relativistic physics kicks in. Its effective
- 8:44Speaker 3: momentum becomes gargantuan. Okay, So when those two tiny oxygen
- 8:48Speaker 3: nuclei hit, all of their kinetic energy is concentrated into
- 8:51Speaker 3: an infinitesimally small, needle like point.
- 8:55Speaker 2: Oh so it's the stiletto heel stepping on.
- 8:57Speaker 3: Your foot, exactly the stiletto heel. Because us the impact
- 9:00Speaker 3: zone is so incredibly small, the energy density at that
- 9:04Speaker 3: specific pinpoint spikes dramatically. That localized concentration of energy creates
- 9:10Speaker 3: a temperature spite high enough to literally melt the boundaries
- 9:14Speaker 3: of the protons.
- 9:15Speaker 2: Even though the overall energy of the collision is lower
- 9:18Speaker 2: than the lead one.
- 9:18Speaker 3: Precisely, it fundamentally pushes the boundary of how small atomic
- 9:23Speaker 3: nuclei can be while still successfully recreating primordial matter.
- 9:27Speaker 2: So it's not about the total size of the crash
- 9:29Speaker 2: at all. It's about the sheer, intensity and focus at
- 9:33Speaker 2: the exact point of impact.
- 9:34Speaker 3: It redefines the fundamental rules for when matter transitions into
- 9:38Speaker 3: this extreme state. We now know that the universe's earliest,
- 9:41Speaker 3: most chaotic form of matter can be sparked into existence
- 9:44Speaker 3: from much smaller starting points than we ever dare to imagine.
- 9:47Speaker 3: It's redefining the absolute minimum requirements for a little big bang.
- 9:51Speaker 2: Okay, so the stiletto works. We've successfully created this tiny
- 9:54Speaker 2: droplet of primordial core glow on plasma using these smaller
- 9:58Speaker 2: lighter elements like oxenen and neon. But that breakthrough creates
- 10:04Speaker 2: a massive new problem, doesn't it.
- 10:06Speaker 3: Oh?
- 10:06Speaker 2: Absolutely, because this droplet of plasma exists for a window
- 10:10Speaker 2: of time so short it makes a millisecond look like
- 10:13Speaker 2: an eternity. We are talking about a fraction of a picosecond.
- 10:16Speaker 3: Almost instantly gone right.
- 10:18Speaker 2: The matter is so incredibly hot, so heavily pressurized and
- 10:22Speaker 2: volatile that it immediately expands, cools down, and crystallizes back
- 10:26Speaker 2: into regular particles almost instantly. So how can scientists possibly
- 10:30Speaker 2: see what happen inside that droplet, let alone know what
- 10:33Speaker 2: the original oxygen or neon atom looked like before the crash.
- 10:37Speaker 3: Well, the short answer is they can't see it directly.
- 10:40Speaker 3: The plasma phase is entirely too brief for any sensor
- 10:43Speaker 3: and existence to snap a picture of it.
- 10:44Speaker 2: What do they do?
- 10:45Speaker 3: Instead? They have to use incredibly complex computational physics to
- 10:49Speaker 3: work backward from the wreckage after the collision, As the
- 10:52Speaker 3: primordial plasma cools and expands, it sprays out thousands and
- 10:56Speaker 3: thousands of newly formed particles in every direction like shrapnel,
- 11:00Speaker 3: exactly like shrapnel, and the alice detector at CERNE is
- 11:03Speaker 3: basically a massive, multi layered cylinder of sensors surrounding the
- 11:07Speaker 3: collision point. Its whole job is to capture the trajectory,
- 11:11Speaker 3: the speed, the mass, and the angle of all that
- 11:13Speaker 3: subatomic shrapnel flying away from the impact zone.
- 11:16Speaker 2: And the distribution of that shrapnel is the key to
- 11:18Speaker 2: everything right, because it turns out that the geometric shape
- 11:22Speaker 2: of the original atomic nucleus thing that exploded directly governs
- 11:25Speaker 2: the fluid dynamics of how those resulting particles move after
- 11:29Speaker 2: the crash.
- 11:30Speaker 3: Yes, the flow of those particles is entirely ad dictated
- 11:34Speaker 3: by the initial pressure gradients of the plasma, and those
- 11:37Speaker 3: pressure gradients carry the imprint of the initial conditions.
- 11:40Speaker 2: Okay, I think I need a visual for that.
- 11:42Speaker 3: Imagine squishing a perfectly round water balloon in your hands
- 11:45Speaker 3: until it pops. The water will spray out in a
- 11:48Speaker 3: generally uniform symmetrical pattern because the initial shape was a sphere.
- 11:52Speaker 3: Makes sense, that is what happens with oxygen sixteen collisions.
- 11:56Speaker 3: The oxygen nucleus is essentially spherical, so when two of
- 12:00Speaker 3: them melt into plasma. The resulting expansion and the spray
- 12:04Speaker 3: of particles hitting the CERN detectors produce a very rounded,
- 12:08Speaker 3: symmetrical pattern.
- 12:09Speaker 2: But when they ran the collisions using neon twenty, the
- 12:12Speaker 2: pattern hitting the sensors wasn't perfectly rounded at all. The
- 12:16Speaker 2: spray of particles had this highly distinct asymmetrical shape. It
- 12:20Speaker 2: produced a pattern shaped remarkably like a bowling.
- 12:24Speaker 3: Pin, a sub atomic bowling pin, which is just so
- 12:27Speaker 3: weird to picture it is, and the reason for this
- 12:29Speaker 3: comes down to the internal structure of the neon twenty
- 12:32Speaker 3: nucleus itself. Neon has ten protons and ten neutrons, but
- 12:36Speaker 3: inside the nucleus they don't just slosh around evenly like
- 12:39Speaker 3: a smooth liquid.
- 12:40Speaker 2: Oh they don't.
- 12:41Speaker 3: No, They actually tend to group together into discrete clusters
- 12:44Speaker 3: of two protons and two neutrons, which is essentially the
- 12:47Speaker 3: makeup of a helium nucleus, also known as an alpha particle.
- 12:50Speaker 3: In neon twenty, these clusters arrange themselves in a highly
- 12:53Speaker 3: specific way that creates a physical bulge at one end
- 12:55Speaker 3: of the nucleus and a taper at the other.
- 12:57Speaker 2: End, creating a bowling pin, creating a bowling pin.
- 13:00Speaker 3: So when two of these asymmetric elongated shapes crash into
- 13:04Speaker 3: each other and melt into that ultra hot liquid plasma,
- 13:07Speaker 3: that specific initial geometry dictates the pressure inside the droplet.
- 13:13Speaker 2: Ah.
- 13:13Speaker 3: I see the plasma is squeezed harder in some directions
- 13:16Speaker 3: than others, It expands faster along the short axis than
- 13:19Speaker 3: the long axis, and that uneven asymmetrical expansion dictates the
- 13:24Speaker 3: exact flight paths of the subatomic shrapnel hitting the detector walls.
- 13:28Speaker 2: Here's where it gets really interesting. There's this brilliant analogy
- 13:32Speaker 2: to explain how scientists actually decipher all of this chaos.
- 13:36Speaker 2: It's exactly like shining a light on an object and
- 13:38Speaker 2: looking at its shadow. You can't see the object itself,
- 13:42Speaker 2: but the shape of the shadow completely reveals what's casting it.
- 13:45Speaker 2: I love that analogy, right. In this case, the spray
- 13:48Speaker 2: of particles hitting the detector is the shadow.
- 13:50Speaker 3: If we connect this to the bigger picture, it is
- 13:53Speaker 3: a brilliant analogy. But we also have to appreciate the
- 13:56Speaker 3: sheer computing power required to actually look at that shadow.
- 13:59Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it's not literally just a shadow on a wall,
- 14:02Speaker 2: not at all.
- 14:02Speaker 3: The scientists are taking the data from tens of thousands
- 14:05Speaker 3: of individual particle strikes, feeding them into supercomputers and running
- 14:09Speaker 3: massive fluid dynamic algorithms backward. They map the exact angle, momentum,
- 14:14Speaker 3: and energy of every single piece of shrapnel to reverse
- 14:17Speaker 3: engineer the three D pressure gradient of the droplet the
- 14:20Speaker 3: exact moment it burst.
- 14:22Speaker 2: It's unbelievable, and if we pull back for a second,
- 14:25Speaker 2: reading that computational shadow is a massive leap forward for physics.
- 14:30Speaker 2: The neon's bowling pin shape proves that by carefully tracking
- 14:34Speaker 2: the movement of post collision particles, physicists can deduce the
- 14:38Speaker 2: exact geometric shapes of atomic nuclei, which is huge. Yeah,
- 14:42Speaker 2: we are talking about objects so impossibly small that they
- 14:45Speaker 2: completely divide traditional observation. You can't just put an atom
- 14:48Speaker 2: under a microscope and look at its shape. Visible lightwaves
- 14:51Speaker 2: are literally too large to interact with them. But now
- 14:53Speaker 2: we can read their geometric signature in the explosive aftermath
- 14:57Speaker 2: of a relativistic collision.
- 14:58Speaker 3: It is difficult to over state how revolutionary this tool
- 15:02Speaker 3: is for the physics community. It is a wonderfully weird
- 15:05Speaker 3: visual The idea of a subatomic bowling pin spinning around
- 15:09Speaker 3: out there in the quantum realm. But this specific geometry
- 15:12Speaker 3: of an atomic nucleus matters deeply. It isn't just a
- 15:16Speaker 3: cool piece of trivia. Physicists are obsessed with knowing the
- 15:19Speaker 3: exact shape of these tiny building blocks, because the shape
- 15:22Speaker 3: is never just a random coincidence, right.
- 15:24Speaker 2: The question of the shape and internal structure of atomic
- 15:27Speaker 2: nuclei has occupied physicists for more than seventy years and
- 15:31Speaker 2: has incredibly deep roots because the geometric shape reveals exactly
- 15:35Speaker 2: how those protons and neutrons are organized inside the nucleus.
- 15:39Speaker 3: And that organization is entirely dictated by the laws of physics.
- 15:42Speaker 3: Specifically the strong force. We talked about it earlier, the
- 15:44Speaker 3: rubber band.
- 15:44Speaker 2: Yeah, the force pulling the quarks together exactly.
- 15:48Speaker 3: The strong force is one of the four fundamental forces
- 15:50Speaker 3: of nature, alongside gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak force. It
- 15:55Speaker 3: is the incredibly powerful glue that binds protons and neutrons together,
- 15:59Speaker 3: actively overcoming the intense electromagnetic repulsion that desperately wants to
- 16:04Speaker 3: tear all those positively charged protons apart.
- 16:06Speaker 2: Because positive charges repel each other like magnets, exactly so
- 16:11Speaker 2: cramming ten positive protons into a tiny neon nucleus should
- 16:15Speaker 2: cause it to blow itself apart instantly. The strong force
- 16:18Speaker 2: is basically the only thing keeping the universe.
- 16:20Speaker 3: Intact, that is the crux of it. But despite being
- 16:22Speaker 3: the most powerful force in nature by a massive margin,
- 16:25Speaker 3: scientists are still struggling to fully understand all its nuances.
- 16:29Speaker 3: How does it behave when you add more neutrons? How
- 16:31Speaker 3: does it organize different clusters?
- 16:33Speaker 2: So the shape tells us that.
- 16:34Speaker 3: Yes, the geometric shape of a nucleus is basically a
- 16:37Speaker 3: physical manifestation of the strong force at work. By understanding
- 16:41Speaker 3: the shape, by seeing way at bulges and where it tapers,
- 16:44Speaker 3: we reverse engineer the rules of the strong force itself.
- 16:47Speaker 2: And historically scientists study this at very low energies, right
- 16:50Speaker 2: like they would watch the gentle rotation and vibration of
- 16:53Speaker 2: atomic nuclei to figure out their structure.
- 16:55Speaker 3: Yeah, it was a much more delicate process.
- 16:57Speaker 2: So instead of that old delicate way of gently vibrating
- 17:01Speaker 2: an atom to guess its shape, tapping a crystal bell
- 17:05Speaker 2: to hear its ring, they are now just violently smashing
- 17:08Speaker 2: it at maximum energy with a particle accelerator and reading
- 17:11Speaker 2: the shrapnel that is a wildly different approach to studying
- 17:15Speaker 2: the exact same fundamental force.
- 17:17Speaker 3: It really frames this violent approach as a true paradigm
- 17:21Speaker 3: shift in the field of physics. For decades, the low
- 17:24Speaker 3: energy tapping the bell method was the gold standard. But
- 17:27Speaker 3: by reading the imprint left behind by high energy collisions,
- 17:31Speaker 3: scientists now have a brand new, incredibly powerful tool to
- 17:34Speaker 3: investigate other mysterious atomic nuclei whose structures are entirely unknown.
- 17:39Speaker 2: They don't have to guess anymore, right, They.
- 17:41Speaker 3: Don't just have to rely on delicate vibrations. They can
- 17:43Speaker 3: read the fundamental architecture of matter in the explosive ashes
- 17:47Speaker 3: of a tiny big bang.
- 17:49Speaker 2: And the mission is an over. This breakthrough with oxygen
- 17:53Speaker 2: and neon is just the beginning of this new era.
- 17:56Speaker 2: Because researchers still haven't found the absolute boundary for when
- 18:00Speaker 2: our gluon plasma can be created.
- 18:01Speaker 3: We still don't know how small we can go.
- 18:03Speaker 2: Right, we know the stiletto heel works for oxygen, but
- 18:07Speaker 2: how small can we go before the collision just isn't
- 18:10Speaker 2: powerful enough to melt those strong force rubber bands. The
- 18:13Speaker 2: immediate next step for the teams, Etcern is to run
- 18:17Speaker 2: these same high speed collisions with an even lighter nucleus,
- 18:20Speaker 2: which is helium four.
- 18:21Speaker 3: That is going to be the ultimate test of energy density.
- 18:24Speaker 3: Helium four is incredibly light, just two protons and two neutrons, So.
- 18:28Speaker 2: It's basically just one of those clusters we were talking
- 18:29Speaker 2: about earlier.
- 18:30Speaker 3: Exactly. It is essentially one of those alpha particle clusters
- 18:33Speaker 3: from inside the neon nucleus, but flying entirely on its own.
- 18:37Speaker 3: If they can manage to generate the primordial soup from
- 18:40Speaker 3: a helium collision, it will once again completely rewrite the
- 18:43Speaker 3: rule book on the minimum conditions necessary to spark the
- 18:46Speaker 3: early universe. It will push the physics of phase transitions
- 18:49Speaker 3: to its absolute breaking point.
- 18:51Speaker 2: It's mind blowing. So what does this all mean for
- 18:54Speaker 2: you listening right now? Because I know it can be
- 18:56Speaker 2: very easy to get lost in the sub atomic weeds.
- 18:59Speaker 2: We're talking about quarks, glue ones, the strong force, relativistic speeds, supercomputers.
- 19:05Speaker 2: It's a lot.
- 19:06Speaker 3: It's very dense material.
- 19:08Speaker 2: Yeah, but think about this in a deeply personal way.
- 19:11Speaker 2: The precise structure of the tiny atoms making up your
- 19:14Speaker 2: own body, the geometry of the carbon in your DNA,
- 19:17Speaker 2: the oxygen in the air, you are breathing, and everything
- 19:20Speaker 2: you interact with daily is intimately and directly connected to
- 19:25Speaker 2: the explosive birth of the entire universe.
- 19:27Speaker 3: It really is.
- 19:28Speaker 2: The rules governing a microscopic bowling pin shaped neon nucleus
- 19:32Speaker 2: today in a lab in Switzerland are the exact same
- 19:35Speaker 2: rules that dictated how the universe behaved in its very
- 19:38Speaker 2: first millionth of a second. You are walking around made
- 19:41Speaker 2: of matter that follows rules forged in a primordial fire.
- 19:45Speaker 3: This raises an important question, though, something that fundamentally pushes
- 19:48Speaker 3: the boundaries of how we see the universe as a whole.
- 19:51Speaker 2: What's that?
- 19:51Speaker 3: Well, we've just established that the microscopic bowling pin like
- 19:55Speaker 3: shape of a single atomic nucleus dictates the flow and
- 19:58Speaker 3: expansion of the primar plasma in a tiny collision right right, the.
- 20:02Speaker 2: Shape of the explosion is governed by the shape.
- 20:04Speaker 3: Of the set exactly now, scale that up our early
- 20:07Speaker 3: universe was once entirely made of this exact same expanding
- 20:11Speaker 3: quark gluon plasma. Could the very macro structure of the
- 20:15Speaker 3: cosmos we see today, the sprawling distribution of our galaxies,
- 20:19Speaker 3: the massive dark voids in space, the intricate web of
- 20:22Speaker 3: star clusters stretching across billions of light years. Could all
- 20:26Speaker 3: of that simply be a massive, univers sized shadow cast
- 20:29Speaker 3: by the geometric quirks and quantum fluctuations of subatomic particles
- 20:33Speaker 3: from that first millionth of a second.
- 20:35Speaker 2: Wow. That is something to think about the next time
- 20:38Speaker 2: you look up at the night sky. The biggest and
- 20:41Speaker 2: most unfathomable structures in the universe might just be a
- 20:43Speaker 2: reflection of the tiniest invisible shapes. Until next time, keep
- 20:47Speaker 2: questioning the shadows.