Latest / Unleashing Intuition Secrets / Ron Bouchard, Author of Rule of Law, & Marcus Kahn: Treason Is Destroying America

Transcript

Ron Bouchard, Author of Rule of Law, & Marcus Kahn: Treason Is Destroying America · Unleashing Intuition Secrets

0:00
The cat's here.
0:01
She's wanting attention
0:03
Hello, everyone.
0:04
It's Michael Jaco with Unleashing Intuition Secrets.
0:07
I'm with Marcus Khan back with us again.
0:09
It's been a little bit since he's been with us.
0:11
And we have a new guest, Ron Bouchard is a constitutional law educator, strategic
0:16
interventionist, and the author of Rule of Law: A Nation of Laws, Not of
0:23
Men, a landmark book that restores the original meaning of the rule of law.
0:29
Drawing from maxims, constitutions, and founding documents, Ron unpacks
0:33
how American governance has been hijacked by arbitrary power and how
0:39
to lawfully un- lawfully correct it.
0:43
Through compelling stories, legal precision, and step-by-step guidance,
0:46
Ron teaches teens and adults alike how to reclaim their authority
0:51
under the highest law of the land.
0:53
His work is rooted in natural law, the US and state constitutions, vital
1:00
and biblical principle, offering clarity in a world of legal confusion.
1:06
The rule of law was never meant to be a tool of power, but a cage for government
1:10
itself, and it seems like government has flipped that on us, gentlemen.
1:15
Absolutely have.
1:16
Yep, that's right
1:19
So yeah, so we're gonna, we're gonna jump in and talk about these these things.
1:22
I got some really good questions here.
1:25
But Marcus, you wanna give us a little bit of background?
1:27
I haven't had you on for a little bit.
1:28
Give us a update of what you've been up to.
1:31
A lot of business stuff, but still trying to do as, probably more
1:35
importantly save the world stuff.
1:37
That's just what I title and tell people.
1:39
They say, "What do you do?" I say I try to do business to do, bring good
1:42
things, to solve problems for people." And I really, the save the world stuff
1:47
is more important because I, what I tell people all the time, "If God puts
1:50
something in front of you, do it."
1:52
And God puts relationships, and he connects people and information, and
1:55
I connect them with other people.
1:57
And Ron being one of those people that we've become friends for a while now,
2:04
and when I understood what he does and how important it is, it's like
2:08
fundamentally significant to everything that we do and how we run the country.
2:12
And he's exposed how corrupt the country is.
2:15
And I would just say, now, he's not gonna say it 'cause he's humble, but
2:18
God's put him in this position, and he is not making any money on this.
2:23
This is out of his following what God wants him to do in his heart.
2:28
He's probably the number one subject matter expert among
2:31
anybody in the country, in the world on the US Constitution,
2:35
God's law, and how to apply it.
2:38
And when I say that, I'm gonna say that 'cause when he starts talking,
2:41
he's gonna go over people's heads.
2:43
We gotta bring him down to our language.
2:45
But he proved himself to me in a really significant way, and
2:49
then I'm gonna let Ron talk.
2:50
But I had friends of mine, military contractors, I can't say who they are
2:56
or too much about it, but they had a Middle Eastern cartel try to steal
3:01
information from them, and they're under, ITAR rules and all that.
3:05
No one in the government- were doing their jobs to step up,
3:09
and these are high-end guys.
3:11
These are well-connected guys.
3:12
They couldn't get any movement- … on what was going on, and this was,
3:16
like, national security stuff.
3:18
Yeah.
3:18
So I said, when I understood it, I said, "Guys, I'm gonna introduce you
3:22
to Ron and he's gonna tell you things you can do, and I bet it's gonna work."
3:26
I introduced them to, Ron, we got on a call.
3:30
Ron explained every- they explained everything.
3:32
He explained everything.
3:33
They went onto Ron's website and they did what Ron told them
3:37
as far as creating documents.
3:38
It's a tool that we can all use.
3:41
And they did what they needed to do.
3:43
They sent it out, and they said within one hour of them sending it out, they
3:47
got a major response from the government, I believe it was New Hampshire.
3:52
And within two hours the FBI was calling them up, and right now I can
3:56
tell you the bad guy is in jail or going to jail for a very long time.
4:01
So I know Ron's stuff works.
4:04
Wow.
4:05
And that's fantastic in this current age and day where it seems like people
4:09
are obviously guilty of horrific crimes and still walk among us.
4:14
And yeah, I see Ron shaking his head.
4:16
So let's jump into some of that now.
4:18
As former CIA and Navy Special Forces rules of engagement was a crazy thing we
4:24
all had to deal with changing daily, gosh.
4:27
W- we could have used a guy like you, Ron to smooth that stuff out.
4:31
But yeah, let's look at what the rule of law really means and what it doesn't.
4:37
I think that's the most important question that we have in our country, because
4:40
most people misunderstand what law is.
4:42
And if you don't know what law is and where it comes from, nothing else matters.
4:47
Because we say we're under law.
4:49
Whose law?
4:49
Where'd that law come from?
4:50
Is it really law?
4:52
And unless we understand where law comes from, everything else is moot.
4:58
So there's a principle and it's called law precedes government.
5:02
That's an absolute iron principle, which means government doesn't create law.
5:07
Now for 95% of the public, that's gonna completely baffle them.
5:11
What do you mean?
5:12
Congress creates laws every day.
5:13
No, Congress doesn't.
5:15
They enact legislation in line with law, and the moment it's not in
5:20
line with law it is no longer law.
5:23
It's called non-positive law.
5:25
And has no binding effect.
5:27
So when you have a governance like we've seen in Colorado, which is extremely
5:32
corrupt had Peter Tichon on just an hour ago, and we talked about some of the stuff
5:37
that he was dealing with Tina Peters.
5:39
And he said it was… He had to be… I said, "You must've been very refined in
5:43
how you dealt with that." And he says, "Yeah, so you know, we had to, deal with
5:46
this government that was, corrupt, and you had to give them a little bit and take a
5:51
little bit and so forth." But they were eventually able to get Tina Peters out.
5:55
Now how can a government like that, knowing that there is rules for thee and
6:00
not for me, you- rules for thee and not for us they- how do we work around that?
6:07
It's just crazy.
6:09
We have to understand where law comes from.
6:11
We have to understand where power comes from.
6:13
And we have to understand who has all the power, and we need to restore that power.
6:19
And until and unless that p- power's restored, nothing's going to happen.
6:23
So the Founding Fathers knew this.
6:25
So let's bind down the second with a change of the Constitution so it'll become
6:28
an enem- a legalized version of the first.
6:31
And that's what we have today.
6:32
We have a criminal cartel at every level of government.
6:37
And I've- what I've done was I've gone back in history, and I've
6:41
pretty much taken what the Founding Fathers put in place and what the law
6:46
which was established, and followed it forward as a chain of authority
6:51
So when did that chain break?
6:54
How did it break?
6:54
Who broke it?
6:56
And tracked it all the way till present day.
6:59
What's good news is the law hasn't changed.
7:01
The law is still there.
7:02
The law is unchangeable, can't be changed.
7:04
Nobody in government has that authority.
7:06
But what we have is a criminal cartel acting under usurpation.
7:11
And I can prove all of those things, and I think the conclusion
7:15
in law is the conclusion in law.
7:17
People need to know what we are dealing with.
7:20
And once you understand what we're dealing with, we can then start
7:23
talking about how to fix the problem.
7:26
Sure.
7:26
And the problem is ignorance on both, both the local level of the
7:31
government and the people themselves.
7:34
They don't understand the founding era principles.
7:38
Yeah.
7:38
And once you understand the founding era principles, and I see this every single
7:41
time I turn on a a X spaces or any chat with any group of people speaking, they
7:47
go on and on about things that make absolutely no, no difference whatsoever.
7:51
And what they talk about is completely ignorant of the principles of the
7:55
Constitution, so I've created a framework of 12 principles that absolutely will
7:59
dismantle all corrupt government.
8:01
Wow.
8:02
Wow.
8:02
Because once you understand the 12 principles, those 12 principles then
8:06
eliminate all of their nonsense, because I make it in binary terms.
8:10
Either law precedes government or it doesn't.
8:13
So was the Constitution here before… And was the government here before the people?
8:19
Was it?
8:21
No, the people created the government.
8:22
Yeah.
8:22
The first lines of the dec- the US Constitution said, "We the People do
8:26
ordain and establish this Constitution."
8:27
We the People, yeah.
8:29
So We the People established the law, the supreme law of the land.
8:32
They work for us.
8:33
So how can the law have come first?
8:34
Yes, they work for us not the other way
8:36
around.
8:36
That, that's right.
8:37
That- so that's the first principle, law predates government.
8:39
And then we have to understand what law is, and law is
8:42
nothing but a rule of right.
8:46
Law is a rule of right, which means it's a rule that protects a right.
8:50
The only reason law exists is because we have rights that exist.
8:55
Wow.
8:55
That's it.
8:56
Law is a rule of right.
8:57
Whatever's contrary to the rule of right is an injury, period.
9:04
Yeah, they've been taking away our rights for a long time, haven't they?
9:06
And Marcus, if you wanna jump in at any time, feel free.
9:09
Yeah.
9:10
So the next… Go ahead.
9:13
I was just gonna say something funny.
9:15
Yeah.
9:16
Ron and I were talking, and this was a while back, and he's laughing.
9:20
I'm watching, laughing about.
9:22
He goes, "I'm arguing something." AI's supposed to be so darn smart, it's
9:25
all the cumulative of all knowledge, of all ti- it's… But they think
9:28
that, people think it's like God.
9:30
So Ron goes, "I'm arguing with the AI."
9:33
And he goes, "And I whooped it." So I go, "Yeah, you're pretty smart
9:37
if you can beat the AI," and he did, so I thought that was funny.
9:40
So it does, when he's talking, if you can understand or break it down into
9:44
English what he's saying, understand the basic basics, and then we get
9:48
into, it'll get into how the program works and how what we need to do.
9:52
'Cause in my opinion, it doesn't matter that we know it that's a first step.
9:57
It doesn't matter what we do with what we know, so he's gonna be able to arm
10:00
your audience with, like, how to, how we actually, we the people, get engaged.
10:07
And so that's… I just wanted to make that clear.
10:09
There's a whole purpose for following Ron and getting involved.
10:13
Yeah, that's brilliant.
10:14
And I've noticed that AI is pretty stupid too.
10:17
Somebody's programming AI, and it's not with the right information.
10:21
Yeah.
10:22
So the five-layer legal hierarchy this sounds fantastic.
10:26
I love this.
10:27
God's law, natural law, rights, maxims, and constitutions.
10:34
I'll break that down more.
10:35
Yeah, so people need to understand that the Constitution doesn't sit in a vacuum.
10:40
It was based on principles, or axioms of law, that predated the Constitution.
10:46
These were thousands of years old jurisprudence.
10:50
So these are let me actually quote the what a maxim is.
10:53
"A maxim is so called because its dignity is chiefest and its authority
10:57
the most certain, and because it's universally proved by all."
11:01
These are like axioms in geometry.
11:03
They're the rules of how law work.
11:05
And they're based on what's what is discovered.
11:09
So you have natural law at the top, comes from God.
11:12
Our Declaration of Independence says un- na- nature, laws of nature's God.
11:15
If there's no laws of nature's God, then we really don't have a country,
11:18
because the Declaration of Independence declares that under the powers of
11:22
the Earth, by the laws of nature's God, we were able to do what we did.
11:26
And if there's lo- no law of nature, nature's God, and no powers of the Earth,
11:29
then we didn't create a country, did we?
11:33
But we
11:33
did, so it's
11:33
true.
11:33
Yeah, but
11:35
we did.
11:35
So that's how attached we are to the law of nature and nature's God.
11:40
Just like gravity is gravity whether you agree with it or not, laws
11:43
of nature are the laws of nature whether you agree with them or not.
11:49
Gravity meaning Joe Biden falling down stairs constantly?
11:53
Gravity in general- Falling up
11:57
the stairs … is a law of nature.
11:58
Falling
11:58
up, falling down the stairs, yeah.
11:59
Gravity in general is a law of nature, right?
12:03
It- you can curse at gravity, you can deny gravity, jump off
12:07
the bridge and find out who wins.
12:10
Gravity will win.
12:12
So we have the laws of nature's God, then they were turned into axioms by Coke.
12:18
Sir Edward Coke created the what, the vast majority of the maxims we
12:23
currently rely on as axioms of law.
12:26
And then on on top of that is the Constitution.
12:30
So the Constitution codified them all.
12:32
So people misunderstand this all the time.
12:34
When it says law of the land, it's actually talking about the common law.
12:39
Common law is these maxims these statements of truth that have been around
12:44
forever, thousands of years old, that have been proven over and over again.
12:50
So that's why it says supreme law of the land.
12:54
If you read the Constitution, it says supreme in lower letters and then
12:57
law of the land in capital letters, because law of the land meant something,
13:01
and it comes from Magna Carta.
13:03
So people will laugh today, it's all Magna Carta, that's not
13:06
anywhere in the Constitution.
13:07
Baloney, it's not.
13:08
It's written in law of the land right into the Constitution.
13:12
Wow.
13:12
It says supreme in lo- lower letters, and then law of the land in big letters.
13:16
There's a reason for that.
13:17
Because the Magna Carta and all of that law has been codified
13:21
into the Constitution itself as the supreme law of the land.
13:24
In fact, due process is sanctioned by settled maxims of law, not by legislature.
13:32
So that's why we get confused.
13:33
If we just understood what law was, we'd be so much better off,
13:37
'cause they couldn't violate it.
13:38
Government must follow the law, 'cause the law made the government.
13:42
Ron, can you give just for illustration an example of a la-
13:46
of a law that's a maxim of God?
13:51
Sure.
13:51
There's tons of maxims of law.
13:53
One of them is in order for there to be a and there needs to be an injury,
13:58
in order to have a wrong, right?
14:01
So you have rights, and the only th- the reason you get
14:03
your wrong is there's an injury.
14:05
So there has to be an injured party for there to be a violation of law-
14:09
because law is a rule of right.
14:10
We see this problem?
14:11
This is… If law is a rule of right, there needed to be a right that was
14:14
violated for a law to be violated.
14:19
Wow, that's brilliant, 'cause I have a friend that talks about this.
14:22
And he says that, if he ever gets pulled over for some infraction he always asks,
14:27
"Was were some- was somebody in danger?
14:31
Was there, a problem?
14:32
Did I make it unsafe," or something like that.
14:34
I think that's brilliant because he always wins, and he uses that.
14:37
So what you're talking about is is perfect.
14:39
So what, was there a wrong that was committed?
14:42
So that's just brilliant.
14:44
And who gets to determine it?
14:45
Because then they say- Yeah … the legislature created a statute.
14:48
Okay is that statute positive law?
14:51
Was it in line with the laws of nature and rules of right?
14:54
And if it wasn't in line with the laws of nature and rules of right, it is not law-
14:59
Wow
14:59
… no matter what they call it.
15:01
And you can look at Van Horne Leslie versus Lawrence, which was
15:04
a early Supreme Court decision.
15:07
Says, "What are legislatures?
15:09
Creatures of the Constitution.
15:10
They owe their existence to the Constitution.
15:12
They derive their powers from the Constitution.
15:14
The Constitution is the work of the will of the people themselves in their
15:17
original sovereign and unlimited capacity.
15:21
Law is the work or will of the legislature in their derivative and
15:25
subordinate capacity, provided that will is in line with the law of right."
15:32
Incredible.
15:34
And that's, when you look at this on a bigger term, you go back
15:37
to the code of Hammurabi we're talking almost 4,000 years ago.
15:40
We're seeing some of that in our Constitution, so these
15:44
guys were really well-versed.
15:46
Why, how was… a lot of them were Masons, but I would say they were the good Masons.
15:49
H- how were they prescient, knowing what would work many hundreds of years later?
15:56
They studied 600 years of human behavior and failed democracies.
16:01
Before the dec- before the Constitutional Convention- Thomas Jefferson
16:07
lent James Madison two trunkfuls of books on failed democracies.
16:11
Wow.
16:11
We're not talking about two books, two trunkfuls of books.
16:15
Crazy.
16:16
He read two trunkfuls of books before he went into the Constitutional Convention.
16:19
Wow.
16:20
What American has read two trunkfuls of books in the last year?
16:24
Or how about in the last 50 years?
16:26
He didn't get distraction b- by, distracted by his by the TV and
16:30
the movies and the cell phones.
16:32
That's right.
16:33
Good
16:33
point.
16:33
And he also didn't get distracted by the opposite problem
16:36
that they had in those days.
16:38
In those days, you had a a problem with access to information, and
16:43
information was very restricted.
16:46
Look in the days of Galileo.
16:47
Galileo the Catholic Church had all the power.
16:51
Yep.
16:52
And they had all the authority, so they chained their Latin Bible to their pulpit.
16:58
And Galileo built a telescope and saw something that the Bible contradicted
17:05
The Catholic doctrine doc- contradicted.
17:08
He saw with his own eyes, and then showed other people.
17:11
They arrested Galileo-
17:13
Yep
17:14
… ' cause they didn't like what Galileo had seen with his own eyes.
17:17
That's not to say that the Bible is wrong, that's to say that the Catholic
17:21
doctrine that they were preaching was wrong, which deviated from the Bible.
17:25
There's a difference between the Bible and the Catholic doctrine.
17:27
So they were using Catholic doctrine to control men.
17:31
That's what they were doing.
17:32
And they were teaching Latin the, to the priests so that only the
17:36
priests could understand what was written in the law, in the Bible.
17:41
And you needed access through a gatekeeper to get access to law, and
17:44
that's exactly what's happening today except for it's now- Yeah … attorneys,
17:48
and attorneys aren't studying law.
17:51
The problem with America is we don't have law taught in our law schools.
17:55
Lawyers don't know law, and law has been stolen, which is probably the
17:59
biggest scandal in American history.
18:02
Law in 1935 was stolen.
18:05
Yeah.
18:06
We're not living under law.
18:08
The British Accredited Registry so a- during the War of 1812, one of the
18:13
reasons why they the British came in and burned the Library of Congress and the
18:17
Capitol and so forth was because we were getting ready to throw that out from the-
18:23
Titles of nobility.
18:24
It was the titles of nobility, man, but I have to say that when people say in modern
18:28
era that it's a British Accreditation Registry, even though there's a history
18:31
that links it, it's not the same.
18:34
The modern day bar is absolutely much worse.
18:37
Ah.
18:38
It's much worse by, by magnitudes.
18:41
Got it.
18:41
And we, most of the bars in America were created by judicial decree.
18:46
Think about that.
18:47
So in 1949 in Florida, the Supreme Court got out and it was
18:51
petitioned by the Bar Association.
18:53
The Bar Association wanted to the Supreme Court of Florida to
18:56
integrate the bar into the judiciary.
19:00
So the judiciary, who has no creation power, no legislative power, by
19:04
judicial decree said, "Okay."
19:07
And what were the reasons they gave it?
19:09
Because it was good for the bar.
19:11
Wow.
19:12
And then they claimed something called inherent authority.
19:16
Now, when a government agency actually says out loud the quiet part,
19:21
inherent, we've got a problem, because inherent is the authority of kings.
19:26
Yeah.
19:26
So they essentially crown themselves kings, and then legislated from the bench
19:32
a new creation of the Bar Association of Florida, and Florida is probably
19:38
the actually biggest example of major corruption in America, that people
19:45
don't even have a clue how bad it is.
19:48
Extortion, tax fraud.
19:50
I have them- I have open cases on all of those p- particular
19:53
pieces of the puzzle in Florida.
19:55
Wow.
19:56
Because Florida is an egregious example of overreach by government.
20:01
And until and unless we get rid of the circularity that the Bar Association
20:05
creates as a Praetorian Guard protecting the system and protecting circularity, and
20:09
the reason I call it circularity is 'cause they make the rules, they adjudicate
20:13
the rules, and they enforce the rules in all three branches of government.
20:17
You have bar agents in the executive branch of government, you have bar
20:21
agents in the legislature, and you have bar agents in the judiciary,
20:24
all answering to the judiciary.
20:27
The Founding Fathers said when all three powers are confined into the judiciary,
20:31
it is the absolute definition of tyranny.
20:34
You wonder why nobody gets any justice today and why there's
20:37
nobody being prosecuted?
20:40
Because the judiciary, they gave themselves doctrines of sovereign
20:44
immunity when they're not the sovereign and they can't give themselves
20:48
immunity, but they've called themselves sovereign immunity and try to challenge
20:52
that in court, that you're not sovereign, you don't have immunity.
20:55
Now, I can prove it that they're not sovereign.
20:57
You can prove it by their own Supreme Court rulings.
21:00
Yick Wo Hopkins says that they're not sovereign.
21:02
Chisholm versus Georgia said they're not sovereign.
21:05
But they go forth as though they're sovereign anyway.
21:09
Master's Constitution says they're not sovereign.
21:11
Yeah, you- so you have those precedents where they're, basically
21:14
being dimed out as not being sovereign, yet they cling to that.
21:18
How do they get away with it?
21:19
I have a gentleman that comes on, Mitch Vexler, and he talks about
21:22
how the bond fraud, the school bond fraud in Texas is out of control.
21:27
And they're doing the property taxes, which keep going up every year to an
21:31
extreme which doesn't correlate with the the amount of inflation way beyond it.
21:36
So they're he's going after them like you're talking about.
21:39
And, just the one statement I said, the rule of law was never meant to be a tool
21:43
of power but a cage for government itself.
21:46
Now,
21:47
they built a cage around themselves so that we can't come at them
21:51
like you're talking about.
21:52
They're sovereign and they're we can't we don't have the
21:55
power, we don't have the rights.
21:57
The rights, it's always supposed to been about our rights.
22:00
So wow, this is fantastic, Ron.
22:02
Good job.
22:03
Yeah, it's called the great inversion.
22:05
So everything that the Founding Fathers put in place to protect
22:07
us, they've actually inverted.
22:09
And if you look at all the protective mechanisms the Constitution
22:12
gives us, there's a bar attorney standing guard at each one of them.
22:16
Grand juries were always supposed to be the people's body.
22:21
So you can indict and you can present.
22:24
Now, presentment means a grand jury of its own fruition comes
22:27
up with an investigation.
22:30
So a corrupt politician, they can do a presentment against a
22:32
corrupt politician all on their own by the power of the people.
22:37
Now, if you read the rule books, the jury handbooks, they've eliminated all that.
22:43
Yeah.
22:43
In fact, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Number 7 say, "I know
22:47
historically you had that right, and the Fifth Amendment says you have
22:50
that but we're gonna ignore it."
22:54
So how do we make them un-ignore it
22:57
- Yeah
22:57
and deal with it?
22:58
You have to kill the circularity, and until people start speaking about
23:01
the circularity and understanding who the enemy is here, the enemy is
23:05
the circularity, the self-referential system that keeps itself
23:10
continually in a state of treason.
23:13
Wow.
23:15
Yeah and treason, people don't like me using the T word, but there's
23:19
actually, in law, there's a a very accurate description of what that is.
23:24
Before we finish, I'd like to end with why this is treason, why what
23:29
we're dealing with is treason.
23:30
We should be calling it treason 'cause it is treason-
23:32
Oh … and I can prove it in law.
23:34
Very good.
23:35
Look forward to it.
23:36
So this is a good one why America is a constitutional republic, not a democracy.
23:42
They changed this.
23:44
They're like, "We're a democracy," and I, I remember my social studies,
23:47
and I was like, "No, that's not right.
23:48
What happened here?" So tell us about, how this shift happened.
23:52
Yeah, so a constitutional republic means something very specific, and
23:56
it's actually defined by Montesquieu.
23:59
A republican form of government is a nation of laws, not of men.
24:03
So that means the rule of law came first, and the representatives
24:10
represent the people, the will of the people through the rule of law.
24:14
That's a republican form of government.
24:16
That's what's codified in us- Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution.
24:19
So in other words, if you have a republican form of government,
24:22
it's a a government of preexisting law that doesn't change.
24:27
It's immutable.
24:29
So you always know what to expect.
24:32
In a democracy says you can vote yourself in some changes to the law.
24:38
That is not true.
24:40
So a democracy, you what they're doing is they're turning the fixed rule of law
24:46
into malleable rules that can be changed.
24:52
Kind of like my truth, your truth, huh?
24:55
Yeah.
24:56
Yeah.
24:57
So this is Cooley.
24:58
This is Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, and he was the in the
25:02
1800s, he was the expert on law.
25:05
And Cooley's Constitutional Limitations says something very profound regarding
25:11
what we're allowed to do with our law.
25:13
It says, "By the constitutions which they form, they tie up alike their own
25:18
hands and the hands of their agencies, and neither the officers of the state
25:23
nor the whole people as an aggregate are at liberty to take action in opposition
25:27
to these fundamental laws," period.
25:31
They don't change.
25:32
You don't get to change the laws.
25:33
Not only can the government not change the laws, the people can't change the law.
25:37
It's fixed, because it's based on reason, of centuries of reason and authority.
25:45
Which comes from God.
25:46
Yeah.
25:48
You can't change gravity and you can't change reason.
25:53
Incredible.
25:53
Incredible.
25:54
This is a great this is a great class in Constitution and law.
25:57
I love it.
25:58
So the eight immutable principles that bind all government.
26:03
Yeah, th- then that was an old iteration.
26:07
It's now 12.
26:08
I've settled on 12.
26:09
Nice.
26:10
And we've already talked about one of them, law precedes government.
26:12
So when we understand law precedes government, that
26:16
is a, that's the first rule.
26:18
Everything else hinges on whether or not we follow that first rule.
26:22
The second one is rights are pre-political, which
26:25
means rights come first.
26:27
The Declaration of Independence says we're ordained by our creator with certain
26:30
unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
26:34
They come from whom?
26:35
The creator, which causes a whole bunch of problems, 'cause how can
26:39
you have federal rights and state rights and all these other rights?
26:43
You don't have rights that are federal or state.
26:46
You have just rights that are unalienable, and they're good everywhere.
26:50
'Cause God didn't give somebody in Massachusetts certain rights and then in
26:53
Georgia he gave a different set of rights.
26:56
Th- that's baloney.
26:59
Doesn't make any sense.
27:02
So our declarations of rights are universal.
27:05
The frames of government are not universal.
27:08
Those are two different things.
27:10
Then the third one is the whole reason government exists
27:12
is to secure these rights
27:16
And then all authority has to be delegated is number four.
27:19
So if you just take those four, think about modern government.
27:22
All authority has to be delegated.
27:25
Government's sole end is to secure your rights.
27:27
Rights are pre-political, and law is a rule of right.
27:30
How far have we drifted?
27:35
Quite a bit.
27:37
So you look at Roe versus Wade, whi- which was struck down, they weaseled that in.
27:42
And, we- we're going back to God's law again, and I believe that, they usurped
27:47
that and inserted the Roe versus Wade, and fortunately President Trump, got
27:52
enough Supreme Court justices that sided with God's law and the Constitution.
27:58
And see, we think that there's a a discretion here for the government
28:02
not to side with God's law and the Constitution, but Article Six of the
28:05
Constitution gives no such discretion.
28:09
They're bound to support and defend that Constitution, period.
28:14
Yeah.
28:14
Not their opinion of the Constitution, not their will.
28:18
And here's one that will also baffle people, that principle
28:23
number six is no will, only law.
28:27
In government, people think that the judges have this thing
28:30
called interpretation ability.
28:33
They don't.
28:35
They only have declaratory ability, which means they can
28:39
only declare what the law is.
28:42
That's Marlboro v.
28:43
Madison They declare what it says.
28:46
That's it.
28:48
And in State v. Post it says, "A court can only declare what the law is and whether
28:52
it aligns with the law of God, fundamental law, and the constitutions of society."
28:56
So Ron, how does that break down into this ridiculous, corrupt, idiotic Supreme
29:03
Court justices that just said that you, y- you can be born in the United
29:08
States to become a birthright citizen just by because you're b- born here.
29:12
How does that… You just said, how does that play out in the real
29:16
God's law, constitutional law?
29:18
So what they're supposed to do is they're supposed to look at what
29:21
the law actually says and what the framers meant by what that law said.
29:26
So what we understand about citizenship comes from the law of nations, and
29:31
the law of nations is codified into Article 1, Section 8, Clause 10.
29:36
I don't know if you know that, but the book Law of Nations by Emer de Vattel
29:39
is codified into our Constitution.
29:42
And in that book, it tells you what a citizen is and what it's not.
29:45
And then you have the framers of the 14th Amendment who actually told us
29:50
what it means when they said what they said in the 14th Amendment, and they
29:55
said, "Of course, this doesn't include aliens and immigra- illegal immigrants."
29:59
Of course, it doesn't include them.
30:03
So-
30:04
what is the definition of a citizen then, in general?
30:08
It all depends.
30:09
It was natural-born citizens.
30:11
Natural-born citizens were people who were born to citizen parents here.
30:16
That's a natural-born citizen, which is why Kamala Harris and why Obama,
30:22
why a lot of Republicans Mitch w- Mitt Romney, they can't run for president
30:29
because they're not natural-born citizens under that definition.
30:33
In fact, one of the problems for Kamala Harris is I called her out
30:38
on it, and they sent Harvard and Cornell University after me thinking
30:42
that was going to shut me up somehow.
30:43
That didn't work.
30:45
So I sent her an affidavit after sending her notices, and then I
30:49
sent her an estoppel saying, "Okay, I've already given you all of the
30:52
opportunity you need to show me how you're a natural-born citizen."
30:56
And I showed her the birth certificate of her parents showing that she's
31:00
not a natural-born citizen, therefore she's disqualified from even being
31:04
vice president, never mind president.
31:07
And then they could not spend all of their resources to use her again
31:11
because they knew I had it already.
31:14
So then I got a call from a certain administration about this particular
31:18
document because it was going viral.
31:21
So I sent… We, and we sent them with groups of people because you
31:25
never send anything individually.
31:27
We just put it online, and people could sign it all around the country.
31:30
So they were getting flooded with notices-
31:33
Wow
31:33
… asking, "By what authority? Show me your authority to do
31:36
X, Y, and Z." And they can't.
31:39
Show me your citizenship.
31:40
Show me how you're a natural born citizen under the definition
31:42
of natural born citizen.
31:43
She can't
31:53
Show me how that doesn't disqualify you from being president.
31:54
She can't But did she, d- she just, she and the system and all the people
31:58
in power, they just blew that off.
32:02
Yep.
32:03
And then we sent notices- Legally they all committed treason.
32:06
Yes, and then we sent notices to all the secretaries of state in the nation- Wow
32:11
telling them that under the law, they were responsible should they put
32:16
somebody on the ballot who did not follow the procedures of the state as
32:21
es- as spells by the state legislature.
32:23
She didn't follow any.
32:24
She was placed on the ballot.
32:25
She didn't qualify in any particular state.
32:29
So we put them on notice letting them know.
32:31
Now, the notice is not gonna do anything in and of itself.
32:34
It's the Constitution that gives the notice the power, 'cause it's already law.
32:38
We're just pointing out you, here's the law, so show me why
32:43
you don't have to follow it
32:46
Wow.
32:46
So now I'm start to see a bigger picture how you're talking about at
32:50
the end of this we're gonna talk about how so many people are treasonous.
32:54
Wow.
32:55
Yeah.
32:55
That's incredible.
32:57
So another one that we have here which is very intriguing, is how
33:00
statutory law has been perverted and what lawful remedy looks like.
33:07
So statutory law, statutes are supposed to follow the Constitution and be m-
33:15
made in pursuance to the Constitution and the law that we already described.
33:19
So if you even look on the, on, on the US, if you l- type in non-positive law in
33:24
your search engine, you'll find there's such a thing called non-positive law,
33:29
which then says what is positive law?
33:30
And if you read that, you will notice that there's this distinction
33:35
because Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives Congress only
33:39
seven- 17 enumerated powers, period.
33:43
That's it.
33:43
So sub- eight- 17 subject matters that they can actually pass laws about.
33:48
17.
33:51
Anything outside of that is by definition outside of their enumerated
33:55
powers and therefore unlawful.
33:58
So what they've done is they've created a non-positive law section
34:02
to justify passing things that are not within the Constitution.
34:10
Further than that, they're supposed to tell you in the front of the law where
34:14
they have the authority to pass it
34:18
Just called the Enacting Clause.
34:20
So in order for a law to be valid, it has to contain the Enacting Clause,
34:23
'cause the Enacting Clause is what gives it authority, 'cause it points
34:26
to the Constitution, and they're withholding the Enacting Clause
34:32
Incredible.
34:33
Wow.
34:33
So it's not law.
34:35
What we call law in modern day
34:37
is
34:38
not law.
34:39
It's fiat.
34:41
It's made
34:42
up.
34:44
It's pretend.
34:44
They've usurped power and assumed power they don't really
34:49
have the authority to do that.
34:52
And but people follow them because they think it's real and it's
34:56
binding, but in reality it's not
35:01
So when people follow them in these illegal laws over time people just
35:06
believe it's part of the law of the land.
35:08
That's what we've been in, involved with for quite some time unfortunately.
35:12
So undoing that, like you're talking about, just with Kamala Harris saying,
35:16
"Hey, you're not legally you don't have a legal option to actually run
35:19
for president," and they just ignore it and keep going because they've
35:22
had Obama that's been in there.
35:24
That was pointed out by President Trump, and he, at what was the
35:28
the the Not the lawyers, but the sh- the people of the press.
35:34
The press dinner that they had- Yeah … and Obama just excoriated
35:37
Trump in that dinner, and that was the last time President Trump went to
35:41
one until the last one where there was a shooting, and then he left again.
35:44
So it's, he pointed out and, this, these jackals in the press and part
35:49
of the corrupt political system just, shouted him down, and that's
35:53
what they do with people that are pointing out truth, like yourself.
35:57
They just come in and they try and shout you down.
35:59
So very frustrating.
36:01
So what, what can students, parents, and patriots do right now?
36:07
So Madison said there is no cure unless there's a broad diffusion of knowledge.
36:12
So the first thing we have to do is we have to understand what
36:15
the Founding Fathers left us as our birthright, and that's why I
36:19
wrote The 12 Immutable Principles.
36:20
You don't need to l- learn what I've learned.
36:22
All you need to know is the 12 principles, and the 12 principles alone are enough
36:27
to get everyone started on, wow, they're not doing any of these principles.
36:33
And my 12th principle is actually com- demonstrating complete chain of authority.
36:37
So I'm actually teaching a class right now that teaches my students
36:40
how to use notices just to get through the chain of authority.
36:43
That's all we're doing.
36:44
So principle 12 is the only thing we're focusing on, and we go to government and
36:47
we ask them, sh- "Please show me your authority from the source, from the people
36:52
to, to modern era, and where you got that authority." And it has to follow a chain.
36:57
Any link in the chain that's broken, by definition voids their authority.
37:02
So for instance, the first one is source.
37:04
Did the people actually delegate this authority?
37:07
Did they give it to you?
37:08
Then there's law.
37:10
Did they show it in the Constitution?
37:11
Then there's delegation, which is where is it written or
37:14
enumerated in that Constitution?
37:16
Then there's due process, which is sanctioned by settled maxims, not
37:20
by whatever they believe it is.
37:22
Then there's jurisdiction.
37:24
So due process is what they call a conditioned precedent.
37:27
It has to happen first before they get jurisdiction.
37:30
Before go- government can do anything to you, that's with due
37:33
process by sett- settled maxims.
37:35
That is a chain that everybody breaks.
37:37
There's not one government agency action that is done without breaking due process.
37:41
Not one.
37:42
Wow.
37:43
So jurisdiction doesn't land.
37:46
There's no jurisdiction without due process.
37:48
So then they have to come up with jurisdiction, then judgment, then
37:51
execution, then accountability.
37:54
Fascinating.
37:55
We're seeing this unlawful notices, affidavits, recordings of record,
38:01
et cetera.
38:02
As citizens we're learning definitely through you, but we're not learning
38:07
through the educational system.
38:08
No.
38:09
We're not learning through the politicians because they're
38:12
conspiring to dumb us down.
38:14
From K all the way into the, university system, it's been infiltrated by a lot
38:19
of communist organizations and teachers and so forth that are purposefully
38:24
dumbing us down so they can get away with these usurpations of our law.
38:28
Yeah, so the connection- They're trying to ruin our his- they're
38:30
trying to ruin our history, take away everything that you've done.
38:33
They've dump- dumbed it down.
38:34
They dumbed down our schools.
38:36
Yeah.
38:36
They criticize the good schools that are, Christian schools or private schools.
38:41
They try to discredit all that because they don't want a smart population, and
38:45
that was one of the things fundamental, like Ron said, diffusion of knowledge.
38:49
We have to have people under- u- able to understand the knowledge being diffused.
38:53
So how do you do that?
38:55
Long-term game by the communists, by Satan, really just for what it is.
38:59
Yeah.
38:59
It's gonna dumb people down, and then they're easy e- easy to be
39:03
ignorant and easy to control, and that's really what's happened.
39:06
So what… how I see it, we gotta wake everybody up, shake them awake and go,
39:11
"Guys, hey, you're actually smarter than what you're allowing yourself to
39:14
be, and let's start educating ourselves and then taking the right action."
39:19
Yeah.
39:21
And getting everybody to the realization that they work for us.
39:26
We, if we can just get to that point that, that'll be huge.
39:30
Because they have dumbed us down to the point where, we feel that, "Oh,
39:33
I'm in trouble because they say I'm in trouble," or, "They have passed
39:37
these laws and now I lo- I lose my rights," and, "Oh it's because they
39:41
have the power and I gotta go by that."
39:43
So yeah that's something we really need to educate people on as well.
39:47
Yeah, and I think the best way of doing that is if every American just opened up
39:50
the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.
39:53
Specifically Massachusetts, 'cause Massachusetts was the model for
39:56
all the 50 state constitutions, especially the US Constitution.
40:00
Massachusetts was written as the first co- first constitution after the Decl-
40:04
the signing of the Declaration of Independence- … and it was the model
40:06
for the rest, and especially the US.
40:09
There were some that predated the Massachusetts Constitution,
40:11
but not after the Declaration of Independence, 'cause Virginia was first.
40:15
And Virginia's great, too.
40:16
So if you- especially the 13 original colonies, if you look at
40:19
their constitutions 12, because R- Rhode Island didn't have one.
40:22
They stayed with the British Crown charter.
40:24
They didn't even have a constitution.
40:26
But if you look at the Massachusetts Constitution in particular, you can't…
40:32
Once you read it, you can't unsee what it says.
40:36
Massachusetts Constitution, Part First, Article 5, let me get it for you.
40:40
Let me r- read the plain English language.
40:43
Awesome.
40:44
I'm surprised he doesn't have a photographic memory.
40:46
I do.
40:47
I do, but, … I wanna make sure.
40:49
"All power residing originally in the people, and being derived from them."
40:53
Already we've got a problem.
40:57
Don't we already have a problem?
40:59
"The several magistrates and officers of government vested with authority,
41:03
whether legislative, executive, or judicial." So who's excluded there?
41:11
Are their substitution agents in an all times accountable to them?
41:15
So where does immunity doctrine come into place when all times
41:18
im- all times accountable?
41:21
How can you have all times accountable and have immunity doctrine?
41:25
You can't.
41:26
You're either all times accountable or you're not.
41:28
It's binary.
41:29
And this is a right.
41:32
This is not a suggestion.
41:34
This is a pre-political right that is un- unalienable.
41:38
So all power comes from the people.
41:40
They are our substitution agents, not our masters.
41:43
We're the masters, and they're all times accountable.
41:48
I think that's a pretty powerful one, don't you think?
41:50
Yeah, definitely.
41:51
Hey, Ron, can you… 'Cause I know, I don't know how much time, Michael, you
41:55
that we got, but Ron, we get in yesterday we were talking about some specific
41:59
things, especially with child trafficking and some other real world things going on.
42:04
Can you maybe explain where the rubbl- rubber hits the road in
42:08
real world situations and things that need to be done to correct it?
42:13
Yeah.
42:14
The primary issue, like I mentioned, in America right now is the circularity.
42:18
So I've been fighting the circularity.
42:20
Took me a long time to figure out.
42:22
I look at corruption as a Jenga tower, okay?
42:26
Some things at the top of the tower are not so important, and you pull those out
42:29
and they just put more on top, and I know because for five years I've been fighting
42:32
them every single day in all 50 states.
42:35
So I said, "Okay, I'm not going to focus on the top powers anymore. I'm gonna try
42:39
to pull the bottom ones out because if you pull the bottom ones out, they all
42:41
come down." And that's where I found the circularity, and the circularity is
42:46
held in place by the Bar Association.
42:48
If you look at all three branches of government, they all have lawyers
42:52
that answer to the judiciary.
42:54
That's a problem.
42:57
If you look at every single mechanism we have to protect ourselves, and
43:01
that the Founding put in place to protect ourselves, a lawyer, a Bar
43:05
lawyer, is there to, to circumvent us.
43:10
So I've been going after, in real time, this circularity.
43:15
Now the reason why we have Child Protective Services having a problem
43:19
in child trafficking is because they collapsed the law in 1935.
43:25
So the Rules Enabling Act Congress passed gave the US Supreme Court the
43:29
authority to create rules for the court.
43:32
But it said, "If you write these rules, they can't violate rights." So
43:38
there are only three parts of the law.
43:40
One, you have the authority.
43:41
One- two, it can't violate rights.
43:43
So you can't even get to number two without them doing it.
43:46
So rule number one and rule number two of the Federal Rules
43:48
of Civil Procedure violated rights in the get go- from the get-go.
43:52
And rule number two, in particular, was an egregious act because
43:57
there were two types of law, and there were two types of law prior.
44:00
There was law and there was equity, and the Constitution
44:02
talks about these two things.
44:04
There's law and there's equity, and they had two different
44:06
procedures, two different actions, 'cause they're very different.
44:11
Equity had to follow the law, and law, we're talking about the common law.
44:15
Okay?
44:16
So this law that predated the government ha- was they could use
44:20
equity, but it had to follow the law.
44:23
Children were among protected by law, 'cause they were your biological
44:28
property, fundamental liberty interests.
44:31
For you to have, be deprived of your life, liberty, or property,
44:34
you had to have due process of law.
44:37
What they did was they collapsed law and equity, now giving the
44:40
judge discretion, eliminating the jury, and calling children equity.
44:47
So now the judge comes in and calls your children equity and just
44:51
makes a decision all by themselves, when that was never allowed.
44:54
The jury was always supposed to be a permanent part of our court
44:58
because the people were supposed to be the check on the court.
45:03
That's what a jury is for.
45:04
It's to check the court.
45:05
That's the only reason it's there.
45:06
It's not for the defendant.
45:09
It's to check to make sure justice is being done
45:13
But we've been told that it's for the defendant.
45:15
So now we have plea deals.
45:17
98% of all our cases in America now are pled out.
45:20
No jury in the courtroom
45:25
And 99% of all grand jury presentments or indictments are rubber stamps
45:36
It almost seemed, Ron, that there's so many court cases going on that
45:40
maybe there's not enough people in the population to be the grand juries.
45:44
Maybe they did it out of, partially out of convenience, right?
45:48
Which is not a, an excuse, but it seems like, there's so many lawsuits
45:54
and e- everything and violations of law, so the practicality of
45:58
implementing that is partially an issue.
46:02
Y- yes.
46:02
That's because they added a whole bunch of things that were not law.
46:06
So they turned things that were not criminal into
46:08
criminal, so now you have to-