Latest / Gil I Am / Insider Trading? Tucker on Nancy Pelosi, Dan Crenshaw, and How They Get Rich at Your Expense

Transcript

Insider Trading? Tucker on Nancy Pelosi, Dan Crenshaw, and How They Get Rich at Your Expense · Gil I Am

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Good morning everybody. That is this Gil. And today I
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: found an article that Tucker Calson interviewed this guy who
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: started an app called a Trade Like a Politician or
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: something of that nature, where it tracks what politicians are
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: done to get rich. And in this interview they talk
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: about how Nancy Pelosi, Dan Crinshaw and just about ninety
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: five percent of all Congressmen, senators, etc. Are getting rich
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: at our expense. So I hope you guys enjoyed. Please
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: let me know what you think. I'll give you a
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: synopsis at the end. But I think it's just bullshit.
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: I don't believe that. I believe there should be term limits,
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: and I also believe that they should not be allowed
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: to trade on anything in front of the House or
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: Congress or.
• 0:54
  Speaker 2: That's just how I feel.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: I think it's just evil that Nancy Pelosi has a
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: fifty eight percent return on the investments and most people
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: give four percent. So this Gill, let me know.
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: What you mean later. So Nancy Pelosi stock tracker is
• 1:08
  Speaker 2: one of those things that I first saw on X
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: on Twitter and I thought this cannot be This is
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: obviously fake. In fact, I didn't even consider for a
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: second that it could be real. And then I was
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: sent it by a buddy of mine and who spent
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: thirty years on Wall Street. If you've seen this, and
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: I was like, is this real? It's like, it's totally real.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: We're just talking off camera. It's like, at fifty five,
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: it's shocking for me. It's hard to accept how corrupt
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: leadership of the country is. I almost can't metabolize it.
• 1:36
  Speaker 2: But I don't think anything has put it into clearer
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: relief than what you have done. So you run it
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: Sposi stocktrackers. It's incredible. I'm first, I'm real, glad to
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: meet you. Yeah, no, and should know that you're real.
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: Who are you? Where are you from? How'd you? How'd
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: you do that?
• 2:12
  Speaker 3: How the whole thing start? I mean, I'm twenty nine.
• 2:15
  Speaker 3: Now at twenty five, would I say that, you know,
• 2:18
  Speaker 3: looking five years from then, I'll be running a Pelosi
• 2:21
  Speaker 3: stock tracker, building an app with the slogan invests like
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: a politician, having that thing become a thing. I no,
• 2:27
  Speaker 3: I don't think I would have ever gotten to that.
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: So at twenty five, I was actually living in Bali.
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: I quit my New York City job when I was
• 2:34
  Speaker 3: doing finance and I started working on my family company
• 2:37
  Speaker 3: where we would sell sports compression products, yes, like little
• 2:40
  Speaker 3: ones with numbers on them, a custom ones that you
• 2:42
  Speaker 3: would get for your kid for you know, pee wee football.
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: And I was so sick of the finance grind in
• 2:47
  Speaker 3: New York that I was like, I'm gonna work on
• 2:48
  Speaker 3: this family thing. I'm going to try and take it
• 2:50
  Speaker 3: up to another level. I'll go travel around, move to
• 2:53
  Speaker 3: BALI was doing working out there for probably like six
• 2:56
  Speaker 3: or seven months, moved back to Boston is where I'm from.
• 3:01
  Speaker 3: Then went up to New Hampshire, became a snowboard instructor,
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: was working on the ski slopes. Yeah, there's a whole
• 3:07
  Speaker 3: story behind it. Was working on the ski slopes as
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: a snowboard instructor. Were Bretton Woods. Ye, great great mountain,
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: very family family and this is my punt. We're all
• 3:17
  Speaker 3: up there. And then when COVID hit moved back into
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: my family and then that's how I connected with my
• 3:22
  Speaker 3: co founders, Brian, Aaron and Scott. They're out in LA
• 3:25
  Speaker 3: And there's a whole story on how I essentially connected
• 3:28
  Speaker 3: with them, which we can get into. But we started
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: building an app together and long story, short I'm sure
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: we'll get into the majority of this stuff. We essentially
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: built out on a tech side, the first way to
• 3:40
  Speaker 3: follow your friends stock portfolios. So if you had a
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: Robinhin and I had a wee Bowl or a Fidelity,
• 3:44
  Speaker 3: we would connect it to our app and you can
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: get push notifications of when you know a trade would happen.
• 3:49
  Speaker 3: I was the co founder of it, and I was
• 3:51
  Speaker 3: in charge of the growth. And one obvious way to
• 3:53
  Speaker 3: do it, this was during the GameStop era, was let
• 3:57
  Speaker 3: me build a Nancy Pelosi portfolio. You know, I'm seeing
• 4:00
  Speaker 3: on Twitter, I'm seeing on TikTok, I'm seeing on Instagram
• 4:03
  Speaker 3: politicians crushing it and them getting called out for their trades,
• 4:07
  Speaker 3: especially during COVID.
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: You know, well, I never will forget it. Yeah, you
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: covered it, Richard Burr, and I knew Richard Burr. I
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: was never against Senator Richard Bird North Carolina, and I
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: saw that and it was it looked like corruption to me.
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: I was disgusted.
• 4:22
  Speaker 3: They got investigative by the DJ, investigative by the SEC.
• 4:25
  Speaker 3: Nothing happened, and that story is insane, and I think
• 4:28
  Speaker 3: that story was where it really started to.
• 4:30
  Speaker 2: Can you just give us the outline of it for
• 4:32
  Speaker 2: people forget.
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: Yeah, so Unusual Whales he's an account on x He
• 4:36
  Speaker 3: was the one that initially started all this, so the
• 4:37
  Speaker 3: Pelosi Tracker came him. Yeah, yeah, yeah, we work with him.
• 4:40
  Speaker 3: He great guy.
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: I love. I don't know his name or anything about him,
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: but I love that feed.
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: Obscure guy doesn't want the world to know about him,
• 4:49
  Speaker 3: but he actually takes deserves so much credit for this stuff.
• 4:52
  Speaker 3: I don't think anyone would be unusual win Usual Whales
• 4:55
  Speaker 3: on Twitter. Yep, he is the one that would essentially
• 4:58
  Speaker 3: call him out. At the beginning, he started the Pelosi
• 5:01
  Speaker 3: Tracker in a way, he was calling out the politician stuff.
• 5:04
  Speaker 3: And then the Policy Tracker came probably in twenty twenty two,
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: but he started in twenty twenty and I think Richard
• 5:10
  Speaker 3: Burr that whole story started because Unusual Will started calling
• 5:13
  Speaker 3: it out. The story behind the Richard Burr is around
• 5:16
  Speaker 3: his COVID trades and it was a full on scandal.
• 5:18
  Speaker 3: You covered it at Fox News. The story is. On
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: February seventh, twenty twenty, he wrote an op ed with
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: another senator saying, Hey, Americans, don't worry, COVID's not that bad.
• 5:31
  Speaker 3: We're keeping an eye on it. Everything will be okay.
• 5:33
  Speaker 3: While he has and writes that op ed, he's getting
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: insider kind of details because he sat as the chairman
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: of the Senate Intelligence Committee while he was writing that opped.
• 5:44
  Speaker 3: So while sitting as the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
• 5:47
  Speaker 3: he's getting private meetings saying, hey, guys, COVID is actually
• 5:50
  Speaker 3: way worse than we think. This is not going to
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: end the same way that people expect. Be ready for
• 5:56
  Speaker 3: some sort of rapid response.
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: And the head of SCI the sentence, like many unintelligence
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: is a major player, and why that's he's not just
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: an average senator, Like, that's a very important position in
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: Washington and this country in the world, and so he
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: would have access to a lot of information that fellow
• 6:13
  Speaker 2: senators wouldn't have access to exactly.
• 6:15
  Speaker 3: And he was tasked with partly like get ready for
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: a response, you know, like, once COVID hits, we think
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: this is going to be bad, get ready for a response.
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: Have the like your materials ready to tackle this situation.
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: So he probably knew this verity of it to a
• 6:31
  Speaker 3: ten x what the everyday American and also probably what
• 6:34
  Speaker 3: other senators and representatives did as well. So if you
• 6:38
  Speaker 3: follow the timeline, though, February seventh is when he wrote
• 6:40
  Speaker 3: that op ed. February thirteenth is the day that he
• 6:44
  Speaker 3: went and he sold off one point sixty five million
• 6:47
  Speaker 3: dollars of his entire retirement account. So a week after
• 6:50
  Speaker 3: he told the American yeah, not only just a normal
• 6:53
  Speaker 3: kind of investment account, as a retirement account, he sold
• 6:57
  Speaker 3: the whole thing.
• 6:58
  Speaker 2: Is it fair to say for non investors, just to
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: inform the rest of us not familiar with the details,
• 7:02
  Speaker 2: just sell if your retirem accounts, like you're not dicking
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: around with.
• 7:04
  Speaker 3: Them, no, no, no, no, yeah. The retirement account is
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: something you don't touch, Like those are the simply buy
• 7:09
  Speaker 3: and holds, you know, never touch them forever. But selling
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: off that to that degree is extreme, and I think
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: is what caught a lot of people's attention of like,
• 7:19
  Speaker 3: you don't just do that, you know what, Yeah, you
• 7:21
  Speaker 3: don't just do that while you're the chair of the
• 7:23
  Speaker 3: Senate Intelligence Committee, you know. But to make this this
• 7:27
  Speaker 3: is why, this, this is what I get passionate about.
• 7:30
  Speaker 3: It's like, I'm not even a political guy, Like I'll
• 7:32
  Speaker 3: tell you the whole story of how this started. I
• 7:33
  Speaker 3: didn't grow up being obsessed with politics. I just citizen
• 7:37
  Speaker 3: journalists kind of see the opportunity to be like this
• 7:39
  Speaker 3: fucked up, we should stop this. The story, though, then
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: goes February thirteenth. He sells off one point sixty five million.
• 7:46
  Speaker 3: Thirty minutes later, he calls his brother in law, and
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: him and his brother in law have around a two
• 7:51
  Speaker 3: minute conversation. The brother in law hangs up the phone,
• 7:55
  Speaker 3: calls his financial advisor. His financial advisor doesn't pick up.
• 7:59
  Speaker 3: He then calls his second financial advisor, they pick up.
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: They have around a thirty second conversation. He then goes
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: off and sells off two hundred sixty five thousand dollars
• 8:09
  Speaker 3: of his own portfolio. So now you got the senator
• 8:13
  Speaker 3: who's the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee calling up
• 8:16
  Speaker 3: his brother in law, them having a conversation, and then
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: the brother in law going and selling off thirty seconds
• 8:21
  Speaker 3: after that conversation. Now I don't that's sketchy as hell
• 8:25
  Speaker 3: to me.
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: The weird thing is that I know the brother in
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: law was my neighbor and a super nice guy, and
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: I sort of knew Burr, not really but kind of,
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: you know. And so when you live and I'm only
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: saying that it's not unusual that I would know them
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: because I lived in Washington my whole life. But that's
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: kind of one of the reasons we have all this corruption,
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: is that everyone knows everybody else. Yeah, yeah, yeah, And
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: it's just impossible to believe that someone whose house you've
• 8:46
  Speaker 2: been at many times and I have, would do something
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: like that. It's just hard. The closer you are to something,
• 8:51
  Speaker 2: the harder it is, just like having an alcoholic spouse.
• 8:54
  Speaker 3: One thousand percent. And like the other argument to be
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: had is like, you know, around February thirteenth, I don't
• 8:59
  Speaker 3: remember remember it, you know, I don't remember the headlines
• 9:01
  Speaker 3: that were coming out, Like how extreme was that? If
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: you're the brother in law, of course you sell out,
• 9:06
  Speaker 3: you know. It's like it's not like you're necessarily going
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: to listen to that, read all the headlines and do
• 9:11
  Speaker 3: nothing about it. So it's not even necessarily his fault
• 9:13
  Speaker 3: for selling. And I don't think like that's where the
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: inside of training necessarily happens. I think the culprit is
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: the person who makes that initial phone call, which is
• 9:21
  Speaker 3: I think where the investigations.
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: Of course, so then what they do with the money.
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: They keep so they that happened on February thirteenth, and
• 9:30
  Speaker 3: then the storyline goes they started having private Richard Burr
• 9:33
  Speaker 3: started having private conversations with his donors, and then the
• 9:37
  Speaker 3: donors were starting to set all this stuff up. A
• 9:39
  Speaker 3: month later that not even a month. Three weeks after that,
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: around March, early March is when the market fell thirty
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: percent and they saved themselves millions. That all gets blown
• 9:50
  Speaker 3: up because of again unusual whales that see gets involved,
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: The DOJ gets involved. They then find nothing. Well, they
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: find all this information. That's how we know about the text.
• 9:59
  Speaker 3: The FBI can, but they don't charge them with anything.
• 10:02
  Speaker 3: That nothing happens. Richard Burr retires, and you know, it's
• 10:07
  Speaker 3: just like again we were chatting about this off camera.
• 10:09
  Speaker 3: I'm twenty nine, I grew up with this. I'm not
• 10:11
  Speaker 3: surprised by it. I'm just like, yeah, of course, the
• 10:14
  Speaker 3: politicians kind of can build this situation where they benefit
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: and people will come after them. They'll make a facade,
• 10:22
  Speaker 3: no charges will happen, and they'll go off into the sunset.
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: So I was raised during the height of empire, you know,
• 10:28
  Speaker 2: our Victorian era, and you were raised in the decline
• 10:31
  Speaker 2: of empire sort of the post World War era, so
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: totally different perspectives. So you're much better situated to understand
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: what's going on, to see it clearly, to not lie
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: to yourself about it. That's crazy. So Burr, just to
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: let you know, since fucks I'm from DC, I don't
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: think the head of the Senate Intel Community can ever
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: be charged with a crime because he knows too much.
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: Yes, he had to step down too while he was
• 10:57
  Speaker 3: getting investigated, but yeah, I mean I believe it.
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: Wow. So you're watching this just at home because you
• 11:02
  Speaker 2: said you're not political.
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm watching this at home while I'm building the
• 11:06
  Speaker 3: social investing app that at the time was called IRIS.
• 11:09
  Speaker 3: So that's what's funny about. You know, we run the
• 11:12
  Speaker 3: Polosi Tracker. I'm not a political guy. I'm just an
• 11:15
  Speaker 3: everyday dude, you know. I'm twenty six, moved out to
• 11:18
  Speaker 3: California to build this with my friends, and then the
• 11:22
  Speaker 3: politics stuff starts happening. And like our mission with with
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: our app is to try and instill trust back into institutions.
• 11:30
  Speaker 3: We always wanted to do that, and our bigger picture
• 11:32
  Speaker 3: was financial management and that whole you know space. But
• 11:36
  Speaker 3: then we start seeing the politics stuff, it's like, this
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: is incredible that they're able to do this. We have
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: technology and we have the team that we can actually
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: build a way for us to get involved with it.
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: And what better way to highlight like the hypocrisy of
• 11:49
  Speaker 3: politicians stock training than to build a way to actually
• 11:51
  Speaker 3: copy them and invest alongside them. And that's not like
• 11:54
  Speaker 3: how our app started. But at the time, no, none
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: of that.
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: And by the way, it's larious. Yeah, I mean it's hilarious.
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: It shouldn't be.
• 12:01
  Speaker 2: No, I know, I know it's crazy. You have to
• 12:05
  Speaker 2: laugh at tragedy.
• 12:06
  Speaker 3: I know it's working. Like I'll get into the whole
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: thing about how like this Pelosi crushed it. She was
• 12:12
  Speaker 3: up fifty four percent last year. We got half a
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: million dollars half a billion dollars invested alongside her. Where
• 12:19
  Speaker 3: the app is too popular, It shouldn't be this popular
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: with just like a slogan invests like a politician. But
• 12:24
  Speaker 3: I think it perfectly encompasses and showcases like the slogan
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: of what's wrong with society right now. It's not only
• 12:32
  Speaker 3: do we not trust politicians, we now are at the
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: point where like throwing up our hands, like fuck it.
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: You know, if you guys aren't gonna ban it, you're
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: gonna keep doing it. We're gonna build a way to
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: get in on the action. And what better way to
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: do it and highly hit Foxy than copying.
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: Them my day?
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean I again, though, if I can snap
• 12:50
  Speaker 3: my fingers and have it just go away or.
• 12:52
  Speaker 2: Of course, but you can't sure unfortunately. So okay, So
• 12:55
  Speaker 2: you see this and you decide it this is going on,
• 13:01
  Speaker 2: that there's corruption that people that politicians are supposed to
• 13:04
  Speaker 2: be protecting and serving the country or actually using this
• 13:06
  Speaker 2: information to their own advantage. Well the country, rots. How
• 13:12
  Speaker 2: did you discover that Pelosi was a then Speaker of
• 13:16
  Speaker 2: the House was particularly successful?
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: Yeah Pelosi. So Pelosi gets a lot of headlines for
• 13:22
  Speaker 3: obvious reasons one millions million and massively out weighs the
• 13:32
  Speaker 3: what the other politicians are trading. And I'm talking like
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: she's trading fifty to sixty million while everyone else is
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: trading smaller amounts. What when she got married? I think
• 13:40
  Speaker 3: it was in twenty twelve, and there's a whole arc
• 13:44
  Speaker 3: for her. She got married in twenty twelve to Paul
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: Paul Pelosi XVC.
• 13:48
  Speaker 2: No no, she's been married to paul Pelosi for decades.
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: Oh has she then? Okay, then when they got married,
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: I'm mixing up. Twenty twelve is when the stock Act started.
• 13:57
  Speaker 3: That's when they had to start showcasing it. When she
• 14:00
  Speaker 3: got married to Paula, they were worth around twenty million
• 14:03
  Speaker 3: their net worth. Their net worth now is around two
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: indred sixty million, So you're ten xing that. How she's
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: been a career long politician making one hundred and seventy
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: five K. Her husband's very, very successful, and you know
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: in stocks, particularly tech stocks. It all started with her
• 14:21
  Speaker 3: in twenty twenty when she bought Tesla, and this is
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: when I personally started paying attention. And then there's you
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: look back, It's like, holy shit, it's been going on forever.
• 14:31
  Speaker 3: And that actually started back in with the Visa IPO.
• 14:35
  Speaker 3: So with the Visa IPO, she and her husband were
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: able to get privileged ways to buy in on the IPO.
• 14:43
  Speaker 3: No one knows how, no one knows why, and then
• 14:45
  Speaker 3: the stock absolutely crushed it. So that was brought up
• 14:48
  Speaker 3: on a sixty minutes interview, and that was that iconic
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: interview from the reporter asking her, like do you think
• 14:56
  Speaker 3: this should be allowed. Is this fine that you got
• 14:58
  Speaker 3: in on the visa? And then you you know, this
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: is ten twelve years ago, nothing necessarily happened. Again, twenty
• 15:04
  Speaker 3: twenty comes around COVID, so people already necessarily know about her.
• 15:09
  Speaker 3: She now starts trading stocks again, and it's getting blown
• 15:12
  Speaker 3: up on social media because while everyone's with COVID, what
• 15:15
  Speaker 3: are they doing. They' around social media and they're trading stocks.
• 15:18
  Speaker 3: So now everyone's like acutely watching these things and paying attention.
• 15:22
  Speaker 3: She in end of twenty twenty, twenty twenty, right after
• 15:30
  Speaker 3: Biden got elected, she went and bought up to five
• 15:34
  Speaker 3: million dollars of Tesla calls. And I can go on
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: forever about the details of these things. She's not just
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: buying stock, well, her husband's not just buying She's buying
• 15:42
  Speaker 3: these things called leaps. And what a leap is is
• 15:45
  Speaker 3: a options contract that allows you to buy a stock
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: and be bullish on a stock at a much cheaper
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: cost basis. So instead of you needing five million dollars
• 15:55
  Speaker 3: to buy you know, x amount of quote unquote risk
• 15:58
  Speaker 3: in a stock for it to go up, you can
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: actually take that five million dollars and buy a leap
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: and it gives you a broader delta so that you
• 16:05
  Speaker 3: can make more money, essentially higher risk, high reward. So
• 16:09
  Speaker 3: she goes and she's buying these leaps. She's not just
• 16:11
  Speaker 3: buying the stocks in them. She buys leaps in Tesla.
• 16:14
  Speaker 3: At the end of twenty twenty, right after buying got elected.
• 16:19
  Speaker 3: Twenty twenty one comes around, or excuse me, twenty nineteen
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: into twenty twenty, because that was when Biden started. There's
• 16:24
  Speaker 3: so many dates. But when Biden's first few weeks in office,
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: he introduces the Build Back Better one point three two
• 16:32
  Speaker 3: point three three whatever, massive Infrastructure Bill. Do you remember
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: that one?
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: Very well.
• 16:37
  Speaker 3: Part of that bill had tons of not only subsidies
• 16:40
  Speaker 3: for the electric vehicle industry, but also money to build
• 16:44
  Speaker 3: out and invest for the charging ports for electric vehicles,
• 16:48
  Speaker 3: because you know, you can't just tell people to go
• 16:49
  Speaker 3: buy electric cars. He's out the infrastructure. Yeah, so when
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: you start following the timeline on it, it's like, Okay,
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: binding gets elected, she buys up to five million dollar
• 17:00
  Speaker 3: dollar of leaps, which are very risky in Tesla. That
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: agenda then comes out the stock flies fifty percent, So
• 17:09
  Speaker 3: it's not like she's actually you know, buying things that
• 17:13
  Speaker 3: the public wouldn't necessarily know about. But she's buying things
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: in a high risky way with a ton of money,
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: in ways that the public now is paying attention to
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: because you know, everyone's training stocks and they're watching Tesla Elon.
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: That was when the things started blown up, and that
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: was the first trade that probably, like I think, re
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: triggered everyone's mind into like, wait a second, you know,
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: this may not be the sketchiest trade in the world
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: because those things were still public. But how are they
• 17:39
  Speaker 3: allowed to necessarily do that? How is Pelosi the third
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: most powerful person in America? You know, President VP, the House,
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: the head of speaker. Yep, they shouldn't be allowed to
• 17:52
  Speaker 3: trade stocks. How is this even like, how are we
• 17:56
  Speaker 3: allowing that? And I think like the culmination of those
• 17:58
  Speaker 3: different intersections is why this started getting big and why
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: people started paying attention specifically to Pelosi.
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: How did she do in those leaps with Tesla's.
• 18:07
  Speaker 3: So she was up around fifty percent and then she
• 18:11
  Speaker 3: sold a little bit, and then it came back down,
• 18:13
  Speaker 3: and then she actually just sold those shares because the
• 18:16
  Speaker 3: way that a leap works is if you're buying a
• 18:18
  Speaker 3: contract and that gives you the ability to buy one
• 18:22
  Speaker 3: hundred shares of that underlying stock. It's pretty complex ish,
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: but so when when she bought the Leaps a year later,
• 18:30
  Speaker 3: she exercises the right to buy those shares, So now
• 18:33
  Speaker 3: she has I think it was around like five thousand
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: shares of Tesla, and she's held those all up until
• 18:39
  Speaker 3: July of twenty twenty four this year actually, and she
• 18:43
  Speaker 3: sold them too early. She sold them before Trump got
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: reelected and the thing started flying. But I think she
• 18:48
  Speaker 3: was up around forty to fifty percent in total from
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: that Tesla trade. Her best ones are in video, and
• 18:56
  Speaker 3: video is a whole nother story for her, But on
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: that Tesla one in particular, I think it was like
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: forty to fifty.
• 19:01
  Speaker 2: When you sleep better, you live better, you feel better,
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: and you live longer. Sleep is really important. But there's
• 19:06
  Speaker 2: a lot acting against us who are trying to get
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: a good sleep, starting with screen time. It scrambles your brain,
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: makes it hard to sleep. So we're thinking a lot
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: about sleep not getting as much as we should. So
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: a new partner we want to tell you about can
• 19:19
  Speaker 2: help you. It's called Beams dream Powder, and it's made
• 19:21
  Speaker 2: of the blend of all natural ingredients, not made by Pfizer.
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: It's science backed, it's American built and run, and best
• 19:28
  Speaker 2: of all, it legitimately tastes good and can help you
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up feeling amazing. Everybody
• 19:33
  Speaker 2: in the staff loves it and we're tossing and churning
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: during the night and more groggy wake ups desperate for
• 19:38
  Speaker 2: the coffee. They're not the only ones who use it.
• 19:40
  Speaker 2: So many people have used Beam that has improved over
• 19:43
  Speaker 2: seventeen and a half million nights sleep. They're keeping track
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: helping Americans from all the country wake up feeling good
• 19:49
  Speaker 2: and ready to go. We're getting a huge discount forty
• 19:53
  Speaker 2: seven percent off for this show. Try their best selling
• 19:57
  Speaker 2: dream Power Get seven percent off for limited ti Go
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: to Shopbeam dot com, shopbam dot com, slash Tucker, use
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: the kode Tucker a checkout and get a massive discout.
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: We can't recommend this enough. Everyone here loves it. We
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: think you will. Also, it's an American company. By the way,
• 20:11
  Speaker 2: awesome What has she done on in video?
• 20:14
  Speaker 3: So in Vidia is the second trade that got the
• 20:17
  Speaker 3: mass's attention.
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: For people to know. Tell us what in video is in.
• 20:20
  Speaker 3: Video is a semiconductor. They're essentially the most popular stock
• 20:23
  Speaker 3: in the best company. I think they're worth more than
• 20:26
  Speaker 3: Apple now, the most valuable company in the world. They
• 20:29
  Speaker 3: sell the chips for semis and like they have a
• 20:31
  Speaker 3: whole broader thing beyond this set, but essentially they're a
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: semi conductor company. They buy and sell chips. So in
• 20:38
  Speaker 3: twenty twenty two, that's when the Chips Act. If you
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: remember this fifty four billion dollar chips bill that Biden
• 20:45
  Speaker 3: and Pelosi pushed, she bought. And this is where social
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: media again why it's powerful, and the pressure started building
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: up to her at this point because people were following
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: the trades. The markets were crushed, and she was crushing it.
• 20:57
  Speaker 3: In twenty twenty one and two came around, the Chips
• 21:01
  Speaker 3: Act comes out, fifty four billion dollars of infrastructure for
• 21:05
  Speaker 3: chips and subsidies for them. She bought in Video I
• 21:08
  Speaker 3: think a couple months before that. Oh come on, yeah, yeah, yeah,
• 21:11
  Speaker 3: it's this. The problem with her is every trade is suspicious.
• 21:16
  Speaker 3: There's never a trade that you just are like, okay,
• 21:18
  Speaker 3: you know I couldnot and I'll get into them without
• 21:21
  Speaker 3: there's a couple more I can get to but with
• 21:22
  Speaker 3: that in video trade in particular, she bought it, the
• 21:25
  Speaker 3: Chips Act comes out, we start making tiktoks, we start
• 21:28
  Speaker 3: tweeting about it, and then everyone's like, what the fuck,
• 21:31
  Speaker 3: what's going on with that? She then sells it for
• 21:35
  Speaker 3: a loss because the stock was already coming down. This
• 21:38
  Speaker 3: was when the market started falling. Yeah, and she ended
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: up selling it for a three inchred thousand dollars loss.
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: She sold it all because I think the public was
• 21:45
  Speaker 3: starting to be like, what the fuck, how are you
• 21:48
  Speaker 3: doing this when we're already calling you out and you're
• 21:50
  Speaker 3: still continuing to do it. She sold those things for
• 21:53
  Speaker 3: a three inch k loss, and then she sold their
• 21:56
  Speaker 3: shares for a two inch k loss, So she lost
• 21:58
  Speaker 3: money on that first in video time. But the interesting
• 22:01
  Speaker 3: thing about that is, per these filings and the way
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: that the filings work is the Stock Act requires politicians
• 22:08
  Speaker 3: to disclose them their spouses, and their dependence of any
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: trade up to forty five days. On that trade in particular,
• 22:16
  Speaker 3: is the only time she's ever publicly said her profit
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: and loss, so never before and never since then. Only
• 22:24
  Speaker 3: in that filing was when she said, hey, everyone, I
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: lost two hundred and fifty k and Nvidia get off
• 22:30
  Speaker 3: my back kind of thing. She's never done that for
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: when she's profited. She's only done it when she's lost.
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: Interesting.
• 22:36
  Speaker 3: Yeah, there's so many things with her. The filings she
• 22:40
  Speaker 3: sends out are always before holidays. So she's notorious in
• 22:47
  Speaker 3: our community for releasing reports around Thanksgiving, July fourth, Christmas.
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: And I think the argument is because, like, if you
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: put it on December twenty third, everyone's going off to vacation.
• 22:59
  Speaker 2: No wor yeah, track it gets lost, Yeah, gets lost
• 23:02
  Speaker 2: in the media. Yea drop bad news on Fridays, That's
• 23:04
  Speaker 2: exactly Yeah. This year she dropped it on July fourth.
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: That was when she dropped all of these previous.
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: Day amerge I no, yeah, but so that in video
• 23:13
  Speaker 3: trade goes on, she loses money. The whole market was
• 23:16
  Speaker 3: doing bad in that year, so she didn't do too
• 23:19
  Speaker 3: well in that that I think it was twenty twenty two.
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: Twenty twenty three comes around, the market starts going up again,
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: and we have all this information which I could probably
• 23:30
  Speaker 3: get to. But she then re buys into in video
• 23:34
  Speaker 3: at the end of twenty twenty two or at the
• 23:38
  Speaker 3: end of twenty twenty three, excuse me. In November, she
• 23:41
  Speaker 3: goes and buys five million dollars worth of leaps again
• 23:44
  Speaker 3: those leaps. Then right after she buys, there's no no,
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: no laws or anything that comes up after that. It
• 23:52
  Speaker 3: just turns out to be a tremendously well timed trade
• 23:55
  Speaker 3: because from there in video goes up one hundred and
• 23:57
  Speaker 3: sixty one hundred and seventy percent, And on that trade
• 24:00
  Speaker 3: in particular, she then bought a little bit more that
• 24:03
  Speaker 3: five million. And the ranges are hard because the way
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: that these filings work is they have to file from
• 24:11
  Speaker 3: one K to fifteen k is one little check, fifteen
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: K to fifty k, fifty k to one hundred k,
• 24:18
  Speaker 3: one hundred k to two hundred fifty k, two hunre
• 24:20
  Speaker 3: of fifty k to five hunch k five r k up.
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: So we're going off of the ranges, so you don't
• 24:25
  Speaker 3: know the exact amount that she's buying, but that in
• 24:29
  Speaker 3: video trade is the best trade she's ever made that
• 24:31
  Speaker 3: we followed in recent memory. And she's up around like
• 24:34
  Speaker 3: one hundred and forty percent on that trade in particularly,
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: and like this is millions. It's not like it's you know,
• 24:42
  Speaker 3: fifty k, it's up to five million dollars that five
• 24:45
  Speaker 3: million dollars could be worth seven point five million now
• 24:49
  Speaker 3: and she's just quiet about it, doesn't say anything when
• 24:52
  Speaker 3: we call her out.
• 24:53
  Speaker 2: How long have you been doing this?
• 24:55
  Speaker 3: We've been doing it since twenty twenty two, so we've
• 24:58
  Speaker 3: tracked her in particularly, and let me be clear, it's
• 25:00
  Speaker 3: not just her.
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: No, I know, I've got a bunch of questions.
• 25:02
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Crenshaw and them, But yeah, we've been tracking hers
• 25:05
  Speaker 3: since twenty twenty hal.
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: You know, you look at if I look at the Congress,
• 25:08
  Speaker 2: who are the filthiest members of Congress? Well, Dan Crenshaw
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: would be right at the top with Pelosi. And it's
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: not surprising that they're.
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: No.
• 25:16
  Speaker 3: And he he is interesting because.
• 25:20
  Speaker 2: Before we get to do yeah, he's his whole thing. Yeah,
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: but I just want to close up post for sex.
• 25:24
  Speaker 2: So you've been doing this for two and a half
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: three years on Pelosi, yep, and gotten you said you've
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: never done an interview before, which is very weird.
• 25:32
  Speaker 3: No.
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: No, but a lot of people I know read you.
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: You know a lot. So she's gotten a lot of
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: scrutiny because of what you've done. Has her office ever
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: reached out to you in any way?
• 25:41
  Speaker 3: Now the office has never reached out. And again, like
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: the crazy thing about this stuff is, uh, we took
• 25:49
  Speaker 3: this whole thing a step further by building our app
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: autopilot and autopilot. The way that it works is you
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: literally can go and invest alongside these politicians. So it's
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: one thing to be like, oh, you Pelosi, you know
• 26:01
  Speaker 3: you're trading in front of us, and then it's like, oh,
• 26:03
  Speaker 3: wait a second, you're crushing it, like whoa. And now
• 26:06
  Speaker 3: it's like and now I can invest alongside them, because
• 26:10
  Speaker 3: so I can get in on the action. And I
• 26:12
  Speaker 3: think like allowing people to get their money in makes
• 26:15
  Speaker 3: the whole thing kind of just more hypocritical and funnier.
• 26:18
  Speaker 3: So Pelosi since we've been tracking her is up eighty
• 26:21
  Speaker 3: seven percent. That's from I think around May of twenty
• 26:24
  Speaker 3: twenty one, outperforming the spy by fifty percent. Since in
• 26:28
  Speaker 3: that time period, since we've been doing this thing, we
• 26:30
  Speaker 3: now have three hundred million dollars literally investing alongside her.
• 26:34
  Speaker 3: People have profited thirty million dollars trading doing whatever she
• 26:38
  Speaker 3: does in that time fer your give or take. And
• 26:41
  Speaker 3: her public office has never reached out. She's gone on,
• 26:45
  Speaker 3: you know, been questioned in the press conferences, being like,
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: do you think you and members of Congress should be
• 26:50
  Speaker 3: allowed to trade stock? And she's like, yeah, well it's
• 26:53
  Speaker 3: a free economy, Like if it's a free market, we
• 26:56
  Speaker 3: as citizens should be able to trade.
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: And of course it's not a free market. And her
• 26:59
  Speaker 2: examples shows you what a rigged market it is. Yeah,
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: of course, I mean she's so, yeah, she's benefiting from
• 27:05
  Speaker 2: information that she has because of her position. She's not
• 27:08
  Speaker 2: allowed to do that. She does it anyway. It's a crime.
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: She should be prosecuted. It's certainly a moral crime. So
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: give us some perspectives. So she's up this, you know,
• 27:18
  Speaker 2: fantastic number relative to like average investors. Informed investors like,
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: how well is she done?
• 27:25
  Speaker 3: Ye, so last year in particular, and this is probably
• 27:28
  Speaker 3: we and let me be clear, so we're not tracking
• 27:31
  Speaker 3: since it's hard to know the exact amount and it's
• 27:34
  Speaker 3: hard to track her actual trades. So what we track
• 27:37
  Speaker 3: is the filings of it, and they're roughly the same
• 27:40
  Speaker 3: because they don't they don't get displayed or filed too
• 27:44
  Speaker 3: long after. So in twenty twenty four, for example, she
• 27:47
  Speaker 3: was up fifty four percent, the market was up around
• 27:50
  Speaker 3: I think like twenty six or twenty seven, so she
• 27:52
  Speaker 3: personally outperformed the stock market, you know, the broader SMP
• 27:56
  Speaker 3: by twenty percent, twenty five percent. We also have these
• 28:00
  Speaker 3: other trackers that track the hedge funds and there was
• 28:04
  Speaker 3: a report from Bloomberg where she actually outperformed I think
• 28:08
  Speaker 3: like ninety five percent of professional hedge fund managers. And
• 28:12
  Speaker 3: when you take us to it's like what is good?
• 28:15
  Speaker 3: What the politicians unusual? Wales has a report in twenty
• 28:19
  Speaker 3: twenty four and she was only the seventh best trader.
• 28:22
  Speaker 3: There were traders that were better than her.
• 28:24
  Speaker 2: Well, the funny thing I was talking about this yesterday
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: with a buddy mine who's in business. But you often
• 28:27
  Speaker 2: see retired politicians decide they're going to go get rich
• 28:29
  Speaker 2: in business, in finance usually, but you know in some
• 28:33
  Speaker 2: form of pe or whatever that they think they're gonna
• 28:36
  Speaker 2: be and they are all terrible, Like there's not been
• 28:39
  Speaker 2: we're talking about. Pompeo thinks he's going to get rich
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: with Pompeo and like, no one wants Pompeo because he's
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: like an idiot, isn't this is not his area? And
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: he's well, I should say he's not an It he's smart,
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: but he's on a business guy, no, and politics and
• 28:50
  Speaker 2: business are very different. So it's especially striking to see
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: polic this is the only way politicians can make money
• 28:57
  Speaker 2: is through inside her training. Yeah, I know, is that
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: fir to say?
• 29:00
  Speaker 3: Pretty much? Yeah, it's that or books. It's a book
• 29:04
  Speaker 3: and honestly that's like specials Now. Yeah, the Clinton's with
• 29:08
  Speaker 3: all that stuff, but she again is extreme because you
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: just trade so much. The other politicians they're trading on
• 29:15
  Speaker 3: lower levels. And but I think like the bigger thing
• 29:18
  Speaker 3: that we're trying to do with all this stuff is
• 29:20
  Speaker 3: like we don't want them trading again, like we think
• 29:22
  Speaker 3: that it's messed up. It creates distrust in the politician.
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: It's not like we don't me personally. It's not like
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: I am you know, saying hey, you guys can't do
• 29:33
  Speaker 3: that because you're getting rich, Like obviously that's a piece
• 29:36
  Speaker 3: of it, but it's more of like, hey, you guys
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: can't do that because the average American can't do that,
• 29:41
  Speaker 3: and we're all just looking at you guys.
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: Influences their policymaking behavior. Yeah, yeah, I mean, of course,
• 29:47
  Speaker 2: it sets up incentives that you don't want to have
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: in your legislative branch at all.
• 29:51
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and you know the sense like, yeah, show me
• 29:54
  Speaker 3: the incentive, I'll show you the reward.
• 29:56
  Speaker 2: It's like, that's.
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: Exactly right, You're gonna the war. Ones are crazy too,
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: Like there's so much that you can get into.
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: I have trouble laughing at that. That that actually makes
• 30:06
  Speaker 2: me feel like these people are going to hell. But
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: I want to ask about that in two seconds. But
• 30:10
  Speaker 2: first you said she's the seventh Yeah, most successful congressional
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: trader who.
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: Are in twenty twenty four. So the other ones off
• 30:17
  Speaker 3: the top, and this is all unusual on unusual Wales
• 30:20
  Speaker 3: is Twitter, We work with them. He actually took some
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: of the portfolios and he put them on our app
• 30:24
  Speaker 3: So now people can go in and they can trade alongside,
• 30:27
  Speaker 3: not just Pelosi, but other ones too. David Rouser was
• 30:31
  Speaker 3: the top one, and I think he he made a
• 30:33
  Speaker 3: lot of money in Nvidia.
• 30:35
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: He also owns some other smaller ETFs, so he wasn't
• 30:38
  Speaker 3: He doesn't trade that much, so he these are stocks
• 30:41
  Speaker 3: that he's owned for a while. Yeah, Wie Wasserman Schultz,
• 30:45
  Speaker 3: she's now a two time top five political stock trader.
• 30:50
  Speaker 2: Speaking of filthy Yeah.
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: Yeah, she gets a We so we run the Pelosi
• 30:55
  Speaker 3: Tracker and we also have a politician trade tracker on
• 30:58
  Speaker 3: Instagram and TikTok that each has of you know, eight
• 31:00
  Speaker 3: hundred thousand. On TikTok, we have around one hundred thousand followers.
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: She gets people don't like that woman.
• 31:06
  Speaker 2: Well, nobody likes her. Yeah, So she was bounced out
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: of a leadership position in the Democratic Party because people
• 31:11
  Speaker 2: disliked her so much personally.
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: And she honestly is one of the five or six
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: that I personally track like that I know a decent
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: amount about because of how many times she has conflicts
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: of interest which what she trades. For example, she bought
• 31:25
  Speaker 3: this company called Viasat, and what Viasat does is they're
• 31:28
  Speaker 3: a military contractor. They're like a starlink like Elon's thing,
• 31:33
  Speaker 3: but they do the communications for the military. They get
• 31:36
  Speaker 3: hundreds of millions of dollars of contracts from you know
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: this or that. She sits on the committee that oversees
• 31:44
  Speaker 3: military construction, and it's like, I'm watching you trade this stock,
• 31:49
  Speaker 3: you know, even aside from performance, I'm watching you buy
• 31:51
  Speaker 3: and sell a military construction company while sitting on a
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: committee that oversees military construction. How is that a loud?
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: I don't know. Another one was she bought a mining
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: company called Helca Mining with ticker symbol hl. That stock
• 32:07
  Speaker 3: has been fluctuating here and there, and I think she
• 32:10
  Speaker 3: is up around fifteen percent on it. She sits on
• 32:13
  Speaker 3: the energy one of the energy resources committees, and it's like,
• 32:19
  Speaker 3: what are we doing? You know, how do they allow?
• 32:21
  Speaker 2: What are we doing? Well, we're watching corruption happen and
• 32:24
  Speaker 2: it's and it's destroying any confidence people have in their government.
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: It's priming the country for some kind of revolution, hopefully
• 32:32
  Speaker 2: a peaceful one, but a revolution anyway. This can't just
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: can't continue in a democracy. So tell us about my
• 32:41
  Speaker 2: all time favorite member of Congress, Dan Crenshaw.
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, yeah, so's he's a tough one. He's a
• 32:47
  Speaker 3: he's a hot head on Twitter now control, Yeah, he's
• 32:50
  Speaker 3: I don't understand why he's taking this stance a little
• 32:53
  Speaker 3: bit because I.
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: Used to be personal life is out of control.
• 32:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah, because he used to be like a right wing darling,
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: like he was, you know, the with the knee I
• 33:00
  Speaker 3: think early early on again.
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: Not with me. I always thought he was a freaking
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: a warmonger. Really weird. Ooh yeah, he's a freaking warmonger.
• 33:07
  Speaker 3: But yeah he's showing it.
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: Now.
• 33:09
  Speaker 3: Did you see the Free Press he did where we
• 33:12
  Speaker 3: posted this. He essentially comes out he's like supporting politicals, politicians,
• 33:18
  Speaker 3: dock trading. He's like, if you get rid of it,
• 33:20
  Speaker 3: you're gonna get crappy politicians. And it's like, what are
• 33:24
  Speaker 3: you talking about? You know, like we're not asking you guys.
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: To It's that's like saying, if you don't allow the
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: police to shake down speeders at gunpoint, you're gonna get
• 33:32
  Speaker 2: a worse kind of cop.
• 33:33
  Speaker 3: Exactly.
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's crazy, It's it's yeah.
• 33:37
  Speaker 3: So he had a fiery one with the Free Press
• 33:40
  Speaker 3: probably about like two months ago, right before Thanks Getting.
• 33:43
  Speaker 3: I saw that his portfolio though in particular he's up
• 33:46
  Speaker 3: around like forty eight to fifty percent and all of this.
• 33:49
  Speaker 3: You know, I got to say this for compliances, Like
• 33:51
  Speaker 3: you can see all this on our app. You know,
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: it's all right there. So I may kind of be
• 33:55
  Speaker 3: depending on the day, but he outperformed the market. He
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: was right below Pelosi.
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: The stock's an idiot though, I mean, with no business
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: background that I'm of, So, like, how would you.
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: Do that his stocks. The one that in particular that
• 34:08
  Speaker 3: really frustrated me about him was Meta. So he with
• 34:13
  Speaker 3: the stocks that he's buying is his portfolio is comprised
• 34:16
  Speaker 3: of Meta, which he's crushing it up like two hundred percent.
• 34:18
  Speaker 3: He bought the dip perfectly back in twenty twenty two,
• 34:21
  Speaker 3: I believe, like pretty much perfectly things started flying. He
• 34:26
  Speaker 3: bought Amazon, he bought Fas, which is like finance ETF.
• 34:32
  Speaker 3: He bought the Spy, and then he bought win Resorts,
• 34:34
  Speaker 3: and then he bought some other company. The the stock though,
• 34:39
  Speaker 3: that crushed it for him was Meta And the part
• 34:42
  Speaker 3: that I get annoyed about, you know, aside from TikTok
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: bands this and that you can't He buys the stock.
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: A couple months later, starts pushing and publicly vocalizing like,
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: hey everyone, we should we should ban TikTok, you know,
• 34:56
  Speaker 3: And it's like pretty convenient to say when you own
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: TikTok's main competitor, and every time you're saying that the
• 35:03
  Speaker 3: stock is going up five percent.
• 35:05
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: He then goes off and starts asking for the ban
• 35:09
  Speaker 3: on and again like I feel like I'm pretty pro
• 35:12
  Speaker 3: banned TikTok. So there's a whole world with that. But
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: he then goes off and votes against the bill to
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: ban TikTok. So now you've got a politician that is
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: buying TikTok's main competitor Meta. You're then publicly talking about
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: how you want to ban it from government, from government
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: officials phones, to then voting on the bill to ban TikTok,
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: all while the stock has gone up two hundred percent
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: while you boned it.
• 35:37
  Speaker 2: And this is like, you're shocking me.
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm numb to it.
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: And when and when he gets called out on it,
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: And this is one of the reasons I dislike him.
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: And I do think that he's there's he's there's a
• 35:48
  Speaker 2: lot wrong with him personally, so I do feel sorry
• 35:51
  Speaker 2: for him. A lot wrong. I mean, I know that.
• 35:53
  Speaker 2: But anyway, leaving that aside, the reason I don't like
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: him is because he's self righteous. Yeah, if I can't,
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: she's shoplifting. And then you punch me in the face
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: and scream how you're being victimized. I can't deal with that.
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: Just to meet your shoplifting, say sorry and I'll preregive
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: you and move on, but don't yell at me.
• 36:09
  Speaker 3: Yeah, or even just help the conversation be like, yeah,
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: I mean if you guys are allowing us, like I'll
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: vote on it, this and that, like just be open
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: and be transparent about it. Yes, you don't have to
• 36:20
  Speaker 3: attack and you know gaslight, No, that's.
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: Exactly right, that's exactly right. And boy is he a
• 36:24
  Speaker 2: specialist in that area. Yeah.
• 36:26
  Speaker 3: Yeah, the Free Press one I would reckon. I'll send
• 36:28
  Speaker 3: it to you after.
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: I've seen it.
• 36:29
  Speaker 3: Yeah, oh yeah, Yeah, that one gets my blood boiling
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: because it's like, what frustrates me about this stuff is
• 36:36
  Speaker 3: you can't sit on the committee, you can't be voting
• 36:39
  Speaker 3: on these things. You can't do it all, be doing
• 36:40
  Speaker 3: all this stuff in front of the American public. Meanwhile,
• 36:44
  Speaker 3: you know, I have a friend that is a consultant
• 36:46
  Speaker 3: at ey or Deloitte. He can't trade individual stocks. I
• 36:51
  Speaker 3: got friends in banking that can't trade individual stuffs. It's like,
• 36:54
  Speaker 3: why can you not let the low level analysts, the
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: JP Morgan buy you know Apple? Yeah, meanwhile, you got
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: these politicians buying up this five hundred million dollar military
• 37:06
  Speaker 3: construction company all right in front of.
• 37:09
  Speaker 2: I know the answer, you want to hear the answer,
• 37:10
  Speaker 2: because after the financial crisis, that Congress helped cause. Congress
• 37:16
  Speaker 2: runs in with Dodd Frank, you know, Chris Dodd and
• 37:20
  Speaker 2: Barney Frank remember the Senate, remember the House, both Democrats,
• 37:22
  Speaker 2: and they come up with all these regulations that are
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: supposedly going to protect America from future disasters of this kind,
• 37:29
  Speaker 2: and they, you know, pass these so called reforms destroy
• 37:33
  Speaker 2: the banking sector, really don't make it less corrupt, just
• 37:37
  Speaker 2: kind of wreck it, take all the innovation out of it,
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: and then they don't apply those same standards themselves, right,
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: I mean that's kind of the shortless Ville enough for me?
• 37:44
  Speaker 2: Is that a fair?
• 37:45
  Speaker 3: Yeah?
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: One hundred percent?
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: And what's the history of the Stock Act that started
• 37:50
  Speaker 3: because of the housing crisis. Yeah, So it was initially
• 37:53
  Speaker 3: introduced in two thousand and six. And the Stock Act
• 37:56
  Speaker 3: literally what it says is stop see whatever, stop trading
• 38:03
  Speaker 3: on congressional knowledge. That's what it means. So if you
• 38:07
  Speaker 3: have a bill that literally says stopped trading on congressional
• 38:09
  Speaker 3: knowledge as the name of the act, you know that
• 38:13
  Speaker 3: there's something already sketchy going on. And why was that
• 38:15
  Speaker 3: not a thing to begin with?
• 38:17
  Speaker 2: And so what happened to it?
• 38:18
  Speaker 3: So in two thousand and six, it got introduced, No
• 38:21
  Speaker 3: politicians cared about it, you know whatever. After the housing crisis,
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: they found out and they realized that they were around
• 38:27
  Speaker 3: thirty three politicians that set their portfolios up after talking
• 38:32
  Speaker 3: with the officials at the FED and you know, the
• 38:34
  Speaker 3: people milding up the military policy. They reconstructed their portfolios
• 38:38
  Speaker 3: while that whole crisis was going on. They didn't have
• 38:41
  Speaker 3: to display or publicly talk about it because the Stock
• 38:43
  Speaker 3: Act wasn't announced. All that stuff came out after that, like, oh,
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: while the housing market is crashing and Americans are losing
• 38:49
  Speaker 3: their homes left and right, these politicians are moving millions
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: reconstructing their portfolios after getting out of the meetings with
• 38:56
  Speaker 3: the FED officials. So that's how it came back on
• 38:59
  Speaker 3: to the center stage. The Stock Act then gets introduced
• 39:03
  Speaker 3: in twenty twelve, and then it gets past shortly after that.
• 39:07
  Speaker 3: What is crazy in my head though, is like, what
• 39:10
  Speaker 3: the heck was going on before?
• 39:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah?
• 39:12
  Speaker 3: Like what that I think was we were talking off camera,
• 39:15
  Speaker 3: Like our generation we grow up with it and we're
• 39:18
  Speaker 3: used to it now because of things like that. It's like,
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: how can they have not had any limitations before twenty twelve?
• 39:27
  Speaker 3: What were they doing. You know, I can't answer your question. Clearly,
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: it's been very corrupt for a long time. Well, they
• 39:35
  Speaker 3: murdered the President of the United States in nineteen sixty
• 39:37
  Speaker 3: three and no one was ever held accountable for it.
• 39:39
  Speaker 3: So you know, looking back, you can say, boy, we've
• 39:42
  Speaker 3: had big problems for a long time. But I can
• 39:44
  Speaker 3: tell you assuming and grew up right in them, right
• 39:45
  Speaker 3: in the middle of it, in DC, in Georgetown, all
• 39:48
  Speaker 3: this stuff was going on, Like when when that COVID,
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: those COVID trades. You've started our conversation by describing Kelly
• 39:56
  Speaker 3: Waffler was involved in that.
• 39:58
  Speaker 2: All this stuff. I was like, heard of me. I
• 40:00
  Speaker 2: think I was the only person in Fox News who
• 40:02
  Speaker 2: did anything on it, because, yeah, it's a great story.
• 40:05
  Speaker 2: But even as I was doing the story, I was like, this, kid,
• 40:07
  Speaker 2: there's got to be another exploits. This can't be real.
• 40:09
  Speaker 2: That beating on a pandemic. Yeah, insider trading on a pandemic.
• 40:14
  Speaker 2: Like I was like, you'd have to be a monster
• 40:15
  Speaker 2: to do that, Like this can't actually have happened.
• 40:18
  Speaker 3: That was me with the Pelosi tracker every day in
• 40:21
  Speaker 3: the early I'm just I remember a couple of these
• 40:25
  Speaker 3: trades and there's so many now. But I remember calling
• 40:28
  Speaker 3: my dad up and I'm like, wait a second, like
• 40:31
  Speaker 3: is this actually like are they actually trading?
• 40:34
  Speaker 4: It's not just Mike McCall. I can't remember the specific trades.
• 40:37
  Speaker 4: I think it was him, but uh, no one were here.
• 40:40
  Speaker 4: I'm talking about poor Dan Crenshaw. It was just like
• 40:43
  Speaker 4: totally unbalanced. That one ends well, but Mike McCall is like,
• 40:46
  Speaker 4: now we're getting really sinister.
• 40:48
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, he I'm.
• 40:50
  Speaker 3: Trying to remember the trades because he sits on the
• 40:52
  Speaker 3: uh he sits on a lot of the intelligence committees
• 40:54
  Speaker 3: and a lot of the big committees, and he's trading millions.
• 40:59
  Speaker 2: But it's not just McCall.
• 41:00
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I think so. I think so he's in particular
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: because he's really hard to track. We know this in
• 41:05
  Speaker 3: the world of the US Quiver quant user Wales, we're
• 41:08
  Speaker 3: the ones that do this. He manually fills out the
• 41:11
  Speaker 3: filings by hand, so his trades don't get picked up
• 41:16
  Speaker 3: by the majority of A'm ninety nine percent sure I
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: can confirm that. But yeah, he and his trades I
• 41:23
  Speaker 3: think are weird because it's him. It's the dependent in
• 41:27
  Speaker 3: the spouse. The trades they come in kind of as
• 41:31
  Speaker 3: the same. So there's an argument that maybe Mike McCall's
• 41:34
  Speaker 3: trades are from a financial advisor. But if he can
• 41:41
  Speaker 3: tell us, you know, we tag him on Twitter. It's like,
• 41:43
  Speaker 3: you guys can just tell us what's going on.
• 41:45
  Speaker 2: It doesn't care. A couple of years ago, somebody said
• 41:48
  Speaker 2: I was talking to Mike McCall and he described he
• 41:49
  Speaker 2: as a Russian agent.
• 41:51
  Speaker 3: Really, oh, so he's Russian one of these guys.
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: So I called Mike McCall and I said, listen, bitch,
• 41:55
  Speaker 2: can I call you bitch? I you I think I
• 41:58
  Speaker 2: said exactly that. You told someone was Russian agent. Like,
• 42:01
  Speaker 2: I'm from this country. I feel like I'm pretty patriotic,
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: And uh, did you say that? And he said I
• 42:07
  Speaker 2: did say that because the Intel briefers told me that.
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: And I said, how old are you, son, I think
• 42:12
  Speaker 2: he's older than I am. You believe you're Intel briefers? Yeah,
• 42:16
  Speaker 2: And he said, yeah, I do. I gotta give him
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: credit to me. He took my call in the whole thing.
• 42:20
  Speaker 2: But I was like, this guy is the most controlled, scary,
• 42:25
  Speaker 2: stupid but also scary person I think I've ever dealt
• 42:28
  Speaker 2: with in Congress ever. So I guess I'm not that
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: surprised that he's What is it with Texas Republicans anyway,
• 42:34
  Speaker 2: I don't know a lot of them.
• 42:36
  Speaker 3: I mean, you go a little the north to Oklahoma
• 42:38
  Speaker 3: and Mark Wayne Mullins an interesting one too, what do
• 42:41
  Speaker 3: you I don't know too much about his. He's a
• 42:44
  Speaker 3: fiery guy too.
• 42:46
  Speaker 2: He was threatened to beat somebody.
• 42:47
  Speaker 3: Yeah the teamstairs president. Yeah yeah, yeah during that. Yeah,
• 42:52
  Speaker 3: we built a whole I have a whole thing.
• 42:54
  Speaker 2: I like Sean O'Brien for the right.
• 42:55
  Speaker 3: Really yeah, good guys. I don't So that's what's the
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: thing that's interesting about me. Again, from my background, I
• 43:00
  Speaker 3: don't know anything about these politicies. I'm not like a
• 43:02
  Speaker 3: political person caut We call out the politicians, the Democrats,
• 43:06
  Speaker 3: like The New York Times came out with a report
• 43:08
  Speaker 3: in twenty twenty two that said that one hundred eighty
• 43:11
  Speaker 3: politicians traded over thirty seven hundred times that totaled over
• 43:15
  Speaker 3: one hundred, ten hundred and fifteen million dollars of volume
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: in UH from twenty nineteen to twenty twenty one. Out
• 43:22
  Speaker 3: of those, it was literally half pretty much half Democrats,
• 43:25
  Speaker 3: half Republicans. So they're all doing it course, out of
• 43:28
  Speaker 3: those one hundred eighty politicians, though, ninety of them sat
• 43:30
  Speaker 3: on committees that directly oversaw companies that they traded. And
• 43:35
  Speaker 3: you're like, okay, well, so that sounds like a conflict
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: of interest. And then that's what stamarked me to get
• 43:40
  Speaker 3: really into this and being like, what actually are the
• 43:43
  Speaker 3: trades that are going on? Are they outperforming? Why are
• 43:45
  Speaker 3: these random companies being bought? And Mike mccallaugh in particularly,
• 43:48
  Speaker 3: he checks this kind of box a lot. He for example,
• 43:53
  Speaker 3: bought this stock in a company called Badger Meters earlier
• 43:56
  Speaker 3: this year. Badger Meters does a water meter solutions. Don't
• 43:59
  Speaker 3: know much of it. It's just a freaking water meters
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: two billion, three billion dollar company. Turns out that the EPA,
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: a couple months to his to be fair before he bought,
• 44:09
  Speaker 3: signed a mandate saying that all these water systems have
• 44:12
  Speaker 3: to upgrade their technology, beneficial for Badger Meters stock goes up.
• 44:17
  Speaker 3: You then do some further digging, and then you realize
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: that Tulsa, Oklahoma, passed a ninety four million dollar bill
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: to upgrade their own water meter systems right around the
• 44:28
  Speaker 3: time that Mark Waynemullan bought Badger Meters Oklahoma. Tulsa, Oklahoma
• 44:34
  Speaker 3: is the state that Mark Wayne Mullen represents. He's the
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: senator of it. So then you're like EPA passes thing,
• 44:42
  Speaker 3: passes the requirement to upgrade the water systems Senator by Stock,
• 44:48
  Speaker 3: senator's home home state gives one hundred million dollars to
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: upgrade water meter systems. Pro for Badger Meters, stock is
• 44:57
  Speaker 3: up fifty percent. I think he's up like forty eight per.
• 45:00
  Speaker 2: On that Badger meet.
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: It might.
• 45:02
  Speaker 2: I mean I'm not an investor, so, but I've never
• 45:04
  Speaker 2: heard of Badger meters. E take good. I feel better.
• 45:07
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, non.
• 45:08
  Speaker 2: So you have two prominent politicians in the Congress buying
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: Badger meters in the same period.
• 45:13
  Speaker 3: It just him, Oh, this is just marketing. This is
• 45:15
  Speaker 3: just wyk wayn Mullen. Yeah, And that's no other politicians
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: are buying. I've never heard of Badger Meters. I don't
• 45:21
  Speaker 3: know anything about the company. But when you when you
• 45:24
  Speaker 3: started just connecting all the dots, there's just too many
• 45:28
  Speaker 3: hip like controversial eyebrow raising like oh wait, the state
• 45:34
  Speaker 3: that you represent just put one hundred million dollars to
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: upgrade their water systems. Oh wait, you just bought the
• 45:39
  Speaker 3: company that specializes in upgrading water systems. Oh wait, now
• 45:43
  Speaker 3: the stock has been crushing on earnings and you're still
• 45:46
  Speaker 3: loaning it and it's up forty percent. He sold it
• 45:48
  Speaker 3: earlier this year, he held it for probably like I think,
• 45:51
  Speaker 3: like eight months, but I think he made like fifty
• 45:53
  Speaker 3: forty fifty percent on that stock. And again, this isn't
• 45:56
  Speaker 3: an Apple, you know, this isn't a Google, this isn't
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: in video. This is a water company that's this type
• 46:04
  Speaker 3: of stuff that we see.
• 46:05
  Speaker 2: And you don't think it's possible. He was taking tips
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: from Jim Kramer on CNBA.
• 46:08
  Speaker 3: Now, no, funny enough, we have an inverse Kramer portfolio.
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: So, the people who built this country built it because
• 46:14
  Speaker 2: they wanted freedom, one word freedom. They wanted freedom from
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: oppressors who forced them to buy overpriced tea, then blockaded
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: them when they tried to dump it into the ocean.
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: How'd that work out? Well, we built America in response.
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: So it's time to throw your big, overpriced wireless contract
• 46:29
  Speaker 2: overboard to a new tea party. You don't have to
• 46:31
  Speaker 2: pay one hundred dollars a month just to use a phone.
• 46:34
  Speaker 2: Most people don't use that much in services, but they
• 46:37
  Speaker 2: pay it anyway. Our cell phone company, pure Talk, says
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: no to those prices. With a qualifying plan, you can
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: choose an iPhone fourteen or a Samsung Galaxy for nothing
• 46:47
  Speaker 2: zero get premium service on America's most dependable five G network.
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: It only takes a minute to switch. We highly recommend it.
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: No hass to, no gimmicks, just honest to goodness wireless price. Right,
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: So you get your iPhone fourteen or sam some Galaxy
• 47:00
  Speaker 2: for nothing zero dollars the qualifying plan. Go to pure
• 47:03
  Speaker 2: talk dot com slash tucker Is it puretalk dot com
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: slash tucker for details America's wireless company. So how does
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: Kramer do relative to say inverse Cramer? Uh, he beats them.
• 47:16
  Speaker 2: So inverse Kramer was up forty eight twenty twenty four.
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: Wait in verse Krame.
• 47:20
  Speaker 3: Oh yeah yeah, and we have a portfolio that does
• 47:23
  Speaker 3: the opposite of what he does. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 47:26
  Speaker 3: I'm telling you that we're just we're we're a group
• 47:29
  Speaker 3: of you know, we're fifteen now out in in Irvine, California,
• 47:33
  Speaker 3: just fucking around with some of these things. And we're
• 47:36
  Speaker 3: we're registered with the SEC or are you in and
• 47:38
  Speaker 3: you invested in YA funds? You can't, so I mean
• 47:41
  Speaker 3: you can, you can, you can't. I don't buy like
• 47:43
  Speaker 3: the Pelosi ones because I I ethically, I don't like
• 47:47
  Speaker 3: to buy the companies that I tweet about because I
• 47:49
  Speaker 3: don't want to believe in like if I tweet this,
• 47:52
  Speaker 3: the stock will go up twenty percent, right, you know,
• 47:54
  Speaker 3: I just don't even want to get into that world.
• 47:57
  Speaker 3: I though invest in some of these other strategies. I
• 48:00
  Speaker 3: have around five k in a strategy provided by quiver quant.
• 48:04
  Speaker 3: Great guys. They do what usual Wells does similar on
• 48:06
  Speaker 3: Instagram and Twitter. They track the lobbying so they see
• 48:10
  Speaker 3: which companies are spending the most on lobbying in DC
• 48:14
  Speaker 3: and then they build a strategy around it to see
• 48:16
  Speaker 3: if a strategy like that outperforms the market over too.
• 48:19
  Speaker 2: Well, I know what what sector has spent a lot? Crypto? Yeah, yeah,
• 48:25
  Speaker 2: I mean, I mean I saw them everywhere on the
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: road this fall.
• 48:27
  Speaker 3: Really we have a Jdvans portfolio. He has some uh bitcoin.
• 48:31
  Speaker 3: His portfolio is very good. He is uh he only
• 48:35
  Speaker 3: is in the ETFs, so kudos to him, but he
• 48:39
  Speaker 3: owns some crypto.
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: I will say this about Obviously JD's a friend of mine,
• 48:42
  Speaker 2: so I would defend him. You know, my instinct is
• 48:45
  Speaker 2: to defend him, and I love JD Vance, But I
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: would say, without knowing any details, he like had a legitimate,
• 48:52
  Speaker 2: you know, career in that world before a one hundred. Yeah,
• 48:54
  Speaker 2: so you could at least say JD Vance knows what
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: ANTF is, you know.
• 48:58
  Speaker 3: And also credit to him. He so he he was
• 49:00
  Speaker 3: a VC founder's fund.
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 49:02
  Speaker 3: I I don't come from this world, but I know
• 49:04
  Speaker 3: this because you know, our app is venture backed. He
• 49:08
  Speaker 3: had again credit to him, he had money and Rumble
• 49:11
  Speaker 3: so YouTube's competitor before he via his venture capital firm.
• 49:17
  Speaker 3: I can't confirm this. I've never met him, but when
• 49:19
  Speaker 3: he got into office, before he became VP, he sold
• 49:22
  Speaker 3: out of Rumble, so only the stocks that he owns
• 49:25
  Speaker 3: are just the main ETFs.
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: Can I ask you, is there some easy or workable
• 49:30
  Speaker 2: way for members of Congress to put all their investments
• 49:34
  Speaker 2: into some blind yeah blind trust?
• 49:36
  Speaker 3: Yeah yes yeah. So this is where it gets complex,
• 49:41
  Speaker 3: and I'd be curious to hear your take on this.
• 49:43
  Speaker 3: So there's bills out there to get it banned. You know,
• 49:47
  Speaker 3: I think social media has done a tremendous job with this,
• 49:49
  Speaker 3: with the Pelosi tracker, with all of us trying to
• 49:52
  Speaker 3: call out with our app it's like our app part
• 49:54
  Speaker 3: of it is built to highlight the hypocrisy of just
• 49:57
  Speaker 3: how big of a problem this is five hundred million
• 49:59
  Speaker 3: dollars and be copying Pelosi. They are like, that's a problem. Yes,
• 50:04
  Speaker 3: So to credit to some of these politicians, AOC has
• 50:07
  Speaker 3: done a lot. You know, she's a fiery figure, but
• 50:09
  Speaker 3: she has had two bills. She actually just released a
• 50:12
  Speaker 3: bill a week ago called the Restore Faith in Government
• 50:15
  Speaker 3: Act and it calls for banning political stock trading. There's
• 50:19
  Speaker 3: been around five bill for her. Yeah, yeah, she's been
• 50:21
  Speaker 3: She had a bill with Matt Gates.
• 50:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 50:25
  Speaker 3: The bill that's got the farthest And this is where
• 50:28
  Speaker 3: this is just frustrates me with all the stuff going on,
• 50:31
  Speaker 3: is there was a bill introduced by Josh Howley, John
• 50:35
  Speaker 3: oss Off and a couple other politicians.
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: Uh.
• 50:38
  Speaker 3: The reason why that one's important is because they got
• 50:40
  Speaker 3: that to the Senate and in the Senate while they
• 50:42
  Speaker 3: were in one of the committees. The way that the
• 50:45
  Speaker 3: bills enter the floor is they have to get passed
• 50:47
  Speaker 3: off by the committee. This is the bill that made
• 50:50
  Speaker 3: it the farthest. In that bill though they offered kind
• 50:54
  Speaker 3: of four things. First, members can't trade stocks by twenty
• 50:58
  Speaker 3: twenty five. This was introt twenty twenty four. Members can't
• 51:00
  Speaker 3: trade stocks. Second, spouses and dependents can't trade stocks through
• 51:05
  Speaker 3: twenty twenty seven. Third, any private investment you have you
• 51:12
  Speaker 3: have to sell out of to run to become a politician. No,
• 51:17
  Speaker 3: no one has ever asked for that. That has never
• 51:20
  Speaker 3: come up, and that became a big, big problem. This
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: is where it gets scaring. We have to be careful
• 51:25
  Speaker 3: with like what we're essentially pushing for. So what everyone
• 51:28
  Speaker 3: is asked for on these bills is no trading, No
• 51:32
  Speaker 3: members in their spouses can trade, put it in a
• 51:34
  Speaker 3: blind trust. Now this fourth bill, no trading, no members
• 51:37
  Speaker 3: and spouse blind trust. But also you have to sell
• 51:40
  Speaker 3: out of every private investment. And that when they started
• 51:44
  Speaker 3: debating it, Mitt Romney, Tim Scott and a couple other
• 51:49
  Speaker 3: politicians on it were like, wait a second, we can't
• 51:52
  Speaker 3: vote yes on this. Like, let's take if you guys
• 51:55
  Speaker 3: are telling me that any future politician that wants to
• 51:58
  Speaker 3: run has to sell out of private investments that could
• 52:01
  Speaker 3: become a major major problem. You know, if you want
• 52:04
  Speaker 3: to run and be a politician, you'd have to sell
• 52:06
  Speaker 3: out of your businesses. If I were to run, I
• 52:08
  Speaker 3: would at to sell it to my businesses, a farmer,
• 52:10
  Speaker 3: at to sell it to this family businesses. Is that right?
• 52:12
  Speaker 3: Like why are we essentially doing that? And when you
• 52:15
  Speaker 3: take a step back at the time, and this was,
• 52:17
  Speaker 3: you know, Kamala versus Trump, Kamala just picked to Waltz
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: to be the VP, and you think about where the
• 52:24
  Speaker 3: directions of each parties are going. If you have a
• 52:27
  Speaker 3: bill out there that bans politicians from owning in private investments,
• 52:33
  Speaker 3: you are turning off kind of a whole part of
• 52:36
  Speaker 3: future people.
• 52:38
  Speaker 2: Yeah, And I mean, you know you do kind of
• 52:44
  Speaker 2: want people who are invested in the country, you know,
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: who have some like longitudinal stake in America. Yeah, I
• 52:51
  Speaker 2: mean I do think that, Like I'm fighting for my
• 52:54
  Speaker 2: That's why I believe in home ownership, you know, because
• 52:56
  Speaker 2: like I own a piece of ground here, you know,
• 52:58
  Speaker 2: in my country.
• 52:59
  Speaker 3: And you know it's you had Trump in jd Vance.
• 53:03
  Speaker 3: Jd Vance probably the most in my lifetime, the smartest,
• 53:07
  Speaker 3: like most accomplished like guy running for politics that I've
• 53:12
  Speaker 3: ever seen I think he's just tremendous. You got him
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: with Trump business guy's first politician second. Yeah, you got
• 53:20
  Speaker 3: the VEC business politician second. On the other side, you
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: got Kamala career long politician twenty plus years Tim Waltz,
• 53:29
  Speaker 3: Tim Walts, you have to disclose what you own. He
• 53:32
  Speaker 3: doesn't own anything like you even just said, like I
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: own part of land in America. He doesn't. From my memory,
• 53:39
  Speaker 3: he doesn't own a house. The only thing he owned
• 53:41
  Speaker 3: on that public disclosure was a teacher's pension. And then
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: you start it's like, where can we go with this
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: path of you know, pro business, successful competent people running
• 53:55
  Speaker 3: our country versus career long politicians that just know how
• 53:59
  Speaker 3: to play the game of thrones in politics to be
• 54:01
  Speaker 3: able to get to why they're exactly nicely put that
• 54:04
  Speaker 3: scared the shit out of me when they started talking
• 54:07
  Speaker 3: about that at that.
• 54:08
  Speaker 2: Uh, well, it maybe just a way to kill the
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: whole idea.
• 54:11
  Speaker 3: So that was the other thing. Is that a kill pill?
• 54:12
  Speaker 3: And I again, this is why I don't know.
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: Yeah, just don't use insider information that you get with
• 54:17
  Speaker 2: my money in the car. We own all that information
• 54:19
  Speaker 2: that belongs to us, does not belong to Mike McCall
• 54:22
  Speaker 2: or any of these other douchebags, corrupt douchebags like Mike McCall,
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: who's I just want to say it is a corrupt douchebag.
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: I just want to say that really clearly. But they
• 54:31
  Speaker 2: don't own this information. It belongs to the public. It
• 54:34
  Speaker 2: belongs to the US government, which is owned by the
• 54:36
  Speaker 2: people who are citizens of this country. So just stop that. Yeah,
• 54:40
  Speaker 2: but you don't want to encourage like government by you know,
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: people who own nothing, like what government by the homeless.
• 54:46
  Speaker 2: I want people who are like, no, my kids live here,
• 54:48
  Speaker 2: my grandkids live here, this is our family farm or whatever.
• 54:51
  Speaker 2: Like you want that skin in the game, skin in
• 54:54
  Speaker 2: the game. I'm no text this country because it's mine.
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and give me the I'll give you the outcome.
• 55:01
  Speaker 3: It's like if you have politicians that are incentivized for
• 55:05
  Speaker 3: the good of American families, you know, it's like, I
• 55:08
  Speaker 3: totally agree kids Trump pro family exactly. You're going to
• 55:12
  Speaker 3: build for your grandkids, not for you.
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: I would ban childless politicians from having too much power. Yeah,
• 55:18
  Speaker 2: it's like you're not. I just know anyone who has
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: kids will tell you it's like, you're really worried about
• 55:22
  Speaker 2: that at a certain point, why do you care. You're
• 55:24
  Speaker 2: going to die anyway, but you care about the next generation.
• 55:27
  Speaker 1: You know.
• 55:27
  Speaker 3: Yeah, And you know, give ro Kahana credit. The representative
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: out of San Francisco. He's doing a lot on social media.
• 55:35
  Speaker 3: He doesn't have as much power, but he's calling for
• 55:37
  Speaker 3: term limits. And I think because we're looking at you
• 55:40
  Speaker 3: know again, I'm twenty nine, I'm not I don't I'm
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: just out of here just calling citizen journalism on X
• 55:46
  Speaker 3: being like this is ridiculous. Let me build with my
• 55:49
  Speaker 3: Like my skill set is I feel like I can do.
• 55:52
  Speaker 3: I know how to use social media algorithms, and I
• 55:55
  Speaker 3: know how to build a product to get people involved
• 55:56
  Speaker 3: in it. Let me use this as the best way
• 55:58
  Speaker 3: in my ability as an America consitizen to promote change,
• 56:02
  Speaker 3: to bring trust back into the institutions. A big part
• 56:05
  Speaker 3: of the problem looking at it is like, what are
• 56:07
  Speaker 3: these eighty five year olds doing?
• 56:08
  Speaker 2: I agree, and you know it's just so obviously unwise,
• 56:13
  Speaker 2: you know, yeah, at eighty five, at seventy five, you know,
• 56:18
  Speaker 2: it's just harder to don't have the mental acuity. That's
• 56:21
  Speaker 2: just a fact. It's a biological fact. But ignoring biology
• 56:23
  Speaker 2: is one of our main army pastimes at this point.
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: I've grown up with that. Yeah, my mom's a pediatrician.
• 56:29
  Speaker 2: I really believes in biology. Oh, for sure, that's free funny.
• 56:35
  Speaker 2: So tell us about the war stocks. I'm sorry, I
• 56:40
  Speaker 2: had to calm down before you went down. That that's
• 56:43
  Speaker 2: really dark. Do you think it's possible that people are
• 56:45
  Speaker 2: encouraging war because they're profiting from it?
• 56:49
  Speaker 3: Yeah? That this is the This topic gets a lot
• 56:53
  Speaker 3: of conversation on TikTok and Instagram, particularly just mainly because
• 56:59
  Speaker 3: it's like warmongering, not war wongering. The idea of even
• 57:03
  Speaker 3: being able to profit from war probably shouldn't be allowed,
• 57:06
  Speaker 3: of course not, but they do. And you know whether
• 57:10
  Speaker 3: they do it inherently or not. If the three main
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: companies are Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics and Ratheon Technologies, Raytheon,
• 57:19
  Speaker 3: Raytheon's hard because Raytheon is the company behind the Israel's
• 57:23
  Speaker 3: Iron Dome.
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: Yes, so.
• 57:26
  Speaker 3: Israel and Hamas. That's pro Raytheon, like Rathon is now
• 57:30
  Speaker 3: selling missiles for the Iron Dome that we're watching on
• 57:33
  Speaker 3: X go off every two days. Back then, when that
• 57:36
  Speaker 3: all with Iran and all that and m Lebanon. But
• 57:42
  Speaker 3: the politicians Mark Waynemullen, he sits on the Armed Services Committee,
• 57:46
  Speaker 3: he owns Ratheon and lockeed Martin And we've called them
• 57:50
  Speaker 3: out for it because that's to another degree because you
• 57:53
  Speaker 3: sit on the committee. Uh, never never heard anything about it. Unusual.
• 57:58
  Speaker 3: Wales has a great report, poss believe.
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: And again I've only met Mark Waynemullen once. He's a
• 58:03
  Speaker 2: friend of a friend of mine who says he's great.
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: He seemed nice. But what could possibly be the excuse
• 58:09
  Speaker 2: for owning defense stocks if you sit on the compety
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: funds them? Yeah?
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: So my this is what's the problem with the way
• 58:16
  Speaker 3: that they disclose right now is I don't know which
• 58:19
  Speaker 3: ones are theirs or which ones are being run by
• 58:22
  Speaker 3: a financial advisor, because to some of some of them
• 58:26
  Speaker 3: have financial advisers running their portfolios, but they still have
• 58:28
  Speaker 3: to disclose it. My hope is that it's financial advisors
• 58:32
  Speaker 3: running some of these.
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: I hope would they And I'm sure that's right. I mean,
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: I guess I have stocks, have no idea what they are,
• 58:38
  Speaker 2: and you know whatever, I've got some person doing that,
• 58:43
  Speaker 2: I guess, But I would hope that they would be
• 58:47
  Speaker 2: thoughtful enough that if you sit on a committee that's
• 58:50
  Speaker 2: you know, overseeing an industry, that you would just call
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: up into your broker and say, hey, we can't buy
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: anything that I regulate.
• 58:56
  Speaker 3: Five minutes, that's all it takes.
• 58:58
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and again this is and you put that out
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: there publicly and he still owns those.
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: Yeah. We call out everybody. Yeah, yeah, there's no one
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: that we I there's no politics. Like we called out
• 59:09
  Speaker 3: the new politician this morning. I can't remember his name,
• 59:13
  Speaker 3: Republican from Kentucky who sits on the Accountability Committee. He
• 59:19
  Speaker 3: traded for the first time in three years. We made
• 59:22
  Speaker 3: a tweet about him. Uh, Dan Goldman. So Dan Goldman,
• 59:27
  Speaker 3: he's a rich guy from New York. We called him
• 59:30
  Speaker 3: out to the point where he stopped trading because we
• 59:33
  Speaker 3: were making all these.
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: Tweets of like he's got a ton of inherited money.
• 59:36
  Speaker 3: A ton of inherited money. Yeah, and credit to him.
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: But I think this is the power of social media
• 59:40
  Speaker 3: and I think this is a win in my opinion.
• 59:41
  Speaker 3: It is like put it in a blind trust or
• 59:45
  Speaker 3: just tell your uh, while you're a freaking politician, just
• 59:49
  Speaker 3: go put it in the market, Like just don't buy
• 59:51
  Speaker 3: individual stocks for the four or five years, eight ten years,
• 59:54
  Speaker 3: just putting it an index fund. Yeah, it's not just
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: do what everyone else is doing, you know, Like, well
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 3: that's such a good point. It's not rocket science. And
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 3: that's why I don't feel bad for calling out anybody,
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 3: because it's like like Dan Crenshaw, you're going to complain
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 3: about it, Just sell out of it and go put
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 3: in an index fund. No one's stopping you.
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 2: Well, then you could plausibly say if you had an
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 2: index fund, which is just the whole market, you could
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 2: just say, I'm betting on America. Great, good for you.
• 1:00:21
  Speaker 3: I want you to do that, pro America. And that's why,
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 3: like if you were to ask me what is the solution,
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 3: I think the solution is kind of two things. For
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 3: how do you solve this whole thing? And again, like
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 3: our mission is, we're trying to instill trust back in society.
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 3: Like I'm pro America. You know, I want my grandkids
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 3: to do well. I don't think a society functions if
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 3: you can't trust your institutions. That's right, and it starts
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 3: with the politicians. Like look at I'm going off on
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 3: a tangent, but at least I live in La California.
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: Your heart breaks for it, and then you just start like,
• 1:00:53
  Speaker 3: I don't know what to believe because these you got newsome,
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 3: you got everything going on on X there's conflicting sides,
• 1:01:00
  Speaker 3: and you go on and you say, hey, if you loot,
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 3: you will get arrested. Okay, you guys are telling me
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 3: that I've watched for the past two years everybody loot
• 1:01:11
  Speaker 3: and no one get arrested. So you're now at this
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 3: point where we're supposed to trust you on this fact that, oh,
• 1:01:17
  Speaker 3: if you loot now, you'll get arrested. Meanwhile, you've promoted
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 3: and incentivized that behavior for people to get away with it.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 3: And what do you think happens? No one's gonna believe you.
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 3: The trust is gone. What happens?
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 2: So do you feel this sidebar but you feel as
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 2: a resident of La San Monica, you've you've watched looting
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 2: for the past two years. That's because that's really what
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 2: it is.
• 1:01:36
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I haven't seen it in particular, but I mean,
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 3: you can't walk into a CVS like the amount of
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 3: times I've walked into cvs and your heart breaks for
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 3: the little girl behind the cashier having to deal with
• 1:01:50
  Speaker 3: these guys is walking in and out like because you
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 3: do see it, and it's scary. That's looting on smaller proportions,
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 3: but you for sure see it in California.
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 2: It's major. I think things fall apart when you see
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 2: stuff like that. Why doesn't someone shoot them? I always
• 1:02:04
  Speaker 2: think that I only see it on video. I haven't
• 1:02:06
  Speaker 2: been to a CVS in a while. Yeah, but I
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 2: think it's just a it's like you're begging for total
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 2: collapse if you.
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 3: Allow that exactly. And my I'm a first principal thinker.
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 3: I think it's trust. I just don't think people trust
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 3: that things will get done. And now if you take
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 3: it out, you know, I love California. I don't think
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 3: it's as bad as people make it sound. But if
• 1:02:27
  Speaker 3: you can't trust the politicians, society crumbles. And I see
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 3: you with the trading. If you can't trust the majority
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 3: of politicians, America will crumble because why would I believe
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 3: what the politician is telling me while I'm watching them
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 3: do these other things right in front of my face
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 3: and I can't do anything about it. Yes, so we
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 3: want them banned to get the trust back into that,
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 3: of course, But The problem with the ban is is
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 3: it constantly like if in that ban, you would have
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: to ban the kids and you would have to ban
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 3: the spouses from trading. Is a constitution only allowed to say, hey,
• 1:03:02
  Speaker 3: you know, say you're a senator from Florida and you're like, hey, Tucker,
• 1:03:08
  Speaker 3: you want to be a senator? That's fine, but per
• 1:03:10
  Speaker 3: of the Stock Act, now your kids can't trade stocks
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 3: and your spouse can't trade stocks. What if your kid
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 3: is a hedge fund manager or your kid is you know, like,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 3: how do you ban that kit? It's hard.
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: It's hard. I mean, well, like any any system is
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: voluntary basically, I mean, if everyone tries to subvert a
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 2: system of any kind, the system will collapse. So people
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: have to decide, like I want to be a better
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: person and not take everything I can. Don't be greedy,
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 2: don't be selfish. I mean it's the things you tell
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: your kids, like you should you show up at somebody's
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 2: house you're eight years old on Halloween and there's a
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: huge basket.
• 1:03:43
  Speaker 3: You're not taking everything. Don't take don't take everyone. Yeah,
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 3: when you're Halloween trick of trading, you're not taking every
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 3: big receas bar they.
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 2: Don't have Halloween in Africa because people just take every
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 2: every recess bar but here we always have because there's
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: a lot of self restraint in the population. So what
• 1:03:58
  Speaker 2: do you do about that? Yeah, I don't know.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 3: I don't know either, But I think a solution though
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 3: can be in this is where like get rid of
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 3: the delay, make them file the same day so that
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 3: you increase transparency, allow on that.
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: How long is it now?
• 1:04:12
  Speaker 3: Forty five days? And I don't I did a lot
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 3: of reason. I couldn't figure out why there was a
• 1:04:16
  Speaker 3: delay to begin with, Like I don't understand why why
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 3: do you need a forty five day delay? I don't know.
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 3: That's prey the Stock Act. But also once you get
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 3: rid of the delay, just make it so that either
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 3: the politicians have to invest in a blind trust or
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 3: major ETFs, or if you're not going to go that far,
• 1:04:35
  Speaker 3: just don't allow them to trade companies they oversee. And
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 3: it's very very simple. If I'm a consultant covering pharmaceutical
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 3: industry at Deloitte, Deloitte does not allow that consultant to
• 1:04:47
  Speaker 3: buy pharmaceutical stocks. They can buy other stocks, they can't
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 3: buy pharmaceutical And like it's all just a step in
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: the right direction towards something that like we can get
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 3: on the right path to trusting the politicians again.
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 2: That's like I think the facts you're watching makes a
• 1:05:01
  Speaker 2: big difference. Yeah, I mean it has to write.
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 3: I think it has.
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: That's what I tell myself, thought about you know, calling
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 2: DJ or copying DJ on some of these social media
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 2: posts and saying, you know, maybe there's there should be
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 2: a criminal referral here.
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and we haven't. Maybe that's the next step. The
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 3: SEC has never investigated any of them, and I think
• 1:05:24
  Speaker 3: the SEC just has a ton of stuff on their hands,
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: to be honest, Like that's for sure, we'll see what
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 3: happens because there's a lot of cruption in the country now.
• 1:05:30
  Speaker 2: It's not yet Congress and.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and the the hard part about this is the
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 3: SEC with there's billion dollar schemes like they should have
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 3: found SBF, you know kind of thing. The politicians is
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 3: not the major, major thing on the monetary side, but
• 1:05:45
  Speaker 3: it is though on the public image side. And that's
• 1:05:49
  Speaker 3: what I think, Like, I don't think people understand the
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 3: long term effects of not trusting institutions.
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 2: You agree, And there should be a priesthood, a secular
• 1:05:56
  Speaker 2: priesthood in charge.
• 1:05:57
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I know.
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: That's why they call them public servants. Yeah, you know,
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: they're giving up something to serve their country. I don't
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: think that's unfair to ask people.
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 3: I feel like they've forgotten about it. They forgot the
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 3: whole I've noticed.
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 2: You know, if you've been paying attention, you know that
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: ALP is not just another nicotine pouch. It is literally
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: the best nicotine pouch in the world. And we know
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 2: because we use it all day long. We've used all
• 1:06:21
  Speaker 2: of them. Turns out you can actually make money by
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 2: telling people about out. We're launching our affiliate program. If
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: you have an audience big or small, you can cash in.
• 1:06:28
  Speaker 2: You wear a ten percent commission on every sale of
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 2: VALP that you bring in. And to make it even easier,
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: we'll give you a ten percent off link for your followers.
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 2: They save you or and it's really simple. By the way,
• 1:06:38
  Speaker 2: compared to all the other products people sell online, help
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 2: is truly good. It's delicious, It is easy to sell
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: because it's heartfelt to spread the word get rewarded for it.
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 2: Best nicotine pouch in the world. How are defense stocks doing?
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 3: They're up, They're up. They had a. They weren't up
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 3: earlier this year, I believe, but I think they are.
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 3: I think the one that I followed in particular is Ratheon,
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 3: and I think Raytheon's up around eighty percent. So my
• 1:07:07
  Speaker 3: thought is Lockheed and General Dynamics are up to but
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 3: there's smaller ones. I mean, Tommy Tubervill bought this company
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 3: called huma Site. And what Humicite does is it treats
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 3: soldiers injured in war in Ukraine. And he bought that stock.
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 3: We flagged it because he sits on the Armed Services Committee,
• 1:07:27
  Speaker 3: and if you go on the Armed Services website, it
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 3: literally says helping companies do military research. He buys a
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 3: company that does military research. The stock was up I think,
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 3: like at the peak of it one hundred percent. He
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 3: sold out early, so I think he made thirty percent.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 3: But it's not even just like my point is, it's
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 3: not necessarily even just Lockheed Raytheon, right, it's these companies
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 3: that get military government contracts to help the the long.
• 1:07:53
  Speaker 2: Tails all Northern Virginia.
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 3: Yeah right there, I know. Yeah, I was listening to
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 3: a couple of your other podcasts.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 2: Yeah no, I mean, I'm I've spent my life there
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 2: so I'm deeply resentful, and it's also very ugly, which
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 2: tells you a lot. What they do for a living
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 2: is ugly. Killing people is the ugliest thing you could do.
• 1:08:08
  Speaker 2: But they've also constructed an incredibly ugly world physically, like
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 2: if you drive from Dolls Airport into the city, you
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 2: see not a single pretty building. Everything is awful, and
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: it's a reflection of their souls in my opinion. Others disagree.
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 2: Tell us and I went right over this. I'm sorry,
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: but about Jim Kramer, you have an inverse Jim Kramer.
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: So if you were to invest with Jim Kramer, would
• 1:08:32
  Speaker 2: you do better or worse than say, Debbie Washerman, Schultzer
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 2: Nancy in twenty.
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 3: Twenty four, you would have done better. And this is
• 1:08:38
  Speaker 3: all up. If people want to go on join autopilot
• 1:08:40
  Speaker 3: dot com or even on our app Autopilot, you'll see
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 3: all these numbers because I don't want to mess up
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 3: the numbers. And yeah, of course, yeah, but Kramer was
• 1:08:48
  Speaker 3: up forty eight percent, stock market was up around twenty
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 3: five percent. He was up not inverse, sorry, sorry, inver
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 3: inverse Kramer was up.
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 2: Oh in verse crowd. Okay, So so when you're talking
• 1:08:58
  Speaker 2: about Cremer, you're talking about Kramer's. Yeah, do the opposite.
• 1:09:01
  Speaker 3: Opposite of Kramer was up forty eight percent, and we
• 1:09:03
  Speaker 3: balance that thing on a monthly basis. He has his
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 3: own stock group, which maybe we'll pay to get the
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 3: subscription in to actually see the stocks that he's talking about.
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 3: He has this through c NBC.
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 2: But yeah, it Kramer has done forty eight That's that's crazy.
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 2: It's do you think it's a gag? Like I think
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 2: it's social media. Not even social media. I think it's
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 2: just how media works. It's headlines and you have to
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 2: talk about But he's like a Harvard graduate who's like
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 2: a genius everybody. So, I mean, I know he's obviously
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 2: not a genius, but but he's employed to tell you
• 1:09:41
  Speaker 2: about the stock market. But betting against him gets you
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: forty eight percent? Like how does that?
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 3: And he has a private stock market group that does
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 3: all this stuff that he tells people with personal stock
• 1:09:52
  Speaker 3: picks and stuff like that. So it's not even just
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 3: he gets employed and does it on social media and TV.
• 1:09:56
  Speaker 3: He has a personal group that does it. But yeah,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 3: that one blows my mind because I don't know how.
• 1:10:03
  Speaker 3: I don't know how you can say, don't you know,
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 3: sell Tesla and the stock goes up one hundred percent.
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 3: There's a tremendous video from when early days with Tesla
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 3: when Kramer is essentially talking about Tesla says it's trash,
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 3: get rid of it, don't even talk about it. From
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 3: that day, the stock some thousands, thousands and thousands of
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 3: percent up and Elon loves me.
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 2: You think that is? Do you think like Kramer? Like
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 2: why would they employ Kramer? How could he be that
• 1:10:33
  Speaker 2: bad if you just employed like your dog, Yeah, or
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 2: a whole bunch of dogs get a chicken. Yeah, exact amount,
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 2: but that's exactly right. Yeah. Do you have any guesses?
• 1:10:44
  Speaker 1: No?
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 3: I mean I think like if I'm thinking about it,
• 1:10:50
  Speaker 3: because I haven't really thought too much about it on
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 3: the sense of how does it actually like, how can
• 1:10:56
  Speaker 3: it actually do it so well? My thought is maybe though,
• 1:10:59
  Speaker 3: like the way that the markets work, and I'm no
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 3: expert at this, is you know, you want to buy
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 3: the news and sell the or buy the build up
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 3: and then you sell the news. Yeah, Kramer could just
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 3: be slow with getting onto these popular stocks so that
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: by the time he's talking about Tesla, by the time
• 1:11:15
  Speaker 3: he's talking about Hey, you know, go buying video. It's like, yeah,
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 3: everyone's been talking about in video for six months before
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 3: you start talking about it. The portfolio that we have
• 1:11:24
  Speaker 3: for him on autopilot is fifteen million dollars following him
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 3: following his inverse picks. So essentially there's a we have
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 3: a pseudo etf ish sort of thing that does the
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 3: exact too, based on his stupidity, all based on his stupidity, yeah,
• 1:11:39
  Speaker 3: or all based on what he thinks is right that
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 3: turns out to be wrong.
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 2: That's incredible that you can't venture backing for all because
• 1:11:48
  Speaker 2: it does sound like, yeah, I love everything, I love
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: it all, but the fact that you made a business
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: out of it is especially amazing. Yeah.
• 1:11:54
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, that's been a journey. And again like I
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 3: don't come from this world. You know, I was living
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 3: and Bali before we started this thing, and Brian Aaron Scott,
• 1:12:04
  Speaker 3: my co founders, like we all did this stuff together.
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 3: We didn't think it would get this big. We got
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 3: a lot of no's and like the slogan of what
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 3: our app essentially was was invest like a politician. So like,
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 3: if your app says invest like a politician, how big
• 1:12:18
  Speaker 3: can that thing actually become. How popular can that actually be?
• 1:12:21
  Speaker 3: Turns out it could be very popular because not only
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 3: are they good, it's also the perfect It's the perfect
• 1:12:28
  Speaker 3: way to highlight the hypocrisy, because it's like, what better
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 3: way to highlight the hipocrisy of politician stock trading than
• 1:12:34
  Speaker 3: to literally build an app to invest alongside that hypocrisy.
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 3: And the next thing you know, you got ABC News
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 3: talking about us. Elon's retweeted US major thanks to you.
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 3: This is the first time we've ever had a long
• 1:12:47
  Speaker 3: form conversation about this. Our app is when we launched it,
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 3: we were a number two in the app store. No,
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 3: the whole thing blew up right before our very eyes. Yeah,
• 1:12:56
  Speaker 3: and the Pelosi tracker was a great part of that.
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 3: But we have much much bigger, much broader ambitions, and
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 3: that's where the venture, the venture backed parts.
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 2: What's so cool is that, so you've built a whole
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: business mocking and simultaneously profiting from the corruption of politicians,
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: but you're at the same time calling for an end
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: to it.
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 3: If we lose the politicians stoctrating, we lose a major
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 3: chunk of our business, for sure, But you're still in
• 1:13:24
  Speaker 3: favor of losing it. One hundred percent, one hundred percent
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 3: because our mission is to still trust back in the institutions.
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 3: And I I'm not an expert at this but this topic.
• 1:13:35
  Speaker 3: But like the way that we see it is knock
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 3: out the politicians. And this is all through autopilot. Autopilots
• 1:13:42
  Speaker 3: are like our slogan and the broader when we pitch
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 3: in beast the way, yeah, I know, put your money
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 3: on it. It's to redefine money management. So I'm twenty
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 3: nine and we're about to go through the greatest wealth
• 1:13:53
  Speaker 3: transfer in the history of the world. You know, eighty
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 3: five trillions about to be parked on people like my doorstep.
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 3: Say I get half a million.
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 2: Dollars when the boomers.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, that's when the boomers, And part of that
• 1:14:05
  Speaker 3: money is in housing, but there still is a lot
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 3: that goes into money management. Seventy five percent of kids
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 3: who inherit their parents' money fire their parents' financial advisor
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 3: the day they get that money. So now you got
• 1:14:19
  Speaker 3: a kid who has half a million dollars parked on
• 1:14:22
  Speaker 3: his lap. Fire is the financial manager because it's like,
• 1:14:24
  Speaker 3: who the heck are you? And now they have to
• 1:14:27
  Speaker 3: make the decisions of how do I invest this money.
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 3: Do I do it on my own? Do I do
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 3: it through a Google search? Pick the top financial advisor?
• 1:14:33
  Speaker 3: Do I do it through a friend? We think there's
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 3: a lot of problems in that and there's no trust
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 3: in transparency in those decisions. So with Autopilot, what we're
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: trying to do is solve that trust in transparent way
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 3: by building a marketplace to find a money manager and
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 3: then invest through that money manager in a way that
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 3: you still have control. And I think, like what you
• 1:14:55
  Speaker 3: said earlier, and I'm sorry for ramblin, but no, I
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 3: love it. The big, big thing that we're trying to
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 3: do is we're trying to ensure that people's money and
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: builds the futures that they want. And I think in
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 3: twenty thirty, twenty thirty five, twenty forty, this is going
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 3: to become a bigger and bigger thing. And a good
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 3: example of the early inklings of this is this. Whether
• 1:15:15
  Speaker 3: it's conspiracy theory or not, you know, we'll we'll see
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 3: what happens with it. But this topic of Blackrock and
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 3: Vanguard having money and taking the assets in their own
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 3: ETFs and stuff and using that to sway public laws
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 3: and public opinion in the company in the states that
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 3: they oversee. They're getting sued in Texas, they're getting sued
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 3: in Florida. And part of like whether again, whether that's
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 3: true or not. What annoys me personally when I invest
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 3: is I want to make sure that my money goes
• 1:15:49
  Speaker 3: towards my beliefs. And if you have someone else managing
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 3: your money, or you put your money in a Vanguard,
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: you put your money in a black rock, there's possibilities
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 3: for that to happen at a much broader scale. And
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 3: if you do it on your own, that's exactly, and
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 3: that's like what we're trying to we're trying to build that.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 3: We're trying to essentially build out the way that you
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 3: can have your money managed without you having to sacrifice
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: your own values, your own voter light rights, your own
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 3: belief exactly.
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you don't want to turn move your money to
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: someone who is trying to eliminate all your rights.
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 3: I mean, that's crazy, it's contradictory, and it works for
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 3: both sides like it. I don't for me personally, Pro America,
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 3: I don't want any dollars invested in Chinese stocks, and like,
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 3: if I have, you know, maybe a couple hundred bucks
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 3: if you're trying to swing in ali Baba. But if
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 3: like you got half a million dollars in the retirement,
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 3: I don't want any of that invested in ali Baba
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 3: because inherently you are funding a future where ali Baba succeeds.
• 1:16:46
  Speaker 3: Like do you want that? And the other side is
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 3: like we have customers and we have clients that are like,
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 3: I don't want my money building invested in oil companies,
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 3: like I want to be pro ev It's like, okay,
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 3: but did you know that you got your retirement account
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 3: with these other people and they they have money in
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 3: chevron oxy?
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 3: You know things like that. That's like what we're trying
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 3: to solve and trying to build to. And again, it
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 3: all starts with just trust. Because if you can't trust
• 1:17:11
  Speaker 3: even where your money is being invested, what does that mean?
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 3: In my opinion, that means society is worse off because
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 3: you don't even trust how your money is being managed
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 3: in that state that you're in.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 2: Right, And it changes people if they conclude that the
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 2: whole the whole deal is a scam. Yeah, I live
• 1:17:30
  Speaker 2: a lot of the You're in a really rural area
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 2: and my whole life. The no one I knew ever
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 2: took any government benefits because the idea was that we're
• 1:17:38
  Speaker 2: like proud, you know, working class people were not doing that.
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: And then the state brought in all these immigrants from
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 2: Africa and gave them everything, you know, houses, phones, airplane tickets,
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: food vouchers, free medical Just these are immigrants getting all
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 2: this free stuff. And everyone in the town where I am,
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 2: which is very few immigrants or people, are not everyone
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 2: people I knew, Like wait a second. You know, I
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: served in the military, I've worked, paid text my whole wife.
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 2: I never gotten anything from the government. Screw it. I'm
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 2: putting in for any any benefit I possibly can in it,
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 2: and it you know, it's easy for me to disapprove
• 1:18:12
  Speaker 2: because I'm rich, so it's like I don't have to
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 2: do that, but I got it. It's like they all
• 1:18:16
  Speaker 2: of a sudden realize people who've lived in this country
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 2: their whole lives, you know, did a lot for the country.
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 2: I would argue, they realized the whole thing's are freaking scam,
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 2: so I might as well get in on it. If
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 2: you have that attitude, man, things fall apart like that.
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 3: Look at COVID exactly happened with all the COVID loans,
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 3: the PBO stuff for whatever. Pelosi was a big part
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 3: of this too, the PPO with the employees. So there's documents.
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 3: So Pelosi owns a hotel up in Napa, I think
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 3: it's a hotel and she has had this one property
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 3: that has made one hundred thousand dollars lost one hundred thousand.
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 3: You all have to file this every year and in
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 3: it you have your income made one hundred k lost
• 1:18:57
  Speaker 3: hundre k, made one hundred k, los andre k that
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 3: COVID happened, they made five million plus in profit. So
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 3: how do you go from And this is income, This
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 3: isn't necessarily even just like like it's not necessarily loans
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 3: or anything. This is income. You lose one hundred K,
• 1:19:14
  Speaker 3: you make one hundred k, COVID happens, the loans go out,
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 3: Your business now makes five million a year. After that
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 3: you go back down to making one hundred k and
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 3: then making one hundred k losing hundred K. So there
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 3: was an anomaly. This came out I think by the
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 3: New York Post right after Thanksgiving, I think, and they
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 3: highlight this and it's like, was the corruption around these
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 3: PPP loans, these you know, COVID loans. Did this get
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 3: up to the degree that the politicians were benefiting from
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 3: this too? And it seems like it did. So that's again,
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 3: like the that frustrates me because that we have a
• 1:19:52
  Speaker 3: family company. We sell sports compression products, little arm sleeves.
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: We don't necessarily have employees, but you know, we're a
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 3: small family business. We took out a loan to survive
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 3: because we sell it in sports. Sports got canceled. We
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 3: have to pay that loan back, which is fine. We
• 1:20:08
  Speaker 3: knew that when we took it out that we have
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 3: to pay this loan back. But that loan money didn't
• 1:20:12
  Speaker 3: go towards profiting us. It essentially went towards sustaining us.
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 3: We had to pay it back, though that loan to Pelosi,
• 1:20:19
  Speaker 3: the five million dollars that she makes it comes in
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 3: as income. You don't have to pay it back because
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: it's just so messed up.
• 1:20:27
  Speaker 2: It's disgusting.
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's again, I don't come from any of this stuff.
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 3: I had known nothing about the politics and how it
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: was before we started tracking, and it just shocks me
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 3: of like these rules for thee and not for me.
• 1:20:41
  Speaker 3: To the every single aspect of our lives.
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: You should be shocked by it. You should fight against it.
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: You are.
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 2: I hope you get ironically, I hope you get rich,
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 2: but you against it. And I really appreciate that explanation.
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 2: It was even more interesting than I thought.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 3: Thank you, Thank you, appreciate it, and thank you again
• 1:20:57
  Speaker 3: for having me on.
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: Dude. You're one of the reasons I like social media.
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 2: Whenever I think, oh, social media is turning everyone trains
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 2: and it's bad, then I see what you do and
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 2: I'm like, no, it's actually there's.
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: Some great things and it's not just us. I think
• 1:21:09
  Speaker 3: Elon with X Yeah saved everything because we had a
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 3: Pelosi tracker on Meta band.
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 2: Then the first week, Yeah, why.
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 3: I didn't in their disclaimer and whatnot, they said they
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 3: can't use the name Pelosi tracker.
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 2: You can't criticize any politician from the Bay Area where.
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 3: And so we then created and we did the Politician
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 3: Trade Tracker. So we're on Instagram now. But but Elon
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 3: with X in the the citizen journalism that's going on,
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: I think that's like the biggest thing that I get
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 3: I'm proud of, is like in the weather, these news CNNs,
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 3: Fox News, NBC's and I don't know how they're going
• 1:21:46
  Speaker 3: to adapt to it, but they have to figure out
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 3: a way to hit the masses through social media. And
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 3: the best people at it are these citizen journalists on
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 3: x that are doing all this work, that are uncovering
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 3: these stories. They may not have all the facts, they
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 3: may not be one hundred percent right. There's probably some
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 3: grift there's out there, but at the end of the day,
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 3: the conversation is being had and it's a step in
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 3: the right direction.
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 2: Oh, it's wonderful. Everything about it is wonderful. Thank you
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 2: for taking this time, shad it I do.
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 1: So.
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 2: It turns out that YouTube is suppressing this show. On
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 2: one level, that's not surprising, that's what they do. But
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 2: on another level, it's shocking. With everything that's going on
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 2: in the world right now, all the change taking place
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: in our economy and our politics, with the wars, one
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 2: of the custom of fighting right now, Google has decided
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 2: you should have less information rather than more, and that
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 2: is totally wrong. It's immoral. What can you do about it, Well,
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: we could wind about it. That's a waste of time.
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 2: We're not in charge of Google or we could find
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: a way around it, a way that you could actually
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 2: get information that is true, not intentionally deceptive. The way
• 1:22:54
  Speaker 2: to do that on YouTube, we think it's a subscribe
• 1:22:57
  Speaker 2: to our channel. Subscribe, hit the little bell icon to
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: be notified when we upload and share this video. That way,
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 2: you'll have a much higher chance of hearing actual news
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 2: and information. So we hope that you'll do that.
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 1: And there you have it. Everything that this kid is
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 1: found out well, i'll say kid, but he's in his thirties.
• 1:23:17
  Speaker 2: Everything this guy and his group found out about they
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: are currently.
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 1: They've currently created an app to follow all the trades
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 1: and all the buys that.
• 1:23:29
  Speaker 2: Centers and congressmen have.
• 1:23:31
  Speaker 1: They've also done a reverse Dan Kramer investment, so everything
• 1:23:38
  Speaker 1: that he tells you to invest in, they buy the
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 1: opposite of and they track those and that has a
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 1: forty something percent that's amazing to me, has a forty
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 1: seven percent return rate on it. But anyway, this is Gil,
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: thanks for listening. Hope you guys enjoy it, and I
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 1: will see you next time later at AP