Latest / Best of Business / Geof Nightingale: independent tax expert weighs up Labour's proposal for capital gains tax
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks'd be follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Now, there is some concern that Labour's capital gains tax
- 0:19Speaker 2: might not bring in as much money as they hope.
- 0:22Speaker 2: On the show last night, Nichola will have said Labour's
- 0:23Speaker 2: policy was already falling apart.
- 0:25Speaker 3: Based on their own statements today. They've based their costings
- 0:28Speaker 3: on the Tax Working Group proposal, and that proposal, if
- 0:32Speaker 3: you sold a property and received a gain on it,
- 0:37Speaker 3: you would pay a tax. What he said in your
- 0:40Speaker 3: interview was if you sold a commercial property but you
- 0:43Speaker 3: then bought a new one, you wouldn't pay tax on
- 0:46Speaker 3: the previous sale.
- 0:48Speaker 2: Now, Jeff Nightingale is an independent TAXIX but who was
- 0:50Speaker 2: actually a member of the aforementioned Tax Working Group? Hi, Jeff, Hi?
- 0:55Speaker 1: Ever is Nicola Wright.
- 0:56Speaker 2: She got a point there, Well, I think.
- 0:58Speaker 4: She's got a point in the sense that, as I
- 1:03Speaker 4: understand it anyway, Labour's proposal has this thing called rollover
- 1:06Speaker 4: relief in it because it's modeled on the Tax Working
- 1:10Speaker 4: Group and we had proposed rollover relief for small businesses.
- 1:15Speaker 4: Businesses the turnover of less than five million who were
- 1:17Speaker 4: selling business assets to reinvest in the business. You need
- 1:21Speaker 4: to do that to preserve economic growth and things. So
- 1:26Speaker 4: I think she's right on that perspective. But what I
- 1:29Speaker 4: also understand those Labour's done its own costings of the
- 1:32Speaker 4: revenue that they propose, and they've included all the assumptions,
- 1:36Speaker 4: are the design assumptions and that revenue costing. So to
- 1:39Speaker 4: that extent, I suspect they are standing. They'll stand by
- 1:43Speaker 4: their numbers.
- 1:43Speaker 2: Okay, So there are forecasting an average of about seven
- 1:46Speaker 2: hundred million dollars being brought in over the first four years.
- 1:49Speaker 2: That sound about right to you? And you know, having
- 1:52Speaker 2: what one point three billion in the first on year four,
- 1:56Speaker 2: does that sound right?
- 1:57Speaker 3: Yeah?
- 1:57Speaker 4: Look it does sound about right. Look, look you've got
- 1:59Speaker 4: to realize there are forecasts, right, and the one thing
- 2:03Speaker 4: you know about them is they'll be wrong. But when so,
- 2:09Speaker 4: Labour's CGT policy is modeled on the minority view of
- 2:14Speaker 4: the Tax Working Group. There was a minority. I was
- 2:17Speaker 4: in the majority, eight out of eleven was voted for
- 2:19Speaker 4: a comprehensive capital gain SAX. A minority of three put
- 2:24Speaker 4: up and said let's just extend it to property. And
- 2:27Speaker 4: in that minority, report, they said that residential property will
- 2:31Speaker 4: be about thirty nine percent of all revenue forecast for
- 2:34Speaker 4: the Capital Gains Tax and Treasury in twenty nineteen. Long
- 2:37Speaker 4: time ago, it suggested that after ten years, the comprehensive
- 2:41Speaker 4: capital gain tax might be six point two billion of
- 2:44Speaker 4: revenue per anum after ten years and thirty nine percent
- 2:48Speaker 4: of that's a couple of billions. So Labour's estimate of
- 2:51Speaker 4: a billion after four years doesn't seem out of skew
- 2:54Speaker 4: to me.
- 2:56Speaker 2: Now, yesterday Chippy said to me, it's not inflation adjusted?
- 3:00Speaker 3: Should it be?
- 3:02Speaker 4: Yeah, I heard that. It's a great question in theory,
- 3:06Speaker 4: Yes it should be, because wish be taxing inflationary gains.
- 3:11Speaker 4: We should only be taxing real gains. But introducing inflation
- 3:15Speaker 4: adjustment is really difficult and produces real complexity. So what
- 3:19Speaker 4: most jurisdictions around the world do is either discount the
- 3:23Speaker 4: rate to allow for inflation, or only include part of
- 3:26Speaker 4: the game as a proxy really for inflation. So you know,
- 3:31Speaker 4: you could argue that at twenty eight percent, it's already
- 3:33Speaker 4: a slight discount for an individual or a trust whose
- 3:36Speaker 4: top rate is thirty nine, but it's not a discount
- 3:39Speaker 4: for companies.
- 3:40Speaker 2: No, and I mean, geez, it's not much of a discount,
- 3:42Speaker 2: is it. Would you do if you had if you
- 3:44Speaker 2: designed it to account for inflation.
- 3:47Speaker 4: Well, when we did the working group, we didn't. We
- 3:52Speaker 4: recommended it not to account for inflation, and the reason
- 3:54Speaker 4: being that we come off of this period of historically
- 3:56Speaker 4: low inflation. But as we've seen in the last couple
- 3:58Speaker 4: of years, of inflation can get away and make it
- 3:59Speaker 4: a hell of a difference. So I do think you
- 4:02Speaker 4: need to in principle account for inflation. It's probably too
- 4:06Speaker 4: hard to do it precisely, and it's CPI are just
- 4:09Speaker 4: the cost base, So it's probably best to apply some
- 4:12Speaker 4: proxy and discount the rate or discount the rate of
- 4:15Speaker 4: inclusion of the capital gain in order to say we
- 4:18Speaker 4: recognize as it's a pretty rough measure, but it does
- 4:21Speaker 4: recognize inflation. If you do that, Jeff, what does.
- 4:23Speaker 2: Your gut tell you? I mean, it looks to me
- 4:25Speaker 2: like this is a trojan horse, right, because I don't
- 4:28Speaker 2: really understand what the point is in bringing in a tax,
- 4:32Speaker 2: or introducing a tax to bring in review and then
- 4:34Speaker 2: immediately spending the vast majority of what it brings in
- 4:37Speaker 2: on something that we don't need right as widespread as
- 4:41Speaker 2: free GP as it's for. So would you say looking
- 4:44Speaker 2: at that that this is just the startup something and
- 4:46Speaker 2: it expands from there. It's being something more comprehensive, like
- 4:49Speaker 2: what you'd like.
- 4:51Speaker 4: Yeah, I think some people will see it like that.
- 4:56Speaker 4: I mean, this approach is consistent with what New Zealand
- 4:59Speaker 4: has done for capital gains all along. It's coherent with
- 5:02Speaker 4: our current policy. So we don't have a comprehensive capital
- 5:05Speaker 4: gains tax, but we do tax some capital gains where
- 5:10Speaker 4: they occur systematically and they start to look like income.
- 5:13Speaker 4: So we tax financial arrangements, we tax property development, we
- 5:17Speaker 4: tax payments around leases, and so we fire rifle shots
- 5:20Speaker 4: in law at these things. And this is another rifle shot.
- 5:23Speaker 4: It's not a broad base yet, but you know, some
- 5:26Speaker 4: people will see it as a we'll start here and
- 5:28Speaker 4: then we'll add some more asset classes in. And in
- 5:30Speaker 4: fact that was the that was what the minority report
- 5:33Speaker 4: of the Tax Working Group said, only add asset classes
- 5:35Speaker 4: in as you can justify that the revenue will outweigh
- 5:38Speaker 4: the complexity in compliance costs.
- 5:40Speaker 2: Jeff, it's good to talk, do you. Thank you so
- 5:42Speaker 2: much for your time in your expertise Jeff Nightingale, independent
- 5:44Speaker 2: tax expert and former member of the Tax Working Group.
- 5:48Speaker 1: For more from News Talks B listen live on air
- 5:51Speaker 1: or online, and keep our shows with you wherever you
- 5:54Speaker 1: go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio