Latest / Elon Musk Podcast / Tesla Murder? How a Hacker at Starbucks Uncovered the Crash Data Tesla Claimed It Didn’t Have
Transcript
- 0:01Hey everybody. Welcome back to the Elon Musk
- 0:04podcast This. Is a show where we discuss the
- 0:07critical crossroads that shape SpaceX.
- 0:09Tesla X, The Boring Company and Neurolink I'm your.
- 0:14Host will. Walden.
- 0:16A federal jury in Miami ordered Tesla to pay 43, excuse me, $243
- 0:21million last month after a 2019 crash in Florida killed 22 year
- 0:26old Nabel Benavides Leon and left her boyfriend Dylan Angelo
- 0:32with life changing injuries. Of the verdict hanged on a
- 0:35single file that Tesla said did not exist until a hacker found
- 0:41it inside a Starbucks. How did Tesla lose critical
- 0:45crash data tied to its own Autopilot system, then claim it
- 0:49didn't exist, only to have it recovered by a third party years
- 0:53later? A hacker.
- 0:55Now this raises doubts about how Tesla stores, retrieves, and
- 1:00controls access to information that can make or break lawsuits
- 1:05about its driver assistance features.
- 1:07Tesla denied withholding the file and said it couldn't locate
- 1:10it. But the jury didn't buy that
- 1:12explanation, especially after the plaintiff's team proved the
- 1:14data had been on Tesla servers all along.
- 1:18Now, the crash occurred on April 25th, 2019 in Key Largo.
- 1:22George McGee was driving a Tesla Model S on Autopilot when he
- 1:25looked away from the road to pick up his dropped phone.
- 1:30Car slammed into Anglo's truck, parked at the end of a dark Rd.
- 1:34where Anglo and Benavides Leon stood behind hazard reflectors.
- 1:39McGee later settled separately, admitting he was using Autopilot
- 1:44at the time. But the civil lawsuit targeted
- 1:46Tesla, accusing the company of negligence for allowing
- 1:49Autopilot to operate on that road and for failing to alert
- 1:53the driver of the situation. Now, Tesla told the court didn't
- 1:57have the collision snapshot, which is a key internal data
- 2:00file that logs exactly what the vehicle saw, sensed and planned
- 2:04in the moments before a crash. Plaintiffs believed it would
- 2:07show that the car failed to detect the couple, failed to
- 2:09warn the driver and proceeded with a deadly maneuver.
- 2:13Tesla eventually said it had simply missed the file.
- 2:16In reality, a hacker known online as Green The only found
- 2:21it. That discovery happened inside
- 2:23of Miami Starbucks. The hacker, who had spent years
- 2:26reverse engineering Tesla's hardware, ran a forensic image
- 2:30of the vehicle's Autopilot controlling unit on his laptop
- 2:33and found the deleted file within minutes.
- 2:36He also found evidence that Tesla had received the data
- 2:38moments after the crash, meaning the company had a copy from the
- 2:42start and test to confirm this in court.
- 2:45Calling oversight clumsy but denied any intent to deceive.
- 2:50Now, the Miami jury didn't need long to deliberate and ruled
- 2:54that Tesla was 33% liable for the crash and ordered the
- 2:57company to pay damages. The remaining responsibility
- 3:00fell on the driver. The plaintiffs attorneys argued
- 3:02that Tesla misled investigators and withheld access to vital
- 3:06evidence for years. They said Tesla attempted to
- 3:08settle quietly before trial, but the family wanted the truth
- 3:12public now. Court records reveal the data
- 3:15had indeed been uploaded to Tesla servers automatically
- 3:17after the crash, but according to internal testimony, it was
- 3:21then unlinked test, the standard protocol for separating vehicle
- 3:24data from specific incidents. Later, an engineer testified
- 3:30that someone had likely taken affirmative action to delete the
- 3:33central server copy as well, although the court found no
- 3:37evidence this was intentional, and the judge ordered Tesla to
- 3:41reimburse the plaintiffs for costs related to data recovery
- 3:44now. That effort to recover the data
- 3:46began years later, when Florida Highway Patrol turned over the
- 3:50original Autopilot unit to the plaintiff's team.
- 3:52The hacker flown in by the legal team warned against Tesla's
- 3:56request to boot up the unit, saying it could trigger
- 3:59automatic updates that would overwrite the file.
- 4:02Instead, he extracted the contents himself.
- 4:05What he found was exactly what the family had been looking for,
- 4:08a complete record of what the Tesla saw as it speed toward the
- 4:14victims. By using that data, the hacker
- 4:17generated A detailed augmented video for the courtroom.
- 4:21Frame by frame. It showed the Tesla detecting a
- 4:24car and then a pedestrian, yet continuing to plan a path
- 4:28straight through their location. Tesla argued the video proved
- 4:32the driver had enough time to react, and the Plano said it
- 4:36confirmed the system failed at every critical moment.
- 4:40Tesla's legal team framed the situation as an honest mistake.
- 4:43His lawyer told jurors the company would never hide helpful
- 4:46evidence, simply didn't realize the file had been preserved.
- 4:50The plaintiff's attorneys described a pattern of
- 4:53obstruction, arguing that Tesla had evidence before the cops
- 4:57even arrived on the scene and only admitted to having it after
- 5:01they found another way to retrieve it.
- 5:05Now, this was not Tesla's first trial involving Autopilot, but
- 5:08it may be the most consequential.
- 5:10The $240 million verdict marked the company's largest public
- 5:14loss over its driver assistance tech to date.
- 5:18Within weeks, investors filed a lawsuit in Texas accusing Tesla
- 5:22of misleading the market about the safety and reliability of
- 5:25its systems, citing the Miami case.
- 5:28Other families are now preparing similar claims, including one in
- 5:32California tied to the death of a 15 year old.
- 5:36Federal regulators have repeatedly investigated Tesla
- 5:39over Autopilot, and the system has been involved in dozens of
- 5:42crashes, many fatal. Tesla has beaten two such
- 5:46lawsuits in the past and settled others before they reach trial.
- 5:50But the Miami case added new pressure, producing internal
- 5:53records, engineer testimony and digital files that other
- 5:57plaintiffs will now use to build their own cases.
- 6:01One example is attorney Mark Dobin, who recently what a
- 6:04refund for the $10,600 he paid for Full Self Driving Software
- 6:09after an arbiter ruled Tesla never delivered the promise
- 6:12features. He said Musk Musk's public
- 6:15claims had created unrealistic expectations, and the Miami case
- 6:19showed what happens when the confidence turns deadly.
- 6:23Tesla has declined us to comment on the outcome, except to say it
- 6:28plans to appeal. A judge said she did not find
- 6:31enough evidence that Tesla deliberately destroyed or
- 6:33withheld the data, but she agreed the company had
- 6:36mishandled it and ordered reimbursement of the cost
- 6:38incurred by the plaintiffs to retrieve it.
- 6:40The hacker who helped find the data says future cases may not
- 6:44be so lucky. Tesla has since tightened its
- 6:46security protocols, making it harder for independent analysts
- 6:50to access internal crash data. Now they believe that's part of
- 6:55the problem sometimes, he said. You just have to get the data
- 6:59out. Hey, thank you so much for
- 7:02listening today. I really do appreciate your
- 7:04support. If you could take a second and
- 7:06hit this subscribe or the follow button on whatever podcast
- 7:09platform that you're listening on.
- 7:10Right. Now I greatly appreciate it.
- 7:12It helps out the show tremendously and you'll never
- 7:15miss an episode. And each episode is about 10
- 7:18minutes or less to get you caught up quickly.
- 7:21And please, if you want to support the show even more, go
- 7:24to. Atreoncom Stage 0.
- 7:28And please take care of yourselves and each other, and
- 7:30I'll see you tomorrow.