Latest / Reformed Thinking / Why Missions Must Be Shaped by Scripture, Not Strategy

Transcript

Why Missions Must Be Shaped by Scripture, Not Strategy · Reformed Thinking

0:00
Welcome to Reformed Thinking. Today we're diving into some
0:03
source material that gets to the heart of, well, one of the
0:06
central duties given to the church missions.
0:09
That's right. And this deep dive is based on
0:12
the introductory material, so we're looking at the forward in
0:15
the editor's preface to a book called Biblical Missions,
0:18
Principles, Priorities, and Practices.
0:21
And our goal for you, the listener, is really to help you
0:24
get a quick but still detailed handle on what these sources
0:27
identify as true biblical missions.
0:30
OK. We want to clarify why some, you
0:32
know, popular modern approaches are seen as deficient, right?
0:35
And what the Scriptural priorities, especially when it
0:38
comes to leadership, really have to be for the Great Commission
0:41
to be effective. The material here offers a very
0:44
focused and I'd say corrective perspective.
0:48
Corrective is a good word for it.
0:49
We forward material here from John MacArthur and then
0:52
editorial notes from Mark Tatlock and Christ Burnett, and
0:55
they said a remarkably strong tone.
0:58
The case they're making is that every single aspect of
1:01
missionary work must be guided by scriptural authority.
1:05
And the first place they go to make that case is, well, it's
1:09
surprisingly basic. It's about nomenclature.
1:11
Just the words we use. Exactly.
1:13
They argue that even the grammar, the specific words we
1:17
choose to define missions, carries serious theological
1:20
weight. It's a fascinating place to
1:22
begin. It is because the language we
1:24
use to describe a task really defines the skip of that task,
1:29
doesn't it? It does.
1:30
It sets the boundaries. And the sources draw this
1:33
crucial distinction between using the plural noun missions
1:36
and the singular noun mission. And they're saying this isn't
1:39
just a minor detail. Not at all, they'd say.
1:42
It's far from trivial. The editors argue that this
1:44
choice defines whether the whole endeavor is clear and specific,
1:48
or whether it's just dissolved into this vague, you know, set
1:51
of activities. OK, so let's unpack that.
1:53
The authors come down strongly on the side of the plural noun
1:56
missions. Very strongly.
1:58
And they note that this has been standard phrasing for
2:00
generations among conservative evangelicals.
2:04
So how do they define this traditional plural term?
2:07
They give a very precise definition.
2:09
They define missions as, and I'm quoting here, the Great
2:12
Commission task of proclaiming the excellencies of Christ to
2:15
sinners cross culturally and applying the authority and
2:18
sufficiency of Scripture to every activity of disciple
2:22
making in all contexts. Wow.
2:25
OK, there is a lot packed into that sentence.
2:27
There is, and I think we need to slow down and look at it because
2:30
every phrase there is loaded, right?
2:32
The emphasis is really on three things that they say can't be
2:36
separated. First, the verbal proclamation
2:39
of the Gospel. Just speaking it speaking it.
2:41
2nd the cross cultural reach, and 3rd the absolute necessity
2:46
of applying scriptural authority to every single step of making
2:50
disciples. So it's an evangelistic and
2:51
theological definition first and foremost.
2:53
That's the core. That emphasis on verbal
2:56
proclamation is key. It sounds like they're saying
2:58
that, you know, social work, while it's a good thing, doesn't
3:00
actually qualify as missions unless it's explicitly tied to
3:04
the spoken word of the Gospel. That is exactly what they're
3:06
saying. If the goal is reconciliation
3:08
with God, then the means has to involve the message given by
3:11
God. OK, so then let's look at the
3:13
other side of the coin, the singular noun mission, right?
3:17
The source material connects the rise of the singular term to the
3:20
mid 20th century, specifically to the rise of the ecumenical
3:24
movement. And why is that historical
3:26
connection so critical for their argument?
3:29
Well, the ecumenical movement in the mid century was often driven
3:32
by a desire for visible Christian unity across
3:35
denominations. Which, on its face, sounds like
3:39
a good thing. It's commendable in some ways,
3:41
of course, but this unity often came at a theological cost.
3:45
How so? To bring together these really
3:47
diverse theological groups, you had everyone from conservative
3:51
evangelicals to very liberal mainline denominations.
3:54
The specific exclusive claims of the gospel had to be well
3:58
softened or. Broadened, they had to find a
4:00
common. Ground they had to, and that
4:02
common ground was often found in things like social justice,
4:05
creation care, or global political activism.
4:08
I see. So the term mission became this
4:10
big theological umbrella, broad enough to cover everything from,
4:14
say, building a church in Ghana to advocating for environmental
4:18
policy in Brussels. Precisely, the sources argue the
4:21
term mission became so inclusive that it broadened the scope far
4:25
beyond what they see as the New Testament mandate.
4:28
It started to include basically anything a believer might do to
4:32
glorify God. Which leads to a real point of
4:34
clarity for the listener. Then the problem with the
4:37
singular mission is that if everything is mission, then the
4:41
central unique task of cross cultural gospel proclamation it
4:46
just gets buried. It gets buried under a mountain
4:49
of necessary maybe, but secondary sociocultural
4:52
activities, and makes it totally unclear to what degree the work
4:55
involves the verbal assertion of the gospel content.
4:58
Or the confronting application of truth to sin.
5:00
You can think of it like this if you define your job description
5:04
as doing anything helpful to the company.
5:06
You might spend all your time watering the office plants and
5:08
forget to actually sell the product.
5:10
That's a great analogy. Biblical missions for these
5:12
authors is about selling the product, the good news of Jesus
5:15
Christ and everything else is just setting up the display.
5:18
So the choice of language really reflects A theological
5:20
allegiance. It does.
5:22
They're arguing that conservative evangelicals have
5:25
to stand firm on the plural missions because it demands that
5:29
verbal witness and that cross cultural reach, all anchored in
5:33
scriptural sufficiency. Which makes the Apostle Paul's
5:36
Commission in Acts 26 the defining model for this specific
5:40
plural task. Absolutely.
5:42
Paul wasn't told to improve Roman infrastructure or start a
5:45
political action committee. He was given a very clear
5:47
spiritual mandate. He was.
5:49
Paul was called by the risen Christ to be a servant and a
5:52
witness. The Lord told him He was being
5:55
sent to rescue the Gentiles, to open their eyes so that they may
5:59
turn from darkness to light and from the authority of Satan to
6:02
God. That they may receive
6:04
forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who've
6:07
been sanctified by faith in Me. That language defines a
6:10
spiritual transformation, not a socio political one.
6:13
Right turning from darkness to light.
6:15
From the authority of Satan to God.
6:17
Forgiveness of sins. These are outcomes that can only
6:20
be achieved through the spiritual intervention of the
6:22
gospel message applied by the Holy Spirit.
6:25
And that function remains the model for biblical missions
6:28
today. It's about going where Christ
6:31
sends and preaching the Word. So the Holy Spirit opens blinded
6:35
spiritual eyes and places people under God's sovereign authority.
6:40
So the missionary's goal isn't just to alleviate poverty or
6:43
correct governmental injustice. No.
6:45
The goal is to facilitate that fundamental spiritual shift that
6:50
is necessary for salvation. That's the only way to get true,
6:53
lasting freedom. Now, we often think of this
6:56
cross cultural scope only in terms of, you know, boarding a
6:59
plane and moving overseas. But the sources address this.
7:03
They know how global demographics have shifted,
7:06
making cross cultural environments a local reality for
7:09
many of us, even if we never leave our hometown.
7:11
That's a critical expansion of the concept.
7:13
The editors note that because of increasing foreign populations
7:16
in cities and towns all over the world, many believers today live
7:20
in highly cross cultural environments.
7:22
We. Talked about this, didn't.
7:23
He he did. He urged believers living among
7:25
Gentiles, which was a cross cultural experience, to keep
7:28
their conduct excellent so they could proclaim the excellencies
7:32
of Christ. So biblical missions, then, is a
7:35
reality for all believers in some way.
7:37
It's both global and local. And it requires evangelistic
7:41
action right where we are. The moment you step outside the
7:44
boundaries of your own familiar culture, you're engaged in cross
7:48
cultural work. That means the mandate to
7:50
verbally proclaim Christo's excellencies applies whether
7:54
you're in a remote village or a major American city with dozens
7:58
of language groups represented. Exactly.
8:00
The focus is on finding the spiritual darkness and bringing
8:03
the light of the gospel, whether that darkness is geographically
8:06
distant or, you know, residing right across the street.
8:09
And this focus on verbal proclamation coupled with holy
8:12
conduct, it serves as a pretty sharp contrast to the
8:16
contemporary approaches the source material critiques next.
8:19
It does. It moves us into Section 2,
8:21
which presents this really robust critique of the current
8:24
evangelical missionary movement. Right.
8:26
They argue that a crisis of dilution has occurred.
8:28
A crisis of dilution because people have prioritized human
8:32
wisdom and pragmatic rationales over biblical authority.
8:35
So the editor's central conviction is that the authority
8:37
for the Great Commission doesn't reside in culture or human
8:41
wisdom or some pragmatic strategy.
8:43
No, it lies entirely outside of them.
8:45
It lies in the revealed Word of God.
8:48
And they say when missions training adopts what they call
8:50
an integrationist approach, it becomes vulnerable to dangerous
8:54
compromise. Yes.
8:55
So what does that integrationist approach actually look like in
8:58
practice? How do these secular authorities
9:01
creep in and replace the Bible? Well, if you survey missions
9:04
literature from the last, say, 50 years, you see this growing
9:08
reliance on secular academic fields.
9:11
Sociology, anthropology, cultural studies, even business
9:15
management theory. No, the critique isn't that
9:18
these fields offer zero insight. Right.
9:20
No, not at all. They can help us understand
9:21
communication, for example, but the problem is that they have
9:24
often replaced Scripture as the primary authority guiding
9:27
missiology. Can you give an example?
9:29
Sure, when missions teachers lean heavily on anthropological
9:33
models to dictate how a church should be structured, or use
9:37
sociological research to define the needs of a community instead
9:40
of defining spiritual need through the Bible, they're
9:43
making a dangerous substitution. So instead of asking what does
9:47
Scripture command regarding church leadership, a missionary
9:51
might ask what does this culture value in terms of community
9:54
structure and how can we adapt the church to fit that model?
9:58
And that risks planting humanistic and, you know, extra
10:02
biblical sociocultural philosophies in the minds of
10:05
future leaders. That's why the editors assert
10:08
that the current evangelical missionary movement is in
10:10
desperate need of reform. Absolutely.
10:12
Because students trained today are tomorrow's missionaries and
10:15
pastors. If their intellectual foundation
10:17
teaches them that the Bible is insufficient for determining
10:20
strategy, they go into the field with a fatal flaw.
10:23
They might be culturally sensitive, but they're
10:25
doctrinally compromised. Exactly.
10:28
And it's staggering that decades of theological training could be
10:31
undercut by a single philosophical premise imported
10:34
from outside the faith. Which is why the anecdote shared
10:36
by the Forward author, John MacArthur, is so, so
10:40
illuminating. The Calcutta anecdote.
10:42
Yeah, from the 1980s. It just vividly shows the
10:45
practical and frankly chilling consequences of secularizing
10:49
missions objectives. The story takes place during a
10:52
visit to Calcutta, India. The forward author met a new
10:56
missionary who had recently arrived from a prominent
10:58
evangelical seminary in the United States.
11:01
And this was a seminary that was widely respected as a leading
11:04
missionary training school at the time.
11:06
That's right. So he asked this young graduate
11:08
a simple direct question. What is your objective for
11:11
coming to India? And the young man's answer was
11:14
not what you'd expect. No, his reply was to liberate
11:17
Indian women from male oppression.
11:19
Wow. Now you can set aside whether
11:21
that's a worthy social cause or not for a moment and just
11:24
consider the context. A missionary sent by a church.
11:27
Responding with a purely temporal secular objective, the
11:31
alarming omission was the complete lack of any reference
11:34
to the Gospel or salvation or service to the Church.
11:37
He was deployed, funded, working on the field, and yet his
11:41
ministry objectives were devoid of the message Christ commanded
11:44
them to preach. And the source says that this
11:46
incident cemented the author's conviction.
11:49
Biblical missions is not driven by socioeconomic concerns
11:52
because its focus is eternal, not temporal.
11:56
So if the primary objective is to change societal structure or
11:59
economic standing, the work ceases to be missions in the
12:04
biblical sense. This is a crucial distinction
12:06
for you, the listener, to grasp. Temporal concerns are real.
12:10
Believers should strive for justice and alleviate suffering,
12:13
but if these activities become the mission itself, they have
12:16
displaced the central purpose of Christ's cross, reconciliation
12:20
with God. True motivation then, has to be
12:22
God centered. It has to be motivated by a love
12:24
for the Lord Jesus, a passion for His Word, and the desire to
12:27
see every soul submit to Him. That submission is spiritual and
12:31
theological, not just political. And so the core work of missions
12:34
must center on the faithful proclamation of the Gospel.
12:37
Yes, the good news that sinners are reconciled to God through
12:40
Christ's person and work. And the source materials so
12:43
clear on this, any activity that distorts, dilutes or distracts
12:48
from this biblical message of salvation is considered
12:51
antithetical to the Great Commission.
12:52
It's a harsh assessment, but it's one rooted in the
12:55
exclusivity of Christ's mandate. It's a stark dividing line.
12:59
It really is. If you're doing work that a
13:01
highly moral secular non profit could do, you are not engaged in
13:06
biblical missions. Biblical Missions requires what
13:09
only the Christian can provide, the exclusive message of
13:13
Christ's finished work. Now, to diagnose why this
13:17
delusion is happening, the editors identify two major
13:21
structural problems in the evangelical publishing world.
13:23
Right, things that lead to ineffectiveness, even for
13:26
dedicated people. The first is the strategy before
13:29
scripture problem. And this is a direct result of
13:31
that integrationist approach we talked about.
13:33
OK, it happens when missions organizations regularly absorb
13:37
literature from non conservative and even non evangelical
13:40
theorists without any rigorous conservative theological
13:44
response or critique. So the material they're reading
13:47
is full of case studies. Full of them.
13:49
Lots of culturally and sociologically interesting
13:52
examples, but they often have far more anecdotal insights than
13:56
scriptural argumentation. So the missionary gets a toolkit
14:00
full of sophisticated sociological strategies for,
14:05
say, community entry or cultural adaptation, right?
14:09
But they haven't been taught how to test those tools against the
14:12
sufficiency of Scripture. That's a great way to put it.
14:15
It's like getting a dazzling modern farming implement with
14:19
instructions written in a foreign language.
14:21
It looks good, but you don't know if it will violate the
14:23
biblical commands for planting. They're I'll equipped to judge
14:26
strategy based on the Word because they've been taught that
14:29
the Bible is silent on methodology.
14:31
Which the sources contend is false.
14:33
As a result, practitioners act on sociological advice before a
14:37
theological command, leading to these culturally interesting
14:40
examples that lack biblical consistency.
14:43
And the second problem is the opposite issue which they label
14:46
the concept without context problem.
14:48
Yes, and this one often happens within conservative reform
14:51
circles themselves. So what's the critique here?
14:53
It's a lack of balance in this case.
14:55
Conservative scholars do a great job detailing the exegetical and
15:00
theological basis for missionary service.
15:03
They give sound biblical foundations.
15:05
They provide the perfect engineering schematic for the
15:07
bridge. An excellent way to put it, but
15:09
the critique is that their writings often sorely lack cross
15:13
cultural examples that model biblical consistency in
15:16
practice. So it's the gap between theory
15:18
and execution. It is if a missions textbook
15:22
spends 300 pages on the theology of justification and its
15:25
relation to missions, but offers no practical case studies on how
15:29
to plant an indigenous church in a closed country without
15:31
compromising that doctrine. The material just feels
15:34
abstract. It makes otherwise helpful
15:36
materials seem culturally unaware, maybe even irrelevant,
15:39
to those who are actually serving on the front lines.
15:41
Right. The real world examples of
15:43
successful, biblically faithful practices stay hidden in the
15:46
scholarly tower, which forces missions enthusiasts to look
15:50
elsewhere. Where they then encounter the
15:52
biblically incompatible or unconvincing case studies from
15:55
the first problem. And it becomes a vicious cycle
15:58
of confusion. So the textbook that we're
16:00
drawing from is designed to be a remedy to both of these
16:03
problems. That's the goal.
16:05
It aims to analyze and promote biblical missions from within
16:09
biblical and theological studies, while also providing
16:12
the necessary variety of cultural case studies that
16:15
exemplify faithful practice in the field.
16:18
That clarity of mandate, rejecting dilution, embracing
16:22
scriptural sufficiency, it brings us right to the strategic
16:25
priorities needed to reform missions.
16:27
It does. If the goal isn't just social
16:29
change, then what is the central non negotiable strategy for
16:33
global success? And the sources point us
16:35
directly to Second Timothy 22. Which makes a powerful case for
16:39
prioritizing sound leadership in the local church globally.
16:42
OK, let's unpack this biblical strategy for Global Advance,
16:45
because it's arguably the most efficient and scalable model in
16:49
the New Testament. The premise is deeply practical
16:52
and at the same time deeply theological.
16:54
For qualified spiritual leaders to be deployed and to succeed,
16:58
they have to be sent by churches that rightly understand and
17:01
support biblical missions. So the strategy has to begin
17:04
with prioritizing strong spiritual leadership.
17:07
A leadership that can reproduce itself.
17:09
It's the only way. And Paul's instruction in Second
17:12
Timothy 2.2 details this four generation model.
17:15
It does things which you have heard from me in the presence of
17:18
many witnesses. Entrust these to faithful men
17:22
who will be able to teach others also.
17:24
So that's Paul to Timothy to faithful men who then teach
17:27
others. It's not about converting large
17:30
numbers quickly. No, it's about multiplying
17:32
qualified faithful teachers and that is the core difference
17:36
between a man centered strategy and a Christ centered.
17:39
One. How so?
17:40
Paul's entire focus is on identifying, training and
17:43
deploying the next generation of faithful men, men who have the
17:47
spiritual gift of teaching, who are doctrinally sound, and who
17:50
meet the high moral qualifications of eldership.
17:53
And the source material asserts that this is the biblical
17:56
strategy for accomplishing the global mission.
17:58
Yes, it all centers on training qualified pastors who will
18:01
preach the Word and lead local, self-sustaining churches.
18:05
This prioritization is also rooted in historical
18:07
observation, isn't it? The New Testament shows the
18:10
church is effective and it endures when it has strong,
18:13
faithful spiritual leadership. Absolutely.
18:15
And conversely, we see churches languish or compromise or
18:20
collapse completely under weak or corrupt leaders.
18:24
That observation holds true today.
18:25
It really does. Strong leadership, as defined by
18:28
the sources, consists of men who are biblically trained,
18:31
doctrinally sound and elder qualified, committed wholly to
18:35
God's Word and God's work. And the source author shared
18:37
that in his ministry travels around the world, visiting
18:40
churches and seminaries in dozens of countries, the
18:43
critical need for this kind of leadership was universally
18:45
apparent. Right, He says the biggest
18:47
barrier to missionary success is not often hostile governments or
18:51
lack of funds. It's the absence of competent
18:53
Indigenous leadership. That puts an enormous burden
18:56
back on the Sending church at home doesn't.
18:57
It it does, if the global mission depends entirely on
19:01
raising up qualified men, then the domestic work of the Church
19:05
is missions work. Which raises an important
19:07
question, how is this missions mindset cultivated in a local
19:11
church domestically to prepare them to be ascending church that
19:14
can deploy this strong leadership?
19:16
And it can't be an isolated emotional event.
19:19
No, the source material really pushes back against the common
19:23
idea that a missions mindset is primarily created through annual
19:26
conferences or inspirational guest speakers or periodic
19:30
missionary reports. Even though those things have
19:32
their place. They have their place, but they
19:34
often lead to short term emotional giving without long
19:37
term commitment. The authors are arguing for
19:39
something much more consistent and organic.
19:42
So what's the alternative? The source argues that the
19:44
missions mindset is cultivated primarily and consistently
19:48
through the diligent, accurate, and faithful exposition of
19:51
Scripture by the pastor. Week in, week out.
19:54
Week in, week out, it's the duty of every faithful pastor to do
19:58
the work of an evangelist, but also to stir up a love for
20:02
missions in the hearts of his congregation by systematically
20:05
preaching the whole council of God.
20:08
So the members don't just hear about the Great Commission on
20:11
Mission Sunday. No, they encounter God's global
20:14
plan of redemption every week as they hear the word preached.
20:17
They hear about God's global purposes, including his heart to
20:21
say the lost, like in First Timothy 2, which speaks of God
20:24
desiring all people to be saved and come to the knowledge of the
20:28
truth. And as believers sit under that
20:30
kind of preaching, they grow in godliness and Christ likeness.
20:35
They become increasingly missions minded not because they
20:37
were emotionally manipulated related, but because they
20:39
understand God's theological mandate.
20:42
And as a result, they start to pray regularly for the lost.
20:45
They give sacrificially to support evangelistic work, and
20:48
in some cases they embrace the work themselves and become
20:52
missionaries. That makes profound, logical
20:55
sense. Mature churches become sending
20:57
churches. Yes, because their members are
20:59
saturated with the theological necessity of the Great
21:02
Commission. They understand God's heart for
21:04
the nations. And the sources stress that the
21:06
success of the global mission hinges upon the priority of
21:09
ministry in and through the local church in every place, and
21:13
their ability to reproduce themselves by raising up
21:16
faithful men. It's a self replicating high
21:18
integrity model. When you train a faithful man
21:20
who can teach others, you establish a chain reaction.
21:23
That faithful man establishes A biblically sound church.
21:26
Which in turn becomes a Center for discipleship, evangelism,
21:30
and the sending of more faithful men.
21:32
That single pastor becomes a spiritual hub for his entire
21:35
region. The material gives a concrete
21:37
modern example of this strategy in action through the Masters
21:40
Academy International or TMAI. Right.
21:43
Since 1991, they've been equipping national pastors in 85
21:47
worldwide locations. So it makes this a good
21:49
illustration of that Timothy 2.2 principle.
21:53
Tmai's model is based on training Indigenous men to lead
21:56
Indigenous churches instead of relying on Western missionaries
22:00
to stay long term. Their strategy focuses on
22:02
equipping national pastors who already understand the language,
22:06
the culture and the specific pressures of their own
22:08
environment. They train them intensively in
22:11
biblical exegesis and expositional methodology.
22:13
Exactly. They ensure they handle the word
22:16
with precision. Which means that when the
22:17
Western support or personnel eventually leave, the church
22:21
doesn't collapse. It doesn't.
22:23
It continues to function, grow and reproduce new leaders
22:26
because it's led by a man who is culturally one of their own and
22:30
theologically sound. It really illustrates the
22:32
conviction that faithfulness to New Testament principles like
22:37
prioritizing leadership training over just getting short term
22:41
converts produces mature, reproducing churches globally.
22:45
And the forward author is quite optimistic about this.
22:47
He suggests that we might be living in the greatest revival
22:50
of biblical truth in the history of the church, characterized by
22:54
an immense hunger for truth and for trained pastors around the
22:57
globe. But even with that optimism, the
22:59
work remains critical, of course, and the strategy has to
23:02
be correct, which means focusing on Paul's model of multiplying
23:06
qualified men who can teach others.
23:08
If a generation of faithful men is trained to shepherd the flock
23:11
globally, they will be positioned to entrust the gospel
23:14
truth to the next generation, thus exalting Christ, edifying
23:18
the Church, and evangelizing the lost.
23:20
This strategy then leads perfectly into our final main
23:23
section, understanding the ultimate motivation for this
23:26
rigorous scripture centered work.
23:27
Why do we go? And we have to ensure our focus
23:29
is God centered or theocentric, ensuring that our motivation is
23:33
shaped by God's standards, not just by human metrics of
23:37
success. The text immediately challenges
23:40
the listener to examine their motivation.
23:42
Is it shaped by human standards or by God's heart to redeem
23:46
sinners it? Issues a very strong warning
23:49
against man centered or numbers oriented strategies.
23:52
Why are those so dangerous in their view?
23:55
Well, man centered strategies are almost always linked to an
23:58
over reliance on man's abilities for bringing salvation to the
24:01
lost. OK, when ministry success is
24:03
measured primarily quantitatively by the number of
24:06
people baptized or the size of the church building, it reflects
24:09
an adoption of Western business models or denominated patterns
24:13
that place greater emphasis on man's persuasive ability or
24:16
strategic prowess. And that focus risks missing the
24:19
heart of the gospel entirely. It does.
24:21
If the missionaries focus is on the numbers.
24:24
They might be tempted to cut corners theologically to boost
24:26
those statistics or compromise the message to make it more
24:29
palatable to a target culture. They might lose the offense of
24:32
the cross. They might The heart of the
24:35
gospel message and the driving force behind missions must be
24:38
that God alone saves sinners so that He is glorified as the
24:42
Savior. Man centered approaches cloud
24:45
that truth by suddenly shifting the glory from God the sovereign
24:48
initiator, to man, the clever executor.
24:52
And this is where the source gets intellectually powerful,
24:55
drawing directly from Christ's own prayer in John 17, which
24:58
provides the ultimate contrast to man centered motives.
25:02
The motivation must be strictly God centered.
25:04
It must Christ emphasized in his high priestly prayer that his
25:08
motive for going to the cross was that sinners might be
25:10
granted eternal life, which he then defines as knowing God.
25:14
Right, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus
25:18
Christ whom you have sent. That frames mission is not as a
25:21
duty to be performed, but as an invitation into knowledge and
25:24
relationship. God's motive to save and
25:26
sanctify sinners is ultimately so they might find their
25:29
greatest delight in the love of the Father, Son, and Holy
25:32
Spirit. That's it.
25:33
To glorify and enjoy God is the ultimate purpose of the cross
25:36
and therefore it must be the motivation for missions activity
25:39
until the end of the age. If we're driven by God's glory,
25:42
then whether we convert 1 person or 1000, the measure of success
25:46
is our faithfulness to His command and His message.
25:49
It removes the performance pressure that's inherent in
25:52
those numbers driven models. And it connects directly to the
25:55
final verses of the Great Commission in Matthew 28, where
25:58
Christ commands his followers to teach the new disciples to keep
26:02
all that I commanded you. Discipleship is about teaching
26:05
obedience, which is an act of glorification.
26:08
Furthermore, Christ prayed for believers to go into the world
26:11
sanctified in the truth. John 17.11419 is crucial because
26:17
it shows that our participation in redemption is predicated on
26:20
our separation unto Him and our proclamation of His truth.
26:23
The missionary is in the world, but not of the world.
26:26
That separation being kept from the evil 1 and sanctified in
26:29
God's Word, it gives integrity to the proclamation.
26:32
It does. The missionary is a living
26:34
demonstration of the truth. They speak.
26:36
Their life is the context, but the message is the content.
26:39
And this God centered motivation provides an absolute assurance
26:42
of victory. Which is essential when the work
26:44
is difficult, slow or hostile. Christ promised to build his
26:48
church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it.
26:51
And this promise gives the missionary to clear assurances
26:55
that prevent burnout or despair. So first, Christ alone will
26:59
accomplish the great outcome of redeeming a people for Himself.
27:03
The missionary is not responsible for the conversion,
27:06
they're responsible for the faithful proclamation.
27:09
The pressure is removed from human abilities and statistics
27:13
and rests squarely on Christ's sovereign action.
27:16
And 2nd victory is secure. The truth will advance against
27:20
the enemy and his powers of darkness.
27:23
This removes all doubt about the success of the mission, provided
27:26
it's conducted according to biblical principles.
27:28
The plural missions center on the local church, driven by the
27:32
desire for God's glory. Which leads to the unavoidable
27:35
and, I think, exciting conclusion for every believer.
27:39
Christ's work, done Christ's way, will accomplish the goal
27:42
for which he died and rose. Which is that Christ will be
27:44
glorified in his church. The sources, rightly, that the
27:47
work of biblical missions, correctly define and correctly
27:50
executed, is the noblest of life's pursuits for those
27:53
devoted to Christ. So we've completed a pretty
27:56
detailed analysis of this call for biblical consistency in
28:00
missions work. We have focusing on clarity of
28:02
terminology that preference for the plural missions to maintain
28:06
evangelist due clarity. The sufficiency of Scripture
28:09
rejecting that secular integrationist approach we saw
28:12
in the Calcutta anecdote. Prioritizing sound leadership
28:15
using Techa Timothy 2.2 as the strategy for global reproduction
28:19
through the local church. And maintaining a focus on the
28:22
glory of God above man's abilities or socioeconomic
28:26
outcomes. So what does this all mean for
28:28
you, the listener? Whether you're one who goes to
28:31
the field or one who stays home to send and support, you're
28:34
being asked to analyze your methods and objectives against
28:37
the clear lines drawn in this material.
28:39
Yeah. Are you focused on the temporal
28:41
needs that fade or the eternal needs that are only satisfied by
28:44
the gospel? Are you just raising money for
28:46
vague causes, or are you prioritizing the raising up of
28:50
faithful men who will be able to teach others?
28:52
Let's give a quick summary of those key takeaways.
28:54
OK, first, biblical missions must be verbally evangelistic
28:58
and cross cultural in scope. It has to focus on the assertion
29:02
of the gospel content above all social or political goals. 2nd,
29:06
the primary strategy for global success is the training and
29:09
deployment of faithful men to pastor and lead local
29:12
reproducing churches. And 3rd motivation has to be
29:16
strictly God centered, seeking his glory over man's ability or
29:20
any short term from socio economic result.
29:22
This raises a really important question for further thought,
29:25
and it builds on the forward authors observation that we may
29:28
be experiencing a great revival of biblical truth right now.
29:32
If this abundance of conservative resources and sound
29:34
theology is available, how does that translate into increased
29:38
practical activity within your local church?
29:40
That's the question. Where do you need to correct
29:42
unbiblical assumptions about what constitutes legitimate
29:45
missions work, moving past good deeds and embracing the unique
29:48
mandate of the cross? You might consider whether your
29:51
local church is structured and focused to be a sending church
29:55
dedicated to raising up the next generation of faithful leaders
29:58
who are wholly committed to the Great Commission and the
30:01
sufficiency of Scripture. That alignment of theological
30:04
conviction and practical activity is the genuine
30:07
challenge before all of us. We invite you to consider that
30:10
question as you look for ways to apply godly zeal and passion to
30:14
understanding how to make disciples of all the nations.
30:17
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive.