Latest / The Bill Handel Show / Air Taxis Becoming Reality | Supreme Court Decision Time

Transcript

Air Taxis Becoming Reality | Supreme Court Decision Time · The Bill Handel Show

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: You're listening to Bill Handle on demand from KFI AM
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: six forty Judgia.
• 0:09
  Speaker 2: I am six forty Bill Handle here on a Thursday morning,
• 0:13
  Speaker 2: May twenty one. A little bit later on, at seven
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: point thirty, I'm going to talk a little bit about
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: what's the Supreme Court and what the decisions are going
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: to come down, because this is a decision time at
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: the Supreme Court, just before they go to their summer recess.
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: All right, yesterday, a couple of days ago, something, in
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: my opinion, extraordinary happened.
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: Now.
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: I don't think the president can ever go this far,
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: and he did it even to the point where his
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: staunchest supporters in Congress in the Senate have said, Okay, okay.
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: This is the line, this one we're not going to cross.
• 0:52
  Speaker 2: Two police officers who defended the US capital on January
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: sixth have sued the president to block a one point
• 0:59
  Speaker 2: eight bill billion dollar anti weaponization fund set up by
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: the DOJ to compensate Trump allies who say they were
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: victims of prosecutorial overreach. The suit says, in the most
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: brazen act of presidential corruption this century, Trump has created
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: a one point seven seven six seventeen seventy six billion
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: taxpayer slash fund to finance the insurrectionists and paramilitary groups
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: that commit violence in his name. The two plaintiffs, a
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: Capitol police officer formal and an former and an active
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: officer of the Metropolitan Police Department, are suing and the
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: fun part of the settlement, by the way, if you
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: want to call it a settlement, which I don't understand
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: how they can call it a settlement, is part of
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: a lawsuit that Trump filed because his tax his tax
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: was tax forms, his returns were released by someone who
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: worked for a contractor who contracted with the IRS. So
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: he sues for ten billion dollars. So keep in mind
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: he is suing himself because he's head of the IRS,
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: and there was a settlement where he settled with himself,
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: and the settlement was, tell you what, I'll drop my
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: ten billion dollar lawsuit if number one the IRS apologizes
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: to me.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: Number two, I want this one point.
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: Eight billion dollar fund, not as sledge fund as he
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: calls it. It's simply an anti weaponization fund. And number
• 2:35
  Speaker 2: three that Trump, his children, his members of his family,
• 2:41
  Speaker 2: and his businesses are exempt from IRS overview. No audits
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: for anything up to today, no idea if the audit's
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: going to happen afterwards what he does. So here is
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: the problem, and that is the DOJ going to defend it?
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: You bet they are, because what they're saying is that
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: this is money that is going to people who were
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: harmed by the previous administration and therefore are entitled to
• 3:14
  Speaker 2: compensation from the government because they were harmed so badly,
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: prosecuted and persecuted to such an extent that they were convicted,
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: they went to prison.
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: I mean all of that.
• 3:29
  Speaker 2: And that is something that should not have happened because
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: these people who attacked the capital were patriots. That's a
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: quote from Trump. The attack was peaceful. It wasn't an
• 3:40
  Speaker 2: attack at all. It was a peaceful demonstration. Look at
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: the video. And the bottom line is and the question
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: is asked, wait a minute, and by the way, this
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: is broad. Anybody who feels that he or she was
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: unfairly attacked and prosecuted and prosecuted by the Biden administration,
• 4:01
  Speaker 2: anybody can make a claim. Well, of course, the big
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: question is does that mean that the January sixth rioters
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: can make a claim?
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: Absolutely.
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: Todd Blanche, acting Attorney General, was asked that question and
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: he danced around it, but the bottom line was yes.
• 4:23
  Speaker 2: And as you can imagine, members of Congress have gone
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: absolutely berserk on this one. Okay, that one is too much,
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: all right? And this is the one that I mentioned yesterday.
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: I almost started crying on this one because the gas
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: lighting that's going on is crazy weaponization of the DOJ
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: and the Biden administration. There's no weaponization today, right. The
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: DOJ is not going after people who are enemies or
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: perceived enemies.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: Not at all. We're just trying to make what was
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: wronged right.
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: And how you go after those January sixth patriots. So
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: Trump day one pardons every one of them, and I
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: don't know how if people were upset, I was, that's
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: for sure because that attack the second attack on the
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: Capitol in the history of the United States, the first
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: one when we were at war with England in eighteen twelve.
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: It was war, and this one was the only time
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: in history that Americans overran their own capital. But they
• 5:28
  Speaker 2: didn't overrun the capitol. They were patriots, just asked the president.
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: And so this now the lawsuit may fail because the
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: argument's going to be there's no standing by these cops,
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: and that's going to be a technical issue as to
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: whether they have standing or at all, because the suit
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: says this new fund endangers their lives, the cops encouraging
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: those who enacted violence and the president's name to continue
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: to do so.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: Again, how do they have standing?
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: And the lawsuit says that these two cops already face
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: credible threats of death and violence on a regular basis,
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: and I'm sure we haven't heard that before. People who
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: are anti MAGA, people who are anti Trump, do not
• 6:14
  Speaker 2: suffer from death threats at all, because again, why would
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: you threaten people that are simply well, you threaten people
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: that are that are enemies of America? Because if your
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: enemies of Trump, you are enemies of America, you are
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: enemies of the Constitution. And I've never heard of a
• 6:38
  Speaker 2: president saying that, but we're you know, it's a different
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: world today. And the spokesperson for the Department, the DOJ
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: said that will continue to expose this law air these
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: people the previous administration going after these wonderful people and
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: ensure those who experience injustice is are made whole.
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: And here's the here is the gas lighting.
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: The attackers are being were prosecuted unfairly because of a
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: weaponized DJ People who are anti Trump, who are being
• 7:17
  Speaker 2: attacked and investigated by the current administration are traders to
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: the constitution, and therefore should be attacked, should go to prison,
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: should actually be compensated if they were wrongly if they
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: were wrongly treated by the administration of Joe Biden. It's
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: it's gone crazy. I mean, the only good news is
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: is as the Republican Party and the Republican senators in
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: Congress line up and no matter what Trump Trump wants,
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: he gets. For the most part, this one was too much.
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: This one crossed the line for sure. All right, interesting lawsuit?
• 7:56
  Speaker 3: Wait wait Dodgers, Oh yeah, okay, right, you're right, go
• 8:01
  Speaker 3: do yours. Your official home for Dodgers Baseball is ADAM
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: five seventy LA Sports. Tomorrow, you're back to back World
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: champion Dodgers take on the Brewers in Milwaukee with first
• 8:12
  Speaker 3: pitch at four forty. Listen to a five seventy LA
• 8:14
  Speaker 3: Sports and streaming on the iHeartRadio app live from the
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: gallupin Ford Broadcast booth.
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: Okay, we've heard about air taxis and we are at
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: the verge. We are at the cusp of air taxis
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: here in southern California. And there are two companies, Joby
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: Aviation and Archer Aviation, and they hate each other and
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: they are suing each other. Joby has accused Archer of
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: corporate espionage. Archer has accused Joby of hiding his reliance
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: on China. Archer aims to operate air taxis in LA
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: by the twenty twenty Olympics, but industry ale to say
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: it's Joby that leads the development and is more likely
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: to achieve fa A certification in time. And these two
• 9:03
  Speaker 2: companies are at the front of the global race to
• 9:06
  Speaker 2: bring battery powered air taxis to the public. And they're
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: going to charge basically, they say they're going to charge
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: high end uber prices. I don't know about that. And
• 9:18
  Speaker 2: each one hoping that their electric vertical takeoff and landing
• 9:23
  Speaker 2: aircraft is going to.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: Rule the skies. And now are they?
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: You know? And the other thing is as these air taxis,
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: because when you get into a fender bender, for example,
• 9:37
  Speaker 2: you're in an uber and you get a lyft and
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: you get into a fender bender, Okay, you know, are
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: you gonna get hurt if it's a bad accident. You
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: are If you get into a fender bender in an
• 9:47
  Speaker 2: air taxi. Good Bye, it is over. There is no
• 9:52
  Speaker 2: such thing as a fender bender in the sky.
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: It is death. It is death D what a capital D.
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: And so it's now it's normal for companies to get
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: into these suits tit for tat, especially in a brand
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: new industry. And the companies are actually among the survivors
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: of many companies that started this using new aircraft designs,
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: electricity AI, that's the model. Each of them have taken
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: hits this year. Financially, the sharers in both companies are
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: down more than twenty percent this year. Joby's market value
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: right now is eight point five billion dollars and as
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: close to twice that of Archer. Now. Joby said it's
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: going to launch commercial air taxis in the United Arab
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: Emirates next year. Archer, on the other hand, recently spent
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: more than one hundred billion dollars to take over Hawthorne
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: Municipal Airport. Because I assume that there has to be
• 11:01
  Speaker 2: a whole lot of infrastructure, although I don't get what
• 11:04
  Speaker 2: kind of infrastructure you need.
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: You need a parking lot, that's what you need.
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: You need a place to park the car, and then
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: you have a little car or a bus pick people
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: up and off you go. And since you're only taking
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: four people at a time, you know you need a
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: golf cart is what you need to move into the
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: airport and you're on your way. Don't know much about
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: luggage either, but I don't think this is for luggage, folks.
• 11:30
  Speaker 2: This is just to go from A to B to
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: beat the traffic. One of the things about Los Angeles,
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: and you may not know this, have you noticed that
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: there aren't many helicopters flying around. You see police helicopters,
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: you see news helicopters. You don't see much else. How
• 11:50
  Speaker 2: many people do you think have enough money in southern
• 11:54
  Speaker 2: California to bypass traffic and take a helicopter from home
• 12:00
  Speaker 2: to their place of business. Kobe ended up Kobe Bryant
• 12:06
  Speaker 2: and a dying in one of these That one of
• 12:08
  Speaker 2: those rare instances where a helicopter was allowed.
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: The city doesn't allow helicopters.
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: Those helipads all these high end buildings, those helopads that
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: you see and people land on them, those are for safety.
• 12:21
  Speaker 2: Those are for simply evacuating people off the top of buildings.
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: They are not to be used for passenger travel. Why
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: is that because the city doesn't want that much traffic
• 12:34
  Speaker 2: above one They just don't want.
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: Want to keep the traffic on the ground. Yeah. Yeah.
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: So here you are, and you're a billionaire, and you're
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: a very wealthy guy, and you're driving from Beverly Hills,
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: let's say, to an office downtown LA. You get to
• 12:50
  Speaker 2: go through the same traffic that the rest of us
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: get to go through. And if I'm that rich and
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: I had the permission to fly a helicopter or an
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: air taxi, I would do it in a heartbeat.
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: So laws have to change too.
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: But it's going to be fun with air taxis and
• 13:09
  Speaker 2: I'll be reporting on how many go down and are
• 13:14
  Speaker 2: you going to take the first ones? I don't know
• 13:17
  Speaker 2: you've said this before.
• 13:18
  Speaker 3: It was like when flight first started, you're going to
• 13:21
  Speaker 3: have accidents, But it doesn't mean it's not the future.
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: Right And by the way, I don't know how many
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: accidents are going to happen because the technology is so
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: good today. And you know, pilots, for example, look how
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: safe airplanes are, relatively speaking, even though they're you know,
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: clipping each other like crazy. You know that airline pilots
• 13:41
  Speaker 2: don't even take tests in airplanes.
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: It used to be that.
• 13:45
  Speaker 2: Pilot and training would fly an airplane, would fly aircraft
• 13:50
  Speaker 2: as a test. They don't even do that anymore. They
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: just do it all in the simulator. And it's certainly
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: safer now than it was now. Supreme Court first Monday
• 14:00
  Speaker 2: in October start their session.
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: And in June it ends.
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: And this is now we're going to hear some decisions
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: because May June is when the Supreme Court hands down
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: their decisions, although they hear them all year round. So
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: since its Supreme Court decision season, we're looking at some
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: key rulings that the Court is looking at. And today
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: the Court is going to continue rolling out.
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: Decisions for the term. The justices over the.
• 14:36
  Speaker 2: Next six weeks will rule or at least release their
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: ruling on issues ranging from presidential power to the culture
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: war over guns transgender athletes. Now that Justice are about
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: halfway through handing down opinions, they heard nearly sixty cases.
• 14:55
  Speaker 2: And a quick word about the cases that the Supreme
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: Court hears. The Supreme Court gets applications from about five
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: thousand plaintiffs and defendants a year in governments, and they
• 15:12
  Speaker 2: choose about sixty So it ain't easy what they do
• 15:15
  Speaker 2: is they deny cciori, which means we ain't going to
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: hear it, or they grant circiori, which means we're going
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: to hear it. Now, the Court doesn't advance, doesn't announce
• 15:27
  Speaker 2: in advance which decisions, which decisions are coming, and actually
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: drops the big blockbusters in the final days before the
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: summer recess. So let's look at some of the cases
• 15:38
  Speaker 2: that the court is going to be ruling at the
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: Supreme Court. Birthright citizenship is one of them. Now, the
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: court ruled against President Trump's tariffs in January, and the
• 15:52
  Speaker 2: President predicted the justices would also strike down his efforts
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: to sharply limit who qualifies for automatic US citizenship. This
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: is the Trump administration filing a lawsuit, going to the court,
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: sort of knowing it's going to lose, and whether they're
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: hoping for a long shot or basically making a point
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: that Trump wants in his immigration wars, He's going to
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: lose this one now. In the first day of his
• 16:20
  Speaker 2: second term, he directed federal agencies not to recognize citizenships
• 16:25
  Speaker 2: or citizenship of babies born in the United States if
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: neither parent is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. By
• 16:32
  Speaker 2: the way, a lot of countries in the world do
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: not allow birthright citizenship. The United States is certainly not
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: unique if it didn't. So the justices have two ways
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: of stopping this puppy. One is it simply violates the
• 16:48
  Speaker 2: fourteenth Amendment, the citizenship guarantee that quote to all persons
• 16:53
  Speaker 2: born or naturalized in the United States and are subject
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: to this jurisdiction.
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: Thereof are mediicens. That's one attack.
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: The other one is really against Trump by finding that
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: in executive order that they ruled violates the nineteen fifty
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: two immigration law straight out.
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: Okay.
• 17:15
  Speaker 2: One of them is the issue of independent agencies. Are
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: there such things as independent agencies in the executive branch? FBI,
• 17:29
  Speaker 2: the FED particularly, the President was going to fire Lisa Cook,
• 17:35
  Speaker 2: and she sued, and the court is hearing that. And
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: it's how much control the president have over what were
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: deemed independent agencies. And it's all about shifting the power
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: of more than a dozen agencies, shifting power from Congress
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: to the White House. The President does not believe there
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: is any such thing as an independent agency under the aministration.
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: And keep in mind, all the agencies are part and
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: parcel of the Executive Branch and then Immigration. The presidents
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: argued the course have no say in his decision to
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: end deportation protections for Syrians and Haitians. And that is
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: a technical issue, but the big one is the administration
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: wants the option of bringing back a migrant management practice
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: to limit the number of asylum seekers.
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: And under this practice, FED officials.
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: Federal officials stand at the border and prevent undocumented migrants
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: from physically setting foot on US soil, and that would
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: mean they would not have the right to seek asylum.
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: By the way, Clinton did something very similar.
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: I don't know if you remember the wet foot dry
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: foot in South Florida. If someone from Cuba was able
• 18:51
  Speaker 2: to come to the United States and their feet hit dry land, they.
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: Were eligible for asylum.
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: If their feet did not hit dry land, and let's
• 19:00
  Speaker 2: say they're up to their ankles and the water is
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: up to their ankles, they were not on American soil,
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: and therefore they could denigh denied asking for asylum. The
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: mail in ballot issue, that's huge campaign spending, that's huge.
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: And we're talking about the landmark Voting Rights Act, which
• 19:24
  Speaker 2: the court effectively gutted. And so the case minorities were
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: ed challenging electoral.
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: Maps as discriminatory.
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: The new electoral maps Court said you can do it,
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: and so up to this point, the court said you
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: can do it.
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: We'll see what the Supreme Court has to say. Also,
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: there's one.
• 19:45
  Speaker 2: About money in federal cases. How much money can people
• 19:52
  Speaker 2: spend in coordination with candidates. There's a federal limit now
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: and it's aimed at preventing wealthy donors by passing limits
• 20:01
  Speaker 2: that they can give to federal candidates by fundling money
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: through the political parties. Well, I don't know what that does,
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: because you can find a little one you want through
• 20:10
  Speaker 2: packs political action committee. So I don't know what they're saying,
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: and I don't know what really has a big deal
• 20:19
  Speaker 2: and setbacks to the LGBTQ community this past year, including
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: in this one.
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: I was wondering why they did.
• 20:29
  Speaker 2: That, including a March decision rejecting Colorado's ban on conversion
• 20:34
  Speaker 2: therapy for young people, saying that the ban was unconstitutional
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: and interfered with a therapist's right to use conversion therapy.
• 20:45
  Speaker 2: And my argument, I'm always thought, because conversion therapy is
• 20:49
  Speaker 2: just damn dangerous to people, and are you allowed to
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: stop it. Well, the court said, no new gun rights
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: being expanded. Now you figure and that all the gun
• 21:00
  Speaker 2: rights have sort of been tested. Nope, here's a new one.
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: There's a line law requiring gun owners to get permission
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: before bringing a firearm into a store or private property
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: that's open to the public. Now, property owners have the
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: ability to restrict weapons.
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: That's a given.
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: But Hawaii and a few other Democrat states flip the default.
• 21:22
  Speaker 2: In other words, you can't bring a gun unless the
• 21:25
  Speaker 2: owner gives express permission, rather than allowing guns unless they're prohibited.
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: So that is a tough one. There's another gun rights case.
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: The justices may loosen a federal law aimed at keeping
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: firearms out of the hands of dangerous or irresponsible people.
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: I don't know how you determine someone who's irresponsible or
• 21:46
  Speaker 2: mentally ill. The gun advocacy say, we have to keep
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: guns out of those who are mentally ill. Ten percent
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: of Americans are mentally ill. Basically, I think that's the number.
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: It's only thirty million people, so let's look at them.
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: And then there is There was March. There was an
• 22:03
  Speaker 2: argument as to a Texas man regular use of marijuana
• 22:08
  Speaker 2: and he was criminally charged for owning a gun because
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: it's a felony under the Federal Gun Control Act of
• 22:13
  Speaker 2: nineteen sixty eight. Someone who is an unlawful user of
• 22:18
  Speaker 2: or addicted.
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: To any control substance couldn't have a gun.
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: And that is an attack because effectively saying that the
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: federal law because it's used. Marijuana is used in virtually
• 22:32
  Speaker 2: every state now, either medical marijuana and or recreational marijuana,
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: it's still a felony under a federal law, which means
• 22:42
  Speaker 2: federal law controls.
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: So there's a lot going on and there are more,
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: which we'll talk about later on.
• 22:50
  Speaker 2: Okay, here is the fight, and man, I love this fight,
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: Coke zero versus diet coke. And I'm going to ask
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: question and I would love an answer because I do this.
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: All the time. KFI AM sixty. You've been listening to
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: the Bill Handle Show.
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: Catch my show Monday through Friday six am to nine am,
• 23:15
  Speaker 2: and anytime on demand on the iHeartRadio app.