Latest / The Slippery Slope / Australia China Marriage (Just forget about morals, principles and justice).

Transcript

Australia China Marriage (Just forget about morals, principles and justice). · The Slippery Slope

• 0:05
  Hi. I'm Jay Fallon, thank you for
• 0:07
  listening to the slippery slope. So over every news headline,
• 0:12
  this morning is China. China is making the headlines
• 0:16
  for in my mind, all the wrong reasons.
• 0:19
  But yesterday, we have this ambassador from China.
• 0:23
  He made a what the guardian described as a fiery speech
• 0:27
  laying out terms that Australia has Eddie declined, another
• 0:31
  headline from Reuters. It says that China withdraws
• 0:34
  promise, not to send troops to Taiwan, if it takes control of
• 0:39
  island of the way says, if it takes control when obviously
• 0:43
  that is. They're very that is their end
• 0:46
  gold anyway. A criking news here in
• 0:49
  Australia, says possible, reset for Australia, China trade and
• 0:54
  this is obviously after the talk with the with the Chinese
• 0:58
  ambassador from the Chinese ambassador.
• 1:00
  The yesterday so they putting a hopeful spin on it.
• 1:02
  I think it's yeah, very wishful thinking on their behalf and
• 1:06
  just shows where their morals, where there where their
• 1:09
  convictions really liar. A Newsweek says that China lays
• 1:13
  out its Taiwan plan in first report under Xi Jinping, this
• 1:19
  this reports very interesting. It goes on to say that China has
• 1:22
  released a major policy. Document outlining the Strategic
• 1:26
  patience underpinning, its objective of reunification.
• 1:29
  With Taiwan in it Beijing, holds open the door to peace but warns
• 1:35
  it could be compelled to use Force.
• 1:39
  Obviously, it'll be compelled because someone the use of this
• 1:43
  word compelled is if someone's holding a holding a gun to their
• 1:47
  back, forcing them to to invade Taiwan, which is not the truth.
• 1:52
  But why would you ever think you would get the truth out of the
• 1:56
  Chinese Communist party? So it goes on in this article.
• 2:00
  Say the tire one question and China's reunification in the new
• 2:03
  year, new era. The first Chinese government,
• 2:07
  white paper on the topic in 22 years.
• 2:10
  And the first under the leadership of President Xi
• 2:13
  Jinping was published as a, as a week of intense Chinese military
• 2:19
  drills. Around Taiwan appeared to ease
• 2:22
  on Wednesday. So the report repeats, many of
• 2:26
  beijing's familiar talking points including It's argument
• 2:30
  that taiwan's, ruling Democratic Progressive Party was
• 2:35
  responsible for raising tensions across the Taiwan Strait course.
• 2:39
  It's their fault. It's their fault because they
• 2:43
  have refused to accept beijing's principle of one.
• 2:47
  China. China's made the decision and as
• 2:53
  far as they're concerned, no one should be able to question their
• 2:57
  ruling what they've decided. The arrogance.
• 3:01
  Now, one other headline, I'm going to read through, before I
• 3:03
  go back to what the Chinese ambassador to Australia was
• 3:06
  saying, yesterday this headline here comes from Washington
• 3:10
  examiner. It says that war games, find us
• 3:15
  and Taiwan can fend off China at massive cost.
• 3:20
  So, these War Games conducted by a Washington, Think Tank found
• 3:24
  that the US military could successfully defend Taiwan
• 3:28
  against a hypothetical. Cool Chinese Invasion.
• 3:31
  But at the cost of massive amounts of personnel and
• 3:35
  materials. A reading through this article,
• 3:38
  I'll put the links up in in the description.
• 3:41
  It is very interesting how they go through these war games.
• 3:44
  So apparently they've held 18 of 22, planned, simulations of a
• 3:49
  2026, Chinese invasion of Taiwan and yes, a so far they've won
• 3:56
  the vast majority of these, these war games, but wait and
• 3:59
  see. Look, I want to go back to this
• 4:01
  article which came from the guardian and it was regarding
• 4:03
  the Chinese ambassadors. What they said is a fiery
• 4:07
  speech. So this investors Far East Beach
• 4:09
  was the sound of China. Laying out terms that Australia
• 4:13
  has already declined, says the guardian.
• 4:16
  So during 90 minutes of statecraft, that was candid
• 4:20
  enough to be deeply chilling, China's ambassador to Australia,
• 4:24
  a Xiao Tian crystallized. The central question in
• 4:28
  Australia, China relations Actions, she's Australian
• 4:32
  representative who was fluent composed and periodically sud.
• 4:37
  Donnie in response to Preamble heavy questioning at the
• 4:41
  national Press Club on Wednesday, floated a dud to a
• 4:45
  daytime. How about more trade and less
• 4:49
  trash talk? Apparently, that's what they
• 4:51
  want. So showers pitch was simple.
• 4:54
  Can we just return to the days when Australia and China engaged
• 4:59
  in New? You and mutually agreeable
• 5:01
  exporting and importing while muting it, our irreconcilable
• 5:06
  conflicts of values. Please Australia, Overlook all
• 5:10
  of the human rights violations that we engage in on a daily
• 5:14
  basis. Overlook all of that and just go
• 5:17
  back to, you know, making money together.
• 5:19
  That's what they want us to do. The Ambassador had a preferred
• 5:23
  location for his regime. Sanctioned Utopia resetting, the
• 5:28
  relationship between Beijing and Canberra was about creating
• 5:33
  favorable atmosphere. So favorable atmosphere was
• 5:37
  apparently, the precondition for everything.
• 5:40
  The removal of current trade barriers, a potential
• 5:44
  face-to-face meeting between, Anthony Albanese E & Xi Jinping
• 5:48
  at the G20 in Bali and visibility over the treatment
• 5:53
  of. Wow, this is weird visibility
• 5:57
  over the treatment of any Australians.
• 5:59
  Arbitrarily detained in China. He said the past five decades
• 6:05
  had demonstrated Australia and China could be partners despite
• 6:10
  having differences. In political systems, such a
• 6:14
  generous offer could only be accompanied by rules, however,
• 6:18
  although they describe it as a generous offer, okay?
• 6:21
  So rule number one, this is what China's laying out their rule.
• 6:24
  Number one was China and Australia must keep their
• 6:27
  quarrels in House the End. Ambassador unfilled and analogy
• 6:32
  about a marriage to illustrate his point.
• 6:35
  It was one thing for a husband and wife to quarrel at home, but
• 6:40
  it's something else. If they fight down in the
• 6:42
  street, it's going to change the nature of the marriage.
• 6:45
  What was required was a proper modality to handle the
• 6:50
  differences between our two great Nations so that
• 6:53
  differences didn't hijack. Our cooperation Rule number two
• 6:59
  was Australia. Could be, could be friends with
• 7:01
  the u.s. if we absolutely must. Isn't that good that they can
• 7:05
  tell us who we can, and can't be friends with goes on anyway, but
• 7:10
  picking sides would be a dangerous business particularly
• 7:14
  on the issues fundamental to China's nationalistic hegemonic
• 7:19
  identity. The sharp end of this was there
• 7:22
  could be no sucking up to the US on Taiwan, none whatsoever.
• 7:27
  As tone of Wednesday via between overt belligerence and wounded
• 7:32
  pride and the Ambassador noted US House speaker.
• 7:36
  Nancy Pelosi had engaged in a public provocation, but going to
• 7:41
  Taipei in the process. Violating the one China
• 7:45
  principle these to this childish, behavior of conducting
• 7:49
  live fire exercises. So that was all bad enough but
• 7:53
  it gets worse. She's Australian representative,
• 7:56
  really preferred The people didn't use the word Invasion
• 8:01
  when speaking about China's intentions or reunification with
• 8:04
  Taiwan, even though it was very clear that Fusion was inevitable
• 8:09
  and would occur by all necessary.
• 8:12
  Means those inclined to pass. All necessary means were invited
• 8:20
  to use your imagination. So the Ambassador believed it
• 8:24
  was entirely legitimate for China to pay.
• 8:27
  Of the Seas surrounding Taiwan with ballistic missiles.
• 8:31
  Even if that heighten the risk of miscalculation or
• 8:35
  catastrophic misadventure, this is because China does not care
• 8:41
  about anyone. Other than China on wrapping up,
• 8:45
  just going to go back into this analogy.
• 8:47
  So he unfilled this analogy about a marriage to illustrate
• 8:51
  his point. Just want to say what the Bible
• 8:53
  says. There's one thing about that
• 8:55
  marriage and how China and Australia.
• 8:58
  You know I like a marriage and they don't want to fight outside
• 9:01
  of the, you know, outside of the house kind of thing that I want
• 9:04
  to be seen to fight outside of the house because that would
• 9:07
  cause embarrassment. So, it's funny when I was
• 9:11
  reading that, it seemed like China sees itself as the strong
• 9:15
  male, okay? And the strained Australia is
• 9:18
  the weak little housewife. And, you know, the little
• 9:23
  housewife, pointing a finger up the strong male, you shouldn't
• 9:27
  do this. This is Wrong and then the
• 9:30
  strong male doesn't want to be, doesn't want to be embarrassed
• 9:33
  outside outside of the house wants to put on a facade so
• 9:38
  everyone thinks everything is. Okay and the problem is that
• 9:42
  marriage is the like that as we as we have seen, unfortunately
• 9:47
  often end with domestic violence, when you have this
• 9:51
  dictator of a husband Who Wants To Rule with an iron fist
• 9:56
  usually have The wife cowering at home too, afraid to go out
• 10:01
  too, afraid to spend money with the inability to live freely in
• 10:06
  our own life and in her own marriage because she's too
• 10:09
  scared of her dictator husband. But this to me seems like the
• 10:14
  kind of marriage that China wants.
• 10:17
  They want the marriage where they are the big Burly, husband
• 10:21
  that tells the tiny little wife. You'll pull your head in and
• 10:25
  you'll do as you're told the next thing I Sighs.
• 10:29
  The Bible says in second Corinthians chapter 6, verse 14.
• 10:35
  It says do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers
• 10:40
  for what Fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness
• 10:43
  and what common has light with darkness and what Accord has
• 10:48
  Christ with Belial or what part has a Believer with an
• 10:53
  unbeliever. Now listen, I know this is this
• 10:56
  is specifically talking to Christian's, but I believe this
• 10:59
  principle can still be held here.
• 11:03
  We are countries of vastly different principles and vastly
• 11:07
  different morals. I believe the Chinese Communist
• 11:11
  party rules with an iron fist. They are ruled by a dictator,
• 11:17
  they rule the nation with Brute Force, we all know that.
• 11:21
  But what they want us to do is take the bride.
• 11:25
  We have to forget about our principles and our morals.
• 11:28
  So that we can make money accept the bribe, but that just means
• 11:32
  we are unequally yoked. Either we hold ourselves to
• 11:36
  higher standards all go and roll around in the mud with the
• 11:40
  Chinese Communist party just to make yourselves richer and in my
• 11:45
  mind that's just disgusting, that's my opinion.
• 11:51
  Don't be unequally yoked but the likes of Chinese Communist
• 11:55
  Party. Thank you for listening to the
• 11:58
  slippery slope.