Latest / The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson / Whistleblower Was Silenced for Calling out the LIES in the Russia Hoax plus Kamala & Colbert, Bitter & Angry Together

Transcript

Whistleblower Was Silenced for Calling out the LIES in the Russia Hoax plus Kamala & Colbert, Bitter & Angry Together · The 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson

0:01
Speaker 1: Good Monday morning. It's nice to have you with us.
0:03
Speaker 1: It's Verdict with Center, Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with you
0:05
Speaker 1: as always and Centater. We've got a lot to cover,
0:08
Speaker 1: including a whistleblower who has come forward revealing how they
0:11
Speaker 1: were quote silenced and threatened to go along on the
0:15
Speaker 1: Russia hoax. This another bombshell and the unraveling of the
0:20
Speaker 1: deep state.
0:21
Speaker 2: Well, every day it seems new news is breaking about
0:24
Speaker 2: how the Obama administration deliberately concocted the Russia hoax to
0:28
Speaker 2: go after President Donald Trump, and how they lied, how
0:32
Speaker 2: they knew they were lying. We now have evidence that
0:34
Speaker 2: the intelligence community for months had concluded that Russia was
0:38
Speaker 2: not attempting to hack the election, and yet they deliberately
0:40
Speaker 2: lied for political purposes. We've now had the story break
0:43
Speaker 2: that Hillary Clinton personally approved the Russia hoax as a
0:47
Speaker 2: way to distract from our own email scandal, and now
0:50
Speaker 2: the latest, a whistleblower from within the Obama intelligence community
0:54
Speaker 2: tried to blow the whistle, tried to stop, tried to
0:57
Speaker 2: say this is a lie. The whistleblower was silenced, the
1:01
Speaker 2: whistleblower was ignored, and we now have damning emails laying
1:05
Speaker 2: out the record. We're going to tell you all about that.
1:07
Speaker 2: We're also going to tell you about Kamala Harris. It
1:10
Speaker 2: turns out, no, she was not kidnapped by space aliens. No,
1:12
Speaker 2: she did not go into witness protection. She did the
1:15
Speaker 2: next best thing, which is she went on Stephen Colbert's show,
1:18
Speaker 2: and the four people watching her, they found out that
1:21
Speaker 2: Kamala has a new book, the people of California. She's
1:25
Speaker 2: not going to subject herself on them by running for governor. Instead,
1:28
Speaker 2: she's trying to sell a book, and of course she's
1:31
Speaker 2: with Colbert. We're going to tell you just how pitiful
1:33
Speaker 2: that was. We're going to cover both of those on
1:35
Speaker 2: today's pod.
1:35
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you real quick though, about
1:37
Speaker 1: something that's really cool, and that is, how would you
1:40
Speaker 1: like to have a make a difference standing up for
1:42
Speaker 1: what you believe in with something you use every day?
1:46
Speaker 1: Your cell phone. I know there's a bunch of choices
1:48
Speaker 1: out there for your cell phone company, but there is
1:51
Speaker 1: one that boldly stands in the gap for every American
1:54
Speaker 1: that believes that freedom is worth fighting for, and that
1:57
Speaker 1: company is Patriot Mobile. Now I want to get give
2:00
Speaker 1: you a free month of service when you switch. I'm
2:02
Speaker 1: gonna tell you about that in a moment. But what
2:04
Speaker 1: really is amazing about Patriot Mobile is this. Not only
2:07
Speaker 1: do they outgain the competition when it comes to technology,
2:10
Speaker 1: but also with coverage. Patriot Mobile is one of the
2:14
Speaker 1: only carriers in the nation with access to all three
2:18
Speaker 1: major US networks. What does that mean for you? Amazing
2:21
Speaker 1: nationwide coverage along with the ability to have multiple phone
2:25
Speaker 1: numbers on different networks on a single smartphone. It's a
2:29
Speaker 1: game changer. They also offer unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots,
2:35
Speaker 1: international roaming, internet backup, and so much more. Switching is
2:40
Speaker 1: easier than ever. You can activate minutes from the comfort
2:43
Speaker 1: of your home, keep your same number you've got now,
2:46
Speaker 1: keep your phone you've got, or upgrade a new one.
2:48
Speaker 1: So why not switch? Because when you pay your bill,
2:52
Speaker 1: that's where the magic happens. They take about five percent
2:54
Speaker 1: of your bill every month, that no extra cost to you,
2:57
Speaker 1: and they give it back to organizations and support our
3:00
Speaker 1: First and our Second Amendment rights, the rights of unborn babies.
3:04
Speaker 1: And they also stand with our military, our veterans and
3:06
Speaker 1: are wounded warriors. So with every call you make, you're
3:09
Speaker 1: making a difference. So stop giving your money to companies
3:12
Speaker 1: that hate your values. Go to Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict.
3:17
Speaker 1: That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash verdict or nine to
3:22
Speaker 1: seven to two Patriot, and use the promo code verdict
3:25
Speaker 1: for a free month of service. That's promo code Verdict
3:28
Speaker 1: for free moonth of service Patriot Mobile dot com slash
3:31
Speaker 1: verdict or called nine to seven to two Patriot. All right,
3:35
Speaker 1: so let's get into this big story number one center
3:37
Speaker 1: and talk about this whistleblower and what we've now learned.
3:41
Speaker 1: This whistleblower revealing they were apparently threatened to go along
3:46
Speaker 1: with the Barack Obama directed Russia hoax.
3:50
Speaker 2: Well, here's what Tulsey Gabberd tweeted out to the world. Quote,
3:54
Speaker 2: new whistleblower reveals how they were threatened by a supervisor
3:58
Speaker 2: to go along with the Obama I'm directed Russia hoax
4:01
Speaker 2: intelligence assessment even though they knew it was not credible
4:06
Speaker 2: or accurate. The whistleblower refused. Yesterday, we released the whistleblower's
4:13
Speaker 2: first hand account of what happened in the crafting of
4:16
Speaker 2: the January twenty seventeen intelligence assessment. Their year's long effort
4:21
Speaker 2: to expose the egregious manipulation and manufacturing of intelligence carried
4:26
Speaker 2: out at the highest levels of government and the ice
4:29
Speaker 2: detailed in our previous releases, and how they were repeatedly ignored.
4:35
Speaker 2: Thank you to this courageous whistleblower and others who are
4:39
Speaker 2: coming forward now putting their own well being on the
4:42
Speaker 2: line to defend our democratic republic in sure the American
4:46
Speaker 2: people know the truth and hold those responsible accountable. And
4:51
Speaker 2: then read the whistleblower's explosive story with emails here and
4:56
Speaker 2: she links to the entire story. We're going to go
4:58
Speaker 2: through it right now, but it is this is damning
5:03
Speaker 2: and there is a reason why under Joe Biden they
5:07
Speaker 2: did everything they could to cover it up. Here's what
5:09
Speaker 2: whistleblower says. Quote for the New twenty seventeen ICA I
5:15
Speaker 2: was directed by blank to focus on Russian attempts to
5:19
Speaker 2: access US election related infrastructure. IC reporting suggested many Russia
5:24
Speaker 2: tributed IP addresses were making connection attempts that the IC
5:28
Speaker 2: could not explain the purpose of. Later, when presenting it's
5:33
Speaker 2: blocked out who with our findings? Blocked out person directed
5:37
Speaker 2: us to abandon any further study of the subject, saying
5:41
Speaker 2: quote it's something else. In light of later development in
5:45
Speaker 2: open source reporting, I came to have concerns about this
5:49
Speaker 2: Russia attributed cyberactivity and the abrupt dismissal of the study effort.
5:55
Speaker 2: In addition, I noted other nations efforts to influence the
5:59
Speaker 2: twenty sixth extine presidential election, but this critical context was
6:03
Speaker 2: omitted from the twenty seventeen ICA. During conversion of the
6:08
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen ICA to classified and unclassified versions, key context
6:15
Speaker 2: was not included, and I was pressured to alter my
6:19
Speaker 2: views on the twenty seventeen ICA's key judgments. With the
6:24
Speaker 2: expressed intent by and the name is blacked out that
6:27
Speaker 2: my concurrence was sought to enable name blacked out to
6:32
Speaker 2: sway the views of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The narrative
6:37
Speaker 2: goes on between twenty sixteen and twenty twenty two. Through
6:40
Speaker 2: first ten involvement, I became aware of multiple events that
6:44
Speaker 2: may have represented the use or attempted use of national
6:47
Speaker 2: security authorities to influence domestic politics. I believe some of
6:51
Speaker 2: these events may have influenced or been intended to influence
6:55
Speaker 2: congressional and public perceptions of the twenty sixteen presidential election,
7:00
Speaker 2: and I am concerned others may represent attempts to obstruct
7:04
Speaker 2: lawful oversight, and it continues with this quote. Through my
7:10
Speaker 2: role in leading production of the prior twenty sixteen ICA,
7:14
Speaker 2: I also knew that as recently a September of twenty sixteen,
7:18
Speaker 2: other elements of the intelligence community had pushed back during
7:21
Speaker 2: analytic coordination on warnings of Russian intent to influence the
7:25
Speaker 2: twenty sixteen presidential election, stating that such a judgment would
7:30
Speaker 2: be misleading, misleadings underlined. Yet by January, at least one
7:36
Speaker 2: of the intelligence community elements that had pushed back, the
7:39
Speaker 2: Federal Bureau of Investigation had seemingly altered its position and
7:44
Speaker 2: embraced a judgment of Russian intent to influence the election,
7:49
Speaker 2: seemingly without any new data other than the election's unexpected
7:54
Speaker 2: result and public speculation that Russia had hacked the vote,
8:00
Speaker 2: a scenario that we and the IC judged simply did
8:05
Speaker 2: not occur. As for the twenty seventeen ICA's judgment of
8:09
Speaker 2: a decisive Russian pressure preference for then candidate Donald Trump,
8:14
Speaker 2: I could not concur in good conscience based on information
8:18
Speaker 2: available and my professional analytic judgment, I did not rule
8:23
Speaker 2: the possibil ability out and was willing to be convinced,
8:27
Speaker 2: But I was not offered access to any of the
8:30
Speaker 2: supposedly dispositive reporting. When I was asked to review it
8:36
Speaker 2: as a one time read for almost anything relevant was
8:41
Speaker 2: normally provided.
8:42
Speaker 1: You've dealt with a lot of whistleblowers in your day,
8:46
Speaker 1: and there's a lot to beople come forward. When I
8:48
Speaker 1: was reading this, it was tweeted out by Tulsi and
8:50
Speaker 1: then yeah, you can see the redactions here obviously, but
8:54
Speaker 1: this actually to me seems like it's incredibly damning and
8:58
Speaker 1: also just comp completely on par with the rest of
9:03
Speaker 1: the story we've been told about the Russia hoax. It's like, yeah,
9:06
Speaker 1: this matches up. This makes sense.
9:08
Speaker 2: Look, it is clear that this was a lie. It
9:13
Speaker 2: is clear that Barack Obama and the entire intelligence community
9:18
Speaker 2: who peddled it to the American people, they knew it
9:22
Speaker 2: was a lie. What we now know is that they
9:24
Speaker 2: had whistleblowers within the intelligence community yelling from the mountaintops,
9:29
Speaker 2: this is a lie. This is a lie. This is
9:31
Speaker 2: a lie. And the political actors who made the decision
9:38
Speaker 2: to corrupt our law enforcement and intelligence operations did not
9:43
Speaker 2: care about the truth. They were happy to lie. They
9:46
Speaker 2: were happy to turn the machinery of the federal government
9:49
Speaker 2: against the newly elected president. They wanted the newly elected
9:51
Speaker 2: president to fail, and what they were attempting was quite
9:57
Speaker 2: literally a coup. It was to remove the president the
10:01
Speaker 2: American people had just elected. I understand that they're of
10:04
Speaker 2: a different party. I understand that they didn't vote for
10:06
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. But nobody in our government has the right
10:10
Speaker 2: to say, just because the person I don't like got
10:13
Speaker 2: elected president, I'm going to pervert the justice system to
10:18
Speaker 2: attack them with lies to try to remove them. That
10:21
Speaker 2: is profoundly corrupt, and I think it is also quite
10:26
Speaker 2: likely illegal. I'm very glad that Pambondi and the Department
10:29
Speaker 2: of Justices have created a strike force to investigate this
10:32
Speaker 2: because the pattern of criminality, of knowing criminality, and we
10:36
Speaker 2: talked about in last week's pod, how the George Soros
10:41
Speaker 2: Foundation did this very explicitly, according to emails that were released,
10:46
Speaker 2: previously classified emails that were released, did it very explicitly
10:50
Speaker 2: in concert with Hillary Clinton. She personally approved it in
10:53
Speaker 2: the middle of the campaign, and they knew it was
10:55
Speaker 2: just a political lie because she was concerned about the
10:59
Speaker 2: criticism she was getting for her email scandal, and so
11:02
Speaker 2: they decided to concoct this lie to try to distract people.
11:05
Speaker 2: And sadly, the FBI happily went along, the New York
11:09
Speaker 2: Times happily went along, the Washington Post happily went along.
11:13
Speaker 2: And every one of those supposedly impartial and unbiased institutions
11:18
Speaker 2: has been demonstrated to have been profoundly corrupted.
11:22
Speaker 1: What is your gut on what happens now? And I
11:26
Speaker 1: say this because look, it's obvious that the I think
11:30
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and his team and those Department of Justice, etc.
11:35
Speaker 1: Told see the list goes on on, They obviously are
11:39
Speaker 1: well read in on this. I doubt this whistle boiler
11:41
Speaker 1: just came forward in the last day or two. They're
11:45
Speaker 1: pretty well read in one where the ball is going
11:48
Speaker 1: on this one? Do you believe this is a pretty
11:50
Speaker 1: good indicator of what you can expect moving forward, that
11:53
Speaker 1: this may genuinely be the tip of the iceberg?
11:56
Speaker 2: Yeah? I think more is coming. And what I've heard,
12:00
Speaker 2: what I've verged Tulsi, what I've verged John Ratcliffe and
12:02
Speaker 2: Pam Bondi and Cash Ptel is engage in radical transparency.
12:07
Speaker 2: Let it all come out let it all be public.
12:09
Speaker 2: I've also urged them to do the same thing with
12:12
Speaker 2: COVID and doctor Fauci and the government's involvement in funding
12:17
Speaker 2: research at the Wuhan Lab and what they knowingly covered up.
12:22
Speaker 2: I think there was similarly a very deliberate cover up there,
12:25
Speaker 2: and I expect we're going to get more direct evidence
12:28
Speaker 2: of that in the coming weeks. I'm glad for that transparency.
12:31
Speaker 2: I think it is owed to the American people. It's
12:33
Speaker 2: the right thing to do, and it speaks volumes that
12:36
Speaker 2: when Democrats were in charge, they had zero interest in
12:40
Speaker 2: anyone knowing what actually happened.
12:42
Speaker 1: Final question on this one when you look at when
12:46
Speaker 1: this comes out, and there's so many questions, Now, if
12:49
Speaker 1: this whistle boy was telling the truth, No, reasonably they're not.
12:53
Speaker 1: But is this also going to encourage others to come
12:55
Speaker 1: forward to is? I mean a lot of times we'll
12:58
Speaker 1: see the dominoes come out.
13:00
Speaker 2: Look, I hope so and and Tulcy's tweet references other
13:03
Speaker 2: whistleblowers coming forward, So there may be others as well.
13:07
Speaker 2: They may have other whistleblower reports. It's possible they've been
13:09
Speaker 2: rolling these out one every other day or so and
13:13
Speaker 2: so there may be more that is coming. But if
13:15
Speaker 2: someone is inside saw what is happening and was outraged,
13:20
Speaker 2: this is indicating it's a time where people are interested
13:23
Speaker 2: in knowing the truth. That's a good sign. So I
13:25
Speaker 2: hope it encourages anyone with knowledge of criminal conduct, with
13:30
Speaker 2: knowledge of lives that were pushed by the Obama administration
13:33
Speaker 2: in the Russia hoax, to come forward and make that
13:36
Speaker 2: information public.
13:38
Speaker 1: You talk about corruption. By the way, Kamala Harris, now
13:41
Speaker 1: she's coming out on her book tour. Not a joke.
13:44
Speaker 1: She kicked it off and joined The Late Show with
13:46
Speaker 1: Stephen Colbert to do it. Harris coming out swinging, blasting
13:51
Speaker 1: Scotus for forgetting what quote democracy and the rule of
13:54
Speaker 1: law is quote unquote supposed to be. She also talked
13:58
Speaker 1: about her new book and the quote horrors of January
14:02
Speaker 1: sixth on The Late Show at Colbert as well. I
14:04
Speaker 1: mean this play a.
14:05
Speaker 2: Little bit from her announcement video on her new book,
14:08
Speaker 2: because I have to say, it's almost like a Saturday
14:12
Speaker 2: Night Live skin Give it a play.
14:14
Speaker 1: Yeah it is. This is her real announcement of her
14:16
Speaker 1: real book launch.
14:17
Speaker 3: Just over a year ago. I launched my campaign for
14:20
Speaker 3: President of the United States, one hundred and seven days
14:23
Speaker 3: traveling the country, fighting for our future, the shortest presidential
14:28
Speaker 3: campaign in modern history. It was intense, high stakes, and
14:34
Speaker 3: deeply personal for me and for so many of you.
14:38
Speaker 3: Since leaving office, I've spent a lot of time reflecting
14:42
Speaker 3: on those days, talking with my team, my family, my friends,
14:47
Speaker 3: and pulling my thoughts together. In essence, writing a journal
14:51
Speaker 3: that is this book one hundred and seven days. With
14:55
Speaker 3: candor and reflection, I've written a behind the scenes account
15:00
Speaker 3: of that journey. I believe there's value in sharing what
15:03
Speaker 3: I saw, what I learned, and what I know it
15:07
Speaker 3: will take to move forward. In writing this book, one
15:12
Speaker 3: truth kept coming back to me. Sometimes the fight takes
15:16
Speaker 3: a while, but I remain full of hope and I
15:20
Speaker 3: remain clear eyed. I will never stop fighting to make
15:24
Speaker 3: our country reflect the very best of its ideals. Always
15:30
Speaker 3: on behalf of the people. So thank you for being
15:33
Speaker 3: in this fight with me. I am forever grateful and
15:36
Speaker 3: I cannot wait for you to read this and I'll
15:40
Speaker 3: see you out there. Take care.
15:42
Speaker 1: I mean, it is Saturday Live worthy. It's also one
15:46
Speaker 1: of the funniest things ever because she's basically saying oh,
15:48
Speaker 1: by the way, I'm not going to run for governor
15:50
Speaker 1: in California. That came up as well, and it's like,
15:54
Speaker 1: here's my book on how bad my campaign sucked, but
15:56
Speaker 1: I'll rewrite the history and that and oh, by the way,
15:58
Speaker 1: I'm basically saying I'm probably gonna run again.
16:01
Speaker 2: Well, you know the script that she's reading there, that's
16:04
Speaker 2: clearly a script she's reading from a telepropter. And I
16:07
Speaker 2: just sort of love with candor and reflection, a behind
16:12
Speaker 2: the scenes tale. And look, it's so clearly written by
16:15
Speaker 2: a book publicist. The chances that there is anything resembling
16:19
Speaker 2: candor or reflection in this book are zero point zero percent.
16:23
Speaker 2: There is not. This is a a sanitized, whitewashed version
16:30
Speaker 2: of how you know, the good ship Lollipop was was
16:36
Speaker 2: derailed by by evil Donald J. Trump, by by evil voters.
16:40
Speaker 2: Oh those voters. And I got to say, it's interesting
16:47
Speaker 2: how little candor and reflection Kamala has. I want you
16:50
Speaker 2: to listen to her with Stephen Colbert. And if there
16:55
Speaker 2: is an even less gracious, kind, balanced, normal person on
17:01
Speaker 2: TV than Stephen Colbert, I don't know who that is.
17:04
Speaker 2: This is one partisan shrill to another, but listen to
17:08
Speaker 2: how neither one of them has learned anything from the
17:12
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four election. Give a listen.
17:14
Speaker 3: This is a time for people to you know, I mean, look,
17:17
Speaker 3: we designed our democracy with three independent, co equal branches
17:23
Speaker 3: of government. I mean, when you see that the President
17:27
Speaker 3: of the United States is trying to get rid of
17:28
Speaker 3: the Department of Education, and Congress has the role and
17:32
Speaker 3: responsibility to stand in the way of that, and they're
17:36
Speaker 3: just sitting on their hands, and then they go on
17:37
Speaker 3: recess because they don't want to deal with transparency.
17:40
Speaker 4: And the Supreme Court says, and the Supreme Court says
17:44
Speaker 4: that he can ignore law that established it.
17:46
Speaker 3: Yeah, but the Supreme Court, we knew what they were doing.
17:49
Speaker 3: Remember I talked about it in one hundred and seven days.
17:52
Speaker 3: I don't put that in the book.
17:53
Speaker 5: By the way, this is about this is an exclusive
17:58
Speaker 5: for the Stephen Colbert Show. But the Supreme Court basically
18:03
Speaker 5: gave whoever would be president.
18:06
Speaker 3: When I was in the campaign, I talking immunity. Immunity
18:12
Speaker 3: we talked about So we're not surprised what the Supreme
18:15
Speaker 3: Court is doing. And God thanked those members of the
18:18
Speaker 3: Court who are brilliant, the sents and remind us of
18:23
Speaker 3: what the democracy and the rule of law is supposed
18:27
Speaker 3: to be.
18:28
Speaker 1: You know, you hear that and it's like, what are
18:32
Speaker 1: you even talking about.
18:34
Speaker 2: There's so much in what she's saying that is incoherent
18:37
Speaker 2: and wrong. Let's start off where she's saying. Okay, the
18:43
Speaker 2: President is trying to abolish the Department of Education and
18:47
Speaker 2: Congresses is refusing to do its jobs. No, we actually
18:51
Speaker 2: agree with abolishing the Department of Education. This was something
18:55
Speaker 2: that the President campaigned on. And the reason the American
18:58
Speaker 2: people agree with abolishing the federal Department of Education, it's
19:01
Speaker 2: not because education doesn't matter, but precisely the opposite, because
19:05
Speaker 2: it matters so much that people are ticked off that
19:08
Speaker 2: a bunch of left wing, woke bureaucrats that you and
19:11
Speaker 2: Joe Biden appointed tried to take over schools, tried to
19:14
Speaker 2: indoctrinate kids, tried to push Marxist ideology in our children,
19:17
Speaker 2: and tried to convince them the boys were girls and
19:20
Speaker 2: girls were boys, and tried to let boys compete in
19:22
Speaker 2: girls sports and force this on schools. And the red
19:25
Speaker 2: tape and the bureaucracy and the waste and the ideology
19:28
Speaker 2: from the Department of education is precisely why President Trump
19:33
Speaker 2: is working to abolish it. And I've actually had Democrat
19:37
Speaker 2: senators say to me very much what Kamala is, Well, well,
19:41
Speaker 2: we're just the Senate is irrelevant because you're not stopping this.
19:44
Speaker 2: It's like, no, the Senate is relevant. In fact, we're
19:47
Speaker 2: voting on it. At one senator say this to me
19:50
Speaker 2: when we voted to shut down NPR and PBS. She
19:53
Speaker 2: was like, how can you be doing this? The Senate's
19:55
Speaker 2: not doing our job. I'm like, no, we're precisely doing
19:58
Speaker 2: our job. The American people are interested in spending billions
20:01
Speaker 2: of dollars to fund left wing propaganda. The irony is
20:06
Speaker 2: Kamala frames what she's saying as a defensive democracy. What
20:10
Speaker 2: she's mad at is democracy. What she's mad at is
20:13
Speaker 2: the American people elected Donald Trump. What she's mad at
20:16
Speaker 2: is the American people elected a Republican House. What she's
20:19
Speaker 2: mad at is the American people elected a Republican Senate.
20:22
Speaker 2: And she's really really mad that President Trump and the
20:26
Speaker 2: Republican Senate and the Republican House are doing what they
20:29
Speaker 2: said they would do. In other words, they are honoring
20:32
Speaker 2: and respecting democracy by carrying out the campaign promises they
20:35
Speaker 2: told the American people, and that infuriates them. And the
20:40
Speaker 2: irony of her claiming that she believes in democracy. This
20:46
Speaker 2: was an administration, the Biden Harris administration that repeatedly indicted
20:52
Speaker 2: her political opponent, Donald Trump. This was an administration. Democrats
20:56
Speaker 2: across the country try to remove Trump's name from the
20:59
Speaker 2: ballot because nothing says protecting democracy like stopping the voters
21:04
Speaker 2: from voting for your opponent. This is an administration. Kamala
21:07
Speaker 2: Harris has demonstrated utter and complete contempt for democracy. And
21:13
Speaker 2: so when she says, well, gosh, we must defend democracy,
21:17
Speaker 2: what she means is we need radical left wing policies
21:23
Speaker 2: and if the voters don't like them, to hell with
21:26
Speaker 2: the voters. We want them anyway. That's what she's saying.
21:30
Speaker 2: And by the way, when she's denouncing the courts, what
21:33
Speaker 2: she's really saying is she wants radical unelected judges to
21:37
Speaker 2: ignore the will of the voters, to ignore democracy, and
21:40
Speaker 2: to force her very unpopular policies on the American people anyway.
21:44
Speaker 2: Doing things like she doesn't want illegal immigrants, Venezuelan gang members,
21:51
Speaker 2: murderers and rapists and child molester her She doesn't want
21:53
Speaker 2: them arrested, she doesn't want them deported, and she wants
21:57
Speaker 2: these radical judges that she was responsible along with Joe
22:00
Speaker 2: Biden for appointing, to stand up and say, we don't
22:03
Speaker 2: care what the American people voted for. We are going
22:07
Speaker 2: to decreate release more illegal immigrants into your neighborhood. Because
22:11
Speaker 2: that's who the Democrat Party represents today.
22:15
Speaker 1: By the way, you mentioned represent the Democratic Party. Kama
22:18
Speaker 1: Harris was asked a question by Stephen Colbert and it's
22:21
Speaker 1: one that went viral. It is the biggest question that's
22:25
Speaker 1: being asked in the political world right now. Who is
22:28
Speaker 1: in charge of the Democratic Party? And I want you
22:32
Speaker 1: to hear this word, salad and get your take on it.
22:35
Speaker 1: Take a listen.
22:37
Speaker 4: Who's leaving the Democratic Party. I'm just curious.
22:40
Speaker 3: There are lots of leaders and we're generally.
22:42
Speaker 4: A leader of the Democratic Party, you know, like, oh,
22:45
Speaker 4: that's the leader Donative Party. Who comes to mind.
22:48
Speaker 3: I think there are a lot of I'm not going
22:50
Speaker 3: to go through names because then I'm going to leave
22:52
Speaker 3: somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it.
22:54
Speaker 3: But let me just let me say this. I think
22:58
Speaker 3: it is a mistake for us who want to figure
23:03
Speaker 3: out how to get out and through this and get
23:06
Speaker 3: out of it. To put it on the shoulders of
23:10
Speaker 3: any one person, it's really on all of our shoulders.
23:14
Speaker 2: It really is.
23:17
Speaker 1: All of our shoulders. It's not a great answer, is it.
23:21
Speaker 2: Well, Look, look, I actually have a little bit of
23:23
Speaker 2: sympathy for her, because there's no way to answer that.
23:25
Speaker 2: The real answer is there is no leader of the
23:27
Speaker 2: Democrat Party. They are leaderless. They are rudderless. They are
23:30
Speaker 2: running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Look,
23:33
Speaker 2: who would you say. You could say Chuck Schumer. But
23:36
Speaker 2: Chuck Schumer's not leading anything. He's utterly terrified of AOC.
23:41
Speaker 2: Whatever AOC in the squad demands, that's what Schumer does.
23:43
Speaker 2: So she's not gonna say Chuck Schumer because the audience
23:45
Speaker 2: would laugh if she said Chuck Schumer. They'd laugh if
23:48
Speaker 2: she said a Keen Jeffries. Most of them would say,
23:51
Speaker 2: who's that? Like, he's not leading anything. He's just in
23:53
Speaker 2: the House, and in both the Senate and House. Schumer
23:57
Speaker 2: and Jeffries are essentially just in by rage and hatred
24:01
Speaker 2: to Donald Trump. They don't have an agenda beyond open
24:04
Speaker 2: borders and lawlessness and hatred to Donald Trump. That's the
24:07
Speaker 2: entirety of the Democrat Party. And then beyond that, you've
24:11
Speaker 2: got all their ambitious governors. You know, Gavin Newsom is
24:13
Speaker 2: desperately trying to be super liberal and supermoderate whatever you want,
24:17
Speaker 2: and slick it all around. And suddenly he knows boys
24:20
Speaker 2: aren't girls until tomorrow and then boys are girls. But
24:23
Speaker 2: she can't say him either, and so there is no
24:26
Speaker 2: answer she can give because this is a rudderless party.
24:29
Speaker 2: And to the extent there is a leader, it is
24:32
Speaker 2: the pro Hamas contingent, It is AOC, it is ilhan Omar.
24:36
Speaker 2: It is the extreme left wing squad that is driving
24:44
Speaker 2: the rest of the party and that everyone else in
24:45
Speaker 2: the party is terrified of.
24:48
Speaker 1: Yeah, it's amazing. It is actually fun for once to
24:51
Speaker 1: watch the Democratic Party from top to bottom being just
24:56
Speaker 1: complete and utter disarray, because, honest.
25:01
Speaker 2: You got to play one more clip. You got to
25:02
Speaker 2: play the clip when when when Colbert asked if she
25:05
Speaker 2: was running for governor.
25:06
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is amazing. Take a listen.
25:09
Speaker 4: Today, you made an announcement that you're not running for
25:12
Speaker 4: the governor of California. Correct, You said you're going to
25:15
Speaker 4: set this one out, Why are you saying this? Are
25:17
Speaker 4: you saving yourself for a different office that obviously people
25:22
Speaker 4: will project onto.
25:24
Speaker 3: And honestly that it's more perhaps basic than that. I
25:29
Speaker 3: am Listen, I am a devout public servant. I have
25:33
Speaker 3: spent my entire career in service of the people. But
25:38
Speaker 3: to be very candid with you, I had to defend
25:41
Speaker 3: my decision to become a prosecutor with my family is
25:44
Speaker 3: why is it then, when we think we want to
25:46
Speaker 3: improve a system or change it, that we're always on
25:49
Speaker 3: the outside on Ben Didnee or trying to break down
25:52
Speaker 3: the door. Shouldn't we also be inside the system? And
25:55
Speaker 3: that has been my career. Recently, I made the decision
25:58
Speaker 3: that I just now I don't want to go back
26:01
Speaker 3: in the system. I think it's broken.
26:04
Speaker 1: I think it's broken. You can't make that up either.
26:07
Speaker 2: But you know what's broken about it?
26:10
Speaker 1: What is the head that she lost?
26:13
Speaker 2: That's her whole definition of whether the system is working
26:17
Speaker 2: or it's broken. It is broken because the American people
26:20
Speaker 2: voted for Donald Trump and not for Kamala Harris. It
26:22
Speaker 2: is broken because the American people voted for a Republican Senate,
26:26
Speaker 2: not a Democrat Senate. It is broken and in her
26:28
Speaker 2: view because the American people voted for a Republican House
26:31
Speaker 2: and not a Democrat house. In her view, democracy the
26:36
Speaker 2: system only works when she and other left wing lunatics
26:40
Speaker 2: are in power. That's how she defines whether it's working
26:44
Speaker 2: or whether it's broken. It is purely it is one
26:47
Speaker 2: hundred percent about power. And look, look part of why,
26:53
Speaker 2: to be honest, you and I we don't listen to
26:56
Speaker 2: Stephen Colbert, and we very rarely listened to Kamala Harris.
26:59
Speaker 2: The reason why we're playing this exchange is because it
27:02
Speaker 2: really does show that there's not a moment of reflection.
27:07
Speaker 2: You know what she had in her book promo about
27:09
Speaker 2: candor and whatever, There's none of that. She continues four
27:15
Speaker 2: years of a disastrous agenda, open borders, twelve million illegal immigrants,
27:21
Speaker 2: the worst illegal immigration in our nation's history. She takes
27:23
Speaker 2: no responsibility for that, doesn't acknowledge that, abandoning all of
27:27
Speaker 2: our friends and allies, going from peace and prosperity to
27:30
Speaker 2: two simultaneous wars across the globe. She takes no responsibility
27:34
Speaker 2: for that. The Democrat Party becoming rabidly anti Semitic, her
27:39
Speaker 2: funders funding violent anti Semitic riots on college campuses. She
27:43
Speaker 2: takes no responsibility for that. That there's not at all
27:48
Speaker 2: an acknowledgment of Gosh, people voted for Donald Trump in
27:54
Speaker 2: significant part because they were really, really really unhappy with
27:59
Speaker 2: the radical policies that Joe Biden Kamala Harris put in place.
28:04
Speaker 2: No acknowledgment of that at all, and their view the
28:07
Speaker 2: system is broken. Why because the democracy is functioning. To
28:12
Speaker 2: her mind, if the voters can vote her out, the
28:15
Speaker 2: system is broken. That is the essence of the contempt
28:20
Speaker 2: that today's Democrat party has for big D democracy.
28:26
Speaker 1: Don't forget We do this show Monday, Wednesday and Friday,
28:28
Speaker 1: So hit that subscriber auto download button wherever you get
28:32
Speaker 1: your podcasts and the Center and I will see you
28:34
Speaker 1: back here in a couple of days