Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Harvard And Their Patron Saint Of Donations, Jeffrey Epstein

Transcript

Harvard And Their Patron Saint Of Donations, Jeffrey Epstein · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Going to talk about harvard and jeffrey epstein now everybody
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: listening to this podcast everybody following this case knows for
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: a fact that jeffrey epstein had a very very comfortable
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: and cozy relationship with many many scientists and a good
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: portion of those scientists and academics were based at harvard Now,
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: the other day when the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: made their ruling, I said right away, why is there
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: a judge from Harvard overseeing this ruling? Now, even if
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: Judge Newsom is completely not tainted and he's unbiased and
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: all of that jazz, it's about optics. Don't these people
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: understand that optics matter? There should have been a different
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: judge who sat on that panel. Not somebody with ties
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: to Harvard, not somebody who could have had ties to
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: any of these people that Epstein was funding. It's just,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: it's ridiculous on its face that a judge from Harvard
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: would be tasked to sit on the three-judge panel. You're
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: telling me there's not another judge on that panel that
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: could have sat for that hearing? Harvard is an absolute
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: den of scum and villainy, in my opinion. These people
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: are horrendous. And the way that they covered up their
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: relationship with Jeffrey Epstein for so long is enough to
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: make your head spin. Anybody who's sending their kid to
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: Harvard at this point... I don't even know what to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: tell you. Talk about a waste of money. Plenty of
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: better universities to send your children at this point. These
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: so-called higher education institutions, these Ivy League schools, are the
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: absolute worst, in my opinion. The absolute worst. And we
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: see it time and time again when we hear stories
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: like this. And we hear about how Jeffrey Epstein was
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: associated with all of these high-profile universities and he had
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: an office at Harvard and he was given this one
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: money and he was... donating money to this program, and
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: he was dropping off Gucci bags full of dough to
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: this one. You know, come on. Enough is enough already.
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: And these are the same institutions that will stand atop
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: their ivory towers and scream down at the rest of
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: us about how we should live our lives? The party's
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: over for them as well. The academics are on notice.
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: We've been talking about the academics on this podcast from
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: the jump. These people are the kind of folks that
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: are usually sliding underneath the spotlight. But what we've learned
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: in this case is that these academics are just as
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: sick as their buddies in the financial sector, it seems.
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: So let's jump into this article by the Daily Mail
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: and see what they have to say. This article is
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: from the Daily Mail. The author is Francis Mulraney. Headline?
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: Harvard math professor is placed on leave for giving Jeffrey
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: Epstein his own office on campus and allowing the school's
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: website to be used to burnish the pedophile's reputation after
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: his 2008 conviction. Review finds. Now, again, remember, this is
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: after his first conviction, folks, okay? We're not talking about
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: previously where they can make pretend and at least try
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: and make the case, well, we didn't know he hadn't
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: been arrested, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. No. This is
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: after the fact. This is how corrupt people are when
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: it comes to money. They don't care who's going to
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: fund their science or who is giving them an endowment.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: As long as they're getting the money, as long as
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: their project's moving forward to hell with what the person
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: has done previously in their lives, who cares if they're
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: a child molester, a sex trafficker? Nah, no big deal.
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: Give me some of your money. And then these people
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: are shocked. When it comes out, and there's an uproar,
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: and the public is enraged? I don't understand what planet
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: these people think they live on, but they're certainly not
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: living on planet Earth. They have a completely separate reality
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: from the rest of us, and that's where they live,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: and within their reality, all of their actions make sense. Meanwhile,
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: any civilized person who's taking a look at their actions
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: knows that these people are sick and twisted. A Harvard
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: math professor was placed on administrative leave Friday after a
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: damning new report claimed he had continued to maintain an
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: office on campus for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein even
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: after the deceased financier's, pedophiles, 2008 sex crimes conviction. Martin Nowak,
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: the lead on Harvard's program for evolutionary dynamics, provided Epstein
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: with a campus keycard, which allowed him to visit more
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: than 40 times between 2010 and 2018, the report states.
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: Now imagine, you're a parent, and you send your kid
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: to Harvard, thinking they're going to get this great education,
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: they're going to be, you know, 10 steps ahead of
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: everybody else who didn't go to Harvard, etc., etc., and
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: they show up and they have Martin Nowak as one
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: of their professors. Well, because they have Martin Nowak as
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: one of their professors, they're now exposed to Jeffrey Epstein.
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: As a parent, do you think you would be comfortable
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: with that? I know I certainly wouldn't be. A convicted
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: sex offender having an office on the Harvard campus, running
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: around with a bunch of girls that are, you know, 18,
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: 19 years old? This is a good idea? And for
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: the Harvard brass to act like they had no idea,
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: that's ridiculous. There needs to be a purging of the
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: board at Harvard the same way the New York Academy
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: of Art needs to be purged. These people are sick.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: A room in the department was established as Jeffrey's office
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: and Epstein, who died by apparent suicide in Manhattan jail
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: in 2019, even had his own Harvard phone line. Again,
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: So for the higher-ups to act like they didn't know
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: what was going on, it's a joke, okay? So who
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: set up the phone line? The IT department? So the
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: IT director didn't know what was going on? The IT
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: director didn't kick that up? These investigations are a bunch
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: of BS, alright? These investigations We never see the people
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: in charge get in trouble with these internal investigations. What
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: we see is the low-hanging fruit. The easy person to
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: axe is who they go after. Never the CEO. Never
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: the trustees. None of that shit. It's always the professor. Like,
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: it's just the professor's fault. Now, don't get me wrong.
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: NOAC should shoulder a majority of the blame for bringing
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Epstein around. But what about his bosses? Is there no
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: responsibility for those who are overseeing the department? A report
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: added that Nowak also signed off on false, flattering statements
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: about Epstein for the school's website as the deceased financier, pedophile,
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: attempted to rehabilitate his image after his 2008 conviction for
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: soliciting sex from an underage girl. And again, how many
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: times do we talk about enablers on the podcast? We
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: have different rings of people who helped Jeffrey Epstein do
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: what he did, and Nowak is definitely an enabler. He
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: helped to rehabilitate his image. He gave him an office
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: on Harvard. He gave him the credibility of Jeffrey Epstein saying, well,
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: I'm invited back to Harvard. Why won't you invite me
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: to your party? If they let me at Harvard, I mean,
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: how bad can I be? And you see, this is
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: the problem with all of the enablers. And this is
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: why all of the enablers must be called out. Because
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: without their actions, without them enabling Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein would
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: have no... There would have been no way Epstein would
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: have been active the way he was and conduct business
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: the way he did. The professor's alleged actions came after
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: the then Harvard president had barred the school from accepting
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: any further donations from Epstein in 2008. So... They don't
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: have any control over what's going on, is what they're saying.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: The president of the board has no say on who
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: has an office at Harvard or how their professors conduct
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: themselves or who they associate with. What are you trying
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: to say here? Are you trying to say that Harvard,
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: there's no leadership structure and everybody just does what they want?
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: Because for the last 11 years, nobody said shit about this. Now,
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden, it's a big problem, huh? Now,
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: all of a sudden, Harvard cares. You're not fooling me, Harvard.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: You don't care. It's all about optics at this point.
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: It's all about saving face. You never cared about the survivors,
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: and you still don't care about the survivors. Epstein pumped $ 9. 2
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: million in donations into the university between 1998 and 2007,
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: according to the month-long investigation carried out by Harvard's General
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: Counsel and an outside law firm. Again, Harvard's General Counsel?
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: So you're telling me that the internal lawyer for Harvard
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: is going to give this a look and give it
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: a real unbiased look and not care if Harvard leaves
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: with a black eye. Yeah, okay. Who's paying his salary, folks?
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: That's right, Harvard. Do you really think this man is
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: going to do a pristine job or this woman is
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: going to do a pristine job of looking into this
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: case and unfurling all of the facts as they are?
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: Or are they going to hide a couple of things,
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: put something in their pocket? We'll report this, but we
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: won't report that. Now, I'm not saying that's what happened
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: because I don't know. What I am saying though is
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: I do not believe for a second that we can
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: believe that a place like Harvard or Yale or any
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: of these corporations is going to be transparent when they're
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: investigating themselves. He was known for using his money to
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: gain access to academics, professing an interest in science, and
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: he earned a reputation for funding some of America's most
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: prestigious institutions, such as MIT and Harvard. Yeah, we know that.
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: And it wasn't just those institutions either. There were a
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: lot of state universities that he was involved with. We
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: know that at Arizona State, with Lawrence Krauss, he had
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: involvement there as well, as we touched on recently. So
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: it's not just the most prestigious institutions. It's any institution
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: where Jeffrey Epstein felt like he could get a foothold
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: and benefit from a relationship with a university. In return,
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: Epstein was welcomed onto campuses and given the opportunity to
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: meet with faculty. He would also invite academics to his
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: private Caribbean island. Oh, I'm sure he would. Because, as
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: you all know, in my opinion, all of these academics,
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: for the most part, are just as sick as his
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: political buddies. You're telling me all of these nerds, and
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: that's what these academics are, folks, make no mistake, that
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: all of these nerds who never got girls in high school,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: probably never got girls in college, get invited... to Jeffrey
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: Epstein's island, and there's all these beautiful girls running around,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: and Epstein says, you know, the island is yours. You're
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: telling me that these dudes weren't involved? They didn't know
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: what was going on? They didn't know that there was
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: a bunch of young girls running around this island? Give
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: me a break. Give me a break. And we already know...
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: about guys like Minsky. We already know what Virginia Roberts
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: has said about Marvin Minsky. And to think that any
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: of these other academics or scientists weren't partaking as well,
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: I don't believe that. In my opinion, there's zero chance
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: that that was occurring. The report published Friday expanded on
• 11:50
  Speaker 1: what was already known about Epstein's link with Harvard, claiming
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: that his presence on campus continued even after the university's
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: then-president Drew Gilpin, Drew, excuse me, Drew Gilpin Fost barred
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: any more donations from the pedophile. About $ 200, 000 of the
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: funding provided by Epstein before the cutoff in 2008 remains unspent,
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: the school said, and will be given to groups that
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: support victims of sexual violence. And that's always their go-to, right?
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: It's going to be given to groups that support sexual
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: violence or human trafficking. Who are these groups? Why don't
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: all of these... people who accepted money from Jeffrey Epstein,
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: get in contact with the lawyers of the survivors and
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: try and coordinate with them to see where this money
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: should go. Maybe the survivors have a charity that this
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: money should be donated to. You know, the people directly
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: affected by your decisions at Harvard, maybe you should try
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: and help those people out. The report found that while
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: Harvard's top leaders cut ties with Epstein in 2008, he
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: maintained close ties with NOAC, a math professor and director
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: of the Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, a research center created
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: in 2003 with $ 6. 5 million from Epstein. So it wasn't
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: just a funded project, okay, folks? He created the division.
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: He put up six and a half million dollars in
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: seed money to create the division at Harvard. Now you
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: mean to tell me that none of the presidents, none
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: of the trustees, none of the board members knew who
• 13:34
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein was or what he was up to? I
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: know this was in 2003, but come on, the rumors
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: were already swirling. And yet Harvard had no problem sliding
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: right into bed with this serpent. It's one of those
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: cases where it's just, you look at it and you
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: say to yourself, how is it even possible that something
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: like this could even occur? I mean, it's just crazy, folks.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: It is just crazy as hell. NOAC gave Epstein an
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: office at the program's building in Harvard Square, the review found,
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: and circumvented campus security rules to grant the financier, pedophile,
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: a key card and unlimited access to the facility. Now,
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: we know from firsthand accounts from Maria Farmer and others
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: that Ghislaine Maxwell used to love to cruise places like
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: Central Park looking for nubiles. Now, you mean to tell
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: me that a campus like Harvard wouldn't be prime hunting
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: ground for Jeffrey Epstein and his stooges to try and
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: lure girls into his atmosphere with these promises and all
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: of these pipe dreams that he loved to pass out?
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: It's a very uncomfortable thought to think that a sexual
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: predator and a man like Jeffrey Epstein had access to
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: a campus like Harvard with his own office. It's really
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: disturbing to think about. Epstein frequently visited Office 610, which
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: was known as Jeffrey's office, and met with scholars to
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: hear about their work, the review found. He brought his
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: own rug and hung his own photos on the wall.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: And none of the administrators knew, huh? None of the
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: administrators ever ventured down to this wing of the school?
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: None of the board members ever went and checked in
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: on what Mr. Nowak was up to? Wasn't important or something? Or,
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: you know, you guys just sit in your ivory-towered office
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: all day, drinking spritzers and eating caviar? What the hell
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: is going on over there? Nowak argued that the office
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: was Epstein's in name only, the report says, but others
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: in the building said it was commonly known to be
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: reserved for the pedophile. So, all those people that said
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: it was commonly reserved for Epstein, where were you outing this?
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: Why were you quiet? Why were you being complicit? I
• 15:49
  Speaker 1: have news for you. Anywhere I'm at, somebody like Jeffrey
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: Epstein walks in the building, there's going to be a
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: few words that tumble out of my mouth. For these
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: people just to sit by and let this man have
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: an office within their wing of the campus, it's gross.
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: We do not take this step lightly, but the seriousness
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: of the matter leads us to believe it is not
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: appropriate for Professor Nowak to continue in his role, wrote
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: Claudine Gay, Dean of Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences,
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: of the decision to place Nowak on leave. You should
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: all be placed on leave. If I had a kid
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: at Harvard, I'd be going crazy right now. I would
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: be at the campus demanding that people are fired. It's
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: not just the professor's fault. It's definitely a majority of
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: the blame falls on his shoulders, but there's no institutional control.
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: So how can we believe that this isn't still going
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: on or won't go on in the future when Harvard
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: refuses to take the reins and have some sort of
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: institutional control over what's going on within its buildings? Harvard's
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: report urges the university to develop clearer procedures for reviewing
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: potentially controversial gifts and for enforcing bans on certain donors.
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: Bacow said he has instructed top officials to implement the
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: suggestions as soon as possible. Yeah, about two decades too late.
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: All of a sudden, now it's a big deal because
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: you're in the media? All of a sudden, because you're
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: tied to Jeffrey Epstein? You're going to institute all of
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: these new steps? A place like Harvard should have all
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: of their ducks in a row from the jump. It
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: shouldn't need outside pressure from content creators, legacy media, and
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: survivors to do the right thing. A place like Harvard,
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: where they're basically teaching and educating the leaders of tomorrow,
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: should have, at the very least, a bit of a
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: moral compass, in my opinion. We will always do our
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: best to improve, Bacow said in a campus message on Friday.
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: The report issued today describes principled decision-making, but also reveals
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: institutional and individual shortcomings that must be addressed, not only
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: for the sake of the university, but also in recognition
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: of the courageous individuals who sought to bring Epstein to justice.
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: So now all of a sudden he's talking about, oh yeah,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: and I want to make sure that I let everybody
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: know that the survivors are brave. Well, that's nice. Lip
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: service is nice and all, but what are you doing
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: for the survivors? What are you doing? Have you reached
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: out to them as a university to apologize? At the
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: very least, you think that would be a step that
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: should be taken, right? I know if I was in
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: charge of this university, I'd be on the phone with
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: every single one of these gals that has come forward
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: with a claim against Epstein, and I'd be apologizing for
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: for the university's role in enabling Jeffrey Epstein's behavior because
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: this is just, this is outrageous. Epstein killed himself in
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: his New York City prison cell, allegedly, in August after
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: he was arrested on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: not guilty to sexually abusing girls as young as 14
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: and young women in New York and Florida in the
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: early 2000s. In lawsuits, women say the abuse spanned decades.
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: Among other allegations against Nowak, the report alleged that he
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: allowed his program's website to be used to burnish Epstein's
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: reputation after his 2008 conviction. Boy, isn't that nice. Talk
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: about enabling Jeffrey Epstein. This Martin Nowak character? Top notch enabler.
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: Imagine a Harvard professor vouching for you amongst his buddies
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: and his friends and, hey, if Nowak says he's cool,
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: he must be cool, right? In reality, NOAC was just
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: another one of Jeffrey Epstein's stooges, it looks like, and
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: another one that didn't care a lick about Epstein's crimes.
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: He only cared how deep he could get his hand
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: into Jeffrey Epstein's pocket. In 2013, at the request of
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: Epstein's publicist, Nowak agreed to post links to the pedophile's websites,
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: which had flattering descriptions of Epstein and made false claims
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: about his levels of giving to Harvard, the review found.
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I'm sure they did. They had to throw
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: that in there, right? False claims of giving. Yeah, I
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: think we need a second look at that, a more
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: stringent look at that. Nowak is also accused of devoting
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: a page on the program's website to Epstein, also at
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: the request of the financier's publicist. Pedophile's publicist, you mean.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: There's no evidence that Harvard's top officials knew about the postings,
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: the report says. Epstein's page on the website was removed
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: in 2014 after Harvard received complaints from a sexual assault
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: survivors group. The report concludes that Harvard's senior leaders acted
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: appropriately in their dealings with Epstein. Of course it does.
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: Has there ever been one of these internal reports that
• 20:52
  Speaker 1: really put the management structure on blast? Has there ever
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: been one of these reports that really did the right
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: thing and outed all of the rats at the top? Nope,
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: never does. Always the low-hanging fruit. Just like the prison guards,
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: Harvard as an institution is no different from the corrupt
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice. Sorry, folks, just the facts. Former President
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: Drew Foss decided to bar donations from Epstein after his conviction,
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: the review says, and a university dean rejected a 2013
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: request from some faculty to reconsider the decision, saying it
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: would be inconsistent with Harvard's values. Okay, some faculty, let's
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: get the names of those faculty members that thought it
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: was a good idea after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: his crimes... to take donations from him. Can we have
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: their names, please? Put their names out so we can
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: disgust them and their disgusting behavior. But some faculty enjoyed
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: close ties with Epstein. The report says a number, just
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: a number, no names, no specific number, nothing, of faculty
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: members visited Epstein at his homes in New York, Florida,
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: New Mexico, and the Virgin Islands. Again, this is, I
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: want names, all right? The report needs to name all
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: of the professors involved so we can go through them
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: one by one and figure out what their role was
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: in the epstein organization because obviously that's not a job
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: that the prosecutors want to do it's not a job
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: that the legacy media in america wants to do they
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: leave it up to the daily mail to do the
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: right thing so can we get those names so that
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: we can get busy building the blueprint Some said they
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: visited him in jail or took trips on his planes.
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: The visits were done in a personal capacity, the report said,
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: and do not appear to violate Harvard rules. Yeah, I
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: don't care if it's personal, professional, whatever it may be.
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: If you're one of my employees and you think it's
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: a good idea to go hang out with Jeffrey Epstein
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: and in turn that's going to cause my business problems... Well,
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: I got news for you. You're out on your ass.
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: You're fired. All right? A, because it's bad business, and B,
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: because I don't want to be associated with somebody hanging
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: out with Jeffrey Epstein. Yet these faculty members, unnamed by
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: the way, at Harvard have no problem. In fact, they're
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: writing to the administration saying that they should be able
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: to accept donations from this man. What a bunch of sick,
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: disgusting bastards. In total, Epstein made more than 20 donations
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: to Harvard, the largest of which was the $ 6. 5 million
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: to NOAC's research group. Smaller donations supported faculty research in psychology, economics, art,
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: and education. Although his gifts were blocked after 2008, the
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: report found that Harvard accepted $ 736, 000 between his arrest and conviction.
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: So while Jeffrey Epstein was on trial and waiting to
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: be convicted, Harvard was still accepting donations from him. In
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: their infinite wisdom, as one of the top tier universities
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: in the world... They couldn't figure out that taking money
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: from Jeffrey Epstein was a bad idea. Yet we're going
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: to listen to these guys about geopolitical issues or about
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: health issues or about economics issues. Sorry, Harvard is a
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: shit school in my opinion, okay? That's right. I said it.
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: A shit school. Most went to Harvard's medical school, while 150,000
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: went to its faculty of arts and sciences. We all
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: know how he loves the arts programs, right? He loves
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: naive art students. He loves naive artists. Jeffrey Epstein was
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: a sick and disgusting bastard, and Harvard enabled his behavior.
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: Point blank, period. Harvard President Lawrence Bacow called for the
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: review in September 2019 amid public outcry over the university's
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: relationship with Epstein. Other schools have faced similar scrutiny, including
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: nearby Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which revealed in January that
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: Epstein donated $ 750, 000 and visited the campus at least nine
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: times after his conviction. The former director of MIT's fan
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: media lab, Joy Ito, resigned last year amid uproar over
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: his ties to Epstein. He issued a public apology and
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: vowed to raise money for victims of trafficking. That's what
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: they all say when they get busted, right? Oh, well,
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry that I took part in... hurting the survivors
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: of Epstein, but what I'm gonna do now, is I'm
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: gonna raise money for victims of trafficking. That's what I'm
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: gonna do, because that makes everything better. To these people,
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: money makes the world go round. They have no conscience,
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: they have no moral compass, and they do not care
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: about me, you, or your children. Get it through your heads, folks.
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: These people do not care. We're up against some of
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: the most evil people in the history of the world,
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: And all of these enablers, all of these people that
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: vouched for Jeffrey Epstein, all of these people that were
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: in his inner circle, all of these people that he
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: used to refurbish his image, all of you were disgusting
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: ass excuses for human beings. And as the information continues
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: to roll out and the names continue to come into
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: the light, we will continue to to talk about all
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: of the people who were involved with Jeffrey Epstein and
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: his criminal organization until they all face justice. If you'd
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: like to contact me, you can do that at bobbycapucci
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-I at protonmail.com. You can also...