Latest / Made of Stars / Erin Go to Space!

Transcript

Erin Go to Space! · Made of Stars

0:00
Warning. The following podcast contains an entertaining look at astronomy, physics, and
0:04
space news throughout the known universe. Listeners have been known to learn about astronomical
0:08
phenomenon the scientific method and expanded vocabulary to include terms like quasar asterism and uranus.
0:15
Listen, that's your own risk. Go ahead. We're made of stars,
0:24
made them stars, madsizes. When made of stars, you could be
0:34
from high they would new Mexicomas where stars When we are made of stars.
0:55
Joined by my good friend doctor Sean Cruising from Columbus State University's Coca Cola Space
1:00
Center. I'm Wes Carroll more than Shan. Good morning West, good to
1:03
be here today. We realized as we wrapped the show last week we had
1:07
a bit of a hang in Chad, just one of the you know,
1:10
for people that remember that particular election twenty something years ago. We just we
1:15
had one little thing we were gonna circle back to, and then we never
1:19
did on the show. So while we don't have a definitive answer yet,
1:26
but we were discussing last week about the amount of time that we have had
1:32
astronauts orbiting the Earth consecutively, and I asked the question, can we find
1:38
out for certain if there's always been an American on board. We believe that
1:42
to be the case, although the old Google machine doesn't give us a definitive
1:48
answer, does it. You know what's funny is now we all have different
1:53
sources of truth. Yeah, in twenty twenty three compared to when, as
1:57
you said, you know, twenty years ago. Go and Google's one of
2:02
those, right, Like, if I can't Google it and find it,
2:05
I'm just lost. What do I do next? There used to be these
2:08
things called books. We used to look things up in books, encyclopedias.
2:14
Those are hard to find now. So so yeah, so I deferred the
2:17
question to our space historian, mister Scott Norman here at Space Science Center,
2:21
and Scott gave me his definitive answer of I can't ever remember a time,
2:27
which is far from definitive. So if I was going to publish a research
2:30
paper on this, I would say, yeah, we still maybe need to
2:34
do some more research. You know, we're a podcast, so we can
2:36
get away with saying all manner of things. Right, We're gonna say this,
2:39
we are not aware of a time that we left the Russians up there
2:46
like a bunch of frat boys to run the space station by themselves. Yes,
2:49
I just can't ever remember a time, and neither could Scott, and
2:53
so I believe that there was never a time where we didn't have Americans on
2:59
board the ISA, with the Russians just doing kind of like you know,
3:04
like dorm room supervision, you know, kind of like that whole business.
3:07
So so anyway, we're gonna go with that answer. Now, listeners,
3:13
this is where you get to participate. It's fun. Go ahead, send
3:16
less an email. Sure, go ahead, say that cruising guy is a
3:22
nut. He's wrong. He didn't look in a book. I blew the
3:25
dust off this book on my bookshelf and it said the one time when Russians
3:29
were solely in charge of the ISS. I don't think that happened. But
3:32
go ahead, if you find that, you know, let us know.
3:35
But I'm gonna go ahead and say until I hear that there's never been a
3:38
time where we didn't have Americans on board ISS. So you say, we're
3:42
a podcast, and therefore we can say, you know, certain things.
3:46
We do try to keep things as accurate as possible, although on the occasion
3:51
that we misspeak, on the occasion that we might leave out a word.
3:55
God knows I've done that before. That certainly helps to to clarify the statement
4:01
I was trying to make. Sometimes you need that one word before the second
4:04
word to make the word mean what you want it to mean, which I
4:10
can think of a very specific incident. I did that once, sadly,
4:14
and I'll never forget it. It's that you always remember I played sports,
4:17
you know, high school. As an adult, I remember every goal I
4:21
missed. I can just tell you that I don't remember all the I don't
4:26
remember all the goals I scored. I remember every single one I missed,
4:30
however, which was a lot. Sadly, it would be easier to remember
4:33
the ones I made, but we try to keep it accurate. We try
4:38
to do that and what we can just say and I feel very comfortable because
4:41
this was the other qualifier that we had last week after we realized we forgot
4:45
to recircle back, was that we don't remember a time when there wasn't an
4:50
American on board, and if it did happen, it probably happened very early
4:56
in the process. It would have probably been in the first few years.
5:00
So I feel like if someone does come back and say hey, hey,
5:01
hey, this is when it happened, it would probably be somewhere. I
5:05
mean, I feel like if we say in the first five years, that's
5:09
probably when it might have happened, if it happened at all. Do you
5:13
think that's a fair way to put it. I think it's a very fair
5:15
way to put it. And I think the statement that we made is highly
5:18
accurate, which is I don't remember a time. Yes, that's one hundred
5:21
percent. I do not remember a time either, Yes, so I can
5:27
either confirm nor deny, but I don't remember. I personally do not remember
5:30
time. And you know my memory, I mean, my memory shouldn't be
5:34
really trusted that much anyway. So I try to just defer to facts and
5:39
other sources as many times as I can on this show, because, like
5:42
you, I have a high ethical standard and want to keep this baby accurate.
5:45
Yep. But I did go check with our space historian as well,
5:48
who came up with the same answer as me, which is he can never
5:51
remember a time. So there's two of us or you know, employed in
5:56
this industry that can neither one of us remember a time. And I'm going
5:59
to go I'm gonna stick with that. That sounds very good until we're proven
6:02
otherwise exactly. Yeah, Well, they can't prove. They can't prove that
6:06
I can't remember it. I mean, I'm gonna go ahead just say I
6:10
pretty much can't remember. Yeah. Times, that's a verifiable fact. I
6:14
can't. I don't trust my memory either. I don't even remember what we're
6:16
talking about. Let's jump into this James Web story. We have a nuther
6:23
and and it seems this is pretty rare. I do remember the fact that
6:25
we've had a number of wins for James Webb since this thing was launched.
6:30
I think since they dropped it and it wasn't broken, it's had a bunch
6:33
of wins since then. I think that's the best way to view it.
6:35
Even the drop turned it wasn't really a loss there because nothing really happened to
6:40
it other than delayed the launch. But since it's been in place and working,
6:46
when after when after when? And this is a pretty cool story we
6:50
have this morning about the origins of how the Earth was formed. Yeah,
6:55
and before we get into that, I would just say, you know,
6:57
I did compare the Russians to a bunch of frat boys. But don't even
6:59
get started on the James Webspace Telescope scientists, because those people. Have you
7:05
seen them at the American Astronomical Society conferences. Oh man, that's one rowdy
7:11
group. Anyways, I have shade on their head. And all right,
7:14
I mean if they can find one at the organic coffee shop, if they
7:17
can find one there, they're gonna put it on their head. So anyway,
7:20
Jwst ladies and gentlemen, James Webspace Telescope has made another really important discovery
7:28
that supports a long standing theory about the way that we think planets are created
7:33
around not only other stars, but in the past they were created around our
7:38
own Sun as well. Let me give you a rundown on that. So
7:44
there's something called solar nebula theory that basically describes an evolutionary process by which the
7:50
Sun itself formed by pulling in hot gas and dust out of a hot gas
7:56
and dust cloud and hats a relative So it's hot on the inside where where
8:01
the where that proto Sun was forming. But then in the outer reaches of
8:05
the same disk of material, little dust grains were bumping into each other,
8:11
and if they were far enough away from that proto Sun, they likely were
8:16
coated with the ices of various volatile compounds such as water, yes, but
8:22
also things like methane, ammonia, and other substances. There are volatile compounds
8:28
that we find throughout our solar system. So these if you've ever been out
8:35
where it's really snowed, a kind of a wet snow, not really a
8:37
dry snow, but kind of a wet snow, you'll know that wet snows
8:41
are better for making snowmen and snowballs because the wet snow sticks together. So
8:48
imagine within this disk of material, little dust particles coated with ice bumping into
8:54
one another, kind of like one wet snowball bumping into another wet snowball,
9:00
and they stick together. That process is labeled with a word that we call
9:03
accretion. So accretion is the process of these little frozen particles bumping together and
9:11
sticking together to make a bigger particle. And then those bigger particles bump together
9:16
and stick to stick together to make even bigger particles than that. So after
9:22
enough time, you have stuck enough particles together that then their gravitational influence begins
9:30
to be important and they start to pull in other dust and gases via their
9:35
gravity so the formation of planets in early solar systems is kind of a two
9:41
step process, first accretion and then later gravitation. Okay, that's kind of
9:46
a just a cartoon level view. So here's what JWST found. JWST,
9:52
the J's Webspace telescope, was looking at a several discs of material forming a
10:00
on other very young stars, and in particular the two more compact discs of
10:05
the four that they examined, which are the two more evolutionarily mature, they've
10:11
been collapsing longer. Those two discs had a distinct ring of steam. Now
10:18
it's cold steam, but it's vaporous water h two ozer coming up out of
10:26
a place that they referred to in a forming solar system as the snow line.
10:31
Okay, what's the snow line. Imagine traveling outward from the star in
10:37
the center of the disc, and of course it's hot near the star or
10:41
the protostar, but the farther you get away from that campfire, the colder
10:43
it gets. Well, eventually it gets so cold that things begin to freeze.
10:48
That's what the snow line is in a galaxy, or I'm sorry,
10:54
in a solar system, a forming solar system. So therefore, in this
10:56
forming solar system, you have the snow line. Well, when JWST astronomers
11:03
were examining their data, they found in the discs of a couple of compact
11:07
starforming regions or solar systems in formation, they found inside the snow line a
11:16
ring of steam. All right, how does that either confirm or deny the
11:22
idea of how planets form. Well, here's how it does. Because there's
11:26
thought to be a process called pebble infall, where these frozen pebbles that have
11:33
stuck together via accretion tend to migrate towards the inner part of the parent solar
11:39
system. And if that's true, it's necessarily true to form planets on the
11:43
inside. So if that's true, there would be a point where they crossed
11:48
the snow line and things got too warm for them to hold onto their watery
11:54
or otherwise volatile sticky materials, and suddenly you had have a ring of steam.
12:00
Well that's a theoretical idea, but friends, the JWST, the James
12:05
Webspace Telescope team, actually was able to identify that very feature in two real
12:13
solar systems in the process of forming. So when you have a whole theoretical
12:18
construct and you come up with con consequences that should exist if your idea is
12:24
correct, and then you go out and actually find those things in reality.
12:31
It's like a giant green light saying, yes, you were right. Here
12:35
is the result of your correct ideas, and you can see it on display
12:41
in an actual physical system out there in the Milky Way. It's pretty darn
12:46
cool. And so that's what they found. Andrea Benzatti of Texas State University,
12:50
was one of the lead authors on the study, had this quote,
12:54
the web results finally revealed the connection between water vapor in the inner disc of
12:58
the solar sece system and the drift of icy pebbles from the outer disc.
13:03
So there's finally now this physical connection. Hopefully I explained it well enough that
13:07
you can kind of follow along. But this is a giant high five,
13:13
not only for these observational astronomers, but for all the theoretical astronomers that work
13:16
to say, hey, one of the things we should look for if we're
13:20
correct, is this ring of cold water steam just inside the snow line of
13:26
the forming solar systems. And lo and behold there It was fantastic example of
13:33
how science works. Amazing when for the folks working with the James Webbs Face
13:37
Telescope, this seems like an appropriate spot. Even though they're not paying us
13:41
in any way, shape or form, it just seems like a good spot
13:43
from a pop culture standpoint. To mention Ghostbusters Frozen Empire, the new trailer
13:48
has dropped, coming to theaters March twenty ninth. I mean, they're not
13:52
paying us, we're not showing any I'm just pointing out from a pop culture
13:56
standpoint, the trailer is out and some of these very things seem to be
14:01
taking place in the trailer. It's it's a pretty looks pretty good. I
14:05
mean it's probably happening just outside the snow line. Yeah, exactly, yes,
14:09
I mean that would be it. I mean, no, you take
14:13
it, look it. No, No, that's good. Let's talk about
14:16
the Starship, because we've been following this saga. That is the Starship.
14:22
It it blew up the launch pad just with sheer force. Sheer power alone
14:26
blew up the launch pad. And when Elon Musk said we hope we don't
14:31
blow up the launch pad, we thought he meant the rocket explode there.
14:33
No, no, no, no, it was just the actual propulsion that
14:37
blew up the launch pad. It's been an ongoing saga to try to figure
14:39
out when are we going to be able to do another test launch on this
14:43
thing. They've been going through things with the FAA, with the environmental folks.
14:50
Every time we seem to get like a little more information about when they
14:52
might launch it. This is just my impression. We get told it may
14:58
be this date, and then Elon or someone at SpaceX. I'm just gonna
15:01
blame Elon, but someone there says no, no, no, maybe this
15:05
date which is much closer. And then somebody comes in and says, hey,
15:09
not so fast. That seems to have happened now a couple of times.
15:11
Well, maybe it could happen this month, and maybe it could happen
15:15
really in a few days according to them. Yes, So the important part
15:20
of this story we did. You did a fantastic job explaining why there was
15:26
a giant mess down there in Boca Chica, Texas. You know, SpaceX
15:30
just basically made a giant mess out of a very large area by trying to
15:35
launch way too big a rocket without a sound suppression system or acoustic suppression system,
15:41
which is what the big water towers do at the Kennedy Space Center when
15:45
they flood the launch pads, all right. So so because of that,
15:50
the FAA got involved, as you said, But then also the US Fish
15:54
and Wildlife Service got involved because apparently there were there was enough environmental damage caused
16:03
by this event that fish and wildlife were both put at risk. And turns
16:08
out that they're not really in any hurry to get their final report done so
16:15
that SpaceX can launch about you know, the report is on the mitigation techniques
16:21
that SpaceX will employ to never ever do that again. It's like, you
16:23
know, going to the board and saying, I'm gonna write five hundred times,
16:26
I will never blow up my launch bet again. I will never blow
16:30
up my launch bet again. It's kind of so they had to do a
16:33
lot of mitigation to the actual systems to try to see if they could prevent
16:37
a similar event from taking place. And then the US Fish and Wildlife Service
16:41
is obligated to review those modifications, but at no given pace, right,
16:47
So they have many many days and they don't. They don't have to get
16:49
it approved by mid November, all right. In the meantime, just a
16:55
few days ago, and we reported that about this on the podcast. Bill
16:57
Gerstenmeyer, who represent SpaceX but is a longtime NASA headliner, shall we say,
17:03
testified in front of Congress that the government bureaucracies were keeping the commercial space
17:11
companies down. They were slowing things down way too much. And the exact
17:14
example he was using was the US Fish and Wildlife Service holding up SpaceX's Starship
17:21
from launching. So Gersty was up there testifying on Capitol Hill. Well,
17:25
Gersty gets back to SpaceX and guess what. SpaceX puts out a message on
17:30
their website, maybe on a platform formerly known as Twitter that might also have
17:37
X on the title anyway, So they put out a message there saying,
17:42
hey, we're ready to go as soon as November thirteenth. Well, they're
17:47
talking from an engineering standpoint, and they're talking about the modifications that they've made
17:52
and reported to the US government, but until the US Fish and Wildlife Service
17:56
clears them, they can't launch. However, these statements may bee meant to
18:03
apply a little extra political pressure after the Gerstenmeyer testimonies up on Capitol Hill to
18:10
try to get the US Fish and Wildlife Service to speed up their reporting and
18:15
clear them for launch within as you said something less than a week now from
18:19
when we're recording this podcast, so it's a very short time. Will it
18:25
happen or is just just another ploy? It's a really interesting question. If
18:29
you want to read more about this story, there's a great article on spaceflight
18:33
now dot com. Go check it out at spaceflightnow dot com. But again,
18:37
according to SpaceX representatives, SpaceX is ready to go with its Starship launch
18:42
and all the modifications therein as soon as November thirteen. All right, another
18:48
SpaceX story as and I guess for the folks in Ireland it would be aaron
18:52
go to space as SpaceX prefares to launch Ireland's first ever satellite. This one.
19:00
Yes, So there's a satellite that was built. It's a great story
19:04
because it's a student leed satellite. Uh. It's a cube sat, which
19:10
means it's a micro satellite or a small satellite. It's it's a gamma ray
19:15
observatory. It's a little tiny, you know the size of your laptop,
19:18
roughly gamma ray observatory. And it was built by the Irish Educational Research Group
19:26
at the University College at Dublin, which is great. The name of the
19:30
satellite is the Educational Irish Research Satellite one, or as you pronounced a moment
19:37
ago, ire SAT one IRISAT one. It could be ear SAT. I
19:41
don't know. I think it's ir SAT, but anyway, I'm not gonna
19:45
argue that I would go ir I think it's you know, when they spell
19:47
Ireland in like the Olympics, I think they put the E in there,
19:49
don't they. So that's it would be yeah, e I R Ireland.
19:52
Yeah, I think so. I mean it seems gaylic, it seems like
19:55
a Gaelic thing to do. So all right, So ire SAT one as
19:59
part of the European Space Agencies Academy which is called Fly Your Satellite FYS,
20:07
the Fly Your Satellite program sponsored by ISSA. So it's kind of a cool
20:11
thing, right. Imagine a bunch of students in a relatively small college that
20:15
get to be involved in a European Space Agency program where they construct and build
20:21
their own gamma ray observatory that's a microsat, and they get to fly it
20:26
aboard a SpaceX Falcon rocket. So that's the whole thing that's taking place.
20:30
It's unfolding. Not only is this little cube sat built by the Irish students.
20:36
Not only is it a gamma ray observatory. It's also got a couple
20:40
of other really interesting tests that it's going to do. The main payload is
20:44
gamma ray a gamma ray module, but it also has a couple of other
20:48
important tests aboard. They're going to test to see whether a new oxide thermal
20:53
coating can protect the satellite from the space environment, which is kind of a
20:59
neat thing. And then they have something else called wave based control. Wave
21:04
based control, so I had to look this term up make sure I understood
21:07
what it was, but it's basically this. The satellite has maybe not the
21:15
same number of retro rockets that you would have on a full sized satellite for
21:21
being able to spin it and turn it and doing all the kind of maneuvers
21:25
that you would want to do in space. So they figured out another way
21:29
to move this little satellite around, which is simply this. They get the
21:33
fuel sloshing. They slash the fuel on the inside of this cube sat at
21:38
a certain rate, which corresponds to a resonance within the rocket itself. So
21:45
it's kind of like this. If you've ever been on a swing and you
21:49
know how to kick your feet to get yourself swinging without touching the ground right,
21:55
and you kind of build a rhythm of kicking your feet out and pulling
21:57
on the chains, but you're never really touching the earth. You're performing an
22:03
internal resonance to get your swing moving back and forth and back and forth without
22:08
ever touching the ground. Well, this is sort of like the internal spacecraft
22:15
version of that. They're getting their fuel to slash in and out in and
22:18
out with inside the vehicle, which can actually begin to cause the vehicle,
22:23
when paired with the other thrusters, to move in certain orientations. And so
22:30
this is a really cool new way to maneuver a satellite in space without having
22:36
to put an extra rocket thrust aboard. You're able to do it with the
22:40
internal mechanics of the device itself. And so this is a really cool test.
22:45
Beyond yes measuring gamma ray bursts from space, which is great, beyond
22:49
yes testing new protective oxide thermal coatings, they can also test this new way
22:56
to actually move a rocket around. It's a proof of but if they show
23:00
it to be valid, they may be able to start incorporating it on other
23:06
small satellites, which lowers the cost of them because they don't have to add
23:10
on new rocket engines. So way to go ir Sat one for Ireland's first
23:17
ever satellite to space and a test of a really cool control system on board.
23:22
We hope them, We wish them the very best and hope them for
23:26
them the best of success. Coming up after a quick break, an update
23:30
on Ingenuity. Yes, it's still flying and we'll talk about Supernova nineteen eighty
23:34
seven right after this. So the lifespan for NASA's Ingenuity helicopter has a far
24:00
past what they expected, which is great, especially considering it's preparing for something
24:07
significant on Mars. Yeah, so they thought, hey, let's stick this
24:11
little helicopter on the Perseverance rover. And it's small enough that it could just
24:15
drop right out from under the rover as if the rover was giving birth on
24:18
the Red planet. And then we'll leave it there until the rover drives off.
24:22
But then we'll deploy these little blades and it's like a little cube sat
24:26
itself. It's a little got a little cubic fuselage basically for lack of a
24:30
better term, And maybe this thing, maybe we can actually fly to the
24:33
Martian atmosphere. Maybe once you know, get a cool video of Perseverance,
24:38
maybe we can fly two or three times, probably not gonna last beyond that.
24:42
Oh were they wrong. So the Ingenuity Helicopter, as part of the
24:49
Mars Perseverance Rover program, has just completed it's sixty fifth and sixty sixth flight
24:59
on the Red planet. Sixty six times. This little helicopter has taken to
25:04
the air, landed safely, recharged with its own little solar panels, and
25:11
is ready to fly again. Friends. That's an amazing story. This is
25:17
a success story, right. The most recent flights of the Ingenuity helicopter have
25:23
been just a couple of short hops. They want this helicopter be in a
25:27
very specific position relative to the Perseverance Rover, which is the easiest to help
25:33
it communicate with the rover and possibly get back on track if it gets lost
25:38
for a little while. Because it turns out that the planet Mars is about
25:42
to go out of view from the planet Earth for about two weeks. It's
25:48
going out of view on the backside of the Sun. This is what we
25:52
call a conjunction, and so when Mars moves behind the Sun relative to the
25:56
Earth, we can't send radio signs up to Mars, which means we can't
26:02
position or control our rovers or our helicopters. If the Ingenuity helicopter was not
26:08
in the right spot to successfully recharge itself, or if it was not in
26:14
the right spot to successfully communicate back with the home base, which is the
26:18
Mars Perseverance Rover, we might actually lose that helicopter on Mars. And since
26:22
it's been so successful at surpassing its initial mission, we want to keep that
26:27
little guy going right. So the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and those folks at NASA
26:33
performed a couple of little flights to make sure that the helicopter was sitting in
26:37
the goldilocks just right position that when we regain signal in a couple of weeks,
26:42
we'll be able to communicate with the helicopter and be able to get it
26:45
back on track for more future flights up on Mars, which is really cool.
26:49
So the last two flights happened on November second and November three. On
26:56
November second, Ingenuity only stayed a law for about forty eight seconds and only
27:00
flew about twenty three feet. The flight the next day, on November third,
27:04
was even shorter. It was only twenty three seconds and only flew about
27:08
three feet. It almost flew perfectly vertically, very little horizontal movement. But
27:15
between those two flights it is now sitting at the just right Goldilock spot relative
27:21
to the rover to be able to recharge itself, to communicate with the rover
27:23
well, and be ready to go. When Mars clears the sun as viewed
27:29
from Earth, the conjunction ends and we can start to fly and explore the
27:33
service of Mars again. Of all of its accomplishments, of all of the
27:37
winds for this thing, maybe the best win, biggest win, I think,
27:42
is just the name ingenuity for how successful this thing has been. What
27:48
an absolute marvel this thing has been on Mars. Yep, it really has.
27:53
I mean again, when people, I think, maybe in the media
27:59
or maybe social media to really like to point out and make fun of failures
28:03
within the technological communities like NASA, it's like, oh, you took all
28:07
our tax money and slammed a spacecraft into Mars. Very often we overlook or
28:11
don't talk enough about the ridiculously impressive successes of the Space Agency, and they're
28:18
various scientists and engineers. This is certainly one of those. Right we are
28:22
flying an aerial vehicle in the atmosphere of an alien planet. That is really
28:30
cool. And so over these sixty six flights of ingenuity up on Mars,
28:34
it's traveled more than nine miles, so I'm not really sure how many kilometers
28:40
that is, some number of kilometers nos anyway, so no one knows it.
28:45
But it's also stayed aloft for one hundred and nineteen minutes, so it
28:49
means it's flown for more than an hour and a half of cumulative time,
28:52
which is just crazy, right, it's almost two hours, so so again,
28:59
success story. The ingenuity almost felt like an afterthought. It kind of
29:03
got added to the mission a little bit late. It was only supposed to
29:07
be a proof of concept. And the fact that it is now the scout
29:10
for the rover. It flies ahead of the rover and looks at the terrain
29:14
and make sure everything is safe, and then it comes back down for a
29:17
safe landing, relays all that information back to JPL and they can drive the
29:21
rover itself more safely through the Martian terrain. You just don't get better than
29:26
that. It's really it's a it's a great success story, very cool outcome.
29:29
So astronomers are trying to detect gravitational waves coming from supernova nineteen eighty seven
29:34
A s N one nine eighty seven A I believe is the catalog number.
29:40
Yes it is. And so friends, you know, I know, I've
29:42
told a lot of stories today so far. I'm kind of in a chatty
29:45
mood apparently on the podcast today. But I will tell you this, I
29:48
do have a little bit of a personal story that goes in conjunction with the
29:52
supernova supernova nineteen eighty seven A. Now, I had nothing to do with
29:56
any of the science. However, there was a guy by the name of
30:00
Ian Shelton who is one of the co discoverers. And Ian Shelton was basically
30:04
at an observatory down in the Southern Hemisphere waiting for the sky to get dark
30:11
and clouds to clear, and he was looking at some plates from and I'm
30:15
saying plates because this was in eighty seven we didn't have digital cameras right,
30:19
so they were looking at photographic plates. And he was looking at his photographic
30:23
plate from the night before when he realized that he would actually see a star
30:30
in the sky that was not on the plate from the night before, of
30:33
the very region of the sky that he was photographing. So he stepped out
30:37
and said, wait a minute, I need to go look at this for
30:40
my own eye again. And yes, he stepped outside, and there it
30:42
is a bright and shining star up there in what's called the large Magelantic Cloud,
30:48
which is a a companion galaxy to our Milky Way. But you can
30:52
see it naked eye. So he stepped out and looked up at the sky
30:55
and there's that bright light. So he walked quickly over to the neighboring of
31:00
and asked one of the technicians there, hey, did you see this thing?
31:03
And the guy there said, you know what, I actually did.
31:07
I saw that too. There's something really unusual going on. So they picked
31:11
up the phone and contacted the Bureau of International Telegrams at the International Astronomical Union,
31:18
which is a place where you report phenomenons such as this, and they
31:23
got their names listed as the discoverers of super nova nineteen eighty seven. Eight.
31:27
Now, none of that tells you why it's a personal connection to me.
31:30
So here comes that punchline, which is this again. Ian Shelton,
31:34
co discoverer, was the brother of a guy that I knew named David Shelton,
31:41
who was the department chair at the University of Nevada Las Vegas Physics Department
31:45
when I was a grad student, so I knew doctor David Shelton very well.
31:51
He's the older and somewhat more studious and detail oriented of the two brothers.
31:56
He would occasionally describe his brother is maybe not moving through his degree program
32:01
quite as quickly as everybody thought he should. But then the younger brother ends
32:06
up being the discoverer of Supernova nineteen eighty seven eighty. So this was good
32:10
fun to talk to David about that and hear his comments on how his brother
32:14
discovered this supernova, which is pretty cool. So there's my story and I'm
32:17
sticking to it. So, in this giant supernova cloud that was created in
32:22
nineteen eighty seven, there's a neutron star and this neutron star. All neutron
32:28
stars have some kind of irregularities and as they spin around really really fast,
32:32
they should be testing they should be emitting gravitational waves. So a group of
32:37
scientists led by Texas Tech University is actually trying to use LIGO data to find
32:45
gravitational waves. Now you might know LIGO, that's the instrument that first detected
32:49
gravitational waves back in twenty fifteen. So the Texas Tech scientists going back through
32:53
the data of Ligo trying to see if they can see little ripples in the
32:59
fabric of space time caused by the uneven rotation of a neutron star inside the
33:05
supernova remnant from the supernova in nineteen eighty seven. So they have yet to
33:08
find it. They haven't found it yet, but they are looking, and
33:12
so it makes a really interesting story about that very famous supernova. The closest
33:16
supernova to Earth since the invention of the telescope is Supernova nineteen eighty seven.
33:22
Eight. Let's talk about Music under the Dome. You guys just had the
33:24
final Music under the Dome of twenty twenty three. But we're just kind of
33:30
at a mid season finale because really there's going to be more shows coming up
33:34
next year. Yep, exactly, So Music under the Dome is going to
33:37
return in March. And so I would tell you this, folks, if
33:42
you have not seen one of these concerts, but you really have been wanting
33:45
to come buy your tickets ahead of time because the tickets sell out fast.
33:51
So that's one piece of advice. The other thing I would tell you is
33:53
this we likely will have a new planetarium projection system in place for the concerts
34:00
happening in the spring. So that's just a little hat tip out there to
34:05
say, hey, be paying attention. Follow us on Facebook here at Colomba
34:08
State University's co Colospace Science Center because we're expecting some changes and some upgrades in
34:14
our planetarium over the next few months. So's there's a there's an advanced notice
34:20
of a headline that's going to be coming out shortly. Also another headline.
34:23
We just did a ribbon cutting ceremony for a brand new exhibit here at the
34:29
Space Science Center, and that new exhibit is now open and accessible to the
34:32
public. It's called the Guzzle Vortex. Yeah, you might be wondering what
34:37
that's kind of an interesting name, guzzle Vortex. What is it? Well,
34:40
it's an exhibit for the youngest kids in the family and it's a place
34:45
where they can let aliens guzzle up some food that then after that flies through
34:51
a vortex of wind tunnels and shoots out in the air high aloft in the
34:57
high atrium of the Coke Coola Space Science Center, where the kids can retrieve
35:00
these targets and put them back in the aliens again and again and again,
35:05
and friends, I can just tell you after watching the first wave of kids
35:08
actually using this display, they're having a great time. There's also opportunities to
35:14
learn about exoplanets and the flight of various machines like the Ingenuity helicopter in the
35:20
Martian atmosphere. All of that content associated with this exhibit. But come down
35:24
and check it out. Come down and check out Guzzle Vortex, Music under
35:27
the Dome and all the other great artifacts and programs we have here at Columbus
35:30
State University's Coca Cola Space Science Center and the website to learn more about what
35:36
you guys do in those upcoming showtimes for Music under the Dome. Yep,
35:40
you can follow us at our website. The web address is www dot cc
35:45
SSC dot org, Charlie Charlie SamSam Charlie dot org. And we thank you
35:52
again for listening, and we'll do it again next week. Overhead Door Company
36:04
of Columbus has all of your garage door needs covered residential and commercial service and
36:08
repairs. If you need a new garage door, or you're just looking to
36:13
upgrade or repair your current door, Overhead Door Company of Columbus has you covered.
36:17
Plus they've got your emergency repairs or service covered as well. Seven oh
36:22
six three five eight forty five hundred seven oh six three five eight forty five
36:27
hundred odccolumbus dot com