Latest / Honey Badger Radio / We all know what we're doing is wrong and stupid' | Rantzerker 188

Transcript

We all know what we're doing is wrong and stupid' | Rantzerker 188 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Coming to you live from deep within a snowy, exhaustingly snowy, radioactive wasteland.
• 0:07
  We are the survivors of the alt right Apocalypse, the few, the
• 0:11
  brave, the bitchy, once more wading into battle against the lobster zombie hordes
• 0:17
  with rant Zerker number one eighty eight. We all know what we're doing is
• 0:24
  wrong and stupid. I'm your host, Alison, and with me is Brian
• 0:30
  and Karen. All right and barking in the background. I'm sorry, Jojo.
• 0:37
  Lindsay stayed home today. She's feeling really, really sick. She had
• 0:40
  a terrible migraine and since she's been bedridden and and Jojo all day. And
• 0:45
  I think she's waking up now. And so Jojo is excited. Oh oh
• 0:50
  yeah, well he's just happy that she did not stay like dead. I
• 0:57
  guess I was. I was muted for a second there because Kevin was out
• 1:04
  of sight and quiet, and that's never never good. Something's happening. What's
• 1:11
  the She's doing something bad? So I had to go look for her.
• 1:17
  Yeah, okay, Well my dog is out in the front playing frisbee with
• 1:22
  my husband, so we're sort of sorted. Uh so, well, let's
• 1:26
  begin. I'll start by saying, if you want to, you want to
• 1:30
  help us out to make sure that we can continue to these shows. We
• 1:32
  were once again doing our monthly Oh speak of the Devil. The dog just
• 1:34
  came in the monthly fundraiser at feedbadger dot com slash support. Although I don't
• 1:41
  think Scipio really barks a heck of a lot, he hasn't. He seems
• 1:46
  to have quieted down quite a bit as he gets older. Kevin will Kevin
• 1:49
  will make up for the lack. Although although Scipio does like to sing the
• 1:57
  song of the people, that means a roller, not a howler like a
• 2:05
  whale, like the sounds of whale song. It's not how how was like
• 2:13
  oh yeah, this is more like a grown you know, like a groan
• 2:17
  to uh oh, like like Borat does. He makes noises like Nibbler,
• 2:23
  the Nibblonian from Futurama, and he looks a lot like nibble Nibbler. We
• 2:29
  could like stick a diaper and a cape on him and like get him like
• 2:32
  a little uh little third eye and take him out trick or treating. That
• 2:38
  sounds like a That sounds like an exceptionally good use of your time. I'm
• 2:42
  like, well, actually, this article is interesting because it's published in the
• 2:46
  Guardian. I think that the Guardian has sort of taken a turn for the
• 2:50
  worst. If this was what was published twelve years ago. It was twelve
• 2:52
  years ago that this was published. Yeah, so everybody knows that feminism is
• 2:58
  bullshit, Let's be honest. The only people who don't are the ones who
• 3:01
  aren't particularly on the ball. Well, the normies that don't really like look
• 3:07
  into it much. Yeah, they don't look into it much. They just
• 3:09
  sort of take it for granted that these people are telling the truth when they
• 3:14
  talk about history and so. But everybody else, the feminists, And I've
• 3:19
  asserted this a lot for a long time because I see that when feminists argue,
• 3:23
  they always say, yeah, you're right, but let me do a
• 3:27
  little dance of sophistry so we can all pretend you're not. Have you noticed
• 3:31
  that you're right? You're right? Yeah, this it's absolutely freaking right.
• 3:36
  But you know we rape culture, sexist jokes, misogyny, cha cha cha
• 3:44
  cha cha cha, patriarchy, male privileged cha cha cha cha cha cha.
• 3:49
  Therefore you know I'm right. Okay, argumented to being wrong, Okay.
• 3:55
  Tom Martin is the he used to go around on camera and ask ask women
• 4:11
  in college about their feminist thoughts. You must remember him vaguely? Did he
• 4:18
  about suffrage? Women's suffrage? Well, no, I don't know the specific
• 4:25
  questions. I just recognized the name and I was like, oh, that's
• 4:28
  so familiar, and then I started googling and yeah, no, I recognize
• 4:32
  his face. He's a very clean cut kind of guy who would go around
• 4:39
  on camera asking, you know, like, okay, so what do you
• 4:42
  think about the patriarchy you know, or whatever? And oh, it's everywhere.
• 4:46
  I didn't even realize it until I took gender studies and he runs sexismbusters
• 4:54
  dot Org at the London School of Economic makes something like that. Yeah,
• 5:02
  so, which is just I think that the London School of Economics. I
• 5:10
  think that's where the women who came up with preference theory comes from. Mike
• 5:19
  Buchanan's always citing her work on Basically what she found was, after analyzing all
• 5:28
  the data, is that as an occupation or a field becomes increasingly populated with
• 5:33
  women, it loses status and monetary value right remuneration, because they don't consider
• 5:43
  economic work like work force participation, to be their primary priority. So as
• 5:58
  women become as more or women become doctors, right, they participate less in
• 6:03
  terms of hours, they participate less in terms of specialization, they participate less
• 6:10
  in terms of labor unions and collective bargaining and all of those things. Right,
• 6:16
  And money isn't their first priority, and the prestige of the field isn't
• 6:20
  necessarily the first priority. Right, So cases for a lot of women.
• 6:27
  So they'll they'll attempt to take these fields, make them more socially prestigious at
• 6:31
  the same socially prestigious, yes, but not necessarily financially prestigious. And so
• 6:38
  what you're or they may not participate at all, they'll get an empty and
• 6:42
  then just won't exploit it. They won't actually do a job as a doctor.
• 6:46
  What I've also noticed is that they changed the culture, yeah, the
• 6:49
  workplace. So it goes from being a meritocracy to more nepotistic, clique ish,
• 6:57
  tribalistic, and more focused on like atmosphere tone. Yeah, oh yeah,
• 7:08
  that the office maintain a certain tone. Well, this is this is
• 7:11
  the problem that you know, I keep seeing when I hear like women who
• 7:15
  complain about, you know, stem fields being unwelcoming to them, you know,
• 7:19
  like, uh, people, the men in the stem fields don't treat
• 7:24
  them right, And I'm like, yeah, because they're all fucking autists,
• 7:27
  right, and you're expecting them to all be prince charming. Well that's not
• 7:30
  going to happen, right. You're basically doing the equivalent of like walking into
• 7:36
  a room full of people in wheelchairs and saying, well, all your wheelchairs
• 7:43
  make me feel uncomfortable, get rid of them, right. I mean,
• 7:46
  these these there's a distinct correlation between men maleness, autism, and interest in
• 7:56
  the dry sciences, so physics and engineering and stuff like that. Right,
• 8:00
  And also like the women who used to be in those we're also autistic.
• 8:05
  We're also autistic. So I mean, if this is there, if this
• 8:07
  is a woman who's like in her little cubby hole trying to, uh,
• 8:13
  I don't know, calculate the gravitational mass of a massive whatever, and and
• 8:18
  she and somebody accosts her by entering her space, and she looks at you
• 8:22
  like a frightened animal. More likely to be on the autistic spectrum, you
• 8:28
  know, and we know they're literally not sexually interested in you. Probably they're
• 8:33
  probably more likely to be just blunt and and did you get that done?
• 8:41
  Well, why the fuck not? Yeah, you know, and then they're
• 8:45
  like, well, that's so rude, and it's like, well, you're
• 8:48
  a fucking normy bitch. Get out of the fucking autist fields. Yeah,
• 8:54
  gender normatives, get out. No, not get out, no, no,
• 9:01
  neurotypical, neurotypical, get the fuck out. And just because women have
• 9:05
  so, it happened to be more often neurotypical, Like yeah, it really
• 9:09
  does come down to that. Scientifically minded people, men and women are not
• 9:16
  incredibly adept at being social, which is they're not well. It isn't unfortunate
• 9:22
  because okay, if Alan touring was wait, wait till I finish my thought,
• 9:30
  it's unfortunate because if they were more adept socially, the women who are
• 9:35
  already in the fields already accept the the the fact that it's a meritocracy,
• 9:39
  it's blunt, it's all about results. You know, would be able to
• 9:43
  stand toe to toe with the women who want to come in and throw their
• 9:46
  neurotypical weight around. That's well, I'm just saying that their space. And
• 9:54
  but these these these autistic women, they're not as capable of of playing the
• 10:00
  game. Shall we say the neurotip. Yeah, no, it's it's there.
• 10:03
  They're being led down a fucking primrose path all the time. And it's
• 10:05
  the same with the men. And it's like, you know, like what
• 10:09
  what you have as a situation with say someone like Alan Turing and what was
• 10:13
  what was the big complaint about him from all of his coworkers, colleagues,
• 10:18
  you know, underlings everything. He's not personable, he's not warm, he
• 10:22
  doesn't want to socialize, he's he's just like focused on the work only to
• 10:31
  the exclusion of everything else. Right, Well, you know that got results,
• 10:35
  right, And that's and you know, lucky for Alan Turing at least
• 10:41
  in the context of you know, everything having to do with that, right,
• 10:46
  lucky for him, because this kind of work, right, the kind
• 10:52
  of work that you need to be doing in those fields is extremely You need
• 10:56
  to have a monomoniacal focus on it. You need to basically exclude everything else.
• 11:03
  You can't. You don't have time. You don't have six months of
• 11:07
  like waking hours every fucking year to devote to like pursuing sexual and social relationships.
• 11:16
  No, you're freaking trying to solve problems, right, and the problems
• 11:20
  don't involve people they involve numbers and mass and freaking the laws of physics,
• 11:30
  right, that's what they involve. Right. You can't you can't say,
• 11:33
  oh, well, you know what this man is. Absolutely he's got an
• 11:35
  IQ of one hundred and fifty five, right, and he's like a super
• 11:41
  genius at like building a freaking mechanical brain, Okay. And he's going to
• 11:48
  build a mechanical brain that's gonna be able to like decode Enigma, right,
• 11:54
  be able to figure out the German enigma, win us the war. Okay.
• 12:00
  Well, if he was socially inclined at all, he'd be spending half
• 12:07
  of his time socializing. Yep. I'm just sorry, but you're you're looking
• 12:20
  at a situation where where you're asking these men James de Moore, most awkward
• 12:26
  fucking person on the planet that I've ever talked to, that I've ever interviewed.
• 12:31
  Right, he's so awkward socially right, absolutely fucking brilliant. Right,
• 12:39
  My husband, he doesn't fit in where he works. He's an engineer,
• 12:43
  he works in he does a lot of coding. He works in like data
• 12:45
  management and stuff like that, right, and he does a lot of the
• 12:48
  technical work. He doesn't fit in where he works, they all want to
• 12:52
  promote him to management, right, All the managers want to promote him to
• 12:56
  management. Well, management is what he would be best at. And he's
• 13:01
  like, yeah, I don't want to be a manager, right. Just
• 13:03
  because I'm sociable, right, just doesn't mean I want to be a manager.
• 13:11
  I'd rather stay in the union, right and not fit in right with
• 13:18
  these small rabbit rabbit like technical people right who basically look at him and go,
• 13:24
  oh God, if you punched me, I die. Yeah, you
• 13:31
  know, like, well he looks like a biker and he's very personable.
• 13:39
  So I just want to say, first of all, happy Halloween. Enjoy
• 13:43
  Halloween while we still have it, because I imagine that Halloween might disappear.
• 13:52
  Also, Happy birthday my daughter Rachel Chel. Okay, so let me do
• 13:58
  the things because we sort of got I track there. Yeah, all right,
• 14:01
  once again, this what we're once again doing our monthly fundraiser at feedbadger
• 14:05
  dot com slash support. I will probably have to do some arm twisting at
• 14:09
  the hour, So get those pledges in, just put the put it in
• 14:11
  your your URL, feed the Badger dot com slash support and think about it.
• 14:18
  And uh yeah, so we need that to make sure that we can
• 14:20
  continue to bring this to continue to bring you this content. And also,
• 14:26
  if you want to send us a message at any point throughout the show,
• 14:28
  you can do so at feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip,
• 14:31
  and we will read it on air and that you get the full benefit of
• 14:35
  avoiding YouTube censorship and we get the full benefit of the funds that you send.
• 14:41
  So feed the Badger dot com slash just the tip to send us a
• 14:46
  message, and feed the Badger dot com slash support to make sure that we
• 14:48
  can continue to bring you this show. I am going to have to go
• 14:52
  afk for a little bit here, so uh, why what's going on?
• 14:58
  I just I have one task that I need to finish, one spoopy Halloween
• 15:03
  task. So all right, I think she needs to get the candy in
• 15:09
  the pool. Are you do you have treaters coming? We may, we
• 15:15
  may. Indeed, yeah, I might too. Actually I meant that might
• 15:18
  be why JoJo's bar, because this is a special treat for for the supporters.
• 15:24
  So I'm gonna go do that. We'll come back. Won't be very
• 15:28
  long at all, all right, but just get this started, like yeah,
• 15:33
  all right, So we'll start reading it. But one last thing,
• 15:35
  if you guys send us a super chow through feedbadge dot com for slash just
• 15:41
  a tip, it will come up in the chat, so you'll see it
• 15:43
  on the screen if you send it through a super chow, unless it's like
• 15:48
  an essay, in which case you just get part of it on the screen
• 15:50
  because the actual like display whatever won't show everything. But yeah, just so
• 15:56
  you know, I will read it out loud and it'll be on the screen
• 15:58
  as well, and I thank you in advance. Okay, So anyway,
• 16:03
  let's get into today's article. This is from The Guardian. This is twelve
• 16:07
  years old and it is entitled you Can't Deny It. Gender Studies is Full
• 16:12
  of male blaming bias by Tom Martin. So we have an article that's older
• 16:18
  than like how long I've been doing this, which is ten years. That's
• 16:25
  basically making the case and we've already been making anyway, I study the subject
• 16:30
  and it avoids male issues and justifies attacks against Menah September of two thousand and
• 16:37
  eleven, Jonathan Dean reacts dismissively to the news that I am suing the Gender
• 16:44
  Institute of the London School of Economics, where I was a student fear not
• 16:48
  Male Readers eight September. I guess that's the name of the another article or
• 16:53
  something. Let me see, Yeah, let's get the straight. Gender studies
• 16:59
  is not about women good men bad. Oh so this is like a year
• 17:04
  before that, I guess, yeah, yeah, no, it is,
• 17:08
  it very much is. Yeah, it's it's about women good. Men could
• 17:15
  be good, but they choose to be bad. Yeah. So it's worse
• 17:18
  than like, oh, it's just in their nature. It's like you could,
• 17:22
  you could be better, but you're choosing not to, which means that
• 17:26
  this is a you know, it's intentional people, it's willful, right,
• 17:30
  yeah, Okay, Uh where was I? Martin claims he had the misfortune
• 17:34
  of being subject to a torrent of anti male discrimination Dean Wrights adding quote.
• 17:41
  Martin alleges that the course material he studied was systematically anti male, overlooked men's
• 17:45
  issues, and ignored any research that contested a woman, good men bad line
• 17:51
  of reasoning. Furthermore, he claims the Gender Institute drummed into the students a
• 17:56
  simplistic view of women as victims and men as per portraders. Huh, where
• 18:02
  have I heard that? Before. No, I don't know. I don't
• 18:04
  know men as a monolithic perpetrator class and women is a monolithic victim class.
• 18:11
  I have not heard that this is, like, I don't there should be
• 18:15
  a word for it, like it's it's a revolutionary idea. Yeah, I
• 18:25
  just want to point out that this was twelve years ago. I know all
• 18:29
  that premise. Everybody, everybody who researches this stuff knows that it's bullshit.
• 18:36
  And gender studies, yeah, the whole gender studies narrative, the whole women's
• 18:40
  studies narrative, the whole narrative is complete crap. And like, all you
• 18:45
  have to do is ask one simple question, all right, what proves that
• 18:48
  men have preference for other men? Yeah, in order for there to be
• 18:53
  a society in which men benefit at them men at the expense of women,
• 18:57
  there has to be male pre friends. Yep. There's no other way.
• 19:03
  And there is absolutely nothing that proves that, not even among gay men.
• 19:08
  In other words, the basic premise of feminism has no proof. It actually
• 19:14
  has ample proof against it, this confirming evidence. You know, So every
• 19:19
  time someone says, well, patriarchy theory, you should say citation because they
• 19:23
  don't have anything it is a non scientific concept. Yeah, no, you
• 19:30
  need to. You need to basically we need to start using the you know,
• 19:34
  the terminology patriarchy hypothesis or patriarchy conjecture, right, and then on top
• 19:41
  of on top of that, we have to begin to describe it as a
• 19:48
  wrongful accusation in which men as a collective were summarily conviction sentence first, then
• 19:59
  conviction then trial. No, no, never trial. We don't, We're
• 20:03
  not even. It's basically a false accusation that has been presumed true. Yep.
• 20:08
  It's a gigantic false accusation by this society against men that has not just
• 20:15
  never been proven true, but been proven false, and yet well over and
• 20:19
  over and over over and over and over again, and we still perpetuate it.
• 20:25
  And funnily enough, you know, I mean, we do this,
• 20:29
  we say to men and boys that they have no place in our society as
• 20:33
  men and boys. And then and then these these individuals who do it.
• 20:37
  Yeah, and if you know what it is, this isn't you know what.
• 20:41
  I'm pretty sure that they're not so stupid they can't make the connection between
• 20:44
  saying to men and boys, yeah, you have no place in society as
• 20:47
  men and boys, which is what they're doing. No positive masculinity. Men's
• 20:52
  contribution to society is oppressive to women on the whole. Men steal from women
• 20:59
  using society on the whole. Men use society as a means or or use
• 21:04
  rape as a means, as a socially acceptable means to keep women under their
• 21:08
  control. All of these statements are feminist statements and promoted by feminist academia,
• 21:15
  feminist influence, government and NGOs and media. Okay, and these individuals who
• 21:22
  promote these statements, I don't think they're so stupid not to realize the ultimate
• 21:26
  effect of these statements on men, because they pretend they're like shock Pikachu face
• 21:33
  when men start checking out when the participation of men not just in the reproductive
• 21:40
  economy, but the actual economy is declining hand over fist year after year,
• 21:47
  you know, and then then again shock pika. I don't think that they
• 21:49
  are that stupid. I think they know that that's going to be the result.
• 21:55
  In fact, I think that they know that all of this is going
• 21:57
  to drive us over a cliff. They just I don't want to do no,
• 22:03
  no, no no. I don't think that they know that this is
• 22:04
  going to drive us over a cliff because nobody's actually allowed to really talk about
• 22:10
  because anytime you talk about something that could actually snap them out of it and
• 22:12
  go, oh, what the fuck are we doing? We're headed off a
• 22:15
  cliff, right, They freak out because they they are in denial and they
• 22:21
  are delusional. And the delusion is that a society can be perpetuated and sustainable
• 22:27
  with only female productivity. And that is the biggest fucking lie of all right,
• 22:37
  you know, like you have the Merry Dailies and the Sally millergare Hearts
• 22:40
  of the world saying, you know, well, men should be and you
• 22:45
  know, the uh Valerie salonises right saying men should be basically could or or
• 22:52
  you know, maybe through selective procreation or whatever. Right, you know,
• 22:56
  maybe we don't have to kill anybody, but you know we could just through
• 23:00
  so just a little bit of eugenics, just a little yeah, a little
• 23:06
  bit you know, just yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, bring men
• 23:10
  out time for an abortion and when it's not you know, yeah, so
• 23:15
  and then we could we could orchestrate, we could organize a society where men
• 23:18
  are only like ten percent of the population, and that would be the ideal
• 23:22
  society. Right, that's what you know, every time I'd see a Hillary
• 23:26
  freaking supporter wearing the Future is female shirt, you know, like, and
• 23:30
  I ask them like, do you know what that actually means? You know
• 23:34
  where that that quote arose from, that slogan arose from it. It rose
• 23:41
  from the idea that men should only be ten percent of the population. Right,
• 23:47
  that's a Sally Miller Gerhart freaking sentiment. And yeah, and so they
• 23:52
  should be reduced to ten percent of the population at most and be basically just
• 23:59
  you as sperm donors and women will take care of everything else because you know
• 24:07
  that'll work, right, that'll that'll definitely work. And and I'm just like,
• 24:12
  no, it's already not working, Like are you fucking retarded? Like
• 24:18
  what is going on? It's already not working, righted, And it's we
• 24:25
  haven't even gotten to the point where we're culling the male population, right.
• 24:32
  We still have a population that's we still have a birth rate that's slightly more
• 24:36
  than fifty percent male and slightly less than fifty percent male overall. So you're
• 24:45
  you're still looking at like the population is forty eight forty nine percent male,
• 24:51
  and we still can't fucking make it work unless men are heavily inv in making
• 25:02
  it work. Yeah, and how and then they get mad. They get
• 25:10
  mad, right, you know, oh, leave women alone. And then
• 25:14
  when men alone, they're like, why aren't you having getting married to us
• 25:19
  and taking our babies. To be fair, it's probably other women. But
• 25:26
  they got to realize those women who are complaining about men not approaching not getting
• 25:30
  married, well, the loudest voice in the room is women saying, don't
• 25:36
  approach us and marriage is slavery. Yeah. Ok. And if you want
• 25:41
  to be a louder voice and the honest to God truth is the only way
• 25:45
  to overwhelm the feminist voice now is not through the conservative Herodin voice, which
• 25:51
  is, oh men, o, they ol us to pay for our living.
• 25:56
  No, you got to actually care. At this point, there's there's
• 26:02
  no. It's not just that men are holding out and saying, ah,
• 26:06
  I'm walking to care into women care. It's that they're in such a state
• 26:08
  of pain that they won't respond to shaming anymore. That's the problem with shaming
• 26:15
  is that you shame people into depression and then they stop responding, or drug
• 26:18
  abuse or suicide, and they just stop respond They just curl up, and
• 26:22
  you cannot shame them more and to get them out of a place that they
• 26:26
  got into because they were shamed. So any kind of herod and conservative wife
• 26:32
  herod and crap is not gonna work. Any kind of statement based on anything
• 26:37
  but a sense of concern and compassion for men is not gonna get them out
• 26:41
  of this turtle position. Sorry, ladies, So you can't You cannot shame
• 26:47
  them by saying man up, you know, marry, man up, go
• 26:51
  and approach women, man up, take jobs and stuff. Now, you
• 26:55
  can't shame people out of depression. It doesn't mean you can't shame them out
• 27:00
  of out of what you because what were you telling them yesterday? Make room
• 27:07
  for women in the workplace, step back, take a step back, to
• 27:12
  make room for women in the public sphere. Don't approach women because it's rude
• 27:19
  and it and it upsets us, right and all of this, And then
• 27:23
  all of a sudden you're complaining about the results of what you were demanding yesterday.
• 27:29
  The conservative women would say, well, we didn't demand that, Yeah,
• 27:32
  they they just didn't stand up against it, Like this is the honest
• 27:38
  satrue. You know, I can say that it's not going to work,
• 27:41
  But also you know what men at this point in time, men deserve to
• 27:47
  have women who have their back. Yeah, well, I mean and they
• 27:49
  don't, oh right, Like I made I think it was in my Female
• 27:55
  Hypoagency video where I basically said, you know, might have been that one.
• 28:02
  You know, like this narrative isn't true of all women, but all
• 28:07
  women seem to be perfectly willing to tolerate this right to tolerate other women perpetuating
• 28:15
  this narrative. And so it's like the whole single mother thing, right,
• 28:22
  Well, how are you going to how are you gonna like fix that?
• 28:27
  Okay, and get women to start making a common sense, intelligent choices,
• 28:37
  reproductive choices right that do not make them a burden on other people or the
• 28:42
  government, right or you know both right, because the government has no money,
• 28:48
  it's our money. Like it if there are no sensible women, and
• 28:56
  there are no consequences standing and shaming the women who make those irresponsible choices,
• 29:08
  right, if all the sensible women who make sensible choices and responsible choices for
• 29:15
  themselves are engaged in making excuses for the ones who who make the irresponse,
• 29:25
  Oh well, you know, she just she had a tough childhood and oh
• 29:29
  well, she just you know, and we can't really shame her because she's
• 29:33
  just doing her best. She's doing the best she can. Yeah no,
• 29:36
  fuck that, fuck that, like this is this is This is what drives
• 29:42
  me crazy is even the sensible women aren't willing to actually go that extra step
• 29:51
  to say that what these other women are doing with their lives and the lives
• 29:56
  of their children is not Okay, I just watched it bass Fizz video for
• 30:00
  the first time in forever, right, and he you know where he called
• 30:06
  uh single bitter single mothers raccoons, right because apparently they they really love bass
• 30:15
  Fizz. Oh okay, yeah, yeah, sorry, and he but he
• 30:25
  he said he called them raccoons because they love trash men. And he's like,
• 30:29
  you know, I'm sorry, but if you got four kids by three
• 30:30
  different baby daddies and none of those baby daddies could be ours to stick around,
• 30:37
  maybe you there's something wrong with your decisions. Mm hmm, right,
• 30:45
  Like because unless they all raped you to get you knocked up, right,
• 30:52
  those were your decisions. You picked those men, yep, right, And
• 31:00
  nobody's willing to actually put it on these women, right because as a woman,
• 31:07
  even if you're raped, you can be on long term birth control,
• 31:12
  you can get an abortion, you can opt for adoption or safe haven abandonment.
• 31:21
  You don't need to condemn that child to a lifetime of only having a
• 31:30
  baby mama and not even knowing who baby daddy is. Yeah. Right,
• 31:37
  But it's not that they're being raped. It's that they're picking these men,
• 31:41
  right, trash men. They complain about the trash that they roll in.
• 31:45
  They're raccoons. Yeah, that's uh. I'm actually very amused by that,
• 31:52
  the raccoon theory or the raccoon epithet, because it really does get to the
• 31:57
  to the meat of the matter. But they love the trash. They have
• 32:01
  to allow these ways. They don't like the way they smell after they've rolled
• 32:06
  it. The consequences of their actions. But here's the big it's not just
• 32:10
  the women suffering the consequences. It's there, I know, it's their children.
• 32:15
  Well, one thing we could try doing, is get is do a
• 32:19
  hell of a lot more to uh improve and expand upon the punitive father registry
• 32:23
  so that we can identify the fathers and give them the option to have custody
• 32:30
  or to share custody with the mother, or pay child support. You know
• 32:34
  for both you know, and uh, maybe that would start to get the
• 32:38
  gears moving in these women's heads if they know that it's not going to just
• 32:44
  be really easy to walk away with the kid in money, that they're actually
• 32:47
  going to have to negotiate with another adult human being. Yeah, you know
• 32:52
  what I mean. And honestly, maybe these women want the kid, but
• 32:57
  they don't want the dad, even though they find desirable, they just don't
• 33:00
  want to have to deal with them in their lives. Which why are you
• 33:05
  creating a kid with a person who you don't want to father that kid?
• 33:08
  Yeah? Honestly, where is your common sense? But yeah, that's a
• 33:14
  that's again there's a complexity there because when we talk about women need to be
• 33:19
  subject to the consequences, now they're creating a child. The child has done
• 33:23
  nothing wrong and he and they're going to have to suffer their the results of
• 33:28
  their mother's shitty behavior. Yep, bad choices. And this is sort of
• 33:35
  a wicked problem because if I could extract the woman from the scenario and actually
• 33:42
  have no blowback fall in the child, then that would be the ideal situation.
• 33:49
  Uh, I don't know, you're right, Probably it's just gonna have
• 33:52
  to be shaming the crap out of women, or at least guilting them,
• 33:55
  making them realize that you are going to be held responsible for the vulnerability of
• 34:00
  something that's completely reliant on you and innocent of innocent did not choose this and
• 34:07
  did not choose this, and you are going to take responsibility for doing the
• 34:13
  best that you can, even before that little life exists. M Yeah,
• 34:17
  I got a super chat from Senior Sticks gives us two dollars and says the
• 34:24
  artificial woman will save us. Humans are messy. Thank you, Senior Sticks.
• 34:30
  And you notice if you send through a super chat, it will it
• 34:34
  will send a message out to every chat that we are connected to right now
• 34:37
  because I'm well because I made that happen. So made that the talent,
• 34:45
  made the chat more interactive, and you integrated it. I did. I
• 34:52
  integrated it into the discord as well as all like the Rumble, because Rumble
• 35:00
  has always been like a dessert island that wasn't quite connected to the other places
• 35:06
  even though we're streaming there. But this kind of brings Rumble in so people
• 35:08
  can see. You know that we have custom emojis on Rumble that people can
• 35:14
  use, like the cool Doge and then people can see it. Maybe they'll
• 35:19
  be like, oh, I want to play with the cool doge, and
• 35:21
  so they will follow us on Rumble because I think Rumble is a good platform
• 35:23
  that should grow. Although their app, their mobile app, needs some work,
• 35:28
  but still, well, you know, you know, you know what,
• 35:30
  you know what Viva Fry does. I don't know if any of our
• 35:32
  listeners know who he is. I do, I do, yeah, yeah.
• 35:36
  Viva Fry and Robert Barnes when they do their streams, they they do
• 35:42
  the first half hour or so on YouTube Rumble and Locals, and then they
• 35:49
  end the stream on YouTube and send everybody the link to Rumble, and then
• 35:55
  they do the next hour or so on maybe hour and a half on Rumble
• 36:00
  and Locals, and then they do an after show where they answer questions for
• 36:08
  money five bucks. Five bucks gets you an answer to a question on locals.
• 36:15
  So they they basically they they're trying to transition people from YouTube toward Rumble
• 36:24
  and Rumble rants at least until the end of the year. I'm not sure
• 36:31
  whether it's the end of the fiscal year or the end of the year year.
• 36:36
  They're not charging anything for there you go Rumble rants. I don't think,
• 36:44
  right, they normally take YouTube takes thirty percent, Rumble takes twenty percent,
• 36:47
  but for some reason this year, Rumble pledged to like stop taking Rumble
• 36:54
  rent money in August or something like that. So yeah, so they're not
• 37:04
  taking a commission at least not on Viva and Barns right. I don't know
• 37:12
  whether that's like across the platform, so don't quote me on that, but
• 37:16
  but yeah, so it's like, if you want to build up a free
• 37:21
  free speech platform, then you know, maybe maybe consider doing that format.
• 37:29
  Yeah, I followed, I follow I start out with them on YouTube,
• 37:32
  and I follow them over to rumbles there you go and occasionally to locals.
• 37:39
  Should I move? Yeah, I'm not on local. I was. I
• 37:43
  was watching molling you on there. I kind of dropped off going a local.
• 37:47
  I don't like it layout. So yeah, it's not it doesn't have
• 37:52
  the best UI, but it is where a lot of the people that you
• 37:54
  are like whatever happened to so and so a lot of them are over there.
• 37:59
  Oh yeah, the ball's cozy, Rumble, you know, Teal Deer
• 38:02
  is there, like yeah, Coltaane is there. So if you're like,
• 38:07
  there are people that you're like, Oh, I wonder what happened to this
• 38:09
  person? They might be over there. I got another super chat super chat
• 38:15
  from Senior six and he gives it two dollars and says, well, the
• 38:19
  artificial womb draw women woman quickly. What do you mean, draw woman quickly?
• 38:23
  I don't understand the question, jez okay. I I don't understand how
• 38:30
  the artificial womb will solve anything. I am. I don't. I don't
• 38:36
  think so either. First of all, I don't think it's really reliable technology.
• 38:39
  Second of all, I don't think I think that it's probably gonna be
• 38:44
  really only good for like, very rich men that can afford it. I
• 38:49
  think that regular men are gonna want to do it the old fashioned way.
• 38:52
  There's just a number of issues with that. I think that sif you're saying
• 38:55
  artificial womb is like the fix, I don't think it's the fix. I
• 38:59
  think think it's actually a step towards the like fucking a brave New World dystopia
• 39:04
  in my opinion. Yeah, No, I think that most people, when
• 39:07
  they're contemplating having kids, most people want a co parent. Yeah. And
• 39:15
  uh, and then on top of that, I mean you could say,
• 39:17
  well, okay, gay men could opt for an artificial womb. But I
• 39:22
  just don't see given the sheer complexity of the biological processes going on, I
• 39:29
  don't see how the technology could be the technology of the actual womb could be
• 39:36
  replicated by an artificial womb. I mean, just stated a goat doesn't mean
• 39:42
  that they are actually you know what, what one thing is occurring is the
• 39:45
  artificial womb or something similar to it is making it so that infant or uh
• 39:54
  in utero? What were they and I don't want to say fetuses, but
• 39:59
  uh babies who are ges stating they are viable younger and younger? Now,
• 40:04
  yes you can't Yeah that was and one week. So the question is if
• 40:12
  it does introduce a question if a woman has a fetus removed during the the
• 40:19
  the window of viability, and she decides she doesn't want to be a parent,
• 40:25
  why can't a man either possession of his own DNA, Yes, of
• 40:31
  his own DNA and you know, pay for the continuing gestation of it.
• 40:37
  Well, this, this is this is what I always ask when these like
• 40:40
  creaking insane pro pro choicers, Right, pro choice, no restrictions period,
• 40:47
  Right, I'm like, okay, well, so let's say, and it's
• 40:53
  it's all because it's her body, her choice. Okay. So let's say
• 40:58
  you could we could pull a star trek, okay, and we could beam
• 41:04
  the baby out to feed us out at even at six days gestation, right,
• 41:12
  and beam it into an artificial womb. And the man will underwrite the
• 41:16
  entire project and pay for the child, and the woman will own nothing,
• 41:22
  the mother will owe nothing to anybody? Right, would you go for that?
• 41:28
  And they're like no, like I have never had a single fucking feminist
• 41:34
  pro choice or say that they would be okay with that. So that tells
• 41:37
  me it's about it's not about their body, it's not about their choice to
• 41:42
  be a mother. M I don't know what the fuck it is about the
• 41:49
  power to deny men, or the power to end life, yeah, or
• 41:58
  the power to not be bothered not you know that they can go with the
• 42:02
  rest of their life never having a fleeting thought about, Oh, I wonder
• 42:07
  how my progeny is out there somewhere you know. No, they'll know exactly
• 42:14
  where it is. It's in a fucking dumpster, It's in a landfill somewhere,
• 42:19
  yep, or you know, ash is in a fucking medical incinerator.
• 42:27
  All right, so yeah, it's the ability to play god. Okay,
• 42:30
  I got a superchow, so thank you. I got a super Chow from
• 42:35
  a great indoors who gives us five dollars and says, just testing out the
• 42:39
  superchowd pop up mechanism. Nothing to see here, badger on all right,
• 42:45
  well you yeah, it works, it's it's I'm displaying it right now.
• 42:51
  So I told you. You want to see your name in big letters on
• 42:55
  the screen, send a superchow. It'll go right through. I got another.
• 43:00
  Here's another one from Nova Fan, which I'm also going to put on
• 43:04
  the screen for twenty dollars. Thank you so much, Nova Fan. And
• 43:08
  he says Republicans, when feminists refuse to be traditional in marriage for selfish reasons,
• 43:14
  sleep the same Republicans when men refuse to get married to feminists avoid being
• 43:19
  harmed by the legal system. Panic. Yeah, thank you Nova fans.
• 43:24
  It's unfortunate and this is not true. Like there are individual conservatives who will
• 43:30
  recognize this problem, but for the most part, it seems like the party
• 43:35
  line is just blame men like men like feminists. Okay, they're afraid of
• 43:40
  women. Jet feminists blame men for constructing society, and Republican or conservatives blame
• 43:47
  men for not constructing society. Yeah, and between the two of them,
• 43:52
  men have no comfortable way of existing. Who but at least even Kevin agrees.
• 44:00
  At least conservatives, you get the veneer of not being as supposedly fiscally
• 44:07
  being more fiscally responsible, or keeping the government knows out of the economy,
• 44:12
  the veneer of it. I honestly don't think they really do. But yeah,
• 44:16
  all right, Well men's issues always vote men's issues. Yeah, all
• 44:23
  right, I'll get back to the article now. Dean, a former researcher
• 44:29
  at ls's Gender Institute, denies everything. Gender studies programs encourage students to acknowledge
• 44:36
  the limitations of a victim centered understanding of womanhood buying words, but a close
• 44:42
  analysis of the core text shows that all the old male blaming biases are still
• 44:46
  there. Patriarchy theory, the idea that men typically dominate women is omnipresent.
• 44:53
  When research shows women tend to boss men interpersonally. Texts highlight misogyny but never
• 45:00
  miss injury. So he was using miss injury twelve years ago. It's anti
• 45:04
  male equivalent despite research finding that women's verbal verbalize Women verbalize four times more miss
• 45:10
  indry than men do misogyny. It's probably gone up since then. Actually,
• 45:15
  and the pre texts highlight violence against women only, despite decades of research showing
• 45:21
  that women are more likely to initiate domestic violence. Does anyonet to say anything
• 45:27
  to that? Or should I just keep doing? No, it's it's it's
• 45:29
  all. This is all old hat, but but it is. It is
• 45:34
  nice that this kind of stuff was being published in the Guardian twelve years weird.
• 45:38
  I don't think. I don't think this guy works for them anymore.
• 45:43
  Okay, let's get a few things thinks straight, says Dean. The dominant
• 45:46
  ideas, approaches, and insights of the vast majority of academic disciplines are produced
• 45:52
  by four and about men. There are entrenched gender biases in most fields.
• 45:58
  So what he's saying is it like everywhere else in academia, it's for men.
• 46:01
  So mathematics that's for men, Geometry that's for men. Science that's for
• 46:07
  men. Right, those things are for men'sology, history, literature, sociology
• 46:21
  is is gender study. Well no, wait, actually men dominate most of
• 46:23
  that, but women all they get is gender studies. That's all they get.
• 46:29
  Okay, anyway, no wonder, I wonder. I can't use their
• 46:31
  their their degrees for anything. You have to remember that this is this is
• 46:35
  part of what you remember the show we did with Teal Deer on feminist nosis.
• 46:38
  Yeah, this is the white male system. Yeah. What this guy
• 46:43
  is saying is because these are meritocracies, they are inherently masculine. And it's
• 46:47
  not wrong. The meritocracy is, which is ironic because the guy would probably
• 46:53
  turn around and say that any benefits to a meritocracy, or of course there's
• 46:58
  really the result of femaleness somehow. But yeah, he's right, Like,
• 47:01
  they are masculine spaces because they're focused on merit and outcome and your ability to
• 47:09
  affect movement towards your goal. Shall we say, Yeah, I mean that's
• 47:15
  a masculine space. So he's right. The problem is that he goes from
• 47:21
  saying this masculine space is anything but of service to society and women, like,
• 47:28
  yes, it's a masculine space, but what is the ultimate benefit.
• 47:31
  Who are the ultimate beneficiaries of all of the activity in this masculine space.
• 47:37
  Who's the ultimate beneficiary of all of the drones in the termite mound building the
• 47:40
  frickin' termite mound, the queen and the offspring and the future of the mound,
• 47:45
  like, yeah, this that's the thing. Like, so they stop
• 47:49
  at the dominant ideas approaches are are masculine. Therefore women are are oppressed by
• 47:57
  everything else in society because it's based on masculine virtues like meritocracy, which they
• 48:01
  won't recognize as masculine virtues, but they will do so in order to say
• 48:08
  that that you see how it is men constructed society, that's why it excludes
• 48:15
  women. But men aren't actually responsible for the positives of society existing. So
• 48:21
  yeah, you know, yeah, no, they constructed everything but except the
• 48:24
  good bits, but which we're stolen from women somehow when good bits arise from
• 48:31
  the meritocracy that they're associating with mathunity in order to argue that they exclude women,
• 48:37
  going, yeah, no, the the irritating thing, right, because
• 48:42
  meritocracy is considered a masculine value. It's just not considered a positive right just
• 48:46
  like it And meritocracy is also now considered under critical race theory to be a
• 48:52
  white supremacist value, right, and it's it's Basically, what they argue is
• 49:00
  that it's what GitHub argued years ago, right when you know they had their
• 49:06
  their big doormat or whatever, when you went into their building and it said
• 49:13
  meritocracy. That was their motto, meritocracy, and they got rid of it,
• 49:16
  and they threw that away as a motto because all of these feminists and
• 49:21
  woke people and social justice warriors said, meritocracy is a sham. Right,
• 49:25
  there's no such thing as meritocracy. You know, I agree about this earlier.
• 49:34
  I agree there is such a thing as nepotism. There is such a
• 49:37
  thing as personal bias, There is such a thing as getting ahead start,
• 49:42
  But not in meritocracy. Well, no, there there is such such a
• 49:47
  thing within systems that are broadly meritocratic. Right, Like my husband, my
• 49:55
  husband's my husband's cousin had a dad with connections, right, who could make
• 50:02
  a phone call for him to get him his first job. Right. My
• 50:07
  husband did not have a dad who could make a phone call for him because
• 50:10
  of his connections and get him his first job. Right. He had to
• 50:14
  struggle more. He was born in a different at a different starting line.
• 50:17
  Okay, that's just the way it is, right, and not everything is
• 50:22
  about the output. Not everything is. Sometimes it really isn't all about what
• 50:27
  you know and what you can do. It's also about who you know and
• 50:30
  what they are willing to do for you because they know your parents, right,
• 50:35
  And that's just the way it is. He got his first freaking real
• 50:38
  job because he texted a friend of his from school whose brother owned a business,
• 50:45
  and he texted him and I'm just out of frustration, didn't ask him
• 50:49
  to make any phone calls. He just texted him and said, what the
• 50:52
  fuck do I have to do? It's been nine months, What the fuck
• 50:54
  do I have to do? Put will suck your dick for a fucking job
• 50:58
  at the top of my resume, right, And then his friend took it
• 51:02
  upon himself to call his brother and say, hey, you want to give
• 51:06
  this guy a shot because he's having a real hard time because he's got no
• 51:08
  connection. So there is no such thing as a straight meritocracy. It does
• 51:15
  not exist. If it exists, it exists. The most uncorrupted versions of
• 51:21
  it exist in the dry sciences, the realm of the autists. Okay,
• 51:29
  but the idea that women are cut out of meritocracies, No, no,
• 51:37
  they're not. They just take all of the merriatiocratic elements of a system and
• 51:44
  turn it into nepotism, turn it into favoritism, turn it into freaking getting
• 51:50
  along, you know, social lubrication, all of that stuff. They don't
• 51:55
  give a shit about productivity, right, even some of the autistic women I
• 52:00
  know. I'm like, are you kidding me, bitch? Right, every
• 52:06
  time you take three days off to go skiing or something, you break a
• 52:08
  bone and then you're off for like two months of paid leave. Right,
• 52:15
  Can can you manage a weekend without breaking a fucking bone doing something stupid?
• 52:22
  Well? And then and then and yeah, and then in a year you're
• 52:25
  gonna want to go on maternity leave and you'd be like, well, I
• 52:29
  earned it. And it's like, well, yeah, you're you're talented,
• 52:31
  you're productive when you're there, right, But that doesn't keep the fucking water
• 52:37
  running. Yeah. But ultimately, even though there are counterexamples to meritocracy,
• 52:45
  the idea that you get your foot in the door, maybe through your contacts,
• 52:49
  maybe through your family contacts, but at that point you have to actually
• 52:52
  perform, there is that concept as well. And overall, okay, just
• 52:59
  let me finish, Just let me finish, overall, what this guy is
• 53:02
  arguing is like, there's a feminine sphere and a masculine sphere, okay,
• 53:09
  and the masculine sphere is governed by meritocracy and logic and outcomes and goals,
• 53:20
  which he would probably regard as masculine because he's saying that that excludes women.
• 53:27
  And then when women get into these fields, and this goes back to what
• 53:30
  we were talking about in the beginning, they change them. They changed them
• 53:34
  into something that is less functional on the meritocratic axis. And I want to
• 53:38
  talk about one example that's really close to my heart, the publishing industry.
• 53:44
  You know, twenty thirty forty years ago, the publishing industry was dominated by
• 53:50
  men who were editing, and women who were probably more masculine, who are
• 53:53
  editing, and and writers who also had more of the meriticratic logic, goals
• 54:04
  results kind of attitude. And now it is becoming dominated by people who think
• 54:10
  that how things are said, the tone, whether or not they're morally correct,
• 54:15
  and that changes every single god damn day with every single person, and
• 54:21
  ultimately just results in a warlord like free for all King of the Mountain deathmatch
• 54:30
  over who has the most social dominance thus can enforce their opinion of what is
• 54:35
  moral. That's what's going on. You see that there is no there is
• 54:38
  no external thing that anybody can judge themselves by. So they are always trying
• 54:43
  to hit the shifting target of being virtuous, and yet the only person who
• 54:47
  really ends up being most virtuous is the woman who can slam body slam everybody
• 54:52
  else around her hardest. You notice that, Karen, Well, when I
• 54:59
  was when I was in the industry, it was basically eighty percent of the
• 55:06
  fiction publishing industry was female agents, female editors, female publishers, right,
• 55:15
  yes, And so they're making the decisions as to what gets published. They're
• 55:21
  the gatekeepers. And then you have you have a situation where this was you
• 55:30
  know, during the sort of the e book entrepreneurship phase, where you had
• 55:35
  all these small public publishers pop up. And what I found was there were
• 55:43
  very few small publishers, independent publishers out there who did ebooks and print books
• 55:52
  that did not try to sell their authors on the idea that this publishing house
• 56:01
  runs like a family. And and so you'd have, oh, I love
• 56:07
  my publisher. You know, the place is like a family. It's like
• 56:10
  and I'm like, oh, fuck no, not touching that shit with a
• 56:15
  ten foot pole. Right. Oh, it's it's run like a family.
• 56:19
  No, I need something that's run like a business, like it needs it
• 56:22
  wants to make money. And I found one, right. But it's like
• 56:29
  this idea that you know, it's all about the fields. It's all about
• 56:31
  the fields and feeling supported and feeling you know, inter like your feelings are
• 56:37
  being entertained and you know, and like you're just very comfortable there and you
• 56:42
  can you can raise a concern about something at any point and and and it's
• 56:46
  like and they'll always accommodate your feelings. And it's I was just like,
• 56:51
  that is the last fucking thing I want, right, And that is kind
• 56:54
  of you know, and if you want to go into like sort of missonry
• 57:00
  in fiction, particularly in children's books, things like boys are stupid, throw
• 57:07
  rocks at them and you know all of that, right you're looking at this,
• 57:12
  which I wouldn't mind if there were also books called, you know,
• 57:21
  club gross, get rid of slimy girls, right, like Calvin and Hobbes.
• 57:28
  Okay, if we were still allowed to have that, have that kind
• 57:31
  of combative rivalry between boys and girls, that goes both ways, but we're
• 57:38
  not allowed to have that anymore. And so you're looking at a lot of
• 57:45
  that is decided by the fact that women run the whole show basically, and
• 57:52
  so I'm just like fiction publishing is, I don't need to be there,
• 58:02
  No, And I think it exactly not worse than that, because now everything
• 58:07
  is about virtue signaling and being sensitive and I can see that it really has
• 58:14
  nothing to do with that. It's it is a like I said, a
• 58:16
  free for all queen of the mountain. Whoever wins the battle is the one
• 58:22
  with the most social clout and the and the and the prize is to erase
• 58:29
  her enemy from from the the from the the writing sphere or the writing industry.
• 58:37
  And I've seen this, like that's what's happening now, Like they're they're
• 58:40
  canceling women for or other women for some of the most minute transgressions, and
• 58:46
  they're just killing you out and they've turned the entire publishing industry or they are
• 58:52
  in the process of turning the entire publishing industry into a battle ground over virtue
• 58:58
  signaling. And it's not really about virtue signaling. I mean, I think
• 59:01
  if women had more risk tolerance. They would probably just use pick axes and
• 59:05
  knives to just to just eradicate their enemies. You know, that's basically like
• 59:10
  really virtue signaling and censorship and social ostracization is women's pick caskses and knives.
• 59:19
  So all they go in these these women are chomping at the bit, grinding
• 59:23
  for some blood. And they go into an industry and they turn it into
• 59:27
  a blood bath. It's not a physical blood bath, I'm using a metaphor.
• 59:30
  It's a social blood bath. But that that kind of competitive absolute aggression
• 59:38
  comes out, and that's what you know, they get into there and this
• 59:42
  is what you see. And whereas in a in a they talk about how
• 59:46
  men's spaces are competitive, Yes, but they're very strictly controlled in how they're
• 59:53
  competitive. Okay, you're not a in a cooperative competitive circumstance. You're competing
• 1:00:00
  to become the best through a meritocracy. You're not competing to utterly eradicate your
• 1:00:07
  rival, you know, to blow Yeah, because of the sphere like out
• 1:00:12
  of the world. Yeah, because the ice flow. Because because you know
• 1:00:16
  the way Gilgamesh knew this with Anky do right, and the way even chimpanzee
• 1:00:22
  emails know, right, Uh, you get into a conflict, right,
• 1:00:29
  there's one who's the victor and one who's who's who's who loses, right,
• 1:00:36
  then you make amends because if if there's someone who is tough enough to give
• 1:00:43
  you a proper fight, right, well you you actually might want to befriend
• 1:00:49
  that person, right, you might want to have that person or that individual
• 1:00:54
  as an ally. Right, Because they're like this is they did this with
• 1:01:01
  They looked at different sports right where there's sort of one on one it's a
• 1:01:10
  like combative ritual combative sports, right, so boxing and competitive sports right where
• 1:01:16
  people are directly competing with each other, tennis and stuff like that. And
• 1:01:22
  they found that when you have two men who are competing, right, then
• 1:01:29
  after one of them is declared the victor and the other declared the loser,
• 1:01:34
  right, they have a much more sincere and warm way of shaking hands or
• 1:01:44
  even hugging once the fight is done. Right, Whereas with women it's cold,
• 1:01:51
  it's cold and perfunctory. They only have to do it because it's a
• 1:01:53
  tradition within male sports. So they just they go through the motions, right.
• 1:01:59
  They not they do not want to be friends make friends, and that's
• 1:02:02
  because women never had to do those things, right if if they were in
• 1:02:07
  direct competition with another woman, right, they don't. They didn't have any
• 1:02:12
  shortage of allies. They had a man. And that is the real problem.
• 1:02:16
  When women take over an industry, they have no ability or less ability
• 1:02:22
  to control their competition with each other. Yeah, forgive turn the industry into
• 1:02:29
  the wasteland of psychological violence. And partly it's because they aren't held to a
• 1:02:35
  standard of behavior when it comes to how they treat other women and how they
• 1:02:38
  treat men. And also, we live in a society which seems to be
• 1:02:43
  convinced that men have nothing to learn from men, nothing at all, that
• 1:02:47
  women are the moral good and men are the fallen ones. And it's like,
• 1:02:52
  no, actually, we women do. If women want to take want
• 1:02:55
  to be part of men's industry, they need to learn how they do it.
• 1:03:00
  It Like it's arrogance to think you can walk into a space and know
• 1:03:04
  it better than the people who built it. Yeah, and demand that it
• 1:03:07
  changed as sooner, then demand that it changed. And then when it changes
• 1:03:12
  and you fuck it all up. Yeah, blame men again. Blame the
• 1:03:15
  men. Yeah, jeez. And like, honestly, you know, women
• 1:03:22
  with that example of the female fighter. You know, what they probably want
• 1:03:25
  is like, you know, the ability to win by backstabbing, like literally
• 1:03:30
  stabbing the other woman after the fight is over, you know, like a
• 1:03:35
  like a like a thirty second free for all if you can, you know,
• 1:03:37
  sudden death. If you stab your partner, if you stab your opponent
• 1:03:43
  to death, you still win. That Like there's no sportsmanship going on with
• 1:03:49
  women, you know, and it's like value, Like, honestly, there's
• 1:03:53
  some under there's some reason for this. I think that women's competition is so
• 1:03:58
  devastating. And part of the reason is because if women are unable to secure
• 1:04:02
  resources, their children die. Yeah, so they are the line of defense
• 1:04:08
  between their children and starvation. So their competition will be deadly. Okay.
• 1:04:14
  Men can have these cooperative competitive relationships in which they share some sense of common
• 1:04:18
  purpose, but for women it's more difficult because a lot of their activities are
• 1:04:24
  individualistic in a lot of ways, they're just on their own sort of,
• 1:04:29
  And so that there's this kind of level of violence makes sense in the terms
• 1:04:32
  of women compete over resources, and that resources are always the most devastating competitions
• 1:04:39
  for humans in many ways. And also when women are engaging in violence,
• 1:04:45
  it usually means that the kids are going to be next in line for death.
• 1:04:48
  So women have evolved certain psychological things that men don't have. They have
• 1:04:54
  the ability to when violence starts. It seems like they have ability to just
• 1:05:01
  it, just go balls to the wall and like it it, like bring
• 1:05:06
  everything to bear, every kind of savagery to bear, and also deal with
• 1:05:11
  it psychologically better. This is something that they found when they when they looked
• 1:05:15
  at female versus male drone pilots. You take away the risk to self.
• 1:05:19
  Women deal with the psychological fallouts of dealing violence to others better than men.
• 1:05:26
  R U. They are. They are brutal, and there's reasons for it,
• 1:05:31
  and if we don't acknowledge that, we will never be in a situation
• 1:05:35
  of perhaps turning that brutality to the benefit of humanity, because every negative is
• 1:05:41
  also a positive. Okay, I'll get off my soapbox. I got I
• 1:05:45
  got a super chat from Paul Grafton. He gives us one hundred tie bots
• 1:05:53
  be a HTS the tie currency, and he says, your coworkers are like
• 1:05:58
  your family. You can't choose them either. Thank you Paul Grafton for the
• 1:06:02
  tie bots bots. I don't know how you say that. I should probably
• 1:06:06
  do the arm twisting since it's in the hour, all right, let's do
• 1:06:10
  it, all right. So I do have a thank you to give to
• 1:06:14
  the redneck Ram who puts in one hundred and seventy five dollars. So thank
• 1:06:17
  you redneck Ram. Why are not at the time? WHI you're not at
• 1:06:23
  the time? And if you would like to join the red neck Ram and
• 1:06:28
  the rest of our supporters, you can do so at feedbadger dot com slash
• 1:06:30
  support. Please do take the time to do that and give us what you
• 1:06:35
  know, five dollars, ten dollars, twenty five dollars. Everything helps,
• 1:06:41
  and everything is very much appreciated, because ultimately, if you guys don't help
• 1:06:45
  us, we don't aren't able to continue to do this work. And this
• 1:06:48
  work is you know, like I've said multiple times, more and more,
• 1:06:54
  I'm realizing that we're, as far as I know, the first outlet to
• 1:07:00
  connect the last the lack of recognition of men's issues to a lot of the
• 1:07:05
  problems we're seeing in the greater world. So the lack of recognition of men's
• 1:07:10
  issues, men's right to their own activities, essentially The fallout of that was
• 1:07:15
  Gamergate and Anita Carsarkisian and the takeover of men's activities because well, women should
• 1:07:23
  have access to it, and that means women should dominate how the social landscape
• 1:07:28
  of those activities is conducted, or at least not not even all women,
• 1:07:32
  just feminist women. And then progressively we see more and more of this,
• 1:07:36
  Oh, this will be improved by removing the masculine virtues and substituting feminists,
• 1:07:45
  feminists and feminine and feminine own reality into it. And the more we do
• 1:07:51
  this, the more we are basically deconstructing what makes our society work. And
• 1:07:56
  honestly, I think we're doing it because women don't know what to do with
• 1:08:00
  themselves. They're bored, they don't have a sphere anymore, so they're co
• 1:08:04
  opting men's sphere to the destruction of both. So, if you would like
• 1:08:09
  to make sure that we can continue to talk about these issues once again,
• 1:08:13
  it's down to you. This is a way you can make a difference.
• 1:08:15
  So go to feed the Badger dot com slash support and help us out.
• 1:08:20
  I will, I'll do some gilt guilt tripping in like maybe twenty minutes.
• 1:08:25
  If you guys don't do it. But and again very much appreciate everybody who
• 1:08:30
  does help out, because this message matters. This message needs to continue and
• 1:08:39
  till the point at which this whole process which we recognized eleven years ago,
• 1:08:45
  twelve years ago, thirty years ago, this whole process of kicking masculinity out
• 1:08:51
  till people the pain of it becomes so great that people recognize that we need
• 1:08:58
  to face whatever it is is it's causing us to be so stupid, face
• 1:09:01
  it down, be honest, and solve it right. Feed the badger dot
• 1:09:08
  com slash support. Let's do this. Let's get this work done so we
• 1:09:12
  can start enjoying a civilization that has a future. Okay. Oh and also
• 1:09:18
  if you want to send us a message, feed the Badger dot com slash
• 1:09:20
  just a tip. All right, let's get some more done with I don't
• 1:09:24
  think you're not the article. I don't know, okay. By pretending men's
• 1:09:30
  issues are disproportionately focused on, and by implying that there is lots of anti
• 1:09:35
  female bias everywhere, Dean attempts to justify the continuation of attacks on men and
• 1:09:43
  avoidance of men's issues debates, as is standard in the gender studies orthodoxy.
• 1:09:47
  Today, when women's studies become gender studies departments, it signaled a new era
• 1:09:53
  of inclusion for men's issues. A rejection of this now is a betrayal of
• 1:09:58
  men and equality prop stop. I just want to point something out to the
• 1:10:03
  conservatives. In order to present men's sphere as a oppression of women, the
• 1:10:15
  existence of men's fear and men's ways of doing things and men's virtues as oppression
• 1:10:20
  of women, they had to embrace this idea of a blank slate when it
• 1:10:26
  comes to gender. So, in other words, men aren't doing these things
• 1:10:30
  because they're men, and not only doing these things because they're men, but
• 1:10:32
  doing it overwhelmingly to protect and provide for other people. They're doing it because
• 1:10:39
  they artificially want to exclude women from these areas. So this entire narrative relies
• 1:10:48
  on a gender neutral proposition. Everything that we have seen from feminism relies on
• 1:10:57
  a gender neutral proposition. All these radical feminists who are suddenly popping up and
• 1:11:01
  turning back and saying but wait, they are doing so because their own what
• 1:11:09
  they were pushing has now come and bit them in the ass in the form
• 1:11:12
  of trans women. Got to realize this and you're not going to solve the
• 1:11:17
  problem by ignoring what women did. What these women did in order to destroy
• 1:11:25
  the notion of gender binary in order to promote the notion of patriarchal oppression.
• 1:11:32
  Yep, you got one or the other. You gotta make a choice.
• 1:11:36
  Yeah. I keep on mentioning this to like, because I do. I
• 1:11:41
  have done a lot of conservative talk radio spots, and I always mentioned this,
• 1:11:45
  like, you know when people say, well, when did this,
• 1:11:47
  you know start, you know, the trans thing, the gender ideology thing
• 1:11:55
  and all of this, like where did it come from? And I'm like,
• 1:11:57
  well, it came from second wave feminists, the very people who are
• 1:12:01
  complaining now that the very people that we call trans exclusionary radical feminists right who
• 1:12:08
  are complaining now, they're the ones who actually packed the Pandora's box and then
• 1:12:14
  insisted on opening it right and letting all this shit loose. And now they
• 1:12:18
  don't like the inevitable, predictable, entirely predictable results of what they created.
• 1:12:26
  Well, it was going on like a long time ago, and was it
• 1:12:30
  Graham She and some of these other people that wrote on this gender queer theory
• 1:12:33
  stuff and putting it in schools that's old that goes back to the sixties and
• 1:12:38
  seventies. So it's not like it's not like it just suddenly came out of
• 1:12:42
  nowhere. It's just that, you know, it takes like a generation or
• 1:12:45
  so to educate people and then all of a sudden you're dealing with this mess.
• 1:12:49
  So you should have been paying attention back then, is what I'm saying,
• 1:12:53
  paying attention to us. Yeah, like we were the first line of
• 1:12:57
  defense. We were the first people thrown into the abyss. And not not
• 1:13:01
  just us in particular, but those researchers and those advocates who were looking at
• 1:13:08
  the situation for men as a counter argument to this proposition that everything's get gender
• 1:13:15
  neutral and every gender difference is a result of patriarchal oppression. Yeah, well,
• 1:13:18
  I mean you look at you look at people like Warren Ferrell and Fred
• 1:13:21
  Hayward. And Fred Hayward, right, he was at the he was in
• 1:13:28
  the Red Pill movie. And you know people people like that, right,
• 1:13:34
  the old guard, right, the Paul Elam's right, the old guard of
• 1:13:39
  the men's movement, And you look at them, they were sounding the alarum
• 1:13:44
  back in the seventies and eighties, right, And but the rest of society.
• 1:13:50
  Basically, I think that they just kind of well, you know,
• 1:13:55
  what's what's the problem. It's just a few kooky women with some kocamamiam ideas
• 1:14:00
  in universities. Also, these ideas in some ways are very satisfying. We
• 1:14:04
  want to save women, we don't want to oh yeah, you know it's
• 1:14:09
  like we like this stuff. Well do you like this stuff that we're seeing
• 1:14:12
  now? Yeah? Yeah, no, And it's like, well we're getting
• 1:14:15
  the hangover now, oh yeah no, It's it's like we were drunk on
• 1:14:23
  you know, like any anybody who actually wants to read some really good stuff,
• 1:14:28
  right, they could google Adam Jones effacing the Male and also Adam Jones
• 1:14:41
  The Globe and Males, uh, which is about the Globe and Mail newspaper.
• 1:14:46
  But it's like he changed the male in the title is males in the
• 1:14:50
  title is u is male? As in sacks? Right? And and just
• 1:14:57
  read those just just read those things that were written like fuck more than a
• 1:15:05
  decade ago. I'm sure. I mean, these are people who have been
• 1:15:12
  quietly plugging away at perforating the narrative, right and actually showing us our own
• 1:15:18
  asses, right, Like, okay, we have a pro female by it,
• 1:15:26
  right, and you hear it constantly, women and children, women and
• 1:15:29
  children, women and children, women and children, women and children, right,
• 1:15:31
  And then you know somebody has the gall like Jordan Peterson has the gall
• 1:15:36
  to say, well, the reason why women are the way they are is
• 1:15:41
  because they didn't evolve as women. They evolved as the mother child diad.
• 1:15:45
  And everybody loses their fucking mind. Women don't have to have children. Yeah,
• 1:15:50
  but the only people who passed on their traits genetically were mothers, right,
• 1:15:59
  who didn't have children. They're evolutionarily irrelevant, right, None of their
• 1:16:06
  daughters inherited their traits because they didn't have any right. This is this is
• 1:16:13
  and we are so wrapped up in this idea of you know, women are
• 1:16:18
  super important and women are super vital, and women are super like they they
• 1:16:23
  they they are so competent and and you know that they're is so important to
• 1:16:30
  society. But at the same time, they're not responsible for anything, right,
• 1:16:35
  And you point it out and people are like, what, I just
• 1:16:38
  don't see it. I just don't see it. I don't know that women
• 1:16:45
  are so vital that if they walk off the job, everything collapses. But
• 1:16:48
  they shouldn't be held responsible for everything collapsing if they walk off the job.
• 1:16:54
  Are you fucking kidding me? Yeah? I know, and it's like it's
• 1:16:57
  like really and or they should be expected to make responsible decisions. Oh,
• 1:17:03
  we can't expect that of them, right, Oh, you know, welfare
• 1:17:09
  is it? I don't like it, but it's necessary because these poor women
• 1:17:14
  who got knocked up by the knock up fairy. Who's gonna pay for their
• 1:17:24
  children? Yeah? Well maybe they should have thought of that before they freaking
• 1:17:28
  opened their legs. Right. I got some super chows and super chats to
• 1:17:35
  recognize, so I'm gonna go ahead and do that really quick. Uh.
• 1:17:42
  First, I got a super chow from Great Indoors and he says Halloween is
• 1:17:47
  an appropriate time for some feminist howling do eat. Well, I'm sorry,
• 1:17:50
  I don't have I don't have that sound. So if you want, if
• 1:17:58
  you want, I think he's I can. If you want, I can,
• 1:18:01
  If you guys want, I can start my dogs up. Yeah,
• 1:18:10
  I can start. I can start my dog's howling. I I vote no,
• 1:18:16
  but you guys do it. No, No, I'll do it right
• 1:18:19
  now. I know you will. I'll do it right now. Oh Okay,
• 1:18:26
  no they're not interested. Dodged, dodge that bullet. All right,
• 1:18:32
  well, thank you great indoors. Sorry, I don't have anything for that.
• 1:18:39
  I also got a super chow from Sir Biggles. Sir Biggles bot and
• 1:18:47
  added the bot is added. Just the bot is what the bot is added
• 1:18:55
  somehow, Yeah, what are you talking about? Yeah? That what like
• 1:18:59
  the when it goes like he's not saying bought, he's like, oh,
• 1:19:02
  oh, oh I know what you Yeah, no, no, I know,
• 1:19:04
  I know. It's just Sir Biggles. Yeah, gives us fifty dollars
• 1:19:09
  and says, been listening to you since twenty sixteen. Keep up the goods
• 1:19:12
  work. May your hearts never fail. Well, thank you, Sir Biggles,
• 1:19:15
  really appreciate it. Then I got another one from ash Run for five
• 1:19:20
  dollars. Thank you so much, Thank you very much. That's really nice.
• 1:19:25
  Thank you. And he says with this twelve year old article, it's
• 1:19:28
  so hard to not see the similarity between current men's rights responses as poor men
• 1:19:32
  versus the quote this is what men's rights looks like end quote, ten to
• 1:19:38
  twelve years ago. Even now, we have gender studies arguing men's issues are
• 1:19:42
  rooted in misogyny. It's ridiculous. Yes, yeah, No, it's the
• 1:19:47
  more things changed, more they stay the same. And it's like it's exact.
• 1:19:51
  You know, there's only so much pointing out that you can do.
• 1:19:56
  I think there's going to have to be some kind of like actual real world
• 1:20:04
  reckoning. You know there is a real world reckoning happening. No, not
• 1:20:09
  yet, what that we're on walking towards World War three? Well, no
• 1:20:15
  world war reckoning. I only think it's world War three. It's just the
• 1:20:19
  end of the petro dollar. Yeah, no, it's it's the end of
• 1:20:24
  the US dollars as the global reserve currency, the end of the petro dollar.
• 1:20:32
  Three different scenarios that could actually escalate into world wars. Thirty three point
• 1:20:43
  six trillion dollars of US debt and growing you have you have, Sorry,
• 1:20:53
  Justin Trudeau increased the money supply in Canada by thirty over twenty twenty and twenty
• 1:21:00
  twenty one, and now he's like, WHOA, where's all this inflation coming
• 1:21:05
  from? Right? Okay? And it's like food is projected there are projected
• 1:21:13
  to be global food shortfalls, and from what I see, nobody's curtailing how
• 1:21:19
  much food they waste, or very few people are curtailing how much food they
• 1:21:25
  waste. So it's like I'm looking at it and I'm thinking, you know,
• 1:21:30
  like we have these ossified systems of government. Government can never do anything
• 1:21:38
  efficiently. The federal government in Canada decided that they were going to do a
• 1:21:44
  federal housing program, right, so the federal government was going to get involved
• 1:21:49
  in housing development across the country here in Canada, and rents have doubled in
• 1:21:59
  the two years since Justin Trudeau announced that. And now he's saying, well,
• 1:22:03
  the federal government has no business in housing, right because yeah no,
• 1:22:09
  He's like, oh fuck, I fucked up, and and he's like,
• 1:22:14
  yeah no, not my fault. The federal government really has no housing.
• 1:22:17
  And I'm just like, and then you got all you got all these retards
• 1:22:21
  out here going oh, I'll vote m DP because they want to increase entitlements,
• 1:22:29
  and I'm like, where where's the fucking money coming from? H Like
• 1:22:34
  it just can we can we stop thinking about money and start thinking about bushels
• 1:22:43
  of wheat? Okay? Can we can we start thinking about bushels of wheat?
• 1:22:46
  Because money is just a representation of productivity or product. Right, it's
• 1:22:57
  just a representation of goods and services. You You can print all of the
• 1:23:02
  money you want, right. If you're handing out people handing people money for
• 1:23:09
  free and they're not doing anything producing anything labor or product to work for it
• 1:23:16
  to earn it, then what are they going to buy with it? Nothing?
• 1:23:20
  People don't seem to like. I had this very brief argument with I
• 1:23:26
  guess as socialist on Twitter, and he was like, well, you know,
• 1:23:30
  they're print money and everybody gets a UBI and I'm like, but that
• 1:23:32
  doesn't make people wealthy. What makes people wealthy is the productivity of your neighbor.
• 1:23:38
  Is Like, if you think about yourself and yourself, what it's money
• 1:23:44
  is just products, just the ability to get products. But if you don't
• 1:23:47
  have products to get, the money is just going to chase fewer and fewer
• 1:23:51
  things. Yea. The productivity increase of factory workers in like the eighteenth century,
• 1:23:59
  eighteenth and nineteen tenth century is what elevated people out of poverty because now
• 1:24:03
  you had one hundred widgets that you could you were making one hundred widgets a
• 1:24:10
  year that you could give or end up putting into the material economy, and
• 1:24:16
  you and your neighbors had access to money just facilitates that. Yeah, No,
• 1:24:23
  I remember, I remember learning in elementary school and I think it was
• 1:24:27
  grade six. They played us a bunch of radio plays about some teenagers who
• 1:24:32
  found themselves stranded on a desert island and they had to build an economy,
• 1:24:38
  and their initial economy was solely barter, right, it was just barter this
• 1:24:45
  for that, and then they developed a money system, right, a currency
• 1:24:49
  system, and because that just makes it easier, you know, like you
• 1:24:56
  don't have to go around with your dead bird saying, you know, do
• 1:25:01
  you need a dead bird today? Because I could really use some of those
• 1:25:05
  berries you picked, right, Okay, it just improves the efficiency of the
• 1:25:13
  economy, right, to have fungible money and or a fungible currency. But
• 1:25:19
  like money is just paper. It's just a representation of what you can purchase
• 1:25:30
  with it, and people don't understand that, Oh just print more money,
• 1:25:32
  yeah, oh yeah, and what are you gonna buy with it? Nothing?
• 1:25:38
  If the shelves are empty, The shelves are empty. So I got
• 1:25:45
  another super chat from Albernita Retro and he says, here's five thanks for the
• 1:25:56
  content, thank you, And I think he meant to say content, but
• 1:26:01
  I wanted to read it exactly as it's written, because I'm a dick like
• 1:26:04
  that. And then I got a super chow but it's kind of big,
• 1:26:09
  so you're not gonna see the whole thing. So I'm just putting it up
• 1:26:12
  there so you guys can see it. But I'll read it out here.
• 1:26:14
  Loquacious primate. Don't show the image. No, I'm not. I can't
• 1:26:20
  show the image. Okay, Oh yeah, I see. Yeah, that's
• 1:26:26
  that's interesting, says I wanted to assure Alison that you aren't all screaming into
• 1:26:30
  the void when I saw this piece of artwork, which is in the discord.
• 1:26:34
  Sorry, that's the only way you're gonna see it. I guess there's
• 1:26:36
  a link. You guys could potentially like type the whole thing in if you're
• 1:26:41
  fast enough. By artist Amanda Sage, I thought of you. I don't
• 1:26:44
  know her personally or her politics. I think I can tell by looking.
• 1:26:48
  But the title refers to a supposedly ancient Indian practice of lifting up skirts to
• 1:26:53
  ward off war. While one could see it as a feminist gesture, I
• 1:26:56
  found it interesting because it acknowledges the power of the feminine over the social world
• 1:27:00
  in a direct and not always comfortable to look at that, to look at
• 1:27:04
  way, all right, thank you. That's an awfully afy landscaped punani there.
• 1:27:13
  Yeah, like for for for for an ancient Indian woman. That's got
• 1:27:18
  some serious land seriously modern landscaping going on. Yeah. Yeah, it's kind
• 1:27:25
  of demonic, but you know, yeah it's also kind of demonic. And
• 1:27:28
  yeah it's pretty demonic. Oh, it doesn't look like an orchid with dewey
• 1:27:33
  petals. No, it looks like something. It looks like something puking spider
• 1:27:39
  webs. Yeah, okay, it's not it is. Okay, let's keep
• 1:27:45
  going, all right, that would be a note back back to the article.
• 1:27:49
  Yeah, that's a note for me, dog okay. Uh. Dean
• 1:27:57
  offers up some token men, but of Jeff Hearn and Michael Kimmel have paved
• 1:28:01
  the way for increasing numbers of men to contribute to academic gender studies, So
• 1:28:06
  which issues of these academics actually discuss class and racial inequalities between men, The
• 1:28:13
  causes and consequences of male violence, the lived experiences of different kinds of male
• 1:28:16
  sexuality, and the ways in which ideas of masculinity influenced social and political thoughts,
• 1:28:21
  so discussions of male violence, but not female on male violence. I
• 1:28:27
  can I I want to say something to this because I know that since like
• 1:28:30
  Michael Kimmel came up probably and I know that Allison got into it with the
• 1:28:33
  other guy, Michael Michael Kimmel, Jeff her No, no, no,
• 1:28:42
  the blood. Yes, I've gotten into it when you got into it with
• 1:28:47
  Michael Flood. But because actually yeah, actually with Michael Flood. At one
• 1:28:54
  point I showed him, like U researchers who had replicated or rep dellicated his
• 1:29:01
  premise I don't know what to call it, and had found it to actually
• 1:29:05
  not like not play out the way he said it would. And he was
• 1:29:09
  like, oh, I've never seen this before. I'm like, you don't
• 1:29:12
  pay attention to your home critics or not even critics. These these these people
• 1:29:17
  would died in the world pro flood premise people, but they couldn't make it
• 1:29:23
  work. Well, here's the thing that I wanted to mention, because I
• 1:29:29
  think it's related. Obviously, people like Michael Kimmel and other male feminist types
• 1:29:36
  that claim to care about men, they will invoke racial differences. Well you
• 1:29:44
  know, they'll they'll talk about black men's experiences, and they'll talk about like,
• 1:29:47
  I don't know, Pakistani men or whatever, just not white gay men.
• 1:29:53
  Yeah, yeah, queer men, gay men, trans women. They
• 1:29:57
  basically will intersect and stay away from treating men as a whole and instead focus
• 1:30:04
  on intersections. And this is something that I don't know that people can see
• 1:30:10
  what's happening. But when they do that, they are first of all,
• 1:30:14
  taking away the male identity from all those men's, all those subgroups of men,
• 1:30:19
  because they're not acknowledging them as men. And to sort of further drive
• 1:30:25
  this home, because I've talked to people who care about men supposedly, but
• 1:30:30
  they don't. They care less about men if those men are white, and
• 1:30:33
  more about men if those men are black, for example, which is stupid
• 1:30:36
  because they're all men. And if you start playing that game, you will
• 1:30:41
  always lose. Because this is the game that these people play. This is
• 1:30:45
  the intersectional game. Intersectionality exists to erase men from the equation because they're always
• 1:30:51
  the last thing considered. They're always at the bottom of the totem pole.
• 1:30:56
  It doesn't matter, right, So I spoke, well, let me finished.
• 1:31:00
  So I watched this Chris Williamson, I like his channel most of the
• 1:31:04
  time he is talking about these issues. And he had a guy on and
• 1:31:08
  they were talking about like, uh no, I'm sorry, it wasn't Chris
• 1:31:12
  Williamson. It was it was uh Nolan will Noland, Okay, who is
• 1:31:17
  like this teacher in the UK that you know, talked about men's issues.
• 1:31:20
  I had him on the show once he lost his job. It was like
• 1:31:23
  a while ago, and he had a guy on there and they were talking
• 1:31:26
  about how to beat feminism, right, They were like talking about how to
• 1:31:28
  defeat it, and the guy was saying that what we need to do is
• 1:31:32
  it's black men that have to like be the bulwark. They have to like
• 1:31:36
  because they're the they're the Canadian, Canarian the coal mine, right, And
• 1:31:40
  I'm like listening to that, I'm like, all of this is true.
• 1:31:43
  Like obviously, if you want to see what's what the state of the rest
• 1:31:46
  of the world is, look at the black population, especially in the United
• 1:31:49
  States, although not exclusively, and see where that is. Look at the
• 1:31:54
  fatherlessness, look at the the murders you know between you know it within the
• 1:32:00
  the gang, the gang population, the teenage pregnancy, the abortion rates,
• 1:32:03
  the poverty, all of that stuff, Okay, this is they take the
• 1:32:08
  fathers out, women marry the state, and this is what you get.
• 1:32:12
  And the black population is where it started. And obviously I've been saying this
• 1:32:15
  for years and years and years and years as the cause. But this guy
• 1:32:20
  was saying, all we gotta do is get black men on board. But
• 1:32:24
  what he doesn't realize is that if you are if you are black and you
• 1:32:30
  grow up in and or just a minority of any kind, because we're all
• 1:32:32
  bombarded with this propaganda black men, if you tell them here's what's going on,
• 1:32:36
  they're going to the problem is is that they've been conditioned to see themselves
• 1:32:41
  as black before they see themselves as men. So they're going to they've been
• 1:32:45
  conditioned to attribute all of their problems to white supremacy or whatever. You know,
• 1:32:50
  you can you could just move, you move into a different department and
• 1:32:54
  you just say, oh, it's you know, Mexicans have this problem,
• 1:32:57
  or Latinos have this problem because of racism, muslim men have this problem because
• 1:33:00
  of aslamophobia, trans women have this problem because of transphobia, et cetera.
• 1:33:05
  So it's all designed to keep you from seeing what's really happening. And so
• 1:33:11
  I told well. I didn't tell them obviously, but I put a comment.
• 1:33:14
  I said, look, until black men stop seeing themselves as black and
• 1:33:18
  see themselves as men, this is never going to change. Never because their
• 1:33:26
  racial identity, which they have been conditioned like over generations repeatedly to see themselves
• 1:33:32
  as that first, is the thing that will ensure that they won't be able
• 1:33:36
  to work with other men of other races and ethnic backgrounds and sexual orientations to
• 1:33:43
  change things. This is the by design they're supposed to keep them apart.
• 1:33:46
  This is why black men and there's like hostility between the races that's been fermented
• 1:33:54
  so that black men and white men and Latino men and Asian men don't work
• 1:33:57
  together. And so because they don't see themselves as men, because men don't
• 1:34:01
  tend they don't have a brotherhood in the same way that women have a sisterhood.
• 1:34:06
  They see themselves as individuals more likely, so they're less likely to do
• 1:34:11
  that, but they have been conditioned to see themselves through the lens of race.
• 1:34:15
  This is the problem. So until there's a way to get black men
• 1:34:20
  to stop seeing themselves as black men and see themselves instead as men and then
• 1:34:27
  go to other men and say, hey, are you also having problems with
• 1:34:30
  you know, insert male issue here, Then what you'll be able to work
• 1:34:33
  together? So this is supposed to keep this is I think this is designed
• 1:34:38
  to keep people apart. This is why I don't like the likes of Jeff
• 1:34:42
  Hearn, Michael Kimmel, Michael Flood, and some of these other guys that
• 1:34:45
  are out here, you know, saying oh, yeah I care about men,
• 1:34:47
  but you know I care more about men of this type or that type.
• 1:34:51
  It's like, no, you either care about them all and you want
• 1:34:54
  to deal with all of it and you want to treat it like one big
• 1:34:57
  problem or you don't really care about any because you're gonna play these you're gonna
• 1:35:00
  play these games where you're putting this this type. Yeah, you're gonna end
• 1:35:03
  up playing feminist games and you will lose because it's it's been set up that
• 1:35:09
  way, so you have to like throw all of it out. So anyway,
• 1:35:12
  that's what I wanted to say about that. Yeah, No, it's
• 1:35:15
  it's like it's like when when I when the you remember the the old failed
• 1:35:21
  term curiarchy, you guys, that's the kariarchy. Yeah, yeah, no,
• 1:35:28
  thatchy, And I was like, okay, so, how's that different
• 1:35:30
  from patriarchy At the end of the day, it's not intersectional. And I
• 1:35:35
  was like, oh, so you took a bowl of lettuce and you called
• 1:35:38
  it a salad, patriarchy salad, right, and then you added a few
• 1:35:43
  mandarin orange slices, cash shoes, and sesame seeds and and some grilled chicken,
• 1:35:49
  and now it's no longer salad. Like what, No, the base
• 1:35:55
  of the the theory, the base of the meal is still ol the fucking
• 1:36:00
  lettuce, right, It's still based on male privilege and female oppression. And
• 1:36:04
  until you actually wipe out those, it's you know, you might as well
• 1:36:10
  just take a house with a broken foundation that's sinking, right, and just
• 1:36:15
  well just keep putting more plaster on the cracks in the walls and and uh,
• 1:36:19
  you know that saft spot on the floor, Just just push the TV
• 1:36:23
  stand over top of it so that nobody steps on it and falls through the
• 1:36:28
  floor, and and it's still a good house. Right. No, No,
• 1:36:31
  you gotta bulldoze the whole fucking thing and rebuilding the foundation. You got
• 1:36:38
  to rebuild the foundation at least, don't build something with greater weight on the
• 1:36:42
  on it, thinking that that's going to solve the foundation issues. Yeah,
• 1:36:45
  but yeah, that's like the the the whole thing about intersectionality is it does
• 1:36:49
  divide men into these groups and keeps them keep each other identify together. They're
• 1:37:00
  victimhood, they identify, and men have a tendency to not want to see
• 1:37:05
  an association with vulnerability and their masculinity, like the fond they don't. So
• 1:37:11
  this is also buying into like just a natural psychological rejection of that connection in
• 1:37:16
  men. But yeah, it's if you don't, if they don't start to
• 1:37:20
  realize that what feminists are calling intersectionality is just different manifestations of male disposability.
• 1:37:30
  Yep, well it's it's it's often the same manifestation to different degrees, right,
• 1:37:35
  because look at trans women. Look at transwomen. Now, what is
• 1:37:40
  the progression here? And I'm not talking about the women who would have always
• 1:37:43
  had gender deuphoria throughout history, but the progression is that women took over men's
• 1:37:49
  role. And they said that that role that men do is a result of
• 1:37:54
  oppressing women and excluding them from this activity, not an activity that naturally comes
• 1:38:00
  out of masculinity and masculine virtues, Which is not to say that women can't
• 1:38:03
  take part, but generally they're more masculine if they do, or masculinely orientate
• 1:38:09
  it. So they said, no, this isn't, this isn't. These
• 1:38:13
  meritocratic fields aren't a manifestation of men's desire to work cooperative, compete, cooperative,
• 1:38:21
  cooperatively over who is able to achieve a goal. And I wanted to
• 1:38:26
  say that men have brotherhood around goals, whereas women sisterhood around identity. But
• 1:38:31
  they want to compete cooperatively towards achieving a goal. Right, this is something
• 1:38:39
  that comes out of them, their masculinity, So it's something a part of
• 1:38:43
  their identity and their self and their toolkit for dealing with the world. But
• 1:38:48
  we can't recognize that. We have to take that away from men and say
• 1:38:53
  no, this is actually the exclusion of women's ways of knowing its oppression.
• 1:38:58
  And then what comes out of that men are left without a recognized identity.
• 1:39:03
  You're gonna have men who are marginal in whatever way. And I'm not talking
• 1:39:09
  about like again, the women who would have gender us for you, the
• 1:39:13
  trans women who exist in every society and throughout history. I'm talking about the
• 1:39:17
  trans trenders. They have been excluded from their own role. They are gender
• 1:39:24
  refugees. That is a manifestation of male expendability. And the transphobia against trans
• 1:39:34
  women comes from this expectation of conservatives, mostly that men assume a role that
• 1:39:43
  they have been shamed out of assuming by feminists. Yeah. Yeah, no,
• 1:39:47
  it is the ultimate catch twenty two. If you're not useful to society,
• 1:39:53
  then you need to go pound stand and nobody has to care about you.
• 1:39:57
  Right. But if you are useful to society in the ways that actually
• 1:40:01
  matter, right, that that actually create productivity, then you're stealing something from
• 1:40:09
  a more deserving woman. Yeah, you're you're you're not expressing the unique thing
• 1:40:15
  that you that as a man, as someone who's masculine, you give to
• 1:40:17
  society. You're actually just depressing women and stealing from them. So in being
• 1:40:23
  producing something, you're actually stealing. This is the message I know, I
• 1:40:28
  know, and it's the message that men get, and this is why they've
• 1:40:30
  been treated expendable. Yeah no, And this is this is why I yelled
• 1:40:34
  at Michael Kimmel in right is you know, like because they throw around like
• 1:40:41
  you know, I took issue with toxic the term toxic masculinity He's like,
• 1:40:45
  well, you just don't understand what it means. You know, maybe you
• 1:40:46
  should take a women's studies course. And I was like, okay, but
• 1:40:54
  you throw that word around like confetti, like it like it. It's like,
• 1:40:59
  it's completely harmless. If a grown ass adult with access to the internet
• 1:41:04
  needs to take a women's studies course to truly understand what you mean by that,
• 1:41:09
  why are you throwing that term around eight year old boys? Because I
• 1:41:15
  can guarantee you they haven't taken a gender studies program to understand the nuance and
• 1:41:21
  that you don't mean anything you know mean by it or anything all I mean
• 1:41:26
  by nuances. They just don't want to take responsibility for the abusiveness of the
• 1:41:30
  term. Yeah. Yeah, you can prove the abusiveness of the term because
• 1:41:38
  when I did my beach at SFU on toxic femininity, all the fucking feminists
• 1:41:43
  lost their freaking minds. Yeah, well, I mean, marry you put
• 1:41:47
  those two words together, and yet men have to deal with it. And
• 1:41:51
  here's the thing, Like, it's like a person with a freaking baseball bat
• 1:41:57
  who hits you in the head, and you're like, you hit me in
• 1:42:00
  the head with a baseball bat, and they're like, but there's nuance here.
• 1:42:03
  I hit you in the head because I wanted you to do something,
• 1:42:06
  It's not because I wanted you to be in pain. Yeah. And it's
• 1:42:11
  like that's the entire discourse around that so called nuance of toxic masculinity. I
• 1:42:16
  know, I know, it's it's it's it's really infuriating because you know,
• 1:42:19
  like I I literally they that the Women's Society at SFU or the Feminist Society,
• 1:42:28
  they were just so outraged they you know, published an open letter condemning
• 1:42:32
  my speech right before anybody had even you know, bothered to like find out
• 1:42:40
  what I might have been wanting to talk about, right, And and it's
• 1:42:45
  like, you know, ooh, that's implying that femininity is toxic. And
• 1:42:50
  and I'm like, oh, but whenever men say that the term toxic masculinity
• 1:43:00
  makes them feel like you're saying that masculinity is toxic, right, You're like,
• 1:43:04
  oh, pshaw, that's not what we mean by it at all.
• 1:43:09
  Actually, you're a misogynist for even saying so, yeah, for even thinking
• 1:43:14
  about that. You know, far be it from a woman. We are
• 1:43:17
  morally perfect from implying that masculinity is toxic. No. What we're saying is
• 1:43:26
  that masculinity is that's no quality that aren't toxic. There you go, and
• 1:43:32
  there you go, that's the perfect, the perfect. Yeah no, And
• 1:43:38
  I'm just like, oh god, I hate this. I hate that we
• 1:43:42
  have this narrative in like I said, I don't mind rivalry. I don't
• 1:43:47
  mind you know, men and women being the bickersons, right, you know,
• 1:43:53
  I don't mind Pope, men and women poke in fun at each other's
• 1:43:56
  foibles, right, finding fault with each other's faults, right, all of
• 1:44:01
  those things. I have no problem with that. What I have a problem
• 1:44:05
  with is the fact that it's so one sided. You are allowed to bash
• 1:44:10
  men and bash them, not not just criticize them, but bash them.
• 1:44:17
  You're not even allowed. Okay, he's walking, he's leaving. Oh good
• 1:44:24
  thing I had you here. Otherwise the maleman wouldn't have like moved on.
• 1:44:30
  He would have taken over your entire house. Yeah. Oh yeah, yeah,
• 1:44:33
  no, that's what he does. That's why he comes here. Oh
• 1:44:41
  he's not leaving quick enough. He's at the neighbor's house now. But but
• 1:44:46
  yeah, no, like it's you you have a situation where like it's not
• 1:44:51
  allowed to go both ways. It's not just about you know, kind of
• 1:44:56
  that poking fun, pointing out flow, kind of kind of like the Russell
• 1:45:04
  Peters brand of comedy where he talks about he does all the different accents,
• 1:45:11
  you know, Jamaican, Indian, Chinese, right, like the Hong Kong
• 1:45:15
  accent and all of that, and talks about you know, like, okay,
• 1:45:18
  you want to see some crazy, you know, just have an Indian
• 1:45:23
  guy go into a Chinese shop and argue over price because the Indian guy he
• 1:45:30
  wants to pay zero and the Chinese guy wants to get every penny out of
• 1:45:35
  you that he can. And this is not a relationship that's going to work
• 1:45:40
  out, right, And yeah, no, So, I mean these are
• 1:45:44
  truths culturally, and there are truths biologically about men and women, and you
• 1:45:49
  can poke fun at all of those things, right, except you can't.
• 1:45:56
  Except it only goes one way. And it's not just joking. When feminists
• 1:46:00
  do it, meant it's mean. It's mean, and it's cruel, and
• 1:46:05
  it's debasing and it's degrading, and it's meant to demoralize. It's not meant
• 1:46:11
  to just make people laugh and uh and go oh yeah, it's funny because
• 1:46:16
  it's true. You know, that's not what it's meant as. It's not
• 1:46:24
  meant that way. And and I hate it. I hate it. I
• 1:46:27
  hate it. It's a it's a it's a society wide splander. Yeah,
• 1:46:31
  I would agree with that. All right, let's read a little bit more
• 1:46:34
  of this, all right, let's read. Yeah, let's go back to
• 1:46:40
  how how far are we going in? I don't know, I don't know,
• 1:46:43
  I don't know. So anyway, Dean, oh, this is the
• 1:46:48
  last paragraph. I think Dean is effectively admitting the bias the gender orthodoxy refuses
• 1:46:55
  to mention all those people fighting for equality in the Father's rights movement are all
• 1:46:59
  those men enslaved in conscription or men's shorter life expectancies. I enrolled at l
• 1:47:04
  S's elite Gender Institute to learn how best to combat discrimination in a world which
• 1:47:10
  verbalizes four times and more sexism against men than it does against women. It's
• 1:47:15
  high time gender studies get set a better example so we might all emulate it.
• 1:47:19
  Those are rookie numbers. Four times. I think it's probably more like
• 1:47:24
  four hundred times now at this point. Yeah, it's twelve years later,
• 1:47:28
  and we've only done we've only gone further. Well, and you know as
• 1:47:34
  well, when you actually look at how people take things, right, how
• 1:47:39
  people perceive things, I think that four times as much missondry even back then,
• 1:47:49
  Right, you have to be really blatantly misinderous in order for it to
• 1:47:56
  even register as man hating. Right, Whereas you just have to tell a
• 1:48:01
  woman she's pretty and she will and that's considered misogyny, or ask her to
• 1:48:08
  smile, right, or accidentally, uh not close your legs when she sits
• 1:48:15
  next to you on the subway, right, just not notice you're busy texting
• 1:48:20
  on your phone. You know, all all of these, you know,
• 1:48:24
  like when in order for something to register as miss injury, it has to
• 1:48:29
  be a macro aggression, is what I'm saying. And that was the case
• 1:48:34
  back then too, right, it has to be really blatant. And so
• 1:48:41
  I don't I don't think that four times as much is a good measure.
• 1:48:48
  It's I don't think that it's I wonder how measure? Well, it was
• 1:48:53
  probably like from a sociological study or something like that, right, Yeah,
• 1:48:59
  But you know, like the problem with one of the problems with feminist false
• 1:49:05
  false accusation is that it sets the baseline for miss inery really high. And
• 1:49:12
  the reason why is because they justify intense amounts of mysingry like blaming men for
• 1:49:17
  blaming men for everything that's wrong in society but not everything that's not giving them
• 1:49:21
  credit for everything that's right. Yeah, like that's they deserve it, and
• 1:49:27
  they we have this whole artifice of unscientific reasoning to justify it, and so
• 1:49:32
  they feel like a certain amount, they feel like, you know, they
• 1:49:35
  get they get at least ninety percent missionry free, if that makes sense.
• 1:49:40
  Like that? The first, uh, the first I don't know, how
• 1:49:45
  would you define it? The first I don't know unit measurement of mysionry.
• 1:49:54
  The first ninety unit measurements of mysagery are free because men are responsible for strrible
• 1:49:59
  at tra against women, which isn't itself recognized as missonry. The fact that
• 1:50:03
  we even have a narrative justifying treating men like ship because of their alleged treating
• 1:50:08
  women like shit. Yeah no, and it's and and you know, when
• 1:50:13
  you can when you can turn around and justify this is using statistics on types
• 1:50:16
  of violence that women also engage in against men. Do you guys hear me?
• 1:50:20
  Am I hearing you? No? Do you not hear us? Okay,
• 1:50:28
  well what what I'm what? Yeah, you know, okay, what
• 1:50:30
  I would say. What I would say is that you know, when you
• 1:50:33
  have when you have a an already entrenched field of you know, alleged study
• 1:50:43
  that uh pause, its that treating women better than you treat men, caring
• 1:50:48
  about their problems more than you care about men's problems, right, wanting to
• 1:50:54
  be nicer to women than you are to men. Right, And this is
• 1:50:58
  true of both men and women. That having more positive feelings about women than
• 1:51:04
  you have about men. Right, That this is actually misogyny because benevolent sexism
• 1:51:13
  is indeed a form of misogyny. Right. If you can actually turn missonry
• 1:51:18
  into a form of misogyny, right, the root cause of miss indry is
• 1:51:24
  actually misogyny. Missonry is just secondary misogyny or or a byproduct of misogyny.
• 1:51:33
  Right. When you have that kind of narrative that's already entrenched not just in
• 1:51:39
  academia, but in the media, in you know, in any kind of
• 1:51:45
  communications field hr Right, all of these areas, the law, right,
• 1:51:54
  all the government, all of these areas. When you have that, then
• 1:52:00
  how can you possibly be able to measure the one against the other in any
• 1:52:08
  kind of fair way, because even when you're treating women good, you're treating
• 1:52:12
  them bad. And when you're treating men bad, it's just what they deserve
• 1:52:16
  because they are bad. It's not manating, it's just it's just criticizing bad
• 1:52:21
  behavior. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. Like, there's the bar for
• 1:52:29
  missonry has been set so high because missonry is almost like this compulsion that we
• 1:52:36
  have the fact that we've constructed this entire narrative in which men are to blame
• 1:52:42
  for societies woes but not for society's you know, excellence and achievements. It's
• 1:52:49
  just all right. Well, I do want to just tell everyone we are
• 1:52:56
  doing our monthly fundraiser. We do need to get that amount funded or you
• 1:53:02
  know, for the month so that we can continue to do this work.
• 1:53:05
  And it's up to you guys to help us out with that. To go
• 1:53:08
  to feed the Badger dot com slash support. We have one day left and
• 1:53:15
  twenty six hundred and some to go, so please, if you got it,
• 1:53:19
  now is the time to help out once again. Let's feed the Badger
• 1:53:24
  dot com slash support. I want to also point out that You can send
• 1:53:28
  us a message at any time after this show is over if you enjoyed the
• 1:53:30
  content. You just want us to give us a tip. You want to
• 1:53:32
  do a shout out. You want to tell us we're not screaming into the
• 1:53:34
  void and that you appreciate what we have to do. You can do so
• 1:53:39
  it feed the badger dot com slash just the tip. We will endeavor to
• 1:53:43
  read your comment at the next reasonable show. Shoe all right? Who really
• 1:53:48
  big shoe? Really really big shoe? All right? So, Brian,
• 1:53:55
  did you have any final words on this? I just it's been twelve years.
• 1:53:58
  I know we will do in the same story sing it well, I
• 1:54:01
  got I did get another super chow. So I wanted to shout out to
• 1:54:08
  ash Run for five dollars. Thank you ash Run. And he says,
• 1:54:15
  we know the amount of ads we see every day on average, this is
• 1:54:17
  four to six thousand. It could be an idea to count to amount of
• 1:54:23
  mystery Emanci's every day by just using social media. I would not be surprised.
• 1:54:27
  On Instagram if it will ramp up to fifty to one hundred anti mail
• 1:54:30
  or mail bashing posts per day or more, imagine the effect it has on
• 1:54:34
  men, thank you, ah asthron asthron. Imagine what if we had a
• 1:54:41
  future in which miss injury wasn't considered to be socially acceptable. Imagine looking back
• 1:54:46
  at this society like it it hopefully that they will also have solved that whole
• 1:54:53
  judging the past harshly. But I'd imagine that this is not going to age.
• 1:54:59
  Well no, no, no, no, this is definitely like these
• 1:55:04
  people are experiencing. They don't know it yet, but this is sunk and
• 1:55:08
  cost fallacy and action. Like by the time everything goes to shit, they're
• 1:55:12
  gonna look back and say what the fuck have I done? And that?
• 1:55:15
  But in the meantime, they'll never I mean, it's gonna be it's not
• 1:55:18
  easy. It's easy to wrong, and it's especially not easy for women to
• 1:55:24
  admit that they're wrong. Yeah, but and and the feminists are gonna say,
• 1:55:28
  are gonna basically do the equivalent of saying, why did you let us
• 1:55:31
  do that? Yeah? Exactly? Of course that everything's on fire, Yeah
• 1:55:38
  yeah, exactly, No, for sure, it's like you know that you've
• 1:55:41
  seen that like TikTok video of the woman who went on a date with a
• 1:55:45
  man she made a little TikTok video, and she said all these positive things
• 1:55:49
  about him, that he was very polite and nice, and he looked he
• 1:55:53
  was handsome and tall, he had everything that she wanted, but she just
• 1:55:57
  didn't feel like he had any husband vibes. She wasn't getting husband vibes.
• 1:56:00
  So she said, you know that she they're not going to see each other
• 1:56:04
  anymore. She can't see him anymore. And he said okay, and just
• 1:56:06
  like left it at that. He's like, all right, bitch and that,
• 1:56:10
  and then she was upset, like, why didn't he like try to
• 1:56:13
  convince me otherwise? Why didn't he fight for me? Yeah? I mean,
• 1:56:18
  oh yeah, no. My husband, my husband got kicked out of
• 1:56:21
  he was living in a co op with a bunch of freaking university students,
• 1:56:25
  like freaking hippyish people and uh and he just he just his ex had just
• 1:56:31
  dumped him. And and so there were these two girls who in the house
• 1:56:38
  who were interested in him, and and they both propositioned him, and he
• 1:56:44
  was like, well, I'm I'm not I can't, I'm not ready to
• 1:56:47
  get into a relationship. But you know, I am a hyper sexual male,
• 1:56:51
  right and he really is, and you know, so I wouldn't mind
• 1:56:58
  some something something on the side, right, friends with benefits, And at
• 1:57:02
  one point they even talked him into a threesome with the two of them.
• 1:57:08
  M hm and uh. And that went on until one day he knocks on
• 1:57:13
  one of the doors and oakes his head inside and says, you feel like
• 1:57:17
  some company night, And she's like, no thanks. So he's like,
• 1:57:20
  oh okay, and he goes across the hall and focks the other one.
• 1:57:26
  And that was when he got kicked out of that house. Mmm. Yeah,
• 1:57:30
  actually abiding by the rules laid down. Yeah. Oh man, Well,
• 1:57:38
  you know, I guess the but she said he wasn't husband, didn't
• 1:57:43
  have a husband vibe, So wasn't it ultimately to her benefit that he was
• 1:57:46
  like, yeah, no, don't waste more time on me. Yeah,
• 1:57:50
  yeah, don't waste more time on me. I'm gonna move on. I
• 1:57:53
  wonder how many how many women since then? He's uh, hopefully he's he's
• 1:57:58
  found a woman who considers him husband material, isn't going to play these stupid
• 1:58:03
  games. Yeah, well, or or even if even if he isn't husband
• 1:58:09
  material, it's like, okay, so why would you want to stay with
• 1:58:14
  him? Man? If you're looking for a husband, why would you want
• 1:58:16
  to stay and waste six months or a year or whatever of your valuable youth?
• 1:58:25
  Uh, trying to convert him into husband material. It's like like,
• 1:58:32
  I'm sorry, but I even with even with my husband, right, I
• 1:58:38
  don't think that he was husband material in the sense of h He was still
• 1:58:44
  recovering from the breakup, and he was still having a lot of problems.
• 1:58:47
  But one of the things that he did tell me was, you know,
• 1:58:51
  because I asked him, you know, if if she hadn't broken up with
• 1:58:56
  you, you know, how long would you have stayed with her? And
• 1:59:00
  he was like, oh forever, There's no question about that. I was
• 1:59:05
  like, okay, husband material. Huh, all right, well there you
• 1:59:11
  go. All right? Sorry, did I read that super chat? Oh?
• 1:59:15
  Yeah, I did know. There's another one as another one? Yeah,
• 1:59:17
  I thought there was a loquacious primate gives us five dollars, Thank you,
• 1:59:21
  loquacious Primate and says sorry. If that image was hard to look at,
• 1:59:27
  it was even more disturbing in person. While I'm not sure the artist
• 1:59:30
  thought of it this way, I saw it as an acknowledgment that women can
• 1:59:33
  move societies towards or away from war. Rather than just passive or oppressed victims
• 1:59:38
  of masculine war. Agreed, agreed, And I you know now I haven't
• 1:59:45
  seen it. I haven't looked at it. I'm going to need you to
• 1:59:48
  send me the link. It's in the super child channel. But yeah,
• 1:59:54
  it's I'll I don't know, I'll drop it in a live show. I'll
• 1:59:58
  just make a copy of it. So if you had a live show like
• 2:00:00
  text chat, you should be able to see it. Now. Oh okay,
• 2:00:05
  all right, I'm not gonna look yet. Yeah, I need to
• 2:00:11
  eat something and sure it. Yeah, you know, I've been warned,
• 2:00:18
  but I will come back and look at it later. All right, let's
• 2:00:21
  close this thing out. Yeah okay, So Alison, should I just get
• 2:00:29
  in there now or what? Or do you have to say something else?
• 2:00:31
  I know, I just want to remind everyone that we are doing a monthly
• 2:00:34
  fundraiser. It's Sarah paused a little bit so and we only have one day
• 2:00:39
  left, so please please please please help us out once again. Let's be
• 2:00:43
  the badger dot com slash support and I'll leave it at that. So back
• 2:00:45
  to you, Brian. All right, Well, if you guys like this
• 2:00:48
  video, please hit like subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit the
• 2:00:53
  battle flodifications, leave us a comment, let us know what you think about
• 2:00:56
  what we discussed on today's show. There's a link to the original article in
• 2:01:00
  the description it is. Remember it is twelve years old and the comments are
• 2:01:03
  also very old. So but yeah, check it out yourself, and please
• 2:01:09
  please please share this video because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much
• 2:01:12
  for coming on today's episode of The Rant Zirker, and we will talk to
• 2:01:15
  you all in the next Did you ask did you do that intro? Or
• 2:01:16
  no? Remember you doing the intro? Maybe I was doing something else.
• 2:01:20
  I did do the intro? Did okay? I did it perfectly and you
• 2:01:26
  didn't. Yeah, I was. I was. I'm in the back room.
• 2:01:30
  I'm always I'm in the back room doing stuff something that doesn't the first
• 2:01:34
  time. The first time, you didn't screw it up and he wasn't there
• 2:01:38
  to witness. I wasn't. I was okay. Well that's all that really
• 2:01:42
  matters, all right, anyway, thanks guys for coming on the show.
• 2:01:45
  We'll talk to you all in the next one.