Latest / Best of Business / Jenee Tibshraeny: NZ Herald Wellington business editor on the concerns for what Government building overhaul means for homeowners
Transcript
- 0:09Speaker 1: You're listening to a podcast from News Talks be follow
- 0:12Speaker 1: this and our wide range of podcasts now on iHeartRadio.
- 0:16Speaker 2: Now, there are homes that concerns rather that the government's
- 0:19Speaker 2: proposed building overhaul might leave homeowners in the lurch. Essentially,
- 0:22Speaker 2: what the government's doing is they want to remove some
- 0:24Speaker 2: of the responsibility for defective buildings from councils and instead
- 0:27Speaker 2: make the builders and the trades and so on responsible
- 0:30Speaker 2: for their work. But that is where the plan hits
- 0:31Speaker 2: a snag. Genative Traine as The Herald's Wellington Business editor
- 0:35Speaker 2: and with us Hello Jane, Hi, Heather. So in this case,
- 0:39Speaker 2: the trade's would have to be insured. But that's the problem,
- 0:41Speaker 2: right whether they can actually get insurance.
- 0:44Speaker 3: That's the thing. So if you are shifting the liability
- 0:48Speaker 3: to the people who cause the problem, the trade's and
- 0:51Speaker 3: so on, that's all fair and well. But these tradees
- 0:55Speaker 3: don't necessarily have deep pockets. So if you have a
- 0:58Speaker 3: problem with your with your home, you chase your builder.
- 1:01Speaker 3: Your builder can say that we're liquidating the company, or
- 1:04Speaker 3: it can or the builder can just say, look, we
- 1:05Speaker 3: can't pay, we can't pay you. We're just two guys
- 1:08Speaker 3: and we can't pay you out, So then I guess
- 1:11Speaker 3: you go, well, hopefully the builder has insurance. All the
- 1:14Speaker 3: builders offered you some sort of guarantee, warranty or whatever
- 1:17Speaker 3: on the building work. The government is looking at when
- 1:22Speaker 3: it makes this change, it's looking at making these consumer
- 1:24Speaker 3: protections mandatory. But I spoke to someone from the insurance industry,
- 1:29Speaker 3: Stanford Insurance Director Duncan Colebrook. He's one of the guys
- 1:32Speaker 3: that provides this insurance cover for the builders, and he's saying, look,
- 1:37Speaker 3: we're not going to just ensure any old builder. You know,
- 1:40Speaker 3: they have strong underwriting processes, and of course insurance companies
- 1:44Speaker 3: don't want to lose money. They can't just ensure everyone.
- 1:49Speaker 3: So the insurance industry doesn't seem to be that keen
- 1:53Speaker 3: on what the government's proposing, because you know, they're not
- 1:56Speaker 3: going to provide blanket cover for every trade, every builder,
- 1:59Speaker 3: every building.
- 2:01Speaker 2: So what's the alternative.
- 2:03Speaker 3: Well, you know, this is all still being worked through,
- 2:06Speaker 3: but as it stands, it seems like there's a risk
- 2:10Speaker 3: that the homeowner will be exposed because if if it
- 2:15Speaker 3: is not entirely ensured, and the pockets of these builders
- 2:19Speaker 3: and things aren't that deep, then it could leave you
- 2:21Speaker 3: in the lurch. Duncan Colebrook, he from Stanford Insurance, said
- 2:26Speaker 3: to me, well, you know, if the government wants to
- 2:28Speaker 3: make the stuff mandatory, like consumer protections mandatory, then maybe
- 2:33Speaker 3: it needs to step in and provide some sort of
- 2:36Speaker 3: insurance cover. But you know that he made the point
- 2:39Speaker 3: that is the exact thing the government is trying to avoid.
- 2:42Speaker 3: You know, it's trying to get rid of their liability
- 2:45Speaker 3: on councils, which kind of comes back on the government.
- 2:49Speaker 3: So you're really it does leave you in a sort
- 2:52Speaker 3: of scratching your head. Another insurance Brokerray spoke to Ben Recard.
- 2:56Speaker 3: He said, well, you know, insurance are hesitant about providing
- 3:00Speaker 3: this kind of cover. You know, it's specialist cover because
- 3:02Speaker 3: normally an insurance company provides cover for a year, like
- 3:05Speaker 3: for your house, it looks at the risk, provides cover
- 3:07Speaker 3: for a year next year, reassesses changes the premium, does
- 3:10Speaker 3: it again. But this is this type of stuff is
- 3:12Speaker 3: for like ten years. Yeah, I know it's quite risky
- 3:15Speaker 3: ten years. There's some hesitancy there.
- 3:18Speaker 2: But this goes some way to explaining why the government
- 3:20Speaker 2: only half announced the thing, right, because we were expecting
- 3:23Speaker 2: an announcement of yes, we're changing where the responsibility lies,
- 3:27Speaker 2: and this is what's going to back it up. But
- 3:29Speaker 2: we only got the changing of the responsibility, not the
- 3:31Speaker 2: backing up because it's too complicated.
- 3:33Speaker 3: Well exactly. So the theory is nice, let's not cripple counsels.
- 3:38Speaker 3: You know, with the leaky home saga many years ago,
- 3:41Speaker 3: councils get left with this big bill, rate payers end
- 3:44Speaker 3: up paying for it. It sounds nice. We all like that,
- 3:46Speaker 3: make the bill, make the naughty people pay. But there's
- 3:51Speaker 3: some fundamental details there. You know. If the insurance industry
- 3:55Speaker 3: is not rushing in to say that's that's fine with us,
- 3:58Speaker 3: then I still have major questions of exactly how this
- 4:01Speaker 3: is going to work.
- 4:01Speaker 2: Yeah, totally all right, let's see what they come up with.
- 4:03Speaker 2: We'll have to wait for Chris Pink to figure it out.
- 4:05Speaker 2: Thank you so much to know I appreciate it. Jenetib Shraney,
- 4:07Speaker 2: the Herald's Welling and Business editor.
- 4:09Speaker 1: For more from News Talk st B, listen live on
- 4:12Speaker 1: air or online, and keep our shows with you wherever
- 4:15Speaker 1: you go with our podcasts on iHeartRadio