Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / WOKE SCIENCE- Scientific American Editor Election Meltdown

Transcript

WOKE SCIENCE- Scientific American Editor Election Meltdown · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Look at this. Scientific American editor issues screed against America
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: for electing Trump. This is Scientific American. This was once
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: a very prestigious, respected publication. It has fallen into disrepute.
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: Why do they always look like that? They always do?
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: So what's going on here? Laura Helmuth, editor in chief
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: of Scientific American, face backlash after posting a series of
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: inflammatory comments following Donald Trump's decisive victory in the presidential election.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: She didn't take it well. The science lady didn't take
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: it well. In postmade on Blue Sky because of course
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: she ran away from X because she's afraid of free speech.
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: In postmade on Blue Sky, because of course she's afraid
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: of X because people say things she doesn't agree with
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: there in postmade on Blue Sky, because of course she's
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: an authoritarian leftist, because of course she can't handle people
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: disagreeing with her, a social media platform considered an alternative
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: to X. Helmuth accused her home state of Indiana of
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: being racist and sexist for voting for Trump. She's got
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: nothing else, the rational minded editor of Scientific American. This
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: lady here, who's exactly what you would imagine she would
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: look like, just couldn't handle it. The only explanation only.
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: Explanation has to be isms and iss. Let's see, where's
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: the where's the actual? So this is Michael Schrmer, who
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: is the editor of Skeptic magazine. I wrote a monthly
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: column for Scientific American for eighteen years and could not
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: have been prouder to have been part of that one
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty year old standard bearer on science and
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: the search for truth. Those days are gone. Scientific American
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: is now a shill for far left, woke progressive Here
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: we go, here's the editor, Laura Helmuth. I apologize to
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: younger voters that my gen x is so full of
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: fucking fascists. Again. The people who want to protect your
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: constitutional rights are never the fascists. It's kind of the
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: whole opposite of the whole fascist thing. Why don't you
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: know that solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: high school classmates are celebrating early results because fuck them
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: to the moon and back. Editor of Scientific American. Now interesting,
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Laura Helmuth. Every four years or I remember why I
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: left Indiana where I grew up, and remember why I
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: respect the people who stayed and are trying to make
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: it less racist and sexist. The moral arc of the
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: universe isn't going to bend itself. Here's an ideologue that
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: it's saying. So every institution that gets infected by the
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: work mind virus is transformed from its original purpose, in
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: this case, informing the public about the latest scientific breakthroughs,
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: latest scientific news, into just simply being a platform, a
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: vehicle for disseminating the work mind virus and the propaganda
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: that it includes that it entails. So that's what scientific
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: American is now, That's what happens with every single institution. Like,
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: remember how universities used to be places where people were
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: taught how to think. Now they're taught what to think.
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: It's the same. It's every Remember how FEMA used to
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: be about helping people at emergencies and now it's about
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: equity and deciding, well, who actually deserves the help. They
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: are all transformed into this awful, useless, counterproductive for civilization
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: or just kind of mental health propaganda outlet. Just this disseminator,
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: this this propagator of the Wok mind virus that is
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: always seeking new vulnerable minds to parasitize and turn into
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: zombies in turn to then presitize more minds, more weak,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: vulnerable minds. Let's see, how is Scientific American doing. By
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: the way, let's see, Laura Hellmuth has to go as
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: an editor. It's her job to not let Scientific American
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: become ideological and unscientific, and she is utterly failed. Let's see.
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: So what's this year the Scientific American. The inequity between
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: male and female athletes is a result not of inherent
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: biological differences between the sexes, but of biases and how
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: they are treated in sports. So a total utter denial
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: of biological reality. So Scientific American now is now opposed
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: to describing reality accurately. I don't that was its original mission.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: I don't think that was the original original mission statement
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: of Scientific American to deny reality. This is what science
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: is turning into. So she said, she wrote an apology.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: She said, I made a series of offensive and inappropriate
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: posts on my personal blue sky account because I had
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: to run away from X because people said things that
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: I didn't agree with there and it's scary, and that's
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: fascism my personal blue Sky accounts on election night, and
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I respect and value people across the political spectrum.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: You clearly don't what did you say, What did you say?
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: I apologize to younger voters that my gen X is
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: so full of fucking fascists. Huh. Let's see, the people
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: you disagree with are the mainest, dumbest, most bigoted high
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: school classmate. So it seems like you don't mean any
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: of this what you're saying in your apology. Maybe you're
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: just trying to keep your job so that you'll have
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: more upperpportunity to poison more people's minds with your brain infection.
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: These posts, which I have deleted, do not reflect my beliefs.
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: They clearly do. They were a mistaken expression of shock
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: and confusion about the election results. Mistaken expression of shock
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: and confusion about the election, Well it was pretty simple
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: landslide for Trump. These posts, of course, do not reflect
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: the position of scientific American or my colleagues. I am
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity. You're clearly not.
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: You've proven that you're not. You should be fired immediately.
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: Gen X is so full of fucking fascists because they
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: didn't vote the way that you wanted, because they voted
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: for somebody who wanted to protect their constitutional rights. You
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: don't understand what fascism is why are you editor in
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: chief of Scientific American? You clearly knowing you're a biologic
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: You're a denier of biological reality. Why do you have
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: that job? Who chose you? I guess the question is
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: what year? Exactly? What was the exact point that Scientific
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: American was parasitized by the by the mind virus, the
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: woke mind virus, by progressivism, by far leftism, by the
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: modern you know, the the neo Marxism. At what point
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: did it did it fall to the cultural revolution exactly?
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Be interesting to find out. Maybe I'll make a video
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: about that. It's clearly not serving its original purpose anymore.
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: His purpose now is clearly to spread her brain infection.
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: Alex Friedman, Scientific American editor in chief is an embarrassment
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: to science. Get politics out of science engineering, stem education.
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: Science and engineering is about building cool shit and exploring
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: the mysteries of physics, chemistry, biology, et cetera. Well that's
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: a good point. Let's see September sixteenth, for only the
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: second time in our one hundred and seventy nine year history,
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: the editors of Scientific American are endorsing a candidate for president.
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: That person is Kamala Harris walk mind virus. It turns
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: everything into a zombie whose purpose is just to propagate
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: more of the mind virus and to infect and victimize
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: more weak minded, vulnerable people. Melissa chan I cannot stress
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: enough the significance of Scientific American continuing to debase itself. Yikes.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: Vote for Kamala Harris to support science, health and the environment.
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: Can I ask you a question? Can I ask Kamala question?
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: What's a woman? Can you tell me? How about the
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: editor in chief of the Scientific American? Can she tell
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: us what a woman is? I'll bet you she can't.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: I'll bet you she can't. But apparently you got to
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: vote for Kamala to support science, health and the environment.
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: I mean the science part here. Scientific American doesn't seem
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: to be in a really cracking job with it, does
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: It Maybe needs a bit of self reflection on that.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: Let's see Pedro Domingos. Scientific American is a partisan rag
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: posing as a science bag. Yes, yes, it's been taken over.
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: It has been parsitized by the woke mind virus. Now
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: its purpose is to spread the woke mind virus. It
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: is now a zombie institution. Just absolutely crazy. How about this?
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: And November eighth, twenty twenty four. Well that just came out.
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: That's just yesterday. The impact of weight stigma on health.
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: This is Scientific American. So here's body positivity. Healthy at
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: any size. Scientific American focusing on size and healthcare might
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: be doing more harm than good. It's not healthy to
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: be fat. Everybody knows it, every doctor knows it. Scientific
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: American should know it. Sorry, I forgot. Scientific American has
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: been parasitized by the woke mind virus, and now it
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: simply exists to propagate more of it, just like the
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: Party had dight ten to eighty four or it was
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: pretty smart about this stuff. He really he knew what
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: he was doing. Anyway. That's all I'm going to say
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: about that. Please like, share, and subscribe. Subscribing really helps
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: me out. I thank you for that. I will see
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: you next time.