Latest / Sleepless History: Sleep Documentaries / Operation Northwoods: America's Secret False Flag Plot | Sleep Podcast w. Rain Sounds

Transcript

Operation Northwoods: America's Secret False Flag Plot | Sleep Podcast w. Rain Sounds · Sleepless History: Sleep Documentaries

• 0:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Welcome back to Sleepless History, the show where we let the past unfold slowly so that your mind can finally rest.
• 0:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: If this is your first time with us, settle in.
• 0:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Tonight we are going back to a cold and specific season of the 20th century, to a locked drawer inside the Pentagon, to a stack of tight written pages that are small circle of men once believed the country would never see.
• 0:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: we are going to talk about Operation Northwoods.
• 0:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: I want to say before we begin that this is a true story, it is documented.
• 0:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is a matter of declassified government record, not rumor, not internet legend, though for decades it's circulated as exactly that, whispered about, half believed, dismissed by many as too strange to be real and then one day it turned out to be real.
• 0:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: We will walk through how it came to exist, what it actually proposed, why it was written the way it was, who stopped it and what happened to the people involved once the world finally found out.
• 1:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is a long story and a quiet one, even though the events inside it were anything but quiet.
• 1:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Lastly, before we begin tonight's story, a quick quiet note.
• 1:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Sleepless history is independent, no network behind it, just careful research and quiet evenings.
• 1:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: If these stories have become part of your nightly routine,
• 1:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: You can support the show on Patreon, linked in the show notes.
• 1:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: Early access, add free listening, different background audio and bonus stories coming soon.
• 1:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: And if that's not for you right now, that's okay, simply commenting or following the show helps just as much.
• 1:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: Now, let's begin.
• 1:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: To understand Operation Northwoods, you first must understand the mood of Washington, D.C. in the early 1960s.
• 2:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: This was a period's sote in anxiety, an anxiety so total that it shaped the furniture of ordinary American life.
• 2:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Families built bombshellters in their backyards.
• 2:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: School children practiced ducking under their desks, as if a wooden desk could do anything against an atomic weapon.
• 2:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Civil defense sirens were tested on quiet afternoons, sending long, mournful whales across suburban neighborhoods that had never known war on their own soil.
• 2:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: The enemy in the American imagination was the union of Soviet socialist republics, also known as the USSR, a vast communist state stretching across two continents armed with nuclear weapons and
• 2:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: as far as most Americans understood, actively looking for the moment to use them.
• 2:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: And just 90 miles off the coast of Florida, SAC Cuba.
• 3:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: An island that had, in the span of only a few years, transformed from a close and somewhat exploited American neighbour into a communist state allied with Moscow.
• 3:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Fidel Castro had swept into power on the first day of January 1959, ending the corrupt and American-backed rule of full-genceo Batista.
• 3:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: At first, Castro's revolution was viewed by many, including some in the American press, with a kind of curiosity, even sympathy.
• 3:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: He was young, he was charismatic, he had overthrown a dictator.
• 3:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: But that sympathy did not last.
• 3:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Castro began seizing American-owned businesses and properties on the island, redistributing land and tightening his own grip on power in ways that alarmed officials in Washington.
• 3:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: By 1960, Cuba had begun purchasing weapons from the Soviet Union.
• 3:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: By early 1961, the United States had severed diplomatic relations with Havana entirely.
• 4:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: For the administration of President Dwight Eisenhower, and then for the incoming administration of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy,
• 4:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Cuba was not simply a diplomatic embarrassment.
• 4:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was viewed as a foothold, a communist beachhead sitting in the western hemisphere close enough to touch.
• 4:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: American policy makers feared with real and constant unease that Cuba would become a base for spreading communist revolution throughout Latin America and worse, that it might eventually host Soviet military assets close enough to strike the American mainland with almost no warning.
• 4:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: That fear would prove in October of 1962 to be entirely justified when Soviet nuclear missiles were discovered on Cuban soil during what became known as the Cuban missile crisis.
• 4:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: But that crisis was still more than a year away from the events we are discussing tonight.
• 5:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the meantime, the Kennedy Administration was already looking for ways to remove Castro from power by whatever means could
• 5:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: The first major attempt came in April of 1961 in the form of the Bay of Pigs invasion.
• 5:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: This operation had been planned under President Eisenhower and inherited by President Kennedy when he took office in January of that year.
• 5:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: The plan called for a brigade of Cuban exiles trained and equipped by the CIA to land on the southern coast of Cuba at a location called the Bay of Pigs, or in Spanish, by here
• 5:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: The hope was that this landing would spark a general uprising among the Cuban population against Castro's government, allowing the exile force to establish a foothold and eventually topple the regime.
• 5:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: All while allowing the United States government to maintain what was called plausible deniability, the idea that Washington's hand in the operation could be publicly denied.
• 6:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: The invading force of roughly 1400 men landed on April 17, 1961, and within three days had been completely defeated by Castro's forces.
• 6:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Over a thousand of the exile fighters were captured and more than 100 were killed.
• 6:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: worse, for the Kennedy administration, the American role in planning and funding the invasion became obvious almost immediately, undermining the very deniability the operation had been designed to protect.
• 6:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was a profound humiliation, both for the young president, who had only been in office a few months, and for the American intelligence and military establishment more broadly.
• 6:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: The failure at the Bay of Pigs did not end the American desire to remove Castro.
• 6:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: If anything, it intensified it.
• 6:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Robert Kennedy, the president's brother and attorney general, became personally and passionately invested in finding a way to bring down the Cuban government.
• 7:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: Treating it almost as an obsession.
• 7:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Out of this determination came a new broader covert program known as Operation Mongoose, launched in late 1961.
• 7:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Mongoose was placed under the direction of an Air Force Brigadier General named Edward Lanzdale, a veteran of counter-insurgency operations in the Philippines and Vietnam.
• 7:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: A man with a reputation as something of an unconventional warfare specialist.
• 7:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Mongus was an umbrella program in composing sabotage operations inside Cuba, propaganda efforts, economic pressure, and a series of increasingly strange assassination plots against Castro himself.
• 7:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: plots that would later become their own subject of congressional investigation, involving everything from poison cigars to exploding seashells.
• 8:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Before we move further into the story, it is worth understanding just how deeply the Cuban question had come to dominate the thinking of the American National Security Establishment by this point.
• 8:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Cuba was not simply one item on a long list of cold war concerns.
• 8:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: For the men running the Pentagon and the CIA in this period, Cuba had become something closer to an obsession, a wound that would not close.
• 8:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: The island had been for the better part of six decades, deeply enmeshed in the American sphere of economic and political influence.
• 8:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: American companies owned enormous sugar plantations, utilities, mines and hotels across Cuba.
• 8:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: The idea that this same island, so close, so familiar, so thoroughly woven into American commercial life, could now stand as an open ally of Moscow was for many officials, almost impossible to fully accept, let alone tolerate as a permanent condition, compounding this anxiety.
• 9:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: was the broader shape of the nuclear standoff between Washington and Moscow.
• 9:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: By 1962, both superpowers possessed nuclear arsenals capable of inflicting catastrophic destruction on one another, and the doctrine that would come to be known as mutually assured destruction, was still being worked out in practice, not yet fully settled as the grim, stabilizing logic it would later become.
• 9:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Soviet premier Nikita Kruschev had in the years leading up to this period, made a series of aggressive statements and gestures, including boasts about Soviet missile capabilities that later turned out to have been considerably overstated.
• 9:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: A fact American intelligence did not yet fully appreciate.
• 9:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: Berlin remained a flashpoint, having seen the construction of the Berlin Wall
• 10:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: physically dividing a city and standing as a stark daily reminder of the ideological line running through the middle of Europe.
• 10:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Against this backdrop, a communist Cuba represented in the minds of many American strategists, not an isolated regional annoyance, but a new and unpredictable front opening in a global contest that already felt dangerously unstable.
• 10:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is inside this atmosphere, this specific climate of humiliation after the Bay of Pigs obsession within the Kennedy family to see Castro removed, and a military and intelligence establishment eager to prove it could succeed where the Bay of Pigs had failed that Operation Northwards was born.
• 10:51
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document did not come from a rogue analyst or a fringe office.
• 10:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: It came from the very top of the United States military chain of command, from the joint chiefs of staff, the body composed of the highest ranking offices of each branch of the armed forces, tasked with advising the president and the secretary of defense on military strategy.
• 11:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: At the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in this period, Sataman named Lyman Lemnitzer, a four-star army general with a long and distinguished record stretching back to the Second World War, where he had served in North Africa and Italy.
• 11:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: Lemnitz was by the standards of his peers deeply conventional, deeply committed to the institution of the military, and deeply frustrated as many senior officers were.
• 11:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: By what he and others viewed as the Kennedy administration's excessive caution in confronting communism directly.
• 11:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: The failure at the Bay of Pigs had in the eyes of many military leaders being a failure of political will rather than of military planning.
• 11:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: a case where the White House had refused to authorize the level of force, particularly air support, that might have made the invasion succeed.
• 12:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: This resentment matters, it shapes everything that follows.
• 12:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: In early 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Lemnitz's leadership began drafting proposals for how the United States might justify direct military intervention
• 12:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: an invasion carried out openly by American forces rather than by proxies, but there was an enormous obstacle standing in the way of such a plan.
• 12:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: Cuba, as of early 1962, had not attacked the United States.
• 12:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: It had not struck an American ship, had not fired on an American plane, had not committed any act that the international
• 12:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: would recognise as clear justification for a full-scale invasion by a much larger neighbouring power.
• 12:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: Without some kind of provocation, an American invasion of Cuba would look exactly like what it would, in fact, be.
• 13:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: The United States are tacking a smaller, weaker nation because it did not like that nation's government and its foreign alliances.
• 13:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: And so the question that the Joint Chiefs turned to quietly, internally, on paper, marked with the highest classifications available to the United States government was this.
• 13:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: If Cuba would not provide a pretext for invasion on its own, could one be manufactured?
• 13:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: Could the appearance of Cuban aggression be created, convincingly enough, realistically enough, to justify American military action to the public, to Congress and to the world?
• 13:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the answer to the joint chiefs of staff produced to it is what we now know as Operation Northwoods.
• 13:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: We are about to look closely at what that answer actually was.
• 14:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter 2, The Memorandum The document at the heart of this story is formally titled Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba.
• 14:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is dated March 13th
• 14:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: 1962, and it was signed by General Lyman Lemnitzer in his capacity as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
• 14:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was addressed to Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, and it was accompanied by a cover memorandum from Brigadier General Edward Lanzdale.
• 14:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: the same officer who was running operation Mongoose.
• 14:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: The memorandum was not a stray idea scribbled by a single disgruntled officer.
• 14:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was a formal staff product developed with input across the various branches of the military.
• 14:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: and it was one of several draft proposals circulating within the Department of Defense during this period, all wrestling with the same underlying question of how to justify direct intervention.
• 15:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document itself runs several pages written in the flat, procedural language typical of military staff work.
• 15:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: The kind of prose that describes catastrophic and violent proposals, using the same tone one might use to describe a supply requisition.
• 15:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: This flatness is, in its own way, one of the most unsettling features of the memorandum when you actually sit down and read it, because it means the authors were not writing in a moment of panic or improvisation.
• 15:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: They were calmly methodically laying out a menu of options for how the United States government might stage acts of violence against its own citizens, its own military personnel, or its own property.
• 15:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: and then attribute those acts to Cuba in order to build public and international support for an invasion.
• 15:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let's walk through some of what the memorandum actually proposed because the details matter and because understanding just how specific and elaborate these plans were is central to understanding why this document is
• 16:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Once it became public decades later, shocked so many people who read it.
• 16:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: One of the central concepts running through the memorandum was what the authors called a remember the main incident, an explicit reference to the sinking of the American battleship main in Havana Harbor in 1898.
• 16:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: an event whose true cause was disputed at the time and remains disputed by historians today, but which was used by the American press and government of that era to justify the Spanish-American war under the rallying cry, remember the main, to hell with Spain.
• 16:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: The authors of the 1962 memorandum were explicitly proposing a modern repeat of this same strategy.
• 16:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: One specific proposal suggested that the United States could arrange to blow up an American ship in Guantanamo Bay.
• 17:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: The American Naval Base located on Cuban soil under a long-standing lease agreement, and then blame the explosion on Cuban forces.
• 17:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: The memorandum discussed staging various events at or near the Guantanamo base itself, including starting rumors using clandestine radio, sabotaging aircraft or vessels within the base.
• 17:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: and even generating casualty lists in American newspapers in order to build public outrage.
• 17:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: Another set of proposals involved staged attacks against Cuban refugees fleeing toward the United States.
• 17:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Attacks that would then be blamed on Castro's government, painting the Cuban regime as willing to fire.
• 17:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: even on its own people attempting to escape.
• 17:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Still another proposal involved developing what the document called a Cuban terror campaign to be carried out in Miami in other Florida cities and even in Washington DC itself.
• 18:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: This particular section is worth pausing on because it proposed acts of violence against American civilians on American soil.
• 18:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: The memorandum suggested it would be in its own words, possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner.
• 18:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: This particular scenario deserves its own explanation because of how specifically it was worked out.
• 18:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: The plan, as described in the memorandum,
• 18:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: involved what was referred to as an elaborate deception, structured around a substitution, a genuine civilian charter aircraft.
• 18:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: described as carrying a group of college students on a trip would depart from the United States on a real flight plan.
• 18:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: Unbeknownst to any actual passengers, however, at a certain point, the real aircraft would be secretly swapped for a specially prepared drone aircraft, painted and numbered to be identical to the civilian plane.
• 19:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: This drone would then proceed toward Cuban airspace, transmitting a distress call indicating it was under attack by Cuban fighter aircraft.
• 19:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Before the drone was remotely destroyed, likely over water, near or within sight of Cuba.
• 19:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Simultaneously, the memorandum proposed
• 19:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: The actual charter aircraft carrying the real passengers would be secretly landed at a covert location, and the passengers held under an assumed identity, allowing the government to later produce a substitute list of casualties.
• 19:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: When in truth, no passengers on the real flight had ever been harmed.
• 19:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: The intended public story would be that a defenseless plane full of young American civilians had been shot out of the sky by the Cuban Air Force, an act of unprovoked murder that the American public and international community would find impossible to ignore.
• 20:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Other proposals within the document described faking hijackings of aircraft or boats and using disguised Cuban exile pilots,
• 20:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: To fly missions that would create the appearance of Cuban military aggression against American or allied targets, including potentially against Jamaica or other nations in the region, in order to widen the perceived scope of Cuban hostility.
• 20:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was discussion of sinking a boatload of Cuban refugees, actual or simulated.
• 20:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: and of blowing up or damaging American military or civilian aircraft, using remote controlled devices, staged to resemble Cuban sabotage.
• 20:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: The memorandum even discussed the possibility of a real or simulated attack on the American naval base at Guantanamo itself, including faking the funerals of victims of these attacks, complete with real coffins and manufactured lists
• 21:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: The memorandum also went further than staged violence alone, describing broader efforts to manipulate public perception through what modern readers would recognize as coordinated disinformation.
• 21:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: It proposed that friendly news outlets and cooperative journalists could be used to plant stories reinforcing the narrative of Cuban aggression, ensuring that when a staged incident occurred.
• 21:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: The press would already be primed with a supporting context of prior incidents, some real, most fabricated, building over time into a pattern that would seem to leave no other reasonable explanation than Cuban hostility.
• 21:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: There was discussion of using Cuban exile pilots.
• 21:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Men already recruited and trained through earlier operations connected to the Bay of Pigs effort to fly missions that could be attributed to the Cuban Air Force.
• 22:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: Since these pilots' backgrounds and equipment could be more easily disguised or denied than those of active duty American servicemen.
• 22:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document also raised the possibility of blowing up American ships in Cuban waters, specifically citing the historical model of the main once again, and suggested that a small, remotely detonated explosive device, planted well in advance, could create a convincing appearance of hostile Cuban action against a vessel that had, in truth, never been under any real threat from Cuban forces at all.
• 22:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Several of the proposals were explicitly graded by risk and plausibility, since the offices drafting the memorandum understood that not every option carried equal weight and that some scenarios would be more convincing and more survivable in terms of avoiding exposure than others.
• 23:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: The drone aircraft substitution plan involving the charter flight of college students
• 23:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: was presented as one of the more elaborate and carefully engineered options, precisely because it minimized the actual loss of American life, while still, producing a dramatic headline generating tragedy.
• 23:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: Other options.
• 23:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: such as a real attack on Guantanamo Bay, involving actual American casualties staged to look Cuban in origin, were acknowledged within the document itself as carrying a higher cost, but also a correspondingly higher persuasive power.
• 23:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: Since real deaths, real funerals and real grieving families would be far more difficult for any skeptical observer, whether in Congress, in the press, or internationally to dismiss as fabricated, taken together these proposals amounted to a coordinated campaign of what would today be called false flag operations.
• 24:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Stageed attacks designed to look like the work of an adversary, in order to justify a response against that adversary.
• 24:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: Deployed not against a foreign target in some distant theater, but potentially against American civilians.
• 24:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: American servicemen and American property on American soil and at American installations, with the loss of real human life treated in the document as an acceptable
• 24:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: almost incidental cost of achieving the desired political effect.
• 24:39
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is worth being very precise here about what this document was and was not.
• 24:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was not an order.
• 24:45
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was not at the time it was written.
• 24:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: an operational plan that had been approved and set into motion.
• 24:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was a proposal, a set of options assembled by military planners and presented to civilian leadership, specifically to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara for consideration.
• 25:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: The joint chiefs of staff under the American system of civilian control of the military do not have the authority to unilaterally launch operations of this kind.
• 25:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: They can propose, they can recommend.
• 25:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the decision to approve or reject such a plan rests with civilian leadership.
• 25:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: ultimately with the president of the United States.
• 25:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: This distinction matters enormously to how we understand what happened next, and it matters to the historical judgment we should render on this episode.
• 25:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: The system, in this particular instance, worked the way it was designed to work.
• 25:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the fact that men, at the very top of the American military establishment,
• 25:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: and submit such a document at all, remains one of the most startling revelations in the history of American Cold War planning.
• 26:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Let's slow down here for a moment.
• 26:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: We have covered the content of a genuinely disturbing document, and it is all right if some part of your mind wants to sit with that discomfort before moving forward.
• 26:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: When you are ready, we will look at what happened when this document reached the desk of Secretary McNamara and eventually, whether directly or indirectly, the White House.
• 26:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter 3, rejection and the quiet aftermath.
• 26:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Northwoods Memorandum, along with related planning documents developed around the same period,
• 26:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: Robert McNamara, the Secretary of Defense, has been widely reported based on later historical research and the personal accounts of officials close to the process to have found the plan unacceptable and there is strong evidence indicating that the proposal was ultimately rejected at the level of the Secretary of Defense in the White House, never receiving presidential approval and never being put into action.
• 27:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is important to say clearly that no part of Operation Northwoods, as described in the March 1962 Memorandum, was actually carried out.
• 27:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: No American aircraft was destroyed and blamed on Cuba.
• 27:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: No staged terrorist campaign was launched in Miami or Washington.
• 27:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: no fabricated casualty lists were published.
• 27:34
  [SPEAKER_00]: The historical record, based on the declassified documents themselves and on subsequent research, does not show any of these specific proposals being executed.
• 27:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: What we are discussing tonight is the existence and content of a plan, a genuinely extraordinary and disturbing plan.
• 27:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: that was proposed by senior military leadership and then turned down.
• 27:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: Why was it turned down?
• 28:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Historians and researchers who have studied this period point to several likely factors.
• 28:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: First, the Kennedy administration despite its aggressive posture toward Cuba through programs like Operation Mongus was still fundamentally cautious about actions that could not be plausibly denied.
• 28:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: Actions that, if exposed, would cause catastrophic damage to American credibility on the world stage, particularly at the height of the Cold War.
• 28:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: When the United States was constantly positioning itself against the Soviet Union as the defender of a free and open international order.
• 28:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: a plan that involved killing or endangering American civilians, faking their deaths, and lying to the American public and Congress about the cause of an armed conflict, represented a risk of exposure and scandal that went far beyond anything the administration had previously sanctioned.
• 28:59
  [SPEAKER_00]: even in the more clandestine corners of Operation Longus.
• 29:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: Second, President Kennedy, in the aftermath of the Bay of Pig's failure, had already grown deeply skeptical of large-scale military and intelligence recommendations, coming from what he and his advisors sometimes viewed as an overly aggressive military and intelligence establishment eager to drag the
• 29:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Country into direct conflict.
• 29:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: The relationship between the Kennedy White House and the senior military leadership and General Lemnitzer, in particular, was already somewhat strained.
• 29:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: Kennedy and his brother Robert had, according to many historical accounts, developed real distrust towards the joint chiefs following the Bay of Pigs.
• 29:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Believing that military leadership had been too eager to commit the country to an operation whose risks had been understated, a proposal like Northwoods, arriving less than a year after that humiliation, likely reinforced rather than ease that distrust.
• 30:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: There is also the matter of what actually happened to Lyman Lemnitz's own career, not long after the Northwoods Memorandum was submitted.
• 30:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the fall of 1962, Lemnitz's term as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff came to an end, and rather than being re-appointed to another term in that position, which was not entirely unusual by itself, since Chairman did rotate.
• 30:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: He was instead moved into the position of Supreme Allied Commander Europe.
• 30:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: the top military post within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
• 30:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: This was, in the formal sense, a lateral move to another position of high prestige, not a demotion, and historians disagree on how directly, if at all, this reassignment was connected to the North Woods proposal specifically as opposed to being part of the ordinary rotation of senior command positions.
• 31:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Some researchers who have studied the Kennedy administration's private correspondence and internal deliberations believe that dissatisfaction with Lemnitz's leadership, including his role in advancing plans like Northwoods, contributed to the decision not to extend his term as chairman.
• 31:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Others caution against assuming too direct a causal link, noting that the position of Supreme Allied Commander Europe was itself an extremely senior and respected post, hardly a punishment posting for a four-star general.
• 31:40
  [SPEAKER_00]: What is clear is that the broader context of Cuba policy shifted dramatically only a few months after the northward's memorandum was submitted.
• 31:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: In October of 1962, American reconnaissance aircraft discovered Soviet medium range and intermediate range ballistic missile installations under construction in Cuba.
• 32:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: missiles capable of striking most of the continental United States within minutes of launch.
• 32:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: This discovery triggered the Cuban missile crisis.
• 32:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: 13 days of extraordinarily tense negotiation and brinkmanship between Washington and Moscow.
• 32:22
  [SPEAKER_00]: During which the world arguably came closer to full-scale nuclear war than at any other point in the Cold War.
• 32:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: The crisis was ultimately resolved through a negotiated agreement in which the Soviet Union agreed to remove its missiles from Cuba, in exchange for an American public pledge not to invade the island, and a private
• 32:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: quieter agreement to remove American Jupiter missiles that had been stationed in Turkey.
• 32:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: The resolution of the missile crisis through negotiation, rather than through invasion, effectively ended, at least for that period.
• 32:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: The kind of large-scale direct military intervention that plans like Operation Northwoods had been designed to justify.
• 33:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: The United States government came away from the crisis having made a formal commitment not to invade Cuba, a commitment that, whatever its later complications made the kind of manufactured pretext described in the Northwoods memorandum politically, almost impossible to revisit in the same form.
• 33:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Mongus itself was wound down not long afterward.
• 33:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: And while covert activity against the Cuban government in various forms continued for years, the specific, elaborate false flag proposals of Northwoods faded from active policy discussion.
• 33:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that, for more than three decades, is where the story of Operation Northwoods essentially ended.
• 33:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: as far as the public was concerned, which is to say it did not exist for the public at all.
• 33:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document was stamped with classification markings, placing it among the most closely guarded material in the American government's possession.
• 34:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: It sat along with thousands of other cold-war era records inside government archives, unseen by journalists, unseen by historians, unseen by the
• 34:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Might have been used as unwitting casualties in a manufactured war.
• 34:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: For that entire span of years, the closest thing the public had to knowledge of anything like Northwoods was rumor, speculation, and the broader.
• 34:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: Well founded understanding that the CIA and elements of the American military and intelligence community had, in various documented instances across the 20th century.
• 34:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: Engaged in covert operations that stretched the boundaries of law and morality.
• 34:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: But nothing as specific, as elaborate, or as chilling as the actual contents of the northward's memorandum had ever been confirmed.
• 35:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter 4.
• 35:01
  [SPEAKER_00]: Into the Light
• 35:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: The path that led to the declassification of Operation Northwoods runs through a piece of American legislation passed in the aftermath of one of the most searing traumas in the nation's modern history.
• 35:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: The assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963.
• 35:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: For decades, following the assassination, public trust in the official explanation of the killing as investigated by the Warren Commission.
• 35:33
  [SPEAKER_00]: remain deeply and persistently divided.
• 35:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Conspiracy theories flourished, some more credible than others, and a significant portion of the American public simply did not believe that the full truth of the assassination had ever been told.
• 35:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: This persistent public distrust eventually led Congress in 1992.
• 35:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: to pass the President John F. Kennedy assassination records collection act.
• 36:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: This law required federal agencies to review and release with narrow and specific exceptions.
• 36:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: Government records related to the Kennedy assassination, in an effort to restore public confidence by making the historical record as complete and transparent as possible.
• 36:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: The act established a review board tasked with identifying and pushing for the release of relevant classified material held across multiple agencies, including the central intelligence agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Defense.
• 36:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Northwoods was not strictly speaking about the Kennedy assassination itself.
• 36:43
  [SPEAKER_00]: But because the assassination review process required an extraordinarily broad sweep through Cold War era Cuba policy documents, given how deeply intertwined Cuba policy, Operation Mongus.
• 36:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: And the broader anti-Castro campaign were with various assassination-related conspiracy theories circulating at the time.
• 37:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: Documents connected to that broader context.
• 37:08
  [SPEAKER_00]: including internal department of defense planning papers from the Kennedy years were pulled into the declassification process.
• 37:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was through this process in the late 1990s that the Northwoods Memorandum, along with a number of related documents, was finally declassified and made available at the National Archives.
• 37:29
  [SPEAKER_00]: For a period after its initial declassification, the documents sat largely unnoticed, a needle inside an enormous haystack of newly released Cold War paperwork.
• 37:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: It took the work of a specific researcher to bring the document to wide public attention.
• 37:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: That researcher was James Bamford, a journalist and author who had built his career investigating and writing about the American intelligence community.
• 37:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: particularly the national security agency.
• 38:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: An agency so secretive during earlier decades that its very existence was sometimes jokingly said to stand for no such agency, Bamford, while conducting research at the National Archives for a new book about the history of American intelligence operations, came across the Northwoods Memorandum among the declassified Cuba-related files.
• 38:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Bamford published his findings in a book titled Body of Secrets, a anatomy of the ultra-secret national security agency, released in the year 2001.
• 38:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: Within that book, Bamford devoted substantial attention to the northward's memorandum, laying out its contents in detail for a general audience for what was,
• 38:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: in practical terms the first time.
• 38:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: The revelation generated significant press attention.
• 38:53
  [SPEAKER_00]: ABC conducted reporting on the memorandum and the story spread through print and television outlets generating a wave of public shock.
• 39:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: Here was documented, undeniable proof, straight from the pages of an official department of defence memorandum, bearing the signature of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
• 39:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: That senior American military leadership had, at least on paper, proposed staging violence against American citizens and blaming it on a foreign government in order to manufacture support for war.
• 39:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Alongside Bamford's book, The National Security Archive, an independent non-governmental research institute based at George Washington University in Washington DC, which specialises in obtaining and publishing declassified government documents through freedom of information act requests and related research, also played a central role in bringing northwards to wider attention.
• 39:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: The National Security Archive posted digitized images of the actual Northwoods Memorand and Pages on its website, allowing members of the public for the first time to read the government's own words for themselves, rather than relying solely on summaries or paraphrases.
• 40:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: This mattered enormously for the document's credibility and impact.
• 40:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: Conspiracy theories about secretive government plots are common, and most lack any solid documentary foundation.
• 40:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: Northwoods was different because the primary source itself, the actual tight Britain memorandum, complete with official markings, signatures, and routing information, was sitting right there, freely available for anyone to examine.
• 40:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: The public reaction, once the story achieved wider circulation, moved along several distinct tracks.
• 40:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: For many people, the discovery of Operation Northwoods functioned as a kind of confirmation of pre-existing suspicion.
• 40:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: evidence that the more paranoid strains of Cold War era conspiracy thinking.
• 41:02
  [SPEAKER_00]: Previously dismissed by mainstream commentators as fringe, had, in at least this one instance, actually been closer to the truth than anyone had been willing to admit.
• 41:13
  [SPEAKER_00]: Northwoods began appearing frequently in discussions of false flag operations more broadly, cited as a real historical example that lent a degree of plausibility to a wide range of other.
• 41:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: Far less substantiated theories about government deception, including theories about later events, entirely unconnected to the actual documented history of northwoods itself.
• 41:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is worth pausing on because it represents one of the more complicated legacies of the story.
• 41:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Northwoods is real, documented and confirmed.
• 41:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: But its notoriety has also made it a kind of rhetorical shorthand, invoked in arguments about entirely different, undocumented, and often thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories.
• 42:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Simply because it demonstrates that government planners have at least once, seriously proposed something this extreme.
• 42:07
  [SPEAKER_00]: For historians and scholars of the Cold War, the significance of Northwoods lay less in its use as a rhetorical trump card in unrelated arguments.
• 42:17
  [SPEAKER_00]: and more in what it revealed about the internal culture of the American national security apparatus during this specific period.
• 42:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: It showed a level of willingness, at least among certain planners within the joint chiefs of staff, to consider extraordinarily aggressive and ethically indefensible options as part of routine staff work, options that, crucially, were ultimately
• 42:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: Scholars have pointed to northwards as a case study in the tension between military planning bodies, whose job is in some sense to generate a full range of options regardless of how extreme and civilian political leadership, whose job includes weighing those options against legal, ethical and political constraints and rejecting those that cross unacceptable lines.
• 43:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: The system, as we discussed earlier, functioned as intended in this instance, with civilian leadership declining to approve the plan.
• 43:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the fact that the plan reached the level of a formal signed memorandum to the Secretary of Defense remains.
• 43:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: For many historians, a genuinely alarming data point about how far military planning was willing to go during the most anxious years of the nuclear age.
• 43:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is worth pausing here to describe in a bit more detail the actual mechanics of how a document like this moves from a locked government file into the hands of a researcher.
• 43:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: declassification review, particularly under a mandate as broad as the one created by the assassination records collection act, is a slow and labor-intensive process.
• 43:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: Government archivists and agency reviewers must examine enormous volumes of material, page by page in many cases, determining which portions can be released in full,
• 44:10
  [SPEAKER_00]: which must be redacted to protect ongoing intelligence methods or the identities of still living individuals and which, in rare cases, remain withheld entirely, pending further review.
• 44:23
  [SPEAKER_00]: The Northwoods Memorandum, once identified as relevant to the broader Cuba policy context surrounding the assassination inquiry, moved through this review process and was ultimately released without significant reduction.
• 44:38
  [SPEAKER_00]: It's full contents, including the specific operational scenarios we discussed earlier, made available essentially in their original form.
• 44:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is itself somewhat notable.
• 44:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: Many declassified Cold War documents emerge from this kind of review process heavily blacked out, entire paragraphs or pages reduced to blank space.
• 45:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Northwoods by contrast survived the process largely intact, which is part of why it was able to generate such a clear and immediate public reaction, once a researcher actually found it and understood what he was looking at.
• 45:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: James Bamford himself has described in interviews conducted after the publication of his book.
• 45:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: The particular experience of encountering the document for the first time among the boxes of declassified material at the National Archives.
• 45:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Describing a sense of genuine disbelief that such a document existed at all, let alone that it had been sitting freely available to any researcher who happened to look in the right place, for as long as it had before anyone brought it to wider attention.
• 45:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: This detail matters because it illustrates something important about how historical truth sometimes surfaces, not through a single dramatic legal whistleblower, but slowly, quietly, through the patient and often unglamorous work of researchers, combing through enormous volumes of declassified paperwork.
• 46:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: most of which turns out to be mundane, waiting for the rare document that turns out to be extraordinary.
• 46:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is also worth noting, in the interest of a complete and careful account, that the declassification of Northwoods did not answer every question historians might wish to ask about the document's full history.
• 46:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: Questions remain, for instance,
• 46:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: about precisely how the proposal was discussed at the highest levels of the Kennedy administration, whether President Kennedy personally reviewed the specific document, or whether the rejection occurred primarily at the level of Secretary McNamara and his staff before ever reaching the President's desk directly.
• 46:54
  [SPEAKER_00]: The available declassified record
• 46:58
  [SPEAKER_00]: and that it was not adopted.
• 47:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the finer details of exactly how and by whom the final rejection was communicated remain somewhat less fully documented in the public record than the plans original contents.
• 47:14
  [SPEAKER_00]: The story of how Operation Northwoods came into public view took the better part of 40 years, moving from a locked file through a legislative response to a
• 47:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: into the hands of one determined researcher and finally into the wider public consciousness through a book and a handful of news broadcasts.
• 47:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: In our final chapter tonight, we will step back from the details and consider what this story leaves behind.
• 47:44
  [SPEAKER_00]: The questions it continues to raise and how it fits into the broader shape of the cold war as history now understands it.
• 47:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: Chapter 5.
• 47:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: What the document leaves behind.
• 48:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: When we look back on Operation Northwoods now, more than 60 years after it was drafted, it is worth resisting the temptation to read the story as simple.
• 48:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: Either as a straightforward tale of villainy narrowly averted, or as a story that can be waved away because, after all, nothing in the memorandum was actually carried out.
• 48:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: Both of those framings miss something important about what actually happened.
• 48:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: and about why this story continues to matter to historians, to students of government, and to anyone interested in how democratic institutions manage the darker corners of their own security establishments.
• 48:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: The first thing worth sitting with is the sheer institutional weight behind the proposal.
• 48:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: This was not the fantasy of a single unstable individual, nor was it a
• 48:57
  [SPEAKER_00]: It was the product of formal staff work within the joint chiefs of staff, submitted under the signature of the chairman himself, a man who had risen to the very top of the American military hierarchy through decades of distinguished service.
• 49:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document represents, in a very real sense, the considered judgment of senior professional military planners about what options should be placed before civilian leadership.
• 49:24
  [SPEAKER_00]: for the achievement of a specific strategic goal.
• 49:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: The removal of a hostile government, 90 miles from American shores.
• 49:32
  [SPEAKER_00]: That such planners considered staged violence against American civilians and servicemen to be a legitimate option worth formally proposing, tells us something important about the culture inside that institution during this period.
• 49:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: A culture shaped by the trauma of a recent and humiliating military failure at the Bay of Pigs, by genuine and not unfounded fear of Soviet expansion and by a belief, common among many Cold War military leaders, that the ends of containing communism justified an extraordinarily wide range of means.
• 50:06
  [SPEAKER_00]: The second thing worth sitting with is the fact that the system, in this instance, held.
• 50:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: Civilian control of the military is one of the foundational principles of the American Constitutional Order.
• 50:19
  [SPEAKER_00]: The idea that elected and appointed civilian leadership ultimately accountable to voters.
• 50:26
  [SPEAKER_00]: retains final authority over military decision-making rather than allowing the uniformed military itself to set national policy unilaterally.
• 50:37
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Northwoods represents a genuine test of that principle, a moment when senior military leadership proposed an extraordinary and ethically indefensible course of action and civilian leadership.
• 50:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: Specifically, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and by extension the Kennedy White House declined to authorize it.
• 51:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is not a small thing, throughout history, in many nations.
• 51:05
  [SPEAKER_00]: Moments like this have not resolved themselves so cleanly.
• 51:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: Military leadership has, in numerous other countries and eras, successfully pushed through plans of comparable or lesser extremity, sometimes with catastrophic consequences, that the American system of civilian oversight functioned as intended in this specific case.
• 51:27
  [SPEAKER_00]: is a point in favor of the durability of that system.
• 51:31
  [SPEAKER_00]: Even as the mere existence of the proposal remains deeply troubling, the third thing worth reflecting on is what the decades of secrecy surrounding this document tell us about the broader relationship between government and citizen during the Cold War and arguably since.
• 51:48
  [SPEAKER_00]: The American public for more than 30 years
• 51:55
  [SPEAKER_00]: Citizens went about their lives, raised families, argued about politics, watched the moon landing, lived through Vietnam and Watergate, and the end of the Soviet Union, entirely unaware that buried in a file somewhere was a document describing how their own deaths or the deaths of their neighbours.
• 52:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: might once have been considered an acceptable price for achieving a foreign policy objective.
• 52:21
  [SPEAKER_00]: This is the nature of classified government action in a democratic society, an uneasy and permanent tension between the government's stated need for secrecy in matters of national security and the public's fundamental right in a system of government that claims to derive
• 52:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: from the consent of the governed to know what has been done and what has been proposed in their name.
• 52:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Northwoods did not in the end cost a single life because it was rejected.
• 52:56
  [SPEAKER_00]: But the fact that it could be proposed at all and that its existence could remain hidden for over three decades.
• 53:04
  [SPEAKER_00]: raises questions about how many other proposals are across the long span of the Cold War and beyond.
• 53:12
  [SPEAKER_00]: May still remain buried in archives not yet opened.
• 53:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: Decisions made or avoided that the public has still never been told about.
• 53:20
  [SPEAKER_00]: There is also a smaller, more personal thread running through this story.
• 53:25
  [SPEAKER_00]: Easy to overlook amid the geopolitics.
• 53:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: And that is the question of what it must have been like to be one of the people involved in drafting or reviewing this document at the time.
• 53:36
  [SPEAKER_00]: We do not have detailed personal accounts from most of the staff officers who contributed to the Northwoods Memorandum, describing their private thoughts about the ethics of what they were proposing.
• 53:49
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document itself is written in the detached procedural voice of institutional bureaucracy, a voice that almost by design strips moral weight away from its subject matter, presenting the fabrication of dead American citizens as simply one item among several options on a numbered list.
• 54:09
  [SPEAKER_00]: Whether the individual officers who contributed to drafting these pages, felt any private unease about what they were writing, we largely do not know.
• 54:18
  [SPEAKER_00]: What we do know is that somewhere along the chain of command, unease, or at minimum, sound political and ethical judgment, did eventually win out, in the person or people who ultimately declined to move the plan forward.
• 54:35
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the years since James Bamford's book and the subsequent news coverage first brought northwards to wide public attention.
• 54:42
  [SPEAKER_00]: The document has taken on a kind of enduring second life in American popular culture and political discourse.
• 54:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: It is frequently cited in documentaries in academic courses on the Cold War, in journalism, examining the history of government deception, and yes, as we discussed earlier.
• 55:03
  [SPEAKER_00]: In the arguments of conspiracy theorists reaching for a real historical anchor to lend credibility to claims about entirely separate and far less substantiated events.
• 55:16
  [SPEAKER_00]: This dual legacy, serious historical case study on one hand, endlessly recycled conspiracy touched on the other, is itself part of the story's lasting significance.
• 55:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: It demonstrates how a single genuinely documented episode of government wrongdoing, even one that was ultimately stopped before causing harm, can permanently reshape the boundaries of what a portion of the public considers plausible when it comes to the actions of its own government.
• 55:46
  [SPEAKER_00]: As we bring this episode toward its close tonight, I want to leave you with a final thought.
• 55:52
  [SPEAKER_00]: History, more often than we like to admit, is made up of roads, not taken as much as it is made up of roads that were.
• 56:00
  [SPEAKER_00]: Operation Northwoods is a road not taken, a plan that existed, that was seriously proposed by serious people occupying serious positions of power.
• 56:11
  [SPEAKER_00]: and that was, in the end, set aside.
• 56:15
  [SPEAKER_00]: We remember it today, not because it happened, but because it so easily could have, and because somewhere in a quiet room in 1962, someone with the authority to say no, said no.
• 56:28
  [SPEAKER_00]: That too is history.
• 56:30
  [SPEAKER_00]: The decisions that are never carried out, leave behind their own kind of record, their own kind of lesson, resting quietly in the file cabinets of the past,
• 56:41
  [SPEAKER_00]: as this one did, for someone to finally turn the light on.
• 56:47
  [SPEAKER_00]: Thank you for spending this time with us tonight.
• 56:50
  [SPEAKER_00]: We will be here again next time, with another story pulled quietly out of the past, until then, from all of us at Sleepless History, rest well.