Latest / Le Mug Nowtech / WWDC25 Ce que Apple ne vous dit pas #apple #tesla #chatGPT etc. ▪ (Replay)

Transcript

WWDC25 Ce que Apple ne vous dit pas #apple #tesla #chatGPT etc. ▪ (Replay) · Le Mug Nowtech

9:09
And hello everyone and welcome to the
9:12
muge
9:14
today, we're going to talk about everything that
9:16
Apple didn't tell you during WWDC.
9:19
What is he hiding from you, huh? Those
9:22
nasty Kenayou. We'll of course
9:24
talk about lots of other tech topics. It
9:26
's Thursday, June 12, 2025, and we're
9:31
getting started right away.
9:53
Hello everyone, how are you
9:55
? warmly, I imagine. I don't know
9:58
if it's hot all over France, but
10:01
in Paris it's hot.
10:04
We are hot. We are hot.
10:07
It's time to break out those
10:08
summer clothes.
10:10
These special heatwave clothes.
10:13
Uh no, it's not a linen shirt
10:15
, it's a mesh shirt with
10:18
lots of holes.
10:20
This way, air can pass through. These are
10:22
my shirts with holes. I bought a
10:24
second one because I think it's so cool.
10:28
Well, the weather forecast is
10:30
that we're going to have 31 in Paris today
10:32
and tomorrow.
10:34
And I also specify, so be careful,
10:38
hang on for some, but I'm
10:41
wearing
10:44
my Birk socks today.
10:49
I have Birk socks. And yes. And
10:52
yes. Oh my God !
10:58
Wting!
11:02
And yeah, it's Birk
11:03
sock season.
11:06
So,
11:07
I could have worn the birqu barefoot
11:10
but I have a problem.
11:13
I have a completely black nail. I
11:15
broke a nail. A German tourist.
11:18
Exactly.
11:21
Dutch pressure.
11:26
There are people who have lost their
11:27
French nationality for less than that,
11:31
with socks. I'm leaving the
11:32
channel. No, but you're right. You
11:34
have to have opinions in life. If I am a
11:36
Tenonian,
11:40
I am hesitating between the German Addis Ababas on
11:42
vacation at the terrace in Saint-Raphaël.
11:46
Thank you very much Lam and thank you Hightech 47
11:51
too. Thank you Laclo, thank you Titanium 31,
11:56
it was the day before yesterday but thank you
11:58
anyway.
12:00
Am I awake? Is this a nightmare
12:02
for real? So, let's talk for 5
12:05
minutes because it's important to
12:06
start with gravel.
12:09
The sock beer
12:11
is comfort.
12:14
From there to saying that it is the style, there is
12:16
a step that we will not take. But I
12:18
'll explain to you why it's a
12:20
comfort when you live in Paris, a big
12:23
metropolis, not always clean, to
12:27
walk around barefoot in Paris, I've
12:29
done it. There was a time when I used to
12:30
walk around in flip-flops a lot in Paris
12:32
when it was really hot, you just wanted to.
12:35
But you feel a little vulnerable with
12:37
bare feet. It's psychological, but
12:41
hey, as much as at the beach and all that, no
12:43
problem eh. I'm wearing flip-flops, not
12:45
socks.
12:46
But the advantage of the sock flip-flop is that
12:48
it still offers a
12:51
little protection for the foot
12:53
while still allowing air to pass through, the
12:55
principle of a flip-flop.
12:58
So it's a bit like the best of both
13:00
worlds.
13:06
Birk the birk sock cascapple
13:08
shirt holey beautiful combo. Yeah,
13:10
I admit I'm giving you the whole thing and I
13:12
haven't even shown you the pants.
13:19
Yeah, like [ __ ]. Stay in the
13:21
fibers, you benefit from them all day long.
13:22
Yes, but you can change your
13:23
socks.
13:31
I was a Patreon contributor a
13:33
year ago, then they canceled my membership without
13:34
explaining anything and I never took the time
13:36
to do it again. Oh yeah, that's a weird
13:38
story. lack it. Well
13:40
anyway, thanks for renewing a
13:42
Patreon subscription. I would like to take this opportunity to thank
13:45
all the Patreons.
13:55
How many socks do you use a
13:56
day? I actually have a
13:59
sock holster that I wear across my body
14:01
Mexican style
14:04
and as soon as there is dirt on my
14:06
socks, I change socks.
14:13
In a big city, you don't walk around in
14:15
flip-flops. I agree with you
14:17
Jamy, but when it's very hot and
14:19
despite what the
14:22
climate skeptics say, we still have
14:24
more and more long heat waves.
14:31
And frankly the closed shoe,
14:33
so I have the Tropic Field which are
14:35
very well ventilated so it's a good
14:36
alternative
14:38
but there you go on heatwave days
14:41
or when it's very hot
14:43
then I might not wear
14:46
my Birks to go walking for 4 hours
14:48
in Paris which happens to me quite often
14:51
because well Birks are comfortable
14:53
but it's not either there you go after
14:56
a while I still prefer a
14:58
sock and a shoe that covers the
15:00
whole foot. But there you
15:03
go, and I guarantee you, it's very
15:05
hot in Paris. Well, you know,
15:07
when it's hot, it's very, very
15:08
hot. We have no shade, we have little
15:10
shade.
15:15
Yeah, I say the Birquins. Well, I'm
15:17
a bourgeois, huh. I don't think I'm surprising
15:20
anyone here.
15:26
An outfit review for the start of the live,
15:29
that's unexpected.
15:31
Full of surprises, man. Always
15:34
a Marion, she has trouble with
15:35
socks in the bars. She likes
15:37
my beer, but
15:38
she has trouble with socks.
15:41
So, what I wear in pants is not far from a Sarwel
15:44
. I'm wearing
15:47
very loose linen pants, it's
15:51
not far off.
16:08
If I do something like that, I think
16:10
my partner will leave me right away.
16:13
No, but there are things I know
16:14
I can't do with Marian. Let's say
16:17
that Birque Chaussette sends
16:19
others
16:22
to Paris, it's still done a lot
16:24
these days, Birque Chaussette, and
16:28
it's more acceptable for
16:29
German tourists.
16:31
I already told you it's trendy in
16:33
Paris. Are
16:34
there any articles planned? Oh
16:36
yes. Oh [ __ ], we have a tex chain.
16:39
It's true. I keep forgetting these
16:41
days.
16:43
You too.
16:46
Luckily there's the
16:47
YouTube channel, huh.
16:51
Given the number of things that are happening in
16:52
Paris, is this really a
16:54
benchmark? Let's say there are several
16:56
grades. There are things you see in
16:58
Paris, you say, "No, I'll never do
16:59
that."
17:05
Hello Kbucha. Yeah.
17:09
Oh, the great boucha, we've been
17:11
drinking it in Paris for a long time. We didn't wait for
17:12
Squeezie.
17:16
My God ! My God !
17:19
Okay, okay, we're going to
17:21
talk a little bit about tech anyway, that's what we're
17:23
here for, let's not mess around.
17:25
What are we going to talk about this morning? We're going to
17:28
talk about the Switch 2. We're going to talk about
17:31
Nintendo, I was going to say Apple, Nintendo
17:34
breaking all records with the sale of the
17:36
Switch 2, an article from Mac Forever.
17:39
We will also talk about, since
17:42
Vivateek started with 01 net, we will
17:45
talk about Mistral AI which wants to embody
17:48
the European alternative to the
17:50
American giant and they are putting the means into it and
17:53
that's very good. We will
17:56
also be talking to the Huffington Post about
17:59
Emmanuel Macron, who is going to have a hard time
18:01
banning social media for those under
18:03
15. a bit like what he said
18:05
in an interview on Tuesday, June 10th and we will
18:08
talk about what happened,
18:10
what is happening in Australia which is
18:13
also trying to ban
18:15
social networks for those under 16 years old.
18:18
Uh, and we'll see that it's a little
18:20
more complicated. No, Vivateek, I
18:22
wasn't invited this year at all, so
18:26
I won't be going to Vivatech.
18:28
Uh, we'll be talking with Frandroï from Disney
18:33
and NBCUniversal, who are declaring war on
18:36
artificial intelligence mid-day
18:39
and in the crosshairs. They filed a
18:40
complaint against Mi-Jour, we
18:43
suspected it, but that's it, things are
18:44
happening and it risks having major
18:47
consequences for image generation.
18:49
No, he doesn't let you enter Vivatech in flip-flops
18:51
. Absolutely, they are people of
18:52
good taste. Uh we will talk with
18:55
iPhone.fr
18:57
uh about
19:00
well they didn't put their title but
19:01
generally about what Apple didn't say
19:04
during WWDC. I assure you, it's
19:07
rather good news. Uh,
19:09
indeed, there was a lot
19:11
of information during this WWDC. Marion
19:13
gave you a summary, we made a video
19:15
on the YouTube channel. Uh, but there are
19:18
things that you haven't been told and
19:20
things that are interesting and always
19:23
in the theme of things that you have
19:24
n't been told. We're going to talk a little bit
19:26
about this Wall Street
19:28
Journal interview where they
19:32
interviewed CG Federigi and Greg Josnac
19:37
precisely about
19:38
artificial intelligence and Siri. The painful question
19:41
, the answers, as you might expect,
19:44
are well formatted at Apple but
19:48
interesting. Afterwards, it's up to us to
19:50
believe it. Is it a veil pu uh
19:53
Oh la la, a modest veil thrown over an
19:56
obvious delay. Well, we'll
19:59
analyze that together.
20:03
And since we are also a
20:05
fashion channel, about fashion, about trends,
20:09
the guy who goes to Forceps, we are going to
20:12
talk. No, but it still concerns
20:13
tech. In any case,
20:15
social networks, distance selling. You
20:17
know it at the moment, ultra fast
20:20
fashion, I will give the definition of
20:22
ultra face fashion in relation to the
20:24
face fashion and under the new
20:27
law, a new law has been passed in
20:29
France, uh,
20:32
and it counterattacks with an army of
20:34
2000 boots mobilized in the service of Shine
20:37
to defend the ultra fast
20:39
fashion company. I prefer to clarify because there
20:41
is a real difference between the
20:43
fashion side and Ultra Fast fashion on social
20:45
networks. So we will see a little of
20:47
Shan's defense methods. We'll
20:51
say that's the article if we have
20:52
time, otherwise we'll talk about it on Friday.
20:55
Uh, you can't say that anymore now that
20:58
you're wearing what you're wearing on your feet.
21:00
Sorry.
21:01
I own up to my Birk socks, I own them completely
21:04
. So if this is too much for
21:06
you,
21:08
I understand.
21:12
I find it sad, but I
21:14
understand.
21:16
So we'll talk about it tomorrow, it's very
21:17
likely. Samuel. We'll start by
21:20
talking about the sales of the Nintendo Switch
21:23
2. Uh, the
21:27
biggest launch in the history of
21:29
consoles and in the history of Nintendo,
21:32
of course. 3.5 million units sold
21:36
in 4 days. It's absolutely
21:38
gigantic. The Nintendo Switch has
21:40
exceeded all expectations,
21:42
selling over 3.5 million
21:44
units.
21:45
uh within 4 days of its
21:48
worldwide release on June 5th. But no, it's
21:50
too expensive, it won't sell, it'll
21:52
be a huge flop for Nintendo.
21:59
There, I think there's the
22:01
Nintendo accountant who says,
22:03
"Luckily I'm not listening to you,
22:05
eh. We did well, we inflated the price
22:07
and we're selling even more." So.
22:10
So you can always say
22:12
that the products are too expensive and will
22:14
sell poorly.
22:15
In reality,
22:17
if there is demand for the product
22:21
and people are willing to pay that
22:24
price, well, it sells and sometimes even
22:27
better.
22:29
Uh,
22:31
but after that we still have the right to
22:33
think that it is too expensive
22:34
compared to what it does or compared
22:37
to the previous model, but the results
22:40
are there. It sold even better
22:42
than the Switch 1.
22:45
So, uh, that's what we always forget
22:48
about the price of a product, how much
22:52
people are willing to pay because otherwise
22:54
everything is too expensive.
22:56
Uh, you're always going to find
22:59
something is too expensive from the moment
23:00
you have to pay for it.
23:03
Uh
23:08
especially with catastrophic real autonomy
23:09
and drift like on the
23:11
V1. Yeah, despite its flaws,
23:13
it actually sold really well
23:14
. This is the fastest launch
23:16
for a Nintendo product, ahead of
23:18
the first Switch, which
23:20
sold 2.7 million units in one month,
23:24
and even the PlayStation, which sold
23:27
3.4 million units in one month. They
23:30
did it in 4 days.
23:32
Uh, there are, you've
23:35
probably seen crazy images everywhere, Japan,
23:37
United States,
23:39
France. This success puts Nintendo on
23:42
track to reach its
23:44
goal of 15 million consoles
23:46
sold by March 2026, although
23:49
several analysts believe that this
23:51
figure could be significantly exceeded.
23:56
Despite significant logistical involvement
23:58
, major
24:00
US retailers like Walmart, Target,
24:02
GameStop, and Best Buy are already showing
24:04
stock shortages on their online stores
24:06
just days after launch.
24:08
In Japan, Nintendo held a
24:11
lottery to manage pre-orders, with
24:13
more than 2.2 million people registering for a
24:16
much smaller number of consoles.
24:17
Analysts agree that
24:19
shortages could continue,
24:21
particularly in Asia, even though the
24:23
situation seems better controlled than when
24:25
the original Switch launched in
24:27
2017. In France, it has also been
24:29
difficult to find stock for
24:31
several days, even though on the day of its
24:33
release, most stores and
24:34
online sales sites
24:36
still had a few models available. We
24:38
even saw some pretty
24:40
impressive stocks. I saw
24:42
stock photos, but they had
24:44
ordered some. Selling for €470, the Switch 2 is the
24:47
most expensive console ever launched by
24:49
Nintendo. This tariff is partly explained
24:51
by the increase in production costs
24:53
but also by uncertainties linked
24:55
to American tariff policies. The
24:57
console, so that tells us two things.
25:00
This tells us that the price was not
25:02
only increased in the United States. It smooths out
25:05
the uncertainty of gifted rates across
25:08
the world. So thank you Trump.
25:12
sign the whole world.
25:16
The console is assembled in Vietnam, a
25:18
country targeted by potential
25:20
tariff increases by the
25:21
Trump administration. Despite these factors, demand
25:23
remains strong, driven by
25:25
technological innovations such as larger screens
25:26
, 8 times more memory
25:28
and new
25:29
social features.
25:33
If the pace continues, the Switch 2
25:36
could well exceed 100 million
25:37
units sold by 2029. It
25:41
would always be the best console
25:44
in terms of sales.
25:47
So what the article doesn't actually say
25:49
is that a certain number
25:51
of problems that were predictable,
25:54
notably the battery life problem,
25:58
which seems to be the red
26:02
flag of this Switch 2. If you play
26:06
autonomously all the time,
26:09
far from a power outlet,
26:12
I advise you to buy a large
26:14
external battery. So.
26:17
Uh
26:20
, then there's the drifting story. Uh
26:23
indeed, a priori uh Nintendo would have
26:25
put the same technology
26:28
uh which causes the drifts,
26:31
that is to say it would not have put a
26:32
magnetic technology.
26:35
Uh, so it remains to be seen whether
26:38
it's better controlled, whether there will
26:39
really be any drifting?
26:41
potentially, since it's the same
26:42
technology,
26:46
it could be a problem.
26:55
The drift is that after a while,
26:56
in fact, the Joycon will become distorted,
27:03
given the technology they used
27:06
for the controllers. In fact, uh, we
27:09
know on the Switch 1 that after a
27:11
while, uh, there
27:13
are problems, let's say, with the
27:15
calibration of the watch. Controller, it
27:17
Yes, it gets out of alignment, they
27:20
tend to drift. That's why we
27:21
call it drifting. Basically, when you
27:24
think you're going straight in Mario Kart,
27:26
you have a slight shift to the right
27:29
or left, I don't remember. Uh, which
27:32
is still quite penalizing. Uh
27:36
so far they have a bit of a policy
27:38
of changing the controller rather than
27:40
repairing it.
27:44
Why is everyone complaining about
27:45
the battery life, is it the same as the 1st?
27:47
Well, people expected better at that
27:49
price maybe.
27:51
And today, what
27:53
some people say is that on big
27:54
games, the battery life doesn't exceed 2 hours
27:58
or even less. And it's true that
28:00
2 hours is still short when you play.
28:05
If you are, if you are on the train,
28:09
there is no outlet,
28:13
well, your autonomy is
28:15
limited. You better have a
28:16
power bank.
28:20
Baron Marutan tells us no, the autonomy
28:22
is degraded compared to the first.
28:30
In any case, it is a good argument for
28:31
the government to say that there is
28:34
no purchasing power problem in
28:36
the country. Purchasing power is a
28:39
complex issue.
28:41
Uh, every product has elasticity.
28:44
Of course, they would have released the Switch 2
28:46
at €1000 sales, anyway. No, at
28:50
€1000 even if people
28:52
really wanted it, they wouldn't have bought it.
28:55
470 they buy.
29:10
It's a question of
29:11
spending priorities. Indeed, the
29:13
purchasing power of the French
29:18
means that people who bought the
29:19
Switch 2 will perhaps
29:22
buy less other things for
29:26
a few months.
29:29
It doesn't necessarily mean that they are
29:31
richer in fact.
29:34
It's more about
29:36
spending priorities.
29:44
No one can complain about the poor
29:45
battery life of Steam Decks. The thing is,
29:47
Nintendo is suffering a bit from
29:49
Apple syndrome.
29:51
Uh,
29:54
I'll give you an example. At Apple,
29:57
we're going to say the battery life of some of
29:59
their smartphones is no better
30:00
than others. Others on Android, we do
30:03
n't blame them. On the other hand, at
30:05
Apple, it is unforgivable. It's a bit like
30:08
first-in-class syndrome. It actually
30:10
goes less well.
30:19
In any
30:27
case, we have to get the idea that
30:29
consumer tech news is about
30:31
happier problems in society, not reality.
30:33
Yes, knowing that I still think that
30:35
the Nintendo Switch is outside the
30:38
tech sphere, given the number of sales they have
30:41
made, it is a real consumer product
30:43
anyway.
30:51
You get a 700 yen penalty with a
30:53
rental car, exactly the same price as the
30:56
Switch 2. I think that was a
30:58
message to stop me from buying
30:59
right away. You have to listen to this kind of message.
31:16
The thing is, you're here, no, but
31:18
people are not reasonable to
31:20
spend their money and everything. Um,
31:25
I don't know about you, but
31:28
when I buy something, it's
31:32
less and less the
31:34
price that matters to me. It's more
31:37
the
31:40
durability, price,
31:43
use ratio. Let me explain.
31:45
For example, if I bought a
31:47
Nintendo Switch
31:49
2, I know I wouldn't use it much because
31:52
I don't have much time for
31:53
video games. I prefer playing on PC, I'm
31:56
not a fan of Nintendo games, I hate
31:58
Mario Kart and so on. So spending
32:03
€470 on something I'm not going to use much
32:07
is a bit of a waste.
32:09
On the other hand, if I was a huge
32:12
Nintendo game player, loved it,
32:14
polished off my Switch 1, the ratio, what
32:19
I mean is, it's a good
32:20
investment. Uh, that's how
32:22
I think.
32:28
And I do the same with
32:30
clothes. Uh, I told you, I'm going to
32:33
buy expensive clothes that I know
32:35
I'm going to wear often, for a long time, that are
32:38
repairable, well made, well finished,
32:42
with good materials. I'm willing to
32:44
spend a lot of money for a
32:47
well-made garment.
32:49
On the other hand, if it's just an item of clothing
32:50
that I know I won't wear much, but
32:52
that I find fun, that's trendy at the
32:55
moment, but that will be out of fashion
32:56
next year, I'll try
32:59
to buy the cheapest item of clothing
33:01
possible or at a free price.
33:06
Well, the typical example is
33:08
buggy jeans. I want a pair of baggy jeans right
33:10
now, but as much as I want a timeless straight leg jean
33:13
, I'm willing to spend
33:14
a lot of money on them because they're
33:15
jeans I want to wear for 10,
33:17
15, 20 years, or even longer.
33:20
As much as I know that baggy jeans
33:22
will be completely out of fashion in 2 or 3 years. So
33:24
I'm not going to go buy myself a pair of
33:27
super expensive Bagy jeans.
33:30
But I'll try to find some Jean
33:31
Bagy that aren't too expensive.
33:34
I'm really taking clothes to
33:36
give you an example of it doesn't
33:39
mean too much, too expensive, but it's
33:42
always a question of sustainability.
33:43
But for me, sustainability is above
33:45
all a question of economy. When I
33:48
talk about saving, it's how I
33:49
spend my money.
33:52
Well before ecology in fact.
33:54
I think we need to talk about sustainability
33:56
in terms of economics.
34:00
So, uh, €470 for something that will keep
34:04
me very busy and which might
34:06
mean I'll have to spend less money
34:08
on other hobbies,
34:10
it's pretty cost-effective.
34:20
Well, that's what I like about the notion
34:21
of sustainability, that sustainability
34:23
means economy and ecological side effects
34:25
.
34:28
It's not just an ecological argument and that's what
34:31
I like.
34:41
I agree with you
34:43
Hardbard. If we see that there are
34:46
drift problems, for the moment the
34:48
drift problems from what I have read
34:50
are not proven. It's just that
34:54
tech journalists said, be careful,
34:56
it's the same technology as the Switch
34:58
1.
35:00
So potentially there are
35:01
drift issues.
35:11
Of course the resale potential. You
35:13
resell a durable product,
35:16
you resell badly a product that is not
35:19
durable. see you don't resell it, you
35:21
throw it away.
35:22
We'll come back to this when we talk about Shin
35:25
if we have time today or tomorrow.
35:27
This is the whole problem with
35:28
Ultrafast Fashion.
35:37
So uh
35:39
something too expensive. After
35:41
careful consideration, don't make me say what
35:43
I didn't say. I understand that for
35:45
some people, they cannot
35:46
spend €470 on a game console.
35:50
That's, uh, I mean the injustice
35:53
of the world. We have
35:55
different incomes, different social statuses
35:56
. Uh, businesses are
36:00
not, uh, charities.
36:05
We do not all have the same
36:07
purchasing power.
36:10
I would say that this is another problem
36:14
that cannot be solved either.
36:17
Finally, at that point, we would
36:19
say the Nintendo Switch would have to
36:21
be €10, but even €10 would be
36:24
too expensive for some people.
36:28
So the price, we can debate it
36:31
for hours but it's really
36:33
a sustainability issue, I
36:36
think.
36:45
Anyway,
36:47
the end
36:49
for Nintendo.
36:52
Otherwise, there are cheaper leisure activities.
36:54
Yes, playing with two pieces of wood does
36:57
n't cost you much money, but
37:00
you said that, you didn't say much.
37:02
Not everyone is passionate about
37:04
pieces of wood.
37:05
Not everyone has passions. We
37:07
also have the right to have
37:09
expensive passions and to spend a lot of money.
37:11
This is often the characteristic of a passion, that
37:13
you will spend a little too much
37:15
money in relation to your passion. That's what
37:16
makes it a passion versus
37:18
your income. Once again.
37:31
So you can always say "Yes, there
37:33
are cheaper hobbies. But in
37:35
fact,
37:36
you haven't changed the debate in fact.
37:43
Uh yes.
37:47
And
37:50
those who have children who do Ah
37:52
yes, horses are expensive as a
37:53
passion. But photography is expensive
37:55
as a patient. Any passion can be
37:57
expensive from the moment you know, there is
37:59
a whole market of enthusiasts.
38:02
enthusiasts, even someone who is passionate about two
38:04
pieces of wood, you will find a guy
38:06
who will say "Yeah but I'm going to
38:07
set up a site on rare pieces of wood
38:09
to invent fire. We return
38:12
to the debate from the other day. You have you
38:14
So, it's wood, there are very
38:17
few examples of it in the world.
38:19
Holes are made in a very special tree. We
38:22
burn resin inside
38:24
to make it the hardest wood
38:25
, I'll sell you this wand for €300.
38:28
I guarantee you that I'm sure it
38:30
exists.
38:42
Any hobby means there's always a
38:44
market of collectors,
38:46
enthusiasts, guys who will say "No,
38:48
but wait,
38:50
you have players with pieces of wood
38:52
and you have players with pieces of
38:54
wood. Here, we're being a little serious.
38:56
I'm talking about competition pieces of wood
38:58
, eh. Pieces of wood made using
39:01
traditional methods from
39:03
the depths of the atlace as they did
39:06
3000 years ago, eh. It's not pieces
39:09
of wood that you just find by
39:10
wandering around. You see, I'm
39:12
already convincing you
39:13
to buy quality wood at €300 per
39:15
piece of wood.
39:18
You know that in Japan, they make the
39:20
best pieces of wood in the world.
39:22
Ancestral tradition.
39:24
The piece of wood is soaked 200 times
39:27
in another source and dried in the
39:29
sun.
39:38
Come on, if you buy two
39:40
because I'm giving you a friendly price,
39:42
€400 for the two pieces of wood. €300
39:45
each.
39:47
You see,
40:08
Marion made my Marion's stroll mode
40:10
, she doesn't have time to play at
40:11
the moment, it's sad but she doesn't have
40:13
time.
40:15
Buy your pieces of wood at the recycling center
40:17
if you don't have the money. You'll
40:18
find some very good ones.
40:22
See, we're talking about jeans, pieces of
40:24
wood, whatever you want, eh.
40:34
I sell pieces of wood boxes,
40:35
pieces of wood on subscription every
40:37
month again. But of course, the good
40:39
idea. Me, I'm going to rent pieces of
40:41
wood because you're tired of your
40:43
pieces of wood. I'll give you a
40:45
yearly rental on the pieces of wood. I
40:47
guarantee you a change of pieces of wood
40:48
as soon as you're tired of your piece of
40:50
wood.
40:55
Whereas I dry my pieces
40:56
of wood in the microwave. But my god,
40:59
that's absolutely not the technique. You're
41:01
going to ruin your pieces of wood.
41:09
Anyway,
41:11
uh,
41:13
if we talked about Mistral, eh, no because
41:16
there you Get started on the bits of
41:17
wood. In short, Mistral AI wants to embody
41:21
the European alternative to the
41:23
American giant. Arthur Mench, CEO
41:26
of the French startup Mistral AI
41:28
, told the Wall Street Journal that
41:30
current transatlantic tensions,
41:32
eh, I'm not going to summarize them for you, are
41:34
boosting demand for sovereign AI tools
41:36
. More and more
41:39
European companies and governments are seeking to
41:41
free themselves from
41:44
American technologies, those that
41:45
directly benefit Mistral in
41:47
generative and open source AI models
41:50
compete with those of Open AI, Google, or
41:52
even the Chinese Dipsic. Mistral
41:55
plans to build a
41:57
400 MW data center, uh Marti, south of Paris equipped
42:02
with 18,000 Nvidia chips to equip these
42:06
models and offer a
42:08
European alternative to
42:09
American infrastructure.
42:11
This center could reach 100 MW in 18
42:15
months.
42:17
100 MW?
42:21
Some have the ref. Uh,
42:25
the young, the young shoot, so Mistral has just
42:27
unveiled a new
42:29
reasoning model, a model of
42:31
more thoughtful reasoning. Wait and see, let's
42:34
go. It's Magistral. This is the new
42:37
model that Mistral is launching. It's going to be
42:40
Magistral, which is a model of
42:44
more in-depth thinking. Um,
42:48
Mistral Haï is currently worth more than
42:51
$6 billion. So, we're a
42:52
long way from Peni's $300 billion
42:54
. But Mistral is today an
42:57
identified player in the AI sector
42:59
with arguments to put forward. They
43:02
are, so I'll do my analysis
43:04
later. Willpower won't do everything. Not to
43:07
mention the decoupling with the
43:08
United States, which seems unrealistic,
43:10
Europe really needs to strengthen its
43:12
capabilities in the cloud and AI,
43:14
if only to meet the needs
43:15
of businesses and governments in
43:17
the region. We have a real opportunity
43:19
today. It's clear that the
43:21
latest things that happened
43:22
under the Trump administration, I will be
43:25
the head of a large company, and
43:27
even being the head of a very
43:29
small company,
43:32
when we see that Donald Trump asked
43:35
Microsoft to shut down Outlook of a
43:39
leader of the International
43:42
Court of Justice
43:44
,
43:47
we say to ourselves, well, Donald Trump tomorrow,
43:50
if he wants to put a spanner in the works
43:52
in the competition, for example on
43:54
airplanes, he can tell Microsoft, you
43:56
cut off Outlook from all
43:58
Airbus emails.
44:00
There you go. Or you collect all
44:03
the attachments and you give them to
44:05
Boeing.
44:06
I'm exaggerating,
44:08
but barely. We are where we are today.
44:12
Sovereignty issues are no
44:14
longer distant problems
44:17
of tech Cassandras, or even
44:21
tech pains in the neck, as
44:22
we have sometimes been, telling you that
44:24
sovereignty is important, and to
44:26
which many of you said,
44:28
yeah, but Google is free and it's
44:30
better, you were right, the product was
44:33
better and cheaper, and so on,
44:36
but the sovereignty issue
44:39
arises,
44:43
and we thought that
44:45
sovereignty issues were limited because,
44:47
well, Microsoft has servers in
44:50
Europe, and so on, but we realize that
44:53
even that has limits.
45:00
So we must take advantage of this
45:02
opportunity.
45:04
We have a real opportunity to
45:07
offer alternatives of
45:09
equivalent quality, eh, let's say it again,
45:12
let's not take advantage of it to
45:13
palm off European crap on us.
45:16
Uh, these startups need to make
45:18
products that are at least of
45:20
equivalent quality. These are products
45:23
that we know less about because they have
45:24
less money for marketing. Open,
45:27
they have reinforced their marketing, that's
45:28
why we know them now.
45:31
So it's sure that these are products
45:33
that are less known,
45:35
so we hesitate. But in fact when you
45:38
raise the issue of sovereignty,
45:40
well we should hesitate more.
45:45
I gave you an example. I
45:47
can't for the moment remove all the
45:49
Google services that we use for
45:51
the company, but for example
45:53
GDrive, we are going to migrate
45:58
our GDrive to Infomaniac, we are going to cut our
46:00
JDrive service. We are looking into
46:03
emails too. So we will re-use our old
46:06
Gmail
46:08
on other email servers
46:10
more for questions actually
46:12
anyway of sovereignty.
46:15
Hi Chonchon.
46:22
And indeed
46:24
the thing is that we live in a world where
46:26
many things that seem
46:29
impossible to us seem possible
46:31
today. So when 2 years ago, I
46:33
told you "Yes, but if the Americans
46:35
decide to cut all
46:36
cloud services in Europe, no, but they will
46:39
never do that, never.
46:42
It's fine, we criticize them, we
46:45
criticize the Americans, but they remain
46:49
friends. Today, we are much
46:51
less sure of this, so it seems much
46:54
less unrealistic.
46:59
We live in a sausage. It's
47:07
not easy to find
47:09
quality services for free or even cheap in
47:10
Europe. It's clear. But it's clear,
47:12
but here I'm reasoning from a point of view,
47:15
I'm not telling you
47:16
as an individual what to do or
47:17
not do. I say as a company
47:19
.
47:21
I'm like, even though I'm a
47:22
very small company and
47:26
I walk around in Birk Socks,
47:29
I still have industrial secrets.
47:32
Uh, my business depends a lot on
47:34
American platforms, not YouTube,
47:39
uh, TikTok. Well, Chinese platform,
47:43
uh, Instagram, American platform,
47:45
Twitch, American platform, even
47:47
if the Twitch business is no longer
47:48
really a business for us. Uh,
47:54
there I am, I'm starting to say to myself, well
47:57
yeah,
47:59
uh, uh, always have plan Bs
48:03
if tomorrow, uh, if tomorrow,
48:06
Trump says, well, we're fed up with
48:09
countries taking advantage
48:12
of our magnificent big beautiful
48:14
American companies, and in particular,
48:17
YouTube bandwidth, we're
48:18
fed up with other countries taking
48:20
advantage of it. So YouTube order,
48:23
anyway no one is contesting my
48:25
order. I prohibit any
48:29
foreign service from using YouTube.
48:33
Well, at least I'm dead.
48:38
I am dead.
48:40
All I'll have left is my Birk
48:42
socks, which I'll sell on Vined
48:45
to eat for a month.
48:49
Impossible.
48:50
Really, you honestly thought I was
48:54
repeating the news, you thought Trump
48:57
had the power to demand Microsoft
49:01
cut off the Outlook emails
49:05
of a high-ranking official
49:08
at the International Criminal Court? Did you
49:11
think that was possible?
49:19
Today we have entered a world
49:21
where many things seem much
49:22
more plausible than before, and not
49:24
good things.
49:39
YouTube is going to shut down. We realize that
49:41
Donald Trump doesn't really care about the
49:45
business of his own companies
49:48
.
49:51
We are no longer in a world where
49:53
companies were international
49:55
before being American. Donald Trump
49:58
tightened the lock
50:01
by telling companies, "Look at
50:02
Elon Musk getting down on his knees and saying
50:05
sorry, sorry for criticizing Trump
50:08
last Elon Musk week.
50:13
Ah, he's too scared of losing
50:15
space budgets and so on, huh.
50:25
But look at OK Elon M like
50:27
it's probably another
50:30
short move but even Team Cook, the
50:36
Apple side is saying no to the American government
50:39
that we knew 5 or 6 years ago,
50:43
we feel that
50:46
Tim Cook is trying to slip through
50:48
the net but he's forced to
50:50
bow down.
50:57
Look at how he's punishing Apple right
50:59
now, Donald Trump,
51:01
with his tariff stories.
51:09
So just to tell you, we're not going to
51:11
get into discussions about
51:13
Trumpis, Elon Musk and all that
51:15
today, but just to say, I
51:17
think you're wrong if you think
51:19
it's impossible for
51:22
certain things to happen today.
51:33
Nemmand, I'm not going to answer
51:35
your question in the middle of an article.
51:37
Try at the end show, it's rare
51:39
that we have time. Maybe tomorrow,
51:41
the show will be more open
51:43
to questions. Try to ask the
51:44
questions again tomorrow.
51:49
Uh
51:51
so there you go. In any case, I say good
51:53
luck to Mistral. I'm not really tired. Uh
51:58
no but Mistral is good. After
52:00
Mistral, I would like Mistral to
52:04
work a little on a public chat.
52:08
I know that they don't necessarily have an interest
52:10
because it will cost them a lot in servers
52:12
and everything but I would like them to work on
52:14
the voice. Today, Mistral's demos
52:16
are disappointing for the general
52:19
public because it's not as magical
52:21
as doing a GPT chat demonstration
52:23
with its voice function.
52:27
Today, Mistral doesn't have the
52:28
voice functions yet.
52:30
Uh we kiss Mistral. Not
52:33
bad that one, Mitsu. Uh
52:38
so
52:40
Mistrral, if you hear me,
52:44
even if it's paying for
52:45
the general public because you can
52:47
totally play the thing. Yes. No,
52:49
we don't, we want to make
52:52
Mistral for the general public, but we do
52:54
n't want people to do anything and
52:55
everything with Mistral. So it will
52:59
only be possible with the
53:01
paid Mistral.
53:02
The winning Mistral, eh, since
53:04
everyone's making the joke. Uh, there you go, the name
53:07
of the paid general public package,
53:09
Winning Mistral. Uh,
53:13
and uh, so there will be a voice chat
53:16
because, stupidly, voice chat is a
53:19
thing
53:20
to impress the gallery and to show
53:23
that we're an AI company, uh, that has what it
53:27
takes. Nothing beats a
53:29
voice demonstration.
53:38
So, it might not be a game
53:39
changer for businesses. That's
53:41
why I understand the
53:42
administrative strategy. Today, it's
53:44
focused on agents, it's
53:47
focused on the best part of the business,
53:49
which is B2B, in fact, for the LIA. The
53:53
general public isn't where we're going to
53:54
make tons of money with Lia, I
53:57
think.
53:59
But it's still very good for
54:00
marketing.
54:06
And There you go, IT dev, you don't
54:08
need voice. I think they've
54:10
decided. Voice is long on the
54:12
roadmap, but it's not
54:14
their priority.
54:18
Mistral is hiring a lot in robotics.
54:19
But it's clear, the market there in 2026
54:22
is the fusion of robotics and, uh, that's
54:26
the market of tomorrow. It's no longer AI,
54:28
it's even no longer generative AI. There,
54:30
it's robotics, it has a
54:32
gigantic market. And there, it's going to be a
54:34
mainstream market.
54:41
No longer Mistral or Perplexity. The thing
54:43
is, every week, I change
54:45
AI a little and I use them all a little
54:47
. Uh, I'll even tell you,
54:49
right now, I'm using GPT chat a lot
54:51
. The latest GPT chat models,
54:54
uh, my jaw drops.
54:57
Uh, we've completely moved to another
54:58
level. That is to say, just to
55:00
make you understand GPT chat when I
55:02
ask it something with 4.5 or
55:05
other more advanced models, if I
55:08
ask him something, he'll ask me
55:09
questions to contextualize my
55:11
request. That is to say, he's not
55:14
going to just try to
55:15
answer my request, he's going to ask me
55:18
questions to refine my request.
55:21
And that's crazy.
55:29
And uh, I use it in voice from time to
55:32
time, but it's true that my main
55:34
use uh of GPT chat is not in
55:37
voice, eh.
55:41
But if then I have the
55:43
paid version, for the moment, it's the uh
55:45
no, we pay for two AIs, mid-day and
55:48
GPT chat. We're going to stop mid-day, we're
55:52
still keeping our subscription to
55:54
Chat GPT.
55:56
Mistral, I also use it in fact
55:58
when I tell you that I use a lot
55:59
of AI, I use a lot of I for
56:02
fact
56:04
checking between them. Chat GPT is
56:07
something for me, I'm going to fact check it at
56:09
Mistral.
56:11
Uh, I do a lot of that in fact
56:23
on Deep Search, eh. Above all, he's going to
56:25
ask you questions and all that. HB
56:32
copilot remains extremely interesting if you
56:34
work mainly on Windows. I
56:37
made a video about it for you.
56:39
Today, copilot and for me Lia is the
56:41
best integrated into a complete ecosystem
56:45
and in the work tools.
56:53
So, your fact checking, it eats up
56:55
CPU, it pollutes. Yeah, but finally if new
56:57
when I write a video, I
56:59
also watch videos on YouTube, which
57:01
pollutes. Uh, I have lights on,
57:04
which pollutes. I have a computer
57:06
running, which pollutes.
57:09
I hear the speech. But in fact,
57:11
to summarize the speech,
57:14
Lia, it pollutes and I did it there
57:16
in my video where I talk to you about
57:18
Lia's problems.
57:23
It consists of saying the li
57:27
so you pollute for nothing.
57:30
No no but it's interesting that you
57:32
say while teasing on
57:36
in fact I'm not here to say we must
57:38
pollute but there too it's like the
57:40
price earlier there There's a ratio
57:42
between the usefulness of things and the
57:43
pollution you generate.
57:47
And I'm going to make another analogy about
57:48
clothing. Making any
57:50
garment, even the best-made, in
57:54
fair trade cotton and linen
57:57
collected under ethical conditions,
57:59
without water. I, I see, the
58:03
best-made thing will consume energy
58:05
and pollute.
58:08
But you can't see things
58:11
only through that lens.
58:14
Uh,
58:18
I think, maybe that's where I'm
58:19
wrong, and I think my work is
58:22
useful. Maybe I'm wrong. There are
58:25
people who will say, "No, making
58:26
videos on YouTube, talking about text,
58:28
it's completely useless to society.
58:31
Uh it's a waste and uh completely the
58:35
finally there you go. I have the pretension of
58:37
thinking that what I do is useful.
58:39
I use polluting tools to
58:43
do it.
58:44
Afterwards, I try to have
58:46
a discourse of responsibility in what I do.
58:50
We buy tech, we use
58:52
tech. Let's be responsible. So.
59:02
So for me, on the other hand, generating
59:07
uh 150 family images in Gibli style
59:14
is debatable. Haven't you
59:16
wasted a bit of resources on
59:18
something that's not very interesting and
59:20
that you won't really use afterwards? So.
59:32
Even a virtuous, chapped shirt
59:34
is
59:36
polluting. Exactly. Even my shirt with
59:39
holes
59:41
pollutes,
59:45
but when it reaches the end of its life,
59:46
when it only has holes and there are no
59:48
more shirts, at
59:51
least it will biodegrade.
59:58
Having fun is pointless. No, watch out, do
1:00:00
n't make me say that, you see, I'm
1:00:02
not the old fool who's going to say:
1:00:04
"Play video games, they're useless and they
1:00:06
pollute."
1:00:07
Having fun is a huge part of
1:00:10
the human experience.
1:00:12
Uh,
1:00:17
if you do your images without Gibl, it
1:00:20
entertains you. This is where I say it is
1:00:22
debatable.
1:00:24
It's debatable.
1:00:26
But if you do 100 gibli images
1:00:28
to see how it works, I think
1:00:30
it's cool. Making a hundred of them that you wo
1:00:33
n't even look at afterwards is
1:00:34
pointless.
1:00:38
Your shirt with a hole uses 30%
1:00:40
less textiles. Exactly.
1:00:53
Ah, but anyway, the real
1:00:56
secret of sustainability is
1:00:57
exactly what you summed up, it's the
1:00:59
most essential sentence. We must
1:01:01
consume less. I am for
1:01:03
degrowth. We must consume less
1:01:06
but better.
1:01:07
I buy expensive clothes
1:01:09
or I buy clothes on
1:01:14
free prices or on Vined,
1:01:17
but I buy
1:01:19
my clothes wardrobe there,
1:01:23
uh, I've reduced it. Two-
1:01:27
thirds of my old clothes
1:01:29
were given away, sold, or thrown away because they
1:01:32
were truly at the end of their life.
1:01:34
So, I'm buying a lot of clothes
1:01:36
right now because I'm redoing my
1:01:38
rotation,
1:01:39
but I'm going to use a lot less
1:01:41
clothes in my rotation than I used to. So.
1:01:46
And tech, I'm not an example to
1:01:49
follow, I'm a tech tester. So
1:01:52
I have way too many products
1:01:54
available. There are three smartphones
1:01:55
on my table. I have three smartphones on
1:01:58
my table but I spend my work. But if
1:02:01
I wasn't a
1:02:04
tech influencer, or rather a
1:02:07
tech content creator,
1:02:10
I think I would still be a take
1:02:13
your time because I was before.
1:02:15
I'm trying to buy less tech.
1:02:26
But if you consume better, you consume
1:02:28
less because you will buy
1:02:30
more sustainable products.
1:02:33
That's a bit why I'm talking to you
1:02:34
about clothes that are more tech than tech because
1:02:36
tech, I can't be an example to
1:02:37
follow. Uh tech, I have all the tech
1:02:39
I want available and we have way too many
1:02:41
products here. But because we
1:02:43
go beyond normal use of
1:02:45
technology.
1:02:54
Minimalism is more for the
1:02:55
bourgeoisie. I don't agree with Burberry
1:02:57
because if we have time, we'll talk
1:02:58
about Shine later.
1:03:01
We consume far too much clothing
1:03:02
today. We have way too many
1:03:05
clothes. We don't need so many
1:03:06
clothes.
1:03:08
We don't need to buy 20 t-shirts
1:03:10
a year like some people do.
1:03:13
In the past, and this is where I
1:03:15
contradict you about the bourgeoisie,
1:03:17
clothes used to be worth much, much
1:03:19
more. If we go back to the
1:03:23
average income of the French 50
1:03:25
years ago, 100 years ago, clothes in
1:03:28
the expenses were worth much more
1:03:30
money but we bought like one item of
1:03:32
clothing per year and we
1:03:35
rotated the clothes we
1:03:36
already had.
1:03:39
So to say minimalism is a
1:03:41
bourgeois thing, I don't agree.
1:03:45
I don't agree.
1:03:47
20 t-shirts per year. I guarantee you
1:03:49
there are plenty of people like Shin and Temou who
1:03:51
buy 20 t-shirts a year.
1:03:57
That's the whole problem. Anyway, let's move on
1:04:00
.
1:04:01
Uh Macron will have a hard time banning
1:04:04
social networks for those under 15,
1:04:06
the example of Australia is rising. So on
1:04:08
the France Télévision set, Tuesday,
1:04:10
June 10, Emmanuel Macron proposed in
1:04:12
response to the program prompted by
1:04:14
the assassination of a supervisor to our
1:04:16
people. to ban social networks for those
1:04:18
under 15. The president
1:04:20
even used the example of banning adult porn sites to demonstrate the
1:04:22
feasibility of his project
1:04:25
. Wow, I'm Hop! Who
1:04:28
skipped uh
1:04:31
online adult sites for
1:04:33
minors applied since
1:04:34
January.
1:04:36
So he actually cites the
1:04:39
laws that have come out that
1:04:41
now impose
1:04:43
much stricter age controls for
1:04:44
X sites, porn sites,
1:04:47
adult sites.
1:04:48
But limiting
1:04:52
the exposure of young people
1:04:53
to pornography as much as possible has not really created
1:04:56
a debate. There are few people who said,
1:04:58
"Oh no, the PN must be accessible to the
1:05:01
minor." Finally, a position that is difficult to
1:05:04
maintain. Well,
1:05:07
here the ban could well
1:05:09
encounter fierce opposition that
1:05:11
is not technical. And that's what's
1:05:13
happening a little bit in Australia.
1:05:15
Since November 2024, Australia
1:05:19
is the only country in the world that has
1:05:21
so far decided to ban
1:05:23
Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok for those
1:05:25
under 16. But while the
1:05:28
parliamentary procedure in Australia was swift,
1:05:31
too swift for some commentators, the
1:05:32
criticism has not stopped since.
1:05:34
Australia is under attack from various
1:05:36
political parties, including the Australian Greens and
1:05:39
Amnesty International, claiming that this
1:05:42
ban on people under 16 leads to
1:05:45
the isolation of young people, especially
1:05:47
the most vulnerable. For others, like
1:05:49
the ubiquitous Elon Musk, banning those under 16 is an
1:05:51
attack on freedom of expression
1:05:53
.
1:05:55
And perhaps more seriously, for many
1:05:58
experts in an open letter, they
1:06:00
felt that this would not resolve any of the
1:06:02
problems, the underlying problems.
1:06:04
So Emmanuel Macron wants to
1:06:07
make it a European issue. He gave
1:06:09
the European Union country a few months
1:06:10
to find an agreement that
1:06:12
harmonizes national laws.
1:06:15
Today, Spain and Greece are
1:06:17
formally on the same line as
1:06:18
Paris. Whether the project succeeds or fails
1:06:22
at the European Union level, he
1:06:24
assured that he would put restrictions in place
1:06:25
in France. But he will
1:06:27
have to face opposition that
1:06:29
was not experienced when
1:06:31
porn was banned for under-18s. So
1:06:33
basically, I
1:06:38
'm very conflicted about the ban on social media for under 15s
1:06:42
, I'll be honest, I'm
1:06:43
very conflicted.
1:06:46
Um, I understand, but I'm very afraid
1:06:49
of a
1:06:52
simplistic solution to a complex problem, and you
1:06:55
know that always scares me.
1:06:58
That's a bit of a simplistic answer
1:07:00
to throw out on a TV show, eh?
1:07:02
This is what Macron did. Yes. No, but
1:07:04
to reduce violence among
1:07:05
young people, I have a very
1:07:07
simple solution. We will ban social media for those
1:07:09
under 15 and the
1:07:12
problem will be solved.
1:07:14
This simple answer to a complex problem will appeal to a certain constituency
1:07:20
,
1:07:21
but it doesn't solve the heart of the
1:07:24
problem.
1:07:27
We know this because we've seen
1:07:29
video games, role-playing games, and
1:07:31
rock and roll in the 50s that
1:07:34
created violence among young people.
1:07:37
For me, the root of the problem of
1:07:39
violence is a cultural problem that is much
1:07:41
broader than the media.
1:07:45
We will ban violence. Look at
1:07:47
Orange. No, but quite honestly,
1:07:50
look me straight in the eye and I'll
1:07:52
make a reference to the movie. Watch A
1:07:55
Clockwork Orange. I don't remember the
1:07:57
release date of A Clockwork Orange, but I
1:07:59
think it was 1968 or the 1960s.
1:08:04
What would a society be like where
1:08:07
violence was forbidden? Very, very interesting
1:08:09
film. Very very Or the book, it's
1:08:12
even better.
1:08:14
Yes. Yes. The book, well no, the film
1:08:16
is exceptional too, but yes, it's
1:08:19
originally a book.
1:08:23
1971. Okay. I wasn't very
1:08:26
far away. 69. Uh,
1:08:31
so
1:08:33
look what that gives. Actually, it's the
1:08:36
same. Oh, there is violence, let's
1:08:38
ban violence. It is a
1:08:41
simple solution to
1:08:42
complex problems that can lead to other
1:08:44
problems. Banning social media for those
1:08:47
under 15 will not
1:08:50
necessarily solve the problem and may
1:08:52
lead to others.
1:08:55
That's what I think. However, I
1:08:58
also put myself in the parents' shoes
1:09:01
and I'm going to tell you right now if there is
1:09:03
a social network that I would ban for those
1:09:05
under 15, it's Twitter,
1:09:08
or X, Elon Musk's social network.
1:09:12
I think it is dangerous for
1:09:15
developing minds.
1:09:17
Going on Twitter without having any armor
1:09:20
and being a little sure of yourself and your
1:09:22
opinions
1:09:24
and what you believe and what your
1:09:26
values are.
1:09:28
Uh, there's so much
1:09:31
propaganda, lies, fake news, it's
1:09:34
going in all directions.
1:09:37
Uh
1:09:39
dangerous dangerous Twitter for
1:09:41
under 15s. Yeah.
1:09:49
So TikTok, I'm much more
1:09:51
reserved about New because of course if you
1:09:55
look at TikTok from the perspective of the
1:09:58
stupid challenges I have that cause
1:10:00
teenagers to die.
1:10:02
Oh yeah, at that point,
1:10:03
TikTok should be banned. But is it
1:10:05
TikTok that should be banned, or the
1:10:07
stupid challenges? Did
1:10:10
you sum up TikTok as a stupid challenge?
1:10:13
TikTok isn't all about stupid challenges.
1:10:15
TikTok isn't just about silly dances.
1:10:18
TikTok isn't all [ __ ]. I
1:10:21
find TikTok to be a great
1:10:23
educational tool.
1:10:25
I really, really wish I had
1:10:28
TikTok when I was younger. There are
1:10:29
many things I would have learned that
1:10:31
I am forced to learn now,
1:10:32
late in life.
1:10:36
And I'll tell you, let's get back to the
1:10:39
stupid challenges. There were stupid challenges that
1:10:41
kill people in my time and we did
1:10:44
n't have the internet, eh? We
1:10:46
already played at choking each other in the playground
1:10:48
because it created sensations.
1:10:51
We were sniffing bicycle tire glue
1:10:52
. Well, I mean, young people
1:10:56
do stupid things. The problem is
1:10:58
that with TikTok, it spreads more. That
1:11:01
's a problem. But what I
1:11:03
mean is that young people didn't
1:11:05
wait for social media to do
1:11:08
dangerous things and put their
1:11:11
lives at risk.
1:11:18
Hello, my 14-year-old daughter spends her life
1:11:20
on TikTok and Snapchat. Yeah. After
1:11:24
all, the thing is, where does she
1:11:26
spend her time on TikTok and Snapchat?
1:11:30
I bring this back to a problem for example
1:11:32
of mine when I was young, when
1:11:33
I was 15, it was the problem of
1:11:36
dating.
1:11:38
I spent my day outside with
1:11:40
groups of friends, but who was I hanging out with
1:11:43
? That was my parents' concern.
1:11:46
Well, today, the concern for parents
1:11:48
shouldn't be how much they're on
1:11:51
TikTok, but rather what's
1:11:53
watching on TikTok.
1:12:00
So I pay attention, these are
1:12:03
always full debates. I'm
1:12:05
not blaming the parents.
1:12:06
Damn, being a parent is probably the
1:12:09
hardest job. We don't do what we
1:12:12
want with kids, we do what we
1:12:13
can and that's already not bad. Uh, and
1:12:16
everything we miss, we pay dearly for in
1:12:17
psi afterwards. Uh, there are some really
1:12:21
interesting things on TikTok. Jean McLean,
1:12:24
I'm learning a lot on
1:12:25
TikTok, even more than on YouTube,
1:12:29
but it's like any other
1:12:30
social media, you have to know where to look. There's
1:12:32
some absolutely
1:12:35
fascinating stuff on TikTok.
1:12:43
I almost want to
1:12:45
scroll through my TikTok and
1:12:46
show you some exciting things. Well,
1:12:47
there's a lot of stuff about
1:12:48
clothes just in case
1:12:54
Oh well, no, but we're going to do it,
1:12:55
we're going to do it because it's always
1:12:57
interesting. We'll see who I am.
1:13:00
So of course, a TikTok, there are not
1:13:02
only the
1:13:04
but I will put myself in my followings.
1:13:06
So, wait, I'll plug in my iPhone.
1:13:08
I check that there is nothing
1:13:09
confidential.
1:13:13
Does it work? Will it
1:13:14
work? Uh yes, but no, I didn't
1:13:17
plug in the right socket. Wait. Hop.
1:13:26
I had already done the exercise but we
1:13:29
might as well do it again, I'll
1:13:31
show you that there are some things that are
1:13:33
interesting. There, for example, it's a
1:13:35
guy who, well, he discovered that he
1:13:39
liked clothes at 50. Does this
1:13:41
remind you of anyone? And there you have it, he
1:13:44
shows the types of style
1:13:47
by saying well at 50, I started to
1:13:50
not give a damn anymore about what
1:13:51
people thought of me and this is how
1:13:53
I dress. You might say, it's not
1:13:54
the most interesting thing in the world,
1:13:56
but there's nothing reprehensible
1:13:58
about it. We move on to the next one. Uh, well,
1:14:00
that's advertising.
1:14:03
Ah well that's it, then that's
1:14:05
good, I'm going to talk about her in the last
1:14:08
topic, uh, and indeed the
1:14:12
2000 boots who are trying to defend
1:14:14
Shin at the moment.
1:14:16
So,
1:14:18
I'm going to go to the channels that I
1:14:20
follow. Well, there's a guy
1:14:22
I'm teaching to sew
1:14:24
right now. So, don't be surprised, there
1:14:25
's a lot of stuff about sewing because
1:14:26
I'm learning to repair my
1:14:28
own clothes. So there's a lot of
1:14:30
TikTok about crafts that explains
1:14:32
how it's done, like the
1:14:35
machine thing. Right now I'm learning how to
1:14:36
repair my clothes. Don't be shocked.
1:14:39
Um,
1:14:41
she's really interesting, I've been following her
1:14:43
since yesterday, Audrey, and she's talking about
1:14:46
luxury brands that sell
1:14:50
clothes that are
1:14:51
badly made for way too much and she's denouncing them. super
1:14:54
interesting. Uh Basti, that's not
1:14:57
interesting Basti.
1:14:59
That's really interesting Basti, he's talking
1:15:01
about liquid ice.
1:15:03
Well, it's on t-shirts.
1:15:07
Comparisons between €5 and $100 t-shirts
1:15:09
. Uh 5 dollars 100 dollars.
1:15:12
Well, that's advertising. Uh there, he's
1:15:15
talking about alternatives to Vintage Levis jackets
1:15:17
. There are a lot of clothes,
1:15:20
a lot of clothes.
1:15:23
Uh,
1:15:25
the phone book of
1:15:26
clothing brands in the United States. Interesting.
1:15:29
An ad. Uh [ __ ], I only have
1:15:32
clothes actually. I only have clothes
1:15:35
on my TikTok. But hey, you see, there
1:15:38
aren't challenges where I'm going to die or where there are
1:15:39
n't stupid dances.
1:15:47
So, the best socks to
1:15:49
wear with sneakers, you're
1:15:51
interested in that,
1:15:55
eh? This might be interesting.
1:15:57
What are the best socks
1:15:58
to wear with sneakers?
1:16:05
Ah, so those were some channels I
1:16:07
wanted to show you because
1:16:09
when I talk about fashion, a lot of people say, "Yeah,
1:16:11
but I have a
1:16:14
rather strong profile. I never find
1:16:17
brands that make XXL stuff or
1:16:19
stuff that suits me. I have, uh, several
1:16:22
channels that I follow from guys who have a
1:16:24
certain build, and this one is
1:16:27
really interesting because he tries
1:16:28
to imitate the styles of models he
1:16:31
sees and he shows how he buys his
1:16:33
clothes for larger builds.
1:16:37
Uh,
1:16:38
and I think that's really good. It's
1:16:41
really interesting.
1:16:43
Well, I don't know about you, but I have
1:16:45
a big belly too, so I ca
1:16:46
n't wear everything
1:16:48
. And knowing, I see, he does
1:16:51
n't necessarily wear XXXL stuff
1:16:55
because he has a bit of a belly. He's going to
1:16:58
show that the cut of the
1:17:00
garment can enhance certain
1:17:02
figures.
1:17:05
So, that's stuff you'll
1:17:07
only find on TikTok.
1:17:10
Okay, more clothes, more clothes.
1:17:13
I'm trying to find you something other than
1:17:14
clothes, but I only have clothes. That
1:17:16
's Sacho. Because I'm
1:17:17
also taking Sacho classes. Well, I'm going to
1:17:19
take Sacho classes. They're
1:17:22
Japanese clothing repair methods. Uh, my life is fascinating
1:17:25
. There's this I'm obsessed with
1:17:27
clothes. A disaster.
1:17:31
An ad. There are only ads and
1:17:33
clothes. Fit check. Well, I'm only
1:17:36
on my subscriptions too, but I
1:17:38
no longer have any tech subscriptions. Oh, of course,
1:17:40
Lucas. [ __ ], I have to [ __ ],
1:17:42
I have to answer Lucas. I I we
1:17:45
're discussing stuff
1:17:47
with Lucas and it's been a month since I've
1:17:49
written.
1:17:50
Uh
1:17:52
yeah, no but actually, there's only
1:17:54
clothes, there's no more tech. The algo
1:17:56
understood that tech doesn't interest me
1:17:58
at all on TikTok anymore.
1:18:00
I'm trying to find you some stuff,
1:18:01
eh.
1:18:03
In the for you tab, it's a little more
1:18:05
varied. Generally,
1:18:08
I have more varied stuff.
1:18:12
Uh, those are trends, it's a
1:18:14
filter that makes So, there you go, I
1:18:17
still see the TikTok a little bit naz. I
1:18:19
still see it.
1:18:22
I was able to follow the Italian brain rot, the
1:18:25
Steve fish, the more trivial stuff, I
1:18:28
love that. He also understood that
1:18:30
I liked old vintage stuff from
1:18:32
Japan.
1:18:36
If I have cooking normally,
1:18:39
there, I have a little tech. There,
1:18:41
in the for you tab, he continues to
1:18:44
try to push tech on me.
1:18:50
That's what's super interesting with
1:18:52
the algoer
1:18:56
not just things he knows I
1:18:58
'll like, but he tests things
1:19:01
to see if I believe in them, if I
1:19:03
stay on them. Uh
1:19:07
Zekoya, he does Zekoa Zekasa to me, he
1:19:11
makes me laugh so much. Well, not always but
1:19:13
generally, he makes me laugh a lot.
1:19:16
Of course, there was Basti, we played
1:19:19
Basti. Basti, I said you were
1:19:21
one of the most interesting things
1:19:23
on TikTok.
1:19:33
Oh yes, we've seen jeans. I
1:19:35
showed you a guy who repaired a pair of jeans
1:19:36
selve.
1:19:38
Miracle of the Storm. You saw when
1:19:41
I'm in the following, there's only
1:19:42
fring, eh. There's only fring at the
1:19:45
moment. Oh no, that's very funny
1:19:48
because I also have very
1:19:49
funny things. Trivios, it's a good one you have to
1:19:53
see to understand but
1:19:54
it's a little pig who eats
1:19:55
things
1:19:58
but who makes me laugh a lot.
1:20:02
Uh abrcheur
1:20:07
material necessary to print his
1:20:09
clothes.
1:20:11
More
1:20:14
original 2020 clothes. which is relaunching a little on
1:20:16
TikTok, more or less successful.
1:20:21
Uh advertising, green screen things.
1:20:25
See what I really wanted to
1:20:27
show you with all this is that TikTok
1:20:29
depending on what interests you, you have
1:20:32
n't seen too much stupid stuff or too much
1:20:35
dangerous stuff on my TikTok.
1:20:42
Yeah, it's 2020 of the 2020h. Yeah.
1:20:44
Stupid
1:20:50
yes, but I like Wait, I have, so
1:20:55
how do you explain that?
1:20:59
I have a big [ __ ] in me.
1:21:01
I would say 10 20% of my personality
1:21:05
laughs at extremely fat jokes
1:21:08
.
1:21:11
I like stupid.
1:21:14
So yes, there is stupid in my
1:21:16
algorithm.
1:21:20
Yeah, 20%. OK, I'm a little kind
1:21:22
to myself, I would say. Yeah, I
1:21:24
still like stupid things too.
1:21:27
I also like cat videos that
1:21:29
break their face.
1:21:32
What I mean, I know that
1:21:34
today I'm breaking the myth for a
1:21:37
lot of you. First, I
1:21:38
showed you that I was wearing Birk
1:21:40
socks today. So a lot of you
1:21:42
left the channel, eh. I'm showing it
1:21:44
again because I own up to it ...
1:21:55
smart things in life.
1:22:00
There you go. So I know I'm busting a
1:22:02
myth. You thought I was
1:22:03
someone who spent all my
1:22:05
free time thinking about
1:22:07
serious tech issues and writing
1:22:11
videos. Oh no, I do super
1:22:13
stupid stuff.
1:22:25
And if the Birk socks, I
1:22:27
fell for France. I won't be
1:22:31
picked up again. Once you
1:22:33
've touched the Birk sock, you won't go
1:22:35
back.
1:22:41
The Birque sock, it's the
1:22:42
sock flip-flop, but
1:22:44
Parisian bobo.
1:22:48
See, Basti fell for it and
1:22:49
yet he's not in Paris.
1:22:59
It's the sock flip-flop, eh.
1:23:01
But a Parisian, we're not going to say he
1:23:02
wears sock flip-flops, he
1:23:03
wears the Birque sock.
1:23:07
So no. A true Parisian from Maris, he
1:23:09
doesn't wear Birques anymore. The Birqu,
1:23:11
it's dead. It's been mainstream since
1:23:13
it was bought by LVMH. It's going to have
1:23:16
brands unknown, he's going to have
1:23:17
Japanese tap dancing.
1:23:19
There you go.
1:23:24
So all that to tell you, to
1:23:26
come back to the ban on social
1:23:28
media for those under 15.
1:23:30
Sorry,
1:23:32
uh, maybe I haven't convinced
1:23:33
some of you, but I'm
1:23:36
convinced that a ban on TikTok for those
1:23:37
under 15, from an educational point of view,
1:23:39
can be penalizing because it
1:23:41
's a tutorial, there are plenty of
1:23:45
really well-made tutorials because they're quick, you
1:23:47
can improve on
1:23:49
niche subjects really quickly. There are actually
1:23:51
really well-stocked niche TikTok channels
1:23:53
, whether it's in cooking,
1:23:56
whether it's in making lots of
1:23:59
stuff.
1:24:03
So summarizing TikTok by saying it's
1:24:06
stupid and dangerous stuff,
1:24:08
it's a simple answer to a
1:24:10
complex problem.
1:24:20
I may not have convinced you,
1:24:22
but what I am convinced of is that
1:24:24
we always forget the benefits of
1:24:27
social media for the human species.
1:24:30
And the benefits are enormous. We
1:24:32
see that the flaws right now, We
1:24:34
are obsessed with flaws.
1:24:36
Social media,
1:24:39
and historians of the future
1:24:42
will measure this
1:24:45
first, has brought us closer together like no other
1:24:47
means of communication in the world, and
1:24:49
today allows us to
1:24:52
learn a number of things. We have
1:24:54
access to human knowledge
1:24:57
that in the past
1:24:59
only presidents of the
1:25:01
Republic had access to such
1:25:03
libraries with an army of guys to
1:25:05
freelance for them.
1:25:08
And you always forget that.
1:25:11
After all, if you only use the
1:25:13
internet to watch
1:25:14
cat videos, that's your problem. But on
1:25:17
TikTok, you have the world's knowledge. The
1:25:22
world's knowledge. After all, if we do
1:25:23
n't take advantage of it, that's another problem.
1:25:27
But I know I'm taking advantage of it.
1:25:29
I'm learning at over 50, I'm learning
1:25:31
to sew
1:25:33
before social media, before the
1:25:35
internet,
1:25:37
it would have been much more complicated.
1:25:47
The flaws are enormous, but
1:25:49
the advantage is enormous too. You should never
1:25:52
forget the advantage of social media.
1:25:58
No, you don't learn to sew in a
1:26:00
minute and a half, but you Learn lots of
1:26:02
little techniques from different
1:26:03
people who are pros who make you
1:26:06
little 1 minute 30 sec videos. And
1:26:08
that's a really interesting way
1:26:10
to distil knowledge. I'm not
1:26:12
telling you that by watching a
1:26:13
TikTok video, you'll sew. Don't
1:26:16
say what I didn't say.
1:26:20
I'm learning how to make a vegetable garden thanks to the
1:26:21
internet. Probably a midlife crisis
1:26:23
. No, but that's what's
1:26:24
great. At any age, you can learn
1:26:26
new skills
1:26:28
that weren't necessarily easy. Before,
1:26:31
if you didn't have a grandmother who
1:26:33
was a sewing expert,
1:26:36
it was super hard. Now, you can learn
1:26:38
from the best.
1:26:46
Our opportunities to learn skills
1:26:49
were much more limited before
1:26:51
social media, before the internet.
1:27:05
On the other hand, you don't at all address the
1:27:06
problem that this ban would pose
1:27:08
to influencers in their communication. No, but
1:27:11
OK, I told you that I was
1:27:13
torn on the subject and Oleg, you're
1:27:15
right. There's a part of me
1:27:18
because I'm not, I haven't yet
1:27:20
decided on this idea of banning children
1:27:23
under 15. I see the
1:27:24
danger. I didn't choose to talk about it
1:27:26
this morning, but the influencers who
1:27:29
appeared before the commission yesterday
1:27:32
, the masculinists and other
1:27:34
disgusting influencers,
1:27:36
uh, who give us a very bad
1:27:39
reputation, uh, yeah, I'm in favor of
1:27:42
banning them outright, but I do
1:27:43
n't want to be against freedom
1:27:45
of expression either. These are very
1:27:46
complex subjects,
1:27:48
but banning them for children under 15 if
1:27:51
we can. Yeah.
1:28:01
No, no, to say that in the past there were
1:28:03
cooking classes, sewing classes and all that at
1:28:04
school. Yes and no. First of all, to
1:28:07
access certain things, we
1:28:09
don't all live in the city where you have lots of
1:28:11
teachers to teach you things. So
1:28:13
it was still a leveling. Uh,
1:28:17
second thing, I'm telling you, the internet
1:28:20
allows you to find the best to teach
1:28:22
you things. And what's more, you have
1:28:24
the public who allows you to bring out
1:28:26
the best tutorials.
1:28:29
I could have learned sewing with
1:28:31
a lady or a gentleman who would learn
1:28:34
about sewing culture down the
1:28:36
street. But if I come across a loser, there are
1:28:38
losers in sewing. A loser who teaches
1:28:41
me the hard way.
1:28:44
That's what I'm telling you.
1:29:00
The best or the coolest
1:29:01
popular ones? Honestly, they're
1:29:03
generally the best because
1:29:04
social media is merciless. I
1:29:06
watch a lot of TikTok cooking. Those
1:29:09
who make somewhat lame recipes
1:29:11
quickly get slaughtered in the
1:29:13
comments. And I swear that already
1:29:15
in tech, the comments are
1:29:17
not gentle. But then in
1:29:19
cooking content or fashion content,
1:29:22
wow, you have to have a strong stomach,
1:29:24
eh, to get into that.
1:29:33
So, skill counts enormously
1:29:35
in those who emerge, uh, in
1:29:38
tutorials anyway.
1:29:46
So in fact, to summarize things on
1:29:49
the ban
1:29:50
that social media has dangers,
1:29:54
I'm not. This is where you make me
1:29:56
drop from a speech to the other. I
1:29:58
never said that social media was
1:29:59
n't dangerous. The dangers
1:30:00
are enormous and it's very dangerous. Do
1:30:05
n't forget the advantages of
1:30:07
social media too.
1:30:09
I think that today, despite the
1:30:11
dangers
1:30:13
of social media, the advantages are
1:30:16
more important than the dangers. I don't
1:30:19
want to go back, I'll put
1:30:21
it bluntly. I don't want to
1:30:23
go back to a world before the internet.
1:30:26
I don't want to. I'm
1:30:29
absolutely not interested.
1:30:31
I don't want to go back to a world
1:30:33
before the internet. I know, there are a lot
1:30:34
of guys from my generation right now.
1:30:36
It's ah, the 80s were great,
1:30:38
the carefree nature and everything. That's not the
1:30:40
memory I have of the 80s, and
1:30:43
I was very bored. Uh, so
1:30:47
we've forgotten the virtues of boredom. But
1:30:51
that's another debate. But no, I do
1:30:53
n't want to go back to the world
1:30:54
before the internet.
1:30:56
I watched, I spent my time
1:30:58
in front of the TV watching a
1:30:59
lot of stuff. more internet-savvy, you know.
1:31:09
Before the internet, it's not the same as before
1:31:11
TikTok. In absolute terms. Yes,
1:31:13
because the
1:31:16
reactionary views regarding
1:31:18
tech, like, it was better before,
1:31:22
in fact there's no limit. You're going to
1:31:24
have guys who will tell you no, but
1:31:26
before electricity, before agriculture, we
1:31:28
polluted less. Which is
1:31:30
factually true.
1:31:42
But that's also there, I agree
1:31:44
with you, I'm an adult, so
1:31:45
I have a use, let's say,
1:31:47
of the internet that is not the same as
1:31:49
someone who is 15 years old who risks
1:31:51
falling much more easily into
1:31:52
traps. And I know that parents don't have
1:31:55
an easy task
1:31:57
teaching their child to use the
1:31:58
internet intelligently. It's almost
1:32:00
mission impossible. So again, do
1:32:03
n't say that Jérôme is promoting the internet
1:32:06
for those under 15. I don't know,
1:32:08
I don't know. I just don't want us to
1:32:11
throw the baby out with the bathwater.
1:32:29
And frankly, the side Yeah, Young people
1:32:31
now have their heads buried in
1:32:33
their smartphones.
1:32:35
So, I don't know about you, but my
1:32:37
generation was my absolute best. The
1:32:39
same close relatives, they spend their
1:32:40
time in front of the TV, they go
1:32:41
outside more, they're in their
1:32:44
imaginary world. For me, it's funny games,
1:32:45
eh, before video games, uh, and the
1:32:48
first video games, we had the same
1:32:50
criticisms, we were the
1:32:51
lost generation.
1:32:53
We would never do anything good in our
1:32:54
lives. The result, we make videos on
1:32:56
YouTube. Anyway, uh,
1:33:01
here we go again,
1:33:03
we fall back into the thing where
1:33:05
generations are always criticized
1:33:06
for being the worst generation the Earth
1:33:08
has ever borne. That pisses me off a
1:33:11
little. It's always the same, always the
1:33:13
same old story.
1:33:17
They wander the streets with their Wman.
1:33:19
They don't even listen to the sounds of
1:33:21
nature anymore. [ __ ], the Wman. Yeah, we got
1:33:22
killed.
1:33:29
But then to come back to what Olec was saying
1:33:31
, the influence,
1:33:34
the dangers of influence
1:33:36
on the developing minds that are
1:33:39
adolescents 15 years old there, yeah, we
1:33:42
'll have to legislate and it's very
1:33:43
dangerous.
1:33:48
If this ban on under 15s
1:33:50
came into effect, what do you estimate the
1:33:53
loss in sight to be?
1:33:56
It's difficult to measure, but
1:33:57
obviously it would have repercussions,
1:33:59
even for me, who isn't a
1:34:01
channel watched by young people, even for
1:34:04
me, obviously, I'd say 10-15%
1:34:07
fewer views. If YouTube were banned for
1:34:12
under 15s or TikTok banned for
1:34:14
under 15s. Maybe, yeah, 50%
1:34:17
fewer views. Uh, that wouldn't be
1:34:20
good. But
1:34:23
I'm saying, but
1:34:26
currently, normally,
1:34:28
social networks are already banned for under
1:34:30
13s. It's not enforced, but in
1:34:33
theory, my business is buying
1:34:36
advertising.
1:34:38
Today, an advertiser
1:34:40
can't say "I want to buy such and such an
1:34:44
advertising keyword on social networks
1:34:46
to reach under
1:34:48
13s." He doesn't legally have the right to
1:34:50
say that. So afterwards, he'll say "No,
1:34:52
no, but I want to make an ad for
1:34:54
candy Haribo, but Haribo sweets
1:34:57
aren't just for kids.
1:35:00
We know you're still hoping to
1:35:01
reach the under-13s." It's
1:35:04
a complex debate, but I see where
1:35:05
you're going with this, Olec. Of course, it
1:35:07
would have repercussions, but don't forget
1:35:09
what I've always told you:
1:35:10
it's not the views that make
1:35:12
money, it's the qualified views that
1:35:15
make money.
1:35:17
It's an ad view that
1:35:18
makes me money. So even if my
1:35:21
views decrease by 50%,
1:35:24
if my ad views don't decrease
1:35:26
by 50%, I'm not losing money.
1:35:36
So I understand what some people
1:35:39
say, "Yeah, influencers
1:35:40
don't want to lose the under-15s." That's
1:35:43
not entirely true. It's because
1:35:44
you don't really know the
1:35:45
business model.
1:35:49
Or, let's just talk about
1:35:51
me, Naotech, I have no sponsors. None.
1:35:56
On the contrary, if they come to my
1:35:57
channel, it's because they want to reach
1:35:58
older people, right?
1:36:00
They don't want to reach younger people. So
1:36:02
there, there For the moment, I'm pretty
1:36:05
good.
1:36:15
What are ad views on
1:36:16
TikTok? It's a bit like YouTube
1:36:19
actually.
1:36:20
Advertisers will buy
1:36:22
keywords on TikTok. TikTok's algorithm puts
1:36:24
ads, we don't
1:36:25
control them and it rewards
1:36:30
ad views.
1:36:32
Uh, it doesn't bring in a lot, eh, for me
1:36:34
at my level on TikTok, Insta, it
1:36:36
brings in nothing at all. There's no
1:36:38
program like that. Afterwards, where it
1:36:40
brings me money is that we do
1:36:41
certain TikToks for brands. So
1:36:43
these are sponsored TikToks, that's
1:36:44
something else.
1:36:48
What do you mean, old people? I've been 20
1:36:49
since 2009. Not bad. That one's not bad
1:36:51
, my little PC.
1:36:54
Well, look at Olit. So the
1:36:57
Ali drinks, I'm taking responsibility, eh, we did I
1:37:00
think three campaigns with them
1:37:04
4 years ago. The
1:37:06
bedtime drink didn't work at all
1:37:08
for us. Uh,
1:37:12
for us, what would work is the Herbal
1:37:14
teas in bed.
1:37:19
There you go. No, but we tried, eh, some
1:37:23
Yes, yes. Well, we're not going to talk about the
1:37:26
problems of Olyé,
1:37:30
one of the sponsors for products for
1:37:32
under-15s on Naute, it didn't
1:37:35
work out like a charm.
1:37:39
Yeah, herbal teas in bed would
1:37:43
be a good title.
1:37:47
A herbal tea and in bed.
1:37:50
We're really that old. Yes, you're
1:37:52
old. You're always someone's old man
1:37:54
. A 15-year-old is
1:37:56
old to a 6-year-old. A
1:37:59
6-year-old is old to a
1:38:01
2-year-old. Et cetera et cetera.
1:38:09
Tisanolit anti-inflammatory mattress, it's horrible.
1:38:16
Incontinence problems.
1:38:25
We're also someone's youngest.
1:38:26
Well, of course, there are people
1:38:29
watching us who are older than me.
1:38:35
Of course, you're always the youngest, you're
1:38:37
always someone's youngest. You're
1:38:39
always someone's old man.
1:38:52
You see, for example, we offered me
1:38:54
2 years ago, I was offered something about
1:38:55
hearing aids.
1:38:58
I said no because I was still doing
1:39:01
damn yeah I'm old but I do
1:39:03
n't really see myself uh doing an ad for
1:39:07
hearing aids.
1:39:09
Since then, I've been made aware of the subject,
1:39:11
not for myself, but for those around me.
1:39:14
It's not just old people who need
1:39:16
hearing aids. First, first
1:39:18
thing
1:39:19
uh
1:39:22
Yeah, I might be more comfortable
1:39:26
today
1:39:28
because I'm also more and more comfortable comfortable comfortable
1:39:30
not to
1:39:34
wet the bed.
1:39:37
I'm more and more comfortable with
1:39:39
my age.
1:39:43
That's it, it's not easy to make
1:39:44
videos on YouTube where lots of people
1:39:46
tell you that you're old because
1:39:47
you have white hairs and
1:39:50
white hairs. It's hard on morale
1:39:52
huh, I take it but I don't give a
1:39:55
damn anymore.
1:40:13
First of all, you have hair.
1:40:17
It's true that I have other
1:40:19
age-related problems, uh, but uh, I'm still
1:40:24
a little bit bald
1:40:26
.
1:40:28
But no, I've kept it. But but
1:40:31
on the other hand, at 25, I already had
1:40:33
white hair. Have
1:40:53
you seen the glasses that amplify the
1:40:55
sound? No, but yes, I saw that
1:40:58
intelligence tested it. But yes,
1:41:00
clearly, there are things that
1:41:01
happen and then, it's like nothing, there will
1:41:02
be AirPods too, hey, on that.
1:41:08
No, but uh, there you go, just to say, I did
1:41:11
n't say that so that you would tell me
1:41:12
"But no, you're not old and all that."
1:41:14
In fact, it's just that when you're
1:41:17
on social networks on YouTube, which
1:41:19
in France is watched a lot by
1:41:22
young people, of course we get
1:41:24
comments about age
1:41:26
and it's easy for no one to
1:41:28
age in certain ways, but one
1:41:30
of the advantages of getting older is that you don't give a damn anymore
1:41:33
either.
1:41:53
Anyway,
1:41:57
uh, we have to Move forward, we
1:42:00
have to move forward, we have to move forward,
1:42:02
eh. We're not here to
1:42:03
sugarcoat things either, eh. Uh Disney and NBC
1:42:06
Universal declare war on
1:42:08
artificial intelligence, midjourna
1:42:10
in the crosshairs. So we expected it,
1:42:12
but here it is, it's happening. The
1:42:13
Hollywood giants are taking action. Disney and
1:42:15
NBC Universal have just dealt the
1:42:19
first major legal blow to a
1:42:20
diagenerative company by suing
1:42:22
midjourna for copyright infringement
1:42:24
.
1:42:26
Uh Disney and Gibli and Avenger, uh Disney,
1:42:30
NBC Universal calls midjourna the
1:42:33
ultimate free rider of
1:42:35
copyright and a bottomless pit
1:42:38
of plagiarism. The wording that sets the
1:42:40
tone for this legal battle. The
1:42:42
complaint is based on
1:42:44
concrete visual evidence: dozens
1:42:45
of images, tens of millions
1:42:48
of images generated by midjourna's AI
1:42:51
showing iconic characters
1:42:52
like Yoda with his lightsaber, Bart
1:42:55
Simpson on his skateboard, Iron Man
1:42:57
flying in the clouds, or even Buzz
1:43:00
Lightyear in full flight.
1:43:02
Uh founded in 2021, Midourné generated
1:43:05
more than $200 million in
1:43:07
revenue in 2023 and would have reached $300
1:43:10
million in 2024 with nearly 21
1:43:13
million users in September
1:43:15
2024. A commercial success built according to
1:43:17
Disney and NBCUniversal on
1:43:19
the unauthorized exploitation of their
1:43:22
intellectual property.
1:43:24
Mid-journé's business model is based on
1:43:26
subscriptions ranging from $10 to $120
1:43:29
per month for
1:43:32
users to view and
1:43:33
download copies of derivatives of the
1:43:35
characters protected by the
1:43:37
plaintiffs' copyright.
1:43:40
Well, we've already talked a lot about this
1:43:42
subject, notably with Guibli
1:43:45
to put it simply.
1:43:50
I think
1:43:52
that soon we will absolutely no longer have the
1:43:55
right to generate a Superman, a Batman,
1:44:00
a Darth Vader,
1:44:03
a Yoda,
1:44:06
a Micket,
1:44:08
uh, because the characters
1:44:13
are registered.
1:44:15
On the other hand,
1:44:17
generating
1:44:21
60s cartoon-style images,
1:44:27
generating
1:44:30
children's cartoon images.
1:44:34
Generating images in an animated,
1:44:39
manga style will be possible. All this to
1:44:43
explain the law to you. can be
1:44:45
relatively simple. Registering a style is
1:44:47
impossible. We can't register
1:44:50
the ban on doing things in the
1:44:53
manga style.
1:44:57
And even Gibli, which has a particular style
1:44:59
in the anime, would have trouble registering the
1:45:03
Gibli style. They can register Totoro,
1:45:07
they can't register the Gibli style.
1:45:11
There you go.
1:45:15
And
1:45:17
what's more, there's also a big
1:45:19
difference: do you make
1:45:21
money with it or not? And this is where
1:45:24
midjourna is going to spend a good fifteen
1:45:25
minutes, which is that they make money
1:45:28
with the rights of these studios.
1:45:31
They sell a product that allows you to
1:45:33
make a Yoda.
1:45:35
Well, the rights holders of Yoda will say,
1:45:39
"You make money by selling a
1:45:41
product, a subscription that allows you to
1:45:44
generate images
1:45:47
of a character that is registered without my permission."
1:45:51
But on the other hand,
1:45:54
they won't be able to prohibit
1:45:56
midjourna
1:45:58
from allowing it to be displayed.
1:46:01
Uh, generate me an image
1:46:05
in the style of a
1:46:07
70s science fiction film,
1:46:11
uh, Space Opera.
1:46:14
There, they won't be able to.
1:46:19
Afterwards, to go into detail, the
1:46:21
lightsaber, I don't know to what
1:46:23
extent,
1:46:25
uh, Disney has the rights.
1:46:29
So, on the word
1:46:32
lightsaber, yes,
1:46:34
a sword of light
1:46:37
will have problems with Escalibur.
1:46:42
I would be curious to know what
1:46:44
Disney or Lucas Lucas before filed on
1:46:48
the principle of the lightsaber.
1:46:53
A box of colored pencils allows you to
1:46:55
make a Yoda with a lightsaber under
1:46:57
copyright. Yes. And we don't prohibit
1:47:00
colored pencil sellers from selling
1:47:02
colored pencils. On the other hand, if you
1:47:04
make a Yoda with your colored pencils
1:47:07
and you sell it at Japan Expo,
1:47:10
it's reprehensible.
1:47:13
See, this is where we must also separate
1:47:15
commercial law
1:47:18
from law.
1:47:33
Imagine if you describe Link from the
1:47:36
Zelda series, you will be blocked from
1:47:37
the generation. Yeah. No, no, but I,
1:47:40
but this time it will be
1:47:43
subtle adjustments. I think that if
1:47:44
you actually say a hero in a
1:47:46
green tunic with a pointy hat, uh, in An
1:47:50
80s video game style, you're going to
1:47:56
be stuck because basically what
1:47:59
the lawyers might be able to prove
1:48:01
is that if the prompts are
1:48:04
predictable that it will generate the
1:48:06
Zelda character,
1:48:10
it's not defensible.
1:48:15
But on the other hand, getting around it, you say
1:48:18
generating a character in the
1:48:20
public domain Robin Hood in an 80s video game
1:48:22
, we'll have to see what
1:48:24
happens.
1:48:32
He signs partnerships with
1:48:33
brands. Yes, but what did the
1:48:35
brands gain? The problem is if, for
1:48:38
example, Disney signs with midjournée
1:48:40
with the right to reproduce their
1:48:42
character in midjournée generated
1:48:44
how we're going to calculate the share of
1:48:46
midjournée's income that goes to Disney
1:48:48
is the whole problem of rights. It's
1:48:51
the problem that music had with
1:48:53
stamples. It's the problem that there is
1:48:55
today with rights holders.
1:49:01
I almost want to do a
1:49:03
quick test. GPT cat.
1:49:07
We'll see.
1:49:09
We'll see, we'll see. Uh no, uh
1:49:12
on the other hand, I don't want you to see that.
1:49:15
Hop.
1:49:17
So
1:49:26
generate me a Robin Hood-type character
1:49:29
evolving in a video game setting
1:49:32
. A video game in the style of
1:49:34
3D video games from the 90s. Uh, he
1:49:38
has to have a sword, uh, and he has to be,
1:49:43
uh, young with rather
1:49:46
yellow hair.
1:49:48
Oh, nice idea. So, we could
1:49:50
imagine a character, uh, who has a
1:49:53
somewhat medieval look but with a
1:49:55
90s touch, he would have a sword. So that,
1:49:58
that changes a little from the classic
1:50:00
Robin Hood bow. And then we can
1:50:02
give him slightly messy blond hair
1:50:05
with a green outfit. That way, he stays
1:50:07
in the forest theme and he could
1:50:09
evolve in a slightly pixelated,
1:50:11
slightly nostalgic setting. That could be
1:50:13
really cool.
1:50:15
Can you generate the image for me?
1:50:19
I can't generate images, but
1:50:21
I love the idea. Maybe you can
1:50:23
try with a graphic design tool
1:50:25
or an image generator. Uh,
1:50:28
if you want, I can help you. detail
1:50:29
the character even more so that you have
1:50:31
all the information.
1:50:33
Can you actually
1:50:34
detail the prompts for me so that I
1:50:36
can prompt the image?
1:50:39
Sure, with pleasure. So, you
1:50:41
could try something like
1:50:43
imagine a Robin Hood-type character
1:50:45
in a 90s 3D video game style.
1:50:47
He's young with
1:50:50
tousled blond hair. He's wearing a
1:50:52
green outfit reminiscent of the forest and he's holding a
1:50:55
sword in his hand. The setting is a
1:50:57
forest environment with a
1:51:00
slightly pixelated style, already nostalgic for the
1:51:02
90s. That should help you
1:51:04
generate the image.
1:51:07
Yes. Yes. Uh well wait, I'll cut.
1:51:10
Hop.
1:51:13
Uh then, I'll take what he told me.
1:51:16
Yes, yes. I should have done it
1:51:17
straight away in text, but let's say that the
1:51:19
demo, you saw the GPT cat voice
1:51:21
right now. So, I tweaked it a little
1:51:24
, eh. He has a weird accent,
1:51:25
but uh but on the other hand, the natural of
1:51:29
the discussion, he's absolutely crazy.
1:51:31
Uh,
1:51:35
hop, wait, I'll copy what he told me
1:51:42
and we'll do it in text. Uh
1:51:46
then,
1:51:48
generate
1:51:50
generate me
1:51:52
an image of this character.
1:51:57
Normally, he kept my conversation,
1:51:59
eh, but there, I switched to
1:52:01
text mode. Normally, there you go, he generates.
1:52:05
So I like to
1:52:06
start with voice, I refine the thing and
1:52:09
then he will take my entire
1:52:10
voice conversation and generate
1:52:12
the image for me.
1:52:21
Okay, so Link or not Link?
1:52:35
Well, you can definitely ask
1:52:37
Sawen to have a much more
1:52:38
mechanical voice, eh.
1:52:41
Yes, I should have specified
1:52:42
pointed ears and a shield. Yeah.
1:52:49
On the other hand, I find that the generation
1:52:50
of images on GPT chat is slowed down
1:52:52
at the moment.
1:53:02
Maybe have something more Peter Pan.
1:53:08
2 months ago that had blocked you. Yeah,
1:53:10
but I got around it a bit, uh, I do
1:53:13
n't know what your prompts were, but uh,
1:53:15
I diverted it a bit with I think
1:53:17
Robin Hood, you See Basti,
1:53:22
it's Blink.
1:53:25
Honestly,
1:53:27
we're not very far off.
1:53:34
We're not very far from Link.
1:53:37
So, it's not Link, we agree.
1:53:39
I couldn't prompt him, uh,
1:53:42
if I said to him, uh,
1:53:45
now draw me Link, the
1:53:48
Zelda character.
1:54:02
Wow! He didn't block me.
1:54:12
He didn't block me.
1:54:14
Wow! OK, I'm going to call
1:54:16
the Nintendo lawyers right away,
1:54:18
take 10% and report GPT chat.
1:54:23
It can block towards the end. Yes, yes,
1:54:25
I know. But in any case, he didn't
1:54:28
block my prompt.
1:54:39
E he generates, eh guys, he generates, we
1:54:41
agree.
1:54:45
Ah, it blocks during the deblur. OK,
1:54:49
I didn't know that.
1:54:52
But it's terrible. We can see that he can do
1:54:54
what, actually.
1:54:58
Yes. So, if he has the same background and the
1:55:00
same position, it's because he took
1:55:02
into context the whole discussion we
1:55:04
had before. You see, that's what's
1:55:06
Great, it's that we're staying in the same
1:55:09
conversation, so he's staying a bit on
1:55:11
my initial prompts.
1:55:16
[ __ ], here, I'm taking a screenshot.
1:55:18
The top of the image, it's good, right?
1:55:27
For now, he hasn't blocked, eh.
1:55:35
Oh [ __ ]!
1:55:37
Okay, I'll call Nintendo directly.
1:55:40
Nintendo Japan. Hello, we have a problem.
1:55:45
I speak fluent Japanese.
1:55:48
Alligato Gozaima, that's all I
1:55:50
remember.
1:55:53
Direct trial.
1:55:56
Yeah. Uh well, Basti, you have to take
1:55:58
advantage of it right now. It doesn't seem
1:56:00
blocked, eh. If you want to generate
1:56:02
links, let's go, eh.
1:56:06
All this electricity consumed
1:56:08
just to press. A
1:56:11
great detail.
1:56:16
Did I hack the system by
1:56:18
diverting the conversation before?
1:56:24
Yeah,
1:56:26
the Nintendo ninjas are already on their way
1:56:28
to your place. But it's not me, it's
1:56:30
not me. It's broken cat.
1:56:33
It's not me. I did that for
1:56:35
Science. I don't like Link. I don't like
1:56:37
Zelda.
1:56:42
Anyway, he has a sword that's
1:56:43
longer than his legs. It's
1:56:45
totally unrealistic.
1:56:53
Wait, he puts his sword at his waist,
1:56:55
that's fine, he can go plow a
1:56:56
field, whatever.
1:57:04
Anyway,
1:57:06
well, cat, GPT the trial. Next one
1:57:10
is you, eh.
1:57:12
I'm going to get screwed by Nintendo.
1:57:17
You do this for subscriptions, it's
1:57:18
prison.
1:57:21
Oh [ __ ], I could rest a
1:57:22
little. No, you shouldn't say that. It's
1:57:24
lame. But
1:57:27
I'm banned from videos but still pay
1:57:31
. Banned from videos but still pay
1:57:33
for a few months.
1:57:38
Rest,
1:57:42
rest, rest. Okay, if we got back to
1:57:46
the sheep,
1:57:48
where are we with the articles? We'll
1:57:50
never finish. Wait, I only have 10
1:57:51
minutes left. I really have to
1:57:53
leave at 10:00.
1:57:55
Uh,
1:57:57
come on, we're still going to tackle the
1:57:59
last article with courage and
1:58:01
determination while avoiding getting too far
1:58:03
into the Gravel and we'll do the article
1:58:05
on Shine tomorrow, I think because
1:58:08
it's exciting. Uh,
1:58:11
what didn't Apple tell you at
1:58:13
WWDC? Everyone stopped at
1:58:17
Oh là là liquette glace, we can't see anything.
1:58:20
Oh là là liquette glace is Windows
1:58:23
Vista. In a letter format, I
1:58:25
showed you that Windows Glass was
1:58:26
n't Windows Vista.
1:58:28
Uh, anyway, but in fact, there are lots of
1:58:32
things they didn't have time to
1:58:33
tell us and there are things that are
1:58:35
super cool. The first thing is
1:58:37
preview on iPhone. Uh, so you
1:58:41
have that on your Mac, now you
1:58:42
have it on the iPhone. I tested it, it
1:58:44
works really well. Uh, then you
1:58:47
have the satellite weather. Well
1:58:50
, the weather is always a
1:58:52
satellite image. You can receive
1:58:55
the weather by satellite even if you
1:58:58
don't have a
1:59:00
5G, 4G, 3G, 2G, edge connection, and below if you
1:59:07
're at full speed in the middle of the
1:59:09
Pampas. where there's only
1:59:11
satellite connection, you'll have the weather
1:59:15
a priori in France too, at least
1:59:17
for the moment they haven't said that
1:59:18
it's reserved for the United States, so that
1:59:20
's still super cool.
1:59:23
I find for something very
1:59:25
simple, for example, a place where you have
1:59:27
satellite communication
1:59:29
without it, it's for the moment in
1:59:31
airplanes. Being able to still check the
1:59:33
weather from the place where you're going to arrive
1:59:35
when you're on a plane. Yes, I know, you
1:59:38
shouldn't take the plane, but in the
1:59:39
case where you have no choice.
1:59:43
Uh, there you go. Then, there are
1:59:45
mountain areas too, uh, where we don't have a
1:59:48
connection. We're in
1:59:49
satellite connection, you have the small
1:59:50
satellite that appears there. Being able to
1:59:53
have the weather forecast can
1:59:55
even be vital.
2:00:02
Will the weather be more accurate?
2:00:04
No, it's just that you'll receive it. It's
2:00:06
true that Apple's weather forecast is
2:00:08
sometimes a bit
2:00:10
creative, let's say. Uh, I don't know anymore
2:00:13
that you'll be able to access your
2:00:15
weather service via satellite.
2:00:19
Let's say that You're in a propeller plane
2:00:21
with very, very large rubber bands. But
2:00:23
you're crazy! Do you know what
2:00:25
chemical is needed to generate
2:00:26
rubber? Rubber bands are
2:00:30
n't too polluting.
2:00:37
No, no, no. And all those good pieces of
2:00:39
wood that were wasted to make a
2:00:40
plane when we could have sold them for
2:00:42
€400.
2:00:45
Uh,
2:00:49
the satellite connection is free for now
2:00:51
. For now,
2:00:54
I think Apple will do that in the
2:00:56
future. The satellite connection for
2:00:58
emergencies, they will keep it
2:01:00
free and pay for it themselves because it
2:01:02
costs them money for the
2:01:03
satellite connection. But for now, they
2:01:05
make it available for free for
2:01:07
users. I can see in the
2:01:09
future keeping the satellite service
2:01:12
free for emergencies
2:01:15
and
2:01:17
to get the satellite weather and
2:01:19
so on, it will be paid for. Wow, I
2:01:23
lost my interface.
2:01:26
Why?
2:01:33
[ __ ]!
2:01:35
Oh yeah, no, it's fine. Sorry, I
2:01:37
lost you.
2:01:43
Yes. No, really, really, you You're
2:01:45
right. Rubber isn't polluting.
2:01:47
It's plastic.
2:01:51
But are all rubber bands made
2:01:52
of natural rubber? I don't think so.
2:01:58
You're better informed than TikTok. I... No,
2:02:00
I'm sure there are guys on
2:02:01
TikTok who talk to you. For example,
2:02:03
there's a girl who knows a
2:02:06
lot about textile chemistry and who explains
2:02:10
the problem with viscose, for example.
2:02:12
Why is viscose an
2:02:15
absolutely disgusting and ultra-polluting process
2:02:17
?
2:02:19
So I'm sure there's a guy who
2:02:20
would know how to talk about how
2:02:23
plastic or rubber is made.
2:02:29
Uh, yeah.
2:02:32
Compared to the number of
2:02:33
potential users of the satellite, it must be a
2:02:35
drop in the ocean for Apple. I do
2:02:37
n't know how much it costs Apple,
2:02:41
but you know, Apple wouldn't have become
2:02:42
so rich
2:02:44
if it didn't pay attention to all
2:02:46
their expenses. I'm saying something there,
2:02:48
it's very old philosophy, but
2:02:51
it's still a reality.
2:02:54
The best way to win money,
2:02:56
it's not to waste it.
2:02:59
And I think Apple looks at
2:03:02
its costs a lot.
2:03:04
So they'll never have a reasoning
2:03:06
"No, but it's okay, it costs 3
2:03:07
billion, it's a drop in the ocean.
2:03:09
They will never have that reasoning."
2:03:13
I think that Apple, from the moment
2:03:14
something costs them something,
2:03:17
has to bring them 10 times more.
2:03:22
That's how we become the
2:03:23
most profitable company in the world.
2:03:31
And yes, it's capitalism.
2:03:35
Uh
2:03:39
yes, but it's not because you have
2:03:40
Pixou, he has a safe because he's
2:03:43
Pixou.
2:03:45
If Pixou was a cicada, he would
2:03:47
n't dive into gold every
2:03:48
morning. I'm not talking about
2:03:49
being happy or not happy with
2:03:51
money and everything. I'm just telling you
2:03:53
that many people have become very
2:03:57
rich by being very careful with their
2:04:00
spending. It's also a philosophy of
2:04:02
life.
2:04:05
If it's also the most profitable in the
2:04:07
world. It's uh
2:04:11
Ah well it's also the most valued,
2:04:13
but it's also one of the al maybe
2:04:14
not the most profitable in the world sorry,
2:04:16
but it's one of the most
2:04:18
profitable companies in the world. Their profits
2:04:19
are enormous.
2:04:22
So, I I don't all the
2:04:24
economic knowledge. In tech,
2:04:28
hardware, it's certainly
2:04:30
the company that makes the most
2:04:31
profits. There you go.
2:04:34
I'm talking about profits, eh. I'm
2:04:35
not talking about turnover.
2:04:47
Yeah, maybe Nvidia. Yeah, I'd
2:04:48
have to look into it. You're
2:04:49
right. I may have said something stupid.
2:04:54
That's why I took
2:04:56
precautions there. I talked about hardware. Yes,
2:04:57
because for example, a perfume company,
2:05:01
uh,
2:05:03
given the cost of the basic product and the
2:05:06
price you sell it at, they make
2:05:08
much higher margins than Apple. But
2:05:10
uh,
2:05:15
Nvidia, it's a 55% margin. Yeah, I'd
2:05:17
have to go see
2:05:21
the signal, the Noah satellite radio signal
2:05:24
is free. Just put
2:05:27
the information on the screen into an image. Okay.
2:05:31
OK. I admit that I don't know
2:05:33
anything about
2:05:39
luxury. It must have a good margin. Luxury
2:05:41
is based on margin. You don't do
2:05:44
luxury. In fact, luxury is the Rarity.
2:05:47
You achieve rarity by making
2:05:48
very expensive products that few people
2:05:50
can afford. So you make a
2:05:53
huge profit margin, but you don't make large volumes. On the
2:05:54
other hand,
2:05:56
that's where Apple
2:05:58
makes a lot of money. They don't make
2:06:00
Apple luxury. If they made luxury, it would be
2:06:03
smartphones costing €5,000 or €10,000.
2:06:06
No, they draw inspiration from
2:06:08
luxury codes to sell a mass-
2:06:10
market product,
2:06:14
but they are absolutely not on the
2:06:16
Apple luxury business model,
2:06:18
contrary to what many believe.
2:06:20
Afterwards, they seem like luxury prices,
2:06:22
but in reality, they're not.
2:06:27
It's just that they borrowed a lot
2:06:28
of things from the luxury code, notably
2:06:30
by making products that create
2:06:31
desire
2:06:33
and immerse you in a universe.
2:06:37
Uh, in fact, there's a lot of
2:06:38
storytelling in luxury and at Apple.
2:06:52
Anyway, uh,
2:06:55
note,
2:06:57
we're also going to have changes in
2:06:59
note. Uh, note supports the
2:07:02
Mark computer language. I'm finishing
2:07:05
the article. Uh, I know it's 10:00.
2:07:09
So, Markdown will allow you to
2:07:10
more easily export your notes
2:07:12
to HTML or PDF. There you go,
2:07:15
so that's cool. Battery, they
2:07:18
went through this a bit quickly, but they're doing some
2:07:19
pretty good things with
2:07:21
battery management at Apple. Uh, you're going to,
2:07:24
they've added
2:07:26
smart charging features. Uh,
2:07:29
iPhones, thanks to iOS 26, will warn you
2:07:34
if you're consuming more energy than
2:07:36
normal, they'll be able to
2:07:38
point out the apps
2:07:40
responsible for this excess
2:07:41
energy, helping you optimize. And
2:07:45
Apple is also adding an option to
2:07:47
see the estimated battery recharge time
2:07:49
of a phone on the
2:07:50
lock screen.
2:07:53
So there you go, more options thanks
2:07:55
to more options around the battery.
2:07:58
On the camera level, we'll have a
2:08:00
dirty lens warning. They
2:08:03
wrote sensor in the article, but it's
2:08:06
a dirty lens warning. Uh,
2:08:10
so it will tell you to clean your
2:08:12
lens. So it will be able to detect
2:08:14
impurities on the lens. It's a
2:08:17
small change, but very classy.
2:08:19
I'm waiting for that.
2:08:24
Uh,
2:08:25
so, something very important, you don't like
2:08:29
transparency, liquid ice,
2:08:31
you find it illegible. They didn't
2:08:34
say it, but you can
2:08:35
completely disable it.
2:08:37
So, it will probably be in the
2:08:39
phone's accessibility settings,
2:08:41
but you can set the transparency
2:08:43
to zero and stay in a very
2:08:46
flat thing. In fact, you will no longer have these
2:08:48
lighting effects
2:08:51
and all that.
2:08:58
Clean your lens, there is a
2:08:59
green dot on backlit photos. Ah the
2:09:01
flair! Ah the flair! Also, there will
2:09:05
be parental controls on the iPhone
2:09:07
that will become much more powerful.
2:09:09
Parents should have more
2:09:10
control over their children's accounts
2:09:11
. It will be possible to
2:09:13
limit certain conversations or
2:09:15
even approve the downloading
2:09:17
of an application. Well, we were talking about that
2:09:18
earlier.
2:09:20
Maybe parental control tools
2:09:22
with AI in them, therefore
2:09:25
easier to use, easier to
2:09:27
configure, imagine a parental control thing
2:09:29
where you can say "Listen,
2:09:31
I have a I have this specific problem with
2:09:33
my child. I want him to have access to
2:09:35
TikTok but I don't want him to follow
2:09:38
dangerous trends. Um, I want to limit
2:09:42
his TikTok usage to 20 minutes a
2:09:45
day.
2:09:47
Afterwards, he is distributed as he wants,
2:09:48
but after 20 minutes, he no longer has
2:09:50
access to TikTok. Um, I don't want him to be
2:09:53
able to be contacted directly
2:09:55
on TikTok. Uh, on Twitter, I
2:09:59
completely ban him from going on
2:10:01
Twitter, so no access. I don't want to,
2:10:03
see, if we could
2:10:05
naturally talk to an IIA about
2:10:12
parental control, the power of the thing
2:10:15
because it would put
2:10:17
parental control within everyone's reach.
2:10:19
Today,
2:10:21
parental control is all about knowing how to hide things and ticking
2:10:24
the right boxes, and it's not always
2:10:26
easy.
2:10:31
There, and this will be one of the advantages of
2:10:33
AI, is to be able to make this kind of
2:10:34
fine adjustment in a personalized way,
2:10:38
readjusted in a natural language and
2:10:42
that will be really good for
2:10:44
positive things.
2:10:46
Well, after that, you can say, "I forbid
2:10:49
my kid everything, he's not allowed anything." You
2:10:52
just give him a coloring app,
2:10:54
period, limited to 2 minutes
2:10:57
because I want to generate frustration
2:10:59
in him. It will teach him about life.
2:11:03
You can, it will cost you dearly in psiard
2:11:09
who does not color Mickey of course eh.
2:11:20
So yeah, we're sometimes very kind
2:11:23
to say yeah no, but that's
2:11:24
the parents' responsibility. But
2:11:28
we are talking about the accessibility of parental controls.
2:11:30
I mean, it's not necessarily easy
2:11:31
for all parents.
2:11:41
Given the price of the psi, I'll give him full
2:11:43
access. Here is a
2:11:45
picture of me for porn sites.
2:11:50
Ah, I am permissive.
2:12:12
Lia must be
2:12:14
the interface so that parents
2:12:15
can naturally request
2:12:17
filtering. Well, that's what I said
2:12:19
in my second to last video. One of the
2:12:21
advantages of Lia in her
2:12:23
personalization when she
2:12:25
knows you well is to be able to
2:12:27
personalize services that were
2:12:28
not customizable before or not
2:12:30
easily. or which required a certain
2:12:33
amount of knowledge or spending
2:12:35
a lot of time on
2:12:36
fine adjustments.
2:12:45
My 40-year-old tech-hating colleague is
2:12:47
battling her 14-year-old son, who is
2:12:50
100 times smarter, to get around the
2:12:52
restrictions. Well yes, that's one of the
2:12:54
problems.
2:13:02
Yeah, but that's where Lia your tome
2:13:07
uh can bring Lia is really
2:13:10
good at
2:13:12
understanding content. So even if
2:13:15
the algorithm or TikTok is not clear about the
2:13:18
content, Lia can watch, for example,
2:13:20
a TikTok video before showing it.
2:13:24
So there will be mistakes. I'm not
2:13:26
saying everything is going to be
2:13:27
perfect. Knowing that some people will
2:13:28
say to me, "Yes, but there will be
2:13:30
mistakes, it will be serious." Yes, of
2:13:31
course, there will be mistakes, there will be
2:13:33
problems, there will be kids who
2:13:34
will manage to get around things and
2:13:36
everything.
2:13:37
They didn't wait to get around it.
2:13:40
Uh
2:13:43
uh watching Feris Müller's Crazy Day
2:13:45
is the very beginning of
2:13:46
home computing. He was
2:13:50
already using it when he was a
2:13:53
teenager, and the children didn't
2:13:56
wait to find ways to get
2:13:58
around parental restrictions.
2:14:01
We've been sneaking out or running away or
2:14:06
playing truant since
2:14:08
parents existed.
2:14:10
So since children have existed,
2:14:23
so uh since there have been walls. Yeah,
2:14:31
we've been doing the wall since we invented the
2:14:33
wall.
2:14:35
Yeah, but the wall, did we
2:14:38
invent the wall or was there someone who said
2:14:40
this rock there
2:14:42
that I can lean on,
2:14:46
wouldn't that make a good wall?
2:14:49
And the guy who was in front of him said, "I do
2:14:53
n't have a rock."
2:14:55
And then there's the guy who said, "Yeah,
2:14:57
but if you take a bunch of little
2:14:58
rocks and put them on top of each
2:15:00
other, it'll make like one big rock and
2:15:02
you can call it a wall."
2:15:06
Yeah, I was supposed to leave 8
2:15:07
minutes ago. When I
2:15:20
was little, I searched everywhere for the
2:15:21
physical key to the PC tower. I found her.
2:15:23
Yeah.
2:15:25
Well, I'll leave you. Uh, I'll
2:15:28
leave you. I'll try anyway.
2:15:30
Damn, I was supposed to leave at 10am. I'll
2:15:32
leave you. See you tomorrow.
2:15:34
Tomorrow I'll be more relaxed, but right now
2:15:37
I have a lot of things to finish.
2:15:40
So, I have other jobs. Of course,
2:15:42
making you a mug is first and foremost a
2:15:44
pleasure, but also a job, but
2:15:46
I also have other jobs to keep
2:15:48
the chain running. Uh, I send you
2:15:52
all big kisses. We're going to do
2:15:54
a little raid of course. A little raid. A little
2:15:58
raid.
2:16:00
Shy.
2:16:04
Well Basti does nothing.
2:16:07
Basti. Basti.
2:16:11
No, he's not here. Basti.
2:16:14
Uh, well, a little raid,
2:16:18
what are the others doing?
2:16:22
Hm hm hm hm.
2:16:34
Go left-handed Flonflon.
2:16:37
As I was at Will of Green this
2:16:39
weekend, I thought music, I thought
2:16:41
Flonflon. I know he wasn't
2:16:43
at Will of Green, he was at Primavera, a
2:16:47
big festival. Finally, Primavera
2:16:49
is much bigger than Love Green.
2:16:51
I send you big kisses. Uh,
2:16:54
well Basti, tomorrow we'll trade
2:16:57
around 1230 when I'm finished.
2:17:01
Big kiss. Big kisses
2:17:03
everyone. Little R at Flonflon.
2:17:06
And have a great day. Stay
2:17:08
cool. Hello everyone.
2:17:40
Ohoh. Mr.