Latest / Early Edition with Ryan Bridge / Philip Morgan KC: Barrister on the Government's proposal to increase the threshold for the right to a jury trial
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: The government wants to reduce the number of jury trials
- 0:02Speaker 1: to address backlogs in the court system. So to do this,
- 0:05Speaker 1: to get a jury trial at the moment, you must
- 0:07Speaker 1: be charged with an offense which carries a maximum penalty
- 0:10Speaker 1: of two years or more in prison. They want to
- 0:12Speaker 1: up that too, three or four years. The idea being
- 0:14Speaker 1: that fewer people will have the option of a jury
- 0:16Speaker 1: trial and will speed the whole thing up. Philip Morgan
- 0:19Speaker 1: is Casey is a barrister. He's with us this morning. Philip,
- 0:23Speaker 1: good morning, good morning, Thank you, thank you for being here.
- 0:26Speaker 1: Do you think this is going to work?
- 0:29Speaker 2: I have my doubt. I mean, cly, I applaud anything
- 0:33Speaker 2: to try and produce the backlog and the courts, but
- 0:37Speaker 2: I question the number of jury trials that will drop
- 0:45Speaker 2: merely because the threshold of two years in prison un
- 0:49Speaker 2: or more has changed to three years in prison or more,
- 0:54Speaker 2: or even four years imprisonment or more. That's because I
- 0:59Speaker 2: think that the number of very trials which proceed to
- 1:03Speaker 2: trial for which the most serious offense in the Crown
- 1:08Speaker 2: charge notice is an offense of liable to a term
- 1:14Speaker 2: of imprisonment for two or three years or more. I
- 1:17Speaker 2: think that the number of such cases is very small.
- 1:21Speaker 1: Okay, what is the hit rate? Guilty v. Not guilty
- 1:26Speaker 1: jury verse judge? What do you advise your clients?
- 1:32Speaker 2: There isn't an answer to the rate. And what I
- 1:36Speaker 2: tend to advise my clients is that there are advantages
- 1:40Speaker 2: and disadvantages in addcting either judge alone or judge and jury,
- 1:47Speaker 2: and they need to make a decision based on a
- 1:50Speaker 2: series of criteria. These days, it's fair to say that
- 1:57Speaker 2: there's no real advantage to a defendant in deciding to
- 2:04Speaker 2: go judge alone compared to a ging jury. So in
- 2:13Speaker 2: it certainly in terms of your initial election, whether you
- 2:17Speaker 2: ultimately stay and have it with the election for trial
- 2:21Speaker 2: by jury or change it back to judge alone, you
- 2:28Speaker 2: know that will vary from case to case as well.
- 2:30Speaker 1: And you can get some benefits by doing that, can't
- 2:32Speaker 1: you If you pick judge alone, Do you have to
- 2:35Speaker 1: do judge alone?
- 2:39Speaker 2: Ordinarily, yes, it's difficult to persuade a court once you've
- 2:44Speaker 2: elected judge alone or you've not made an election of
- 2:48Speaker 2: til by jury, to be able to change that to
- 2:52Speaker 2: judge alone.
- 2:53Speaker 1: And that's part of the problem, isn't it, Because that's
- 2:54Speaker 1: why everyone goes, well, I'll do jury and then I
- 2:56Speaker 1: can always flip to judge alone later.
- 3:00Speaker 2: Yeah, I agree, which.
- 3:01Speaker 1: Draws the pro whole process out, which defeats the purpose.
- 3:05Speaker 1: And yeah, yeah, all right, hey, thanks very much for
- 3:07Speaker 1: your time. That's Philip Morgan k C with us. We say,
- 3:10Speaker 1: barrister talking there about the government's plans to try and
- 3:12Speaker 1: I am on applaud it for doing something I guess,
- 3:16Speaker 1: try and reduce the backlog in our court system, because,
- 3:19Speaker 1: as they say, justice delayed is justice denied.
- 3:23Speaker 2: For more from News Talks B listen live on air
- 3:26Speaker 2: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 3:29Speaker 2: go with our podcasts on Irradio.