Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What Does the Lindsay Clancy Case Reveal About Women? | HBR News 565

Transcript

What Does the Lindsay Clancy Case Reveal About Women? | HBR News 565 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: That's all right.
• 0:03
  Speaker 2: This is HBr News number five sixty five. What does
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: the Lindsey Clancy case reveal about women?
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: Where we discuss the news of.
• 0:11
  Speaker 2: The week and give it the badger treatment. That's the
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: blame women treatment. By the way, Hello everybody, and welcome
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: back to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: My name is Brian.
• 0:21
  Speaker 2: I am here with Hannah and doctor Randa Mcammon. This
• 0:23
  Speaker 2: is HBr News where we discuss the news of the
• 0:25
  Speaker 2: week and give it the badger treatment. I want to say,
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: first of all, hello to Hannah and Mike were joining
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: me on the show. I kind of screwed up my opening,
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: so I'm just gonna wing it, but it's okay. Please
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: be sure to continue the conversations about what I did
• 0:42
  Speaker 2: wrong in the opening in the in the live chat
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: as well as the comments section. On this week's HBr News,
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: we're going to be talking about the reaction to what
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: can only be described really as a mass murder of
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: children by their own mother, and.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: More importantly, the reaction to it.
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: Jason our Day has apparently committed suicide, though we don't
• 1:03
  Speaker 2: really know for sure. Light yeah, yeah, yeah, But what
• 1:11
  Speaker 2: we do know is that it was because of racism,
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: whatever it was, and more so, stick around. It's gonna
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: be a good time and be sure to join us
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: afterwards for the Patron Only show. So, I, you know,
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: without like going into it for too much time, when
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: I first got winto the Lindsay Clancy case, it was like,
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: I don't know, over a week ago or something. It
• 1:33
  Speaker 2: might have even been something we covered when it happened,
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: which was in twenty twenty four, but it's basically become
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: like the talk of the entire internet, like you know,
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: it's basically the Lindsay Clancy case and anything else is
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: being seen through the lens of that same case. And
• 1:52
  Speaker 2: so I figured, what I what, you know, what I
• 1:55
  Speaker 2: thought was interesting were some of the let's say, the
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: caping that's been done for this woman who admitted to
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: killing her children. And I thought we'd look at one
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: of the many articles that have been written. So this
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: is the article by USA today, Lindsey Clancy is on
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: trail for trial for an illness medicine won't name. So apparently, yeah,
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: it wasn't because she had murderous intent, is because of medicine.
• 2:22
  Speaker 2: So we're gonna talk, We're gonna look at this in
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: The Patron Show. We are going to cover the story
• 2:26
  Speaker 2: on today's show as well, So don't worry if you're
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: you know, if you're thinking we're gonna miss out on
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: our commentary on the Lindsay Clancy case, but we're gonna
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: continue the conversation in the in the Patron Show, which
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: is why I made the Lindsay Clancy case the last story,
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: so it can like transition into that, you know, relatively smoothly.
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: But if you guys want to join us for that,
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: you have to become a Badger by going to feed
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: the Badger dot com and starting a monthly subscription five bucks.
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: Some months, we'll get you into the Discord server. We'll
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: be able to watch all the additional content, including the
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: paper shows like this one, and all of the stuff
• 3:02
  Speaker 2: that Allison's been working on behind the scenes at HBr,
• 3:06
  Speaker 2: doing her deep, deep dig into all of the sort
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: of like historical and philosophical roots of feminism and whatever
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: else she gets into, like vasapress and studies and you know,
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: banksters trying to engage in mass financial fraud and theft
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: and et cetera, and how all that is connected to
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: the attack on male identity itself. So if you want
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: to do that, go to feed the Badger dot com
• 3:37
  Speaker 2: forge slash subscribe to become a member. And if you
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: don't want to wake up one morning to find that
• 3:42
  Speaker 2: we've been yeeded from the Internet, please go to badgerfeed
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: dot com or honey Badger Radio dot com, which is
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: where all of our content lives. All right, So with
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: that all out of the way, let us get into
• 3:53
  Speaker 2: today's story.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: So first we have a little follow up, not really
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: follow up.
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: It's a it's a late story that it happened like
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: a while ago, but we did not cover it, and
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: I thought we should talk about it. This has to
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: do with Panama. So in June, so that's how long ago.
• 4:11
  Speaker 2: Just a couple months back, Panama enacted Law five point
• 4:14
  Speaker 2: thirty five, signed by President Jose Raoul Mulino, which formally
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: criminalizes paternity fraud under the country's Pedal Code. The measure,
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: originally proposed by Deputy Jiro I'm sorry, Deputy Hiro Bolota
• 4:31
  Speaker 2: Salazar and approved by the National Assembly earlier that year,
• 4:35
  Speaker 2: defines the offense as any intentional act of deception or
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: concealment that leads a man to legally recognize as his
• 4:43
  Speaker 2: own child who is not biologically his or that withholds
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: or falsifies information about the child's true biological father. Penalties
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: range from two to five years in prison, plus finds
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: of one hundred to five hundred days multa which with
• 5:00
  Speaker 2: possible increases if the deception lasts more than five years,
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: involves multiple children, or yields repeated economic benefits. The law
• 5:10
  Speaker 2: also strengthens related civil procedures. Victims may challenge the legal
• 5:14
  Speaker 2: paternity at any time without statute of limitations barriers. Courts
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: must order DNA testing when fraud is alleged, and a
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: proving case allows cancelation of the violation in the civil registry,
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: along with the end of future legal obligations for the
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: deceived party. Voluntary recognition of a non biological child remains
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: lawful if done freely, knowingly, and without deception. The legislation
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: aims to protect the right to biological truth, deter intentional
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: fraud that imposes unjust financial and emotional burdens, and fill
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: what lawmakers described as a previous legal gap in Panama's
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: family and criminal codes. So, yeah, that's good news for
• 5:58
  Speaker 2: anyone here that lives in Panis. But okay, what are
• 6:02
  Speaker 2: your guys' thoughts on this.
• 6:04
  Speaker 3: It's so weird that this wasn't already a crime. It's
• 6:08
  Speaker 3: really weird that it's still not a crime across the
• 6:12
  Speaker 3: entire like everywhere, if you defraud a company, you get
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: the book thrown at you. If you defraud a nation,
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: you get all the books thrown at you. At least
• 6:23
  Speaker 3: you should, I mean, it would be nice and so on.
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: But if you defraud a person, should that not be
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: as punishable as if you had defrauded a company? Should
• 6:36
  Speaker 3: it not be worse? Should an individual not be more
• 6:40
  Speaker 3: sacred than a company? Stealing a company's intellectual property should
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: indeed be illegal, So why should it be any less
• 6:49
  Speaker 3: illegal to steal a person's genetic property? I mean, to
• 6:53
  Speaker 3: hijack a man's identity in the pretense that it is
• 6:58
  Speaker 3: his genetics. That should be a crime of the highest order.
• 7:03
  Speaker 3: Should it not. No, because there's a crime that only
• 7:07
  Speaker 3: women can commit against men, much like so many of
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: our countries have defined rape as something that can only
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: be committed by men, especially against women. Therefore it is
• 7:23
  Speaker 3: the world's worst crime. In the meantime, genetic fraud is
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: a crime that can only be committed by women against men. Therefore,
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: it is not a crime, It is not even a thing.
• 7:39
  Speaker 3: Go back to sleep. You were dreaming all along. You
• 7:43
  Speaker 3: will wake up in a world where women are oppressed
• 7:46
  Speaker 3: by men, and that is all, and that is everything. Sleep,
• 7:50
  Speaker 3: my beloved pet, Sleep. Sorry, crime, You're back in the
• 7:57
  Speaker 3: room now. Nothing just happened, and nothing ever, well, not
• 8:00
  Speaker 3: even in the back rooms clique.
• 8:07
  Speaker 4: It's a crime that is committed against men and children,
• 8:12
  Speaker 4: and against men. It is a theft, and it is
• 8:17
  Speaker 4: a deliberate abuse of a man's love. A father would
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: sacrifice his life for his children, and we have done stories,
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: we've discussed stories in which men did do that. It's
• 8:36
  Speaker 4: also a crime against the children for other reasons. And
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: it's a crime. If she doesn't tell the biological father
• 8:47
  Speaker 4: that he has kids, it's a crime against him too,
• 8:50
  Speaker 4: because then he doesn't get the opportunity to parent his children.
• 8:54
  Speaker 4: And there are women who cheat and get pregnant and
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: don't say a word because they don't want anybody to know.
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: And it's not just a thing that some women do
• 9:10
  Speaker 4: that everybody else is like, what the fuck is wrong
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: with you? It's romanticized in pop culture. I remember a
• 9:19
  Speaker 4: song from when I was younger. I can't remember the
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: eighties and nineties. The song was I think called The
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: chorus was all I want to do is make love
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: to you, And I think that's what the song was called.
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: And it was about a woman whose husband was infertile,
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: so she went off and found some random guy hitchhiking,
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: and she had sex with him in a hotel and
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: just happened to run into him later on, and you know,
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: that's how he discovered that he had fathered a child
• 9:54
  Speaker 4: with her. And this was this was popular, Like you
• 10:00
  Speaker 4: could see women rocking out to this stupid song. They'd
• 10:04
  Speaker 4: sing it when it came on the radio. Everybody thought
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: it was just so romantic, even though what this woman
• 10:11
  Speaker 4: did was cuck one man, rob another one of his
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: opportunity to become a father, and deny her child the
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: knowledge of his family's medical history. Now, I don't know
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: if this would occur to everyone or not, but it
• 10:29
  Speaker 4: occurred to me because my family's medical history has some
• 10:32
  Speaker 4: things in it that you know, it can be risky
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: to even get pregnant. And we didn't know till I
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: got a DNA test. Till I got a medical DNA test,
• 10:44
  Speaker 4: I didn't know. I had Tailor's dan Low syndrome. I
• 10:47
  Speaker 4: didn't know I had the mother too of the motherfucker
• 10:50
  Speaker 4: gene mutations. I didn't know that. I didn't know that
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: I wasn't getting the nutrients that I should have gotten
• 10:58
  Speaker 4: when I ate my food because my body wasn't processing them.
• 11:03
  Speaker 4: I know now there's things I can do about it now,
• 11:07
  Speaker 4: and that I'm in my fifties that it sure would
• 11:09
  Speaker 4: have been nice to know that growing up. But you know,
• 11:12
  Speaker 4: you didn't have that kind of testing when I was
• 11:15
  Speaker 4: a kid, so we only knew about the asthma. But
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: you can, dann Well, make sure that I told my son,
• 11:24
  Speaker 4: because you know, if he ever has kids, he's going
• 11:28
  Speaker 4: to have to find out about that, and it's very
• 11:33
  Speaker 4: possible that those things can be passed on. That's the
• 11:39
  Speaker 4: kind of thing that you know if you know who
• 11:42
  Speaker 4: your parents are. But if you don't know who your
• 11:45
  Speaker 4: parents are, you can have something like that in your
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: DNA that you should know about, because there are things
• 11:53
  Speaker 4: you can do to make your health better as you
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: grow and then throughout your adulthood that you will you
• 12:00
  Speaker 4: won't know about until you get that information. But you
• 12:04
  Speaker 4: can't get that information if you think one man is
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: your father when another man is your father, unless you
• 12:11
  Speaker 4: get old enough to get a DNA test because you
• 12:13
  Speaker 4: know your mom's not going to let you do it.
• 12:15
  Speaker 4: If you're if you're being tried about you know, and
• 12:21
  Speaker 4: if you're being lied to about who your father is.
• 12:23
  Speaker 4: So it's a crime against everybody in the family, and
• 12:30
  Speaker 4: it is it should be. It should be criminal everywhere.
• 12:36
  Speaker 4: And if a father wants to have a paternity test
• 12:41
  Speaker 4: done at a hospital after the mother has given birth,
• 12:48
  Speaker 4: it should be mandatory that they have to say yes.
• 12:53
  Speaker 4: They shouldn't be able to tell him no, and they
• 12:57
  Speaker 4: shouldn't be able to tell the mother without his consent.
• 13:01
  Speaker 4: Should He shouldn't be made to do it by the hospital,
• 13:04
  Speaker 4: whether he wants to or not. But it definitely should
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: not be something that they can deny him, and it
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: is something that he should have medical privacy for. The
• 13:18
  Speaker 4: testing should be protected against the information being taken by
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: any other source of interest, including law enforcement. But aside
• 13:31
  Speaker 4: from that, the father should have the right to know.
• 13:35
  Speaker 4: He should have the right to concrete knowledge whether or
• 13:39
  Speaker 4: not his children or his children, And if he finds
• 13:44
  Speaker 4: out that she has lied to him, then he should
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: be able to make that admissible in court, and it
• 13:52
  Speaker 4: should be a crime because it is a hefty abuse.
• 14:02
  Speaker 2: Well, good news for Panemonians or is that what they
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: call them pandemoniums Panama Panama.
• 14:08
  Speaker 4: People's orders In the rest of the world, we're the
• 14:12
  Speaker 4: ones with pandemonium.
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, they have it together. Well I'm glad, like
• 14:18
  Speaker 2: hopefully it will become a you know, like the start
• 14:21
  Speaker 2: of a trend of some kind. But it's good news,
• 14:23
  Speaker 2: nonethelast and uh yeah, it's just it's good to know.
• 14:27
  Speaker 2: So let me just make sure I didn't miss any
• 14:30
  Speaker 2: super chats or anything. Nope, We're good. All right, Well,
• 14:34
  Speaker 2: let us know what you guys think about this one
• 14:35
  Speaker 2: in the comments. Rumble should be working. I saw some
• 14:39
  Speaker 2: people complaining that it wasn't, but I'm able to see it.
• 14:42
  Speaker 2: So let us know what you guys think about this
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: story in the comments. We got to move on to
• 14:46
  Speaker 2: the next one, all right. So I know we covered this,
• 14:50
  Speaker 2: but there I think there's been some additional information. So
• 14:53
  Speaker 2: this is the SPLCCFO and as we know, she is
• 14:56
  Speaker 2: down with opp As you know, me Hi the Byrick,
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: former senior official at the Southern Poverty Law Center who
• 15:04
  Speaker 2: previously directed its intelligence project tracking hate groups. Was arrested
• 15:09
  Speaker 2: on August twelfth, twenty twenty six, and charts in a
• 15:13
  Speaker 2: superseding federal indictment as part of the Justice Department's ongoing
• 15:17
  Speaker 2: case against the organization. Prosecutors alleged that she oversaw a
• 15:22
  Speaker 2: long running program that secretly funneled millions of dollars in
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: donor funds more than four million between two thousand seven
• 15:28
  Speaker 2: and twenty twenty three to informants embedded in White Supremacists
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: and other extremist groups, including payments routed through shell companies
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: and fictitious entities. The indictment specifically claims Byric was in
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: a romantic relationship with one key informant, identified as F nine,
• 15:46
  Speaker 2: who infiltrated the Neo Nazi National Alliance and received over
• 15:50
  Speaker 2: one million dollars from the SPLC. The pair allegedly shared
• 15:55
  Speaker 2: a home and bank accounts into which about one hundred
• 15:58
  Speaker 2: and forty thousand dollars in donor mounde flowed between twenty
• 16:01
  Speaker 2: fifteen and twenty twenty one, some of which was used
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: for personal expenses. Byrick faces charges of conspiracy to commit
• 16:08
  Speaker 2: wire fraud, conspiracy to submit false statements to a federally
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: insured bank and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering. Byrick,
• 16:18
  Speaker 2: fifty nine, of Palm Springs, California, made her initial appearance
• 16:22
  Speaker 2: the same day in federal court in Riversdale, California, where
• 16:26
  Speaker 2: she was released on her own recognissance after prosecutors did
• 16:30
  Speaker 2: not seek detention. She was ordered to surrender her passport
• 16:33
  Speaker 2: and appear in court in Alabama, where the main case
• 16:36
  Speaker 2: is pending, within two weeks. Her attorney, Michael Proctor, has
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: called the charges politically motivated and without merit, stating that
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: Byric has dedicated her career to combating hate groups and extremism,
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: even if it involves horizontal hula. The SPLC, which was
• 16:54
  Speaker 2: previously charged in the broader case, has denied wrongdoing and
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: described the prosecution as retaliatory. The case continues to develop,
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: with rates further proceedings scheduled in the coming days.
• 17:07
  Speaker 3: Okay, I addressed this a couple of months ago. We
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: here at Honey Radio addressed this a couple of months ago,
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: and I will continue to pat myself on the back
• 17:18
  Speaker 3: for being the first to point out that this quote
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: unquote Nazi informant was not a Nazi who was an informant,
• 17:25
  Speaker 3: But an informant on the subject of Nazis bah Nazi
• 17:33
  Speaker 3: is just an insult. Like Tanky, there is an entire
• 17:37
  Speaker 3: industry based on name calling. Do we know this? Have
• 17:44
  Speaker 3: you heard of this? Calling someone a socialist doesn't matter anymore.
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: You can just say yay, I'm a socialist and YouTube
• 17:51
  Speaker 3: will make you a megastar, But saying I'm a nationalist,
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: we'll have you arrested for hate speech. I have to
• 17:59
  Speaker 3: keep when has it gone too far? And then keep
• 18:02
  Speaker 3: hearing never. If that is your answer to any question.
• 18:09
  Speaker 3: If someone asks you when has it gone too far
• 18:12
  Speaker 3: and your answer is never, you are the extremist. You
• 18:18
  Speaker 3: are the absolute extremist, the fundamentalist extremist.
• 18:22
  Speaker 2: The idea that.
• 18:23
  Speaker 3: Your idea can never go too far, no matter what
• 18:27
  Speaker 3: it is the most extremist position that can be held
• 18:32
  Speaker 3: about any subject ever. Try this with your friends and family,
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: ladies and gentlemen. Not necessarily over the dinner table at Christmas,
• 18:44
  Speaker 3: but you know, somewhere in the surrounding conversation, whatever subject
• 18:50
  Speaker 3: you might be talking about, ask them when has it
• 18:53
  Speaker 3: gone too far? A reasonable person will have an answer
• 19:00
  Speaker 3: one physics or mathematics or whatever. But an unreasonable person
• 19:05
  Speaker 3: will give the answer never. This idea cannot ever go
• 19:12
  Speaker 3: too far, no matter what happens, and at that point
• 19:17
  Speaker 3: you either lock in or you know, pout. You probably
• 19:22
  Speaker 3: don't want to know how deeply woke slash anti woke
• 19:27
  Speaker 3: this member of your family is. But to return to
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: the point, the question is when has it gone too far?
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: And if the answer is never, then the conversation is over.
• 19:42
  Speaker 3: You probably can't breach that gap no matter how hard
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: you try. If you love these people, then you should
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: just love them. The Icos is more important than the Xenos.
• 19:57
  Speaker 3: I don't speak ancient Greek and so I am out
• 20:00
  Speaker 3: of my depth and as such I will stop. But
• 20:05
  Speaker 3: I hope you got the point. Lazies and gentlemen.
• 20:12
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I gotta say, like just just playing fuck this
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: cloak and daggershit. They're not the FBI, they're not the CIA.
• 20:23
  Speaker 4: We don't want the FBI and the CIA doing what
• 20:25
  Speaker 4: they did. They have been doing that, we don't want it.
• 20:30
  Speaker 4: Dance PLC should not be funding the organizations that they're
• 20:35
  Speaker 4: claiming exist and are associated with major politicians. But that's
• 20:40
  Speaker 4: what they're doing. What does that mean the same thing
• 20:46
  Speaker 4: that it means when the CIA does it in some
• 20:49
  Speaker 4: other country, and when when the CIA goes to some
• 20:53
  Speaker 4: other country and engages in a smear campaign against politicians
• 21:00
  Speaker 4: in that country that are trying to get into positions
• 21:05
  Speaker 4: of authority and responsibility in that country, and they smear
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: those individuals as being associated with this or that evil,
• 21:17
  Speaker 4: unpopular group that the public thinks, you know, how do
• 21:21
  Speaker 4: these people even exist? The goal is to control who
• 21:26
  Speaker 4: is going to be in charge of the country. The
• 21:31
  Speaker 4: SPLC did the same thing with President Trump, and they
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: did the same thing with every Republican president before him.
• 21:41
  Speaker 4: They have attempted for decades to use false association with
• 21:49
  Speaker 4: groups that only still exist, probably because the SPLC is
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: funding them, as if you know, this was the smoking
• 22:05
  Speaker 4: gun that should keep people from voting for that politician.
• 22:12
  Speaker 4: Even when these politicians disavowed set organizations, and in the meantime,
• 22:20
  Speaker 4: with their donor money, they used that smear campaign to
• 22:26
  Speaker 4: put organizations on a list that included the most hateful
• 22:34
  Speaker 4: of the hateful, in order to smear us as well.
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: Anybody that cares about men, anybody that cares about their
• 22:44
  Speaker 4: right to freedom of religion, anybody that cares about fathers,
• 22:49
  Speaker 4: anybody that cares about individuality and bootstrapping, being able to
• 22:56
  Speaker 4: pull yourself up by your bootstraps, anything like that was
• 23:01
  Speaker 4: enough to get you or some members of your organization
• 23:06
  Speaker 4: put on that list and compared with Nazis and socialists,
• 23:12
  Speaker 4: national socialists and other groups of people who historically have
• 23:21
  Speaker 4: committed some pretty massive abuses, but these days are mainly
• 23:25
  Speaker 4: just a joke because they don't really do anything. It's fraud,
• 23:33
  Speaker 4: but it's not just fraud, it's spycraft. They're probably going
• 23:38
  Speaker 4: to get very little consequences. She's probably gonna get very
• 23:43
  Speaker 4: little consequences. But that's what we're dealing with, and that's
• 23:46
  Speaker 4: what we're so the SPLC, as far as I'm concerned,
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: should never have any credibility with anyone ever again, no
• 23:54
  Speaker 4: matter how much money they get, and they will still
• 23:56
  Speaker 4: get money as long as they're allowed to exist, no
• 23:59
  Speaker 4: matter what they say say, no matter how widely published
• 24:02
  Speaker 4: it is, no matter how many mainstream authoritative sources tell
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: you the SBLC said this so it must be true.
• 24:15
  Speaker 4: Don't ever believe them about anything again. If the SBLC
• 24:21
  Speaker 4: publishes an article on their website or any of their
• 24:25
  Speaker 4: other publications that says the sky is blue, go outside
• 24:31
  Speaker 4: and look to make sure that's still true. If they
• 24:34
  Speaker 4: publish something that says the grass is green, go outside.
• 24:38
  Speaker 4: Aside from people in Kentucky, we all know bluegrass, but
• 24:42
  Speaker 4: go outside and look at make sure it's still green,
• 24:44
  Speaker 4: because you shouldn't believe anything they say just because they
• 24:51
  Speaker 4: said it. So that's really my take on it. And
• 24:56
  Speaker 4: if anybody gives you an argument that includes, well the
• 25:01
  Speaker 4: SPLC said, make fun of them, don't just do it
• 25:05
  Speaker 4: a little bit, Ridicule them into the ground, talk about
• 25:10
  Speaker 4: them like they are the moron of the century, like that,
• 25:15
  Speaker 4: you know, they're the person that decided to go streaking
• 25:18
  Speaker 4: in church or in court, because that's how stupid that is.
• 25:23
  Speaker 4: And people who cite cite the SPLC as an authority
• 25:30
  Speaker 4: on anything should be made to feel very embarrassed that
• 25:34
  Speaker 4: they ever thought about doing that. Do that, and that'll
• 25:38
  Speaker 4: be a much better punishment than anything the government's ever
• 25:42
  Speaker 4: going to do to them.
• 25:47
  Speaker 2: All right, yeah, well said, And yeah, I mean she's
• 25:52
  Speaker 2: still she stole basically like one hundred and six figures,
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: probably more, we don't know yet, So that's good enough
• 26:01
  Speaker 2: for me. Go to jail, do not pass go, do
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: not collect two hundred dollars. So all right, So I
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: got a super child from Richard Pierre four or five.
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: And he says, at the hospital, when you request the
• 26:14
  Speaker 2: DNA paternity test, the nurse bringing the form will be
• 26:17
  Speaker 2: the same one who brings you the consent to circumcise
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: for form, the circumcised form and be pointing out which
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: line to sign while you try to read the form
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: without glasses and are still loopy from the epidural.
• 26:30
  Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, fortunately they don't usually give the husband an epidural. Yeah,
• 26:38
  Speaker 4: not on purpose anyway.
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: Yep, all right, And OI se gave us a dollar
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: or two dollars sorry on rumble and said the smear
• 26:48
  Speaker 2: merchants only ever speak truth to bolster their reputations so
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: they can make a bigger lie. In other words, they
• 26:53
  Speaker 2: use the truth to just cover up their lies. Yes,
• 26:56
  Speaker 2: speaking of lies, we're gonna move on to the next story.
• 26:59
  Speaker 2: Let us know what you guys think about this one
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: in the comments. So late last Friday, the disgraced never
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: was Cambridge University scholar Jason Arday was found unresponsive in
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: his home and was later pronounced dead by his own hand.
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: Our day became infamous after his decade's worth of deceit
• 27:18
  Speaker 2: and lies concerning everything from his childhood to college career,
• 27:23
  Speaker 2: which was exposed, and then he was replaced under investigation.
• 27:27
  Speaker 2: Our Day would resign shortly after submitting a resignation letter
• 27:30
  Speaker 2: that was also plagiarized, and then take his own life.
• 27:34
  Speaker 2: It's currently unclear if Cambridge's investigation will still continue and
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: to what extent they knew about this academic mistruths our
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: Day leaves behind two children, Taylor and Noah, and Mike
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: jsent me video clips. So they are trying to politicize
• 27:52
  Speaker 2: this man's death and turn him into the new well,
• 27:56
  Speaker 2: you know, the new Floyd basically as they're saying that
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: he died because of racism. So let's take a look
• 28:05
  Speaker 2: at this on X. Okay, there's no sound. I gotta
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: I gotta stop it and restart it. Give you a second. Sorry, guys,
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: al right, here we go.
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: It's only this is only a minute long. So I am.
• 28:29
  Speaker 5: Here today to honor Professor Jason Ardie, and I want
• 28:38
  Speaker 5: any particular to talk about the road that I believe
• 28:44
  Speaker 5: the vicious.
• 28:47
  Speaker 6: Campaign drove him to. I was with Professor all day
• 28:56
  Speaker 6: just a week ago. He was always a lovely time.
• 29:03
  Speaker 6: I'm brilliant man, But you felt a week ago that
• 29:10
  Speaker 6: the vicious campaign against him.
• 29:13
  Speaker 2: What's beginning, all right? So they are currently trying to
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: politicize this. There's a website called the Good Law Project
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: which is saying, demand a public inquiry now to ensure
• 29:37
  Speaker 2: we never see a tragic death like doctor r Days again.
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: And they are claiming that what killed him was I
• 29:46
  Speaker 2: don't like, I don't know, like the fact that the
• 29:49
  Speaker 2: colleges are are dominated by white people or something. But
• 29:52
  Speaker 2: they're trying to turn it into a racial issue. Yeah,
• 29:57
  Speaker 2: he blaterized his resignation letter on top of it. But okay, anyway,
• 30:01
  Speaker 2: I will add more, but I'll let you guys go first,
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: so I see the floor.
• 30:06
  Speaker 3: It's times like these. I'm glad that I'm lazy. I
• 30:13
  Speaker 3: have sat and watched the internet talking about this man
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: for the last couple of weeks, and I have said nothing.
• 30:22
  Speaker 3: Not because I didn't have an opinion, but because I
• 30:25
  Speaker 3: was too lazy to express it. To noncommittal if you
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: want a neutral descriptor, to discerning, if you want a
• 30:34
  Speaker 3: positive descriptor. It's times like these. I'm glad I'm not
• 30:39
  Speaker 3: one of those channels that makes five videos a day
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: about whatever stories are dribbling through your Twister timelines that day,
• 30:47
  Speaker 3: Because those folks are all experiencing something. I'm glad I
• 30:52
  Speaker 3: am yet too experienced berating and gloating over someone's misfortune,
• 31:01
  Speaker 3: deserved misfortune or otherwise, and then days later that person
• 31:07
  Speaker 3: offs themselves. Can I say that, I'm pretty sure I
• 31:09
  Speaker 3: can say that. See, I'm in quite the out of camp.
• 31:13
  Speaker 3: There are at least dozens of people who have told
• 31:18
  Speaker 3: me that I have helped them to not off themselves,
• 31:21
  Speaker 3: and I'm zero in the other column as far as
• 31:27
  Speaker 3: I know. But hell, I've mocked and criticized and perhaps
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: attempted to humiliate hundreds of people on the Internet over
• 31:38
  Speaker 3: the years, and statistically at least one of them must
• 31:40
  Speaker 3: have died by now. That's just time equals death is
• 31:46
  Speaker 3: very much unavoidable, but it's easy not to think about,
• 31:51
  Speaker 3: and so you don't. But yeah, but yeah, I'm glad
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: I kept myself to myself because now we're dealing with
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: the Suisu eyes and I'm not gonna mock or belittle
• 32:04
  Speaker 3: anyone who has done that recently. See that's the comedian's
• 32:12
  Speaker 3: contract in common law. The law of too soon, question mark.
• 32:20
  Speaker 3: I'll happily mock Hitler for committing Suisu wide because you know,
• 32:26
  Speaker 3: come on, man, there was so much more to do.
• 32:29
  Speaker 3: And that's that's okay, because it was more than eighty
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: years ago and it sort of softened up a bit.
• 32:36
  Speaker 3: But I'm not gonna I'm not gonna say this guy's Hitler,
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: by the way, ood Lally heavens it was. It was
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: merely an analogy of scale. I really helped. No one
• 32:47
  Speaker 3: inferred by my analogy that I mean to compare this
• 32:51
  Speaker 3: man to Hitler as though that they were moral equivalents. Yeah, no,
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: no yet, Okay, yeah, all right, well let me give
• 33:02
  Speaker 3: my two cents. I think frauds should be exposed. That
• 33:10
  Speaker 3: is what I say to you, frauds should be exposed.
• 33:13
  Speaker 3: And what you say to me in response is you
• 33:17
  Speaker 3: are a racist. And I ask you why, and you
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: say to me, because the fraud is a black. And
• 33:30
  Speaker 3: I'm imagining myself as Jason Arde, living my life in
• 33:34
  Speaker 3: a land far from my ancestry, where the inhabitants of
• 33:38
  Speaker 3: this land will so angel wings on my every opposable joint,
• 33:44
  Speaker 3: reward my every lie, rationalize my every impulse, treat me
• 33:50
  Speaker 3: not like a child they wish to discipline, but as
• 33:53
  Speaker 3: a pet they wish to wear like a precious jewel.
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: Now there's an upsetting amount of women out there for
• 34:05
  Speaker 3: whom I have just described paradise. But to me, as
• 34:12
  Speaker 3: an average man, it sounds like hell. It sounds like
• 34:15
  Speaker 3: a sort of novice layer of hell, where it seems
• 34:18
  Speaker 3: like everything's fine, but you can't help noticing it's not fine,
• 34:23
  Speaker 3: and then once you've noticed, you go to the next
• 34:25
  Speaker 3: layer of hell. No know what I mean. I might
• 34:29
  Speaker 3: think about hell too much. I'll work on that, but yeah,
• 34:35
  Speaker 3: I don't. I don't think it's healthy for any human
• 34:40
  Speaker 3: to be treated like a pet by any other human.
• 34:44
  Speaker 3: This is what happened to Jesson Ade, long before his
• 34:49
  Speaker 3: death and long before he appeared in the news for
• 34:52
  Speaker 3: his alleged plagiarism. For most of his life, he was
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: a piece of bling wrapped around the finger of a
• 35:03
  Speaker 3: pretentious British university, lubricated into place by a silo full
• 35:10
  Speaker 3: of lies. But then the lies came out, and the
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: pedestal on which Jason Day stood, the one ten sizes
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: too big for him, came tumbling down. I'm not surprised
• 35:28
  Speaker 3: that he would. He would be left with nothing, despite
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: his wife and child. If ninety nine percent of your
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: reputation was mounted on a colossus of lies, and then
• 35:45
  Speaker 3: that colossus collapses like colossuses usually do, then yeah, that's
• 35:52
  Speaker 3: that's about. When men kill themselves, when their ability to
• 35:58
  Speaker 3: feed their wives and children and vanishes into a puff
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: of smoke. Don't get me wrong, this man was a
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: hustler at the end of the day. But you know,
• 36:11
  Speaker 3: we're all just out here hustling at the end of
• 36:13
  Speaker 3: the day. But meritocracy is what makes the hustle work.
• 36:20
  Speaker 3: Those who excel at the hustle should be decided by
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: the free market. When when When When when the giant
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: hand of the government reaches through the free market and
• 36:37
  Speaker 3: picks out a random black kid and brings him to
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: the palace and smothers him in gold and parades him
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: before your peers like some kind of zoo animal status symbol.
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: That's not that's not good by any do you know
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: what I mean? Of course, he killed himself. That's an
• 37:03
  Speaker 3: awful life. You should not have done that to this man.
• 37:08
  Speaker 3: You should not still be doing that to countless other men.
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: And of course you're all more pissed off with me
• 37:17
  Speaker 3: for saying you shouldn't do that than you are with
• 37:21
  Speaker 3: the people who are doing it. You're out here going,
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: let's pick up this ant and make it a super ant. Behold,
• 37:31
  Speaker 3: two seconds ago it was an ant, but now it's
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: a science experiment. Again, this is an analogy of scale,
• 37:42
  Speaker 3: a lot of moral balance. No human is a cockroach,
• 37:46
  Speaker 3: No human is a viper. I'm not saying any of that,
• 37:51
  Speaker 3: but I forgot I was doing. Just don't give free
• 37:58
  Speaker 3: shit to foreign people just because that foreign Like, what
• 38:01
  Speaker 3: the fuck? It's stupid. Yeah, oh, that's what I'm saying.
• 38:05
  Speaker 3: And I'm done.
• 38:08
  Speaker 4: And Hannah, everything Mike said, and also the entire university
• 38:17
  Speaker 4: system is ship. How long did this guy engage in
• 38:22
  Speaker 4: this before he was caught?
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: And and I think we covered it when he was
• 38:29
  Speaker 2: made president of Oxford it was a few years ago.
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: I think, yeah, I think I think we I know
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: we covered it on the show. I'm pretty sure we
• 38:41
  Speaker 2: covered it on a news show when he was put
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: in position, because it was clear that he wasn't there
• 38:48
  Speaker 2: because he earned it, and that he was there because
• 38:50
  Speaker 2: they wanted a black guy in that position.
• 38:54
  Speaker 4: So but the plagiarism wasn't just one instance, it was
• 38:58
  Speaker 4: it was bunch of stuff, and it was a habit
• 39:01
  Speaker 4: with him.
• 39:02
  Speaker 2: Well, he wasn't just plagiarizing. He was he lied about
• 39:05
  Speaker 2: his whole life, all the suffering, all the stuff he
• 39:10
  Speaker 2: went through. And well there might even be some truth
• 39:12
  Speaker 2: in there, but because he lied so much, it's like
• 39:15
  Speaker 2: impossible to determine what's true and what's not.
• 39:17
  Speaker 4: And it took him that long to figure it out.
• 39:21
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 39:21
  Speaker 4: And this this is an issue with universities, right. They
• 39:27
  Speaker 4: they don't care if they are providing the students with
• 39:32
  Speaker 4: a solid, well founded and expertly provided education. They just
• 39:46
  Speaker 4: want butts in the seats. And they got to have
• 39:49
  Speaker 4: somebody in charge, somebody in the classroom in charge, and
• 39:55
  Speaker 4: various positions throughout the university, somebody in charge of this
• 40:00
  Speaker 4: thing and that thing, and obviously a president, not so
• 40:05
  Speaker 4: much because they have to have all those positions, but
• 40:10
  Speaker 4: because it's not prestigious if you don't have all those positions.
• 40:14
  Speaker 4: And they don't bother evaluating or background checking or anything
• 40:23
  Speaker 4: to make sure that they haven't got a liar in
• 40:26
  Speaker 4: there or somebody who's just completely unqualified, and their qualification
• 40:31
  Speaker 4: system is not exactly stellar either. If you are, for instance,
• 40:38
  Speaker 4: a genuine expert in your field as a result of
• 40:42
  Speaker 4: working in that field, as the thing you are teaching
• 40:45
  Speaker 4: became created, so you were on the forefront of its
• 40:50
  Speaker 4: advancement in technology and your teaching it. Your student with
• 40:58
  Speaker 4: a four year degree can take over your class because
• 41:03
  Speaker 4: you have no degree and the student has a degree,
• 41:06
  Speaker 4: and the degree matters more than the knowledge. The piece
• 41:12
  Speaker 4: of paper matters more than the service that the students
• 41:19
  Speaker 4: are getting. So of course they don't really give a
• 41:22
  Speaker 4: ratsass if they hired somebody who lied about everything. Of
• 41:27
  Speaker 4: course they don't really give a rats ass, you know,
• 41:32
  Speaker 4: if what they're providing the students with is a complete fraud,
• 41:41
  Speaker 4: and they really don't care if allowing that to happen
• 41:47
  Speaker 4: on their watch leads to a man's death. Either, they
• 41:51
  Speaker 4: don't care if they're part of the machine that gives
• 41:56
  Speaker 4: this guy a reason to have suicidal ideation and act
• 42:01
  Speaker 4: on it. They just care if they have enough butts
• 42:05
  Speaker 4: in the seats to make their billion dollars this year
• 42:09
  Speaker 4: on tuition, room and board, and other university expenses, plus
• 42:13
  Speaker 4: donations from their prestigious donors that want something in their
• 42:21
  Speaker 4: name on the university campus so they can tell everybody, look,
• 42:24
  Speaker 4: I donated that it's all fraud. Here we have this
• 42:32
  Speaker 4: guy singled out as the fraud that was on campus.
• 42:39
  Speaker 4: Maybe he committed suicide because he was in an environment
• 42:45
  Speaker 4: where everything was fraud and he was scapegoated.
• 42:58
  Speaker 2: All right, So well, I'm gonna say something about this case,
• 43:02
  Speaker 2: but I'm not gonna talk about Jason Arday's suicide or
• 43:07
  Speaker 2: whatever brought him to that point because I don't know.
• 43:13
  Speaker 2: I don't I don't buy that it's out of like guilt,
• 43:19
  Speaker 2: like for having done something wrong. I think suicide is
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: a coward's way out. I think that if he'd had
• 43:25
  Speaker 2: just said, you know what, yes, I lied about all that,
• 43:28
  Speaker 2: I don't deserve this position. I'm just gonna, you know,
• 43:31
  Speaker 2: do what I can to like support my family in
• 43:35
  Speaker 2: another way. But this is not the way, and I
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: think it Maybe it was eating away at him, maybe not.
• 43:39
  Speaker 2: I don't know. I think that's a bit charitable, but
• 43:41
  Speaker 2: I but I do want to say something about the
• 43:44
  Speaker 2: way this is being used so that that, to me
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: is what stands out, and that's why I showed that
• 43:50
  Speaker 2: clip of them basically making him into the new the
• 43:54
  Speaker 2: new black martyr. Right, it's always when a black man dies,
• 43:58
  Speaker 2: all of a sudden, he becomes useful to leftists and
• 44:02
  Speaker 2: they are trying to politicize this because there's an opportunity
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: here to seize power of some kind.
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: Right, so there was the Good Law Project.
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: They are saying this guy's death, a lot of people
• 44:14
  Speaker 2: are saying activist types are saying that his death is
• 44:17
  Speaker 2: because of racism. They are claiming a racist media campaign,
• 44:22
  Speaker 2: which all it did was show the thing.
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: That he was doing.
• 44:26
  Speaker 2: But the question is then, and they're coming out, they're protesting,
• 44:29
  Speaker 2: they're doing big public speeches. They got the president of
• 44:33
  Speaker 2: the Drum sorry, the director of Cambridge Universities Autism Research Center,
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: Simon Baron Cohen, you know, coming out publicly and making
• 44:42
  Speaker 2: all these statements.
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: And this is why they're doing it.
• 44:45
  Speaker 2: In my opinion, they invested in a fraud that was
• 44:50
  Speaker 2: going to basically make the case that this guy, because
• 44:53
  Speaker 2: of his skin color, should be allowed to hold this position,
• 44:57
  Speaker 2: and that meritocracy is an outdated, old idea that you know,
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: doesn't make sense because you should be able to put
• 45:05
  Speaker 2: anyone in that place and they should do well. And
• 45:08
  Speaker 2: when he got there, and he got caught lying about
• 45:11
  Speaker 2: basically everything that mattered to be any kind of representative
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: at any university, much less one like Cambridge, which is
• 45:19
  Speaker 2: like one of the most prestigious in the world.
• 45:22
  Speaker 1: And that's the reason why.
• 45:24
  Speaker 2: They put this guy there by the way, because they
• 45:26
  Speaker 2: wanted to say something about equality or whatever.
• 45:31
  Speaker 1: And the house of cards fell.
• 45:34
  Speaker 2: And now they have there at a crossroads where they
• 45:37
  Speaker 2: can either choose to again own up, which is what
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: he failed to do, and it drove him to probably
• 45:44
  Speaker 2: drove him to kill himself. I don't know for sure,
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: but there was an opportunity there to humble yourself and
• 45:51
  Speaker 2: just you know, tell the truth, be like this is
• 45:54
  Speaker 2: what I did.
• 45:54
  Speaker 1: He didn't do it.
• 45:56
  Speaker 2: Instead, he chose the cowards way out and took his
• 45:59
  Speaker 2: own life. And now these people are using this to
• 46:04
  Speaker 2: try and seize power for themselves. And the one thing
• 46:06
  Speaker 2: they won't do is say we should not have done that,
• 46:10
  Speaker 2: Like not because they're to blame for his suicide. I
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: don't believe that, but that they they don't that they
• 46:17
  Speaker 2: they're wrong in their assumption that anyone can be in
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: that position, be the president of Cambridge whatever it was.
• 46:25
  Speaker 1: His position was that you had to be a.
• 46:28
  Speaker 2: Certain person of a certain kind of like metal, a
• 46:32
  Speaker 2: certain quality to hold that position. And the idea that
• 46:36
  Speaker 2: there are different people of different qualifications that are better
• 46:40
  Speaker 2: at things than other people absolutely paradigm ship shattering ideas.
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 46:45
  Speaker 2: These people can't stand the idea that some people are
• 46:48
  Speaker 2: better than other people at things. They hate it, and
• 46:51
  Speaker 2: so they're like, well, anybody should go to do it,
• 46:54
  Speaker 2: and this guy couldn't do it because he was a
• 46:55
  Speaker 2: fucking liar, And now they have to continue the lie
• 46:59
  Speaker 2: and they're going to which is why they're blaming racism,
• 47:02
  Speaker 2: which is why they're saying that you know that that
• 47:06
  Speaker 2: this is all it's a harassment campaign by the media. Bitch,
• 47:11
  Speaker 2: you don't know what harassment by the media looks like. Okay,
• 47:15
  Speaker 2: And no one here at HBr and we've been the
• 47:17
  Speaker 2: on the butt end of evil media campaigns for over
• 47:22
  Speaker 2: a decade now. No one has taken their life because
• 47:24
  Speaker 2: of it because we know what is true and so
• 47:28
  Speaker 2: we stay the course. These people can't tell the truth.
• 47:32
  Speaker 2: So watch these fucking ghouls that are gonna use his
• 47:37
  Speaker 2: death to further push for more legislative changes, more, you know,
• 47:43
  Speaker 2: people moving into posiness of power, more marginalization of qualified
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: people because they're too white or too male or whatever
• 47:50
  Speaker 2: it is. Because they cannot let this break that there
• 47:54
  Speaker 2: they are committed, okay, they are committed to making this work,
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: and that guy is just a casualty, right. You can't
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: make an omelet without breaking a few few eggs. That's
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: how they see it. And they're gonna go up there
• 48:08
  Speaker 2: and they're gonna pretend like they're so sad. They're gonna
• 48:10
  Speaker 2: pretend like they knew him, like he was like their
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: brother whatever. Those people that are doing that, they are
• 48:17
  Speaker 2: the villains in this story. And I mean, I would
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: say he is too, but he's gone now, so you know,
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: what are you gonna do? But yeah, that's what this
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: comes down to. This is why they cannot stop. They
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: that you know, they that the old saying goes SJW
• 48:32
  Speaker 2: is always double down they do. And the reason is
• 48:35
  Speaker 2: because to admit that you are wrong is like the
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: last thing they want to do, and so they cannot
• 48:41
  Speaker 2: do it no matter what. And you'll see that in
• 48:44
  Speaker 2: the next story as well. The coping will continue until
• 48:48
  Speaker 2: morale improves. So that's basically what my thoughts are on that.
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: And I'm specifically referring to the way that people in
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: you know that were that are the rounding this case.
• 49:00
  Speaker 2: Not necessarily the case itself. The way that they are
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: acting is the issue. And and they you know, they're
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: they're I mean, it's fucking evil.
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: It's evil.
• 49:09
  Speaker 2: So anyway, those are my thoughts on that. Let me
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: see what you guys are saying, and then we're gonna
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: move on to the last story, which is the big one.
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: That's why this has been going so fast. Richard Bierre
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: gives us five dollars and says the SPOC funding those
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: groups is akin to witch Hunters of Salem supporting witch covens,
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: just to ensure that there is a reliable supply of
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: witches to put through witch trials. All right, thank you
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: for that. Okay, So let me know what you guys
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: think about this, Jason our day case. Is this the
• 49:40
  Speaker 2: first time you ever heard this before? You know, or
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: you know, did you already know about this, like when
• 49:47
  Speaker 2: I think we covered it when he was made president.
• 49:49
  Speaker 2: And I look again, if you're put in a position
• 49:51
  Speaker 2: that you don't deserve, and you know you don't deserve it,
• 49:54
  Speaker 2: it's going to wear away at your soul, like you're
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: going to feel like you don't belong there, and it might.
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: And look, the best thing to do again is to
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: sack up and say, you know what, I'm not qualified
• 50:06
  Speaker 2: for this, I shouldn't be doing this, instead of trying
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: to freaking fake it till you make it, because that's
• 50:11
  Speaker 2: not going to work.
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: And I think that that is evident here.
• 50:15
  Speaker 2: But the people that are propping you up they don't
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: want that to happen. So if you do end up,
• 50:21
  Speaker 2: you know, saying I can't do this anymore, then they
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: might tell you that, you know, you can't do that
• 50:28
  Speaker 2: because because you are our avatar, you are our, for
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: lack of a better term, our weapon to basically ensuring
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: that our ideological framework becomes normalized. And it didn't work,
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: and but they don't care. They're gonna do it anyway.
• 50:44
  Speaker 2: So anyway, that's my thoughts on that. Let's get into
• 50:47
  Speaker 2: the last story. Okay, so we got to talk.
• 50:52
  Speaker 4: About huh yeah, so.
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, strap In. This one is interesting as well.
• 51:01
  Speaker 3: So we just said, oh, how dark that shit we
• 51:04
  Speaker 3: just said was get prepared.
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: You guys knew this was coming too, all right, So.
• 51:11
  Speaker 3: You've seen a long time.
• 51:13
  Speaker 2: Okay, Lindsey Clancy a former labor and delivery nurse That's
• 51:17
  Speaker 2: Crazy is on trial in Massachusetts for the January twenty
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: twenty three killings of her three young children, Cora five
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: years old, Dawson three years old, and Callen eight months old,
• 51:29
  Speaker 2: whom she strangled with exercise bands in the basement of
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: their Duxbury home while her husband was out on errands.
• 51:36
  Speaker 2: She had requested, she had requested. She then attempted suicide,
• 51:43
  Speaker 2: supposedly by cutting herself and jumping from a second story window,
• 51:47
  Speaker 2: leaving her paralyzed from the waist down. Clancy was admitted
• 51:51
  Speaker 2: to the acts. Clancy has admitted to these acts, but
• 51:56
  Speaker 2: is pleading not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility,
• 52:00
  Speaker 2: arguing she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: compounded by multiple psychiatric medications and a possible bipolar disorder,
• 52:08
  Speaker 2: and heard a commanding male voice, the patriarchy, I'm guessing,
• 52:12
  Speaker 2: telling her to kill the children so she could kill herself.
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: A prosecution contends the killings were deliberate and premeditated. The
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: closely watched live screen livestream trial has drawn intense national
• 52:26
  Speaker 2: attention as the defense and prosecution present competing or as
• 52:30
  Speaker 2: the defense and prosecution present competing psychiatric evidence. Online reactions,
• 52:37
  Speaker 2: particularly among many women on platforms like TikTok and x
• 52:42
  Speaker 2: and YouTube and Reddit, have been highly polarized and unusually
• 52:48
  Speaker 2: supportive of Clancy compared with past maternal philicide cases. A
• 52:52
  Speaker 2: GoFundMe for her parents, Mike and Paula Musgrove, who relocated
• 52:56
  Speaker 2: and depleted savings to support her through the proceeding, rapidly
• 53:01
  Speaker 2: raise more than eight hundred nine hundred thousand. I think
• 53:04
  Speaker 2: they're closing in on a million dollars right now. With
• 53:07
  Speaker 2: a two million dollar goal in under a week after
• 53:10
  Speaker 2: Wisconsin TikTok creator launched it, donors overwhelmingly women, including international ones,
• 53:17
  Speaker 2: have left messages of solidarity, citing their own postpartum struggles,
• 53:22
  Speaker 2: probably also while holding babies. While critics have labeled the
• 53:26
  Speaker 2: outpouring true crime psychosis and question raising funds linked to
• 53:31
  Speaker 2: the case, Conspiracy theories have flourished in true crime online communities,
• 53:37
  Speaker 2: with many amateur sleuths claiming Clancy was framed by her
• 53:42
  Speaker 2: ex husband, Patrick, whose solid alibi includes surveillance footage and
• 53:47
  Speaker 2: phone records placing him at a CVS. He also is
• 53:50
  Speaker 2: the one that called police alleging body doubles, deliberate inducement
• 53:55
  Speaker 2: of her symptoms, or even involvement by his later wife,
• 53:58
  Speaker 2: despite Clancy's admission and the lack of supporting evidence. Overall,
• 54:02
  Speaker 2: reactions range from empathy for a mother failed by the
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: mental health system and calls for greater awareness of postpartum psychosis,
• 54:10
  Speaker 2: to sharp condemnation that the focus should remain on the
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: murdered children and that supporting Clancy or even theorizing her
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: innocence minimizes the gravity of this crime. All right, I'm
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: gonna back off.
• 54:24
  Speaker 3: Go ahead, Hey, gentlemen, I regret to inform you women.
• 54:33
  Speaker 3: I don't know how else to introduce any of this,
• 54:37
  Speaker 3: because that seems to be what the story is. It's
• 54:42
  Speaker 3: always the controversy is who do we blame for this?
• 54:46
  Speaker 3: And I think the reason this is such a divisive
• 54:51
  Speaker 3: story is that there are two avenues of blame. One
• 54:55
  Speaker 3: of them is, a woman killed some children, So let's
• 54:59
  Speaker 3: blame the woman. I think that's reasonable. I think that's
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: like sound. The other avenue is why was she on
• 55:08
  Speaker 3: thirteen kinds of mind altering medication? That does seem like
• 55:11
  Speaker 3: the kind of thing that might every now and again
• 55:13
  Speaker 3: result in a fucking horror movie. And can I just
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: regiterate that almost no amount of drugs is an excuse
• 55:25
  Speaker 3: for killing anyone. Let's alone children, Let's alone your own children,
• 55:30
  Speaker 3: Let's alone. In those circumstances. There are billions of people
• 55:39
  Speaker 3: taking drugs every day, both the illicit kind and the
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: state enforced kind. It is still very rare for any
• 55:48
  Speaker 3: such people to deliberately murder their children, especially not in
• 55:53
  Speaker 3: such a way. So yeah, like I said, this is
• 56:00
  Speaker 3: a two pronged problem. You have feminists hew bent on
• 56:04
  Speaker 3: convincing women that they are an oppressed class no matter
• 56:07
  Speaker 3: what they do. And you have big Farmer observing these
• 56:12
  Speaker 3: feminists mental illnesses and treating them with a thousand of
• 56:16
  Speaker 3: varieties of designer and fetimins. And we're just we're just
• 56:21
  Speaker 3: sitting back acting like there's not a powder keg about
• 56:26
  Speaker 3: to go off, if it hasn't already gone off. We
• 56:31
  Speaker 3: used to have a civilization. You know, women didn't eat
• 56:36
  Speaker 3: their children's heads off, like what rats do?
• 56:42
  Speaker 6: Do you know?
• 56:43
  Speaker 3: Can you imagine if rats were in charge, they would
• 56:47
  Speaker 3: totally be like, yeah, you can eat your children. My
• 56:51
  Speaker 3: mother ate her children like my grandmother ate her children before.
• 56:55
  Speaker 3: And we all turned out just fine. Yeah, Well, I
• 57:00
  Speaker 3: like you think humans are a bit more k in
• 57:03
  Speaker 3: a bit less ah. I thought humans were pretty good
• 57:08
  Speaker 3: at like protecting their young, especially since getting the males
• 57:13
  Speaker 3: involved in like having a connection to their young. Like,
• 57:16
  Speaker 3: when men can protect their lineage, they will move heaven
• 57:20
  Speaker 3: and earth to protect their lineage, and I think that's
• 57:24
  Speaker 3: a good thing. Conversely, when women can protect their lineage
• 57:32
  Speaker 3: and not al a lot of the time, they strangle
• 57:33
  Speaker 3: their lineage and then they try to kill themselves, leaving
• 57:38
  Speaker 3: their husband to pick up a million piece jigsaw. While
• 57:43
  Speaker 3: the feminists of the internet blame everything on that man
• 57:48
  Speaker 3: who lost everything in an instant through a fold of
• 57:51
  Speaker 3: his own and his left to pick up a million
• 57:54
  Speaker 3: piece jigsaw. This isn't a story about a war who
• 58:00
  Speaker 3: murdered her children. That happens every day, and I mean
• 58:04
  Speaker 3: every day, not just somewhere in the world in situations
• 58:08
  Speaker 3: like this, but in every country of every state under
• 58:12
  Speaker 3: the supervision of a doctor. I think you know where
• 58:18
  Speaker 3: I'm going with this. Children belong to women. That's the
• 58:27
  Speaker 3: dogma under which we live now. As much as feministle
• 58:32
  Speaker 3: to complain that women were burdened by children throughout all history,
• 58:38
  Speaker 3: women have always demanded to have primary, if not exclusive,
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: access to the children, and men have always accepted this
• 58:48
  Speaker 3: trade off since forever, we as the women, will deal
• 58:54
  Speaker 3: with the boundaries, you, as the men, will deal with
• 58:57
  Speaker 3: the nucleus. No, it is the other way around. But
• 59:03
  Speaker 3: it's a beautiful metaphor that connected the single celled organism
• 59:07
  Speaker 3: to the multicellular organism, long before anyone knew what the
• 59:12
  Speaker 3: fuck any of that means. But now we're in this
• 59:16
  Speaker 3: mal evolved nightmare future where women are in charge of
• 59:20
  Speaker 3: the nucleus and the boundaries. Men are not in charge
• 59:27
  Speaker 3: of any of that. They're just hanging on under the
• 59:29
  Speaker 3: guts of this great replaced machine. And now we're at
• 59:33
  Speaker 3: the point where it's yeah, women can kill their children,
• 59:38
  Speaker 3: all three of them, in front of each other. She
• 59:42
  Speaker 3: didn't do it, The man did it, And I say
• 59:47
  Speaker 3: the man in scare quotes. Meanwhile, if the man so
• 59:52
  Speaker 3: much it raises his voice, he's a criminal. If he's
• 59:55
  Speaker 3: so much as lowers his voice, it was actually he
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 3: who committed these crimes. It's getting weird, folks. You thought
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 3: it was getting weird ten years ago. In the Great
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 3: Meme Wars of twenty sixteen, well, check out the Great
• 1:00:14
  Speaker 3: Meme War was of twenty twenty six. Do you think
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 3: you've won? Do you feel in charge? Sick of it?
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 6: Man?
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 3: Fucking sick of it? Sorry, someone else talk. I am done.
• 1:00:32
  Speaker 4: Okay, let's start with the thing that has to be
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 4: gotten out of the way, all right. We hear from
• 1:00:46
  Speaker 4: women all over the internet that the only reason that
• 1:00:50
  Speaker 4: they simply sympathize sympathize with this woman is because she
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 4: allegedly had postpartum psychosis. So when you look into it, no,
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 4: she didn't. No doctor diagnosed her with it. She wasn't
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 4: seeking treatment for it. There was no anything on paper
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 4: anywhere where anyone suspected it. Her behavior hadn't up until
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 4: that point, hadn't even disturbed her husband enough for him
• 1:01:29
  Speaker 4: to think she might be suffering from postpartum psychosis. She
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 4: was medical personnel. If she had symptoms of psychosis that
• 1:01:41
  Speaker 4: suddenly came on, she would have asked for help, She
• 1:01:47
  Speaker 4: would have sought treatment. She would have told someone this
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 4: is abnormal for me, and it's happening and it's scaring me.
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 4: But that's not what happened. She actively looked up information
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 4: on whether or not sociopaths can be treated suicide method
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 4: way is to die. Information on hallucinations and psychosis, everything
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 4: you would need to know to make up a really
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 4: good story if you thought that you were smarter than
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 4: everyone else, which a lot of sociopaths do, and that
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 4: you could get away with murder. Now, she did have
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 4: some mental health conditions, but most people with those mental
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 4: health conditions do not kill their children. And having those
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 4: mental health connections or conditions does not keep you from
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 4: knowing right from wrong. It doesn't keep you from knowing
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 4: that it's abnormal to hear a voice outside your head,
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 4: you know, from outside of your head or in your head.
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 4: And I think that she only claims to have heard
• 1:03:00
  Speaker 4: voices because she thought it would bolster her mental health claim.
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 4: This woman was a cold blooded killer. So let's take
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 4: a look at the way women are behaving around this.
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 4: They're not just claiming ownership of children. They're not just
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 4: supporting the sisterhood and empathizing with a woman because their
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 4: mothers and she's mother, you know, and they're sad at
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 4: what they found out she did, and she pretends to
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 4: be sad and cries in court. They're doing it because
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 4: they haven't us versus them mentality toward men. They wanted
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 4: it to be an evil man they could all hate on,
• 1:03:44
  Speaker 4: not a woman who did something terrible that might be
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 4: accountable for her actions. That's where we are today. We
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 4: are in the timeline where women will ignore evidence that
• 1:04:02
  Speaker 4: is in front of them, that is out in the public.
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 4: They will ignore facts in a case and they will
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 4: call it punishment for being sick, or sexism against women,
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 4: or everybody failed this woman and her children, anything that
• 1:04:25
  Speaker 4: they can say other than this woman committed a terrible, violent, brutal,
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 4: evil act and she needs to face the music. They
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 4: will not say that because that would be a betrayal
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 4: of the sisterhood and it would mean that a man
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 4: is innocent and a woman is guilty. That is heartbreaking
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 4: to know about women. This case told me that at
• 1:05:04
  Speaker 4: least a percentage of the female population is a complete
• 1:05:08
  Speaker 4: lost cause. And not just you know, the feminist population,
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 4: but the female population people who think they're non feminist,
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 4: people who I had arguments with conservatives about this, and
• 1:05:27
  Speaker 4: I'm like, I'm not conservative, I'm not liberal. I don't
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 4: think government really does much that helps people. I think
• 1:05:38
  Speaker 4: it mostly causes damage. But conservatives are usually pretty religious
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 4: and the idea of committing murder usually will lead to
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 4: a great deal of condemnation. But the conservative movement has
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 4: been completely dominated by guynocentrism, the idea that women are
• 1:06:07
  Speaker 4: angels and they somehow civilize men. Men aren't the ones
• 1:06:12
  Speaker 4: killing their babies. And let's be clear, what if she
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 4: did have postpartum psychosis, what if those things were true? Right,
• 1:06:22
  Speaker 4: Let's look at the statistics. Less than less than two
• 1:06:32
  Speaker 4: tenths of one percent of women diagnosed with postpartum psychosis
• 1:06:40
  Speaker 4: kill their kids, and of women who kill their kids
• 1:06:46
  Speaker 4: after birth, by the way, this is after birth, because
• 1:06:49
  Speaker 4: obviously that's what we're talking about. But among women who
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 4: kill their kids after birth, less than nineteen percent are
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 4: diagnosed with postpartum psychosis. So it's a very rare crime.
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 4: Among the women who commit that crime, it's even more
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 4: rare for them to have this diagnosis. Four out of
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 4: five of the women who commit this crime do not
• 1:07:19
  Speaker 4: have that diagnosis. They do not have that excuse. And
• 1:07:24
  Speaker 4: about seventy percent, give or take a percent given on
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 4: a given year, about seventy percent of parents who engage
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 4: in fatal maltreatment, whether it is violent abuse or starving
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 4: the child to death or other forms of neglect, letting
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 4: the kid end up dying of exposure and things like that.
• 1:07:50
  Speaker 4: Among parents who act just one without the other parent
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 4: being involved, seventy percent or women. So most of the
• 1:07:59
  Speaker 4: time when this type of crime happens, it's a woman.
• 1:08:04
  Speaker 4: Most of the time, she does not have postpartum psychosis.
• 1:08:11
  Speaker 4: Some of them do have other mental health conditions, but
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 4: that's not even one hundred percent. The crime is often
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 4: committed because the woman wants to get revenge, or wants
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 4: to abuse her husband, or because she is just generally
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 4: abusive herself. And this is what women don't want to
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 4: talk about. That is why it has to be a
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 4: bad man. It can't be that this mother did this thing.
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 4: It has to be that somebody ignored her problems. Every
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 4: woman has such a terrible time raising her children that
• 1:08:55
  Speaker 4: this is inevitable that there will be some women doing this.
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 4: The husband and made her do it. The husband did
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 4: it and blamed her for it. She loved those children,
• 1:09:06
  Speaker 4: she was just in a moment of psychosis, and blah
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 4: blah blah blah blah. Excuses on top of excuses, because
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 4: they can't face the fact that among people who do
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 4: shit like this. Seventy percent of the time, it's a woman.
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 4: Most of the time, she didn't have postpartum psychosis, and
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 4: even if she did, most of the women who have
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 4: it don't do this. Women get mad when you talk
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 4: about this stuff. And I've actually been accused of being
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 4: so anti woman that I've ignored the reality of the situation,
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 4: which is not as the prosecutors describe it, not as
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 4: the doctors describe it, not as her own lawyers describe it,
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 4: but as the sympathetic hearts of the women of the
• 1:10:04
  Speaker 4: internet describe it. Oh, the poor dear. The whole time
• 1:10:09
  Speaker 4: she was wrapping giant rubber bands around her children's necks
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 4: and watching them turn blue and cry and choke and
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 4: sob and piss themselves, flail and fight and die with
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 4: fear in their eyes. The whole time she was suffering
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 4: because she couldn't control her actions when she had to
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 4: chase one of her children down to murder that child. Oh,
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 4: the poor woman, the poor victim of this murder. The
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 4: perpetrator must feel so awful for having done that. How
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 4: do the kids feel? Oh wait, they can't, They're dead.
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 3: And this.
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 4: Is what we are supposed to accept this is what
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 4: we are supposed to not judge because she's a woman.
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 4: I always felt like I was a bitch because the
• 1:11:12
  Speaker 4: accountability gap discussions, right, I'm I'm down on women for this.
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 4: I've even come out and said that there's at least
• 1:11:23
  Speaker 4: a percentage of the accountability gap that can't be eliminated.
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 4: You can't get rid of the whole thing because women
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 4: are naturally risk averse. They don't they don't accept the
• 1:11:36
  Speaker 4: risk of being responsible for their actions, and they don't
• 1:11:41
  Speaker 4: accept the risk of being expected to do what they
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 4: say they're going to do and to own up to
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 4: being at fault for the consequences of it if they
• 1:11:56
  Speaker 4: do what they say they're going to do and it
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 4: doesn't go the way they thought it was going to go.
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 4: And the other component of that, the other reason that
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 4: contributes to that risk aversion is narcissism. Women cannot stand
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 4: to be judged. They can't be criticized. They can't accept
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 4: seeing women criticized. They can't accept women being judged. They
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 4: can't accept a brutal, violent, torturer and murderer of children
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 4: being judged because she has two X chromosomes. Women are
• 1:12:38
  Speaker 4: so narcissistic that they paint themselves as victims by painting
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 4: this woman as a victim and painting themselves over her.
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 4: So you can't eliminate the entire accountability gap. It will
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 4: never all go away. Narrow it. You can at least
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 4: deal with the part where society doesn't hold women accountable
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 4: right as long as you're dealing with the men. But
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 4: you can never eliminate this. The sisterhood, the me first sisterhood,
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 4: the I'm every woman's sisterhood, the every woman is me sisterhood,
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 4: and therefore the you can't judge any woman sisterhood. It'll
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 4: never go away, and so men may have to do
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 4: something that is going to piss women off pretty badly. Historically,
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 4: there were two things that might have protected this children,
• 1:13:50
  Speaker 4: this group of children, this woman's offspring from her wrath.
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 4: One of was that people lived in extended families. Your
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 4: in laws were close to you, Your parents were close
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 4: to you. Your siblings, after they grew up and moved out,
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 4: stayed close to you. Your aunts and uncles were close
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 4: to you, so you had, even if everybody didn't all
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 4: live in the same house together, you had people regularly
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 4: visiting your home that were members of your family. You
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 4: had judgment in your home. Your mother in law might
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 4: notice that your behavior was a little off. Your aunt
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 4: might suggest that maybe you needed a break from the kids,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 4: and they might want to come visit her house, and
• 1:14:41
  Speaker 4: then she might listen, and if they had anything weird
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 4: to say about mommy, you had people who would notice
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 4: if something was really off about mommy. And the other
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 4: thing that you had was if mommy was off, that
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 4: she might actually do something like this, and people knew
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 4: that it was true. People in her family, her in laws,
• 1:15:09
  Speaker 4: her parents, her siblings, her aunts and uncles, her husband's
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 4: aunts and uncles and siblings, anybody. They could have a
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 4: talk with a husband, and he had the power to
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 4: stop her from being alone with the kids, and there
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 4: were a couple of different ways he could do it.
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 4: He could take the kids and leave based on her condition,
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 4: or he could have her institutionalized and treated. And I
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 4: don't think that that was necessarily wrong because it protected kids.
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 4: I think that there may have needed to be fail
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 4: safes if somebody didn't actually need to be institutionalized, because
• 1:15:50
  Speaker 4: wives and husbands could both do that. But I think
• 1:15:56
  Speaker 4: that feminists getting rid of those laws, getting rid of
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 4: the family structure isolating women and isolating families like this
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 4: from the rest of their family created a pathway for
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 4: this kind of murder. These kids were killed by their mother,
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 4: but they were also killed by feminism. Feminism put up
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 4: a curtain around her so that people wouldn't see what
• 1:16:24
  Speaker 4: she was doing until she did it and it was
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 4: over and it was too late. Even her husband didn't know.
• 1:16:31
  Speaker 4: He should be scared of her. If he had known,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 4: he should be scared of her when we know what
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 4: would have happened, because that was demonstrated by the Andrea
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 4: Yates case years ago in Texas, Andrea Yates drowned all
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 4: four of her children in the bathtub. The story was
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 4: so similar that just like with this story, she had
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 4: to chase one down after that one saw what was
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 4: happening to the other children. She was psychotic, she was nuts,
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 4: She was completely off her rocker, and she should have
• 1:17:09
  Speaker 4: been institutionalized. And her husband tried, he sought help for her.
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 4: He bent over backwards to try to get help for her,
• 1:17:17
  Speaker 4: and the system told him, no, those kids are dead.
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 4: Not once have I seen or heard of anything but
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 4: changed since then. So the people blaming her husband for
• 1:17:34
  Speaker 4: failing her because he didn't know what she was thinking.
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 4: It wouldn't have mattered. He could have She could have
• 1:17:42
  Speaker 4: stood on the roof of her house screaming that she
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 4: was going to kill the children. She could have written
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 4: it on every wall in the entire house in red paint,
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 4: I am going to kill the children. He could have
• 1:17:55
  Speaker 4: done jack shit about it. Nobody would have listened to
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 4: him because he's the husband. And if he says stuff
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 4: like that, even if he has evidence, well, he's taking
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 4: it out of context. He's an abuser. He's just trying
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 4: to get her put away, and those children would still
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 4: be dead. And you know what happened with the Andrea
• 1:18:22
  Speaker 4: Yates case. Years later, we were discussing it on an
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 4: episode of Honey Badger Radio. I was the only Badger
• 1:18:31
  Speaker 4: that knew that he had sought help for her, because
• 1:18:36
  Speaker 4: the news media promoted the narrative that he hadn't, and
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 4: if he had, his kids would still be alive. Only
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 4: a very small few outlets published the facts of that case,
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 4: so his kids would still be dead and he would
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 4: still be demonized, and even publishing the evidence would have
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 4: just resulted in people saying, why didn't you seek help
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 4: before she did this? Instead of waiting until afterwards to
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 4: show us this. That's the situation. The accountability gap is
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 4: so big that three and ten children fall into it
• 1:19:27
  Speaker 4: before they are ever born, fall to their deaths. Three
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 4: in ten pregnancies in the world worldwide, three and ten
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 4: pregnancies end in elective abortion. That means that it's not
• 1:19:43
  Speaker 4: done to prevent the death of the mother from complications
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 4: of the pregnancies. It's done for any other reason but that.
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 4: And among people who kill their children, women are seventy percent.
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 4: And when people hear that statistic, the first thing they
• 1:20:03
  Speaker 4: try to do is cushing it. Well, it's not because
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 4: women are abusive. It's not because more people who are
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 4: abusive are women. It's not because there's no accountability for
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 4: abusers when they're women. It's because women spend more time
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 4: with their children. That argument is one that I heard
• 1:20:22
  Speaker 4: quite a bit online this week. Well, it's not gendered.
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 4: The statistic is only gendered because of the time factor.
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 4: But if time is the only factor that determines whether
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 4: or not a woman is going to kill her child,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 4: that indicates that give it enough time, all women would
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 4: kill their children. It's not a very good defense. So
• 1:20:52
  Speaker 4: you really can't cush in the blow. The fact is,
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 4: we have a very serious issue, and it exists because
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 4: we don't hold women accountable. It exists because we don't
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 4: view female violence as a threat. It exists because we
• 1:21:12
  Speaker 4: don't view female threats as something to take seriously. And
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 4: it exists because female activists decided that families were traps
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 4: and shouldn't have any power over the people in the family,
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 4: and in particular, the men of the family. The heads
• 1:21:33
  Speaker 4: of the household, shouldn't be the ones primarily responsible for
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 4: protecting the children, and they shouldn't have the rights that
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 4: go along with that responsibility. So these children are dead,
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 4: killed by their mother, killed by feminism, killed by women's narcissism,
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 4: killed by women's attitudes. And until men turn around and
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 4: look at all of the ugliness that can exist within
• 1:22:09
  Speaker 4: the thing that is woman, and except that it's real
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 4: and dangerous, deadly and cruel and heartless, cold blooded. Until
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 4: you can do that, the baby killings will continue. Until
• 1:22:33
  Speaker 4: morality improves.
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 3: All right, Well you would say that you're a man,
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 3: and yeah, zero.
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 4: Days, zero days, zero fucking days.
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: All right, So.
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 2: Once again, for me, the story is not the story.
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 2: The story is the reaction to the story. This is
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 2: an old case from twenty twenty three, and you know,
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 2: absolutely absolutely tragic, barbaric, evil, vile, the spirit of Lilith,
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 2: you know whatever. But the reaction is the thing that
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 2: I was that got me to want to pick this
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 2: one for a story. So here is the Musgrove Family
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 2: Fund that has some artwork someone made of a bunch
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 2: of women forming a protective circle around Lindsey Clancy, who
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 2: is wheelchair bound. By the way, the fact that she's
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 2: in a wheelchair gives them extra points, I guess of sympathy,
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 2: even though this is all self inflicted stuff. And I
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 2: just want to like talk a little bit about the
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 2: way the women have reacted to this. And I don't
• 1:23:54
  Speaker 2: want to propose it I know what goes on in
• 1:23:57
  Speaker 2: these women's heads because I don't, but there's a lot
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: of apologia going on surrounding this case. Now they can't blame.
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 2: It's just like I agree with Mike and Hannah basically
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 2: for before I get into this, right, like, this is
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 2: all about the avoiding any kind of accountability, even if
• 1:24:22
  Speaker 2: it's somebody you don't know at all, liked, none of
• 1:24:25
  Speaker 2: these women know who this woman is. They just know
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 2: she is a woman who was a mother and then
• 1:24:32
  Speaker 2: murdered her children, and there was a man in the
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 2: family that wasn't there to protect them because Lindsey Clancy
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 2: sent him to the store on an errand so that
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 2: he could be gone long enough for her to kill
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 2: her kids. So she knew he would have protected them
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: if he was there, and she wouldn't be havele to
• 1:24:52
  Speaker 2: do it unless she got rid of him. But there
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 2: are women claiming that he might have done it, or
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 2: that he framed her, or that he drugged her, And
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: that comes from this idea that there's no way that
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 2: a woman could do this of her own volition. There's
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: no possible way that a woman could do this to
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 2: her own children, even though we have seen stories of
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 2: this happening, this has happened for the dawn of time, right.
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 2: I think that I think that in general it's men
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 2: that protect children from women, That's what I think, like,
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 2: and I mean from their own kids. Yes, but I
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 2: do think that there is that that's like a corrective factor,
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 2: which is why again he wasn't there when this went down.
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: But so what what kind of like coping are we seeing?
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 2: So we got women claiming they're like and and and
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 2: it's not just like the the true crime conspiratored women.
• 1:25:48
  Speaker 2: That's that's like a thing I saw where people were saying, oh,
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 2: it's it's it's because of TikTok. It's about it's because
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: a true crime. No, stop it. It's because they chose
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 2: to do it. They're fucking adults. They make decisions. This
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 2: is where they're sitting. Stop blaming media, Stop blaming TVs,
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 2: Stop blaming the fucking you know, the internet, social media, whatever.
• 1:26:11
  Speaker 2: Stop doing that. It's you're giving these bitches a pass.
• 1:26:14
  Speaker 2: They don't deserve it. They have sided with the wrong person, Okay,
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 2: full stop. And there are women who are mothers themselves
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: that Like, there was one woman who was who made
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 2: a TikTok video where she was basically, I'm not gonna
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 2: play it, but she was basically saying listening to the
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 2: to the to the defense or whatever, and she was
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: holding her baby, saying that she was on Lindsay Clancy's
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 2: side holding her baby like that. Like, the children are
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 2: gonna grow up and they're probably gonna see that and
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 2: they be like, mom, what the fuck.
• 1:26:50
  Speaker 1: So I mean? But but you know what, here's.
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 2: The question I'll propose, do you guys think it's possible
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 2: that the reason why we are there's so much, so
• 1:27:00
  Speaker 2: many people that are willing to defend her murdering her children, okay, five,
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 2: three and eight months, one of whom she had to
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 2: chase around the house to catch him because he saw
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: what was happening to the others and was trying to
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 2: escape and didn't. Do you think that the reason why
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 2: people can defend this is because we have devalued human
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 2: life so much, part of which was done due to
• 1:27:30
  Speaker 2: the sort of laxa daisy way that we look at abortion.
• 1:27:34
  Speaker 2: Because if you think about it, if we're just like
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 2: okay with abortion, like no matter what stage, okay, but
• 1:27:40
  Speaker 2: we just don't see a problem with it in general,
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 2: then why wouldn't we just not value human life as much,
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 2: especially if it inconveniences women, because it seems to me
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: that the most like it. We should live in a
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: society where the most vulnerable among us are the ones
• 1:27:57
  Speaker 2: that deserve the most protection, which are the children and
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 2: the unb But what we do is we give all
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 2: the protection to women, and everyone else is an afterthought,
• 1:28:06
  Speaker 2: and the men they just have to work to support
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 2: the system. That puts women first and treats children as
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 2: you know, potentially expendable if the woman is having a
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 2: bad day and she gets showered with comfort and sympathy
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 2: and money.
• 1:28:22
  Speaker 1: And so I.
• 1:28:24
  Speaker 2: Saw like, as an example, Shoe on Head made a
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 2: post where she said, over seven hundred thousand dollars now
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: this before it got to nine hundred thousand now raised
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 2: for a woman who strangles her three children to death
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 2: with exercise ropes. Every single donation is from a woman.
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: Hundreds of thousands of women in a TikTok true crime
• 1:28:43
  Speaker 2: psychosis where they believe the husband did it because he
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: looks mean. Even Shoe is wrong, so wrong on this
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 2: because she thinks, oh TikTok did.
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 1: This, No bitch. This is how they are.
• 1:28:57
  Speaker 2: Like we have to under we have to get it
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 2: through our head, is that there is a not insignificant
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 2: number of absolutely cooked women out here that are willing
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 2: to do this, not just to to accept like what
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 2: other women are doing to their kids, but they're okay
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 2: with doing it to their own kids. And it's because
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 2: we don't think that children matter as much. And that's
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 2: what I think. So, like I get it, Like it's
• 1:29:28
  Speaker 2: frustrating you know, there's there's a number of comments under
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 2: the GoFundMe, things like the mental load that she carried
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 2: and all women, especially moms.
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: Carrie is real.
• 1:29:39
  Speaker 2: Uh, she's already serving a life sentence in her mind,
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 2: Like basically, she's she's suffered enough because she has to
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: live with the fact that she murdered her kids.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: Why cent her to prison.
• 1:29:53
  Speaker 2: I think the spouse did it all and drove her
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: to think she did it. They're accusing her husband of
• 1:30:00
  Speaker 2: being I think it was like a controlling narcissist or something.
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: They had no idea who this guy is. It's not
• 1:30:08
  Speaker 2: because of true crime, it's not because of TikTok, it's
• 1:30:11
  Speaker 2: not because of YouTube, it's not Reddit, it's not x
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 2: it's just the way they are. It's just women being
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 2: women in this case. And I'm just sick and tired
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: of people trying to make excuses for this. I mean, like, Okay,
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 2: on the upside, I have noticed a number of people
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 2: like Stephen Crowder and John Doyle and even Matt Walsh,
• 1:30:36
  Speaker 2: They've made videos saying that you know, this is like,
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 2: especially Crowder and John Doyle, they were like, we gotta
• 1:30:42
  Speaker 2: do something about women. Guys like women are a problem
• 1:30:44
  Speaker 2: right now, and they and they should see that. Like
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 2: we've been saying for years, things are only gonna get
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 2: worse in the in terms of the domain of women's accountability.
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 2: You're gonna just see more and more of this escalating,
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 2: and people are just gonna have to do something about
• 1:31:00
  Speaker 2: it at some point because this can't stand. Okay, I mean,
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: it's it's unsustainable anyways, So just wanted to tell you guys.
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: You know, obviously, I think it's absolutely tragic that this has
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 2: happened to those kids. They did not deserve that, obviously,
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: and the husband I couldn't imagine coming home to that.
• 1:31:21
  Speaker 1: Also, by the way, those self.
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 2: Inflicted cuts that she did on her wrists and throat,
• 1:31:26
  Speaker 2: they were superficial. They weren't deep enough to do any
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 2: lasting damage. She was fine now. It could be because
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 2: she didn't have the courage to go through with it.
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 1: I get it.
• 1:31:34
  Speaker 2: Men are a lot better at that thing that you are.
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 2: But I don't think that she was ready to do that.
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 2: She just wanted to kill her kids and make it
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 2: look like she was losing her shit so that maybe
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 2: she would get like a lighter sentence. Hence the not
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 2: guilty plea, although she did ultimately confess, I mean, like
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 2: right away, that she did do this. So it's not
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 2: like she's trying to say she didn't. She's just trying
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 2: to pass the buck in terms of, you know, like
• 1:31:58
  Speaker 2: why she did it or what took her over Like
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: this male voice. Women are saying that the male voice
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: that she claims she heard was her husband's voice. I mean,
• 1:32:08
  Speaker 2: it's fucking monstrous. Man, Like, I bet this guy is
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 2: gonna have to uh the husband. I mean, who's basically
• 1:32:18
  Speaker 2: just a single man. Now he had a whole family
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 2: and now he's got nothing. I bet he's gonna get
• 1:32:23
  Speaker 2: harassment from these women. These cunts are gonna come after
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 2: him online because they're gonna try. They have to, because
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 2: the thing is they are prepared to see her as
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 2: an innocent victim. And this goes back to the last
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 2: story recovered. They are unable fundamentally, do not have the
• 1:32:40
  Speaker 2: humility to say I was wrong. She is a cold
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 2: blooded killer. She killed her kids. That's monstrous. I would
• 1:32:47
  Speaker 2: never do that to my own kids, even if I
• 1:32:49
  Speaker 2: had postpartum depression. Because lots of people supposedly get it personally,
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 2: I don't know if it's real, but that's another conversation.
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: But they don't have the to do it because they
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: can't be wrong. And I'm really glad that Hannah said
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 2: that this is all about avoiding judgment, because that's what
• 1:33:08
  Speaker 2: I've been saying for a long time. Feminism is simply
• 1:33:11
  Speaker 2: a tool so that women can have could not feel
• 1:33:14
  Speaker 2: like people are judging them.
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: That's it.
• 1:33:16
  Speaker 2: So they can do whatever they want and no one
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 2: can have an opinion on it unless it's positive. And
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 2: now we're getting to the point where women are committing
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 2: mass murder on children and we still can't find them
• 1:33:28
  Speaker 2: wrong for doing that.
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: So I'm glad that we said that. But that's basically it.
• 1:33:35
  Speaker 2: I mean, it's the absolutely monstrous behavior from these bitches.
• 1:33:41
  Speaker 1: And I don't know, like if I was.
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 7: Look, if you are with someone or you know someone
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 7: who has talked about this case and they're trying to
• 1:33:51
  Speaker 7: make a defense for that person, run the fuck away,
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 7: but cuss them out first.
• 1:33:56
  Speaker 2: Make sure they know they are backing the wrong horse.
• 1:33:59
  Speaker 2: They are as elude fucking monsters for doing that. All right, anyway,
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 2: let me see what you guys are saying, and then
• 1:34:06
  Speaker 2: we're gonna wrap it up. I think I got another
• 1:34:08
  Speaker 2: super chow or two. So Richard Bierre gave us a
• 1:34:12
  Speaker 2: super chow earlier about an hour ago, not half an
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 2: hour ago, and said there was an interview with Jasmine
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 2: Crockett about her experience, and she mentioned that when she
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 2: interviewed for a position, she was asked by why she
• 1:34:25
  Speaker 2: should be hired, and she replied to the interviewer that
• 1:34:28
  Speaker 2: she should be hired because she's black. Yeah, well there
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 2: you go, she's she's a retard. Meredith g gives us
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 2: five dollars and says, HPR News five sixty five, honey
• 1:34:39
  Speaker 2: for the Badgers. Thank you, Meredith.
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 1: And I got a.
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 2: Super chat from Zaranks for five and he says physiognomy
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 2: checks are being done regarding mother Clancy. Now I can't
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 2: ignore the irony of her defenders making themselves suspect. Uh yeah,
• 1:34:57
  Speaker 2: and let me see, let's see viewer activity. I want
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 2: to be tried to miss any other ones. Albatross earlier
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 2: gave us two dollars and said it's Johnny and Amber
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 2: all over again. Johnny Deppenamber heard that is yeah, it
• 1:35:10
  Speaker 2: is kind of like that, but this is a lot
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 2: worse because the stakes are much higher and these are
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 2: not like, you know, millionaire celebrities.
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 4: But yeah, how bad this is. I think people don't
• 1:35:22
  Speaker 4: realize it, okay, And I have had the unfortunate experience
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 4: of following some of this stuff because I argue with
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 4: women on the internet about accountability, and women have a
• 1:35:33
  Speaker 4: tendency to make the claim that men are more violent,
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 4: and men do worse things to their victims when they
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 4: are violent than women do to theirs when they are violent.
• 1:35:45
  Speaker 4: And I guarantee you that there will be women out
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 4: there arguing that it's worse to be strangled by a
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 4: woman than it is to be or a man than
• 1:35:54
  Speaker 4: it is to be strangled by a woman, and they'll
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 4: have some stupid reason men are bigger and that's wronger
• 1:36:00
  Speaker 4: or blah blah blah. It doesn't matter. Having your hair
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 4: cut off is terrible and it's terrifying, and it's a
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 4: terrifying death, but it's not the worst way that women
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 4: have killed their children. It is a common thing. When
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 4: Susan Smith wanted to get rid of her children, she
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 4: drove them into a lake and left them there. And
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 4: of course we mentioned Andrea Yates and drowning her children
• 1:36:27
  Speaker 4: in the bathtub. So cutting off air is one way
• 1:36:30
  Speaker 4: that women do it. Okay. Here in the Dayton metro
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 4: area and somewhere in California two different cases of women
• 1:36:39
  Speaker 4: who microwaved their baby to death. There are cases of
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 4: a grandmother and a mother that murdered their babies in
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 4: a hot oven. There are laws for safe haven abandonment
• 1:36:57
  Speaker 4: because of how many teen girls kill their babies by
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 4: just leaving them, abandoning them in a trash can or
• 1:37:04
  Speaker 4: a dumpster to die from exposure or worse. There are
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 4: women who have left their children out in the woods
• 1:37:16
  Speaker 4: to be again killed by exposure or worse. There are
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 4: women who have beaten their children to death. There are
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 4: women who have burned their children to death with hot
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 4: air from a hair dryer or other instruments. There are
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 4: women who have stabbed their children to death. The woman
• 1:37:40
  Speaker 4: in Dayton who put her baby in the microwave tried
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 4: to scapegoat a little boy for it. She claimed the
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 4: neighbor kid who wasn't at the house that day did it.
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 4: And the only thing that saved him from being in
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 4: a position where other people said, oh, it must have
• 1:38:00
  Speaker 4: been the boy. A mother never would do that to
• 1:38:02
  Speaker 4: her baby was the fact that he wasn't there, because
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 4: if he had been, then that blame would have fallen
• 1:38:11
  Speaker 4: on his shoulders. Women can be incredibly disgustingly brutal to
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 4: the weakest and most helpless people, and that's just with babies.
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 4: When you hear stories about elder abuse, it's mostly women.
• 1:38:28
  Speaker 4: A lot of times it's women who took a job
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 4: to take care of an older person and engaged in abuse.
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 4: That's a dominated profession by women. Most caregivers are women.
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 4: Abusive people with disabilities mostly women. Right, So it is
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 4: the weak and the vulnerable that women pray on. Yes,
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 4: men can be violent, and yes, the most people arrested
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 4: for violent crime is men. But I think the reason
• 1:39:08
  Speaker 4: is because there are a lot of violent behaviors, a
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 4: lot of violent actions that can be done to people
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 4: who don't have any recourse, people who won't be heard from,
• 1:39:19
  Speaker 4: people who won't be found, people who can't tell others
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 4: what happened to them, or people who won't be believed
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 4: when they do tell, like the mentally ill those people
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 4: when they're abused, their abuser doesn't always get arrested, and
• 1:39:36
  Speaker 4: it's mostly women, and a lot of times the woman
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 4: doesn't even think she's being abusive. She thinks she's a
• 1:39:44
  Speaker 4: victim of abuse, and she's just fighting back. So when
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 4: I said it's ugly, I'm in it. It's ugly. It's
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 4: ugly as fuck. Men. There isn't any reason in the
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 4: world why you should coddle women and just let this go.
• 1:40:12
  Speaker 2: None, all right, So that will do it for the
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 2: show today, we're gonna go into the Patron show.
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: I think we'll look at.
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 2: The this, uh the comments under this Moscrow family fun
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 2: thing that could be fun. So if you guys want
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 2: to join us for that, go to Feed the Badger
• 1:40:29
  Speaker 2: dot com forward slash subscribe to start a membership by
• 1:40:33
  Speaker 2: bucks a month. We'll get you into the Discord server,
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 2: which is basically it's less than a cup of coffee
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 2: and or less than a freaking order fries, I think
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 2: at this point, and uh yeah, like, well, you'll be
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 2: able to give at higher levels and you can join
• 1:40:49
  Speaker 2: in the conversation. Hopefully we'll see you guys there, So
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 2: please consider doing that. And for with all that said, though,
• 1:40:55
  Speaker 2: I want to thank Mike Ja for helping with the
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 2: write ups. I want to thank Ryana Rackham and for
• 1:41:01
  Speaker 2: their commentary and their thoughts on today's stories, and I
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 2: want to thank you guys most of all for joining us,
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 2: because without you, we'd be shouting into the void. And
• 1:41:08
  Speaker 2: I mean ranting into the void is such a waste
• 1:41:10
  Speaker 2: because somebody should be there to hear it, all right,
• 1:41:13
  Speaker 2: So thank you so much for coming on the stream today.
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 2: If you guys like this video, please hit like subscribe
• 1:41:17
  Speaker 2: if you're not already subscribed to the Belve notifications, leave
• 1:41:20
  Speaker 2: us a comment, let us know what you guys think
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 2: about what we discussed on the show today, and share
• 1:41:24
  Speaker 2: the video because sharing is caring. Thanks so much for
• 1:41:26
  Speaker 2: coming on this episode of HPR News and we will
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 2: see you next Tuesday.