Latest / Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags / Mike Davis: Ilhan Omar's Home Raid, the RICO Threat, and the Judges Who Should Be Impeached

Transcript

Mike Davis: Ilhan Omar's Home Raid, the RICO Threat, and the Judges Who Should Be Impeached · Unshaken & Unafraid with Joe Pags

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This Democrat judge ordered this home raid on a leading
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Democrat member of Tom Brady. She would be disqualified to
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: serve in the House. And I imagine that the Trump
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: Justice Department is going to give her a giant Christmas
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: gift in the form of a federal indictment for many charges,
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: including rape. There's no one who I'd like to see
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: in prison more than James Comey. I think the guy
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: is a scumbag.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: There are several possibilities when it comes to Ilhan Omar,
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: and her not being a citizen is just about the
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: answer on all of them, save for maybe one. If
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: she's not a citizen, what now? I mean, can she
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: go to jail here? I mean, is this bad enough
• 0:40
  Speaker 2: that she might have lied about her immigration status? I
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: don't know. Let's get with Mike Davis, Article 3 Project
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: founder and president, Article3Project. org. Mike, good to see you. How
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: are you doing?
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: Thank you for having me. I'm very good, especially after
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: this Ilhan Omar home raid.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: Dude, I got to tell you something. I spelled it
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: out in my head, and it seems to make sense
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: this way. I want you to say yes or no
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: to all of this. Either she came here at 17
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: and was naturalized with her father, who was naturalized, or
• 1:09
  Speaker 2: she came here at 18 and wasn't naturalized with her father.
• 1:12
  Speaker 2: therefore not a citizen, if her father was even naturalized.
• 1:15
  Speaker 2: Or her father was never naturalized to begin with. He
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: wasn't a citizen. She's not a citizen. And number five, oh,
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: she might have married her brother as well, and it
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: looks awfully good like she did. Out of this whole thing,
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: there's an 80% chance that she did something wrong out
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: of those five options.
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: What do you see? Well, I think you're spot on.
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: First of all, if that's even her father, we don't
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: even know if it's her father, but if the guy
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: who claimed to be her father is her father, He
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: is likely ineligible for asylum and naturalization because he was
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: a colonel in the Somali military. He was a warlord, right?
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: He's pretending like he was escaping persecution. He was the
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: one perpetuating the persecution in Somalia. So he would not
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: be qualified under our asylum laws there to get citizenship.
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: So therefore she would lose her citizenship that way if,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: if she claimed as a minor that she had derivative citizenship,
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: so she would lose it because he didn't have legitimate citizenship.
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: So she did not have legitimate citizenship as a minor
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: for derivative. There's pretty strong evidence that she lied on
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: her paperwork and said that she was 17 when in
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: fact she could have been 18, right? That's the allegation.
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: And so if that's the case, She would not have
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: derivative citizenship at all through her father, whether the colonel
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: was her father or someone else was her father. We're
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: not sure who her real father was, according to the
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: DOJ pleadings that said that Ilhan Omar went by an alias,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: another name, right? And then, as you said, there's the
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: issue of marrying, potentially marrying her brother, her second husband.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: So she had a first husband. who was a Somali.
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: And then during this time, she allegedly or apparently married
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: her gay brother. And then during that time, the gay
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: brother slash husband's living with her and her first husband.
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: I don't know what the hell they do in Somalia,
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: but America, you can't marry your brother.
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: And then apparently she divorced her gay brother, allegedly. And
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: then She's married now to this third husband, her white knight, right?
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: And then there's another problem for Ilan Omar Joe.
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: It's her income, right? With the U.S. House, you have
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: to disclose your income as a member. So she discloses
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: a modest income one year. And then with her white
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: knight third husband, she discloses $ 30 million the next year
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: and says that she has this wine business.
• 4:01
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: And then she gets caught. Apparently there were like empty
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: barrels of wine or that's the reporting. And so she
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: amends her financial disclosures the third year back to a
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: modest income. But the problem is she doesn't explain how
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: she goes from modest to 30 million back to modest. Right.
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: And so, look, remember with this home raid and your
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: viewers need to hear this. This was signed. by a D.C.
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: magistrate judge, Matthew Sharbaugh is this magistrate judge's name. Let
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: me tell you about Judge Matthew Sharbaugh. He is a Democrat.
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: He donated to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. He clerked for
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: an Obama judge in D.C. twice, once when the judge
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: was on the D.C. District Court, and then when that
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: judge got elevated to the D.C. Circuit, the highest court
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: in the land, Matthew Sharbaugh clerked for him again. So
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: that shows you He's clerking for a highly partisan Obama judge.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: And then he got picked, this Matthew Sharpaugh got picked
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: by DC judges filled with Obama and Biden judges in
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: 2024 to become a magistrate judge. So the fact that
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: you had this Democrat operative turned magistrate judge issuing this
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: order to do a home raid on a member of
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: Congress is stunning because the member of Congress is has
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: speech and debate clause immediately under the Constitution. So it's
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: pretty damning if you're ordering any home raid on any
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: member of Congress. That means it's more likely than not,
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: or there's probable cause, evidence of a federal crime will
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: be found within that home. This Democrat judge ordered this
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: home raid on a leading Democrat member of Congress, Ilhan Omar,
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: or whatever the hell her last name is. And then
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: this Democrat judge ordered this unprecedented, I think, home raid
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: on a sitting... member of Congress who's a Democrat. He
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: did this three weeks before the midterm elections. That tells
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: you this was not a Trump partisan hit on Ilhan Omar.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: This means there is damning evidence inside that home, according
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: to this Hillary Clinton donating judge.
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: It is Mike Davis. So well said, Mike. I appreciate that. Article3project. org.
• 6:17
  Speaker 2: Let's break down some of that individually. We know beyond
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: the shadow of a doubt, I don't have to say allegedly,
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: I don't have to say accused. We know that her staff,
• 6:24
  Speaker 2: after she won the first time into the House of Representatives,
• 6:28
  Speaker 2: went to all the records bureaus in Minnesota and in Washington, D.C.,
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: changed her year of birth from 1981 to 1982. That's
• 6:35
  Speaker 2: a fact. They did that. Now, they're claiming it was
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: a clerical error. Her entire life, she lived that she
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: was born in 1981. As soon as she realized, uh-oh,
• 6:44
  Speaker 2: that might mean that I'm not a citizen, suddenly her
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: staff makes them change it to 1982. That makes her,
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: instead of 18, makes her 17, when her father allegedly
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: got nationality or citizenship. Was he even naturalized? I have
• 6:55
  Speaker 2: no idea. We can't seem to find out. Nancy Mace
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: wanted to see her naturalized papers published They wouldn't let her. Now,
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: we want to see the father's naturalization papers. We're not
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: allowed to see that either. We also know that her
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: name was really Elon Nur Saeed Elmi. Her brother husband's
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: name is Ahmed Nur Saeed Elmi. Same exact last name combination.
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: on both ends. We need to find out whether or
• 7:21
  Speaker 2: not they are related because that's another chart. So changing your,
• 7:24
  Speaker 2: lying about your age, that can be a charge. Not
• 7:26
  Speaker 2: being naturalized at all. Hello, why are you in Congress?
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: Why are you in the country? Father might've been a
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: warlord who did, you know, Black Hawk down in Somalia
• 7:33
  Speaker 2: for all we know. And he's just here as a
• 7:35
  Speaker 2: so-called naturalized citizen. There are so many levels of problems here, Mike.
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: So let's go to the constitutional level. Constitutionally, Can she
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: just simply be removed from Congress without some act of Congress?
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: Because God forbid the House goes to Speaker of the
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: House Hakeem Jeffries, they'll seat her ass. She's going to
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: win 99% to one against the guy who's running against
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: her right now. I mean, if the Democrats have control,
• 7:58
  Speaker 2: can an illegal alien potentially, allegedly, member of Congress continue
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: to serve?
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: That's under the Constitution. She has to be a U.S. citizen,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: I think, in the House for the last nine years.
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: And she clearly has not met that requirement if she's
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: never been a U.S. citizen. Right. So she's not qualified.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: She would be disqualified to serve in the House. The
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: issue is, is the remedy you'd have to have. This
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: is unprecedented because we've never had someone lie about their
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: citizenship to get into the House as we so so
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: far as we know.
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: And so the issue could be it would take two
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: thirds of the House to expel her. Or you could
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: have maybe a court, a lawsuit in a court to
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: expel her. This is just unchartered territory. I would just
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: say this. It would be very hard for a Democrat
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: House member to serve in the House and cast votes
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: if they're serving in federal prison for immigration fraud or
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: naturalization fraud or RICO or financial fraud or any of
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: the other potential charges she could be facing. And it
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: would be really hard for her to serve in the
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: House and vote if she went to prison and then
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: went back to Somalia. Go ahead. I was going to say,
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: I would think that the Democrats, if they want to
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: keep that vote, I think they're going to cut Ilhan
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: Elmi or Omar or whatever the hell her last name is.
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: I think they're going to cut her loose when she's
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: no longer useful to them. And if she's in prison
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: or deported, she's no longer useful to them.
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: Let's be honest, a lot of what comes out of
• 9:36
  Speaker 2: Hollywood these days makes a mockery of America. Somehow we're
• 9:39
  Speaker 2: the bad guys. They make a mockery of our history,
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: our values, our faith. There's still a place telling stories,
• 9:46
  Speaker 2: real stories, that remind us what makes America, the United States,
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: worth celebrating. That place is Angel Studios. They're creating unapologetically
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: patriotic films and shows, original films and shows that uplift, educate,
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: and inspire like sound of freedom have you checked that
• 10:02
  Speaker 2: out yet a powerful true story that exposed the horrors
• 10:05
  Speaker 2: of child trafficking and inspired millions to take action something
• 10:09
  Speaker 2: to stand for with mike rowe have you seen this
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: an incredible tribute to ordinary americans who risked everything To
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: Defend Liberty and The Last Rodeo, an upcoming heartland drama
• 10:18
  Speaker 2: about a bull riding veteran who comes out of retirement
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: to save his grandson. It's faith. It's grit. It's the
• 10:24
  Speaker 2: kind of storytelling Hollywood forgot how to do. These aren't
• 10:27
  Speaker 2: just good films. They are cultural reset buttons. And when
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: you join the Angel Guild, you don't just stream entertainment.
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: You help to create it. You vote on what gets made.
• 10:35
  Speaker 2: You support filmmakers who still believe in this great land, America.
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: And as a premium member, you get two free tickets
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: to every theatrical release. And that's awesome. So if you're
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: ready to support entertainment that celebrates faith, family, community, and freedom,
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: go to angel.com slash PAGS right now. Angel.com slash PAGS.
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: Become a premium Angel Guild member today. Support entertainment that
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: builds something worth passing on. The statute of limitations, that
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: seems to have been a problem, and I want you
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: to expand on this if you don't mind. It seems
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: as though if she kept on using the wrong birth year,
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: or the incorrect name on passports or official papers in Congress,
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: the statute would have kept on updating, no?
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: Well, there's no statute of limitations for civil denaturalization, right?
• 11:22
  Speaker 2: Right, but I mean the criminal stuff.
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: On the criminal stuff, like you have some ongoing issues.
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: You have some ongoing issues with when you cover up
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: a crime, and when you conspire with others to cover
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: up the crime, you continue the crime. So there could
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: be conspiracies. charges on that. There could be charges related
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: to her disclosures. She has to make disclosures when she's
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: running for office. She has to make disclosures when she's
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: in office, like House financial disclosures. She has to make
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: campaign finance disclosures. If she's making these disclosures under a
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: false name, then she could face federal charges for each
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: and every one of those false claims that she's making
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: to these various federal agencies, including the U.S. House, I
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: think her bigger problem, it seems to me, is RICO. Like,
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: not only are they going after her, remember, they got
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: her sister's phone. And so I think there's going to
• 12:17
  Speaker 1: be a lot more that the HSI and Homeland Security
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: or the FBI or other federal agencies find on this money. Like,
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: is she, for example, is she sending money back to
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: Somalia that's funding Somali warlords that are fighting and killing
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: Americans and our allies? I mean, these are some big
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: problems when you're going through around Somalia and you have
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: these pirates attacking American flag vessels and you have, there
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: are all kinds of potential charges that I can think
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: of in my head when you have someone who is
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: lying about who they are, lying about where they're from,
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: lying about their financial disclosures. There's a lot you can
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: charge a person with.
• 13:03
  Speaker 2: Well, we know that the Luggage filled with cash, $ 7
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: million or something was sent back to Somalia through the
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: airport in Minnesota. I don't know that she was connected
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: to that, but it looks to me if it's a
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: RICO case, then she would be involved in a much
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: wider criminal enterprise, and we'll see if that shakes out.
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: What you said earlier really does ring true. This far
• 13:22
  Speaker 2: left-wing magistrate that donated to Hillary Clinton back in the day,
• 13:25
  Speaker 2: this is somebody who is not going to sign that
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: at all unless there's something that's concrete. Why do you
• 13:31
  Speaker 2: think Boesberg is involved?
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: It's actually worse than that. It's worse than that, Joe.
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: In order to order, judges do not order home rates, right?
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: Unless there is a compelling reason to do it. And
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: meaning that they couldn't get this evidence through other means,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: or there was evidence that someone was going to destroy
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: the evidence.
• 13:49
  Speaker 3: Right.
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: Right. And so this is a judge ordering a home
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: rate on anyone is a big deal. A judge ordering
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: a home raid on a member of Congress is a
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: monumental deal. And that makes it exponentially worse for Elon
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: that this is a partisan Democrat judge against a leading
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: Democrat three weeks before the midterm elections. Elon Omar, Elon Elmi,
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: or whatever the hell her name is, I think she
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: is in some very deep, deep, deep legal trouble here.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: And I imagine... that the Trump Justice Department is going
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: to give her a giant Christmas gift in the form
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: of a federal indictment for many charges, including RICO.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: It is Mike Davis, Article3Project. org. Boesberg's name is attached to
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: this somehow. I can't cite the article right this second,
• 14:40
  Speaker 2: but I promise you, there was an article just in
• 14:43
  Speaker 2: the past few days that suggested Judge Boesberg, James Boesberg,
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: is somehow involved in this, and he might be slow-walking it,
• 14:49
  Speaker 2: why would he be involved at all? And do you
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: think that there can be justice? Again, you're right, the
• 14:54
  Speaker 2: magistrate judge, everything you just explained, this is a concrete
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: case that he was compelled to have to allow this
• 15:00
  Speaker 2: to happen right now. But you still have the D.C.
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: mechanisms in place, Boasberg and Paula Zinnis and all these idiots.
• 15:07
  Speaker 2: I mean, these people aren't going to allow this to
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: go where you and I would like it to go
• 15:11
  Speaker 2: and actually find the facts. before the election or even
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: right after the election. How is he involved? And do
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: you think that this can stick in D.C. beyond the
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: original magistrate judge?
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: It's unclear how Boesberg is involved. Maybe as the chief judge,
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: he would be involved in the D.C. district court. As
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: the chief judge, he manages the grand jury. But it's unclear.
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: Jeb Boesberg is a partisan hack. He is Jeb Boesberg
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: the clown. I actually hope that he gets involved on
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: this because it could help take down Jeff Boasberg as
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: well if he's trying to run interference and obstruct this investigation. Look, again,
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: a highly partisan U.S. magistrate judge in D.C. who donated
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: to Hillary and clerked for an Obama judge twice, signed
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: off on this home raid. I imagine once this affidavit
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: comes out, There's going to be overwhelming evidence. I imagine
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: that HSI and other federal law enforcement agencies are all
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: over this. There are many other potential defendants who I
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: imagine would get named in a RICO conspiracy indictment. And
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: like I said, I would be stunned. They're not going
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: to do anything before the election, but I would be
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: stunned if there's not a huge indictment after the election,
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: before Christmas, or whatever holidays the Somali warlords and I
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: don't even know what they celebrate. I don't know what
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: they celebrate.
• 16:39
  Speaker 2: I have no idea. That's a good question. It's Mike Davis.
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: They go pirate the Christmas ships.
• 16:46
  Speaker 2: That's what it is. Yeah, they go steal the presents.
• 16:48
  Speaker 2: It is Mike Davis. Mike, will the left run away
• 16:51
  Speaker 2: from her as fast as they did Swalwell?
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: When she's no longer useful. I remember the Democrats like
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: their useful idiots, and when they're no longer useful, they
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: throw them overboard. So when they will defend her as
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: long as they need to defend her, But if Democrats,
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: let's say the Democrats get a bunch of seats in
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: this election and they no longer have a three or
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: four seat minority, they will throw her overboard so fast
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: when she becomes a liability that, you know, it will
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: make her head spin. They will throw her over as
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: fast as she threw out her gay brother from their marriage. Yeah.
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: And by the way, he is gay. There's no doubt.
• 17:32
  Speaker 2: He's actually an activist over wherever he is.
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that to smear him. He admitted that
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: on social media. It's all over social media that he's
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: out as a gay person. And Ilan Omar, if it's
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: not her brother, why is she marrying this guy?
• 17:46
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I have no idea. It's a great question. Mike,
• 17:49
  Speaker 2: can we go through something that is a little less
• 17:52
  Speaker 2: specific about the court system? You and I have talked
• 17:55
  Speaker 2: about this for many, many years now, and I'm still
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: frustrated as hell. Why is a Paula Zinnis or a
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: Boesberg or what was the guy's name? Murphy or somebody
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: in Massachusetts. Why are they allowed to stay in the
• 18:04
  Speaker 2: court when they are lawless? They are not following the
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: Supreme Court rulings. They're not following the Constitution whatsoever. They're
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: doing anything and everything they want. And when you ask
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: Chief Justice John Roberts about it, he says, well, that's
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: not the impeachment is not the mechanism in place to
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: remove them. The mechanism in place is to take it
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: to the next higher court. So we just ignore the
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: really bad judges that are legislating from the bench and
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: just keep on taking to the appellate court, the higher
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: court and to the Supreme Court eventually. Is there really
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: no mechanism that was put in place by the founding
• 18:30
  Speaker 2: fathers that said if you suck as a judge or
• 18:33
  Speaker 2: if you are biased as hell and you're passing laws
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: from the bench, you can't serve? Is there nothing that
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: we can do to get rid of these people? It
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: wasn't that long ago. Remember back in 2020 when the
• 18:41
  Speaker 2: media narrative was absolute. In fact, anyone suggesting early alternatives
• 18:45
  Speaker 2: was instantly silenced and deplatformed. The late Dr. Zev Zelenko
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: was at the center of the controversy with his Z-Stack
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: and Zelenko Protocol. You probably heard about it. He faced
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: Immense criticism for sharing his approach, yet President Trump referenced
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: him during a press briefing. I just saw the video
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: on X. Go see it for yourself. It's amazing. Zelenko
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: carefully selected ingredients and doses based on his research, and
• 19:07
  Speaker 2: today his work remains part of the conversation around immune health.
• 19:11
  Speaker 2: You shouldn't feel helpless when scary headlines flash across your
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: TV or your computer screen. Z-Stack gives your body the
• 19:17
  Speaker 2: foundational immune support it needs to help fight off whatever's
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: circulating out there. You never know what it might be.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: Don't wait. Take charge of your wellness right now. ZStack
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: is offering its biggest discount ever. Get started today for
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: just $ 4. 95, plus shipping and handling. Get the biggest discount
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: in their history at ZStackLife.com slash PAGS. ZStackLife.com slash PAGS.
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: One more time. ZStackLife.com slash PAGS. Now back to the video.
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: Well, I disagree with the Chief Justice on this. I
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: clerked on the Supreme Court. I served as the Chief
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: Counsel for nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee. My portfolio
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: for the Senate Judiciary Chairman, as the staff lead included,
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: helping the chairman with oversight of the federal judiciary. And
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: of course, there is an oversight and impeachment role. When
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: you have judges... Judges have an awesome power, right? They
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: have a unique power. They have the judicial power. They
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: have the power to decide cases and controversies of the
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: parties properly before them with redressable claims, nothing more, nothing less.
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: They have lifetime tenure. They have pay protection because we
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: want them to exercise that judicial power to make sure
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: we're protecting minority rights, to make sure that parties are
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: getting a fair shake, right? It's not their job as
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: a federal judge to steal legislative power from Congress or
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: executive power from the president. If they do that, they
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: should face serious blowback from the American people, including oversight,
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: including impeachment. And they should also. have the Chief Justice
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: as the head of the federal judiciary, pulling them in
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: and saying, you cannot abuse your power like this. You
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: do not have legislative power. That's the most awesome power
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: under the Constitution. And we divide that between 535 members
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: of Congress who are elected by the American people and
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: divided between 435 in the House and 100 in the Senate.
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: You do not have executive power. That is someone who
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: is elected by all Americans. And when When unelected, unaccountable,
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: lifetime tenured, pay protected federal judges think they can steal
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: legislative power under Article 1 or executive power under Article 2,
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: they should be impeached.
• 21:35
  Speaker 2: You know, the way that it's worded for Supreme Court justices,
• 21:37
  Speaker 2: and I'm sure this was the intention for other federal
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: judges that got a lifetime appointment. is it's not really
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: you've got it for life. You've got it as long
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: as you're doing the job right. You're doing it as
• 21:47
  Speaker 2: long as you're not breaking the law. It's good behavior.
• 21:50
  Speaker 2: So does that not apply to these judges under the justices?
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: Absolutely. If you're a good judge exercising good behavior, exercising
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: Article III judicial power, no, you should not be impeached
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: for your judicial decisions unless you can find corruption or
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: some other misconduct. But if you're a federal judge and
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: you're stealing the awesome power of Congress to legislate, stealing
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: that from the American people through our duly elected, 535
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: duly elected members of Congress, if you're one federal judge
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: stealing that power, you should be impeached. That's bad behavior.
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: That's not good behavior, right, under our Same with executive power.
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: If you're stealing the president's executive power as this unelected
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: narcissist in a robe, you should be impeached because you
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: are a grave danger to our constitutional order, to our liberties,
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: to our separation of powers when you're stealing other branches' power.
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: And that's exactly what these judges are doing, and they
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: should be impeached for that.
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: So if they're not acting with good behavior, it is
• 22:53
  Speaker 2: a congressional move to impeach them. Like Brandon Gill, I know,
• 22:57
  Speaker 2: has filed impeachment papers against Boesberg, I believe, hasn't gone anywhere.
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: It should go somewhere. So it is up to Article
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: 1 to keep Article 3 in check.
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. Has it ever happened? Well, look, yeah, I mean,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: judges have been impeached, largely for corruption. But I would
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: say this, if the Chief Justice does not want Congress
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: to step in with oversight and impeachment, the Chief Justice
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: needs to get his own judicial house and order, right?
• 23:28
  Speaker 1: And it's not just, oh, we're going to let these
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: judges steal the president's poor Article II executive powers and
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: steal Congress's Article I legislative powers, and we're just going
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: to let that happen, and we'll go through the normal
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: appellate process. No, that is a grave danger to our
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: liberties as we the people, the sovereign citizens of America,
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: when judges steal power from other branches of government. That
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: is tyrannical when judges do that. And it needs to
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: be stopped and it needs to be stopped immediately and
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: not years later through the appellate process. That is an
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: unacceptable answer by the chief justice.
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: Maybe the dumbest question of the interview. I promise I
• 24:07
  Speaker 2: don't mean it to be dumb, but can the current
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: president change who the chief justice is or you're the
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: chief justice for good? Because I remember when John Roberts
• 24:14
  Speaker 2: was sworn in, he was selected by or appointed by
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: George W. Bush and he made him the chief justice immediately.
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: Like he bypassed anybody else who was already on the court.
• 24:22
  Speaker 2: Can that change or you have it forever?
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: Well, I wish. The chief justice is nominated by the
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: president and confirmed for the Senate for life. But hey,
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: if the chief justice is going to let some radical D.C.
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: Obama or Biden judge like Jeff Boasberg in the D.C.
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: steal legislative power from Congress or the executive power from
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: the president, then maybe the president can make a new
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: chief justice, right? I mean, if we're just going to
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: steal power from other branches of government, then why can't
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: we just Say that we no longer recognize John Roberts
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: as the Chief Justice. I say that jokingly, but I'm
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: trying to make a point. Yeah, like when you steal
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: other branches' powers, it is a grave danger to our
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: constitutional order and to our liberties. And that is my
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: point to the Chief Justice. Get your judicial house in order.
• 25:17
  Speaker 2: James Comey in the news again. By the way, it's
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: Mike Davis, article3project. org. Go and support everything that he does.
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: It's an amazing organization. Uh, James Comey is in the
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: news again. James Comey, in my opinion, is a corrupt,
• 25:28
  Speaker 2: no good guy. James Comey was going back to the
• 25:31
  Speaker 2: fires of court, lying about why he needed to surveil
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: Trump tower. We know that because they actually were doing
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: circular reporting. Let's put it into Yahoo news, go back
• 25:39
  Speaker 2: to the judge and say, Hey judge, look, there's a
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: new story about it. That was probably put in there
• 25:42
  Speaker 2: by the FBI. We also know the dossier was fake
• 25:45
  Speaker 2: paid for by Hillary Clinton's campaign. Now the 86 47
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: thing that's taken as a threat to the president. But
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: the latest charge, this is the third time he's been charged.
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: He wasn't indicted on this one. He didn't go to
• 25:55
  Speaker 2: a grand jury, but they did charge him with something
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: about the Espionage Act. Do you know what this latest
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: one is? And he keeps on putting out these, oh,
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: woe is me, I'm innocent. They're weaponizing the DOJ. He's
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: the king of weaponizing the DOJ. What is the latest charge?
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: Do you know?
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: Well, I hope the third time's the charm here with
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: this third charge. There are Democrat judges who seem to
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: jump in and save James Comey Look, here's the allegation
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: as far as I can tell from the criminal information
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: and the reporting. James Comey was having conversations with a
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: New York Times reporter or reporters back in 2016. Before
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: the presidential campaign of 2016, maybe it relates to the
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: Russian collusion hope. And so there is a 10-year statute
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: of limitations on espionage. And these are espionage charges when
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: you're When you're sharing national defense information with New York
• 26:51
  Speaker 1: Times reporters, that would be a violation of the Espionage
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: Act if you've done that knowingly. And there's also issues
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: with maybe conspiracy or obstruction. I can't remember the exact
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: second charge, but you have a criminal information that they
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: filed at the Justice Department so they can preserve the
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: 10-year statutes of limitations because that was going to run...
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: that day or the next day if they didn't get
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: this criminal information on file. Now, remember, this came out
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: before the midterm elections. It wasn't the Trump Justice Department
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: that made this public, as far as I know. I
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: think it was James Comey and his attorneys who made
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: this public. The Trump Justice Department had to file the
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: charges to make sure that the charges were within the
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: 10-year statute of limitations. And then the Trump Justice Department
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: kept its mouth shut about this, so it didn't. So
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: people couldn't say they're trying to interfere with the midterm elections.
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: And I think it was James Kobe and his attorneys
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: who made that public. So that's on that.
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: I'm sorry. His attorneys are saying that he was simply
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: fact checking a story written by Reuters that was then
• 28:02
  Speaker 2: carried by the New York times or something. He was
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: just fact checking it. But, but the actual allegation is
• 28:06
  Speaker 2: the fact check was here's some classified information to prove
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: that what you're saying is either right or wrong, I guess.
• 28:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: Well, I want to be careful what I say here.
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: Every criminal defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: And I have to pretend like I'm a real lawyer.
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: But look, if you are the FBI director, you know
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: what classified materials are. And there are materials, as James
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: Comey has said many times, that are born classified, right?
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: Meaning it doesn't have to actually have a label on
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: it that it's top secret or top secret SEI or
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: top secret SAP. I've had a security clearance. I've had
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: the highest... Security clearance, including SCI and SAP from the CIA,
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: from the Department of War. I've had every compartment, it seems.
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: James Comey knows what he's doing. And he knows through
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: his training that you cannot have conversations about classified materials
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: with anyone who doesn't have a clearance, number one. And
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: number two, they have to have a need to know.
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: I don't think leaking to a New York Times reporter
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: without a clearance is a problem. Leaking to a New
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: York Times reporter reporter who doesn't have the need to
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: know is a problem. And then you have to ask,
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: why is he leaking this material? Look, it's a huge problem.
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: Fortunately for James Comey, these charges are in D.C., so
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: you can't get a better jury pool and judge pool
• 29:31
  Speaker 1: for that matter for James Comey. But the allegations, if
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: you believe the news reporter, aren't good for James Comey.
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: Mike, again, maybe I'm a dumb guy, but lying to
• 29:44
  Speaker 2: the FISA court in and of itself is a crime,
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: is it not? Are these guys just going to get
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: a pass at every turn? It's crazy to me.
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: Well, look, it's not fun to go through criminal charges
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: This is the third time he's gone through criminal charges.
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: He's deserved all three. But of course, these Democrat judges
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: in D.C. and the D.C. suburbs, the Eastern District of Virginia,
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: seem to protect this guy because, look, I mean, this
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: is the guy who bragged on at a conference on
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: television that he set up President Trump and his incoming
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: national security advisor, Michael Flynn, with he tried to entrap
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: him to try to take out the Trump when Trump
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: won in.
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: 20- Same thing with Papadopoulos. They tried to entrap them
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: to get Trump. All that stuff was illegal.
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: So it's, look, the people, there's no one who I'd
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: like to see in prison more than James Comey. I
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: think the guy is a scumbag. He has done so
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: much damage to our country by how he politicized and
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: weaponized the FBI and the intel agencies to go after
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: Trump and Trump's aides and allies. So James Comey can
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: go to hell. In the meantime, good luck in your
• 31:01
  Speaker 1: criminal proceedings.
• 31:03
  Speaker 2: It is Mike Davis. Mike, last question. Should the House
• 31:05
  Speaker 2: go to the Democrats? Without a doubt, they're impeaching everybody, right?
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: They are. I always say that House Democrats, look, I'm
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: not delusional. I expect Democrats to win the House. And
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: I think they're going to win a comfortable margin in
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: the House just because the way the politics are, the
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: natural cycle. when, when the president is in his second
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: year of his term that the other party does pretty well,
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: I think they're going to get a lot of seats,
• 31:32
  Speaker 1: maybe 240 seats in the house. And they're going to
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: be very involved. And they're going to be like the
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: fat kids at the all you can eat buffet. They're
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: not going to know when to stop eating. Right. And
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: they're going to try to impeach everyone and they won't focus.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: And it's, it's not good. They'll have fun for two years.
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: And then it's, it's, almost certainly going to blow back
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: in their faces in 2028.
• 31:57
  Speaker 2: You know, Chuck Schumer actually set the precedent, though, Mike.
• 32:00
  Speaker 2: If you impeach, and I think the Senate's not only
• 32:02
  Speaker 2: going to be held by the Republicans, I think they
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: might gain a seat or two. That said, as they
• 32:07
  Speaker 2: send the impeachment articles over, you just dismiss them. That's
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: what Chuck Schumer did. When Mayorkas was impeached, he literally
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: set the precedent, and that's all that, God, I hope
• 32:16
  Speaker 2: it's not John Thune, but whoever the leader is in
• 32:18
  Speaker 2: the U.S. Senate, they can just dismiss it, can't they?
• 32:22
  Speaker 1: They can. Look, remember this. My first job in Washington
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: was interning for House Speaker Newt Gingrich in 1998. And
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: I remember my first week on the job, Ken Starr's
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: office called and said, we're delivering the impeachment report. This
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: was 1998. President Clinton was, you know, the second year
• 32:41
  Speaker 1: of President Clinton's second term. So it should have been
• 32:44
  Speaker 1: a very bad year for Democrats. And remember, Republicans pushed impeachment.
• 32:49
  Speaker 1: against President Clinton because he was sleeping with Monica Lewinsky
• 32:53
  Speaker 1: and lying about it, his intern, and lying about it.
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: Bill Clinton's a total scumbag, but the American people thought
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: that House Republicans went too far. They thought they should
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: have just censured Bill Clinton and not impeached him. I disagree.
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: I think he should have been impeached. I'm glad he was.
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: But the American people didn't like it. And guess what?
• 33:12
  Speaker 1: In 1998, which should have been a good year for
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: House Republicans, House Republicans got beat. And it wasn't... Bill Clinton,
• 33:20
  Speaker 1: who got chased out of the White House. It was
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: my former boss and my political hero, Newt Gingrich, who
• 33:25
  Speaker 1: lost the House speakership, right? I think you could see
• 33:27
  Speaker 1: the same thing with House Democrats is they're going to
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: try to do this impeachment stuff. They won't know how
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: to focus. They'll go too far and it's going to
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: blow back in their faces. Remember what happened when they
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: did this when I was in the Senate back in,
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: what was it, 2017, 2018, what they did to Kavanaugh, right?
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: It should have been a great year for Democrats in 2018.
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: Democrats won the House in 2018, but because of what
• 33:55
  Speaker 1: they did to Kavanaugh, they ended up losing four Senate
• 33:59
  Speaker 1: Democrat incumbents and lost two Senate seats overall. And then
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: we were able to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court, right? It's just when the Democrats go too far,
• 34:10
  Speaker 1: as they will, I'm nervous about the Senate too, candidly.
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: I hope I'm wrong because I want Republicans confirming Trump's
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: judges for the next two years with four justices in
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: their 70s. But look, if Trump and his MAGA base
• 34:26
  Speaker 1: gets out and vote, we can keep the Senate. And
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: that's crucially important, right? If we want to confirm judges
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: and make sure Democrats don't defund ICE and reopen the
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: border and destroy our country. I think we're two elections
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: away from the destruction of our country. If Democrats win
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: big the next two elections in 2026 and 2028, if
• 34:44
  Speaker 1: they win big, it's game over America. They're going to pack.
• 34:47
  Speaker 1: The Supreme Court with left-wing radicals, they're going to open
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: the border. They're going to have amnesty and citizenship. We're
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: going to become France at that point. It's goodbye America.
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: So that's why it's so important that Trump supporters, the
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: MAGA base, get out and vote, particularly to help us
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: save the Senate.
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: It is. Mike Davis. Mike is the boss over at
• 35:09
  Speaker 2: Article 3 Project, article3project. org. Thanks for making time, brother. Always
• 35:13
  Speaker 2: appreciate the knowledge. Thank you.
• 35:14
  Speaker 1: Thank you.